e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30,
2010
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File Number
000-29472
AMKOR TECHNOLOGY,
INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
(State of
incorporation)
|
|
|
|
23-1722724
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
1900
South Price Road
Chandler, AZ 85286
(Address
of principal executive offices and zip code)
(480) 821-5000
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The number of outstanding shares of the registrants Common
Stock as of July 30, 2010 was 183,367,298.
(This page
intentionally left blank)
QUARTERLY
REPORT ON
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
AMKOR
TECHNOLOGY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
For the Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
749,165
|
|
|
$
|
506,516
|
|
|
$
|
1,394,903
|
|
|
$
|
895,292
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
569,966
|
|
|
|
404,129
|
|
|
|
1,078,748
|
|
|
|
744,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
179,199
|
|
|
|
102,387
|
|
|
|
316,155
|
|
|
|
150,426
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
66,356
|
|
|
|
52,445
|
|
|
|
122,652
|
|
|
|
102,513
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
12,095
|
|
|
|
10,035
|
|
|
|
23,768
|
|
|
|
20,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
78,451
|
|
|
|
62,480
|
|
|
|
146,420
|
|
|
|
122,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
100,748
|
|
|
|
39,907
|
|
|
|
169,735
|
|
|
|
27,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
24,410
|
|
|
|
27,438
|
|
|
|
46,779
|
|
|
|
54,015
|
|
Interest expense, related party
|
|
|
3,813
|
|
|
|
3,812
|
|
|
|
7,625
|
|
|
|
5,374
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(847
|
)
|
|
|
(612
|
)
|
|
|
(1,580
|
)
|
|
|
(1,044
|
)
|
Foreign currency (gain) loss
|
|
|
(421
|
)
|
|
|
5,970
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
|
|
(6,098
|
)
|
Loss (gain) on debt retirement, net
|
|
|
17,807
|
|
|
|
(7,888
|
)
|
|
|
17,807
|
|
|
|
(16,884
|
)
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliate
|
|
|
(1,608
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,709
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(390
|
)
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense, net
|
|
|
43,005
|
|
|
|
28,710
|
|
|
|
68,086
|
|
|
|
35,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
57,743
|
|
|
|
11,197
|
|
|
|
101,649
|
|
|
|
(7,681
|
)
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(1,200
|
)
|
|
|
1,833
|
|
|
|
(1,367
|
)
|
|
|
4,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
58,943
|
|
|
|
9,364
|
|
|
|
103,016
|
|
|
|
(12,595
|
)
|
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
(274
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Amkor
|
|
$
|
59,050
|
|
|
$
|
9,223
|
|
|
$
|
103,347
|
|
|
$
|
(12,869
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Amkor per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing per common share amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
183,274
|
|
|
|
183,036
|
|
|
|
183,250
|
|
|
|
183,036
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
282,644
|
|
|
|
265,846
|
|
|
|
282,551
|
|
|
|
183,036
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
-2-
AMKOR
TECHNOLOGY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
437,803
|
|
|
$
|
395,406
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
2,679
|
|
|
|
2,679
|
|
Accounts receivable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade, net of allowances
|
|
|
411,273
|
|
|
|
328,252
|
|
Other
|
|
|
15,310
|
|
|
|
18,666
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
182,288
|
|
|
|
155,185
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
47,572
|
|
|
|
32,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,096,925
|
|
|
|
932,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,442,508
|
|
|
|
1,364,630
|
|
Intangibles, net
|
|
|
17,084
|
|
|
|
9,975
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
22,522
|
|
|
|
19,108
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
12,923
|
|
|
|
6,795
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
101,096
|
|
|
|
99,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,693,058
|
|
|
$
|
2,432,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
144,500
|
|
|
$
|
88,944
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
|
489,850
|
|
|
|
361,263
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
169,766
|
|
|
|
155,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
804,116
|
|
|
|
605,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,049,335
|
|
|
|
1,095,241
|
|
Long-term debt, related party
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
Pension and severance obligations
|
|
|
86,445
|
|
|
|
83,067
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
6,015
|
|
|
|
9,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,195,911
|
|
|
|
2,043,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 15)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amkor stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000 shares
authorized, designated Series A, none issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 500,000 shares
authorized, issued and outstanding of 183,367 in 2010 and
183,171 in 2009
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,502,894
|
|
|
|
1,500,246
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(1,018,894
|
)
|
|
|
(1,122,241
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
7,037
|
|
|
|
5,021
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 37 shares in 2010
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Amkor stockholders equity
|
|
|
490,986
|
|
|
|
383,209
|
|
Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
|
|
|
6,161
|
|
|
|
6,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
497,147
|
|
|
|
389,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
2,693,058
|
|
|
$
|
2,432,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
-3-
AMKOR
TECHNOLOGY, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
103,016
|
|
|
$
|
(12,595
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
154,406
|
|
|
|
156,507
|
|
Loss (gain) on debt retirement, net
|
|
|
10,562
|
|
|
|
(16,884
|
)
|
Other operating activities and non-cash items
|
|
|
(4,697
|
)
|
|
|
5,407
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(72,779
|
)
|
|
|
(99,077
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
190,508
|
|
|
|
33,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(142,928
|
)
|
|
|
(69,955
|
)
|
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
1,062
|
|
|
|
687
|
|
Financing lease payment from unconsolidated affiliate
|
|
|
7,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investing activities
|
|
|
(9,782
|
)
|
|
|
(3,086
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(143,881
|
)
|
|
|
(72,354
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under revolving credit facilities
|
|
|
3,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments under revolving credit facilities
|
|
|
(34,253
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of short-term working capital facility
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Payments of short-term working capital facility
|
|
|
(15,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
611,007
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt, related party
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Payments of long-term debt, net of redemption premiums and
discounts
|
|
|
(577,259
|
)
|
|
|
(186,156
|
)
|
Payments for debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(7,579
|
)
|
|
|
(8,539
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of stock through share-based compensation
plans
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(4,236
|
)
|
|
|
70,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(346
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
42,397
|
|
|
|
30,978
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
395,406
|
|
|
|
424,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
437,803
|
|
|
$
|
455,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
52,945
|
|
|
$
|
60,297
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
4,118
|
|
|
$
|
1,327
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
-4-
AMKOR
TECHNOLOGY, INC.
(Unaudited)
|
|
1.
|
Interim
Financial Statements
|
Basis of Presentation. The Consolidated
Financial Statements and related disclosures as of June 30,
2010 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010
and 2009 are unaudited, pursuant to the rules and regulations of
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The
December 31, 2009 Consolidated Balance Sheet data was
derived from audited financial statements, but does not include
all disclosures required by accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (U.S.).
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included
in financial statements prepared in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(U.S. GAAP) have been condensed or omitted
pursuant to such rules and regulations. In our opinion, these
financial statements include all adjustments (consisting only of
normal recurring adjustments) necessary for the fair statement
of the results for the interim periods. These financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the financial
statements included in our Annual Report for the year ended
December 31, 2009 filed on
Form 10-K
with the SEC on February 24, 2010. The results of
operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010
are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for
the full year. All references to Amkor,
we, us, our or the
company are to Amkor Technology, Inc. and our
subsidiaries.
The U.S. dollar is our reporting currency and the
functional currency for the majority of our foreign
subsidiaries. For our subsidiaries and affiliate in Japan, the
local currency is the functional currency.
Use of Estimates. The Consolidated Financial
Statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP,
using managements best estimates and judgments where
appropriate. These estimates and judgments affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements.
The estimates and judgments will also affect the reported
amounts for certain revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ materially from these
estimates and judgments.
Treasury Stock. Treasury stock is acquired by
us when certain restricted share awards vest or are forfeited
(see Note 3). At the vesting or retirement eligibility
date, a participant has a tax liability and, pursuant to the
recipients award agreement, we withhold restricted shares
to satisfy statutory minimum tax withholding obligations. The
withheld or forfeited restricted shares are accounted for as
treasury stock and carried at cost.
|
|
2.
|
New
Accounting Standards
|
Recently
Adopted Standards
In December 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU)
2009-17,
Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved
with Variable Interest Entities (ASU
2009-17).
This ASU codified consolidation guidance previously issued in
June 2009 which applies to variable interest entities and
affects the overall consolidation analysis under FASB
Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities. This standard is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2009. Our adoption of ASU
2009-17 on
January 1, 2010, did not have an impact on our financial
statements.
In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU
2009-16,
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets (ASU
2009-16).
This ASU codified guidance previously issued in June 2009 which
amends existing derecognition guidance, eliminates the exemption
from consolidation for qualifying special-purpose entities, and
requires additional disclosures about a transferors
continuing involvement in transferred financial assets. This
standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2009, and applies to financial asset transfers
occurring on or after the effective date. Our adoption of ASU
2009-16 on
January 1, 2010, did not have an impact on our financial
statements.
-5-
AMKOR
TECHNOLOGY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
|
|
3.
|
Share-Based
Compensation Plans
|
All of our share-based payments to employees, including grants
of employee stock options and restricted shares, are measured at
fair value and expensed over the requisite service period
(generally the vesting period). The following table presents
share-based compensation expense attributable to stock options
and restricted shares. There is no deferred income tax benefit
in either period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
$
|
636
|
|
|
$
|
559
|
|
|
$
|
1,259
|
|
|
$
|
1,338
|
|
Restricted shares
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
1,065
|
|
|
$
|
559
|
|
|
$
|
1,993
|
|
|
$
|
1,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents share-based compensation expense as
included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
921
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
1,741
|
|
|
|
1,045
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
1,065
|
|
|
$
|
559
|
|
|
$
|
1,993
|
|
|
$
|
1,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
Options
The following is a summary of all common stock option activity
for the six months ended June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Term (Years)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
8,302
|
|
|
$
|
10.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
7.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
5.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
18.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2010
|
|
|
8,176
|
|
|
$
|
10.23
|
|
|
|
3.77
|
|
|
$
|
849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2010
|
|
|
7,227
|
|
|
$
|
10.41
|
|
|
|
3.23
|
|
|
$
|
734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully vested and expected to vest at June 30, 2010
|
|
|
8,087
|
|
|
$
|
10.25
|
|
|
|
3.72
|
|
|
$
|
839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-6-
AMKOR
TECHNOLOGY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
The following assumptions were used in the Black-Scholes option
pricing model to calculate weighted average fair values of the
options granted for the three and six months ended June 30,
2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
Volatility
|
|
|
71
|
%
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
|
|
71
|
%
|
|
|
76
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value per option granted
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
$
|
2.96
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
$
|
2.70
|
|
The intrinsic value of options exercised for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010 was $0.1 million and
$0.2 million, respectively. The intrinsic value of options
exercised for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
was nominal. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, cash
received for stock option exercises was $0.6 million, while
a nominal amount was received in the six months ended
June 30, 2009. No tax benefits were realized. The related
cash receipts are included in financing activities in the
accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Total unrecognized compensation expense from stock options,
including a forfeiture estimate, was approximately
$4.4 million as of June 30, 2010, which is expected to
be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.1 years
beginning July 1, 2010. To the extent that the actual
forfeiture rate is different than what we have anticipated, the
share-based compensation expense related to these awards will be
different from our expectations.
Restricted
Shares
In February 2010, we granted 472,000 restricted shares to
employees under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan. The restricted
shares vest ratably over 4 years, with 25% of the shares
vesting at the end of the first year, and
1/48th
each month thereafter, such that 100% of the shares will become
vested on the fourth anniversary of the award date, subject to
the recipients continued employment with us on the
applicable vesting dates. In addition, provided that the
restricted shares have not been forfeited earlier, the
restricted shares will vest upon the recipients death,
disability or retirement, or upon a change in control of Amkor.
Although ownership of the restricted shares does not transfer to
the recipients until the shares have vested, recipients have
voting and dividend rights on these shares from the date of
grant. The value of the restricted shares is determined based on
the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of
the grant and is recognized ratably over the vesting period or
to the date on which the recipient becomes retirement eligible,
if shorter.
The Equity Incentive Plan provides that when a recipients
age plus years of service equals or exceeds 75, the recipient
will be eligible to voluntarily retire and become fully vested
in their restricted shares upon retirement. Consequently, under
federal tax law, when a recipient becomes retirement eligible,
the employee is immediately taxable on 100% of their restricted
shares whether or not the recipient actually retires. Upon the
earlier of retirement eligibility or vesting of the restricted
shares, the recipient has a tax liability and pursuant to the
recipients award agreement, a portion of the restricted
shares are withheld to satisfy the recipients statutory
minimum tax withholding obligations. The shares withheld are
accounted for as treasury stock at cost, which is determined by
the closing stock price per share on the applicable date of
vesting or retirement eligibility.
-7-
AMKOR
TECHNOLOGY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
The following table summarizes our restricted share activity for
the six months ended June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards granted
|
|
|
472
|
|
|
$
|
5.96
|
|
Awards vested
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
5.96
|
|
Awards forfeited
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
5.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at June 30, 2010
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
$
|
5.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards vested include 81,000 shares for retirement eligible
recipients whose restricted shares are treated for accounting
and tax purposes as if vested when they meet the retirement
eligible date. Of those 81,000 shares, 27,488 shares
were withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations and are
treated as treasury stock, at a cost of $0.2 million. The
unrecognized compensation cost, including a forfeiture estimate,
was $1.8 million as of June 30, 2010, which is
expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
approximately 3.6 years beginning July 1, 2010. To the
extent that the actual forfeiture rate is different than what we
have anticipated, the share-based compensation expense related
to these awards will be different from our expectations.
Our income tax benefit of $1.4 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 reflects the release of a
$5.3 million valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets
of a Taiwan subsidiary partially offset by $3.9 million of
expense primarily related to income taxes at certain of our
foreign operations, foreign withholding taxes and minimum taxes.
Our income tax expense reflects the benefit from tax holidays
and lower income tax rates in certain foreign jurisdictions. We
released the valuation allowance during the three months ended
June 30, 2010 because we believe that sufficient positive
evidence now exists to support the conclusion it is more likely
than not that we will realize the benefits of these deferred tax
assets. The positive evidence we considered was: (i) the
consistent profitability of these operations over a two year
period, which included the recent downturn in the semiconductor
industry in late 2008 and 2009; (ii) the increase in
profitability experienced in the second quarter of 2010 based on
demand for the products from these operations; and
(iii) our expectation that we will realize substantially
all of the deferred tax assets over the next three years for
these operations.
At June 30, 2010, we had U.S. net operating loss
carryforwards totaling $381.6 million, which expire at
various times through 2030. Additionally, at June 30, 2010,
we had $62.2 million of
non-U.S. net
operating loss carryforwards, which expire at various times
through 2020. We maintain a valuation allowance on all of our
U.S. net deferred tax assets, including our net operating
loss carryforwards. We also have valuation allowances on
deferred tax assets in certain foreign jurisdictions. Such
valuation allowances are released as the related tax benefits
are realized on our tax returns or when sufficient net positive
evidence exists to conclude it is more likely than not that the
deferred tax assets will be realized.
Our gross unrecognized tax benefits increased from
$5.1 million at December 31, 2009 to $5.3 million
as of June 30, 2010 primarily because of $1.7 million
of additions for contested deductions in a foreign jurisdiction,
partially offset by reductions for expired statutes of
limitations. All of the June 30, 2010 balance of
$5.3 million, if recognized, would affect the effective tax
rate. It is reasonably possible that the total amount of
unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by up to
$3.5 million within the next twelve months related to our
eligibility for certain tax incentives in a foreign jurisdiction
and the expected resolution of the aforementioned contested
deductions. Our
-8-
AMKOR
TECHNOLOGY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
unrecognized tax benefits are subject to change as examinations
of tax years are completed. Tax return examinations involve
uncertainties and there can be no assurances regarding the
outcome of examinations.
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed by
dividing net income (loss) attributable to Amkor common
stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period. The weighted average number of
common shares outstanding includes restricted shares held by
retirement eligible recipients and a reduction for treasury
stock acquired. The accounting framework for calculating
earnings per share includes guidance on unvested share-based
payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends
or dividend equivalents and states that they are participating
securities and should be included in the computation of earnings
per share pursuant to the two-class method. As discussed in
Note 3, we granted restricted shares which entitle
recipients to voting and nonforfeitable dividend rights from the
date of grant. As a result, we have applied the two-class method
to determine earnings per share.
Diluted EPS is computed on the basis of the weighted average
number of shares of common stock plus the effect of dilutive
potential common shares outstanding during the period. Dilutive
potential common shares include outstanding employee stock
options, unvested restricted shares and convertible debt. The
basic and diluted EPS amounts are the same for the six months
ended June 30, 2009, as a result of the potentially diluted
securities being antidilutive due to a net loss. The following
table summarizes the computation of basic and diluted EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Amkor
|
|
$
|
59,050
|
|
|
$
|
9,223
|
|
|
$
|
103,347
|
|
|
$
|
(12,869
|
)
|
Income allocated to participating securities
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to Amkor common stockholders
|
|
|
58,927
|
|
|
|
9,223
|
|
|
|
103,132
|
|
|
|
(12,869
|
)
|
Adjustment for dilutive securities on net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on 2.5% convertible notes due 2011, net of tax
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on 6.25% convertible notes due 2013, net of tax
|
|
|
1,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on 6.0% convertible notes due 2014, net of tax
|
|
|
4,026
|
|
|
|
4,032
|
|
|
|
8,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Amkor diluted
|
|
$
|
64,874
|
|
|
$
|
13,255
|
|
|
$
|
115,028
|
|
|
$
|
(12,869
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
183,274
|
|
|
|
183,036
|
|
|
|
183,250
|
|
|
|
183,036
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested restricted shares
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5% convertible notes due 2011
|
|
|
2,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.25% convertible notes due 2013
|
|
|
13,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0% convertible notes due 2014
|
|
|
82,658
|
|
|
|
82,781
|
|
|
|
82,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
282,644
|
|
|
|
265,846
|
|
|
|
282,551
|
|
|
|
183,036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Amkor per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
-9-
AMKOR
TECHNOLOGY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
The following table summarizes the potential shares of common
stock that were excluded from diluted EPS, because the effect of
including these potential shares was antidilutive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
For the Six Months
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
6,828
|
|
|
|
8,652
|
|
|
|
6,828
|
|
|
|
8,896
|
|
2.5% convertible notes due 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,142
|
|
6.25% convertible notes due 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,351
|
|
6.0% convertible notes due 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total potentially dilutive shares
|
|
|
6,828
|
|
|
|
26,358
|
|
|
|
6,828
|
|
|
|
70,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options excluded from diluted EPS because the exercise
price was greater than the average market price of the common
shares
|
|
|
6,828
|
|
|
|
8,652
|
|
|
|
6,828
|
|
|
|
8,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-10-
AMKOR
TECHNOLOGY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
|
|
6.
|
Equity
and Comprehensive Income
|
The following table reflects the changes in equity and
comprehensive income attributable to both Amkor and the
noncontrolling interests:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amkor
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Equity at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
383,209
|
|
|
$
|
6,492
|
|
|
$
|
389,701
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
103,347
|
|
|
|
(331
|
)
|
|
|
103,016
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension liablility adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
1,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income
|
|
|
2,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
105,363
|
|
|
|
(331
|
)
|
|
|
105,032
|
|
Treasury stock acquired through surrender of shares for tax
withholdings or forfeitures
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
Issuance of stock through employee stock compensation plans
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
655
|
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
1,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity at June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
490,986
|
|
|
$
|
6,161
|
|
|
$
|
497,147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
237,139
|
|
|
$
|
6,024
|
|
|
$
|
243,163
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(12,869
|
)
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
(12,595
|
)
|
Other comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension liablility adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
(4,389
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,389
|
)
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
(1,581
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(1,563
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(5,970
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(5,952
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(18,839
|
)
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
(18,547
|
)
|
Issuance of stock through employee stock compensation plans
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity at June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
219,655
|
|
|
$
|
6,316
|
|
|
$
|
225,971
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-11-
AMKOR
TECHNOLOGY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Raw materials and purchased components
|
|
$
|
129,117
|
|
|
$
|
119,393
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
53,171
|
|
|
|
35,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories
|
|
$
|
182,288
|
|
|
$
|
155,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Property,
Plant and Equipment
|
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
106,333
|
|
|
$
|
106,395
|
|
Land use rights
|
|
|
19,945
|
|
|
|
19,945
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
844,280
|
|
|
|
832,782
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
2,554,155
|
|
|
|
2,382,220
|
|
Software and computer equipment
|
|
|
175,782
|
|
|
|
151,208
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and other equipment
|
|
|
20,654
|
|
|
|
27,030
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
27,474
|
|
|
|
57,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,748,623
|
|
|
|
3,577,355
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(2,306,115
|
)
|
|
|
(2,212,725
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
1,442,508
|
|
|
$
|
1,364,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table reconciles our activity related to property,
plant and equipment purchases as presented on the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows to property, plant and
equipment additions reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment additions
|
|
$
|
230,825
|
|
|
$
|
51,649
|
|
Net change in related accounts payable and deposits
|
|
|
(87,897
|
)
|
|
|
18,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment
|
|
$
|
142,928
|
|
|
$
|
69,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-12-
AMKOR
TECHNOLOGY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Acquired intangibles as of June 30, 2010 consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Patents and technology rights
|
|
$
|
54,384
|
|
|
$
|
(48,705
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,679
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
22,483
|
|
|
|
(11,078
|
)
|
|
|
11,405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangibles
|
|
$
|
76,867
|
|
|
$
|
(59,783
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In May 2010, we executed new supply and technology development
agreements with a customer which require us to make
approximately $9.5 million of cash payments of which
$3.6 million was paid in the three months ended
June 30, 2010, and the balance was recorded as a liability
at June 30, 2010. Approximately $8.0 million was
recorded as a customer relationship intangible asset, and
$1.5 million was recorded as technology rights.
Acquired intangibles as of December 31, 2009 consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Patents and technology rights
|
|
$
|
53,059
|
|
|
$
|
(48,214
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,845
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
14,483
|
|
|
|
(9,353
|
)
|
|
|
5,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangibles
|
|
$
|
67,542
|
|
|
$
|
(57,567
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of identifiable intangible assets for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $1.3 million
and $1.7 million, respectively. Amortization of
identifiable intangible assets for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $2.5 million and
$4.5 million, respectively. Based on the amortizing assets
recognized in our balance sheet at June 30, 2010,
amortization for each of the next five years is estimated as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2010 Remaining
|
|
$
|
2,963
|
|
2011
|
|
|
4,752
|
|
2012
|
|
|
3,099
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2,710
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2,231
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortization
|
|
$
|
17,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Investment in unconsolidated affiliate
|
|
$
|
22,522
|
|
|
|
30.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
19,108
|
|
|
|
30.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-13-
AMKOR
TECHNOLOGY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
J-Devices
Corporation
On October 30, 2009, Amkor and Toshiba Corporation
(Toshiba) invested in Nakaya Microdevices
Corporation (NMD) and formed a joint venture to
provide semiconductor assembly and final testing services in
Japan. As a result of the transaction, NMD is now owned 60% by
the existing shareholders of NMD, 30% by Amkor and 10% by
Toshiba and has changed its name to J-Devices. J-Devices is a
variable interest entity, but as we are not the primary
beneficiary, the investment is accounted for as an
unconsolidated affiliate.
Our investment includes our 30% equity interest and call options
to acquire additional equity interest. Under the equity method
of accounting, we recognize our 30% proportionate share of
J-Devices net income or loss which includes
J-Devices income taxes in Japan, during each accounting
period. In addition, we record equity method adjustments for the
amortization of a basis difference as our carrying value
exceeded our equity in the net assets of J-Devices at the date
of investment and other adjustments required by the equity
method.
In conjunction with entering into the joint venture, one of our
existing subsidiaries in Japan purchased assembly and test
equipment from Toshiba and leased the equipment to J-Devices
under an agreement which is accounted for as a direct financing
lease. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, we
recognized $0.3 million and $0.6 million,
respectively, in interest income. Our lease receivables consist
of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Current (Other accounts receivable)
|
|
$
|
11,984
|
|
|
$
|
13,581
|
|
Non-current (Other assets)
|
|
|
27,181
|
|
|
|
32,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total lease receivable
|
|
$
|
39,165
|
|
|
$
|
45,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Payroll and benefits
|
|
$
|
67,320
|
|
|
$
|
42,228
|
|
Customer advances and deferred revenue
|
|
|
26,144
|
|
|
|
49,136
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
12,196
|
|
|
|
13,832
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
7,180
|
|
|
|
2,947
|
|
Accrued severance plan obligations (Note 13)
|
|
|
4,897
|
|
|
|
4,466
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
52,029
|
|
|
|
43,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
169,766
|
|
|
$
|
155,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-14-
AMKOR
TECHNOLOGY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Following is a summary of short-term borrowings and long-term
debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Debt of Amkor Technology, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured credit facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$100 million revolving credit facility, LIBOR plus
3.5% 4.0%, due April 2013
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Senior notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.125% Senior notes due March 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,503
|
|
7.75% Senior notes due May 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358,291
|
|
9.25% Senior notes due June 2016
|
|
|
264,283
|
|
|
|
390,000
|
|
7.375% Senior notes due May 2018
|
|
|
345,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior subordinated notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5% Convertible senior subordinated notes due May 2011
|
|
|
42,579
|
|
|
|
42,579
|
|
6.0% Convertible senior subordinated notes due April 2014,
$150 million related party
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
Subordinated notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.25% Convertible subordinated notes due December 2013,
related party
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Debt of subsidiaries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan, bank base rate plus 0.5% due April 2014
|
|
|
171,424
|
|
|
|
192,852
|
|
Term loan, bank funding rate-linked base rate plus 1.99% due May
2013
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan,
90-day
primary commercial paper rate plus 0.835% due April 2015
|
|
|
46,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan TIBOR + 0.8%, due September 2012
|
|
|
23,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan TIBOR + 0.65%, due July 2011
|
|
|
4,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital facility, LIBOR + 1.7%, due January 2011
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Revolving credit facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,435
|
|
Secured equipment and property financing
|
|
|
1,202
|
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,443,835
|
|
|
|
1,434,185
|
|
Less: Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
(144,500
|
)
|
|
|
(88,944
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (including related party)
|
|
$
|
1,299,335
|
|
|
$
|
1,345,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In May 2010, we announced a tender offer for up to
$175.0 million of our outstanding 9.25% Senior Notes
due June 2016 (the 2016 Notes). We used proceeds
from the lower interest rate ATK Loan (described below) to
purchase $125.7 million in notes tendered. We recorded a
$6.7 million loss on extinguishment related to premiums and
fees paid for the tender of the 2016 Notes and a
$1.6 million charge for the write-off of the associated
unamortized deferred debt issuance costs. Both charges are
included in debt retirement costs, net in our Consolidated
Statement of Operations for the three months ended June 30,
2010.
In May 2010, Amkor Technology Korea, Inc., a Korean wholly-owned
subsidiary (ATK), entered into a
$180.0 million,
3-year
secured term loan with a Korean bank (the ATK Loan),
of which $47.0 million was repaid in July 2010 upon
conclusion of the tender offer described above. The ATK Loan is
guaranteed on an unsecured basis by Amkor Technology, Inc.
(Amkor) and is secured by substantially all the
land, factories, and equipment located at our ATK facilities.
The ATK Loan bears interest at the banks funding
rate-linked base rate plus 1.99% (4.5% as of June 30,
2010) and amortizes in 11 equal quarterly installments of
$5 million per installment, with the remaining balance of
$78.0 million due in May 2013.
-15-
AMKOR
TECHNOLOGY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
In May 2010, we issued $345.0 million of our
7.375% Senior Notes due 2018 (the 2018 Notes).
The 2018 Notes were issued at par and are senior unsecured
obligations. Interest is payable semi-annually on May 1 and
November 1 of each year at a rate of 7.375%, commencing on
November 1, 2010. In addition, we entered into a
Registration Rights Agreement with the initial purchasers of the
2018 Notes where we agreed to use our reasonable best efforts to
cause to become effective a registration statement to exchange
the 2018 Notes for freely tradable notes issued by us. If we are
unable to effect the exchange offer within 210 days, we agree to
pay additional interest on the notes. We incurred
$7.4 million of debt issuance costs associated with the
2018 Notes in the three months ended June 30, 2010. We used
the net proceeds together with existing cash to redeem in full
the $53.5 million outstanding principal amount of our
7.125% Senior Notes due 2011 (the 2011 Notes)
and the $358.3 million principal amount of our
7.75% Senior Notes due 2013 (the 2013 Notes),
and to pay related fees and expenses during the three months
ended June 30, 2010. In connection with the prepayment of
the 2011 and 2013 Notes, we recorded a loss on extinguishment of
$9.5 million in June 2010, which included $7.3 million
in prepayment fees and a $2.2 million write-off of the
associated unamortized deferred debt issuance costs. Both
charges are included in debt retirement costs, net in our
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months ended
June 30, 2010.
In April 2010, Amkor Technology Taiwan Ltd, a Taiwanese
subsidiary, entered into a 1.5 billion Taiwan dollar
(approximately $47 million) term loan with a Taiwanese bank
due April 2015 primarily to fund capital expenditures. The loan
is guaranteed on an unsecured basis by Amkor and is
collateralized with certain land, buildings, and equipment in
Taiwan. Principal payments are due annually in the first year
and semiannually thereafter, and interest payments are due
monthly. The term loan accrues interest at the
90-day
primary commercial paper rate plus 0.835% (2.3% as of
June 30, 2010).
In March 2010, Amkor Iwate Company, Ltd., a Japanese subsidiary
(AIC), entered into a 2.5 billion Japanese yen
(approximately $28 million) term loan with a Japanese bank
due September 2012. Principal amounts borrowed are to be repaid
in equal quarterly payments and may be prepaid at any time
without penalty. The term loan accrues interest monthly at the
Tokyo Interbank Offering Rate (TIBOR) plus 0.8%
(1.4% as of June 30, 2010). The borrowing outstanding as of
June 30, 2010 was $23.1 million. The proceeds of the
term loan were used to repay the revolving line of credit with
the same bank.
Additionally, in March 2010, AIC entered into a 1.0 billion
Japanese yen (approximately $11 million) term loan with
another Japanese bank initially due October 2012. In May 2010,
we prepaid $5.3 million of the outstanding balance, which
changed the maturity date to July 2011. Principal amounts
borrowed are to be repaid in equal monthly payments and may be
prepaid at any time without penalty. The term loan accrues
interest monthly at TIBOR plus 0.65% (0.9% as of June 30,
2010). The borrowing outstanding was $4.5 million as of
June 30, 2010. The term loan is collateralized with certain
equipment located at our AIC facilities. The proceeds of the
term loan were used to repay the $3.3 million of AICs
existing revolving line of credit balance and the remaining
proceeds were used for general corporate purposes.
There have been no borrowings under our senior secured credit
facility as of June 30, 2010; however, we have utilized
$0.5 million of the available letter of credit
sub-limit of
$25.0 million. The borrowing base for the revolving credit
facility is based on the amount of our eligible accounts
receivable, which exceeded $100.0 million as of
June 30, 2010.
At June 30, 2010, Mr. James J. Kim, our Executive
Chairman of the Board of Directors, and certain Kim family
members owned all of the $100 million principal amount of
our 6.25% Convertible Subordinated Notes due December 2013,
$150 million principal amount of our 6.0% Convertible
Senior Subordinated Notes due April 2014, and $35.6 million
principal amount of our outstanding 9.25% Senior Notes due
2016. The 2016 notes were acquired in open market purchases
during 2008 and 2009.
-16-
AMKOR
TECHNOLOGY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Our secured bank debt agreements and the indentures governing
our senior, convertible senior subordinated and subordinated
notes and our senior secured credit facility contain a number of
affirmative and negative covenants which could restrict our
operations. We were in compliance with all of our covenants as
of June 30, 2010.
|
|
13.
|
Pension
and Severance Plans
|
Foreign
Pension Plans
Our Philippine, Taiwanese and Japanese subsidiaries sponsor
defined benefit plans that cover substantially all of their
respective employees who are not covered by statutory plans.
Charges to expense are based upon actuarial analyses. The
components of net periodic pension cost for these defined
benefit plans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Components of net periodic pension cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
1,454
|
|
|
$
|
1,069
|
|
|
$
|
2,904
|
|
|
$
|
2,190
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
928
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
1,842
|
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(581
|
)
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
(1,153
|
)
|
|
|
(701
|
)
|
Amortization of transitional obligation
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Recognized actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
|
1,504
|
|
|
|
3,752
|
|
|
|
3,030
|
|
Curtailment gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,109
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pension expense
|
|
$
|
1,880
|
|
|
$
|
1,504
|
|
|
$
|
3,752
|
|
|
$
|
1,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we recognized
a curtailment gain of $1.1 million related to the
remeasurement of two defined benefit plans due to reductions in
force programs (see Note 17).
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, we
contributed $7.4 million and $7.5 million to the
pension plans, respectively, and we expect to contribute an
additional $0.2 million during 2010.
Korean
Severance Plan
Our Korean subsidiary participates in an accrued severance plan
that covers employees, officers and directors with at least one
year of service. Eligible employees are entitled to receive a
lump-sum payment upon termination of employment, based on their
length of service, seniority and average monthly wages at the
time of termination. Accrued severance benefits are estimated
assuming all eligible employees were to terminate their
employment at the balance sheet date. Our contributions to the
National Pension Plan of the Republic of Korea are deducted from
accrued severance benefit liabilities.
The provision recorded for severance benefits for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $6.3 million
and $4.6 million, respectively. The provision recorded for
severance benefits for the six months ended June 30, 2010
and 2009 was $10.5 million and $6.9 million,
respectively. The balance recorded in non-current pension and
severance obligations for accrued severance at our Korean
subsidiary was $69.1 million and $64.4 million at
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
-17-
AMKOR
TECHNOLOGY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
|
|
14.
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
The accounting framework for determining fair value for assets
and liabilities includes a hierarchy for ranking the quality and
reliability of the information used to measure fair value, which
enables the reader of the financial statements to assess the
inputs used to develop those measurements. The fair value
hierarchy consists of three tiers as follows: Level 1,
defined as quoted market prices in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities; Level 2, defined as inputs other
than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or
indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active,
model-based valuation techniques for which all significant
assumptions are observable in the market, or other inputs that
are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data
for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities;
and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs that are not
corroborated by market data.
Assets
and Liabilities that are Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring
Basis
Our financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a
recurring basis include cash and cash equivalents and restricted
cash. Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash are invested
in U.S. money market funds and various U.S. and
foreign bank operating and time deposit accounts, which are due
on demand or carry a maturity date of less than three months
when purchased. No restrictions have been imposed on us
regarding withdrawal of balances with respect to our cash and
cash equivalents as a result of liquidity or other credit market
issues affecting the money market funds we invest in or the
counterparty financial institutions holding our deposits. Money
market funds and restricted cash are valued using quoted market
prices in active markets for identical assets as summarized in
the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
Other
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
Observable
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Cash equivalent money market funds
|
|
$
|
140,373
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
140,373
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
13,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,849
|
|
The following table presents the financial instruments that are
not recorded at fair value but which require fair value
disclosure as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Carrying value of debt
|
|
$
|
1,443,835
|
|
|
$
|
1,434,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
(Level 1)
|
|
$
|
1,335,959
|
|
|
$
|
1,509,079
|
|
Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)
|
|
|
443,771
|
|
|
|
359,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value of debt
|
|
$
|
1,779,730
|
|
|
$
|
1,868,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publicly quoted trading prices are based on the market prices on
the respective balance sheet dates. Market based observable
inputs include current borrowing rates for similar types of
borrowing arrangements considering duration, optionality, and
risk profile.
-18-
AMKOR
TECHNOLOGY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Assets
and Liabilities that are Measured at Fair Value on a
Nonrecurring Basis
We measure certain assets and liabilities, including property,
plant and equipment, intangible assets and an equity investment,
at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Impairment losses on
property, plant, and equipment included in cost of sales were
$0.7 million and $1.7 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Impairment
losses on property, plant, and equipment included in cost of
sales were $1.3 million and $2.7 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
|
|
15.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
We have a $100.0 million first lien revolving credit
facility that matures in April 2013. The facility has a letter
of credit
sub-limit of
$25.0 million. As of June 30, 2010, we have
$0.5 million of standby letters of credit outstanding and
have an additional $24.5 million available for letters of
credit. Such standby letters of credit are used in the ordinary
course of our business and are collateralized by our cash
balances.
We generally warrant that our services will be performed in a
professional and workmanlike manner and in compliance with our
customers specifications. We accrue costs for known
warranty issues. Historically, our warranty costs have been
immaterial.
Legal
Proceedings
We are involved in claims and legal proceedings and we may
become involved in other legal matters arising in the ordinary
course of our business. We evaluate these claims and legal
matters on a
case-by-case
basis to make a determination as to the impact, if any, on our
business, liquidity, results of operations, financial condition
or cash flows. Except as indicated below, we currently believe
that the ultimate outcome of these claims and proceedings,
individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material
adverse impact to us. Our evaluation of the potential impact of
these claims and legal proceedings on our business, liquidity,
results of operations, financial condition or cash flows could
change in the future. We currently are party to the legal
proceedings described below. Attorney fees related to legal
matters are expensed as incurred.
Arbitration
Proceedings with Tessera, Inc.
On March 2, 2006, Tessera, Inc. filed a request for
arbitration with the International Court of Arbitration of the
International Chamber of Commerce (the ICC),
captioned Tessera, Inc. v. Amkor Technology, Inc. The
subject matter of the arbitration was a license agreement
(License Agreement) entered into between Tessera and
our predecessor in 1996.
On October 27, 2008, the arbitration panel in that
proceeding issued an interim order in this matter. While the
panel found that most of the packages accused by Tessera were
not subject to the patent royalty provisions of the License
Agreement, the panel did find that past royalties were due to
Tessera as damages for some infringing packages. The panel also
denied Tesseras request to terminate the License Agreement.
On January 9, 2009, the panel issued the final damage award
in this matter awarding Tessera $60.6 million in damages
for past royalties due under the License Agreement. The award
was for the period March 2, 2002 through December 1,
2008. The final award, plus interest, and the royalties for
December 2008, were paid when due in February 2009.
We have been calculating, accruing and paying royalties under
the License Agreement for periods subsequent to December 1,
2008 using the same methodology specified in the panels
interim order for calculating damages for past royalties.
Tessera has made repeated statements to customers and others
claiming that we are in breach of the royalty provisions of the
License Agreement. We informed Tessera that we are in full
compliance with the License
-19-
AMKOR
TECHNOLOGY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Agreement and of our intent to continue making the royalty
payments when due in accordance with the terms of the License
Agreement.
On August 7, 2009, we filed a request for arbitration in
the ICC against Tessera, captioned Amkor Technology,
Inc. v. Tessera, Inc. We have instituted this action in
order to obtain declaratory relief confirming that we are a
licensee in good standing under our 1996 License Agreement with
Tessera and that the License Agreement remains in effect. We are
also seeking damages and injunctive relief regarding
Tesseras tortious interference with our contractual
relations and prospective economic advantage, including
Tesseras false and misleading statements questioning our
status as a licensee under the License Agreement.
On November 2, 2009, Tessera filed an answer to our request
for arbitration and counterclaims in the ICC. In the answer and
counterclaims, Tessera denies Amkors claims. Tessera also
alleges breach of contract, seeking termination of the License
Agreement and asserting that Amkor owes Tessera additional
royalties under the License Agreement, including royalties for
use of thirteen U.S. and six foreign patents that Tessera
did not assert in the previous arbitration. Tessera also alleges
that Amkor has tortiously interfered with Tesseras
prospective business relationships and seeks damages. Tessera
claims that the amount in dispute is approximately
$100 million.
We filed our response to Tesseras answer on
January 15, 2010 denying Tesseras claims and filed a
motion with the panel seeking priority consideration and phased
early determination of issues from the previous arbitration
decision, including the proper method for calculating royalties
under the License Agreement for periods subsequent to
December 1, 2008. On March 28, 2010, the panel granted
our request for priority consideration and phased early
determination. The first hearing is expected to occur during the
fourth quarter of 2010.
While we believe we are a licensee in good standing and are
paying all royalties to Tessera due under the License Agreement,
the outcome of this matter is uncertain and an adverse decision
could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations, cash flows and financial condition.
In connection with the new arbitration proceeding, we deposited
$5.1 million in an escrow account, which is classified as
restricted cash in non-current assets at December 31, 2009.
This amount represented our good faith estimate of the disputed
amount of royalties that we expected Tessera to allege that we
owe on packages assembled by us for one of our customers for the
period from December 2, 2008 through June 30, 2009. We
deposited an additional $6.1 million in escrow in February
2010 covering the period from July 1 through December 31,
2009. We do not believe that the funds held in escrow are owed
to Tessera and these funds may only be distributed upon the
order of the panel in the current arbitration proceeding.
Amkor
Technology, Inc. v. Carsem (M) Sdn Bhd, Carsem
Semiconductor Sdn Bhd, and Carsem Inc.
On November 17, 2003, we filed a complaint against Carsem
(M) Sdn Bhd, Carsem Semiconductor Sdn Bhd, and Carsem Inc.
(collectively Carsem) with the International Trade
Commission (ITC) in Washington, D.C., alleging
infringement of our United States Patent Nos. 6,433,277;
6,455,356 and 6,630,728 (collectively the Amkor
Patents) and seeking, under Section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, an exclusion order barring the importation by
Carsem of infringing products. We allege that by making, using,
selling, offering for sale, or importing into the U.S. the
Carsem Dual and Quad Flat No-Lead Packages, Carsem has infringed
on one or more of our MicroLeadFrame packaging technology
claims in the Amkor Patents.
On November 18, 2003, we also filed a complaint in the U.S.
District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging
infringement of the Amkor Patents and seeking an injunction
enjoining Carsem from further infringing the Amkor Patents,
compensatory damages, and treble damages due to willful
infringement plus interest, costs and attorneys fees. This
District Court action has been stayed pending resolution of the
ITC case.
The ITC Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) conducted an
evidentiary hearing during July and August of 2004 in Washington
D.C. and, on November 18, 2004, issued an Initial
Determination that Carsem infringed some of our
-20-
AMKOR
TECHNOLOGY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
patent claims relating to our MicroLeadFrame package
technology, that some of our 21 asserted patent claims are
valid, that we have a domestic industry in our patents, and that
all of our asserted patent claims are enforceable. However, the
ALJ did not find a statutory violation of Section 337 of
the Tariff Act.
We filed a petition in November 2004 to have the ALJs
ruling reviewed by the full International Trade Commission. On
March 31, 2005, the ITC ordered a new claims construction
related to various disputed claim terms and remanded the case to
the ALJ for further proceedings. On November 9, 2005, the
ALJ issued an Initial Determination on remand finding that
Carsem infringed some of our patent claims and that Carsem had
violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act.
On remand, the ITC had also authorized the ALJ to reopen the
record on certain discovery issues related to a subpoena of
documents from a third party. An order by the U.S. District
Court for the District of Columbia enforcing the subpoena became
final on January 9, 2009, and the third party produced
documents pursuant to the subpoena.
On July 1, 2009, the Commission remanded the investigation
for a second time to the ALJ to reopen the record to admit into
evidence documents and related discovery obtained from the
enforcement of the above-referenced third-party subpoena.
Following a
two-day
hearing, on October 30, 2009, the ALJ issued an Initial
Determination reaffirming his prior ruling that the Carsem Dual
and Quad Flat No-Lead Packages infringe some of Amkors
patent claims relating to MicroLeadFrame package
technology, that all of Amkors asserted patent claims are
valid, and that Carsem violated Section 337 of the Tariff
Act.
On December 16, 2009, the Commission ordered a review of
the ALJs Initial Determination. On February 18, 2010,
the Commission reversed a finding by the ALJ on the issue of
whether a certain invention constitutes prior art to
Amkors asserted patents. The Commission remanded the
investigation to the ALJ to make further findings in light of
the Commissions ruling. On March 22, 2010, the ALJ
issued a Supplemental Initial Determination. Although the
ALJs ruling did not disturb the prior finding that Carsem
Dual and Quad Flat No-Lead Packages infringe some of
Amkors patent claims relating to MicroLeadFrame
technology, the ALJ found that some of Amkors patent
claims are invalid and, as a result, the ALJ did not find a
statutory violation of the Tariff Act. On July 20, 2010,
the Commission issued a Notice of Commission Final
Determination, in which the Commission determined that there is
no violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act and
terminated the investigation. On July 27, 2010, the
Commission issued a confidential Commission Opinion, a public
version of which is expected in the future. We intend to appeal
the Commissions ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit.
We have two reportable segments, packaging and test. Packaging
and test are integral parts of the process of manufacturing
semiconductor devices and our customers will engage with us for
both packaging and test services, or just packaging or test
services. The packaging process creates an electrical
interconnect between the semiconductor chip and the system
board. In packaging, fabricated semiconductor wafers are
separated into individual chips. These chips are typically
attached through wire bond or wafer bump technologies to a
substrate or leadframe and then encased in a protective
material. In the case of an advanced wafer level package, the
package is assembled on the surface of a wafer. The packaged
chips are then tested using sophisticated equipment to ensure
that each packaged chip meets its design and performance
specifications.
The accounting policies for segment reporting are the same as
those for our Consolidated Financial Statements. We evaluate our
operating segments based on gross margin and gross property,
plant and equipment. We do not specifically identify and
allocate total assets by operating segment. Summarized financial
information
-21-
AMKOR
TECHNOLOGY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
concerning reportable segments is shown in the following table.
The other column includes exit costs associated with
contractual obligations for our Singapore land and building
leases as well as asset impairments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Packaging
|
|
|
Test
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
677,937
|
|
|
|
71,128
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
749,165
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
159,932
|
|
|
|
19,281
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
179,199
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
448,335
|
|
|
|
58,152
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
506,516
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
94,161
|
|
|
|
13,456
|
|
|
|
(5,230
|
)
|
|
$
|
102,387
|
|
Six Months Ended Months June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,258,524
|
|
|
|
136,191
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
$
|
1,394,903
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
282,041
|
|
|
|
34,503
|
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
$
|
316,155
|
|
Six Months Ended Months June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
787,274
|
|
|
|
108,027
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
895,292
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
138,030
|
|
|
|
17,837
|
|
|
|
(5,441
|
)
|
|
$
|
150,426
|
|
Gross Property, Plant and Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
2,831,561
|
|
|
|
774,849
|
|
|
|
142,213
|
|
|
$
|
3,748,623
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
2,689,005
|
|
|
|
753,234
|
|
|
|
135,116
|
|
|
$
|
3,577,355
|
|
|
|
17.
|
Exit
Activities and Reductions in Force
|
As part of our ongoing efforts to improve our manufacturing
operations and manage costs, we regularly evaluate our staffing
levels and facility requirements compared to business needs. The
following table summarizes our exit activities and reduction in
force initiatives for the six months ended June 30, 2010
and 2009. Charges represents the initial charge
related to the exit activity. Cash Payments and
Non-cash Amounts consist of the utilization of
Charges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separation
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Obligations
|
|
|
Impairments
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Accrual at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
3,938
|
|
|
$
|
2,813
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,751
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
2,045
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,368
|
|
Cash Payments
|
|
|
(893
|
)
|
|
|
(2,854
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,747
|
)
|
Non-cash Amounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(282
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(282
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual at June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
5,090
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-22-
AMKOR
TECHNOLOGY, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separation
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Obligations
|
|
|
Impairments
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Accrual at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
782
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
782
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
9,162
|
|
|
|
4,668
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
14,572
|
|
Cash Payments
|
|
|
(9,059
|
)
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,256
|
)
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
Non-cash Amounts
|
|
|
1,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(556
|
)
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual at June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
1,855
|
|
|
$
|
4,471
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Singapore
Manufacturing Operations
In June 2009, we communicated to our employees the decision to
wind-down and exit our manufacturing operations in Singapore. We
relocated the majority of the machinery and equipment to our
other factories. We expect to complete our exit plans before the
end of 2010.
The liability for our one-time involuntary termination benefits
for employees that have provided services beyond the minimum
retention period is recognized over the future service period.
During the three months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded
charges for termination benefits of $1.1 million, of which
$0.8 million and $0.3 million were recorded in cost of
sales and selling, general and administrative expenses,
respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we
recorded charges for termination benefits of $2.0 million,
of which $1.4 million and $0.6 million were recorded
in cost of sales and selling, general and administrative
expenses, respectively. During the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009, approximately $1.3 million and
$0.5 million of employee separation costs are in costs of
goods sold and selling, general and administrative expenses,
respectively. As of June 30, 2010, we expect to incur
approximately $0.5 million of additional employee
separation costs during the remainder of 2010.
Contractual obligation costs, asset impairments and other costs
are included in costs of goods sold. In January 2010, a final
payment was made related to the early lease termination of a
vacated facility and relief from our existing $1.1 million
asset retirement obligation related to the leased property.
Asset impairment expense related to non-transferable machinery
and equipment.
All amounts accrued at June 30, 2010 are classified in
current liabilities.
Other
Reductions in Force in 2009
During the first three months of 2009, we reduced our headcount
through
reductions-in-force
programs by 1,750 employees in certain other foreign
locations. We recorded a charge for one-time and contractual
termination benefits of $6.3 million, net of a pension
curtailment gain, of which $5.8 million and
$0.5 million were charged to cost of sales and selling,
general and administrative expenses, respectively. All amounts
were paid prior to March 31, 2009.
During 2007, we commenced a phased transition of all wafer level
processing production from our wafer bumping facility in North
Carolina to our facility in Taiwan. All wafer level processing
production ceased at our North Carolina facility in the three
months ended June 30, 2009, and the North Carolina facility
is now exclusively used for research and development activities.
We recorded charges for termination benefits during the six
months ended June 30, 2009 of $1.1 million, of which
$0.9 million and $0.2 million were recorded in cost of
sales and selling, general and administrative expenses,
respectively. All amounts were paid prior to December 31,
2009.
-23-
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This report contains forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the federal securities laws, including but not
limited to statements regarding: (1) expected customer
demand, (2) the amount and timing of our expected capital
investments and focus on customer requirements, investments in
technology advancements and cost reduction programs,
(3) our ability to fund our operating activities for the
next twelve months, (4) the effect of capacity utilization
rates on our gross margin, (5) the release of valuation
allowances related to taxes in the future, (6) the expected
use of future cash flows, if any, for the expansion of our
business, capital expenditures and the repayment of debt,
(7) expected workforce reductions and related severance
charges in connection with our plan to exit manufacturing
operations in Singapore, (8) our repurchase of outstanding
debt in the future, (9) payment of dividends,
(10) compliance with our covenants, (11) expected
contributions to defined benefit pension plans,
(12) liability for unrecognized tax benefits, (13) the
effect of foreign currency exchange rate exposure on our
financial results, (14) the volatility of the trading price
of our common stock, (15) changes to our internal controls
related to implementation of a new enterprise resource planning
system, and (16) other statements that are not historical
facts. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking
statements by terminology such as may,
will, should, expects,
plans, anticipates,
believes, estimates,
predicts, potential,
continue, intend or the negative of
these terms or other comparable terminology. Because such
statements include risks and uncertainties, actual results may
differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking
statements as a result of certain factors, including those set
forth in the following discussion as well as in Part II,
Item 1A Risk Factors of this Quarterly Report.
The following discussion provides information and analysis of
our results of operations for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2010 and our liquidity and capital resources. You
should read the following discussion in conjunction with
Item 1, Financial Statements in this Quarterly
Report as well as other reports we file with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC).
Overview
Amkor is one of the worlds leading subcontractors of
semiconductor packaging and test services. Packaging and test
are integral steps in the process of manufacturing semiconductor
devices. The manufacturing process begins with silicon wafers
and involves the fabrication of electronic circuitry into
complex patterns, thus creating large numbers of individual
chips on the wafers. The fabricated wafers are then probe tested
to ensure the individual devices meet electrical specifications.
The packaging process creates an electrical interconnect between
the semiconductor chip and the system board. In packaging,
fabricated semiconductor wafers are separated into individual
chips. These chips are typically attached through wire bond or
wafer bump technologies to a substrate or leadframe and then
encased in a protective material. In the case of an advanced
wafer level package, the package is assembled on the surface of
a wafer.
Our packages are designed for application specific body size and
electrical connection requirements to provide optimal electrical
connectivity and thermal performance. The packaged chips are
then tested using sophisticated equipment to ensure that each
packaged chip meets its design and performance specifications.
Increasingly, packages are custom designed for specific chips
and specific end-market applications. We are able to provide
turnkey assembly and test solutions including semiconductor
wafer bump, wafer probe, wafer backgrind, package design,
assembly, test and drop shipment services.
Our customers include, among others: Altera Corporation; Atmel
Corporation; Broadcom Corporation; Infineon Technologies AG;
International Business Machines Corporation; LSI Corporation;
Qualcomm Incorporated; ST Microelectronics, Pte.; Texas
Instruments, Inc. and Toshiba Corporation. The outsourced
semiconductor packaging and test market is very competitive. We
also compete with the internal semiconductor packaging and test
capabilities of many of our customers.
The semiconductor industry has continued to recover from the
recent cyclical downturn. Our unit demand increased by
1.0 billion units to 2.7 billion units during the
three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to
1.7 billion units during the three months ended
June 30, 2009, principally driven by the recovery of the
semiconductor industry and improved consumer spending following
the global economic downturn.
-24-
Our net sales of $749.2 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2010 increased $242.7 million or 47.9%
compared to net sales of $506.5 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2009. Increased consumer spending
beginning in the second half of 2009 and continuing into 2010
resulted in increased demand for end-user products such as
mobile phones, consumer electronics, computers and networking
equipment, which require our semiconductor packaging (sometimes
referred to as assembly) and test services.
Gross margin of 23.9% for the three months ended June 30,
2010 was up from 20.2% for the three months ended June 30,
2009. Our gross margin for the three months ended June 30,
2010 benefited from increased levels of demand and the
corresponding higher level of utilization of our manufacturing
assets. Gross margin in the three months ended June 30,
2010, was also impacted by the increased cost of gold used in
many of our wirebond packages and the negative impact of foreign
currency exchange rate movements compared to the three months
ended June 30, 2009. Other factors affecting gross margin
in the three months ended June 30, 2010, were increased
labor and other manufacturing costs, and the restoration of some
of the compensation costs and other temporary cost reduction
initiatives implemented in 2009.
Our net income for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was
$59.1 million, or $0.23 per diluted share, compared with
net income of $9.2 million, or $0.05 per diluted share, for
the three months ended June 30, 2009. Net income for the
three months ended June 30, 2010 includes a
$17.8 million loss on the refinancing of debt, or $0.06 per
diluted share partially offset by a gain of $5.3 million,
or $0.02 per diluted share, from the release of a valuation
allowance on certain deferred tax assets. In the three months
ended June 30, 2009 we had a $7.9 million gain on the
retirement of debt, or $0.03 per diluted share.
Our capital additions totaled $158.1 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $27.4 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2009. This increase in
capital additions is to support increased customer demand. Based
on continuing strong demand, we have increased our expectations
for 2010 capital additions to be between 16% and 17% of net
sales. Capital additions are focused on incremental capacity for
advanced packaging services including chip scale, ball grid
array and bumping, specific customer requirements, technology
advancements and cost reduction programs.
Cash provided by operating activities was $190.5 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2010, as compared with
cash provided by operating activities of $33.4 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2009. We experienced positive
free cash flow of $47.6 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2010, which increased $84.2 million from the
prior year comparable period. The increase was primarily
attributable to the approximately $103.8 million of
payments made in the six months ended June 30, 2009
relating to the resolution of a patent license dispute and
employee benefit and separation payments, as well as reduced
business levels in 2009 as a result of the recession. Our free
cash flow was also affected by increased purchases of property,
plant and equipment in 2010 compared to 2009. We define free
cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities less
investing activities related to the acquisition of property,
plant and equipment. Free cash flow is not defined by
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(U.S. GAAP) and a reconciliation of free cash
flow to net cash provided by operating activities is set forth
under the caption Cash Flows below. Please see
Liquidity and Capital Resources and Cash
Flows below for a further analysis of the change in our
balance sheet and cash flows during the first three months of
2010.
We believe our financial position and liquidity are sufficient
to fund our operating activities for at least the next twelve
months. At June 30, 2010, our cash and cash equivalents
totaled approximately $437.8 million with an aggregate of
$38.8 million of debt due through the end of 2010. In May
2010, we issued $345.0 million of our 7.375% Senior
Notes due 2018. We used the proceeds of that note issuance
together with existing cash to redeem in full the
$53.5 million outstanding principal amount of our
7.125% Senior Notes due 2011 and the $358.3 million
principal amount of our 7.75% Senior Notes due 2013, and to
pay related fees and expenses during the three months ended
June 30, 2010. In addition, in May 2010, we entered into a
$180.0 million,
3-year
secured term loan in Korea, the proceeds of which were used to
purchase $125.7 million of our 9.25% Senior Notes due
2016. In July 2010, we repaid $47.0 million of the Korean
term loan.
-25-
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth certain operating data as a
percentage of net sales for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
23.9
|
%
|
|
|
20.2
|
%
|
|
|
22.7
|
%
|
|
|
16.8
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
|
|
15.1
|
%
|
|
|
11.1
|
%
|
|
|
17.5
|
%
|
Operating income
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
|
12.2
|
%
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)%
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Amkor
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)%
|
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended
June 30, 2009
Net Sales. Net sales increased
$242.7 million, or 47.9%, to $749.2 million in the
three months ended June 30, 2010 from $506.5 million
in the three months ended June 30, 2009. Sales of
substantially all product lines increased for the three months
ended June 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2009 primarily due to the recovery of the
semiconductor industry and improved consumer spending following
the global economic downturn.
Packaging Net Sales. Packaging net sales
increased $229.6 million, or 51.2%, to $677.9 million
in the three months ended June 30, 2010 from
$448.3 million in the three months ended June 30, 2009
because of the broad-based product demand across our package
offerings. Packaging unit volume increased in the three months
ended June 30, 2010 to 2.7 billion units, compared to
1.7 billion units in the three months ended June 30,
2009 primarily due to strong demand for our leadframe and chip
scale packaging services and the recovery of the semiconductor
industry and improved consumer spending following the global
economic downturn. The growth in ball grid array packaging
services with higher average sales prices per unit contributed
to the overall growth in net sales from the three months ended
June 30, 2009.
Test Net Sales. Test net sales increased
$12.9 million, or 22.2%, to $71.1 million in the three
months ended June 30, 2010 from $58.2 million in the
three months ended June 30, 2009 primarily due to the
recovery of the semiconductor industry and improved consumer
spending following the global economic downturn.
Cost of Sales. Our cost of sales consists
principally of materials, labor, depreciation and manufacturing
overhead. Since a substantial portion of the costs at our
factories is fixed, relatively modest increases or decreases in
our capacity utilization rates can have a significant effect on
our gross margin.
Material costs as a percentage of net sales increased to 42.4%
for the three months ended June 30, 2010 from 40.4% in the
three months ended June 30, 2009 due to change in mix to
packages with higher material content as a percentage of net
sales and the increased cost of gold.
As a percentage of net sales, labor costs decreased to 12.7% in
the three months ended June 30, 2010 from 13.1% in the
three months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in labor
costs as a percentage of net sales was due primarily to
increased customer demand and the corresponding increase in net
sales. The increase labor costs in absolute dollars is partially
due to the restoration in 2010 of some of the compensation costs
and other temporary cost reduction initiatives such as foreign
subsidy programs which were available and utilized in 2009.
Labor costs were negatively impacted by foreign currency
exchange rate movements in the three months ended June 30,
2010 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009. In
addition, labor costs in the three months ended June 30,
2010 included a charge of $0.8 million related to workforce
reduction programs associated with the wind-down and exit of
manufacturing operations in Singapore compared to
$1.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2009
for workforce reduction programs.
As a percentage of net sales, other manufacturing costs
decreased to 21.0% in the three months ended June 30, 2010
from 26.3% in the three months ended June 30, 2009 due to
increased customer demand and the corresponding
-26-
increase in net sales. The increase in other manufacturing costs
in absolute dollars was related to increased repairs and
maintenance costs primarily due to higher levels of production
in our factories.
Gross Profit. Gross profit increased
$76.8 million to $179.2 million, or 23.9% of net
sales, in the three months ended June 30, 2010 from
$102.4 million, or 20.2% of net sales, in the three months
ended June 30, 2009 primarily due to the increased customer
demand and the corresponding higher level of utilization of our
manufacturing assets during the quarter. Gross margin in the
three months ended June 30, 2010, was also impacted by the
increased cost of gold used in many of our wirebond packages and
the negative impact of foreign currency exchange rate movements
from the three months ended June 30, 2009. Other factors
affecting gross margin in the three months ended June 30,
2010, were increased labor and other manufacturing costs and
depreciation expense resulting from the ramp in production for
the higher level of demand, and the restoration of some of the
compensation costs and other temporary cost reduction
initiatives implemented in 2009.
Packaging Gross Profit. Gross profit for
packaging increased $65.7 million to $159.9 million,
or 23.6% of packaging net sales, in the three months ended
June 30, 2010 from $94.2 million, or 21.0% of
packaging net sales, in the three months ended June 30,
2009. The increase in gross margin is primarily attributable to
increased customer demand.
Test Gross Profit. Gross profit for test
increased $5.8 million to $19.3 million, or 27.1% of
test net sales, in the three months ended June 30, 2010
from $13.5 million, or 23.2% of test net sales, in the
three months ended June 30, 2009 due to increased customer
demand.
Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses. Selling, general and administrative
expenses increased $14.0 million, or 26.7%, to
$66.4 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010,
from $52.4 million in the three months ended June 30,
2009. The increase was primarily driven by the reinstatement of
employee compensation and benefit costs that had been reduced in
2009 as part of our cost reduction initiatives through the
global economic downturn as well as an increase in contracted
services in conjunction with our global enterprise resource
planning information system implementation.
Research and Development. Research and
development activities are currently focused on developing new
package solutions, test services and improving the efficiency
and capabilities of our existing production processes. Our key
areas for research and development are advanced flip chip
packaging, 3D packaging, copper pillar bumping, laminate and
leadframe packaging, Through Mold Via and Through Silicon Via
technologies, wafer level packaging services and other
manufacturing cost reduction initiatives. Research and
development expenses increased $2.1 million to
$12.1 million, or 1.6% of net sales in the three months
ended June 30, 2010 from $10.0 million, or 2.0% of net
sales in the three months ended June 30, 2009. Increased
research and development expenses are due to increased activity
and reinstatement of employee compensation and benefit costs.
Other (Income) Expense, Net. Other expense,
net increased $14.3 million to $43.0 million, or 5.7%
of net sales, in the three months ended June 30, 2010 from
$28.7 million, or 5.7% of net sales in the three months
ended June 30, 2009. During the three months ended
June 30, 2010, we recorded $17.8 million of debt
retirement costs related to the debt transactions described
above in the Overview. During the three months ended
June 30, 2009, we recorded a net gain of $7.9 million
related to the repurchase of an aggregate $144.2 million
principal amount of our 7.125% Senior Notes and
2.5% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011. This
increase was partially offset by foreign currency changes.
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded a
$6.0 million foreign currency loss compared to a
$0.4 million foreign currency gain in the three months
ended June 30, 2010.
Income Tax Benefit (Expense). In the three
months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded an income tax
benefit of $1.2 million compared to an income tax expense
of $1.8 million in the three months ended June 30,
2009. The decrease in income tax expense was primarily
attributable to a decline in profits in certain taxable foreign
jurisdictions and the release of a valuation allowance of
$5.3 million on the net deferred tax assets of a Taiwan
subsidiary. Our income tax benefit for the three months ended
June 30, 2010 primarily consists of $4.1 million of
expense in certain foreign jurisdictions, foreign withholding
taxes, and minimum taxes offset by the release of the valuation
allowance.
At June 30, 2010, we had U.S. net operating loss
carryforwards totaling $381.6 million, which expire at
various times through 2030. Additionally, at June 30, 2010,
we had $62.2 million of
non-U.S. net
operating loss
-27-
carryforwards, which expire at various times through 2020. We
maintain a valuation allowance on all of our U.S. net
deferred tax assets, including our net operating loss
carryforwards. We also have valuation allowances on deferred tax
assets in certain foreign jurisdictions. We release such
valuation allowances as the related tax benefits are realized on
our tax returns or when sufficient positive evidence exists to
conclude that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax
assets will be realized.
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to Six Months Ended
June 30, 2009
Net Sales. Net sales increased
$499.6 million, or 55.8%, to $1,394.9 million in the
six months ended June 30, 2010 from $895.3 million in
the six months ended June 30, 2009. Sales of all product
lines increased for the six months ended June 30, 2010
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009 primarily
due to the recovery of the semiconductor industry and improved
consumer spending following the global economic downturn.
Packaging Net Sales. Packaging net sales
increased $471.2 million, or 59.9%, to
$1,258.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010
from $787.3 million in the six months ended June 30,
2009 because of the broad-based product demand across our
package offerings. Packaging unit volume increased in the six
months ended June 30, 2010 to 5.2 billion units,
compared to 2.9 billion units in the six months ended
June 30, 2009 primarily due to strong demand for our
leadframe and chip scale packaging services and the recovery of
the semiconductor industry and improved consumer spending
following the global economic downturn. The growth in net sales
of ball grid array packaging services with higher average sales
prices per unit contributed to the overall growth in net sales
from the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Test Net Sales. Test net sales increased
$28.2 million, or 26.1%, to $136.2 million in the six
months ended June 30, 2010 from $108.0 million in the
six months ended June 30, 2009 primarily due to the
recovery of the semiconductor industry and improved consumer
spending following the global economic downturn.
Cost of Sales. Our cost of sales consists
principally of materials, labor, depreciation and manufacturing
overhead. Since a substantial portion of the costs at our
factories is fixed, relatively modest increases or decreases in
our capacity utilization rates can have a significant effect on
our gross margin.
Material costs as a percentage of net sales increased to 42.2%
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 from 39.9% in the
six months ended June 30, 2009 due to change in mix to
packages with higher material content as a percentage of net
sales and the increased cost of gold.
As a percentage of net sales, labor costs decreased to 12.9% in
the six months ended June 30, 2010 from 14.6% in the six
months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in labor costs as
a percentage of net sales was due primarily to increased
customer demand and the corresponding increase in net sales. The
increase in labor costs in absolute dollars is partially due to
the restoration in 2010 of some of the compensation costs and
other temporary cost reduction initiatives such as foreign
subsidy programs which were available and utilized in 2009.
Labor costs were negatively impacted by foreign currency
exchange rate movements in the six months ended June 30,
2010 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009. In
addition, labor costs in the six months ended June 30, 2010
included a charge of $1.4 million related to workforce
reduction programs associated with the wind-down and exit of
manufacturing operations in Singapore compared to
$8.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2009 for
workforce reduction programs.
As a percentage of net sales, other manufacturing costs
decreased to 22.2% in the six months ended June 30, 2010
from 28.7% in the six months ended June 30, 2009 due to
increased customer demand and the corresponding increase in net
sales. The increase in other manufacturing costs in absolute
dollars was related to increased repairs and maintenance costs
primarily due to higher levels of production in our factories.
Gross Profit. Gross profit increased
$165.8 million to $316.2 million, or 22.7% of net
sales, in the six months ended June 30, 2010 from
$150.4 million, or 16.8% of net sales, in the six months
ended June 30, 2009, primarily due to the increased
customer demand and the corresponding higher level of
utilization of our manufacturing assets during the quarter.
Gross margin in the six months ended June 30, 2010, was
also impacted by the increased cost of gold used in many of our
wirebond packages and the negative impact of foreign currency
exchange rate movements from the six months ended June 30,
2009. Other factors affecting gross margin in the six months
ended June 30, 2010, were increased labor and other
manufacturing costs and depreciation expense resulting from the
ramp in
-28-
production for the higher level of demand, and the restoration
of some of the compensation costs and other temporary cost
reduction initiatives implemented in 2009.
Packaging Gross Profit. Gross profit for
packaging increased $144.0 million to $282.0 million,
or 22.4% of packaging net sales, in the six months ended
June 30, 2010 from $138.0 million, or 17.5% of
packaging net sales, in the six months ended June 30, 2009.
The increase in gross margin was primarily attributable to
increased customer demand.
Test Gross Profit. Gross profit for test
increased $16.7 million to $34.5 million, or 25.3% of
test net sales, in the six months ended June 30, 2010 from
$17.8 million, or 16.5% of test net sales, in the six
months ended June 30, 2009 due to increased customer demand.
Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses. Selling, general and administrative
expenses increased $20.2 million, or 19.7%, to
$122.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010,
from $102.5 million in the six months ended June 30,
2009. The increase was primarily driven by the reinstatement of
employee compensation and benefit costs that had been reduced in
2009 as part of our cost reduction initiatives through the
global economic downturn as well as an increase in contracted
services in conjunction with our global enterprise resource
planning information system implementation.
Research and Development. Research and
development activities are currently focused on developing new
package solutions, test services and improving the efficiency
and capabilities of our existing production processes. Our key
areas for research and development are advanced flip chip
packaging, 3D packaging, copper pillar bumping, laminate and
leadframe packaging, Through Mold Via and Through Silicon Via
technologies, wafer level packaging services and other
manufacturing cost reduction initiatives. Research and
development expenses increased $3.5 million to
$23.7 million, or 1.7% of net sales in the six months ended
June 30, 2010 from $20.2 million, or 2.3% of net sales
in the six months ended June 30, 2009. Increased research
and development expenses were due to increased activity and
reinstatement of employee compensation and benefit costs.
Other (Income) Expense, Net. Other expense,
net increased $32.7 million to $68.1 million, or 4.9%
of net sales, in the six months ended June 30, 2010 from
$35.4 million, or 4.0% of net sales in the six months ended
June 30, 2009. This increase was driven by an increase in
debt retirement costs. During the six months ended June 30,
2010, we recorded $17.8 million of debt retirement costs
related to the debt transactions described in the Overview.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded a
net gain of $16.9 million related to the repurchase of an
aggregate $177.3 million principal amount of our
7.125% Senior Notes and 2.5% Convertible Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2011. Also during the six months ended
June 30, 2009, we recorded a $6.1 million foreign
currency gain compared to a $0.6 million foreign currency
loss in the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Income Tax Benefit (Expense). In the six
months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded an income tax
benefit of $1.4 million compared to an income tax expense
of $4.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2009.
The decrease in income tax expense was primarily attributable to
a decline in profits in certain taxable foreign jurisdictions
and the release of a valuation allowance of $5.3 million on
the net deferred tax assets of a Taiwan subsidiary.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
We assess our liquidity based on our current expectations
regarding sales, operating expenses, capital spending and debt
service requirements. Based on this assessment, we believe that
our cash flow from operating activities together with existing
cash and cash equivalents and availability under our revolving
credit facility will be sufficient to fund our working capital,
capital expenditure and debt service requirements for at least
the next twelve months. Thereafter, our liquidity will continue
to be affected by, among other things, volatility in the global
economy and credit markets, the performance of our business, our
capital expenditure levels and our ability to either repay debt
out of operating cash flow or refinance debt at or prior to
maturity with the proceeds of debt or equity offerings. There is
no assurance that we will generate the necessary net income or
operating cash flows to meet the funding needs of our business
beyond the next twelve months due to a variety of factors,
including the cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry and
the other factors discussed in Part II, Item 1A
Risk Factors.
-29-
Our primary source of cash and the source of funds for our
operations are cash flows from our operations, current cash and
cash equivalents, borrowings under available debt facilities, or
proceeds from any additional debt or equity financings. As of
June 30, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of
$437.8 million and availability of $99.5 million under
our $100.0 million first lien senior secured revolving
credit facility. We expect cash flows to be used in the
operation and expansion of our business, making capital
expenditures, paying principal and interest on our debt and for
other corporate purposes.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009 we implemented
cost reduction measures including lowering executive and other
employee compensation, reducing employee and contractor
headcount, and shortening work weeks. As capacity utilization
increased during the second half of 2009 and through the first
half of 2010, we have experienced increased labor and other
overhead costs. During 2010, executive and other employee
compensation has largely been restored to previous levels and we
have reversed other temporary cost reduction initiatives.
We sponsor an accrued severance plan for our Korean subsidiary
which under existing tax laws in Korea, limits our ability to
deduct related severance expenses incurred under that plan. The
purpose of these limitations is to encourage companies to
migrate to a defined contribution or defined benefit plan;
however, if we retain our existing severance plan, we will be
required to pay increased taxes. If we decide to adopt a new
plan retroactively, we would be required to significantly fund
the existing liability. Our Korean severance liability was $74.0
million as of June 30, 2010.
From time to time, we evaluate our staffing levels compared to
business needs and changes in demand in order to manage costs
and improve performance. The wind-down and exit of our
manufacturing operations in Singapore will require approximately
$5.6 million in additional payments during the remainder of
2010. In connection with the wind-down of our Singapore
manufacturing operations, we refunded approximately
$12.1 million of customer advances using cash on hand
during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
We have a significant level of debt, with $1,443.8 million
outstanding at June 30, 2010, $144.5 million of which
is current. At June 30, 2010, we have an aggregate of
$38.8 million of debt coming due through the end of 2010,
and $147.4 million of debt due in 2011, which includes the
remaining $42.6 million aggregate principal amount of our
2.5% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011.
As discussed above in the Overview, we completed various debt
transactions during the six months ended June 30, 2010,
which extended the maturities of our nearest term senior notes
by five years and refinanced some of our highest cost debt at a
lower interest rate. In July 2010, we repaid $47.0 million
of the unused proceeds from the Korean term loan.
The interest payments required on our debt are substantial. For
example, we paid $116.2 million of interest in 2009. We
refer you to Contractual Obligations below for a
summary of principal and interest payments.
In order to reduce leverage and future cash interest payments,
we may from time to time repurchase or call our outstanding
notes for cash or exchange shares of our common stock for our
outstanding notes. Any such transaction may be made in the open
market, through privately negotiated transactions or pursuant to
the terms of the indentures, and these transactions, are subject
to the terms of our indentures and other debt agreements, market
conditions, and other factors. Our 6.25% Convertible
Subordinated Notes due 2013 will become callable in December
2010 and our 9.25% Senior Notes due 2016 will become
callable in June 2011.
Certain debt agreements have restrictions on dividend payments
and the repurchase of stock and subordinated securities,
including our convertible notes. These restrictions are
determined by defined calculations which include net income. We
have never paid a dividend to our stockholders, and we do not
have any current plans to do so.
We were in compliance with all debt covenants at June 30,
2010 and expect to remain in compliance with these covenants for
at least the next twelve months.
Capital
Additions
Our capital additions for the six months ended June 30,
2010 were $230.8 million. We currently expect that our full
year 2010 capital additions will be approximately 16% to 17% of
net sales. Ultimately, the amount of our 2010 capital additions
will depend on several factors including, among others, the
performance of our business, the need
-30-
for additional capacity to service customer demand and the
availability of suitable cash flow from operations or financing.
The following table reconciles our activity related to property,
plant and equipment purchases as presented on the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows to property, plant and
equipment additions reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment additions
|
|
$
|
230,825
|
|
|
$
|
51,649
|
|
Net change in related accounts payable and deposits
|
|
|
(87,897
|
)
|
|
|
18,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment
|
|
$
|
142,928
|
|
|
$
|
69,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows
Cash provided by operating activities was $190.5 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to cash
provided by operating activities of $33.4 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2009. We experienced positive
free cash flow of $47.6 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2010, which increased $84.2 million from the
prior year comparable period. The increase was primarily due to
approximately $103.8 million of payments made in the six
months ended June 30, 2009 relating to the resolution of a
patent license dispute and employee benefit and separation
payments, as well as reduced business levels in 2009 as a result
of the recession, partially offset by increased capital
additions in 2010 compared to 2009.
Net cash provided by (used in) operating, investing and
financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2010
and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
190,508
|
|
|
$
|
33,358
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(143,881
|
)
|
|
|
(72,354
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(4,236
|
)
|
|
|
70,320
|
|
Operating activities: Our cash flow from
operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2010
increased by $157.1 million compared to the prior year
comparable period. Operating income for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 adjusted for depreciation and amortization,
other operating activities and non-cash items increased
$129.8 million which was largely attributable to increased
net sales and the related increase in net income.
Changes in assets and liabilities decreased operating cash flow
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 principally due to
increases in inventories and accounts receivable attributable to
increased business volumes. The $99.1 million decrease from
changes in assets and liabilities in the six months ended
June 30, 2009 was principally due to the $64.7 million
payment made in connection with the resolution of a patent
license dispute and $39.1 million in other employee benefit
and separation payments.
Investing activities: Our cash flows used in
investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2010
increased by $71.5 million. This increase was primarily due
to increased levels of capital additions in 2010 resulting in a
$72.9 million increase in payments for property, plant and
equipment. Our capital additions were focused on incremental
capacity for advanced packaging services including chip scale,
ball grid array and bumping, specific customer requirements and
other technology advancements.
Financing activities: Our net cash used in
financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2010
was $4.2 million, compared with net cash provided of
$70.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
The net cash used in financing activities for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 was primarily driven by the refinancing
of existing debt with new debt, including term loans at our
Japanese, Korean and Taiwanese subsidiaries and the
-31-
issuance of our 7.375% Senior Notes due 2018. We also
incurred $7.6 million in debt issuance costs in the six
months ended June 30, 2010 primarily associated with the
issuance of the 2018 Notes.
Our net cash provided by financing activities for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 was $70.3 million, which was
primarily due to the issuance of our 6.0% Convertible Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2014 and our working capital facility in
China. We used the net proceeds from the issuance of the 6.0%
Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014 to repurchase a
portion of our 7.125% Senior Notes due 2011 and a portion of our
2.5% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011. For the six
months ended June 30, 2009, we also incurred
$8.5 million in debt issuance costs related to the April
2009 issuance of our 6.0% Convertible Senior Subordinated
Notes due 2014 and the amendment and extension of our
$100.0 million first lien revolving credit facility to
April 2013.
We provide the following supplemental data to assist our
investors and analysts in understanding our liquidity and
capital resources. We define free cash flow as net cash provided
by operating activities less investing activities related to the
acquisition of property, plant and equipment. Free cash flow is
not defined by U.S. GAAP and our definition of free cash
flow may not be comparable to similar companies and should not
be considered a substitute for cash flow measures in accordance
with U.S. GAAP. We believe free cash flow provides our
investors and analysts useful information to analyze our
liquidity and capital resources.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
190,508
|
|
|
$
|
33,358
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(142,928
|
)
|
|
|
(69,955
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow
|
|
$
|
47,580
|
|
|
$
|
(36,597
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual
Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at
June 30, 2010, and the effect such obligations are expected
to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due for year ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
1,443,835
|
|
|
$
|
38,780
|
|
|
$
|
147,447
|
|
|
$
|
80,665
|
|
|
$
|
282,206
|
|
|
$
|
280,778
|
|
|
$
|
613,959
|
|
Scheduled interest payment obligations(1)
|
|
|
449,613
|
|
|
|
39,886
|
|
|
|
82,352
|
|
|
|
79,115
|
|
|
|
74,131
|
|
|
|
54,656
|
|
|
|
119,473
|
|
Purchase obligations(2)
|
|
|
137,505
|
|
|
|
137,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
37,821
|
|
|
|
3,731
|
|
|
|
6,221
|
|
|
|
5,814
|
|
|
|
5,950
|
|
|
|
6,355
|
|
|
|
9,750
|
|
Severance obligations(3)
|
|
|
74,003
|
|
|
|
2,492
|
|
|
|
4,810
|
|
|
|
4,484
|
|
|
|
4,183
|
|
|
|
3,908
|
|
|
|
54,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$
|
2,142,777
|
|
|
$
|
222,394
|
|
|
$
|
240,830
|
|
|
$
|
170,078
|
|
|
$
|
366,470
|
|
|
$
|
345,697
|
|
|
$
|
797,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Scheduled interest payment obligations were calculated using
stated coupon rates for fixed rate debt and interest rates
applicable at June 30, 2010 for variable rate debt. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents capital-related purchase obligations outstanding at
June 30, 2010 for capital additions. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents estimated benefit payments for our Korean subsidiary
severance plan. |
In addition to the obligations identified in the table above,
other non-current liabilities recorded in our Consolidated
Balance Sheet at June 30, 2010 include:
|
|
|
|
|
$17.3 million of foreign pension plan obligations for which
the timing and actual amount of funding required is uncertain.
We expect to contribute $0.2 million to the defined benefit
pension plans during the remainder of 2010.
|
-32-
|
|
|
|
|
$3.4 million net liability associated with unrecognized tax
benefits. Due to the uncertainty regarding the amount and the
timing of any future cash outflows associated with our
unrecognized tax benefits, we are unable to reasonably estimate
the amount and period of ultimate settlement, if any, with the
various taxing authorities.
|
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
As of June 30, 2010, we had no off-balance sheet guarantees
or other off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in
Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of SEC
Regulation S-K,
other than our operating leases.
Contingencies,
Indemnifications and Guarantees
We refer you to Note 15 Commitments and
Contingencies to our Consolidated Financial Statements in
Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report for a
discussion of our contingencies related to litigation and other
legal matters. If an unfavorable ruling were to occur in these
matters, there exists the possibility of a material adverse
impact on our business, liquidity, results of operations,
financial position and cash flows in the period in which the
ruling occurs. The potential impact from legal proceedings on
our business, liquidity, results of operations, financial
position and cash flows, could change in the future.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Our critical accounting policies are disclosed in our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009. During the three
months ended June 30, 2010, there have been no significant
changes in our critical accounting policies as reported in our
2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
For information regarding recent accounting pronouncements, see
Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included
within Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
Market
Risk Sensitivity
We are exposed to market risks, primarily related to foreign
currency and interest rate fluctuations. In the normal course of
business, we employ established policies and procedures to
manage the exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency values
and changes in interest rates. Our use of derivative
instruments, including forward exchange contracts, has been
historically insignificant; however, we continue to evaluate the
use of hedge instruments to manage currency and other risk. We
have not entered into any derivative transactions in the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and have no outstanding
contracts as of June 30, 2010.
Foreign
Currency Risks
We currently do not have forward contracts or other instruments
to reduce our exposure to foreign currency gains and losses. To
the extent possible, we have managed our foreign currency
exposures by using natural hedging techniques to minimize the
foreign currency rate risk.
The U.S. dollar is our reporting currency and the
functional currency for the majority of our foreign subsidiaries
including our largest subsidiaries in Korea and the Philippines
and also our subsidiaries in Taiwan, China and Singapore. For
our subsidiaries and affiliate in Japan, the local currency is
the functional currency.
We have foreign currency exchange rate risk associated with the
remeasurement of monetary assets and monetary liabilities on our
Consolidated Balance Sheet that are denominated in currencies
other than the functional currency. We performed a sensitivity
analysis of our foreign currency exposure as of June 30,
2010, to assess the potential impact of fluctuations in exchange
rates for all foreign denominated assets and liabilities.
Assuming a 10% adverse movement for all currencies against the
U.S. dollar as of June 30, 2010, our income before
income taxes would have been approximately $20.1 million
lower for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
-33-
In addition, we have foreign currency exchange rate exposure on
our results of operations. For the six months ended
June 30, 2010, approximately 88% of our net sales were
denominated in U.S. dollars. Our remaining net sales were
principally denominated in Japanese yen and Korean won for local
country sales. For the six months ended June 30, 2010,
approximately 55% of our cost of sales and operating expenses
were denominated in U.S. dollars and were largely for raw
materials and factory supplies. The remaining portion of our
cost of sales and operating expenses was principally denominated
in the Asian currency where our production facilities are
located and was largely for labor and utilities. To the extent
that the U.S. dollar weakens against these Asian-based
currencies, similar foreign currency denominated transactions in
the future will result in higher sales and higher operating
expenses, with increased operating expenses having the greater
impact on our financial results. Similarly, our sales and
operating expenses will decrease if the U.S. dollar
strengthens against these foreign currencies. We performed a
sensitivity analysis of our foreign currency exposure as of
June 30, 2010 to assess the potential impact of
fluctuations in exchange rates for all foreign denominated sales
and expenses. Assuming a 10% adverse movement of the
U.S. dollar compared to all of these Asian-based currencies
as of June 30, 2010, our operating income would have been
approximately $36.2 million lower for the six months ended
June 30, 2010.
There are inherent limitations in the sensitivity analysis
presented, primarily due to the assumption that foreign exchange
rate movements across multiple jurisdictions are similar and
would be linear and instantaneous. As a result, the analysis is
unable to reflect the potential effects of more complex market
or other changes that could arise which may positively or
negatively affect our results of operations.
We have foreign currency exchange rate exposure on our
stockholders equity as a result of the translation of our
subsidiaries and an affiliate where the local currency is the
functional currency. To the extent the U.S. dollar
strengthens against the local currency, the translation of these
foreign currency denominated transactions will result in reduced
sales, operating expenses, assets and liabilities. Similarly,
our sales, operating expenses, assets and liabilities will
increase if the U.S. dollar weakens against the local
currencies. The effect of foreign exchange rate translation on
our Consolidated Balance Sheet for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009 was a net foreign translation loss
of $1.9 million and a loss of $1.6 million,
respectively, and was recognized as an adjustment to equity
through other comprehensive (loss) income.
Interest
Rate Risks
We have interest rate risk with respect to our long-term debt.
As of June 30, 2010, we had a total of
$1,443.8 million of debt of which 69.4% was fixed rate debt
and 30.6% was variable rate debt. Our variable rate debt
principally relates to our foreign borrowings and any amounts
outstanding under our $100.0 million revolving line of
credit, of which no amounts were drawn as of June 30, 2010.
The fixed rate debt consists of senior notes, senior
subordinated notes and subordinated notes. As of
December 31, 2009, we had a total of $1,434.2 million
of debt of which 83.3% was fixed rate debt and 16.7% was
variable rate debt.
The table below presents the interest rates and maturities of
our fixed and variable rate debt as of June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Long term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate debt (In thousands)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
42,579
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
250,000
|
|
|
$
|
609,283
|
|
|
$
|
1,001,862
|
|
|
$
|
1,335,959
|
|
Average interest rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate debt (In thousands)
|
|
$
|
38,780
|
|
|
$
|
104,868
|
|
|
$
|
80,665
|
|
|
$
|
182,206
|
|
|
$
|
30,778
|
|
|
$
|
4,676
|
|
|
$
|
441,973
|
|
|
$
|
443,771
|
|
Average interest rate
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
For information regarding the fair value of our long-term debt,
see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
included in this Quarterly Report.
Equity
Price Risks
We have convertible notes that are convertible into our common
stock. If investors were to decide to convert their notes to
common stock, our future earnings would benefit from a reduction
in interest expense and our common stock outstanding would
increase. If we paid a premium to induce such conversion, our
earnings could include an additional charge.
-34-
Further, the trading price of our common stock has been and is
likely to continue to be highly volatile and could be subject to
wide fluctuations. Such fluctuations could impact our decision
or ability to utilize the equity markets as a potential source
of our funding needs in the future.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed
to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our
periodic reports to the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs
rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, based on
the definition of disclosure controls and procedures
in
Rule 13a-15(e)
and
Rule 15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In
designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures,
management recognizes that any disclosure controls and
procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can
provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired
control objectives, and management necessarily is required to
apply their judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship
of possible disclosure controls and procedures.
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of
the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures as of June 30, 2010 and concluded those
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of that
date.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We are implementing a new enterprise resource planning
(ERP) system over a multi-year program on a
company-wide basis. During the three months ended June 30,
2010, we implemented several significant ERP modules including
modules associated with financial reporting, inventory costing
and invoicing. The implementation of the ERP modules represents
a change in our internal control over financial reporting. We
believe the ERP modules implemented have maintained or enhanced
our internal control over financial reporting. We have taken the
necessary steps to implement appropriate internal control over
financial reporting during this period of change and will
continue to evaluate the design and operating effectiveness of
our internal controls during subsequent periods.
Other than internal controls affected by the implementation of
the new ERP system modules discussed above, there have not been
any other changes in our internal control over financial
reporting. We will complete our evaluation and testing of the
internal control changes as of December 31, 2010.
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
Information about legal proceedings is set forth in Note 15
to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this
Quarterly Report.
The factors discussed below are cautionary statements that
identify important factors and risks that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those anticipated by the
forward-looking statements contained in this report. For more
information regarding the forward-looking statements contained
in this report, see the introductory paragraph to Part I,
Item 2 of this Quarterly Report. You should carefully
consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together
with all of the other information included in this report, in
considering our business and prospects. The risks and
uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing
Amkor. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to
us also may impair our business operations. The occurrence of
any of the following risks could affect our business, liquidity,
results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
-35-
Dependence
on the Highly Cyclical Semiconductor and Electronic Products
Industries We Operate in Volatile Industries and
Industry Downturns and Declines in Global Economic and Financial
Conditions Could Harm Our Performance.
Our business is impacted by market conditions in the
semiconductor industry, which is cyclical by nature and impacted
by broad economic factors, such as world-wide gross domestic
product and consumer spending. The semiconductor industry has
experienced significant and sometimes prolonged downturns in the
past. For example, the recent financial crisis and global
recession resulted in a downturn in the semiconductor industry
that adversely affected our business and results of operations
in late 2008 and in 2009.
Since our business is, and will continue to be, dependent on the
requirements of semiconductor companies for subcontracted
packaging and test services, any downturn in the semiconductor
industry or any other industry that uses a significant number of
semiconductor devices, such as consumer electronic products,
telecommunication devices, or computing devices, could have a
material adverse effect on our business and operating results.
It is difficult to predict the timing, strength or duration of
any economic slowdown or subsequent economic recovery, which, in
turn, makes it more challenging for us to forecast our operating
results, make business decisions, and identify risks that may
affect our business, sources and uses of cash, financial
condition and results of operations. Additionally, if industry
conditions deteriorate, we could suffer significant losses, as
we have in the past, which could materially impact our business,
liquidity, results of operations, financial condition and cash
flows.
Fluctuations
in Operating Results and Cash Flows Our Operating
Results and Cash Flows Have Varied and May Vary Significantly as
a Result of Factors That We Cannot Control.
Many factors, including the impact of adverse economic
conditions, could have a material adverse effect on our net
sales, gross profit, operating results and cash flows, or lead
to significant variability of quarterly or annual operating
results. Our profitability and ability to generate cash from
operations is principally dependent upon demand for
semiconductors, the utilization of our capacity, semiconductor
package mix, the average selling price of our services, our
ability to manage our capital expenditures in response to market
conditions and our ability to control our costs including labor,
material, overhead and financing costs. The recent downturn in
demand for semiconductors in late 2008 and in 2009 resulted in
significant declines in our operating results and cash flows as
capacity utilization declined.
Our operating results and cash flows have varied significantly
from period to period. Our net sales, gross margins, operating
income and cash flows have historically fluctuated significantly
as a result of many of the following factors, over which we have
little or no control and which we expect to continue to impact
our business:
|
|
|
|
|
fluctuation in demand for semiconductors and conditions in the
semiconductor industry;
|
|
|
|
changes in our capacity utilization rates;
|
|
|
|
changes in average selling prices;
|
|
|
|
changes in the mix of semiconductor packages;
|
|
|
|
evolving package and test technology;
|
|
|
|
absence of backlog and the short-term nature of our
customers commitments and the impact of these factors on
the timing and volume of orders relative to our production
capacity;
|
|
|
|
changes in costs, availability and delivery times of raw
materials and components;
|
|
|
|
changes in labor costs to perform our services;
|
|
|
|
wage and commodity price inflation, including precious metals;
|
|
|
|
the timing of expenditures in anticipation of future orders;
|
|
|
|
changes in effective tax rates;
|
|
|
|
the availability and cost of financing;
|
-36-
|
|
|
|
|
intellectual property transactions and disputes;
|
|
|
|
high leverage and restrictive covenants;
|
|
|
|
warranty and product liability claims and the impact of quality
excursions and customer disputes and returns;
|
|
|
|
costs associated with litigation judgments, indemnification
claims and settlements;
|
|
|
|
international events, political instability, civil disturbances
or environmental or natural events, such as earthquakes, that
impact our operations;
|
|
|
|
pandemic illnesses that may impact our labor force and our
ability to travel;
|
|
|
|
difficulties integrating acquisitions and the failure of our
joint ventures to operate in accordance with business plans;
|
|
|
|
our ability to attract and retain qualified employees to support
our global operations;
|
|
|
|
loss of key personnel or the shortage of available skilled
workers;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in foreign exchange rates;
|
|
|
|
delay, rescheduling and cancellation of large orders; and
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in our manufacturing yields.
|
It is often difficult to predict the impact of these factors
upon our results for a particular period. The downturn in the
global economy and the semiconductor industry increased the
risks associated with the foregoing factors as customer
forecasts became more volatile, and there was less visibility
regarding future demand and significantly increased uncertainty
regarding the economy, credit markets, and consumer demand.
These factors may have a material and adverse effect on our
business, liquidity, results of operations, financial condition
and cash flows, or lead to significant variability of quarterly
or annual operating results. In addition, these factors may
adversely affect our credit ratings which could make it more
difficult and expensive for us to raise capital and could
adversely affect the price of our securities.
High
Fixed Costs Due to Our High Percentage of Fixed
Costs, We Will Be Unable to Maintain Our Gross Margin at Past
Levels if We Are Unable to Achieve Relatively High Capacity
Utilization Rates.
Our operations are characterized by relatively high fixed costs.
Our profitability depends in part not only on pricing levels for
our packaging and test services, but also on the utilization of
our human resources and packaging and test equipment. In
particular, increases or decreases in our capacity utilization
can significantly affect gross margins since the unit cost of
packaging and test services generally decreases as fixed costs
are allocated over a larger number of units. In periods of low
demand, we experience relatively low capacity utilization in our
operations, which lead to reduced margins during that period.
For example, we experienced lower than optimum utilization in
the three months ended December 31, 2008 and the first half
of 2009 due to a decline in world-wide demand for our packaging
and test services which impacted our gross margin. Although our
capacity utilization at times has been strong, we cannot assure
you that we will be able to achieve consistently high capacity
utilization, and if we fail to do so, our gross margins may
decrease. If our gross margins decrease, our business,
liquidity, results of operations, financial condition and cash
flows could be materially and adversely affected.
In addition, our fixed operating costs have increased in recent
years in part as a result of our efforts to expand our capacity
through significant capital additions. Forecasted customer
demand for which we have made capital investments may not
materialize, especially if industry conditions deteriorate. As a
result, our sales may not adequately cover our substantial fixed
costs resulting in reduced profit levels or causing significant
losses, both of which may adversely impact our liquidity,
results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Guidance
Our Failure to Meet Our Guidance or Analyst Projections Could
Adversely Impact the Trading Prices of Our
Securities.
We periodically provide guidance to investors with respect to
certain financial information for future periods. Securities
analysts also periodically publish their own projections with
respect to our future operating results. As
-37-
discussed above under Fluctuations in Operating Results
and Cash Flows Our Operating Results and Cash Flows
Have Varied and May Vary Significantly as a Result of Factors
That We Cannot Control, our operating results and cash
flows vary significantly and are difficult to accurately
predict. Volatility in customer forecasts and reduced visibility
caused by economic uncertainty and fluctuations in global
consumer demand make it particularly difficult to predict future
results. To the extent we fail to meet or exceed our own
guidance or the analyst projections for any reason, the trading
prices of our securities may be adversely impacted. Moreover,
even if we do meet or exceed that guidance or those projections,
the analysts and investors may not react favorably, and the
trading prices of our securities may be adversely impacted.
Declining
Average Selling Prices The Semiconductor Industry
Places Downward Pressure on the Prices of Our Packaging and Test
Services.
Prices for packaging and test services have generally declined
over time. Historically, we have been able to partially offset
the effect of price declines by successfully developing and
marketing new packages with higher prices, such as advanced
leadframe and laminate packages, by negotiating lower prices
with our material vendors, recovering material cost increases
from our customers, and by driving engineering and technological
changes in our packaging and test processes which resulted in
reduced manufacturing costs. We expect general downward pressure
on average selling prices for our packaging and test services in
the future. If we are unable to offset a decline in average
selling prices, by developing and marketing new packages with
higher prices, reducing our purchasing costs, recovering more of
our material cost increases from our customers and reducing our
manufacturing costs, our business, liquidity, results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows could be
materially adversely affected.
Decisions
by Our Integrated Device Manufacturer Customers to Curtail
Outsourcing May Adversely Affect Our Business.
Historically, we have been dependent on the trend in outsourcing
of packaging and test services by integrated device
manufacturers, or IDMs. Our IDM customers continually evaluate
the outsourced services against their own in-house packaging and
test services. As a result, at any time and for a variety of
reasons, IDMs may decide to shift some or all of their
outsourced packaging and test services to internally sourced
capacity.
The reasons IDMs may shift their internal capacity include:
|
|
|
|
|
their desire to realize higher utilization of their existing
test and packaging capacity, especially during downturns in the
semiconductor industry;
|
|
|
|
their unwillingness to disclose proprietary technology;
|
|
|
|
their possession of more advanced packaging and test
technologies; and
|
|
|
|
the guaranteed availability of their own packaging and test
capacity.
|
Furthermore, to the extent we limit capacity commitments for
certain customers, these customers may begin to increase their
level of in-house packaging and test capabilities, which could
adversely impact our sales and profitability and make it more
difficult for us to regain their business when we have available
capacity. Any shift or a slowdown in this trend of outsourcing
packaging and test services is likely to adversely affect our
business, liquidity, results of operations, financial condition
and cash flows.
In a downturn in the semiconductor industry, IDMs could respond
by shifting some outsourced packaging and test services to
internally serviced capacity on a short term basis. If we
experience a significant loss of IDM business, it could have a
material adverse effect on our business, liquidity, results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows especially during
a prolonged industry downturn.
Our
Substantial Indebtedness Could Adversely Affect Our Financial
Condition and Prevent Us from Fulfilling Our
Obligations.
We have a significant amount of indebtedness. As of
June 30, 2010, our total debt balance was
$1,443.8 million, of which $144.5 million was
classified as a current liability. In addition, despite current
debt levels, the terms of the
-38-
indentures governing our indebtedness allow us or our
subsidiaries to incur more debt, subject to certain limitations.
If new debt is added to our consolidated debt level, the related
risks that we now face could intensify.
Our substantial indebtedness could:
|
|
|
|
|
make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with
respect to our indebtedness, including our obligations under our
indentures to purchase notes tendered as a result of a change in
control of Amkor;
|
|
|
|
increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and
industry conditions;
|
|
|
|
limit our ability to fund future working capital, capital
expenditures, research and development and other general
corporate requirements;
|
|
|
|
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow
from operations to service payments on our debt;
|
|
|
|
increase the volatility of the price of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
limit our flexibility to react to changes in our business and
the industry in which we operate;
|
|
|
|
place us at a competitive disadvantage to any of our competitors
that have less debt; and
|
|
|
|
limit, along with the financial and other restrictive covenants
in our indebtedness, among other things, our ability to borrow
additional funds.
|
We May
Have Difficulty Funding Liquidity Needs
We operate in a capital intensive industry. Servicing our
current and future customers requires that we incur significant
operating expenses and continue to make significant capital
expenditures, which are generally made in advance of the related
revenues and without any firm customer commitments. During the
six months ended June 30, 2010, we had capital additions of
$230.8 million and for the full year 2010, we currently
expect to make capital additions of approximately 16% to 17% of
net sales.
In addition, we have a significant level of debt, with
$1,443.8 million outstanding at June 30, 2010,
$144.5 million of which is current. The terms of such debt
require significant scheduled principal payments in the coming
years, including $38.8 million due in 2010,
$147.4 million due in 2011, $80.7 million due in 2012,
$282.2 million due in 2013, $280.8 million due in 2014
and $613.9 million due thereafter. The interest payments
required on our debt are also substantial. For example, in 2009,
we paid $116.2 million of interest. The source of funds to
fund our operations, including making capital expenditures and
servicing principal and interest obligations with respect to our
debt, are cash flows from our operations, current cash and cash
equivalents, borrowings under available debt facilities, or
proceeds from any additional debt or equity financing. As of
June 30, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of
$437.8 million and $99.5 million available under our
senior secured revolving credit facility which matures in April
2013.
We assess our liquidity based on our current expectations
regarding sales, operating expenses, capital spending and debt
service requirements. Based on this assessment, we believe that
our cash flow from operating activities together with existing
cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to fund our working
capital, capital expenditure and debt service requirements for
at least the next twelve months. Thereafter, our liquidity will
continue to be affected by, among other things, the performance
of our business, our capital expenditure levels and our ability
to repay debt out of our operating cash flow or refinance the
debt with the proceeds of debt or equity offerings at or prior
to maturity. Moreover, the health of the worldwide banking
system and financial markets affects the liquidity in the global
economic environment. Volatility in fixed income, credit and
equity markets could make it difficult for us to maintain our
existing credit facilities or refinance our debt. If our
performance or access to the capital markets differs materially
from our expectations, our liquidity may be adversely impacted.
In addition, if we fail to generate the necessary net income or
operating cash flows to meet the funding needs of our business
beyond the next twelve months due to a variety of factors,
including the cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry and
the other factors discussed in this Risk Factors
section, our liquidity would be adversely affected.
-39-
Our
Ability To Draw On Our Current Loan Facilities May Be Adversely
Affected by Conditions in the U.S. and International Capital
Markets.
If financial institutions that have extended credit commitments
to us are adversely affected by the conditions of the
U.S. and international capital and credit markets, they may
be unable to fund borrowings under their credit commitments to
us. For example, we currently have a $100.0 million
revolving credit facility with three banks in the U.S. If
any of these banks are adversely affected by capital and credit
market conditions and are unable to make loans to us when
requested, there could be a corresponding adverse impact on our
financial condition and our ability to borrow additional funds,
if needed, for working capital, capital expenditures,
acquisitions, research and development and other corporate
purposes.
Restrictive
Covenants in the Indentures and Agreements Governing Our Current
and Future Indebtedness Could Restrict Our Operating
Flexibility.
The indentures and agreements governing our existing debt, and
debt we may incur in the future, contain, or may contain,
affirmative and negative covenants that materially limit our
ability to take certain actions, including our ability to incur
debt, pay dividends and repurchase stock, make certain
investments and other payments, enter into certain mergers and
consolidations, engage in sale leaseback transactions and
encumber and dispose of assets. The $671.1 million
write-off of our goodwill at December 31, 2008
significantly reduced our ability to pay dividends and
repurchase stock and subordinated securities, including our
convertible notes, due to defined calculations which include net
income. In addition, our future debt agreements may contain
financial covenants and ratios.
The breach of any of these covenants by us or the failure by us
to meet any of these financial ratios or conditions could result
in a default under any or all of such indebtedness. If a default
occurs under any such indebtedness, all of the outstanding
obligations thereunder could become immediately due and payable,
which could result in a default under our other outstanding debt
and could lead to an acceleration of obligations related to
other outstanding debt. The existence of such a default or event
of default could also preclude us from borrowing funds under our
revolving credit facilities. Our ability to comply with the
provisions of the indentures, credit facilities and other
agreements governing our outstanding debt and indebtedness we
may incur in the future can be affected by events beyond our
control and a default under any debt instrument, if not cured or
waived, could have a material adverse effect on us.
We
Have Significant Severance Plan Obligations Associated With Our
Manufacturing Operations in Korea Which Could Reduce Our Cash
Flow and Negatively Impact Our Financial
Condition.
We sponsor an accrued severance plan for our Korean subsidiary,
under which we have an accrued liability of $74.0 million
as of June 30, 2010. Under the Korean plan, eligible
employees are entitled to receive a lump sum payment upon
termination of their service based on their length of service,
seniority and rate of pay at the time of termination. Since our
severance plan obligation is significant, in the event of a
significant layoff or other reduction in our labor force in
Korea, payments under the plan could have a material adverse
effect on our liquidity, financial condition and cash flows. In
addition, existing tax laws in Korea limit our ability to
currently deduct severance expenses associated with the current
plan. These limitations are designed to encourage companies to
migrate to a defined contribution or defined benefit plan. If we
adopt a new plan retrospectively, we would be required to
significantly fund the existing liability, which could have a
material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition
and cash flows. If we do not adopt a new plan, we will have to
pay higher taxes which could adversely affect our liquidity,
financial condition and cash flows. See Note 13 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly
Report.
If We
Fail to Maintain an Effective System of Internal Controls, We
May Not be Able to Accurately Report Financial Results or
Prevent Fraud.
Effective internal controls are necessary to provide reliable
financial reports and to assist in the effective prevention of
fraud. Any inability to provide reliable financial reports or
prevent fraud could harm our business. We must annually evaluate
our internal procedures to satisfy the requirements of
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
-40-
of 2002, which requires management and our independent
registered public accounting firm to assess the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting. If we fail to remedy
any deficiencies or maintain the adequacy of our internal
controls, as such standards are modified, supplemented or
amended from time to time, we could be subject to regulatory
scrutiny, civil or criminal penalties or shareholder litigation.
In addition, failure to maintain adequate internal controls
could result in financial statements that do not accurately
reflect our operating results or financial condition.
During the three months ended June 30, 2010, we implemented
several significant enterprise resource planning modules which
represent a change in our internal control over financial
reporting. Although management believes internal controls have
been maintained or enhanced by the enterprise resource planning
modules implemented, there is a risk that deficiencies exist
that could constitute significant deficiencies or in the
aggregate, a material weakness. We will complete our evaluation
and testing of the internal control changes as of
December 31, 2010.
We
Face Product Return and Liability Risks, the Risk of Economic
Damage Claims and the Risk of Negative Publicity if Our Packages
Fail.
Our packages are incorporated into a number of end products, and
our business is exposed to product return and liability risks,
the risk of economic damage claims and the risk of negative
publicity if our packages fail.
In addition, we are exposed to the product and economic
liability risks and the risk of negative publicity affecting our
customers. Our sales may decline if any of our customers are
sued on a product liability claim. We also may suffer a decline
in sales from the negative publicity associated with such a
lawsuit or with adverse public perceptions in general regarding
our customers products. Further, if our packages are
delivered with impurities or defects, we could incur additional
development, repair or replacement costs, suffer other economic
losses and our credibility and the markets acceptance of
our packages could be harmed.
Absence
of Backlog The Lack of Contractually Committed
Customer Demand May Adversely Affect Our Sales.
Our packaging and test business does not typically operate with
any material backlog. Our quarterly net sales from packaging and
test services are substantially dependent upon our
customers demand in that quarter. None of our customers
have committed to purchase any significant amount of packaging
or test services or to provide us with binding forecasts of
demand for packaging and test services for any future period, in
any material amount. In addition, our customers often reduce,
cancel or delay their purchases of packaging and test services
for a variety of reasons including industry-wide,
customer-specific and Amkor-related reasons. Since a large
portion of our costs is fixed and our expense levels are based
in part on our expectations of future revenues, we may not be
able to adjust costs in a timely manner to compensate for any
sales shortfall. If we are unable to do so, it would adversely
affect our margins, operating results, financial condition and
cash flows. If the decline in customer demand continues, our
business, liquidity, results of operations, financial condition
and cash flows will be materially and adversely affected.
Risks
Associated With International Operations We Depend
on Our Factories and Operations in China, Japan, Korea, the
Philippines, Singapore and Taiwan. Many of Our Customers
and Vendors Operations Are Also Located Outside of the
U.S.
We provide packaging and test services through our factories and
other operations located in China, Japan, Korea, the
Philippines, Singapore and Taiwan. Substantially all of our
property, plant and equipment is located outside of the United
States. Moreover, many of our customers and vendors
operations are located outside the U.S. The following are
some of the risks we face in doing business internationally:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in consumer demand resulting from deteriorating
conditions in local economies;
|
|
|
|
regulatory limitations imposed by foreign governments, including
limitations or taxes imposed on the payment of dividends and
other payments by
non-U.S. subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
|
-41-
|
|
|
|
|
political, military, civil unrest and terrorist risks,
particularly an increase in tensions between South Korea and
North Korea;
|
|
|
|
disruptions or delays in shipments caused by customs brokers or
government agencies;
|
|
|
|
changes in regulatory requirements, tariffs, customs, duties and
other restrictive trade barriers or policies;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing, retention and employee turnover and
managing foreign operations, including foreign labor
disruptions; and
|
|
|
|
potentially adverse tax consequences resulting from changes in
tax laws in the foreign jurisdictions in which we operate.
|
Changes
in the U.S. Tax Law Regarding Earnings Of Our Subsidiaries
Located Outside the U.S. Could Materially Affect Our Future
Results.
There have been proposals to change U.S. tax laws that
would significantly impact how U.S. corporations are taxed
on foreign earnings. We earn a substantial portion of our income
in foreign countries. Although we cannot predict whether or in
what form this proposed legislation will pass, if enacted it
could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity, results
of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Our
Management Information Systems May Prove Inadequate
We Face Risks in Connection With Our Current Project to Install
a New Enterprise Resource Planning System For Our
Business.
We depend on our management information systems for many aspects
of our business. Some of our key software has been developed by
our own programmers, and this software may not be easily
integrated with other software and systems. We are making a
significant investment to implement a new enterprise resource
planning system to replace many of our existing systems. We face
risks in connection with our current project to install a new
enterprise resource system for our business. These risks include:
|
|
|
|
|
we may face delays in the design and implementation of the
system;
|
|
|
|
the cost of the system may exceed our plans and
expectations; and
|
|
|
|
disruptions resulting from the implementation of the system may
impact our ability to process transactions and delay shipments
to customers, impact our results of operations or financial
condition, or harm our control environment.
|
Our business could be materially and adversely affected if our
management information systems are disrupted or if we are unable
to improve, upgrade, integrate or expand upon our systems,
particularly in light of our intention to continue to implement
a new enterprise resource planning system over a multi-year
program on a company-wide basis.
We
Face Risks Trying to Attract and Retain Qualified Employees to
Support Our Operations.
Our success depends to a significant extent upon the continued
service of our key senior management and technical personnel,
any of whom may be difficult to replace. Competition for
qualified employees is intense, and our business could be
adversely affected by the loss of the services of any of our
existing key personnel, including senior management, as a result
of competition or for any other reason. We evaluate our
management team and engage in long-term succession planning in
order to ensure orderly replacement of key personnel. We do not
have employment agreements with our key employees, including
senior management or other contracts that would prevent our key
employees from working for our competitors in the event they
cease working for us. We cannot assure you that we will be
successful in these efforts or in hiring and properly training
sufficient numbers of qualified personnel and in effectively
managing our growth. Our inability to attract, retain, motivate
and train qualified new personnel could have a material adverse
effect on our business.
-42-
Difficulties
Consolidating and Evolving Our Operational
Capabilities We Face Challenges as We Integrate
Diverse Operations.
We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience,
change in the scope and complexity of our operations primarily
through facility consolidations, strategic acquisitions, joint
ventures and other partnering arrangements and may continue to
engage in such transactions in the future. For example, each
business we have acquired had, at the time of acquisition,
multiple systems for managing its own production, sales,
inventory and other operations. Migrating these businesses to
our systems typically is a slow, expensive process requiring us
to divert significant amounts of resources from multiple aspects
of our operations. These changes have strained our managerial,
financial, plant operations and other resources. Future
consolidations and expansions may result in inefficiencies as we
integrate operations and manage geographically diverse
operations.
Dependence
on Materials and Equipment Suppliers Our Business
May Suffer If the Cost, Quality or Supply of Materials or
Equipment Changes Adversely.
We obtain from various vendors the materials and equipment
required for the packaging and test services performed by our
factories. We source most of our materials, including critical
materials such as leadframes, laminate substrates and gold wire,
from a limited group of suppliers. Furthermore, we purchase the
majority of our materials on a purchase order basis. From time
to time, we enter into supply agreements, generally up to one
year in duration, to guarantee supply to meet projected demand.
Our business may be harmed if we cannot obtain materials and
other supplies from our vendors in a timely manner, in
sufficient quantities, in acceptable quality or at competitive
prices.
We purchase new packaging and test equipment to maintain and
expand our operations. From time to time, increased demand for
new equipment may cause lead times to extend beyond those
normally required by equipment vendors. For example, in the
past, increased demand for equipment caused some equipment
suppliers to only partially satisfy our equipment orders in the
normal time frame or to increase prices during market upturns
for the semiconductor industry. The unavailability of equipment
or failures to deliver equipment could delay or impair our
ability to meet customer orders. If we are unable to meet
customer orders, we could lose potential and existing customers.
Generally, we do not enter into binding, long-term equipment
purchase agreements and we acquire our equipment on a purchase
order basis, which exposes us to substantial risks. For example,
changes in foreign currency exchange rates could result in
increased prices for equipment purchased by us, which could have
a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
We are a large buyer of gold and other commodity materials
including substrates and copper. The prices of gold and other
commodities used in our business fluctuate. Historically, we
have been able to partially offset the effect of commodity price
increases through price adjustments to some customers and
changes in our product designs, such as shorter, thinner, gold
wire and migration to copper wire. However, we typically do not
have long-term contracts that permit us to impose a price
adjustment, and market conditions may limit our ability to do
so. Significant price increases may adversely impact our gross
margin in future quarters to the extent we are unable to pass
along past or future commodity price increases to our customers.
Loss
of Customers The Loss of Certain Customers May Have
a Significant Adverse Effect on Our Operations and Financial
Results.
The loss of a large customer or disruption of our strategic
partnerships or other commercial arrangements may result in a
decline in our sales and profitability. Although we have
approximately 250 customers, we have derived and expect to
continue to derive a large portion of our revenues from a small
group of customers during any particular period due in part to
the concentration of market share in the semiconductor industry.
Our ten largest customers together accounted for approximately
53.8%, 53.4% and 49.8% of our net sales in the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and the years ended December 31, 2009,
and 2008, respectively. In addition, no customer accounted for
greater than 10% of our sales for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2008. A
single customer accounted for more than 10% of our sales during
the year ended December 31, 2009.
The demand for our services from each customer is directly
dependent upon that customers level of business activity,
which could vary significantly from year to year. The loss of a
large customer may adversely affect our
-43-
sales and profitability. Our key customers typically operate in
the cyclical semiconductor business and, in the past, order
levels have varied significantly from period to period based on
a number of factors. Our business is likely to remain subject to
this variability in order levels, and we cannot assure you that
these key customers or any other customers will continue to
place orders with us in the future at the same levels as in past
periods.
The loss of one or more of our significant customers, or reduced
orders by any one of them and our inability to replace these
customers or make up for such orders could reduce our
profitability. For example, our facility in Iwate, Japan, is
primarily dedicated to a single customer, Toshiba Corporation.
We have also invested in an unconsolidated affiliate, J-Devices
Corporation, for which Toshiba is the primary customer. If we
were to lose Toshiba as a customer or if it were to materially
reduce its business with us, it could be difficult for us to
find one or more new customers to utilize the capacity, which
could have a material adverse effect on our operations and
financial results. In addition, we have amended and extended a
long term supply agreement that now expires in December 2013
with International Business Machines, or IBM. If we were to lose
IBM as a customer, this could have a material adverse effect on
our business, liquidity, results of operations, financial
condition and cash flows.
Capital
Additions We Make Substantial Capital Additions To
Support the Demand Of Our Customers, Which May Adversely Affect
Our Business If the Demand Of Our Customers Does Not Develop As
We Expect or Is Adversely Affected.
We make significant capital additions in order to service the
demand of our customers. The amount of capital additions will
depend on several factors, including the performance of our
business, our assessment of future industry and customer demand,
our capacity utilization levels and availability, our liquidity
position and the availability of financing. Our ongoing capital
addition requirements may strain our cash and short-term asset
balances, and, in periods when we are expanding our capital
base, we expect that depreciation expense and factory operating
expenses associated with our capital additions to increase
production capacity will put downward pressure on our gross
margin, at least over the near term.
Furthermore, if we cannot generate or raise additional funds to
pay for capital additions, particularly in some of the advanced
packaging and bumping areas, as well as research and development
activities, our growth prospects and future profitability may be
adversely affected. Our ability to obtain external financing in
the future is subject to a variety of uncertainties, including:
|
|
|
|
|
our future financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows;
|
|
|
|
general market conditions for financing activities by
semiconductor companies;
|
|
|
|
volatility in fixed income, credit and equity markets; and
|
|
|
|
economic, political and other global conditions.
|
The lead time needed to order, install and put into service
various capital additions is often significant, and, as a
result, we often need to commit to capital additions in advance
of our receipt of firm orders or advance deposits based on our
view of anticipated future demand with only very limited
visibility. Although we seek to limit our exposure in this
regard, in the past we have from time to time expended
significant capital for additions for which the anticipated
demand did not materialize for a variety of reasons, many of
which were outside of our control. To the extent this occurs in
the future, our business, liquidity, results of operations,
financial condition and cash flows could be materially and
adversely affected.
In addition, during periods where customer demand exceeds our
capacity, customers may transfer some or all of their business
to other suppliers who are able to support their needs. To the
extent this occurs, our business, liquidity, results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows could be
materially and adversely affected.
Impairment
Charges Any Impairment Charges Required Under U.S.
GAAP May Have a Material Adverse Effect on Our Net
Income.
Under U.S. GAAP, we review our long-lived assets including
property, plant and equipment, intellectual property, and other
intangibles for impairment when events or changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be
recoverable. Factors we consider include significant
under-performance relative to expected historical
-44-
or projected future operating results, significant negative
industry or economic trends and our market capitalization
relative to net book value. We may be required in the future to
record a significant charge to earnings in our financial
statements during the period in which any impairment of our
long-lived assets is determined. Such charges have had and could
have a significant adverse impact on our results of operations
and our operating flexibility under our debt covenants.
Litigation
Incident to Our Business Could Adversely Affect
Us.
We have been a party to various legal proceedings, including
those described in Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements included in this Quarterly Report, and may be a party
to litigation in the future. If an unfavorable ruling or outcome
were to occur in this or future litigation, there could be a
material adverse impact on our business, liquidity, results of
operations, financial condition, cash flows and the trading
price of our securities.
We
Could Suffer Adverse Tax and Other Financial Consequences if
Taxing Authorities Do Not Agree with Our Interpretation of
Applicable Tax Laws.
Our corporate structure and operations are based, in part, on
interpretations of various tax laws, including withholding tax,
compliance with tax holiday requirements, application of changes
in tax law to our operations and other relevant laws of
applicable taxing jurisdictions. From time to time, the taxing
authorities of the relevant jurisdictions may conduct
examinations of our income tax returns and other regulatory
filings. We cannot assure you that the taxing authorities will
agree with our interpretations. To the extent they do not agree,
we may seek to enter into settlements with the taxing
authorities which require significant payments or otherwise
adversely affect our results of operations or financial
condition. We may also appeal the taxing authorities
determinations to the appropriate governmental authorities, but
we cannot be sure we will prevail. If we do not prevail, we may
have to make significant payments or otherwise record charges
(or reduce tax assets) that adversely affect our results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Intellectual
Property Our Business Will Suffer if We Are Not Able
to Develop New Proprietary Technology, Protect Our Proprietary
Technology and Operate Without Infringing the Proprietary Rights
of Others.
The complexity and breadth of semiconductor packaging and test
services are rapidly increasing. As a result, we expect that we
will need to develop, acquire and implement new manufacturing
processes and package design technologies and tools in order to
respond to competitive industry conditions and customer
requirements. Technological advances also typically lead to
rapid and significant price erosion and may make our existing
packages less competitive or our existing inventories obsolete.
If we cannot achieve advances in package design or obtain access
to advanced package designs developed by others, our business
could suffer.
The need to develop and maintain advanced packaging capabilities
and equipment could require significant research and development
and capital expenditures and acquisitions in future years. In
addition, converting to new package designs or process
methodologies could result in delays in producing new package
types, which could adversely affect our ability to meet customer
orders and adversely impact our business.
We maintain an active program to protect and derive value from
our investment in technology and the associated intellectual
property rights. Intellectual property rights that apply to our
various packages and services include patents, copyrights, trade
secrets and trademarks. We have filed for and have obtained a
number of patents in the U.S. and abroad the duration of
which varies depending on the jurisdiction in which the patent
was filed. While our patents are an important element of our
intellectual property strategy, as a whole, we are not
materially dependent on any one patent or any one technology.
The process of seeking patent protection takes a long time and
is expensive. There can be no assurance that patents will issue
from pending or future applications or that, if patents are
issued, the rights granted under the patents will provide us
with meaningful protection or any commercial advantage. Any
patents we do obtain may be challenged, invalidated or
circumvented and may not provide meaningful protection or other
commercial advantage to us.
Some of our technologies are not covered by any patent or patent
application. The confidentiality agreements on which we rely to
protect these technologies may be breached and may not be
adequate to protect our proprietary
-45-
technologies. There can be no assurance that other countries in
which we market our services will protect our intellectual
property rights to the same extent as the U.S.
Our competitors may develop, patent or gain access to know-how
and technology similar to our own. In addition, many of our
patents are subject to cross licenses, several of which are with
our competitors.
The semiconductor industry is characterized by frequent claims
regarding patent and other intellectual property rights. If any
third party makes an enforceable infringement claim against us
or our customers, we could be required to:
|
|
|
|
|
discontinue the use of certain processes;
|
|
|
|
cease to provide the services at issue;
|
|
|
|
pay substantial damages;
|
|
|
|
develop non-infringing technologies; or
|
|
|
|
acquire licenses to the technology we had allegedly infringed.
|
We may need to enforce our patents or other intellectual
property rights, including our rights under patent and
intellectual property licenses with third parties, or defend
ourselves against claimed infringement of the rights of others
through litigation, which could result in substantial cost and
diversion of our resources. Furthermore, if we fail to obtain
necessary licenses, our business could suffer. We have been
involved in legal proceedings involving the acquisition and
license of intellectual property rights, the enforcement of our
existing intellectual property rights or the enforcement of the
intellectual property rights of others, including the
arbitration proceeding filed against Tessera, Inc. and complaint
filed and ongoing proceeding against Carsem (M) Sdn Bhd,
Carsem Semiconductor Sdn Bhd, and Carsem Inc., or collectively
Carsem, both of which are described in more detail
in Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Unfavorable outcomes in any litigation matters involving
intellectual property could result in significant liabilities
and could have a material adverse effect on our business,
liquidity, results of operations, financial condition and cash
flows. The potential impact from the legal proceedings referred
to in this Quarterly Report on our results of operations,
financial condition and cash flows could change in the future.
Packaging
and Test Packaging and Test Processes Are Complex
and Our Production Yields and Customer Relationships May Suffer
from Defects in the Services We Provide.
Semiconductor packaging and test services are complex processes
that require significant technological and process expertise.
The packaging process is complex and involves a number of
precise steps. Defective packages primarily result from:
|
|
|
|
|
contaminants in the manufacturing environment;
|
|
|
|
human error;
|
|
|
|
equipment malfunction;
|
|
|
|
changing processes to address environmental requirements;
|
|
|
|
defective raw materials; or
|
|
|
|
defective plating services.
|
Testing is also complex and involves sophisticated equipment and
software. Similar to most software programs, these software
programs are complex and may contain programming errors or
bugs. The testing equipment is also subject to
malfunction. In addition, the testing process is subject to
operator error.
These and other factors have, from time to time, contributed to
lower production yields. They may also do so in the future,
particularly as we adjust our capacity or change our processing
steps. In addition, we must continue to expand our offering of
packages to be competitive. Our production yields on new
packages typically are significantly lower than our production
yields on our more established packages.
-46-
Our failure to maintain high standards or acceptable production
yields, if significant and prolonged, could result in loss of
customers, increased costs of production, delays, substantial
amounts of returned goods and claims by customers relating
thereto. Any of these problems could have a material adverse
effect on our business, liquidity, results of operations,
financial condition and cash flows.
In addition, in line with industry practice, new customers
usually require us to pass a lengthy and rigorous qualification
process that may take several months. If we fail to qualify
packages with potential customers or customers, our business,
results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could
be adversely affected.
Competition
We Compete Against Established Competitors in the Packaging and
Test Business as Well as Internal Customer
Capabilities.
The subcontracted semiconductor packaging and test market is
very competitive. We face substantial competition from
established packaging and test service providers primarily
located in Asia, including companies with significant processing
capacity, financial resources, research and development
operations, marketing and other capabilities. These companies
also have established relationships with many large
semiconductor companies that are our current or potential
customers. We also face competition from the internal
capabilities and capacity of many of our current and potential
IDM customers. In addition, we may in the future have to compete
with companies (including semiconductor foundries) that may
enter the market or offer new or emerging technologies that
compete with our packages and services.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete
successfully in the future against our existing or potential
competitors or that our customers will not rely on internal
sources for packaging and test services, or that our business,
liquidity, results of operations, financial condition and cash
flows will not be adversely affected by such increased
competition.
Environmental
Regulations Future Environmental Regulations Could
Place Additional Burdens on Our Manufacturing
Operations.
The semiconductor packaging process uses chemicals, materials
and gases and generates byproducts that are subject to extensive
governmental regulations. For example, at our foreign facilities
we produce liquid waste when semiconductor wafers are diced into
chips with the aid of diamond saws, then cooled with running
water. In addition, semiconductor packages have historically
utilized metallic alloys containing lead (Pb) within the
interconnect terminals typically referred to as leads, pins or
balls. Federal, state and local laws and regulations in the
U.S., as well as environmental laws and regulations in foreign
jurisdictions, impose various controls on the storage, handling,
discharge and disposal of chemicals used in our production
processes and on the factories we occupy and are increasingly
imposing restrictions on the materials contained in
semiconductor products. We may become liable under environmental
laws for the cost of clean up of any disposal or release of
hazardous materials arising out of our former or current
operations, or otherwise as a result of the existence of
hazardous materials on our properties. In such an event, we
could be held liable for damages, including fines, penalties and
the cost of investigations and remedial actions, and could also
be subject to revocation of permits negatively affecting our
operations.
Public attention has focused on the environmental impact of
semiconductor operations and the risk to neighbors of chemical
releases from such operations and to the materials contained in
semiconductor products. For example, the European Unions
Restriction of Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical
and Electronic Equipment Directive imposes strict restrictions
on the use of lead and other hazardous substances in electrical
and electronic equipment. In response to this directive, and
similar laws and developing legislation in countries like China,
Japan and Korea, we have implemented changes in a number of our
manufacturing processes in an effort to achieve compliance
across all of our package types. Complying with existing and
possible future environmental laws and regulations, including
laws and regulations relating to climate change, may impose upon
us the need for additional capital equipment or other process
requirements, restrict our ability to expand our operations,
disrupt our operations, increase costs, subject us to liability
or cause us to curtail our operations.
-47-
Fire,
Flood or Other Calamity With Our Operations
Conducted in a Limited Number of Facilities, a Fire, Flood or
Other Calamity at one of Our Facilities Could Adversely Affect
Us.
We conduct our packaging and test operations at a limited number
of facilities. Significant damage or other impediments to any of
these facilities, whether as a result of fire, weather, the
outbreak of infectious diseases (such as SARs or flu), civil
strife, industrial strikes, breakdowns of equipment,
difficulties or delays in obtaining materials and equipment,
natural disasters, terrorist incidents, industrial accidents or
other causes could temporarily disrupt or even shut down our
operations, which would have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations. In the
event of such a disruption or shutdown, we may be unable to
reallocate production to other facilities in a timely or
cost-effective manner (if at all) and may not have sufficient
capacity to service customer demands in our other facilities.
For example, our operations in Asia are vulnerable to regional
typhoons that can bring with them destructive winds and
torrential rains, which could in turn cause plant closures and
transportation interruptions. In addition, some of the processes
that we utilize in our operations place us at risk of fire and
other damage. For example, highly flammable gases are used in
the preparation of wafers holding semiconductor devices for flip
chip packaging. While we maintain insurance policies for various
types of property, casualty and other risks, we do not carry
insurance for all the above referred risks and with regard to
the insurance we do maintain, we cannot assure you that it would
be sufficient to cover all of our potential losses.
Continued
Control By Existing Stockholders Mr. James J.
Kim and Members of His Family Can Substantially Control The
Outcome of All Matters Requiring Stockholder
Approval.
As of June 30, 2010, Mr. James J. Kim, our Executive
Chairman of the Board of Directors, members of
Mr. Kims immediate family and affiliates beneficially
owned approximately 56% of our outstanding common stock. This
percentage includes beneficial ownership of the securities
underlying $100 million of our 6.25% Convertible
Subordinated Notes due 2013 and $150 million of our
6.0% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014.
Subject to certain requirements imposed by voting agreements
that the Kim family vote in a neutral manner any shares issued
upon conversion of their convertible notes, Mr. James J.
Kim and his family and affiliates, acting together, have the
ability to effectively determine matters (other than interested
party transactions) submitted for approval by our stockholders
by voting their shares, including the election of all of the
members of our Board of Directors. There is also the potential,
through the election of members of our Board of Directors, that
Mr. Kims family could substantially influence matters
decided upon by the Board of Directors. This concentration of
ownership may also have the effect of impeding a merger,
consolidation, takeover or other business consolidation
involving us, or discouraging a potential acquirer from making a
tender offer for our shares, and could also negatively affect
our stocks market price or decrease any premium over
market price that an acquirer might otherwise pay.
The exhibits required by Item 601 of
Regulation S-K
which are filed with this report are set forth in the
Exhibit Index.
-48-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Joanne Solomon
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Duly Authorized
Officer)
Date: August 5, 2010
-49-
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Indenture, dated May 4, 2010, by and between Amkor
Technology, Inc. and U.S. National Bank Association as Trustee,
relating to the 7.375% Senior Notes due 2018. (1)
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated May 4, 2010, by and
among Amkor Technology, Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. (1)
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Credit Facility Agreement, dated May 24, 2010, between
Woori Bank and Amkor Technology Korea, Inc. (2)
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Additional Agreement, dated May 24, 2010, between Woori
Bank and Amkor Technology Korea, Inc. (2)
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
General Terms and Conditions for Bank Credit Transactions, dated
May 24, 2010, between Woori Bank and Amkor Technology
Korea, Inc. (2)
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Amendment to Kun-mortgage Agreement, dated May 24, 2010, by
and between Amkor Technology Korea, Inc. and Woori Bank. (2)
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Kun-Guarantee, dated May 24, 2010, by and between Amkor
Technology, Inc. and Woori Bank. (2)
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Kenneth T. Joyce, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Amkor Technology, Inc., pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Joanne Solomon, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Amkor Technology, Inc., pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
101
|
.INS*
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
101
|
.SCH*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
|
101
|
.CAL*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
101
|
.LAB*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
101
|
.PRE*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed May 5, 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed May 27, 2010. |
|
* |
|
This information is furnished and not filed or a part of a
registration statement or prospectus for purposes of
sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed
not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability
under these sections. |
-50-