e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended July 1, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number: 001-31650
MINDSPEED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
01-0616769 |
(State of incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
4000 MacArthur Boulevard, East Tower
Newport Beach, California
|
|
92660-3095 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(949) 579-3000
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of outstanding shares of the Registrants Common Stock as of July 29, 2011 was
34,630,374.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains statements (including certain projections and
business trends) relating to Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. that are forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act),
and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and are
subject to the safe harbor created by those sections. All statements included in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q, other than those that are purely historical, are forward-looking statements.
Words such as expect, believe, anticipate, outlook, could, target, project, intend,
plan, seek, estimate, should, may, assume and continue, as well as variations of such
words and similar expressions, also identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements
in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q include, without limitation, statements regarding:
|
|
|
the ability of our relationships with leading network infrastructure original equipment
manufacturers to facilitate early adoption of our products, enhance our ability to obtain
design wins and encourage adoption of our technology in the industry; |
|
|
|
the growth prospects for the network infrastructure equipment and communications
semiconductors markets, including increased demand for network capacity, the upgrade and
expansion of existing networks and the build-out of networks in developing countries; |
|
|
|
our belief that our diverse portfolio of semiconductor
solutions has positioned us to capitalize on some of the most significant trends in telecommunications spending; |
|
|
|
our belief that we are well-situated in China and that fiber
deployments are being rolled out by the countrys major telecommunications carriers; |
|
|
|
our plans to make substantial investments in research and development and participate
in the formulation of industry standards; |
|
|
|
our belief that we can maximize our return on our research and development spending by
focusing our investment in what we believe are key growth markets; |
|
|
|
the continuation of intense price and product competition, and the resulting declining
average selling prices for our products; |
|
|
|
the increasing trend toward industry consolidation and the effect it could have on our
operating results; |
|
|
|
the sufficiency of our cash balances, along with cash expected from product sales, to
fund our operations, research and development efforts, anticipated capital expenditures,
working capital and other financing requirements, including interest payments on debt
obligations, for the next 12 months; |
|
|
|
our expectations with respect to our recognition of income tax benefits in the future; |
|
|
|
our restructuring plans, including timing, expected workforce reductions, the expected
cost savings under our restructuring plans and the uses of those savings, the timing and
amount of payments, the impact on our business, the amounts of future charges to complete
our restructuring plans, including any future plans to reduce operating expenses and/or
increase revenue; |
|
|
|
the value of our intellectual property, our ability to continue recognizing
patent-related revenue from the sale or licensing of our intellectual property and our
plans to periodically enter into strategic arrangements to leverage our portfolio by
licensing or selling our intellectual property; |
|
|
|
our intention to continue to expand our international business activities, including
expansion of design and operations centers abroad, and the challenges associated with such
expansion; |
|
|
|
our intention to continue to monitor the effect of the events in Japan on end demand
patterns and inventory levels throughout the supply chain;
|
2
|
|
|
our expectations regarding the effect of the recent crisis in Japan on our operations
in the fiscal fourth quarter of 2011 and beyond; |
|
|
|
our expectations regarding the cyclical nature of the
semiconductor industry; and |
|
|
|
the impact of recent accounting pronouncements and the adoption of new accounting
standards. |
Our expectations, beliefs, anticipations, objectives, intentions, plans and strategies
regarding the future are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results, and actual events that occur, to differ materially
from results contemplated by the forward-looking statement. These risks and uncertainties include,
but are not limited to:
|
|
|
fluctuations in our operating results and future operating losses; |
|
|
|
constraints in the supply of wafers and other product components from our third-party
manufacturers; |
|
|
|
worldwide political and economic uncertainties and specific conditions in the markets
we address; |
|
|
|
fluctuations in the price of our common stock; |
|
|
|
loss of or diminished demand from one or more key customers or distributors; |
|
|
|
successful development and introduction of new products; |
|
|
|
our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; |
|
|
|
doing business internationally and our ability to successfully and cost effectively
establish and manage operations in foreign jurisdictions; |
|
|
|
cash requirements and terms and availability of financing; |
|
|
|
the expense of and our ability to defend our intellectual property against infringement
claims by others; |
|
|
|
pricing pressures and other competitive factors; |
|
|
|
order and shipment uncertainty; |
|
|
|
our ability to obtain design wins and develop revenue from them; |
|
|
|
product defects and bugs; |
|
|
|
business acquisitions and investments; and |
|
|
|
our ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes. |
The forward-looking statements in this report are subject to additional risks and
uncertainties, including those set forth in Part II, Item 1A Risk Factors and those detailed from
time to time in our other filings with the SEC. These forward-looking statements are made only as
of the date hereof and, except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise
any of them, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Mindspeed® and Mindspeed Technologies® are registered trademarks of Mindspeed
Technologies, Inc. Other brands, names and trademarks contained in this report are the property of
their respective owners.
3
MINDSPEED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
INDEX
4
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MINDSPEED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited, in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
43,227 |
|
|
$ |
43,685 |
|
Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $375 at July 1, 2011 and $189 at
October 1, 2010 |
|
|
16,397 |
|
|
|
25,678 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
20,412 |
|
|
|
10,205 |
|
Deferred tax assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,264 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
2,778 |
|
|
|
3,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
82,814 |
|
|
|
84,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
15,196 |
|
|
|
12,700 |
|
Licensed and purchased intangibles, net |
|
|
13,982 |
|
|
|
9,887 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,683 |
|
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
113,675 |
|
|
$ |
108,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
9,033 |
|
|
$ |
9,303 |
|
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
|
5,292 |
|
|
|
9,336 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
1,291 |
|
|
|
1,503 |
|
Deferred income on sales to distributors |
|
|
6,179 |
|
|
|
5,199 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
658 |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
5,863 |
|
|
|
4,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
28,313 |
|
|
|
31,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible senior notes long term |
|
|
14,114 |
|
|
|
13,810 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
2,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
44,242 |
|
|
|
47,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value: 25,000
shares authorized; no shares issued or
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000 shares
authorized; 33,864 (July 1, 2011) and 32,220
(October 1, 2010) issued and outstanding
shares |
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
324,778 |
|
|
|
318,468 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(255,597 |
) |
|
|
(257,001 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
69,433 |
|
|
|
61,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
113,675 |
|
|
$ |
108,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
5
MINDSPEED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited, in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
42,216 |
|
|
$ |
43,281 |
|
|
$ |
118,812 |
|
|
$ |
120,560 |
|
Intellectual property |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
42,216 |
|
|
|
43,281 |
|
|
|
121,312 |
|
|
|
120,560 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
15,967 |
|
|
|
15,501 |
|
|
|
44,531 |
|
|
|
43,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
26,249 |
|
|
|
27,780 |
|
|
|
76,781 |
|
|
|
77,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
15,077 |
|
|
|
12,731 |
|
|
|
43,525 |
|
|
|
37,540 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
11,034 |
|
|
|
10,190 |
|
|
|
31,324 |
|
|
|
30,215 |
|
Special charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
26,111 |
|
|
|
22,737 |
|
|
|
74,831 |
|
|
|
68,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
5,043 |
|
|
|
1,950 |
|
|
|
8,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(398 |
) |
|
|
(396 |
) |
|
|
(1,195 |
) |
|
|
(1,419 |
) |
Other income/(expense), net |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
4,970 |
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
8,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
(750 |
) |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
(716 |
) |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
464 |
|
|
$ |
4,864 |
|
|
$ |
1,404 |
|
|
$ |
7,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares
used in per share computation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
32,400 |
|
|
|
31,481 |
|
|
|
32,147 |
|
|
|
29,781 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
33,390 |
|
|
|
36,075 |
|
|
|
33,144 |
|
|
|
30,942 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
6
MINDSPEED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited, in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,404 |
|
|
$ |
7,843 |
|
Adjustments required to reconcile net income/(loss)
to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3,969 |
|
|
|
3,654 |
|
Amortization of license agreements |
|
|
1,716 |
|
|
|
914 |
|
Restructuring (recovery) charges |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
605 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
4,023 |
|
|
|
3,165 |
|
Inventory (recovery) provision |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
1,417 |
|
Amortization of debt discount on convertible debt |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
446 |
|
Other non-cash items, net |
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
9,141 |
|
|
|
(10,881 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(10,167 |
) |
|
|
92 |
|
Current deferred tax asset |
|
|
2,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
(265 |
) |
|
|
106 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
3,070 |
|
Deferred income on sales to distributors |
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
(569 |
) |
|
|
(1,005 |
) |
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
|
(4,128 |
) |
|
|
248 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
Other liabilities, net |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
(738 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
10,406 |
|
|
|
10,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(5,849 |
) |
|
|
(3,814 |
) |
Payments under license agreements |
|
|
(6,819 |
) |
|
|
(1,131 |
) |
Net cash paid for acquired companies |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(12,768 |
) |
|
|
(4,945 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross proceeds from sale of equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,300 |
|
Offering costs from sale of equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,307 |
) |
Retirement of convertible debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,500 |
) |
Payments made on capital lease obligations |
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
(380 |
) |
Borrowings under line of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
Payments made on borrowings under line of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,000 |
) |
Repurchase of restricted stock for income tax withholding |
|
|
(362 |
) |
|
|
(490 |
) |
Proceeds from equity compensation programs |
|
|
2,666 |
|
|
|
1,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
1,902 |
|
|
|
7,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange rates on cash |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase/ (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(458 |
) |
|
|
13,216 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
43,685 |
|
|
|
20,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
43,227 |
|
|
$ |
34,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
7
MINDSPEED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. (Mindspeed or the Company) designs, develops and sells
semiconductor solutions for communications applications in the wireline and wireless network
infrastructure, which includes enterprise networks, broadband access networks (fixed and mobile)
and metropolitan and wide area networks.
Basis of Presentation The consolidated condensed financial statements, prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States of America,
include the accounts of Mindspeed and each of its subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and
transactions among Mindspeed and its subsidiaries have been eliminated in consolidation. In the
opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements contain all
adjustments, consisting of adjustments of a normal recurring nature and special charges (Note 7),
necessary to present fairly the Companys financial position, results of operations and cash flows
in accordance with GAAP. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for a full year. These financial statements should
be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2010.
Fiscal Periods The Companys interim fiscal quarters end on the thirteenth Friday of each
quarter. The third quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2010 ended on July 1, 2011 and July 2, 2010,
respectively.
Recent Accounting Standards In September 2009, the Emerging Issues Task Force reached a
consensus on Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605)
Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, or ASU 2009-13 and ASU 2009-14, Software (Topic 985)
Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements, or ASU 2009-14. ASU 2009-13 modifies
the requirements that must be met for an entity to recognize revenue from the sale of a delivered
item that is part of a multiple-element arrangement when other items have not yet been delivered.
ASU 2009-13 eliminates the requirement that all undelivered elements must have either: (i) vendor
specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value; or (ii) third-party evidence (TPE) before an
entity can recognize the portion of an overall arrangement consideration that is attributable to
items that have already been delivered. In the absence of VSOE or TPE of the standalone selling
price for one or more delivered or undelivered elements in a multiple-element arrangement, entities
will be required to estimate the selling prices of those elements. Overall arrangement
consideration will be allocated to each element (both delivered and undelivered items) based on
their relative selling prices, regardless of whether those selling prices are evidenced by VSOE or
TPE or are based on the entitys estimated selling price. The residual method of allocating
arrangement consideration has been eliminated. ASU 2009-14 modifies the software revenue
recognition guidance to exclude from its scope tangible products that contain both software and
non-software components that function together to deliver a products essential functionality.
These new updates are effective for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in
fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company adopted these provisions effective
October 2, 2010, and they did not have a material impact on its consolidated condensed financial
statements.
Revenue Recognition The Companys revenue consists principally of sales of semiconductor
devices and, to a lesser extent, support and maintenance contracts, development agreements and the
sale and license of intellectual property. The Company recognizes revenue when the following
fundamental criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery has
occurred; (iii) the price to the customer is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collection of the
sales price is probable. In instances where final acceptance of the product, system or solution is
specified by the customer, revenue is deferred until all acceptance criteria have been met.
The Companys semiconductor products either do not contain software that is more than
incidental to the functionality of the product, or the software functions together with
non-software deliverables to deliver the essential functionality of the product. Accordingly, the
Company accounts for revenue in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification
605, Revenue Recognition, or ASC 605, and all related
8
interpretations. Additionally, the Company
provides unspecified software upgrades and enhancements through its
support and maintenance contracts for certain of its semiconductor products. Support and
maintenance services revenue is deferred and recognized ratably over the period during which the
services are to be performed.
Revenue is recognized on products shipped directly to customers at the time the products are
shipped and title and risk of loss transfer to the customer, in accordance with the terms specified
in the arrangement, and the four above mentioned revenue recognition criteria are met.
Revenue is recognized on sales to distributors based on the rights granted to these
distributors in the distribution agreements. The Company has certain distributors who have been
granted return rights and receive credits for changes in selling prices to end customers, the
magnitude of which is not known at the time products are shipped to the distributor. The return
rights granted to these distributors consist of limited stock rotation rights, which allow them to
rotate up to 10% of the products in their inventory twice a year, as well as certain product return
rights if the applicable distribution agreement is terminated. These distributors also receive
price concessions because they resell the Companys products to end customers at various negotiated
price points which vary by end customer, product, quantity, geography and competitive pricing
environments. When a distributors resale is priced at a discount from the distributors invoice
price, the Company credits back to the distributor a portion of the distributors original purchase
price after the resale transaction is complete. Thus, a portion of the Deferred income on sales to
distributors balance will be credited back to the distributor in the future. Under these
agreements, recognition of revenue is deferred until the products are resold by the distributor, at
which time the Companys final net sales price is fixed and the distributors right to return the
products expires. At the time of shipment to these distributors: (i) a trade receivable at the
invoiced selling price is recorded because there is a legally enforceable obligation from the
distributor to pay the Company currently for product delivered; (ii) inventory is relieved for the
carrying value of products shipped because legal title has passed to the distributor; and (iii)
deferred revenue and deferred cost of inventory are recorded under the Deferred income on sales to
distributors caption in the liability section of the Companys consolidated balance sheets. The
Company evaluates the deferred cost of inventory component of this account for possible impairment
by considering potential obsolescence of products that might be returned and by considering the
potential of resale prices of these products being below the Companys cost. By reviewing deferred
inventory costs in the manner discussed above, the Company ensures that any portion of deferred
inventory costs that are not recoverable from future contractual revenue are charged to cost of
goods sold as an expense. Deferred income on sales to distributors effectively represents the
gross margin on sales to distributors; however, the amount of gross margin that is recognized in
future periods may be less than the originally recorded deferred income as a result of subsequent
negotiated price concessions. In recent years, such concessions have exceeded 30% of list price on
average. See Note 2 for detail of this account balance.
Revenue from other distributors is recognized at the time of shipment and when title and risk
of loss transfer to the distributor, in accordance with the terms specified in the arrangement, and
when the four above mentioned revenue recognition criteria are met. These distributors may also be
given business terms to return a portion of inventory, however they do not receive credits for
changes in selling prices to end customers. At the time of shipment, product prices are fixed and
determinable and the amount of future returns can be reasonably estimated and accrued.
Revenue from the sale and license of intellectual property is recognized when the four above
mentioned revenue recognition criteria are met. Development revenue is recognized when services are
performed and customer acceptance has been received and was not significant for any of the periods
presented.
9
2. Supplemental Financial Statement Data
Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Work-in-process |
|
$ |
8,469 |
|
|
$ |
4,681 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
11,943 |
|
|
|
5,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
20,412 |
|
|
$ |
10,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income on Sales to Distributors
Deferred income on sales to distributors was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Deferred revenue on shipments to distributors |
|
$ |
6,706 |
|
|
$ |
5,674 |
|
Deferred cost of goods sold on shipments to distributors |
|
|
(586 |
) |
|
|
(528 |
) |
Reserves |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income on sales to distributors |
|
$ |
6,179 |
|
|
$ |
5,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities
Details of other liabilities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred rent |
|
$ |
730 |
|
|
$ |
1,075 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
Royalties |
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
Licensed intangibles |
|
|
1,823 |
|
|
|
1,302 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,524 |
|
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other current liabilities |
|
$ |
5,863 |
|
|
$ |
4,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
320 |
|
|
$ |
574 |
|
Licensed intangibles |
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
952 |
|
Other |
|
|
848 |
|
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other liabilities |
|
$ |
1,815 |
|
|
$ |
2,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
Computation of Net Income per Share
The following table presents the computation of net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Earnings per share basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
464 |
|
|
$ |
4,864 |
|
|
$ |
1,404 |
|
|
$ |
7,843 |
|
Basic weighted average comman
shares outstanding |
|
|
32,400 |
|
|
|
31,481 |
|
|
|
32,147 |
|
|
|
29,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share basic |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average common
shares outstanding |
|
|
32,400 |
|
|
|
31,481 |
|
|
|
32,147 |
|
|
|
29,781 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive stock awards |
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
1,161 |
|
Dilutive employee stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
purchase plan shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average
common shares outstanding |
|
|
33,390 |
|
|
|
36,075 |
|
|
|
33,144 |
|
|
|
30,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the number of potentially dilutive shares,
of the Companys common stock excluded from the computation of
diluted income per share as their effect would have been antidilutive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Convertible senior notes |
|
|
3,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,165 |
|
|
|
3,165 |
|
Stock awards |
|
|
2,364 |
|
|
|
2,316 |
|
|
|
2,042 |
|
|
|
2,565 |
|
Employee stock purchase plan shares |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
6,109 |
|
|
|
6,109 |
|
|
|
6,109 |
|
|
|
6,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive weighted average common shares |
|
|
11,657 |
|
|
|
8,425 |
|
|
|
11,335 |
|
|
|
11,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
464 |
|
|
$ |
4,864 |
|
|
$ |
1,404 |
|
|
$ |
7,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency
translation
adjustments, net of
tax |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
(767 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
496 |
|
|
$ |
4,420 |
|
|
$ |
1,470 |
|
|
$ |
7,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenue by Product Line
Net revenue by product line was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Communications convergence
processing products |
|
$ |
18,917 |
|
|
$ |
17,823 |
|
|
$ |
51,111 |
|
|
$ |
47,946 |
|
High-performance analog products |
|
|
15,488 |
|
|
|
14,332 |
|
|
|
44,541 |
|
|
|
39,442 |
|
WAN communications products |
|
|
7,811 |
|
|
|
11,126 |
|
|
|
23,160 |
|
|
|
33,172 |
|
Intellectual property |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
$ |
42,216 |
|
|
$ |
43,281 |
|
|
$ |
121,312 |
|
|
$ |
120,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenue by Geographic Area
Revenue by geographic area, based upon country of destination, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Americas |
|
$ |
6,850 |
|
|
$ |
10,472 |
|
|
$ |
26,678 |
|
|
$ |
26,978 |
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
31,725 |
|
|
|
29,832 |
|
|
|
84,310 |
|
|
|
84,745 |
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa |
|
|
3,641 |
|
|
|
2,977 |
|
|
|
10,324 |
|
|
|
8,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
$ |
42,216 |
|
|
$ |
43,281 |
|
|
$ |
121,312 |
|
|
$ |
120,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company believes a substantial portion of the products sold to original equipment
manufacturers (OEMs) and third-party manufacturing service providers in the Asia-Pacific region are
ultimately shipped to end-markets in the Americas and Europe.
12
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Non-cash investing activities consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Purchase of property and equipment through
capital leasing arrangements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,130 |
|
Purchase of property and equipment on account |
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
License of intellectual property on account |
|
|
2,843 |
|
|
|
485 |
|
Customer Concentrations
The following direct customers accounted for 10% or more of net revenue in the periods
presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
July 1, |
|
July 2, |
|
July 1, |
|
July 2, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Customer A |
|
29% |
|
19% |
|
24% |
|
15% |
Customer B |
|
18% |
|
15% |
|
17% |
|
17% |
Customer D |
|
11% |
|
13% |
|
8% |
|
11% |
The following direct customers accounted for 10% or more of total accounts receivable at each
period end:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
October 1, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Customer A |
|
23% |
|
5% |
Customer B |
|
18% |
|
25% |
Customer C |
|
10% |
|
8% |
Customer D |
|
7% |
|
12% |
3. Fair Value Measurements
The following table represents financial assets measured at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, 2011 |
|
|
October 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active markets for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active markets for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instruments |
|
|
Total Fair Value |
|
|
Instruments |
|
|
Total Fair Value |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
32,713 |
|
|
$ |
32,713 |
|
|
$ |
22,174 |
|
|
$ |
22,174 |
|
Money market fund |
|
|
10,514 |
|
|
|
10,514 |
|
|
|
16,007 |
|
|
|
16,007 |
|
Government money market fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,504 |
|
|
|
5,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
43,227 |
|
|
$ |
43,227 |
|
|
$ |
43,685 |
|
|
$ |
43,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
4. Stock-Based Compensation
The Company has stock-based incentive plans in effect that provide for the grant of stock
options, unrestricted stock, restricted stock units and other stock-awards to employees and
non-employee directors. These stock-based incentive plans include inducement grants that are
occasionally made to new employees of the Company. The Company also provides an employee stock
purchase plan for all eligible employees. The fair value of stock-based awards are estimated on the
date of grant and recognized as an expense ratably over the requisite service period.
The following table presents stock-based compensation by functional line item presented on our
unaudited consolidated condensed statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
Research and developemnt |
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
721 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
1,217 |
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
2,725 |
|
|
|
2,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation |
|
$ |
1,811 |
|
|
$ |
948 |
|
|
$ |
4,023 |
|
|
$ |
3,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option grant date fair value was estimated using the Black-Scholes pricing model with
the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Weighted-average assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected option life |
|
2.9 years |
|
3.2 years |
|
2.9 years |
|
2.8 years |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
95 |
% |
|
|
94 |
% |
|
|
97 |
% |
|
|
95 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average grant
date fair value per share |
|
$ |
5.08 |
|
|
$ |
5.25 |
|
|
$ |
4.52 |
|
|
$ |
3.16 |
|
14
Stock Option Awards
The following tables summarize stock option activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Contractual Term |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Outstanding at October 1,
2010 |
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
$ |
6.41 |
|
|
4.8 years |
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
7.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(368 |
) |
|
|
3.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
(469 |
) |
|
|
7.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at July 1, 2011 |
|
|
2,918 |
|
|
|
6.98 |
|
|
5.4 years |
|
$ |
7,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at July 1, 2011 |
|
|
1,376 |
|
|
$ |
8.22 |
|
|
3.6 years |
|
$ |
3,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Years |
|
Vesting Condition |
|
Cost |
|
|
to Vest |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Service based |
|
$ |
4,579 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
On March 10, 2010, the Company granted awards of 190,000 performance shares to certain
executive officers of the Company, with vesting subject to satisfaction of specific market and
performance conditions. These awards begin to vest on the date when the average of the closing
price of the Companys common stock reaches certain minimum amounts over a consecutive 20-day
trading period. On each vesting trigger date, 8.33% of the shares of common stock underlying these
awards will vest for each completed three month period from the grant date to the vesting trigger
date. An additional 8.33% of the shares of common stock underlying these awards will vest on each
three month anniversary date of the vesting trigger date. If the vesting trigger price is not
achieved prior to the three year anniversary date of the grant date, these awards will be
forfeited. These awards were valued using the Monte Carlo simulation model, which estimates value
based on the probability of vesting achievement.
15
The following tables summarize restricted stock award activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Fair Value of |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Shares Vested |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Nonvested shares at October 1, 2010 |
|
|
680 |
|
|
$ |
6.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
8.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
5.27 |
|
|
$ |
1,640 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
5.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested shares at July 1, 2011 |
|
|
1,551 |
|
|
$ |
7.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Years |
|
Vesting Condition |
|
Cost |
|
|
to Vest |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Service based |
|
$ |
8,660 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Market based |
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock awards |
|
$ |
9,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Revolving Credit Facility and Convertible Senior Notes
Revolving Credit Facility
At July 1, 2011, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under its available $5.0 million
revolving credit facility and was in compliance with all required covenants.
3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2009
In December 2004, the Company sold an aggregate principal amount of $46.0 million in 3.75%
convertible senior notes due in November 2009 for net proceeds (after discounts and commissions) of
approximately $43.9 million. Through the end of fiscal 2009, the Company repurchased or exchanged
$35.5 million of aggregate principal amount of this debt. During the first quarter of fiscal 2010,
the Companys 3.75% convertible senior notes matured and the remaining balance of $10.5 million was
repaid.
The following table sets forth interest expense information related to the 3.75% convertible
senior notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Interest expense coupon |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
Interest expense debt discount amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective interest rate on the liability component for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.68 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
6.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2013
On July 30, 2008, the Company entered into separate exchange agreements with certain holders
of its previously outstanding 3.75% convertible senior notes, pursuant to which holders of an
aggregate of $15.0 million of the notes agreed to exchange their notes for $15.0 million in
aggregate principal amount of a new series of 6.50% convertible senior notes due 2013 (the Exchange
Offer). The Exchange Offer closed on August 1, 2008. The Company paid at the closing an aggregate
of approximately $100,000 in accrued and unpaid interest on the 3.75% convertible senior notes that
were exchanged for the 6.50% convertible senior notes, as well as approximately $900,000 in
transaction fees.
The 6.50% convertible senior notes are convertible at the option of the holders, at any time
on or prior to maturity, into shares of the Companys common stock at a conversion rate initially
equal to approximately $4.74 per share of common stock, which is subject to adjustment in certain
circumstances. Upon conversion of the notes, the Company generally has the right to deliver to the
holders thereof, at the Companys option: (i) cash; (ii) shares of the Companys common stock; or
(iii) a combination thereof. The initial conversion price of the 6.50% convertible senior notes
will be adjusted to reflect stock dividends, stock splits, issuances of rights to purchase shares
of the Companys common stock, and upon other events. If the Company undergoes certain fundamental
changes prior to maturity of the notes, the holders thereof will have the right, at their option,
to require us to repurchase for cash some or all of their 6.50% convertible senior notes at a
repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes being repurchased, plus accrued
and unpaid interest (including additional interest, if any) to, but not including, the repurchase
date, or convert the notes into shares of its common stock and, under certain circumstances,
receive additional shares of its common stock in the amount provided in the indenture.
The Companys contingent obligation to issue additional shares or make additional cash payment
upon conversion following a fundamental change is considered an embedded derivative. As of July 1,
2011, the liability under the fundamental change adjustment has been recorded at its estimated fair
value and is not significant.
The following table sets forth balance sheet information related to the 6.50% convertible
senior notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Principal value of the liability component |
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
Unamortized value of the liability component |
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying value of the liability component |
|
$ |
14,114 |
|
|
$ |
13,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth interest expense information related to the 6.50% convertible
senior notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Interest expense coupon |
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
$ |
244 |
|
|
$ |
731 |
|
|
$ |
731 |
|
Interest expense debt
discount amortization |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
345 |
|
|
$ |
343 |
|
|
$ |
1,035 |
|
|
$ |
1,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective interest rate
on the liability for the
period |
|
|
9.20 |
% |
|
|
9.15 |
% |
|
|
9.20 |
% |
|
|
9.12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
6. Commitments and Contingencies
Various lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been or may be instituted or asserted against
the Company, including those pertaining to product liability, intellectual property, environmental,
safety and health and employment matters. As is common in the industry, the Company currently has
in effect a number of agreements in which it has agreed to defend, indemnify and hold harmless
certain of its suppliers and customers from damages and costs which may arise from the infringement
by the Companys products of third-party patents, trademarks or other proprietary rights. The
Company has never incurred significant costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these
indemnification agreements.
The outcome of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty and some lawsuits, claims or
proceedings may be determined unfavorably against the Company. Many intellectual property disputes
have a risk of injunctive relief, and there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to
license a third partys intellectual property. Injunctive relief could have a material adverse
effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company. Unless specifically
noted below, during the period presented we have not: recorded any accrual for loss contingencies
associated with the legal proceedings described below; determined that an unfavorable outcome is
probable or reasonably possible; or determined that the amount or range of any possible loss is
reasonably estimable. Based on its evaluation of matters which are pending or asserted, while there
can be no assurance, management of the Company believes the disposition of such matters will not
have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company.
In June 2011, the Company was notified by a customer, with whom there is an indemnification
agreement, that it had settled an outstanding patent infringement claim against the customer that
it asserts relates to products purchased from the Company. The customer requested that the Company
contribute approximately $1.3 million to the settlement, representing its estimate of the Companys
pro rata share of the settlement and related legal fees. The Company has notified the customer that
it believes the indemnification agreement does not apply to the contribution sought by the
customer, and the Company intends to vigorously defend this position. The outcome of this
litigation and any potential exposure to the Company cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.
Accordingly, the Company has no liabilities recorded related to this, or other indemnification
agreements, as of July 1, 2011.
7. Special Charges
Restructuring Charges
The Company has, from time to time, and may in the future, commit to restructuring plans to
help manage the costs of the Company or to help implement strategic initiatives, among other
reasons.
Fourth Quarter of Fiscal 2010 Restructuring Plan In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, the
Company committed to the implementation of a restructuring plan. The plan consisted primarily of a
targeted headcount reduction in its wide area networking (WAN) communications product family and
selling, general and administrative functions. The restructuring plan was substantially completed
during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010.
The following table sets forth charges incurred under the plan (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Severance costs |
|
$ |
966 |
|
Abandoned technology |
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total charges incurred |
|
$ |
1,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
18
Activity and liability balances related to the Companys fourth quarter of fiscal 2010
restructuring plan from October 1, 2010 through July 1, 2011 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce |
|
|
Facility and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Restructuring balance, October 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
701 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
701 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(567 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(567 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring balance, July 1, 2011 |
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The remaining accrued restructuring balance principally represents employee severance
benefits. The Company expects to pay these remaining obligations through the second quarter of
fiscal 2012.
Fiscal 2009 Restructuring Plans In fiscal 2009, the Company implemented two restructuring
plans to improve its operating structure. These restructuring plans included workforce reductions,
closure of facilities and reductions in areas of selling, general and administrative and WAN
communications spending.
At October 1, 2010, the total remaining accrued restructuring balance under these plans was
$20,000. During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, any amounts left to be paid under these plans
were paid and any remaining accrued amounts were reversed. At July 1, 2011, there was no remaining
accrued restructuring balance related to these plans.
8. Income Taxes
The Company utilizes the liability method of accounting for income taxes. The federal
statutory rate was 34% for all periods. The difference between the Companys effective tax rate and
the federal statutory rate is primarily due to the effect of foreign earnings taxed at rates
differing from the federal statutory rate.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company received a $3.1 million payment related
to a foreign research and development credit. A portion of this payment was previously recorded as
an unrecognized tax benefit. Reversal of this unrecognized tax benefit resulted in a $780,000
income tax benefit, which had a favorable impact on the effective tax rate.
9. Related Party Transactions
In connection with a June 2003 distribution to stockholders of our former parent of all
outstanding shares of common stock of Mindspeed, a warrant was issued to acquire approximately 6.1
million shares of common stock at a price of $16.74 per share, as adjusted, exercisable through
June 27, 2013, representing approximately 14% of the Companys outstanding common stock on a fully
diluted basis. The warrant may be transferred or sold in whole or part at any time. For the nine
months ended July 2, 2010, rent and operating expenses paid to the warrant holder were
approximately $4.0 million. On June 26, 2010, the Companys sublease of its corporate headquarters
in Newport Beach, California from the warrant holder expired.
In June 2011, the Company entered into an agreement to license certain intellectual property
from a related party. The licensor is a related party because one of the Companys directors also
serves as a director of the licensor. Pursuant to terms of the license agreement, the Company will
pay an aggregate of $6.0 million upon the completion of certain milestones, including the delivery
of licensed intellectual property. In addition, the Company is obligated to pay royalties not to
exceed an additional $2.5 million for products sold that include the licensed intellectual
property. As of the fiscal quarter ended July 1, 2011, no amounts had been paid under the license
agreement. The first payment of $875,000 is due and payable in July 2011.
10. Acquisition
In April 2011, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets
of privately held IPG Communications, Inc, a software developer that specialized in advanced signal
processing technologies for wideband code division multiple access, for $500,000 cash
consideration. The purchase price was primarily allocated to the assigned intellectual property and
is included in licensed and purchased intangibles on the accompanying balance sheet at July 1,
2011.
19
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This information should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated condensed
financial statements and the notes thereto included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for our fiscal year ended October 1, 2010.
Overview
Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. designs, develops and sells semiconductor solutions for
communications applications in the wireline and wireless network infrastructure, which includes
enterprise networks, broadband access networks (fixed and mobile) and metropolitan and wide area
networks (WAN). We have organized our solutions for these interrelated and rapidly converging
networks into three product families: communications convergence processing (formerly known as
multiservice access), high-performance analog and WAN communications. Our communications
convergence processing products include ultra-low-power, multi-core digital signal processor (DSP)
system-on-chip (SoC) products for the fixed and mobile (3G/4G) carrier infrastructure and
residential and enterprise platforms. Our high-performance analog products include high-density
crosspoint switches, optical drivers, equalization and signal-conditioning solutions that solve
difficult switching, timing and synchronization challenges in next-generation optical networking,
enterprise storage and broadcast video transmission applications. Our WAN communications portfolio
helps optimize todays circuit-switched networks that furnish much of the Internets underlying
long-distance infrastructure.
Our products are used in a variety of network infrastructure equipment, including:
|
|
|
Communications Convergence Processing triple-play edge and metro trunking gateways
for Voice-over-Internet protocol (VoIP) platforms; broadband customer premises equipment
(CPE) gateways and other equipment that carriers use to deliver voice, data and video
services to residential subscribers; Internet protocol (IP) private branch exchange (PBX)
equipment and security appliances used in the enterprise and 3G/4G mobile base stations in
the carrier infrastructure; |
|
|
|
|
High-Performance Analog next-generation fiber access network equipment (including
passive optical networking, or PON, systems); storage and server systems supporting
high-speed PCI Express and Serial Attached SCSI (SAS) protocols; and production switches,
routers and other systems that are driving the migration to 3G high-definition (HD)
transmission; and |
|
|
|
|
WAN Communications circuit-switched networking equipment that implements
asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) and T1/E1 and T3/E3 communications protocols. |
Our customers include Alcatel-Lucent, Cisco Systems, Inc., Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.,
Hitachi Ltd., LM Ericsson Telephone Company, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Nokia Siemens
Networks and Zhongxing Telecom Equipment Corp.
Trends and Factors Affecting Our Business
Our products are components of network infrastructure equipment. As a result, we rely on
network infrastructure OEMs to select our products from among alternative offerings to be designed
into their equipment. These design wins are an integral part of the long sales cycle for our
products. Our customers may need six months or longer to test and evaluate our products and an
additional six months or more to begin volume production of equipment that incorporates our
products. We believe our close relationships with leading network infrastructure OEMs facilitate
early adoption of our products during development of their products, enhance our ability to obtain
design wins and encourage adoption of our technology by the industry. We believe our diverse
portfolio of semiconductor solutions has us well positioned to capitalize on some of the most
significant trends in telecommunications spending, including: next generation network convergence;
VoIP/fiber access deployment in developing and developed
20
markets; 3G/4G wireless infrastructure build-out; the adoption of higher speed
interconnectivity solutions; and the migration of broadcast video to high definition.
We market and sell our semiconductor products directly to network infrastructure OEMs. We also
sell our products indirectly through electronic component distributors and third-party electronic
manufacturing service providers, who manufacture products incorporating our semiconductor
networking solutions for OEMs. Sales to distributors accounted for approximately 58% of our net
revenue for the first nine months of fiscal 2011 and approximately 50% of our net revenue for the
first nine months of fiscal 2010. Our net revenue is well diversified globally, with 80% of our net
revenue for the first nine months of fiscal 2011 coming from outside of the Americas. We believe a
substantial portion of the products we sell to OEMs and third-party manufacturing service providers
in the Asia-Pacific region is ultimately shipped to end markets in the Americas and Europe. We
believe we are well-situated in China, where fiber deployments are being rolled out by the
countrys major telecommunications carriers. Through our OEM customers, we are shipping into the
fiber-to-the-building (FTTB) deployments of China Telecom, China Unicom and China Mobile. In the
first nine months of fiscal 2011, 39% of our net revenue was derived from China as compared with
34% in the first nine months of fiscal 2010.
We have significant research, development, engineering and product design capabilities. Our
success depends to a substantial degree upon our ability to develop and introduce in a timely
fashion new products and enhancements to our existing products that meet changing customer
requirements and emerging industry standards. We have made, and plan to make, substantial
investments in research and development and to participate in the formulation of industry
standards. We spent approximately $43.5 million on research and development in the first nine
months of fiscal 2011 and $37.5 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2010. We seek to
maximize our return on our research and development spending by focusing our research and
development investment in what we believe are key growth markets, including VoIP and other
high-bandwidth multiservice access applications, high-performance analog applications such as
optical networking and broadcast-video transmission, and wireless infrastructure solutions for base
station processing. We have developed and maintain a broad intellectual property portfolio, and we
may periodically enter into strategic arrangements to leverage our portfolio by licensing or
selling our intellectual property.
We are dependent upon third parties for the development, manufacturing, assembly and testing
of our products. Our ability to bring new products to market, to fulfill orders and to achieve
long-term revenue growth is dependent upon our ability to obtain sufficient external manufacturing
capacity, including wafer fabrication capacity. Periods of upturn in the semiconductor industry may
be characterized by rapid increases in demand and a shortage of capacity for wafer fabrication and
assembly and test services. In such periods, we may experience longer lead times or indeterminate
delivery schedules, which may adversely affect our ability to fulfill orders for our products.
During periods of capacity shortages for manufacturing, assembly and testing services, our primary
foundries and other suppliers may devote their limited capacity to fulfill the requirements of
their other customers that are larger than we are, or who have superior contractual rights to
enforce manufacture of their products, including to the exclusion of producing our products. We may
also incur increased manufacturing costs, including costs of finding acceptable alternative
foundries or assembly and test service providers.
On March 11, 2011, the northeast coast of Japan experienced a severe earthquake followed by a
tsunami, with continuing aftershocks. These geological events have caused significant damage in the
region, including severe damage to nuclear power plants, and have impacted Japans power and other
infrastructure, as well as its economy. Certain of our suppliers located outside Japan integrate
components or use materials manufactured in Japan in the production of its products. Due to cross
dependencies, supply chain disruptions stemming from the occurrences in Japan could negatively
impact the demand for our products, including, for example, if our customers are unable to obtain
sufficient supply of other components required for their end products. We continue to monitor the
effect of the events in Japan on end demand patterns and inventory levels throughout the supply
chain. While we recognize that the crisis in Japan has impacted our supply chain, we have secured
certain product commitments from our suppliers and therefore we do not currently believe these
events will have a material impact on our operations in the fiscal fourth quarter of 2011 unless
conditions worsen, including, but not limited to, power outages and expansion of evacuation zones
around the nuclear power plants. Beyond the fiscal fourth quarter of 2011, uncertainty exists with
respect to the availability of electrical power, the damage to nuclear power plants and the impact
to other infrastructure. Thus, there is a risk that we could in the future experience delays or
other constraints in obtaining key
21
components and products and/or price increases related to such components and products that
could materially adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.
In order to achieve sustained profitability and positive cash flows from operations, we may
need to further reduce operating expenses and/or increase our revenue. We have completed a series
of cost reduction actions, which have improved our operating cost structure, and we will continue
to perform additional actions, when necessary. Our ability to achieve revenue growth will depend,
in part, on increased demand for network infrastructure equipment that incorporates our products,
which in turn depends primarily on the level of capital spending by communications service
providers, the level of which may decrease due to general economic conditions and uncertainty, over
which we have no control. We believe the market for network infrastructure equipment in general,
and for communications semiconductors in particular, offers attractive long-term growth prospects
due to increasing demand for network capacity, the continued upgrading and expansion of existing
networks and the build-out of telecommunication networks in developing countries. However, the
semiconductor industry is highly cyclical and is characterized by constant and rapid technological
change, rapid product obsolescence and price erosion, evolving technical standards, short product
life cycles and wide fluctuations in product supply and demand. In addition, there has been an
increasing trend toward industry consolidation, particularly among major network equipment and
telecommunications companies. Consolidation in the industry has generally led to pricing pressure
and loss of market share. These factors have caused substantial fluctuations in our revenue and our
results of operations in the past, and we may experience cyclical fluctuations in our business in
the future.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The accounting policies that have the greatest impact on our financial condition and results
of operations and that require the most judgment are those relating to revenue recognition,
inventories, stock-based compensation, deferred income taxes and uncertain tax positions, and
impairment of long-lived assets. These policies are described in further detail in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2010. Except as described below, there
have been no significant changes in our critical accounting policies and estimates during the
fiscal quarter ended July 1, 2011 as compared to what was previously disclosed in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2010.
Revenue Recognition Our revenue consists principally of sales of semiconductor devices and,
to a lesser extent, support and maintenance contracts, development agreements and the sale and
license of intellectual property. We recognize revenue when the following fundamental criteria are
met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery has occurred; (iii) the price
to the customer is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collection of the sales price is probable. In
instances where final acceptance of the product, system or solution is specified by the customer,
revenue is deferred until all acceptance criteria have been met.
Our semiconductor products either do not contain software that is more than incidental to the
functionality of the product, or the software functions together with non-software deliverables to
deliver the essential functionality of the product. Accordingly, we account for revenue in
accordance with the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification 605, Revenue Recognition, or
ASC 605, and all related interpretations. Additionally, we provide unspecified software upgrades
and enhancements through our support and maintenance contracts for certain of our semiconductor
products. Support and maintenance services revenue is deferred and recognized ratably over the
period during which the services are to be performed.
We recognize revenue on products shipped directly to customers at the time the products are
shipped and title and risk of loss transfer to the customer, in accordance with the terms specified
in the arrangement, and the four above mentioned revenue recognition criteria are met.
We recognize revenue on sales to distributors based on the rights granted to these
distributors in our distribution agreements. We have certain distributors who have been granted
return rights and receive credits for changes in selling prices to end customers, the magnitude of
which is not known at the time products are shipped to the distributor. The return rights granted
to these distributors consist of limited stock rotation rights, which allow them to rotate up to
10% of the products in their inventory twice a year, as well as certain product return rights if
the applicable distribution agreement is terminated. These distributors also receive price
concessions because they resell our products to end customers at various negotiated price points
which vary by end customer, product, quantity,
22
geography and competitive pricing environments. When a distributors resale is priced at a
discount from the distributors invoice price, we credit back to the distributor a portion of the
distributors original purchase price after the resale transaction is complete. Thus, a portion of
the Deferred income on sales to distributors balance will be credited back to the distributor in
the future. Under these agreements, we defer recognition of revenue until the products are resold
by the distributor, at which time our final net sales price is fixed and the distributors right to
return the products expires. At the time of shipment to these distributors: (i) we record a trade
receivable at the invoiced selling price because there is a legally enforceable obligation from the
distributor to pay us currently for product delivered; (ii) we relieve inventory for the carrying
value of products shipped because legal title has passed to the distributor; and (iii) we record
deferred revenue and deferred cost of inventory under the Deferred income on sales to
distributors caption in the liability section of our consolidated balance sheets. We evaluate the
deferred cost of inventory component of this account for possible impairment by considering
potential obsolescence of products that might be returned to us and by considering the potential of
resale prices of these products being below our cost. By reviewing deferred inventory costs in the
manners discussed above, we ensure that any portion of deferred inventory costs that are not
recoverable from future contractual revenue are charged to cost of goods sold as an expense.
Deferred income on sales to distributors effectively represents the gross margin on sales to
distributors, however, the amount of gross margin we recognize in future periods may be less than
the originally recorded deferred income as a result of negotiated price concessions. In recent
years, such concessions have exceeded 30% of list price on average. See Note 2 to our Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements for detail of this account balance.
We recognize revenue from other distributors at the time of shipment and when title and risk
of loss transfer to the distributor, in accordance with the terms specified in the arrangement, and
when the four above mentioned revenue recognition criteria are met. These distributors may also be
given business terms to return a portion of inventory, however they do not receive credits for
changes in selling prices to end customers. At the time of shipment, product prices are fixed or
determinable and the amount of future returns can be reasonably estimated and accrued.
We recognize revenue from the sale and license of intellectual property when the four above
mentioned revenue recognition criteria are met. We recognize development revenue when services are
performed and customer acceptance has been received and was not significant for any of the periods
presented.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2009, the Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus on Accounting Standards
Update, or ASU, 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) Multiple-Deliverable Revenue
Arrangements, or ASU 2009-13 and ASU 2009-14, Software (Topic 985) Certain Revenue Arrangements
That Include Software Elements, or ASU 2009-14. ASU 2009-13 modifies the requirements that must be
met for an entity to recognize revenue from the sale of a delivered item that is part of a
multiple-element arrangement when other items have not yet been delivered. ASU 2009-13 eliminates
the requirement that all undelivered elements must have either: (i) vendor specific objective
evidence (VSOE) of fair value; or (ii) third-party evidence (TPE) before an entity can recognize
the portion of an overall arrangement consideration that is attributable to items that have already
been delivered. In the absence of VSOE or TPE of the standalone selling price for one or more
delivered or undelivered elements in a multiple-element arrangement, entities will be required to
estimate the selling prices of those elements. Overall arrangement consideration will be allocated
to each element (both delivered and undelivered items) based on their relative selling prices,
regardless of whether those selling prices are evidenced by VSOE or TPE or are based on the
entitys estimated selling price. The residual method of allocating arrangement consideration has
been eliminated. ASU 2009-14 modifies the software revenue recognition guidance to exclude from its
scope tangible products that contain both software and non-software components that function
together to deliver a products essential functionality. These new updates are effective for
revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June
15, 2010. We adopted these provisions effective October 2, 2010, and it did not have a material
impact on our consolidated condensed financial statements.
23
Results of Operations
Net Revenue by Product Line
The following table summarizes fiscal quarter net revenue by product line:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages) |
|
Communications convergence processing |
|
$ |
18,917 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
|
$ |
17,823 |
|
|
|
41 |
% |
|
$ |
1,094 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
High-performance analog |
|
|
15,488 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
14,332 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
1,156 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
% |
WAN communications |
|
|
7,811 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
11,126 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
(3,315 |
) |
|
|
-29.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net product revenue |
|
|
42,216 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
43,281 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
(1,065 |
) |
|
|
-2.5 |
% |
Intellectual property |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
42,216 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
43,281 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
(1,065 |
) |
|
|
-2.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in our net revenue for the third quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the
third quarter of fiscal 2010 was due to lower sales volumes for our WAN communications products,
partially offset by an increase in demand for our communications convergence processing products
and our high-performance analog products. Net revenue from our communications convergence
processing products increased in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 when compared to the third
quarter of fiscal 2010 due to an increase in shipments of
CPE products, which are used in broadband CPE gateways and other equipment that service
providers are deploying in order to deliver voice, data and video services to residential
subscribers. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in net revenue from a slowdown in 3G
investment which resulted in fewer shipments of wireless media gateways used in terminating calls
between the public switch telephone network (PTSN) and wireless media gateways. Net revenue from
high-performance analog products increased in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 when compared to the
third quarter of fiscal 2010 due to increased demand for physical media devices, which are
primarily used in equipment for fiber-to-the-premise deployments. Net revenue from WAN
communications products decreased in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the third quarter
of fiscal 2010 due to a slowdown in demand at several large customers, particularly in ATM-based
systems. WAN communications products represent a legacy business for us, as we have shifted almost
all of our research and development investment into our two growth businesses of communications
convergence processing products and high-performance analog products.
The following table summarizes year-to-date net revenue by product line:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages) |
|
Communications
convergence processing |
|
$ |
51,111 |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
$ |
47,946 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
$ |
3,165 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
High-performance analog |
|
|
44,541 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
39,442 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
5,099 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
% |
WAN communications |
|
|
23,160 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
33,172 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
(10,012 |
) |
|
|
-30.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net product revenue |
|
|
118,812 |
|
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
120,560 |
|
|
|
101 |
% |
|
|
(1,748 |
) |
|
|
-1.4 |
% |
Intellectual property |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
121,312 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
120,560 |
|
|
|
101 |
% |
|
$ |
752 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in net revenue for the first nine months of fiscal 2011 compared to the first
nine months of fiscal 2010 was due to higher sales volume for our communications convergence
processing products and high-performance analog products, as well as the sale of intellectual
property, mostly offset by a decrease in demand for our WAN communications products. Net revenue
from communications convergence processing products increased in the first nine months of fiscal
2011 compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2010 due to an increase in shipments of
24
CPE products, which are used in broadband CPE gateways and other equipment that service providers are
deploying in order to deliver voice, data and video services to residential subscribers. Net
revenue from high-performance analog products increased in the first nine months of fiscal 2011
compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2010 due to increased demand for both physical media
devices, which are primarily used in equipment for fiber-to-the-premise deployments, and our video
products. Net revenue from WAN communications products decreased in the first nine months of
fiscal 2011 compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2010 due to a slowdown in demand at several
large customers, particularly in ATM-based systems. Net revenue from intellectual property
licensing and sales increased in the first nine months of fiscal 2011 compared to the first nine
months of fiscal 2010, due to the timing of intellectual property sales. We have developed and
maintain a broad intellectual property portfolio, and we may periodically enter into strategic
arrangements to leverage our portfolio by licensing or selling our patents.
Net Revenue by Geographic Region
The following table summarizes fiscal quarter net revenue by geographic region, based on
country of destination:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages) |
|
Americas |
|
$ |
6,850 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
$ |
10,472 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
$ |
(3,622 |
) |
|
|
-34.6 |
% |
Europe, Middle East and Africa |
|
|
3,641 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
2,977 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
% |
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
31,725 |
|
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
29,832 |
|
|
|
69 |
% |
|
|
1,893 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
42,216 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
43,281 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
(1,065 |
) |
|
|
-2.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in Americas net revenue for the third quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the third quarter of fiscal
2010 was due to lower sales volumes of our WAN communications products and to a lesser extent lower sales volumes of our communications convergence processing products and our high-performance
analog products. The increase in Europe, Middle East and Africa net revenue for the third quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2010 was due to higher sales volumes of our communications convergence processing products and our high-performance analog products. The increase in Asia-Pacific
net revenue for the third quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2010 was due to higher sales volumes of our communications convergence processing products and our high-performance analog products partially offset by lower sales volumes of our WAN communications products.
The following table summarizes fiscal year-to-date net revenue by geographic region,
based on country of destination:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages) |
|
Americas |
|
$ |
26,678 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
$ |
26,978 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
$ |
(300 |
) |
|
|
-1.1 |
% |
Europe, Middle East and Africa |
|
|
10,324 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
8,837 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
1,487 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
% |
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
84,310 |
|
|
|
69 |
% |
|
|
84,745 |
|
|
|
71 |
% |
|
|
(435 |
) |
|
|
-0.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
121,312 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
120,560 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
752 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in Americas net revenue for the first nine months of fiscal 2011 compared to the first nine months
of fiscal 2010 was due to lower sales volumes of our WAN communications products partially offset by an increase in sales volumes of our
communications convergence processing products and our high-performance analog products. The increase in Europe, Middle East and Africa net revenue for the first nine months of fiscal 2011 compared
to the first nine months of fiscal 2010 was due to higher sales volumes of our WAN communications products and communications convergence
processing products. The decrease in Asia-Pacific net revenue for the first nine months of fiscal 2011 compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2010 was
due to lower sales volumes of our WAN communications products partially offset by an increase in sales volumes of our communications convergence processing products and our high-performance analog products.
Gross Margin
Gross margin represents net revenue less cost of goods sold. As a fabless semiconductor
company, we use third parties (including Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (TSMC), Amkor
Technology, Inc. and Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, Inc. (ASE)) for wafer fabrication and
assembly and test services. Cost of goods sold primarily consisted of: purchased finished wafers;
assembly and test services; royalty and other intellectual property costs; labor and overhead costs
associated with product procurement; amortization of the cost of mask sets purchased; and
sustaining engineering expenses pertaining to products sold.
25
The following table presents fiscal quarter gross margin:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
$ |
26,249 |
|
|
|
62 |
% |
|
$ |
27,780 |
|
|
|
64 |
% |
|
$ |
(1,531 |
) |
|
|
-5.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin decreased for the third quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the third quarter of
fiscal 2010 due partially to a $1.1 million, or 2.5%, decrease in net revenue. The decrease in our
gross margin as a percent of net revenue for the third quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the third
quarter of fiscal 2010 was primarily due to a change in product mix.
The following table presents fiscal year-to-date gross margin:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages) |
|
Gross margin |
|
$ |
76,781 |
|
|
|
63 |
% |
|
$ |
77,263 |
|
|
|
64 |
% |
|
$ |
(482 |
) |
|
|
-0.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin decreased for the first nine months of fiscal 2011 compared to the first nine
months of fiscal 2010 as a result of a decrease in product revenue and a change in product mix
partially offset by the favorable impact of intellectual property sales, with no associated costs.
Research and Development
Research and development (R&D) expenses consisted primarily of: direct personnel costs,
including stock-based compensation; photomasks; electronic design automation tools; and
pre-production evaluation and test costs.
The following table presents details of fiscal quarter R&D expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages) |
|
Personnel-related costs |
|
$ |
9,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,615 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
% |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
119.8 |
% |
Design & development
costs |
|
|
2,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
Facilities |
|
|
1,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
-1.6 |
% |
Depreciation |
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
68.2 |
% |
Other |
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
15,077 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
$ |
12,731 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
$ |
2,346 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R&D expenses increased for the third quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the third quarter of
fiscal 2010 due to increased investment in our next generation products in both the
wireless and enterprise markets that resulted in: an increase in personnel costs, including
stock-based compensation, primarily resulting from increased headcount; an increase in the cost of
engineering tools; and an increase in depreciation expense resulting from an increase in R&D
related capital expenditures.
26
The following table presents details of fiscal year-to-date R&D expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages) |
|
Personnel-related costs |
|
$ |
26,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,010 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
% |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
52.0 |
% |
Design & development
costs |
|
|
9,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,379 |
|
|
|
34.7 |
% |
Facilities |
|
|
4,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(474 |
) |
|
|
-10.2 |
% |
Depreciation |
|
|
1,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
49.3 |
% |
Other |
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
43,525 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
$ |
37,540 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
|
$ |
5,985 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R&D expenses increased for the first nine months of fiscal 2011 compared to the first nine
months of fiscal 2010 due to increased investment in our next
generation products in both
the wireless and enterprise markets that resulted in: an increase in design and development costs,
including engineering tools and contracted engineering services; and an increase in personnel
costs, including stock-based compensation, as a result of increased headcount.
Selling, General and Administrative
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses consisted of: personnel costs, including
stock-based compensation; independent sales representative commissions; product marketing;
applications engineering and other marketing costs. In addition, SG&A expenses consisted of the
costs of corporate support functions, including: accounting, finance, legal, human resources,
information systems and communications.
The following table presents details of fiscal quarter SG&A expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages) |
|
Personnel-related costs |
|
$ |
6,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
|
-0.2 |
% |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
1,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
69.9 |
% |
Professional fees & outside
services |
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
% |
Facilities |
|
|
794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
-4.2 |
% |
Depreciation |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
32.6 |
% |
Other |
|
|
1,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
11,034 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
$ |
10,190 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
$ |
844 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SG&A expenses increased for the third quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the third quarter of
fiscal 2010 primarily due to an increase in stock-based compensation.
27
The following table presents details of fiscal year-to-date SG&A expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages) |
|
Personnel-related costs |
|
$ |
19,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
284 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
2,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
% |
Professional fees & outside
services |
|
|
3,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Facilities |
|
|
2,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(220 |
) |
|
|
-8.2 |
% |
Depreciation |
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
% |
Other |
|
|
3,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
31,324 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
$ |
30,215 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
$ |
1,109 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SG&A expenses increased for the first nine months of fiscal 2011 compared to the first nine
months of fiscal 2010 primarily due to an increase in personnel-related costs, including
stock-based compensation, as well as an increase in travel costs related to increased sales
activities mainly occurring in the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
Special Charges
Special charges consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges/(reversals) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(184 |
) |
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
$ |
605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring Charges
We have, from time to time, and may in the future, commit to restructuring plans to help
manage our costs or to help implement strategic initiatives, among other reasons.
Mindspeed Fourth Quarter of Fiscal 2010 Restructuring Plan In the fourth quarter of fiscal
2010, we committed to the implementation of a restructuring plan. The plan consisted primarily of a
targeted headcount reduction in our WAN communications product family and selling, general and
administrative functions. The restructuring plan was substantially completed during the fiscal
fourth quarter of 2010. The following table sets forth charges incurred under the plan:
|
|
|
|
|
Severance costs |
|
$ |
966 |
|
Abandoned technology |
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total charges incurred |
|
$ |
1,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
28
Activity and liability balances related to our fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 restructuring
plan from October 1, 2010 through July 1, 2011 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce |
|
|
Facility and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Restructuring balance, October 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
701 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
701 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(567 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(567 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring balance, July 1, 2011 |
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The remaining accrued restructuring balance principally represents employee severance
benefits. We expect to pay these remaining obligations through the second quarter of fiscal 2012.
Mindspeed Fiscal 2009 Restructuring Plans In fiscal 2009, we implemented two restructuring
plans to improve our operating structure. These restructuring plans included workforce reductions,
closure of facilities and reductions in areas of selling, general and administrative and WAN
communications spending.
At October 1, 2010, the total remaining accrued restructuring balance under these plans was
$20,000. During the first nine months of fiscal 2011, the amounts left to be paid under these
plans were paid and the remaining accrued amounts were reversed. At July 1, 2011, there was no
remaining accrued restructuring balance related to these plans.
Interest Expense
Interest expense primarily consisted of interest on our convertible senior notes. The
following tables present details of fiscal quarter and fiscal year-to-date interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
398 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
$ |
396 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
1,195 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
$ |
1,419 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
$ |
(224 |
) |
|
|
-15.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense decreased for the first nine months of fiscal 2011 compared to the first nine
months of fiscal 2010 due to the repayment of the remaining $10.5 million due under our 3.75%
convertible senior notes during the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Other Income, Net
Other income, net, principally consists of interest income, foreign exchange gains and losses
and other non-operating gains and losses. The following tables present details of fiscal quarter
and fiscal year-to-date other income (expense), net:
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages) |
|
Other Income/(Expense), Net |
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
323 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
$ |
(349 |
) |
|
|
-108.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages) |
|
Other Income/(Expense), Net |
|
$ |
(67 |
) |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
524 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
(591 |
) |
|
|
-112.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income/(expense), net, decreased for the third quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the
third quarter of fiscal 2010 primarily due to minor foreign exchange losses recorded in the third
quarter of fiscal 2011, whereas foreign exchange gains were recorded in the third quarter of fiscal
2010.
Other income/(expense), net, decreased for the nine months ended July 1, 2011, as compared to
the nine months ended July 2, 2010, primarily due to minor foreign exchange losses recorded in the
second and third quarters of fiscal 2011, whereas foreign exchange gains were recorded in the
second and third quarters of fiscal 2010.
Income Taxes
Our provision (benefit) for income taxes for the first three and nine months of fiscal 2011
and 2010 principally consisted of income taxes incurred by our foreign subsidiaries. As a result of
our history of operating losses and the uncertainty of future operating results, we determined that
it is more likely than not that the U.S. federal and state income tax benefits (principally net
operating losses we can carry forward to future years), which arose during the first quarter of
fiscal 2010 and the second quarter of fiscal 2011 will not be realized. At October 2, 2010, based
on the available objective evidence, we believed it was more likely than not that our deferred tax
assets would not be realized. Accordingly, we continue to provide a full valuation allowance
against our U.S. federal and state net deferred tax assets at July 1, 2011. Should sufficient
positive objectively verifiable evidence of the realization of our net deferred tax assets exist at
a future date, we would reverse any remaining valuation allowance to the extent supported by
estimates of future taxable income at that time. In the first nine months of fiscal 2011, we
generated operating income. A substantial portion of this operating income will be offset by
previously generated net operating losses, thereby reducing the effective tax rate on U.S. earnings
in the current period. During April 2011, we received a payment related to a foreign research and
development credit. A portion of this payment had been recorded as an unrecognized tax benefit.
Reversal of this unrecognized tax benefit resulted in a $780,000 income tax benefit, which was
recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2011.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of liquidity are our existing cash and cash equivalent balances and cash
generated from product sales.
In order to achieve sustained profitability and positive cash flows from operations, we may
need to further reduce operating expenses and/or increase revenue. We have completed a series of
cost reduction actions, which have improved our operating expense structure and we will continue to
perform additional actions, if necessary. In addition, from time to time, we may commit to
additional restructurings to help implement strategic initiatives. These restructurings and other
cost saving measures alone may not allow us to sustain the profitability we have recently achieved.
Our ability to maintain, or increase, current revenue levels to sustain profitability will depend,
in part, on demand for network infrastructure equipment that incorporates our products, which in
turn depends primarily on the level of capital spending by communications service providers and
enterprises, the level of which may decrease due to general economic conditions, and uncertainty,
over which we have no control. We may be
30
unable to maintain, or increase, current revenue levels or
sustain past and future expense reductions in subsequent periods. We may not be able to achieve
sustained profitability.
We believe that our existing cash balances, along with cash expected to be generated from
product sales will be sufficient to fund our operations, research and development efforts,
anticipated capital expenditures, working capital and other financing requirements, including
interest payments on debt obligations, for the next 12 months. In November 2009, we repaid the
$10.5 million outstanding balance of our 3.75% senior convertible notes, and we have no other
principal payments on currently outstanding debt due in the next 12 months. From time to time, we
may acquire our debt securities through privately negotiated transactions, tender offers, exchange
offers (for new debt or other securities), redemptions or otherwise, upon such terms and at such
prices as we may determine appropriate. We will need to continue a focused program of capital
expenditures to meet our research and development and corporate requirements. We may also consider
acquisition opportunities to extend our technology portfolio and design expertise and to expand our
product offerings. In order to fund capital expenditures, increase our working capital or complete
any acquisitions, we may seek to obtain additional debt or equity financing. We may also need to
seek to obtain additional debt or equity financing if we experience downturns or cyclical
fluctuations in our business that are more severe or longer than anticipated or if we fail to
achieve anticipated revenue and expense levels. However, we cannot assure you that such financing
will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all, particularly in light of recent economic
conditions in the capital markets.
The following table presents details of our working capital and cash and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
Increase/ |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
54,501 |
|
|
$ |
53,762 |
|
|
$ |
739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
43,227 |
|
|
$ |
43,685 |
|
|
$ |
(458 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents decreased as a result of cash used in our investing activities to
make payments under license agreements and the purchases of property, plant and equipment. The cash
used in our investing activities was mostly offset by cash provided by operating activities and
financing activities.
31
The following table presents the major components of the consolidated statements of cash
flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Net cash provided by/(used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,404 |
|
|
$ |
7,843 |
|
Non-cash operating expenses, net |
|
|
10,217 |
|
|
|
10,547 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
9,141 |
|
|
|
(10,881 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(10,167 |
) |
|
|
92 |
|
Current deferred tax asset |
|
|
2,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
(265 |
) |
|
|
106 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
3,070 |
|
Deferred income on sales to distributors |
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
(569 |
) |
|
|
(1,005 |
) |
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
|
(4,128 |
) |
|
|
248 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities |
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
Other liabilities, net |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
(738 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
10,406 |
|
|
|
10,975 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(12,768 |
) |
|
|
(4,945 |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
1,902 |
|
|
|
7,093 |
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(458 |
) |
|
$ |
13,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
Operating activities provided cash for the nine months ended July 1, 2011 due to net income
and net non-cash operating expenses, offset by net cash used by changes in operating assets and
liabilities. Significant non-cash operating expenses included stock-based compensation expense,
depreciation and amortization and amortization of licensed and purchased intangibles. The changes
in operating assets and liabilities that had a significant impact on cash provided by operating
activities included an increase in inventories resulting from an acceleration of our
ordering of certain raw materials in an effort to ensure supply on these items in light of the
impact that the Japan natural disaster could have on production and a decrease in accrued
compensation and benefits mainly due to the fiscal 2010 management bonus that was paid in early
fiscal 2011. These cash outflows were mostly offset by a decrease in receivables due to the timing
of product shipments and cash receipts and a decrease in our current deferred tax asset due to the
receipt of cash related to a foreign research and development credit.
Operating activities provided cash for the nine months ended July 2, 2010 due to net income
and net non-cash operating expenses, offset in part by net cash used by changes in operating assets
and liabilities. Significant non-cash operating expenses included depreciation and amortization,
stock-based compensation expense, amortization of licensed and purchased intangibles, inventory
provision and restructuring charges. The changes in operating assets and liabilities that had a
significant impact on cash provided by operating activities included an increase in accounts
receivable as a result of the timing of product shipments and cash receipts, partially offset by an
increase in accounts payable as a result of the timing of cash payments.
32
Investing Activities
Investing activities used cash for the nine months ended July 1, 2011 due to payments under
licensed and purchased intangibles of $6.8 million and the purchase of property, plant and
equipment of $5.8 million.
Investing activities used cash for the nine months ended July 2, 2010 due to the purchase of
property, plant and equipment of $3.8 million and payments under licensed and purchased intangibles
of $1.1 million.
Financing Activities
Financing activities provided cash for the nine months ended July 1, 2011 due to $2.7 million
in proceeds from equity compensation programs, partially offset by $362,000 in payments made
related to shares of our common stock withheld from, or delivered by, employees in order to satisfy
applicable tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock and
$402,000 in payments made on capital lease obligations.
Financing activities provided cash for the nine months ended July 2, 2010 primarily due to
$10.5 million paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 to retire the remaining principal amount of
our 3.75% convertible senior notes, which matured in November 2009, offset by $17.0 million in net
proceeds received from the sale of approximately 2.5 million shares of our common stock in an
offering that was completed in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. In addition, we received $1.5
million in proceeds from equity compensation programs.
Revolving Credit Facility and Convertible Senior Notes
Revolving Credit Facility
On September 30, 2008, we entered into a loan and security agreement with Silicon Valley Bank,
or SVB. Under the loan and security agreement, SVB agreed to provide us with a three-year
revolving credit line of up to $15.0 million, subject to availability against certain eligible
accounts receivable, for the purposes of: (i) working capital; (ii) funding our general business
requirements; and (iii) repaying or repurchasing our 3.75% convertible senior notes due in November
2009. In April 2010, we amended the loan and security agreement and reduced the maximum amount
available under the revolving credit line from $15.0 million to $5.0 million. This amendment was
initiated in order to reduce fees due under the agreement. Our indebtedness to SVB under the loan
and security agreement is guaranteed by three of our domestic subsidiaries and secured by
substantially all of the domestic assets of the Company and such subsidiaries, other than
intellectual property. The security and loan agreement expires in September 2011. We are currently
assessing our future financing needs.
Any indebtedness under the loan and security agreement bears interest at a variable rate
ranging from prime plus 0.25% to a maximum rate of prime plus 1.25%, as determined in accordance
with the interest rate grid set forth in the loan and security agreement. The loan and security
agreement contains affirmative and negative covenants which, among other things, require us to
maintain a minimum tangible net worth and to deliver to SVB specified financial information,
including annual, quarterly and monthly financial information, and limit our ability to (or, in
certain circumstances, to permit any subsidiaries to), subject to certain exceptions and
limitations: (i) merge with or acquire other companies; (ii) create liens on our property; (iii)
incur debt obligations; (iv) enter into transactions with affiliates, except on an arms length
basis; (v) dispose of property; and (vi) issue dividends or make distributions.
As of July 1, 2011, we were in compliance with all required covenants and had no outstanding
borrowings under our revolving credit facility with SVB.
33
3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2009
In December 2004, we sold an aggregate principal amount of $46.0 million in 3.75% convertible
senior notes due in November 2009 for net proceeds (after discounts and commissions) of
approximately $43.9 million. Through the end of fiscal 2009, we repurchased or exchanged $35.5
million of aggregate principal amount of this debt. During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, our
3.75% convertible senior notes matured and the remaining balance of $10.5 million was repaid.
6.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2013
We issued our 6.50% convertible senior notes due in August 2013 pursuant to an indenture,
dated as of August 1, 2008, between us and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee. At maturity, we will
be required to repay the outstanding principal amount of the notes. At July 1, 2011, $15.0 million
in aggregate principal amount of our 6.50% convertible senior notes were outstanding.
The 6.50% convertible senior notes are convertible at the option of the holders, at any time
on or prior to maturity, into shares of our common stock at a conversion rate equal to
approximately $4.74 per share of common stock, which is subject to adjustment in certain
circumstances. Upon conversion of the notes, we generally have the right to deliver to the holders
thereof, at our option: (i) cash; (ii) shares of our common stock; or (iii) a combination thereof.
The initial conversion price of the notes will be adjusted to reflect stock dividends, stock
splits, issuances of rights to purchase shares of our common stock, and upon other events. If we
undergo certain fundamental changes prior to maturity of the notes, the holders thereof will have
the right, at their option, to require us to repurchase for cash some or all of their 6.50%
convertible senior notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes
being repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest (including additional interest, if any) to, but
not including, the repurchase date, or convert the notes into shares of our common stock and, under
certain circumstances, receive additional shares of our common stock in the amount provided in the
indenture.
For financial accounting purposes, our contingent obligation to issue additional shares or
make additional cash payment upon conversion following a fundamental change is an embedded
derivative. At July 1, 2011, the liability under the fundamental change adjustment has been
recorded at its estimated fair value and is not significant.
If there is an event of default under the 6.50% convertible senior notes, the principal of and
premium, if any, on all the notes and the interest accrued thereon may be declared immediately due
and payable, subject to certain conditions set forth in the indenture. An event of default under
the indenture will occur if we: (i) are delinquent in making certain payments due under the notes;
(ii) fail to deliver shares of common stock or cash upon conversion of the notes; (iii) fail to
deliver certain required notices under the notes; (iv) fail, following notice, to cure a breach of
a covenant under the notes or the indenture; (v) incur certain events of default with respect to
other indebtedness; or (vi) are subject to certain bankruptcy proceedings or orders. If we fail to
deliver certain SEC reports to the trustee in a timely manner as required by the indenture: (x) the
interest rate applicable to the notes during the delinquency will be increased by 0.25% or 0.50%,
as applicable (depending on the duration of the delinquency); and (y) if the required reports are
not delivered to the trustee within 180 days after their due date under the indenture, a holder of
the notes will generally have the right, subject to certain limitations, to require us to
repurchase all or any portion of the notes then held by such holder.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have made guarantees and indemnities, under which we may be required to make payments to a
guaranteed or indemnified party, in relation to certain transactions. In connection with a June
2003 distribution to stockholders of our former parent company of all outstanding shares of common
stock of Mindspeed, we generally assumed responsibility for all contingent liabilities and
then-current and future litigation against our former parent company or its subsidiaries related to
our business. We may also be responsible for certain federal income tax liabilities under a tax
allocation agreement between us and our former parent company, which provides that we will be
responsible for certain taxes imposed on us, our former parent company or its stockholders. In
connection with certain facility leases, we have indemnified our lessors for certain claims arising
from the facility or the lease. We have also entered into certain distribution, license, supply and
purchase agreements under which we have agreed to certain guarantees
34
and have agreed to indemnify other parties. We indemnify our directors, officers, employees
and agents to the maximum extent permitted under the laws of the State of Delaware. The duration of
the guarantees and indemnities varies, and in many cases is indefinite. The majority of our
guarantees and indemnities do not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future
payments we could be obligated to make. We have not recorded any liability for these guarantees and
indemnities in the accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheets.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We do not use derivative instruments for speculative or investment purposes.
Interest Rate Risk
Our cash and cash equivalents are not subject to significant interest rate risk. As of July 1,
2011, the carrying value of our cash and cash equivalents approximated fair value.
At July 1, 2011, our debt consisted of long-term convertible senior notes, which bear interest
at a fixed rate of 6.50% per annum. Therefore, our results of operations and cash flows are not
subject to any significant interest rate risk relating to our convertible senior notes. The fair
value of the debt could increase or decrease if interest rates decreases or increase, respectively,
and that could impact our ability and cost to negotiate a settlement of such notes prior to
maturity. In addition, we have a revolving credit facility. Advances under our credit facility bear
interest at a variable rate ranging from prime plus 0.25% to a maximum rate of prime plus 1.25%, as
determined in accordance with the interest rate grid set forth in the loan and security agreement.
If the prime rate increases, thereby increasing our effective borrowing rate by the same amount,
cash interest expense related to the credit facility would increase dependent on any outstanding
borrowings. Because there were no outstanding borrowings on the credit facility as of July 1, 2011,
any change in the prime interest rate would have no effect on our obligations under the credit
facility.
Foreign Exchange Risk
We transact business in various foreign currencies and we face foreign exchange risk on assets
and liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies. Currently, our foreign exchange risks
are not hedged; however, from time to time, we may utilize foreign currency forward exchange
contracts to hedge a portion of our exposure to foreign exchange risk.
Hedging transactions are intended to offset the gains and losses we experience on foreign
currency transactions with gains and losses on the forward contracts, so as to mitigate our overall
risk of foreign exchange gains and losses. We do not enter into forward contracts for speculative
or trading purposes. At July 1, 2011, we held no foreign currency forward exchange contracts. Based
on our overall currency rate exposure at July 1, 2011, a 10% change in currency rates would not
have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and our Interim Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of
the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of July 1, 2011. Disclosure
controls and procedures are defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), as controls and other procedures that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under
the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within required time periods, and
that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer
and our Interim Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of July 1, 2011, these disclosure
controls and procedures were effective.
35
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule
13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act, during the fiscal quarter ended July 1, 2011 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
We have revised the risk factors that relate to our business, as set forth below. These risks
include any material changes to and supersede the risks previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2010. We encourage investors to
review these risk factors, as well as those contained under Forward-Looking Statements preceding
Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Our business, financial condition and operating results can be affected by a number of
factors, including those listed below, any one of which could cause our actual results to vary
materially from recent results or from our anticipated future results. Any of these risks could
also materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or the price of our common
stock or other securities.
Our operating results are subject to substantial quarterly and annual fluctuations.
Although we are currently generating net income, we have incurred significant losses in prior
periods. Our net revenue and operating results have fluctuated in the past and may fluctuate in
the future and we may incur losses and negative cash flows in future periods. These fluctuations
are due to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include, among
others:
|
|
|
changes in end-user demand for the products manufactured and sold by our customers; |
|
|
|
|
the effects of competitive pricing pressures, including decreases in
average selling prices of our
products; |
|
|
|
|
the gain or loss of significant customers; |
|
|
|
|
market acceptance of our products and our customers products; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to develop, introduce, market and support new products
and technologies on a timely basis; |
|
|
|
|
availability and cost of products from our suppliers; |
|
|
|
|
intellectual property disputes; |
|
|
|
|
the timing of receipt, reduction or cancellation of significant orders by customers; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the levels of component inventories held by our customers and changes in our
customers inventory management practices; |
|
|
|
|
shifts in our product mix and the effect of maturing products; |
|
|
|
|
the timing and extent of product development costs; |
|
|
|
|
new product and technology introductions by us or our competitors; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in manufacturing yields; and |
|
|
|
|
significant warranty claims, including those not covered by our suppliers. |
36
The foregoing factors are difficult to forecast, and these, as well as other factors, could
materially and adversely affect our quarterly or annual operating results.
We are entirely dependent upon third parties for the manufacture of our products and are vulnerable
to their capacity constraints during times of increasing demand for semiconductor products.
We are entirely dependent upon outside wafer fabrication facilities, known as foundries, for
wafer fabrication services. Our principal suppliers of wafer fabrication services are TSMC and Jazz
Semiconductor. We are also dependent upon third parties, including Amkor and ASE, for the assembly
and testing of all of our products. Under our fabless business model, our long-term revenue growth
is dependent on our ability to obtain sufficient external manufacturing capacity, including wafer
production capacity. Periods of upturns in the semiconductor industry may be characterized by rapid
increases in demand and a shortage of capacity for wafer fabrication and assembly and test
services.
The risks associated with our reliance on third parties for manufacturing services include:
|
|
|
the lack of assured supply, potential shortages and higher prices; |
|
|
|
|
the effects of disputes or litigation involving our third-party foundries; |
|
|
|
|
increased lead times; |
|
|
|
|
limited control over delivery schedules, manufacturing yields, production costs and product
quality; and |
|
|
|
|
the unavailability of, or delays in obtaining, products or access to key process technologies. |
Our standard lead time, or the time required to manufacture our products (including wafer
fabrication, assembly and testing), is typically 12 to 16 weeks. During periods of manufacturing
capacity shortages, the foundries and other suppliers on whom we rely may devote their limited
capacity to fulfill the production requirements of other customers that are larger or better
financed than we are, or who have superior contractual rights to enforce the manufacture of their
products, including to the exclusion of producing our products.
Additionally, if we are required to seek alternative foundries or assembly and test service
providers, we would be subject to longer lead times, indeterminate delivery schedules and increased
manufacturing costs, including costs to find and qualify acceptable suppliers. For example, if we
choose to use a new foundry, the qualification process may take as long as six months over the
standard lead time before we can begin shipping products from the new foundry. Such delays could
negatively affect our relationships with our customers.
Wafer fabrication processes are subject to obsolescence, and foundries may discontinue a wafer
fabrication process used for certain of our products. In such event, we generally offer our
customers a last-time buy program to satisfy their anticipated requirements for our products. Any
unanticipated discontinuation of a wafer fabrication process on which we rely may adversely affect
our revenue and our customer relationships.
The foundries and other suppliers on whom we rely may experience financial difficulties or
suffer disruptions in their operations due to causes beyond our control, including deteriorations
in general economic conditions, labor strikes, work stoppages, electrical power outages, fire,
earthquake, flooding or other natural disasters. Certain of our suppliers manufacturing facilities
are located near major earthquake fault lines in the Asia-Pacific region and in California. Certain
of our Asian suppliers integrate components or use materials manufactured in Japan in the
production of our products. The recent earthquake and tsunami in Japan have disrupted the global
supply chain for components manufactured in Japan that are incorporated in our products or included
in the end user products of our customers. We continue to monitor the effect of the events in Japan
on inventory levels throughout the supply chain. In the event of a disruption of the operations of
one or more of our suppliers, we may not have an alternate source immediately available. Such an
event could cause significant delays in shipments until we are able to shift the products from an
affected facility or supplier to another facility or supplier. While we recognize that the recent
crisis in Japan has impacted our supply chain, we do not currently believe these events will have a
material impact on our
37
operations in the fiscal fourth quarter of 2011 unless conditions worsen, including, but
not limited to, power outages and expansion of evacuation zones around the nuclear power plants.
Beyond the fiscal fourth quarter of 2011, there is a risk that we could in the future experience
delays or other constraints in obtaining key components and products and/or price increases related
to such components and products that could materially adversely affect our financial condition and
operating results. The manufacturing processes we rely on are specialized and are available from a
limited number of suppliers. Alternate sources of manufacturing capacity, particularly wafer
production capacity, may not be available to us on a timely basis. Even if alternate manufacturing
capacity is available, we may not be able to obtain it on favorable terms, or at all. Difficulties
or delays in securing an adequate supply of our products on favorable terms, or at all, could
impair our ability to meet our customers requirements and have a material adverse effect on our
operating results.
In addition, the highly complex and technologically demanding nature of semiconductor
manufacturing has caused foundries to experience, from time to time, lower than anticipated
manufacturing yields, particularly in connection with the introduction of new products and the
installation and start-up of new process technologies. Lower than anticipated manufacturing yields
may affect our ability to fulfill our customers demands for our products on a timely basis.
Moreover, lower than anticipated manufacturing yields may adversely affect our gross margin and our
results of operations.
Our operating results may be adversely impacted by worldwide economic uncertainties and specific
conditions in the markets we address, including the cyclical nature of and volatility in the
semiconductor industry.
We operate primarily in the semiconductor industry, which is cyclical and subject to rapid
change and evolving industry standards. From time to time, the semiconductor industry has
experienced significant downturns characterized by decreases in product demand, excess customer
inventories and accelerated erosion of prices. The semiconductor industry also periodically
experiences increased demand and production capacity constraints, which may affect our ability to
ship products. Furthermore, during challenging economic times, our customers and vendors may face
issues gaining timely access to sufficient credit, which could impact their ability to make timely
payments to us. As a result, we may experience growth patterns that are different than the end
demand for products, particularly during periods of high volatility. Accordingly, our operating
results may vary significantly as a result of the general conditions in the semiconductor industry,
which could cause large fluctuations in our stock price.
We cannot predict the timing, strength or duration of any economic slowdown or the impact it
will have on our customers, our vendors or us. The combination of our lengthy sales cycle coupled
with challenging macroeconomic conditions could have a compound impact on our business. The impact
of market volatility is not limited to revenue, but may also affect our product gross margins and
other financial metrics. Any downturns in the semiconductor industry could be severe and prolonged,
and any failure of the industry or wired and wireless communications markets to fully recover from
downturns could seriously impact our revenue and harm our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
The price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly.
The price of our common stock is volatile and may fluctuate significantly. There can be no
assurance as to the prices at which our common stock will trade or that an active trading market in
our common stock will be sustained in the future. The market price at which our common stock trades
may be influenced by many factors, including:
|
|
|
our operating and financial performance and prospects, including our
ability to achieve sustained
profitability; |
|
|
|
|
the depth and liquidity of the market for our common stock which can
impact, among other things, the volatility of our stock price and the
availability of market participants to borrow shares; |
|
|
|
|
investor perception of us and the industry in which we operate; |
|
|
|
|
the level of research coverage of our common stock; |
|
|
|
|
changes in earnings estimates or buy/sell recommendations by analysts; |
38
|
|
|
the issuance and sale of additional shares of common stock; |
|
|
|
general financial and other market conditions; and |
|
|
|
|
domestic and international economic conditions. |
In addition, public stock markets have experienced, and may in the future experience, extreme
price and trading volume volatility, particularly in the technology sectors of the market. This
volatility has significantly affected the market prices of securities of many technology companies
for reasons frequently unrelated to or disproportionately impacted by the operating performance of
these companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our
common stock. If we do not meet the requirements for continued quotation on the Nasdaq Global
Select Market (NASDAQ), our common stock could be delisted which would adversely affect the ability
of investors to sell shares of our common stock and could otherwise adversely affect our business.
The loss of one or more key customers or distributors, or the diminished demand for our products
from a key customer could significantly reduce our net revenue, gross margin and results of
operations.
A relatively small number of end customers and distributors have accounted for a significant
portion of our net revenue in any particular period. There has been an increasing trend toward
industry consolidation in our markets in recent years, particularly among major network equipment
and telecommunications companies. Industry consolidation could decrease the number of significant
customers for our products thereby increasing our reliance on key customers. In addition, industry
consolidation has generally led, and may continue to lead, to pricing pressures and loss of market
share. We have no long-term volume purchase commitments from our key customers. One or more of our
key customers or distributors may discontinue operations as a result of consolidation, financial
instability, liquidation or otherwise. Reductions, delays and cancellation of orders from our key
customers or the loss of one or more key customers could significantly reduce our net revenue and
results of operations. We cannot assure you that our current customers will continue to place
orders with us, that orders by existing customers will continue at current or historical levels or
that we will be able to obtain orders from new customers.
Our success depends on our ability to develop competitive new products in a timely manner and keep
abreast of the rapid technological changes in our market.
Our operating results will depend largely on our ability to continue to introduce new and
enhanced semiconductor products on a timely basis as well as our ability to keep abreast of rapid
technological changes in our markets. Our products could become obsolete sooner than we expect
because of faster than anticipated, or unanticipated, changes in one or more of the technologies
related to our products. The introduction of new technology representing a substantial advance over
current technology could adversely affect demand for our existing products. Currently accepted
industry standards are also subject to change, which may also contribute to the obsolescence of our
products. If we are unable to develop and introduce new or enhanced products in a timely manner,
our business may be adversely affected.
Successful product development and introduction depends on numerous factors, including, among
others:
|
|
|
our ability to anticipate customer and market requirements and
changes in technology and industry standards; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to accurately define new products; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to complete development of new products, and bring our products to market, on a
timely basis; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to differentiate our products from offerings of our competitors; and |
|
|
|
|
overall market acceptance of our products. |
39
We may not have sufficient resources to make the substantial investment in research and
development in order to develop and bring to market new and enhanced products, particularly if we
are required to take further cost reduction actions. Furthermore, we are required to continually
evaluate expenditures for planned product development and to choose among alternative technologies
based on our expectations of future market growth. We may be unable to develop and introduce new or
enhanced products in a timely manner, our products may not satisfy customer requirements or achieve
market acceptance, or we may be unable to anticipate new industry standards and technological
changes. We also may not be able to respond successfully to new product announcements and
introductions by competitors.
Research and development projects may experience unanticipated delays related to our internal
design efforts. New product development also requires the production of photomask sets and the
production and testing of sample devices. In the event we experience delays in obtaining these
services from the wafer fabrication and assembly and test vendors on whom we rely, our product
introductions may be delayed and our revenue and results of operations may be adversely affected.
We may not be able to attract and retain qualified personnel necessary for the design, development,
sale and support of our products. Our success could be negatively affected if key personnel leave.
Our future success depends on our ability to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel,
including executive officers and other key management, technical and support personnel. As the
source of our technological and product innovations, our key technical personnel represent a
significant asset. The competition for such personnel can be intense in the semiconductor industry.
We may not be able to attract and retain qualified management and other personnel necessary for the
design, development, sale and support of our products.
In periods of poor operating performance, we have experienced, and may experience in the
future, particular difficulty attracting and retaining key personnel. If we are not successful in
assuring our employees of our financial stability and our prospects for success, our employees may
seek other employment, which may materially and adversely affect our business. Moreover, our recent
expense reduction and restructuring initiatives, including a series of worldwide workforce
reductions, have reduced the number of our technical employees. We intend to continue to expand our
international business activities including expansion of design and operations centers abroad and
may have difficulty attracting and maintaining international employees. The loss of the services of
one or more of our key employees, including Raouf Y. Halim, our chief executive officer, or certain
key design and technical personnel, or our inability to attract, retain and motivate qualified
personnel could have a material adverse effect on our ability to operate our business.
Many of our engineers are foreign nationals working in the U.S. under work visas. The visas
permit qualified foreign nationals working in specialty occupations, such as certain categories of
engineers, to reside in the U.S. during their employment. The number of new visas approved each
year may be limited and may restrict our ability to hire additional qualified technical employees.
In addition, immigration policies are subject to change, and these policies have generally become
more stringent since the events of September 11, 2001. Any additional significant changes in
immigration laws, rules or regulations may further restrict our ability to retain or hire technical
personnel.
We are subject to the risks of doing business internationally.
A significant part of our strategy involves our continued pursuit of growth opportunities in a
number of international markets. We market, sell, design and service our products internationally.
Products shipped to international destinations, primarily in the Asia-Pacific region and Europe,
were approximately 78% of our net revenue for the first nine months of fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010.
China is a particularly important international market for us, as more than 38% of our revenue for
the first nine months of fiscal 2011 came from customers in China. In addition, we have design
centers, customer support centers, and rely on suppliers, located outside the U.S., including
foundries and assembly and test service providers located in the Asia-Pacific region. Certain of
our suppliers integrate components or use materials manufactured in Japan in the production of our
products. The recent earthquake and tsunami in Japan have disrupted the global supply chain for
components manufactured in Japan that are incorporated in our products or included in the end user
products of our customers. Due to cross dependencies, supply chain disruptions stemming from the
occurrences in Japan could negatively impact the demand for our products, including, for example,
if our customers are unable to obtain sufficient supply of other components
40
required for their end products. We continue to monitor the effect of the events in Japan on
end demand patterns and inventory levels throughout the supply chain.
We intend to continue to expand our international business activities and may open other
design centers and customer support centers abroad. Our international sales and operations are
subject to a number of risks inherent in selling and operating abroad which could adversely impact
our international sales and could make our international operations more expensive. These include,
but are not limited to, risks regarding:
|
|
|
currency exchange rate fluctuations; |
|
|
|
|
local economic and political conditions; |
|
|
|
|
disruptions of capital and trading markets; |
|
|
|
|
accounts receivable collection and longer payment cycles; |
|
|
|
|
wage inflation; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations; |
|
|
|
|
potential hostilities and changes in diplomatic and trade relationships; |
|
|
|
|
restrictive governmental actions (such as restrictions on the transfer or repatriation of funds
and trade protection measures, including export duties and quotas and customs duties and tariffs); |
|
|
|
|
changes in legal or regulatory requirements; |
|
|
|
|
difficulty in obtaining distribution and support; |
|
|
|
|
the laws and policies of the U.S. and other countries affecting
trade, foreign investment and loans and import or export licensing
requirements; |
|
|
|
|
existing or future environmental laws and regulations governing,
among other things, air emissions, wastewater discharges, the
contents of our products, the use, handling and disposal of hazardous
substances and wastes, soil and groundwater contamination and
employee health and safety; |
|
|
|
|
tax laws; |
|
|
|
|
limitations on our ability under local laws to protect our intellectual property; |
|
|
|
|
cultural differences in the conduct of business; and |
|
|
|
|
natural disasters, acts of terrorism and war. |
Because most of our international sales are currently denominated in U.S. dollars, our
products could become less competitive in international markets if the value of the U.S. dollar
increases relative to foreign currencies. As we continue to shift a portion of our operations
offshore, more of our expenses are incurred in currencies other than those in which we bill for the
related services. An increase in the value of certain currencies, such as the Euro, Japanese yen,
Ukrainian hryvnia and Indian rupee, against the U.S. dollar could increase costs of our offshore
operations by increasing labor and other costs that are denominated in local currencies.
We may in the future enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to mitigate the
risk of loss from currency exchange rate fluctuations for foreign currency commitments entered into
in the ordinary course of business. We do not enter into foreign currency forward exchange
contracts for other purposes. Our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely
affected by currency fluctuations.
41
We have substantial cash requirements to fund our operations, research and development efforts and
capital expenditures. Our capital resources are limited and capital needed for our business may not
be available when we need it.
Although we generated cash through operating activities in the first three quarters of fiscal
2011 and during fiscal 2010, we have used significant cash in operating activities in previous
periods. Our principal sources of liquidity are our existing cash balances and cash generated from
product sales. We believe that our existing cash balances, along with cash expected to be generated
from product sales will be sufficient to fund our operations, research and development efforts,
anticipated capital expenditures, working capital and other financing requirements, including
interest payments on our debt obligations, for at least the next 12 months. However, if we incur
operating losses and negative cash flows in the future, we may need to further reduce our operating
costs or obtain alternate sources of financing, or both. We have completed transactions that
involved the issuance of equity and the issuance or incurrence of indebtedness, including credit
facilities. Even after completing these transactions, we may need additional capital in the future
and may not have access to additional sources of capital on favorable terms or at all. If we raise
additional funds through the issuance of equity, equity-based or debt securities, such securities
may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of our common stock and our stockholders
may experience dilution of their ownership interests. In addition, there can be no assurance that
we will continue to benefit from the sale or licensing of intellectual property as we have in
previous periods.
We may be subject to claims, or we may be required to defend and indemnify customers against
claims, of infringement of third-party intellectual property rights or demands that we, or our
customers, license third-party technology, which could result in significant expense.
The semiconductor industry is characterized by vigorous protection and pursuit of intellectual
property rights. From time to time, third parties have asserted and may in the future assert
patent, copyright, trademark and other intellectual property rights against technologies that are
important to our business. The resolution or compromise of any litigation or other legal process to
enforce such alleged third party rights, including claims arising through our contractual
indemnification of our customers, or claims challenging the validity of our patents, regardless of
its merit or resolution, could be costly and divert the efforts and attention of our management and
technical personnel.
We may not prevail in any such litigation or other legal process or we may compromise or
settle such claims because of the complex technical issues and inherent uncertainties in
intellectual property disputes and the significant expense in defending such claims. If litigation
or other legal process results in adverse rulings, we may be required to:
|
|
|
pay substantial damages for past, present and future use of the infringing technology; |
|
|
|
|
cease the manufacture, use or sale of infringing products; |
|
|
|
|
discontinue the use of infringing technology; |
|
|
|
|
expend significant resources to develop non-infringing technology; |
|
|
|
|
pay substantial damages to our customers or end users to discontinue use or replace infringing
technology with non-infringing technology; |
|
|
|
|
license technology from the third party claiming infringement, which
license may not be available
on commercially reasonable terms, or at all; or |
|
|
|
|
relinquish intellectual property rights associated with one or more
of our patent claims, if such claims are held invalid or otherwise
unenforceable. |
We are subject to intense competition.
The communications semiconductor industry in general, and the markets in which we compete in
particular, are intensely competitive. We compete worldwide with a number of U.S. and international
semiconductor manufacturers that are both larger and smaller than we are in terms of resources and
market share. We currently face
42
significant competition in our markets and expect that intense price and product competition
will continue. This competition has resulted, and is expected to continue to result, in declining
average selling prices for our products.
Many of our current and potential competitors have certain advantages over us, including:
|
|
|
stronger financial position and liquidity; |
|
|
|
|
longer, or stronger, presence in key markets; |
|
|
|
|
greater name recognition; |
|
|
|
|
more secure supply chain; |
|
|
|
|
lower cost alternatives to our products; |
|
|
|
|
access to larger customer bases; and |
|
|
|
|
significantly greater sales and marketing, manufacturing,
distribution, technical and other resources. |
As a result, these competitors may be able to adapt more quickly to new or emerging
technologies and changes in customer requirements or may be able to devote greater resources to the
development, promotion and sale of their products than we can. Moreover, we have incurred
substantial operating losses and we may in the future incur losses in future periods. We believe
that financial stability of suppliers is an important consideration in our customers purchasing
decisions. If our OEM customers perceive that we lack adequate financial stability, they may choose
semiconductor suppliers that they believe have a stronger financial position or liquidity.
Current and potential competitors also have established or may establish financial or
strategic relationships among themselves or with our existing or potential customers, resellers or
other third parties. These relationships may affect customers purchasing decisions. Accordingly,
it is possible that new competitors or alliances among competitors could emerge and rapidly acquire
significant market share. We may not be able to compete successfully against current and potential
competitors.
Because of the lengthy sales cycles of many of our products, we may incur significant expenses
before we generate any revenue related to those products.
Our customers generally need six months or longer to test and evaluate our products and an
additional six months or more to begin volume production of equipment that incorporates our
products. These lengthy periods also increase the possibility that a customer may decide to cancel
or change product plans, which could reduce or eliminate sales to that customer. As a result of
this lengthy sales cycle, we may incur significant research and development and selling, general
and administrative expenses before we generate any revenue from new products. We may never generate
the anticipated revenue if our customers cancel or change their product plans as customers may
increasingly do if economic conditions continue to deteriorate.
Uncertainties involving the ordering and shipment of our products could adversely affect our
business.
Our sales are typically made pursuant to individual purchase orders and we generally do not
have long-term supply arrangements with our customers. Generally, our customers may cancel orders
until 30 days prior to shipment. In addition, we sell a substantial portion of our products through
distributors, some of whom have a right to return unsold products to us. Sales to distributors
accounted for approximately 58% of our revenue for the first nine months of fiscal 2011 and 50% of
our revenue for the first nine months of fiscal 2010.
Because of the significant lead times for wafer fabrication and assembly and test services, we
routinely purchase inventory based on estimates of end-market demand for our customers products.
End-market demand may be subject to dramatic changes and is difficult to predict. End-market demand
is highly influenced by the timing and extent of carrier capital expenditures which may decrease
due to general economic conditions, and uncertainty, over
43
which we have no control. The difficulty in predicting demand may be compounded when we sell
to OEMs indirectly through distributors or contract manufacturers, or both, as our forecasts of
demand are then based on estimates provided by multiple parties. In addition, our customers may
change their inventory practices on short notice for any reason. The cancellation or deferral of
product orders, the return of previously sold products or overproduction due to the failure of
anticipated orders to materialize could result in our holding excess or obsolete inventory, which
could result in write-downs of inventory. Conversely, if we fail to anticipate inventory needs we
may be unable to fulfill demand for our products, resulting in a loss of potential revenue.
If network infrastructure OEMs do not design our products into their equipment, we will be unable
to sell those products. Moreover, a design win from a customer does not guarantee future sales to
that customer.
Our products are not sold directly to the end-user but are components of other products. As a
result, we rely on network infrastructure OEMs to select our products from among alternative
offerings to be designed into their equipment. We may be unable to achieve these design wins.
Without design wins from OEMs, we would be unable to sell our products. Once an OEM designs another
suppliers semiconductors into one of its product platforms, it is more difficult for us to achieve
future design wins with that OEMs product platform because changing suppliers involves significant
cost, time, effort and risk for the OEM. Achieving a design win with a customer does not ensure
that we will receive significant revenue from that customer, and we may be unable to convert design
wins into actual sales. Even after a design win, the customer is not obligated to purchase our
products and can choose at any time to stop using our products if, for example, its own products
are not commercially successful.
If we are not successful in protecting our intellectual property rights, it may harm our ability to
compete.
We rely primarily on patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as employee
and third-party nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements and other methods, to protect our
proprietary technologies and processes. We may be required to engage in litigation to enforce or
protect our intellectual property rights, which may require us to expend significant resources and
to divert the efforts and attention of our management from our business operations; in particular:
|
|
|
the steps we take to prevent misappropriation or infringement of our intellectual property
may not be successful; |
|
|
|
|
any existing or future patents may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented; or |
|
|
|
|
the measures described above may not provide meaningful protection. |
Despite the preventive measures and precautions that we take, a third party could copy or
otherwise obtain and use our technology without authorization, develop similar technology
independently or design around our patents. We generally enter into confidentiality agreements with
our employees, consultants and strategic partners. We also try to control access to and
distribution of our technologies, documentation and other proprietary information. Despite these
efforts, internal or external parties may attempt to copy, disclose, obtain or use our products,
services or technology without our authorization. Also, former employees may seek employment with
our business partners, customers or competitors, and the confidential nature of our proprietary
information may not be maintained in the course of such future employment. Further, in some
countries outside the U.S., patent protection is not available or not reliably enforced. Some
countries that do allow registration of patents do not provide meaningful redress for patent
violations. As a result, protecting intellectual property in those countries is difficult and
competitors may sell products in those countries that have functions and features that infringe on
our intellectual property.
The complexity of our products may lead to errors, defects and bugs, which could subject us to
significant costs or damages and adversely affect market acceptance of our products.
Although we, our customers and our suppliers rigorously test our products, our products are
complex and may contain errors, defects or bugs when first introduced or as new versions are
released. We have in the past experienced, and may in the future experience, errors, defects and
bugs. If any of our products contain production defects or reliability, safety, quality or
compatibility problems that are significant to our customers, our reputation
44
may be damaged and customers may be reluctant to buy our products, which could adversely
affect our ability to retain existing customers and attract new customers. In addition, these
defects or bugs could interrupt or delay sales of affected products to our customers, which could
adversely affect our results of operations.
If defects or bugs are discovered after commencement of commercial production of a new
product, we may be required to make significant expenditures of capital and other resources to
resolve the problems. This could result in significant additional development costs and the
diversion of technical and other resources from our other development efforts. We could also incur
significant costs to repair or replace defective products, and we could be subject to claims for
damages by our customers or others against us. We could also be exposed to product liability claims
or indemnification claims by our customers. These costs or damages could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We may make business acquisitions or investments, which involve significant risk.
We may, from time to time, make acquisitions, enter into alliances or make investments in
other businesses to complement our existing product offerings, augment our market coverage or
enhance our technological capabilities. However, any such transactions could result in:
|
|
|
issuances of equity securities dilutive to our existing stockholders; |
|
|
|
|
substantial cash payments; |
|
|
|
|
the incurrence of substantial debt and assumption of unknown liabilities; |
|
|
|
|
large one-time write-offs; |
|
|
|
|
amortization expenses related to intangible assets; |
|
|
|
|
ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards; |
|
|
|
|
the diversion of managements attention from other business concerns; and |
|
|
|
|
the potential loss of key employees, customers and suppliers of the acquired business. |
Integrating acquired organizations and their products and services may be expensive,
time-consuming and a strain on our resources and our relationships with employees, customers and
suppliers, and ultimately may not be successful. The benefits or synergies we may expect from the
acquisition of complementary or supplementary businesses may not be realized to the extent or in
the time frame we initially anticipate.
Additionally, in periods subsequent to an acquisition, we must evaluate goodwill and
acquisition-related intangible assets for impairment. If such assets are found to be impaired, they
will be written down to estimated fair value, with a charge against earnings.
Our ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes may be
limited.
As of October 1, 2010, we had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $627.1 million
for federal income tax purposes. Under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, if a corporation
undergoes an ownership change, the corporations ability to use its pre-change net operating loss
carryforwards and other pre-change tax attributes to offset its post-change income may be
significantly limited. An ownership change is generally defined as a greater than 50% change in
equity ownership by value over a three-year period. In August 2009, our board of directors adopted
a shareholder rights agreement that is designed to help preserve our ability to utilize fully
certain tax assets primarily associated with net operating loss carryforwards under Section 382 of
the Internal Revenue Code. Even with this rights agreement in place, we may experience an
ownership change in the future as a result of shifts in our stock ownership, including upon the
issuance of our common stock, the exercise of stock options or warrants or as a result of any
conversion of our convertible notes into shares of our common stock, among other
45
things. If we were to trigger an ownership change in the future, our ability to use any net
operating loss carryforwards existing at that time could be significantly limited.
Our results of operations could vary as a result of the methods, estimates and judgments we use in
applying our accounting policies.
The methods, estimates and judgments we use in applying our accounting policies have a
significant impact on our results of operations (see Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
in Part I, Item 2 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q). Such methods, estimates and judgments
are, by their nature, subject to substantial risks, uncertainties and assumptions, and changes in
rule making by various regulatory bodies. Factors may arise over time that lead us to change our
methods, estimates and judgments. Changes in those methods, estimates and judgments could
significantly affect our results of operations.
Substantial sales of the shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion of our convertible
senior notes or exercise of our outstanding warrant and antidilution and other provisions in our
outstanding warrant could adversely affect our stock price or our ability to raise additional
financing in the public capital markets.
At July 1, 2011, we had $15.0 million aggregate principal amount of convertible senior notes
outstanding. These notes are convertible at any time, at the option of the holder, into a total of
approximately 3.2 million shares of common stock. The conversion of the notes and subsequent sale
of a substantial number of shares of our common stock could also adversely affect demand for, and
the market price of, our common stock. Each of these transactions could adversely affect our
ability to raise additional financing by issuing equity or equity-based securities in the public
capital markets.
A warrant is outstanding to acquire approximately 6.1 million shares of our common stock at a
price of $16.74 per share, as adjusted, exercisable through June 27, 2013, representing
approximately 14% of our outstanding common stock on a fully diluted basis. The warrant may be
transferred or sold in whole or part at any time. If the warrant holder sells the warrant or if it
or a transferee of the warrant exercises the warrant and sells a substantial number of shares of
our common stock in the future, or if investors perceive that these sales may occur, the market
price of our common stock could decline or market demand for our common stock could be sharply
reduced.
The warrant contains antidilution provisions that provide for adjustment of the warrants
exercise price, and the number of shares issuable under the warrant, upon the occurrence of certain
events. If we issue, or are deemed to have issued, shares of our common stock, or securities
convertible into our common stock, at prices below the current market price of our common stock (as
defined in the warrant) at the time of the issuance of such securities, the warrants exercise
price will be reduced and the number of shares issuable under the warrant will be increased. The
amount of such adjustment if any, will be determined pursuant to a formula specified in the warrant
and will depend on the number of shares issued, the offering price and the current market price of
our common stock at the time of the issuance of such securities. Adjustments to the warrant
pursuant to these antidilution provisions may result in significant dilution to the interests of
our existing stockholders and may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. The
antidilution provisions may also limit our ability to obtain additional financing on terms
favorable to us.
Moreover, we may not realize any cash proceeds from the exercise of the warrant. The holder of
the warrant may opt for a cashless exercise of all or part of the warrant. In a cashless exercise,
the holder of the warrant would make no cash payment to us, and would receive a number of shares of
our common stock having an aggregate value equal to the excess of the then-current market price of
the shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrant over the exercise price of the
warrant. Such an issuance of common stock would be immediately dilutive to the interests of other
stockholders.
Provisions in our organizational documents and stockholders rights agreements and Delaware law will
make it more difficult for someone to acquire control of us.
Our restated certificate of incorporation, our amended and restated bylaws, our stockholders
rights agreements and the Delaware General Corporation Law contain several provisions that would
make more difficult an acquisition
46
of control of us in a transaction not approved by our board of directors. Our restated
certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws include provisions such as:
|
|
|
the division of our board of directors into three classes to be
elected on a staggered basis, one class each year; |
|
|
|
|
the exclusive responsibility of the board of directors to fill vacancies on the board of directors; |
|
|
|
|
the ability of our board of directors to issue shares of our preferred stock in one or more
series without further authorization of our stockholders; |
|
|
|
|
a prohibition on stockholder action by written consent; |
|
|
|
|
a requirement that stockholders provide advance notice of any
stockholder nominations of directors or any proposal of new business
to be considered at any meeting of stockholders;
|
|
|
|
|
a requirement that a supermajority vote be obtained to remove a director for cause or to amend
or repeal certain provisions of our restated certificate of incorporation or amended and
restated bylaws; |
|
|
|
|
elimination of the right of stockholders to call a special meeting of stockholders; and |
|
|
|
|
a fair price provision. |
Our stockholders rights agreements give our stockholders certain rights that would
substantially increase the cost of acquiring us in a transaction not approved by our board of
directors.
In addition to the stockholders rights agreements and the provisions in our restated
certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, Section 203 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law generally provides that a corporation shall not engage in any business combination
with any interested stockholder during the three-year period following the time that such
stockholder becomes an interested stockholder, unless a majority of the directors then in office
approves either the business combination or the transaction that results in the stockholder
becoming an interested stockholder or specified stockholder approval requirements are met.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
|
(or Units) |
|
|
Paid per Share |
|
|
|
Purchased (a) |
|
|
(or Unit) |
|
April 2, 2011 to April 29, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
April 30, 2011 to May 27, 2011 |
|
|
3,168 |
|
|
|
8.66 |
|
May 28, 2011 to July 1, 2011 |
|
|
5,808 |
|
|
|
7.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,976 |
|
|
$ |
7.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents shares of our common stock withheld from, or delivered by, employees in order to
satisfy applicable tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted
stock. These repurchases were not made pursuant to any publicly announced plan or program. |
47
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3
(Registration Statement No. 333-106146), is incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation
of the Registrant, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Current
Report on Form 8-K dated July 1, 2008, is incorporated herein by
reference (SEC File No. 001-31650). |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Designation of Series B Junior Participating Preferred
Stock, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K dated August 9, 2009, is incorporated herein by
reference (SEC File No. 001-31650). |
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, filed as Exhibit 3.1
to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 27, 2011, is
incorporated herein by reference (SEC File No. 000-31650). |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen Certificate for the Registrants Common Stock, par value
$.01 per share, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Registration
Statement on Form S-8 dated April 6, 2011, is incorporated herein by
reference (SEC File No. 333-173328). |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Rights Agreement dated as of June 26, 2003, by and between the
Registrant and Mellon Investor Services LLC, as Rights Agent, filed
as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated
July 1, 2003, is incorporated herein by reference (SEC File No.
001-31650). |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
First Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of December 6, 2004, by
and between the Registrant and Mellon Investor Services LLC, filed as
Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated
December 2, 2004, is incorporated herein by reference (SEC File No.
001-31650). |
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Second Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2008, by
and between the Registrant and Mellon Investor Services LLC, filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated June
11, 2008, is incorporated herein by reference (SEC File No.
000-50499). |
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Section 382 Rights Agreement, dated as of August 9, 2009, between the
Registrant and Mellon Investor Services LLC, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to
the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 10, 2009, is
incorporated herein by reference (SEC File No. 001-31650). |
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated June 27, 2003, issued by the
Registrant to Conexant Systems, Inc., filed as Exhibit 4.5 to the
Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration
Statement No. 333-109523), is incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of June 27, 2003 by and
between the Registrant and Conexant Systems, Inc., filed as Exhibit
4.6 to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3
(Registration Statement No. 333-109523), is incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Indenture, dated as of August 1, 2008, between the Registrant and
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 4, 2008, is incorporated
herein by reference (SEC File No. 001-31650). |
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
Form of 6.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2013, attached as Exhibit
A to the Indenture (Exhibit 4.9 hereto), is incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 27, 2011, is
incorporated herein by reference (SEC File No. 001-31650). |
48
|
|
|
*10.2
|
|
Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. 2003 Long-Term Incentives Plan, as amended and restated, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 8, 2011, is incorporated herein by reference (SEC File No.
001-31650). |
|
|
|
*10.3
|
|
Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. Indemnification Agreement, dated May 6, 2011, by and between Kristen M. Schmidt and
the Registrant filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 18, 2011, is
incorporated herein by reference (SEC File No. 001-31650). |
|
|
|
*10.4
|
|
Confidential Severance and General Release Agreement, effective May 21, 2011, by and between the
Registrant and Anil Mankar. |
|
|
|
*10.5
|
|
Schedule identifying parties to and terms of agreements with the Registrant substantially
identical to the form of Employment Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrants Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2009 (SEC File No. 001-31650). |
|
|
|
*10.6
|
|
Schedule identifying parties to and terms of agreements with the Registrant substantially
identical to the form of Form of Indemnification Agreement, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 27, 2011, is incorporated herein by reference
(SEC File No. 001-31650). |
|
|
|
*10.7
|
|
Summary of Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales, Cash Bonus Arrangement. |
|
|
|
*10.8
|
|
Termination Agreement, effective May 6, 2011, by and between the Registrant and Bret W. Johnsen. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Interim Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Interim Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
|
|
**101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
**101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
|
|
**101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
**101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
**101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
Certain confidential portions of this exhibit have been omitted
pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Omitted portions
have been filed separately with the SEC. |
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
|
** |
|
Pursuant to applicable securities laws and regulations, we are deemed
to have complied with the reporting obligation relating to the
submission of interactive data files in such exhibits and are not
subject to liability under any anti-fraud provisions of the federal
securities laws as long as we have made a good faith attempt to comply
with the submission requirements and promptly amend the interactive
data files after becoming aware that the interactive data files fail
to comply with the submission requirements. Users of this data are
advised that, pursuant to Rule 406T, these interactive data files are
deemed not filed and otherwise are not subject to liability. |
49
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MINDSPEED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: August 5, 2011 |
By |
/s/ KRISTEN M. SCHMIDT
|
|
|
|
Kristen M. Schmidt |
|
|
|
Interim Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial and accounting officer) |
|
50
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
*10.4
|
|
Confidential Severance and General Release Agreement, effective May 21, 2011, by and between the
Registrant and Anil Mankar. |
|
|
|
*10.5
|
|
Schedule identifying parties to and terms of agreements with the Registrant substantially identical to
the form of Employment Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2009 (SEC File No. 001-31650). |
|
|
|
*10.6
|
|
Schedule identifying parties to and terms of agreements with the Registrant substantially identical to
the form of Form of Indemnification Agreement, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report
on Form 8-K dated May 27, 2011, is incorporated herein by reference (SEC File No. 001-31650). |
|
|
|
*10.7
|
|
Summary of Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales, Cash Bonus Arrangement. |
|
|
|
*10.8
|
|
Termination Agreement, effective May 6, 2011, by and between the Registrant and Bret W. Johnsen. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Interim Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Interim Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
|
|
**101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
**101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
|
|
**101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
**101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
**101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
Certain confidential portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for
confidential treatment. Omitted portions have been filed separately with the SEC. |
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
|
** |
|
Pursuant to applicable securities laws and regulations, we are deemed to have complied with
the reporting obligation relating to the submission of interactive data files in such exhibits
and are not subject to liability under any anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities
laws as long as we have made a good faith attempt to comply with the submission requirements
and promptly amend the interactive data files after becoming aware that the interactive data
files fail to comply with the submission requirements. Users of this data are advised that,
pursuant to Rule 406T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed and otherwise are not
subject to liability. |
51