SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Filed by the Registrant [ ]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [X]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ] | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
[ ] | Definitive Proxy Statement | |
[ ] | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
[X] | Definitive Additional Materials | |
[ ] | Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-12 |
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
WALTER B. HEWLETT, EDWIN E. VAN BRONKHORST AND THE WILLIAM R. HEWLETT REVOCABLE TRUST
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] | Fee not required. | ||||
[ ] | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11. | ||||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
||||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
||||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction
computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the
amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it
was determined): |
||||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
||||
(5) | Total fee paid: |
||||
[ ] | Fee
paid previously with preliminary materials: |
||||
[ ] | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing. | ||||
(1) | Amount Previously Paid: |
||||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
||||
(3) | Filing Party: |
||||
(4) | Date Filed: |
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
HP SUPPRESSES UNFAVORABLE CUSTOMER SURVEY RESULTS
Palo Alto, CA, March 7, 2002 Walter B. Hewlett, on behalf of The William R. Hewlett Revocable Trust and its trustees, today issued the following statement about Hewlett-Packards (NYSE: HWP) suppression of customer survey results, as reported in The Wall Street Journal:
As reported in the March 7, 2002 Digits column in The Wall Street Journal, it appears that HP, in the weeks leading up to ISS report on the merger, attempted to suppress the findings of a customer survey that HP commissioned in February 2002 from Ziff Davis Media Inc.s Market Experts. This survey shows that customers would be spending less with the combined HP/Compaq after the merger. The results of the Ziff Davis survey stand in stark contrast to those of a much smaller Technology Business Research Inc. customer survey HP presented to ISS.
The results of the Ziff Davis survey show that1:
At announcement of the proposed merger:
| 41% of customers started with a negative view of the proposed merger | ||
| 29% of customers started with a positive view of the proposed merger | ||
| 48% of those who say HP is a critical vendor were negative | ||
| 62% who say Compaq is a critical vendor were negative |
Since the announcement:
| 25% of customers are more negative about the merger | ||
| 17% of customers are more positive about the merger | ||
| 30% of customers who say HP is a critical vendor are more negative about the merger | ||
| 13% of customers who say HP is a critical vendor are more positive about the merger | ||
| 27% of customers who say Compaq is a critical vendor are more negative about the merger | ||
| 17% of customers who say Compaq is a critical vendor are more positive about the merger |
A negative reaction of this magnitude from both HP and Compaq customers, we believe, does not bode well for integration and emphasizes the potential for revenue losses of 10% or more. It specifically calls into question HPs low revenue loss assumptions.
The suppression of this survey appears to be part of a pattern that HP has been pursuing in order to hide the truth and convince shareholders that the proposed merger will not destroy significant shareholder value.
-more-
-2-
In addition to suppressing the results of the Ziff Davis survey, in the last three months HP has:
| Continued to publicly claim widespread employee support for the proposed merger based on its own internal employee surveys, while three employee surveys conducted by the nationally recognized independent Field Research Corporation, commissioned by David Packard, have shown that employees are against the merger at a rate of over 2-to-1.2 In addition, HP has refused to disclose either the name of the firm doing the polls or the methodology used in the internal surveys; | ||
| Refused to reveal information on CEO compensation packages that were being contemplated totaling $115 million, while publicly touting the $8 million and $14.4 million retention bonuses that HP chairman and CEO Carly Fiorina and Compaq CEO Michael Capellas voluntarily declined. Note: ISS censured HPs management for its lack of disclosure on CEO compensation issues. 3 | ||
| Tried to distance Carly Fiorina from the failure of the joint venture she led between Lucent and Philips Electronics NV in 1997, even though she remained Consumer Products Business President at Lucent until after the joint venture was called off at significant loss to both companies which she has called the biggest mistake of her career.4,5 |
We believe that HP stockholders deserve to know the truth and that HPs win at all costs strategy destroys the same credibility that HP needs to get the merger done in the face of strong opposition from investors, employees and customers.
We urge all HP stockholders to vote AGAINST the proposed merger by signing, dating and mailing the GREEN proxy card today.
1 | Ziff Davis Market Experts survey The HP/Compaq Merger: Customers in the Balance, February 2002 | |
2 | The surveys were commissioned and paid for by David W. Packard, acting as an individual. Mr. Packard is not a participant in the solicitation of proxies from Hewlett-Packard stockholders being conducted by Walter B. Hewlett, Edwin E. van Bronkhorst and The William R. Hewlett Revocable Trust. | |
3 | ISS Proxy Analysis, Hewlett Packard, p.18-19, March 5, 2002 | |
4 | Carly Fiorina Q&A Session, HP Analyst Meeting, February 27, 2002. | |
5 | H-P Names Carly Fiorina a Lucent Star to be CEO, The Wall Street Journal, 7/20/99 |
-more-
-3-
ADDITIONAL IMPORTANT INFORMATION
# # #
Contact:
Media:
Joele Frank/Todd Glass
Joele Frank, Wilkinson Brimmer Katcher
(212) 355-4449