United States
Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.                     )

		Filed by the registrant þ
		Filed by a party other than the registrant o
		Check the appropriate box:
o		Preliminary proxy statement
o		Confidential, for use of the Commission only
		(as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ		Definitive proxy statement
o		Definitive additional materials
o		Soliciting material pursuant to § 240.14a-12

Brightpoint, Inc

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, If Other Than Registrant)

Payment of filing fee (Check the appropriate box):

	þ		No fee required.
	o		Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

     

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

     

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined.)

       

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

       

(5)

Total Fee Paid:

       

o

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:

       

o

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

       

(1)

Amount previously paid:

       

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

       

(3)

Filing party:

       

(4)

Date filed:

       

March 31, 2008

Dear Shareholder:

     You are cordially invited to attend the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Brightpoint, Inc. that will be held on Tuesday, May 13, 2008, at 9:00 a.m. local time, at Brightpoint’s Americas division headquarters located at 501 Airtech Parkway, Plainfield, Indiana 46168.

     This year, we are pleased to be taking advantage of a new Securities and Exchange Commission rule that allows companies to furnish their proxy materials over the Internet. As a result, we are mailing to many of our shareholders a notice instead of a paper copy of this proxy statement and our 2007 Annual Report to Shareholders. The notice contains instructions on how to access those documents over the Internet. The notice also contains instructions on how each of those shareholders can receive a paper copy of our proxy materials, including this proxy statement, our 2007 Annual Report to Shareholders and a proxy card. We believe that this new process will provide our shareholders with easier access to these proxy materials, reduce the costs of printing and distributing our proxy materials and conserve environmental resources.

     At the annual meeting you will be asked to vote on proposals to (1) elect as Class II directors the nominees specified in the accompanying proxy statement, (2) approve an amendment of our 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares available for issuance thereunder by 2,173,953 shares, and (3) ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. In addition, you will be asked to act on such other business as may properly come before the annual meeting.

     Your board of directors believes that each of the foregoing proposals is in the best interests of Brightpoint and its shareholders and, accordingly, unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” each of such proposals.

     Enclosed is a notice of annual meeting and proxy statement containing detailed information concerning the foregoing proposals. Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, we urge you to read this material carefully and encourage you to vote promptly. You may vote your shares via a toll-free telephone number or over the Internet. If you received a proxy card by mail, you may vote by signing, dating and mailing the proxy card in the envelope provided. Instructions regarding all three methods of voting are contained on the proxy card.

     Thank you and I look forward to seeing you at the meeting.

Sincerely yours,

Robert J. Laikin
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
OF BRIGHTPOINT, INC.
TO BE HELD ON MAY 13, 2008

To the Shareholders of Brightpoint, Inc.:

     NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Brightpoint, Inc., an Indiana corporation, will be held on May 13, 2008, at 9:00 a.m. local time, at Brightpoint’s Americas division headquarters located at 501 Airtech Parkway, Plainfield, Indiana 46168, to consider and vote upon the following matters, as explained more fully in the accompanying proxy statement:

	1.		a proposal to elect three Class II directors, each to hold office until Brightpoint’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in 2011;
	2.		a proposal to approve the amendment of Brightpoint’s 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”) to increase the number of shares available for issuance thereunder by 2,173,953 shares;
	3.		a proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Brightpoint’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008; and
	4.		any other matters properly brought before the annual meeting, including approval of any adjournment or postponement of the meeting.

     It is anticipated that a presentation will be made by a member of our senior management after the foregoing business has been conducted at the annual meeting. A live webcast of the presentation, including audio and slides, can be accessed through the “Investors” section of Brightpoint’s website at www.brightpoint.com. A written report of the results of the annual meeting will be posted on Brightpoint’s website following the annual meeting.

     Only shareholders of record at the close of business on March 17, 2008 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof. You may vote your shares via a toll-free telephone number or over the Internet. If you received a proxy card by mail, you may vote by signing, dating and mailing the proxy card in the envelope provided. Whether or not you attend the meeting, it is important that your shares be represented and voted.

     Your board of directors believes that the election of the nominees specified in the accompanying proxy statement as directors at the annual meeting is in the best interests of Brightpoint and its shareholders and, accordingly, unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” such nominees. Further, the board believes that the proposed amendment to Brightpoint’s 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Brightpoint’s independent registered public accounting firm are each in the best interests of Brightpoint and its shareholders and, accordingly, unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” each of such proposals.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Steven E. Fivel
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Plainfield, Indiana
March 31, 2008

     YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, PLEASE ENSURE YOU TAKE THE TIME TO CAST YOUR VOTE.

     YOU MAY VOTE BY SUBMITTING YOUR PROXY BY TELEPHONE, THE INTERNET OR MAIL. IF YOU ARE A REGISTERED SHAREHOLDER AND ATTEND THE MEETING, YOU MAY REVOKE YOUR PROXY AND VOTE YOUR SHARES IN PERSON. IF YOU HOLD YOUR SHARES THROUGH A BANK OR BROKER AND WANT TO VOTE YOUR SHARES IN PERSON AT THE MEETING, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR BANK OR BROKER TO OBTAIN A LEGAL PROXY.

BRIGHTPOINT, INC.

2008 PROXY STATEMENT

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 13, 2008
GENERAL INFORMATION

     This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our board of directors for use at our annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May 13, 2008, at 9:00 a.m. local time, at Brightpoint’s Americas division headquarters located at 501 Airtech Parkway, Plainfield, Indiana 46168, including any adjournments or postponements thereof. At the annual meeting, Brightpoint shareholders will have the opportunity to consider and vote upon the proposals set forth in the accompanying notice to shareholders, including the following, each of which is discussed in further detail elsewhere in this proxy statement:

	•		the election of three Class II directors to serve as such commencing immediately following the annual meeting and until the annual meeting of shareholders in 2011;
	•		approval of an amendment to our 2004 Plan to increase the number of shares available for issuance thereunder by 2,173,953 shares;
	•		ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008; and
	•		any other matters properly brought before the annual meeting, including approval of any adjournment or postponement of the meeting.

     The board of directors of Brightpoint has unanimously approved each of the foregoing proposals and unanimously recommends that Brightpoint shareholders vote “FOR” each of the proposals set forth above, each as outlined elsewhere in this proxy statement.

     It is anticipated that all of our directors and executive officers will be present at the annual meeting and that a presentation will be made after the conclusion of the business to be conducted at the annual meeting.

     Proxies in the accompanying form, duly executed and returned to Brightpoint’s management and not revoked, will be voted at the annual meeting. Any proxy given by a shareholder may be revoked by the shareholder at any time prior to the voting of the proxy by a subsequently dated proxy, by written notification to Brightpoint’s corporate secretary, or by personally withdrawing the proxy at the annual meeting and voting in person.

     Unless otherwise indicated, all references in this proxy statement to “we,” “us,” “our,” “our company,” or “the company” refer to Brightpoint, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

AVAILABILITY OF PROXY STATEMENT AND QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE
PROPOSALS TO BE VOTED UPON AND THE VOTING PROCEDURES

     Notice of Electronic Availability of Proxy Statement and Annual Report. As permitted by rules recently adopted by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (sometimes referred to as the SEC), Brightpoint is making this proxy statement and its annual report available to its shareholders electronically via the Internet. On March 31, 2008, we mailed to our shareholders a notice containing instructions on how to access this proxy statement and our annual report and vote online. If you received a notice by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials in the mail. The notice instructs you on how to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy statement and annual report. The notice also instructs you on how you may submit your proxy over the Internet. If you received a Notice by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in the notice.

Q.		What am I voting on?
A.		You are being asked to vote on three proposals at this year’s annual meeting:
		Proposal 1 — to elect three Class II directors (Thorleif Krarup, Marisa E. Pratt and Richard W. Roedel) to serve as such commencing immediately following our May 2008 annual meeting and until our annual meeting of shareholders in 2011;
		Proposal 2 — to approve the amendment of our 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares available for issuance thereunder by 2,173,953 shares; and
		Proposal 3 — to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008.
		In addition, you may be asked to consider and vote upon other matters that may properly come before the annual meeting, including approval of any adjournment or postponement of the meeting.
Q.		Who is entitled to vote at the annual meeting?
A.		Shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 17, 2008, the record date, are entitled to vote on each of the proposals at the annual meeting. Each shareholder is entitled to one vote per each share of our common stock held by such shareholder on the record date with respect to each proposal.
Q.		How do I vote?
A.		Shareholders can vote in person at the annual meeting or by proxy. There are three ways to vote by proxy:
		•    By Telephone — You can vote by telephone by calling 1-800-690-6903 and following the instructions on the proxy card;
		•    By Internet — You can vote over the Internet at www.proxyvote.com by following the instructions on the proxy card; or
		•    By Mail — If you received your proxy materials by mail, you can vote by mail by signing, dating and mailing the enclosed proxy card.

		Telephone and Internet voting facilities for shareholders of record will be available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m. (EDT) on May 12, 2008.
		If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, you will receive instructions from the holder of record. You must follow the instructions of the holder of record in order for your shares to be voted. Telephone and Internet voting also will be offered to shareholders owning shares through certain banks and brokers. If your shares are not registered in your own name and you plan to vote your shares in person at the annual meeting, you should contact your broker or agent to obtain a legal proxy or broker’s proxy card and bring it to the annual meeting in order to vote.
Q.		How may I revoke or change my vote?
A.		You have the right to revoke your proxy any time before the meeting by (a) notifying Brightpoint’s corporate secretary of your revocation or (b) returning a later-dated proxy. The last vote received chronologically will supersede any prior vote. You may also revoke your proxy by voting in person at the annual meeting. Attendance at the meeting, without voting at the meeting, will not in and of itself serve as a revocation of your proxy.
Q.		What does it mean if I receive more than one notice or set of proxy materials?
A.		It may mean that you are the registered holder of shares in more than one account. You may call our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, at 1-800-937-5449, if you have any questions regarding the share information or your address appearing on the notice or proxy materials.
Q.		Who will count the votes?
A.		It is expected that a vice president of Brightpoint will tabulate the votes and act as the inspector of election.
Q.		What constitutes a quorum?
A.		A majority of the outstanding shares, present or represented by proxy, of Brightpoint’s common stock will constitute a quorum for the annual meeting. As of the record date, there were 81,858,328 shares of Brightpoint common stock, $.01 par value per share, issued and outstanding.
Q.		How many votes are needed for Proposal 1 — the election of the three Class II directors?
A.		Assuming a quorum is present, the three Class II directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the annual meeting, meaning the three nominees receiving the highest number of votes will be elected as directors. Only votes cast for a nominee will be counted, except that a properly executed proxy that does not specify a vote with respect to the nominees will be voted for the three nominees whose names are printed on the proxy card (Thorleif Krarup, Marisa E. Pratt and Richard W. Roedel). Because the vote on this proposal is determined by a plurality of the votes cast, neither abstentions nor broker non-votes (as described below) will have any effect on the election of directors.
Q.		How many votes are needed to approve the other proposals?
A.		Assuming a quorum is present, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Brightpoint common stock represented at the annual meeting, either in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote at the annual meeting is required for each of Proposal 2 and Proposal 3, to pass.

		As described below, for these proposals, abstentions and broker-non votes will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.
Q.		What happens if I abstain from voting?
A.		If an executed proxy card is returned and the shareholder has explicitly abstained from voting on any proposal, the shares represented by the proxy will be considered present at the annual meeting for the purpose of determining a quorum. In addition, while they will not count as votes cast in favor of the proposal, they will count as votes cast on the proposal. As a result, other than with respect to Proposal 1, which will be determined by a plurality of the votes cast, an abstention on a proposal will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.
Q.		What is a “broker non-vote”?
A.		A “broker non-vote” occurs when a broker submits a proxy that does not indicate a vote for one or more of the proposals because the broker has not received instructions from the beneficial owner on how to vote on such proposals and does not have discretionary authority to vote in the absence of instructions. While broker non-votes will be counted for the purposes of determining whether a quorum exists at the annual meeting, they will not be considered to have voted on any of the proposals on which such instructions have been withheld, in the case of those proposals requiring a majority vote in favor of the proposal, will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.
Q.		Who bears the cost of soliciting of proxies?
A.		The entire cost of soliciting proxies, including the costs of preparing, assembling, printing and mailing the notice and, as applicable, this proxy statement, the proxy and any additional soliciting material furnished to shareholders, will be borne by us. In addition, arrangements will be made with brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to send proxies and proxy materials to the beneficial owners of stock, and we may reimburse such persons for their expenses.
Q.		Why does Brightpoint want to amend its 2004 Plan?
A.		Our board of directors believes the increase in shares available for issuance under the Plan will enable us to continue to attract and retain personnel of the highest caliber, provide incentive for officers, directors, employees and other key persons, and to promote the well-being of the company. Our board of directors has resolved that, if the increase in shares available for issuance under the 2004 Plan is approved by shareholders, it will terminate the company’s Amended and Restated Independent Director Stock Compensation Plan (“Director Stock Plan”), which currently has the same number of shares available for issuance as the increase sought for the 2004 Plan. Our board believes that the impact of effectively shifting the 2,173,953 shares from the Director Stock Plan to the 2004 Plan will provide more flexibility to provide future incentives to a broader group of potential recipients. Accordingly, our board of directors believes it is in the best interest of the company and its shareholders to increase the number of shares available for issuance under the 2004 Plan.

PROPOSAL 1:

TO ELECT THREE CLASS II DIRECTORS

General

     Our by-laws provide that our board of directors be divided into three classes (Class I, Class II and Class III). At each annual meeting of shareholders, directors constituting one class are elected for a three-year term. At this year’s annual meeting, three Class II directors will be elected to hold office for a term expiring at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2011. Based upon the review of and recommendation by our board’s corporate governance and nominating committee, the board has nominated Thorleif Krarup, Marisa E. Pratt and Richard W. Roedel to serve as Class II directors.

     Each of the directors will be elected to serve during his or her term until a successor is elected and qualified or until the director’s earlier resignation or removal.

     Pursuant to the shareholder agreement we entered into with Dangaard Holding A/S (“Dangaard Holding”) upon the closing of our acquisition of Dangaard Telecom A/S (“Dangaard Telecom”), Dangaard Holding has the right to propose between one and three individuals (which right is in lieu of, and not in addition to, its right to have three designees appointed to our board upon the closing of the acquisition) for election or appointment to our board of directors. This right is subject to the final approval of each such designee by our board’s corporate governance and nominating committee, applying reasonable and uniform standards consistent with both its past practices and our corporate governance principles and after it determines that such designee satisfies the independence requirements of NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 4200(a). This right is contingent upon the percentage of our common stock owned by Dangaard Holding as follows:

	•		for as long as it owns at least 27.5% of our then outstanding common stock, Dangaard Holding will retain its designee proposal right with respect to three designees;
	•		for as long as it owns at least 17.5% but less than 27.5% of our then outstanding common stock, Dangaard Holding will retain its designee proposal right with respect to two designees; and
	•		for as long as it owns at least 7.5% but less than 17.5% of our then outstanding common stock, Dangaard Holding will retain its designee proposal right with respect to one designee.

     Dangaard Holding currently owns 36.7% of our outstanding common stock. In the event, and at such time as, the number of directors with respect to which Dangaard Holding has designee proposal rights is reduced in accordance with the foregoing, upon request from us, Dangaard Holding shall immediately cause the requisite number of its designated directors to resign from our board of directors. To facilitate this procedure, in connection with each appointment or nomination for election of a director designee of Dangaard Holding to our board of directors, Dangaard Holding will cause such proposed director to deliver to us an irrevocable letter of resignation that is automatically effective in the event (a) the number of director designees Dangaard Holding is entitled to propose has been reduced, in accordance with the foregoing, as a result of a decrease in its ownership percentage in our company and (b) the resignation of such director is requested by a majority of our non-Dangaard designee board members or by Dangaard Holding in order to reduce the number of Dangaard Holding directors then serving on our board to the number of such directors that Dangaard Holding is then permitted to designate.

     Upon the July 31, 2007 closing of our acquisition of Dangaard Holding, and in accordance with the terms of the shareholder agreement, we (i) accepted the resignations of V. William Hunt, Stephen H. Simon and Robert F. Wagner as members of our board of directors, and (ii) appointed three designees of Dangaard Holding, Jorn P. Jensen, Thorleif Krarup and Jan Gesmar-Larsen to our board. Each of Messrs. Jensen, Krarup and Gesmar-Larsen was approved by the corporate governance and nominating committee of our board of directors and determined by our board to be independent under both our corporate governance principles and NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 4200(a). In addition, upon the closing, we reclassified our board’s nine members among our board’s three classes as follows: Eliza Hermann, Robert J. Laikin and Mr. Gesmar-Larsen as Class I directors; Mr. Krarup, Marisa E. Pratt and Richard W. Roedel as Class II directors; and Mr. Jensen, Jerre L. Stead and Kari-Pekka Wilska as Class III directors.

     Pursuant to the terms of the shareholder agreement that we entered into with Dangaard Holding upon the closing of the Dangaard Telecom acquisition, until the earlier of (a) the date on which Dangaard Holding owns less than 7.5% of our outstanding common stock and (b) the date on which it (i) owns less than 10% of our outstanding common stock, (ii) has no designee serving as a member of our board of directors and (iii) has irrevocably given up its director designee rights, referred to as the “standstill period,” Dangaard Holding will be required to vote all of its shares in favor of all director candidates and shareholder proposals (other than those seeking approval to authorize a merger, sale of all or substantially all of our common stock or assets or other similar business combination or for matters related to the foregoing) recommended by our board of directors.

     At this year’s annual meeting, the proxies granted by shareholders will be voted individually for the election, as directors of Brightpoint, of the persons listed below, unless a proxy specifies that it is not to be voted in favor of a nominee for director. You may not vote your proxy for the election of a person to fill a directorship for which no nominee is named in this proxy statement. If, at the time of the annual meeting, any of the nominees named in the enclosed proxy should be unable or decline to serve as a director, the proxies are authorized to be voted for such substitute nominee or nominees as the board recommends. The board has no reason to believe that any nominee will be unable or decline to serve as a director.

Recommendation of our board of directors

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT SHARE-HOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES SPECIFIED BELOW.

Nominees to be elected as Class II directors at this year’s annual meeting

     The following table sets forth for each nominee, his or her age, a brief description of his or her principal occupation and business experience during the past several years, certain other directorships held and how long he or she has been a director of Brightpoint. None of the nominees is employed by Brightpoint or any entity that is an affiliate of Brightpoint:

Nominees for Class II Directors
(Term to expire in 2011)

Name of director		Age				Principal occupation and other information
Thorleif Krarup			55			Mr. Krarup has served as a member of our board of directors since the July 31, 2007 closing of our acquisition of Dangaard Telecom and is currently a member of our corporate governance and nominating committee. From September 2006 until the closing of the Dangaard Telecom acquisition (at which time he resigned his positions with Dangaard Telecom and Dangaard Holding), Mr. Krarup served as the chairman of Dangaard Telecom and Dangaard Holding. Mr. Krarup has functioned as an advisor to Nordic Capital since 2004. Previously, he held several group chief executive positions within the financial sector, including with Nykredit A/S, a Danish mortgage bank, and following its merger with Tryg, a Danish insurance company, the holding company Tryg Nykredit Holding, from 1987 to 1992; Unibank A/S, a Danish bank, from 1992 to 2000; and Nordea AB, a bank in the Nordic region, which he co-founded, from 2000 to 2002. Mr. Krarup also currently serves as deputy chairman of the boards of H. Lundbeck A/S, a pharmaceuticals company, Alk Abello A/S, an allergy treatment/pharmaceuticals company, and LFI A/S, an investment company that holds 72% of H. Lundbeck. He is also a member of the board of directors for each of Group 4 Securicor Plc, a security and cash service company, and Bang & Olufsen A/S, a consumer electronics company, as well as several foundations, including Lundbeckfonden, The Crown Prince Frederik Fond and Danmark-Amerika fondet.
Marisa E. Pratt			43			Ms. Pratt has served as a member of our board of directors since January 2003 and is currently a member of our audit committee. Since 1991, Ms. Pratt has been employed by Eli Lilly and Company, a pharmaceutical company, in various finance and treasury related positions.
Richard W. Roedel			58			Mr. Roedel has served as a member of our board of directors and as chairman of our audit committee since October 2002 and currently serves as a member of our corporate governance and nominating committee. Mr. Roedel is a director, and chairman of the audit committee of Sealy Corporation and Luna Innovations Incorporated, and is a director and a member of the audit committee of IHS Inc. He is also a director of the Association of Audit Committee Members, Inc., a non-profit organization. Mr. Roedel was a director and chairman of the audit committee of Dade Behring Holdings, Inc. from October 2002 until November 2007 when Dade was acquired by Siemens AG. Mr. Roedel served in various capacities while with Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. from April 2004 to June 2005, including as its chairman and chief executive officer. From 1999 to 2000, Mr. Roedel was chairman and chief executive officer of the accounting firm BDO Seidman LLP, the United States member firm of BDO International. Before becoming chairman and chief executive officer, he was the managing partner of BDO Seidman’s New York metropolitan area from 1994 to 1999, the managing partner of its Chicago office from 1990 to 1994 and an audit partner from 1985 to 1990. Mr. Roedel is a certified public accountant.

Incumbent Class I and Class III directors

     The following two tables set forth similar information with respect to incumbent Class I and Class III directors who are not nominees for election at the annual meeting:

Class I Directors
(Term expires in 2010)

Name of director		Age				Principal occupation and other information
Robert J. Laikin			44			Mr. Laikin, founder of Brightpoint, has served as a member of our board of directors since its inception in August 1989. Mr. Laikin has been chairman of the board and chief executive officer of Brightpoint since January 1994. Mr. Laikin was president of Brightpoint from June 1992 until September 1996 and vice president and treasurer of Brightpoint from August 1989 until May 1992. From July 1986 to December 1987, Mr. Laikin was vice president and, from January 1988 to February 1993, president of Century Cellular Network, Inc., a company engaged in the retail sale of cellular telephones and accessories.
Jan Gesmar-Larsen			47			Mr. Gesmar-Larsen has served as a member of our board of directors since the July 31, 2007 closing of our acquisition of Dangaard Telecom and is currently a member of our compensation and human resources committee. From September 2006 until the closing our acquisition of Dangaard Telecom (at which time he resigned his positions with Dangaard Telecom and Dangaard Holding) Mr. Gesmar-Larsen served on the board of directors of Dangaard Telecom and Dangaard Holding. Prior thereto, he served on various other boards of directors, including as chairman of Interse A/S from January 2001 until May 2005, chairman of Hal Knowledge Solutions from August 2002 until May 2004 and as vice chairman of Bang & Olufsen A/S from 1996 to May 2003. He also served on the advisory board of Danske Bank A/S from September 1999 to May 2004. Previously he held senior executive positions in the personal computer industry, including at Dell Computer Corporation as president of Europe, Middle East and Africa division (EMEA) from 1997 to 2000 and at Apple computer in various positions from 1992 to 1997, including most recently as its president EMEA.
Eliza Hermann			46			Ms. Hermann has been a member of our board of directors since January 2003, and is currently chairperson of our compensation and human resources committee and a member of our corporate governance and nominating committee. She is currently Managing Director of Green Park Consultancy Limited (UK). She was formerly employed by BP plc from 1985-2008 where she served as Vice President Human Resources at global headquarters for 7 years, and was previously part of the business leadership in the oil and gas exploration and production division for over 10 years. During the late 1990’s she was integrally involved in the merger of British Petroleum and Amoco Corporation, participating in the organization design and cultural integration of the two companies.

Class III Directors
(Term expires in 2009)

Name of director		Age				Principal occupation and other information
Kari-Pekka Wilska			60			Mr. Wilska has served as a member of our board of directors since November 2005. Since November 2005, Mr. Wilska has been a venture partner in Austin Ventures, a venture capital fund that focuses on investing in Texas. Mr. Wilska served in a variety of leadership positions in Nokia’s U.S. mobile phone operations from 1993 to 2004, including as president of Nokia, Inc. (Nokia Americas) from 1999 to December 2004 and as president of Vertu Ltd., a subsidiary of Nokia, Inc. From November 2004 until December 2005, Mr. Wilska served as a director of Zarlink Semiconductor Inc., and from December 2005 until it was merged with LSI Corporation, Mr. Wilska served as a director of Agere Systems, a global leader in semiconductors and software solutions for storage, mobility and networking markets. From June 2004 until its merger with American Tower Corporation in August 2005, Mr. Wilska served as a director of SpectraSite, Inc. Mr. Wilska serves on the boards of Pulsewave RF Inc. Mavenir Systems Inc., Paragon Wireless Inc., 724 Solutions, Inc. and BlackSand Technologies.
Jørn P. Jensen			44			Mr. Jensen has served as a member of our board of directors since the July 31, 2007 closing of our acquisition of Dangaard Telecom and is currently a member of our audit committee. He has also served as Executive Vice President and chief financial officer of Carlsberg A/S, an international brewery, since 2000 and, during his tenure there, has also served as chairman, vice chairman or board member in several companies within the Carlsberg Group. Mr. Jensen is also a member of the board of directors of the JL Foundation (Vesterhavet A/S) which owns the J. Lauritzen Group, a shipping company.
Jerre L. Stead			65			Mr. Stead has served as a member of our board of directors since June 2000 and currently serves as our lead independent director. Mr. Stead is a member of our compensation and human resources committee and chairman of our corporate governance and nominating committee. Mr. Stead has been chairman of IHS Inc. since December 2000 and its chief executive officer since September 2006. From August 1996 to June 2000, Mr. Stead served as chairman of the board and chief executive officer of Ingram Micro Inc., a worldwide distributor of information technology products and services. Mr. Stead served as chairman, president and chief executive officer of Legent Corporation, a software development company from January 1995 until its sale in September 1995. From 1993 through 1994, Mr. Stead was executive vice president of American Telephone and Telegraph Company, a telecommunications company, and chairman and chief executive officer of AT&T Global Information Solutions, a computer and communications company, formerly NCR Corp. Mr. Stead was president of AT&T Global Business Communications Systems, a communications company, from 1991 to 1993. Mr. Stead was chairman, president and chief executive officer from 1989 to 1991 and president from 1987 to 1989 of Square D Company, an industrial control and electrical distribution products company. In addition, he held numerous positions during a 21-year career at Honeywell. Mr. Stead is a director of Mindspeed Technologies, Inc., and Conexant Systems, Inc.

Meetings of the board of directors

     During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, our board of directors held six meetings and took action five times by unanimous consent in lieu of a meeting. During 2007, each member of the board participated in at least 75% of all board and applicable committee meetings held during the period in which he or she was a director. The board of directors and each of its committees met regularly in executive sessions. Brightpoint policy is that the board of directors must attend our annual meeting of shareholders each year. All of the members of our board at the time attended our 2007 annual meeting.

Board committees

     Our board of directors maintains an audit committee, a corporate governance and nominating committee and a compensation and human resources committee. Each of these three committees is comprised solely of persons who meet the definition of an “independent director” under our governance principles and NASDAQ Marketplace Rules. Each of these committees has adopted a charter, and each of these charters is available on our website, www.brightpoint.com.

     The functions of each of the board committees are described below:

Corporate governance and nominating committee

     The corporate governance and nominating committee is responsible for developing and reviewing the effectiveness of our corporate governance guidelines, recommending appropriate board and board committee structures and membership, establishing procedures for the director nomination process and recommending nominees for election to the board. In 2007, the corporate governance and nominating committee met five times. The corporate governance and nominating committee considers qualified nominees for election to our board of directors, including those recommended by shareholders following the procedures set forth in this proxy statement under the section entitled “Shareholder Proposals for Next Annual Meeting,” based on the criteria and standards set forth below under the section entitled “—Director Selection Process.” In addition, the members of this committee are responsible for analyzing and approving the compensation for our directors. The current members of the corporate governance and nominating committee are:

	•		Jerre L. Stead, chair,
	•		Eliza Hermann,
	•		Richard W. Roedel and
	•		Thorleif Krarup.

Audit committee

     The audit committee has the power to select and oversee the performance of our independent registered public accountants and supervise our audit and financial procedures. During 2007, the audit committee held nine meetings. The current members of the audit committee are:

	•		Richard W. Roedel, chair,
	•		Kari-Pekka Wilska,

	•		Marisa E. Pratt and
	•		Jørn P. Jensen.

     None of the members of the audit committee are employees of Brightpoint and each meets the independence and financial literacy requirements under current NASDAQ Marketplace Rules. In addition, our board of directors has determined that Mr. Roedel is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined under Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K of the SEC.

Compensation and human resources committee

     The compensation and human resources committee has responsibility for approving our compensation policies and for reviewing and recommending for approval by our board of directors all elements of compensation for our officers and other highly compensated members of management. The compensation and human resources committee provides oversight of the administration of our compensation program. The committee also provides oversight of the administration of the issuance of securities under our equity-based compensation plans and cash incentive and deferred compensation plans for our executives. The compensation and human resources committee also has responsibility for reviewing the supplementary benefits paid to our executive officers as well as retirement and other benefits and any special compensation. In addition, the committee reviews and recommends for approval by our board executive employment agreements, severance agreements and change of control provisions for our chief executive officer and other senior executives. The committee also directs the succession planning process for our chief executive officer and other senior executives. The committee provides oversight of our global diversity activities and reviews its charter and evaluates its performance as a committee on an annual basis.

     The compensation and human resources committee met nine times in 2007. All committee members participated in each meeting during the period that they served on the committee. The committee has direct access to independent legal counsel and independent compensation consultants for survey data and other information as it deems appropriate, and it utilized these independent counsel and consultants from time to time during the year.

     The current members of the compensation and human resources committee are:

	•		Eliza Hermann, chair,
	•		Jerre L. Stead and
	•		Jan Gesmar-Larsen.

Director selection process

     The qualities and skills sought in prospective members of the board are determined by the corporate governance and nominating committee. The corporate governance and nominating committee requires that director candidates be qualified individuals who, if added to our board, would provide the mix of director characteristics and diverse experiences, perspectives and skills appropriate for us. The criteria for selection of candidates will include, but not be limited to: (i) business and financial acumen, as determined by the corporate governance and nominating committee in its discretion, (ii) relevant education or training, (iii) a commitment to business ethics and the “Brightpoint Values,” (iv) tenure and breadth of experience in a significant leadership capacity, as well as qualities reflecting a proven record of accomplishment and ability to work with others, (v) knowledge of our industry, (vi) relevant experience and knowledge of corporate governance practices, and (vii) expertise in an area relevant to our company. Any prospective director nominee must be “independent” under NASDAQ Marketplace Rules and our corporate governance principles. Such nominees should not have commitments that would conflict with

the time commitments of being our director. Such nominees shall be of high repute and recognized integrity and not have been convicted in a criminal proceeding or be named a subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses). Such nominees shall not have been found in a civil proceeding to have violated any federal or state securities or commodities law, and shall not be subject to any court or regulatory order or decree limiting his or her business activity, including in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity. Such nominees shall have other characteristics considered appropriate for membership on our board of directors, as determined by our corporate governance and nominating committee.

     The corporate governance and nominating committee will consider candidates for director nominees put forward by shareholders. The proposal should state how the proposed candidate meets the criteria described above and the shareholder must comply with the other requirements set forth in the section in this proxy statement entitled “Shareholder Proposals for Next Annual Meeting.” The corporate governance and nominating committee will consider candidates proposed by shareholders by evaluating such candidates in the same manner and using the criteria described above. The corporate governance and nominating committee will also adhere to all applicable laws and regulations.

Director compensation

General

     Our corporate governance and nominating committee is responsible for approving, and recommending to our board of directors, our directors’ compensation. Each year, the corporate governance and nominating committee initiates discussions with respect to directors’ compensation for the following year at its August committee meeting. At this meeting, the committee typically reviews director compensation surveys from off-the-shelf sources such as the NACD or Corporate Board Member magazine and commences discussions regarding any philosophical shifts or external trends in the marketplace. Thereafter, more data is compiled and reviewed by the members of the committee (e.g., in 2007, the committee hired each of Mercer Human Resources Consulting and Hewitt Associates LLC, separately, to provide benchmarking data for its director compensation analysis). Then, at its November meeting, the corporate governance and nominating committee discusses all the data collected and prepares its recommendation to the board. The committee’s general philosophy is one of not wanting to change director compensation each year, i.e., it has an explicit view that changing director compensation annually would be too frequent.

Director Stock Plan

     During 2004, our shareholders approved an Amended and Restated Independent Director Stock Compensation Plan, referred to as our “Director Stock Plan,” pursuant to which 2,430,000 shares of our common stock were reserved for issuance to non-employee directors. As of December 31, 2007, 2,173,953 of these shares remained available for future grant. The Director Stock Plan provides for the following types of awards:

	•		initial awards, consisting of restricted shares of our common stock granted to an independent director when he or she joins our board;
	•		annual awards, consisting of up to an aggregate of 5,400 restricted shares of our common stock granted to each of our independent directors on an annual basis; and
	•		elective awards, consisting of an award of restricted shares of our common stock granted to each of our independent directors equal to a percentage elected by such director of his or her board compensation, in lieu of cash, which are paid in June and December of each year.

     In light of to the changes to the compensation plan for independent directors for 2008, 2009 and 2010 discussed below, and because our board believes the shares remaining for issuance under the Director Stock Plan would better serve the company and its shareholders if the same number of shares were instead available for issuance under the 2004 Plan, the board has resolved to terminate the Director Stock Plan if Proposal 2 is approved.

2007 director compensation

     The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of our directors except for Robert J. Laikin, our chief executive officer and chairman of our board of directors, during our fiscal year ended December 31, 2007:

		Fees earned or
		paid in cash				Stock awards
Name		($)				($)(1)(2)				Total
Jerre L. Stead(3)		$	149,875			$	66,657			$	216,532
Eliza Hermann		$	80,000			$	66,657			$	146,657
Jan Gesmar-Larsen(4)		$	18,675			$	10,465			$	29,140
Thorleif Krarup(5)		$	19,285			$	10,465			$	29,750
Richard W. Roedel(6)		$	84,937			$	76,716			$	161,653
Kari-Pekka Wilska		$	60,000			$	97,009			$	157,009
Marisa E. Pratt(7)		$	59,987			$	66,657			$	126,644
Jørn P. Jensen(8)		$	21,935			$	10,465			$	32,400
Stephen H. Simon(9)		$	61,404			$	66,874			$	128,278
Robert F. Wagner(9)		$	65,166			$	66,874			$	132,040
V. William Hunt(9)		$	69,969			$	76,932			$	146,901

     For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, other than our lead independent director, our non-employee directors, referred to as our independent directors, each received (i) a $50,000 retainer that was received either (a) in the form of restricted shares of our common stock as elective awards under our Director Stock Plan, (b) as a combination of cash and elective awards or (c) all in cash, at the director’s option, subject to a requirement that a director electing to receive his or her entire retainer in cash already own 200% of the value of that director’s retainer in shares of the company’s common stock; and (ii) 3,717 restricted shares of our common stock as annual awards under our Director Stock Plan, with a grant date fair value of $49,994 computed in accordance with SFAS 123R.

     For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, our lead independent director, Jerre L. Stead, received (i) a $100,000 cash retainer; (ii) 3,717 restricted shares of our common stock as an annual award under our Director Stock Plan, with a grant date fair value of $49,994 computed in accordance with SFAS 123R; and (iii) 3,300 additional restricted shares of our common stock with a grant date fair value of $50,006 computed in accordance with SFAS 123R (equal to the difference obtained by subtracting the grant-date value of the 3,717 restricted shares of common stock referred to in (ii) above from $100,000) as elective awards under our Director Stock Plan.

     In 2007, an aggregate of 51,513 restricted shares of common stock were granted to independent directors under our Director Stock Plan.

     In 2007, the chair of our compensation and human resources committee and the chair of our audit committee received $30,000 and $35,000, respectively, for services rendered in those roles. Members of the audit committee, other than its chairman, received annual payments of $10,000 for services rendered in their capacity as audit committee members.

     2008 director compensation

     On December 20, 2007, our board of directors, upon the recommendation of the corporate governance and nominating committee, approved the compensation plan for our independent directors for 2008, 2009 and 2010. The board’s independent director compensation for those years will be paid entirely in cash as opposed to a combination of cash and equity. Each independent director, except for the lead independent director, will receive an annual cash retainer of $120,000. In addition, the chairs of the audit, compensation and human resources and corporate governance and nominating committees will receive additional annual fees of $80,000, $30,000 and $30,000, respectively. The lead independent director will receive an annual cash retainer of $250,000, but will not be eligible to receive any additional compensation for board service, including serving as chair of a committee.

     Accordingly, the board no longer requires that any portion of annual board compensation be paid in shares of stock, but does require that value of a director’s holdings of our common stock be equal to or

greater than $200,000 by and after his or her fourth anniversary of service on the board. The board has modified our corporate governance principles to be consistent with this new compensation structure.

Corporate governance

Corporate governance principles

     The board of directors of Brightpoint has adopted a set of corporate governance principles which are consistent with the board’s responsibility for management oversight. These governance principles are designed to strengthen our company and protect the interests of Brightpoint shareholders while helping to insure the continued vitality of the board. Copies of these governance principles may be accessed at our website, www.brightpoint.com.

     Highlights of the corporate governance principles adopted by the board include:

	•		requiring that the board consist of a majority of independent directors and adopting a definition of “independent director” that is designed to help ensure that persons who serve as independent directors are truly independent;
	•		appointing a lead independent director to act as a liaison between the board and management;
	•		limiting the compensation that can be paid by Brightpoint to the members of the board to that compensation relating to their board or board committee service;
	•		requiring the chairperson of the audit committee to be a “financial expert”;
	•		prohibiting independent directors or their family members from conducting business with Brightpoint;
	•		establishing director compensation practices intended to align more closely the interest of the independent directors with Brightpoint’s shareholders; and
	•		encouraging the independent directors to meet in executive session.

Director independence

     The board has determined that all of our current directors, with the exception of Mr. Laikin (our chairman and chief executive officer), have met the independence requirements set forth in our corporate governance principles and the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules. In making determinations regarding a director’s independence, the board considers all relevant facts and circumstances, including the director’s commercial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and familial relationships, and such other criteria as the board may determine from time to time.

Shareholder communications with directors

     Our board of directors, through its corporate governance and nominating committee, has established a process for shareholders to send communications to the board. You may communicate with the board, individually or as a group, by writing to: The Board of Directors of Brightpoint, Inc. c/o Corporate Secretary, 2601 Metropolis Parkway, Suite 210, Plainfield, Indiana 46168 or via e-mail: board.directors@brightpoint.com. You should identify your e-mail or other communication as being from a Brightpoint shareholder in the “subject line” of such communication. The corporate secretary may require reasonable evidence that your communication or other submission is made by a Brightpoint shareholder before transmitting your communication to the board of directors.

MANAGEMENT OF BRIGHTPOINT

Management table

     Our board of directors elects executive officers annually, following our annual meeting of shareholders, to serve until the meeting of the board following the next annual meeting of our shareholders. The following management table sets forth the name of each executive officer as of the record date (all of which also served as such as of December 31, 2007) and the principal positions and offices he holds with Brightpoint. The table also sets forth the current directors of Brightpoint. See the section entitled “Proposal 1” above for additional information relating to each of the directors listed below.

Name		Age				Position(s)
Robert J. Laikin			44			Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Class I Director
J. Mark Howell			43			Co-Chief Operating Officer and President, Americas
Michaél Køehn Milland			45			Co-Chief Operating Officer and President, International Operations
Anthony Boor			45			Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Steven E. Fivel			47			Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Vincent Donargo			47			Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller
R. Bruce Thomlinson			46			President, Asia Pacific, Middle East and Africa
John Alexander du Plessis Currie			43			Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer
Eliza Hermann (1)(2)			46			Class I Director
Jørn P. Jensen (3)			44			Class III Director
Thorleif Krarup (1)			55			Class II Director
Jan Gesmar-Larsen (2)			47			Class I Director
Marisa E. Pratt (3)			43			Class II Director
Richard W. Roedel (1)(3)			58			Class II Director
Jerre L. Stead (1)(2)			65			Class III Director
Kari-Pekka Wilska (3)			60			Class III Director

Background information on our executive officers

     Set forth below for each of our executive officers (other than Robert J. Laikin, our chairman and chief executive officer, as his information is included in this proxy statement under “Proposal 1 — Incumbent Class I and Class III directors”) is a brief description of the positions he has held at Brightpoint, his principal occupation and business experience for at least the last five years and how long he has been employed by Brightpoint:

     J. Mark Howell. On July 31, 2007, Mr. Howell became our co-chief operating officer and President, Americas. Mr. Howell had served as president of Brightpoint, Inc. since September 1996, president, Americas since March 2001 and was our chief operating officer from August 1995 to April 1998 and from July 1998 to March 2003. He was executive vice president, finance, chief financial officer, treasurer and secretary of Brightpoint from July 1994 until September 1996. From July 1992 until joining Brightpoint in 1994, Mr. Howell was corporate controller for ADESA Corporation, a company that owns and operates automobile auctions in the United States and Canada. Prior thereto, Mr. Howell was an accountant with Ernst & Young LLP.

     Michaél Køehn Milland. On July 31, 2007, Mr. Køehn Milland became co-chief operating officer and president, International Operations of Brightpoint. Prior to that, he served as chief operating officer of Dangaard Telecom since 1999. Prior to joining Dangaard Telecom, he held positions as chief executive officer of the handset vendor Phillips Consumer Communication in Central Europe, General Director and chief executive officer of FOR A, a Russian telecommunications operator in St. Petersburg, chief operating officer of Thorn EMI, a retail, defense, music and consumer electronics company, in Denmark and other positions in international retail and telecommunications. Mr. Køehn Milland was also part of the team that started Sonofon, which is today a part of the Telenor Group, a wireless network operator.

     Anthony Boor has served as Brightpoint’s executive vice president, chief financial officer and treasurer since October 2005 and, prior thereto, from June 2005 to October 2005, he served as our acting chief financial officer and acting principal financial officer. Since July 2001, Mr. Boor has also served as the senior vice president and chief financial officer of our Americas division. Mr. Boor was previously vice president and controller of Brightpoint North America L.P. from July 1999 to July 2001 and Director of Business Management of Brightpoint North America from August 1998 to July 1999. Prior to joining Brightpoint, Mr. Boor was employed in various financial positions with Macmillan Publishing, Day Dream, Inc., Ernst & Young LLP, New Mexico State Fairgrounds and The Downs at Albuquerque, KPMG, LLP and Ernst & Whinney. Mr. Boor is a certified public accountant.

     Steven E. Fivel has served as our executive vice president, general counsel and secretary since January 1997. From December 1993 until January 1997, Mr. Fivel was an attorney with an affiliate of Simon Property Group, a publicly-held real estate investment trust. From February 1988 to December 1993, Mr. Fivel was an attorney with Melvin Simon & Associates, Inc., a privately-held shopping center development company.

     Vincent Donargo has served as Brightpoint’s vice president, chief accounting officer and controller since September 2005. From 1998 to 2005, Mr. Donargo was the strategic business unit controller, director of finance and corporate controller of Aearo Company, a safety products manufacturing company. Prior to that, from 1990 to 1998, Mr. Donargo was employed in various financial positions with National Starch and Chemical Company, a specialty chemical manufacturing subsidiary of ICI Americas, Inc. Mr. Donargo is a certified public accountant and a certified management accountant.

     R. Bruce Thomlinson has served as president, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa since November 2007. From August 2005 until August 2007 Mr. Thomlinson served as our president, Asia-

Pacific and president, International Operations, the latter of which he relinquished upon the closing of the Dangaard Telecom acquisition. Prior thereto, until July 2005, he served as president of our Asia-Pacific division from October 1998 and as managing director of Brightpoint Australia, one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, from October 1996. Prior to joining our management team, Mr. Thomlinson held the position of managing director/director for Hatadicorp Pty Ltd., a company he co-owned from 1989 until it was acquired by Brightpoint in October 1996.

     John Alexander du Plessis Currie has served as our executive vice president and chief information officer since November 2007. Prior thereto he served as our president, emerging markets from January 2006 until November 2007. From August 2002 to December 2005, Mr. Currie was the chairman and chief executive officer of Persequor Limited, a holding company for investments in wireless telecommunications that we subsequently acquired and which is now one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. From January 1998 to August 2002, Mr. Currie served as the managing director of Brightpoint Middle East FZE, then one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. Mr. Currie also serves on the board of directors of several of our subsidiaries.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation discussion and analysis

General

     The board’s compensation and human resources committee, sometimes referred to as the “compensation committee,” evaluates and approves compensation for our officers. As part of its responsibilities, the compensation committee approves and administers cash incentives, equity compensation and supplementary benefits, as well as our retirement, benefit and special compensation programs.

     The discussion and analysis that follows includes sections related to:

	•		the objectives of our compensation program;
	•		the forms of compensation paid during 2007 to each of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer and the other executive officers named in our summary compensation table during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, referred to throughout this proxy statement as our “named executive officers;”
	•		the compensation committee’s process for determining named executive officer compensation; and
	•		certain determinations made by our compensation committee with respect to the various components of our named executive officers’ compensation.

Objectives of our compensation program

     We offer an executive compensation program that aligns individuals’ financial incentives with our strategic direction and corporate values. Our program is designed to attract and retain key talent needed to manage and grow our business and enhance shareholder value. Our executive compensation program includes both cash (base pay and short-term incentive) and non-cash (equity) components.

     In keeping with this executive compensation philosophy, our overall compensation program with respect to our named executive officers is designed to achieve the following objectives:

	•		to provide our named executive officers with base salaries in the aggregate near the median of the relevant external market comparator group, recognizing that individual base salaries will vary above and below that level, reflecting individual job performance, including results and behaviors, as well as skills, experience and length of tenure in position;
	•		to provide an opportunity for the total cash compensation paid to our executive officers to significantly exceed the market median when exceptional individual and business performance is achieved;
	•		to link a portion of the compensation of these officers with the achievement of our overall performance goals, to ensure that individual performance is directed towards the achievement of our collective goals;
	•		to enhance alignment of individual performance and contribution with long-term shareholder value and business objectives by providing equity awards through our 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan, sometimes referred to as our 2004 Plan;
	•		to motivate and incentivize our named executive officers to continually contribute superior job performance throughout the year;
	•		to retain the services of named executive officers so that they will continue to contribute to and be a part of our long-term success; and
	•		to encourage the ongoing career development of our executives and other employees.

Forms of compensation paid to named executive officers

     We provide our named executive officers with some or all of the following forms of compensation:

	•		Base salaries. Base salary represents cash amounts paid during the fiscal year to named executive officers under their employment agreements as direct compensation for their services to us. Base salaries and base salary increases are used to reward superior individual job performance of each named executive officer on a day-to-day basis during the year and to encourage continued superior job performance. We also use base salary as an incentive to attract top quality executives from the external labor market. Base salaries and base salary increases also recognize the overall skills, experience and tenure in position of each named executive officer.
	•		Performance-based cash bonuses under our annual executive bonus plan. Each year our compensation committee adopts, and routinely reviews the design of, an executive bonus plan which provides our named executive officers and certain other key employees with the opportunity to earn a cash bonus payment if specific pre-determined financial and strategic performance measures are attained. We use these cash bonuses to reward named executive officers for their short-term contributions to our performance, as measured by our ability to achieve specified financial and strategic targets within our overall operating plan.
	•		Discretionary cash-based bonuses. In addition to performance-based cash bonuses earned under our annual executive bonus plan, the compensation committee may also award discretionary cash bonuses to certain named executive officers and certain other key employees based on both their individual performance and our overall performance.
	•		Performance-based grants of equity compensation under our annual executive equity program. Each year we use performance-based equity grants under our 2004 Plan to ensure focus on key financial and strategic objectives. These awards recognize the named executive officers for their contributions to our overall corporate performance, as measured by our ability to achieve specified financial and strategic performance measures within our overall operating plan. Performance based grants of equity compensation are subject to forfeiture, in whole or in part, if we do not achieve the pre-established performance measures. Those equity awards that are no longer subject to forfeiture vest in three equal annual installments subject to, and in accordance with our 2004 Plan and any agreement entered into between us and the grantee. These awards can take the form of options, restricted stock units and restricted stock awards. Each restricted stock unit entitles the holder to receive one share of our common stock upon the vesting date. A restricted stock award entitles the holder to receive shares of our common stock upon the grant date, which remain subject to the restrictions set forth in a restricted stock agreement. Unlike restricted stock units,             shares of restricted stock are considered issued and outstanding immediately upon the date of grant. In 2007, all of our performance-based equity grants were made in restricted stock units.
	•		Discretionary grants of equity compensation. The compensation committee may also determine, on a case-by-case basis, when additional grants are warranted due to individual or company performance or for motivation or retention reasons. These awards can take the form of options, restricted stock units and restricted stock awards and are also made under our 2004 Plan. In 2007, all discretionary equity grants were made in restricted stock units.
	•		Initial equity grant upon being hired or appointed. Initial grants of restricted stock units under our 2004 Plan may be made when an executive officer is hired or otherwise becomes a named executive officer. Such grants enable us to reward existing executive officers upon promotion to higher levels of management and to recruit new executives. Initial equity grants are determined based on overall market data, as well as comparisons to our other executives’ similar grants or holdings, and are usually recommended by Robert J. Laikin, our chief executive officer, with approval by the compensation committee or the full board of directors. Because these initial grants are structured as an incentive for employment, the amount of these grants may vary depending on the particular circumstances of the named executive officer. We did not award any initial grants in 2007.

	•		Post-termination compensation. We do not offer any pension plan to our named executive officers aside from complying with statutory provisions in the different jurisdictions in which we operate around the world. We do, however, offer all our U.S.-based employees, including our U.S.-based named executive officers, the opportunity to participate in our ERISA-qualified 401(k) Plan. All U.S.-based named executive officers are eligible to participate in this 401(k) Plan and to receive a company match, subject to plan requirements and contribution limits established by the Internal Revenue Service. While we do not offer a qualified pension plan, four of our named executive officers have individual supplementary post-termination compensation arrangements. In the case of Mr. Køehn Milland, Brightpoint succeeded to his existing contract with Dangaard Telecom which included pension contributions in excess of statutory requirements in Denmark. Pursuant to his employment agreement with us, the company makes an annual contribution equal to 6.6% of Mr. Køehn Milland’s base salary to a privately held and managed pension plan. In addition, three of our named executive officers have Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan agreements, referred to as “SERPs,” which will provide these executives with a ten-year benefit upon the latter of employment termination or achieving a specified age. Additionally, pursuant to our employment agreements with our named executive officers, they are each entitled to certain cash payments, and the acceleration of certain of their equity awards, upon a change of control.
	•		Other benefits. We generally do not offer perquisites to our named executive officers; we do, however, provide them with certain other benefits. These include payments of life insurance premiums, payments of long-term disability insurance premiums and employer contributions toward group medical insurance.

Process for determining named executive officer compensation

     Overall compensation program. The fundamental tenets of our compensation program are as follows:

	•		for the compensation level of Mr. Laikin, our chief executive officer, the compensation committee determines a recommendation for subsequent approval by the full board of directors; and
	•		our chief executive officer, Mr. Laikin, supported by our senior vice president of global human resources, Annette Cyr, provides input and recommendations with respect to the compensation levels for each of the individuals reporting directly to him, including our named executive officers; The compensation committee approves and recommends that the board approve the compensation for these individuals. Mr. Laikin and Ms. Cyr also review the total compensation amounts of all of the named executive officers except Mr. Laikin; and
	•		compensation paid to executive officers, as defined in Section 16 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, other than our named executive officers, must also be approved by our compensation committee or full board of directors.

Executive Compensation Review Process

     Competitive positioning. The compensation committee has developed a comparator group of other companies for use as a benchmarking reference group. The comparator group was initially determined as part of an executive compensation analysis conducted for our compensation committee by Hewitt Associates LLC (“Hewitt”) in 2004 and has been updated each year since. Hewitt acts as an independent compensation consultant to the compensation committee. The scope of Hewitt’s engagement is to provide a comparator group against which to analyze our compensation packages in relation to companies similarly situated to us and to determine the economic value of our equity awards for purposes of compensation benchmarking. The compensation committee then considers these analyses and insights when determining compensation.

     We believe that Hewitt is independent because it is and was engaged by the compensation committee itself. Prior to first being hired by the compensation committee in 2004, Hewitt had provided no products or services to us or any of our subsidiaries, and, since such time, we have (in addition to the consulting services it provides to our compensation committee) purchased only a small number of online tools from Hewitt. The Hewitt executive compensation team was neither involved with nor informed of these purchases.

     Many of the constituents of the comparator group are distribution and logistics companies and retailers with focus areas and revenues similar to ours. The comparator group also includes some companies that are larger or smaller than us but which we believed to have similar business models. In accordance with its usual methodology, Hewitt uses a regression analysis to normalize for these differences within our comparator group.

     The companies comprising the Hewitt comparator group that the compensation committee considered when determining 2007 compensation are:

Alltel Corp.		DST Systems, Inc.		Solectron Corporation
Ametek, Inc.		Global Payments Inc.		The Servicemaster Company
Arrow Electronics Inc.		Graphic Packaging Corporation		Tech Data Corporation
Avaya Inc.		Imation		Teradyne, Inc
CDW Corporation		Ingram Micro Inc.		United Stationers
Ceridian Corporation		L-3 Communications Corporation		W.W. Grainger, Inc.
Convergys Corporation		Rockwell Automation

     (The following four companies were in the Hewitt comparator group for 2006 but were not included in 2007 due to their lack of participation in vendor surveys and/or changes in circumstances or scope: Anixter, Inc., Corporate Express, UPS Supply Chain Solutions and FedEx Supply Chain Services.)

     In addition to Hewitt, the compensation committee also engaged Mercer Human Resources Consulting (“Mercer”) as an executive compensation consultant beginning in 2006 as an additional source of data and to provide further validation of the overall competitiveness of our executive compensation program. We believe that Mercer is independent because it was retained directly by the Compensation Committee and has not performed any other human resource consulting for us except that we have purchased some basic online compensation tools from Mercer. The committee believes Mercer adds dimension to the committee’s analysis, because unlike Hewitt, which uses a regression analysis, Mercer uses both direct proxy analysis as well as survey data for a custom peer group which is focused on technology, telecommunications and business services organizations with a comparable target revenue scope, industry classification and asset turnover. The companies comprising the Mercer comparator group are:

Anixter International Inc,		Insight Enterprises Inc.
Bell Microproducts		PC Connection Inc.
CDW Corporation		Scansource, Inc.
Commscope Inc.		Source Interlink Companies, Inc.
Handleman Co.		Synnex Corp.
Harris Corp.		Tessco Technologies Inc.
Ingram Micro Inc.

     Factors considered and reviewed. In performing its duties, the compensation committee takes into account the data and analysis provided by Hewitt and Mercer, as well as several other factors. The compensation committee considers the individual job performance of each named executive officer,

including results achieved and behaviors demonstrated. The compensation committee also considers our overall performance. Relative individual tenure in position is taken into account, and relative internal equity among the named executive officers is also considered. Periodic review of “tally sheets” showing all elements of compensation for each named executive officer is conducted. Ultimately, the compensation committee members take into account all of these factors and data, and apply their own professional judgment in determining their recommendations and decisions on compensation.

     Each of the components of compensation is considered as part of the total compensation amount and serves to meet one or more of our compensation objectives.

     We have established a total compensation amount that, in aggregate among all executives, is at or slightly below the 50th percentile of the relevant comparator data prepared by Hewitt and Mercer. More emphasis is placed on the variable components of compensation, comprised of annual bonus and long-term incentive compensation, so that a greater portion of total pay is “at risk,” based on performance. We believe the combination of competitive base salaries and opportunity to exceed the market median if performance warrants, yields a conservative but attractive compensation program that aids us in the attraction, retention and motivation of highly qualified executive personnel.

     For new hires, an appropriate package for each individual is determined by considering both external survey data provided by our compensation consultants and internal equity (i.e., relative compensation positioning among our executives). In 2007 Michaél Køehn Milland joined us upon our acquisition of Dangaard Telecom and we assumed his pre-existing contract in conjunction with the transaction. The compensation committee believed that his base salary placed him above the market median and determined not to increase his compensation upon his joining the organization. The committee did, however, approve an amendment to Mr. Køehn Milland’s employment agreement pursuant to which it was restated in U.S. dollars and also approved a relocation package, described below, in connection with moving his family from Denmark to the United States.

     Timing and procedures. The compensation committee conducts several meetings in person and telephonically to review and consider the executive compensation analysis presented by Hewitt, Mercer and the recommendations from Mr. Laikin. With respect to 2007, the compensation committee held seven working sessions, either in person or telephonically, between July 2006 and February 2007 to analyze the data and other factors including individual and company performance. The compensation committee makes its compensation decisions on all elements of compensation during the first quarter, generally at its February meeting. Making compensation decisions at this point allows the compensation committee not only to consider compensation survey data, but also to consider total annual performance against both financial and strategic performance measures. The February meeting is scheduled to coincide with a full meeting of the entire board of directors, and follows our quarterly earnings release. The February meeting also occurs during an “open” trading window.

Determinations made with respect to executive compensation in and for 2007

     Base salaries

     In February 2007, the compensation committee, taking into account all of the factors noted above and considering the recommendations of Robert J. Laikin, our chief executive officer, and Annette Cyr, our senior vice president of global human resources, approved increases in the base salaries of our named executive officers as follows:

		2006				2007				Change				Change
Named executive officer		Base Salary				Base Salary				Amount				%
J. Mark Howell		$	455,000			$	493,700			$	38,700				8.5	%
Michaél Køehn Milland(1)		$	—			$	530,880			$	—				N/A
Anthony W. Boor		$	350,000			$	375,000			$	25,000				7.1	%
Steven E. Fivel		$	360,000			$	375,000			$	15,000				4.2	%
R. Bruce Thomlinson(2)		$	465,905			$	538,857			$	72,952				15.7	%
John Alexander Du Plessis Currie		$	400,000			$	434,000			$	34,000				8.5	%

     In addition, the compensation committee on its own and taking into account all of the factors described above, developed a recommendation that was subsequently approved by our board of directors regarding an increase in base salary for Robert J. Laikin, our chief executive officer, as follows:

		2006				2007				Change				Change
Named executive officer		Base Salary				Base Salary				Amount				%
Robert J. Laikin		$	750,000			$	800,000			$	50,000				6.7	%

     The compensation committee considered internal comparisons with our other senior executives when setting Mr. Laikin’s compensation. Mr. Laikin’s total compensation, assuming all of his targets are met, is roughly double that of the next most highly compensated named executive officer. We believe this is justified because of his role as founder and leader of our organization. The differential is also consistent with the compensation analyses prepared by Hewitt and Mercer.

     In the aggregate, the total compensation of named executive officers is at or slightly below the market median, with some individual variance around the median based upon job performance, skills, experience and length of tenure in position.

     As part of its ongoing duties, the compensation committee continually reviews its use of tools, consultants and the composition of the comparator groups to ensure that the overall data and analyses with which it works are both up to date and relevant.

     Performance-based cash bonuses under our annual executive bonus plans

     In February 2007 the compensation committee approved our 2007 executive bonus plan, which established performance measures consisting of a financial target (adjusted income from continuing operations) weighted at 50% and certain strategic objectives (four specific equally weighted measures

associated with implementation of our long range business strategy) which, in the aggregate, were also weighted at 50%. Under the 2007 executive bonus plan, the target cash bonus established for Mr. Laikin was 100% of his 2007 base salary and the target bonus established for each of our other then named executive officers was 50% of his respective 2007 base salary.

     In determining the specific targets to incorporate into the 2007 executive bonus plan, we relied heavily on both our annual operating plan and our key strategic objectives. We believe that these objectives appropriately balanced shorter-term operational goals with long-term strategic directives and are attainable with “stretch efforts.” In analyzing our executive compensation programs, we estimated that the performance measures could be achieved approximately two-thirds of the time based upon recent company performance.

     After the end of the fiscal year, the committee reviews the company’s actual performance against each of the financial performance and strategic performance measures established at the outset of the year by the committee.

     In February 2008, the compensation committee determined that each of the performance targets under the 2007 executive bonus plan was achieved or exceeded. The committee determined that the company achieved certain predetermined goals and metrics for the full year established by the committee relating to (i) adjusted income from continuing operations, after excluding the impact of the Dangaard Telecom operations acquired in 2007, and (ii) certain strategic objectives. Accordingly, each of the named executive officers participating in the 2007 plan received a cash bonus equal to his respective target bonus.

     Michaél Køehn Milland participated in the Dangaard Telecom bonus program through the end of Dangaard’s fiscal year, September 30, 2007. As set forth in his contract with Dangaard, he had an annual bonus opportunity of twenty-five percent of base salary, which he received. Accordingly, we provided him a bonus opportunity for the fourth quarter of 2007 of 6.25% of annual base salary or $33,180. Based upon his significant efforts toward the integration of the operations the compensation committee determined that Mr. Køehn Milland had earned and was entitled to 100% of this interim bonus.

     Discretionary cash-based bonuses

     In February 2008, the committee approved discretionary cash bonuses for each of Messrs. Boor, Fivel, Howell, Currie, Thomlinson and Køehn Milland for 2007 based on individual and overall performance. All of these discretionary bonuses for 2007 were paid by us in 2008. The compensation committee determined that the additional discretionary bonuses were warranted because of the strong operating performance and results of the company in 2007, as well as the significant growth in scale, scope and geographic footprint of the company as a result of the CellStar and Dangaard Telecom acquisitions and the significant efforts of management toward integrating these two new businesses while continuing to execute its annual plan.

     Performance based equity awards under our annual executive bonus plan

     In February 2007, the compensation committee adopted our 2007 executive equity program and, in accordance with that program, granted performance-based restricted stock units under our 2004 Plan to each of our then executive officers, including our chief executive officer. These grants were subject to forfeiture, in whole or in part, prior to the first anniversary of the grant if we did not achieve the same pre-established financial and strategic measures that were used in determining the performance-based cash bonuses under our 2007 executive bonus plan discussed above.

     Under the 2007 executive equity program, the number of restricted stock units that each named executive officer was granted, and was thus eligible to earn, was based on a percentage of his base salary, as follows: Mr. Laikin — 125% and for each of Messrs. Boor, Howell, Fivel, Thomlinson and Currie — 100%. The number of restricted stock units included in these grants was calculated for each named executive officer by dividing the dollar value of the applicable percentage of his base salary by the per share closing price of our common stock on February 7, 2007, the day immediately prior to the date of the contingent award.

     In February 2008, the compensation committee determined that all of the pre-established performance measures had been achieved or exceeded and that all of the restricted stock units granted thereunder had thus been earned by our executive officers as of such date. The satisfaction of the performance measures was determined by the compensation committee after excluding the impact of the Dangaard Telecom operations acquired in 2007. These earned restricted stock units commenced vesting in three equal annual installments in February 2008.

     Discretionary grants of equity compensation. In February 2008, the compensation committee also approved and recommended that the board approve, and the board of directors approved, discretionary grants of equity compensation, in the form of restricted stock units, under our 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan to each of our named executive officers, except for Mr. Køehn Milland. The compensation committee determined the additional discretionary equity awards were warranted because of our strong operating performance and results in 2007, the significant growth in scale, scope and geographic footprint of the company in 2007, and the significant efforts of management toward integrating the CellStar and Dangaard Telecom operations we acquired, while continuing to focus on executing our annual plan. Further, the compensation committee recognized the need to further reward, motivate and retain certain key executives.

										2007
		2007				2007 Cash				RSUs Earned				2007
		Cash Bonus				Discretionary				under 2007 Equity				Discretionary
Named executive officer		Earned				Bonus Awarded				Program				RSUs Earned
Robert J. Laikin		$	800,000				—				93,197				86,957	(3)
J. Mark Howell		$	246,850			$	180,000				46,011				8,696	(4)
Michaél Køehn Milland(1)		$	33,180	(1)		$	67,500				—				—
Anthony W. Boor		$	187,500			$	112,500				34,949				58,696	(5)
Steven E. Fivel		$	187,500			$	112,500				34,949				8,696	(4)
R. Bruce Thomlinson(2)		$	269,501			$	87,517				45,203				8,696	(4)
John Alexander Du Plessis Currie		$	217,000			$	90,000				40,447				8,696	(4)
Total		$	1,941,531			$	650,017				294,756				180,437

     Based on our comparator group review, Mr. Laikin’s total compensation at target ($2,600,000) and actual payments received during 2007 were below the aggregate median of comparator groups. This is due to long-term incentive compensation which, at target, is currently well below the market median. The compensation committee determined that an additional discretionary award of restricted stock units was appropriate to retain and motivate Mr. Laikin and to reward him for his continued leadership, industry knowledge and business development skills. As a founder of the company, the compensation committee recognized that Mr. Laikin’s vision and drive were essential to our future success and could not easily be replaced. Thus, the compensation committee recommended, and on February 14, 2008 our board of directors approved, a discretionary grant of 86,957 restricted stock units to Mr. Laikin, which will vest as to one-half on each of the fourth and sixth anniversaries of the grant. This discretionary grant was valued at $1,000,000, based on the per-share closing price on the day immediately prior to the date of grant.

     Anthony Boor, our chief financial officer, received his discretionary restricted stock unit award primarily to increase his equity holdings, to retain his services, and as an incentive to motivate him to continue to work toward the long-term success of the company. The committee also considered Mr. Boor’s job performance and the increased responsibilities Mr. Boor is assuming as a result the acquisitions we completed in 2007.

     Post-termination compensation

     Post-retirement compensation. All U.S.-based named executive officers are eligible to participate in our ERISA-qualified 401(k) Plan and to receive a company match, subject to plan requirements and contribution limits established by the IRS. The 401(k) Plan provides a matching benefit of $0.50 per each dollar invested to a maximum of six percent of base salary, subject to these limitations. In 2005, 2006 and 2007, named executive officers and other “highly compensated employees” as defined by the IRS were subject to contribution and matching limitations based upon required annual non-discrimination testing. During 2007, the named executive officers were each allowed to contribute $9,787 to the 401(k) Plan and receive a matching contribution from us of $6,491.

     In 2005, we entered into supplemental executive retirement plan agreements, referred to as SERP agreements, with each of Robert Laikin, Mark Howell and Steven Fivel. The payments under the SERP agreements will be made on an annual basis beginning on the later of the individual’s termination date (other than termination for “cause”), or the attainment of age 50, 53 or 55 for Messrs. Laikin, Howell or Fivel, respectively, for a period of ten years or until such individual’s death, if earlier. If Mr. Laikin, Howell or Fivel is terminated for cause, then the benefit would not commence for that executive until he reached the age of 62 for a period of ten years or until such individual’s death, if earlier. The benefit is an annual payment equal to a certain percentage of average base salary and on the amount of annual benefits payable, referred to as the “cap amount.”

     Assuming annual salary increases of 3% per year, the anticipated payments would reach the cap amount and would be paid in approximately the following amounts: $496,000 per year to Mr. Laikin

beginning on the later of termination or age 50; $344,000 per year to Mr. Howell beginning on the later of termination or age 53; and $229,000 per year to Mr. Fivel beginning on the later of termination or age 55, in each case for a period of ten years or until such individual’s death, if earlier. Payment under the amended and restated SERP agreements is contingent upon termination of service.

     The compensation committee believes that these SERP benefits are reasonable and recognize the long-term contributions of these three named executive officers.

     Pursuant to Mr. Køehn Milland’s employment agreement, the company makes an annual contribution equal to 6.6% of Mr. Køehn Milland’s base salary to a private pension plan maintained and managed by Mr. Koehn Milland. These contributions are taxable income to Mr. Koehn Milland. The company has no further pension liability to Mr. Køehn Milland.

     Change of control agreements, severance arrangements. We have entered into employment agreements with each of our named executive officers, which are described below under the heading “Employment agreements with named executive officers.” Under these employment agreements, each of our named executive officers is entitled to severance payments upon the termination of their employment under certain circumstances, including, in each case, in the event we terminate their employment in breach of the employment agreement (other than for cause or disability) after a change of control. In addition, some of the agreements with our named executive officers provide for accelerated vesting of their stock options and or restricted stock awards upon the termination of their employment under certain circumstances. These potential change of control and severance payments are detailed in the “Potential payments upon termination or change of control” section below. We believe that these arrangements support our ability to attract and retain superior executive talent and, if a change of control were to occur, to retain our top executives through a period of uncertainty, keep our management team intact, preserve the neutrality of the management team in negotiating and executing a transaction and keep the management team focused on the best interests of the shareholders, rather than their own job security.

     Other benefits

     During 2007, our named executive officers received, to varying degrees, a limited amount of other benefits that we paid on their behalf or for which we provided reimbursement. These benefits included the following:

	•		payments of life insurance premiums. We continued to provide all U.S.-based named executive officers and other executives with a group life insurance plan at no cost. The life insurance plan provides a benefit of two times the executive’s annual base salary up to a maximum of $400,000 in the event of the death of the plan participant. This plan also provides an accidental death and dismemberment benefit with a maximum possible benefit equal to that of the life insurance benefit. In addition, Mr. Currie participates in a plan in the United Arab Emirates with a benefit of $250,000 in the event of death;
	•		payments of long-term disability insurance premiums. We continued to provide all of our U.S.-based named executive officers, other U.S.-based executives and other key employees with a group long-term disability plan that provides a benefit in the event of the plan participant’s disability equal to two-thirds of the participant’s pre-disability income, up to a maximum of $12,000 per month;
	•		employer contributions toward group medical insurance. We continued to provide all of our U.S.-based named executive officers and other U.S.-based executives and employees with a group medical insurance program that provides both preventive and catastrophic benefits. Benefits offered to employees outside of the United States vary by local practice and statutory requirements in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate;

•

relocation. In association with Mr. Køehn Milland’s relocation to Indianapolis, we provided a variety of relocation and expatriate benefits to assist him and his family. These include housing assistance, relocation of personal belongings, expatriate allowance, education for children and tax assistance.

Policy on tax matters

     Section 162(m)

     Our policy is to maximize the tax deductibility of compensation paid to our most highly compensated executives under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and related regulations. Our shareholders have approved our 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan. We may, however, authorize payments to our named executive officers that may not be fully deductible if we believe such payments are in our shareholders’ interests. The performance-based restricted stock unit awards have been structured to qualify as performance-based compensation exempt from the limitations on deductibility imposed by Section 162(m).

     Sections 280G and 4999

     The employment agreements for Messrs. Laikin, Howell, Fivel and Boor provide for tax protection on severance payments resulting from a change of control in the form of a gross up payment to reimburse the executive for any excise tax under Internal Revenue Code Section 4999 as well as any additional income and employment taxes resulting from such reimbursement. Code Section 4999 imposes a 20% non-deductible excise tax on the recipient of an “excess parachute payment” and Code Section 280G disallows the tax deduction to the payor of any amount of an excess parachute payment that is contingent on a change of control. A payment as a result of a change of control must exceed three times the executive’s base amount in order to be considered an excess parachute payment, and then the excise tax is imposed on the parachute payments that exceed the executive’s base amount. The intent of the tax gross-up is to provide a benefit without a tax penalty to our executives who are displaced in the event of a change of control. We believe the provision of tax protection for excess parachute payments for our executive officers is consistent with market practice, is a valuable executive talent retention incentive, and is consistent with the objectives of our overall executive compensation program.

Report of compensation committee on compensation analysis and discussion

     The information contained in this Compensation and Human Resources Committee Report is not “soliciting material” and has not been “filed” with the SEC. This report will not be incorporated by reference into any of our future filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that we may specifically incorporate it by reference into a future filing.

     The compensation and human resources committee has reviewed and discussed the section in this proxy statement entitled “Executive Officers — Compensation discussion and analysis” with Brightpoint’s management. Based on this review and these discussions, the compensation and human resources committee recommended to Brightpoint’s board of directors that this “Compensation discussion and analysis” section be included in Brightpoint’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 and in this proxy statement.

		COMPENSATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
		Eliza Hermann, chair
		Jan Gesmar-Larsen
		Jerre L. Stead

2007 summary compensation table

     The following table discloses for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 the compensation for the person who served as our chief executive officer, the person who served as our chief financial officer and our other named executive officers.

																										Change in
																										pension value
																										and non-
																						Non-equity				qualified
														Stock				Option				incentive plan				deferred				All other
						Base								awards				awards				compensation				compensation				compensation
Name		Year				Salary				Bonus				(1)				(2)				(3)				earnings (4)				(5)				Total
Robert J. Laikin Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer			2007			$	800,000				—			$	1,220,495			$	69,079			$	800,000			$	230,713			$	9,719			$	3,130,006
			2006			$	750,000				—			$	888,301			$	265,324			$	750,000			$	154,686			$	8,112			$	2,816,423
J. Mark Howell Co-chief Operating Officer and President, Americas Division			2007			$	493,700			$	180,000			$	648,878			$	34,589			$	246,850			$	91,604			$	8,669			$	1,704,290
			2006			$	455,000				—			$	423,288			$	132,775			$	227,500			$	63,288			$	8,112			$	1,309,963
Michaél Køehn-Milland Co-chief Operating Officer and President, International Operations			2007			$	221,200			$	67,500				—				—			$	33,180				—			$	77,136			$	399,016
Anthony W. Boor Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer			2007			$	375,000			$	112,500			$	282,983			$	16,738			$	187,500				—			$	8,369			$	983,090
			2006			$	350,000				—			$	159,863			$	42,347			$	175,000				—			$	7,972			$	735,182
Steven E. Fivel Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary			2007			$	375,000			$	112,500			$	388,843			$	30,373			$	187,500			$	78,744			$	8,294			$	1,181,254
			2006			$	360,000				—			$	265,385			$	123,295			$	180,000			$	55,081			$	8,112			$	991,873
R. Bruce Thomlinson (6) President, Asia Pacific, Middle East and Africa			2007			$	538,857			$	87,517			$	469,235			$	34,589			$	269,501				—			$	11,103			$	1,410,802
			2006			$	465,905				—			$	308,155			$	132,775			$	232,952				—			$	9,895			$	1,149,682
John Alexander Du Plessis Currie Executive Vice President, Chief Information Officer			2007			$	434,000			$	90,000			$	621,345				—			$	217,000				—			$	58,182			$	1,420,527
			2006			$	400,000				—			$	419,644				—			$	200,000				—			$	253,011			$	1,272,655

2007 grants of plan-based awards

     The following table discloses for the periods presented the grants of awards made to the named executive officers during our fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 under any of our plans:

All other

stock

awards:

Estimated future payouts under

Estimated future payouts under

number of

Grant date

non-equity incentive plan awards

equity incentive plan awards

shares

fair value of

Grant

or stock or

restricted

Name

date

Threshold

Target(1)

Maximum

Threshold

Target(1)

Maximum

units

stock units

Robert J. Laikin

02/08/07

N/A

$

800,000

N/A

N/A

93,197

N/A

—

$

1,000,936

J. Mark Howell

02/08/07

N/A

$

246,850

N/A

N/A

46,011

N/A

20,000

$

708,958

Michaél Køehn Milland

02/08/07

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Anthony W. Boor

02/08/07

N/A

$

187,500

N/A

N/A

34,949

N/A

—

$

375,352

Steven E. Fivel

02/08/07

N/A

$

187,500

N/A

N/A

34,949

N/A

—

$

375,352

R. Bruce Thomlinson(2)

02/08/07

N/A

$

269,501

N/A

N/A

45,203

N/A

—

$

485,480

John Alexander Du Plessis Currie

02/08/07

N/A

$

217,000

N/A

N/A

40,447

N/A

—

$

434,401

Narrative to summary compensation table and plan-based awards table

Employment agreements with named executive officers

     Certain defined terms

     We have entered into employment agreements with each of our named executive officers, all of which are described below. When used in those agreements, the following terms (except as described below with respect to the use of the term “cause” in the agreements of Messrs. Thomlinson and Currie and Mr. Køehn Milland) have the following meanings:

     “Good reason” is defined as:

	•		any limitation upon or change to the employee’s duties or reporting obligations,
	•		any failure by us to comply with our material obligations under the employment agreement, or
	•		the failure of any successor to our business to assume the employment agreement upon succession.

     A “change of control” shall be deemed to occur, unless previously consented to in writing by the respective employee, upon the occurrence of any of the following:

	•		individuals who as of the date of the agreement constituted our then current board of directors cease to constitute a majority of our board;
	•		subject to certain specified exceptions, the acquisition, by any person or entity not affiliated with the respective employee or us, of beneficial ownership of 15% or more of our voting securities;
	•		the commencement of a proxy contest against management for the election of a majority of our board of directors if the group conducting the proxy contest owns, has or gains the power to vote at least 15% of our voting securities;
	•		the consummation under certain conditions by us of a reorganization, merger or consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets to any person or entity not affiliated with the respective employee or us; or
	•		our complete liquidation or dissolution.

     “Cause” is defined as:

	•		the willful and continuous failure of the employee to substantially perform his required duties;
	•		the employee’s willful criminal misconduct (including embezzlement and criminal fraud) that is materially injurious to us; or
	•		the conviction of the employee of a felony.

     Under our employment agreements with Messrs. Thomlinson and Currie, “cause” is defined as follows:

	•		the employee’s failure to perform any or all of his duties under the employment agreement after reasonable notice from us to him to rectify any such failure;
	•		the employee’s engagement in misconduct that is detrimental or injurious to us, monetarily or otherwise;
	•		the employee being charged with an indictable offense; or
	•		the employee’s violation of our policies and procedures.

     Under our employment agreement with Mr. Køehn Milland, “cause” is defined as follows:

	•		the employee’s failure to perform his duties under the employment agreement after reasonable notice from us to him to rectify any such failure;
	•		the engaging by the employee in misconduct which is injurious to us, monetarily or otherwise;
	•		the conviction of the employee of a felony and the expiration of the time to appeal such conviction; or
	•		if at any time that our securities are listed on a stock exchange, the employee commits any violation of, or fails to comply with, any securities law.

     Messrs. Laikin’s and Howell’s agreements

     We have entered into five-year “evergreen” employment agreements with each of Messrs. Laikin and Howell, which are automatically renewable for successive one-year periods and provided for an annual base compensation in 2007 of $800,000 and $493,700, respectively, and such bonuses as our board of directors may from time to time determine. If we provide the employee with notice of non-renewal or that we desire to terminate the agreement without cause, there is a final five-year term commencing on the date of such notice. The employment agreements provide for employment on a full-time basis and contain a provision that the employee will not compete or engage in a business competitive with our business during the term of the employment agreement and for a period of two years thereafter.

     The employment agreements also provide for severance payments if the employee’s employment is terminated

	•		by him, without good reason, within 12 months after a change of control,
	•		by him, for good reason, prior to and not as a result of a change of control, or
	•		by us, other than for disability or cause, prior to and not as a result of a change of control,

equal to (subject to a severance cap of $9.0 million with respect to Mr. Laikin and $4.5 million with respect to Mr. Howell) the greater of (a) $2.25 million for Mr. Laikin and $1.625 million for Mr. Howell and (b) five times the total compensation (including salary, bonus and the value of all perquisites) received from us during the twelve months prior to the date of termination. If after, or as a result of, a change of control, the employee’s employment is terminated either by the employee for good reason or by us other than for disability or cause, the employee will be entitled to receive severance pay (subject to the respective severance cap) equal to ten times the total compensation (including salary, bonus, the value of all perquisites and the value of all stock options granted to the employee) received from us during the twelve months prior to the date of termination. In addition, the vesting of all options and restricted stock awards granted to the employee will be accelerated, so that the options become immediately exercisable and remain exercisable until the earlier of (a) 180 days from the date of the employee’s termination and (b) the expiration of the stock option, and all restricted stock awards immediately vest, when and if (i) a change of control occurs, (ii) we, in breach of the agreement, terminate the employee’s employment other than for disability or cause, or (iii) the employee terminates his employment for good reason.

     Mr. Køehn Milland’s agreement

     We assumed Mr. Køehn Milland’s employment agreement with Dangaard Telecom upon our acquisition of Dangaard Telecom in July 2007. We amended and restated this agreement on substantially the same terms in October 2007, so that the payment obligations are set forth in U.S. dollars. The employment agreement provides for an annual base salary of $530,880 and such increases and bonuses as our board of directors or compensation committee may from time to time determine. The agreement provides that Mr. Køehn Milland is eligible to participate in our annual executive cash and equity bonus plans at a rate of 25% and 50%, respectively, of his annual base salary. The employment agreement provides for employment on a full-time basis and contains a provision that Mr. Køehn Milland will not compete or engage in a business competitive with our business during the term of his employment and for a period of two years thereafter. Mr. Køehn Milland can terminate his employment upon six months written notice. The agreement includes extended notification provisions that was part of his agreement with Dangaard Telecom, pursuant to which if we terminate Mr. Køehn Milland’s employment other than for cause or because of his death or disability, he will receive his base salary, but not bonus, for a period of 60 months; provided, however, that this period decreases by 12 months on each anniversary of our acquisition of Dangaard Telecom until it reaches a minimum level of 24 months.

     We also entered into a relocation agreement with Mr. Køehn Milland as an incentive for him to move from Denmark to the United States and to help him defray certain costs associated with his and his family’s relocation to Indianapolis. The relocation agreement has a term of three years (so long as Mr. Køehn Milland remains employed with us pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement) and contains annual housing, benefit, vacation, education and tax preparation assistance payments in an aggregate annual amount of approximately $150,000.

     Mr. Boor’s agreement

     We also entered into a three-year “evergreen” employment agreement with Mr. Boor which is automatically renewable for successive one-year periods and provided for an annual base compensation in

2007 of $375,000 and such bonuses as our board of directors or the compensation committee of the board may from time to time determine. The employment agreement provides for employment on a full-time basis and contains a provision that Mr. Boor will not compete or engage in a business competitive with our business during the term of the employment agreement and for a period of two years thereafter. If Mr. Boor’s employment is terminated by him for good reason or within 12 months after a change of control or by us other than for disability or cause, Mr. Boor will be entitled to receive severance pay equal to 2.99 times his annual base compensation (excluding any bonus and the value of all perquisites) received from us during the twelve months prior to the date of termination.

     In addition, the vesting of all options granted to Mr. Boor will be accelerated, so that the options become immediately exercisable and remain exercisable until the earlier of (a) 180 days from the date his employment is terminated and (b) the expiration of the stock option, when and if a change of control occurs.

     Mr. Fivel’s agreement

     We have entered into a three-year “evergreen” employment agreement with Mr. Fivel, which is automatically renewable for successive one-year periods and provided for an annual base compensation in 2007 of $375,000 and such bonuses as our board of directors may from time to time determine. If we provide Mr. Fivel with notice of non-renewal or that we desire to terminate the agreement without cause, there is a final three-year term commencing on the date of such notice. Otherwise, the employment agreement provides substantially the same terms as the employment agreements for Messrs. Laikin and Howell, except that if Mr. Fivel’s employment is terminated:

	•		by him, without good reason, within 12 months after a change of control,
	•		by him, for good reason, prior to and not as a result of a change of control, or
	•		by us, other than for disability or cause, prior to and not as a result of a change of control,

he will be entitled to receive (subject to a $2.25 million severance cap) the greater of (a) $825,000 and (b) three times the total compensation (including salary, bonus and the value of all perquisites) he received from us during the twelve months prior to the date of his termination. If after, or as a result of a change of control, Mr. Fivel’s employment is terminated either by him for good reason or by us other than for disability or cause, Mr. Fivel will be entitled to receive severance pay (subject to the foregoing severance cap) equal to six times the compensation (including, salary, bonus, and the value of all perquisites and the value of all stock options granted to him) received or earned by him from us during the twelve months prior to the date of termination.

     In addition, the vesting of all options and restricted stock awards granted to Mr. Fivel will be accelerated, so that the options become immediately exercisable and remain exercisable until the earlier of (a) 180 days from the date of his termination and (b) the expiration of the stock option, and all restricted stock awards immediately vest, when and if (i) a change of control occurs, (ii) we, in breach of the agreement, terminate his employment other than for disability or cause, or (iii) Mr. Fivel terminates his employment for good reason.

     Mr. Thomlinson’s agreement

     We also entered into a five-year employment agreement with Mr. Thomlinson, which, as renewed, currently extends through December 31, 2007. Pursuant to that agreement, he had an annual base compensation in 2007 of $538,857 (after converting his salary from Australian dollars to U.S. dollars using the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2007, or 0.8752 Australian dollars to one U.S. dollar) and such bonuses as our board of directors or the compensation committee of the board may from time to time determine. The employment agreement provides for employment on a full-time basis and

contains a provision that Mr. Thomlinson will not compete in a business competitive with our business during the term of the employment agreement and for a period of one year thereafter. The employment agreement also provides that if Mr. Thomlinson’s employment is terminated by us other than for death, disability or cause, prior to and not as a result of a change of control, then Mr. Thomlinson is entitled to a termination payment equal to the aggregate emoluments (defined as base salary, bonus and the value of all perquisites, but excluding the value of any equity) he received for the 12-month period ending on the date of termination. If Mr. Thomlinson is terminated other than for death, disability or cause, in breach of this agreement and upon a change of control, we shall pay Mr. Thomlinson a lump sum severance amount on the tenth day following the date of termination, equal to three times the salary (inclusive of statutory superannuation) received or earned by Mr. Thomlinson under the agreement during the twelve months prior to the termination date (subject to a severance cap of $1,320,795 Australian dollars, which is currently approximately $1,227,017 U.S. dollars).

     Mr. Currie’s agreement

     We have entered into a three-year employment contract with Mr. Currie, which is automatically renewable for a one-year period and provided for an annual base compensation in 2007 of $434,000 and such bonuses as our board of directors or the compensation committee of the board may from time to time determine. The employment agreement provides for employment on a full-time basis and contains a provision that Mr. Currie will not compete in a business competitive with our business during the term of the employment agreement and for a period of one year thereafter. The employment agreement also provides that if Mr. Currie’s employment is terminated by us in breach of this agreement, prior to and not as a result of a change of control, then Mr. Currie is entitled to a termination payment equal to the aggregate emoluments (defined as base salary, bonus and the value of all perquisites, but excluding the value of any equity) he received for the 12-month period ending on the date of termination. If Mr. Currie is terminated other than for death, disability or cause, in breach of this agreement and upon a change of control, we shall pay Mr. Currie a lump sum severance amount on the tenth day following the date of termination, equal to three times the salary received or earned by Mr. Currie under the agreement during the twelve months prior to the termination date (subject to a severance cap of $1.0 million, provided that this maximum amount shall not include statutory entitlements). If Mr. Currie’s employment is terminated for heightened cause, defined in his agreement as being convicted of, or entering a guilty or no contest plea to (i) a crime constituting a felony under the U.S. laws of that is related to our business or Mr. Currie’s employment with us, or (ii) actual or attempted theft, fraud, embezzlement or willful misappropriation of funds against us, then Mr. Currie will forfeit the unvested balance of the 120,000 shares of our restricted stock awarded to him on February 23, 2006 as a material inducement to his employment. These shares vest as to one-eighth of the shares on each of the first eight anniversaries of the date of grant, and the unvested balance as of December 31, 2007 was 105,000 shares. These shares were registered on a registration statement on Form S-3 filed on November 19, 2007.

Executive equity program and bonus plans

     2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan

     The equity component of our executive compensation program is derived from our 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which is administered by the compensation committee. Currently our incentive plan enables the compensation committee to grant to our employees, including our named executive officers, the employees of our subsidiaries, our directors, our consultants and other persons who are expected to contribute to our success, the following types of equity awards under the plan:

	•		non-qualified incentive stock options,
	•		performance units;

	•		restricted stock;
	•		deferred stock;
	•		other stock-based awards (which includes restricted stock units); and
	•		cash based awards.

     Prior to 2005, all performance-based equity compensation for named executive officers was issued in the form of stock options. Beginning in 2005, we began issuing restricted stock units in combination with stock options and restricted stock awards as part of our equity program, primarily because of the increased stock-based compensation expense associated with stock options and similar instruments under SFAS 123R. In 2007, all of our performance-based equity compensation was issued under our 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan in the form of restricted stock units.

     No participant may be granted awards under the plan relating to more than 2,025,000 shares of our common stock in the aggregate, in any year. The total number of shares reserved and available for distribution under the incentive plan was originally set at 4,050,000 shares. As of December 31, 2007, a total of 2,566,497 of such shares had been granted and 1,483,503 were available for future award grants.

     We are currently seeking shareholder approval to amend our 2004 Long-Term Incentive plan to increase the number of shares available for issuance thereunder by 2,173,953 shares. For more information with respect to this proposed amendment, see the section in this proxy statement entitled “Proposal 2” commencing on page 52.

     2007 executive equity program and bonus plan

     In February 2007, the compensation committee adopted our 2007 executive equity program and, as part of that program, granted performance-based restricted stock units under our 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan to each of our executive officers, including our chief executive officer. These grants were subject to forfeiture, in whole or in part if we did not achieve certain pre-established performance measures, including adjusted income from continuing operations, weighted at 50%, and four equally weighted strategic measures also weighted, in the aggregate, at 50%. In February 2008, our compensation committee determined that each of the pre-established performance measures had been achieved or exceeded, after excluding the impact of the Dangaard Telecom operations acquired in 2007. As a result, all of the grants made as part of the 2007 executive equity program were earned by our executive officers. These earned grants commenced vesting in three equal annual installments commencing in February 2008.

     The compensation committee also established a 2007 cash award bonus program for our executive officers, referred to as the 2007 executive bonus plan, which was based upon the same pre-established performance measures set forth in our 2007 executive equity program. Under the 2007 executive bonus plan, the target bonus established for Robert J. Laikin, our chief executive officer, was 100% of his 2007 base salary and the target bonus established for each of our other participating named executive officers was 50% of his respective 2007 base salary. In February 2008, our compensation committee determined that each of the pre-established performance measures had been achieved or exceeded, after excluding the impact of the Dangaard Telecom operations acquired in 2007.

Outstanding equity awards at 2007 fiscal year-end

     The following table discloses, for each named executive officer, his unexercised options and unvested stock and equity incentive plan awards outstanding as of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2007:

		Option Awards															Stock Awards
																										Equity incentive
																										plan awards:
																														Market
																														or
																										Number				payout
																										of				value of
																						Market				unearned				unearned
																						value of				shares or				shares or
																		Number				shares or				units or				units or
																		of shares				units of				other				other
																		or units of				stock				rights				rights
		Number of securities												Option				stock that				that have				that have				that have
		underlying options (#)								Option				expira-				have not				not				not				not
						Un-				exercise				tion				not vested				vested				vested				vested
Name		Exercisable				exercisable				price				date				(#)				(#)				(#)				($)
Robert J. Laikin			60,022				30,010	(1)		$	6.78				02/18/10				596,861	(3)		$	9,167,785				93,197	(9)		$	1,431,506
J. Mark Howell			—				15,034	(1)		$	6.78				02/18/10				311,902	(4)		$	4,790,815				46,011	(9)		$	706,729
Michaél Køehn Milland			—				—				—				—				—				—				—				—
Anthony W. Boor			—				9,000	(2)		$	7.48				02/07/10				35,164	(5)		$	540,119				34,949	(9)		$	536,817
Steven E. Fivel			25,156				12,578	(1)		$	6.78				02/18/10				152,822	(6)		$	2,347,346				34,949	(9)		$	536,817
R. Bruce Tomlinson			—				15,034	(1)		$	6.78				02/18/10				162,386	(7)		$	2,494,249				45,203	(9)		$	694,318
John Alexander Du Plessis Currie			—				—				—				—				116,152	(8)		$	1,784,095				40,447	(9)		$	621,266

Option exercises and stock vested in 2007

     The following table sets forth information concerning the number of shares acquired and dollar amounts realized by each of the named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 on the exercise of stock options and the vesting of restricted stock held by the named executive officers as of December 31, 2007:

		Option Awards								Stock Awards
		Number of				Value				Number of				Value
		shares acquired				realized				shares acquired				realized
		on exercise				on exercise				on vesting				on vesting
Name		(#)				($)				(#)				($)
Robert J. Laikin			90,000			$	1,350,000				27,901			$	294,624
J. Mark Howell			75,070			$	1,160,165				13,673			$	144,345
Michaél Køehn Milland			—				—				—				—
Anthony W. Boor			26,100			$	438,193				6,332			$	68,006
Steven E. Fivel			45,000			$	675,000				11,310			$	119,263
R. Bruce Thomlinson			60,036			$	829,097				13,415			$	141,574
John Alexander Du Plessis Currie			—				—				20,576			$	241,356

2007 pension benefits table

     The following table sets forth information concerning each plan that provides for payments of other benefits at, following, or in connection with retirement with respect to each of the named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007:

				Number of
				years				Present value				Payments
				credited				of accumulated				during last
Name		Plan name		service (1)				benefit (2)				fiscal year
Robert J. Laikin		Brightpoint, Inc. Amended & Restated Agreement for Supplemental Executive Retirement Benefits			18.5			$	659,286			None
J. Mark Howell		Brightpoint, Inc. Amended & Restated Agreement for Supplemental Executive Retirement Benefits			13.5			$	310,276			None
Michaél Køehn Milland(3)		N/A			—				—			—
Anthony W. Boor		N/A			—				—			—
Steven E. Fivel		Brightpoint, Inc. Amended & Restated Agreement for Supplemental Executive Retirement Benefits			11			$	283,950			None
R. Bruce Thomlinson		N/A			—				—			—
John Alexander Du Plessis Currie(4)		N/A			—				—			—

     Our amended and restated SERP agreements provide that we will implement a supplemental retirement benefit providing each of Messrs. Laikin, Howell and Fivel with an additional payment subject to a cap amount.

     Assuming annual salary increases of 3% per year, the anticipated payments pursuant to the amended and restated SERP agreements would reach the cap amount and would be paid in approximately the following amounts: $496,000 per year to Mr. Laikin commencing at age 50; $344,000 per year to Mr. Howell commencing at age 53; and $229,000 per year to Mr. Fivel commencing at age 55. Payment under the amended and restated SERP agreements is contingent upon termination of service.

     The SERP agreements we have entered into with each of Messrs. Laikin, Howell and Fivel do not provide an enhanced or reduced benefit based on the circumstances regarding termination, except that (a) if such person is fired for cause, he may not receive any payments under the SERP agreement until he has reached age 62 and (b) there is no survivor benefit in the event that termination results from the executive’s death.

Potential payments upon termination or change of control

     General

     With respect to termination by us of a named executive officer’s employment for cause (at any time) or by the named executive officer of his employment without good reason (and not as a result of a change of control), the executive is only entitled to his accrued and unpaid salary and his unvested stock options, restricted stock units and shares of restricted stock are deemed forfeited at such time. The following table sets forth potential payments receivable by our named executive officers upon termination of their employment under the various circumstances listed and assumes for purposes of calculating amounts due that the executive was terminated as of December 31, 2007:

		Termination of executive’s employment by												Termination of executive’s
		executive:												employment by us:
		Within 12
		months after				Prior to								Prior to
		change of				change of				After change				change of
		control,				control,				of control,				control,				After change				For death
		without good				with good				with good				without				of control,				or
Benefit(1)		reason				reason				reason				cause				without cause				disability
Robert J. Laikin(2):
Severance(3)		$	8,048,595	(4)		$	8,048,595	(4)		$	9,000,000	(5)		$	8,048,595	(4)		$	9,000,000	(5)		$	1,200,000	(6)
Acceleration of long-term incentives		$	9,244,510	(7)(8)		$	8,736,121	(7)		$	8,294,400	(7)(8)		$	9,244,510	(7)		$	8,294,400	(7)(8)		$	5,069,696	(9)
Tax gross up(10)		$	—			$	4,569,535			$	6,221,943			$	5,339,862			$	6,221,943			$	—
Michaél Køehn Milland:
Severance(3)		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	2,654,400			$	2,654,400			$	—
Acceleration of long-term incentives		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—
Tax gross up(10)		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—
J. Mark Howell(2):
Severance(3)		$	3,746,095	(4)		$	3,746,095	(4)		$	4,500,000	(5)		$	3,746,095	(4)		$	4,500,000	(5)		$	740,550	(6)
Acceleration of long-term incentives		$	4,899,810	(7)(8)		$	4,276,152	(7)		$	4,147,200	(7)(8)		$	4,276,152	(7)		$	4,147,200	(7)(8)		$	2,732,764	(9)
Tax gross up(10)		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—
Anthony W. Boor:
Severance(3)		$	1,121,250	(11)		$	1,121,250	(11)		$	1,121,250	(11)		$	1,121,250	(11)		$	1,121,250	(11)		$	81,000	(12)
Acceleration of long-term incentives		$	1,147,829	(7)(8)		$	—	(7)		$	1,147,829	(7)(8)		$	—	(7)		$	1,147,829	(7)(8)		$	1,076,936	(9)
Tax gross up(10)		$	552,342			$	—			$	552 342			$	—			$	552 342			$	—
Steven E. Fivel(2):
Severance(3)		$	1,712,382	(13)		$	1,712,382	(13)		$	2,250,000	(14)		$	1,712,382	(13)		$	2,250,000	(14)		$	562,500	(6)
Acceleration of long-term incentives		$	2,610,441	(7)(8)		$	2,181,482	(7)		$	2,073,600	(7)(8)		$	2,181,482	(7)		$	2,073,600	(7)(8)		$	1,501,768	(9)
Tax gross up(10)		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—
R. Bruce Thomlinson:
Severance(3)		$	806,627	(15)		$	806,627	(15)		$	806,627	(15)		$	806,627	(15)		$	1,155,960	(16)		$	—
Acceleration of long-term incentives		$	3,356,548	(8)(17)		$	—			$	3,356,548	(8)(17)		$	—			$	3,356,548	(8)(17)		$	2,700,303	(9)
Tax gross up(10)		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—
John Alexander Du Plessis Currie:
Severance(3)		$	952,935	(15)		$	952,935	(15)		$	952,935	(15)		$	952,935	(15)		$	1,301,935	(16)		$	301,935	(18)
Acceleration of long-term incentives		$	2,405,361	(8)(19)		$	1,612,800	(19)		$	2,405,361	(8)(19)		$	1,612,800	(19)		$	2,405,361	(8)(19)		$	2,405,361	(8)(19)
Tax gross up(10)		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—

  Employment agreements

     General

     Pursuant to their respective employment agreements, our named executive officers are entitled to payments upon a change of control and, in some cases, upon termination of their employment with us for other reasons, depending on the circumstances in which they leave their employment with us. Generally, the employment agreements with our named executive officers provide that upon a change of control, they are entitled to a lump sum payment equal to a multiple of their base salary (or their base compensation) if we terminate their employment in breach of their agreement other than for disability or cause. In addition, some of the agreements with our named executive officers provide for accelerated vesting of their stock options and/or restricted stock awards upon the termination of their employment under certain circumstances. A more detailed discussion of each of our employment agreements with our named executive officers, including, where applicable, details with respect to their severance formulas and severance caps and the definitions used in such agreements for terms such as “change of control,” “good reason” and “cause,” are set forth above in the section entitled “—Employment agreements with named executive officers.”

     Severance payments

     Each of Messrs. Laikin, ,Howell and Fivel is entitled to a lump sum severance payment equal to the greater of (a) a designated amount and (b) a multiple (five, in the case of Messrs. Laikin and Howell, and three, in the case of Mr. Fivel) of the aggregate salary, bonus and perquisites received by him during

the prior 12 months, subject in each case to a designated severance cap, in the event that, prior to and not as a result of a change of control, his employment is terminated either by him with good reason or by us other than for disability or cause or in the event that he terminates his employment within 12 months after a change of control. In addition, each of them is entitled to a higher lump sum severance payment, an amount equal to ten, in the case of Messrs. Laikin and Howell, and six, in the case of Mr. Fivel, times the aggregate salary, bonus, value of any perquisites and value of any stock options received by him during the prior 12 months, subject to his severance cap, if his employment is terminated either by him with good reason or by us other than for disability or cause, in each case, after or as a result of a change of control.

     The employment agreements of each of Messrs. Laikin, Howell and Fivel provide that in the event that the aggregate severance payments or benefits provided to him under his employment agreement and under all plans, programs and arrangements of the employer, referred to as the severance total, is determined to constitute a “parachute payment” under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, then the severance total will be increased by an amount, referred to as the increase, sufficient so that after he pays (a) any income taxes on the increase and (b) any excise tax on the sum of the severance total and the increase, he will have received an amount, net of such taxes, equal to the severance total. Pursuant to their employment agreements, none of Messrs. Laikin, Howell and Fivel will be required to repay to us any amount that is finally determined by the Internal Revenue Service to have been in excess of the amount permitted to be received without incurring such excise tax.

     Mr. Boor is entitled to a lump sum severance payment equal to 2.99 times the salary he received during the 12 months prior to the termination of his employment in the event that we, at any time, terminate his employment (other than for cause or disability) in breach of his employment agreement or he terminates his employment agreement either with good reason or within 12 months after a change of control. Mr. Boor’s employment agreement provides that in the event any excise tax is due with respect to severance payments made under his employment agreement then the severance payments will be increased so that the excise tax on such severance pay shall be paid, as well as any income tax payable on such excise tax.

     Each of Messrs. Currie and Thomlinson is entitled to a lump sum severance payment equal to three times the salary he received during the 12 months prior to the termination of his employment, subject to a designated severance cap, if we terminate his employment (other than for death, disability or cause) in breach of his employment agreement following a change of control. Each of Messrs. Thomlinson and Currie is entitled to a termination payment equal to the aggregate emoluments (defined as base salary, bonus and the value of all perquisites, but excluding the value of any equity) he received for the 12-month period ending on the date of termination, if his employment is terminated, prior to and not as a result of a change of control, for any reason other than death, disability or cause. Additionally, in all cases, Mr. Currie is entitled to statutory severance payments under the law of the United Arab Emirates, and such amounts do not reduce the severance amounts under his employment agreement.

     Mr. Køehn Milland is entitled to a payment that includes an extended notice period for termination other than cause, death or disability pursuant to which if we terminate Mr. Køehn Milland’s employment other than for cause or because of his death or disability, he will receive his base salary, but not bonus, for a period of 60 months; provided, however, that this period decreases by 12 months on each anniversary of our July 31, 2007 acquisition of Dangaard Telecom until it reaches a minimum level of 24 months

     Post-termination obligations to us

     While employed by us and for a period of two years after his employment with us terminates, each of Messrs. Laikin, Howell, Køehn Milland , Fivel and Boor has agreed not to engage in or have an interest in or offer any services to any business competitive with our principal business activities. Each of these executives has also agreed that for two years after his employment with us has terminated, he will not:

	•		use, disseminate, or disclose any of our confidential information, or
	•		interfere with or disrupt our business activities, including soliciting our customers or personnel.

Each has also agreed that at no time during the term of his respective employment agreement or thereafter will he disparage our commercial, business or financial reputation or misappropriate any of our trade secrets.

     Each of Messrs. Currie and Thomlinson has agreed that during the term of his employment and for a period of one year following the termination of his employment, he will not compete with us in any territory in which he performed services for us pursuant to his employment agreement, and he will not have any interest in, or render services to, any of our competitors. Each has also agreed that during such one year period, he will not interfere with or disrupt our business activities, including soliciting our customers or personnel.

OTHER INFORMATION RELATING TO OUR DIRECTORS AND
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

Voting security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management

     The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of Brightpoint’s common stock as of the record date, based on information obtained from the persons named below, by:

	•		each person known by us to own beneficially more than five percent of our common stock;
	•		each of our executive officers;
	•		each of our directors; and
	•		all of our executive officers and directors as a group.

     Except as indicated by footnote, to our knowledge, the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all securities beneficially owned, subject to community property laws where applicable. The shares “beneficially owned” by a person are determined in accordance with the definition of “beneficial ownership” set forth in the regulations of the SEC and, accordingly, shares of our common stock subject to options, warrants, restricted stock units or other convertible securities that are exercisable or convertible within 60 days of March 17, 2008 are deemed to be beneficially owned by the person holding such securities and to be outstanding for purposes of determining such holder’s percentage ownership. The same securities may be beneficially owned by more than one person. Shares of common stock subject to options, warrants, restricted stock units, or other convertible securities that are not exercisable or do not vest within 60 days of March 17, 2008 are not included in the table below as shares “beneficially owned”. In addition, the table does not include the economic interest in an aggregate of 2,784,600 shares held by three of our directors and two of our executives through their share ownership in Dangaard Holding (inclusive of their warrants on Dangaard Holding A/S stock), because these directors and executive officers do not have voting or investment power with respect to these shares. Percentage of common stock beneficially owned is based on 81,858,328 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 17, 2008.

		Number of shares of
		common stock				% of common stock
Name and address of beneficial owner (1)		beneficially owned				beneficially owned
Nordic Capital VI Limited and Dangaard
Holding A/S (2)			30,000,000				36.7	%
GS Investment Strategies, LLC (3)			6,000,000				7.3	%
Robert J. Laikin (4)			723,137				*
J. Mark Howell (5)			346,713				*
Michaél Køehn Milland (6)			—				*
Anthony Boor (7)			31,373				*
Steven E. Fivel (8)			205,454				*
R. Bruce Thomlinson (9)			248,889				*
John Alexander du Plessis Currie (10)			121,059				*
Richard W. Roedel (11)			99,738				*
Jerre L. Stead (12)			95,350				*
Eliza Hermann (13)			31,555				*
Marisa E. Pratt (14)			29,661				*
Kari-Pekka Wilska (15)			16,555				*
Jørn P. Jensen (16)			4,922				*
Jan Gesmar-Larsen (17)			4,587				*
Thorleif Krarup (18)			4,364				*
All directors and executive officers as a group (17 persons) (19)			1,970,462				2.4	%