As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 2, 2008

Registration No. 333- 143819

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form N-2

 

 

PROSPECT CAPITAL CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

10 East 40th Street, 44th Floor

New York, NY 10016

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code:

(212) 448-0702

 

John F. Barry III

M. Grier Eliasek

c/o Prospect Capital Management LLC

10 East 40th Street, 44th Floor

New York, NY 10016

(212) 448-0702

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

Copies of information to:

 

Leonard B. Mackey, Jr., Esq.

Andrew S. Epstein, Esq.

Clifford Chance US LLP

31 West 52nd Street

New York, NY 10019-6131

(212) 878-8000

 

 

Approximate date of proposed public offering:  As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement.

 

If any securities being registered on this form will be offered on a delayed or continuous basis in reliance on Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, other than securities offered in connection with a distribution reinvestment plan, check the following box  þ.

 

It is proposed that this filing will become effective (check appropriate box):

 

 

If appropriate, check the following box:

 

 

 

 

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS DATED JULY 2, 2008

 

Prospectus dated          , 2008

 

$500,000,000

 

 

PROSPECT CAPITAL CORPORATION

 

Common Stock

Preferred Stock

Warrants

Debt Securities

 

We may offer, from time to time, in one or more offerings or series, together or separately, up to $500,000,000 of our common stock, preferred stock, debt securities or warrants representing rights to purchase shares of common stock, preferred stock or debt securities, collectively, the Securities, to provide us with funds to repay outstanding debt and to acquire investments that we reasonably believe are in our acquisition pipeline. Securities may be offered at prices and on terms to be disclosed in one or more supplements to this prospectus. You should read this prospectus and the applicable prospectus supplement carefully before you invest in our Securities.

 

Our Securities may be offered directly to one or more purchasers, or through agents designated from time to time by us, or to or through underwriters or dealers. The prospectus supplement relating to the offering will identify any agents or underwriters involved in the sale of our Securities, and will disclose any applicable purchase price, fee, commission or discount arrangement between us and our agents or underwriters or among our underwriters or the basis upon which such amount may be calculated. See “Plan of Distribution.” We may not sell any of our Securities through agents, underwriters or dealers without delivery of the prospectus and a prospectus supplement describing the method and terms of the offering of such Securities. Our common stock is traded on The NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “PSEC.” As of June 30, 2008, the last reported sales price for our common stock was $13.18.

 

Prospect Capital Corporation, or the Company, is a company that lends to and invests in middle market privately held or thinly traded public companies.

 

Prospect Capital Corporation, a Maryland corporation, has been organized as a closed-end investment company since April 13, 2004 and has filed an election to be treated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the 1940 Act, and is a non-diversified investment company within the meaning of the 1940 Act.

 

Prospect Capital Management LLC, our investment adviser, manages our investments and Prospect Administration LLC, our Administrator, provides the administrative services necessary for us to operate.

 

Investing in our Securities involves a heightened risk of total loss of investment and is subject to risks. Before buying any Securities, you should read the discussion of the material risks of investing in our Securities in “Risk Factors” beginning on page 11 of this prospectus.

 

This prospectus contains important information about us that you should know before investing in our Securities. Please read it before making an investment decision and keep it for future reference. We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information about us with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. This information will be available free of charge by writing to Prospect Capital Corporation at 10 East 40^th Street, 44th Floor, New York, NY 10016, or by calling collect at 212-448-0702. Our Internet address is http://www.prospectstreet.com. You may also obtain information about us from the SEC’s website (http://www.sec.gov).

 

Neither the SEC nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 

This prospectus may not be used to consummate sales of securities unless accompanied by a prospectus supplement.

 

Table of Contents

 

 

This prospectus is part of a registration statement that we have filed with the SEC, using the “shelf” registration process. Under the shelf registration process, we may offer, from time to time on a delayed basis, up to $500,000,000 of our common stock, preferred stock, debt securities or warrants representing rights to purchase shares of our common stock, preferred stock or debt securities on the terms to be determined at the time of the offering. The Securities may be offered at prices and on terms described in one or more supplements to this prospectus. This prospectus provides you with a general description of the Securities that we may offer. Each time we use this prospectus to offer Securities, we will provide a prospectus supplement that will contain specific information about the terms of that offering. The prospectus supplement may also add, update or change information contained in this prospectus. Please carefully read this prospectus and any prospectus supplement together with any exhibits and the additional information described under the heading “Available Information” and the section under the heading “Risk Factors” before you make an investment decision.

 

The following summary contains basic information about this offering. It does not contain all the information that may be important to an investor. For a more complete understanding of this offering, we encourage you to read this entire document and the documents to which we have referred.

 

Information contained or incorporated by reference in this prospectus may contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which are statements about the future that may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “plans,” “anticipate,” “estimate” or “continue” or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements do not meet the safe harbor for forward-looking statements pursuant to Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act. The matters described in “Risk Factors” and certain other factors noted throughout this prospectus and in any exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, constitute cautionary statements identifying important factors with respect to any such forward-looking statements, including certain risks and uncertainties, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in such forward-looking statements. The Company reminds all investors that no forward-looking statement can be relied upon as an accurate or even mostly accurate forecast because humans cannot forecast the future.

 

The terms “we,” “us,” “our,” and “Company” refer to Prospect Capital Corporation; “Prospect Capital Management” refers to Prospect Capital Management LLC; “Prospect Administration” or the “Administrator” refers to Prospect Administration LLC; and “Prospect” refers to Prospect Capital Management LLC, its affiliates and its predecessor companies.

 

The Company

 

We are a financial services company that lends to and invests in middle market privately held or thinly traded public companies.

 

We were originally organized under the name “Prospect Street Energy Corporation” and we changed our name to “Prospect Energy Corporation” in June 2004. We changed our name again to “Prospect Capital Corporation” in May 2007 and at the same time terminated our policy of investing at least 80% of our net assets in energy companies. While we expect to be less focused on the energy industry in the future, we will continue to have significant holdings in the energy and energy related industries. We have been organized as a closed-end investment company since April 13, 2004 and have filed an election to be treated as a business development company under the 1940 Act, and we are a non-diversified company within the meaning of the 1940 Act. Our headquarters are located at 10 East 40^th Street, 44^th Floor, New York, NY 10016, and our telephone number is (212) 448-0702.

 

The Investment Adviser

 

Prospect Capital Management, an affiliate of the Company, manages our investment activities. Prospect Capital Management is an investment adviser that has been registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, or the Advisers Act, since March 31, 2004. Under an investment advisory agreement between us and Prospect Capital Management, or the Investment Advisory Agreement, we have agreed to pay Prospect Capital Management investment advisory fees, which will consist of an annual base management fee based on our gross assets (which include any amount borrowed, i.e. total assets without deduction for any liabilities) as well as a two-part incentive fee based on our performance.

 

The Offering

 

We may offer, from time to time, in one or more offerings or series, together or separately, up to $500,000,000 of our Securities to provide us with funds to repay outstanding debt and to acquire investments that we reasonably believe are in our acquisition pipeline.

 

Our Securities may be offered directly to one or more purchasers, to new stockholders, via an optional cash purchase, in which such purchaser can purchase Securities directly from us for cash, or designated offeree

program, in which certain designated individuals who may or may not be new stockholders can purchase Securities directly from us for cash, or through agents designated from time to time by us, or to or through underwriters or dealers. The prospectus supplement relating to the offering will disclose the terms of the offering, including the name or names of any agents or underwriters involved in the sale of our Securities by us, the purchase price, and any fee, commission or discount arrangement between us and our agents or underwriters or among our underwriters, or the basis upon which such amount may be calculated. See “Plan of Distribution.” We may not sell any of our Securities through agents, underwriters or dealers without delivery of a prospectus supplement describing the method and terms of the offering of our Securities.

 

Set forth below is additional information regarding the offering of our Securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recent Developments

 

On April 3, 2008 we provided approximately $39.8 million of first and second lien debt and equity for the recapitalization of Ajax Rolled Ring & Machine, or Ajax, a custom forger of seamless rolled steel rings located in York, South Carolina. Our debt is secured by a first lien on inventory, machinery, and certain other assets of Ajax. The equity interest purchased in Ajax is controlling in nature and was made alongside equity co-investments by Ajax’s senior managers.

 

On April 30, 2008, we provided debt financing of $20 million to support the acquisition by Peerless Mfg Co., or Peerless, headquartered in Dallas, Texas, of Nitram Energy Inc., or Nitram. Peerless is a leading designer, manufacturer, and marketer of industrial environmental separation and filtration systems while Nitram focuses on separation, heat transfer, pulsation dampening, and industrial silencing products. Peerless and Nitram serve a diversified, global list of customers in industries such as oil and gas production, gas pipelines, chemical and petrochemical processing, and power generation.

 

On April 30, 2008 we fully exited out of our investment in Arctic Acquisition Corp., doing business as Cougar Pressure Control, or Arctic, through the sale of our equity interest in Arctic for approximately $3.4 million. We initially invested $9.25 million in Arctic in July 2005 in the form of a senior secured loan, which loan was subsequently increased by $6.0 million. We received the equity interest in Arctic as additional consideration for making the secured loan. The loan was fully repaid in August 2007.

 

On June 2, 2008, we closed a public offering of 3.25 million shares of our common stock. The net proceeds to us were approximately $45.7 million after deducting estimated offering expenses.

 

On June 9, 2008, Deep Down, Inc. or Deep Down, one of our portfolio companies, fully repaid the $12.0 million loan we made to Deep Down in August 2007 and December 2007. We currently own a warrant to purchase approximately 5.0 million shares of Deep Down common stock at an exercise price of $0.507 per share.

 

Fees and Expenses

 

The following tables are intended to assist you in understanding the costs and expenses that an investor in this offering will bear directly or indirectly. We caution you that some of the percentages indicated in the table below are estimates and may vary. In these tables, we assume that we have borrowed $200 million under our credit

facility, which is the maximum amount available under the credit facility. Except where the context suggests otherwise, whenever this prospectus contains a reference to fees or expenses paid by “you” or “us” or that “we” will pay fees or expenses, the Company will pay such fees and expenses out of our net assets and, consequently, you will indirectly bear such fees or expenses as an investor in the Company. However, you will not be required to deliver any money or otherwise bear personal liability or responsibility for such fees or expenses.

 

 

 

     Example

 

The following table demonstrates the projected dollar amount of cumulative expenses we would pay out of net assets and that you would indirectly bear over various periods with respect to a hypothetical investment in our common stock. In calculating the following expense amounts, we have assumed we would have borrowed all $200 million available under our line of credit, that our annual operating expenses would remain at the levels set forth in the table above and that we would pay the stockholder costs shown in the table above.

 

 

 

 

 

Examples of how the incentive fee is calculated are as follows:

 

Assuming pre-incentive fee net investment income of 0.55%, there would be no income incentive fee because such income would not exceed the hurdle rate of 1.75%.

 

Assuming pre-incentive fee net investment income of 2%, the income incentive fee would be as follows:

 

= 100% × (2%−1.75%)

 

= 0.25%

 

Assuming pre-incentive fee net investment income of 2.30%, the income incentive fee would be as follows:

 

= (100% × (“catch-up”: 2.1875%−1.75%)) + (20% × (2.30%−2.1875%))

 

= (100% × 0.4375%) + (20% × 0.1125%) = 0.4375% + 0.0225% = 0.46%

 

Assuming net realized capital gains of 6% and realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation of 1%, the capital gains incentive fee would be as follows:

 

= 20% × (6%−1%)

 

= 20% × 5% = 1%

The following is a calculation of the most recently paid incentive fee of $3,229,805 in March 2008 (for the quarter ended March 31, 2008):

 

Prior Quarter Net Asset Value		$	345,823,823
Quarterly Hurdle Rate			1.75	%
Current Quarter Hurdle		$	6,051,917
125% of the Quarterly Hurdle Rate			2.1875	%
125% of the Current Quarter Hurdle		$	7,564,896
Current Quarter Pre Incentive Fee Net Investment Income		$	16,149,024
Incentive Fee — “Catch-Up”		$	1,512,979
Incentive Fee — 20% in excess of 125% of the Current Quarter Hurdle		$	1,716,826
Total Current Quarter Incentive Fee		$	3,229,805

 

For a more detailed discussion of the calculation of the two-part incentive fee, see “Management — Management Services — Investment Advisory Agreement.”

 

 

Base management fee			2.09	%
Incentive fees payable under Investment Advisory Agreement (20% of realized capital gains and 20% of pre-incentive fee net investment income)			3.48	%
Interest payments on borrowed funds			None
Other expenses			2.20	%
Total annual expenses (estimated)			7.77	%

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

You should read the condensed financial information below with the Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in this prospectus. Financial information for the twelve months ended June 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005 has been derived from the audited financial statements for that period. Quarterly financial information is derived from unaudited financial data, but in the opinion of management, reflects all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that are necessary to present fairly the results of such interim periods. Interim results for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending June 30, 2008. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” on page 24 for more information.

 

 

 

 

The following is a schedule of financial highlights for the periods indicated below:

 

 

 

 

Investing in our Securities involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below, together with all of the other information included in this prospectus, before you decide whether to make an investment in our Securities. The risks set forth below are not the only risks we face. If any of the adverse events or conditions described below occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In such case, our NAV, and the trading price of our common stock could decline, or the value of our preferred stock, debt securities or warrants may decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

 

Risks Relating To Our Business And Structure

 

A failure on our part to maintain our status as a business development company would significantly reduce our operating flexibility.

 

If we do not continue to qualify as a business development company, we might be regulated as a registered closed-end investment company under the 1940 Act, which would which make us subject to additional regulatory requirements, which may significantly decrease our operating flexibility by limiting our ability to employ leverage.

 

We are dependent upon Prospect Capital Management’s key management personnel for our future success.

 

We depend on the diligence, skill and network of business contacts of the senior management of Prospect Capital Management. We also depend, to a significant extent, on Prospect Capital Management’s access to the investment professionals and the information and deal flow generated by these investment professionals in the course of their investment and portfolio management activities. The senior management team of Prospect Capital Management evaluates, negotiates, structures, closes, monitors and services our investments. For a description of the senior management team, see “Management.” Our success depends to a significant extent on the continued service of the senior management team, particularly John F. Barry III and M. Grier Eliasek. The departure of any of the senior management team could have a material adverse effect on our ability to achieve our investment objective. In addition, we can offer no assurance that Prospect Capital Management will remain our investment adviser or that we will continue to have access to its investment professionals or its information and deal flow.

 

Prospect Capital Management and its senior management team have limited experience managing a business development company under the 1940 Act.

 

The 1940 Act imposes numerous constraints on the operations of business development companies. For example, business development companies are required to invest at least 70% of their total assets primarily in securities of privately held or thinly traded U.S. public companies, cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and other high quality debt investments that mature in one year or less. Prospect Capital Management and its senior management team’s limited experience in managing a portfolio of assets under such constraints may hinder their ability to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities and, as a result, achieve our investment objective. In addition, our investment strategies differ in some ways from those of other investment funds that have been managed in the past by the investment professionals.

 

We are a relatively new company with limited operating history.

 

We were incorporated in April 2004 and have conducted investment operations since July 2004. We are subject to all of the business risks and uncertainties associated with any new business enterprise, including the risk that we may not achieve our investment objective and that the value of your investment in us could decline substantially or fall to zero. We completed our initial public offering on July 27, 2004. As of March 31, 2008, we continue to pursue our investment strategy and 94% of our portfolio is invested in long-term investments, with the remainder invested in U.S. government and money market securities. As we continue to make new investments, future dividend levels will be dependent on our ability to make such investments and

our ability to finance such investments. If we do not realize yields in excess of our expenses, we may incur operating losses and the market price of our shares may decline.

 

Our financial condition and results of operations will depend on our ability to manage our future growth effectively.

 

Prospect Capital Management has been registered as an investment adviser since March 31, 2004, and the Company has been organized as a closed-end investment company since April 13, 2004. As such, each entity is subject to the business risks and uncertainties associated with any young business enterprise, including the limited experience in managing or operating a business development company under the 1940 Act. Our ability to achieve our investment objective depends on our ability to grow, which depends, in turn, on Prospect Capital Management’s ability to continue to identify, analyze, invest in and monitor companies that meet our investment criteria. Accomplishing this result on a cost-effective basis is largely a function of Prospect Capital Management’s structuring of investments, its ability to provide competent, attentive and efficient services to us and our access to financing on acceptable terms. As we grow, we and Prospect Capital Management need to continue to hire, train, supervise and manage new employees. Failure to manage our future growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

We operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities.

 

A large number of entities compete with us to make the types of investments that we make in target companies. We compete with other business development companies, public and private funds, commercial and investment banks and commercial financing companies. Additionally, because competition for investment opportunities generally has increased among alternative investment vehicles, such as hedge funds, those entities have begun to invest in areas they have not traditionally invested in, including investments in middle-market companies. As a result of these new entrants, competition for investment opportunities at middle-market companies has intensified and we expect that trend to continue.

 

Many of our existing and potential competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. For example, some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more relationships than us. Furthermore, many of our competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act imposes on us as a business development company. We cannot assure you that the competitive pressures we face will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, as a result of existing and increasing competition, we may not be able to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities from time to time, and we can offer no assurance that we will be able to identify and make investments that are consistent with our investment objective.

 

We do not seek to compete primarily based on the interest rates that we offer, and we believe that some of our competitors make loans with interest rates that are comparable to or lower than the rates we offer. We may lose investment opportunities if we do not match our competitors’ pricing, terms and structure. If we match our competitors’ pricing, terms and structure, we may experience decreased net interest income and increased risk of credit loss.

 

Regulations governing our operation as a business development company affect our ability to raise, and the way in which we raise, additional capital.

 

We may issue debt securities or preferred stock and/or borrow money from banks or other financial institutions, which we refer to collectively as “senior securities,” up to the maximum amount permitted by the 1940 Act. Under the provisions of the 1940 Act, we are permitted, as a business development company, to issue senior securities only in amounts such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% after each issuance of senior securities. If the value of our assets declines, we may be unable to satisfy this test. If that happens, we may be required to sell a portion of our investments or sell additional shares of

common stock and, depending on the nature of our leverage, to repay a portion of our indebtedness at a time when such sales may be disadvantageous. In addition, issuance of additional securities could dilute the percentage ownership of our current stockholders in us.

 

As a business development company regulated under provisions of the 1940 Act, we are not generally able to issue and sell our common stock at a price below the current NAV per share. We may, however, sell our common stock, or warrants, options or rights to acquire our common stock, at a price below the current NAV of our common stock in a rights offering to our stockholders or if (1) our Board of Directors determines that such sale is in our and our stockholders’ best interests, (2) our stockholders approve the sale of our common stock at a price that is less than the current NAV, and (3) the price at which our common stock is to be issued and sold may not be less than a price which, in the determination of our Board of Directors, closely approximates the market value of these securities (less any sales load).

 

In addition, we may securitize our loans to generate cash for funding new investments. To securitize loans, we may create a wholly owned subsidiary and contribute a pool of loans to such subsidiary. This could include the sale of interests in the loans by the subsidiary on a nonrecourse basis to purchasers who we would expect to be willing to accept a lower interest rate to invest in investment grade loan pools. We would retain a portion of the equity in the securitized pool of loans. An inability to successfully securitize our loan portfolio could limit our ability to grow our business and fully execute our business strategy, and could decrease our earnings, if any. Moreover, the successful securitization of our loan portfolio exposes us to a risk of loss for the equity we retain in the securitized pool of loans and might expose us to losses because the residual loans in which we do not sell interests may tend to be those that are riskier and more likely to generate losses. A successful securitization may also impose financial and operating covenants that restrict our business activities and may include limitations that could hinder our ability to finance additional loans and investments or to make the distributions required to maintain our status as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. The 1940 Act may also impose restrictions on the structure of any securitizations.

 

If we fail to qualify as a RIC, we will have to pay corporate-level taxes on our income, and our income available for distribution would be reduced.

 

To maintain our qualification for federal income tax purposes as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and obtain RIC tax treatment, we must meet certain source-of-income, asset diversification and annual distribution requirements. The annual distribution requirement for a RIC is satisfied if we distribute at least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, to our stockholders on an annual basis. Because we expect to use debt financing in the future, we are subject to certain asset coverage ratio requirements under the 1940 Act and financial covenants that could, under certain circumstances, restrict us from making distributions necessary to qualify for RIC tax treatment. If we are unable to obtain cash from other sources, we may fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment and, thus, may be subject to corporate-level income tax. To maintain our qualification as a RIC, we must also meet certain asset diversification requirements at the end of each calendar quarter. Failure to meet these tests may result in our having to dispose of certain investments quickly in order to prevent the loss of RIC status. Because most of our investments are in private companies, any such dispositions could be made at disadvantageous prices and may result in substantial losses. If we fail to qualify as a RIC for any reason or become subject to corporate income tax, the resulting corporate taxes could substantially reduce our net assets, the amount of income available for distribution, and the actual amount of our distributions. Such a failure would have a material adverse effect on us and our shares. For additional information regarding asset coverage ratio and RIC requirements, see “Regulation — Senior Securities” and “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.”

 

We may have difficulty paying our required distributions if we recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income.

 

For federal income tax purposes, we include in income certain amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as original issue discount, which may arise if we receive warrants in connection with the making of a loan or possibly in other circumstances, or payment-in-kind interest, which represents contractual interest

added to the loan balance and due at the end of the loan term. Such original issue discount, which could be significant relative to our overall investment activities, or increases in loan balances as a result of payment-in-kind arrangements, are included in our income before we receive any corresponding cash payments. We also may be required to include in income certain other amounts that we do not receive in cash. While we focus primarily on investments that will generate a current cash return, our investment portfolio may also include securities that do not pay some or all of their return in periodic current cash distributions.

 

The income incentive fee payable by us is computed and paid on income that may include interest that has been accrued but not yet received in cash. If a portfolio company defaults on a loan that is structured to provide accrued interest, it is possible that accrued interest previously used in the calculation of the income incentive fee will become uncollectible.

 

Since in some cases we may recognize taxable income before or without receiving cash representing such income, we may have difficulty meeting the tax requirement to distribute at least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, to maintain RIC tax treatment. Accordingly, we may have to sell some of our investments at times we would not consider advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital or reduce new investment originations to meet these distribution requirements. If we are not able to obtain cash from other sources, we may fail to qualify for RIC treatment and thus become subject to corporate-level income tax. See “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations — Taxation As A RIC.”

 

If we issue senior securities, including debt, you will be exposed to additional risks, including the typical risks associated with leverage.

 

 

Changes in interest rates may affect our cost of capital and net investment income.

 

We expect that a significant portion of our debt investments will bear interest at fixed rates and the value of these investments could be negatively affected by increases in market interest rates. In addition, an increase in interest rates would make it more expensive to use debt to finance our investments. As a result, a significant increase in market interest rates could both reduce the value of our portfolio investments and increase our cost of capital, which would reduce our net investment income.

 

We need to raise additional capital to grow because we must distribute most of our income.

 

We need additional capital to fund growth in our investments. A reduction in the availability of new capital could limit our ability to grow. We must distribute at least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, to our stockholders to maintain our RIC status. As a result, such earnings are not available to fund investment originations. We have sought additional capital by borrowing from financial institutions and may issue debt securities or additional equity securities. If we fail to obtain funds from such sources or from other sources to fund our investments, we could be limited in our ability to grow, which may have an adverse effect on the value of our Securities. In

addition, as a business development company, we are generally required to maintain a ratio of at least 200% of total assets to total borrowings, which may restrict our ability to borrow in certain circumstances.

 

Most of our portfolio investments are recorded at fair value as determined in good faith by our Board of Directors and, as a result, there is uncertainty as to the value of our portfolio investments.

 

A large percentage of our portfolio investments consist of securities of privately held or thinly traded public companies. The fair value of these securities is often not readily determinable. The determination of fair value, and thus the amount of unrealized losses we may incur in any year, is to a degree subjective, and Prospect Capital Management has a conflict of interest in making the determination. We value these securities quarterly at fair value as determined in good faith by our Board of Directors based on input from Prospect Capital Management, a third party independent valuation firm and our audit committee. Our Board of Directors utilizes the services of an independent valuation firm to aid it in determining the fair value of any securities. The types of factors that may be considered in fair value pricing of our investments include the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments and its earnings, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, comparison to publicly traded companies, discounted cash flow and other relevant factors. Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private securities and private companies, are inherently uncertain, the valuations may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on estimates. The determinations of fair value by our Board of Directors may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these securities existed. Our NAV could be adversely affected if the determinations regarding the fair value of our investments were materially higher than the values that we ultimately realize upon the disposal of such securities.

 

The lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our business.

 

We generally make investments in private companies. Substantially all of these securities are subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or are otherwise less liquid than publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to sell such investments if the need arises. In addition, if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we have previously recorded our investments. In addition, we may face other restrictions on our ability to liquidate an investment in a portfolio company to the extent that we or Prospect Capital Management have material non-public information regarding such portfolio company.

 

We may experience fluctuations in our quarterly results.

 

We could experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating results due to a number of factors, including the interest or dividend rates payable on the debt or equity securities we acquire, the default rate on debt securities, the level of our expenses, variations in and the timing of the recognition of realized and unrealized gains or losses, the degree to which we encounter competition in our markets, the seasonality of the energy industry, weather patterns, changes in energy prices and general economic conditions. As a result of these factors, results for any period should not be relied upon as being indicative of performance in future periods.

 

Potential conflicts of interest could impact our investment returns.

 

Our executive officers and directors, and the executive officers of Prospect Capital Management, may serve as officers, directors or principals of entities that operate in the same or related lines of business as we do or of investment funds managed by our affiliates. Accordingly, they may have obligations to investors in those entities, the fulfillment of which might not be in the best interests of us or our stockholders. Nevertheless, it is possible that new investment opportunities that meet our investment objective may come to the attention of one of these entities in connection with another investment advisory client or program, and, if so, such opportunity might not be offered, or otherwise made available, to us. However, as an investment adviser, Prospect Capital Management has a fiduciary obligation to act in the best interests of its clients, including us. To that end, if Prospect Capital Management or its affiliates manage any additional investment vehicles or client accounts in the future, Prospect Capital Management will endeavor to allocate investment opportunities in a fair and equitable manner over time so as not to discriminate unfairly against any client. If

Prospect Capital Management chooses to establish another investment fund in the future, when the investment professionals of Prospect Capital Management identify an investment, they will have to choose which investment fund should make the investment.

 

In the course of our investing activities, under the Investment Advisory Agreement we pay base management and incentive fees to Prospect Capital Management, and reimburse Prospect Capital Management for certain expenses it incurs. As a result of our Investment Advisory Agreement, there may be times when the senior management team of Prospect Capital Management has interests that differ from those of our stockholders, giving rise to a conflict.

 

Prospect Capital Management receives a quarterly income incentive fee based, in part, on our pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, for the immediately preceding calendar quarter. This income incentive fee is subject to a fixed quarterly hurdle rate before providing an income incentive fee return to Prospect Capital Management. To the extent we or Prospect Capital Management are able to exert influence over our portfolio companies, the income incentive fee may provide Prospect Capital Management with an incentive to induce our portfolio companies to accelerate or defer interest or other obligations owed to us from one calendar quarter to another. This fixed hurdle rate was determined when then current interest rates were relatively low on a historical basis. Thus, if interest rates rise, it would become easier for our investment income to exceed the hurdle rate and, as a result, more likely that Prospect Capital Management will receive an income incentive fee than if interest rates on our investments remained constant or decreased. Subject to the receipt of any requisite stockholder approval under the 1940 Act, our Board of Directors may readjust the hurdle rate by amending the Investment Advisory Agreement.

 

The income incentive fee payable by the Company is computed and paid on income that may include interest that has been accrued but not yet received in cash. If a portfolio company defaults on a loan that has a deferred interest feature, it is possible that interest accrued under such loan that has previously been included in the calculation of the income incentive fee will become uncollectible. If this happens, Prospect Capital Management is not required to reimburse us for any such income incentive fee payments. If we do not have sufficient liquid assets to pay this incentive fee or distributions to stockholders on such accrued income, we may be required to liquidate assets in order to do so. This fee structure could give rise to a conflict of interest for Prospect Capital Management to the extent that it may encourage Prospect Capital Management to favor debt financings that provide for deferred interest, rather than current cash payments of interest. In addition, the amount of Prospect Capital Management ’s compensation under the incentive fee due, is affected in part, by the amount of unrealized depreciation accrued by us.

 

We have entered into a royalty-free license agreement with Prospect Capital Management. Under this agreement, Prospect Capital Management agrees to grant us a non-exclusive license to use the name “Prospect Capital.” Under the license agreement, we have the right to use the “Prospect Capital” name for so long as Prospect Capital Management or one of its affiliates remains our investment adviser. In addition, we rent office space from Prospect Administration, an affiliate of Prospect Capital Management, and pay Prospect Administration our allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by Prospect Administration in performing its obligations as Administrator under the Administration Agreement, including rent and our allocable portion of the costs of our chief financial officer and chief compliance officer and their respective staffs. This may create conflicts of interest that our Board of Directors monitors.

 

Changes in laws or regulations governing our operations may adversely affect our business.

 

We and our portfolio companies are subject to regulation by laws at the local, state and federal levels. These laws and regulations, as well as their interpretation, may be changed from time to time. Accordingly, changes in these laws or regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business. For additional information regarding the regulations we are subject to, see “Regulation.”

 

Our ability to enter into transactions with our affiliates is restricted.

 

We are prohibited under the 1940 Act from knowingly participating in certain transactions with our affiliates without the prior approval of our independent directors. Any person that owns, directly or indirectly,

5% or more of our outstanding voting securities is our affiliate for purposes of the 1940 Act and we are generally prohibited from buying or selling any security from or to such affiliate, absent the prior approval of our independent directors. The 1940 Act also prohibits “joint” transactions with an affiliate, which could include investments in the same portfolio company (whether at the same or different times), without prior approval of our independent directors. If a person acquires more than 25% of our voting securities, we are prohibited from buying or selling any security from or to such person, or entering into joint transactions with such person, absent the prior approval of the SEC.

 

Risks Related To Our Investments

 

We may not realize gains or income from our investments.

 

We seek to generate both current income and capital appreciation. However, the securities we invest in may not appreciate and, in fact, may decline in value, and the issuers of debt securities we invest in may default on interest and/or principal payments. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize gains from our investments, and any gains that we do realize may not be sufficient to offset any losses we experience. See “Business — Our Investment Objective and Policies.”

 

Our portfolio is concentrated in a limited number of portfolio companies in the energy industry, which subject us to a risk of significant loss if any of these companies defaults on its obligations under any of the securities that we hold or if the energy industry experiences a downturn.

 

As of March 31, 2008, we had invested in 31 companies (including a net profits interest in Charlevoix Energy Trading, LLC, or Charlevoix). A consequence of this lack of diversification is that the aggregate returns we realize may be significantly adversely affected if a small number of such investments perform poorly or if we need to write down the value of any one investment. Beyond our income tax diversification requirements, we do not have fixed guidelines for diversification, and our investments are concentrated in relatively few portfolio companies. In addition, to date we have concentrated on making investments in the energy industry. While we expect to be less focused on the energy industry in the future, we will continue to have significant holdings in the energy and energy related industries. As a result, a downturn in the energy industry could materially adversely affect us.

 

The energy industry is subject to many risks.

 

We have a significant concentration in the energy industry. Our definition of energy, as used in the context of the energy industry, is broad, and different sectors in the energy industry may be subject to variable risks and economic pressures. As a result, it is difficult to anticipate the impact of changing economic and political conditions on our portfolio companies and, as a result, our financial results. The revenues, income (or losses) and valuations of energy companies can fluctuate suddenly and dramatically due to any one or more of the following factors:

 

 

 

 

Our investments in prospective portfolio companies may be risky and you could lose all or part of your investment.

 

Some of our portfolio companies have relatively short or no operating histories. These companies are and will be subject to all of the business risk and uncertainties associated with any new business enterprise, including the risk that these companies may not reach their investment objective and the value of our investment in them may decline substantially or fall to zero.

 

In addition, investment in the middle market companies that we are targeting involves a number of other significant risks, including:

 

 

Economic recessions or downturns could impair our portfolio companies and harm our operating results.

 

Our portfolio companies will generally be affected by the conditions and overall strength of the national, regional and local economies, including interest rate fluctuations, changes in the capital markets and changes in the prices of their primary commodities and products. These factors also impact the amount of residential, industrial and commercial growth in the energy industry. Additionally, these factors could adversely impact the customer base and customer collections of our portfolio companies.

 

As a result, many of our portfolio companies may be susceptible to economic slowdowns or recessions and may be unable to repay our loans or meet other obligations during these periods. Therefore, our non-performing assets are likely to increase, and the value of our portfolio is likely to decrease, during these periods. Adverse economic conditions also may decrease the value of collateral securing some of our loans and the value of our equity investments. Economic slowdowns or recessions could lead to financial losses in our portfolio and a decrease in revenues, net income and assets. Unfavorable economic conditions also could increase our funding costs, limit our access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to us. These events could prevent us from increasing investments and harm our operating results.

 

A portfolio company’s failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, termination of its loans and foreclosure on its secured assets, which could trigger cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize a portfolio company’s ability to meet its obligations under the debt or equity securities that we hold. We may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms, which may include the waiver of certain financial covenants, with a defaulting portfolio company. In addition, if one of our portfolio companies were to go bankrupt, even though we may have structured our interest as senior debt or preferred equity, depending on the facts and circumstances, including the extent to which we actually provided managerial assistance to that portfolio company, a bankruptcy court might recharacterize our debt or equity holding and subordinate all or a portion of our claim to those of other creditors.

 

Our portfolio companies may incur debt or issue equity securities that rank equally with, or senior to, our investments in such companies.

 

We invest primarily in mezzanine debt and dividend-paying equity securities issued by our portfolio companies. Our portfolio companies usually have, or may be permitted to incur, other debt, or issue other equity securities, that rank equally with, or senior to, the securities in which we invest. By their terms, such instruments may provide that the holders are entitled to receive payment of dividends, interest or principal on or before the dates on which we are entitled to receive payments in respect of the securities in which we invest. Also, in the event of insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of a portfolio company, holders of securities ranking senior to our investment in that portfolio company would typically be entitled to receive payment in full before we receive any distribution in respect of our investment. After repaying the senior security holders, the portfolio company may not have any remaining assets to use for repaying its obligation to us. In the case of securities ranking equally with securities in which we invest, we would have to share on an equal basis any distributions with other security holders in the event of an insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of the relevant portfolio company. In addition, we may not be in a position to control any portfolio company in which we invest. As a result, we are subject to the risk that a portfolio company in which we invest may make business decisions with which we disagree and the management of such company, as representatives of the holders of their common equity, may take risks or otherwise act in ways that do not serve our interests as debt or preferred equity investors.

 

We may not be able to fully realize the value of the collateral securing our debt investments.

 

Although a substantial amount of our debt investments are protected by holding security interests in the assets of the portfolio companies, we may not be able to fully realize the value of the collateral securing our investments due to one or more of the following factors:

 

 

 

Our incentive fee could induce Prospect Capital Management to make speculative investments.

 

The incentive fee payable by us to Prospect Capital Management may create an incentive for Prospect Capital Management to make investments on our behalf that are more speculative or involve more risk than would be the case in the absence of such compensation arrangement. The way in which the incentive fee payable is determined (calculated as a percentage of the return on invested capital) may encourage Prospect Capital Management to use leverage to increase the return on our investments. The use of leverage would increase the likelihood of default, which would disfavor holders of our common stock. Similarly, because Prospect Capital Management will receive an incentive fee based, in part, upon net capital gains realized on our investments, Prospect Capital Management may invest more than would otherwise be appropriate in companies whose securities are likely to yield capital gains, as compared to income producing securities. Such a practice could result in our investing in more speculative securities than would otherwise be the case, which could result in higher investment losses, particularly during economic downturns.

 

The incentive fee payable by us to Prospect Capital Management also could create an incentive for it to invest on our behalf in instruments, such as zero coupon bonds, that have a deferred interest feature. Under these investments, we would accrue interest income over the life of the investment but would not receive payments in cash on the investment until the end of the term. Our net investment income used to calculate the income incentive fee, however, includes accrued interest. For example, accrued interest, if any, on our investments in zero coupon bonds will be included in the calculation of our incentive fee, even though we will not receive any cash interest payments in respect of payment on the bond until its maturity date. Thus, a portion of this incentive fee would be based on income that we may not have yet received in cash.

 

Our investments in foreign securities may involve significant risks in addition to the risks inherent in U.S. investments.

 

Our investment strategy contemplates potential investments in securities of foreign companies. Investing in foreign companies may expose us to additional risks not typically associated with investing in U.S. companies. These risks include changes in exchange control regulations, political and social instability, expropriation, imposition of foreign taxes, less liquid markets and less available information than is generally the case in the United States, higher transaction costs, less government supervision of exchanges, brokers and issuers, less developed bankruptcy laws, difficulty in enforcing contractual obligations, lack of uniform accounting and auditing standards and greater price volatility.

 

Although currently most of our investments are, and we expect that most of our investments will be, U.S. dollar-denominated, our investments that are denominated in a foreign currency will be subject to the risk that the value of a particular currency will change in relation to one or more other currencies. Among the factors that may affect currency values are trade balances, the level of short-term interest rates, differences in relative values of similar assets in different currencies, long-term opportunities for investment and capital appreciation, and political developments.

We may employ hedging techniques to minimize these risks, but we can offer no assurance that such strategies will be effective. If we engage in hedging transactions, we may expose ourselves to risks associated with such transactions. We may utilize instruments such as forward contracts, currency options and interest rate swaps, caps, collars and floors to seek to hedge against fluctuations in the relative values of our portfolio positions from changes in currency exchange rates and market interest rates. Hedging against a decline in the values of our portfolio positions does not eliminate the possibility of fluctuations in the values of such positions or prevent losses if the values of such positions decline. However, such hedging can establish other positions designed to gain from those same developments, thereby offsetting the decline in the value of such portfolio positions. Such hedging transaction may also limit the opportunity for gain if the values of the portfolio positions should increase. Moreover, it may not be possible to hedge against an exchange rate or interest rate fluctuation that is so generally anticipated that we are not able to enter into a hedging transaction at an acceptable price.

 

The success of our hedging transactions depends on our ability to correctly predict movements, currencies and interest rates. Therefore, while we may enter into such transactions to seek to reduce currency exchange rate and interest rate risks, unanticipated changes in currency exchange rates or interest rates may result in poorer overall investment performance than if we had not engaged in any such hedging transactions. The degree of correlation between price movements of the instruments used in a hedging strategy and price movements in the portfolio positions being hedged may vary. Moreover, for a variety of reasons, we may not seek to establish a perfect correlation between such hedging instruments and the portfolio holdings being hedged. Any such imperfect correlation may prevent us from achieving the intended hedge and expose us to risk of loss. In addition, it may not be possible to hedge fully or perfectly against currency fluctuations affecting the value of securities denominated in non-U.S. currencies.

 

Risks Relating To Our Securities

 

There is a risk that you may not receive dividends or that our dividends may not grow over time.

 

We have made and intend to continue to make distributions on a quarterly basis to our stockholders out of assets legally available for distribution. We cannot assure you that we will achieve investment results or maintain a tax status that will allow or require any specified level of cash distributions or year-to-year increases in cash distributions. In addition, due to the asset coverage test applicable to us as a business development company, we may be limited in our ability to make distributions. See “Distributions.”

 

Provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law and of our charter and bylaws could deter takeover attempts and have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock.

 

The Maryland General Corporation Law and our charter and bylaws contain provisions that may have the effect of discouraging, delaying or making more difficult a change in control and preventing the removal of incumbent directors. We are covered by the Maryland Business Combination Act, or the Business Combination Act, to the extent such statute is not superseded by applicable requirements of the 1940 Act. However, our Board of Directors has adopted a resolution exempting any business combination between us and any other person from the Business Combination Act, subject to prior approval of such business combination by our Board of Directors, including a majority of our directors who are not interested persons as defined in the 1940 Act. In addition, the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act, or the Control Share Act, provides that control shares of a Maryland corporation acquired in a control share acquisition have no voting rights except to the extent approved by a vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the Control Share Act any and all acquisitions by any person of our shares of stock. If the applicable Board of Directors resolution is repealed or our Board of Directors does not otherwise approve a business combination, the Business Combination Act and the Control Share Act (if we amend our bylaws to be subject to that Act) may discourage others from trying to acquire control of us and increase the difficulty of consummating any offer.

 

Additionally, under our charter, our Board of Directors is divided into three classes serving staggered terms; our Board of Directors may, without stockholder action, authorize the issuance of shares of stock in one

or more classes or series, including preferred stock; and our Board of Directors may, without stockholder action, amend our charter to increase the number of shares of stock of any class or series that we have authority to issue. The existence of these provisions, among others, may have a negative impact on the price of our common stock and may discourage third party bids for ownership of our Company. These provisions may prevent you from being able to sell shares of our common stock at a premium over the current or prevailing market prices.

 

Investing in our Securities may involve a high degree of risk.

 

The investments we make in accordance with our investment objective may result in a higher amount of risk than alternative investment options and volatility or loss of principal. Our investments in portfolio companies may be speculative and aggressive, and therefore, an investment in our shares may not be suitable for someone with low risk tolerance.

 

The market price of our Securities may fluctuate significantly.

 

The market price and liquidity of the market for our Securities may be significantly affected by numerous factors, some of which are beyond our control and may not be directly related to our operating performance. These factors include:

 

 

We may allocate the net proceeds from any offering in ways with which you may not agree.

 

We will have significant flexibility in investing the net proceeds of any offering of our Securities. We may use the net proceeds from the offering in ways with which you may not agree or for investments other than those contemplated at the time of the offering, unless such change in the use of proceeds is subject to stockholders’ approval or prohibited by law.

 

Sales of substantial amounts of our Securities in the public market may have an adverse effect on the market price of our Securities.

 

Sales of substantial amounts of our Securities or the availability of such securities for sale could adversely affect the prevailing market price for our Securities. If this occurs and continues it could impair our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of securities should we desire to do so.

 

Overview as of March 31, 2008

 

Prospect Capital Corporation is a publicly traded mezzanine debt and private equity firm that provides investment capital to micro to middle market companies. We invest primarily in senior and subordinated debt and equity of companies in need of capital for acquisitions, divestitures, growth, development, project financing and recapitalization. We work with the management teams or financial sponsors to seek investments with historical cash flows, asset collateral or contracted pro-forma cash flows.

 

The aggregate value of our portfolio investments was $429,156 and $328,222 as of March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2007, respectively. During the first three quarters of fiscal year 2008, our net cost of investments increased by $110,360, or 33.8%, as we invested in 12 new and follow-on investments while we sold three investments and three other investments repaid their loans.

 

Compared to the end of last fiscal year (ended June 30, 2007), net assets increased by $71,670 during the nine-month period ended March 31, 2008, from $300,048 to $371,718. This increase resulted from the issuance of new shares of our common stock (less offering costs) in the amount of $92,979, dividend re-investments of $2,753, and another $3,605 from operations. These increases, in turn, were offset by $27,667 in dividend distributions to our stockholders. The $3,605 increase in net assets resulting from operations is net of the following: Net investment income of $31,444, realized loss on investments of $18,413, and a net decrease in net assets due to changes in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments of $9,426. The realized losses were mainly due to the sale of Central Illinois Energy, LLC, or CIE, and Advantage Oilfield Group Ltd., or AOG. The net unrealized depreciation was driven by significant write-downs in our investments in, Integrated Contract Services, Inc., or ICS, Worcester Energy Company, Inc., or WECO, and Genesis Coal Corp., or Genesis, which, in turn, were partially offset by write-ups for our investments in GSHI, and by the disposition of previously written-down investments in AOG and in ESA Environmental Specialists, or ESA.

 

We seek to be a long-term investor with our investment companies. As of March 31, 2008, we continue to pursue our investment strategy, and 115.5% of our net assets are invested in long-term investments.

 

To date we have invested primarily in industries related to the industrial/energy economy. However, we continue to widen our strategy focus in other sectors of the economy to diversify our portfolio holdings. This is further evidenced by the change of our corporate name. Some of the companies in which we invest have relatively short or no operating histories. These companies are and will be subject to all of the business risks and uncertainties associated with any new business enterprise, including the risks that these companies may not reach their investment objective or the value of our investments in them may decline substantially or fall to zero.

 

After a robust global debt market during the earlier part of 2007, beginning in June 2007, signs of strain emerged as fears of increasing defaults in the subprime mortgage lending market caused a broader loss of investor confidence beyond the subprime mortgage lending market and into the corporate leveraged loan and high-yield debt markets. Collateralized Loan Obligations, or CLOs, and hedge funds, in particular, have been a driving force in the excess liquidity that existed in the debt capital markets. The loss of investor confidence in many of these highly-leveraged investment vehicles has significantly constrained the market for new CLO issuance, a consequence of limited relevance to our business historically.

 

Since June 2007, there has been a significant reduction in liquidity in the corporate debt capital markets and transactions in the high-yield and leveraged loan markets have recently been cancelled, postponed, or restructured, enhancing opportunities for us going forward. The extra supply and meaningfully less demand has shifted the dynamics between buyers and sellers and caused several hundred billion dollars of corporate loans and bridge loan commitments to remain on the balance sheets of financial institutions and remain undistributed. We believe that, as of today, this reduction in liquidity has caused increased market volatility in the secondary prices of existing leveraged loans and high yield bonds, driving many leveraged loan and bond

market quotes to below the primary market offer price without necessarily reflecting a deterioration, if any, in underlying fundamental performance of many of these issuers. The valuation of securities held within our portfolio has not been materially affected in an adverse way by these events because we had not participated in the syndicated loan market prior to September 2007 to any meaningful extent. If we were to enter into these markets in a meaningful way, we would be able to lend money at higher rates of interest and would be able to purchase loans at greater discounts than prior to the occurrence of these events. We also expect that greater structural protection that lenders require for new loans, such as lower overall financial leverage and maintenance financial covenants, will increase the opportunities for us to invest since we have generally decided not to invest in highly leveraged or “covenant light” credit facilities. In turn, these events also could increase our cost of financing.

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reported period. Changes in the economic environment, financial markets and any other parameters used in determining these estimates could cause actual results to differ.

 

Recent Developments

 

On April 3, 2008, we provided approximately $39.8 million first and second lien debt and equity for the recapitalization of Ajax, a custom forger of seamless rolled steal rings located in York, South Carolina. Our debt is secured by a first lien on inventory, machinery, and certain other assets of Ajax. The equity interest purchased in Ajax is controlling in nature and was made alongside equity co-investments by Ajax’s senior managers.

 

On April 30, 2008, we provided debt financing of $20 million to support the acquisition by Peerless headquartered in Dallas, Texas, of Nitram. Peerless is a leading designer, manufacturer, and marketer of industrial environmental separation and filtration systems while Nitram focuses on separation, heat transfer, pulsation dampening, and industrial silencing products. Peerless and Nitram serve a diversified, global list of customers in industries such as oil and gas production, gas pipelines, chemical and petrochemical processing, and power generation.

 

On April 30, 2008, we fully exited out of our investment in Arctic through the sale of our equity interest in Arctic for approximately $3.4 million. We initially invested $9.25 million in Arctic in July 2005 in the form of a senior secured loan, which loan was subsequently increased by $6.0 million. We received the equity interest in Arctic as additional consideration for making the secured loan. The loan was fully repaid in August 2007.

 

On June 2, 2008, we closed a public offering of 3.25 million shares of our common stock. The net proceeds to us were approximately $45.7 million after deducting estimated offering expenses.

 

On June 9, 2008, Deep Down, one of our portfolio companies, fully repaid the $12.0 million loan we made to Deep Down in August 2007 and December 2007. We currently own a warrant to purchase approximately 5.0 million shares of Deep Down common stock at an exercise price of $0.507 per share.

 

Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

We believe that the estimates, assumptions and judgments involved in the accounting policies described below have the greatest potential impact on our financial statements. So we consider these to be our critical accounting policies, and they are consistently applied by us.

 

Consolidation:

 

Under the 1940 Act rules, the regulations pursuant to Article 6 of Regulation S-X, and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies, we are precluded from consolidating any entity other than another investment company or an operating company which provides substantially all of its services and benefits to us. Our March 31, 2008 financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of Prospect Capital Funding, LLC, our only wholly-owned, closely-

managed subsidiary that is also an investment company. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

Investments:

 

(a) Security transactions are recorded on a trade-date basis.

 

(b) Valuation:

 

(1) Investments for which market quotations are readily available are valued at such market quotations.

 

(2) Short-term investments that mature in 60 days or less, such as United States Treasury Bills, are valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. The amortized cost method involves recording a security at its cost (i.e., principal amount plus any premium and less any discount) on the date of purchase and thereafter amortizing/accreting that difference between the principal amount due at maturity and cost assuming a constant yield to maturity as determined at time of purchase. Short-term securities that mature in more than 60 days are valued at current market quotations by an independent pricing service or at the mean between the bid and ask prices obtained from at least two brokers or dealers (if available, or otherwise by a principal market maker or a primary market dealer). Investments in money market mutual funds are valued at their net asset value as of the close of business on the day of valuation.

 

(3) It is expected that most of the investments in the Company’s portfolio will not have readily available market values. Debt and equity securities whose market prices are not readily available are valued at fair value with the assistance of an independent valuation service using a documented valuation policy and a valuation process that is consistently applied under the direction of our Board of Directors. The factors that may be taken into account in fairly valuing investments include, as relevant, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments, its estimated earnings and projected discounted cash flows, the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the sensitivity of the investments to fluctuations in interest rates, the financial environment in which the portfolio company operates, comparisons to securities of similar publicly traded companies and other relevant factors. Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of these investments may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had ready market existed for such investments, and any such differences could be material.

 

(4) In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued a new pronouncement addressing fair value measurements, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Number 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” or SFAS 157. This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 becomes effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007; therefore, its first applicability to the Company will be for the Company’s upcoming fiscal year beginning July 1, 2008. The Company does not believe that the adoption of SFAS 157 will materially impact the amounts reported in its financial statements, however, additional disclosures will be required about the inputs used to develop the measurements and the effect of certain of the measurements reported to changes in net assets for a fiscal period.

 

(5) In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115”. SFAS 159 permits an entity to elect fair value as the initial and subsequent measurement attribute for many of assets and liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected and similar assets and liabilities measured using another measurement attribute. SFAS 159 becomes effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and, therefore, is applicable for the Company’s upcoming fiscal year beginning July 1, 2008. The Company’s management does not believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 159 will have a material impact on its financial statements.

(c) Realized gains or losses on the sale of investments are calculated using the specific identification method.

 

(d) Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount, is recorded on an accrual basis. Origination, closing and/or commitment fees associated with investments in portfolio companies are accreted into interest income over the respective terms of the applicable loans. Upon the prepayment of a loan or debt security, any prepayment penalties and unamortized loan origination, closing and commitment fees are recorded as interest income.

 

(e) Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date.

 

(f) Structuring fees and similar fees are recognized as income as earned. Structuring fees, excess deal deposits, net profits interests, overriding royalty interests, administrative agent fees and forbearance fees are included in other income.

 

In determining the fair value of our portfolio investments at March 31, 2008, the Audit Committee met on April 24, 2008, and considered valuations from the independent valuation firm and from management having an aggregate range of $416,608 to $437,988.

 

Our portfolio across all our long-term debt and certain equity investments had an annualized current yield of 16.8% and 17% as of March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007, respectively. This yield includes interest from all of our long-term investments as well as dividends from GSHI and NRG Manufacturing, Inc., or NRG, as of March 31, 2008 and from GSHI as of March 31, 2007. We expect the current yield to decline over time as we increase the size of the portfolio. Monetization of other equity positions that we hold is not included in this yield calculation. In each of our portfolio companies, we hold equity positions, ranging from minority interests to majority stakes, which we expect over time to contribute to our investment returns. Many of these equity positions include features such as contractual minimum internal rates of returns, preferred distributions, flip structures and other features expected to generate additional investment returns, as well as contractual protections and preferences over junior equity, in addition to the yield and security offered by our cash flow and collateral debt protections. Set forth below are several views of our investment portfolio, classified by type of investment, geographic diversification and sector diversification at March 31, 2008, and March 31, 2007, respectively:

 

 

 

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Comparison of the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2008 to the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2007

 

Investment Activity

 

We completed our 16th quarter, which was our 15th full quarter since completion of our initial public offering on July 27, 2004, with approximately 115.5% of our net assets or about $429,156 invested in 31 long-term portfolio investments (including a net profits interest remaining in Charlevoix) and 7.3% of our net assets

invested in money market funds. The remaining 22.8% of our net assets represents liabilities in excess of other assets.

 

Long-Term Portfolio Investments

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2008, we completed two new investments and several follow-on investments in existing portfolio companies, totaling approximately $31,794. During the nine months ended March 31, 2008, we completed 14 new investments and follow-on investments in existing portfolio companies, totaling approximately $193,000. The more significant of these investments are described briefly in the following:

 

On July 31, 2007, we provided $15,000 growth financing to Wind River Resources Corp. and Wind River II Corp., a privately held oil and gas production business based in Salt Lake City, Utah. The investment was in the form of senior secured notes with a net profits interest.

 

On August 8, 2007, we provided $6,000 growth and recapitalization financing to Deep Down, a deepwater drilling services and manufacturing provider based in Houston, Texas. The investment was in the form of senior secured notes and warrants.

 

On August 28, 2007, we provided $9,200 growth and recapitalization financing to Diamondback Operating, LP, an oil and gas production company based in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The investment was in the form of senior secured notes with a net profits interest.

 

On October 9, 2007, we made a second lien debt investment of $9,750 in Resco Products, Inc., a leading designer and manufacturer of refractory materials based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

 

On October 17, 2007, we made a $3,000 follow-on secured debt investment in NRG, in support of NRG’s acquisition of Dynafab Corporation, or Dynafab. Dynafab is a manufacturer of a range of metal structures and vessels for use in the oil and gas and transportation industries, including fuel tanks for on-road and off-road vehicles as well as various drilling rig components.

 

On October 19, 2007, we made a second lien debt investment of approximately $5,000 in a leading provider of outsourced technical services based in Pennsylvania. Our investment is supporting the acquisition of this service provider by HM Capital Partners, L.P., or HM, a $1.6 billion private equity fund based in Dallas, Texas. HM’s investment professionals previously were principals with Hicks, Muse, Tate & Furst, Inc.

 

On November 1, 2007, we made a second lien secured debt investment, as well as a small equity co-investment, aggregating approximately $13,750 in Maverick Healthcare, Inc. doing business as Preferred Homecare, a leading comprehensive home healthcare services provider based in Mesa, Arizona.

 

On November 5, 2007, we invested approximately $18,000 in second lien secured financing in Shearer’s Foods, Inc., a snack food manufacturer based in Brewster, Ohio, with Winston Partners as the private equity financial sponsor.

 

On November 9, 2007, we made a second lien debt investment of $12,000 in Qualitest Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and its affiliates, a leading manufacturer and distributor of generic pharmaceuticals based in Huntsville, Alabama.

 

On November 14, 2007, we entered into an agreement to invest in a second lien secured debt from Deb Shops, Inc., of $15,000. This transaction was consummated on December 10, 2007. Deb Shops, Inc. is a leading specialty apparel retailer based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

 

On November 21, 2007, we provided combined debt financing of $25,600 to IEC Systems LP and Advanced Rig Services LLC, two related oilfield service companies based in Houston, Texas. This investment took the form of two separate senior secured instruments with cross-collateralized guarantees and a net profit interest in each company.

On February 11, 2008, we made a $5,121 senior secured loan to North Fork Collieries LLC, or North Fork, a Kentucky-based mining and coal production company. We also have a controlling equity interest in North Fork.

 

On March 5, 2008, we made an additional secured Term C debt investment of approximately $6,500 in Unitek Acquisition, Inc., or Unitek, a leading provider of outsourced technical services based in Blue Bell, Pennsylvania. We now have extended in the aggregate $11,500 of debt capital to Unitek.

 

On March 14, 2008, we provided debt financing of $14,500 to support the acquisition of American Gilsonite Company, or AGC, by a private equity firm based in New York. AGC is a specialty mineral company with operations based in Bonanza, Utah. Furthermore, we made an additional $1,000 investment in the equity of AGC.

 

For the nine months ended March 31, 2008, we closed-out six positions which are briefly described below.

 

On August 16, 2007, Arctic, completely paid its loan with an additional prepayment penalty of $461 for the loan. We will maintain holdings in warrants in Arctic. Including the prepayment premium, we realized a 20% cash internal rate of return on this investment, representing 1.25 times cash on cash (not including the equity investments that we continue to hold).

 

On December 5, 2007, we received $5,099 from the sale of our debt investment in CIE, an ethanol project.

 

On December 28, 2007 and December 31, 2007, we entered into two agreements which monetized our investment in AOG. These transactions generated aggregate proceeds of $3,939 for us.

 

On February 20, 2008, one of our investees, Ken-Tex Energy Corp., or Ken-Tex, repaid the $10,800 debt that it owed us. As part of the transaction, we also sold back our net profit interest, or NPI, and overriding royalty interest, or ORRI, in Ken-Tex. In addition to the debt repayment, this transaction generated $3,300 in the form of a prepayment penalty and the sale of the NPI and ORRI.

 

On March 5, 2008, we closed out our position of common shares of Evolution Petroleum Corp. at a gain of $486.

 

On March 31, 2008, TLOGH, L.P. repaid the $15,500 debt that it owed to us.

 

Since inception, here is a quarter-by-quarter summary of the investment activity.

 

 

 

 

 

We classify our investments by level of control. As defined in the 1940 Act, control investments are those where there is the ability or power to exercise a controlling influence over the management or policies of a company. Control is generally deemed to exist when a company or individual owns 25% or more of the voting securities of an investee company. Affiliated investments and affiliated companies are defined by a lesser degree of influence. This lesser degree of influence is deemed to exist through ownership of 5% or more but less than 25% of the outstanding voting securities of another person. As of March 31, 2008, we held a controlling interest in GSHI, Genesis, ICS, Iron Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc., or Iron Horse, NRG, North Fork, R-V Industries, Inc., or R-V, Whymore Coal Company, Inc., or Whymore, and WECO. As of March 31, 2008, we held an affiliated interest in AEH Investment Corp.

 

 

Coal prices and forward curve prices continued to rise in Central Appalachia during the first quarter 2008. However, marginal spot prices for coal remained below operating costs for many of the smaller coal producers in that region, including Genesis. Both Whymore and Genesis are selling coal under new contracts which expire December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, respectively. The cost cutting, productivity, and revenue enhancing efforts begun in 2007 at these portfolio companies have continued, including the purchase of additional equipment at Genesis and the acquisition of additional coal reserves at Whymore. We also continue looking at various opportunities to take advantage of acquisitions at favorable prices.

 

With respect to Unity Virginia Holdings LLC, or Unity, discussions continue between the Company (the second lien holder), the senior lender, Texas Capital (whose exposure is approximately $1,100), and Unity regarding next steps after liquidating the last remaining saleable property in the collateral package which consisted of land, coal inventory, and the refuse area. According to Unity, the sale of these assets was necessary to the remediation of the mine property, under the supervision of state and federal authorities. The Company believes that Unity principals have to pay-off the remaining debt to Texas Capital and would still be obligated to repay the outstanding debt to Prospect.

 

ESA defaulted under our contract governing our investment in ESA, prompting us to commence foreclosure actions with respect to certain ESA assets in respect of which we have a priority lien. In response to our actions, ESA filed voluntarily for reorganization under the bankruptcy code. We have a senior-secured, first-lien debt position with collateral in the form of receivables, real estate, other assets, personal guaranties and the stock of ESA’s subsidiary company, Lisamarie Fallon, Inc. (doing business as The Healing Staff). On September 20, 2007 the U.S. Bankruptcy Court approved a Section 363 Asset Sale for ESA to the Company. To complete this transaction, we contributed our ESA debt to a newly-formed entity, ICS and provided funds for working capital on October 9, 2007. In return for the ESA debt, we received senior secured debt in ICS of equal amount to our ESA debt, preferred stock of ICS, and 49% of the ICS common stock. ICS subsequently ceased operations and assigned the collateral back to us.

 

In late December 2007, the Company’s largest 100% controlled investment, Gas Solutions Holdings Inc., or GSHI, a midstream gathering and processing business in East Texas, engaged RBC Capital Markets Corporation as a financial advisor to explore strategic alternatives, including a potential sale. This monetization process is ongoing. Management can make no assurances as to the timing or success of the potential sale of GSHI, or as to any proceeds to be received from such sale. In late March 2008, Royal Bank of Canada provided a $38 million term loan to Gas Solutions II Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of GSHI, the proceeds of which were used to refinance all of Citibank’s approximately $8 million of outstanding senior secured debt as

well as to make a $30 million cash distribution to GSHI. The Company has non-recourse access to this cash at GSHI, in addition to the Company’s other assets and undrawn revolving credit facility. In early May 2008, Gas Solutions II Ltd purchased a series of propane puts at $0.10 out of the money and at prices of $1.53 per gallon and $1.394 per gallon covering the periods May 1, 2008, through April 30, 2009, and May 1, 2009, through April 30, 2010, respectively. These hedges have been executed at close to the highest market propane prices ever achieved on an historical basis; such hedges preserve the upside of Gas Solutions II Ltd to benefit from potential future increases in commodity prices.

 

Investment Income

 

We generate revenue in the form of interest income on the debt securities that we own, dividend income on any common or preferred stock that we own, and amortized loan origination fees on the structuring of new transactions. Our investments, if in the form of debt securities, will typically have a term of one to ten years and bear interest at a fixed or floating rate. To the extent achievable, we will seek to collateralize our investments by obtaining security interests in our portfolio companies’ assets. We also may acquire minority or majority equity interests in our portfolio companies, which may pay cash or in-kind dividends on a recurring or otherwise negotiated basis. In addition, we may generate revenue in other forms including prepayment penalties and possibly consulting fees. Any such fees generated in connection with our investments are recognized as earned.

 

Investment income, which consists of interest income, including accretion of loan origination fees, dividend income and other income, including net profits interests, overriding royalty interests and structuring fees, amounted to $22,000 and $12,069 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007, respectively and $55,954 and $26,672 for the nine months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007, respectively. Investment income increased as compared to the same period one year earlier as a direct result of the growth of our investment portfolio.

 

Operating Expenses

 

Our primary operating expenses consist of investment advisory fees (base and incentive fees), credit facility costs, legal and professional fees, insurance expenses, directors’ fees and other general and administrative expenses. Operating expenses were $9,081 and $5,054 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007, respectively and $24,510 and $11,890 for the nine months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007, respectively. These expenses include our allocable portion of overhead under the Administration Agreement with Prospect Administration under which Prospect Administration provides administrative services and facilities to us. We bear all other costs and expenses of our operations and transactions in accordance with our Administration Agreement with Prospect Administration.

 

The base investment advisory fees were $2,388 and $1,531 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007, respectively and $6,366 and $3,715 for the nine months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007, respectively. The income incentive fees were $3,230 and $1,754 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007, respectively and $7,861 and $3,695 for the nine months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007, respectively. The increases are directly related to the growth of our investment portfolio as compared with the previous period. Our investment advisory fees compensate Prospect Capital Management for its work in identifying, evaluating, negotiating, closing and monitoring our investments. No capital gains incentive fee has yet been incurred pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement.

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007, the Company incurred $1,863 and $353, respectively of expenses related to its credit facilities. During the nine months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007, the Company incurred $4,719 and $1,385, respectively of expenses related to its credit facilities. The table below describes the components of the credit facility costs.

 

 

The increase in interest expense for the three-month and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2008 relative to the comparable periods a year earlier is due to an increase in our weighted-average borrowings. Weighted-average borrowings for the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2008 were $112,023 and $80,301, respectively. Weighted-average borrowings for the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2007 were $0 and $5,709 respectively. The weighted-average interest rates on all of the borrowings were 4.80% and 8.37% over the nine-month periods ended, March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007, the Company incurred legal expenses of $449 and $593, respectively. During the nine months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007, the Company incurred legal expenses of $2,224 and $970, respectively. A substantial amount of the legal expenses incurred in fiscal year 2008 (approximately $1,761) relate to one arbitration matter. The Company has prevailed in the aforesaid arbitration and believes that it is entitled to reimbursement of such expenses. The Company considers such expenses largely non-recurring items that it does not expect to occur to such a degree in subsequent quarters.

 

Net Investment Income, Net Realized Gains, Net Unrealized Appreciation and Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations

 

Our net investment income was $12,919 and $7,015 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007, respectively and $31,444 and $14,782 for the nine months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007, respectively. Net investment income represents the difference between investment income and operating expenses and is directly impacted by the items described above. Net realized gains (losses) were $208 and ($1) for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007, respectively and ($18,413) and $1,949 for the nine months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007, respectively. The net increase (decrease) in net assets due to changes in unrealized appreciation/depreciation was ($14,386) and ($2,038) for the three months ended March 31, 2008, and March 31, 2007, respectively and ($9,426) and ($4,851) for the nine months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007, respectively. The increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations represents the sum of the returns generated from net investment income, realized gains (losses) and the changes in net assets as a result of changes in unrealized appreciation/depreciation.

 

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Our cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities totaled ($150,705) and ($158,247) for the nine months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007, respectively. For the nine months ended March 31, 2008 dividends declared totaled $27,667 of which $15,956 has been paid and $2,753 were reinvested; March 31, 2008, $8,958 were still to be paid out.

 

Our primary use of funds will be investments in portfolio companies and cash distributions to holders of our common stock. In the future, we may continue to fund a portion of our investments through borrowings from banks, issuances of senior securities or secondary offerings. We may also securitize a portion of our investments in mezzanine or senior secured loans or other assets. Our objective is to put in place such borrowings in order to expand our portfolio. On September 6, 2007, our Shelf Registration Statement on Form N-2 was declared effective by the SEC. Under the Registration Statement, we may issue up to approximately $350,000 in the aggregate of our common and preferred stock and debt securities over the next two-and-a-half years.

Borrowings

 

The Company had $90,667 and $0 in borrowings at March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2007, respectively. The following table shows the facility amounts and outstanding borrowings at March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2007:

 

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

At March 31, 2008, we did not have any off-balance sheet liabilities or other contractual obligations that are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, other than those which originate from (1) the investment advisory and management agreement and the administration agreement and (2) the portfolio companies.

 

Overview as of June 30, 2007

 

The aggregate value of our portfolio investments was $328,222 and $133,969 as of June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively. During the fiscal year 2007, our net cost of investments increased by $202,604, or 164%, as we invested in 10 new investments, while two of our investments repaid their loans during the year.

 

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, our net assets increased by $191,778 (or 177%). The change in net assets is as a result of an increase of $202,592 of proceeds from the issuance of new shares of our stock and $16,728 from net operations, offset by $27,542 in dividend distributions to our stockholders. Out of the $16,728 from net operations, our investment income accounted for $23,131 and realized gain on investments of $1,949 reduced by $8,352 in unrealized depreciation of investments. The decrease in unrealized value was mainly associated with write-downs in our investments in AOG, ESA, Genesis, Unity, Whymore and WECO. However, there were significant write-ups in our investments in GSHI and NRG.

 

We seek to be a long-term investor in our portfolio companies. As of June 30, 2007, we continue to pursue our investment strategy and 109.4% of our net assets are invested in long-term investments.

 

Estimates

 

In determining the fair value of our portfolio investments at June 30, 2007, the Audit Committee met on August 22, 2007, and considered valuations from the independent valuation firm and from management having an aggregate range of $310,250 to $330,876.

 

Our portfolio had an annualized current yield of 17.1% and 17% across all our long-term debt and certain equity investments as of June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively. This yield includes interest from all of our long-term investments as well as dividends from GSHI. We expect the current yield to decline over time as we increase the size of the portfolio. Monetization of other equity positions that we hold is not included in this yield calculation. In each of our portfolio companies, we hold equity positions, ranging from minority interests to majority stakes, which we expect over time to contribute to our investment returns. Many of these equity positions include features such as contractual minimum internal rates of returns, preferred distributions, flip structures and other features expected to generate additional investment returns, as well as contractual protections and preferences over junior equity, in addition to the yield and security offered by our cash flow and collateral debt protections. Set forth below are several views of our investment portfolio, classified by type

of investment, geographic diversification and energy sector diversification at June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively:

 

 

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Comparison of the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2007 to the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2006

 

Investment Activity

 

We completed our 13th quarter on June 30, 2007, which was our 12th full quarter since completion of our initial public offering on July 27, 2004, with approximately 109.4% of our net assets or about $328,222 invested in 24 long-term portfolio investments (including a net profits interest remaining in Charlevoix) and 13.9% of our net assets invested in money market funds. The remaining (23.3%) of our net assets represents liabilities in excess of other assets.

 

Long-Term Portfolio Investments

 

During the quarter ended June 30, 2007, we completed five new investments and follow on investments in existing portfolio companies, totaling approximately $130,409. Additionally, on June 6, 2007, Charlevoix completely repaid its loan plus a prepayment penalty of $352 for the loan. The Company will maintain a net profits interest in Charlevoix. Including the prepayment premium, the Company realized a 21% internal rate of return on this investment, representing 1.2 times cash on cash.

 

On April 11, 2007, we provided $12,200 acquisition and growth financing to ESA, a construction, engineering and environmental services firm located in Charlotte, North Carolina. The investment was in the form of senior secured notes and warrants. There were additional fundings in May of 2007.

 

On June 4, 2007, we provided $10,750 growth financing to Ken-Tex, an independent energy company engaged in the development and production of crude oil and natural gas hydrocarbons in East Texas. The investment was in the form of senior secured notes, as well as net profits interests and overriding royalty interests.

 

On June 26, 2007, we closed on a transaction that provided $19,511 for the acquisition of R-V, a diversified engineering and manufacturing company located in Honey Brook, Pennsylvania. The investment was in the form of senior secured notes, common shares and warrants. The investment was funded on June 28, 2007.

 

On June 29, 2007, we closed on a transaction that provided $45,000 growth financing to H&M Oil & Gas, LLC, an oil and gas production and development company located in Dallas, Texas. The investment was in the form of senior secured notes, as well as a net profits interest. The investment was funded on July 3, 2007.

 

On June 29, 2007, we closed on a transaction that provided $25,000 debt financing to Regional Management Corp, a consumer finance installment loan company located in Greenville, South Carolina. The investment was in the form of subordinated secured notes. The investment was funded on July 12, 2007.

The following is a quarter-by-quarter summary of our investment activity since inception.

 

 

 

 

We classify our investments by level of control. As defined in the 1940 Act, control investments are those where there is the ability or power to exercise a controlling influence over the management or policies of a company. Control is generally deemed to exist when a company or individual owns more than 25% or more of the voting securities of an investee company. Affiliated investments and affiliated companies are defined by a lesser degree of influence and are deemed to exist through ownership of 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities of another person.

 

As of June 30, 2007, we held a controlling interest in AOG, GSHI, Genesis, NRG, R-V, Whymore and WECO. As of June 30, 2007, we held an affiliated interest in Appalachian Energy Holdings LLC and Iron Horse.

 

 

With respect to Unity, as of June 30, 2007, discussions were underway between the Company, the second lien holder, the senior lender Texas Capital Banc Shares, Inc., or Texas Capital, whose exposure has been reduced to $1,350, and Unity regarding liquidating the last remaining saleable property in the collateral package which consists of land, coal inventory, and the refuse area. According to Unity, the sale could yield up to $195. We believe that Unity principals would then have to pay off the remaining debt to Texas Capital, making us the senior most secured lender.

 

As of June 30, 2007, loans we have made to ESA and AOG are under enhanced scrutiny by our senior management team due to existing or potential payment and/or covenant defaults under the contracts governing these investments. ESA recently defaulted under our contract governing our investment in ESA, prompting us to commence foreclosure actions with respect to certain ESA assets in respect of which we have a priority lien. In response to our actions, ESA filed voluntarily for reorganization under the bankruptcy code. We have a senior-secured, first-lien debt position with collateral in the form of receivables, real estate, other assets, personal guaranties and the stock of ESA’s subsidiary company, The Healing Staff. Our loan to ESA represents approximately 3.7% of our current asset base. At its August 22, 2007 meeting, our Board of Directors reduced

the fair value of our investment in ESA as of June 30, 2007 from $13,800 to $5,000, negatively impacting our NAV per share by $0.44.

 

AOG provides construction services to the gas industry, primarily in Alberta, which has experienced a significant slowdown in gas related construction activity. At March 31, 2007, our investment in AOG was carried at approximately $17,100. We have a senior secured, first-lien debt position with collateral consisting of substantially all of AOG’s assets. AOG has experienced a business slowdown and liquidity problems, and Prospect Capital Management believes AOG could continue to experience payment and covenant defaults. In addition, we may be required to provide additional capital to AOG to permit it to continue to operate until its liquidity improves and its business prospects are realized. Our investment in AOG represents approximately 4.6% of our current asset base. At its August 22, 2007 meeting referenced above, our Board of Directors reduced the fair value of our investment in AOG as of June 30, 2007 from $17,100 to $9,900, negatively impacting our NAV per share by $0.36.

 

Investment Income

 

Investment income, which consists of interest income, including accretion of loan origination fees and prepayment penalty fees, dividend income and other income, including net profits interest, overriding royalties interest and structuring fees, was $40,681, $16,869 and $8,093 for the years ended June 30, 2007, June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, respectively.

 

Operating Expenses

 

Operating expenses were $17,550, $8,311 and $5,682 for the years ended June 30, 2007, June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, respectively. These expenses consisted of investment advisory and administrative services fees, credit facility costs, professional fees, insurance expenses, directors’ fees and other general and administrative expenses. The base investment advisory fees were $5,445, $2,082 and $1,808 for the years ended June 30, 2007, June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, respectively. $5,781, $1,786 and $0 income incentive fees were earned for the years ended June 30, 2007, June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, respectively. No capital gains incentive fee has yet been incurred pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement.

 

During the years ended June 30, 2007, June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, the Company incurred $1,903, $642 and $0, respectively of expenses related to its credit facilities. The table below describes the components of the credit facility costs.

 

 

Net Investment Income, Net Realized Gains, Net Unrealized Appreciation and Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations

 

Our net investment income was $23,131, $8,558 and $2,411 for the years ended June 30, 2007, June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, respectively. Net investment income represents the difference between investment income and operating expenses and is directly impacted by the items described above. Net realized gains (losses) were $1,949, $303 and ($2) for the years ended June 30, 2007, June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, respectively. Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) was ($8,352), $4,035 and $6,342 for the years ended June 30, 2007, June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, respectively. Net increase in net assets resulting from operations represents the sum of the returns generated from net investment income, realized gains (losses) and the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation).

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Our cash flows used in operating activities totaled ($143,890), ($29,919) and ($84,729) for the years ended June 30, 2007, June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, respectively. Financing activities provided cash flows of $143,890, $20,332 and $94,315 for the years ended June 30, 2007, June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, respectively. Dividends paid and declared were $21,634, $7,663 and $2,646 for the years ended June 30, 2007, June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, respectively.

 

Borrowings

 

The Company had $0 and $28,500 in borrowings at June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively. The following table shows the facility amounts and outstanding borrowings at June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006: