Harris Corporation
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended December 29, 2006
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from ___________to_____________
Commission File Number 1-3863
HARRIS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
34-0276860 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1025 West NASA Boulevard |
|
|
Melbourne, Florida
|
|
329l9 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(321) 727-9l00
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (l) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):
Large Accelerated Filer þ Accelerated Filer o Non-Accelerated Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The
number of shares outstanding of the registrants common stock as
of January 26, 2007, was 134,088,616 shares.
HARRIS CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended December 29, 2006
INDEX
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains trademarks, service marks and registered marks of
Harris Corporation and its subsidiaries.
HD
Radio® is a registered trademark of iBiquity Digital Corporation.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
HARRIS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Two Quarters Ended |
|
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
Revenue from product sales and services |
|
$ |
1,016.2 |
|
|
$ |
841.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,963.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,601.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product sales and services |
|
|
(683.7 |
) |
|
|
(605.6 |
) |
|
|
(1,324.6 |
) |
|
|
(1,142.2 |
) |
Engineering, selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
(181.4 |
) |
|
|
(167.7 |
) |
|
|
(350.8 |
) |
|
|
(307.4 |
) |
Non-operating income (loss) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(18.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(9.8 |
) |
|
|
(10.1 |
) |
|
|
(19.6 |
) |
|
|
(16.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
143.6 |
|
|
|
61.0 |
|
|
|
254.2 |
|
|
|
140.6 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(49.6 |
) |
|
|
(31.0 |
) |
|
|
(76.3 |
) |
|
|
(60.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
94.0 |
|
|
$ |
30.0 |
|
|
$ |
177.9 |
|
|
$ |
80.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
.71 |
|
|
$ |
.23 |
|
|
$ |
1.34 |
|
|
$ |
.61 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
.67 |
|
|
$ |
.22 |
|
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
$ |
.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid per common share |
|
$ |
.11 |
|
|
$ |
.08 |
|
|
$ |
.22 |
|
|
$ |
.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
132.9 |
|
|
|
132.9 |
|
|
|
132.9 |
|
|
|
132.6 |
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
141.6 |
|
|
|
141.7 |
|
|
|
141.6 |
|
|
|
141.4 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
HARRIS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 29, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2006(1) |
|
|
(In millions) |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
367.9 |
|
|
$ |
181.3 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.6 |
|
Receivables |
|
|
534.2 |
|
|
|
560.6 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
501.1 |
|
|
|
468.9 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
111.0 |
|
|
|
105.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,514.2 |
|
|
|
1,428.4 |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
404.0 |
|
|
|
393.4 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
951.8 |
|
|
|
951.1 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets |
|
|
177.5 |
|
|
|
193.4 |
|
Non-current notes receivable |
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
179.2 |
|
|
|
171.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,719.6 |
|
|
|
1,713.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,233.8 |
|
|
$ |
3,142.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
220.6 |
|
|
|
235.6 |
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
151.3 |
|
|
|
198.4 |
|
Other accrued items |
|
|
158.3 |
|
|
|
148.5 |
|
Advance payments and unearned income |
|
|
154.3 |
|
|
|
129.9 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
38.1 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
149.1 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
864.9 |
|
|
|
752.1 |
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income taxes |
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
|
28.6 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
550.0 |
|
|
|
699.5 |
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, without par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $1.00 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized; issued and
outstanding 132,858,121 shares at December 29, 2006 and 132,842,734 shares
at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
132.9 |
|
|
|
132.8 |
|
Other capital |
|
|
279.2 |
|
|
|
264.8 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,380.0 |
|
|
|
1,252.8 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
1,797.7 |
|
|
|
1,662.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,233.8 |
|
|
$ |
3,142.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Derived from audited financial statements. |
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
HARRIS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two Quarters Ended |
|
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(In millions) |
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
177.9 |
|
|
$ |
80.3 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
54.8 |
|
|
|
44.5 |
|
Non-current deferred income tax |
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
|
1.9 |
|
(Increase) decrease in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable |
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(33.3 |
) |
|
|
(28.3 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(53.0 |
) |
|
|
(46.8 |
) |
Advance payments and unearned income |
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(12.4 |
) |
|
|
3.1 |
|
Other |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
182.3 |
|
|
|
112.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for acquired businesses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(443.5 |
) |
Additions of plant and equipment |
|
|
(38.8 |
) |
|
|
(35.7 |
) |
Additions of capitalized software |
|
|
(23.9 |
) |
|
|
(18.9 |
) |
Cash paid for short-term investments available-for-sale |
|
|
(82.7 |
) |
|
|
(194.8 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of short-term investments available-for-sale |
|
|
195.3 |
|
|
|
138.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
49.9 |
|
|
|
(554.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from borrowings |
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
321.1 |
|
Repayment of borrowings |
|
|
(12.9 |
) |
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options |
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
|
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(26.4 |
) |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
Cash dividends |
|
|
(29.4 |
) |
|
|
(21.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(48.3 |
) |
|
|
288.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
186.6 |
|
|
|
(156.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
181.3 |
|
|
|
377.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
367.9 |
|
|
$ |
221.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
December 29, 2006
Note A Basis of Presentation and Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of Harris Corporation and its
subsidiaries (Harris, Company, we, our, and us refer to Harris Corporation and its
consolidated subsidiaries) have been prepared by Harris, without an audit, in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and
with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, they
do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial
position, results of operations and changes in cash flows in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. In the opinion of management, such financial statements reflect all
adjustments (consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair
presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows for such periods. The
results for the quarter and two quarters ended December 29, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of
the results that may be expected for the full fiscal year or any subsequent period. The balance
sheet at June 30, 2006 has been derived from the audited financial statements but does not include
all the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States for annual financial statements. We provide complete financial statements in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K, which includes information and footnotes required by the rules and
regulations of the SEC. The information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be
read in conjunction with the Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations, and the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2006 (Fiscal 2006 Form 10-K).
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position
(FSP) FAS 123(R)-3, Transition Election Related to Accounting for the Tax Effects of Share-Based
Payment Awards (FSP 123R-3). FSP 123R-3 provides a simplified alternative method to calculate
the beginning pool of excess tax benefits against which excess future deferred tax assets (that
result when the compensation cost recognized for an award exceeds the ultimate tax deduction) could
be written off under FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004)
Share-Based Payment (Statement 123R). The guidance in FSP 123R-3 was effective on November 10,
2005. We determined not to make the one-time election to adopt the alternative transition method
described in FSP 123R-3. We have implemented the provisions of Statement 123R following the
guidance for calculating the pool of excess tax benefits described in paragraph 81 of Statement
123R and the guidance related to reporting cash flows described in paragraph 68 of Statement 123R.
Our determination not to adopt the alternative transition method described in FSP 123R-3 did not
have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In March 2006, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue 06-3, How Taxes
Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income
Statement (That Is, Gross versus Net Presentation) (Issue 06-3). The Task Force reached a
conclusion that the presentation of taxes such as sales, use, value added, and excise taxes on
either a gross (included in revenues and costs) or a net (excluded from revenues and costs) basis
is an accounting policy decision that should be disclosed by a company. In addition, a company
should disclose the amounts of those taxes such as sales, use, value added, and excise taxes that
are reported on a gross basis in interim and annual financial statements for each period for which
an income statement is presented if those amounts are significant. The provisions of Issue 06-3 are
effective for interim and annual reporting periods that begin after December 15, 2006. We have
disclosed in our Fiscal 2006 Form 10-K that we record taxes collected from customers and remitted
to governmental authorities on a net basis. Our early adoption and implementation of the provisions
of Issue 06-3 did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement 109 (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in
accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and
measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides
guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
4
periods, disclosure, and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years that begin after
December 15, 2006, which for us will be our fiscal 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact FIN
48 will have on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements (Statement 157). Statement 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework
for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. Statement 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require
fair value measurement in which the FASB concluded that fair value was the relevant measurement,
but does not require any new fair value measurements. Statement 157 will be effective for us
beginning in fiscal 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact Statement 157 will have on our
financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans (Statement
158), which amends FASB Statements No. 87, Employers Accounting for Pensions; No. 88,
Employers Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for
Termination Benefits; No. 106, Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than
Pensions; and No. 132(R), Employers Disclosures about Pension and Other Postretirement
Benefits. Statement 158 requires an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of
a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in its statement of financial
position and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur
through the comprehensive income of a business entity. Statement 158 also requires an employer to
measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of the employers year-end balance sheet, with
limited exceptions. The portion of Statement 158 that requires the recognition of overfunded or
underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability will be
effective for us as of June 29, 2007. The portion of Statement 158 that requires an employer to
measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of the employers year-end balance sheet will be
effective for us as of July 3, 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact Statement 158 will have
on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 Considering the Effects
of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements
(SAB 108). SAB 108 expresses the SECs views regarding the process of quantifying misstatements
in financial statements. The view of the SEC is that the effects of prior year errors in the
balance sheet must be taken into account for the current year income statement financial reporting.
We implemented the provisions of SAB 108 during the first quarter of fiscal 2007 and it did not
have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Reclassifications
Certain prior-year amounts have been reclassified on the accompanying condensed consolidated
financial statements to conform with current-year classifications. These reclassifications include:
|
|
|
Reclassifying $28.1 million software capitalized under the provisions of the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountant Statement of Position No. 98-1, Accounting for the
Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use from the caption Other
assets to the caption Property, plant and equipment in our Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheet as of June 30, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
Reclassifying $2.7 million of the reduction of income tax paid as a result of the
deduction related to employees exercise of stock options from financing activities to
operating activities in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the two
quarters ended December 30, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
Reclassifying the purchases and sales of auction rate securities as investing activities
rather than cash and cash equivalents. We reclassified $56.6 million from a positive change
in cash and cash equivalents to cash used in investing activities, in our Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the two quarters ended December 30, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
Reclassifying $3.3 million and $5.1 million amortization of developed technology from
Engineering, selling and administrative expenses to Cost of product sales and services
in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income for the quarter and two quarters ended
December 30, 2005. |
Note B Stock Options and Share-Based Compensation
As of December 29, 2006, we had three shareholder-approved stock incentive plans for employees
under which options or other share-based compensation was outstanding, and we had the following
types of share-based awards outstanding under these plans:
5
stock options, performance share awards, performance share unit awards, restricted stock
awards and restricted stock unit awards. We believe that such awards more closely align the
interests of our employees with those of our shareholders. The compensation cost related to our
share-based awards that was charged against income was $6.1 million for the quarter ended December
29, 2006, and $11.7 million for the two quarters ended December 29, 2006. The compensation cost
related to our share-based awards that was charged against income was $5.5 million for the quarter
ended December 30, 2005, and $10.2 million for the two
quarters ended December 30, 2005. Grants to employees during the
second quarter of fiscal 2007 under these plans consisted of 34,900 stock
option grants; 8,100 performance share awards; 400 performance share unit awards and 31,000
restricted stock awards. Grants to employees during the first two quarters of fiscal
2007 under these plans consisted of 1,110,500 stock option grants; 243,800 performance share awards; 19,900
performance share unit awards and 154,200 restricted stock awards.
The fair value of these options was estimated using a
Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model that used the following
assumptions; expected volatility of 32.2%; expected dividend yield of
1.0%; and expected life in years of 4.33.
Note C Comprehensive Income and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Total comprehensive income for the quarter and two quarters ended December 29, 2006 and
December 30, 2005 was comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Two Quarters Ended |
|
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(In millions) |
Net income |
|
$ |
94.0 |
|
|
$ |
30.0 |
|
|
$ |
177.9 |
|
|
$ |
80.3 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain (loss) on securities available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
(10.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
2.2 |
|
Net unrealized gain (loss) on hedging derivatives |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
82.5 |
|
|
$ |
27.3 |
|
|
$ |
171.8 |
|
|
$ |
83.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of related tax, at December 29,
2006 and June 30, 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 29, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(In millions) |
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
$ |
11.8 |
|
Net unrealized gain (loss) on hedging activity |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
|
$ |
11.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note D Receivables
Receivables are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 29, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(In millions) |
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
473.0 |
|
|
$ |
479.7 |
|
Unbilled cost from cost-plus contracts |
|
|
65.1 |
|
|
|
82.6 |
|
Notes receivable due within one year, net |
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550.6 |
|
|
|
577.9 |
|
Less allowances for collection losses |
|
|
(16.4 |
) |
|
|
(17.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
534.2 |
|
|
$ |
560.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
Note E Inventories
Inventories are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 29, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(In millions) |
Unbilled costs and accrued earnings on fixed-price contracts |
|
$ |
172.2 |
|
|
$ |
137.3 |
|
Finished products |
|
|
89.0 |
|
|
|
90.0 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
72.6 |
|
|
|
69.4 |
|
Raw materials and supplies |
|
|
167.3 |
|
|
|
172.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
501.1 |
|
|
$ |
468.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unbilled costs and accrued earnings on fixed-price contracts are net of progress payments of
$147.7 million at December 29, 2006 and $131.4 million at June 30, 2006.
Note F Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 29, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(In millions) |
Land |
|
$ |
11.6 |
|
|
$ |
11.6 |
|
Software capitalized for internal use |
|
|
61.3 |
|
|
|
52.3 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
332.3 |
|
|
|
326.1 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
707.9 |
|
|
|
699.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,113.1 |
|
|
|
1,089.4 |
|
Less allowances for depreciation and software amortization |
|
|
(709.1 |
) |
|
|
(696.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
404.0 |
|
|
$ |
393.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and software amortization expense related to property, plant and equipment for
the quarter and two quarters ended December 29, 2006 was $18.6 million and $35.3 million,
respectively. Depreciation and software amortization expense related to property, plant and
equipment for the quarter and two quarters ended December 30, 2005 was $13.8 million and $29.7
million, respectively.
Note G Selected Investments
We have equity investments in technology companies, which are accounted for using the cost
method of accounting. These investments are included in the Other assets caption on our
accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. These selected investments are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 29, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
Investments (ownership interest) |
|
(In millions) |
Terion, Inc. (19.6%) |
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
$ |
23.0 |
|
AuthenTec, Inc. (17.4%) |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13.7 |
|
|
$ |
33.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terion, Inc. (Terion) is a privately-held company that, until the asset sale transaction
described below, provided wireless data communication and information solutions for mobile and
remote business-to-business applications focusing on the transportation industry. None of Terions
revenue is generated from Harris or its affiliates. We have invested technology and cash in Terion
since fiscal 1994 and we currently nominate one member of Terions board of directors. As
previously reported in our Fiscal 2006 Form 10-K, Terions largest customer, which represented
approximately 60,000 units of an installed base of approximately 110,000 units, informed Terion in
July 2006 that it had signed a contract with another provider and would be moving its fleet off of
Terions system over the next two years. Terion management provided us with a revised forecast for
the business and an update on the strategic alternatives for Terion. Based on the information
provided and an analysis performed by an independent valuation specialist using different
probabilities for likely outcomes, we recorded a $19.8 million impairment of the investment under
the caption Non-operating income (loss) on our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income for the
first quarter of fiscal 2007. On January 10, 2007,
7
Terion sold substantially all of its assets to GE Asset Intelligence, LLC (the Purchaser).
Following the sale, Terion distributed the initial proceeds to its stockholders, and we received
$5.0 million in respect of our ownership interest in Terion, resulting in a gain of $1.8 million.
The gain will be recorded during our fiscal third quarter of 2007 in the Non-operating income
(loss) caption in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income. Terion may receive additional
proceeds from the asset sale, which are being held in escrow and will be released by the Purchaser
if and when certain events occur, and any such additional proceeds would be distributed by Terion
to its stockholders including us, in accordance with their respective ownership interests. We have
no exposure to any further losses related to our ownership interest in Terion.
AuthenTec, Inc. (AuthenTec) is a privately-held company that provides advanced biometric
fingerprint sensors to the PC, wireless, PDA, access control and automotive markets. AuthenTecs
revenue generated from Harris and its affiliates has not been material. We have invested technology
and cash in AuthenTec since 1998 and we currently nominate one member of AuthenTecs board of
directors. The current maximum exposure to loss we have with our ownership interest in AuthenTec is
$10.5 million. We use an independent valuation specialist to assist us in determining the fair
value of the investment.
Note H Accrued Warranties
Changes in our warranty liability, which is included as a component of Other accrued items
on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, during the first two quarters of fiscal
2007, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
Balance as of June 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
30.2 |
|
Warranty provision for sales made during the two quarters ended December 29, 2006 |
|
|
9.9 |
|
Settlements made during the two quarters ended December 29, 2006 |
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
Other adjustments to the warranty liability, including those for foreign
currency translation, during the two quarters ended December 29, 2006 |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 29, 2006 |
|
$ |
33.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note I Net Income Per Diluted Share
The computations of net income per diluted share are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Two Quarters Ended |
|
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
Net income |
|
$ |
94.0 |
|
|
$ |
30.0 |
|
|
$ |
177.9 |
|
|
$ |
80.3 |
|
Impact of convertible debentures |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income used in diluted share calculation(A) |
|
$ |
95.0 |
|
|
$ |
31.0 |
|
|
$ |
179.9 |
|
|
$ |
82.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
132.9 |
|
|
|
132.9 |
|
|
|
132.9 |
|
|
|
132.6 |
|
Impact of dilutive stock options |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Impact of convertible debentures |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding(B) |
|
|
141.6 |
|
|
|
141.7 |
|
|
|
141.6 |
|
|
|
141.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per diluted share(A)/(B) |
|
$ |
.67 |
|
|
$ |
.22 |
|
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
$ |
.58 |
|
In fiscal 2003, we issued $150 million in aggregate principal amount of 3.5% Convertible
Debentures due 2022. Holders of the debentures have the right to convert each of their debentures
into shares of our common stock prior to the stated maturity of the debentures under any of the
following circumstances:
|
|
|
during any calendar quarter, if the closing sale price of our common stock, for at least
20 trading days in the 30 consecutive trading day period ending on the last trading day of
the previous calendar quarter, is more than 110 percent of the applicable conversion price
per share of our common stock on such last trading day, |
|
|
|
|
debentures called for redemption may be surrendered for conversion until the close of
business on the business day immediately preceding the redemption date, |
8
|
|
|
during any period that the long-term credit rating assigned to the debentures by either
of Moodys Investors Service Inc. or Standard & Poors Ratings Group is at or below Ba1 or
BB+, respectively, or if the debentures no longer are rated by either of these ratings
services, or if the ratings for the debentures have been suspended by either of these
ratings services, or |
|
|
|
|
upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions, including if we make a
significant distribution to holders of our common stock or if we are a party to specified
consolidations, mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of our properties and
assets. |
After giving effect to the adjustment in connection with our March 2005 stock split, a holder
will receive 44.2404 shares of our common stock for each $1,000 of debentures surrendered for
conversion. This represents a conversion price of $22.625 per share of our common stock. Based upon
satisfaction of the market price trigger as of the end of the calendar quarter ended December 31,
2006, these debentures are convertible into shares of our common stock during the calendar quarter
ending March 31, 2007. To date, $890,000 of these debentures have been converted into 39,374 shares
of common stock.
The debentures will mature on August 15, 2022, unless earlier redeemed, repurchased or
converted. We may redeem some or all of the debentures at any time on or after August 18, 2007 at a
price equal to 100 percent of the principal amount of the debentures to be redeemed plus any
accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. Holders may require us to purchase for cash all
or a portion of their debentures on August 15, 2007, August 15, 2012 and August 15, 2017 at a price
equal to 100 percent of the principal amount of the debentures to be purchased plus accrued and
unpaid interest to the purchase date.
We have assessed whether the embedded conversion feature within our 3.5% Convertible
Debentures due 2022 should be bifurcated from the host instrument and accounted for as a derivative
at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in earnings under paragraph 12 of FASB Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (Statement 133). Based on our assessment, we have determined that the conversion
feature is not required to be bifurcated under the provisions of Statement 133; EITF Issue No.
00-19, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a
Companys Own Stock; FASB Statement No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with
Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity or EITF Issue No. 05-2, The Meaning of
Conventional Convertible Debt Instrument in EITF Issue No. 00-19, Accounting for Derivative
Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Companys Own Stock.
Note J Non-Operating Income (Loss)
The components of non-operating income (loss) are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Two Quarters Ended |
|
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
Write-downs of
investments for other
than temporary
decreases in market
value |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(6.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(19.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.4 |
) |
Royalty income (expense) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
Equity loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(18.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note K Guarantees and Commitments
During the quarter ended September 29, 2006, our Broadcast Communications segment entered into
an agreement to sell products and services to a customer (the Customer) in connection with the
Customers prime contract (the Prime Contract) to provide 19 transmission stations to a state
agency (the Agency). Pursuant to the terms of the Prime Contract, the Customer was required to
post a $20 million bond in favor of the Agency to secure the Customers obligations under the Prime
Contract. In order to facilitate the issuance of the bond, we entered into an agreement with the
Customer and the bond surety to provide additional indemnity to the surety in the event the surety
incurs any loss by reason of executing such bond. Our indemnity obligations are supported by, among
other things, $2 million in irrevocable standby letters of credit obtained by the Customer in favor
of Harris; a guarantee from the Customer, as primary guarantor, in favor of Harris of up to
approximately $11 million; personal guarantees from certain principals of the Customer, as
secondary guarantors, in favor of Harris of up to approximately $11 million in the aggregate; an
additional fee payable by the Customer to Harris of up to $300,000; certain additional undertakings
by the Customer to Harris with respect to the amount of Harris products and services to be sold by
Harris to the Customer in connection with the Customers Prime Contract with
9
the Agency; an agreement by the Customer to use best efforts to include Harris in any
resolution procedure should default be declared or a claim be made to the bond; and an agreement
with the Customer, to the extent the Customer is able, recommending Harris step into the
Customers place in the event the Customer is not able to perform under the Prime Contract with the
Agency. The bond may remain outstanding until February 2010. We believe that the technical, project
and financial risks associated with our agreement to provide additional indemnity to the surety is
remote and should not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
Note L Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate (income taxes as a percentage of income before income taxes) was 34.5
percent in the second quarter of fiscal 2007, compared to 50.8 percent in the second quarter of
fiscal 2006 and was 30.0 percent in the first two quarters of fiscal 2007, compared to 42.9 percent
in the first two quarters of fiscal 2006. In the first quarter of fiscal 2007, a reduction in tax
rate resulted from a favorable settlement that was approved by the United States Joint Committee on
Taxation and related matters between us and the Internal Revenue Service concerning the tax audit
for fiscal years 2001, 2002 and 2003, which settlement and related matters were in an aggregate
amount of $12 million. In the second quarter of fiscal 2007, a reduction in tax rate resulted from
the re-enactment of the research and development credit for fiscal 2006, which reduced income taxes
by $1 million. In the second quarter and the first two quarters of fiscal 2006, the effective tax
rate was impacted significantly by charges related to product discontinuances in our Microwave
Communications segment and cost-reduction initiatives and acquisitions in our Broadcast
Communications segment in foreign jurisdictions where we have
significant net operating losses and where we were unable to realize
a tax benefit associated with these charges.
Note M Business Segments
We are structured primarily around the markets we serve and operate in four business segments
Government Communications Systems, RF Communications, Microwave Communications and Broadcast
Communications. Our Government Communications Systems segment engages in advanced research and
develops, designs, produces and services advanced communication and information processing systems,
primarily for the U.S. Department of Defense and various other agencies of the U.S. Government. Our
RF Communications segment performs advanced research and develops, designs, manufactures, sells and
services secure tactical radio products, primarily for the U.S. Department of Defense and various
international defense agencies. Our Microwave Communications segment designs, manufactures, sells
and services microwave radio products and develops, designs, produces, sells and services network
management systems, primarily for cellular network providers and private network operators. Our
Broadcast Communications segment designs, manufactures, sells and services television and radio
transmission products; high-performance video systems and products; software solutions related to
automation, asset management control and workflow; and broadcast networking systems and products,
primarily for radio and television broadcasters as well as governmental agencies. Within each of
our business segments, there are multiple program areas and product lines that logically aggregate
into our four business segments described above.
The accounting policies of our operating segments are the same as those described in Note 1:
Significant Accounting Policies in our Fiscal 2006 Form 10-K. We evaluate each segments
performance based on its operating income or loss, which we define as profit or loss from
operations before income taxes excluding interest income and expense, equity income and gains or
losses from securities and other investments. Intersegment sales are transferred at cost to the
buying segment and the sourcing segment recognizes a normal profit that is eliminated. The
Corporate eliminations line item in the tables below represents the elimination of intersegment
sales and their related profits. Headquarters expense represents the portion of corporate
expenses not allocated to the business segments.
Total assets by business segment are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 29, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(In millions) |
Total Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Communications Systems |
|
$ |
717.7 |
|
|
$ |
697.6 |
|
RF Communications |
|
|
306.9 |
|
|
|
297.4 |
|
Microwave Communications |
|
|
347.1 |
|
|
|
340.7 |
|
Broadcast Communications |
|
|
1,329.8 |
|
|
|
1,336.8 |
|
Headquarters |
|
|
532.3 |
|
|
|
469.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,233.8 |
|
|
$ |
3,142.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
Segment revenue, segment operating income (loss) and a reconciliation of segment operating
income (loss) to total income before income taxes follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Two Quarters Ended |
|
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(In millions) |
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Communications Systems |
|
$ |
483.7 |
|
|
$ |
443.5 |
|
|
$ |
942.9 |
|
|
$ |
876.0 |
|
RF Communications |
|
|
285.5 |
|
|
|
180.8 |
|
|
|
549.2 |
|
|
|
351.7 |
|
Microwave Communications |
|
|
101.3 |
|
|
|
89.2 |
|
|
|
194.9 |
|
|
|
164.5 |
|
Broadcast Communications |
|
|
155.0 |
|
|
|
135.4 |
|
|
|
294.8 |
|
|
|
223.1 |
|
Corporate eliminations |
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
|
(18.8 |
) |
|
|
(14.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,016.2 |
|
|
$ |
841.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,963.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,601.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Operating Income (Loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Communications Systems |
|
$ |
55.8 |
|
|
$ |
53.9 |
|
|
$ |
108.8 |
|
|
$ |
107.3 |
|
RF Communications |
|
|
95.7 |
|
|
|
61.5 |
|
|
|
183.4 |
|
|
|
119.6 |
|
Microwave Communications (1) |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
(29.5 |
) |
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
(26.5 |
) |
Broadcast Communications (2) |
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
(8.8 |
) |
Headquarters expense |
|
|
(17.6 |
) |
|
|
(15.7 |
) |
|
|
(34.0 |
) |
|
|
(31.2 |
) |
Corporate eliminations |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
Non-operating income (loss) (3) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(18.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Net interest |
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
|
|
(14.7 |
) |
|
|
(10.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
143.6 |
|
|
$ |
61.0 |
|
|
$ |
254.2 |
|
|
$ |
140.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The operating income in the Microwave Communications segment in the second quarter of fiscal
2007 was impacted by $1.7 million of costs associated with the segments combination with
Stratex Networks, Inc. The segments operating loss in the second quarter of fiscal 2006
included $35.5 million in inventory write-downs and other charges associated with product
discontinuances and the shutdown of manufacturing activities in our Montreal, Canada plant. |
|
(2) |
|
The operating income in the Broadcast Communications segment in the second quarter of fiscal
2006 was impacted by approximately $6.5 million for costs associated with the segments
acquisition of Leitch Technology Corporation (Leitch) ($3.6 million write-off of in-process
research and development and $2.9 million of other expenses) and $5.2 million for costs
associated with the consolidation of manufacturing locations and cost-reduction
initiatives. Included in the $5.2 million of charges were severance-related exit costs of
approximately $0.6 million and facility-related costs of $2.3 million. The operating loss in
the Broadcast Communications segment for the first two quarters of fiscal 2006 also includes
an additional $18.0 million in charges associated with consolidating manufacturing locations.
Included in these charges were severance-related exit costs of approximately $6.5 million. |
|
(3) |
|
Non-operating income (loss) includes equity losses, royalties and related intellectual
property expenses and write-downs of investments and expenses associated with our selected
investments. In the first quarter of fiscal 2007, we recorded a $19.8 million impairment to
our investment in Terion. Additional information regarding non-operating income (loss) is set
forth in Note J Non-Operating Income (Loss). |
Note N Subsequent Events
On January 26, 2007, we completed the combination of the Microwave Communications Division
with Stratex Networks, Inc. (Stratex Networks), a provider of high-speed wireless transmission
systems, to form a new company named Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. In connection with the
combination, we contributed our Microwave Communications Division, including $32.1 million of cash,
in exchange for approximately 56 percent ownership of the combined Harris Stratex Networks, Inc.
Stratex Networks shareholders have exchanged their existing ownership of Stratex Networks for
approximately 44 percent ownership of the combined company. Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. is a
publicly traded company listed on the NASDAQ Global Market. The combination resulted in a gain of
approximately $131 million to us, which will be recorded in our
third quarter of fiscal 2007. The financial
results of Harris Stratex Networks, Inc. will be reflected in our consolidated financial
statements, with appropriate elimination of the minority interest not held by us, beginning in the
third quarter of fiscal 2007.
11
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Harris Corporation
We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of Harris Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 29, 2006, and the related condensed consolidated statement of income
for the quarter and two quarters ended December 29, 2006 and December 30, 2005, and the condensed
consolidated statement of cash flows for the two quarters ended December 29, 2006 and December 30,
2005. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of
applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with
the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do
not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the
condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Harris Corporation and
subsidiaries as of June 30, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flows,
and comprehensive income and shareholders equity for the year then ended, not presented herein,
and in our report dated August 25, 2006, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated
financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in
relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certified Public Accountants |
|
|
Jacksonville, Florida
January 29, 2007
12
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
OVERVIEW
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations (MD&A) is intended to assist in an understanding of Harris. MD&A is provided as a
supplement to, should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to, our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) and accompanying Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (Notes) appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q. In addition, reference should be made to our audited Consolidated Financial Statements and
accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and MD&A included in our Fiscal 2006 Form
10-K. Except for the historical information contained herein, the discussions in MD&A contain
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results for future
periods could differ materially from those discussed herein. Factors that could cause or contribute
to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below under Forward-Looking
Statements and Factors that May Affect Future Results.
The following is a list of the sections of MD&A contained in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q, together with our perspective on the contents of these sections of MD&A, which we hope will
make reading these pages more productive:
|
|
|
Operations Review an analysis of our consolidated results of operations and of the
results in each of our four operating segments, to the extent the operating segment results
are helpful to an understanding of our business as a whole, for the periods presented in our
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources an analysis of cash flows, common stock repurchases,
dividend policy, capital structure and resources, off-balance sheet arrangements, commercial
commitments and contractual obligations. |
|
|
|
|
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates information about accounting policies that
require critical judgments and estimates and of accounting pronouncements that have been
issued but not yet implemented by us and their potential impact. |
|
|
|
|
Forward-Looking Statements and Factors that May Affect Future Results cautionary
information about forward-looking statements and a description of certain risks and
uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our historical
results or our current expectations or projections. |
OPERATIONS REVIEW
Highlights
Operations results for the second quarter of fiscal 2007 include:
|
|
|
Net income increased from $30.0 million, or $.22 per diluted share, in the second quarter
of fiscal 2006 to $94.0 million, or $.67 per diluted share, in the second quarter of fiscal
2007. The prior-year quarter net income was adversely impacted by $42.5 million of after-tax
charges related to the discontinuance of products and the shutdown of
manufacturing activities in Montreal, Canada in our Microwave Communications segment
and charges associated with cost-reduction actions and acquisitions in our Broadcast
Communications segment; |
|
|
|
|
Revenue increased 20.7 percent from $841.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2006
to $1,016.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2007; |
|
|
|
|
Government Communications Systems revenue increased by 9.1 percent and operating income
increased by 3.5 percent compared to the prior-year quarter; |
|
|
|
|
RF Communications achieved revenue growth of 57.9 percent and operating income increased
55.6 percent compared to the prior-year quarter; |
|
|
|
|
Microwave Communications revenue increased 13.6 percent compared to the prior-year
quarter and operating income increased to $8.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2007
compared to an operating loss of $29.5 million in the prior-year quarter. The prior-year
quarter included $35.5 million of charges related to product
discontinuances and the shutdown of
manufacturing activities in Montreal, Canada; |
|
|
|
|
Broadcast Communications achieved revenue growth of 14.5 percent compared to the
prior-year quarter and operating income increased to $13.0 million in the second quarter of
fiscal 2007 compared to operating income of $3.2 million in the prior-year quarter. The
prior-year quarter was adversely impacted by $6.5 million of expenses associated with our
Leitch acquisition and |
13
|
|
|
$5.2 million of expenses due to cost-reduction actions. This segments results include the
results of Leitch which we acquired on October 25, 2005, and the results of Optimal Solutions,
Inc. (OSi) and Aastra Digital Video, each of which we acquired during the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2006; and |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities was $182.3 million in the first two quarters of
fiscal 2007 compared to $112.0 million in the first two quarters of fiscal 2006. |
Revenue and Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Two Quarters Ended |
|
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
% |
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
% |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Inc / (Dec) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Inc / (Dec) |
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts and percentages) |
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,016.2 |
|
|
$ |
841.6 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
% |
|
$ |
1,963.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,601.3 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
% |
Net income |
|
$ |
94.0 |
|
|
$ |
30.0 |
|
|
|
213.3 |
% |
|
$ |
177.9 |
|
|
$ |
80.3 |
|
|
|
121.5 |
% |
% of revenue |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Net income per
diluted common
share |
|
$ |
.67 |
|
|
$ |
.22 |
|
|
|
204.5 |
% |
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
$ |
.58 |
|
|
|
119.0 |
% |
Second Quarter 2007 Compared With Second Quarter 2006: Revenue for the quarter ended December
29, 2006 was $1,016.2 million, an increase of 20.7 percent compared to the prior-year quarter.
Revenue increased in all four segments. The growth was led by our RF Communications segment, whose
revenue increased 57.9 percent over the prior-year quarter. The revenue growth in the Broadcast
Communications segment was primarily due to the acquisitions of Leitch, OSi, and Aastra Digital
Video.
Net income for the quarter ended December 29, 2006 was $94.0 million, or $.67 per diluted
share, compared to $30.0 million, or $.22 per diluted share, for the quarter ended December 30,
2005. The increase in net income was led by a 55.6 percent increase in our RF Communications
segment operating income that primarily resulted from increased demand for tactical radio products.
Operating income in our Microwave Communications segment also improved significantly from an
operating loss of $29.5 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 to operating income of $8.1
million in the second quarter of fiscal 2007. The increase was primarily due to $35.5 million in
charges incurred during the second quarter of fiscal 2006 associated with product discontinuances
and the shutdown of manufacturing activities in Montreal, Canada. Operating income in our Broadcast
Communications segment also improved significantly from operating income of $3.2 million in the
second quarter of fiscal 2006 to operating income of $13.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal
2007. The increase was primarily due to $11.7 million in charges during the second quarter of
fiscal 2006 associated with the acquisition of Leitch and cost-reduction initiatives. Excellent
financial results in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 were driven by both strong organic revenue growth and
improved operating performance. Results in the RF Communications segment continued to benefit from
robust demand for our Falcon® II and Falcon® III tactical radio systems from both domestic and
international customers. The Government Communications Systems and Microwave Communications
segments delivered strong growth in revenue and solid operating performance.
First Two Quarters 2007 Compared With First Two Quarters 2006: Our revenue for the first two
quarters ended December 29, 2006 was $1,963.0 million, an increase of 22.6 percent compared to the
prior-year first two quarters. The increase resulted from the same reasons as noted above regarding
the second quarter of fiscal 2007.
Net income for the two quarters ended December 29, 2006 was $177.9 million, or $1.27 per
diluted share, compared to $80.3 million, or $.58 per diluted share, for the two quarters ended
December 30, 2005. The increase was primarily due to the 53.3 percent increase in operating income
in the RF Communications segment in the first two quarters of fiscal
2007 and the charges taken in
the second quarter of fiscal 2006 in the Microwave Communications and Broadcast Communications
segments as described above.
Net income during the first two quarters of fiscal 2007 also benefited from a reduction in tax
rate resulting from a favorable settlement that was approved by the United States Joint Committee
on Taxation and related matters between us and the Internal Revenue Service concerning the tax
audit for fiscal years 2001, 2002 and 2003. The settlement and related matters were in an aggregate
amount of $12 million. The improvement in net income was partially offset by a $19.8 million
pre-tax ($12.9 million after-tax) impairment to our investment in Terion that was recorded during
the first quarter of fiscal 2007.
See the Discussion of Business Segments section of this MD&A for further information.
14
Gross Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Two Quarters Ended |
|
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
% |
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
% |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Inc / (Dec) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Inc / (Dec) |
|
|
(In millions, except percentages) |
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,016.2 |
|
|
$ |
841.6 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
% |
|
$ |
1,963.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,601.3 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
% |
Cost of product sales and services |
|
|
(683.7 |
) |
|
|
(605.6 |
) |
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
(1,324.6 |
) |
|
|
(1,142.2 |
) |
|
|
16.0 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
$ |
332.5 |
|
|
$ |
236.0 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
% |
|
$ |
638.4 |
|
|
$ |
459.1 |
|
|
|
39.1 |
% |
% of revenue |
|
|
32.7 |
% |
|
|
28.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.5 |
% |
|
|
28.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter 2007 Compared With Second Quarter 2006: Our gross margin (revenue less cost of
product sales and services) as a percentage of revenue was 32.7 percent in the second quarter of
fiscal 2007 compared to 28.0 percent in the second quarter of fiscal 2006. The increase in gross
margin as a percentage of revenue was driven by a higher percentage of our overall revenue coming
from our RF Communications segment in the second quarter of fiscal 2007, the impact of our October
25, 2005 acquisition of Leitch, and $35.5 million in charges during the second quarter of fiscal
2006 associated with product discontinuances in our Microwave Communications segment.
First Two Quarters 2007 Compared With First Two Quarters 2006: Our gross margin as a
percentage of revenue was 32.5 percent in the first two quarters of fiscal 2007 compared to 28.7
percent in the first two quarters of fiscal 2006 for the same reasons as noted above regarding the
second quarter of fiscal 2007.
See the Discussion of Business Segments section of this MD&A for further information.
Engineering, Selling and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Two Quarters Ended |
|
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
% |
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
% |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Inc / (Dec) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Inc / (Dec) |
|
|
(In millions, except percentages) |
Engineering,
selling and
administrative
expenses |
|
$ |
(181.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(167.7 |
) |
|
|
8.2 |
% |
|
$ |
(350.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(307.4 |
) |
|
|
14.1 |
% |
% of revenue |
|
|
17.9 |
% |
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.9 |
% |
|
|
19.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter 2007 Compared With Second Quarter 2006: Our engineering, selling and
administrative expenses increased from $167.7 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 to
$181.4 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2007. As a percentage of revenue, these expenses
decreased from 19.9 percent in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 to 17.9 percent in the second
quarter of fiscal 2007. The increase in engineering, selling and administrative expenses was
primarily due to our October 25, 2005 acquisition of Leitch and increased spending in our RF
Communications segment on Falcon III tactical radio system development, which experienced 57.9 percent revenue growth in
the second quarter of fiscal 2007 over the prior-year quarter. In
addition, increases in engineering,
selling and administrative expenses during the second quarter of
fiscal 2006 reflected $12.2 million in charges associated with our Broadcast Communications segments consolidation
of manufacturing locations and other cost-reduction initiatives. The decrease in engineering,
selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to the increased
sales volume at our RF Communications segment and the aforementioned $12.2 million in charges
during the second quarter of fiscal 2006 in our Broadcast Communications segment, which were
partially offset by the impact of our Leitch acquisition.
First Two Quarters 2007 Compared With First Two Quarters 2006: Our engineering, selling and
administrative expenses increased from $307.4 million in the first two quarters of fiscal 2006 to
$350.8 in the first two quarters of fiscal 2007. As a percentage of revenue, these expenses
decreased from 19.2 percent in the first two quarters of fiscal 2006 to 17.9 percent in the first
two quarters of fiscal 2007. The increase in engineering, selling and administrative expenses was
due to the same items noted above regarding the second quarter of 2007.
See the Discussion of Business Segments section of this MD&A for further information.
15
Non-Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Two Quarters Ended |
|
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
% |
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
% |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Inc / (Dec) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Inc / (Dec) |
|
|
(In millions, except percentages) |
Non-operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(18.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
Second Quarter 2007 Compared With Second Quarter 2006: We had a non-operating loss of $0.2
million for the quarter ended December 29, 2006 and
for the quarter ended December 30, 2005.
First Two Quarters 2007 Compared With First Two Quarters 2006: We had a non-operating loss of
$18.7 million for the two quarters ended December 29, 2006 compared to a non-operating loss of $0.8
million for the two quarters ended December 30, 2005. The increase in our non-operating loss was
due to a $19.8 million write-down of our investment in Terion in the first quarter of fiscal 2007.
This loss was partially offset by royalty income of $1.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal
2007. See Note G Selected Investments in the Notes for further information.
Interest Income and Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Two Quarters Ended |
|
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
% |
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
% |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Inc / (Dec) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Inc / (Dec) |
|
|
(In millions, except percentages) |
Interest income |
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
|
(16.7 |
)% |
|
$ |
4.9 |
|
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
|
|
(21.0 |
)% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(9.8 |
) |
|
|
(10.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
)% |
|
|
(19.6 |
) |
|
|
(16.5 |
) |
|
|
18.8 |
% |
Second Quarter 2007 Compared With Second Quarter 2006: Our interest income decreased to $2.5
million in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 from $3.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2006
primarily due to lower average balances of cash and short-term investments when compared to the
prior-year quarter. Our interest expense decreased from $10.1 million in the quarter ended December
30, 2005 to $9.8 million in the quarter ended December 29, 2006 primarily due to lower debt
balances.
First Two Quarters 2007 Compared With First Two Quarters 2006: Our interest income decreased
to $4.9 million in the first two quarters of fiscal 2007 compared to $6.2 million in the first two
quarters of fiscal 2006. Our interest expense increased from $16.5 million in the first two
quarters of fiscal 2006 to $19.6 million in the first two quarters of fiscal 2007. The decrease in
interest income was due to lower average balances of cash and short-term securities and interest
expense increased due to our issuance on September 20, 2005 of $300 million in aggregate principal
amount of 5% notes due October 1, 2015.
Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Two Quarters Ended |
|
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
% |
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
% |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Inc / (Dec) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Inc / (Dec) |
|
|
(In millions, except percentages) |
Income taxes |
|
$ |
(49.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(31.0 |
) |
|
|
60.0 |
% |
|
$ |
(76.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(60.3 |
) |
|
|
26.5 |
% |
Effective tax rate |
|
|
34.5 |
% |
|
|
50.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.0 |
% |
|
|
42.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter 2007 Compared With Second Quarter 2006: Our effective tax rate (income taxes as
a percentage of income before income taxes) was 34.5 percent for the second quarter of fiscal 2007
compared to 50.8 percent for the second quarter of fiscal 2006. In the second quarter of fiscal
2007, a reduction in tax rate resulted from the re-enactment of the research and development credit
for fiscal 2006, which reduced income taxes by $1 million. In the second quarter of fiscal 2006,
the effective tax rate was impacted significantly by charges related to product discontinuances in
our Microwave Communications segment and cost-reduction initiatives and acquisitions in our
Broadcast Communications segment in foreign jurisdictions where we have significant net operating
losses and where we were unable to realize a tax benefit associated
with these charges.
First Two Quarters 2007 Compared With First Two Quarters 2006: Our effective tax rate was 30.0
percent for the first two quarters of 2007 compared to 42.9 percent for the first two quarters of
2006. In the first two quarters of fiscal 2007, a reduction in tax rate resulted from a favorable
settlement that was approved by the United States Joint Committee on Taxation and related matters
between us and the Internal Revenue Service concerning the tax audit for fiscal years 2001, 2002
and 2003. The settlement and related
16
matters were in an aggregate amount of $12 million. In the second quarter of fiscal 2007, a
reduction in tax rate resulted from the re-enactment of the research and development credit for
fiscal 2006, which reduced income taxes by $1 million. In the first two quarters of fiscal 2006,
the effective tax rate was impacted significantly by charges related to product discontinuances in
our Microwave Communications segment and cost-reduction initiatives and acquisitions in our
Broadcast Communications segment in foreign jurisdictions where we have significant net operating
losses and where we were unable to realize a tax benefit associated
with these charges.
Discussion of Business Segments
Government Communications Systems Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Two Quarters Ended |
|
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
% |
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
% |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Inc / (Dec) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Inc / (Dec) |
|
|
(In millions, except percentages) |
Revenue |
|
$ |
483.7 |
|
|
$ |
443.5 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
$ |
942.9 |
|
|
$ |
876.0 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
% |
Segment operating income |
|
|
55.8 |
|
|
|
53.9 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
108.8 |
|
|
|
107.3 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
% of revenue |
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter 2007 Compared With Second Quarter 2006: Government Communications Systems
segment revenue increased 9.1 percent while operating income increased 3.5 percent from the second
quarter of fiscal 2006 to the second quarter of fiscal 2007. Revenue was
higher in all business areas in the second quarter of fiscal 2007
compared to the prior-year quarter. Operating
income as a percentage of revenue was 11.5 percent in the second quarter of fiscal 2007, reflecting
continuing excellent program performance.
Year-over-year
revenue growth drivers in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 when
compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2006 included:
|
|
|
The 15-year, $2.2 billion Federal Aviation Administration Telecommunications
Infrastructure (FTI) program. FTI is a new state-of-the-art telecommunications
network designed to save hundreds of millions of dollars in operational costs while
increasing network reliability and security; |
|
|
|
|
The 5-year, $600 million Field Data Collection Automation (FDCA) program for
the U.S. Census Bureau, for which we recently demonstrated our wireless handheld
device, with integrated global positioning system and secure communication capabilities, which will be used by
500,000 census takers during the 2010 census; |
|
|
|
|
The $66 million CDL Hawklink program for the U.S. Navy that
transmits real-time sensor data from LAMPS helicopters to naval vessels; |
|
|
|
|
Several new programs for National Intelligence customers; and |
|
|
|
|
Several commercial satellite antenna programs. |
First Two Quarters 2007 Compared With First Two Quarters 2006: Government Communications
Systems segment revenue increased from $876.0 million in the first two quarters of fiscal 2006 to
$942.9 million in the first two quarters of fiscal 2007. Operating income as a percentage of
revenue decreased from 12.2 percent in the first two quarters of fiscal 2006 to 11.5 percent in the
first two quarters of fiscal 2007.
RF Communications Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Two Quarters Ended |
|
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
% |
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
% |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Inc / (Dec) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Inc / (Dec) |
|
|
(In millions, except percentages) |
Revenue |
|
$ |
285.5 |
|
|
$ |
180.8 |
|
|
|
57.9 |
% |
|
$ |
549.2 |
|
|
$ |
351.7 |
|
|
|
56.2 |
% |
Segment operating income |
|
|
95.7 |
|
|
|
61.5 |
|
|
|
55.6 |
% |
|
|
183.4 |
|
|
|
119.6 |
|
|
|
53.3 |
% |
% of revenue |
|
|
33.5 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.4 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter 2007 Compared With Second Quarter 2006: RF Communications segment revenue
increased 57.9 percent and operating income increased 55.6 percent from the second quarter of
fiscal 2006 to the second quarter of fiscal 2007. Revenue in the second quarter of fiscal 2007
was 8.3 percent higher sequentially than the first quarter of fiscal 2007.
Strength in both U.S. and international markets continues to reflect worldwide demand and
customer preference for our high-performance, feature-rich Falcon® II and Falcon® III tactical
radios. We received significant domestic orders in the second quarter
of fiscal 2007 from the
17
U.S. Marine Corp, U.S. Navy, and U.S. Army. International orders nearly doubled in the
second quarter of fiscal 2007 compared to the prior-year quarter, with significant orders received from Romania, the
Netherlands, Kenya, and Tajikistan. The government of Canada ordered radios for its NATO forces in
Afghanistan, where our Falcon® II AN/PRC-117-F radios are being used to provide the primary
long-range communications backbone.
Shipments to date of the new Falcon® III multiband handheld radios, the AN/PRC-152, and its
vehicular version, the AN/VRC-110, reached $130 million. These radios are now in service with the
Army, Navy, Air Force and other U.S. Government agencies and are performing well.
First Two Quarters 2007 Compared With First Two Quarters 2006: RF Communications segment
revenue increased 56.2 percent, while operating income increased 53.3 percent during the first two
quarters of 2007 when compared to the comparable prior-year period. These increases were for the
same reasons as those noted above regarding the second quarter of fiscal 2007.
Microwave Communications Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Two Quarters Ended |
|
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
% |
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
% |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Inc / (Dec) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Inc / (Dec) |
|
|
(In millions, except percentages) |
Revenue |
|
$ |
101.3 |
|
|
$ |
89.2 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
$ |
194.9 |
|
|
$ |
164.5 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
% |
Segment operating income (loss) |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
(29.5 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
(26.5 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
% of revenue |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
(33.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.2 |
% |
|
|
(16.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter 2007 Compared With Second Quarter 2006: Microwave Communications segment
revenue increased 13.6 percent from the second quarter of fiscal 2006 to the second quarter of
fiscal 2007. The segment had operating income of $8.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2007
compared to an operating loss of $29.5 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2006. Operating
income in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 was impacted by $35.5 million of charges associated with
product discontinuances and the shutdown of our manufacturing
activities in Montreal, Canada.
Increased
demand in North America during the second quarter of fiscal 2007 came from both wireless service providers and private
networks. Mobile operators are beginning to substitute microwave wireless capabilities for leased
lines to reduce network operating costs. In addition, they are expanding their geographic
footprint and increasing capacity to handle high-bandwidth voice, data, and video services.
Private network demand also increased significantly during the second quarter of fiscal 2007, driven by the need for higher bandwidth and by
the availability of Federal grant dollars to improve interoperability of public safety networks.
International demand remained strong during the second quarter of fiscal 2007 as well, with orders significantly outpacing sales,
reflecting the continued expansion of the global customer base. Europe, the Middle East and Africa
continued to dominate orders, driven by the deployment of 3G services and network expansions.
Major orders in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 were received from network operators in Romania, Nigeria, Burkina Faso,
Gabon, Benin, Niger, Togo, Kenya, Portugal, Indonesia, Russia, Brazil, and Mexico.
On January 26, 2007 we completed the combination of our Microwave Communications segment with
Stratex Networks, Inc. creating a new company, Harris Stratex
Networks (NASDAQ:HSTX). With trailing
twelve months revenue of $650 million, Harris Stratex Networks is now the largest independent global provider of wireless
transmission network solutions. We own 56 percent of the new company. The combination resulted in
a gain of approximately $131 million to us, which will be
recorded in our third quarter of fiscal 2007. Beginning
with the third quarter of fiscal 2007, results of Harris Stratex Networks will be consolidated in our
financial results, with eliminations for minority interest.
First Two Quarters 2007 Compared With First Two Quarters 2006: Microwave Communications
segment revenue increased 18.5 percent during the first two quarters of fiscal 2007 when compared
to the first two quarters of fiscal 2006. The segment had an operating profit of $16.0 million
during the first two quarters of fiscal 2007 compared to an operating loss of $26.5 million during
the first two quarters of fiscal 2006. The reasons for theses variances are the same as those noted
above regarding the second quarter of fiscal 2007 and the second quarter of
fiscal 2006, respectively.
18
Broadcast Communications Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Two Quarters Ended |
|
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
% |
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
% |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Inc / (Dec) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Inc / (Dec) |
|
|
(In millions, except percentages) |
Revenue |
|
$ |
155.0 |
|
|
$ |
135.4 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
% |
|
$ |
294.8 |
|
|
$ |
223.1 |
|
|
|
32.1 |
% |
Segment operating income (loss) |
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
306.3 |
% |
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
(8.8 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
% of revenue |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
(3.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter 2007 Compared With Second Quarter 2006: Broadcast Communications segment
revenue increased 14.5 percent from the second quarter of fiscal 2006 to the second quarter of
fiscal 2007, and operating income increased from $3.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2006
to $13.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2007. Revenue in the second quarter of fiscal 2007
benefited from the October 2005 acquisition of Leitch, and the acquisitions of OSi and Aastra
Digital Video during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006. Operating income in the second quarter of
fiscal 2006 was adversely impacted by $11.7 million of charges associated with the acquisition of
Leitch and cost-reduction actions that began in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. Sequentially,
revenue increased in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 by 10.9 percent compared to the first
quarter of fiscal 2007. Orders increased 29 percent to
$158 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2007, compared to
the prior-year
quarter, and were higher in all business areas except TV transmission systems.
Revenue
growth in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 was led by double-digit increases in the video distribution infrastructure and
digital media solutions business areas as global customers continue to upgrade to digital and
high-definition (HD) broadcast operations. Radio Transmission Systems revenue was also higher, led
by shipments of HD Radio® systems in North America. TV Transmission Systems and Software Systems
revenue declined in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 compared to the prior-year quarter.
Operating
income in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 was negatively impacted by continued lower than
expected revenue in the segments TV Transmission Systems and Software Systems business areas,
increased costs in the software systems business, and increased amortization. As a result of the
weak performance and near-term order outlook for TV Transmission Systems, a number of cost-
reduction actions are being implemented. We expect to incur related charges of
approximately $5 million in the second half of fiscal 2007 for
severance and facilities exit costs. These cost-reduction actions are expected to result
in annual cost savings of approximately $10 million in fiscal year 2008.
First Two Quarters 2007 Compared With First Two Quarters 2006: Broadcast Communications
segment revenue increased 32.1 percent during the first two quarters of fiscal 2007 when compared
to the first two quarters of fiscal 2006. The segment had operating income of $21.8 during the
first two quarters of fiscal 2007 compared to an operating loss of $8.8 million during the first
two quarters of fiscal 2006. The reasons for these variances are the same as those noted above
regarding the second quarter of fiscal 2007 and second quarter of
fiscal 2006, respectively.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two Quarters Ended |
|
|
December 29, |
|
December 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(In millions) |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
182.3 |
|
|
$ |
112.0 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
49.9 |
|
|
|
(554.7 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(48.3 |
) |
|
|
288.1 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
186.6 |
|
|
$ |
(156.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents: Our cash and cash equivalents increased $186.6 million from the end
of fiscal 2006 to $367.9 million at the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2007. The increase was
primarily due to $182.3 million of net cash provided by operating activities.
Management currently believes that existing cash, funds generated from operations, sales of
marketable securities, our credit facilities and access to the public and private debt and equity
markets will be sufficient to provide for our anticipated requirements for
19
working capital, capital expenditures and share repurchases under the current repurchase
program for the next 12 months and the foreseeable future. We expect tax payments over the next
three years to approximate our tax expense during the same period. With the exception of potential
acquisitions, no other significant cash payments are anticipated during the remainder of fiscal
2007 and thereafter, other than those noted in the Commercial Commitments and Contractual
Obligations discussion set forth below in this MD&A and the contribution of $32.1 million of cash
we made in connection with the closing of the transactions pursuant to the definitive agreement we
entered into with Stratex Networks, as described in Note N Subsequent Events in the Notes.
There can be no assurance, however, that our business will continue to generate cash flow at
current levels, or that anticipated operational improvements will be achieved. If we are unable to
maintain cash balances or generate sufficient cash flow from operations to service our obligations,
we may be required to sell assets, reduce capital expenditures, reduce or terminate our stock
repurchase program, reduce or eliminate dividends, refinance all or a portion of our existing debt
or obtain additional financing. Our ability to make scheduled principal payments, pay interest on
or refinance our indebtedness or obtain additional funding depends on our future performance and
financial results, which, to a certain extent, are subject to general conditions in or affecting
the government, defense, microwave communications and broadcast communications markets and to
general economic, political, financial, competitive, legislative and regulatory factors beyond our
control.
Net cash provided by operating activities: Our net cash provided by operating activities was
$182.3 million in the first two quarters of fiscal 2007 compared to $112.0 million in the first two
quarters of fiscal 2006. All four of our operating segments had improved cash flows for the first
two quarters of fiscal 2007 when compared to the prior-year period. The largest increase was in the
RF Communications segment primarily due to increased operating income. We expect cash flow provided
by operating activities in fiscal 2007 to be in the $400 million to $450 million range.
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities: Our net cash provided by investing
activities was $49.9 million in the first two quarters of fiscal 2007 compared to net cash used in
investing activities of $554.7 million in the first two quarters of fiscal 2006. Net cash provided
by investing activities in the first two quarters of fiscal 2007 was primarily due to the net
proceeds from the sale of short-term investments of $112.6 million. This was partially offset by
$38.8 million of property, plant and equipment additions and $23.9 million of capitalized software
additions. Our total capital expenditures, including capitalized software, in fiscal 2007 are
expected to be in the $140 million to $150 million range. Net cash used in investing activities in
the first two quarters of fiscal 2006 was primarily due to the acquisition of Leitch for $443.5
million, the net purchase of short-term investments of $56.6 million, $35.7 million of property,
plant and equipment additions and $18.9 million of capitalized software additions.
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities: Our net cash used in financing activities
in the first two quarters of fiscal 2007 was $48.3 million compared to net cash provided by
financing activities in the first two quarters of fiscal 2006 of $288.1 million. Net cash used in
financing activities in the first two quarters of fiscal 2007 included payment of $29.4 million of
cash dividends and $26.4 million used for repurchases of common stock. These amounts were partially
offset by proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options of $9.4 million.
Common Stock Repurchases
We repurchased 465,000 shares of our common stock in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 under
our repurchase program at an average price per share of $41.96. We did not repurchase any shares of
our common stock during the second quarter of fiscal 2006 under our repurchase program. During the
first two quarters of fiscal 2007, we repurchased a total of 625,000 shares of our common stock at
an average price per share of $42.24. During the first two quarters of fiscal 2006, we repurchased
a total of 150,000 shares of our common stock at an average price per share of $39.98, all of which
repurchases occurred in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. We currently expect that we will
repurchase shares of common stock to offset the dilutive effect of shares issued under our
share-based incentive plans. Additional information regarding share repurchases during the second
quarter of fiscal 2007 and our repurchase program is set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q under Part II. Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Dividend Policy
On August 26, 2006, our Board of Directors authorized an increase in our quarterly common
stock dividend rate, from $0.08 per share to $0.11 per share, for an annualized rate of $0.44 per
share. This was the fifth consecutive annual increase in our dividend rate. Our annual common stock
dividend was $0.32 per share in fiscal 2006. The declaration of dividends and the amount thereof
will depend on a number of factors, including our financial condition, capital requirements,
results of operations, future business prospects,
20
and other factors that our Board may deem relevant. There can be no assurances that annual
dividends will continue to increase or that dividends will be paid at all in the future.
Capital Structure and Resources
On March 31, 2005, we entered into a five-year senior unsecured revolving credit agreement
(the Credit Agreement) with a syndicate of lenders. The Credit Agreement provides for the
extension of credit to us in the form of revolving loans and letters of credit issuances at any
time and from time to time during the term of the Credit Agreement, in an aggregate principal
amount at any time outstanding not to exceed $500 million (we may request an increase, not to
exceed an additional $250 million). The Credit Agreement may be used for working capital and other
general corporate purposes and to support any commercial paper that we may issue. At our election,
borrowings under the Credit Agreement will bear interest either at LIBOR plus an applicable margin
or at the base rate. The base rate is a fluctuating rate equal to the higher of the Federal funds
rate plus 0.50 percent or SunTrust Banks publicly announced prime lending rate. The Credit
Agreement provides that the interest rate margin over LIBOR, initially set at 0.50 percent, will
increase or decrease within certain limits based on changes in the ratings of our senior, unsecured
long-term debt securities. We are also permitted to request borrowings with interest rates and
terms that are to be set pursuant to competitive bid procedures or directly negotiated with a
lender or lenders.
The Credit Agreement contains certain covenants, including covenants limiting: liens on our
assets; certain mergers, consolidations or sales of assets; certain sale and leaseback
transactions; certain vendor financing investments; and the use of proceeds for hostile
acquisitions. The Credit Agreement also prohibits our consolidated ratio of total indebtedness to
total capital from being greater than 0.60 to 1.00 and prohibits our consolidated ratio of adjusted
EBITDA to net interest expense from being less than 3.00 to 1.00 for any rolling four-quarter
period. The Credit Agreement contains certain events of default, including payment defaults;
failure to perform or observe terms and covenants; material inaccuracy of representations or
warranties; default under other indebtedness with a principal amount in excess of $50 million; the
occurrence of one or more judgments or orders for the payment of money in excess of $50 million
that remain unsatisfied; incurrence of certain ERISA liabilities in excess of $50 million; failure
to pay debts as they come due, or our bankruptcy; or a change of control, including if a person or
group becomes the beneficial owner of 25 percent or more of our voting stock. If an event of
default occurs the lenders may, among other things, terminate their commitments and declare all
outstanding borrowings, together with accrued interest and fees, to be immediately due and payable.
All amounts borrowed or outstanding under the Credit Agreement are due and mature on March 31,
2010, unless the commitments are terminated earlier either at our request or if certain events of
default occur. At December 29, 2006, no borrowings were outstanding under the Credit Agreement.
On September 20, 2005, we completed the issuance of $300 million in aggregate principal amount
of 5% Notes due October 1, 2015. Interest on the notes is payable on April 1 and October 1 of each
year. We may redeem the notes in whole, or in part, at any time at the make-whole redemption
price. The make-whole redemption price is equal to the greater of 100 percent of the principal
amount of the notes being redeemed or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled
payments of the principal and interest (other than interest accruing to the date of redemption) on
the notes being redeemed, discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis (assuming a
360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) at the Treasury Rate, as defined, plus 15 basis
points. In each case, we will pay accrued interest on the principal amount of the notes being
redeemed to the redemption date. We incurred $4.1 million in debt issuance costs and discounts
related to the issuance of the notes, which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a
ten-year period and reflected as a portion of interest expense in the Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Income.
We have a universal shelf registration statement related to the potential future issuance of
an indeterminate amount of securities, including debt securities, preferred stock, common stock,
fractional interest in preferred stock represented by depository shares and warrants to purchase
debt securities, preferred stock or common stock.
In fiscal 2003, we issued $150 million in aggregate principal amount of 3.5% Convertible
Debentures due 2022. These debentures are convertible at a conversion price of $22.625 during any
calendar quarter if the closing price of our common stock, for at least 20 trading days in the 30
consecutive trading day period ending on the last trading day of the prior calendar quarter, is
more than $24.8875, and in certain other circumstances as described in Note I Net Income Per
Diluted Share in the Notes. Based upon satisfaction of the market price trigger as of the end of
the calendar quarter ended December 31, 2006, these debentures are convertible during the calendar
quarter ended March 31, 2007 into shares of our common stock.
In addition to our $150 million 3.5% Convertible Debentures and $300 million 5% Notes
mentioned above, we have outstanding unsecured long-term debt securities of $250.9 million. The
earliest maturity date of any such long-term debt securities is fiscal 2008.
21
We have uncommitted short-term lines of credit. These lines provide for borrowings at various
interest rates, typically may be terminated upon notice, may be used on such terms as mutually
agreed to by the banks and us and are reviewed annually for renewal or modification. These lines do
not require compensating balances. We have a short-term commercial paper program in place, which we
may utilize to satisfy short-term cash requirements. There were no borrowings under the commercial
paper program at December 29, 2006.
Our debt is currently rated BBB by Standard and Poors Rating Group and Baa2 by Moodys
Investors Service. We expect to maintain operating ratios, fixed-charge coverage ratios and balance
sheet ratios sufficient for retention of or improvement to these debt ratings. There are no
assurances that our credit ratings will not be reduced in the future. If our credit rating is
lowered below investment grade, then we may not be able to issue short-term commercial paper, but
may instead need to borrow under our credit facilities or pursue other options. We do not currently
foresee losing our investment-grade debt ratings, however, no assurances can be given. If our debt
ratings were downgraded, however, it could adversely impact, among other things, our future
borrowing costs and access to capital markets.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In accordance with the definition under SEC rules, any of the following qualify as off-balance
sheet arrangements:
|
|
|
Any obligation under certain guarantee contracts; |
|
|
|
|
A retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity or
similar entity or similar arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk
support to that entity for such assets; |
|
|
|
|
Any obligation, including a contingent obligation, under certain derivative instruments;
and |
|
|
|
|
Any obligation, including a contingent obligation, under a material variable interest
held by the registrant in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity,
market risk or credit risk support to the registrant, or engages in leasing, hedging or
research and development services with the registrant. |
During the quarter ended September 29, 2006, our Broadcast Communications segment entered into
an agreement to sell products and services to a customer (the Customer) in connection with the
Customers prime contract (the Prime Contract) to provide 19 transmission stations to a state
agency (the Agency). Pursuant to the terms of the Prime Contract, the Customer was required to
post a $20 million bond in favor of the Agency to secure the Customers obligations under the Prime
Contract. In order to facilitate the issuance of the bond, we entered into an agreement with the
Customer and the bond surety to provide additional indemnity to the surety in the event the surety
incurs any loss by reason of executing such bond. Our indemnity obligations are supported by, among
other things, $2 million in irrevocable standby letters of credit obtained by the Customer in favor
of Harris; a guarantee from the Customer, as primary guarantor, in favor of Harris of up to
approximately $11 million; personal guarantees from certain principals of the Customer, as
secondary guarantors, in favor of Harris of up to approximately $11 million in the aggregate; an
additional fee payable by the Customer to Harris of up to $300,000; certain additional undertakings
by the Customer to Harris with respect to the amount of Harris products and services to be sold by
Harris to the Customer in connection with the Customers Prime Contract with the Agency; an
agreement by the Customer to use best efforts to include Harris in any resolution procedure should
default be declared or a claim be made to the bond; and an agreement with the Customer, to the
extent the Customer is able, recommending Harris step into the Customers place in the event the
Customer is not able to perform under the Prime Contract with the Agency. The bond may remain
outstanding until February 2010. We believe that the technical, project and financial risks
associated with our agreement to provide additional indemnity to the surety is remote and should
not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
There is a $9.0 million potential payment to the former owners of OSi if certain financial
performance criteria are met in the future. There is also a potential payment to the former owners
of Question dImage, which we purchased in fiscal 2005, if certain financial performance criteria
are met. Liabilities are not reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet for these
potential payments until the performance criteria have been met. If the performance criteria
related to these payments are met in the future, we will accrue the liability and adjust goodwill
on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet in the period that the performance criteria are met.
Currently we are not participating in transactions that generate relationships with
unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, including variable interest entities, and we do
not have any material retained or contingent interest in assets as defined above. As of
22
December 29, 2006, we did not have material financial guarantees or other contractual
commitments that are reasonably likely to adversely affect liquidity. In addition, we are not
currently a party to any related party transactions that materially affect our results of
operations, cash flows or financial condition.
Commercial Commitments and Contractual Obligations
The amounts disclosed in our Fiscal 2006 Form 10-K include our commercial commitments and
contractual obligations. During the two quarters ended December 29, 2006, other than the
aforementioned agreement by Harris to provide additional indemnity to the surety in respect of a
$20 million bond posted by our Broadcast Communications segments Customer in favor of the Agency,
no material changes occurred in our contractual cash obligations to repay debt, to purchase goods
and services and to make payments under operating leases or our commercial commitments and
contingent liabilities on outstanding letters of credit, guarantees and other arrangements as
disclosed in our Fiscal 2006
Form 10-K.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) and accompanying Notes are
prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Preparing financial
statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are affected by the
application of our accounting policies. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note
1: Significant Accounting Policies in our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in
our Fiscal 2006 Form 10-K. Critical accounting policies and estimates are those that require
application of managements most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of
matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods. Critical accounting
policies and estimates for us include: (i) revenue recognition on development and production
contracts and contract estimates, (ii) provisions for excess and obsolete inventory losses, (iii)
valuation of selected investments, (iv) impairment testing of goodwill, (v) income taxes and tax
valuation allowances, and (vi) assumptions used to record stock option and share-based
compensation. For additional discussion of our critical accounting policies and estimates, see our
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our
Fiscal 2006 Form 10-K.
Impact Of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
As described in Note A Basis of Presentation and Recent Accounting Pronouncements in the
Notes, there are accounting pronouncements that have recently been issued but not yet implemented
by us. Note A includes a description of the potential impact that these pronouncements are expected
to have on our financial position, cash flows and results of operations.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they do not materialize or prove correct, could
cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be
deemed forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, statements: of our plans,
strategies and objectives for future operations; concerning new products, services or developments;
regarding future economic conditions, performance or outlook; as to the outcome of contingencies;
as to the value of our contract awards and programs; of expected cash flows or capital
expenditures; of beliefs or expectations; and of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing.
Forward-looking statements may be identified by their use of forward-looking terminology, such as
believes, expects, may, should, would, will, intends, plans, estimates,
anticipates, projects and similar words or expressions. You should not place undue reliance on
forward-looking statements, which reflect managements opinions only as of the date of the filing
of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Forward-looking statements are made in reliance upon the
safe harbor provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Our consolidated results and
the forward-looking statements could be affected by many factors, including:
|
|
|
our participation in markets that are often subject to uncertain economic conditions,
which makes it difficult to estimate growth in our markets and, as a result, future income
and expenditures; |
|
|
|
|
our dependence on the U.S. Government for a significant portion of our revenue, as the
loss of this relationship or a shift in U.S. Government funding could have adverse
consequences on our future business; |
23
|
|
|
potential changes in U.S. Government or other customer priorities due to program reviews
or revisions to strategic objectives, including termination of or potential failure to fund
U.S. Government contracts; |
|
|
|
|
risks inherent in large long-term fixed price contracts, particularly the risk that we
may not be able to contain cost overruns; |
|
|
|
|
financial, governmental and regulatory risks relating to international sales and
operations, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and the effectiveness
of our currency hedging program, and in certain regions, such as Africa and the Middle East,
risks of instability, violence and armed conflict; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to continue to develop new products that achieve market acceptance; |
|
|
|
|
the consequences of future geo-political events, which may affect adversely the markets
in which we operate, our ability to insure against risks, our operations or our
profitability; |
|
|
|
|
strategic acquisitions and the risks and uncertainties related thereto, including our
ability to manage and integrate acquired businesses; |
|
|
|
|
the performance of critical subcontractors or suppliers; |
|
|
|
|
potential claims that we are infringing the intellectual property rights of third parties; |
|
|
|
|
the successful resolution of patent infringement claims and the ultimate outcome of other
contingencies, litigation and legal matters; |
|
|
|
|
customer credit risk; |
|
|
|
|
the fair values of our portfolio of passive investments, which values are subject to significant price volatility or erosion; |
|
|
|
|
risks inherent in developing new technologies; |
|
|
|
|
the potential impact of hurricanes on our operations in Florida and the potential impact
of earthquakes on our operations in California; |
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions in the markets in which we operate; and |
|
|
|
|
changes in our effective tax rate that may have an adverse effect on our results of operations. |
Additional details and discussions concerning some of the factors that could affect our
forward-looking statements or future results are set forth in our Fiscal 2006 Form 10-K under Item
1A. Risk Factors. The foregoing list of factors and the factors set forth in Item 1A. Risk
Factors included in our Fiscal 2006 Form 10-K are not exhaustive. Additional risks and
uncertainties not known to us or that we currently believe not to be material also may adversely
impact our operations and financial position. Should any risks or uncertainties develop into actual
events, these developments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations. The forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q are made as of the date hereof and we disclaim any intention or obligation,
other than imposed by law, to update or revise any forward-looking statements or to update the
reasons actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. For further
information concerning risk factors, see Part II. Item 1A. Risk Factors in this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
In the normal course of doing business, we are exposed to the risks associated with foreign
currency exchange rates and changes in interest rates. We employ established policies and
procedures governing the use of financial instruments to manage our exposure to such risks.
Foreign Exchange and Currency: We use foreign exchange contracts and options to hedge both
balance sheet and off-balance sheet future foreign currency commitments. Generally, these foreign
exchange contracts offset foreign currency denominated inventory and purchase commitments from
suppliers, accounts receivable from and future committed sales to customers, and
24
intercompany loans. We believe the use of foreign currency financial instruments should reduce
the risks that arise from doing business in international markets. At December 29, 2006, we had
open foreign exchange contracts with a notional amount of $43.9 million, of which $21.4 million
were classified as cash flow hedges and $22.6 million were classified as fair value hedges. This
compares to open foreign exchange contracts with a notional amount of $45.7 million as of June 30,
2006, of which $15.7 million were classified as cash flow hedges and $30.0 million were classified
as fair value hedges. At December 29, 2006, contract expiration dates ranged from less than one
month to 15 months with a weighted average contract life of 4.3 months.
More specifically, the foreign exchange contracts classified as cash flow hedges are primarily
being used to hedge currency exposures from cash flows anticipated on two programs in the U.K. for
our RF Communications segment, payments to a vendor in the U.K. that is supporting one of our
government contracts in our Government Communications Systems segment and various intercompany
transactions in our RF Communications segment between the U.K. and U.S. operations and in our
Broadcast Communications segment between our European, Asia Pacific and Canadian operations. As of
December 29, 2006, we estimated that a pre-tax loss of less than $1.5 million would be reclassified
into net income from comprehensive income within the next 14 months related to these cash flow
hedges.
The net gain included in our net income in the first two quarters of fiscal 2007 and the first
two quarters of fiscal 2006 representing the amount of fair value and cash flow hedges
ineffectiveness was not material. No amounts were recognized in our net income in the first two
quarters of fiscal 2007 or the first two quarters of fiscal 2006 related to the component of the
derivative instruments gain or loss excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. In
addition, no amounts were recognized in our net income in the first two quarters of fiscal 2007 or
the first two quarters of fiscal 2006 related to hedged firm commitments that no longer qualify as
fair value hedges. All of these derivatives were recorded at their fair value on the balance sheet
in accordance with FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
Factors that could impact the effectiveness of our hedging programs for foreign currency
include accuracy of sales estimates, volatility of currency markets and the cost and availability
of hedging instruments. A 10 percent adverse change in currency exchange rates for our foreign
currency derivatives held at December 29, 2006 would have an impact of approximately $3.9 million
on the fair value of such instruments. This quantification of exposure to the market risk
associated with foreign exchange financial instruments does not take into account the offsetting
impact of changes in the fair value of our foreign denominated assets, liabilities and firm
commitments.
Interest Rates: We utilize a balanced mix of debt maturities, along with both fixed-rate and
variable-rate debt and available lines of credit to manage our exposure to changes in interest
rates. We do not expect changes in interest rates to have a material effect on income or cash flows
in fiscal 2007, although there can be no assurances that interest rates will not change
significantly.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures: We maintain disclosure controls and
procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports
filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms. Our disclosure controls and procedures include,
without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. There are inherent limitations to the
effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of
human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even
effective disclosure controls and procedures can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving
their control objectives, and management necessarily is required to use its judgment in evaluating
the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Also, we have investments in
certain unconsolidated entities. As we do not control or manage those entities, our controls and
procedures with respect to those entities are necessarily substantially more limited than those we
maintain with respect to our consolidated subsidiaries. As required by Rule 13a-15 under the
Exchange Act, as of the end of the fiscal quarter ended December 29, 2006, we carried out an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our
senior management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer. Based
upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded
that as of the end of the fiscal quarter ended December 29, 2006 our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective.
(b) Changes in internal control: We periodically review our system of internal control over
financial reporting as part of our efforts to ensure compliance with the requirements of Section
404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. In addition, we periodically
25
review our system of internal control over financial reporting to identify potential changes
to our processes and systems that may improve controls and increase efficiency, while ensuring that
we maintain an effective internal control environment. Changes may include such activities as
implementing new, more efficient systems, consolidating the activities of acquired business units,
migrating certain processes to our shared services organizations, formalizing policies and
procedures, improving segregation of duties, and adding additional monitoring controls. In
addition, when we acquire new businesses, we incorporate our controls and procedures into the
acquired business as part of our integration activities. There have been no changes in our internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended December 29, 2006
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
Not Applicable.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Investors should carefully review and consider the information regarding certain factors which
could materially affect our business, operating results, cash flows and financial condition set
forth under Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Fiscal 2006 Form 10-K. We do not believe that there have
been any material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our Fiscal 2006 Form 10-K,
although we may disclose changes to such factors or disclose additional factors from time to time
in our future filings with the SEC.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
During the second quarter of fiscal 2007, we repurchased 465,000 shares of our common stock at
an average price per share of $41.96. During the second quarter of fiscal 2006, we did not
repurchase any shares of our common stock. We currently expect that we will repurchase shares of
our common stock to offset the dilutive effect of shares issued under our share-based incentive
plans. However, the level of repurchases also depends on a number of factors, including our
financial condition, capital requirements, results of operations, future business prospects, and
other factors our Board of Directors may deem relevant. Shares repurchased by us are cancelled and
retired.
The following table sets forth information with respect to repurchases by us of our common
stock during the fiscal quarter ended December 29, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of shares |
|
Maximum number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
purchased as part of |
|
shares that may yet be |
|
|
Total number of |
|
Average price paid |
|
publicly announced |
|
purchased under the |
Period* |
|
shares purchased |
|
per share |
|
plans or programs (1) |
|
plans or programs (1) |
Month No. 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(September 30, 2006October 27, 2006) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase Programs (1) |
|
None |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
None |
|
|
3,356,000 |
|
Employee Transactions (2) |
|
|
8,175 |
|
|
$ |
44.18 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Month
No. 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
(October 28, 2006November 24, 2006) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase Programs (1) |
|
|
465,000 |
|
|
$ |
41.96 |
|
|
|
465,000 |
|
|
|
2,891,000 |
|
Employee Transactions (2) |
|
|
85,283 |
|
|
$ |
40.56 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Month
No. 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
(November 25, 2006December 29, 2006) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase Programs (1) |
|
None |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
None |
|
|
2,891,000 |
|
Employee Transactions (2) |
|
|
19,332 |
|
|
$ |
44.03 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
577,790 |
|
|
$ |
41.85 |
|
|
|
465,000 |
|
|
|
2,891,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Periods represent our fiscal months. |
26
(1) |
|
On April 27, 2004, we announced that our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase
program that authorizes us to repurchase, on a post-stock split basis, up to 6 million shares
through open-market transactions, or in negotiated block transactions. This program does not
have an expiration date. The maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under our
currently authorized repurchase program as of December 29, 2006 is 2,891,000. As a matter of
policy, we do not repurchase shares during the period beginning on the 15th day of the third
month of a fiscal quarter and ending two days following the public release of earnings and
financial results for such fiscal quarter. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents a combination of (a) shares of our common stock delivered to us in satisfaction of
the exercise price and/or tax withholding obligation by holders of employee stock options who
exercised stock options, (b) shares of our common stock delivered to us in satisfaction of the
tax withholding obligation of holders of performance shares or restricted shares which vested
during the quarter, (c) performance or restricted shares returned to us upon the retirement or
employment termination of employees, or (d) shares of our common stock purchased by the
trustee of the Harris Corporation Master Rabbi Trust at our direction to fund obligations
under our deferred compensation plans. Our equity incentive plans provide that the value of
shares delivered to us to pay the exercise price of options or to cover tax withholding
obligations shall be the closing price of our common stock on the date the relevant
transaction occurs. |
Sales of Unregistered Securities
During the second quarter of fiscal 2007, we did not issue or sell any unregistered equity
securities.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Not Applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Our 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on October 27, 2006. A total of 120,524,099
of our outstanding shares were represented in person or by proxy at the meeting. This represented
approximately 90% of our shares issued, outstanding and entitled to be voted at the 2006 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders.
(1) Proposal 1: Shareholders elected four nominees to our Board of Directors for a three-year
term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders in 2009, or until their successors are elected
and qualified. The vote tabulation for individual directors was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
Nominee |
|
For |
|
Withheld |
Terry D. Growcock |
|
|
120,111,734 |
|
|
|
412,365 |
|
Leslie F. Kenne |
|
|
119,883,575 |
|
|
|
640,524 |
|
David B. Rickard |
|
|
119,994,892 |
|
|
|
529,207 |
|
Gregory T. Swienton |
|
|
119,980,429 |
|
|
|
543,670 |
|
The terms of the following directors also continued after the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:
|
|
|
Thomas A. Dattilo |
|
|
|
|
Lewis Hay III |
|
|
|
|
Karen Katen |
|
|
|
|
Stephen P. Kaufman |
|
|
|
|
Howard L. Lance |
|
|
|
|
Dr. James C. Stoffel |
|
|
|
|
Hansel E. Tookes II |
(2) Proposal 2: To ratify our Audit Committees appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our
independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending June 29, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
119,955,695
|
|
483,526
|
|
84,877 |
Proposal 2 was approved by our shareholders.
27
Item 5. Other Information.
Not Applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits.
The following exhibits are filed herewith or incorporated by reference to exhibits previously
filed with the SEC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
(a) Underwriting Agreement dated as of September 15, 2005 among Harris Corporation and
Morgan Stanley Co. Incorporated and Bank of America Securities, LLC, on behalf of several
underwriters, named therein, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 16, 2005. (Commission File Number
1-3863) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
(a) Formation, Contribution and Merger Agreement, dated as of September 5, 2006, between
Harris Corporation and Stratex Networks, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
2.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 8, 2006.
(Commission File Number 1-3863) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)(i) Arrangement Agreement between Harris Corporation and Leitch Technology
Corporation, dated August 31, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 2, 2005. (Commission
File Number 1-3863) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) Amending Agreement, dated as of September 12, 2005, between Harris Corporation
and Leitch Technology Corporation, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 16, 2005. (Commission
File Number 1-3863) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 6, 2004, by and among Harris
Corporation, Sunshine Merger Corp. and Encoda Systems Holdings, Inc., incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC
on October 6, 2004. (Commission File Number 1-3863) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
(a) Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Harris Corporation (1995), incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended March 31, 1996. (Commission File Number 1-3863) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) By-Laws of Harris Corporation, as amended and restated effective October 28, 2005,
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on November 3, 2005. (Commission File Number 1-3863) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
(a) Specimen stock certificate for the Companys Common Stock, incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4(a) to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended December 31, 2004. (Commission File Number 1-3863) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)(i) Indenture, dated as of May 1, 1996, between Harris Corporation and The Bank of New
York, as Trustee, relating to unlimited amounts of debt securities which may be issued from
time to time by the Company when and as authorized by the Companys Board of Directors or a
Committee of the Board, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-03111, filed with the
SEC on May 3, 1996. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) Instrument of Resignation from Trustee and Appointment and Acceptance of
Successor Trustee among Harris Corporation, JP Morgan Chase Bank, as Resigning Trustee and
The Bank of New York, as Successor Trustee, dated as of November 1, 2002 (effective
November 15, 2002), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.4 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 27, 2002. (Commission
File Number 1-3863) |
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Indenture, dated as of October 1, 1990, between Harris Corporation and National City
Bank, as Trustee, relating to unlimited amounts of debt securities which may be issued from
time to time by the Company when and as authorized by the Companys Board of Directors or a
Committee of the Board, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 33-35315, filed with the SEC
on June 8, 1990. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Indenture, dated as of August 26, 2002, between Harris Corporation and The Bank of New
York, as Trustee, relating to $150,000,000 of 3.5% Convertible Debentures due 2022,
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form
8-K filed with the SEC on August 26, 2002. (Commission File Number 1-3863) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e) Indenture, dated as of September 3, 2003, between Harris Corporation and The Bank of
New York, as Trustee, relating to unlimited amounts of debt securities which may be issued
from time to time by the Company when and as authorized by the Companys Board of Directors
or a committee of the Board, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4(b) to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-108486, filed
with the SEC on September 3, 2003. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(f) Subordinated Indenture, dated as of September 3, 2003, between Harris Corporation and
The Bank of New York, as Trustee, relating to unlimited amounts of debt securities which
may be issued from time to time by the Company when and as authorized by the Companys
Board of Directors or a committee of the Board, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
4(c) to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-3, Registration Statement No.
333-108486, filed with the SEC on September 3, 2003. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g) Pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 601 (b) (4) (iii), Registrant by this filing agrees,
upon request, to furnish to the SEC a copy of other instruments defining the rights of
holders of long-term debt of the Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
(10) |
|
(a) Supplemental Pension Plan for Howard L. Lance, effective as of
October 27, 2006, between Harris Corporation and Howard L. Lance, incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
November 2, 2006. (Commission File Number 1-3863) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
(10) |
|
(b) Amendment Number Two to the Harris Corporation Retirement Plan dated
December 20, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
Letter Regarding Unaudited Interim Financial Information. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31.1 |
) |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31.2 |
) |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32.1 |
) |
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32.2 |
) |
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory
plan or arrangement. |
29
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
HARRIS CORPORATION
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: January 31, 2007 |
By: |
/s/ Gary L. McArthur
|
|
|
|
Gary L. McArthur |
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer and duly authorized officer) |
|
30
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
|
Under Reg. S-K, |
|
|
Item 601 |
|
Description |
|
|
(1) |
|
|
(a) Underwriting Agreement dated as of September 15, 2005 among Harris Corporation and
Morgan Stanley Co. Incorporated and Bank of America Securities, LLC, on behalf of several
underwriters, named therein, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 16, 2005. (Commission File
Number 1-3863) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
(a) Formation, Contribution and Merger Agreement, dated as of September 5, 2006, between
Harris Corporation and Stratex Networks, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
2.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 8, 2006.
(Commission File Number 1-3863) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)(i) Arrangement Agreement between Harris Corporation and Leitch Technology Corporation,
dated August 31, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 2, 2005. (Commission File Number 1-3863) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) Amending Agreement, dated as of September 12, 2005, between Harris Corporation and
Leitch Technology Corporation, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 16, 2005. (Commission
File Number 1-3863) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 6, 2004, by and among Harris
Corporation, Sunshine Merger Corp. and Encoda Systems Holdings, Inc., incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC
on October 6, 2004. (Commission File Number 1-3863) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
(a) Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Harris Corporation (1995), incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended March 31, 1996. (Commission File Number 1-3863) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) By-Laws of Harris Corporation as amended and restated effective October 28, 2005,
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on November 3, 2005. (Commission File Number 1-3863) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
(a) Specimen stock certificate for the Companys Common Stock, incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4(a) to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended December 31, 2004. (Commission File Number 1-3863) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) (i) Indenture, dated as of May 1, 1996, between Harris Corporation and The Bank of New
York, as Trustee, relating to unlimited amounts of debt securities which may be issued from
time to time by the Company when and as authorized by the Companys Board of Directors or a
Committee of the Board, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-03111, filed with the
SEC on May 3, 1996. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) Instrument of Resignation from Trustee and Appointment and Acceptance of Successor
Trustee among Harris Corporation, JP Morgan Chase Bank, as Resigning Trustee, and The Bank
of New York, as Successor Trustee, dated as of November 1, 2002 (effective November 15,
2002), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.4 to the Companys Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 27, 2002. (Commission File Number
1-3863) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Indenture, dated as of October 1, 1990, between Harris Corporation and National City
Bank, as Trustee, relating to unlimited amounts of debt securities which may be issued from
time to time by the Company when and as authorized by the Companys Board of Directors or a
Committee of the Board, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 33-35315, filed with the SEC
on June 8, 1990. |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
|
Under Reg. S-K, |
|
|
Item 601 |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Indenture, dated as of August 26, 2002, between Harris Corporation and The Bank of New
York, as Trustee, relating to $150,000,000 of 3.5% Convertible Debentures due 2022,
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form
8-K filed with the SEC on August 26, 2002. (Commission File Number 1-3863) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e) Indenture, dated as of September 3, 2003, between Harris Corporation and The Bank of
New York, as Trustee, relating to unlimited amounts of debt securities which may be issued
from time to time by the Company when and as authorized by the Companys Board of Directors
or a committee of the Board, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4(b) to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-108486, filed
with the SEC on September 3, 2003. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(f) Subordinated Indenture, dated as of September 3, 2003, between Harris Corporation and
The Bank of New York, as Trustee, relating to unlimited amounts of debt securities which
may be issued from time to time by the Company when and as authorized by the Companys
Board of Directors or a committee of the Board, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
4(c) to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-3, Registration Statement No.
333-108486, filed with the SEC on September 3, 2003. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g) Pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 601 (b) (4) (iii), Registrant by this filing agrees,
upon request, to furnish to the SEC a copy of other instruments defining the rights of
holders of long-term debt of the Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
(10) |
|
(a) Supplemental Pension Plan for Howard L. Lance, effective as of October 27, 2006,
between Harris Corporation and Howard L. Lance, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 2, 2006.
(Commission File Number 1-3863) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
(10) |
|
(b) Amendment Number Two to the Harris Corporation Retirement Plan, dated December 20, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
Letter Regarding Unaudited Interim Financial Information. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31.1 |
) |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31.2 |
) |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32.1 |
) |
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32.2 |
) |
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory
plan or arrangement. |