Edgar Filing: BERKSHIRE INCOME REALTY, INC.

BIR-2014.06.30-10Q

United States

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO THE SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

_____________________

Commission File Number 001-31659

BERKSHIRE INCOME REALTY, INC.



Maryland		32-0024337
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I. R. S. Employer Identification No.)

One Beacon Street, Boston, Massachusetts		02108
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)



	(617) 523-7722
	(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large Accelerated Filer o	Accelerated Filer o
Non-accelerated Filer ý (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller Reporting Company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No ý

There were 1,406,196 shares of Class B common stock outstanding as of August 13, 2014.



	BERKSHIRE INCOME REALTY, INC.


	TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM NO.		PAGE NO.

PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:

	Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013	3

	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013	4

	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Deficit for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013	5

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013	6

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	8

Item 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	23

Item 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	42

Item 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	43


PART II	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	44

Item 1A.	RISK FACTORS	44

Item 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	44

Item 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	44

Item 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	44

Item 5.	OTHER INFORMATION	44

Item 6.	EXHIBITS	44

Table of contents

Part I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

BERKSHIRE INCOME REALTY, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS



	June 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
	(unaudited)			(audited)
ASSETS
Multifamily apartment communities, net of accumulated depreciation of $232,057,518 and $242,291,624, respectively	$	486,124,326		$	381,663,433
Cash and cash equivalents	17,591,612			15,254,613
Cash restricted for tenant security deposits	1,499,541			1,321,895
Restricted cash held in escrow for 1031 exchange	40,835,011			—
Replacement reserve escrow	1,394,116			1,121,258
Prepaid expenses and other assets	9,326,085			10,675,302
Investments in unconsolidated multifamily entities	14,689,566			14,294,474
Acquired in-place leases and tenant relationships, net of accumulated amortization of $745,203 and $0, respectively	896,895			—
Deferred expenses, net of accumulated amortization of $2,989,868 and $2,953,066, respectively	6,765,645			2,977,939
Total assets	$	579,122,797		$	427,308,914

LIABILITIES AND DEFICIT

Liabilities:
Mortgage notes payable	$	517,873,498		$	475,525,480
Credit Facility (Note 6)	80,000,000			—
Note payable - other	1,250,000			1,250,000
Due to affiliates, net	2,166,157			2,454,167
Due to affiliate, incentive advisory fees	10,566,401			8,289,617
Dividend and distributions payable	837,607			837,607
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	11,623,784			10,968,053
Tenant security deposits	1,720,489			1,531,472
Total liabilities	626,037,936			500,856,396

Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)	—			—

Deficit:
Noncontrolling interest in properties (Note 12)	695,975			879,785
Noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership (Note 13)	(76,130,378		)	(102,297,937		)
Series A 9% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, no par value, $25 stated value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, 2,978,110 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively	70,210,830			70,210,830
Class A common stock, $.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively	—			—
Class B common stock, $.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, 1,406,196 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively	14,062			14,062
Excess stock, $.01 par value, 15,000,000 shares authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively	—			—
Accumulated deficit	(41,705,628		)	(42,354,222		)
Total deficit	(46,915,139		)	(73,547,482		)

Total liabilities and deficit	$	579,122,797		$	427,308,914

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Table of contents

BERKSHIRE INCOME REALTY, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)



	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Revenue:
Rental	$	21,167,877		$	18,154,499		$	40,457,163		$	35,929,035
Utility reimbursement	1,108,411			852,825			2,027,248			1,690,499
Other	1,129,850			843,754			2,098,392			1,651,633
Total revenue	23,406,138			19,851,078			44,582,803			39,271,167
Expenses:
Operating	4,995,317			4,425,981			11,316,545			9,075,223
Maintenance	1,440,932			1,230,171			2,573,755			2,113,072
Real estate taxes	2,550,600			2,024,714			4,733,781			3,835,212
General and administrative	721,624			507,809			1,342,785			1,237,899
Management fees	1,339,036			1,203,974			2,565,289			2,396,786
Incentive advisory fees	2,409,374			622,908			2,673,419			1,373,780
Depreciation	7,243,111			6,432,388			13,529,323			12,759,624
Interest, inclusive of amortization of deferred financing fees	7,967,522			6,647,682			15,061,340			13,057,302
Loss on extinguishment of debt	1,743,652			—			1,743,652			—
Amortization of acquired in-place leases and tenant relationships	745,203			—			745,203			5,377
Total expenses	31,156,371			23,095,627			56,285,092			45,854,275
Loss before equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated multifamily entities	(7,750,233		)	(3,244,549		)	(11,702,289		)	(6,583,108		)
Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated multifamily entities	12,292,944			(855,136		)	12,975,436			(1,631,103		)
Gain on disposition of real estate assets	49,519,992			—			49,519,992			—
Income (loss) from continuing operations	54,062,703			(4,099,685		)	50,793,139			(8,214,211		)
Discontinued operations:
Income (loss) from discontinued operations	—			(58,070		)	(114,216		)	59,780
Gain on disposition of real estate assets	—			18,689,058			—			18,689,058
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations	—			18,630,988			(114,216		)	18,748,838
Net income	54,062,703			14,531,303			50,678,923			10,534,627
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest in properties	(125,887		)	4,724			(190,723		)	(14,808		)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership (Note 13)	(51,012,570		)	(12,553,460		)	(46,011,219		)	(6,998,082		)
Net income attributable to the Company	2,924,246			1,982,567			4,476,981			3,521,737
Preferred dividend	(1,675,193		)	(1,675,194		)	(3,350,387		)	(3,350,388		)
Net income available to common shareholders	$	1,249,053		$	307,373		$	1,126,594		$	171,349
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to the Company per common share, basic and diluted	$	0.89		$	(13.03	)	$	0.88		$	(13.21	)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to the Company per common share, basic and diluted	$	—		$	13.25		$	(0.08	)	$	13.33
Net income available to common shareholders per common share, basic and diluted	$	0.89		$	0.22		$	0.80		$	0.12
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted	1,406,196			1,406,196			1,406,196			1,406,196

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Table of contents

BERKSHIRE INCOME REALTY, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN DEFICIT

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 AND 2013

(unaudited)



	Company Shareholders
	Series A Preferred Stock			Class B Common Stock			Accumulated Deficit			Noncontrolling Interests –Properties			Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership			Total Deficit
	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount
Balance at January 1, 2013	2,978,110	$	70,210,830	1,406,196	$	14,062	$	(42,077,020	)	$	1,527,431		$	(89,708,267	)	$	(60,032,964	)
Net income	—	—		—	—		3,521,737			14,808			6,998,082			10,534,627
Contributions	—	—		—	—		—			264,718			—			264,718
Distributions	—	—		—	—		—			(921,443		)	(1,138,750		)	(2,060,193		)
Distributions to preferred shareholders	—	—		—	—		(3,350,388		)	—			—			(3,350,388		)
Balance at June 30, 2013	2,978,110	$	70,210,830	1,406,196	$	14,062	$	(41,905,671	)	$	885,514		$	(83,848,935	)	$	(54,644,200	)



	Company Shareholders
	Series A Preferred Stock			Class B Common Stock			Accumulated Deficit			Noncontrolling Interests –Properties			Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership			Total Deficit
	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount
Balance at January 1, 2014	2,978,110	$	70,210,830	1,406,196	$	14,062	$	(42,354,222	)	$	879,785		$	(102,297,937	)	$	(73,547,482	)
Net income	—	—		—	—		4,476,981			190,723			46,011,219			50,678,923
Contributions	—	—		—	—		—			665,447			—			665,447
Distributions	—	—		—	—		(478,000		)	(1,039,980		)	(19,843,660		)	(21,361,640		)
Distributions to preferred shareholders	—	—		—	—		(3,350,387		)	—			—			(3,350,387		)
Balance at June 30, 2014	2,978,110	$	70,210,830	1,406,196	$	14,062	$	(41,705,628	)	$	695,975		$	(76,130,378	)	$	(46,915,139	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Table of contents



BERKSHIRE INCOME REALTY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
	For the six months ended
	June 30,
	2014			2013

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	50,678,923		$	10,534,627
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization of deferred costs	543,373			293,111
Amortization of acquired in-place leases and tenant relationships	745,203			5,377
Amortization of fair value premium on mortgage debt	(126,111		)	—
Loss on extinguishment of debt	67,672			3,807
Depreciation	13,529,323			13,364,746
Deferred costs	(18,119		)	—
Equity in (income) loss of unconsolidated multifamily entities	(12,975,436		)	1,631,103
Gain on disposition of real estate assets	(49,519,992		)	(18,689,058		)
Increase (decrease) in cash attributable to changes in assets and liabilities:
Tenant security deposits, net	(229,891		)	152,576
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(18,262		)	1,519,655
Due to/from affiliates	(288,010		)	(1,511,314		)
Due to affiliate - incentive advisory fees	2,276,784			683,111
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	(1,519,822		)	(7,622		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	3,145,635			7,980,119

Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital improvements	(11,913,603		)	(9,405,207		)
Acquisition of multifamily apartment communities	(60,611,119		)	—
Return of earnest money deposits on acquisition	2,000,000			—
Proceeds from sale of multifamily apartment communities	74,668,760			30,958,927
Investments in unconsolidated multifamily entities	—			(305,175		)
Distributions from investment in unconsolidated multifamily entities	12,580,344			—
Deposit to restricted cash held in escrow for 1031 exchange	(40,835,011		)	—
Interest earned on replacement reserve deposits	(458		)	(292		)
Deposits to replacement reserve escrow	(272,400		)	(96,790		)
Withdrawal from replacement reserve escrow	—			41,481
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities	(24,383,487		)	21,192,944

Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings from mortgage notes payable	46,253,335			2,770,663
Principal payments on mortgage notes payable	(3,067,912		)	(3,047,886		)
Repayments of mortgage notes payable	(71,183,360		)	(14,833,286		)
Borrowings from Credit Facility - Affiliate	—			1,627,000
Principal payments on Credit Facility - Affiliate	—			(1,627,000		)
Borrowings from Credit Facility	80,000,000			—
Deferred financing costs	(4,380,632		)	(58,969		)
Contributions from noncontrolling interest holders in properties	665,447			264,718
Distributions to noncontrolling interest holders in properties	(1,039,980		)	(1,221,443		)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest partners in Operating Partnership	(19,843,660		)	(1,138,750		)
Distributions to common shareholders	(478,000		)	—
Distributions to preferred shareholders	(3,350,387		)	(3,350,388		)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	23,574,851			(20,615,341		)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	2,336,999			8,557,722
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	15,254,613			12,224,361
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	17,591,612		$	20,782,083

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Table of contents



BERKSHIRE INCOME REALTY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
	For the six months ended
	June 30,
	2014			2013

Supplemental disclosure:
Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest	$	15,249,485		$	13,990,060
Capitalization of interest	496,223			393,677

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Capital improvements included in accrued expenses and other liabilities	1,847,998			159,156
Dividends declared and payable to preferred shareholders	837,607			837,607
Mortgage debt assumed	70,472,066			—
Write-off of fully amortized acquired in-place leases and tenant relationships	—			605,079

Acquisition of multifamily apartment communities:
Assets acquired:
Multifamily apartment communities	$	(129,560,979	)	$	—
Acquired in-place leases	(1,642,098		)	—
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(632,521		)	—
Liabilities assumed:
Accrued expenses	511,151			—
Tenant security deposit liability	241,262			—
Mortgage notes payable	70,472,066			—
Net cash used for acquisition of multifamily apartment communities	$	(60,611,119	)	$	—

Sale of real estate:
Gross selling price	$	76,200,000		$	31,500,000
Cost of sale	(1,531,240		)	(541,073		)
Cash flows from sale of multifamily apartment communities	$	74,668,760		$	30,958,927

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Table of contents

BERKSHIRE INCOME REALTY, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)


1.	ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Berkshire Income Realty, Inc. (the “Company”), a Maryland corporation, was incorporated on July 19, 2002 and 100 Class B common shares were issued upon organization. The Company is in the business of acquiring, owning, operating, developing and rehabilitating multifamily apartment communities. As of June 30, 2014, the Company owned, or had an interest in, 18 multifamily apartment communities consisting of 5,281 total apartment units, two multifamily development projects and two unconsolidated multifamily entities. The Company conducts its business through Berkshire Income Realty-OP, L.P. (the "Operating Partnership").

The Company elected to be treated as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") under Section 856 of the Tax Code (the "Code"), with the filing of its first tax return. As a result, the Company generally is not subject to federal corporate income tax on its taxable income that is distributed to its shareholders. A REIT is subject to a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it currently distribute at least 90% of its annual taxable income. The Company's policy is to make sufficient distributions of its taxable income to meet the REIT distribution requirements. The Company must also meet other operational requirements with respect to its investments, assets and income. The Company monitors these various requirements on a quarterly basis and believes that as of and for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, it was in compliance on all such requirements. Accordingly, the Company has made no provision for federal income taxes in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The Company is subject to certain state level taxes based on the location of its properties.

Discussion of acquisitions for the six-month period ended June 30, 2014

On January 22, 2014, the Company executed a joint venture limited liability company agreement with an unrelated entity for the development of Aura Prestonwood, a 322-unit multifamily apartment project located in Dallas, Texas (the "Prestonwood Project"). The Company has a 95% interest in the joint venture and has made a commitment to invest $12,643,500 in the project, which has been fully funded. Simultaneously with the execution of the limited liability company agreement, the joint venture acquired the land where the multifamily apartment project is being built. The cost of the land was $7,302,960 and consideration of $1,000,000 was paid at closing for the option to acquire the abutting land parcel at a future time.

On March 20, 2014, the Company, through its subsidiaries, BIR Pavilion, L.L.C. and BIR Eon, L.L.C., completed the acquisitions of Pavilion Townplace, a 236-unit multifamily apartment community located in Dallas, Texas and EON at Lindbergh, a 352-unit multifamily apartment community located in Atlanta, Georgia, respectively. The seller was an unaffiliated third party. The purchase prices for Pavilion Townplace and EON at Lindbergh were $56,000,000 and $64,000,000, respectively, and were subject to loan assumptions, normal operating prorations and adjustments as provided for in the purchase and sale agreements. The Company has designated these properties to qualify as replacement properties in a reverse exchange transaction, under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code, for properties identified to be sold in 2014. The Company has 180 days from the acquisition of the replacement properties to complete the reverse exchange transaction.

Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 805-10 requires that identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recorded at fair value as of the acquisition date. As of the acquisition date, the amounts recognized for each major class of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is as follows:



	Aura Prestonwood		Pavilion Townplace		EON at Lindbergh		Total
Asset acquired:
Multifamily apartment communities	$	8,302,960	$	57,201,053	$	64,056,966	$	129,560,979
Acquired in-place leases and tenant relationships	—		769,534		872,564		1,642,098
Prepaid and other assets	100,000		296,013		236,508		632,521
Total assets acquired	$	8,402,960	$	58,266,600	$	65,166,038	$	131,835,598

Liabilities assumed:
Accrued expenses	$	—	$	309,154	$	201,997	$	511,151
Tenant security deposit liability	—		119,808		121,454		241,262
Mortgage notes payable	—		27,542,536		42,929,530		70,472,066
Total liabilities assumed	$	—	$	27,971,498	$	43,252,981	$	71,224,479

Table of contents

Discussion of dispositions for the six-month period ended June 30, 2014

On May 5, 2014, the Company completed the sale of Chisholm Place, located in Dallas, Texas, to an unaffiliated buyer. The sale price of $15,000,000 was subject to normal operating prorations and adjustments as provided for in the purchase and sale agreement. The Company recognized $7,556,301 of gain from the sale.

On May 12, 2014, the Company completed the sale of Laurel Woods, located in Austin, Texas, to an unaffiliated buyer. The sale price of $13,200,000 was subject to normal operating prorations and adjustments as provided for in the purchase and sale agreement. The Company recognized $9,211,973 of gain from the sale.

On June 4, 2014, the Company completed the sale of Bear Creek, located in Dallas, Texas, to an unaffiliated buyer. The sale price of $9,500,000 was subject to normal operating prorations and adjustments as provided for in the purchase and sale agreement. The Company recognized $5,988,770 of gain from the sale.

On June 25, 2014, the Company completed the sale of Berkshires on Brompton, located in Houston, Texas, to an unaffiliated buyer. The sale price of $38,500,000 was subject to normal operating prorations and adjustments as provided for in the purchase and sale agreement. The Company recognized $26,762,948 of gain from the sale.

The Company has designated Chisholm Place, Laurel Woods, Bear Creek and Berkshires on Brompton as the potential relinquished properties in the reverse exchange transaction for Pavilion Townplace and EON at Lindbergh, under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code. The net 1031 exchange proceeds from the sale of Chisholm Place, Laurel Woods, Bear Creek and Berkshires on Brompton of $40,835,011 have been deposited with a qualified intermediary and may be used to close the reverse 1031 exchange transaction for Pavilion Townplace and EON at Lindbergh.

On April 23, 2014, the Company executed a purchase and sale agreement for the sale of Bridgewater and Lakeridge located in Hampton, Virginia and Reserves at Arboretum located in Newport News, Virginia, with anticipated closing on August 18, 2014.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On April 10, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2014-08, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity, which raises the threshold for determining which disposals are required to be presented as discontinued operations and modifies related disclosure requirements. The standard is applied prospectively and is effective in 2015 with early adoption permitted. The Company has elected to early adopt this standard effective with the interim period beginning April 1, 2014. Prior to April 1, 2014, disposed properties are presented in discontinued operations.

On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which requires a company to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount reflecting the consideration it expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In adopting ASU 2014-09, companies may use either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach. Additional, this guidance requires improved disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. ASU 2014-09 is effective for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact that the adoption of this guidance will have on its financial position and results of operations.

Table of contents

Unaudited interim consolidated financial statements

The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements of the Company are unaudited; however, the consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") for interim financial information and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Accordingly, certain disclosures accompanying annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP are omitted. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring matters) necessary for a fair statement for the interim periods have been included. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be obtained for other interim periods or for the full fiscal year. The interim financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, comprehensive income (loss) equaled net income (loss). Therefore, the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and Loss required to be presented have been omitted from the consolidated financial statements.

2. MULTIFAMILY APARTMENT COMMUNITIES

The following summarizes the carrying value of the Company’s multifamily apartment communities:



	June 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
	(unaudited)			(audited)
Land	$	86,939,257		$	66,318,761
Buildings, improvement and personal property	631,242,587			557,636,296
Multifamily apartment communities	718,181,844			623,955,057
Accumulated depreciation	(232,057,518		)	(242,291,624		)
Multifamily apartment communities, net	$	486,124,326		$	381,663,433

The Company accounts for its acquisitions of investments in real estate in accordance with ASC 805-10, which requires the fair value of the real estate acquired be allocated to the acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building, furniture, fixtures and equipment and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of the above-market and below-market leases, the value of in-place leases and the value of other tenant relationships, based in each case on their fair values. The value of in-place leases and tenant relationships is determined based on the specific expiration dates of the in-place leases and amortized over a period of 12 months and the tenant relationships are based on the straight-line method of amortization over a 24-month period.

The Company evaluated the carrying value of its multifamily apartment communities for impairment pursuant to ASC 360-10. The Company did not record an impairment adjustment during the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 or twelve-month period ended December 31, 2013.

Discontinued Operations

On June 25, 2013, the Company completed the sale of Walden Pond and Gables of Texas, both located in Houston, Texas, to an unaffiliated buyer. The combined sale price of $31,500,000 was subject to normal operating prorations and adjustments as provided for in the purchase and sale agreement.

The results of operations for Walden Pond and Gables of Texas have been restated and are presented as results from discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, pursuant to ASC 205-20.*

Table of contents

The operating results of properties sold in 2013* and their discontinued operations for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 are presented in the following table.



	Three months ended					Six months ended
	June 30,					June 30,
	2014		2013			2014			2013
Revenue:
Rental	$	—	$	991,853		$	—		$	2,015,158
Utility reimbursement	—		145,684			—			230,542
Other	—		114,868			210			245,234
Total revenue	—		1,252,405			210			2,490,934
Expenses:
Operating	—		406,878			112,954			773,382
Maintenance	—		57,009			—			129,122
Real estate taxes	—		130,398			—			265,522
General and administrative	—		22,822			1,472			31,663
Management fees	—		48,115			—			94,550
Depreciation	—		302,285			—			605,122
Interest, inclusive of amortization of deferred financing fees	—		339,161			—			527,986
Loss on extinguishment of debt	—		3,807			—			3,807
Total expenses	—		1,310,475			114,426			2,431,154
Income (loss) from discontinued operations	$	—	$	(58,070	)	$	(114,216	)	$	59,780


*	On April 1, 2014, the Company early adopted ASU 2014-08 and as such, the dispositions of Chisholm Place, Laurel Woods, Bear Creek and Berkshires on Brompton are not presented as part of discontinued operations. Discussion of property sales is included in Note 1 - Organization and Basis of Presentation.

3. INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED MULTIFAMILY ENTITIES

INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

On August 12, 2005, the Company, together with affiliates and other unaffiliated parties, entered into a subscription agreement to invest in the Berkshire Multifamily Value Fund, L.P. (“BVF”), an affiliate of Berkshire Property Advisors, L.L.C. (“Berkshire Advisor” or the “Advisor”). Under the terms of the agreement and the related limited partnership agreement, the Company and its affiliates agreed to invest up to $25,000,000, or approximately 7%, of the total capital of the partnership. The Company’s final commitment under the subscription agreement with BVF totaled $23,400,000, which represented an ownership interest of 7% of BVF. BVF’s investment strategy was to acquire middle-market properties where there is an opportunity to add value through repositioning or rehabilitation.

In accordance with ASC 810-10 issued by FASB, as amended by ASU 2009-17, related to the consolidation of variable interest entities, the Company has performed an analysis of its investment in BVF to determine whether it would qualify as a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and whether it should be consolidated or accounted for as an equity investment in an unconsolidated joint venture. As a result of the Company’s qualitative assessment to determine whether its investment in BVF is a VIE, the Company determined that the investment is a VIE based upon the fact that the holders of the equity investment at risk lack the power, through voting or similar rights, to direct the activities of BVF that most significantly impact BVF’s economic performance. Under the terms of the limited partnership agreement of BVF, the general partner of BVF has the full, exclusive and complete right, power, authority, discretion, obligation and responsibility to make all decisions affecting the business of BVF.

After making the determination that its investment in BVF was a VIE, the Company performed an assessment of which partner would be considered the primary beneficiary of BVF and therefore would be required to consolidate BVF’s balance sheets and result of operations. This assessment was based upon which entity (1) had the power to direct matters that most significantly impact the activities of BVF, and (2) had the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of BVF that could potentially be significant to the entity based upon the terms of the partnership and management agreements of BVF. As a result of fees paid to an affiliate of the general partner of BVF for asset management and other services, the Company has determined that the general partner of BVF has the obligation to absorb the losses or the right to receive benefits of BVF while retaining the power to make significant decisions for BVF. Based upon this understanding, the Company concluded that the general partner of BVF should

Table of contents

consolidate BVF and as such, the Company accounts for its investment in BVF as an equity investment in an unconsolidated joint venture.

As of June 30, 2014, the Company had invested 100% of its total committed capital amount of $23,400,000 in BVF and had received distributions from BVF of $17,753,897, or approximately 75.9%, of its invested capital. The general partner of BVF is proceeding with BVF's plan to sell the remaining 18 assets in the portfolio.

The summarized statement of assets, liabilities and partners’ equity (deficit) of BVF is as follows:



	June 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
	(unaudited)			(audited)
ASSETS
Multifamily apartment communities, net	$	286,818,380		$	664,692,480
Cash and cash equivalents	20,743,022			21,227,583
Other assets	7,699,307			11,565,547
Total assets	$	315,260,709		$	697,485,610

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Mortgage notes payable	$	312,773,050		$	686,193,544
Credit facility	—			16,200,000
Other liabilities	8,680,454			15,049,296
Noncontrolling interest	(8,870,090		)	(6,961,558		)
Partners’ equity (deficit)	2,677,295			(12,995,672		)
Total liabilities and partners’ equity (deficit)	$	315,260,709		$	697,485,610

Company’s share of partners’ equity (deficit)	$	187,426		$	(604,395	)
Basis differential (1)	604,395			604,395
Carrying value of the Company’s investment in unconsolidated limited partnership (2)	$	791,821		$	—

(1)

This amount represents the difference between the Company’s investment in BVF and its share of the underlying equity in the net assets of BVF (adjusted to conform with GAAP). At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the differential was comprised mainly of $583,240, which represents the Company’s share of syndication costs incurred by BVF that the Company was not required to fund via a separate capital call.

(2)

Per the partnership agreement of BVF, the Company’s liability is limited to its investment in BVF. The Company does not guarantee any third-party debt held by BVF. The Company has fully funded its obligations under the partnership agreement as of June 30, 2014 and has no commitment to make additional contributions to BVF. The carrying value of the investment is $0 at December 31, 2013, as distributions from the investment have exceeded the Company's invested equity as adjusted for the Company's share of gains and losses over the holding period of the investment. The Company resumed equity method earnings in BVF during the six-month period ended June 30, 2014, as its share of BVF's earnings during the period exceeded the excess distribution recognized as equity in income of unconsolidated limited partnership previously by the Company.

The Company evaluates the carrying value of its investment in BVF for impairment periodically and records impairment charges when events or circumstances change indicating that a decline in the fair values below the carrying values has occurred and such decline is other-than-temporary. No such other-than-temporary impairment charges have been recognized during the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 or twelve-month period ended December 31, 2013.

Table of contents

The summarized statements of operations of BVF for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 are as follows:



	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013

Revenue	$	25,249,135		$	33,815,366		$	54,012,855		$	66,886,032
Expenses	(48,623,445		)	(41,257,883		)	(85,881,200		)	(83,516,896		)
Gain on property sales and extinguishment of debt (2)	210,092,640			(57,153		)	225,340,593			(78,824		)
Noncontrolling interest	874,319			1,150,895			1,900,719			2,603,107
Net income (loss) attributable to investment	$	187,592,649		$	(6,348,775	)	$	195,372,967		$	(14,106,581	)

Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated limited partnership (1)(2)	$	12,427,064		$	(444,462	)	$	13,372,165		$	(987,567	)


(1)	There were no impairment indicators or impairment writeoffs in the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 or 2013.

The Company has determined that its valuation of the real estate was categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy in accordance with ASC 820-10, as it utilized significant unobservable inputs in its assessment.


(2)	During the six-month period ended June 30, 2014, BVF recorded a net gain on the disposition of fifteen properties. The gain on the sale was $225,340,593, of which the Company's share was approximately $15,774,000 and is reflected in the "Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated multifamily entities" for the six-month period ended June 30, 2014.

There were no dispositions of property by BVF during the six-month period ended June 30, 2013.

INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

On March 2, 2011, the Operating Partnership executed an agreement with Berkshire Multifamily Value Fund II ("BVF II"), an affiliated entity, to create a joint venture, BIR/BVF-II NoMa JV, L.L.C. ("NoMa JV"), to participate in and take an ownership position in a real estate development project. BVF II is the managing member of NoMa JV and has a percentage ownership interest of approximately 67% while the Operating Partnership has a percentage ownership interest of approximately 33%.

Also on March 2, 2011, NoMa JV acquired a 90% interest in NOMA Residential West I, LLC. (“NOMA Residential”). NOMA Residential has developed and is operating a 603-unit multifamily apartment community in Washington, D.C. (the "NoMa Project"). The remaining 10% interest in NOMA Residential is owned by the developer, an unrelated third party (the “NoMa Developer”). The governing agreements for NOMA Residential give the NoMa Developer the authority to manage the construction and development of, and subsequent to completion, the day-to-day operations of NOMA Residential. The agreement also provides for fees to the NoMa Developer, limits the authority of the NoMa Developer and provides for distributions based on percentage interest and thereafter in accordance with achievement of economic hurdles.

In accordance with ASC 810-10, as amended by ASU 2009-17, related to the consolidation of variable interest entities, the Company has performed an analysis of its investment in NoMa JV to determine whether it would qualify as a VIE and whether it should be consolidated or accounted for as an equity investment in an unconsolidated joint venture. As a result of the Company's qualitative assessment to determine whether its investment is a VIE, the Company determined that the investment is a VIE based upon the holders of the equity investment at risk lacking the power, through voting rights or similar rights to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance. Under the terms of the limited liability company agreement of NoMa JV, the managing member has the full, exclusive and complete right, power, authority, discretion, obligation and responsibility to make all decisions affecting the business of NoMa JV.

After making the determination that its investment in NoMa JV was a VIE, the Company performed an assessment of which partner would be considered the primary beneficiary of NoMa JV and would be required to consolidate the VIE's balance sheet and results of operations. This assessment was based upon which entity (1) had the power to direct matters that most significantly impact the activities of NoMa JV, and (2) had the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of NoMa JV that could potentially be significant to the VIE based upon the terms of the partnership and management agreements of NoMa JV. Because the managing member owns two-thirds of the entity and all profits and losses are split pro-rata in accordance with capital accounts, the Company has determined that the managing member has the obligation to absorb the losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE while retaining the power to make significant decisions for NoMa JV. Based upon this understanding, the Company concluded that the managing member should consolidate NoMa JV and as such, the Company accounts for its investment in NoMa JV as an equity investment in an unconsolidated joint venture.

Table of contents

As of June 30, 2014, the Company had invested 100% of its total committed capital amount of $14,520,000 in NoMa JV for an ownership interest of approximately 33% and had recorded $1,710,327 of capitalized interest on the investment. The Company has no obligation to fund capital to NoMa JV in excess of its original commitment of capital of $14,520,000. The NoMa Project was completed during the quarter ended June 30, 2013.

The summarized statement of assets, liabilities and members’ capital of NoMa JV is as follows:



	June 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
	(unaudited)		(audited)
ASSETS
Multifamily apartment communities, net	$	123,341,334	$	126,139,123
Cash and cash equivalents	4,054,709		1,629,885
Other assets	429,295		546,996
Total assets	$	127,825,338	$	128,316,004

LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS’ CAPITAL
Mortgage note payable	$	85,466,258	$	85,466,258
Other liabilities	1,441,109		756,990
Noncontrolling interest	4,122,700		4,209,276
Members’ capital	36,795,271		37,883,480
Total liabilities and members’ capital	$	127,825,338	$	128,316,004

Company’s share of members’ capital	$	12,265,090	$	12,627,826
Basis differential (1)	$	1,632,655	$	1,666,648
Carrying value of the Company’s investment in unconsolidated limited liability company (2)	$	13,897,745	$	14,294,474


(1)	This amount represents capitalized interest, net of amortization, pursuant to ASC 835-20, related to the Company's equity investment in NoMa JV. The capitalized interest was computed on the amounts borrowed by the Company to finance its investment in NoMa JV and was not an item required to be funded via a capital call.


(2)	Per the limited liability company agreement of NoMa JV, the Company's liability is limited to its investment in NoMa JV. The Company has fully funded its maximum obligation under the limited liability company agreement as of June 30, 2014 and has no commitment to make additional contributions to NoMa JV.

The Company evaluates the carrying value of its investment in NoMa JV for impairment periodically and records impairment charges when events or circumstances change indicating that a decline in the fair values below the carrying values has occurred and such decline is other-than-temporary. No such other-than-temporary impairment charges have been recognized during the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 or twelve-month period ended December 31, 2013.

The summarized statements of operations of NoMa JV for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 are as follows:



	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013

Revenue	$	2,878,510		$	873,174		$	5,260,408		$	1,282,316
Expenses	(3,268,911		)	(2,242,086		)	(6,435,192		)	(3,427,436		)
Noncontrolling interest	39,031			136,891			117,460			214,512
Net loss attributable to investment	$	(351,370	)	$	(1,232,021	)	$	(1,057,324	)	$	(1,930,608	)

Equity in loss of unconsolidated limited liability company	$	(117,123	)	$	(410,674	)	$	(362,736	)	$	(643,536	)
Amortization of basis	(16,997		)	—			(33,993		)	—
Adjusted equity in loss of unconsolidated limited liability company	$	(134,120	)	$	(410,674	)	$	(396,729	)	$	(643,536	)

Table of contents

4. MORTGAGE NOTES PAYABLE

On November 1, 2013, the Company, through its joint venture partnership for the development of the 141-unit apartment building in Walnut Creek, California (the "Walnut Creek Project"), acquired the land associated with the development project. The Company assumed the seller's outstanding land loan in the amount of $4,828,495. The assumed land loan had a fixed interest rate of 6.00% and matured on March 31, 2014, at which point it was paid off in the amount of $4,828,495.

On January 16, 2014, the Company closed on a $44,000,000 mortgage loan refinancing for Berkshires of Columbia and paid off the three existing mortgages totaling $32,254,894. The refinanced mortgage bears interest at a variable rate of 2.43% above the 1-month London Inter-Bank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") and matures on February 1, 2024.

On January 22, 2014, the Company through the joint venture formed with its subsidiary, BRD Arapaho, L.L.C. and TRG Prestonwood, L.P., entered into a loan agreement totaling up to $31,054,212 for the development of Aura Prestonwood, a 322-unit multifamily apartment project in Dallas, Texas. The loan has a variable interest rate of 2.50% above the 1-month LIBOR and matures on January 22, 2017. As of June 30, 2014, the outstanding balance on the loan was $2,253,335.

On March 20, 2014, the Company, through its subsidiaries, BIR Pavilion, L.L.C. and BIR Eon, L.L.C., assumed mortgage notes payable with outstanding balances of $25,571,949 and $42,000,000, respectively, in connection with acquisitions of Pavilion Townplace and EON at Lindbergh. Both mortgage notes are collateralized by the related properties. The mortgage on Pavilion Townplace has a fixed interest rate of 5.27% and matures on January 1, 2021. The mortgage on EON at Lindbergh has a fixed interest rate of 4.25% and matures on May 1, 2022. In accordance with ASC 805-10, which requires identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recorded at fair value as of the acquisition date, the Company determined the fair values of both mortgage notes by calculating the present value of future payments at current interest rates. The fair values at the acquisition date for the mortgages assumed were $27,542,536 for Pavilion Townplace and $42,929,530 for EON at Lindbergh, respectively.

The Company determines the fair value of the mortgage notes payable in accordance with authoritative guidance related to fair value measurement based on the discounted future cash flows at a discount rate that approximates the Company’s current effective borrowing rate for comparable loans (other observable inputs or Level 3 inputs, as defined by the authoritative guidance). For purposes of determining fair value, the Company groups its debt by similar maturity date for purposes of obtaining comparable loan information. In addition, the Company also considers the loan-to-value percentage of individual loans to determine if further stratification of the loans is appropriate in the valuation model. Under this approach, debt in excess of 80% loan-to-value is considered similar to mezzanine debt and is valued using a greater interest spread than the average debt pool. Based on this analysis, the Company has determined that the fair value of the mortgage notes payable approximated $554,464,000 and $505,385,000 at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

5. REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITY - AFFILIATE

On June 30, 2005, the Company obtained new financing in the form of a revolving credit facility. The revolving credit facility in the amount of $20,000,000 was provided by an affiliate of the Company (the "Credit Facility - Affiliate"). The Credit Facility - Affiliate was amended on May 31, 2007 to add additional terms to the Credit Facility - Affiliate ("Amendment No. 1"), on February 17, 2011 to add an amendment period with a temporary increase in the commitment amount to $40,000,000 ("Amendment No. 2"), and on May 24, 2011 to increase the commitment fee ("Amendment No. 3"). The Credit Facility - Affiliate provides for interest on borrowings at a rate of 5% above the 30-day LIBOR rate, as announced by Reuter's, and fees based on borrowings under the Credit Facility - Affiliate and various operational and financial covenants, including a maximum leverage ratio and a maximum debt service ratio. The agreement had a maturity date of December 31, 2006, with a one-time six-month extension available at the option of the Company. The terms of the Credit Facility - Affiliate were agreed upon through negotiations and were approved by the Audit Committee (which committee is comprised of our three directors who are independent under applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the NYSE MKT LLC) ("Audit Committee"). Subsequent to its exercise of extension rights, the Company on May 31, 2007 executed Amendment No.1 that provides for an extension of the maturity date by replacing the then current maturity date of June 30, 2007 with a 60-day notice of termination provision by which the lender can affect a termination of the commitment under the agreement and render all outstanding amounts due and payable. Amendment No. 1 also added a clean-up requirement to the agreement, which requires the borrower to repay in full all outstanding loans and have no outstanding obligations under the agreement for a 14 consecutive day period during each 365-day period. The clean-up requirement for the current 365-day period was satisfied on July 9, 2013.

On February 17, 2011, the Company executed Amendment No. 2 which provides for a temporary modification of certain provisions of the Credit Facility - Affiliate during a period commencing with the date of execution and ending on July 31, 2012 (the "Amendment Period"), subject to extension. During the Amendment Period, certain provisions of the Credit Facility - Affiliate were modified and included: an increase in the amount of the commitment from $20,000,000 to $40,000,000; elimination of the leverage ratio

Table of contents

covenant and clean-up requirement (each as defined in the Credit Facility - Affiliate agreement); and computation and payment of interest on a quarterly basis. At the conclusion of the Amendment Period, including extensions, the provisions modified pursuant to Amendment No. 2 reverted back to the provisions of the Credit Facility - Affiliate agreement prior to the Amendment Period.

On May 24, 2011, the Company executed Amendment No. 3 which limits the total commitment fee provided for in the agreement to be no greater than $400,000 in the aggregate.

On July 31, 2012, the provisions of the Amendment Period, as described above, expired as the Company did not exercise the extension provision to the Amendment Period of the Credit Facility - Affiliate, as provided for in Amendment No. 2. As a result, the specific provisions, which had been modified pursuant to Amendment No. 2, reverted back to the original provisions of the Credit Facility - Affiliate agreement prior to the Amendment Period.

During the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company borrowed $0 and $1,627,000, respectively, under the Credit Facility - Affiliate and did not repay any outstanding balances during the same periods. The Company incurred interest charges of $0 and $32,981 related to the Credit Facility - Affiliate during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company did not pay any commitment fees during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 or 2013. There was no outstanding balance under the Credit Facility - Affiliate as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

6. CREDIT FACILITY

On January 21, 2014, the Company, through the Operating Partnership, closed on a $90,000,000 line of credit (the "Credit Facility") with an unaffiliated lender. The Credit Facility provides for interest on borrowings at a rate of 3.75% above the 30-day LIBOR rate, as announced by Reuter's, and includes various operational and financial covenants, including a leverage ratio and a debt service ratio. The Credit Facility has a maturity date of January 21, 2017 and provides for a maximum commitment to the Company of $90,000,000 commencing with the date of execution through June 29, 2014; $75,000,000 from June 30, 2014 to September 29, 2014; $60,000,000 from September 30, 2014 to December 30, 2014; and $45,000,000 from December 31, 2014 to January 21, 2017. The Credit Facility provides for unused commitment fees of 0.50% per annum if the unused amount is equal to or greater than 50% of the applicable maximum commitment and 0.35% per annum if such unused amount is less than 50%.

On June 16, 2014, the Company amended the Credit Facility to extend the date on which the maximum commitment reduces to $75,000,000 from June 30, 2014 to August 30, 2014.

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2014, the Company borrowed $80,000,000 under the Credit Facility and did not repay any outstanding balances during the same period. The Company incurred $1,112,900 of interest expense and $56,875 of unused commitment fee during the six-month period ended June 30, 2014. There was $80,000,000 and $0 outstanding on the Credit Facility as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

The Company determines the fair value of the Credit Facility in accordance with authoritative guidance related to fair value measurement. The Company has determined the fair value of the Credit Facility approximated the outstanding principal balance of the Credit Facility at June 30, 2014.

Table of contents

7. NOTE PAYABLE - OTHER

On June 12, 2012, Zocalo Community Development, Inc. ("Zocalo"), the managing member of the joint venture ("JV 2020 Lawrence") that the Operating Partnership formed with its subsidiary, BIR 2020 Lawrence, L.L.C. ("BIR 2020"), Zocalo and JB 2020, LLC, entered into a financing agreement with the State of Colorado, through the Colorado Energy Office, for $1,250,000 (the "Colorado Energy Loan") to be used for inclusion of energy efficient components in the construction of a mid-rise multifamily apartment building in Denver, Colorado (the "2020 Lawrence Project"). The Colorado Energy Loan has a term of 10 years and an interest rate of 5% per annum. The Colorado Energy Loan will mature on June 11, 2022. Zocalo has pledged all of its membership interests, both currently owned and subsequently acquired, in JV 2020 Lawrence as collateral for the Colorado Energy Loan. Pursuant to an authorizing resolution adopted by the members of JV 2020 Lawrence, Zocalo advanced the proceeds of the Colorado Energy Loan, as received from time to time, to JV 2020 Lawrence for application to the 2020 Lawrence Project. Such advances to JV 2020 Lawrence will not be considered contributions of capital to JV 2020 Lawrence. Also, Zocalo is authorized and directed to cause JV 2020 Lawrence to repay such advances, including principal and interest, made by Zocalo at such times as required by the Colorado Energy Loan. Any payments pursuant to the authorizing resolution shall be payable only from surplus cash of the 2020 Lawrence Project as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") in the governing regulatory agreement of the primary financing on the project as described above. If surplus cash is not available to satisfy Zocalo's payment obligations under the Colorado Energy Loan, then either Zocalo or BIR 2020 may issue a funding notice, pursuant to the JV 2020 Lawrence limited liability company agreement, for payment obligation amounts due and payable. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the outstanding balance on the Colorado Energy Loan was $1,250,000.

Based on the fair value analysis using the same method as described in Note 4 - Mortgage Notes Payable, the Company has determined that the fair value of the "Note payable - other" approximated $1,352,000 and $1,287,000 at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

8. EQUITY / DEFICIT

On March 25, 2003, the Board of Directors (“Board”) declared a dividend at an annual rate of 9%, on the stated liquidation preference of $25 per share of the outstanding 9% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Preferred Shares") which is payable quarterly in arrears, on February 15, May 15, August 15, and November 15 of each year to shareholders of record in the amount of $0.5625 per share per quarter. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company’s aggregate dividends on the Preferred Shares totaled $3,350,387 and $3,350,388, respectively, of which $837,607 was payable and included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in "Dividends and distributions payable" as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, the Board did not authorize the general partner of the Operating Partnership to distribute any quarterly distributions to the common general and common limited partners or a common dividend on the Company’s Class B common stock.

On January 16, 2014, the Board authorized the general partner of the Operating Partnership to make a special distribution of $20,000,000 from proceeds of the supplemental loan on Seasons of Laurel, which closed in December 2013, and the refinancing of Berkshires of Columbia, which closed in January 2014, to the common general and noncontrolling interest partners in Operating Partnership, which was paid on January 17, 2014. Also on January 16, 2014, the Board declared a common dividend of $0.339924 per share on the Company's Class B common stock in respect to the special distribution to the common general partner. Concurrently with the Operating Partnership distributions, the common dividend was paid from the special distribution proceeds of the common general partner on January 17, 2014.

During the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company made tax payments of $321,660 and $1,138,750, respectively, on behalf of the noncontrolling interest partners in Operating Partnership as required by the taxing authorities of the jurisdictions in which the Company owns and operates properties. The payments were treated as distributions attributable to the noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership and are reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Deficit.

The Company’s policy to provide for common distributions is based on available cash and Board approval.

Table of contents

9. EARNINGS PER SHARE

Net income (loss) per common share, basic and diluted, is computed as net income (loss) available to common shareholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the applicable period, basic and diluted.

The reconciliation of the basic and diluted earnings per common share for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 follows:



		Three months ended						Six months ended
		June 30,						June 30,
		2014			2013			2014			2013
Income (loss) from continuing operations prior to adjustments		$	54,062,703		$	(4,099,685	)	$	50,793,139		$	(8,214,211	)
Add:	Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest in properties	$	—		$	4,724		—			—
Less:	Preferred dividends	$	(1,675,193	)	$	(1,675,194	)	(3,350,387		)	(3,350,388		)
	Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in properties	$	(125,887	)	$	—		(190,723		)	(14,808		)
	Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership	$	(51,012,570	)	$	(12,553,460	)	(46,011,219		)	(6,998,082		)
Income (loss) from continuing operations		$	1,249,053		$	(18,323,615	)	$	1,240,810		$	(18,577,489	)

Net income (loss) from discontinued operations		$	—		$	18,630,988		$	(114,216	)	$	18,748,838

Net income available to common shareholders		$	1,249,053		$	307,373		$	1,126,594		$	171,349

Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to the Company per common share, basic and diluted		$	0.89		$	(13.03	)	$	0.88		$	(13.21	)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to the Company per common share, basic and diluted		$	—		$	13.25		$	(0.08	)	$	13.33
Net income available to common shareholders per common share, basic and diluted		$	0.89		$	0.22		$	0.80		$	0.12

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted		1,406,196			1,406,196			1,406,196			1,406,196

Dividend declared per common share		$	—		$	—		$	0.339924		$	—

For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company did not have any common stock equivalents; therefore basic and dilutive earnings per share were the same.

10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company is party to certain legal actions arising in the ordinary course of its business, such as those relating to tenant issues. All such proceedings taken together are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company. While the resolution of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that the final outcome of such legal proceedings and claims will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity, financial position or results of operations.

The Company has commitments to two joint venture multifamily development projects as of June 30, 2014. The Walnut Creek Project is a 141-unit multifamily apartment development project located in Walnut Creek, California. The Company will own a 98% interest in the project once fully invested and its current commitment in the joint venture is approximately $26.8 million. As of June 30, 2014, the Company has made capital contributions totaling approximately $9.5 million. The Company consolidates its investment in the Walnut Creek Project.

The Prestonwood Project is a 322-unit multifamily apartment development project located in Dallas, Texas. The Company has a 95% interest in the joint venture and has made a commitment to invest $12.6 million in the project. The Company has no obligation to fund capital to the Prestonwood Project in excess of its commitment of capital of $12.6 million. As of June 30, 2014, the Company has invested 100% of its total committed capital amount. The Company consolidates its investment in the Prestonwood Project.

In connection with mortgage financings collateralized by the Standard at Lenox Park, Berkshires at Town Center and Sunfield Lake properties, the Operating Partnership agreed to guarantee approximately $11.7 million of mortgage debt, at origination,

Table of contents

related to its obligation to achieve certain revenue targets at the properties. Additionally, the Company has guaranteed payment of the obligation under the Credit Facility, in full, when due at maturity or otherwise.

11. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company utilizes interest rate caps to add stability to interest expense, to manage our exposure to interest rate movements and as required by our lenders when entering into variable interest mortgage debt. Interest rate caps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts if interest rates rise above a certain level in exchange for an upfront premium.

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2014, the Company acquired an interest rate cap related to its investment in Berkshires of Columbia. The derivative instrument was obtained as a requirement by the lender under the terms of the financing and limits increases in interest costs of the variable rate debt. The interest rate cap limits that interest exposure on the variable rate mortgage to 4.25% of the total mortgage amount of $44,000,000. The instrument matures on February 1, 2018. As of June 30, 2014, the value of the interest rate cap is $101,521 and is included in "Prepaid expenses and other assets".

The Company did not own any derivative instruments as of December 31, 2013.

12. NONCONTROLLING INTEREST IN PROPERTIES

Six of the Company's properties, Berkshires of Columbia, Country Place I, Country Place II, 2020 Lawrence, Walnut Creek and Aura Prestonwood, are owned in joint ventures with third parties as of June 30, 2014. The Company owns interests of 91.38% in Berkshires of Columbia, 58.00% in Country Place I and Country Place II, 91.08% in 2020 Lawrence, 95.00% in Aura Prestonwood and will own a 98.00% interest in Walnut Creek once fully invested.

During the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company received $665,447 and $264,718, respectively, of contributions from noncontrolling interest holders in properties.

During the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company made tax payments of $76,000 and $300,000, respectively, on behalf of the noncontrolling interest holders in properties as required by the taxing authorities of the jurisdictions in which the Company owns and operates properties.

During the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company's aggregate distributions to the noncontrolling interest holders in properties totaled $1,039,980 and $1,221,443, respectively.

13. NONCONTROLLING INTEREST IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIP

The following table sets forth the calculation of net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest in the Operating Partnership for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:



		Three months ended						Six months ended
		June 30,						June 30,
		2014			2013			2014			2013
Net income		$	54,062,703		$	14,531,303		$	50,678,923		$	10,534,627
Adjust:	Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest in properties	(125,887		)	4,724			(190,723		)	(14,808		)
Income before noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership		53,936,816			14,536,027			50,488,200			10,519,819
Preferred dividend		(1,675,193		)	(1,675,194		)	(3,350,387		)	(3,350,388		)
Income available to common equity		52,261,623			12,860,833			47,137,813			7,169,431
Noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership		97.61		%	97.61		%	97.61		%	97.61		%
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership		$	51,012,570		$	12,553,460		$	46,011,219		$	6,998,082

Table of contents

The following table sets forth a summary of the items affecting the noncontrolling interest in the Operating Partnership:



	For the six months ended
	June 30,
	2014			2013
Balance at beginning of period	$	(102,297,937	)	$	(89,708,267	)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in Operating Partnership	46,011,219			6,998,082
Distributions to noncontrolling interest partners in Operating Partnership	(19,843,660		)	(1,138,750		)
Balance at end of period	$	(76,130,378	)	$	(83,848,935	)

As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the noncontrolling interest in the Operating Partnership consisted of 5,242,223 Operating Partnership units held by parties other than the Company.

14. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Amounts accrued or paid to the Company’s affiliates are as follows:



	Three months ended				Six months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
Property management fees	$	898,568	$	824,676	$	1,684,353	$	1,636,509
Expense reimbursements	72,172		49,533		132,307		98,807
Salary reimbursements	2,292,524		2,158,870		4,463,277		4,549,457
Asset management fees	407,913		407,914		815,826		815,827
Incentive advisory fee	2,409,374		622,908		2,673,419		1,373,780
Acquisition fees	—		—		1,200,000		—
Construction management fees	103,700		113,322		109,544		119,118
Development fees	26,420		—		123,971		69,715
Interest on revolving credit facility	—		20,168		—		32,981
Total	$	6,210,671	$	4,197,391	$	11,202,697	$	8,696,194

Amounts due to affiliates of $2,166,157 and $2,454,167 are included in “Due to affiliates, net” at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, and represent intercompany development fees, expense reimbursements, asset management fees and shared services, which consist of amounts due to affiliates of $4,352,124 and $5,070,512 at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, and amounts due from affiliates of $2,185,967 and $2,616,345 at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

The Company pays property management fees to an affiliate, Berkshire Advisor, for property management services. The fees are payable at a rate of 4% of gross income. The Company incurred $1,684,353 and $1,636,509 of property management fees in the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

The Company also reimburses Berkshire Advisor for administrative services for our operation, including property management, legal, accounting, data processing, transfer agent and other necessary services. Under the terms of the Advisory Services Agreement, the Company reimburses Berkshire Advisor for actual property employee salary and benefit expenses incurred in the operation of the properties under management. Additionally, Berkshire Advisor allocates a portion of its corporate level personnel and overhead expense to the Company on the basis of an employee's time spent on duties and activities performed on behalf of the Company. Expense reimbursements paid were $132,307 and $98,807 for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Salary reimbursements paid were $4,463,277 and $4,549,457 for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

The Company pays Berkshire Advisor a fixed annual asset management fee equal to 0.40%, up to a maximum of $1,600,000 in any calendar year, of the purchase price of real estate properties owned by the Company, as adjusted from time to time to reflect the then current fair value of the properties. Annual asset management fees earned by the affiliate in excess of the $1,600,000 maximum payable by the Company represent fees attributable to and paid by the noncontrolling partners in the properties. As discussed below, in addition to the fixed fee, effective January 1, 2010, the Company may also pay Berkshire Advisor an incentive advisory fee based on increases in value of the Company that would not be subject to the $1,600,000 maximum.

Table of contents

On November 12, 2009, the Audit Committee of the Company approved an amendment to the advisory services agreement with Berkshire Advisor which included an incentive advisory fee component to the existing asset management fees payable to Berkshire Advisor (the "Advisory Services Amendment") pursuant to Berkshire Advisor's Supplemental Long Term Incentive Plan (the "Supplemental Plan"). The Advisory Services Amendment became effective January 1, 2010 and provides for an incentive advisory fee based on the increase in fair value of the Company, as calculated and approved by management, over the base value ("Base Value"). The Company accrues incentive advisory fees payable to Berkshire Advisor at 10%, which can be increased to 12% from time to time, based on the increase in fair value of the Company above the Base Value established by the Advisor. On May 12, 2014, the Audit Committee of the Company approved an amendment to the Supplemental Plan which allows reissuance of previously forfeited or settled carried interests. The Company has recorded $2,673,419 and $1,373,780 of incentive advisory fees during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the accrued liability of $10,566,401 and $8,289,617, respectively, was included in "Due to affiliate, incentive advisory fees" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Payments from the Company to Berkshire Advisor approximate the amounts Berkshire Advisor pays to its employees. Payments to employees by Berkshire Advisor pursuant to the Supplemental Plan are generally paid over a four-year period in quarterly installments. Additional limits have been placed on the total amount of payments that can be made by the Company in any given year, with interest accruing at the rate of 7% on any payments due but not yet paid. The Company made $396,635 and $690,668 of incentive advisory fee payments during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

The Company pays acquisition fees to an affiliate, Berkshire Advisor, for acquisition services. These fees are payable upon the closing of an acquisition of real property. The fee is equal to 1% of the purchase price of any new property acquired directly or indirectly by the Company. The purchase price is defined as the capitalized basis of an asset under GAAP, including renovations or new construction costs, or other items paid or received that would be considered an adjustment to basis. The purchase price does not include acquisition fees and capital costs of a recurring nature. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2014, the Company paid acquisition fees of $560,000 and $640,000 on the acquisitions of Pavilion Townplace and EON at Lindbergh, respectively. The Company did not acquire any properties in the six-month period ended June 30, 2013.

The Company pays a construction management fee to an affiliate, Berkshire Advisor, for services related to the management and oversight of renovation and rehabilitation projects at its properties. The Company paid or accrued $109,544 and $119,118 in construction management fees for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The fees are capitalized as part of the project cost in the year they are incurred.

The Company pays development fees to an affiliate, Berkshire Residential Development, L.L.C. ("BRD"), for property development services. The fees were based on the project’s development and construction costs. During the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company incurred $123,971 and $69,715, respectively, on the 2020 Lawrence Project, the Walnut Creek Project and the Prestonwood Project. The Company did not incur any development fees on the NoMa Project to BRD for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

During the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company borrowed $0 and $1,627,000, respectively, under the Credit Facility - Affiliate and did not repay any outstanding balances during the same periods. The Company incurred interest of $0 and $32,981 related to the Credit Facility - Affiliate during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company did not pay any commitment fees during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 or 2013. There was no outstanding balance under the Credit Facility - Affiliate as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Related party arrangements are approved by the independent directors of the Company and are evidenced by a written agreement between the Company and the affiliated entity providing the services.

15. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Table of contents

16. PROFORMA CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

As discussed in Note 1 - Organization and Basis of Presentation, during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014, the Company acquired Pavilion Townplace and EON at Lindbergh, which were deemed to be individually significant in accordance with Regulation S-X, Rule 3-14 “Special Instructions for Real Estate Operations to be Acquired”.

The proforma financial information set forth below is based upon the Company's historical Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, adjusted to give effect to the transaction at the beginning of each of the periods presented.

The proforma financial information is presented for informational purposes only and may not be indicative of what actual results of operations would have been had the transaction occurred at the beginning of each year, nor does it attempt to represent the results of operations for future periods.



	Three months ended June 30,					Six months ended June 30,
	2014		2013			2014		2013
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)			(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Revenue from rental property	$	23,407,520	$	22,522,745		$	46,896,898	$	44,576,119
Net loss	$	54,129,230	$	14,147,600		$	51,588,926	$	9,821,864
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders	$	1,315,580	$	(76,330	)	$	2,036,597	$	(541,414	)
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders, per common share, basic and diluted	$	0.94	$	(0.05	)	$	1.45	$	(0.39	)

17. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On July 23, 2014, the Company through the joint venture formed with its subsidiary, BRD Walnut Creek, L.L.C., and Laconia Residential One LLC, entered into a loan agreement totaling up to $44,500,000 for the Walnut Creek Project. The loan has a fixed interest rate of 5.309% and matures on August 1, 2024.

Also on July 23, 2014, the Company executed a purchase and sale agreement for the sale of Yorktowne located in Millersville, Maryland. The sale price of the property is $33,000,000. The closing is currently anticipated to take place on October 30, 2014.

On August 12, 2014, the Company executed a purchase and sale agreement for the sale of the Country Place I and Country Place II located in Burtonsville, Maryland for the combined sale price of $57,800,000. The closing is currently anticipated to take place no later than October 31, 2014.

Table of contents


Item 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF BERKSHIRE INCOME REALTY, INC.

You should read the following discussion in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of Berkshire Income Realty, Inc. (the “Company”) and the related notes and other financial information included in this report. For further information please refer to the Company’s consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

Forward Looking Statements

The statements contained in this report, including information with respect to our future business plans, constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). For this purpose, any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements, subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ significantly from those described in this report. These forward-looking statements include statements regarding, among other things, our business strategy and operations, future expansion plans, future prospects, financial position, anticipated revenues or losses and projected costs, and objectives of management. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements. There are a number of important factors that could cause our results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to, changes in economic conditions generally and the real estate and bond markets specifically, legislative/regulatory changes (including changes to laws governing the taxation of real estate investment trusts (“REITs”)), possible sales of assets, the acquisition restrictions placed on the Company by an affiliated entity Berkshire Multifamily Value Plus Fund III, LP (“BVF III”), availability of capital, interest rates and interest rate spreads, changes in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") and policies and guidelines applicable to REITs, those factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A - Risk Factors of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and other risks and uncertainties as may be detailed from time to time in our public announcements and our reports filed with the SEC.

The foregoing risks are not exhaustive. Other sections of this report may include additional factors that could adversely affect our business and financial performance. Moreover, we operate in a competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all such risks factors, nor can it assess the impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results.

As used herein, the terms “we”, “us” or the “Company” refer to Berkshire Income Realty, Inc., a Maryland corporation, incorporated on July 19, 2002. The Company is in the business of acquiring, owning, operating, developing and renovating multifamily apartment communities. Berkshire Property Advisors, L.L.C. (“Berkshire Advisor” or “Advisor”) is an affiliated entity we have contracted with to make decisions relating to the day-to-day management and operation of our business, subject to the oversight of the Company’s Board of Directors ("Board"). Refer to Part III, Item 13 - Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence and Part IV, Item 15 - Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 14 - Related Party Transactions of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the SEC, for additional information about the Advisor.

Overview

The Company is engaged primarily in the acquisition, ownership, operation, development and rehabilitation of multifamily apartment communities in the Baltimore/Washington D.C., Southeast, Southwest, Northwest and Western areas of the United States. We conduct substantially all of our business and own, either directly or through subsidiaries, substantially all of our assets through Berkshire Income Realty-OP, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the "Operating Partnership"). The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, BIR GP, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership.

As of August 13, 2014, the Company owns 100% of the preferred limited partner units of the Operating Partnership, whose terms mirror the terms of the Company’s Series A 9% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock and, through BIR GP, L.L.C., owns 100% of the general partner interest of the Operating Partnership, which represents approximately 2.39% of the common economic interest of the Operating Partnership.

Table of contents

Our general and limited partner interests in the Operating Partnership entitle us to share in cash distributions from, and in the profits and losses of, the Operating Partnership in proportion to our percentage interest therein. The other partners of the Operating Partnership are affiliates who contributed their direct or indirect interests in certain properties to the Operating Partnership in exchange for common units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership.

Our highlights of the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 included the following:

On January 16, 2014, the Company closed on a $44,000,000 mortgage loan refinancing for Berkshires of Columbia. The mortgage has a variable interest rate of 2.43% above the 1-month London Inter-Bank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") and will mature on February 1, 2024. As part of the refinancing, proceeds from the new mortgage were used to pay off three existing loans on the Berkshire of Columbia property totaling $32,254,893.

On January 16, 2014, the Board authorized the general partner of the Operating Partnership to make a special distribution of $20,000,000 from proceeds of the supplemental loan on Seasons of Laurel and the refinancing of Berkshires of Columbia to the common general and noncontrolling interest partners in Operating Partnership, which was paid on January 17, 2014. Also on January 16, 2014, the Board declared a common dividend of $0.339924 per share on the Company's Class B common stock in respect to the special distribution to the common general partner. Concurrently with the Operating Partnership distributions, the common dividend was paid from the special distribution proceeds of the common general partner on January 17, 2014.

On January 21, 2014, the Company closed on a $90,000,000 line of credit (the "Credit Facility") with an unaffiliated lender. The Credit Facility will be used to facilitate property acquisitions and to fund the development activities of the Company.

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2014, the Company borrowed $80,000,000 from the Credit Facility.

On January 22, 2014, the Company executed a joint venture limited liability company agreement with an unrelated entity for the development of Aura Prestonwood, a 322-unit multifamily apartment project in Dallas, Texas (the "Prestonwood Project"). The Company's ownership percentage in the project is 95%. Total capital committed to the venture is $12,643,500 and is fully funded as of June 30, 2014. Simultaneously with the execution of the limited liability company agreement, the joint venture acquired the land where the multifamily apartment project is being built. The cost of the land was $7,302,960 and consideration of $1,000,000 was paid at closing for the option to acquire the abutting land parcel at a future time.

On March 31, 2014, the Company through its joint venture partnership in the development of the 141-unit apartment project in Walnut Creek, California (the "Walnut Creek Project"), paid off the outstanding land loan balance of $4,828,495. The land loan was assumed on November 1, 2013 as part of the acquisition of the land for the Walnut Creek Project.

On April 23, 2014, the Company executed a purchase and sale agreement for the sale of Bridgewater and Lakeridge located in Hampton, Virgina and Reserves at Arboretum located in Newport News, Virginia. The sale prices for Bridgewater, Lakeridge and Reserves at Arboretum are $23,500,000, $40,000,000 and $21,500,000, respectively. The closing for the sale of all three properties is currently anticipated to take place on August 18, 2014.

Table of contents

The Company recognized $5,988,770 of gain from the sale and paid off the outstanding mortgage balance of $3,676,750 from the sale proceed.

General

The Company detailed a number of significant trends and specific factors affecting the real estate industry in general and the Company’s business in particular in Part II, Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. The Company believes those trends and factors continue to be relevant to the Company’s performance and financial condition.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash and Cash Flows

As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had approximately $17,592,000 and $15,255,000 of cash and cash equivalents, respectively. Cash provided and used by the Company for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 are as follows:



	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Cash (used in) provided by operating activities	$	(781,992	)	$	3,280,980		$	3,145,635		$	7,980,119
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities	41,093,246			26,883,104			(24,383,487		)	21,192,944
Cash (used in) provided by financing activities	(36,731,327		)	(18,664,547		)	23,574,851			(20,615,341		)

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2014, cash increased by approximately $2,337,000.

The Company's net cash flow from operating activities for the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 decreased by $4,834,000 from the same period in 2013 primarily due to $2,004,000 of higher interest expense and $616,000 decrease in cash attributable to changes in assets and liabilities, partially offset by $138,000 higher Net Operating Income ("NOI") (see page 37 for more detail).

The Company's net cash outflow from investing activities for the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 increased by $45,576,000 from the comparable period in 2013 primarily due to $60,611,000 used for acquisitions of Pavilion Townplace, EON at Lindbergh and Aura Prestonwood and $40,835,000 in restricted cash related to the reverse exchange transaction under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code. The increase in cash outflow was partially offset by $74,669,000 of sale proceeds from property dispositions received for the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 as compared to $30,959,000 received during the same period in 2013. The Company also received $12,580,000 of distributions from its investment in unconsolidated multifamily entities during the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 but did not receive any distributions during the comparable period in 2013.

Cash used in financing activities for the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 increased by $44,190,000 from the same period in 2013, primarily due to net borrowing from the credit facilities of $80,000,000 during the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 compared to $1,627,000 in the comparable period of 2013. The increase was offset by net cash outflow for mortgage notes of $27,998,000 in the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 compared to $15,111,000 in the comparable period of 2013 and aggregate distributions of $21,362,000 made during the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 compared to $2,360,000 made during the six-month period ended June 30, 2013.

The Company's principal liquidity demands are expected to be distributions to our preferred and common shareholders and Operating Partnership unitholders based on availability of cash and approval of the Board, capital improvements, rehabilitation projects and repairs and maintenance for the properties, debt repayment, ongoing development projects and acquisition and development of additional properties within the investment restrictions placed on it by BVF III.

The Company intends to meet its short-term liquidity requirements through net cash flows provided by operating activities and advances from the credit facility. The Company considers its ability to generate cash to be adequate to meet all operating

Table of contents

requirements and make distributions to its preferred stockholders in accordance with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, applicable to REITs. Funds required to make distributions to our preferred shareholders that are not provided by operating activities will be supplemented by property debt financing and refinancing activities, property sales and advances on the credit facilities. Funds required to make distributions to common shareholders and Operating Partnership unitholders are funded by operating and refinancing proceeds.

The Company intends to meet its long-term liquidity requirements through property sales, property debt financing and refinancing, noting that possible interest rate increases could negatively impact the Company's ability to refinance existing debt at acceptable rates. As of June 30, 2014, approximately $161,489,000 of principal, or 31.2% of the Company’s outstanding mortgage debt, is due to be repaid through 2016. During that period, principal of $35,238,000, $54,722,000 and $60,748,000 relates to loans that are due to mature and be repaid in full in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. The Company has executed a purchase and sale agreement to sell Bridgewater and Lakeridge, which are the only remaining properties that have debt maturities in 2014. In addition, Reserves at Arboretum, Yorktowne, Country Place I and Country Place II, which have mortgage loans maturing in 2015 and 2016, are under agreement to be sold in 2014. All other payments of principal during the three-year period are normal recurring monthly payments in accordance with the loan amortization schedules. The Company expects to fund any maturing mortgages through refinancing of such mortgages or through the sale of the related properties. Additionally, the Company may seek to expand its purchasing power through the use of joint venture relationships with other companies with liquidity.

As of June 30, 2014, the Company has fixed interest rate mortgage financing on all properties in the portfolio with the exception of Walnut Creek which had no mortgage, and Berkshires of Columbia, Bridgewater and Aura Prestonwood, which have variable interest rate debt.

On June 12, 2012, Zocalo Community Development, Inc. ("Zocalo"), the managing member of the joint venture ("JV 2020 Lawrence") of the Operating Partnership's subsidiary, BIR 2020 Lawrence, L.L.C. ("BIR 2020") with Zocalo and JB 2020, LLC, entered into a financing agreement with the State of Colorado, through the Colorado Energy Office, for $1,250,000 (the "Colorado Energy Loan") to be used for inclusion of energy efficient components in the construction of JV 2020 Lawrence's multifamily apartment building (the "2020 Lawrence Project"). Zocalo has pledged all of its membership interests, both currently owned and subsequently acquired, in JV 2020 Lawrence as collateral for the Colorado Energy Loan. Pursuant to an authorizing resolution adopted by the members of JV 2020 Lawrence, Zocalo will advance the proceeds of the Colorado Energy Loan, as received from time to time, to JV 2020 Lawrence for application to the 2020 Lawrence Project. Such advances to JV 2020 Lawrence will not be considered contributions of capital to JV 2020 Lawrence. Also, Zocalo is authorized and directed to cause JV 2020 Lawrence to repay such advances, including principal and interest, made by Zocalo at such times as required by the Colorado Energy Loan. Any payments pursuant to the authorizing resolution shall be payable only from surplus cash of the 2020 Lawrence Project as defined by U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") in the governing regulatory agreement of the primary financing on the project as describe above. If surplus cash is not available to satisfy Zocalo's payment obligations under the Colorado Energy Loan, then either Zocalo or BIR 2020, may issue a funding notice, pursuant to the JV 2020 Lawrence limited liability company agreement, for payment obligation amounts due and payable.

The Company has a $20,000,000 revolving credit facility in place with an affiliate of the Company ("Credit Facility - Affiliate"). The Credit Facility - Affiliate does not have a stated maturity date but is subject to a 60-day notice of termination provision by which the lender can affect a termination of the commitment. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there were no outstanding balances on the Credit Facility - Affiliate.

The Company has a $90,000,000 Credit Facility with an unaffiliated lender. The Credit Facility will be used to facilitate property acquisitions and to fund the development activities of the Company. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there was $80,000,000 and $0 outstanding on the Credit Facility, respectively.

Table of contents

Capital Expenditures

The Company paid $1,551,280 and $2,001,545 in recurring capital expenditures during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Recurring capital expenditures typically include items such as appliances, carpeting, flooring, HVAC equipment, kitchen and bath cabinets, site improvements and various exterior building improvements.

The Company paid $10,362,323 and $7,403,662 in renovation-related and development capital expenditures during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Renovation-related capital expenditures generally include capital expenditures of a significant non-recurring nature, including construction management fees payable to an affiliate of the Company, where the Company expects to see a financial return on the expenditure or where the Company believes the expenditure preserves the status of a property within its submarket. Costs directly associated with the development of properties are capitalized. Additionally, the Company capitalizes interest, real estate taxes, insurance and project management/development fees. Management uses judgment to determine when a development project commences and capitalization begins and when a development project is substantially complete and capitalization ceases. Generally, most capitalization begins during the pre-construction period, defined as activities that are necessary to start the development of the property. A development is generally considered substantially complete after major construction has ended and the property is available for occupancy. For properties that are built in phases, capitalization generally ceases on each phase when it is considered substantially complete and ready for use. Costs will continue to be capitalized only on those phases under development.

On December 12, 2011, the Company executed a limited liability company agreement with an unrelated entity related to the Walnut Creek Project, a 141-unit multifamily apartment development project located in Walnut Creek, California, which is currently in the entitlement phase. Once fully invested, the Company's ownership percentage will be 98%. As of June 30, 2014, the project development costs incurred were approximately $10.1 million, of the total budgeted costs of approximately $68.6 million. Total capital currently committed to the project is approximately $26.8 million. As of June 30, 2014, the Company has made capital contributions of approximately $9.5 million, or 35.3% of its current total commitment. The Walnut Creek Project was delayed by environmental and regulatory requirements and budget finalization. The construction began in July 2014. The Company consolidates its investment in the Walnut Creek Project.

On January 22, 2014, the Company executed a joint venture limited liability company agreement with an unrelated entity related to the Prestonwood Project, a 322-unit multifamily apartment development project located in Dallas, Texas. The Company's ownership percentage in the project is 95%. As of June 30, 2014, the project development costs incurred were approximately $16.8 million, of the total budgeted costs of approximately $44.4 million. Total capital committed to the joint venture is $12.6 million and is fully funded as of June 30, 2014. The construction began in the first quarter of 2014. The Company consolidates its investment in the Prestonwood Project.

The following table presents a summary of the development projects, in which the Company holds direct or indirect fee simple interests:



Development Projects	Anticipated Total # of Units	Anticipated Average Apt Size (Sq Ft)	Anticipated Rentable Building Size (Sq Ft) (1)	Budgeted Costs (in millions)		Costs Incurred to-date June 30, 2014 (in millions)		Anticipated Completion Date
Walnut Creek	141	846	138,370	68.6		10.1		Q2 2016
Aura Prestonwood	322	837	269,370	44.4		16.8		Q4 2015
Total / Average	463	842	407,740	$	113.0	$	26.9


(1)	Includes retail space of 19,017 sq ft at the Walnut Creek Project.

Pursuant to terms of the mortgage debt on certain properties in the Company's portfolio, lenders require the Company to fund repair or replacement escrow accounts. The funds in the escrow accounts are disbursed to the Company upon completion of the required repairs or renovations activities. The Company is required to provide the lender with documentation evidencing the completion of the repairs, which in some cases, are subject to inspection by the lender.

The Company's capital budgets for 2014 anticipate spending approximately $10,858,000 for ongoing capital needs. As of June 30, 2014, the Company has not committed to any new significant rehabilitation projects.

Table of contents

Discussion of acquisitions for the six-month period ended June 30, 2014

On January 22, 2014, the Company executed a joint venture limited liability company agreement with an unrelated entity for the Prestonwood Project to build a 322-unit multifamily apartment community located in Dallas, Texas. The Company's ownership percentage in the project is 95%. Total capital committed to the joint venture is $12,643,500 and is fully funded as of June 30, 2014. Simultaneously with the execution of the limited liability company agreement, the joint venture acquired the land where the multifamily apartment project is being built. The cost of the land was $7,302,960 and consideration of $1,000,000 was paid at closing for the option to acquire the abutting land parcel at a future time.

On March 20, 2014, the Company, through its subsidiaries, BIR Pavilion, L.L.C. and BIR Eon, L.L.C., completed the acquisitions of Pavilion Townplace, a 236-unit multifamily apartment community located in Dallas, Texas and EON at Lindbergh, a 352-unit multifamily apartment community located in Atlanta, Georgia, respectively. The seller was an unaffiliated third party. The purchase prices for Pavilion Townplace and EON at Lindbergh were $56,000,000 and $64,000,000, respectively, and were subject to loan assumptions, normal and operating prorations and adjustments as provided for in the purchase and sale agreements. The Company has designated these properties to qualify as replacement properties in a reverse exchange transaction, under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code, for properties identified to be sold in 2014.



	Aura Prestonwood		Pavilion Townplace		EON at Lindbergh		Total
Asset acquired:
Multifamily apartment communities	$	8,302,960	$	57,201,053	$	64,056,966	$	129,560,979
Acquired in-place leases and tenant relationships	—		769,534		872,564		1,642,098
Prepaid and other assets	100,000		296,013		236,508		632,521
Total assets acquired	$	8,402,960	$	58,266,600	$	65,166,038	$	131,835,598

Liabilities assumed:
Accrued expenses	$	—	$	309,154	$	201,997	$	511,151
Tenant security deposit liability	—		119,808		121,454		241,262
Mortgage notes payable	—		27,542,536		42,929,530		70,472,066
Total liabilities assumed	$	—	$	27,971,498	$	43,252,981	$	71,224,479

Discussion of dispositions for the six-month period ended June 30, 2014

Table of contents

Brompton of $40,835,011 have been deposited with a qualified intermediary and may be used to close the reverse 1031 exchange transaction for Pavilion Townplace and EON at Lindbergh.

Declaration of Dividends and Distributions

On March 25, 2003, the Board declared a dividend at an annual rate of 9% on the stated liquidation preference of $25 per share of the outstanding Preferred Shares which is payable quarterly in arrears, on February 15, May 15, August 15, and November 15 of each year to shareholders of record in the amount of $0.5625 per share, per quarter. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company’s aggregate dividends on the Preferred Shares totaled $3,350,387 and $3,350,388, respectively, of which $837,607 was payable and included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in "Dividends and distributions payable" as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, the Board did not authorize the general partner of the Operating Partnership to distribute quarterly operating distributions to the common general and common limited partners or a common dividend on the Company’s Class B common stock.

On January 16, 2014, the Board authorized the general partner of the Operating Partnership to make a special distribution of $20,000,000 from proceeds of the supplemental loan on Seasons of Laurel and the refinancing of Berkshires of Columbia to the common general and noncontrolling interest partners in Operating Partnership, which was paid on January 17, 2014. Also on January 16, 2014, the Board declared a common dividend of $0.339924 per share on the Company's Class B common stock in respect to the special distribution to the common general partner. Concurrently with the Operating Partnership distributions, the common dividend was paid from the special distribution proceeds to the common general partner on January 17, 2014.

For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company’s aggregate dividends on the Class B common stock totaled $478,000 and $0, respectively. There were no dividends payable to the Class B common stockholders as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company’s aggregate distribution to noncontrolling interest partners in Operating Partnership totaled $19,843,660 and $1,138,750, respectively. There were no distributions payable to the noncontrolling interest partners in Operating Partnership as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

During the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company's aggregate distributions to the noncontrolling interest holders in properties totaled $1,039,980 and $1,221,443, respectively. There were no distributions payable to the noncontrolling holders in properties as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

The Company’s policy to provide for common distributions is based on available cash and Board approval.

Table of contents

Leasing Activities

The table below presents leasing activities information which includes the volume of new and renewed leases with average rents for each and the impact of rent concessions for all properties, including those acquired or disposed of during the period.



	Six months ended						Six months ended
	June 30, 2014						June 30, 2013
	# of Units	Average Apt Size (Sq Ft)	Average Monthly Rent Rate per Apt		Impact of Average Rent Concessions		# of Units	Average Apt Size (Sq Ft)	Average Monthly Rent Rate per Apt		Impact of Average Rent Concessions
New leases	1,493	991	$	1,339	$	6	1,496	959	$	1,172	$	9
Renewed leases	1,300	990	$	1,318	$	—	1,346	958	$	1,197	$	—

Results of Operations and Financial Condition

The Company's portfolio (the "Total Property Portfolio") consists of all properties acquired or placed in service and owned at any time during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. As a result of changes in the Total Portfolio over time, including the change in the portfolio holdings during six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013, the financial statements show considerable changes in revenue and expenses from period to period. The Company does not believe that its period-to-period financial data are comparable. Therefore, the Company also presents the comparison of operating results for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 reflect changes attributable to the properties that were owned by the Company throughout each period presented (the "Same Property Portfolio").

“Net Operating Income” (“NOI”) falls within the definition of a “non-GAAP financial measure” as stated in Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss), the most directly comparable financial measure of our performance calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. The Company believes NOI is a measure of operating results that is useful to investors to analyze the performance of a real estate company because it provides a direct measure of the operating results of the Company’s multifamily apartment communities. The Company also believes it is a useful measure to facilitate the comparison of operating performance among competitors. The calculation of NOI requires classification of income statement items between operating and non-operating expenses, where operating items include only those items of revenue and expense which are directly related to the income producing activities of the properties. We believe that to achieve a more complete understanding of the Company’s performance, NOI should be compared with our reported net income (loss). Management uses NOI to evaluate the operating results of properties without reflecting the effect of capital decisions such as the issuance of mortgage debt and investments in capital items; in turn, these capital decisions have an impact on interest expense and depreciation and amortization.

The most directly comparable financial measure of the Company’s NOI, calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, is net income (loss), shown on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. For the three-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, net income was $54,062,703 and $14,531,303, respectively. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, net income was $50,678,923 and $10,534,627, respectively. A reconciliation of the Company’s NOI to net income (loss) for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 is presented as part of the following tables.

Table of contents

Comparison of the three-month period ended June 30, 2014 to the three-month period ended June 30, 2013

The table below reflects selected operating information for the Same Property Portfolio. The Same Property Portfolio consists of the 17 properties acquired or placed in service on or prior to January 1, 2013 and owned through June 30, 2014. The Total Property Portfolio includes the effect of the change in the acquisition of two properties, Pavilion Townplace and EON at Lindbergh and the sale of four properties, Chisholm, Laurel Woods, Bear Creek and Berkshires on Brompton, during the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 and the completion of the 2020 Lawrence Project and sale of two properties, Walden Pond and Gables of Texas, during the six-month period ended June 30, 2013. (The 2013 and 2014 activity for Gables and Walden Pond has been removed from the presentation as the results have been reflected as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations.)



	Same Property Portfolio
	Three months ended June 30,
	2014			2013			Increase/ (Decrease)			% Change
Revenue:
Rental	$	16,136,838		$	15,740,218		$	396,620		2.52	%
Utility reimbursement and other	1,509,462			1,425,269			84,193			5.91	%
Total revenue	17,646,300			17,165,487			480,813			2.80	%

Operating Expenses:
Operating	3,628,058			3,574,217			53,841			1.51	%
Maintenance	1,159,952			1,091,214			68,738			6.30	%
Real estate taxes	1,712,706			1,528,816			183,890			12.03	%
General and administrative	—			—			—			—	%
Management fees	707,260			686,816			20,444			2.98	%
Incentive advisory fees	—			—			—			—	%
Total operating expenses	7,207,976			6,881,063			326,913			4.75	%

Net Operating Income	10,438,324			10,284,424			153,900			1.50	%

Non-operating expenses:
Depreciation	5,180,065			5,379,357			(199,292		)	(3.70	)%
Interest, inclusive of amortization of deferred financing fees	5,647,609			5,613,436			34,173			0.61	%
Loss on extinguishment of debt	—			—			—			—	%
Amortization of acquired in-place leases and tenant relationships	—			—			—			—	%
Total non-operating expenses	10,827,674			10,992,793			(165,119		)	(1.50	)%

Net loss	$	(389,350	)	$	(708,369	)	$	319,019		45.04	%

Table of contents

Comparison of the three-month period ended June 30, 2014 to the three-month period ended June 30, 2013



	Total Property Portfolio
	Three months ended June 30,
	2014			2013			Increase/ (Decrease)			% Change
Revenue:
Rental	$	21,167,877		$	18,154,499		$	3,013,378		16.60	%
Utility reimbursement and other	2,238,261			1,696,579			541,682			31.93	%
Total revenue	23,406,138			19,851,078			3,555,060			17.91	%

Operating Expenses:
Operating	4,995,317			4,425,981			569,336			12.86	%
Maintenance	1,440,932			1,230,171			210,761			17.13	%
Real estate taxes	2,550,600			2,024,714			525,886			25.97	%
General and administrative	721,624			507,809			213,815			42.11	%
Management fees	1,339,036			1,203,974			135,062			11.22	%
Incentive advisory fees	2,409,374			622,908			1,786,466			286.79	%
Total operating expenses	13,456,883			10,015,557			3,441,326			34.36	%

Net Operating Income	9,949,255			9,835,521			113,734			1.16	%

Non-operating expenses:
Depreciation	7,243,111			6,432,388			810,723			12.60	%
Interest, inclusive of amortization of deferred financing fees	7,967,522			6,647,682			1,319,840			19.85	%
Loss on extinguishment of debt	1,743,652			—			1,743,652			100.00	%
Amortization of acquired in-place leases and tenant relationships	745,203			—			745,203			100.00	%
Total non-operating expenses	17,699,488			13,080,070			4,619,418			35.32	%

Loss before equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated multifamily entities and discontinued operations	(7,750,233		)	(3,244,549		)	(4,505,684		)	(138.87	)%

Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated multifamily entities	12,292,944			(855,136		)	13,148,080			1,537.54	%

Gain on disposition of real estate assets	49,519,992			—			49,519,992			100.00	%

Discontinued operations *	—			18,630,988			(18,630,988		)	(100.00	)%

Net income	$	54,062,703		$	14,531,303		$	39,531,400		272.04	%


*	On April 1, 2014, the Company early adopted ASU 2014-08 and as such, the dispositions of Chisholm Place, Laurel Woods, Bear Creek and Berkshires on Brompton are not presented as part of discontinued operations. Discussion of property sales is included in Note 1 - Organization and Basis of Presentation of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of contents

Comparison of the three-month period ended June 30, 2014 to the three-month period ended June 30, 2013

(Same Property Portfolio)

Revenue

Rental Revenue

Rental revenue of the Same Property Portfolio increased for the three-month period ended June 30, 2014 in comparison to the same period of 2013. The increase in rental revenue is mainly attributable to increase in rental rates. Average monthly rental rates for the three-month period ended June 30, 2014 of $1,283 per apartment unit increased by 2.23% over the 2013 rental rates of $1,255 for the same period, contributing to an increase of approximately $381,000 in rental revenue. Average physical occupancy for the 2014 Same Property Portfolio was 96.43%, above the 2013 average of 95.99%, attributing to $16,000 increase in rental revenue. Market conditions remain stable in the majority of the submarkets in which the Company owns and operates apartments. Improving economic conditions and the continued strength in the apartment markets has allowed the Company to implement rent increases at properties in strong markets while maintaining occupancy and retaining high quality tenants throughout the portfolio.



	Same Property Portfolio
	Three months ended June 30,
	2014			2013			Increase/ (Decrease)		% Change
Rental
Market rent	$	17,081,700		$	16,700,774		$	380,926	2.28	%
Occupancy	(944,862		)	(960,556		)	15,694		1.63	%
Total Rental	$	16,136,838		$	15,740,218		$	396,620	2.52	%

Utility reimbursement and other revenue

Same Property Portfolio utility reimbursement and other revenue increased for the three-month period ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2013, due primarily to increased utility reimbursements as a result of higher utility expenses for the applicable billing period, as the majority of utility expenses are billed back to tenants.

The table below breaks out the two major components of utility reimbursement and other revenue:



	Same Property Portfolio
	Three months ended June 30,
	2014		2013		Increase/ (Decrease)		% Change
Utility reimbursement and other
Utility reimbursement	$	781,403	$	725,508	$	55,895	7.70	%
Other	728,059		699,761		28,298		4.04	%
Total Utility reimbursement and other	$	1,509,462	$	1,425,269	$	84,193	5.91	%

Table of contents

Operating Expenses

Operating

Operating expenses increased during the three-month period ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013. Property-related G&A increased as a result of higher state income taxes at the Company's property located in Philadelphia and higher property-related legal expenses.

The following table breaks out the major components of operating expense:



	Same Property Portfolio
	Three months ended June 30,
	2014		2013		Increase/ (Decrease)			% Change
Operating
Payroll	$	1,528,502	$	1,520,284	$	8,218		0.54	%
Utilities	1,039,262		1,041,467		(2,205		)	(0.21	)%
Insurance	305,305		336,387		(31,082		)	(9.24	)%
Property-related G&A	457,833		361,248		96,585			26.74	%
Leasing	167,517		168,861		(1,344		)	(0.80	)%
Advertising	126,372		126,409		(37		)	(0.03	)%
Other	3,267		19,561		(16,294		)	(83.30	)%
Total Operating	$	3,628,058	$	3,574,217	$	53,841		1.51	%

Maintenance

Maintenance expenses increased during the three-month period ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013, mainly due to increases in repairs. Management continues to employ a proactive maintenance rehabilitation strategy at its apartment communities and considers the strategy an effective program that preserves, and in some cases, increases occupancy levels through improved consumer appeal of the apartment communities, from both an interior and exterior perspective.

The table below breaks out the major components of maintenance expense:



	Same Property Portfolio
	Three months ended June 30,
	2014		2013		Increase/ (Decrease)			% Change
Maintenance
Pool service	$	92,811	$	115,449	$	(22,638	)	(19.61	)%
Exterminating	38,054		33,876		4,178			12.33	%
Landscaping	175,247		164,228		11,019			6.71	%
Supplies	14,315		15,896		(1,581		)	(9.95	)%
Cleaning	179,164		175,788		3,376			1.92	%
Painting	181,165		200,223		(19,058		)	(9.52	)%
Repairs	308,058		243,353		64,705			26.59	%
Other	171,138		142,401		28,737			20.18	%
Total Maintenance	$	1,159,952	$	1,091,214	$	68,738		6.30	%

Table of contents

Real Estate Taxes

Real estate taxes increased for the three-month period ended June 30, 2014 from the comparable period of 2013 primarily due to increases at Standard at Lenox Park and Estancia Townhomes. The Company continually scrutinizes the assessed values of its properties and participates in arbitration hearings or similar forums with the taxing authorities to appeal increases in assessed values that it considers to be unreasonable. The Company has been successful in achieving tax abatements for certain of its properties based on challenges made to the assessed values. Going forward, the Company anticipates a general upward trend in real estate tax expense as local and state taxing agencies continue to place significant reliance on property tax revenue.

Management Fees

Management fees of the Same Property Portfolio increased for the three-month period ended June 30, 2014 compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2013 as a result of an increase in total revenue of the operating properties.

Non-Operating Expenses

Depreciation

Depreciation expense of the Same Property Portfolio decreased for the three-month period ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of the prior year. The decrease is a result of assets that have been fully depreciated, partially offset by the additions to the basis of fixed assets in the portfolio driven by normal recurring capital expenditures.

Interest, inclusive of amortization of deferred financing fees

Interest expense for the three-month period ended June 30, 2014 increased over the comparable period of 2013 primarily due to higher loan balance and change in interest cap on Berkshires of Columbia and higher interest expenses incurred on the supplemental loan at Seasons of Laurel that closed in December 2013, which was partially offset by lower interest rates for Berkshires of Columbia and Bridgewater mortgages as mortgages for both properties have been converted to variable interest rate debt.

Comparison of the three-month period ended June 30, 2014 to the three-month period ended June 30, 2013

(Total Property Portfolio)

In addition to the revenue and expense analysis discussed with respect to the Same Property Portfolio, changes in revenue, total operating expenses and non-operating expenses of the Total Property Portfolio for the three-month period ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2013 are also due to the fluctuations in the actual properties owned during the comparative periods. Total revenue increased mainly due to revenue from Pavilion Townplace of approximately $1,314,000 and EON at Lindbergh of $1,424,000, which were acquired in the first quarter of 2014, in addition to higher occupancy at 2020 Lawrence as the property was in lease-up period throughout 2013 after the construction was completed in the first quarter of 2013. The increase in total operating expenses was primarily attributable to increased incentive advisory fee and operating expenses at Pavilion Townplace and EON at Lindbergh. (Refer to Related Party Transactions on page 20 for further discussion.) Non-operating expenses increased mainly due to increased interest expenses incurred on the Credit Facility, loss on extinguishment debt for the properties sold during the three-month period ended June 30, 2014, and amortization of acquired in-place leases and tenant relationships of Pavilion Townplace and EON at Lindbergh.

Table of contents

Comparison of the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 to the six-month period ended June 30, 2013

The table below reflects selected operating information for the Same Property Portfolio. The Same Property Portfolio consists of the 19 properties acquired or placed in service on or prior to January 1, 2013 and owned through June 30, 2014.



	Same Property Portfolio
	Six months ended June 30,
	2014			2013			Increase/ (Decrease)			% Change
Revenue:
Rental	$	32,045,096		$	31,307,716		$	737,380		2.36	%
Utility reimbursement and other	2,945,539			2,819,510			126,029			4.47	%
Total revenue	34,990,635			34,127,226			863,409			2.53	%

Operating Expenses:
Operating	7,645,596			7,344,955			300,641			4.09	%
Maintenance	2,171,933			1,849,760			322,173			17.42	%
Real estate taxes	3,415,626			3,037,347			378,279			12.45	%
General and administrative	—			—			—			—	%
Management fees	1,398,756			1,363,971			34,785			2.55	%
Incentive advisory fees	—			—			—			—	%
Total operating expenses	14,631,911			13,596,033			1,035,878			7.62	%

Net Operating Income	20,358,724			20,531,193			(172,469		)	(0.84	)%

Non-operating expenses:
Depreciation	10,401,647			10,744,207			(342,560		)	(3.19	)%
Interest, inclusive of amortization of deferred financing fees	11,149,189			11,187,757			(38,568		)	(0.34	)%
Loss on extinguishment of debt	—			—			—			—	%
Amortization of acquired in-place leases and tenant relationships	—			5,378			(5,378		)	(100.00	)%
Total non-operating expenses	21,550,836			21,937,342			(386,506		)	(1.76	)%

Net loss	$	(1,192,112	)	$	(1,406,149	)	$	214,037		15.22	%

Table of contents

Comparison of the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 to the six-month period ended June 30, 2013



	Total Property Portfolio
	Six months ended June 30,
	2014			2013			Increase/ (Decrease)			% Change
Revenue:
Rental	$	40,457,163		$	35,929,035		$	4,528,128		12.60	%
Utility reimbursement and other	4,125,640			3,342,132			783,508			23.44	%
Total revenue	44,582,803			39,271,167			5,311,636			13.53	%

Operating Expenses:
Operating	11,316,545			9,075,223			2,241,322			24.70	%
Maintenance	2,573,755			2,113,072			460,683			21.80	%
Real estate taxes	4,733,781			3,835,212			898,569			23.43	%
General and administrative	1,342,785			1,237,899			104,886			8.47	%
Management fees	2,565,289			2,396,786			168,503			7.03	%
Incentive advisory fees	2,673,419			1,373,780			1,299,639			94.60	%
Total operating expenses	25,205,574			20,031,972			5,173,602			25.83	%

Net Operating Income	19,377,229			19,239,195			138,034			0.72	%

Non-operating expenses:
Depreciation	13,529,323			12,759,624			769,699			6.03	%
Interest, inclusive of amortization of deferred financing fees	15,061,340			13,057,302			2,004,038			15.35	%
Loss on extinguishment of debt	1,743,652			—			1,743,652			100.00	%
Amortization of acquired in-place leases and tenant relationships	745,203			5,377			739,826			13,759.08	%
Total non-operating expenses	31,079,518			25,822,303			5,257,215			20.36	%

Loss before equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated multifamily entities and discontinued operations	(11,702,289		)	(6,583,108		)	(5,119,181		)	(77.76	)%

Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated multifamily entities	12,975,436			(1,631,103		)	14,606,539			895.50	%

Gain on disposition of real estate assets	49,519,992			—			49,519,992			100.00	%

Discontinued operations *	(114,216		)	18,748,838			(18,863,054		)	(100.61	)%

Net income	$	50,678,923		$	10,534,627		$	40,144,296		381.07	%


*	On April 1, 2014, the Company early adopted ASU 2014-08 and as such, the dispositions of Chisholm Place, Laurel Woods, Bear Creek and Berkshires on Brompton are not presented as part of discontinued operations. Discussion of property sales is included in Note 1 - Organization and Basis of Presentation of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of contents

Comparison of the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 to the six-month period ended June 30, 2013

(Same Property Portfolio)

Revenue

Rental Revenue

Rental revenue of the Same Property Portfolio increased for the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 in comparison to the same period of 2013. The increase in rental revenue is mainly attributable to increase in rental rates. Average monthly rental rates for the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 of $1,279 per apartment unit increased by 2.24% over the 2013 rental rates of $1,251 for the same period, contributing to an increase of approximately $710,000 in rental revenue. Average physical occupancy for the 2014 Same Property Portfolio was 95.90%, above the 2013 average of 95.62%, attributing to $28,000 increase in rental revenue. Market conditions remain stable in the majority of the submarkets in which the Company owns and operates apartments. Improving economic conditions and the continued strength in the apartment markets has allowed the Company to implement rent increases at properties in strong markets while maintaining occupancy and retaining high quality tenants throughout the portfolio.



	Same Property Portfolio
	Six months ended June 30,
	2014			2013			Increase/ (Decrease)		% Change
Rental
Market rent	$	34,105,187		$	33,395,407		$	709,780	2.13	%
Occupancy	(2,060,091		)	(2,087,691		)	27,600		1.32	%
Total Rental	$	32,045,096		$	31,307,716		$	737,380	2.36	%

Utility reimbursement and other revenue

Same Property Portfolio utility reimbursement and other revenue increased for the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, due primarily to increased utility reimbursements as a result of higher utility expenses for the applicable billing period, as the majority of utility expenses are billed back to tenants.

The table below breaks out the two major components of utility reimbursement and other revenue:



	Same Property Portfolio
	Six months ended June 30,
	2014		2013		Increase/ (Decrease)		% Change
Utility reimbursement and other
Utility reimbursement	$	1,520,803	$	1,439,760	$	81,043	5.63	%
Other	1,424,736		1,379,750		44,986		3.26	%
Total Utility reimbursement and other	$	2,945,539	$	2,819,510	$	126,029	4.47	%

Table of contents

Operating Expenses

Operating

Operating expenses increased during the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013. Utilities expenses were higher due to an unusually cold winter. Property-related G&A increased as a result of higher franchise taxes incurred at the Company's Texas properties, higher state income taxes at the Company's property located in Philadelphia and higher property-related legal expenses. The increase in operating expenses were also attributable to loss recognized on fixed assets that were replaced as a result of insurance-related events.

The following table breaks out the major components of operating expense:



	Same Property Portfolio
	Six months ended June 30,
	2014		2013			Increase/ (Decrease)			% Change
Operating
Payroll	$	3,067,546	$	3,065,884		$	1,662		0.05	%
Utilities	2,388,617		2,326,143			62,474			2.69	%
Insurance	655,890		666,960			(11,070		)	(1.66	)%
Property-related G&A	903,452		767,019			136,433			17.79	%
Leasing	308,154		295,738			12,416			4.20	%
Advertising	273,603		265,649			7,954			2.99	%
(Gain) loss on fixed assets replacement	15,837		(78,450		)	94,287			120.19	%
Other	32,497		36,012			(3,515		)	(9.76	)%
Total Operating	$	7,645,596	$	7,344,955		$	300,641		4.09	%

Maintenance

Maintenance expenses increased during the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of 2013, mainly due to increases in repairs and snow removal. Management continues to employ a proactive maintenance rehabilitation strategy at its apartment communities and considers the strategy an effective program that preserves, and in some cases, increases occupancy levels through improved consumer appeal of the apartment communities, from both an interior and exterior perspective.

The table below breaks out the major components of maintenance expense:



	Same Property Portfolio
	Six months ended June 30,
	2014		2013		Increase/ (Decrease)			% Change
Maintenance
Pool service	$	121,931	$	145,659	$	(23,728	)	(16.29	)%
Exterminating	67,701		63,507		4,194			6.60	%
Landscaping	312,924		295,356		17,568			5.95	%
Supplies	29,401		28,496		905			3.18	%
Cleaning	338,772		333,880		4,892			1.47	%
Snow removal	93,855		12,932		80,923			625.76	%
Painting	343,818		359,802		(15,984		)	(4.44	)%
Repairs	572,554		349,400		223,154			63.87	%
Other	290,977		260,728		30,249			11.60	%
Total Maintenance	$	2,171,933	$	1,849,760	$	322,173		17.42	%

Table of contents

Real Estate Taxes

Real estate taxes increased for the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 from the comparable period of 2013 primarily due to increases at Standard at Lenox Park and Estancia Townhomes. The Company continually scrutinizes the assessed values of its properties and participates in arbitration hearings or similar forums with the taxing authorities to appeal increases in assessed values that it considers to be unreasonable. The Company has been successful in achieving tax abatements for certain of its properties based on challenges made to the assessed values. Going forward, the Company anticipates a general upward trend in real estate tax expense as local and state taxing agencies continue to place significant reliance on property tax revenue.

Management Fees

Management fees of the Same Property Portfolio increased for the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 as a result of an increase in total revenue of the operating properties.

Non-Operating Expenses

Depreciation

Depreciation expense of the Same Property Portfolio decreased for the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period of the prior year. The decrease is a result of assets that have been fully depreciated, partially offset by the additions to the basis of fixed assets in the portfolio driven by normal recurring capital expenditures.

Interest, inclusive of amortization of deferred financing fees

Interest expense for the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 decreased over the comparable period of 2013 primarily due to lower interest rates for Berkshires of Columbia and Bridgewater mortgages as mortgages for both properties have been converted to variable interest rate debt, which was partially offset by the higher loan balance on Berkshires of Columbia and higher interest expenses incurred on the supplemental loan at Seasons of Laurel that closed in December 2013.

Amortization of acquired in-place leases and tenant relationships

Amortization of acquired in-place-leases and tenant relationships decreased during the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period in 2013. The decrease is related to the completion of amortization of the acquired-in-place lease and tenant relationships intangible assets recorded at acquisition and amortized over a 24-month period, which did not extend into the six-month period ended June 30, 2014.

Comparison of the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 to the six-month period ended June 30, 2013

(Total Property Portfolio)

In addition to the revenue and expense analysis discussed with respect to the Same Property Portfolio, changes in revenue, total operating expenses and non-operating expenses of the Total Property Portfolio for the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 are also due to the fluctuations in the actual properties owned during the comparative periods. Total revenue increased mainly due to revenue from Pavilion Townplace of approximately $1,480,000 and EON at Lindbergh of $1,578,000, which were acquired in the first quarter of 2014, in addition to increase in rental revenue of approximately $1,350,000 due to higher occupancy at 2020 Lawrence as the property was in lease-up period throughout 2013 after the construction was completed in the first quarter of 2013. The increase in total operating expenses was primarily attributable to acquisition costs related to Pavilion Townplace and EON at Lindbergh expensed pursuant to the guidance of ASC 805-10 and other operating expenses at the properties, in addition to increased incentive advisory fees. (Refer to Related Party Transactions on page 20 for further discussion.) Non-operating expenses increased mainly due to increased interest expenses incurred on the Credit Facility, loss on extinguishment debt for the properties sold during the six-month period ended June 30, 2014, and amortization of acquired in-place leases and tenant relationships of Pavilion Townplace and EON at Lindbergh.

Table of contents

Funds From Operations

The Company follows the revised definition of Funds from Operations (“FFO”) adopted by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”). Management considers FFO to be an appropriate measure of performance of an equity REIT. We calculate FFO by adjusting net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP, including non-recurring items), for gains (or losses) from sales of properties, impairments, real estate related depreciation and amortization, and adjustment for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Management believes that in order to facilitate a clear understanding of the historical operating results of the Company, FFO should be considered in conjunction with net income as presented in the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein. Management considers FFO to be a useful measure for reviewing the comparative operating and financial performance of the Company because, by excluding gains and losses related to sales of previously depreciated operating real estate assets and excluding real estate asset depreciation and amortization (which can vary among owners of identical assets in similar condition based on historical cost accounting and useful life estimates), FFO can help one compare the operating performance of a company’s real estate between periods or as compared to different companies.

The Company’s calculation of FFO may not be directly comparable to FFO reported by other REITs or similar real estate companies that have not adopted the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently. FFO is not a GAAP financial measure and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss), the most directly comparable financial measure of our performance calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, as an indication of our performance. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP and is not a measure of liquidity or an indicator of our ability to make cash distributions. We believe that to further understand our performance, FFO should be compared with our reported net income (loss) and considered in addition to cash flows in accordance with GAAP, as presented in our consolidated financial statements.

The following table presents a reconciliation of net income to FFO for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:



	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Net income	$	54,062,703		$	14,531,303		$	50,678,923		$	10,534,627
Add:
Depreciation of real property	6,339,996			5,615,658			11,796,977			11,175,225
Depreciation of real property included in results of discontinued operations	—			256,118			—			513,336
Amortization of acquired in-place leases and tenant relationships	745,203			—			745,203			5,377
Equity in loss of unconsolidated multifamily entities	—			855,136			—			1,631,103
Funds from operations of unconsolidated multifamily entities, net of impairments	(664,672		)	431,695			(286,435		)	800,396
Less:
Funds from operations of noncontrolling interest in properties	(289,667		)	(161,439		)	(517,050		)	(337,988		)
Gain on disposition of real estate assets	(49,519,992		)	(18,689,058		)	(49,519,992		)	(18,689,058		)
Equity in income of unconsolidated multifamily entities	(12,292,944		)	—			(12,975,436		)	—
Funds from Operations	$	(1,619,373	)	$	2,839,413		$	(77,810	)	$	5,633,018

FFO decreased for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013. The decrease in FFO is mainly attributable to the acquisition costs related to Pavilion Townplace and EON at Lindbergh expensed pursuant to the guidance of ASC 805-10, loss on extinguishment of debt for properties sold during the six-month period ended June 30, 2014, increased incentive advisory fee and increased interest expenses incurred on the Credit Facility. Further, the decrease in FFO is also attributable to the loss of operating income provided by assets that were sold in the second quarter of 2013, which were partially offset by higher net operating income from the balance of the portfolio driven by higher rents and added operations from the 2020 Lawrence Project, Pavilion Townplace and EON at Lindbergh.

Table of contents

Environmental Issues

There are no recorded amounts resulting from environmental liabilities because there are no known contingencies with respect to environmental liabilities. The Company obtains environmental audits, through various sources including lender evaluations and acquisition due diligence, for each of its properties at various intervals throughout a property's life. The Company has not been advised by any third party as to the existence of, nor has it identified on its own, any material liability for site restoration or other costs that may be incurred with respect to any of its properties. The Company re-evaluates potential environmental liabilities on an annual basis by reviewing the current properties in the portfolio at year end as the portfolio continues to change with the sale and acquisition of properties.

Inflation and Economic Conditions

Substantially all of the leases at our properties are for a term of one year or less, which enables the Company to seek increased rents for new leases or upon renewal of existing leases. These short-term leases minimize the potential adverse effect of inflation on rental income, although residents may leave without penalty at the end of their lease terms and may do so if rents are increased significantly.

During 2014, the multifamily sector has continued to exhibit improved performance and strong fundamentals on a national basis due to sustained higher rent levels and continued stable occupancies due to ongoing favorable apartment unit supply and demand mix. Continued reduced levels of new unit construction and home ownership rates in the apartment sector have driven demand in recent years to a 10-year low national vacancy rate. Improved capital markets have had a favorable impact on the sale of multifamily assets with transaction volumes reaching five-year highs in recent years.

As had been the case during the previous downturn in the economy, creditworthy borrowers in the multifamily sector continue to have access to capital through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and other sources, at favorable interest rates. There is no assurance that under existing or future regulatory restrictions this source of capital, unique to multifamily borrowers, will continue to be available.

The Company believes that projected demographic trends will continue to favor the multifamily sector, driven primarily by the overall population growth, decrease in homeownership and the continued flow of prime renters (those under 35 years old), the fastest growing segment of the population. The Company's properties are generally located in markets where zoning restrictions, scarcity of land and high construction costs create significant barriers to new development. The Company believes it is well positioned to manage its portfolio and to take advantage of current trends in the apartment sector to create value.

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The tables below provide information about the Company's financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates, specifically debt obligations.

The following tables present scheduled principal and interest payments and related weighted average interest rates by expected maturity dates for the Company's mortgage notes payable as of June 30, 2014.



	2014			2015			2016			2017			2018			Thereafter			Total
Fixed Rate Debt	$	25,293,460		$	59,246,068		$	64,538,723		$	41,580,747		$	16,353,167		$	252,196,910		$	459,209,075
Interest Payments (1)	24,087,094			21,188,502			19,582,773			16,007,102			14,395,057			86,977,441			182,237,969
Average Interest Rate(1)	5.38		%	5.39		%	5.36		%	5.32		%	5.23		%	5.17		%	5.38		%



	2014			2015			2016			2017			2018			Thereafter			Total
Variable Rate Debt	$	12,411,088		$	—		$	—		$	2,877,093		$	748,509		$	42,627,733		$	58,664,423
Interest Payments (1)	1,314,347			1,211,978			1,215,299			1,150,417			1,126,101			5,512,398			11,530,540
Average Interest Rate(1)	2.60		%	2.58		%	2.58		%	2.58		%	2.58		%	2.58		%	2.60		%

Table of contents


(1)	Interest payments represent amounts expected to be made on outstanding debt as of June 30, 2014. Average interest rate represents weighted average of stated interest rates on the mortgage debt as applied to the principal balance payable in the respective period.

The following table presents scheduled principal and interest payments and related stated interest rates by expected maturity dates for the note payable - other as of June 30, 2014.



	2014			2015			2016			2017			2018			Thereafter			Total
Fixed Rate Debt (1)	$	—		$	18,545		$	38,493		$	40,442		$	42,489		$	1,110,031		$	1,250,000
Interest Payments (3)	30,993			62,757			61,098			59,149			57,101			182,188			453,286
Average Interest Rate (2)(3)	5.00		%	5.00		%	5.00		%	5.00		%	5.00		%	5.00		%	5.00		%


(1)	Relates to the Colorado Energy Loan as described in Note 7 - Note Payable - Other of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


(2)	The Company's note payable - other is a fixed rate instrument; therefore, the Company's outstanding note payable - other is not sensitive to changes in the capital markets except upon maturity.


(3)	Interest payments represent amounts expected to be made on outstanding debt as of June 30, 2014. Average interest rate represents the stated interest rates on the note payable - other for the respective period.

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Based on their evaluation, as required by the Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b), the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) were effective as of June 30, 2014 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and were effective as of June 30, 2014 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of the Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2014, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Table of contents

Part II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

There were no material litigation developments during the quarter. See Note 15 - Legal Proceedings of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

Please read the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the SEC on March 31, 2014. As of June 30, 2014, there have been no material changes to the risk factors as presented therein. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our financial condition and/or operating results.

Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

- None

Item 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

- None

Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

- Not applicable

Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION

- None

Item 6. EXHIBITS


31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


32.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.

The following materials from Berkshire Income Realty, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Deficit, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



	BERKSHIRE INCOME REALTY, INC.
August 14, 2014	/s/ Charles B. Leitner III
	Charles B. Leitner III
	President and Principal Executive Officer



August 14, 2014	/s/ David E. Doherty
	David E. Doherty
	Senior Vice President and Principal Financial Officer