Filed by the Registrant | þ | ||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant |
Check the appropriate box: | ||
o | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
o | Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
þ | Definitive Proxy Statement | |
o | Definitive Additional Materials | |
o | Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12 |
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): | ||
þ | No fee required. |
o | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. | ||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: | ||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: | ||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): | ||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: | ||
(5) | Total fee paid: |
o | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials: | ||
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing. | |||
(1) | Amount Previously Paid: | ||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: | ||
(3) | Filing Party: | ||
(4) | Date Filed: |
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1. | To elect nine directors for the ensuing year; |
2. | To act on the proposal to approve, for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and Section 303A.08 of the New York Stock Exchange's listing standards, the NACCO Industries, Inc. Executive Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (Amended and Restated Effective March 1, 2012); |
3. | To act on the proposal to approve, for purposes of Section 303A.08 of the New York Stock Exchange's listing standards, the NACCO Industries, Inc. Supplemental Executive Long-Term Incentive Bonus Plan (Amended and Restated Effective March 1, 2012); |
4. | To act on the proposal to approve, for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, the NACCO Materials Handling Group Inc. Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2012); |
5. | To act on the proposal to approve, for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, the NACCO Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (Effective January 1, 2012); |
6. | To confirm the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the current fiscal year; and |
7. | To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting. |
Charles A. Bittenbender |
Secretary |
1. | Election of Directors |
Name | Age | Principal Occupation and Business Experience and Other Directorships in Public Companies During Last Five Years | Director Since | |||
John P. Jumper | 67 | President and Chief Executive Officer of SAIC, Inc. (a government technology solutions company). Retired Chief of Staff, United States Air Force. From prior to 2007, President, John P. Jumper & Associates (aerospace consulting). Also, Director of Goodrich Corporation, Science Applications International Corporation, Wesco Aircraft Holding, Inc. From prior to 2007 to 2009, Director of TechTeam Global and from 2007 to 2010, Director of Somanectics Corp. From 2007 to February 2012, Director of Jacobs Engineering, Inc. | 2012 | |||
Through his extensive military career, including as the highest-ranking officer in the U.S. Air Force, General Jumper developed valuable and proven leadership and management skills that will make him a significant contributor to our Board of Directors. In addition, General Jumper's service on the boards of other publicly-traded corporations allows him to provide valuable insight to the Board of Directors on matters of corporate governance and executive compensation policies and practices. | ||||||
Dennis W. LaBarre | 69 | Partner in the law firm of Jones Day. | 1982 | |||
Mr. LaBarre is a lawyer with broad experience counseling boards and senior management of publicly-traded and private corporations regarding corporate governance, compliance and other domestic and international business and transactional issues. In addition, he has over 25 years of experience as a member of senior management of a major international law firm. These experiences enable him to provide our Board of Directors with an expansive view of the legal and business issues pertinent to the Company, which is further enhanced by his extensive knowledge of us as a result of his many years of service on our Board of Directors and through his involvement with its committees. | ||||||
Name | Age | Principal Occupation and Business Experience and Other Directorships in Public Companies During Last Five Years | Director Since | |||
Richard de J. Osborne | 78 | Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ASARCO Incorporated (a leading producer of non-ferrous metals). Current non-executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of Datawatch Corp. | 1998 | |||
Mr. Osborne's experience as chairman, chief executive officer and chief financial officer of a leading producer of non-ferrous metals enables him to provide our Board of Directors with a wealth of experience in and understanding of the mining industry. From this experience, as well as his past and current service on the boards of other publicly-traded corporations, Mr. Osborne offers our Board of Directors a comprehensive perspective for developing corporate strategies and managing risks of a major publicly-traded corporation. | ||||||
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. | 70 | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Chairman of the Board of each of our principal subsidiaries: NACCO Materials Handling Group, Inc., which we refer to as NMHG, The North American Coal Corporation, which we refer to as NA Coal, Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc., which we refer to as HBB, and The Kitchen Collection, LLC, which we refer to as KC (all wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company). Also, Director of Goodrich Corporation and The Vanguard Group, and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. | 1972 | |||
In over 39 years of service to the Company as a Director and over 20 years in senior management, Mr. Rankin has amassed extensive knowledge of all of our strategies and operations. In addition to his extensive knowledge of the Company, he also brings to our Board of Directors unique insight resulting from his service on the boards of other publicly-traded corporations and the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. Additionally, through his dedicated service to many of Cleveland's cultural institutions, he provides a valuable link between our Board of Directors, the Company and the community surrounding our corporate headquarters. | ||||||
Michael E. Shannon | 75 | President of MEShannon & Associates, Inc. (a private firm specializing in corporate finance and investments). Retired Chairman, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer of Ecolab, Inc. (a specialty chemicals company). From prior to 2007 to April 2010, Director of CenterPoint Energy, Inc. From prior to 2007 to 2007, Director of Apogee Enterprises, Inc. and Director of Clorox Company. | 2002 | |||
Mr. Shannon's experience in finance and general management, including his service as chairman and chief financial and administrative officer of a major publicly-traded corporation, enables him to make significant contributions to our Board of Directors, particularly in his capacity as the Chairman of our Audit Review Committee and as our audit committee financial expert. Through his past and current service on the boards of publicly-traded corporations, he has a broad and deep understanding of the financial reporting system, the challenges involved in developing and maintaining effective internal controls and the isolation of areas of focus for evaluating risks to the Company. | ||||||
Britton T. Taplin | 55 | Self-employed (personal investments). Former Partner of Western Skies Group, Inc. (a privately-held real estate developer) from prior to 2007 to 2007. From prior to 2007 to 2007, worked in a commercial real-estate development business. | 1992 | |||
Mr. Taplin is a grandson of the founder of the Company and brings the perspective of a long-term stockholder to our Board of Directors. | ||||||
Name | Age | Principal Occupation and Business Experience and Other Directorships in Public Companies During Last Five Years | Director Since | |||
David F. Taplin | 62 | Self-employed (tree farming). | 1997 | |||
Mr. Taplin is a grandson of the founder of the Company and brings the perspective of a long-term stockholder to our Board of Directors. | ||||||
John F. Turben | 76 | Founding Partner of Kirtland Capital Partners (a private equity company). | 1997 | |||
Mr. Turben brings to our Board of Directors the entrepreneurial perspective of a founder and operator of a successful company. Mr. Turben has acquired extensive experience handling transactional and investment issues through his over 35 years of involvement in operating a private equity firm. Through this experience as well as his service on other boards of publicly-traded corporations and private institutions, he provides important insight and assistance to our Board of Directors in the areas of finance, investments and corporate governance, which enable him to be a significant contributor to our Board of Directors. | ||||||
Eugene Wong | 77 | Professor Emeritus of the University of California at Berkeley. | 2005 | |||
Dr. Wong has broad experience in engineering, particularly in the areas of electrical engineering and software design, which are of significant value to the oversight of our information technology infrastructure, product development and general engineering. He has served as technical consultant to a number of leading and developing nations, which enables him to provide an up-to-date international perspective to our Board of Directors. Dr. Wong has also co-founded and managed several corporations, and has served as a chief executive officer of one, enabling him to contribute the unique administrative and management perspective of a corporate chief executive officer. |
Audit Review Committee | Compensation Committee |
John P. Jumper | John P. Jumper |
Richard de J. Osborne | Richard de J. Osborne (Chairman) |
Michael E. Shannon (Chairman) | Eugene Wong |
John F. Turben | |
Finance Committee | Executive Committee |
Dennis W. LaBarre | Dennis W. LaBarre |
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. | Richard de J. Osborne |
Michael E. Shannon | Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. (Chairman) |
Britton T. Taplin | Michael E. Shannon |
John F. Turben (Chairman) | John F. Turben |
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | |
Dennis W. LaBarre | |
Richard de J. Osborne | |
Michael E. Shannon (Chairman) | |
David F. Taplin | |
John F. Turben |
• | the quality and integrity of our financial statements; |
• | our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; |
• | the adequacy of our internal controls; |
• | our guidelines and policies to monitor and control our major financial risk exposures; |
• | the qualifications, independence, selection and retention of the independent registered public accounting firm; |
• | the performance of our internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm; |
• | assisting our Board of Directors and us in interpreting and applying our Corporate Compliance Program and other issues related to us and employee ethics; and |
• | preparing the Annual Report of the Audit Review Committee to be included in our Proxy Statement. |
• | the review and approval of corporate goals and objectives relevant to compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers; |
• | the evaluation of the performance of the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers in light of these goals and objectives; |
• | the determination and approval of Chief Executive Officer and other executive officer compensation levels; |
• | the consideration of whether the risks arising from our employee compensation policies and practices are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us; |
• | the making of recommendations to our Board of Directors, where appropriate or required, and the taking of other actions with respect to all other compensation matters, including incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans; and |
• | the review and approval of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the preparation of the annual Compensation Committee Report to be included in our Proxy Statement. |
• | the review and making of recommendations to our Board of Directors of the criteria for membership on our Board of Directors; |
• | the review and making of recommendations to our Board of Directors of the optimum number and qualifications of directors believed to be desirable; |
• | the establishment and monitoring of a system to receive suggestions for nominees to directorships of the Company; and |
• | the identification and making of recommendations to our Board of Directors of specific candidates for membership on our Board of Directors. |
• | the nature of the related person's interest in the transaction; |
• | the material terms of the transaction, including, without limitation, the amount and type of transaction; |
• | the importance of the transaction to the related person; |
• | the importance of the transaction to us; |
• | whether the transaction would impair the judgment of a director or executive officer to act in our best interest; and |
• | any other matters the Audit Review Committee deems appropriate. |
1. | the name and address of the stockholder recommending the candidate for consideration as such information appears on our records, the telephone number where such stockholder can be reached during normal business hours, the number of shares of Class A Common and Class B Common owned by such stockholder and the length of time such shares have been owned by the stockholder; if such person is not a stockholder of record or if such shares are owned by an entity, reasonable evidence of such person's beneficial ownership of such shares or such person's authority to act on behalf of such entity; |
2. | complete information as to the identity and qualifications of the proposed nominee, including the full legal name, age, business and residence addresses and telephone numbers and other contact information, and the principal occupation and employment of the candidate recommended for consideration, including his or her occupation for at least the past five years, with a reasonably detailed description of the background, education, professional affiliations and business and other relevant experience (including directorships, employments and civic activities) and qualifications of the candidate; |
3. | the reasons why, in the opinion of the recommending stockholder, the proposed nominee is qualified and suited to be one of our directors; |
4. | the disclosure of any relationship of the candidate being recommended has with us or any of our subsidiaries or affiliates, whether direct or indirect; |
5. | a description of all relationships, arrangements and understandings between the proposing stockholder and the candidate and any other person(s) (naming such person(s)) pursuant to which the candidate is being proposed or would serve as a director, if elected; and |
6. | a written acknowledgment by the candidate being recommended that he or she has consented to being considered as a candidate, has consented to our undertaking of an investigation into that individual's background, education, experience and other qualifications and, in the event that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee desires to do so, has consented to be named in our Proxy Statement and to serve as one of our directors, if elected. |
• | focus our Board of Directors on the most significant strategic goals and risks of our businesses; |
• | utilize the individual qualifications, skills and experience of the other members of the Board of Directors in order to maximize their contributions to our Board of Directors; |
• | ensure that each other member of our Board of Directors has sufficient knowledge and understanding of our businesses to enable him to make informed judgments; |
• | provide a seamless flow of information from our subsidiaries to our Board of Directors; and |
• | facilitate the flow of information between our Board of Directors and our management. |
Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(1) ($) | Stock Awards(2) ($) | All Other Compensation(3) ($) | Total ($) | ||||
Owsley Brown II (4) | $61,047 | $46,953 | $2,019 | $110,019 | ||||
John P. Jumper (5) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||
Dennis W. LaBarre | $54,503 | $84,497 | $6,718 | $145,718 | ||||
Richard de J. Osborne | $89,226 | $51,774 | $6,518 | $147,518 | ||||
Michael E. Shannon | $90,197 | $61,803 | $6,571 | $158,571 | ||||
Britton T. Taplin | $71,047 | $46,953 | $6,515 | $124,515 | ||||
David F. Taplin | $66,047 | $46,953 | $6,631 | $119,631 | ||||
John F. Turben | $97,226 | $51,774 | $6,549 | $155,549 | ||||
Eugene Wong | $25,583 | $89,417 | $4,549 | $119,549 |
(1) | Amounts in this column reflect the annual retainers and other fees earned by the directors in 2011. They also include payment for certain fractional shares of Class A Common that were earned and cashed out in 2011 under the Non-Employee Directors' Plan described below. |
(2) | Under the Non-Employee Directors' Plan, the directors are required to receive a portion of their annual retainer in shares of Class A Common, which we refer to as the Mandatory Shares. They are also permitted to elect to receive all or part of the remainder of the retainer and all fees in the form of shares of Class A Common, which we refer to as the Voluntary Shares. Amounts in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of the Mandatory Shares and Voluntary Shares that were granted to directors under the Non-Employee Directors' Plan, determined pursuant to the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, which we refer to as FASB ASC Topic 718. The amounts listed include the following amounts that certain directors elected to receive in the form of Voluntary Shares rather than in cash: $37,544 for Dennis W. LaBarre, $4,821 for Richard de J. Osborne, $14,850 for Michael E. Shannon, $4,821 for John F. Turben and $42,464 for Eugene Wong. See Note (2) of the consolidated financial statements in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 for more information regarding the accounting treatment of our equity awards. |
(3) | The amount listed includes: (i) $1,129 for Mr. Brown and $1,505 for each other director in Company-paid premium payments for life insurance for the benefit of the directors; (ii) other Company-paid premium payments for accidental death and dismemberment insurance for the director and his spouse; and (iii) personal excess liability insurance for the director and members of his immediate family. The amount listed also includes charitable contributions made in our name on behalf of the director and his spouse under our matching charitable gift program in the amount of $3,796 for Britton Taplin, $2,000 for Eugene Wong and $4,000 for each of Messrs. LaBarre, Osborne, Shannon, Turben and David Taplin. |
(4) | Mr. Brown ceased serving as a director on September 26, 2011 due to his death. |
(5) | General Jumper became a director effective January 1, 2012. |
• | a retainer of $125,000 ($69,000 of which is required to be paid in the form of shares of Class A Common, as described below); |
• | attendance fees of $1,000 for each meeting attended (including telephonic meetings) of our Board of Directors or a subsidiary board of directors, but not exceeding $2,000 per day; |
• | attendance fees of $1,000 for each meeting attended (including telephonic meetings) of a committee of our Board of Directors on which the director served or a committee of a subsidiary's board of directors on which the Director served; |
• | a retainer of $5,000 for each committee of our Board of Directors on which the director served (other than the Executive Committee); |
• | an additional retainer of $5,000 for each committee of our Board of Directors on which the director served as chairman (other than the Audit Review Committee); and |
• | an additional retainer of $10,000 for the chairman of the Audit Review Committee of our Board of Directors. |
• | by will or the laws of descent and distribution; |
• | pursuant to a qualifying domestic relations order; or |
• | to a trust for the benefit of the director or his spouse, children or grandchildren. |
• | the date which is ten years after the last day of the calendar quarter for which such shares were earned; |
• | the date of the death or permanent disability of the director; |
• | five years (or earlier with the approval of our Board of Directors) from the date of the retirement of the director from our Board of Directors; or |
• | the date that a director is both retired from our Board of Directors and has reached 70 years of age. |
• | review and approval of corporate goals and objectives relevant to compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers; |
• | evaluation of the performance of the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers in light of these performance goals and objectives; |
• | determination and approval of the compensation levels of the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers based on this evaluation; |
• | consideration of whether the risks arising from our employee compensation policies and practices are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us; |
• | making recommendations to our Board of Directors, where appropriate or required, with respect to non-equity-based compensation matters; and |
• | taking other actions with respect to all other compensation matters, including equity-based and other incentive compensation plans. |
Name | Title(s) | 2011 Employer |
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer — NACCO | NACCO |
Kenneth C. Schilling | Vice President and Controller — NACCO Vice President and Chief Financial Officer — NMHG | NACCO |
Michael P. Brogan | President and Chief Executive Officer — NMHG | NMHG |
Colin Wilson | Vice-President, Chief Operating Officer and President, Americas — NMHG | NMHG |
Gregory H. Trepp (1) | President and Chief Executive Officer — HBB Chief Executive Officer — KC | HBB |
(1) | Although Mr. Trepp is the Chief Executive Officer of KC, he does not receive any compensation from KC or participate in any incentive compensation plans sponsored by KC. |
• | make recommendations regarding Hay point levels, salary midpoints and incentive targets for all new senior management positions and/or changes to current senior management positions; |
• | make recommendations regarding 2011 salary midpoints, short-term and long-term incentive compensation targets (calculated as a percentage of salary midpoint) and target total compensation for all senior management positions; |
• | make recommendations regarding 2011 salary midpoints and/or range movement for all other employee positions; |
• | evaluate and provide recommendations regarding the compensation program for our non-employee directors; and |
• | make presentations regarding legislative and regulatory changes. |
• | the use of a broad-based survey reduces volatility and lessens the impact of cyclical upswings or downturns in any one industry that could otherwise skew the survey results in any particular year; and |
• | due to the unique nature of our holding group structure, this survey provides internal consistency in compensation among all of our subsidiaries, regardless of industry. |
• | to attract, retain and motivate talented management; |
• | to reward management with competitive total compensation for achievement of specific corporate and individual goals; and |
• | to make management long-term stakeholders in us. |
Named Executive Officer | (A) Salary Midpoint ($)(%) | (B) Cash in Lieu of Perquisites ($)(%) | (C) Short-Term Plan Target ($)(%) | (D) Long-Term Plan Target ($)(%) | (A)+(B)+(C)+(D) Target Total Compensation ($) | |||||||
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. | $974,600 | 19 | % | $50,000 | 1% | $974,600 | 19% | $3,082,173 | 61% | (1) | $5,081,373 | |
Kenneth C. Schilling | $307,600 | 49 | % | $20,000 | 3% | $123,040 | 20% | $176,870 | 28% | (1) | $627,510 | |
Michael P. Brogan | $631,100 | 31 | % | $40,000 | 2% | $441,770 | 21% | $946,650 | 46% | $2,059,520 | ||
Colin Wilson | $475,500 | 38 | % | $32,000 | 2% | $261,525 | 21% | $499,275 | 39% | $1,268,300 | ||
Gregory H. Trepp | $566,100 | 34 | % | $34,992 | 2% | $339,660 | 20% | $735,930 | 44% | $1,676,682 |
(1) | The amounts include a 15% increase from the Hay-recommended long-term plan target awards that the Compensation Committee applies each year to account for the immediately taxable nature of the NACCO Long-Term Plan awards. See “- Long-Term Incentive Compensation - NACCO Long-Term Incentive Compensation.” |
• | As a result of the improvement in the economy and the Company's financial results in 2010, the Compensation Committee fully restored retirement benefits at NACCO and NMHG effective January 1, 2011. |
• | The Hay Group prepared an updated analysis of the cash in lieu of perquisite amounts for our senior U.S. management employees. Based on this analysis, starting January 1, 2011, the Compensation Committee changed the methodology from calculating the perquisite allowance based on a percentage of salary midpoint to paying a specified dollar amount, which was recommended by the Hay Group and varies based on Hay salary grade. This change avoids unwarranted annual automatic increases in perquisite allowances. The Committee intends to have the Hay Group review the dollar amounts every few years in order to determine if the amounts should be modified. |
• | base salary; |
• | cash in lieu of perquisites for U.S. executives; |
• | short-term incentives; and |
• | long-term incentives. |
• | general inflation, salary trends and economic forecasts provided by the Hay Group; |
• | general budget considerations and business forecasts provided by management; and |
• | any extraordinary personal or corporate events that occurred during the prior year. |
Named Executive Officer | Salary Midpoint Determined by the Hay Group ($) | Salary Range (Compared to Salary Midpoint) Determined by the Compensation Committee (%) | Base Salary For 2011 and as a Percentage of Salary Midpoint ($)(%) | Change Compared to 2010 Base Salary (%) | ||||||
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. | $974,600 | 80% - 130% | $1,167,000 | 120 | % | 5.6% | ||||
Kenneth C. Schilling | $307,600 | 80% - 120% | $277,022 | 90 | % | 6.5% | ||||
Michael P. Brogan | $631,100 | 80% - 120% | $534,711 | 85 | % | 6.6% | ||||
Colin Wilson | $475,500 | 80% - 120% | $446,727 | 94 | % | 10% | ||||
Gregory H. Trepp | $566,100 | 80% - 120% | $459,996 | 81 | % | 4.5% |
Named Executive Officer | Amount of Cash Paid in Lieu of Perquisites in 2011 ($) | |
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. | $50,000 | |
Kenneth C. Schilling | $20,000 | |
Michael P. Brogan | $40,000 | |
Colin Wilson | $32,000 | |
Gregory H. Trepp | $34,992 |
Name | 2011 Employer | Incentive Compensation Plan Name | ||
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. | NACCO | NACCO Short-Term Plan NACCO Long-Term Plan | ||
Kenneth C. Schilling | NACCO | NACCO Short-Term Plan NACCO Long-Term Plan | ||
Michael P. Brogan | NMHG | NMHG Short-Term Plan NMHG Long-Term Plan | ||
Colin Wilson | NMHG | NMHG Short-Term Plan NMHG Long-Term Plan | ||
Gregory H. Trepp | HBB | HBB Short-Term Plan HBB Long-Term Plan |
• | Targets Based on Annual Operating Plan. Certain performance targets are based on forecasts contained in each subsidiary's 2011 annual operating plan. With respect to these targets, there is an expectation that these performance targets will be met during the year. If they are not, the participants will not receive all or a portion of the award that is based on these performance criteria. |
• | Targets Based on Long-Term Goals. Other performance targets are not based on the 2011 annual operating plans. Rather, they are based on long-term goals established by the Compensation Committee. Because these targets are not based on the annual operating plan, it is possible in any given year that the level of expected performance may be above or below the specified performance target for that year. Return on total capital employed, which we refer to as ROTCE, is an example of a target that is based on long-term goals (see below). |
• | The NACCO Industries, Inc. Executive Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (Amended and Restated Effective February 1, 2010), referred to as the NACCO Long-Term Plan; |
• | The NACCO Industries, Inc. Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (effective January 1, 2010), referred to as the NACCO Short-Term Plan; |
• | The NACCO Materials Handling Group, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (Effective January 1, 2010), referred to as the NMHG Long-Term Plan; and |
• | The Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (Effective January 1, 2010), referred to as the HBB Long-Term Plan. |
• | forecasts of future operating results and the business models for the next several years (including the annual operating plans for the current fiscal year and our five-year long-range business plans); |
• | anticipated changes in the industries and businesses that affect ROTCE (e.g., the amount of capital required to generate a projected level of sales); and |
• | the potential impact a change in the ROTCE performance target would have on the ability to incentivize our employees. |
• | a subsidiary's expected ability to take advantage of anticipated changes in industry dynamics over the longer term; |
• | the anticipated impact of programs (such as layoffs and restructurings) on future profitability of a subsidiary's business; |
• | the anticipated impact of economic conditions on a subsidiary's business; |
• | major accounting changes; and |
• | the anticipated impact over time of changes in a subsidiary's business model on the subsidiary's business. |
2011 Net income | $ | 162.1 | |
Plus: 2011 Interest expense, net | 22.4 | ||
Less: Income taxes on 2011 interest expense, net at 38% | (8.5 | ) | |
Earnings Before Interest After-Tax | $ | 176.0 | |
2011 Average stockholders' equity (12/31/2010 and each of 2011's quarter ends) | $ | 525.4 | |
2011 Average debt (12/31/2010 and each of 2011's quarter ends) | 379.1 | ||
Less: 2011 Average cash (12/31/2010 and each of 2011's quarter ends) | (273.9 | ) | |
Total Capital Employed | $ | 630.6 | |
ROTCE (Before Adjustments) | 27.9 | % | |
Less: Adjustments to Earnings Before Interest After-Tax | $ | (31.1 | ) |
Less: Adjustments to Total Capital Employed | $ | (14.6 | ) |
ROTCE (After Adjustments) | 23.5 | % |
• | the elimination of the cost of any valuation allowances; |
• | the after-tax cost of any tangible or intangible asset impairment; |
• | the after-tax impact of environmental expenses or early lease termination expenses; and |
• | the after-tax impact of refinancing costs. |
• | target awards for each executive are equal to a specified percentage of the executive's 2011 salary midpoint, based on the number of Hay points assigned to the position and the Hay Group's recommendations regarding an appropriate level of short-term incentive compensation at that level; |
• | each short-term plan has a one-year performance period; |
• | generally, payments under the short-term plans may not exceed 150% of the target award levels; |
• | payouts to the Named Executive Officers under the short-term plans are determined after year-end by comparing the Company's or subsidiary's actual performance to the pre-established performance targets that were set by the Compensation Committee; |
• | the Compensation Committee, in its discretion, may decrease awards; |
• | for participants other than the Named Executive Officers in the 162(m) Plans, the Compensation Committee, in its discretion, may also increase awards and may approve the payment of awards where business unit performance would otherwise not meet the minimum criteria set for payment of awards, although it rarely does so; and |
• | awards are paid annually in cash and are immediately vested when paid. |
Named Executive Officer and Short-Term Plan | (A) 2011 Salary Midpoint | (B) Short-Term Plan Target as a % of Salary Midpoint (%) | (C) = (A) x (B) Short-Term Plan Target ($) | Short-Term Plan Payout as a % of Salary Midpoint (%) | Short-Term Plan Payout ($)(1) | ||||||
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. (NACCO Short-Term Plan) | $974,600 | 100% | $974,600 | 97.4 | % | $949,260 | |||||
Kenneth C. Schilling (NACCO Short-Term Plan) | $307,600 | 40% | $123,040 | 39.0 | % | $119,841 | |||||
Michael P. Brogan (NMHG Short-Term Plan) | $631,100 | 70% | $441,770 | 69.2 | % | $436,911 | |||||
Colin Wilson (NMHG Short-Term Plan) | $475,500 | 55% | $261,525 | 54.4 | % | $258,648 | |||||
Gregory H. Trepp (HBB Short-Term Plan) | $566,100 | 60% | $339,660 | 19.0 | % | $107,672 |
(1) | As shown in the calculations below, the final payout percentages under the various short-term plans, as applied to the Named Executive Officers, were: 97.4% under the NACCO Short-Term Plan; 98.9% under the NMHG Short-Term Plan and 31.7% under the HBB Short-Term Plan. |
Performance Criteria | (A) Weighting | Performance Target | Performance Results | (B) Achievement Percentage(1) | (A) x (B) Payout Factor | ||||||||||
Adjusted Operating Profit Dollars - NMHG Global | 30 | % | $62,700,000 | $112,172,000 | 150 | % | 45% | ||||||||
Operating Profit Percent - NMHG Global | 20 | % | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | 62.2 | % | 12.4% | ||||||
NMHG ROTCE - Global (3) | 20 | % | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | 150 | % | 30% | ||||||
Americas Market Share | 15 | % | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | — | % | —% | ||||||
EMEA Market Share | 9 | % | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | 116.7 | % | 10.5% | ||||||
Asia-Pacific Market Share | 5 | % | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | 12.5 | % | 0.6% | ||||||
Japan Market Share | 1 | % | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | 40 | % | 0.4% | ||||||
Final Payout Percentage U.S. Corporate | 98.9% | (4) |
(1) | The achievement percentages are based on the formulas contained in underlying performance guidelines adopted by the Compensation Committee. The formulas do not provide for straight-line interpolation from the performance target to the maximum payment target. The maximum achievement percentage is 150%. |
(2) | This table does not disclose the NMHG operating profit percent or market share targets or results due to the competitively sensitive nature of that information. The operating profit target used for incentive compensation purposes reflects long-term corporate objectives and is not based on the target established by management and contained in NMHG's five-year long-range business plan or the long-term NMHG financial objectives (although there is a connection between them). For 2011, the NMHG Compensation Committee expected NMHG to meet the market share targets but did not expect NMHG to meet the operating profit percent target under the NMHG Short-Term Plan. |
(3) | NMHG ROTCE is calculated in the same manner as shown above under “- Incentive Compensation of Named Executive Officers - ROTCE Methodology and Explanation” (including the adjustments for the non-recurring or special items). The NMHG ROTCE target for 2011 is the same target that was used for 2010. For 2011, the NMHG Compensation Committee expected the NMHG ROTCE performance to exceed the target for the NMHG Short-Term Plan. |
(4) | For 2011, NMHG performance resulted in a performance payout factor of 98.9% of short-term incentive compensation targets for NMHG U.S. corporate participants, including Messrs. Brogan and Wilson. This final performance factor was less than the maximum 150% under the 162(m) payment pool. |
Performance Criteria | (A) Weighting | Performance Target | Performance Results | (B) Achievement Percentage(1) | (A) x (B) Payout Factor | |||||||||||
Adjusted Net Income | 30 | % | $23,610,000 | $19,959,962 | 31.6 | % | 9.5 | % | ||||||||
Adjusted Net Sales | 30 | % | $539,990,000 | $493,047,414 | — | % | — | % | ||||||||
HBB ROTCE(2) | 15 | % | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | 41.5 | % | 6.2 | % | ||||||
Operating Profit Percent | 25 | % | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | 64 | % | 16 | % | ||||||
Final Payout Percentage | 31.7 | % | (4) |
(1) | The achievement percentages are based on formulas contained in the underlying performance guidelines adopted by the Compensation Committee. The formulas do not provide for straight-line interpolation from the performance target to the maximum payment target. The maximum achievement percentage is 150%. |
(2) | HBB ROTCE is calculated in the manner as shown above under “- Incentive Compensation of Named Executive Officers - ROTCE Methodology and Explanation” (including the adjustments for the non-recurring or special items). The 2011 HBB ROTCE target was higher than the 2010 ROTCE target due to the anticipated improvement in economic conditions. For 2011, the HBB Compensation Committee expected the HBB ROTCE performance to exceed the target for the HBB Short-Term Plan. |
(3) | This table does not disclose the HBB operating profit percent target or result due to the competitively sensitive nature of that information. The operating profit target used for incentive compensation purposes reflects long-term corporate objectives and is not based on the target established by management and contained in HBB's five-year long-range business plan or the long-term HBB financial objectives (although there is a connection between them). For 2011, the HBB Compensation Committee did not expect HBB to meet the operating profit percent target. |
(4) | For 2011, HBB performance resulted in a performance payout factor of 31.7% of short-term incentive compensation target for all participants, including Mr. Trepp. This final performance factor was less than the maximum 150% under the 162(m) payment pool. |
Performance Criteria | (A) Initial Weighting at Subsidiary Level | (B) NACCO Weighting | (C)=(A) x (B) NACCO Payment Factor | Performance Target | Performance Result | (D) Achievement Percentage (1) | (C) x (D) Payout Factor | |||||||||||||||
NMHG Adjusted Operating Profit Dollars - Global | 30 | % | 40 | % | 12.00 | % | $62,700,000 | $112,172,000 | 150.0 | % | 18.0 | % | ||||||||||
NMHG ROTCE - Global | 20 | % | 40 | % | 8.00 | % | (2)(3) | (2)(3) | 150.0 | % | 12.0 | % | ||||||||||
NMHG Operating Profit Percent-Global | 20 | % | 40 | % | 8.00 | % | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | 62.2 | % | 5.0 | % | ||||||||
NMHG Market Share: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Americas | 15 | % | 40 | % | 6.00 | % | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | — | % | — | % | ||||||||
EMEA | 9 | % | 40 | % | 3.60 | % | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | 116.7 | % | 4.2 | % | ||||||||
Asia-Pacific | 5 | % | 40 | % | 2.00 | % | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | 12.5 | % | 0.3 | % | ||||||||
Japan | 1 | % | 40 | % | 0.40 | % | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | 40.0 | % | 0.2 | % | ||||||||
NMHG Total | 39.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
HBB Adjusted Net Income | 30 | % | 25 | % | 7.50 | % | $23,610,000 | $19,959,962 | 31.5 | % | 2.4 | % | ||||||||||
HBB ROTCE | 15 | % | 25 | % | 3.75 | % | (3)(4) | (3)(4) | 41.5 | % | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||
HBB Operating Profit Percent | 25 | % | 25 | % | 6.25 | % | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | 64.0 | % | 4.0 | % | ||||||||
HBB Adjusted Net Sales | 30 | % | 25 | % | 7.50 | % | $539,990,000 | $493,047,414 | — | % | — | % | ||||||||||
HBB Total | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
KC Adjusted Net Income | 30 | % | 5 | % | 1.50 | % | $4,743,200 | $1,459,557 | — | % | — | % | ||||||||||
KC ROTCE | 15 | % | 5 | % | 0.75 | % | (3)(5) | (3)(5) | — | % | — | % | ||||||||||
KC Operating Profit Percent | 25 | % | 5 | % | 1.25 | % | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | — | % | — | % | ||||||||
KC Adjusted Net Sales | 30 | % | 5 | % | 1.50 | % | $226,267,500 | $221,172,872 | 75.9 | % | 1.1 | % | ||||||||||
KC Total | 1.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
NA Coal Adjusted Net Income | 50 | % | 30 | % | 15.00 | % | $33,430,000 | $32,373,340 | 90.7 | % | 13.6 | % | ||||||||||
NA Coal Consolidated Operations ROTCE | 20 | % | 30 | % | 6.00 | % | (3)(6) | (3)(6) | 47.5 | % | 2.9 | % | ||||||||||
NA Coal New Project Development | 30 | % | 30 | % | 9.00 | % | (6 | ) | (6 | ) | 106.0 | % | 9.5 | % | ||||||||
NA Coal Positive Discretion | 2.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
NA Coal Total | 28.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sub-Total | 77.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
NACCO Positive Discretion | 20.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Final Payout Percentage | 97.4 | % | (7) |
(1) | The achievement percentages are based on the formulas contained in underlying performance guidelines adopted by the Compensation Committee. The formulas do not provide for straight-line interpolation from the performance target to the maximum payment target. The maximum achievement percentage is 150%. |
(2) | NMHG Performance Factors: Refer to the NMHG Short-Term Plan chart on page 24 for descriptions of individual NMHG targets and the reasons for non-disclosure of certain targets. |
(3) | ROTCE Performance Factors: ROTCE performance factors are calculated as shown above under “- Incentive Compensation of Named Executive Officers - ROTCE Methodology and Explanation” (including the adjustments for the non-recurring or special items). ROTCE targets and results are not disclosed for the reasons stated in that section. |
(4) | HBB Performance Factors: Refer to the HBB Short-Term Plan chart on page 25 for descriptions of the individual HBB targets and the reasons for non-disclosure of certain targets. |
(5) | KC Performance Factors: This table does not disclose the KC operating profit percent targets or results due to the competitively sensitive nature of that information. The operating profit target used for incentive compensation purposes reflects long-term corporate objectives and is not based on the target established by management and contained in KC's five-year long-range business plan or the long-term KC financial objectives (although there is a connection between them). For 2011, the KC Compensation Committee did not expect KC to meet the operating profit percent target or the ROTCE target. |
(6) | NA Coal Performance Factors: The NA Coal ROTCE performance factor is based on 2011 ROTCE performance of the Mississippi Lignite Mining Company, the Florida Dragline Operations and NA Coal Royalty Company, each of which require a capital contribution from NA Coal and which we refer to collectively as the Consolidated Operations. In 2010, the performance factor was based solely on the performance of one of these Consolidated Operations. Therefore, there is no comparison for this performance target. For 2011, the Compensation Committee did not expect the Consolidated Operations ROTCE performance to exceed the target for the NA Coal Short-Term Plan. The new project development goals are highly specific, task-oriented goals. They identify specific future projects, customers and contracts. This table does not list the new project development goals due to their competitively sensitive nature. In 2011, NA Coal began negotiations for a long-term lignite supply agreement with a utility customer. The utility is expected to select a supplier in 2012. NA Coal also executed a long-term contract with a new customer relating to use of coal from an existing mine in a non-fuel application. NA Coal continued its efforts to develop four new mining operations, two of which have been issued mining permits. NA Coal continues to research, evaluate and implement innovative technologies that will allow low cost lignite to successfully continue as a viable fuel source for power generation, coal-to-liquids production and the production of activated carbon. Finally, NA Coal also made significant progress on its project in India. Due to these new project successes, as well as unforeseen issues beyond the control of the employees at a mine site that were favorably resolved by year-end due to the extraordinary efforts of the management team, the Compensation Committee increased the payouts under the NA Coal short-term plan by 10% of the amount otherwise payable. |
(7) | The Compensation Committee recognized the extraordinary effort of the NACCO executives in obtaining a litigation settlement of $60 million ($39 million after-tax of $21 million) related to the Applica Incorporated litigation by increasing their awards under the NACCO Short-Term Plan by 20%. The settlement was not otherwise reflected in the subsidiary performance targets. The final, actual short-term payments for Messrs. Rankin and Schilling were 97.4% of short-term incentive compensation target, which is less than the maximum 150% under the Code Section 162(m) payment pool. |
• | target awards for each executive are equal to a specified percentage of the executive's 2011 salary midpoint, based on the number of Hay points assigned to the position and the Hay Group's recommendations regarding an appropriate level of long-term incentive compensation at that level; |
• | each long-term plan has a one-year performance period; |
• | awards under the long-term plans are determined after year-end by comparing the Company's or subsidiary's actual performance to the pre-established performance targets; |
• | the Compensation Committee, in its discretion, may decrease awards; and |
• | for participants other than the Named Executive Officers in the 162(m) Plans, the Compensation Committee, in its discretion, may also increase awards and may approve the payment of awards where business unit performance would otherwise not meet the minimum criteria set for payment of awards, although it rarely does so. |
Named Executive Officer and Long-Term Plan | (A) Salary Midpoint ($) | (B) Long-Term Plan Target as a Percentage of Salary Midpoint ($) | (C)=(A) x (B) Long-Term Plan Target ($) | (D) Cash-Denominated Long-Term Plan Payout(2)(3) | (E)=(D)/(A) Cash-Denominated Long- Term Plan Payout as a Percentage of Salary Midpoint (%) | (F) Fair Market Value of Long-Term Plan Payout (3)(4) | (G)=(F)/(A) Fair Market Value of Long-Term Plan Payout as a Percentage of Salary Midpoint | ||||||||||
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. (NACCO Long-Term Plan) | $974,600 | 316.25 | % | (1) | $3,082,173 | $1,827,729 | 187.54 | % | $2,066,197 | 212.00 | % | ||||||
Kenneth C. Schilling (NACCO Long-Term Plan) | $307,600 | 57.5 | % | (1) | $176,870 | $104,884 | 34.10 | % | $118,557 | 38.54 | % | ||||||
Michael P. Brogan (NMHG Long-Term Plan) | $631,100 | 150 | % | $946,650 | $747,854 | 118.50 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||
Colin Wilson (NMHG Long-Term Plan) | $475,500 | 105 | % | $499,275 | $394,427 | 82.95 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||
Gregory H. Trepp (HBB Long-Term Plan) | $566,100 | 130 | % | $735,930 | $434,935 | 76.83 | % | N/A | N/A |
(1) | The target percentages for participants in the NACCO Long-Term Plan include a 15% increase from the Hay-recommended long-term plan target awards that the Compensation Committee applies each year to account for the immediately taxable nature of the NACCO Long-Term Plan awards. See “- Long-Term Incentive Compensation - NACCO Long-Term Incentive Compensation.” |
(2) | As shown in the calculations below, the final payout percentages under the various long-term plans, as applied to the Named Executive Officers, were: 59.3% under the NACCO Long-Term Plan; 79.0% under the NMHG Long-Term Plan and 59.1% under the HBB Long-Term Plan. |
(3) | Awards under the NMHG and HBB Long-Term Plans are each calculated and paid in dollars. There is no difference between the amount of the cash-denominated awards and the fair market value of the awards under those plans. |
(4) | Awards under the NACCO Long-Term Plan are initially denominated in dollars. The amounts shown in columns (D) and (E) reflect the dollar-denominated awards that were earned for services performed in 2011. This is the amount that is used by the Compensation Committee when analyzing the total compensation of the Named Executive Officers of NACCO. As described in “- Long-Term Incentive Compensation - NACCO Long-Term Incentive Compensation” beginning on page 30, the dollar-denominated awards are then paid to the participants in a combination of restricted shares of Class A Common and cash. For Messrs. Rankin and Schilling, 35% of the award is distributed in cash, to approximate their income tax withholding obligations for the shares, with the remaining 65% being distributed in whole shares of restricted stock. The actual number of shares of stock issued is determined by taking the dollar value of the stock component of the award and dividing it by the lower of the average share price during the 2011 performance period or the preceding calendar year. The amounts shown in column (F) reflect the sum of (i) the cash distributed and (ii) the grant date fair value of the stock that was distributed for services performed in 2011. This amount is computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and is the same as the amount that is disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table on page 40. The shares were valued using a grant date of February 7, 2012, the date on which the NACCO Long-Term Plan awards were approved by the Compensation Committee. The difference in the amounts disclosed in columns (D) and (F) is due to the fact that the number of shares issued was calculated using a price of $85.57 (the average share price during 2010) and the grant date fair value was calculated using a share price of $102.75 (the average of the high and low share price on February 7, 2012 when the shares were granted). |
• | The awards are immediately vested as of the grant date of the award (which is the January 1st following the end of the performance period). |
• | Once granted, awards are not subject to any forfeiture or risk of forfeiture under any circumstances. |
• | Awards approved by the subsidiary's Compensation Committee for a calendar year are credited to separate sub-accounts established for each participant for each award year. The sub-accounts are credited with interest based on the rate earned by the Vanguard RST fixed income fund under the U.S. 401(k) plans. While a participant remains actively employed, additional interest is credited based on the excess (if any) of a ROTCE-based rate over the Vanguard RST fixed income fund rate. |
• | Each sub-account is paid at the earliest of death, disability, retirement, change in control or on the third anniversary of the grant date of the award. |
Performance Criteria | (A) Weighting | Performance Target | Performance Result | (B) Achievement Percentage(1) | (A) x (B) Payout Factor | |||||||||||
Operating Profit Percent-NMHG Global | 45 | % | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | 62.2 | % | 28.0 | % | ||||||
NMHG ROTCE (2)-Global | 25 | % | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | 150 | % | 37.5 | % | ||||||
Americas Market Share | 15 | % | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | — | % | — | % | ||||||
EMEA Market Share | 9 | % | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | 150 | % | 13.5 | % | ||||||
Asia-Pacific Market Share | 5 | % | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | — | % | — | % | ||||||
Japan Market Share | 1 | % | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | — | % | — | % | ||||||
Final Payout Percentage - U.S. Corporate | 79.0 | % | (3) |
(1) | The achievement percentages are based on the formulas contained in underlying performance guidelines adopted by the Compensation Committee. The formula does not provide for straight-line interpolation from the performance target to the maximum payment target. The maximum achievement percentage is 150%. |
(2) | The operating profit percent and NMHG ROTCE targets under the NMHG Long-Term Plan are the same as those used under the NMHG Short-Term Plan. For 2011, the NMHG Compensation Committee expected that NMHG would meet the ROTCE target but not the operating profit percent target under the NMHG Long-Term Plan. The NMHG market share targets under the NMHG Long-Term Plan are different since they reflect longer-term market share targets than those used in the NMHG Short-Term Plan. For 2011, the NMHG Compensation Committee expected that NMHG would meet the market share targets for the Americas and EMEA, but not the others. Refer to the NMHG Short-Term Plan chart on page 24 for descriptions of the targets and reasons for non-disclosure. |
(3) | For 2011, NMHG performance resulted in a performance payout factor of 79.0% of long-term incentive compensation target for all participants, including Messrs. Brogan and Wilson, which is less than the maximum 150% permitted under the Code Section 162(m) payment pool. |
Performance Criteria | (A) Weighting | Performance Target | Performance Result | (B) Achievement Percentage(1) | (A) x (B) Payout Factor | |||||||||||
Adjusted Standard Margin | 15 | % | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | 69.1 | % | 10.4 | % | ||||||
Adjusted Net Sales | 15 | % | $513,300,000 | $493,047,414 | 60.3 | % | 9.0 | % | ||||||||
HBB ROTCE(3) | 25 | % | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | 36.5 | % | 9.1 | % | ||||||
Operating Profit Percentage | 45 | % | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | 68 | % | 30.6 | % | ||||||
Final Payout Percentage | 59.1 | % | (4) |
(1) | The achievement percentages are based on formulas contained in the underlying performance guidelines adopted by the Compensation Committee. The formulas do not provide for straight-line interpolation from the performance target to the maximum payment target. The maximum achievement percentage is 150%. |
(2) | This table does not include the adjusted standard margin target or result due to the competitively sensitive nature of that information. For 2011, the HBB Compensation Committee expected HBB to meet its adjusted standard margin targets under the HBB Long-Term Plan. |
(3) | The ROTCE and operating profit percent targets under the HBB Long-Term Plan were slightly higher than those used under the HBB Short-Term Plan. For 2011, the HBB Compensation Committee did not expect either target to be met under the HBB Long-Term Plan. Refer to the HBB Short-Term Plan chart shown on page 25 for descriptions of the targets and reasons for non-disclosure. |
(4) | For 2011, HBB performance resulted in a performance payout factor of 59.1% of long-term incentive compensation target for all participants, including Mr. Trepp, which is less than the maximum 150% permitted under the Code Section 162(m) payment pool. |
• | NACCO Long-Term Plan. The NACCO Long-Term Plan used the Company's consolidated ROTCE to determine the minimum and maximum payment pools. The Compensation Committee then used negative discretion using the performance of the Company's subsidiaries compared to the performance criteria established under their long-term plans to determine the final, actual payouts under the NACCO Long-Term Plan. |
• | NACCO Supplemental Long-Term Plan. Under the NACCO Supplemental Long-Term Plan, the Compensation Committee has the flexibility to provide additional equity compensation in its discretion. |
• | the average closing price of Class A Common on the New York Stock Exchange at the end of each week during the year preceding the start of the performance period (or such other previous calendar year as determined by the Compensation Committee no later than the 90th day of the performance period); or |
• | the average closing price of Class A Common on the New York Stock Exchange at the end of each week during the performance period. |
• | the date which is ten years after the last day of the performance period; |
• | the date of the participant's death or permanent disability; or |
• | five years (or earlier with the approval of the Compensation Committee) from the date of retirement. |
Performance Criteria | (A) Initial Weighting Subsidiary Level | (B) NACCO Weighting | (C) = (A) x (B) NACCO Payment Factor | Performance Target | Performance Result | (D) Achievement Percentage (1) | (C) x (D) Payout Percentage | |||||||||||||||
NMHG ROTCE - Global | 25 | % | 40 | % | 10.00 | % | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | 150.0 | % | 15.0 | % | ||||||||
NMHG Operating Profit Percent - Global | 45 | % | 40 | % | 18.00 | % | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | 62.2 | % | 11.2 | % | ||||||||
NMHG Market Share: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Americas | 15 | % | 40 | % | 6.00 | % | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | — | % | — | % | ||||||||
EMEA | 9 | % | 40 | % | 3.60 | % | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | 150.0 | % | 5.4 | % | ||||||||
Asia-Pacific | 5 | % | 40 | % | 2.00 | % | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | — | % | — | % | ||||||||
Japan | 1 | % | 40 | % | 0.40 | % | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | — | % | — | % | ||||||||
NMHG Total | 31.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
HBB Adjusted Standard Margin | 15 | % | 25 | % | 3.75 | % | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | 69.1 | % | 2.6 | % | ||||||||
HBB ROTCE | 25 | % | 25 | % | 6.25 | % | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | 36.5 | % | 2.3 | % | ||||||||
HBB Operating Profit Percent | 45 | % | 25 | % | 11.25 | % | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | 68.0 | % | 7.7 | % | ||||||||
HBB Adjusted Net Sales | 15 | % | 25 | % | 3.75 | % | $513,300,000 | $493,047,414 | 60.3 | % | 2.3 | % | ||||||||||
HBB Total | 14.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
KC Adjusted Gross Profit | 15 | % | 5 | % | 0.75 | % | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | 53.6 | % | 0.4 | % | ||||||||
KC ROTCE | 25 | % | 5 | % | 1.25 | % | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | — | % | — | % | ||||||||
KC Operating Profit Percent | 45 | % | 5 | % | 2.25 | % | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | — | % | — | % | ||||||||
KC Adjusted Net Sales | 15 | % | 5 | % | 0.75 | % | $237,400,000 | $221,172,872 | 73.4 | % | 0.6 | % | ||||||||||
KC Total | 1.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
NA Coal Annual Factor | 30 | % | 30 | % | 9.00 | % | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | — | % | ||||||||
NA Coal Cumulative Factor | 30 | % | 30 | % | 9.00 | % | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | 1.8 | % | ||||||||
NA Coal New Project Factor | 40 | % | 30 | % | 12.00 | % | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | — | % | ||||||||
NA Coal Total | 1.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sub-total | 49.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
NACCO Positive Discretion | 10.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Final Payout Percentage | 59.3 | % | (6) |
(1) | The achievement percentages are based on the formulas contained in underlying performance guidelines adopted by the Compensation Committee. The formulas do not provide for straight-line interpolation from the performance target to the maximum payment target. The maximum achievement percentage is 150% for all factors other than the NA Coal New Project Factor, which is unlimited. |
(2) | NMHG Performance Factors. See the NMHG Long-Term Plan table on page 29 for descriptions of individual targets in the NMHG Long-Term Plan and reasons for non-disclosure of certain targets and results. |
(3) | HBB Performance Factors. See the HBB Long-Term Plan table on page 30 for descriptions of individual targets in the HBB Long-Term Plan and reasons for non-disclosure of certain targets and results. |
(4) | KC Performance Factors. This table does not disclose the KC adjusted gross profit, ROTCE or operating profit percentage targets or results due to the competitively sensitive nature of that information. For 2011, the KC Compensation Committee expected KC to meet the adjusted gross profit percentage target but did not expect KC to meet the ROTCE target or the operating profit percent target. |
(5) | NA Coal Performance Factors. The performance factors under the NA Coal long-term plan that are used in the NACCO Long-Term Plan measure the economic value of income of current and new projects as the performance criteria because the Compensation Committee believes it is a more accurate reflection of the rate of return in NA Coal's business, where a substantial portion of revenue is based on long-term contracts and projects. Each of the factors is described in detail below. |
• | New Project Factor. When the NA Coal long-term plan was established in 2006, the NA Coal Compensation Committee set a target dollar level of the “present value appreciation” that was to be earned by new projects obtained during the entire ten-year plan term. Value appreciation for a new project is determined based on the economics of the project. For example, the present value appreciation will be determined based on the forecasted net income and cost of capital over the life of the contract (which could be 40 years) based on the contract terms, including a present value calculation over the life of the contract. During the year the new project comes into existence, the value appreciation of that project for the ten-year term (or the remainder thereof) is taken into account under the NA Coal new project factor portion of the NACCO Long-Term Plan and compared to the target that was initially set by the Compensation Committee in 2006. |
• | Annual Factor. When the NA Coal long-term plan was established, the NA Coal Compensation Committee listed each NA Coal project that was in effect at that time. Using the existing contractual terms for each project, as shown in NA Coal's five-year business plan that was in effect in 2006 and forecasting the results out for another five years, the Compensation Committee established annual net income targets and forecasted capital expenditure targets for each project for each year from 2006 through 2015. Each year, the Compensation Committee compares the actual net income and actual capital charges for each project against these previously established targets to determine whether the pre-established targets have been satisfied. |
• | Cumulative Factor. When the NA Coal plan was established, the NA Coal Compensation Committee used the same five-year business plan and forecasting for the same projects to establish cumulative net income targets and cumulative forecasted capital expenditure targets for the same projects for each and every year during the ten-year term of the plan. Each year, the NA Coal Compensation Committee compares the actual cumulative net income and actual capital charges for each project against these previously established targets to determine whether the pre-established targets have been satisfied. |
(6) | The Compensation Committee recognized the extraordinary effort of the NACCO executives in obtaining $60 million ($39 million after-tax of $21 million) related to the Applica Incorporated litigation settlement in 2011 by increasing their awards under the NACCO Long-Term Plan by 10%. The settlement was not otherwise reflected in the subsidiary performance targets. Application of the formula resulted in a final, actual long-term payment for Messrs. Rankin and Schilling of 59.3% of long-term incentive target, which is less than the maximum 200% permitted under the Code Section 162(m) maximum payment pool. |
• | employee deferrals; |
• | matching benefits or "safe harbor" employer contributions; and |
• | minimum and additional profit sharing benefits. |
• | NACCO Plans. 50% of the first 5% of before-tax contributions; |
• | NMHG U.S. Plans. 66-2/3% of the first 3% of before-tax contributions and 25% of the next 4% of before-tax contributions; and |
• | HBB Plans. 3% employer safe-harbor contribution, regardless of amount contributed by the employee. |
• | Mr. Rankin: between 7.00% and 16.35% of compensation; |
• | Mr. Schilling: between 5.15% and 11.90% of compensation; |
• | Mr. Brogan: between 4.50% and 14.90% of compensation; |
• | Mr. Wilson: between 3.80% and 12.25% of compensation; and |
• | Mr. Trepp: between 3.66% and 7.35% of compensation. |
• | avoid additional statutory and regulatory restrictions applied to nonqualified deferred compensation plans under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code; |
• | simplify plan administration and recordkeeping; and |
• | eliminate the risk to the executives based on the unfunded nature of these plans. |
• | participants' account balances, other than excess profit sharing benefits, are credited with earnings during the year based on the rate of return of the Vanguard RST fixed income fund, which is one of the investment funds under the U.S. qualified plans. The maximum annual earnings rate for this purpose is 14%; |
• | no interest is credited on excess profit sharing benefits; |
• | the amounts credited under the plans each year will be paid during the period from January 1st to March 15th of the following year; and |
• | the amounts credited under the plans each year will be increased by 15% to reflect the immediately taxable nature of the payments. The 15% increase will apply to all benefits other than the portion of the excess 401(k) benefits that are in excess of the amount needed to obtain a full employer matching contribution under the plans. |
• | Mr. Rankin. Mr. Rankin maintains accounts under The NACCO Industries, Inc. Unfunded Benefit Plan, which we refer to as the Frozen NACCO Unfunded Plan, and the Retirement Benefit Plan for Alfred M. Rankin, Jr., which we refer to as the Frozen Rankin Retirement Plan. |
• | Messrs. Brogan and Wilson. Messrs. Brogan and Wilson each maintain an account under the NACCO Materials Handling Group, Inc. Unfunded Benefit Plan, which we refer to as the Frozen NMHG Unfunded Plan. |
• | No additional benefits are credited to the frozen plans (other than interest credits). |
• | The frozen accounts are credited with interest each year. Interest credits will be based on the greater of 5% or a ROTCE-based rate. The maximum interest rate for this purpose is 14%. The amount of the annual interest credits, increased by 15% to reflect the immediately taxable nature of the payments, will be paid to these Named Executive Officers during the period from January 1st to March 15th of the following year. |
• | The frozen accounts (including unpaid interest for the year of payment, if any) will be paid at the earlier of termination of employment (subject to a six-month delay if required under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code) or a change in control. |
• | Upon payment of the frozen accounts, a determination will be made whether the highest incremental state and federal personal income tax rates in the year of payment exceed the rates that were in effect in 2008 when all other nonqualified participants received their nonqualified plan payment. In the event the rates have increased, an additional tax gross-up payment will be paid to the Named Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee determined that the Company or the subsidiary, as applicable, and not the executive should bear the risk of a tax increase after 2008 because the Named Executive Officers would have received payment of their frozen accounts in 2008 were it not for the adverse cash flow and income tax impact on us. No other tax gross-ups (such as gross-ups for excise or other taxes) will be paid. |
• | amounts or benefits earned or accrued during their term of employment, including earned but unpaid salary and accrued but unused vacation pay; and |
• | benefits that are provided under the retirement plans, incentive compensation plans and U.S. nonqualified deferred compensation plans at termination of employment that are further described in this Proxy Statement. |
• | All former Company employees will be subject to the NMHG matching and profit sharing contribution formulas. |
• | Non-qualified U.S. defined contribution benefits for former Company employees will be provided under an NMHG plan. |
• | The salary midpoints for all NMHG employees in Hay salary grades 25 and above, including the Named Executive Officers, will be based on 100% of the All Industrials survey and the salary midpoints for those in salary grades 24 and below will be based on 97.5% of the All Industrials survey, but any employee whose midpoint was higher under the prior rules will be grandfathered. |
• | Some former Company employees will continue to participate in the NACCO Long-Term Plan. The NACCO Long-Term Plan was amended and restated, effective March 1, 2012 (subject to stockholder approval) to, among other things, allow subsidiary employees to participate in the plan and to provide that different groups of participants may be subject to different performance factors. See "Approval, for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and Section 303A.08 of the New York Stock Exchange's listing standards, of the NACCO Industries, Inc. Executive Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (Amended and Restated Effective March 1, 2012)" on page 51. |
• | The NACCO Supplemental Long-Term Plan was amended and restated, effective March 1, 2012 (subject to stockholder approval) to, among other things, allow subsidiary employees to participate in the plan and to increase by 17,567 the number of shares of Class A Common Shares available for issuance under the plan. See "Approval, for purposes of Section 303A.08 of the New York Stock Exchange's listing standards, of the NACCO Industries, Inc. Supplemental Executive Long-Term Incentive Bonus Plan (Amended and Restated Effective March 1, 2012)" on page 54. |
• | The NMHG Long-Term Plan was amended and restated, effective as of January 1, 2012 (subject to stockholder approval) to, among other things, expand the list of permitted performance objectives and to provide that different groups of participants may be subject to different performance factors. See "Approval, for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, of the NACCO Materials Handling Group, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2012)" on page 56. |
• | The NACCO Short-Term Plan was terminated effective December 31, 2011 and all former Company employees began participating in a short-term incentive compensation plan sponsored by NMHG on January 1, 2012. A replacement NMHG short-term plan was adopted by the Compensation Committee subject to stockholder approval in order to satisfy the requirements of Code Section 162(m). See "Approval, for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, of the NACCO Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (Effective January 1, 2012)" on page 58. |
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary(1)($) | Bonus (2)(3) ($) | Stock Awards(3)($) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | Change in Pension Value(4) and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings(5) ($) | All Other Compensation ($)(6) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr.; Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company | 2011 | $ | 1,217,000 | $ | — | $ | 1,426,409 | $ | 1,589,048 | (7) | $ | 1,871,523 | $ | 629,760 | $ | 6,733,740 | ||||||||||||||
2010 | $ | 1,217,943 | $ | — | $ | 5,306,595 | $ | 2,037,348 | (7) | $ | 1,628,046 | $ | 341,592 | $ | 10,531,524 | |||||||||||||||
2009 | $ | 1,138,798 | $ | 552,245 | $ | 665,388 | $ | 554,168 | (7) | $ | 473,137 | $ | 104,598 | $ | 3,488,334 | |||||||||||||||
Kenneth C. Schilling; Vice President and Controller of the Company and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of NMHG | 2011 | $ | 297,022 | $ | — | $ | 81,785 | $ | 156,613 | (7) | $ | 8,361 | $ | 76,218 | $ | 619,999 | ||||||||||||||
2010 | $ | 284,168 | $ | — | $ | 322,910 | $ | 189,945 | (7) | $ | 9,020 | $ | 34,572 | $ | 840,615 | |||||||||||||||
2009 | $ | 265,904 | $ | 67,215 | $ | 46,904 | $ | 58,718 | (7) | $ | 4,951 | $ | 3,325 | $ | 447,017 | |||||||||||||||
Michael P. Brogan; President and Chief Executive Officer of NMHG | 2011 | $ | 574,711 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,184,765 | (8) | $ | 184,658 | $ | 209,774 | $ | 2,153,908 | ||||||||||||||
2010 | $ | 565,866 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 985,160 | $ | 159,912 | $ | 48,496 | $ | 1,759,434 | ||||||||||||||||
2009 | $ | 531,026 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 334,468 | $ | 4,036 | $ | 869,530 | ||||||||||||||||
Colin Wilson; Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and President, Americas of NMHG (9) | 2011 | $ | 478,727 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 653,075 | (10) | $ | 143,030 | $ | 136,302 | $ | 1,411,134 | ||||||||||||||
Gregory H. Trepp; President and Chief Executive Officer of HBB (11) | 2011 | $ | 494,988 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 542,607 | (12) | $ | 101,623 | $ | 95,029 | $ | 1,234,247 | ||||||||||||||
2010 | $ | 494,952 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,102,800 | $ | 13,466 | $ | 93,805 | $ | 1,705,023 |
(1) | As required under the current disclosure requirements of the SEC, the amounts reported under the “Salary” column include both the base salary and the fixed dollar amount of cash paid in lieu of perquisites for the Named Executive Officers. Refer to the “- Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” which begins on page 14, for further information on our compensation philosophy with respect to perquisites. |
(2) | The discretionary cash bonuses that were granted to Messrs. Rankin and Schilling for 2009 consist of the sum of (i) discretionary cash bonuses of $274,140 and $44,040 for Messrs. Rankin and Schilling, respectively, and (ii) the cash portion of the discretionary award granted under the NACCO Supplemental Long-Term Plan described in note (3) below, which were $278,105 and $23,175 for Messrs. Rankin and Schilling, respectively. |
(3) | The amounts reported in the Stock Award column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the shares of Class A Common that were granted to Named Executive Officers of the Company for awards under the NACCO Long-Term Plan and the NACCO Supplemental Long-Term Plan computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Based on FASB ASC Topic 718, the grant date of the Company's awards under the NACCO Long-Term Plan and the NACCO Supplemental Long-Term Plan is the date on which the shares are issued, which is a date after the end of the fiscal year in which the services are performed. However, based on SEC guidance, the share awards that are payable under the NACCO Long-Term Plan are required to be reported for the year in which the employee's service inception date for such award occurs (i.e., the year earned), while the discretionary share awards that are payable under the NACCO Supplemental Long-Term Plan are required to be reported for the year in which such awards are granted (i.e., the year paid). As a result, the share awards shown in the table reflect the following: |
• | 2011. The amount shown reflects the shares that were granted on the service inception date in March 2011 and issued on February 7, 2012 under the NACCO Long-Term Plan for 2011 performance. |
• | 2010. The amount shown reflects the sum of (i) the shares that were granted on the service inception date in March 2010 and issued on February 8, 2011 under the NACCO Long-Term Plan for 2010 performance plus (ii) the shares that were issued in the discretion of the Compensation Committee on January 29, 2010 under the NACCO Supplemental Plan for 2009 performance. |
• | 2009. The amount shown reflects only the shares that were granted on the service inception date in March 2009 and issued January 29, 2010 under the NACCO Long-Term Plan for 2009 performance. It does not reflect the shares that were issued in the discretion of the Compensation Committee on January 29, 2010 under the NACCO Supplemental Plan for 2009 performance. |
Named Executive Officer | Year | Stock Awards ($) | Total ($) | |||
Mr. Rankin | 2010 | $4,652,115 | $9,877,044 | |||
2009 | $1,319,868 | $4,142,814 | ||||
Mr. Schilling | 2010 | $268,370 | $786,075 | |||
2009 | $101,444 | $501,557 |
(4) | Amounts listed in this column include the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of accumulated plan benefits under all defined benefit pension plans, as described in more detail in the Pension Benefits Table on page 48. For 2011, the following amounts were included: $0 for Mr. Schilling, $820 for Mr. Brogan and $1,229 for Mr. Wilson. Messrs. Rankin and Trepp do not participate in any defined benefit pension plans. |
(5) | Amounts listed in this column also include the interest that is in excess of 120% of the federal long-term interest rate, compounded monthly, that was credited to the executives' accounts under the nonqualified deferred compensation plans of the Company and its subsidiaries, as described in more detail in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table on page 46. For 2011, the following amounts were included: $1,871,523 for Mr. Rankin; $8,361 for Mr. Schilling; $183,838 for Mr. Brogan, $141,801for Mr. Wilson and $101,623 for Mr. Trepp. |
(6) | All other compensation earned during 2011 for each of the Named Executive Officers is as follows: |
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. | Kenneth C. Schilling | Michael P. Brogan | Colin Wilson | Gregory H. Trepp | |||||
Employer Qualified Matching Contributions | $6,125 | $6,125 | $7,188 | $7,188 | $0 | ||||
Employer Nonqualified Matching Contributions | $50,446 | $4,619 | $21,853 | $14,159 | $0 | ||||
Employer Qualified Profit Sharing Contributions | $0 | $20,875 | $25,313 | $11,082 | $9,465 | ||||
Employer Nonqualified Profit Sharing Contributions | $448,010 | $42,128 | $152,811 | $101,301 | $68,239 | ||||
Other Qualified Employer Retirement Contributions | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $7,350 | ||||
Other Nonqualified Employer Retirement Contributions | $62,850 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $7,500 | ||||
Employer Paid Life Insurance Premiums | $23,021 | $1,519 | $1,657 | $1,620 | $0 | ||||
Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits | $38,356 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||
Other | $952 | $952 | $952 | $952 | $2,475 | ||||
Total | $629,760 | $76,218 | $209,774 | $136,302 | $95,029 |
(7) | The amounts listed for Messrs. Rankin and Schilling include the cash payments under the NACCO Short-Term Plan and the NACCO Long-Term Plan that were earned during 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Refer to note (3) above. |
(8) | The amount listed for 2011 includes a cash payment of $436,911 to Mr. Brogan under the NMHG Short-Term Plan and $747,854 representing the value of his award under the NMHG Long-Term Plan. No incentive compensation payments were paid to any NMHG employees for 2009, including Mr. Brogan. |
(9) | Mr. Wilson was not a Named Executive Officer for 2009 or 2010. |
(10) | The amount listed for 2011 includes a cash payment of $258,648 to Mr. Wilson under the NMHG Short-Term Plan and $394,427 representing the value of his award under the NMHG Long-Term Plan. |
(11) | Mr. Trepp was not a Named Executive Officer for 2009. |
(12) | The amount listed for 2011 includes a cash payment of $107,672 to Mr. Trepp under the HBB Short-Term Plan and $434,935 representing the value of his award under the HBB Long-Term Plan. |
(A) Estimated Future or Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) | (B) Estimated Future or Possible Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards(2) ($) | ||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date | Plan Name | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | ||||||||
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. | N/A | NACCO Short-Term Plan | (3) | $974,600 | $1,461,900 | $0 | $0 | N/A | ||||||
2/7/2012 | NACCO Long-Term Plan | (4) | $1,078,761 | $2,157,522 | $2,003,412 | $4,006,825 | $1,426,409 | |||||||
Kenneth C. Schilling | N/A | NACCO Short-Term Plan | (3) | $123,040 | $184,560 | $0 | $0 | N/A | ||||||
2/7/2012 | NACCO Long-Term Plan | (4) | $61,905 | $123,809 | $114,966 | $229,931 | $81,785 | |||||||
Michael P. Brogan | N/A | NMHG Short-Term Plan | (3) | $441,770 | $662,655 | $0 | $0 | N/A | ||||||
N/A | NMHG Long-Term Plan | (5) | $946,650 | $1,419,975 | $0 | $0 | N/A | |||||||
Colin Wilson | N/A | NMHG Short-Term Plan | (3) | $261,525 | $392,288 | $0 | $0 | N/A | ||||||
NMHG Long-Term Plan | (5) | $499,275 | $748,913 | $0 | $0 | N/A | ||||||||
Gregory H. Trepp | N/A | HBB Short-Term Plan | (3) | $339,660 | $509,490 | $0 | $0 | N/A | ||||||
N/A | HBB Long-Term Plan | (5) | $735,930 | $1,103,895 | $0 | $0 | N/A |
(1) | There are no minimum or threshold payouts to the Named Executive Officers under any of the incentive plans. |
(2) | Amounts in this column reflect the grant date fair value of shares of Class A Common that were granted and issued to Named Executive Officers of the Company for the 2011 performance period under the NACCO Long-Term Plan. The |
(3) | Awards under the short-term plans are based on a one-year performance period that consists solely of the 2011 calendar year. The awards are paid out, in cash, as soon as practicable after they are calculated and approved by the Compensation Committee. Therefore, there is no post-2011 payout opportunity under these plans. The amounts disclosed in this table are the target and maximum awards that were initially communicated to the executives when the targets were established by the Compensation Committee in 2011. The amount the executives actually received, after the final payout was calculated based on the actual performance compared to the pre-established performance goals, is disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table and the related footnotes. |
(4) | These amounts reflect the awards issued in 2012 under the NACCO Long-Term Plan for 2011 performance. Awards under the plan are based on a one-year performance period that consists solely of the 2011 calendar year. The awards are paid out, partially in stock and partially in cash, as soon as practicable after they are calculated and approved by the Compensation Committee. Therefore, there is no post-2011 payout opportunity for any award under the plan. The amounts disclosed in this table are the dollar values of the target and maximum awards that were communicated to the executives when the targets were established by the Compensation Committee in 2011 (including the 15% increase to Messrs. Rankin and Schilling to account for the immediately taxable nature of their long-term plan awards). The cash portion of the award, representing 35% of the total award, is listed under column (A) of this table. The remaining 65% of the award, reflecting the stock portion of the award, is listed under column (B) of this table. To determine the number of shares that are actually issued under the NACCO Long-Term Plan, the dollar value of the stock portion of the award is divided by the average closing price of shares of Class A Common on the New York Stock Exchange at the end of each week during the relevant period specified in the NACCO Long-Term Plan, as discussed beginning on page 30 under the heading “- Long-Term Incentive Compensation - NACCO Long-Term Incentive Compensation.” The number of shares of Class A Common that the Named Executive Officers actually received under the plan is disclosed in the Stock Vested Table below. |
(5) | These amounts reflect the dollar value of Messrs. Brogan, Wilson and Trepp's award targets for the 2011 performance period under their respective long-term plans. |
Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value Realized on Vesting ($) | |||
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. | 13,883 | $1,426,409 | |||
Kenneth C. Schilling | 796 | $81,785 | |||
Michael P. Brogan | — | $0 | |||
Colin Wilson | — | $0 | |||
Gregory H. Trepp | — | $0 |
• | the account balances as of the date of the change in control under the subsidiary long-term incentive compensation plans and all of the U.S. nonqualified defined contribution plans will automatically be paid in the form of a lump sum payment in the event of a change in control of the Company or the participant's employer; and |
• | the change in control provisions under our long-term and short-term incentive compensation plans, in addition to providing for the immediate payment of the account balance (plus interest) as of the date of the change in control (if any), also provide for the payment of a pro-rated target award for the year of the change in control. |
• | any employee benefit plan; |
• | the Company; |
• | the applicable subsidiary or one of its affiliates; or |
• | the parties to the stockholders' agreement discussed under “- Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership - Class B Common Stock” on page 64; |
• | the individuals and entities who beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the combined voting power of the Company immediately prior to such business combination continue to hold at least 50% of the voting securities of the successor; and |
• | at the time of the execution of the initial agreement, or of the action of the Board of Directors of the Company providing for such business combination, at least a majority of the members of the Board of Directors of the Company were incumbent directors. |
Name | Estimated Total Value of Payments Based on Incentive Plan Award Targets in Year of Change in Control ($)(1) | Estimated Total Value of Cash Payments Based on Accrued Balance in Long-Term Plans in Year of Change in Control ($)(2) | Estimated Total Value of Cash Payments Based on Accrued Balance in Nonqualified U.S. Deferred Compensation Plans($)(3) | Estimated Total Value of all Payments ($) | ||||
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. | $4,056,773 | N/A | $15,641,588 | $19,698,361 | ||||
Kenneth C. Schilling | $299,910 | N/A | $82,714 | $382,624 | ||||
Michael P. Brogan | $1,388,420 | $680,259 | $1,405,552 | $3,474,231 | ||||
Colin Wilson | $760,800 | $358,749 | $1,635,821 | $2,755,370 | ||||
Gregory H. Trepp | $1,075,590 | $776,681 | $87,159 | $1,939,430 |
(1) | This column reflects the award targets for the Named Executive Officers under the short-term and long-term incentive compensation plans for 2011. Under the change in control provisions of the plans, they would have been entitled to receive their award targets for 2011 if a change in control had occurred on December 31, 2011. Awards under the NACCO Long-Term Plan are denominated in dollars and the amounts shown in the above-table reflect the dollar-denominated 2011 target awards. As described in note (4) to the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table, Messrs. Rankin and Schilling would receive approximately 35% of the value of the award in cash, and the remainder in shares of restricted Class A Common. |
(2) | This column reflects the December 31, 2011 account balances under the subsidiary long-term plans, excluding the 2011 award (which is reflected in Column (1)). Under the change in control provisions of those plans, these Named Executive Officers would have been entitled to receive the acceleration of the payment of their entire account balances under those plans if a change in control had occurred on December 31, 2011. The amounts shown were earned for services performed in years prior to 2011 and were 100% vested prior to December 31, 2011. No additional amounts are paid due to a change in control. There are no accrued balances under the Company's long-term plans. |
(3) | This column reflects the account balances of the Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2011 under all of the U.S. defined contribution, nonqualified deferred compensation plans. Under the change in control provisions of those plans, the Named Executive Officers would have been entitled to receive payment of their entire account balances under those plans if a change in control had occurred on December 31, 2011. The majority of the amounts shown were earned for services performed in years prior to 2011 and were 100% vested prior to December 31, 2011. Only a small portion of the account balance represents benefits earned for services performed in 2011. No additional amounts are paid due to a change in control. These plans are discussed in more detail under “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Benefits” below. |
Name | Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan | Executive Contributions in 2011 ($)(1) | Employer Contributions in 2011 ($) | Aggregate Earnings in 2011 ($)(2) | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions in 2011 ($) | Aggregate Balance at December 31, 2011 ($) | ||||||
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. | Frozen NACCO Unfunded Plan | $0(3) | $0(3) | $705,302 | $705,302(4) | $4,812,018(5) | ||||||
Frozen Rankin Retirement Plan | $0(3) | $0(3) | $1,475,869 | $1,475,869(4) | $10,069,313(6) | |||||||
NACCO Excess Plan | $96,642 | $561,306(7) | $102,308 | $406,834(8) | $760,256(9) | |||||||
Kenneth C. Schilling | NACCO Excess Plan | $26,476 | $46,747(7) | $9,491 | $40,439(8) | $82,714(9) | ||||||
Michael P. Brogan | NMHG Excess Plan | $51,260 | $174,664(7) | $35,679 | $60,312(8) | $261,603(10) | ||||||
Frozen NMHG Unfunded Plan | $0(3) | $0(3) | $117,218 | $117,218(4) | $1,143,949(11) | |||||||
Frozen NMHG Long-Term Plan | $0(3) | $0(3) | $0 | $832,744(12) | $0(12) | |||||||
NMHG Long-Term Plan | $0(3) | $747,854 | $88,391 | $0 | $1,428,113(13) | |||||||
Colin Wilson | NMHG Excess Plan | $54,653 | $115,460(7) | $24,584 | $47,458(8) | $194,697(10) | ||||||
Frozen NMHG Unfunded Plan | $0(3) | $0(3) | $126,497 | $126,497(4) | $1,441,124(11) | |||||||
Frozen NMHG Long-Term Plan | $0(3) | $0(3) | $0 | $451,358(12) | $0(12) | |||||||
NMHG Long-Term Plan | $0(3) | $394,427 | $46,615 | $0 | $753,176(13) | |||||||
Gregory H. Trepp | HBB Excess Plan | $0(3) | $75,739(7) | $11,420 | $78,935(8) | $87,159(14) | ||||||
Frozen HBB Long-Term Plan | $0(3) | $0(3) | $0 | $138,278(12) | $0(12) | |||||||
HBB Long-Term Plan | $0(3) | $434,935 | $100,920 | $0 | $1,211,616(15) |
(1) | These amounts, which were otherwise payable in 2011 but were deferred at the election of the executives, are also included in the “Salary” or “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” columns of the Summary Compensation Table. |
(2) | The above-market earnings portion of the amounts shown in this column is also reflected in the “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column and described in note (5) of the Summary Compensation Table. |
(3) | As described in more detail in the “- Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 14, the Frozen NACCO Unfunded Plan, the Frozen Rankin Retirement Plan and the Frozen NMHG Unfunded Plan were each frozen effective December 31, 2007 and we refer to these plans collectively as the Frozen Unfunded Plans. No additional contributions (other than interest credits) will be made to these plans or the Frozen NMHG or HBB Long-Term Plans. No employee contributions are made to the NMHG or HBB Long-Term Plans or the HBB Excess Plan. |
(4) | The Named Executive Officers who participate in the Frozen Unfunded Plans will receive payment of their December 31, 2007 account balances upon the earlier of a change in control or termination of employment (with a six month delay if required by Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code). However, the interest that is accrued under the Frozen Unfunded Plans each calendar year is paid to those Named Executive Officers no later than March 15th of the following year. Because the interest that was credited to their accounts for 2010 was paid in 2011, it is reflected as a distribution for 2011. |
(5) | The account balance under the Frozen NACCO Unfunded Plan includes all above-market earnings that are also required to be disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table. Of Mr. Rankin's December 31, 2011 account balance, |
(6) | The account balance under the Frozen Rankin Retirement Plan includes all above-market earnings that are also required to be disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table. Of Mr. Rankin's December 31, 2011 account balance, $1,204,771 is reported as nonqualified deferred compensation earnings for 2011 in the Summary Compensation Table. In addition, $7,029,960 of the account balance was previously reported in prior Summary Compensation Tables. |
(7) | These amounts are also reflected in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table and specifically identified in note (6) to the Summary Compensation Table. |
(8) | The Named Executive Officers will each receive payment of the amounts earned under the active U.S. nonqualified defined contribution deferred compensation plans for each calendar year (including interest) no later than March 15th of the following year. Because the payments for 2010 were made in 2011, they are reflected as a distribution in 2011. Because the payments for 2011 were made in 2012, they are reflected in the Named Executive Officer's aggregate balance as of December 31, 2011 and are not reflected as a distribution in 2011. |
(9) | The account balance under the NACCO Industries, Inc. Excess Retirement Plan, which we refer to as the NACCO Excess Plan, includes all employer and employee contributions and above-market earnings that are also required to be disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table. Of their December 31, 2011 account balances, $748,953 of Mr. Rankin's account balance and $81,584 of Mr. Schilling's account balance is reported in the Summary Compensation Table for 2011. Because the account balance under the NACCO Excess Plan is paid out each year, none of their current account balances was previously reported in prior Summary Compensation Tables. |
(10) | The account balance under the NACCO Materials Handling Group, Inc. Excess Retirement Plan, which we refer to as the NMHG Excess Plan, includes all employer contributions and above-market earnings that are also required to be disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table. Of their December 31, 2011 account balances, $255,215 of Mr. Brogan's account balance and $190,122 of Mr. Wilson's account balances is reported in the Summary Compensation Table for 2011. Because the account balance under the NMHG Excess Plan is paid out each year, none of their current account balances was previously reported in prior Summary Compensation Tables. |
(11) | The account balance under the Frozen NMHG Unfunded Plan includes all above-market earnings that are also required to be disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table. Of their December 31, 2011 account balances, $84,828 of Mr. Brogan's account balance and $85,024 of Mr. Wilson's account balance is reported as nonqualified deferred compensation earnings for 2011 in the Summary Compensation Table. In addition, $569,234 of Mr. Brogan's account balance and none of Mr. Wilson's account balance was previously reported in prior Summary Compensation Tables. |
(12) | The awards under the Frozen NMHG and HBB Long-Term Compensation Plans for pre-2008 award periods were subject to a three-year holding period. The Named Executive Officers from NMHG and HBB each received payment of their 2007 award in 2011. No further amounts are owed under the Frozen NMHG and HBB Long-Term Compensation Plans. |
(13) | Messrs. Brogan and Wilson are participants in the NMHG Long-Term Plan. This amount reflects the value of the awards they received under the plan for 2011 performance, which awards are also reflected in both the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table and in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. The NMHG Long-Term Plan account balance includes all employer contributions and above-market earnings that are also required to be disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table for 2011. $815,573 of Mr. Brogan's account balance and $431,195 of Mr. Wilson's account balance is reported as non-equity incentive plan compensation and above-market earnings for 2011 in the Summary Compensation Table. $591,868 of Mr. Brogan's account balance and none of Mr. Wilson's account balance was previously reported in prior Summary Compensation Tables. |
(14) | The account balance under the Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. Excess Retirement Plan, which we refer to as the HBB Excess Plan, includes all employer contributions and above-market earnings that are also required to be disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table. $85,981 of Mr. Trepp's December 31, 2011 account balance is reported in the Summary Compensation Table for 2011. Because the account balance under the HBB Excess Plan is paid out each year, none of his current account balance was previously reported in prior Summary Compensation Tables. |
(15) | Mr. Trepp is a participant in the HBB Long-Term Plan. This amount reflects the value of the award he received under the plan for 2011 performance, which award is also reflected in both the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table and in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. The HBB Long-Term Plan account balance includes all employer contributions and above-market earnings that are also required to be |
Name | Plan Name | Number of Years Credited Service (#) | Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($) | Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($) | |||||
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. | N/A (1) | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||
Kenneth C. Schilling | Part I of Combined Plan | 2.1 | (2) | $38,416 | $0 | ||||
The SERP | 2.1 | (2) | $3,295 | $0 | |||||
Michael P. Brogan | The UK Plan | 15.10 | (3) | $980,422 | $0 | ||||
The UK Excess Plan | 18.25 | (3) | $87,407 | $0 | |||||
Colin Wilson | The UK Plan | 6.6 | (4) | $277,449 | $0 | ||||
Gregory H. Trepp | N/A (1) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
(1) | Messrs. Rankin and Trepp never participated in any of our defined benefit pension plans. |
(2) | For Mr. Schilling, the number of years of credited service taken into account to determine pension benefits was frozen as of December 31, 1993. |
(3) | For Mr. Brogan, the number of years of credited service taken into account to determine pension benefits under the statutorily-approved pension plan for U.K. employees, which is referred to as the UK Plan, was frozen as of October 1, 2002 and the number of years of credited service taken into account to determine pension benefits under a nonqualified U.S. plan for Mr. Brogan, which is referred to as the UK Excess Plan, was frozen as of December 31, 2005. |
(4) | For Mr. Wilson, the number of years of credited service taken into account to determine pension benefits was frozen as of May 31, 1995. |
• | a discount rate of 4.55% for the Combined Plan and 4.30% for the SERP and UK Excess Plan; |
• | the RP2000 mortality table with mortality improvement projected to 2019 and no collar adjustment; and |
• | assumed retirement age of 65 with no pre-retirement decrement. |
• | a discount rate of 4.90%; |
• | the SAPS series mortality table, year of use 2011, with a 1.1 multiplier; |
• | an annual cost-of-living adjustment of 2.05% (in-payment and in-deferment); and |
• | assumed retirement age of 65 with no pre-retirement decrement. |
Plan Category | Number of Securities to Be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column(a)) | |||||
Class A Shares: | (a) | (b) | (c) | |||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | — | N/A | 501,073 | |||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | — | N/A | — | |||||
Total | — | N/A | 501,073 | |||||
Class B Shares: | ||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | — | N/A | 80,100 | |||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | — | N/A | — | |||||
Total | — | N/A | 80,100 |
2. | Approval, for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and Section 303A.08 of the New York Stock Exchange's listing standards, of the NACCO Industries, Inc. Executive Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (Amended and Restated Effective March 1, 2012) |
Name and Position | Dollar Value(s) | ||||
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. - Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company | $ | 3,166,928 | (1)(2) | ||
Kenneth C. Schilling - Vice President and Controller of the Company and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of NMHG | $ | 182,563 | (1)(2) | ||
Michael P. Brogan - President and Chief Executive Officer of NMHG | $ | — | (2) | ||
Colin Wilson - Vice-President, Chief Operating Officer and President, Americas of NMHG | $ | — | (2) | ||
Gregory H. Trepp - President and Chief Executive Officer of HBB and Chief Executive Officer of KC | $ | — | (2) | ||
Executive Officer Group (30 persons) | $ | 4,204,460 | (1)(2) | ||
Non-Executive Director Group (8 persons) | $ | — | (3) | ||
Non-Executive Officer Employee Group (8,870 persons) | $ | 161,075 | (1)(2) |
(1) | The amounts include the 15% increase from the Hay-recommended long-term target awards that the Compensation Committee applies each year to account for the immediately taxable nature of the NACCO Long-Term Plan awards. See “- Long-Term Incentive Compensation - NACCO Long-Term Incentive Compensation.” |
(2) | Only certain executive officers and non-executive officer employees designated by the Compensation Committee each year are eligible to participate in the NACCO Long-Term Plan. As of March 13, 2012, the Compensation Committee designated only eleven employees, all of whom are former Company employees currently employed by NMHG, including Messrs. Rankin and Schilling, as plan participants. Messrs. Brogan, Wilson and Trepp are not eligible to participate in the NACCO Long-Term Plan during 2012. |
(3) | Directors who are not employees of NACCO or its subsidiaries are not eligible to participate in the NACCO Long-Term Plan. |
3. | Approval, for purposes of Section 303A.08 of the New York Stock Exchange's listing standards, of the NACCO Industries, Inc. Supplemental Executive Long-Term Incentive Bonus Plan (Amended and Restated Effective March 1, 2012) |
Name and Position | Dollar Value(s) | ||
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. - Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company | $0 | ||
Kenneth C. Schilling - Vice President and Controller of the Company and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of NMHG | $0 | ||
Michael P. Brogan - President and Chief Executive Officer of NMHG | $0 | ||
Colin Wilson - Vice-President, Chief Operating Officer and President, Americas of NMHG | $0 | ||
Gregory H. Trepp - President and Chief Executive Officer of HBB and Chief Executive Officer of KC | $0 | ||
Executive Officer Group (30 persons) | $0 | ||
Non-Executive Director Group (8 persons) | $0 | (1) | |
Non-Executive Officer Employee Group (8,870 persons) | $0 |
(1) | Directors who are not employees of NACCO or its subsidiaries are not eligible to participate in the NACCO Supplemental Long-Term Plan. |
4. | Approval, for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, of the NACCO Materials Handling Group, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2012) |
Name and Position | Dollar Value(s) | ||||
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. - Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company | $ | — | (1) | ||
Kenneth C. Schilling - Vice President and Controller of the Company and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of NMHG | $ | — | (1) | ||
Michael P. Brogan - President and Chief Executive Officer of NMHG | $ | 997,650 | |||
Colin Wilson - Vice-President, Chief Operating Officer and President, Americas of NMHG | $ | 526,155 | |||
Gregory H. Trepp - President and Chief Executive Officer of HBB and Chief Executive Officer of KC | $ | — | (1) | ||
Executive Officer Group (30 persons) | $ | 1,318,686 | (1) | ||
Non-Executive Director Group (8 persons) | $ | — | (2) | ||
Non-Executive Officer Employee Group (8,870 persons) | $ | 4,655,999 | (1) |
(1) | Employees (i) who are participants in the NACCO Long-Term Plan for 2012 or (ii) who are not employed by NMHG or its subsidiaries are not eligible to participate in the NMHG Long-Term Plan for 2012. Consequently, Messrs. Rankin, Schilling and Trepp are not eligible to participate in the NMHG Long-Term Plan for 2012. |
(2) | Directors who are not employees of NMHG or its subsidiaries are not eligible to participate in the NMHG Long-Term Plan. |
5. | Approval, for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, of the NACCO Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (Effective January 1, 2012) |
Name and Position | Dollar Value(s) | ||||
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. - Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company | $ | 1,001,400 | |||
Kenneth C. Schilling - Vice President and Controller of the Company and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of NMHG | $ | 127,000 | |||
Michael P. Brogan - President and Chief Executive Officer of NMHG | $ | 465,570 | |||
Colin Wilson - Vice-President, Chief Operating Officer and President, Americas of NMHG | $ | 275,605 | |||
Gregory H. Trepp - President and Chief Executive Officer of HBB and Chief Executive Officer of KC | $ | — | (1) | ||
Executive Officer Group (30 persons) | $ | 3,075,354 | (1) | ||
Non-Executive Director Group (8 persons) | $ | — | (2) | ||
Non-Executive Officer Employee Group (8,870 persons) | $ | 8,911,164 | (1) |
(1) | Employees who are not employed by NMHG or its subsidiaries in 2012 are not eligible to participate in the NACCO Annual Plan. |
(2) | Directors who are not employees of NMHG or its subsidiaries are not eligible to participate in the NACCO Annual Plan. |
6. | Confirmation of Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm of the Company for the Current Fiscal Year |
Name | Title of Class | Sole Voting and Investment Power | Shared Voting or Investment Power | Aggregate Amount | Percent of Class(1) | |||||||||
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (2) 1299 Ocean Avenue Santa Monica, CA 90401 | Class A | 454,465 | (2) | — | 454,465 | (2) | 6.69 | % | ||||||
LSV Asset Management (3) 155 N. Wacker Drive, Suite 4600 Chicago, IL 60606 | Class A | 366,732 | (3) | — | 366,732 | (3) | 5.40 | % | ||||||
Beatrice B. Taplin Suite 300 5875 Landerbrook Drive Cleveland, OH 44124-4069 | Class A | 353,213 | — | 353,213 | 5.20 | % | ||||||||
The Vanguard Group, Inc. (4) 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355 | Class A | 334,031 | (4) | 9,201 | 343,232 | (4) | 5.05 | % | ||||||
John P. Jumper (5) | Class A | — | — | — | — | % | ||||||||
Dennis W. LaBarre (5) | Class A | 8,734 | — | 8,734 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||
Richard de J. Osborne (5) | Class A | 5,269 | — | 5,269 | — | |||||||||
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. | Class A | 222,954 | 540,602 | (6) | 763,556 | (6) | 11.24 | % | ||||||
Michael E. Shannon (5) | Class A | 5,561 | — | 5,561 | — | |||||||||
Britton T. Taplin (5) | Class A | 36,213 | 6,055 | (7) | 42,268 | (7) | 0.62 | % | ||||||
David F. Taplin (5) | Class A | 14,324 | 37,000 | (8) | 51,324 | (8) | 0.76 | % | ||||||
John F. Turben (5) | Class A | 6,664 | — | 6,664 | — | |||||||||
Eugene Wong (5) | Class A | 5,198 | — | 5,198 | — | |||||||||
Kenneth C. Schilling | Class A | 11,221 | 11,221 | 0.17 | % | |||||||||
Michael P. Brogan | Class A | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
Colin Wilson | Class A | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
Gregory H. Trepp | Class A | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
All executive officers and directors as a group (38 persons) | Class A | 377,240 | 584,449 | (9) | 961,689 | (9) | 14.16 | % |
(1) | Less than 0.10%, except as otherwise indicated. |
(2) | A Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC with respect to Class A Common on February 14, 2012 reported that Dimensional Fund Advisors LP, which is referred to as Dimensional, may be deemed to beneficially own the shares of Class A Common reported above as a result of being an investment adviser registered under Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 that furnishes investment advice to four investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and serving as an investment manager to certain other commingled group trusts and separate accounts, which are referred to collectively as the Dimensional Funds, which own the shares of Class A Common. In its role as investment adviser or manager, Dimensional possesses the sole power to vote 444,089 shares of Class A Common and the sole power to invest 454,465 shares of Class A Common owned by the Dimensional |
(3) | A Schedule 13G filed with the SEC with respect to Class A Common on February 3, 2012 reported that LSV Asset Management may be deemed to beneficially own the shares of Class A Common reported above as a result of being an investment adviser. |
(4) | A Schedule 13G filed with the SEC with respect to Class A Common on February 8, 2012 reported that The Vanguard Group, Inc. may be deemed to beneficially own the shares of Class A Common reported above as a result of being an investment adviser. |
(5) | Pursuant to our Non-Employee Directors' Plan, each non-employee director has the right to acquire additional shares of Class A Common within 60 days after February 28, 2012. The shares each non-employee director has the right to receive are not included in the table because the actual number of additional shares will be determined on April 1, 2012 by taking the amount of such director's quarterly retainer required to be paid in shares of Class A Common plus any voluntary portion of such director's quarterly retainer, if so elected, divided by the average of the closing price per share of Class A Common on the Friday (or if Friday is not a trading day, the last trading day before such Friday) for each week of the calendar quarter ending on March 31, 2012. |
(6) | Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. may be deemed to be a member of Rankin Associates II, L.P., which is referred to as Associates, which is made up of the individuals and entities holding limited partnership interests in Associates and Rankin Management, Inc., which is referred to as RMI, the general partner of Associates. Associates may be deemed to be a “group” as defined under the Exchange Act and therefore may be deemed as a group to beneficially own 338,295 shares of Class A Common held by Associates. Although Associates holds the 338,295 shares of Class A Common, it does not have any power to vote or dispose of such shares of Class A Common. RMI has the sole power to vote such shares and shares the power to dispose of such shares with the other individuals and entities holding limited partnership interests in Associates. RMI exercises such powers by action of its board of directors, which acts by majority vote and consists of Alfred M. Rankin, Jr., Thomas T. Rankin, Claiborne R. Rankin and Roger F. Rankin, the individual trusts of whom are the shareholders of RMI. Under the terms of the Limited Partnership Agreement of Associates, Associates may not dispose of Class A Common without the consent of RMI and the approval of the holders of more than 75% of all of the partnership interests of Associates. As a result of holding through his trust, of which he is trustee, partnership interests in Associates, Mr. Rankin may be deemed to beneficially own, and share the power to dispose of, 338,295 shares of Class A Common held by Associates. In addition, Mr. Rankin may be deemed to be a member of a group, as defined under the Exchange Act, as a result of holding through his trust, of which he is trustee, partnership interests in Rankin Associates IV, L.P., which we refer to as Rankin IV. As a result, the group consisting of Mr. Rankin, the other general and limited partners of Rankin IV and Rankin IV may be deemed to beneficially own, and share the power to vote and dispose of, 105,272 shares of Class A Common held by Rankin IV. Mr. Rankin disclaims beneficial ownership of 513,971 shares of Class A Common held by (a) members of Mr. Rankin's family, (b) charitable trusts, (c) trusts for the benefit of members of Mr. Rankin's family and (d) Associates and Rankin IV to the extent in excess of his pecuniary interest in each such entity. |
(7) | Britton T. Taplin is deemed to share with his spouse voting and investment power over 6,055 shares of Class A Common held by Mr. Taplin's spouse; however, Mr. Taplin disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares. Mr. Taplin has pledged 2,169 shares of Class A Common. |
(8) | David F. Taplin is deemed to share with his step-sister the power to vote and dispose of 37,000 shares of Class A Common as a result of being a co-trustee of a trust; however, Mr. Taplin has disclaimed beneficial ownership of such shares to the extent in excess of his pecuniary interest in such shares. |
(9) | The aggregate amount of Class A Common beneficially owned by all executive officers and directors and the aggregate amount of Class A Common beneficially owned by all executive officers and directors as a group for which they have shared voting or investment power include the shares of Class A Common of which Mr. Rankin has disclaimed beneficial ownership in note (6) above, Mr. B. Taplin has disclaimed beneficial ownership in note (7) above and Mr. D. Taplin has disclaimed beneficial ownership in note (8) above. As described in note (5) above, the aggregate amount of Class A Common beneficially owned by all executive officers and directors as a group as set forth in the table above does not include shares that the non-employee directors have the right to acquire within 60 days after February 28, 2012 pursuant to the Non-Employee Directors' Plan. |
Name | Title of Class | Sole Voting and Investment Power | Shared Voting or Investment Power | Aggregate Amount | Percent of Class(1) | |||||||||
Clara Taplin Rankin, et al. (2) c/o PNC Bank, N.A. 3550 Lander Road Pepper Pike, OH 44124 | Class B | (2) | (2) | 1,542,757 | (2) | 96.87 | % | |||||||
Rankin Associates I, L.P., et al. (3) Suite 300 5875 Landerbrook Drive Cleveland, OH 44124-4069 | Class B | (3) | (3) | 472,371 | (3) | 29.66 | % | |||||||
Beatrice B. Taplin Suite 300 5875 Landerbrook Drive Cleveland, OH 44124-4069 | Class B | 337,310 | (4) | — | 337,310 | (4) | 21.18 | % | ||||||
Rankin Associates IV, L.P., et al. (5) Suite 300 5875 Landerbrook Drive Cleveland, OH 44124-4069 | Class B | (5) | (5) | 294,728 | (5) | 18.51 | % | |||||||
John P. Jumper | Class B | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
Dennis W. LaBarre | Class B | 100 | — | 100 | — | |||||||||
Richard de J. Osborne | Class B | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. | Class B | 63,052 | (6) | 767,099 | (6) | 830,151 | (6) | 52.13 | % | |||||
Michael E. Shannon | Class B | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
Britton T. Taplin | Class B | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
David F. Taplin | Class B | 15,883 | (7) | — | 15,883 | (7) | 1.00 | % | ||||||
John F. Turben | Class B | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
Eugene Wong | Class B | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
Kenneth C. Schilling | Class B | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
Michael P. Brogan | Class B | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
Colin Wilson | Class B | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
Gregory H. Trepp | Class B | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
All executive officers and directors as a group (38 persons) | Class B | 80,910 | (8) | 767,099 | (8) | 848,009 | (8) | 53.25 | % |
(1) | Less than 0.10%, except as otherwise indicated. |
(2) | A Schedule 13D, which was filed with the SEC with respect to Class B Common and most recently amended on February 14, 2012, which is referred to as the Stockholders 13D, reported that, except for NACCO and PNC Bank, N.A., as depository, the signatories to the stockholders' agreement, together in certain cases with trusts and custodianships, which are referred to collectively as the Signatories, may be deemed to be a “group” as defined under the Exchange Act, and therefore may be deemed as a group to beneficially own all of the Class B Common subject to the stockholders' agreement, which is an aggregate of 1,542,757 shares. The stockholders' agreement requires that each Signatory, prior to any conversion of such Signatory's shares of Class B Common into Class A Common or prior to any sale or transfer of Class B Common to any permitted transferee (under the terms of the Class B Common) who has not become a Signatory, offer such shares to all of the other Signatories on a pro-rata basis. A Signatory may sell or transfer all shares not purchased under the right of first refusal as long as they first are converted into Class A Common prior to their sale or transfer. The shares of Class B Common subject to the stockholders' agreement constituted 96.87% of the Class B Common outstanding on February 28, 2012 or 67.90% of the combined voting power of all Class A Common and Class B Common outstanding on such date. Certain Signatories own Class A Common, which is not subject to the stockholders' agreement. Under the stockholders' agreement, NACCO may, but is not obligated to, buy any of the shares of Class B Common not purchased by the Signatories following the trigger of the right of first refusal. The stockholders' agreement does not restrict in any respect how a Signatory may vote such Signatory's shares of Class B Common. |
(3) | A Schedule 13D, which was filed with the SEC with respect to Class B Common and most recently amended on February 14, 2012, reported that Rankin Associates I, L.P., which is referred to as Rankin I, and the trusts holding limited partnership interests in Rankin I may be deemed to be a “group” as defined under the Exchange Act and |
(4) | Beatrice B. Taplin has the sole power to vote and dispose of 337,310 shares of Class B Common held in trusts. The Stockholders 13D reported that the Class B Common beneficially owned by Beatrice B. Taplin is subject to the stockholders' agreement. |
(5) | A Schedule 13D, which was filed with the SEC with respect to Class B Common and most recently amended on February 14, 2012, reported that the trusts holding limited partnership interests in Rankin IV may be deemed to be a “group” as defined under the Exchange Act and therefore may be deemed as a group to beneficially own 294,728 shares of Class B Common held by Rankin IV. Although Rankin IV holds the 294,728 shares of Class B Common, it does not have any power to vote or dispose of such shares of Class B Common. Alfred M. Rankin, Jr., Thomas T. Rankin, Claiborne R. Rankin and Roger F. Rankin, as trustees and primary beneficiaries of trusts acting as general partners of Rankin IV, share the power to vote such shares of Class B Common. Voting actions are determined by the general partners owning at least a majority of the general partnership interests of Rankin IV. Each of the trusts holding general and limited partnership interests in Rankin IV share with each other the power to dispose of such shares. Under the terms of the Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Rankin IV, Rankin IV may not dispose of Class B Common or convert Class B Common into Class A Common without the consent of the general partners owning more than 75% of the general partnership interests of Rankin IV and the consent of the holders of more than 75% of all of the partnership interests of Rankin IV. The Stockholders 13D reported that the Class B Common beneficially owned by Rankin IV and each of the trusts holding limited partnership interests in Rankin IV is also subject to the stockholders' agreement. |
(6) | Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. may be deemed to be a member of the group described in note (3) above as a result of holding through his trust, of which he is trustee, partnership interests in Rankin I and therefore may be deemed to beneficially own, and share the power to vote and dispose of, 472,371 shares of Class B Common held by Rankin I. In addition, Mr. Rankin may be deemed to be a member of the group described in note (5) above as a result of holding through his trust, of which he is trustee, partnership interests in Rankin IV and therefore may be deemed to beneficially own, and share the power to vote and dispose of, 294,728 shares of Class B Common held by Rankin IV. Mr. Rankin disclaims beneficial ownership of 612,155 shares of Class B Common held by Rankin I and Rankin IV to the extent in excess of his pecuniary interest in each such entity. The Stockholders 13D reported that the Class B Common beneficially owned by Alfred M. Rankin, Jr. is subject to the stockholders' agreement. |
(7) | The Stockholders 13D reported that the Class B Common beneficially owned by David F. Taplin is subject to the stockholders' agreement. |
(8) | The aggregate amount of Class B Common beneficially owned by all executive officers and directors as a group and the aggregate amount of Class B Common beneficially owned by all executive officers and directors as a group for which they have shared voting or investment power include the shares of Class B Common of which Mr. Rankin has disclaimed beneficial ownership in note (6) above. |
1. | Purpose of the Plan |
2. | Definitions |
(a) | “Average Award Share Price” means the lesser of (i) the average of the closing price per share of Class A Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the Friday (or if Friday is not a trading day, the last trading day before such Friday) for each week during the calendar year preceding the commencement of the Performance Period (or such other previous calendar year as determined by the Committee and specified in the Guidelines; provided, however, that with respect to any Qualified Performance-Based Award, such determination shall be made not later than 90 days after the commencement of the applicable Performance Period) or (ii) the average of the closing price per share of Class A Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the Friday (or if Friday is not a trading day, the last trading day before such Friday) for each week of the applicable Performance Period. |
(b) | “Award” means an award paid to a Participant under this Plan for a Performance Period (or portion thereof) in an amount determined pursuant to a formula based upon the achievement of Performance Objectives which is established by the Committee; provided, however, that with respect to any Qualified Performance-Based Award, such formula shall be established not later than 90 days after the commencement of the Performance Period on which the Award is based and prior to the completion of 25% of such Performance Period. The Committee shall allocate the amount of an Award between the cash component, to be paid in cash, and the equity component, to be paid in Award Shares, pursuant to a formula which is established by the Committee; provided, however, that with respect to any Qualified Performance-Based Award, such formula shall be established not later than 90 days after the commencement of the Performance Period on which the Award is based and prior to the completion of 25% of such Performance Period. |
(c) | “Award Shares” means fully-paid, non-assessable shares of Class A Common Stock that are issued pursuant to, and with such restrictions as are imposed by, the terms of this Plan and the Guidelines. Such shares may be shares of original issuance or treasury shares or a combination of the foregoing and, in the discretion of the Company, may be issued as certificated or uncertificated shares. |
(d) | “Change in Control” means the occurrence of an event described in Appendix 1 hereto. |
(e) | “Class A Common Stock” means the Company's Class A Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share. |
(f) | “Committee” means the Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors or any other committee appointed by the Company's Board of Directors to administer this Plan in accordance with Section 3, so long as any such committee consists of not less than two directors of the Company and so long as each member of the Committee (i) is an “outside director” for purposes of Section 162(m) and (ii) is a “non-employee director” for purposes of Rule 16b-3. |
(g) | “Covered Employee” means any Participant who is a “covered employee” for purposes of Section 162(m) or any Participant who the Committee determines in its sole discretion could become a “covered employee.” |
(h) | “Guidelines” means the guidelines that are approved by the Committee for the administration of the Awards granted under this Plan. To the extent that there is any inconsistency between the Guidelines and this Plan, the Guidelines will control. |
(i) | “Participant” means any person who is classified as a salaried employee of the Employers on a U.S. payroll (including directors of the Employers who are also salaried employees of the Employers) who, in the judgment of the Committee, occupies an executive position in which his efforts may significantly contribute to the profits or growth of the Company. |
(j) | “Payment Period” means, with respect to any Performance Period, the period from January 1 to March 15 of the calendar year immediately following the calendar year in which such Performance Period ends. |
(k) | “Performance Period” means any period of one or more years (or portion thereof) on which an Award is based, as established by the Committee. Any Performance Period(s) applicable to a Qualified Performance-Based Award shall be established by the Committee not later than 90 days after the commencement of the Performance Period on which such Qualified Performance-Based Award will be based and prior to completion of 25% of such Performance Period. |
(l) | “Performance Objectives” shall mean the performance objectives established pursuant to this Plan for Participants. Performance Objectives may be described in terms of Company-wide objectives or objectives that are related to the performance of the individual Participant or any subsidiary, division, business unit, department or function of the Company. Performance Objectives may be measured on an absolute or relative basis. Different groups of Participants may be subject to different Performance Objectives for the same Performance Period. Relative performance may be measured by a group of peer companies or by a financial market index. Any Performance Objectives applicable to a Qualified Performance-Based Award shall be based on one or more, or a combination, of the following criteria, or the attainment of specified levels of growth or improvement in one or more of the following criteria: return on equity, return on total capital employed, diluted earnings per share, total earnings, earnings growth, return on capital, return on assets, return on sales, earnings before interest and taxes, revenue, revenue growth, gross margin, net or standard margin, return on investment, increase in the fair market value of shares, share price (including, but not limited to, growth measures and total stockholder return), operating profit, net earnings, cash flow (including, but not limited to, operating cash flow and free cash flow), inventory turns, financial return ratios, market share, earnings measures/ratios, economic value added, balance sheet measurements (such as receivable turnover), internal rate of return, customer satisfaction surveys or productivity, net income, operating profit or increase in operating profit, market share, increase in market share, sales value increase over time, economic value income, economic value increase over time, new project development or net sales. |
(m) | “Qualified Performance-Based Award” shall mean any Award or portion of an Award granted to a Covered Employee that is intended to satisfy the requirements for “qualified performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m). |
(n) | “Retire” means a termination of employment that entitles the Participant to immediate commencement of his pension benefits under The Combined Defined Benefit Plan of NACCO Industries, Inc. and its Subsidiaries or, for Participants who are not members of such plan, a termination of employment after reaching age 60 with at least 15 years of service with one or more of the Employers. |
(o) | “Rule 16b-3” means Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (or any successor rule to the same effect), as in effect from time to time. |
(p) | “Salary Points” means the salary points assigned to a Participant by the Committee for the applicable Performance Period pursuant to the Hay salary point system, or any successor salary point system adopted by the Committee. |
(q) | “Section 162(m)” means Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or any successor provision. |
(r) | “Target Award” means a dollar amount calculated by multiplying (i) the designated salary midpoint that corresponds to a Participant's Salary Points by (ii) the long-term incentive compensation target percent for those Salary Points for the applicable Performance Period, as determined by the Committee. The Target Award is the award that would be paid to a Participant under this Plan if each Performance Objective was met. |
3. | Administration |
4. | Eligibility |
5. | Awards |
(a) | The Committee shall approve (i) a Target Award to be granted to each Participant and (ii) a formula for determining the amount of each Award, which formula is based upon the Company's achievement of Performance Objectives; provided, however, that with respect to any Qualified Performance-Based Award, the Committee shall approve the foregoing not later than the 90th day of the applicable Performance Period and prior to the completion of 25% of such Performance Period. Each grant shall specify an initial allocation between the cash portion of the Award and the equity portion of the Award. |
(b) | Prior to the end of the Payment Period, the Committee shall approve (i) a preliminary calculation of the amount of each Award based upon the application of the formula and actual performance to the Target Awards previously determined in accordance with Section 5(a); and (ii) a final calculation of the amount of each Award to be paid to each Participant for the Performance Period. Such approval shall be certified by the Committee before any amount is paid under any Award with respect to that Performance Period. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee shall have the power to (1) decrease the amount of any Award below the amount determined in accordance with Section 5(b)(i); (2) increase the amount of any Award above the amount determined in accordance with Section 5(b)(i); and/or (3) adjust the allocation between the cash portion of the Award and the equity portion of the Award; provided, however, that (A) no such decrease may occur following a Change in Control and (B) no such increase, change or adjustment may be made that would cause any Qualified Performance-Based Award to be includable as “applicable employee remuneration” of such Participant, as such term is defined in Section 162(m) (i.e., to no longer qualify for the exception for “qualified performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m)). No Award, including any Award equal to the Target Award, shall be payable under this Plan to any Participant except as determined by the Committee. |
(c) | Each Award shall be fully paid during the Payment Period and shall be paid partly in cash and partly in Award Shares. The number of Award Shares to be issued to a Participant shall be determined by dividing the equity portion of the Award by the Average Award Share Price (subject to adjustment as described in Subsection (b) above). The Company shall pay any and all brokerage fees and commissions incurred in connection with any purchase by the Company of shares which are to be issued as Award Shares and the transfer thereto to Participants. Awards shall be paid subject to all withholdings and deductions pursuant to Section 6. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan, the maximum amount paid to a Participant in a single calendar year as a result of Awards under this Plan shall not exceed the greater of (i) $12,000,000 or (ii) the fair market value of 500,000 Award Shares, determined at the time of payment. |
(d) | At such time as the Committee approves a Target Award and formula for determining the amount of each Award, the Committee shall designate whether all or any portion of the Award is a Qualified Performance-Based Award. |
6. | Withholding Taxes |
7. | Change in Control |
(a) | The following provisions shall apply notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan to the contrary. |
(b) | Amount of Award for Year of Change In Control. In the event of a Change in Control during a Performance Period, the amount of the Award payable to a Participant who is employed by an Employer on the date of the Change in Control (or who died, become permanently disabled or Retired during such Performance Period and prior to the Change in Control) for such Performance Period shall be equal to the Participant's Target Award for such Performance Period, multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days during the Performance Period during which the Participant was employed by the Employers prior to the Change in Control and the denominator of which is the number of days in the Performance Period. |
(c) | Time of Payment. In the event of a Change in Control, the payment date of all outstanding Awards (including, without limitation, the pro-rata Target Award for the Performance Period during which the Change in Control occurred) shall be the date that is between two days prior to, or within 30 days after, the date of the Change in Control, as determined by the Committee in its sole and absolute discretion. |
8. | Award Shares Terms and Restrictions |
(a) | Award Shares granted to a Participant shall entitle such Participant to voting, dividend and other ownership rights. Each payment of Award Shares shall be evidenced by an agreement executed on behalf of the Company by an authorized officer and delivered to and accepted by such Participant. Each such agreement shall contain such terms and provisions, consistent with this Plan, as the Committee may approve, including, without limitation, prohibitions and restrictions regarding the transferability of Award Shares. |
(b) | Except as otherwise set forth in this Section, Award Shares shall not be assigned, transferred, exchanged, pledged, hypothecated or encumbered (a "Transfer") by a Participant or any other person, voluntarily or involuntarily, other than a Transfer of Award Shares (i) by will or the laws of descent and distribution, (ii) pursuant to a domestic relations order meeting the definition of a qualified domestic relations order under Section 206(d)(3)(B) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“QDRO”), (iii) to a trust for the benefit of a Participant or his spouse, children or grandchildren (provided that Award Shares transferred to such trust shall continue to be Award Shares subject to the terms of this Plan) or (iv) with the consent of the Committee, after the substitution by a Participant of a number of shares of Class A or Class B Common Stock (the "New Shares") for an equal number of Award Shares, whereupon the New Shares shall become and be deemed for all purposes to be Award Shares, subject to all of the terms and conditions imposed by this Plan and the Guidelines on the shares for which they are substituted, including the restrictions on Transfer, and the restrictions hereby imposed on the shares for which the New Shares are substituted shall lapse and such shares shall no longer be subject to this Plan or the Guidelines. The Company shall not honor, and shall instruct the transfer agent not to honor, any attempted Transfer and any attempted Transfer shall be invalid, other than Transfers described in clauses (i) through (iv) above. |
(c) | Each Award shall provide that a Transfer of the Award Shares shall be prohibited or restricted for a period of ten years from the last day of the Performance Period, or such other shorter or longer period as may be determined by the Committee (in its sole and absolute discretion) from time to time. Notwithstanding the foregoing, such restrictions shall automatically lapse on the earliest of (i) the date the Participant dies or becomes permanently disabled, (ii) five years (or earlier with the approval of the Committee) after the Participant Retires, (iii) an extraordinary release of restrictions pursuant to Subsection (d) below, or (iv) a release of restrictions as determined by the Committee in its sole and absolute discretion (including, without limitation, a release caused by a termination of this Plan). Following the lapse of restrictions pursuant to this Subsection or Subsection (d) below, the shares shall no longer be “Award Shares” and, at the Participant's request, the Company shall take all such action as may be necessary to remove such restrictions from the stock certificates, or other applicable records with respect to the uncertificated shares, representing the Award Shares, such that the resulting shares shall be fully paid, nonassessable and unrestricted by the terms of this Plan. |
(d) | Extraordinary Release of Restrictions. At any time following the third anniversary of the date Award Shares are issued, a Participant may request in writing that the Committee authorize the lapse of restrictions on a Transfer of such Award Shares if the Participant desires to dispose of such Award Shares for (i) the purchase of a principal residence for the Participant, (ii) payment of medical expenses for the Participant, his spouse or his dependents, (iii) payment of expenses for the education of the Participant, his spouse or his dependents or (iv) any other extraordinary reason which the Committee has previously approved in writing, provided that the restrictions on no more than 20% of such Award Shares may be released pursuant to this Subsection. The Committee shall have the sole power to grant or deny any such request. Upon the granting of any such request, the Company shall cause the release of restrictions in the manner described in Subsection (c) of such number of Award Shares as the Committee shall authorize. |
(e) | Legend. The Company shall cause an appropriate legend, to be placed on each certificate, or other applicable records with respect to uncertificated shares, for the Award Shares, reflecting the foregoing restrictions. |
9. | Amendment, Termination and Adjustments |
(a) | The Committee, subject to approval by the Board of Directors of the Company, may alter or amend this Plan from time to time or terminate it in its entirety; provided, however, that no such action shall, without the consent of a Participant, affect the rights in (i) an outstanding Award of a Participant that was previously approved by the Committee for a Performance Period but has not yet been paid or (ii) any Award Shares that were previously issued to a Participant under this Plan. Unless otherwise specified by the Committee, all Award Shares that were issued prior to the termination of this Plan shall continue to be subject to the terms of this Plan following such termination; provided that the transfer restrictions on such Shares shall lapse as otherwise provided in Section 8. |
(b) | The Committee may make or provide for such adjustment in the total number of Award Shares to be issued under this Plan specified in Section 10 as the Committee in its sole discretion, exercised in good faith, may determine is equitably required to reflect (i) any stock dividend, stock split, combination of shares, recapitalization or any other change in the capital structure of the Company, (ii) any merger, consolidation, spin-off, split-off, spin-out, split-up, reorganization, partial or complete liquidation or other distribution of assets, issuance of rights or warrants to purchase securities, or (iii) any other corporate transaction or event having an effect similar to any of the foregoing (collectively, the “Extraordinary Events”). Any securities that are distributed in respect to Award Shares in connection with any of the Extraordinary Events shall be deemed to be Award Shares and shall be subject to the transfer restrictions set forth herein to the same extent and for the same period as if such securities were the original Award Shares with respect to which they were issued, unless such restrictions are waived or otherwise altered by the Committee. |
(c) | Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsection (a) or Subsection (b), without further approval by the stockholders of the Company, no such action shall (i) increase the maximum number of Award Shares to be issued under this Plan specified in Section 10 (except that adjustments and additions expressly authorized by this Section shall not be limited by this clause (i)), (ii) cause Rule 16b-3 to become inapplicable to this Plan or (iii) cause any amount of any Qualified Performance-Based Award to be includable as “applicable employee remuneration” of such Participant, as such term is defined in Section 162(m) (i.e., to no longer qualify for the exception for “qualified performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m)). |
10. | Award Shares Subject to Plan |
11. | Approval by Stockholders |
12. | General Provisions |
(a) | No Right of Employment. Neither the adoption or operation of this Plan, nor any document describing or referring to this Plan, or any part thereof, shall confer upon any employee any right to continue in the employ of the Employers, or shall in any way affect the right and power of the Employers to terminate the employment of any employee at any time with or without assigning a reason therefor to the same extent as the Employers might have done if this Plan had not been adopted. |
(b) | Governing Law. The provisions of this Plan shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware. |
(c) | Miscellaneous. Headings are given to the sections of this Plan solely as a convenience to facilitate reference. Such headings, numbering and paragraphing shall not in any case be deemed in any way material or relevant to the construction of this Plan or any provisions thereof. The use of the masculine gender shall also include within its meaning the feminine. The use of the singular shall also include within its meaning the plural, and vice versa. |
(d) | Limitation on Rights of Employees. No Trust. No trust has been created by the Employers for the payment of Awards under this Plan; nor have the employees been granted any lien on any assets of the Employers to secure payment of such benefits. This Plan represents only an unfunded, unsecured promise to pay by the Company and a participant hereunder is a mere unsecured creditor of the Company. |
(e) | Non-transferability of Awards. Awards shall not be transferable by a Participant. Award Shares paid pursuant to an Award shall be transferable, subject to the restrictions described in Section 8. |
(f) | Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. This Plan is intended to be exempt from the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and applicable Treasury Regulations issued thereunder, and shall be administered in a manner that is consistent with such intent. |
13. | Effective Date |
ii. | a majority of the Board of Directors of NACCO ceases to be comprised of Incumbent Directors; or |
iii. | the consummation of a reorganization, merger or consolidation or sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of NACCO or the acquisition of assets of another corporation, or other transaction involving NACCO (“NACCO Business Combination”) excluding, however, such a Business Combination pursuant to which both of the following apply (such a Business Combination, an “Excluded NACCO Business Combination”): |
1. | Purpose of the Plan |
2. | Definitions |
(a) | “Average Award Share Price” means the lesser of (i) the average of the closing price per share of Class A Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the Friday (or if Friday is not a trading day, the last trading day before such Friday) for each week during the calendar year preceding the commencement of the Award Year (or such other previous calendar year as determined in advance by the Committee) or (ii) the average of the closing price per share of Class A Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the Friday (or if Friday is not a trading day, the last trading day before such Friday) for each week of the applicable Award Year. |
(b) | “Award” means an award paid to a Participant under this Plan for an Award Year (if any) in an amount determined by the Committee. The Committee shall allocate the amount of an Award between the cash component, to be paid in cash, and the equity component, to be paid in Award Shares. |
(c) | “Award Shares” means fully-paid, non-assessable shares of Class A Common Stock that are issued pursuant to, and with such restrictions as are imposed by, the terms of this Plan. Such shares may be shares of original issuance or treasury shares or a combination of the foregoing and, in the discretion of the Company, may be issued as certificated or uncertificated shares. |
(d) | “Award Year” means the calendar year on which an Award is based. |
(e) | “Class A Common Stock” means the Company's Class A Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share. |
(f) | “Committee” means the Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors or any other committee appointed by the Company's Board of Directors to administer this Plan in accordance with Section 3, so long as any such committee consists of not less than two directors of the Company and so long as each member of the Committee (i) is not an employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries and (ii) is a “disinterested person” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3. |
(g) | “Participant” means any person who is classified as a salaried employee of the Employers on a U.S. payroll who, in the judgment of the Committee, contributed to the profits or growth of the Employers during an Award Year. |
(h) | “Retire” means a termination of employment that entitles the Participant to immediate commencement of his pension benefits under The Combined Defined Benefit Plan of NACCO Industries, Inc. and Its Subsidiaries or, for Participants who are not members of such plan, a termination of employment after reaching age 60 with at least 15 years of service with one or more of the Employers. |
(i) | “Rule 16b-3” means Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (or any successor rule to the same effect), as in effect from time to time. |
3. | Administration |
4. | Eligibility |
5. | Awards |
(a) | No later than March 15th following each Award Year, the Committee shall determine whether any Awards will be granted hereunder to any Participant and the amount thereof. When making such determination, the Committee shall take into account such factors as (i) individual performance and contributions towards various goals of the Employers, (ii) extraordinary results and (iii) any extraordinary events. The Committee shall have the power to specify the allocation between the cash portion of the Award and the equity portion of the Award. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Award shall be payable under this Plan to any Participant except as determined by the Committee. |
(b) | Each Award shall be fully paid prior to March 15th of the year following the Award Year and shall be paid partly in cash and partly in Award Shares. The number of Award Shares to be issued to a Participant shall be based upon the number of shares of Class A Common Stock that can be purchased with the equity portion of the Award at the Average Award Share Price. The Company shall pay any and all brokerage fees and commissions incurred in connection with the purchase by the Company of shares which are to be issued as Award Shares and the transfer thereto to Participants. Awards shall be paid subject to all withholdings and deductions pursuant to Section 6. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan, the maximum cash-denominated Award granted to a Participant in a single calendar year under this Plan (prior to the division of the Award between cash and Award Shares) shall not exceed $1,000,000. |
(c) | Except as otherwise set forth in this Section, Award Shares shall not be sold, assigned, transferred, exchanged, pledged, hypothecated or encumbered (collectively, a “Transfer”) by a Participant or any other person, voluntarily or involuntarily, other than a Transfer of Award Shares (i) by will or the laws of descent and distribution, (ii) pursuant to a domestic relations order meeting the definition of a qualified domestic relations order under Section 206(d)(3)(B) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“QDRO”) or (iii) to a trust for the benefit of a Participant or his spouse, children or grandchildren (provided that Award Shares transferred to such trust shall continue to be Award Shares subject to the terms of this Plan). The Company shall not honor, and shall instruct the transfer agent not to honor, any attempted Transfer and any attempted Transfer shall be invalid, other than Transfers described in clauses (i) through (iii) above. |
(d) | Award Shares shall entitle such Participant to voting, dividend and other ownership rights. Each Award shall provide that a Transfer of the Award Shares shall be prohibited or restricted in the manner and to the extent prescribed by the Committee at the date of payment for a period of ten years from the last day of the Award Year, or such other shorter or longer period as may be determined by the Committee (in its sole and absolute discretion) from time to time. Notwithstanding the foregoing, such restrictions shall automatically lapse on the earliest of (i) the date the Participant dies or becomes permanently disabled, (ii) five years (or earlier with the approval of the Committee) after the Participant Retires or (iii) a release of restrictions as determined by the Committee in its sole and absolute discretion (including, without limitation, a release caused by a termination of this Plan). |
(e) | The Company shall cause an appropriate legend to be placed on each certificate, or other applicable records with respect to uncertificated shares, for the Award Shares, reflecting the foregoing restrictions. |
(f) | Each payment of Award Shares shall be evidenced by an agreement executed on behalf of the Company by an authorized officer and delivered to and accepted by such Participant. Each such agreement shall contain such terms and provisions, consistent with this Plan, as the Committee may approve, including, without limitation, prohibitions and restrictions regarding the Transfers of Award Shares. Following the lapse of restrictions in accordance with this Section, the shares shall no longer be “Award Shares” and, at the Participant's request, the Company shall take all such action as may be necessary to remove such restrictions from the stock certificates, or other applicable records with respect to any uncertificated shares, representing the Award Shares, such that the resulting shares shall be fully paid, nonassessable and unrestricted by the terms of this Plan. |
6. | Withholding Taxes |
7. | Amendment, Termination and Adjustments |
(a) | The Committee, subject to the approval of the Board of Directors of the Company, may alter or amend this Plan from time to time or terminate it in its entirety; provided, however, that no such action shall, without the consent of a Participant, affect the rights in any Award Shares that were previously issued to a Participant under this Plan. Unless otherwise specified by the Committee, all Award Shares that were issued prior to the termination of this Plan shall continue to be subject to the terms of this Plan following such termination; provided that the transfer restrictions on such Award Shares shall lapse in accordance with Section 5. |
(b) | Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsection (a) or Subsection (c), without further approval by the stockholders of the Company, no such action shall (i) increase the maximum number of Award Shares to be issued under this Plan specified in Section 8 (except that adjustments and additions expressly authorized by this Section 7 shall not be limited by this clause (i)) or (ii) cause Rule 16b-3 to become inapplicable to this Plan. |
(c) | The Committee may make or provide for such adjustment in the total number of Award Shares to be issued under this Plan specified in Section 8 as the Committee in its sole discretion, exercised in good faith, may determine is equitably required to reflect (i) any stock dividend, stock split, combination of shares, recapitalization or any other change in the capital structure of the Company, (ii) any merger, consolidation, spin-off, split-off, spin-out, split-up, reorganization, partial or complete liquidation or other distribution of assets, issuance of rights or warrants to purchase securities, or (iii) any other corporate transaction or event having an effect similar to any of the foregoing (collectively, the “Extraordinary Events”). Any securities that are distributed in respect to Award Shares in connection with any of the Extraordinary Events shall be deemed to be Award Shares and shall be subject to the transfer restrictions set forth herein to the same extent and for the same period as if such securities were the original Award Shares with respect to which they were issued, unless such restrictions are waived or otherwise altered by the Committee. |
8. | Award Shares Subject to Plan |
9. | Approval by Stockholders |
10. | General Provisions |
(a) | No Right of Employment. Neither the adoption or operation of this Plan, nor any document describing or referring to this Plan, or any part thereof, shall confer upon any employee any right to continue in the employ of the Employers, or shall in any way affect the right and power of the Employers to terminate the employment of any employee at any time with or without assigning a reason therefor to the same extent as the Employers might have done if this Plan had not been adopted. |
(b) | Governing Law. The provisions of this Plan shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware. |
(c) | Miscellaneous. Headings are given to the sections of this Plan solely as a convenience to facilitate reference. Such headings, numbering and paragraphing shall not in any case be deemed in any way material or relevant to the construction of this Plan or any provisions thereof. The use of the masculine gender shall also include within its meaning the feminine. The use of the singular shall also include within its meaning the plural, and vice versa. |
(d) | Limitation on Rights of Employees. No Trust. No trust has been created by the Employers for the payment of Awards under this Plan; nor have the employees been granted any lien on any assets of the Employers to secure payment of such benefits. This Plan represents only an unfunded, unsecured promise to pay by the Company and a Participant hereunder is a mere unsecured creditor of the Company. |
(e) | Non-transferability of Awards. Awards shall not be transferable by a Participant. Award Shares paid pursuant to an Award shall be transferable, subject to the restrictions described in Section 5. |
(f) | Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. This Plan is intended to be exempt from the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and applicable Treasury Regulations issued thereunder, and shall be administered in a manner that is consistent with such intent. |
11. | Effective Date |
1. | Effective Date |
2. | Purpose of the Plan |
3. | Code Section 409A |
4. | Definitions |
(a) | “Account” shall mean the record maintained by the Employer in accordance with Section 7 to reflect the Participants' Awards under the Plan (plus interest thereon). The Account shall be further sub-divided into various Sub-Accounts as described in Section 8. |
(b) | “Award” shall mean the cash awards granted to a Participant under this Plan for the Award Terms. |
(c) | “Award Term” shall mean the period of one or more years on which an Award is based, as established by the Committee and specified in the Guidelines. Any Award Term(s) applicable to a Qualified Performance-Based Award shall be established by the Committee not later than 90 days after the commencement of the Award Term on which such Qualified Performance-Based Award will be based and prior to the completion of 25% of such Award Term. |
(d) | “Beneficiary” shall mean the person(s) designated in writing (on a form acceptable to the Committee) to receive the payment of a Participant's Sub-Accounts hereunder in the event of his death. In the absence of such a designation and at anytime when there is no existing Beneficiary hereunder, a Participant's Beneficiary shall be his surviving legal spouse or, if none, his estate. |
(e) | “Change in Control” shall mean the occurrence of an event described in Appendix 1 hereto. |
(f) | “Code” shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. |
(g) | “Committee” shall mean the Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors, any other committee appointed by the Company's Board of Directors, or any sub-committee appointed by the Compensation Committee to administer this Plan in accordance with Section 5 so long as any such committee or sub-committee consists of not less than two directors of the Company and so long as each such member of the committee or sub-committee is an “outside director” for purposes of Code Section 162(m). |
(h) | “Covered Employee” shall mean any Participant who is a “covered employee” for purposes of Code Section 162(m) or any Participant who the Committee determines in its sole discretion is likely to become such a covered employee. |
(i) | “Disability” or “Disabled.” A Participant shall be deemed to have a “Disability” or be “Disabled” if the Participant is determined to be totally disabled by the Social Security Administration or if the Participant (i) is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months, or (ii) is, by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months, receiving income replacement benefits for a period of not less than 3 months under an Employer sponsored accident and health plan. |
(j) | “Grant Date” shall mean the effective date of an Award, which is the January 1st following the end of the Award Term. |
(k) | “Guidelines” shall mean the guidelines that are approved by the Committee for each Award Term for the administration of the Awards granted under the Plan. To the extent that there is any inconsistency between |
(l) | “Hay Salary Grade” shall mean the salary grade or Salary Points assigned to a Participant by the Employers pursuant to the Hay Salary System, or any successor salary system subsequently adopted by the Employers. |
(m) | “Key Employee.” A Participant shall be classified as a Key Employee if he meets the following requirements: |
• | The Participant, with respect to the Participant's relationship with the Employers and their affiliates, met the requirements of Section 416(i)(1)(A)(i), (ii) or (iii) of the Code (without regard to Section 416(i)(5) thereof) and the Treasury Regulations issued thereunder at any time during the 12-month period ending on the most recent Identification Date (defined below) and his Termination of Employment occurs during the 12-month period beginning on the most recent Effective Date (defined below). When applying the provisions of Code Sections 416(i)(1)(A)(i), (ii) or (iii) for this purpose: (i) the definition of “compensation” (A) shall be as defined under Treasury Regulation Section 1.415(c)-2(d)(4) (i.e., the wages and other compensation for which the Employer is required to furnish the Employee with a Form W-2 under Code Sections 6041, 6051 and 6052, plus amounts deferred at the election of the Employee under Code Sections 125, 132(f)(4) or 401(k)) and (B) shall apply the rule of Treasury Regulation Section 1.415(c)-2(g)(5)(ii) which excludes compensation of non-resident alien employees and (ii) the number of officers described in Code Section 416(i)(1)(A)(i) shall be 60 instead of 50. |
• | The Identification Date for Key Employees is each December 31st and the Effective Date is the following April 1st. As such, any Employee who is classified as a Key Employee as of December 31st of a particular calendar year shall maintain such classification for the 12-month period commencing on the following April 1st. |
• | Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Participant shall not be classified as a Key Employee unless the stock of NACCO Industries, Inc. (the “Parent Company”) (or a related entity) is publicly traded on an established securities market or otherwise on the date of the Participant's Termination of Employment. |
(n) | “Maturity Date” shall mean the date established in Section 10(a)(i) for each Sub-Account under the Plan. |
(o) | “Non-U.S. Participant” shall mean a Participant who is classified by the Committee as a non-resident alien with no U.S.-earned income. Such classification shall be determined as of the Grant Date of each particular Award. Once a Participant is classified by the Committee as a Non-U.S. Participant with respect to a particular Award, such classification shall continue in effect until such Award is paid, regardless of any subsequent change in classification. |
(p) | “Participant” shall mean any person who meets the eligibility criteria set forth in Section 6 and who is granted an Award under the Plan or a person who maintains an Account balance hereunder. |
(q) | “Performance Objectives” shall mean the performance objectives established pursuant to the Plan for Participants. Performance Objectives may be described in terms of Parent Company-wide or Company-wide objectives or objectives that are related to the performance of (i) the individual Participant, (ii) any subsidiary, division, business unit, department or function of the Parent Company or (iii) any Subsidiary, division, business unit, department or function of the Company. Performance Objectives may be measured on an absolute or relative basis. Different groups of Participants may be subject to different Performance Objectives for the same Award Term. Relative performance may be measured by a group of peer companies or by a financial market index. Any Performance Objectives applicable to a Qualified Performance-Based Award shall be based on one or more, or a combination, of the following criteria, or the attainment of specified levels of growth or improvement in one or more of the following criteria: return on equity, return on total capital employed, diluted earnings per share, total earnings, earnings growth, return on capital, return on assets, return on sales, earnings before interest and taxes, revenue, revenue growth, gross margin, net or standard margin, return on investment, increase in the fair market value of shares, share price (including, but not limited to, growth measures and total stockholder return), operating profit, net earnings, cash flow (including, but not limited to, operating cash flow and free cash flow), inventory turns, financial return ratios, market share, earnings measures/ratios, economic value added, balance sheet measurements (such as receivable turnover), internal rate of return, customer satisfaction surveys or productivity, net income, operating profit or increase in operating profit, market share, increase in market share, sales value increase over time, economic value income, economic value increase over time, new project development, adjusted standard margin or net sales. |
(r) | “Qualified Performance-Based Award” shall mean any Award or portion of an Award granted to a Covered Employee that is intended to satisfy the requirements for “qualified performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m). |
(s) | “Retirement” or “Retire” shall mean the (i) termination of a U.S. Participant's employment with the Employers after the Participant has reached age 60 and completed at least 15 years of service, or |
(t) | “ROTCE” shall mean the return on total capital employed of the Company, as determined for a particular calendar year. |
(u) | “Salary Points” means the salary points assigned to a Participant by the Committee for the applicable Award Term pursuant to the Hay salary point system, or any successor salary point system adopted by the Committee. |
(v) | “Subsidiary” shall mean any corporation, partnership or other entity, the majority of the outstanding voting securities of which is owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company. |
(w) | “Target Award” shall mean a dollar amount calculated by multiplying (i) the designated salary midpoint that corresponds to a Participant's Hay Salary Grade by (ii) the long-term incentive compensation target percent for that Hay Salary Grades for the applicable Award Term, as determined by the Committee. The Target Award is the Award that would be paid to a Participant under the Plan if each Performance Objective is met exactly at target level. |
(x) | “Termination of Employment” shall mean, with respect to any Participant's relationship with the Employers and their affiliates, a separation from service as defined in Code Section 409A (and the regulations and guidance issued thereunder). |
(y) | “U.S. Participant” shall mean, with respect to any Award, any Participant who is not a Non-U.S. Participant. |
5. | Administration |
(a) | This Plan shall be administered by the Committee. A majority of the Committee shall constitute a quorum, and the action of members of the Committee present at any meeting at which a quorum is present, or acts unanimously approved in writing, shall be the act of the Committee. All acts and decisions of the Committee with respect to any questions arising in connection with the administration and interpretation of this Plan, including the severability of any or all of the provisions hereof, shall be conclusive, final and binding upon the Employers and all present and former Participants, all other employees of the Employers, and their respective descendants, successors and assigns. No member of the Committee shall be liable for any such act or decision made in good faith. |
(b) | The Committee shall have complete authority to interpret all provisions of this Plan, to prescribe the form of any instrument evidencing any Award granted under this Plan, to adopt, amend and rescind general and special rules and regulations for its administration (including, without limitation, the Guidelines) and to make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of this Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no such action may be taken by the Committee that would cause any Qualified Performance-Based Awards to be treated as “applicable employee remuneration” of such Participant, as such term is defined in Code Section 162(m) (i.e., to no longer qualify for the exception for “qualified performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m)). |
6. | Eligibility |
7. | Accounts and Sub-Accounts. |
8. | Granting of Awards/Crediting of Sub-Accounts. |
(a) | The Committee shall approve (i) a Target Award to be granted to each Participant and (ii) a formula for determining the amount of each Award for such Award Term, which formula is based upon the achievement of Performance Objectives, as set forth in the Guidelines; provided, however, that with respect to any Qualified Performance-Based Award, the Committee shall approve the foregoing not later than the ninetieth day of the applicable Award Term and prior to the completion of 25% of such Award Term. At such time, the Committee shall designate whether the Award is a Qualified Performance-Based Award. |
(b) | Effective no later than April 30th of the calendar year following the end of the Award Term, the Committee shall approve (i) a preliminary calculation of the amount of each Award based upon the application of the formula and actual performance to the Target Awards previously determined in accordance with Section 8(a); and (ii) a final calculation and approval of the amount of each Award to be granted to each Participant for the Award Term (with the specified “Grant Date” of such Award being January 1st of the calendar year following the end of the Award Term). Such approval shall be certified in writing by the Committee before any amount is paid for any Award granted with respect to an Award Term. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (1) the Committee shall have the power to decrease the amount of any Award below the amount determined in accordance with the foregoing provisions and (2) the Committee shall have the power to increase the amount of any Award above the initial amount determined in accordance with the foregoing provisions or adjust the amount of thereof in any other manner determined by the Committee in its sole and absolute discretion. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (X) no such decrease may occur following a Change in Control; (Y) no such increase, adjustment or any other change may be made that would cause any Qualified Performance-Based Award to be includable as “applicable employee remuneration” of such Participant, as such term is defined in Code Section 162(m) (i.e., to no longer qualify for the exception for “qualified performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m)) and (Z) no Award, including any Award equal to the Target Award, shall be payable under the Plan to any Participant except as determined and approved by the Committee. |
(c) | Calculations of Target Awards for U.S. Participants for an Award Term shall initially be based on the Participant's Hay Salary Grade as of January 1st of the first year of the Award Term. Calculations of Target Awards for Non-U.S. Participants for an Award Term shall be determined in accordance with the Guidelines in effect for such Award Term. However, such Target Awards shall be changed during or after the Award Term under the following circumstances: (i) if a Participant receives a change in Hay Salary Grade, salary midpoint and/or long-term incentive compensation target percentage during an Award Term, such change shall be reflected in a pro-rata Target Award, (ii) employees hired into or promoted into a position eligible to participate in the Plan (as specified in Section 6 above) during an Award Term will be assigned a pro-rated Target Award based on their length of service during the Award Term; provided that the employees have been employed by the Employers for at least 90 days during the Award Term and (iii) the Committee may increase or decrease the amount of the Target Award at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion; provided, however, that (X) no such decrease may occur following a Change in Control and (Y) no such increase, adjustment or any other change may be made that would cause any Qualified Performance-Based Award to be includable as “applicable employee remuneration” of such Participant, as such term is defined in Code Section 162(m) (i.e., to no longer qualify for the exception for “qualified performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m)). Unless otherwise determined by the Committee (in its sole and absolute discretion), in order to be eligible to receive an Award for an Award Term, the Participant must be employed by an Employer and must be a Participant on December 31st of the last year of an Award Term. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a Participant dies, becomes Disabled or Retires during the Award Term, the Participant shall be entitled to a pro-rata portion of the Award for such Award Term, calculated based on actual performance for the entire Award Term in accordance with Section 8(b)(ii) above and the number of days the Participant was actually employed by the Employers during the Award Term. |
(d) | After approval by the Compensation Committee, each Award shall be credited to the Participant's Account in accordance with the following rules. The cash value of each Award for each Award Term shall be credited to a separate Sub-Account for each Participant. Such Sub-Accounts shall be classified based on the Grant Date of the particular Award. For example, the cash value of the Awards with a Grant Date of 1/1/12 shall be credited to the 2012 Sub-Account, the cash value of the Awards with a Grant Date of 1/1/13 shall be credited to the 2013 Sub-Account, etc. |
(e) | Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, (1) the maximum cash value of the Awards granted to a Participant under this Plan for any Award Term shall not exceed $6,000,000 and (2) the maximum cash value |
(f) | Multiple Awards may be granted to a Participant; provided, however, that no two Awards to a Participant may have identical performance periods. |
(g) | All determinations under this Section shall be made by the Committee. Each Qualified Performance-Based Award shall be granted and administered to comply with the requirements of Code Section 162(m). |
9. | Vesting |
10. | Payment of Sub-Account Balances/Interest |
(a) | Payment Dates. |
(i) | Maturity Dates. The Maturity Date of each Sub-Account shall be the third anniversary of the Grant Date of the Award that was credited to such Sub-Account. For example, the Maturity Date of the 2012 Sub-Account (containing Awards with a Grant Date of 1/1/12) shall be 1/1/15. Subject to the provisions of clause (ii) below, the balance of each Sub-Account shall be paid to the Participant on the Maturity Date of such Sub-Account. |
(ii) | Other Payment Dates. Notwithstanding the foregoing, but subject to the provisions of Section 11 hereof, (A) the payment date of amounts that were credited to a particular Sub-Account while a Participant was a Non-U.S. Participant may be any earlier date determined by the Committee and (B) in the event a Participant dies, becomes Disabled, or incurs a Termination of Employment as a result of Retirement prior to the applicable Maturity Date, (X) the payment date of all amounts credited to the Participant's Sub-Accounts as of the date of death, Disability, or such Termination of Employment shall be the date of such death, Disability, or Termination of Employment and (Y) the Award earned for the Award Term in which the date of death, Disability, or Termination of Employment occurs shall be paid during the period from January 1st through April 30th of the calendar year following the last day of the Award Term; provided, however, that if a Participant who incurs a Termination of Employment on account of Retirement is a Key Employee, the Participant's payment date shall not be any earlier than the 1st day of the 7th month following the date of his Termination of Employment (or, if earlier, the date of the Participant's death). |
(b) | Interest. The Participant's Sub-Accounts shall be credited with interest as follows; provided, however, that (1) no interest shall be credited to a Sub-Account after the Maturity Date of the Sub-Account, (2) no interest shall be credited to a Sub-Account following a Participant's Termination of Employment prior to a Maturity Date (except as described in Section 10(c)(ii) with respect to delayed payments made to Key Employees on account of a Termination of Employment), (3) no interest shall be credited to the Sub-Accounts after the last day of the month preceding the payment date of such Sub-Account and (4) no interest in excess of 14% shall be credited to any Sub-Account. |
(i) | Interest Rate for Non-Covered Employees. At the end of each calendar month during a calendar year, the Sub-Accounts of Participants who are not Covered Employees shall be credited with an amount determined by multiplying the Participant's Sub-Account balances during such month by 5%. In addition, as of the end of each calendar year in which the ROTCE for such calendar year exceeds 5%, the Sub-Accounts shall also be credited with an additional amount determined by multiplying the Participant's Sub-Account balances during each month of such calendar year by the excess of the ROTCE rate over 5%, compounded monthly. In the event that, prior to an applicable Maturity Date, a Participant who is not a Covered Employee (1) incurs a Termination of Employment or (2) becomes eligible for a payment from a Sub-Account hereunder, the foregoing interest calculations shall be made as of the last day of the month prior to such date. When making such calculations, the ROTCE rate shall be equal to the year-to-date ROTCE rate as of the last day of the prior month. |
(ii) | Interest Rate for Covered Employees. At the end of each calendar month during a calendar year, the Sub-Accounts of Participants who are Covered Employees shall be credited with an amount determined by multiplying the Participant's Sub-Account balances during such month by 14%. In the event that, prior to an applicable Maturity Date, a Participant who is a Covered Employee (1) incurs a Termination of Employment or (2) becomes eligible for a payment from a Sub-Account hereunder, the foregoing interest calculation shall be made as of the last day of the month prior to such date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee shall have the power to decrease the |
(iii) | Changes. The Committee may change (or suspend) the interest rate credited on Accounts hereunder at any time. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no such change may be made in a manner that would cause any Qualified Performance-Based Award to be includable as “applicable employee remuneration” of such Participant, as such term is defined in Code Section 162(m) (i.e., to no longer qualify for the exception for “qualified performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m)). |
(c) | Payment Date, Form of Payment and Amount. |
(i) | Payment Date and Form. Except as otherwise described in Section 11 hereof, the Participant's Employer or former Employer shall deliver to the Participant (or, if applicable, his Beneficiary), a check in full payment of each Sub-Account within 90 days of the applicable payment date of such Sub-Account. |
(ii) | Amount. Each Participant shall be paid the entire balance of each Sub-Account (including interest). If a Participant who incurs a Termination of Employment on account of Retirement is a Key Employee whose payment is delayed until the 1st day of the 7th month following such Termination of Employment, such Participant's Sub-Accounts shall continue to be credited with interest (in accordance with the rules specified in Section 10(b) but at the rate of 5%) through the last day of the month prior to the payment date. Any amounts that would otherwise be payable to the Key Employee prior to the 1st day of the 7th month following Termination of Employment shall be accumulated and paid in a lump sum make-up payment within 30 days following such delayed payment date. Amounts that are payable to the Non-U.S. Participants shall be converted from U.S. dollars to local currency in accordance with the terms of the Guidelines. |
11. | Change in Control |
(a) | The following provisions shall apply notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary. |
(b) | Amount of Award for Year of Change In Control. In the event of a Change in Control during an Award Term, the amount of the Award payable to a Participant who is employed by the Employers on the date of the Change in Control (or who died, became Disabled or Retired during such Award Term and prior to the Change in Control) for such Award Term shall be equal to the Participant's Target Award for such Award Term, multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days during the Award Term during which the Participant was employed by the Employers prior to the Change in Control and the denominator of which is the number of days in the Award Term. |
(c) | Time of Payment. In the event of a Change in Control, the payment date of all amounts credited to the Participant's Sub-Accounts (including, without limitation, the pro-rata Target Award for the Award Term during which the Change in Control occurred) shall be the date that is between two days prior to, or within 30 days after, the date of the Change in Control, as determined by the Committee in its sole and absolute discretion. |
12. | Amendment, Termination and Adjustments |
(a) | The Committee, in its sole and absolute discretion, may alter or amend this Plan from time to time; provided, however, that without the written consent of the affected Participant, no such amendment shall, (i) reduce a Participant's Account balance as in effect on the date of the amendment, (ii) reduce the amount of any outstanding Award that was previously approved by the Committee but not yet paid as of the date of the amendment, (iii) modify Section 11(b) hereof or (iv) alter the time of payment provisions described in Sections 10 and 11 of the Plan, except for any amendments that accelerate the time of payment as permitted under Code Section 409A or are required to bring such provisions into compliance with the requirements of Code Section 409A and, in either case, are permitted by Code Section 409A and the regulations issued thereunder. |
(b) | The Committee, in its sole and absolute discretion, may terminate this Plan in whole or in part at any time; provided that, such termination is permitted under Code Section 409A and, without the written consent of the affected Participant, no such termination shall, (i) reduce a Participant's Account balance as in effect on the date of the termination, (ii) reduce the amount of any outstanding Award that was previously approved by the Committee but not yet paid as of the date of termination or (iii) alter the time of payment provisions described in Sections 10 and 11 of the Plan, except for modifications that accelerate the time of payment or are required to bring such provisions into compliance with the requirements of Code Section 409A and, in either case, are permitted by Code Section 409A. |
(c) | Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon a complete termination of the Plan, the Committee, in its sole and absolute discretion, shall have the right to change the time of distribution of Participants' Sub-Accounts under the Plan, including requiring that all such Sub-Accounts be immediately distributed in the form of lump sum cash payments (but only to the extent such change is permitted by Code Section 409A). |
(d) | No amendment may cause any Qualified Performance-Based Award to be includable as “applicable employee remuneration” of such Participant, as such term is defined in Code Section 162(m) (i.e., to no longer qualify for the exception for “qualified performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m)). |
(e) | Any amendment or termination of the Plan shall be in the form of a written instrument executed by an officer of the Company on the order of the Committee. Such amendment or termination shall become effective as of the date specified in the instrument or, if no such date is specified, on the date of its execution. |
13. | General Provisions |
(a) | No Right of Employment. Neither the adoption or operation of this Plan, nor any document describing or referring to this Plan, or any part thereof, shall confer upon any employee any right to continue in the employ of an Employer, or shall in any way affect the right and power of an Employer to terminate the employment of any employee at any time with or without assigning a reason therefor to the same extent as the Employer might have done if this Plan had not been adopted. |
(b) | Governing Law. The provisions of this Plan shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, except when preempted by federal law. |
(c) | Expenses. Expenses of administering the Plan shall be paid by the Employers, as directed by the Parent Company. |
(d) | Assignability. No amount payable to a Participant under this Plan shall be assignable or transferable by him for any reason whatsoever, or be subject to alienation, anticipation, sale, pledge, encumbrance or other legal process or in any manner be liable for or subject to the debts or liabilities of the Participant or Beneficiary; provided, however, that upon the death of a Participant the right to the amounts payable hereunder shall be paid to the Participant's Beneficiary. |
(e) | Taxes. There shall be deducted from each payment under the Plan the amount of any tax required by any governmental authority to be withheld and paid over to such governmental authority for the account of the person entitled to such payment. |
(f) | Limitation on Rights of Participants; No Trust. No trust has been created by the Employers for the payment of any benefits under this Plan; nor have the Participants been granted any lien on any assets of the Employers to secure payment of such benefits. This Plan represents only an unfunded, unsecured promise to pay by the Employer or former Employer of the Participant, and the Participants and Beneficiaries are merely unsecured creditors of the Participant's Employer or former Employer. |
(g) | Payment to Guardian. If a Sub-Account balance is payable to a minor, to a person declared incompetent or to a person incapable of handling the disposition of his property, the Committee may direct payment of such Sub-Account to the guardian, legal representative or person having the care and custody of such minor, incompetent or person. The Committee may require such proof of incompetency, minority, incapacity or guardianship as it may deem appropriate prior to the distribution of such Sub-Account. Such distribution shall completely discharge the Employers from all liability with respect to such Sub-Account. |
(h) | Miscellaneous. |
(i) | Headings. Headings are given to the sections of this Plan solely as a convenience to facilitate reference. Such headings, numbering and paragraphing shall not in any case be deemed in any way material or relevant to the construction of this Plan or any provisions thereof. |
(ii) | Construction. The use of the masculine gender shall also include within its meaning the feminine. The use of the singular shall also include within its meaning the plural, and vice versa. |
(iii) | Acceleration of Payments. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, to the extent permitted under Code Section 409A and the Treasury Regulations issued thereunder, payments of Sub-Accounts hereunder may be accelerated (1) to the extent necessary to comply with federal, state, local or foreign ethics or conflicts of interest laws or agreements, (2) to the extent necessary to pay the FICA taxes imposed under Code Section 3101, and the income withholding taxes related thereto or (3) if the Plan (or a portion thereof) fails to satisfy the requirements of Code Section 409A; provided that the amount of such payment may not exceed the amount required to be included as income as a result of the failure to comply with Code Section 409A |
(iv) | Delayed Payments due to Solvency Issues. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary (but except as otherwise provided in Section 14), an Employer shall not be required to make any payment hereunder to any Participant or Beneficiary if the making of the payment would jeopardize the ability of the Employer to continue as a going concern; provided that any missed payment is made during the first calendar year in which the funds of the Employer are sufficient to |
(v) | Payments Violating Applicable Law. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, the payment of all or any portion of the amounts payable hereunder will be deferred to the extent that the Employer reasonably anticipates that the making of such payment would violate Federal securities laws or other applicable law (provided that the making of a payment that would cause income taxes or penalties under the Code shall not be treated as a violation of applicable law). The deferred amount shall become payable at the earliest date at which the Employer reasonably anticipates that making the payment will not cause such violation. |
14. | Liability of Employers, Transfers and Guarantees. |
(a) | In general. The provisions of this Section shall apply notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary. |
(b) | Liability for Payment/Transfers of Employment. |
(i) | Subject to the provisions of clause (ii) of this Section, the Employers shall each be solely liable for the payment of amounts due hereunder to or on behalf of the Participants who are (or were) its employees. |
(ii) | Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the benefits that are payable to or on behalf of a Participant are based on the Participant's employment with more than one Employer, the following provisions shall apply: |
(1) | Upon a transfer of employment, the Participant's Sub-Accounts shall be transferred from the prior Employer to the new Employer and interest shall continue to be credited to the Sub-Accounts following the transfer (to the extent otherwise required under the terms of the Plan). Subject to Section 14(b)(ii)(2)(C), the last Employer of the Participant shall be responsible for processing the payment of the entire amount which is allocated to the Participant's Sub Accounts hereunder; and |
(2) | Notwithstanding the provisions of clause (1), (A) each Employer shall be solely liable for the payment of the amounts credited to a Participant's Account which were earned by the Participant while he was employed by that Employer; (B) each Employer (unless it is insolvent) shall reimburse the last Employer for its allocable share of the Participant's distribution; (C) if any responsible Employer is insolvent at the time of distribution, the last Employer shall not be required to make a distribution to the Participant with respect to amounts which are allocable to service with that Employer (until the payment date specified in Section 13(h)(v)); and (4) each Employer shall (to the extent permitted by applicable law) receive an income tax deduction for the Employer's allocable share of the Participant's distribution. |
(c) | Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that an Employer is unable or refuses to satisfy its obligations hereunder with respect to the payment of benefits under this Plan to a Participant whose Awards are based in whole or in part on Parent Company Performance Objectives, the Parent Company (unless it is insolvent) shall guarantee and be responsible for the payment thereof. |
15. | Approval by Stockholders |
I. i. | Any “Person” (as such term is used in Sections 13(d)(3) or 14(d)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), other than one or more Permitted Holders (as defined below), is or becomes the “beneficial owner”(as defined in Rules 13d-3 and 13d-5 of the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of more than 50% of the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of a Related Company (as defined below) entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (the “Outstanding Voting Securities”), other than any direct or indirect acquisition, including but not limited to an acquisition by purchase, distribution or otherwise, of voting securities by any Person pursuant to an Excluded Business Combination (as defined below); or |
ii. | The consummation of a reorganization, merger or consolidation or sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of any Related Company or the acquisition of assets of another corporation, or other transaction involving a Related Company (“Business Combination”) excluding, however, such a Business Combination pursuant to which (such a Business Combination, an “Excluded Business Combination”) the individuals and entities who beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the combined voting power of any Related Company immediately prior to such Business Combination beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the combined voting power of the then Outstanding Voting Securities of the entity resulting from such Business Combination (including, without limitation, an entity that as a result of such transaction owns any Related Company or all or substantially all of the assets of any Related Company, either directly or through one or more subsidiaries). |
II. i. | Any “Person” (as such term is used in Sections 13(d)(3) or 14(d)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), other than one or more Permitted Holders, is or becomes the “beneficial owner”(as defined in Rules 13d-3 and 13d-5 of the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of more than 50% of the combined voting power of the then Outstanding Voting Securities of NACCO Industries, Inc. (“NACCO”), other than any direct or indirect acquisition, including but not limited to an acquisition by purchase, distribution or otherwise, of voting securities: |
ii. | a majority of the Board of Directors of NACCO ceases to be comprised of Incumbent Directors; or |
iii. | the consummation of a reorganization, merger or consolidation or sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of NACCO or the acquisition of assets of another corporation, or other transaction involving NACCO (“NACCO Business Combination”) excluding, however, such a Business Combination pursuant to which both of the following apply (such a Business Combination, an “Excluded NACCO Business Combination”): |
1. | Purpose of the Plan |
2. | Definitions |
(a) | “Award” means cash paid to a Participant under the Plan for a Performance Period in an amount determined in accordance with Section 5. |
(b) | “Change in Control” means the occurrence of an event described in Appendix 1 hereto. |
(c) | “Committee” means the Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors or any other committee appointed by the Company's Board of Directors to administer this Plan in accordance with Section 3, so long as any such committee consists of not less than two directors of the Company and so long as each member of the Committee is (i) an “outside director” for purposes of Section 162(m) and (ii) is not an employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. |
(d) | “Covered Employee” means any Participant who is a “covered employee” for purposes of Section 162(m) or any Participant who the Committee determines in its sole discretion could become a “covered employee. |
(e) | “Disability” means an approved application for disability benefits under the Company's long-term disability plan or under any applicable government program. |
(f) | “Guidelines” means the guidelines that are approved by the Committee for the administration of the Awards granted under the Plan. To the extent that there is any inconsistency between the Guidelines and the Plan, the Guidelines will control. |
(g) | “Hay Salary Grade” shall mean the salary grade or Salary Points assigned to a Participant by the Employers pursuant to the Hay Salary System, or any successor salary system subsequently adopted by the Employers. |
(h) | “Participant” means any person who is classified by the Employers as a salaried employee in Hay Salary Grade 24 or above, who in the judgment of the Committee occupies a key position in which his efforts may significantly contribute to the profits or growth of the Company and/or the Parent Company; provided, however, that the Committee may select any employee who is expected to contribute, or who has contributed, significantly to the profitability of the Company and/or the Parent Company to participate in the Plan and receive an Award hereunder; and further provided, however, that following the end of the Performance Period, the Committee may make one or more discretionary Awards to employees of the Employers who were not previously designated as Participants. Directors of the Employers who are also employees of the Employers are eligible to participate in the Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) the Committee may delegate to the Chief Executive Officer and/or the Chairman of the Company the right to designate Participants in Hay Salary Grades 27 and below who are not Covered Employees or officers and (ii) employees of the Employers may not participate in this Plan and the Company's marketing incentive compensation plans during the same time period. |
(i) | “Payment Period” means, with respect to any Performance Period, the period from January 1 to March 15 of the calendar year immediately following the calendar year in which such Performance Period ends. |
(j) | “Performance Period” means any period of one year (or portion thereof) on which an Award is based, as established by the Committee. Any Performance Period(s) applicable to a Qualified Performance-Based Award shall be established by the Committee not later than 90 days after the commencement of the Performance Period on which such Qualified Performance-Based Award will be based and prior to completion of 25% of such Performance Period. |
(k) | “Performance Objectives” shall mean the performance objectives established pursuant to the Plan for Participants. Performance Objectives may be described in terms of Parent Company-wide or Company-wide objectives or objectives that are related to the performance of (i) the individual Participant, (ii) any subsidiary, division, business unit, department or function of the Parent Company or (iii) any Subsidiary, division, business unit, department or function of the Company. Performance Objectives may be measured on an absolute or relative basis. Different groups of Participants may be subject to different Performance Objectives for the same Performance Period. Relative performance may be measured by a group of peer |
(l) | “Qualified Performance-Based Award” shall mean any Award or portion of an Award granted to a Covered Employee that is intended to satisfy the requirements for “qualified performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m). |
(m) | “Retire.” For U.S. Participants, “Retire” means a termination of employment that entitles the Participant to immediate commencement of his pension benefits under The Combined Defined Benefit Plan of NACCO Industries, Inc. and its Subsidiaries or, for U.S. Participants who are not members of such plan, a termination of employment with the Employers after reaching age 60 with at least 15 years of service. For non-U.S. Participants, “Retire” means the earlier of age 60 with at least 15 years of service with the Employers or the termination of a non-U.S. Participant's employment with the Employers that qualifies as retirement under local practices and procedures and/or which qualifies the non-U.S. Participant for foreign retirement benefits. |
(n) | "Salary Points” means the salary points assigned to a Participant by the Committee for the applicable Performance Period pursuant to the Hay salary point system, or any successor salary point system adopted by the Committee. |
(o) | “Section 162(m)” means Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or any successor provision. |
(p) | “Subsidiary” shall mean any corporation, partnership or other entity, the majority of the outstanding voting securities of which is owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company. |
(q) | “Target Award” shall mean the designated salary midpoint that corresponds to a Participant's Salary Points, multiplied by the short-term incentive compensation target percent for those Salary Points for the applicable Performance Period, as determined by the Committee. The Target Award is the Award that would be paid to a Participant under the Plan if each Performance Objective is met exactly at target level. Calculations of Target Awards for a Performance Period shall initially be based on the Participant's Hay Salary Grade as of January 1st of the first year of the Performance Period. However, such Target Awards shall be changed during or after the Performance Period under the following circumstances: (i) if a Participant receives a change in Salary Points, salary midpoint and/or short-term incentive compensation target percentage during a Performance Period, such change shall be reflected in a pro-rata Target Award, (ii) employees hired into or promoted into a position eligible to participate in the Plan during a Performance Period will be assigned a pro-rated Target Award based on their length of service during the Performance Period and (iii) the Committee may increase or decrease the amount of the Target Award at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion; provided, however, that (X) no such decrease may occur following a Change in Control and (Y) no such increase, adjustment or any other change may be made that would cause any Qualified Performance-Based Award to be includable as “applicable employee remuneration” of such Participant, as such term is defined in Code Section 162(m) (i.e., to no longer qualify for the exception for “qualified performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m)). |
3. | Administration |
4. | Eligibility |
5. | Awards |
(a) | The Committee shall approve (i) a Target Award to be granted to each Participant and (ii) a formula for determining the amount of each Award, which formula is based upon the achievement of Performance Objectives as set forth in the Guidelines; provided, however, that with respect to any Qualified Performance-Based Award, the Committee shall approve the foregoing not later than the ninetieth day of the applicable Performance Period and prior to the completion of 25% of such Performance Period. |
(b) | Prior to the end of the Payment Period, the Committee shall approve (i) a preliminary calculation of the amount of each Award based upon the application of the formula and actual performance to the Target Awards previously determined in accordance with Section 5(a); and (ii) a final calculation of the amount of each Award to be paid to each Participant for the Performance Period. Such approval shall be certified by the Committee before any amount is paid under any Award with respect to that Performance Period. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee shall have the power to (1) decrease the amount of any Award below the amount determined in accordance with Section 5(b)(i); and/or (2) increase the amount of any Award above the amount determined in accordance with Section 5(b)(i); provided, however, that (A) no such decrease may occur following a Change in Control and (B) no such increase, change or adjustment may be made that would cause any Qualified Performance-Based Award to be includable as “applicable employee remuneration” of such Participant, as such term is defined in Section 162(m) (i.e., to no longer qualify for the exception for “qualified performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m)). No Award, including any Award equal to the Target Award, shall be payable under the Plan to any Participant except as determined by the Committee. |
(c) | Each Award shall be fully paid during the Payment Period and shall be paid in cash. Awards shall be paid subject to all withholdings and deductions pursuant to Section 7. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, the maximum amount paid to a Participant in a single calendar year as a result of Awards under this Plan shall not exceed $8,000,000 or such lesser amount specified in the Guidelines. |
(d) | At such time as the Committee approves a Target Award and formula for determining the amount of each Award, the Committee shall designate whether all or any portion of the Award is a Qualified Performance-Based Award. |
6. | Change in Control |
(a) | The following provisions shall apply notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary. |
(b) | Amount of Award for Year of Change In Control. In the event of a Change in Control during a Performance Period, the amount of the Award payable to a Participant who is employed by the Employers on the date of the Change in Control (or who died, become Disabled or Retired during such Performance Period and prior to the Change in Control) for such Performance Period shall be equal to the Participant's Target Award for such Performance Period, multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days during the Performance Period during which the Participant was employed by the Employers prior to the Change in Control and the denominator of which is the number of days in the Performance Period. |
(c) | Time of Payment. In the event of a Change in Control, the payment date of all outstanding Awards (including, without limitation, the pro-rata Target Award for the Performance Period during which the Change in Control occurred) shall be the date that is between two days prior to, or within 30 days after, the date of the Change in Control, as determined by the Committee in its sole and absolute discretion. |
7. | Withholding Taxes |
8. | Amendment and Termination |
9. | Approval by Stockholders |
10. | General Provisions |
(a) | No Right of Employment. Neither the adoption or operation of this Plan, nor any document describing or referring to this Plan, or any part thereof, shall confer upon any employee any right to continue in the employ of the Employers, or shall in any way affect the right and power of the Employers to terminate the employment of any employee at any time with or without assigning a reason therefor to the same extent as the Employers might have done if this Plan had not been adopted. |
(b) | Governing Law. The provisions of this Plan shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware. |
(c) | Miscellaneous. Headings are given to the sections of this Plan solely as a convenience to facilitate reference. Such headings, numbering and paragraphing shall not in any case be deemed in any way material or relevant to the construction of this Plan or any provisions thereof. The use of the masculine gender shall also include within its meaning the feminine. The use of the singular shall also include within its meaning the plural, and vice versa. |
(d) | American Jobs Creation Act. It is intended that this Plan be exempt from the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, as enacted by the American Jobs Creation Act, and the Plan shall be interpreted and administered in a manner to give effect to such intent. |
(e) | Limitation on Rights of Participants; No trust. No trust has been created by the Employers for the payment of Awards granted under this Plan; nor have the Participants been granted any lien on any assets of the Employers to secure payment of such benefits. This Plan represents only an unfunded, unsecured promise to pay by the Participant's Employers, and the Participants hereunder are unsecured creditors of their Employer. |
(f) | Payment to Guardian. If an Award is payable to a minor, to a person declared incompetent or to a person incapable of handling the disposition of his property, the Committee may direct payment of such Award to the guardian, legal representative or person having the care and custody of such minor, incompetent or person. The Committee may require such proof of incompetency, minority, incapacity or guardianship as it may deem appropriate prior to the distribution of such Award. Such distribution shall completely discharge the Company from all liability with respect to such Award. |
11. | Liability of Employers, Transfers and Guarantees. |
(a) | In general. The provisions of this Section shall apply notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary. |
(b) | Liability for Payment/Transfers of Employment. |
(i) | Subject to the provisions of clause (ii) of this Section, the Employers shall each be solely liable for the payment of amounts due hereunder to or on behalf of the Participants who are (or were) its employees. |
(ii) | Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the benefits that are payable to or on behalf of a Participant are based on the Participant's employment with more than one Employer, the following provisions shall apply: |
(1) | Upon a transfer of employment, the Participant's Award shall be transferred from the prior Employer to the new Employer. Subject to Section 11(b)(ii)(2)(C), the last Employer of the Participant shall be responsible for processing the payment of the entire amount of the Participant's Award hereunder; and |
(2) | Notwithstanding the provisions of clause (i), (A) each Employer shall be solely liable for the payment of the portion of the Participant's Award that was earned by the Participant while he was employed by that Employer; (B) each Employer (unless it is insolvent) shall reimburse the last Employer for its allocable share of the Participant's distribution; (C) if any responsible Employer is insolvent at the time of distribution, the last Employer shall not be required to make a distribution to the Participant with respect to amounts which are allocable to service with that Employer; and (4) each Employer shall (to the extent permitted by applicable law) receive an income tax deduction for the Employer's allocable share of the Participant's distribution. |
(c) | Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that an Employer is unable or refuses to satisfy its obligations hereunder with respect to the payment of benefits under this Plan to a Participant whose Awards are based in whole or in part on Parent Company Performance Objectives, the Parent Company (unless it is insolvent) shall guarantee and be responsible for the payment thereof. |
12. | Effective Date |
I. i. | Any “Person” (as such term is used in Sections 13(d)(3) or 14(d)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), other than one or more Permitted Holders (as defined below), is or becomes the “beneficial owner”(as defined in Rules 13d-3 and 13d-5 of the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of more than 50% of the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of a Related Company (as defined below) entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (the “Outstanding Voting Securities”), other than any direct or indirect acquisition, including but not limited to an acquisition by purchase, distribution or otherwise, of voting securities by any Person pursuant to an Excluded Business Combination (as defined below); or |
ii. | The consummation of a reorganization, merger or consolidation or sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of any Related Company or the acquisition of assets of another corporation, or other transaction involving a Related Company (“Business Combination”) excluding, however, such a Business Combination pursuant to which (such a Business Combination, an “Excluded Business Combination”) the individuals and entities who beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the combined voting power of any Related Company immediately prior to such Business Combination beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the combined voting power of the then Outstanding Voting Securities of the entity resulting from such Business Combination (including, without limitation, an entity that as a result of such transaction owns any Related Company or all or substantially all of the assets of any Related Company, either directly or through one or more subsidiaries). |
ii. | a majority of the Board of Directors of NACCO ceases to be comprised of Incumbent Directors; or |
iii. | the consummation of a reorganization, merger or consolidation or sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of NACCO or the acquisition of assets of another corporation, or other transaction involving NACCO (“NACCO Business Combination”) excluding, however, such a Business Combination pursuant to which both of the following apply (such a Business Combination, an “Excluded NACCO Business Combination”): |