e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
Commission File No. 001-33861
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
New York
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
11-2153962
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
2929 California Street, Torrance, California
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
90503
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (310) 212-7910
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ
There were 12,067,271 shares of Common Stock outstanding at February 2, 2011.
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC.
GLOSSARY
The following terms are frequently used in the text of this report and have the meanings indicated
below.
Used Core An alternator or starter which has been used in the operation of a vehicle.
Generally, the Used Core is an original equipment (OE) alternator or starter installed by the
vehicle manufacturer and subsequently removed for replacement. Used Cores contain salvageable parts
which are an important raw material in the remanufacturing process. We obtain most Used Cores by
providing credits to our customers for Used Cores returned to us under our core exchange program.
Our customers receive these Used Cores from consumers who deliver a Used Core to obtain credit from
our customers upon the purchase of a newly remanufactured alternator or starter. When sufficient
Used Cores cannot be obtained from our customers, we will purchase Used Cores from core brokers,
who are in the business of buying and selling Used Cores. The Used Cores purchased from core
brokers or returned to us by our customers under the core exchange program, and which have been
physically received by us, are part of our raw material or work in process inventory included in
long-term core inventory.
Remanufactured Core The Used Core underlying an alternator or starter that has gone through
the remanufacturing process and through that process has become part of a newly remanufactured
alternator or starter. The remanufacturing process takes a Used Core, breaks it down into its
component parts, replaces those components that cannot be reused and reassembles the salvageable
components of the Used Core and additional new components into a remanufactured alternator or
starter. Remanufactured Cores are included in our on-hand finished goods inventory and in the
remanufactured finished good product held for sale at customer locations. Used Cores returned by
consumers to our customers but not yet returned to us continue to be classified as Remanufactured
Cores until we physically receive these Used Cores. All Remanufactured Cores are included in our
long-term core inventory or in our long-term core inventory deposit.
3
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
622,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,210,000 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
289,000 |
|
|
|
451,000 |
|
Accounts receivable net |
|
|
2,758,000 |
|
|
|
5,553,000 |
|
Inventory net |
|
|
28,781,000 |
|
|
|
31,547,000 |
|
Inventory unreturned |
|
|
4,151,000 |
|
|
|
3,924,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
8,431,000 |
|
|
|
8,391,000 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
2,677,000 |
|
|
|
2,735,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
47,709,000 |
|
|
|
53,811,000 |
|
Plant and equipment net |
|
|
11,468,000 |
|
|
|
12,693,000 |
|
Long-term core inventory net |
|
|
78,603,000 |
|
|
|
67,957,000 |
|
Long-term core inventory deposit |
|
|
25,984,000 |
|
|
|
25,768,000 |
|
Long-term deferred income taxes |
|
|
760,000 |
|
|
|
951,000 |
|
Long-term note receivable |
|
|
4,863,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets net |
|
|
5,724,000 |
|
|
|
6,304,000 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,722,000 |
|
|
|
1,549,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
176,833,000 |
|
|
$ |
169,033,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
31,856,000 |
|
|
$ |
31,603,000 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
1,006,000 |
|
|
|
1,863,000 |
|
Accrued salaries and wages |
|
|
2,936,000 |
|
|
|
3,590,000 |
|
Accrued workers compensation claims |
|
|
1,265,000 |
|
|
|
1,574,000 |
|
Customer finished goods returns accrual |
|
|
7,408,000 |
|
|
|
7,454,000 |
|
Income tax payable |
|
|
49,000 |
|
|
|
678,000 |
|
Revolving loan |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
527,000 |
|
|
|
697,000 |
|
Current portion of term loan |
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations |
|
|
267,000 |
|
|
|
953,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
47,614,000 |
|
|
|
50,412,000 |
|
Term loan, less current portion |
|
|
6,000,000 |
|
|
|
7,500,000 |
|
Deferred core revenue |
|
|
7,977,000 |
|
|
|
6,061,000 |
|
Deferred gain on sale-leaseback |
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
319,000 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
686,000 |
|
|
|
676,000 |
|
Capital lease obligations, less current portion |
|
|
249,000 |
|
|
|
445,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
62,539,000 |
|
|
|
65,413,000 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock; par value $.01 per share, 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A junior participating preferred stock; par value $.01 per share,
20,000 shares authorized; none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock; par value $.01 per share, 20,000,000 shares authorized;
12,067,271 and 12,026,021 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010
and March 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
121,000 |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 14,400 shares of common stock at December 31, 2010 and
none at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
(89,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
93,081,000 |
|
|
|
92,792,000 |
|
Additional paid-in capital-warrant |
|
|
1,879,000 |
|
|
|
1,879,000 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(735,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,426,000 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
20,037,000 |
|
|
|
10,255,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
114,294,000 |
|
|
|
103,620,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
176,833,000 |
|
|
$ |
169,033,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part hereof.
4
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated
Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
118,499,000 |
|
|
$ |
108,609,000 |
|
|
$ |
41,288,000 |
|
|
$ |
36,482,000 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
81,099,000 |
|
|
|
79,745,000 |
|
|
|
28,115,000 |
|
|
|
25,605,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
37,400,000 |
|
|
|
28,864,000 |
|
|
|
13,173,000 |
|
|
|
10,877,000 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
11,979,000 |
|
|
|
9,966,000 |
|
|
|
4,384,000 |
|
|
|
3,801,000 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
4,739,000 |
|
|
|
4,355,000 |
|
|
|
1,798,000 |
|
|
|
1,548,000 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
1,153,000 |
|
|
|
1,023,000 |
|
|
|
391,000 |
|
|
|
355,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
17,871,000 |
|
|
|
15,344,000 |
|
|
|
6,573,000 |
|
|
|
5,704,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
19,529,000 |
|
|
|
13,520,000 |
|
|
|
6,600,000 |
|
|
|
5,173,000 |
|
Other expense (income): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,331,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense net |
|
|
4,300,000 |
|
|
|
3,746,000 |
|
|
|
997,000 |
|
|
|
1,776,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
15,229,000 |
|
|
|
11,105,000 |
|
|
|
5,603,000 |
|
|
|
3,397,000 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
5,447,000 |
|
|
|
4,330,000 |
|
|
|
1,842,000 |
|
|
|
1,252,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
9,782,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,775,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,761,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,145,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share |
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share |
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
12,038,296 |
|
|
|
11,977,239 |
|
|
|
12,042,792 |
|
|
|
11,996,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
12,254,510 |
|
|
|
12,098,126 |
|
|
|
12,399,211 |
|
|
|
12,126,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part hereof.
5
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
9,782,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,775,000 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
2,331,000 |
|
|
|
2,419,000 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
580,000 |
|
|
|
451,000 |
|
Amortization of deferred gain on sale-leaseback |
|
|
(306,000 |
) |
|
|
(393,000 |
) |
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
64,000 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
Provision for inventory reserves |
|
|
1,454,000 |
|
|
|
851,000 |
|
Provision for customer payment discrepancies |
|
|
563,000 |
|
|
|
219,000 |
|
Net (recovery of) provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(39,000 |
) |
|
|
74,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
|
702,000 |
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
Gain on acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,331,000 |
) |
Impact of tax benefit on APIC pool from stock options exercised |
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
|
36,000 |
|
Gain on redemption of short-term investment |
|
|
(25,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
37,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
Changes in current assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
2,271,000 |
|
|
|
13,784,000 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
2,209,000 |
|
|
|
(3,951,000 |
) |
Inventory unreturned |
|
|
(227,000 |
) |
|
|
441,000 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
26,000 |
|
|
|
(563,000 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(180,000 |
) |
|
|
(430,000 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(464,000 |
) |
|
|
6,184,000 |
|
Customer finished goods returns accrual |
|
|
(46,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,998,000 |
) |
Income tax payable |
|
|
(641,000 |
) |
|
|
(830,000 |
) |
Deferred core revenue |
|
|
1,917,000 |
|
|
|
(173,000 |
) |
Long-term core inventory |
|
|
(11,535,000 |
) |
|
|
(3,871,000 |
) |
Long-term core inventory deposits |
|
|
(216,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,317,000 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
(163,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,364,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
7,634,000 |
|
|
|
15,855,000 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of plant and equipment |
|
|
(1,119,000 |
) |
|
|
(816,000 |
) |
Purchase of businesses |
|
|
(464,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,622,000 |
) |
Long-term note receivable |
|
|
(4,863,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in short term investments |
|
|
178,000 |
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(6,268,000 |
) |
|
|
(3,416,000 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under revolving loan |
|
|
39,700,000 |
|
|
|
26,200,000 |
|
Repayments under revolving loan |
|
|
(39,400,000 |
) |
|
|
(47,100,000 |
) |
Proceeds from term loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000,000 |
|
Repayments of term loan |
|
|
(1,500,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
(16,000 |
) |
|
|
(414,000 |
) |
Payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
(882,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,218,000 |
) |
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
166,000 |
|
|
|
123,000 |
|
Excess tax benefit from employee stock options exercised |
|
|
78,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of tax benefit on APIC pool from stock options exercised |
|
|
(36,000 |
) |
|
|
(36,000 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock, including fees |
|
|
(89,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(1,978,000 |
) |
|
|
(12,445,000 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
19,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash |
|
|
(588,000 |
) |
|
|
13,000 |
|
Cash Beginning of period |
|
|
1,210,000 |
|
|
|
452,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash End of period |
|
$ |
622,000 |
|
|
$ |
465,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, net |
|
$ |
4,306,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,672,000 |
|
Income taxes, net of refunds |
|
|
6,658,000 |
|
|
|
4,050,000 |
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement of accounts receivable in connection with the purchase of business |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,123,000 |
|
The accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part hereof.
6
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2010
(Unaudited)
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with
the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation
have been included. Operating results for the nine and three months ended December 31, 2010 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending March 31,
2011. This report should be read in conjunction with the Companys audited consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, which are included in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on
June 14, 2010.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a consistent basis with,
and there have been no material changes to, the accounting policies described in Note 2, Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies, to the consolidated financial statements that are presented in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010.
Reclassification
Certain items in the Consolidated Balance Sheet for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 have been
reclassified to conform to the fiscal 2011 presentation (Refer to Note 4).
1. Company Background and Organization
Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company or MPA) remanufacture and
distribute alternators and starters for import and domestic cars and light trucks. These
replacement parts are sold for use on vehicles after initial vehicle purchase. These automotive
parts are sold to automotive retail chain stores and warehouse distributors throughout the United
States and Canada and to major automobile manufacturers.
The Company obtains used alternators and starters, commonly known as Used Cores, primarily from its
customers using its core exchange program. The Company also purchases Used Cores from vendors (core
brokers). The customers grant a credit to the consumer when the used part is returned to them, and
the Company in turn provides a credit to the customers upon return to the Company. These Used Cores
are an essential material needed for the remanufacturing operations.
The Company has remanufacturing, warehousing and shipping/receiving operations for alternators and
starters in Mexico, California, Singapore and Malaysia. In addition, the Company utilizes third
party warehouse distribution centers in Edison, New Jersey and Springfield, Oregon. In June 2010,
the Company entered into a two year lease for a warehouse distribution facility in Berlin,
Connecticut.
2. Long Term Note Receivable
In August 2010, the Company made a loan in the amount of approximately $1,894,000 (the Original
Loan) to Fenwick Automotive Products Limited (Fenwick), a privately-owned Toronto-based
manufacturer, remanufacturer and distributor of new and remanufactured aftermarket auto parts,
pursuant to a debenture executed by Fenwick in favor of the Company (the Original Debenture). In
December 2010, the Company made an additional loan in the amount of approximately $2,969,000 to
Fenwick pursuant to an amended and restated debenture (the Amended and Restated Debenture),
bringing the total aggregate loan amount to approximately $4,863,000 (the Aggregate Loan). The
Aggregate Loan matures on July 31, 2012 and bears interest at a rate equal to the prime rate plus
8.75% per annum, which is payable in cash quarterly in arrears beginning on December 31, 2010.
7
The Aggregate Loan is secured by a blanket lien on all of Fenwicks assets. FAPL Holdings, Inc.
(FAPL), Fenwicks parent company, and each of Fenwicks Canadian and U.S. subsidiaries have also
agreed to grant blanket liens of their assets to secure the Aggregate Loan. The Companys rights to
the payment of any amounts due in connection with the Aggregate Loan and its rights as a secured
party under the security agreements are subordinated to the rights of Manufactures and Traders
Trust Company (M&T Bank), as a lender to, and secured party of, Fenwick. Upon the occurrence of
an event of default, as defined in the Amended and Restated Debenture, the Company may declare all
amounts under the Amended and Restated Debenture immediately due and payable.
In connection with the Aggregate Loan, the Company was granted an amended option (the Amended
Option) to purchase treasury shares representing 80% of the common stock of FAPL (or at the
election of the Company, another Fenwick entity) for an aggregate purchase price of CDN$10,000,000.
The Amended Option is exercisable until August 23, 2012.
If the Company exercises the Amended Option, the Company also has a call right, which expires on
August 24, 2013, to acquire all the remaining outstanding shares of FAPL (or the applicable Fenwick
entity) from its other shareholders for an aggregate purchase price of 360,000 shares of common
stock of the Company plus an additional 40,000 shares of common stock of the Company if FAPLs
adjusted net income for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2011 is equal to or greater than
CDN$4,000,000 (the Call Right Exercise Price). If the call right expires without being exercised
by the Company, the remaining shareholders are granted a put right to require the Company to
acquire all the remaining outstanding shares at the Call Right Exercise Price.
3. Intangible Assets
The following is a summary of the Companys intangible assets at December 31, 2010 and March 31,
2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
Gross Carrying Value |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Gross Carrying Value |
|
|
Amortization |
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks |
|
9 years |
|
$ |
553,000 |
|
|
$ |
170,000 |
|
|
$ |
553,000 |
|
|
$ |
115,000 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
12 years |
|
|
6,464,000 |
|
|
|
1,285,000 |
|
|
|
6,464,000 |
|
|
|
799,000 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
5 years |
|
|
257,000 |
|
|
|
95,000 |
|
|
|
257,000 |
|
|
|
56,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
11 years |
|
$ |
7,274,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,550,000 |
|
|
$ |
7,274,000 |
|
|
$ |
970,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $580,000 and $451,000 during the nine
months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Amortization expense related to intangible
assets was $193,000 during both the three months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. The aggregate
estimated future amortization expense for intangible assets is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending March 31, |
|
|
|
|
2011 remaining three months |
|
$ |
194,000 |
|
2012 |
|
|
774,000 |
|
2013 |
|
|
774,000 |
|
2014 |
|
|
738,000 |
|
2015 |
|
|
670,000 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
2,574,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,724,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
4. Accounts Receivable Net
Included in accounts receivable net are significant offset accounts related to customer
allowances earned, customer payment discrepancies, returned goods authorizations (RGA) issued for
in-transit unit returns, estimated
8
future credits to be provided for Used Cores returned by the
customers and potential bad debts. Due to the forward looking nature and the different aging
periods of certain estimated offset accounts, they may not, at any point in time, directly relate
to the balances in the open trade accounts receivable.
Accounts receivable net is comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Accounts receivable trade |
|
$ |
23,275,000 |
|
|
$ |
30,977,000 |
|
Allowance for bad debts |
|
|
(1,104,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,141,000 |
) |
Customer allowances earned |
|
|
(6,451,000 |
) |
|
|
(5,104,000 |
) |
Customer payment discrepancies |
|
|
(543,000 |
) |
|
|
(553,000 |
) |
Customer returns RGA issued (1) |
|
|
(2,273,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,582,000 |
) |
Customer core returns accruals |
|
|
(10,146,000 |
) |
|
|
(16,044,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: total accounts receivable offset accounts |
|
|
(20,517,000 |
) |
|
|
(25,424,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts receivable net |
|
$ |
2,758,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,553,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The portion of customer unit returns for which an RGA was issued at period end for in-transit
unit returns (warranty returns) and finished goods returns (stock adjustment returns) is
recorded as an offset account to accounts receivable net. The estimated future warranty and
stock adjustment returns accrual portion for which an RGA has not been issued is presented as
a current liability in the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2010 and
March 31, 2010, of $7,408,000 and $7,454,000, respectively. The March 31, 2010 customer
finished goods returns accrual reclassification from accounts receivable net to current
liabilities totaling $7,454,000 did not have any impact on the Companys debt covenant
calculations, consolidated financial position or results of operations. |
Warranty Returns
The Company allows its customers to return goods to the Company that their end-user customers have
returned to them, whether the returned item is or is not defective (warranty returns). The Company
accrues an estimate of its exposure to warranty returns based on a historical analysis of the level
of this type of return as a percentage of total unit sales. Amounts charged to expense for these
warranty returns are considered in arriving at the Companys net sales. At December 31, 2010, the
warranty return accrual of $1,336,000 was included under the customer returns
RGA issued in the above table and the warranty estimate of $1,325,000 was included in customer
finished goods returns accrual in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Change in the Companys warranty return accrual is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
(3,445,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,596,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,975,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,139,000 |
) |
Charged to expense |
|
|
28,841,000 |
|
|
|
26,668,000 |
|
|
|
9,622,000 |
|
|
|
8,262,000 |
|
Amounts processed |
|
|
(29,625,000 |
) |
|
|
(26,788,000 |
) |
|
|
(9,936,000 |
) |
|
|
(8,925,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
(2,661,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,476,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,661,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,476,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
5. Inventory
Inventory includes non-core inventory, inventory unreturned, long-term core inventory, long-term
core inventory deposit and is comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Non-core inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
12,024,000 |
|
|
$ |
10,362,000 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
94,000 |
|
|
|
29,000 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
18,639,000 |
|
|
|
22,919,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,757,000 |
|
|
|
33,310,000 |
|
Less allowance for excess and obsolete inventory |
|
|
(1,976,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,763,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
28,781,000 |
|
|
$ |
31,547,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory unreturned |
|
$ |
4,151,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,924,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term core inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used cores held at the Companys facilities |
|
$ |
23,449,000 |
|
|
$ |
14,491,000 |
|
Used cores expected to be returned by customers |
|
|
2,931,000 |
|
|
|
3,350,000 |
|
Remanufactured cores held in finished goods |
|
|
14,822,000 |
|
|
|
17,955,000 |
|
Remanufactured cores held at customers locations |
|
|
38,275,000 |
|
|
|
32,878,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,477,000 |
|
|
|
68,674,000 |
|
Less allowance for excess and obsolete inventory |
|
|
(874,000 |
) |
|
|
(717,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
78,603,000 |
|
|
$ |
67,957,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term core inventory deposit |
|
$ |
25,984,000 |
|
|
$ |
25,768,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Major Customers
The Companys four largest customers accounted for the following total percentage of net sales and
accounts receivable trade:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer A |
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
46 |
% |
Customer B |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
Customer C |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
Customer D |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
March 31, 2010 |
Accounts receivable trade |
|
|
|
|
Customer A |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
Customer B |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
Customer C |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
Customer D |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
10
The Companys largest supplier accounted for the following total percentage of raw materials
purchases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Significant supplier purchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplier A |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
7. Debt
In October 2009, the Company entered into a revolving credit and term loan agreement (the Credit
Agreement), with its bank and one additional lender (the Lenders), which permits the Company to
borrow up to a total of $45,000,000 (the Credit Facility). The Credit Facility is comprised of
(i) a revolving facility with a $7,000,000 letter of credit sub-facility and (ii) a term loan. The
Company may borrow on a revolving basis up to an amount equal to $35,000,000 minus all outstanding
letter of credit obligations minus a borrowing reserve of $7,500,000 (the Revolving Loan). The
borrowing reserve remains in effect only if the Company is party to a receivable discount program
pursuant to which its accounts receivable owed to the Company by its largest customer are being
discounted. The term loan is in the principal amount of $10,000,000 (the Term Loan). The Lenders
hold a security interest in substantially all of the Companys assets.
The Revolving Loan and the Term Loan bear interest at the banks reference rate, plus an applicable
margin, or a London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) rate, plus an applicable margin, as selected
by the Company in accordance with the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement, among other things,
requires the Company to maintain certain financial covenants, including tangible net worth, fixed
charge coverage ratio and leverage ratio covenants. The Company was in compliance with all
financial covenants under the Credit Agreement as of December 31, 2010.
The Term Loan matures in October 2014 and requires principal payments of $500,000 on a quarterly
basis. The Revolving Loan expires in October 2011 and provides the Company the option to request up
to three one-year extensions.
In May 2010, the Company entered into a first amendment to the Credit Agreement with its Lenders.
This amendment provides, among other things, that the borrowing reserve against the Companys
Revolving Loan commitment amount be increased from $7,500,000 to $10,000,000.
In November 2010, the Company entered into a second amendment to the Credit Agreement with its
Lenders. This amendment, among other things, extended the expiration date of the Revolving Loan to
October 2012.
In December 2010, the Company entered into a third amendment to the Credit Agreement with its
Lenders. This amendment, among other things, eliminated the minimum LIBOR lending rate with respect
to the Term Loan.
The balance of the Revolving Loan was $300,000 at December 31, 2010. There was no outstanding
balance on the Revolving Loan at March 31, 2010. The Company had reserved $1,826,000 of the
Revolving Loan for standby letters of credit for workers compensation insurance and $3,161,000 for
commercial letters of credit as of December 31, 2010. As of December 31, 2010, $29,713,000 was
available under the Revolving Loan, and of this, $10,000,000 was reserved for use in the event the
Companys largest customer discontinued its current practice of having the Companys receivables
discounted.
8. Accounts Receivable Discount Programs
The Company has established receivable discount programs with certain customers and their
respective banks. Under these programs, the Company may sell those customers receivables to those
banks at a discount to be agreed upon at the time the receivables are sold. These discount
arrangements have allowed the Company to accelerate collection of customers receivables
aggregating $100,857,000 and $64,885,000 for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, by a weighted average of 328 days and 335 days, respectively. On an annualized basis,
the weighted average discount rate on the receivables sold to the banks during the nine months
11
ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was 4.1% and 4.7%, respectively. The amount of the discount on
these receivables, $3,755,000 and $2,841,000 for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, was recorded as interest expense.
9. Net Income Per Share
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of
shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share includes the
effect, if any, from the potential exercise or conversion of securities, such as stock options and
warrants, which would result in the issuance of incremental shares of common stock.
The following presents a reconciliation of basic and diluted net income per share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
9,782,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,775,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,761,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,145,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic shares |
|
|
12,038,296 |
|
|
|
11,977,239 |
|
|
|
12,042,792 |
|
|
|
11,996,021 |
|
Effect of dilutive stock options and warrants |
|
|
216,214 |
|
|
|
120,887 |
|
|
|
356,419 |
|
|
|
130,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted shares |
|
|
12,254,510 |
|
|
|
12,098,126 |
|
|
|
12,399,211 |
|
|
|
12,126,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effect of dilutive options and warrants excludes 1,063,984 shares subject to options and
546,283 shares subject to warrants with exercise prices ranging from $8.70 to $15.00 per share for
the nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 449,001 shares subject to options and 546,283 shares
subject to warrants with exercise prices ranging from $11.50 to $15.00 per share for the three
months ended December 31, 2010 all of which were anti-dilutive. The effect of dilutive options
and warrants excludes 1,253,316 shares subject to options and 546,283 shares subject to warrants
with exercise prices ranging from $5.00 to $15.00 per share for the nine months ended December 31,
2009 and 1,252,316 shares subject to options and 546,283 shares subject to warrants with exercise
prices ranging from $5.20 to $15.00 per share for the three months ended December 31, 2009 all
of which were anti-dilutive.
10. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity during a period resulting from transactions
and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. The Companys total comprehensive income
consists of net income, unrealized (loss) gain on short-term investments and foreign currency
translation adjustments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
9,782,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,775,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,761,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,145,000 |
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on short-term investments |
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
696,000 |
|
|
|
(130,000 |
) |
|
|
237,000 |
|
|
|
157,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive net income |
|
$ |
10,473,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,710,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,007,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,312,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. Income Taxes
Income tax expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2010 reflect income tax rates lower
than the federal statutory rates primarily due to adjustments to the apportionment for state income
taxes and the benefit of lower
12
statutory tax rates in foreign taxing jurisdictions. Income tax
expenses for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 reflect income tax rates higher than the
federal statutory rates primarily due to state income taxes, and were partially offset by
adjustments to the apportionment for state income taxes and the benefit of lower statutory tax
rates in foreign taxing jurisdictions. Income tax expenses for the nine and three months ended
December 31, 2009 reflect income tax rates higher than the federal statutory rates primarily due to
state income taxes, which were partially offset by the benefit of lower statutory tax rates in
foreign taxing jurisdictions.
In addition, during the nine months ended December 31, 2010, the rate was further offset to a rate
below the federal statutory rate by a reduction in the liability for unrealized tax benefits due to
the conclusion of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) examination noted below.
The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and
various state and foreign jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations. At March 31, 2010,
the IRS had an ongoing tax examination of the federal tax returns for the fiscal year ended March
31, 2007. In November 2009, the IRS expanded its ongoing tax examination of the federal tax returns
to include the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008. In May 2010, the IRS concluded its examination of
the Companys federal income tax returns for the fiscal 2007 and 2008 tax years. The IRS required
no changes to the Companys tax returns for those fiscal years as filed.
12. Financial Risk Management and Derivatives
Purchases and expenses denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, which are primarily
related to the Companys production facilities overseas, expose the Company to market risk from
material movements in foreign exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the foreign currency. The
Companys primary risk exposure is from changes in the rate between the U.S. dollar and the Mexican
peso related to the operation of the Companys facility in Mexico. The Company enters into forward
foreign currency exchange contracts to exchange U.S. dollars for Mexican pesos in order to mitigate
this risk. The extent to which forward foreign currency exchange contracts are used is modified
periodically in response to managements estimate of market conditions and the terms and length of
specific purchase requirements to fund those overseas facilities.
The Company enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts in order to reduce the impact
of foreign currency fluctuations and not to engage in currency speculation. The use of derivative
financial instruments allows the Company to reduce its exposure to the risk that the eventual cash
outflow resulting from funding the expenses of the foreign operations will be materially affected
by changes in exchange rates. The Company does not hold or issue financial instruments for trading
purposes. The forward foreign currency exchange contracts are designated for forecasted expenditure
requirements to fund the foreign operations.
The Company had forward foreign currency exchange contracts with a U.S. dollar equivalent notional
value of $6,489,000 and $6,159,000 at December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010, respectively. The
forward foreign currency exchange contracts entered into require the Company to exchange Mexican
pesos for U.S. dollars. These contracts generally expire in a year or less, at rates agreed at the
inception of the contracts. The counterparty to this derivative transaction is a major financial
institution with investment grade or better credit rating; however, the Company is exposed to
credit risk with this institution. The credit risk is limited to the potential unrealized gains
(which offset currency fluctuations adverse to the Company) in any such contract should this
counterparty fail to perform as contracted. Any changes in the fair values of forward foreign
currency exchange contracts are reflected in current period earnings and accounted for as an
increase or offset to general and administrative expenses.
The following table shows the effect of the Companys derivative instruments on its Consolidated
Statement of Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss (Gain) Recognized within General and Administrative Expenses |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Derivatives Not Designated as |
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Hedging Instruments |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts |
|
$ |
301,000 |
|
|
$ |
(1,395,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(31,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(292,000 |
) |
13
The fair value of the forward foreign currency exchange contracts of $216,000 and $517,000 is
included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at
December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010, respectively.
13. Fair Value Measurements
The following table summarizes the Companys financial assets and liabilities measured at fair
value, by level within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using Inputs Considered as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using Inputs Considered as |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
207,000 |
|
|
$ |
207,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual funds |
|
$ |
289,000 |
|
|
$ |
289,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
244,000 |
|
|
|
244,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts |
|
|
216,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
216,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
517,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
517,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
289,000 |
|
|
|
289,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
451,000 |
|
|
|
451,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys short-term investments, which fund its deferred compensation liabilities,
consist of investments in mutual funds. These investments are classified as Level 1 as the shares
of these mutual funds trade with sufficient frequency and volume to enable the Company to obtain
pricing information on an ongoing basis.
The forward foreign currency exchange contracts are primarily measured based on the foreign
currency spot and forward rates quoted by the banks or foreign currency dealers. During the nine
months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, a loss of $301,000 and a gain of $1,395,000, respectively,
were recorded in general and administrative expenses due to the change in the value of the forward
foreign currency exchange contracts subsequent to entering into the contracts. During the three
months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, a gain of $31,000 and $292,000, respectively, was recorded
in general and administrative expenses due to the change in the value of the forward foreign
currency exchange contracts subsequent to entering into the contracts.
During the nine and three months ended December 31, 2010, the Company had no significant
measurements of assets or liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis subsequent to their
initial recognition.
The carrying amounts of cash, short-term investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable and
accrued liabilities approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
The carrying amount of the long-term note receivable approximates its fair value based on current
rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the
same remaining maturity. The carrying amounts of the Revolving Loan, Term Loan and other long-term
liabilities approximate their fair value based on current rates for instruments with similar
characteristics.
14. Treasury Stock
In March 2010, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to
$5,000,000 of the Companys outstanding common stock from time to time in the open market and in
private transactions at prices deemed appropriate by management. There is no expiration date
governing the period over which the Company can repurchase shares under this program. During July
2010, the Company repurchased 14,400 shares at a total cost of approximately $89,000.
14
15. New Accounting Pronouncements
Transfers of Financial Assets
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued new guidance on the
treatment of transfers of financial assets which eliminates the concept of a qualifying
special-purpose entity, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and requires
additional disclosures in order to enhance information reported to users of financial statements by
providing greater transparency about transfers of financial assets, including securitization
transactions, and an entitys continuing involvement in and exposure to the risks related to
transferred financial assets. This new guidance is effective as of the beginning of an entitys
first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance on April 1,
2010 did not have any impact on the Companys consolidated financial position and results of
operations.
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
In June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance which amends the consolidation guidance applicable to
variable interest entities and is effective as of the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year
that begins after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance on April 1, 2010 did not have
any impact on the Companys consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
In January 2010, the FASB issued an update which requires new disclosures for transfers in and out
of Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and expanded disclosures for activity in Level 3
of the fair value hierarchy. The update also clarifies existing disclosures regarding the level of
disaggregation for disclosure and disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. The new
disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The adoption of this update on January 1, 2010
did not have any impact on the Companys consolidated financial position and results of operations.
The disclosures regarding certain Level 3 activity are effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance on April 1, 2011 to
have any material impact on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Disclosure Requirements Related to Financing Receivables
In July 2010, the FASB issued an update which requires enhanced disclosures about the credit
quality of financing receivables and the related allowance for credit losses. Trade accounts
receivable with maturities of one year or less are excluded from the disclosure requirements.
Disclosures required as of the end of a reporting period are effective for interim and annual
periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this guidance on December 31, 2010
did not have any impact on the Companys consolidated financial position and results of operations.
The disclosures required about activity that occurs during a reporting period are effective for
interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The Company does not expect the
adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2011 to have any material impact on its consolidated
financial position and the results of operations.
When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative
Carrying Amounts
In December 2010, the FASB issued guidance which modifies step 1 of the goodwill impairment test
for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units with a
carrying amount equal to or less than zero for which qualitative factors indicate that it is more
likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, step 2 of the goodwill impairment test will need
to be performed. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those
years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption of this update is prohibited. The Company
does not expect the adoption of this guidance on April 1, 2011 to have any material impact on its
consolidated financial position and the results of operations.
15
Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations
In December 2010, the FASB issued guidance which specifies that if comparative financial statements
are presented, disclosure of revenue and earnings of a combined entity should be made as though the
business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of
the comparable prior annual reporting period only. This guidance is effective for business
combinations consummated in fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance on April 1, 2011 will have on its
consolidated financial position and the results of operations.
16
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis presents factors that Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. and its
subsidiaries (our, we, or us) believe are relevant to an assessment and understanding of our
consolidated financial position and results of operations. This financial and business analysis
should be read in conjunction with our March 31, 2010 audited consolidated financial statements
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) on June 14, 2010.
Disclosure Regarding Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
This report contains certain forward-looking statements with respect to our future performance that
involve risks and uncertainties. Various factors could cause actual results to differ materially
from those projected in such statements. These factors include, but are not limited to:
concentration of sales to certain customers, changes in our relationship with any of our major
customers, the increasing customer pressure for lower prices and more favorable payment and other
terms, the increasing demands on our working capital, the significant strain on working capital
associated with large Remanufactured Core inventory purchases from customers, our ability to obtain
any additional financing we may seek or require, our ability to maintain positive cash flows from
operations, potential future changes in our previously reported results as a result of the
identification and correction of errors in our accounting policies or procedures or potential
material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting, lower revenues than
anticipated from new and existing contracts, our failure to meet the financial covenants or the
other obligations set forth in our credit agreement and our lenders refusal to waive any such
defaults, any meaningful difference between projected production needs and ultimate sales to our
customers, increases in interest rates, changes in the financial condition of any of our major
customers, the impact of high gasoline prices, the potential for changes in consumer spending,
consumer preferences and general economic conditions, increased competition in the automotive parts
industry, including increased competition from Chinese and other offshore manufacturers, difficulty
in obtaining Used Cores and component parts or increases in the costs of those parts, political,
criminal or economic instability in any of the foreign countries where we conduct operations,
currency exchange fluctuations, unforeseen increases in operating costs and other factors discussed
herein and in our other filings with the SEC.
Management Overview
The after-market for automobile parts is divided into two markets. The first market is the
do-it-yourself (DIY) market, which is generally serviced by the large retail chain outlets.
Consumers who purchase parts from the DIY channel generally install parts into their vehicles
themselves. In most cases, this is a cheaper alternative than having the repair performed by a
professional installer. The second market is the professional installer market, commonly known as
the do-it-for-me (DIFM) market. This market is serviced by the retail chains, traditional
warehouse distributors and the dealer networks. Generally, the consumer in this channel is a
professional parts installer.
We remanufacture alternators and starters for import and domestic cars, light trucks, heavy duty,
agricultural and industrial applications. These products are distributed to both the DIY and DIFM
markets. Our products are distributed predominantly throughout the United States and Canada. Our
products are sold to the largest auto parts retail chains in the United States and Canada. In
addition, our products are sold to various traditional warehouses for the professional installers,
and to major automobile manufacturers for both their after-market programs and their warranty
replacement programs (OES). Demand and replacement rates for after-market remanufactured
alternators and starters generally increase with increases in miles driven and the age of vehicles.
Historically, our business has focused on the DIY market. In times of recession, we believe
consumers are more apt to purchase replacement parts in the DIY market because of lower prices
compared to the DIFM market. We believe we have recently increased our market share in the DIY
market.
The DIFM market is an attractive opportunity for growth. We are positioned to benefit from this
market opportunity in two ways: (1) our auto parts retail customers are expanding their efforts to
target the DIFM market and (2) we sell our products under private label and our Quality-Built®,
Talon®, Xtreme®, Reliance and other brand names directly to suppliers that focus on professional
installers. In addition, we sell our products to original equipment manufacturers for distribution
to the professional installer both for warranty replacement and their general after-market
channels. We have been successful in growing sales to this market.
17
In August 2010, we made a secured loan of approximately $1,894,000 to Fenwick Automotive Products
Limited (Fenwick), a privately-owned Toronto-based manufacturer, remanufacturer and distributor
of new and remanufactured aftermarket auto parts. In December 2010, we made an additional secured
loan of approximately $2,969,000 to Fenwick, bringing the aggregate loan balance to approximately
$4,863,000. In connection with this loan, we have an option to acquire a substantial ownership
interest in Fenwick. We believe this transaction provides us potential opportunities to expand
beyond our existing product lines of alternators and starters and further enhance our market
presence in North America.
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein.
The following table summarizes certain key operating data for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Gross profit percentage |
|
|
31.9 |
% |
|
|
29.8 |
% |
Cash flow (used in) provided by operations |
|
$ |
(1,446,000 |
) |
|
$ |
13,130,000 |
|
Finished goods turnover (annualized) (1) |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Annualized return on equity (2) |
|
|
14.5 |
% |
|
|
9.2 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Annualized finished goods turnover for the fiscal quarter is calculated by multiplying cost
of sales for the quarter by 4 and dividing the result by the average between beginning and
ending non-core finished goods inventory values for the fiscal quarter. We believe this
provides a useful measure of our ability to turn production into revenues. |
|
(2) |
|
Annualized return on equity is computed as net income for the fiscal quarter multiplied by 4
and dividing the result by beginning shareholders equity. Annualized return on equity
measures our ability to invest shareholders funds profitably. |
Following is our unaudited results of operations, reflected as a percentage of net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
68.1 |
|
|
|
70.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
|
29.8 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales. Net sales for the three months ended December 31, 2010 increased by $4,806,000, or
13.2%, to $41,288,000 compared to net sales for the three months ended December 31, 2009 of
$36,482,000. The increase in our net sales was primarily due to increased sales to our existing
customers and increased sales to several new customers.
18
Cost of Goods Sold/Gross Profit. Cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales decreased during
the three months ended December 31, 2010 to 68.1% from 70.2% for the three months ended December
31, 2009, resulting in a corresponding increase in our gross profit of 2.1% to 31.9% for the three
months ended December 31, 2010 from 29.8% for the three months ended December 31, 2009. The
increase in the gross profit percentage was primarily due to increased revenue from our scrap metal
and lower per unit manufacturing costs during the three months ended December 31, 2010.
General and Administrative. Our general and administrative expenses for the three months ended
December 31, 2010 were $4,384,000, which represents an increase of $583,000, or 15.3%, from general
and administrative expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2009 of $3,801,000. This
increase in general and administrative expenses during the three months ended December 31, 2010 was
primarily due to (i) a gain of $31,000 recorded due to the changes in the fair value of forward
foreign currency exchange contracts, compared to a gain of $292,000 during the three months ended
December 31, 2009 and (ii) $185,000 of increased general and administrative expenses at our
offshore manufacturing facilities due primarily to increased employee-related expenses,
professional services fees, and travel.
Sales and Marketing. Our sales and marketing expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2010
increased $250,000, or 16.1%, to $1,798,000 from $1,548,000 for the three months ended December 31,
2009. This increase was due primarily to (i) increased trade show expense, (ii) increased travel,
(iii) increased advertising, and (iv) increased commission expenses due to higher net sales.
Research and Development. Our research and development expenses increased by $36,000, or 10.1%, to
$391,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2010 from $355,000 for the three months ended
December 31, 2009. The increase in research and development expenses was due primarily to an
increase in employee-related expenses as compared to the three months ended December 31, 2009.
Interest Expense, Net. Our interest expense, net of interest income of $73,000, for the three
months ended December 31, 2010 was $997,000. This represents a decrease of $779,000, or 43.9%, over
interest expense of $1,776,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2009. This decrease was
primarily attributable to (i) a lower balance of receivables being discounted under the receivable
discount programs and (ii) lower average outstanding debt balances.
Income Tax. For the three months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, we recognized income tax expense
of $1,842,000 and $1,252,000, respectively. Our effective tax rates for the three months ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009 were 32.9% and 36.9%, respectively. This decrease was primarily due to
favorable adjustments to the apportionment for state income taxes.
Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein.
The following table summarizes certain key operating data for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Gross profit percentage |
|
|
31.6 |
% |
|
|
26.6 |
% |
Cash flow provided by operations |
|
$ |
7,634,000 |
|
|
$ |
15,855,000 |
|
Finished goods turnover (annualized) (1) |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
Annualized return on equity (2) |
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Annualized finished goods turnover for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 is
calculated by multiplying cost of sales for each nine month period by 1.33 and dividing the
result by the average between beginning and ending non-core finished goods inventory values
for each nine month period. We believe this provides a useful measure of our ability to turn
production into revenues. |
19
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Annualized return on equity is computed as net income for the nine months ended December 31,
2010 and 2009 multiplied by 1.33 and dividing the result by beginning shareholders equity.
Annualized return on equity measures our ability to invest shareholders funds profitably. |
Following is our unaudited results of operations, reflected as a percentage of net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
68.4 |
|
|
|
73.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
31.6 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
Gain on acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales. Net sales for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 increased by $9,890,000, or
9.1%, to $118,499,000 compared to net sales for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 of
$108,609,000. The increase in our net sales was primarily due to (i) increased sales to our
existing customers, (ii) increased sales to customers acquired as a result of our acquisitions, and
(iii) increased sales to several new customers.
Cost of Goods Sold/Gross Profit. Cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales decreased during
the nine months ended December 31, 2010 to 68.4% from 73.4% for the nine months ended December 31,
2009, resulting in a corresponding increase in our gross profit of 5.0% to 31.6% for the nine
months ended December 31, 2010 from 26.6% for the nine months ended December 31, 2009. The increase
in the gross profit percentage was primarily due to lower per unit manufacturing costs during the
nine months ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the nine months ended December 31, 2009.
General and Administrative. Our general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended
December 31, 2010 were $11,979,000, which represents an increase of $2,013,000, or 20.2%, from
general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 of $9,966,000. This
increase in general and administrative expenses during the nine months ended December 31, 2010 was
primarily due to (i) a loss of $301,000 recorded due to the changes in the fair value of forward
foreign currency exchange contracts, compared to a gain of $1,395,000 during the nine months ended
December 31, 2009 and (ii) $321,000 of increased general and administrative expenses at our
offshore manufacturing facilities due primarily to increased employee-related expenses,
professional services fees, and travel.
Sales and Marketing. Our sales and marketing expenses for the nine months ended December 31, 2010
increased $384,000, or 8.8%, to $4,739,000 from $4,355,000 for the nine months ended December 31,
2009. This increase was due primarily to (i) the addition of employees as a result of our
acquisition in the prior year, (ii) increased travel expenses, (iii) increased trade show expenses,
and (iv) increased advertising expenses. These increases were partly offset by (i) the reversal of
commission expenses in connection with our prior year acquisition as certain thresholds were not
met and (ii) decreased catalog expenses.
Research and Development. Our research and development expenses increased by $130,000, or 12.7%, to
$1,153,000 for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 from $1,023,000 for the nine months ended
December 31, 2009.
20
The increase in research and development expenses was due primarily to
employee-related expenses and an increase in the cost of supplies compared to the nine months ended
December 31, 2009.
Gain on Acquisition. During the nine months ended December 31, 2009, we recorded a gain of
$1,331,000 in connection with our August 2009 acquisition as the estimated fair value of the net
assets acquired exceeded the fair value of the consideration transferred.
Interest Expense, Net. Our interest expense, net of interest income of $96,000, for the nine months
ended December 31, 2010 was $4,300,000. This represents an increase of $554,000, or 14.8%, over
interest expense of $3,746,000 for the nine months ended December 31, 2009. This increase was
primarily attributable to a higher balance of receivables being discounted under the receivable
discount programs during the nine months ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the nine months
ended December 31, 2009. This increase in net interest expense was partly offset by a decrease in
interest expense incurred on our Revolving Loan and capital lease obligations.
Income Tax. For the nine months ended December 31, 2010, we recognized income tax expense of
$5,447,000 compared to an income tax expense of $4,330,000 recognized for the nine months ended
December 31, 2009. Our effective tax rate for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was
35.8% and 39.0%, respectively. The lower effective tax rate for the nine months ended December 31,
2010 reflects a reduction in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits due to the conclusion of
an IRS examination of the federal tax returns for fiscal years ended March 31, 2007 and March 31,
2008. We were notified during May 2010 that the IRS required no changes to our tax returns for
those fiscal years as filed. In addition, our tax rates during the nine months ended December 31,
2010 were favorably impacted by adjustments to the apportionment for state income taxes.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
At December 31, 2010, we had working capital of $95,000, a ratio of current assets to current
liabilities of 1:1, and cash of $622,000, compared to working capital of $3,399,000, a ratio of
current assets to current liabilities of 1.1:1, and cash of $1,210,000 at March 31, 2010. The
decrease in working capital from March 31, 2010 primarily resulted from a decrease in our non-core
inventory levels, which was due primarily to higher sales and a decrease in our accounts receivable
balance due primarily to a higher balance of receivables being discounted under the receivable
discount programs.
During the nine months ended December 31, 2010, we used cash generated by operations, from our use
of receivable discount programs with certain of our major customers, and our Revolving Loan as our
primary sources of liquidity. These sources were primarily used to make a secured aggregate loan of
approximately $4,863,000 to Fenwick, to make the quarterly principal payment on the Term Loan, and pay the purchase price
holdback in connection with our May 2008 acquisition.
We believe our cash generated by operations, use of receivable discount programs with certain of
our major customers, amounts available under our Revolving Loan, and our cash and short term
investments on hand are sufficient to satisfy our expected future working capital needs, capital
lease commitments, repayment of the current portion of our Term Loan, and capital expenditure
obligations over the next twelve months.
Cash Flows
Net cash provided by operating activities was $7,634,000 and $15,855,000 for the nine months ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The most significant changes in operating activities for
the nine months ended December 31, 2010 compared to the nine months ended December 31, 2009 were
(i) our accounts receivables, net decreased less during the nine months ended December 31, 2010
compared to the same nine month period of the prior year due primarily to a reduction in the future
credits to be provided for Used Cores returned by the customers, (ii) an increase in our long-term
core inventory levels due primarily to an increase in Used Cores held at our facilities and
Remanufactured Cores held at customers locations due to higher sales, and (iii) our accounts
payable and accrued liabilities decreased during the nine months ended December 31, 2010 compared
to an increase during the nine months ended December 31, 2009. These changes in our operating
activities were partly offset by a decrease in our non-core inventory levels during the nine months
ended December 31, 2010 compared to the same period of the prior year due primarily to higher net
sales.
21
Net cash used in investing activities was $6,268,000 and $3,416,000 during the nine months ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase in net cash used in investing activities was
primarily a result of the secured aggregate loan of approximately $4,863,000 made to Fenwick during
the nine months ended December 31, 2010. This increase in net cash used in investing activities was
partly offset by the payment of the purchase price holdback of $464,000 in connection with our May
2008 acquisition compared to the payment of $2,622,000 during the nine months ended December 31,
2009 for our acquisitions. Capital expenditures for the nine months ended December 31 2010
primarily related to the purchase of equipment for our manufacturing facilities and improvements to
our California facility compared to purchases in the same period of the prior year primarily
related to purchases of equipment for our manufacturing facilities.
Net cash used in financing activities was $1,978,000 and $12,445,000 during the nine months ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. This change was primarily due to borrowings under our
Revolving Loan during the nine months ended December 31, 2010 compared to repayments of our
previous revolving loan, in part by the use of the proceeds from our term loan, during the nine
months ended December 31, 2009. Additionally, during the nine months ended December 31, 2010, we
repurchased 14,400 shares at a total cost of $89,000 pursuant to a share repurchase program
authorized by our Board of Directors in March 2010.
Capital Resources
Debt
In October 2009, we entered into a revolving credit and term loan agreement (the Credit
Agreement) with our bank and one additional lender (the Lenders), which permits us to borrow up
to a total of $45,000,000 (the Credit Facility). The Credit Facility is comprised of (i) a
revolving facility with a $7,000,000 letter of credit sub-facility and (ii) a term loan. We may
borrow on a revolving basis up to an amount equal to $35,000,000 minus all outstanding letter of
credit obligations minus a borrowing reserve of $7,500,000 (the Revolving Loan). The borrowing
reserve remains in effect only if we are party to a receivable discount program pursuant to which
our accounts receivable owed to us by our largest customer are being discounted. The term loan is
in the principal amount of $10,000,000 (the Term Loan). The Lenders hold a security interest in
substantially all of our assets
The Credit Agreement, among other things, requires us to maintain certain financial covenants,
including tangible net worth, fixed charge coverage ratio and leverage ratio covenants. We were in
compliance with all financial covenants under the Credit Agreement as of December 31, 2010.
The Term Loan matures in October 2014 and requires principal payments of $500,000 on a quarterly
basis. The Revolving Loan expires in October 2011 and provides us the option to request up to three
one-year extensions.
In May 2010, we entered into a first amendment to the Credit Agreement with our Lenders. This
amendment provides, among other things, that the borrowing reserve against our Revolving Loan
commitment amount be increased from $7,500,000 to $10,000,000.
In November 2010, we entered into a second amendment to the Credit Agreement with our Lenders. This
amendment, among other things, (i) extended the expiration date of the Revolving Loan to October
2012 and (ii) lowered the applicable margins on our borrowings to the levels described below.
In December 2010, we entered into a third amendment to the Credit Agreement with our Lenders. This
amendment, among other things, eliminated the minimum London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR)
lending rate with respect to the Term Loan.
The balance of the Revolving Loan was $300,000 at December 31, 2010. There was no outstanding
balance on the Revolving Loan at March 31, 2010. Additionally, we had reserved $1,826,000 of the
Revolving Loan for standby letters of credit for workers compensation insurance and $3,161,000 for
commercial letters of credit as of December 31, 2010. As of December 31, 2010, $29,713,000 was
available under the Revolving Loan, and of this, $10,000,000 was reserved for use in the event our
largest customer discontinued its current practice of having our receivables discounted.
22
The Revolving Loan and the Term Loan bear interest at either our banks reference rate plus an
applicable margin or a LIBOR rate plus an applicable margin, as selected by us in accordance with
the Credit Agreement. The reference rate is, as further described in the Credit Agreement, the
higher of our banks announced base rate and the Federal funds rate plus 1/2 percent. The
applicable margins are determined quarterly on a prospective basis as set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage Ratio |
|
Applicable LIBOR Margin |
|
Applicable Reference Rate Margin |
Less than 1.0:1.0
|
|
250 basis points
|
|
125 basis points |
Greater than or equal to
1.0:1.0, but less than 1.5:1.0
|
|
275 basis points
|
|
150 basis points |
Greater than or equal to 1.5:1.0
|
|
300 basis points
|
|
175 basis points |
Our ability to comply in future periods with the financial covenants in the Credit Agreement, will
depend on our ongoing financial and operating performance, which, in turn, will be subject to
economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our
control and will be substantially dependent on the selling prices and demand for our products,
customer demands for marketing allowances and other concessions, raw material costs, and our
ability to successfully implement our overall business strategy, including acquisitions. If a
violation of any of the covenants occurs in the future, we would attempt to obtain a waiver or an
amendment from our Lenders. No assurance can be given that we would be successful in this regard.
Receivable Discount Programs
Our liquidity has been positively impacted by receivable discount programs we have established with
certain customers and their respective banks. Under these programs, we have the option to sell
those customers receivables to those banks at a discount to be agreed upon at the time the
receivables are sold. The weighted average discount under this program was 4.1% during the nine
months ended December 31, 2010 and has allowed us to accelerate collection of receivables
aggregating $100,857,000 by a weighted average of 328 days. While these arrangements have reduced
our working capital needs, there can be no assurance that these programs will continue in the
future. These programs resulted in interest expense of $3,755,000 during the nine months ended
December 31, 2010. Interest expense resulting from these programs would increase if interest rates
rise, if utilization of these discounting arrangements expands or if the discount period is
extended to reflect more favorable payment terms to customers.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
At December 31, 2010, we had no off-balance sheet financing or other arrangements with
unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships (such as entities often referred to as structured
finance or special purpose entities) established for purposes of facilitating off-balance sheet
financing or other debt arrangements or for other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
Capital Expenditures and Commitments
Capital Expenditures
Our capital expenditures were $1,119,000 for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 and primarily
related to the purchase of equipment for our manufacturing facilities and improvements for our
California facility. We expect our fiscal year 2011 capital expenditures to be approximately $2.0
million. We expect to use our working capital and incur additional capital lease obligations to
finance these capital expenditures.
Related Party Transactions
Our related party transactions primarily consist of employment and director agreements and stock
option agreements. Our related party transactions have not changed since March 31, 2010.
23
Critical Accounting Policies
There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates that are
presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010, which was filed on June 14,
2010, except as discussed below.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Transfers of Financial Assets
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued new guidance on the
treatment of transfers of financial assets which eliminates the concept of a qualifying
special-purpose entity, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and requires
additional disclosures in order to enhance information reported to users of financial statements by
providing greater transparency about transfers of financial assets, including securitization
transactions, and an entitys continuing involvement in and exposure to the risks related to
transferred financial assets. This new guidance is effective as of the beginning of an entitys
first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance on April 1,
2010 did not have any impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
In June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance which amends the consolidation guidance applicable to
variable interest entities and is effective as of the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year
that begins after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance on April 1, 2010 did not have
any impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
In January 2010, the FASB issued an update which requires new disclosures for transfers in and out
of Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and expanded disclosures for activity in Level 3
of the fair value hierarchy. The update also clarifies existing disclosures regarding the level of
disaggregation for disclosure and disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. The new
disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The adoption of this update on January 1, 2010
did not have any impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations. The
disclosures regarding certain Level 3 activity are effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2010. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance on April 1, 2011 to have any material impact on our consolidated
financial position and results of operations.
Disclosure Requirements Related to Financing Receivables
In July 2010, the FASB issued an update which requires enhanced disclosures about the credit
quality of financing receivables and the related allowance for credit losses. Trade accounts
receivable with maturities of one year or less are excluded from the disclosure requirements.
Disclosures required as of the end of a reporting period are effective for interim and annual
periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this guidance on December 31, 2010
did not have any impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations. The
disclosures required about activity that occurs during a reporting period are effective for interim
and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. We do not expect the adoption of this
guidance on January 1, 2011 to have any material impact on our consolidated financial position and
the results of operations.
When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative
Carrying Amounts
In December 2010, the FASB issued guidance which modifies step 1 of the goodwill impairment test
for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units with a
carrying amount equal to or less than zero for which qualitative factors indicate that it is more
likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, step 2 of
24
the goodwill impairment test will need
to be performed. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those
years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption of this update is prohibited. We do not
expect the adoption of this guidance on April 1, 2011 to have any material impact on our
consolidated financial position and the results of operations.
Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations
In December 2010, the FASB issued guidance which specifies that if comparative financial statements
are presented, disclosure of revenue and earnings of a combined entity should be made as though the
business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of
the comparable prior annual reporting period only. This guidance is effective for business
combinations consummated in fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2010. We are currently
evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance on April 1, 2011 will have on our consolidated
financial position and the results of operations.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There have been no material changes in market risk from the information provided in Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as
of March 31, 2010, which was filed on June 14, 2010.
25
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer, we have conducted an evaluation of
the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of December 31, 2010.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the third
quarter ended December 31, 2010, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth in Item 1A to Part I of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, filed on June 14, 2010.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Limitation on Payment of DividendsThe Credit Agreement prohibits the declaration or payment of
any dividends by us other than dividends payable in our capital stock.
26
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
Method of Filing |
3.1
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to the
Companys
Registration
Statement on Form
SB-2 declared
effective on March
22, 1994 (the 1994
Registration
Statement). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of
the Company
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to the
Companys
Registration
Statement on Form
S-1 (No. 33-97498)
declared effective
on November 14,
1995. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of
the Company
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to
Exhibit 3.3 to the
Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year
ended March 31,
1997. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of
the Company
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to
Exhibit 3.4 to the
Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year
ended March 31,
1998 (the 1998
Form 10-K). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of
the Company
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to
Exhibit C to the
Companys proxy
statement on
Schedule 14A filed
with the SEC on
November 25, 2003. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of Motorcar
Parts of America, Inc.
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to
Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on
August 24, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen Certificate of the Companys common
stock
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the
1994 Registration
Statement. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Form of Underwriters common stock purchase
warrant
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to the
1994 Registration
Statement. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
1994 Stock Option Plan
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to
Exhibit 4.3 to the
1994 Registration
Statement. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to
Exhibit 4.4 to the
1994 Registration
Statement. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
1994 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to
Exhibit 4.5 to the
Companys Annual
Report on Form
10-KSB for the
fiscal year ended
March 31, 1995. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
1996 Stock Option Plan
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to
Exhibit 4.6 to the
Companys
Registration
Statement on Form
S-2 (No. 333-37977)
declared effective
on November 18,
1997. |
27
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
Method of Filing |
4.8
|
|
2003 Long Term Incentive Plan
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to
Exhibit 4.9 to the
Companys
Registration
Statement on Form
S-8 filed with the
SEC on April 2,
2004. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
2004 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to
Appendix A to the
Proxy Statement on
Schedule 14A for
the 2004 Annual
Shareholders
Meeting. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement among the
Company and the investors identified on the
signature pages thereto, dated as of May 18,
2007
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to
Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on
May 18, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.11
|
|
Form of Warrant to be issued by the Company
to investors in connection with the May 2007
Private Placement
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to
Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on
May 18, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
First Amendment to the Revolving Credit and
Term Loan Agreement, dated as of May 12,
2010, between the Company and Union Bank,
N.A. and Branch Banking & Trust Company
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to
Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on
May 13, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Debenture, dated August 24, 2010, issued by
Fenwick Automotive Products Limited to
Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to
Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on
August 30, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Addendum to Unanimous Shareholders Agreement,
dated August 24, 2010, between Motorcar Parts
of America, Inc., Fenwick Enterprises Inc.,
Escal Holdings Inc., Fencity Holdings Inc.,
Jofen Holdings Inc., Gordon Fenwick, Paul
Fenwick, Joel Fenwick, Stanley Fenwick, Karen
Fenwick, Jack Shuster and FAPL Holdings Inc.
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to
Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on
August 30, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Second Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term
Loan Agreement, dated as of November 3, 2010,
between the Company and Union Bank, N.A. and
Branch Banking & Trust Company
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q filed on
November 8, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Third Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term
Loan Agreement, dated as of December 6, 2010,
between the Company and Union Bank, N.A. and
Branch Banking & Trust Company
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to
Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on
December 13, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Amended and Restated Debenture, dated
December 15, 2010, issued by Fenwick
Automotive Products Limited to Motorcar Parts
of America, Inc.
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to
Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on
December 21, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Amended and Restated Addendum to Unanimous
Shareholders Agreement, dated December 15,
2010, between Motorcar Parts of America,
Inc., Fenwick Enterprises Inc., Jack Shuster,
Gordon Fenwick, Paul Fenwick, Joel Fenwick,
FAPL, Fenwick Automotive Products Limited,
Introcan Inc., Escal Holdings Inc., Fencity
Holdings Inc. and Jofen Holdings Inc.
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to
Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on
December 21, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
Filed herewith. |
28
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
Method of Filing |
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
Certification of Chief Accounting Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting
Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
Filed herewith. |
29
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC
|
|
Dated: February 7, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ David Lee
|
|
|
|
David Lee |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
Dated: February 7, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Kevin Daly
|
|
|
|
Kevin Daly |
|
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer |
|
30