UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal
quarter ended:
|
Commission file
number: |
July 31, 2008 |
0-14939 |
AMERICA’S
CAR-MART, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas |
63-0851141 |
(State or other
jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
802
Southeast Plaza Ave., Suite 200, Bentonville, Arkansas 72712
(Address
of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(479)
464-9944
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer o Accelerated
filer ý
Non-accelerated
filer o Smaller
reporting company o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date.
|
Title
of Each Class |
Outstanding
at
September
9, 2008
|
|
Common stock, par
value $.01 per share |
11,777,731 |
Part
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial
Statements |
America’s Car-Mart,
Inc.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars
in thousands except per share amounts)
|
|
July
31, 2008
|
|
|
April
30, 2008
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
267 |
|
|
$ |
153 |
|
Accrued
interest on finance receivables
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
833 |
|
Finance
receivables, net
|
|
|
173,282 |
|
|
|
163,344 |
|
Inventory
|
|
|
14,737 |
|
|
|
13,532 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
|
|
1,429 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
Income
tax receivable
|
|
|
3,334 |
|
|
|
3,400 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
|
|
18,431 |
|
|
|
18,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
212,728 |
|
|
$ |
200,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
and stockholders’ equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$ |
3,914 |
|
|
$ |
3,871 |
|
Deferred
payment protection plan revenue
|
|
|
6,679 |
|
|
|
4,631 |
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
9,695 |
|
|
|
11,063 |
|
Deferred
tax liabilities
|
|
|
6,226 |
|
|
|
3,465 |
|
Revolving
credit facilities and notes payable
|
|
|
42,628 |
|
|
|
40,337 |
|
|
|
|
69,142 |
|
|
|
63,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’
equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, par value $.01 per share, 1,000,000 shares
authorized;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
none
issued or outstanding
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Common
stock, par value $.01 per share, 50,000,000 shares
authorized;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,139,674
issued (12,091,628 at April 30, 2008)
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
38,367 |
|
|
|
37,284 |
|
Retained
earnings
|
|
|
110,588 |
|
|
|
105,307 |
|
Less:
Treasury stock, at cost, 403,941 shares
|
|
|
(5,490 |
) |
|
|
(5,490 |
) |
Total
stockholders’equity
|
|
|
143,586 |
|
|
|
137,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
212,728 |
|
|
$ |
200,589 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Statements of
Operations |
America’s Car-Mart,
Inc.
|
(Unaudited)
(Dollars
in thousands except per share amounts)
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July
31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$ |
69,226 |
|
|
$ |
52,863 |
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
6,435 |
|
|
|
5,844 |
|
|
|
|
75,661 |
|
|
|
58,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs
and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
39,027 |
|
|
|
31,538 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
|
|
12,818 |
|
|
|
11,195 |
|
Provision
for credit losses
|
|
|
14,490 |
|
|
|
11,519 |
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
|
67,347 |
|
|
|
55,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
before taxes
|
|
|
8,314 |
|
|
|
3,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
|
3,033 |
|
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Income
|
|
$ |
5,281 |
|
|
$ |
2,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
.45 |
|
|
$ |
.18 |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
.45 |
|
|
$ |
.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average number of shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
11,707,243 |
|
|
|
11,875,782 |
|
Diluted
|
|
|
11,790,086 |
|
|
|
11,967,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows |
America’s Car-Mart,
Inc.
|
(Unaudited)
(In
thousands)
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
July
31,
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
Operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
5,281 |
|
|
$ |
2,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income from operations
to
net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
for credit losses
|
|
|
14,490 |
|
|
|
11,519 |
|
Claims
under payment protection plan
|
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
(Gain)
loss on sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
47 |
|
Share
based compensation
|
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
Unrealized
loss on derivative
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
2,761 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance
receivable originations
|
|
|
(65,793 |
) |
|
|
(48,853 |
) |
Finance
receivable collections
|
|
|
35,345 |
|
|
|
30,553 |
|
Accrued
interest on finance receivables
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
Inventory
|
|
|
4,073 |
|
|
|
5,815 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(597 |
) |
|
|
(125 |
) |
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
3,228 |
|
Deferred
payment protection plan revenue
|
|
|
2,048 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Income
taxes receivable
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
797 |
|
Excess
tax benefit from share-based payments
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(939 |
) |
|
|
5,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
|
|
(647 |
) |
|
|
(697 |
) |
Proceeds
from sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(618 |
) |
|
|
(653 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
of stock options and warrants
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Excess
tax benefit from share-based compensation
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of common stock
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Change
in cash overdrafts
|
|
|
(1,021 |
) |
|
|
1,992 |
|
Proceeds
from notes payable
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Principal
payments on notes payable
|
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
(180 |
) |
Proceeds
from revolving credit facilities
|
|
|
18,245 |
|
|
|
13,697 |
|
Payments
on revolving credit facilities
|
|
|
(15,768 |
) |
|
|
(20,671 |
) |
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
1,671 |
|
|
|
(5,123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
Cash
and cash equivalents at:
|
Beginning
of period
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End
of period |
|
$ |
267 |
|
|
$ |
238 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Unaudited) |
America’s Car-Mart, Inc.
|
A
– Organization and Business
America’s
Car-Mart, Inc., a Texas corporation (the “Company”), is the largest publicly
held automotive retailer in the United States focused exclusively on the “Buy
Here/Pay Here” segment of the used car market. References to the
Company typically include the Company’s consolidated
subsidiaries. The Company’s operations are principally conducted
through its two operating subsidiaries, America’s Car-Mart, Inc., an Arkansas
corporation (“Car-Mart of Arkansas”), and Colonial Auto Finance, Inc., an
Arkansas corporation (“Colonial”). Collectively, Car-Mart of Arkansas
and Colonial are referred to herein as “Car-Mart.” The Company
primarily sells older model used vehicles and provides financing for
substantially all of its customers. Many of the Company’s customers have limited
financial resources and would not qualify for conventional financing as a result
of limited credit histories or past credit problems. As of July 31,
2008, the Company operated 91 stores located primarily in small cities
throughout the South-Central United States.
B
– Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
General
The
accompanying condensed balance sheet as of April 30, 2008, which has been
derived from audited financial statements and the unaudited interim condensed
financial statements as of July 31, 2008 have been prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and
in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q in Article 10 of Regulation
S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion
of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals)
considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating
results for the three months ended July 31, 2008 are not necessarily indicative
of the results that may be expected for the year ending April 30,
2009. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial
statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form
10-K for the year ended April 30, 2008.
Principles
of Consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Concentration
of Risk
The
Company provides financing in connection with the sale of substantially all of
its vehicles. These sales are made primarily to customers residing in
Arkansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Kentucky and Missouri, with approximately 51% of
revenues from customers residing in Arkansas. The Company maintains a
security interest in the vehicles sold. Periodically, the Company
maintains cash in financial institutions in excess of the amounts insured by the
federal government. Car-Mart’s revolving credit facilities mature in
April 2009. The Company expects that these credit facilities will be
renewed or refinanced on or before the scheduled maturity date.
Restrictions
on Subsidiary Distributions/Dividends
Car-Mart’s
revolving credit facilities limit distributions from Car-Mart to the Company
beyond (i) the repayment of an intercompany loan ($10.0 million at July 31,
2008), and (ii) dividends equal to 75% of Car-Mart of Arkansas’ net
income. At July 31, 2008, the Company’s assets (excluding its $131
million equity investment in Car-Mart) consisted of $4,000 in cash, $2.2 million
in other assets and a $10.0 million receivable from Car-Mart. Thus,
the Company is limited in the amount of dividends or other distributions it can
make to its shareholders without the consent of Car-Mart’s lender.
Cash
Equivalents
The
Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with maturities
of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Finance
Receivables, Repossessions and Charge-offs and Allowance for Credit
Losses
The
Company originates installment sale contracts from the sale of used vehicles at
its dealerships. Finance receivables are collateralized by vehicles
sold and consist of contractually scheduled payments from installment contracts
net of unearned finance charges and an allowance for credit
losses. Unearned finance charges represent the balance of interest
income remaining from the total interest to be earned over the term of the
related installment contract. An account is considered delinquent
when a contractually scheduled payment has not been received by the scheduled
payment date. At July 31, 2008 and 2007, 3.6% and 4.1%, respectively,
of the Company’s finance receivables balance were 30 days or more past
due.
The
Company takes steps to repossess a vehicle when the customer becomes delinquent
in his or her payments, and management determines that timely collection of
future payments is not probable. Accounts are charged-off after the
expiration of a statutory notice period for repossessed accounts, or when
management determines that timely collection of future payments is not probable
for accounts where the Company has been unable to repossess the vehicle. For
accounts where the vehicle has been repossessed, the fair value of the
repossessed vehicle is a reduction of the gross finance receivables balance
charged-off. On average, accounts are approximately 54 days past due
at the time of charge-off. For previously charged-off accounts that
are subsequently recovered, the amount of such recovery is credited to the
allowance for credit losses.
The
Company maintains an allowance for credit losses on an aggregate basis at a
level it considers sufficient to cover estimated losses in the collection of its
finance receivables. The allowance for credit losses is based
primarily upon historical and recent credit loss experience, with consideration
given to recent credit loss trends and changes in loan characteristics (i.e.,
average amount financed and term), delinquency levels, collateral values,
economic conditions and underwriting and collection practices. The
allowance for credit losses is periodically reviewed by management with any
changes reflected in current operations. Although it is at least
reasonably possible that events or circumstances could occur in the future that
are not presently foreseen which could cause actual credit losses to be
materially different from the recorded allowance for credit losses, the Company
believes that it has given appropriate consideration to all relevant factors and
has made reasonable assumptions in determining the allowance for credit
losses.
Beginning
May 1, 2007, the Company began offering retail customers in certain states the
option of purchasing a payment protection plan product as an add-on to the
installment sale contract. This product contractually obligates the
Company to cancel the remaining principal outstanding for any loan where the
retail customer has totaled the vehicle or the vehicle has been stolen. The
Company will periodically evaluate anticipated losses to ensure that if they do
exceed deferred payment protection plan revenues, an additional liability is
recorded for such difference. No such additional liability is required at July
31, 2008.
Inventory
Inventory
consists of used vehicles and is valued at the lower of cost or market on a
specific identification basis. Vehicle reconditioning costs are
capitalized as a component of inventory. Repossessed vehicles are
recorded at fair value, which approximates wholesale value. The cost
of used vehicles sold is determined using the specific identification
method.
Goodwill
Goodwill
reflects the excess of purchase price over the fair value of specifically
identified net assets purchased. In accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangibles”
(“SFAS 142”), goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite
lives are not amortized but are subject to annual impairment tests. The
impairment tests are based on the comparison of the fair value of the reporting
unit to the carrying value of such unit. If the fair value of the reporting unit
falls below its carrying value, goodwill is deemed to be impaired and a
write-down of goodwill would be recognized. There was no impairment of goodwill
during fiscal 2008, and to date, there has been none in fiscal
2009.
Property
and Equipment
Property
and equipment are stated at cost. Expenditures for additions,
renewals and improvements are capitalized. Costs of repairs and
maintenance are expensed as incurred. Leasehold improvements are
amortized over the shorter of the estimated life of the improvement or the lease
term. The lease term includes the primary lease term plus any
extensions that are reasonably assured. Depreciation is computed principally
using the straight-line method generally over the following estimated useful
lives:
Furniture,
fixtures and equipment
|
3
to 7 years
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
5
to 15 years
|
Buildings
and improvements
|
18
to 39 years
|
Property
and equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured
by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net
cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are
considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the
amount by which the carrying values of the impaired assets exceed the fair value
of such assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of
the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.
Cash
Overdraft
The
Company’s primary disbursement bank account is set up to operate with a fixed
$50,000 cash balance. As checks are presented for payment, monies are
automatically drawn against cash collections for the day and, if necessary, are
drawn against one of its revolving credit facilities. The cash
overdraft balance principally represents outstanding checks, net of any deposits
in transit that as of the balance sheet date had not yet been presented for
payment.
Deferred
Sales Tax
Deferred
sales tax represents a sales tax liability of the Company for vehicles sold on
an installment basis in the State of Texas. Under Texas law, for
vehicles sold on an installment basis, the related sales tax is due as the
payments are collected from the customer, rather than at the time of
sale.
Income
Taxes
Income
taxes are accounted for under the liability method. Under this
method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences
between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and are
measured using the enacted tax rates expected to apply in the years in which
these temporary differences are expected to be recovered or
settled.
Occasionally,
the Company is audited by taxing authorities. These audits could
result in proposed assessments of additional taxes. The Company
believes that its tax positions comply in all material respects with applicable
tax law. However, tax law is subject to interpretation, and
interpretations by taxing authorities could be different from those of the
Company, which could result in the imposition of additional taxes.
The
Company applies the provisions of FASB Interpretation 48, “Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes.” As required by Interpretation 48, which clarifies
Statement 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”, the Company recognizes the
financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the
relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position following
an audit. For tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not
threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest
benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon
ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority.
The
Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various
state jurisdictions. Tax regulations within each jurisdiction are
subject to the interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations and
require significant judgment to apply. With few exceptions, the
Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax
examinations by tax authorities for the years before fiscal 2006.
The
Company’s policy is to recognize accrued interest related to unrecognized tax
benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses. The Company
had no accrued penalties and/or interest as of July 31, 2008.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenues
are generated principally from the sale of used vehicles, which in most cases
includes a service contract, interest income and late fees earned on finance
receivables, and revenues generated from the payment protection plan product
sold in certain states.
Revenues
from the sale of used vehicles are recognized when the sales contract is signed,
the customer has taken possession of the vehicle and, if applicable, financing
has been approved. Revenues from the sale of service contracts are
recognized ratably over the five-month service contract
period. Service contract revenues are included in sales and the
related expenses are included in cost of sales. Payment protection
plan revenues are initially deferred and then recognized to income using the
“Rule of 78’s” interest method over the life of the loan so that revenues are
recognized in proportion to the amount of cancellation protection
provided. Payment protection plan revenues are included in sales and
related losses are included in cost of sales. Interest income is
recognized on all active finance receivable accounts using the interest method.
Late fees are recognized when collected and are included in interest income.
Active accounts include all accounts except those that have been paid-off or
charged-off. At July 31, 2008 and 2007, finance receivables more than
90 days past due were approximately $305,000 and $342,000,
respectively.
Earnings
per Share
Basic
earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the average number of
common shares outstanding during the period. The calculation of
diluted earnings per share takes into consideration the potentially dilutive
effect of common stock equivalents, such as outstanding stock options and
warrants, which if exercised or converted into common stock would then share in
the earnings of the Company. In computing diluted earnings per share,
the Company utilizes the treasury stock method and anti-dilutive securities are
excluded.
Stock-based
compensation
The
Company applies the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
123R, “Share Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”), which revises Statement 123,
“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and supersedes APB Opinion 25,
“Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” SFAS 123R requires the
Company to recognize expense related to the fair value of stock-based
compensation awards, including employee stock options. The Company
has elected to use the modified prospective transition method as permitted by
SFAS 123R and therefore has not restated financial results for prior
periods. Under this transition method, the Company applied the
provisions of SFAS 123R to new awards and to awards modified, repurchased, or
cancelled after May 1, 2006.
The
Company recorded compensation cost for stock-based employee awards of $682,000
($433,000 after tax effects) during the quarter ended July 31,
2008. The pretax amounts include $89,000 for restricted shares issued
on May 1, 2006, $67,000 for restricted shares issued on December 18, 2007,
$519,000 for stock options granted during quarter ended July 31, 2008, and
$7,000 related to stock issued under the 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The
Company recorded $232,000 ($146,000 after tax effects) during the quarter ended
July 31, 2007. The pretax amount includes $89,000 for restricted
shares issued on May 1, 2006, $136,000 related to stock options granted during
quarter ended July 31, 2007, and $7,000 related to stock issued under the 2006
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Tax benefits were recognized for these
costs at the Company’s overall effective tax rate.
The fair
value of options granted is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model based on the assumptions in the table
below.
|
July
31,
2008
|
|
July
31,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Expected
term (years)
|
5.0
|
|
5.0
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
3.33%
|
|
5.02%
|
Volatility
|
90%
|
|
80%
|
Dividend
yield
|
—
|
|
—
|
The
expected term of the options is based on evaluations of historical and expected
future employee exercise behavior. The risk-free interest rate is
based on the U.S. Treasury rates at the date of grant with maturity dates
approximately equal to the expected life at the grant
date. Volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company’s
stock. The Company has not historically issued any dividends and does
not expect to do so in the foreseeable future.
Stock
Options
On
October 16, 2007, the shareholders of the Company approved the 2007 Stock Option
Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan provides for the grant of options to
purchase up to an aggregate of 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to
employees, directors and certain advisors of the Company at a price not less
than the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant and for periods not
to exceed ten years. The shares of common stock available for issuance under the
2007 Plan may, at the election of the Company’s board of directors, be unissued
shares or treasury shares, or shares purchased in the open market or by private
purchase.
The
shareholders of the Company previously approved three stock option plans,
including the 1986 Incentive Stock Option Plan ("1986 Plan"), the 1991
Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan ("1991 Plan") and the 1997 Stock Option Plan
(“1997 Plan”). No additional option grants may be made under the
1986, 1991, or 1997 plans. Outstanding options granted under the
Company’s stock option plans expire in the calendar years 2008 through
2017.
|
Plan
|
|
|
|
|
1997
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
exercise price as a percentage of fair market value at date of
grant
|
100%
|
100%
|
|
Last
expiration date for outstanding options
|
July
2, 2017
|
October
16, 2017
|
|
Shares
available for grant at July 31, 2008
|
0
|
640,000
|
|
The
grant-date fair value of options granted during the quarters ended July 31, 2008
and 2007 was $201,000 and $135,000, respectively. The options were granted at
fair market value on date of grant. The aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding
options at July 31, 2008 is $4,278,000. As of July 31, 2008, the Company has
$2,221,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested options
granted under the 2007 Plan. At each period end, the Company will evaluate and
estimate the likelihood of attaining underlying performance goals and recognize
compensation cost accordingly. These outstanding options have a weighted-average
remaining vesting period of 1.75 years.
There
were 40,000 options exercised during the first three months of fiscal year 2009
with an intrinsic value of $553,000. The Company received cash from
options exercised during the first three months of fiscal year 2009 of
$147,000. The impact of these cash receipts is included in financing
activities in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows.
Warrants
As of
July 31, 2008, the Company had no remaining outstanding stock purchase
warrants. Warrants for 18,750 shares were exercised during the three
months ended July 31, 2008 with an intrinsic value of $60,000.
Stock
Incentive Plan
The
shareholders of the Company approved an amendment to the Company’s Stock
Incentive Plan on October 16, 2007. The amendment increased from 100,000 to
150,000 the number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the Stock
Incentive Plan. For shares issued under the Stock Incentive Plan, the
associated compensation expense is generally recognized equally over the vesting
periods established at the award date and is subject to the employee’s continued
employment by the Company. During fiscal 2008, 65,000 restricted
shares were granted with a fair value of $11.90 per share, the market price of
the Company’s stock on the grant date. A total of 21,302 shares
remained available for award at July 31, 2008.
The
Company recorded a pre-tax expense of $157,000 and $89,000 related to the Stock
Incentive Plan during quarters ended July 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
As of
July 31, 2008, the Company has $652,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to unvested awards granted under the Stock Incentive Plan, which the
Company expects to recognize over a weighted-average remaining period of 1.3
years. No awards under the Stock Incentive Plan vested during the
period ending July 31, 2008 or 2007.
There
were no modifications to any of the Company’s outstanding share-based payment
awards during fiscal 2008 or during the first quarter of fiscal
2009.
Treasury
Stock
The
Company did not purchase any shares of its common stock during the
first three months of fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008. Treasury stock may
be used for issuances under the Company’s stock-based compensation plans or for
other general corporate purposes.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
Occasionally,
new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (“FASB”) or other standard setting bodies which the Company adopts as of
the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, the Company believes
the impact of recently issued standards which are not yet effective will not
have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements upon
adoption.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”), which defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted
accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements, but provides guidance
on how to measure fair value by providing a fair value hierarchy used to
classify the source of the information.
In
February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-2, “Effective Date of
FASB Statement No. 157,” to provide a one-year deferral of the effective date of
Statement 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those
that are recognized or disclosed in financial statements at fair value on a
recurring basis. For nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities
subject to the deferral, the effective date of Statement 157 is postponed to
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company does not
believe the adoption of Statement 157 will have a material impact on the
Company’s financial statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Statement 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB
Statement 115.” The statement permits entities to choose to measure certain
financial instruments and other items at fair value. The objective is to improve
financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate
volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and
liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting
provisions. Unrealized gains and losses on any items for which Car-Mart elects
the fair value measurement option would be reported in earnings. Statement 159
is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The
Company does not believe the adoption of Statement 159 will have a material
impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In March
2008, the FASB issued Statement 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities.” Due to the use and complexity of derivative
instruments, there were concerns regarding the existing disclosure requirements
in FASB 133. Accordingly, this Statement requires enhanced
disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging
activities. Entities will be required to provide enhanced disclosures
about (i) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (ii) how derivative
instruments and related hedging items are accounted for under Statement 133 and
its related interpretations, and (iii) how derivative instruments and related
hedging items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and
cash flows. This Statement is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years after November 15, 2008. The Company does not believe
the adoption of Statement 161 will have a material impact on the Company’s
financial statements.
C
– Finance Receivables
The
Company originates installment sale contracts from the sale of used vehicles at
its dealerships. These installment sale contracts typically include
interest rates ranging from 6% to 19% per annum, are collateralized by the
vehicle sold and provide for payments over periods ranging from 12 to 36
months. The components of finance receivables are as
follows:
|
July
31,
|
|
April
30,
|
(In
thousands)
|
2008
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
contract amount
|
|
$ |
244,306 |
|
|
$ |
231,069 |
|
Unearned
finance charges
|
|
|
(23,979 |
) |
|
|
(22,916 |
) |
Principal
balance
|
|
|
220,327 |
|
|
|
208,153 |
|
Less
allowance for credit losses
|
|
|
(47,045 |
) |
|
|
(44,809 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
173,282 |
|
|
$ |
163,344 |
|
Changes
in the finance receivables, net balance for the three months ended July 31, 2008
and 2007 are as follows:
|
Three
Months Ended
July
31,
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
163,344 |
|
|
$ |
139,194 |
|
Finance
receivable originations
|
|
|
65,793 |
|
|
|
48,853 |
|
Finance
receivable collections
|
|
|
(35,345 |
) |
|
|
(30,553 |
) |
Provision
for credit losses
|
|
|
(14,490 |
) |
|
|
(11,519 |
) |
Inventory
acquired in repossession and payment protection plan
claims
|
|
|
(6,020 |
) |
|
|
(4,487 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at end of period
|
|
$ |
173,282 |
|
|
$ |
141,488 |
|
Changes
in the finance receivables allowance for credit losses for the three months
ended July 31, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:
|
Three
Months Ended
July
31,
|
(In
thousands)
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
Balance
at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
44,809 |
|
|
$ |
39,325 |
|
Provision
for credit losses
|
|
|
14,490 |
|
|
|
11,519 |
|
Allowance
related to business acquisition, net change
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
Net
charge-offs
|
|
|
(12,254 |
) |
|
|
(11,493 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at end of period
|
|
$ |
47,045 |
|
|
$ |
39,313 |
|
D
– Property and Equipment
A summary
of property and equipment is as follows:
|
July
31,
|
|
April
30,
|
(In
thousands)
|
2008
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$ |
5,740 |
|
|
$ |
5,740 |
|
Buildings
and improvements
|
|
|
7,091 |
|
|
|
6,808 |
|
Furniture,
fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
4,463 |
|
|
|
4,295 |
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
|
|
5,345 |
|
|
|
5,213 |
|
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(4,208 |
) |
|
|
(3,916 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,431 |
|
|
$ |
18,140 |
|
E
– Accrued Liabilities
A summary
of accrued liabilities is as follows:
|
|
July
31,
|
|
|
April
30,
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
$ |
2,701 |
|
|
$ |
3,354 |
|
Cash
overdraft
|
|
|
1,535 |
|
|
|
2,556 |
|
Deferred
service contract revenue
|
|
|
2,425 |
|
|
|
2,295 |
|
Deferred
sales tax
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
1,035 |
|
Subsidiary
redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
Interest
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
Other
|
|
|
1,212 |
|
|
|
1,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,695 |
|
|
$ |
11,063 |
|
F
– Debt Facilities
A summary
of revolving credit facilities is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving
Credit Facilities
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
Balance
at
|
Primary
Lender
|
|
Amount
|
|
Rate
|
|
Maturity
|
|
July
31, 2008
|
|
April
30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank
of Oklahoma
|
|
$50.0
million
|
|
Prime
+/-
|
|
Apr 2009
|
|
$
33,065
|
|
$
30,587
|
On
April 28, 2006, Car-Mart and its lenders amended the credit facilities. The
amended facilities set total borrowings allowed on the revolving credit
facilities at $50 million and established a $10 million term loan. The term loan
was funded in May 2006 and called for 120 consecutive and substantially equal
installments beginning June 1, 2006. The interest rate on the term loan is fixed
at 7.33%. The principal balance on the term loan was $8.5 million at July 31,
2008. The combined total for the Company’s credit facilities is $60 million. On
March 12, 2007 (effective December 31, 2006) Car-Mart and its lenders again
amended the credit facilities. The March 12, 2007 amendments served to change
the Company’s financial covenant requirements and to adjust the Company’s
interest rate pricing grid on its revolving credit facilities. The pricing grid
is based on funded debt to EBITDA, as defined, and the interest rate on the
revolving credit facilities can range from prime minus .25 or LIBOR plus 2.75 to
prime plus 1.00 or LIBOR plus 4.00.
The
facilities are collateralized by substantially all the assets of Car-Mart
including finance receivables and inventory. Interest is payable monthly under
the revolving credit facilities at the bank’s prime lending rate minus .25% per
annum at July 31, 2008 (4.75%) and at the bank’s prime lending rate plus .75%
per annum at July 31, 2007 (9.0%). The interest rate on the revolving credit
facilities decreased between years due to decreases in the prime rate and the
Company’s financial performance. The facilities contain various reporting and
performance covenants including (i) maintenance of certain financial ratios and
tests, (ii) limitations on borrowings from other sources, (iii) restrictions on
certain operating activities, and (iv) limitations on the payment of dividends
or distributions to the Company. The Company was in compliance with the
covenants at July 31, 2008. The amount available to be drawn under the
facilities is a function of eligible finance receivables and inventory. Based
upon eligible finance receivables and inventory at July 31, 2008, Car-Mart could
have drawn an additional $16.9 million under its facilities.
The
Company also has a $1.1 million term loan secured by the corporate aircraft. The
term loan is payable over fifteen years and has a fixed interest rate of 5.79%
at July 31, 2008.
Interest
Rate Swap Agreement
On May
16, 2008, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement (“Agreement”)
with its primary lender for a notional principal amount of $20
million. The effective date of the Agreement is May 20,
2008. The Agreement matures on May 31, 2013 and provides that the
Company will pay monthly interest on the notional amount at a fixed rate of
6.68% and receive monthly interest on the notional amount at a floating rate
based on the bank’s prime lending rate, an initial rate of 5.00% (effective rate
of 6.43% at July 31, 2008). The Company entered into
this Agreement to manage a portion of its interest rate exposure by
effectively converting a portion of its variable rate debt into fixed rate
debt. The interest rate swap agreement is not designated as a hedge
by Company management; therefore, the gain (loss) of the Agreement is reported
in earnings. The cumulative net loss for the Agreement reported in earnings as
interest expense is $13,000 for the quarter ended July 31, 2008. The
fair value of the Agreement is included in other liabilities on the consolidated
balance sheet at July 31, 2008 at $13,000. The interest on the credit
facilities, the net settlements under the interest rate swap, and the changes in
the fair value of the agreement, is all reflected in interest
expense.
G
– Fair Value Measurements
The
Company adopted SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” (“SFAS
No. 157”) effective May 1, 2008 for financial assets and liabilities
measured on a recurring basis. SFAS No. 157 applies to all financial assets
and financial liabilities that are being measured and reported on a fair value
basis. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. 157-2, which delayed
the effective date of SFAS No. 157 by one year for nonfinancial assets and
liabilities. As defined in SFAS No. 157, fair value is the price that would
be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price).
SFAS No. 157 requires disclosure that establishes a framework for measuring fair
value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. The statement
requires fair value measurements be classified and disclosed in one of the
following categories:
Level 1:
Unadjusted quoted prices in active
markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted
assets or liabilities. We consider active markets as those in which transactions
for the assets or liabilities occur in sufficient frequency and volume to
provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
Level 2:
Quoted prices in markets that are not
active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for
substantially the full term of the asset or liability. This category includes
those derivative instruments that we value using observable market data.
Substantially all of these inputs are observable in the marketplace throughout
the full term of the derivative instrument, can be derived from observable data,
or supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the
marketplace. Level 2 instruments primarily include non-exchange traded
derivatives such as over-the-counter commodity price swaps, investments and
interest rate swaps. Our valuation models are primarily industry-standard models
that consider various inputs including: (a) quoted forward prices for
commodities, (b) time value and (c) current market and contractual
prices for the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic
measures. We utilize our counterparties’ valuations to assess the reasonableness
of our prices and valuation techniques.
Level 3:
Measured based on prices or valuation
models that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value
measurement and less observable from objective sources (i.e., supported by
little or no market activity). Level 3 instruments primarily include derivative
instruments, such as basis swaps, commodity price collars and floors, as well as
investments. Our valuation models are primarily industry-standard models that
consider various inputs including: (a) quoted forward prices for
commodities, (b) time value, (c) volatility factors and (d) current
market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments, as well as other
relevant economic measures. Although we utilize our counterparties’ valuations
to assess the reasonableness of our prices and valuation techniques, we do not
have sufficient corroborating market evidence to support classifying these
assets and liabilities as Level 2.
As
required by SFAS No. 157, financial assets and liabilities are classified
based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value
measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input
to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of
the fair value of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair
value hierarchy levels. The following table summarizes the valuation of the
Company’s financial instruments by SFAS No. 157 pricing levels as of July
31, 2008:
|
Fair
Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted
prices in
active
markets
(Level
1)
|
Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level
2)
|
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level
3)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
Rate Swap
|
-
|
13,000
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
H
– Weighted Average Shares Outstanding
Weighted
average shares outstanding, which are used in the calculation of basic and
diluted earnings per share, are as follows:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July
31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding-basic
|
|
|
11,707,243 |
|
|
|
11,875,782 |
|
Dilutive
options and warrants
|
|
|
82,843 |
|
|
|
91,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding-diluted
|
|
|
11,790,086 |
|
|
|
11,967,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Antidilutive
securities not included:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
and warrants
|
|
|
467,064 |
|
|
|
93,228 |
|
Restricted
stock
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
39,667 |
|
I
– Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Supplemental
cash flow disclosures are as follows:
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
July
31,
|
(In
thousands)
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
paid
|
|
$ |
666 |
|
|
$ |
845 |
|
Income
taxes paid, net
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash
transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory
acquired in repossession and payment protection plan
claims
|
|
|
6,020 |
|
|
|
4,487 |
|
Item
2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
The
following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company's
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this
report.
Forward-Looking
Information
The
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for
certain forward-looking statements. Certain information included in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains, and other materials filed or to be
filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (as well as
information included in oral statements or other written statements made or to
be made by the Company or its management) contain or will
contain, forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended. The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,”
“estimate,” “project” and similar expressions identify forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was
made. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or
revise any forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking
statements are based upon management’s current plans or expectations and are
subject to a number of uncertainties and risks that could significantly affect
current plans, anticipated actions and the Company’s future financial condition
and results. As a consequence, actual results may differ materially
from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of
the Company as a result of various factors. Uncertainties and risks
related to such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to,
those relating to the continued availability of lines of credit for the
Company’s business, the Company’s ability to underwrite and collect its finance
receivables effectively, assumptions relating to unit sales and gross margins,
changes in interest rates, competition, dependence on existing management,
adverse economic conditions (particularly in the State of Arkansas), changes in
tax laws or the administration of such laws and changes in lending laws or
regulations. Any forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and, as such, speak only as of
the date made.
Overview
America’s
Car-Mart, Inc., a Texas corporation (the “Company”), is the largest publicly
held automotive retailer in the United States focused exclusively on the “Buy
Here/Pay Here” segment of the used car market. References to the
Company typically include the Company’s consolidated
subsidiaries. The Company’s operations are principally conducted
through its two operating subsidiaries, America’s Car-Mart, Inc., an Arkansas
corporation (“Car-Mart of Arkansas”), and Colonial Auto Finance, Inc., an
Arkansas corporation (“Colonial”). Collectively, Car-Mart of Arkansas
and Colonial are referred to herein as “Car-Mart”. The Company
primarily sells older model used vehicles and provides financing for
substantially all of its customers. Many of the Company’s customers have limited
financial resources and would not qualify for conventional financing as a result
of limited credit histories or past credit problems. As of July 31,
2008, the Company operated 91 stores located primarily in small cities
throughout the South-Central United States.
Car-Mart
has been operating since 1981. Car-Mart has grown its revenues
between 3% and 21% per year over the last ten fiscal years (average
16%). Growth results from same store revenue growth and the addition
of new stores. Revenue increased during the first quarter of fiscal
2009 (28.9%) as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2008 due
to a 25.8% increase in retail units sold, a 6.5% increase
in average retail sales price offset by a $300,000 decrease in wholesale sales.
Interest income for the quarter was up 10.1% compared to the first quarter of
fiscal 2008.
The
Company’s primary focus is on collections. Each store handles its own
collections with supervisory involvement of the corporate
office. Over the last five full fiscal years, Car-Mart’s credit
losses as a percentage of sales have ranged between approximately 20.1% in 2005
and 29.1% in 2007 (average of 22.8%). Credit losses in the first
three months of fiscal 2009 were 20.9% of sales compared to 21.8% for the first
quarter of fiscal 2008. Management has invested considerable time and effort on
improving underwriting and collections, which resulted in the decrease in credit
losses when compared to the credit losses in fiscal 2007. Credit
losses, on a percentage basis, tend to be higher at new and developing stores
than at mature stores. Generally, this is the case
because store management at new and developing stores tends to be
less experienced (in making credit decisions and collecting customer accounts)
and the customer base is less seasoned. Generally, older stores have more
repeat customers and on average repeat customers are a better credit risk than
non-repeat customers. Due to the rate of the Company’s growth, the percentage of
new and developing stores as a percentage of total stores has been increasing
over the past few years. The Company believes the most significant factor
affecting credit losses is the proper execution (or lack thereof) of its
business practices. The Company also believes that higher energy and fuel costs,
increasing interest rates, general inflation and personal discretionary spending
levels affecting customers have had a negative impact on recent collection
results. At July 31, 2008, 3.6% of the Company’s finance
receivables balance was over 30 days past due, compared to 4.1% at July 31,
2007.
The
Company’s gross margins as a percentage of sales have been fairly consistent
from year to year. Over the past five full fiscal years, Car-Mart’s
gross margins as a percentage of sales have ranged between approximately 42% and
48%. Gross margins as a percentage of sales in the first three months
of fiscal 2009 were 43.6%, up from 40.3% in the same period of the prior fiscal
year. The Company’s retail gross margins are set based upon the cost
of the vehicle purchased, with lower-priced vehicles generally having higher
gross margin percentages. The increase in the gross margin percentage between
periods resulted from efficiencies in retail pricing and lower wholesale sales.
Wholesale sales relate to repossessed vehicles sold at or near cost, which was
higher in fiscal 2008 due to the increased level of repossession activity
coupled with lower retail sales levels. Additionally, the Company’s payment
protection plan product had a positive effect on gross profit percentages for
the first quarter of fiscal 2009 when compared to the first quarter of fiscal
2008. The Company expects that its gross margin percentage will not
change significantly in the near term from its current levels.
Hiring,
training and retaining qualified associates are critical to the Company’s
success. The rate at which the Company increases its revenues, which may
include the addition of new stores, is limited by the number of trained managers
the Company has at its disposal. Excessive turnover, particularly at the
Store Manager level, could impact the Company’s ability to increase
revenues. Over the past several fiscal years, the Company has added
resources to train and develop personnel. The Company expects to continue to
invest in the development of its workforce.
Consolidated
Operations
(Operating
Statement Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
%
Change
|
|
|
As
a % of Sales
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July
31,
|
|
|
vs.
|
|
|
July
31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$ |
69,226 |
|
|
$ |
52,863 |
|
|
|
31.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Interest
income
|
|
|
6,435 |
|
|
|
5,844 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
Total
|
|
|
75,661 |
|
|
|
58,707 |
|
|
|
28.9 |
|
|
|
109.3 |
|
|
|
111.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs
and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
39,027 |
|
|
|
31,538 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
|
|
|
56.4 |
|
|
|
59.7 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
|
|
12,818 |
|
|
|
11,195 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
Provision
for credit losses
|
|
|
14,490 |
|
|
|
11,519 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
(14.4 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
.5 |
|
|
|
.5 |
|
Total
|
|
|
67,347 |
|
|
|
55,336 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
97.3 |
|
|
|
104.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax
income
|
|
$ |
8,314 |
|
|
$ |
3,371 |
|
|
|
147.6 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail
units sold
|
|
|
7,353 |
|
|
|
5,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
stores in operation
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
units sold per store per month
|
|
|
26.9 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
retail sales price
|
|
$ |
8,952 |
|
|
$ |
8,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same
store revenue change
|
|
|
28.5 |
% |
|
|
(8.3 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
End Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stores
open
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
over 30 days past due
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended July 31, 2008 vs. Three Months Ended July 31, 2007
Revenues
increased by $16.95 million, or 28.9%, for the three months ended July 31, 2008
as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. The increase
was principally the result of (i) revenue growth from stores that operated a
full three months in both periods ($15.5 million, or 28.5%), (ii) revenue growth
from stores opened during the three months ended July 31, 2007 or stores that
opened or closed a satellite location after April 30, 2007 ($1.4 million, or
32.9%), (iii) revenue growth from stores opened after July 31, 2007 ($.3
million), offset by (iv) a $200,000 revenue decrease from a store closed after
July 31, 2007.
Cost of
sales as a percentage of sales decreased 3.3% to 56.4% for the three months
ended July 31, 2008 from 59.7% in the same period of the prior fiscal
year. Efficiencies in retail pricing and reduced wholesale sales
(both in total and as a percentage of total sales) led to increased gross margin
percentages for the first quarter of fiscal 2009. The Company’s gross margins
have also been positively affected by margins earned on the payment protection
plan product. The negative effect of a higher level of wholesale volumes was
more pronounced in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 because of the decline in
overall retail sales for the period. The Company expects that its
gross margin percentage will remain relatively constant during the balance of
fiscal 2009.
Selling,
general and administrative expense as a percentage of sales was 18.5% for the
three months ended July 31, 2008, a decrease of 2.7% from the same period of the
prior fiscal year. Selling, general and administrative expenses
are more fixed in nature. The dollar increase between periods mostly relates to
higher payroll costs, which resulted from improved operating performance. Many
of the Company’s compensation arrangements are tied to financial performance and
as such, more payroll costs are incurred during periods of improved financial
results. Additionally, there was a $450,000 increase in non-cash stock based
compensation during the first quarter of fiscal 2009 when compared to the prior
year quarter.
Provision
for credit losses as a percentage of sales decreased .9% to 20.9% for the three
months ended July 31, 2008 from 21.8% in the same period of the prior fiscal
year. The decrease is largely attributable to lower losses
experienced for most of the store locations during the
quarter. Credit losses, on a percentage basis, tend to be higher at
new and developing stores than at mature stores. Generally, this is the
case because the store management at new and developing stores tends to be less
experienced (in making credit decisions and collecting customer accounts) and
the customer base is less seasoned. Normally, older stores have more
repeat customers and on average, repeat customers are a better credit risk than
non-repeat customers. The Company believes the most significant factor affecting
credit losses is the proper execution of its business practices. The Company
also believes that higher energy and fuel costs, general inflation
and potentially lower personal discretionary spending levels affecting customers
will continue to impact collection results. The Company intends
to continue to focus store management on credit quality and collections -
particularly at those stores under six years of age.
Interest
expense as a percentage of sales decreased .5% to 1.0% for the three months
ended July 31, 2008 from 1.5% for the same period of the prior fiscal
year. The decrease was attributable to a lower average interest rate
charged during the three months ended July 31, 2008 (average rate of 6.4% per
annum) as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year (average rate
of 8.8% per annum), offset by higher average borrowings during the
period ending July 31, 2008 (approximately $43.4 million) as compared to the
same period in the prior fiscal year (approximately $35.6 million). The increase
in average borrowings resulted primarily from the higher sales levels and the
resulting working capital needs. The lower average interest rate relates to
decreases in the prime interest rate of the Company’s lender as well as
decreases based on improved financial performance.
Financial
Condition
The
following table sets forth the major balance sheet accounts of the Company as of
the dates specified (in thousands):
|
July
31,
|
|
April
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance
receivables, net
|
|
$ |
173,282 |
|
|
$ |
163,344 |
|
Inventory
|
|
|
14,737 |
|
|
|
13,532 |
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
|
|
18,431 |
|
|
|
18,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
13,609 |
|
|
|
14,934 |
|
Debt
facilities
|
|
|
42,628 |
|
|
|
40,337 |
|
Historically,
finance receivables have grown slightly faster than revenues. This has been due,
to a large extent, to an increase in average term necessitated by increases in
the average retail sales price. In fiscal 2008, revenues increased 14.3% and
finance receivables increased 16.5%. After subtracting deferred revenue
associated with the payment protection plan product, finance receivables
increased 14% during fiscal 2008. The average term for installment sales
contracts at July 31, 2008 was relatively flat as compared to July 31, 2007
(27.45 months vs. 27.25 months). It is anticipated that the experience of
finance receivables growing slightly faster than revenues on a full year basis
will again be the trend into the future. Average months to maturity
for the portfolio of finance receivables was 16.6 months at July 31,
2008.
In the
first quarter of fiscal 2009, inventory increased by 9% to support continued
sales growth. The Company has increased the level of inventory it
carries at many of its stores to facilitate sales growth and meet competitive
demands.
Property
and equipment, net increased $.3 million during the three months ended July 31,
2008 as the Company completed improvements at existing properties.
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities decreased $1.3 million during the three months
ended July 31, 2008. The decrease was largely due to a decrease in
accrued compensation related to the timing of payroll and an increase
in cash overdraft. Cash overdraft fluctuates based upon the day of the week and
the level of checks that are outstanding at any point in time. Deferred payment
protection plan revenues were $6.7 million at July 31, 2008 and $4.6 million at
April 30, 2008. This product was introduced in May 2007.
Borrowings
on the Company’s revolving credit facilities fluctuate based upon a number of
factors including (i) net income, (ii) finance receivables growth, (iii) capital
expenditures, and (iv) stock repurchases.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The
following table sets forth certain summarized historical information with
respect to the Company’s statements of cash flows (in thousands):
|
Three
Months Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Income
|
|
$ |
5,281 |
|
|
$ |
2,141 |
|
Provision
for credit losses
|
|
|
14,490 |
|
|
|
11,519 |
|
Finance
receivable originations
|
|
|
(65,793 |
) |
|
|
(48,853 |
) |
Finance
receivable collections
|
|
|
35,345 |
|
|
|
30,553 |
|
Inventory
|
|
|
4,073 |
|
|
|
5,815 |
|
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
3,228 |
|
Change
in deferred payment protection plan revenue
|
|
|
2,048 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Income
taxes payable
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
797 |
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
2,761 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other
|
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
Total
|
|
|
(939 |
) |
|
|
5,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
|
|
(647 |
) |
|
|
(697 |
) |
Sale
of property and equipment
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
Total
|
|
|
(618 |
) |
|
|
(653 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
facilities, net
|
|
|
2,291 |
|
|
|
(7,154 |
) |
Change
in cash overdrafts
|
|
|
(1,021 |
) |
|
|
1,992 |
|
Issuance
of common stock
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Exercise
of stock options and warrants
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Excess
tax benefit from share-based compensation
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total
|
|
|
1,671 |
|
|
|
(5,123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in Cash
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
The
Company generates cash flow from net income from operations. The cash
has historically been used to fund finance receivables growth. The
Company generally increases borrowings under its credit facilities to the extent
finance receivables growth exceeds net income from operations.
The
Company has historically leased the majority of the properties where its stores
are located. As of July 31, 2008, the Company leased approximately
70% of its store properties. The Company expects to continue to lease
the majority of the properties where its stores are located to preserve capital
and maintain flexibility. However, the Company does periodically
purchase the real property where its stores are located if the Company expects
to be in that location for 10 years or more.
The
Company’s credit facilities with its primary lender total $60 million and
consist of a combined $50 million revolving line of credit and a $10 million
term loan. The facilities limit distributions from Car-Mart to the Company
beyond (i) the repayment of an intercompany loan ($10.0 million at July 31,
2008), and (ii) dividends equal to 75% of Car-Mart of Arkansas’ net
income. At July 31, 2008, the Company’s assets (excluding its $131
million equity investment in Car-Mart) consisted of $4,000 in cash, $2.2 million
in other assets and a $10.0 million receivable from Car-Mart. Thus,
the Company is limited in the amount of dividends or other distributions it can
make to its shareholders without the consent of Car-Mart’s
lender. The Company was in compliance with the loan covenants at July
31, 2008.
At July
31, 2008, the Company had approximately $0.3 million of cash on hand and an
additional $16.9 million of availability under the revolving credit
facilities. On a short-term basis, the Company’s principal sources of
liquidity include income from operations and borrowings under the revolving
credit facilities. On a longer-term basis, the Company expects
its principal sources of liquidity to consist of income from continuing
operations and borrowings under revolving credit facilities and/or fixed
interest term loans. Further, while the Company has no present plans
to issue debt or equity securities, the Company believes it could raise
additional capital through the issuance of such securities if
necessary.
The
Company expects to use cash to grow its finance receivables portfolio and to
purchase property and equipment in the amount of approximately $2 million to $3
million in the next 12 months in connection with opening new stores and
refurbishing existing stores. Occasionally, the Company may also use
cash to repurchase its common stock.
The
revolving credit facilities mature in April 2009. The $10 million
term loan is payable in 120 consecutive and substantially equal installments
beginning June 1, 2006. The interest rate on the term loan is currently fixed at
7.33%. The Company expects that it will be able to renew or refinance the
revolving credit facilities on or before the maturity date. The Company believes
it will have adequate liquidity to satisfy its capital needs for the foreseeable
future.
Contractual
Payment Obligations
There
have been no material changes outside of the ordinary course of business in the
Company’s contractual payment obligations from those reported at
April 30, 2008 in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
The
Company has entered into operating leases for approximately 70% of its store and
office facilities. Generally these leases are for periods of three to
five years and usually contain multiple renewal options. The Company
uses leasing arrangements to maintain flexibility in its store locations and to
preserve capital. The Company expects to continue to lease the
majority of its store and office facilities under arrangements substantially
consistent with the past.
Other
than its operating leases, the Company is not a party to any off-balance sheet
arrangement that management believes is reasonably likely to have a current or
future effect on the Company’s financial condition, revenues or expenses,
results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that
are material to investors.
Related
Finance Company Contingency
Car-Mart
of Arkansas and Colonial do not meet the affiliation standard for filing
consolidated income tax returns, and as such they file separate federal and
state income tax returns. Car-Mart of Arkansas routinely sells its
finance receivables to Colonial at what the Company believes to be fair market
value and is able to take a tax deduction at the time of sale for the difference
between the tax basis of the receivables sold and the sales
price. These types of transactions, based upon facts and
circumstances, have been permissible under the provisions of the Internal
Revenue Code (“IRC”) as described in the Treasury Regulations. For
financial accounting purposes, these transactions are eliminated in
consolidation and a deferred tax liability has been recorded for this timing
difference. The sale of finance receivables from Car-Mart of
Arkansas to Colonial provides certain legal protection for the Company’s finance
receivables and, principally because of certain state apportionment
characteristics of Colonial, also has the effect of reducing the Company’s
overall effective state income tax rate by approximately 240 basis
points. The actual interpretation of the Regulations is in part a
facts and circumstances matter. The Company believes it satisfies the
material provisions of the Regulations. Failure to satisfy those
provisions could result in the loss of a tax deduction at the time the
receivables are sold and have the effect of increasing the Company’s overall
effective income tax rate as well as the timing of required tax
payments.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires the Company to make
estimates and assumptions in determining the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from the
Company’s estimates. The Company believes the most significant
estimate made in the preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial
statements relates to the determination of its allowance for credit losses,
which is discussed below. The Company’s accounting policies are
discussed in Note B to the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.
The
Company maintains an allowance for credit losses on an aggregate basis at a
level it considers sufficient to cover estimated losses in the collection of its
finance receivables. The allowance for credit losses is based
primarily upon historical credit loss experience, with consideration given to
recent credit loss trends and changes in loan characteristics (i.e., average
amount financed and term), delinquency levels, collateral values, economic
conditions, underwriting and collection practices, and management’s expectation
of future credit losses. The allowance for credit losses is
periodically reviewed by management with any changes reflected in current
operations. Although it is at least reasonably possible that events
or circumstances could occur in the future that are not presently foreseen which
could cause actual credit losses to be materially different from the recorded
allowance for credit losses, the Company believes that it has given appropriate
consideration to all relevant factors and has made reasonable assumptions in
determining the allowance for credit losses.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
Occasionally,
new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (“FASB”) or other standard setting bodies which the Company adopts as of
the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, the Company believes
the impact of recently issued standards which are not yet effective will not
have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements upon
adoption.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”), which defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted
accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements, but provides guidance
on how to measure fair value by providing a fair value hierarchy used to
classify the source of the information.
In
February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-2, “Effective Date of
FASB Statement No. 157,” to provide a one-year deferral of the effective date of
Statement 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those
that are recognized or disclosed in financial statements at fair value on a
recurring basis. For nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities
subject to the deferral, the effective date of Statement 157 is postponed to
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company does not
believe the adoption of Statement 157 will have a material impact on the
Company’s financial statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Statement 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB
Statement 115.” The statement permits entities to choose to measure
certain financial instruments and other items at fair value. The objective is to
improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to
mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and
liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting
provisions. Unrealized gains and losses on any items for which Car-Mart elects
the fair value measurement option would be reported in earnings. Statement 159
is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The
Company does not believe the adoption of Statement 159 will have a material
impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In March
2008, the FASB issued Statement 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities.” Due to the use and complexity of derivative
instruments, there were concerns regarding the existing disclosure requirements
in FASB 133. Accordingly, this Statement requires enhanced
disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging
activities. Entities will be required to provide enhanced disclosures
about (i) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (ii) how derivative
instruments and related hedging items are accounted for under Statement 133 and
its related interpretations, and (iii) how derivative instruments and related
hedging items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and
cash flows. This Statement is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years after November 15, 2008. The Company does not believe
the adoption of Statement 161 will have a material impact on the Company’s
financial statements.
Seasonality
The Company’s automobile
sales and finance business is seasonal in nature. Historically, the
Company’s third fiscal quarter (November through January) has been the slowest
period for car and truck sales. Conversely, the Company’s first and fourth
fiscal quarters (May through July and February through April) have historically
been the busiest times for car and truck sales. Therefore, Car-Mart generally
realizes a higher proportion of its revenues and operating profit during the
first and fourth fiscal quarters. However, in fiscal 2008, tax refund
anticipation sales efforts began in early November 2007 and continued through
January 2008. The success of the tax refund anticipation sales efforts led to
higher sales levels during the third quarter of fiscal 2008. The Company expects
this third quarter sales trend to continue in future periods. If conditions
arise that impair vehicle sales during the first, third or fourth
fiscal quarters, the adverse effect on the Company’s revenues and operating
profit for the year could be disproportionately large. Many of the Company’s
operating expenses such as administrative personnel, rent, and insurance are
fixed and cannot be reduced during periods of decreased sales. The
Company’s fourth fiscal quarter (February through April) has historically been
the busiest time for car and truck sales as many of the Company’s customers use
actual income tax refunds as a down payment on the purchase of a
vehicle. Further, the Company experiences seasonal fluctuations in
its finance receivables credit losses. As a percentage of sales, the Company’s
first, third, and fourth fiscal quarters have historically tended to have lower
credit losses, while its second fiscal quarter has tended to have higher credit
losses.
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk
The
Company is exposed to market risk on its financial instruments from changes in
interest rates. In particular, the Company has exposure to changes in
the federal primary credit rate and the prime interest rate of its
lender. The Company uses derivative instruments to manage the risks
of interest rate changes between the federal primary credit rate and the prime
interest rate of the its lender. The Company’s earnings are impacted
by its net interest income, which is the difference between the income earned on
interest-bearing assets and the interest paid on interest-bearing notes
payable. As described below, a decrease in market interest rates
would generally have an adverse effect on the Company’s
profitability.
The
Company’s financial instruments consist of fixed rate finance receivables and
variable rate notes payable. The Company’s finance receivables
generally bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 6% to 19%. These
finance receivables generally have remaining maturities from one to 36
months. Certain of the Company’s borrowings contain variable interest
rates that fluctuate with market interest rates (i.e., the rate charged on the
revolving credit facilities fluctuate with the prime interest rate of its
lender). However, interest rates charged on finance receivables
originated in the State of Arkansas are limited to the federal primary credit
rate (2.25% at July 31, 2008) plus 5.0%. Typically, the Company
charges interest on its Arkansas loans at or near the maximum rate allowed by
law. Thus, while the interest rates charged on the Company’s loans do
not fluctuate once established, new loans originated in Arkansas are set at a
spread above the federal primary credit rate which does fluctuate. At
July 31, 2008, approximately 54% of the Company’s finance receivables were
originated in Arkansas. Assuming that this percentage is held
constant for future loan originations, the long-term effect of decreases in the
federal primary credit rate would generally have a negative effect on the
profitability of the Company. This is the case because the amount of
interest income lost on Arkansas originated loans would likely exceed the amount
of interest expense saved on the Company’s variable rate borrowings (assuming
the prime interest rate of its lender decreases by the same percentage as the
decrease in the federal primary credit rate). The initial impact on
profitability resulting from a decrease in the federal primary credit rate and
the rate charged on its variable interest rate borrowings would be positive, as
the immediate interest expense savings would outweigh the loss of interest
income on new loan originations. However, as the amount of new loans
originated at the lower interest rate increases to an amount in excess of the
amount of variable interest rate borrowings, the effect on profitability would
become negative.
The
table below illustrates the estimated impact that hypothetical changes in the
federal primary credit rate would have on the Company’s continuing pretax
earnings. The calculations assume (i) the increase or decrease in the federal
primary credit rate remains in effect for two years, (ii) the increase or
decrease in the federal primary credit rate results in a like increase or
decrease in the rate charged on the Company’s variable rate borrowings, (iii)
the principal amount of finance receivables ($220.3 million) and variable
interest rate borrowings ($13.1 million- excludes the $20 million notional
amount underlying the interest rate swap agreement), and the percentage of
Arkansas originated finance receivables (54%), remain constant during the
periods, and (iv) the Company’s historical collection and charge-off experience
continues throughout the periods.
|
|
Year
1
|
|
Year
2
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
In
Interest Rates
|
|
in
Pretax Earnings
|
|
in
Pretax Earnings
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
+200
basis points
|
|
$777
|
|
$1,848
|
+100
basis points
|
|
388
|
|
924
|
-
100 basis points
|
|
(388)
|
|
(924)
|
-
200 basis points
|
|
(777)
|
|
(1,848)
|
A similar
calculation and table was prepared at April 30, 2008. The calculation
and table was comparable with the information provided above.
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
|
a)
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
|
We
completed an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) as
of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure
that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the
reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is
(1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in applicable rules and forms, and (2) accumulated and communicated to
our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, to allow timely discussions regarding required
disclosures.
|
b)
|
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
|
During
the first fiscal quarter, there have been no changes in our internal control
over financial reporting or that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
Item
4T. Controls and Procedures
Not
applicable
PART
II
Item
3. Exhibits
|
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Description
of Exhibit
|
|
3.1
|
|
Articles
of Incorporation of the Company (formerly SKAI, Inc.), as amended,
incorporated by reference from the Company’s Registration Statement on
Form S-8 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November
16, 2005, File No. 333-129727, exhibits 4.1 through
4.8.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
By-Laws
dated August 24, 1989, incorporated by reference from the Company’s
Registration Statement on Form S-8 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on November 16, 2005, File No. 333-129727, exhibit
4.9.
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Sixth
Amendment to Amended and Restated Agented Revolving Credit Agreement,
dated May 16, 2008, among Colonial Auto Finance, Inc., as borrower, Bank
of Arkansas, N.A., Great Southern Bank, First State Bank of Northwest
Arkansas, Enterprise Bank and Trust, Sovereign Bank, Commerce Bank, N.A.
and First State Bank, incorporated by reference from the Company's Current
Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
May 21, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Fifth
Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated May 16, 2008, among
America's Car-Mart, Inc. an Arkansas corporation, and Texas Car-Mart, Inc.
as borrowers, and Bank of Arkansas, N.A., as lender, incorporated by
reference from the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 21, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
International
Swap Dealers Association, Inc. Master Agreement, Schedule to the Master
Agreement and Credit Support Annex dated May 15, 2008 among America's
Car-Mart, Inc. Texas Car-Mart, Inc., Colonial Auto Finance, Inc. and Bank
of Oklahoma, N.A., incorporated by reference from the Company's Current
Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
May 21, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule
13a-14(a) certification.
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule
13a-14(a) certification.
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section
1350 certification.
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
|
America’s Car-Mart,
Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
\s\
William H. Henderson |
|
|
|
William
H. Henderson |
|
|
|
Chief Executive
Officer |
|
|
|
(Principal Executive
Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
\s\
Jeffrey A. Williams |
|
|
|
Jeffrey
A. Williams |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary |
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated:
September 9, 2008 |
|
|
|
Exhibit
Index
31.1 Rule
13a-14(a) certification.
31.2 Rule
13a-14(a) certification.
32.1 Section
1350 certification.
24