e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file
number: 1-4717
KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
427 West 12th Street
Kansas City, Missouri
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
|
|
44-0663509
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
64105
(Zip
Code)
|
816.983.1303
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
None
(Former name, former address and
former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Preferred Stock, Par Value $25 Per Share, 4%, Noncumulative
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Common Stock, $.01 Per Share Par Value
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Exchange
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of common stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant was $2.78 billion at
June 30, 2007. There were 77,122,045 shares of
$.01 par common stock outstanding at February 7, 2008.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Kansas City Southerns Definitive Proxy Statement for the
2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders which will be filed no later
than 120 days after December 31, 2007, is incorporated
by reference in Parts I and III.
KANSAS
CITY SOUTHERN
2007
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT
Table of
Contents
ii
COMPANY
OVERVIEW
Kansas City Southern, a Delaware corporation, is a holding
company with domestic and international rail operations in North
America that are strategically focused on the growing
north/south freight corridor connecting key commercial and
industrial markets in the central United States with major
industrial cities in Mexico. As used herein, KCS or
the Company may refer to Kansas City Southern or, as
the context requires, to one or more subsidiaries of Kansas City
Southern. KCS and its subsidiaries had approximately
6,485 employees on December 31, 2007. The Kansas City
Southern Railway Company (KCSR), which was founded
in 1887, is a U.S. Class I railroad. KCSR serves a
ten-state region in the midwest and southeast regions of the
United States and has the shortest north/south rail route
between Kansas City, Missouri and several key ports along the
Gulf of Mexico in Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas.
KCS controls and owns all of the stock of Kansas City Southern
de México, S.A de C.V. (KCSM). KCS previously
owned this stock through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Grupo
KCSM, S.A. de C.V. (Grupo KCSM), formerly known as
Grupo Transportación Ferroviaria Mexicana, S.A. de C.V., or
Grupo TFM. Effective May 8, 2007, Grupo KCSM was merged
into KCSM. Through its
50-year
Concession from the Mexican government (the
Concession), which will expire in 2047 unless extended,
KCSM operates a key commercial corridor of the Mexican railroad
system and has as its core route the most strategic portion of
the shortest, most direct rail passageway between Mexico City
and Laredo, Texas. KCSM serves most of Mexicos principal
industrial cities and three of its major seaports. KCSMs
rail lines provide exclusive rail access to the United States
and Mexico border crossing at Nuevo Laredo, Mexico, the largest
rail freight interchange point between the United States and
Mexico. Under the Concession, KCSM has the right to control and
operate the southern half of the rail bridge at Laredo, Texas,
which spans the Rio Grande River between the United States and
Mexico.
The Company wholly owns, directly and indirectly, through its
wholly-owned subsidiaries, Mexrail, Inc. (Mexrail)
which, in turn, wholly owns The Texas Mexican Railway Company
(Tex-Mex). Tex-Mex operates a
157-mile
rail line extending from Laredo, Texas to the port city of
Corpus Christi, Texas, which connects the operations of KCSR
with KCSM. Tex-Mex connects with KCSM at the United
States/Mexico border at Laredo, Texas, and connects to KCSR
through trackage rights at Beaumont, Texas. Through its
ownership of Mexrail, the Company owns the northern half of the
rail bridge at Laredo, Texas. Laredo is a principal
international gateway through which more than half of all rail
and truck traffic between the United States and Mexico
crosses the border. The Company also controls the southern half
of this bridge through its ownership of KCSM.
The KCS rail network (KCSR, KCSM and Tex-Mex) comprises
approximately 6,000 miles of main and branch lines
extending from the midwest and southeast portions of the United
States south into Mexico and connects with other Class I
railroads, providing shippers with an effective alternative to
other railroad routes and giving direct access to Mexico and the
southeast and southwest United States through less congested
interchange hubs.
Panama Canal Railway Company (PCRC), a joint venture
company owned equally by KCS and
Mi-Jack
Products, Inc. (Mi-Jack), was awarded a concession
from the Republic of Panama to reconstruct and operate the
Panama Canal Railway, a
47-mile
railroad located adjacent to the Panama Canal that provides
international container shipping companies with a railway
transportation option in lieu of the Panama Canal. The
concession was awarded in 1998 for an initial term of
25 years with an automatic renewal for an additional
25 year term. The Panama Canal Railway is a north-south
railroad traversing the Isthmus of Panama between the Atlantic
and Pacific Oceans. PCRCs subsidiary, Panarail Tourism
Company (Panarail), operates and promotes commuter
and tourist passenger service over the Panama Canal Railway.
Other subsidiaries and affiliates of KCS include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Meridian Speedway, LLC (MSLLC), a seventy-six
percent owned consolidated affiliate that owns the former KCSR
rail line between Meridian, Mississippi and Shreveport,
Louisiana, which is the portion of the KCSR rail line between
Dallas, Texas and Meridian known as the Meridian
Speedway. Norfolk
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
Southern Corporation (NS) through its wholly-owned
subsidiary, The Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company, owns
the remaining twenty-four percent of MSLLC. Ultimately KCS will
own seventy percent and NS will own thirty percent of MSLLC upon
the contribution of additional capital by NS to MSLLC or its
subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
|
|
PABTEX GP, LLC, a wholly-owned and consolidated owner of a bulk
materials handling facility with deep-water access to the Gulf
of Mexico at Port Arthur, Texas that stores and transfers
petroleum coke from rail cars to ships, primarily for export;
|
|
|
|
Trans-Serve, Inc. (doing business as Superior Tie and Timber), a
wholly-owned and consolidated operator of a railroad wood tie
treatment facility;
|
|
|
|
Transfin Insurance, Ltd., a wholly-owned and consolidated
captive insurance company, providing property, general liability
and certain other insurance coverage to KCS and its subsidiaries
and affiliates;
|
|
|
|
Southern Capital Corporation, LLC (Southern
Capital), a fifty percent owned unconsolidated affiliate
that leases locomotives and rail equipment; and
|
|
|
|
Ferrocarril y Terminal del Valle de México, S.A. de C.V.
(FTVM), a twenty-five percent owned unconsolidated
affiliate that provides railroad services as well as ancillary
services in the greater Mexico City area.
|
|
|
|
MARKETS SERVED
Chemical and petroleum. KCS transports chemical and petroleum products via tank and hopper cars to markets in the southeast and northeast United States and throughout Mexico through interchanges with other rail carriers. Primary traffic includes plastics, petroleum, oils, petroleum coke, rubber and miscellaneous chemicals.
Forest products and metals. KCS rail lines run through the heart of the southeast United States timber-producing region. The Company believes that forest products made from trees in this
|
|
2007 Revenues
Business Mix
|
region are generally less expensive than those from other
regions due to lower production costs. As a result, southern
yellow pine products from the southeast are increasingly being
used at the expense of western producers that have experienced
capacity reductions because of public policy considerations.
KCSR serves paper mills directly and indirectly through
short-line connections.
|
This product category includes metals and ores such as iron,
steel, zinc and copper. The majority of metals, minerals and
ores mined, and steel produced in Mexico are used for domestic
consumption. The volume of Mexican steel exports fluctuates
based on global market prices. Higher-end finished products such
as steel coils used by Mexican manufacturers in automobiles,
household appliances and other consumer goods are imported
through Nuevo Laredo and through the seaports served by
KCS rail lines. United States slab steel products are used
primarily in the manufacture of drill pipe for the oil industry.
Agriculture and minerals. Agriculture products
consist of grain, food and related products. Shipper demand for
agriculture products is affected by competition among sources of
grain and grain products, as well as price fluctuations in
international markets for key commodities. In the United States,
KCS rail lines receive and originate shipments of grain
and grain products for delivery to feed mills serving the
poultry industry. KCS currently serves feed mills along its rail
lines throughout Arkansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Louisiana,
Mississippi and Alabama. Through its marketing agreements, KCS
has access to sources of corn and other grain in Iowa and other
midwest states. United States export grain shipments and Mexico
import grain shipments include primarily corn, wheat, and
soybeans transported to Mexico via Laredo and to the Gulf of
2
Mexico for overseas destinations. Over the long term, export
grain shipments to Mexico are expected to increase as a result
of Mexicos reliance on grain imports. Food and related
products consist mainly of soybean meal, grain meal, oils,
canned goods, sugar and beer. Mineral shipments consist of a
variety of products including ores, clay, stone and cement.
Intermodal and automotive. The intermodal
freight business consists primarily of hauling freight
containers or truck trailers on behalf of steamship lines, motor
carriers, and intermodal marketing companies with rail carriers
serving as long-distance haulers. KCS serves and supports the
U.S. market, the Mexican market, as well as cross border
traffic between the U.S. and Mexico. In light of the
importance of trade between Asia and the U.S., the Company
believes the port of Lázaro Cárdenas continues to
become a strategically beneficial location for ocean carriers
and big box retailers as current capacity increases and future
capacity is developed. The Asia/U.S. commerce is handled
through the port of Lázaro Cárdenas in conjunction
with cross border movement on the KCS rail network. The
automotive business consists primarily of moving parts to
assembly plants and finished vehicles to distribution centers
for market consumption in North and South America.
Coal. KCS hauls unit trains of coal for nine
electric generating plants in the central United States from the
Powder River Basin in Wyoming. Coal mined in the midwest United
States is transported in
non-unit
trains to industrial consumers such as paper mills and cement
companies.
GOVERNMENT
REGULATION
The Companys United States operations are subject to
federal, state and local laws and regulations generally
applicable to all businesses. Rail operations are also subject
to the regulatory jurisdiction of the Surface Transportation
Board (STB) of the U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), the Federal Railroad
Administration of the DOT, the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), as well as other federal and
state regulatory agencies. The STB has jurisdiction over
disputes and complaints involving certain rates, routes and
services, the sale or abandonment of rail lines, applications
for line extensions and construction, and consolidation or
merger with, or acquisition of control of, rail common carriers.
DOT and OSHA each has jurisdiction under several federal
statutes over a number of safety and health aspects of rail
operations, including the transportation of hazardous materials.
State agencies regulate some aspects of rail operations with
respect to health and safety in areas not otherwise regulated by
federal law.
KCS subsidiaries, as well as its competitors, are subject
to extensive federal, state and local environmental regulations.
These laws cover discharges to water, air emissions, toxic
substances, and the generation, handling, storage,
transportation and disposal of waste and hazardous materials.
These regulations have the effect of increasing the costs, risks
and liabilities associated with rail operations. Environmental
risks are also inherent in rail operations, which frequently
involve transporting chemicals and other hazardous materials.
Primary regulatory jurisdiction for the Companys Mexican
operations is overseen by the Secretary of Communications and
Transportation (SCT). The SCT establishes
regulations concerning railway safety and operations, and is
responsible for resolving disputes between railways and between
railways and customers. In addition, KCSM must register its
maximum rates with the SCT and make regular reports to the SCT
on investment and traffic volumes. See Note 1 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K
Description of the Business The KCSM
Concession.
The Mexican operations are subject to Mexican federal and state
laws and regulations relating to the protection of the
environment through the establishment of standards for water
discharge, water supply, emissions, noise pollution, hazardous
substances and transportation and handling of hazardous and
solid waste. The Mexican government may bring administrative and
criminal proceedings and impose economic sanctions against
companies that violate environmental laws, and temporarily or
even permanently close non-complying facilities.
Noncompliance with applicable legal provisions may result in the
imposition of fines, temporary or permanent shutdown of
operations or other injunctive relief, criminal prosecution or
the termination of the Concession. KCS believes that all
facilities which it operates are in substantial compliance with
applicable
3
environmental laws, regulations and agency agreements. There are
currently no material legal or administrative proceedings
pending against the Company with respect to any environmental
matters and management does not believe that continued
compliance with environmental laws will have any material
adverse effect on the Companys financial condition. KCS
cannot predict the effect, if any, that unidentified
environmental matters or the adoption of additional or more
stringent environmental laws and regulations would have on the
Companys results of operations, cash flows or financial
condition.
COMPETITION
The Company competes against other railroads, many of which are
much larger and have significantly greater financial and other
resources. Since 1994, there has been significant consolidation
among major North American rail carriers. As a result, the
railroad industry is now dominated by a few very large carriers.
The larger western railroads (BNSF Railway Company and Union
Pacific Railroad Company), in particular, are significant
competitors of KCS because of their substantial resources. The
ongoing impact of past and future rail consolidation is
uncertain. However, KCS believes that its investments and
strategic alliances continue to competitively position the
Company to attract additional rail traffic throughout its rail
network.
In November 2005, Ferrocarril Mexicano, S.A. de C.V.
(Ferromex) acquired control of and merged with
Ferrocarril del Sureste, S.A. de C.V. (Ferrosur),
creating Mexicos largest railway. These merged operations
are much larger than KCSM, and they serve most of the major
ports and cities in Mexico and together own fifty percent of
FTVM, which serves industries located within Mexico City. The
merger between Ferromex and Ferrosur has been declared illegal
by the Comisión Federal de Competencia (Mexican
Antitrust Commission, or COFECO). Both Ferromex and
Ferrosur have challenged this ruling.
The Company is subject to competition from motor carriers, barge
lines and other maritime shipping, which compete across certain
routes in KCS operating areas. In the past, truck carriers
have generally eroded the railroad industrys share of
total transportation revenues. Intermodal traffic and certain
other traffic face highly price sensitive competition,
particularly from motor carriers. However, rail carriers,
including KCS, have placed an emphasis on competing in the
intermodal marketplace and working with motor carriers to
provide end-to-end transportation of products.
While deregulation of U.S. freight rates has enhanced the
ability of railroads to compete with each other and with
alternative modes of transportation, this increased competition
has generally resulted in downward pressure on freight rates.
Competition with other railroads and other modes of
transportation is generally based on the rates charged, the
quality and reliability of the service provided and the quality
of the carriers equipment for certain commodities.
EMPLOYEES
AND LABOR RELATIONS
Labor relations in the U.S. railroad industry are subject
to extensive governmental regulation under the Railway Labor Act
(RLA). Under the RLA, national labor agreements are
renegotiated on an industry-wide scale when they become open for
modification, but their terms remain in effect until new
agreements are reached or the Railway Labor Acts
procedures (which include mediation, cooling-off periods, and
the possibility of Presidential intervention) are exhausted.
Contract negotiations with the various unions generally take
place over an extended period of time and the Company rarely
experiences work stoppages during negotiations. Wages, health
and welfare benefits, work rules and other issues have
traditionally been addressed during these negotiations.
Approximately 80% of KCSR employees are covered by various
collective bargaining agreements. KCSR participates in
industry-wide bargaining as a member of the National
Carriers Conference Committee. A negotiating process for
new, major collective bargaining agreements covering all of
KCSRs union employees has been underway since the
bargaining round was initiated on November 1, 2004. Long
term settlement agreements have been reached during 2007
covering approximately 60% of KCSRs unionized work force
through January 1, 2010. The settlements have not had a
material impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements. Negotiations continue with the two remaining unions
representing the remaining KCSR union employees and are expected
to conclude in 2008 under similar terms to the 2007 settlements.
We do not
4
believe that the expected settlements in 2008 will have a
material impact to the consolidated financial statements.
KCSM union employees are covered by one labor agreement, which
was signed on June 23, 1997 between KCSM and the Sindicato
de Trabajadores Ferrocarrileros de la República Mexicana
(Mexican Railroad Union), for a term of 50 years, for the
purpose of regulating the relationship between the parties and
improving conditions for the union employees. Approximately 80%
of KCSM employees are covered by this labor agreement. The
compensation terms under this labor agreement are subject to
renegotiation on an annual basis and all other terms are
renegotiated every two years. Compensation terms and other
benefits are currently being renegotiated and KCSM expects to
finalize these terms during the first quarter of 2008. The union
labor negotiation with the Mexican Railroad Union has not
historically resulted in any strike, boycott, or other
disruption in KCSMs business operations. KCSM anticipates
that the expected settlements in 2008 will not have a material
impact to the consolidated financial statements.
The response to Item 101 of
Regulation S-K
under Part II Item 7 of this
Form 10-K,
and the responses under Note 1 and Note 11 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K
are incorporated by reference in partial response to this
Item 1. Refer to Item 2, Properties, for
further discussion of the Companys business.
RAIL
SECURITY
The Company and its rail subsidiaries have made a concentrated,
multi-disciplinary effort since the terrorist attacks on the
United States on September 11, 2001, to continue securing
the Companys assets and personnel against the risk of
terrorism and other homeland security incidents. Many of the
specific measures the Company utilizes for these efforts are
required to be kept confidential through arrangements with
government agencies, such as the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS), or through jointly-developed and implemented
strategies and plans with connecting carriers. To protect the
confidentiality and sensitivity of the efforts the Company has
made to safeguard against terrorism and other security
incidents, the following paragraphs will provide only a general
overview of some of these efforts. KCSR utilizes a security plan
based on an industry-wide security plan developed by Association
of American Railroads (AAR) members which focuses on
comprehensive risk assessments in five areas
hazardous materials; train operations; critical physical assets;
military traffic; and information technology and communications.
The security plan is kept confidential, with access to the plan
tightly limited to members of management with direct security
and anti-terrorism implementation responsibilities. KCSR
participates with other AAR members in periodic drills under the
industry plan to test and refine its various provisions.
KCSRs security activities range from annually mailing each
employee a security awareness brochure to its ongoing
development and implementation of security plans for rail
facilities in areas labeled by the DHS as High Threat Urban
Areas (HTUAs). KCSRs other activities to
bolster security against terrorism include, but are not limited
to, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Conferring regularly with other railroads security
personnel and with industry experts on security issues;
|
|
|
|
Analyzing routing alternatives and other strategies to reduce
the distances that certain chemicals which might be toxic if
inhaled are transported;
|
|
|
|
Initiating a series of over 20 voluntary action items agreed to
between AAR and DHS as enhancing security in the rail
industry; and
|
|
|
|
Including periodic security training as part of the scheduled
training for operating employees and managers.
|
In addition, the Company recently created a new leadership role
titled Director of Homeland Security to oversee the
ongoing and increasingly complex security efforts of the Company
in both the United States and Mexico. The Company identified and
retained an individual to fill the position who has an extensive
law enforcement background, including being formerly employed as
an analyst with the Federal Bureau of
5
Investigation (FBI) for the past 12 years. This
member of management remains a member of the FBIs Joint
Terrorism Task Force and is a valuable asset to the Company in
implementing and developing anti-terrorism and other security
initiatives.
During 2008, KCSR intends to work toward implementation of
DHSs Transport Worker Identification Card program for
those employees requiring unescorted access to secure areas of
port facilities, and toward implementation of a contractor
background check program for contractor employees having access
to certain Company facilities.
AVAILABLE
INFORMATION
KCS website (www.kcsouthern.com) provides at no cost
KCS Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
and Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
and amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably
practicable after electronic filing of these reports with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, KCS
corporate governance guidelines, ethics and legal compliance
policy, and the charters of the Audit Committee, the Finance
Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and
the Compensation and Organization Committee of the Board of
Directors are available on KCS website. These guidelines,
policies and charters are available in print without charge to
any stockholder requesting them. Written requests may be made to
the Corporate Secretary, P.O. Box 219335, Kansas City,
Missouri
64121-9335
(or if by express delivery to 427 West 12th Street,
Kansas City, Missouri 64105).
Risks
Related to an Investment in KCS Common Stock
The
price of KCS common stock may fluctuate significantly,
which may make it difficult for investors to resell common stock
when they want to or at prices they find
attractive.
The price of KCS common stock on the New York Stock
Exchange (NYSE), listed under the ticker symbol
KSU, constantly changes. The Company expects that
the market price of its common stock will continue to fluctuate.
The Companys stock price can fluctuate as a result of a
variety of factors, many of which are beyond KCS control.
These factors include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
quarterly variations in operating results;
|
|
|
|
operating results that vary from the expectations of management,
securities analysts, ratings agencies and investors;
|
|
|
|
changes in expectations as to future financial performance,
including financial estimates by securities analysts, ratings
agencies and investors;
|
|
|
|
developments generally affecting the railroad industry;
|
|
|
|
announcements by KCS or its competitors of significant
contracts, acquisitions, joint marketing relationships, joint
ventures or capital commitments;
|
|
|
|
the assertion or resolution of significant claims or proceedings
against KCS;
|
|
|
|
KCS dividend policy and restrictions on the payment of
dividends;
|
|
|
|
future sales of KCS equity or equity-linked securities;
|
|
|
|
the issuance of common stock in payment of dividends on
preferred stock or upon conversion of preferred stock; and
|
|
|
|
general domestic and international economic conditions.
|
6
In addition, from time to time the stock market in general has
experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to
the operating performance of a particular company. These broad
market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of
KCS common stock.
KCS
ability to pay cash dividends on its common stock is currently
restricted, and KCS does not anticipate paying cash dividends on
its common stock in the foreseeable future.
KCS has agreed, and may agree in the future, to restrictions on
its ability to pay cash dividends on its common stock. In
addition, to maintain its credit ratings, the Company may be
limited in its ability to pay cash dividends on its common stock
so that it can maintain an appropriate level of debt. During the
first quarter of 2000, the Board of Directors suspended common
stock dividends. KCS does not anticipate making any cash
dividend payments to its common stockholders for the foreseeable
future.
Holders
of the Series C Preferred Stock and Series D Preferred
Stock may have special voting rights if KCS fails to pay
dividends on that preferred stock over a stated number of
quarters.
Because of certain restrictions in the indentures governing
notes issued by KCSR, KCS did not pay dividends on its
Series C Preferred Stock or Series D Preferred Stock
commencing on May 15, 2006, for the first quarter of 2006,
until those dividend arrearages were made up in February 2007.
If dividends on the Series C Preferred Stock or
Series D Preferred Stock are in arrears for six consecutive
quarters (or an equivalent number of days in the aggregate,
whether or not consecutive) holders of the Series C
Preferred Stock or Series D Preferred Stock, as applicable,
will be entitled to elect two of the authorized number of
directors at the next annual stockholders meeting at which
directors are elected and at each subsequent stockholders
meeting until such time as all accumulated dividends are paid on
the Series C Preferred Stock or Series D Preferred
Stock, as applicable, or set aside for payment. In addition, KCS
will not be eligible to register future offerings of securities
on
Form S-3
or to avail itself of the other benefits available to companies
that qualify as well-known seasoned issuers under
SEC rules if KCS fails to pay dividends on its preferred stock.
If that happens it could adversely affect KCS ability to
access capital markets, and increase the cost of accessing
capital markets, until the Company again qualifies as a
well-known seasoned issuer.
Sales
of substantial amounts of KCS common stock in the public
market could adversely affect the prevailing market price of the
common stock.
As of December 31, 2007, there were 10,284,625 shares
of common stock issued or reserved for issuance under the 1991
Amended and Restated Stock Option and Performance Award Plan and
the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 2,087,602 shares of
common stock held by executive officers and directors outside
those plans, and 20,389,113 shares of common stock reserved
for issuance upon conversion of the outstanding shares of
convertible preferred stock. Sales of common stock by employees
upon exercise of their options, sales by executive officers and
directors subject to compliance with Rule 144 under the
Securities Act, and sales of common stock that may be issued
upon conversion of the outstanding preferred stock, or the
perception that such sales could occur, may adversely affect the
market price of KCS common stock.
KCS
has provisions in its charter, bylaws and Rights Agreement that
could deter, delay or prevent a third party from acquiring a
controlling interest in KCS and that could deprive an investor
of an opportunity to obtain a takeover premium for shares of
KCS common stock.
KCS has provisions in its charter and bylaws that may delay or
prevent unsolicited takeover bids from third parties. These
provisions may deprive KCS stockholders of an opportunity
to sell their shares at a premium over prevailing market prices.
For example, the restated certificate of incorporation provides
for a classified Board of Directors. It further provides that
the vote of 70% of the shares entitled to vote in the election
of directors is required to amend the restated certificate of
incorporation to increase the number of directors to more than
eighteen, abolish cumulative voting for directors and abolish
the classification of the board. The same vote requirement is
imposed by the restated certificate of incorporation on certain
transactions involving mergers, consolidations, sales or leases
of assets with or to certain owners of more than 5% of KCS
outstanding stock entitled to vote in the election of directors.
The bylaws provide that a stockholder must give
7
the Company advance written notice of its intent to nominate a
director or raise a matter at an annual meeting. In addition,
the Company has adopted a Rights Agreement which under certain
circumstances would significantly impair the ability of third
parties to acquire control of KCS without prior approval of the
Board of Directors.
Risks
Related to KCS Business
KCS
competes against other railroads and other transportation
providers.
The Companys domestic and international operations are
subject to competition from other railroads, in particular the
Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) and BNSF Railway
Company (BNSF) in the United States and
Ferromex in Mexico. Many of KCS rail competitors are much
larger and have significantly greater financial and other
resources than KCS. In addition, the Company is subject to
competition from truck carriers and from barge lines and other
maritime shipping. Increased competition could result in
downward pressure on freight rates. Competition with other
railroads and other modes of transportation is generally based
on the rates charged, the quality and reliability of the service
provided and the quality of the carriers equipment for
certain commodities. While KCS must build or acquire and
maintain its infrastructure, truck carriers, maritime shippers
and barges are able to use public rights-of-way. The trucking
industry provides rate and service competition to the railroad
industry. Trucking requires substantially smaller capital
investment and maintenance expenditures than railroads and
allows for more frequent and flexible scheduling. Continuing
competitive pressures, any reduction in margins due to
competitive pressures, future improvements that increase the
quality of alternative modes of transportation in the locations
in which the Company operates, or legislation or regulations
that provide motor carriers with additional advantages, such as
increased size of vehicles and reduced weight restrictions,
could have a material adverse effect on results of operations,
financial condition and liquidity.
A central part of KCS growth strategy is based upon the
conversion of truck traffic to rail. There can be no assurance
the Company will have the ability to convert traffic from truck
to rail transport or that the customers already converted will
be retained. If the railroad industry in general, and the
Mexican operations in particular, are unable to preserve their
competitive advantages vis-à-vis the trucking industry,
projected revenue growth from the Mexican operations could be
adversely affected. Additionally, the revenue growth
attributable to the Mexican operations could be affected by,
among other factors, KCS inability to grow its existing
customer base and capture additional cargo transport market
share because of competition from the shipping industry and
other railroads.
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)
called for Mexican trucks to have unrestricted access to
highways in United States border states by 1995 and full access
to all United States highways by January 2000. However, the
United States did not follow that timetable because of concerns
over Mexicos trucking safety standards. In February 2001,
a NAFTA tribunal ruled in arbitration between the United States
and Mexico that the United States must allow Mexican trucks to
cross the border and operate on United States highways. On
March 14, 2002, as part of its agreement under NAFTA, the
U.S. Department of Transportation issued safety rules that
allow Mexican truckers to apply for operating authority to
transport goods beyond the
20-mile
commercial zones along the United States-Mexico border. These
safety rules require Mexican motor carriers seeking to operate
in the United States to, among other things, pass safety
inspections, obtain valid insurance with a United States
registered insurance company, conduct alcohol and drug testing
for drivers and obtain a U.S. Department of Transportation
identification number. Under the rules issued by the
U.S. Department of Transportation, it was expected that the
border would have been opened to Mexican motor carriers in 2002.
However, in January 2003, in response to a lawsuit filed in May
2002 by a coalition of environmental, consumer and labor groups,
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a
ruling which held that the rules issued by the
U.S. Department of Transportation violated federal
environmental laws because the Department of Transportation
failed to adequately review the impact on United States air
quality of rules allowing Mexican carriers to transport beyond
the 20-mile
commercial zones along the United States-Mexico border. The
Court of Appeals ruling required the Department of
Transportation to provide an Environmental Impact Statement on
the Mexican truck plan and to certify compliance with the United
States Clean Air Act. The Department of Transportation requested
the United States Supreme Court to review the Court of Appeals
8
ruling and, on December 15, 2003, the Supreme Court granted
the Department of Transportations request. On June 7,
2004, the Supreme Court unanimously overturned the Court of
Appeals ruling. The Department of Transportation is in the midst
of a pilot program which commenced in early 2007 granting a
limited number of Mexican trucking companies the right to
operate on international movements between the
United States and Mexico and to pick up or deliver outside
of the border commercial zone. There can be no assurance that
truck transport between Mexico and the United States will not
increase substantially in the future. Any such increase in truck
traffic could affect KCS ability to continue converting
traffic to rail from truck transport because it may result in an
expansion in the availability, or an improvement in the quality,
of the trucking services offered by Mexican carriers.
Through KCSMs Concession from the Mexican government, the
Company has the right to control and operate the southern half
of the rail-bridge at Laredo, Texas. Under the Concession, KCSM
must grant to Ferromex the right to operate over a north-south
portion of KCSMs rail lines between Ramos Arizpe near
Monterrey and the city of Queretaro that constitutes over 600
kilometers (360 miles) of KCSMs main track. Using
these trackage rights, Ferromex may be able to compete with KCSM
over KCSMs rail lines for traffic between Mexico City and
the United States. The Concession also requires KCSM to grant
rights to use certain portions of its tracks to Ferrosur and the
belt railroad operated in the greater Mexico City
area by FTVM, thereby providing Ferrosur with more efficient
access to certain Mexico City industries. As a result of having
to grant trackage rights to other railroads, KCSM loses the
capacity of using a portion of its tracks at all times.
Ferromex, the operator of the largest railway system in Mexico,
is in close proximity to KCSMs rail lines. KCSM has
experienced and continues to experience competition from
Ferromex with respect to the transport of a variety of products.
The rail lines operated by Ferromex run from Guadalajara and
Mexico City to four United States border crossings west of the
Nuevo Laredo-Laredo crossing, providing an alternative to
KCSMs routes for the transport of freight from those
cities to the United States border. In addition, Ferromex
directly competes with KCSM in some areas of its service
territory, including Tampico, Saltillo, Monterrey, and Mexico
City. Ferrosur competes directly with KCSM for traffic to and
from southeastern Mexico. Ferrosur, like KCSM, also services
Mexico City and Puebla.
In November 2005, Grupo México, the controlling shareholder
of Ferromex, acquired all of the shares of Ferrosur. The common
control of Ferromex and Ferrosur would give Grupo México
control over a nationwide railway system in Mexico and ownership
of 50% of the shares of FTVM. The merger between Ferromex and
Ferrosur has been declared illegal by the Mexican Antitrust
Commission. Both Ferromex and Ferrosur have challenged this
ruling. There can be no assurance as to whether Grupo
México will be successful in challenging this ruling. If
Grupo México is successful in its appeal, KCSMs
competitive position may be materially harmed.
On August 3, 2006, COFECO announced an investigation into
possible antitrust practices in the provision of rail cargo
services. The targets of that investigation have not been
identified, and while KCSM may be required to provide
information in connection with the investigation, the Company
does not believe KCSMs operations are the subject of the
inquiry, however there can be no assurance KCSM is not or will
not become a subject of the inquiry.
Rate reductions by competitors could make KCS freight
services less competitive and KCS cannot assure that it would
always be able to match these rate reductions. In recent years,
KCS has experienced aggressive price competition from Ferromex
in freight rates for agriculture products, which has adversely
affected results of operations. KCS ability to respond to
competitive pressures by decreasing rates without adversely
affecting gross margins and operating results will depend on,
among other things, the ability to reduce operating costs.
KCS failure to respond to competitive pressures, and
particularly rate competition, in a timely manner could have a
material adverse effect on the Companys results of
operation and financial condition.
In recent years, there has also been significant consolidation
among major North American rail carriers. The resulting merged
railroads could attempt to use their size and pricing power to
block other railroads access to efficient gateways and
routing options that are currently and have been historically
available. There
9
can be no assurance that further consolidation in the railroad
industry, whether in the United States or Mexico, will not have
an adverse effect on operations.
KCS
business strategy, operations and growth rely significantly on
agreements with other railroads and third parties.
Operation of KCS rail network and its plans for growth and
expansion rely significantly on agreements with other railroads
and third parties, including joint ventures and other strategic
alliances. KCS operations are dependent on interchange,
trackage rights, haulage rights and marketing agreements with
other railroads and third parties that enable KCS to exchange
traffic and utilize trackage the Company does not own. KCS
ability to provide comprehensive rail service to its customers
depends in large part upon its ability to maintain these
agreements with other railroads and third parties. The
termination of, or the failure to renew, these agreements could
adversely affect KCS business, financial condition and
results of operations. KCS is also dependent in part upon the
financial health and efficient performance of other railroads.
For example, some of KCSRs traffic moves over the
UPs lines via trackage rights, a significant portion of
KCSRs grain shipments originate with another rail carrier
pursuant to marketing agreements with that carrier, and BNSF is
KCS largest partner in the interchange of rail traffic.
There can be no assurance that KCS will not be materially
adversely affected by operational or financial difficulties of
other railroads.
Pursuant to the Concession, KCSM is required to grant rights to
Ferromex, Ferrosur, and FTVM to use portions of KCSMs
tracks. Applicable law stipulates that Ferromex, Ferrosur and
FTVM are required to grant to KCSM rights to use portions of
their tracks. KCSMs Concession classifies trackage rights
as short trackage rights and long-distance trackage rights.
Although all of these trackage rights have been granted under
the Concession, no railroad has actually operated under the
long-distance trackage rights because the means of setting rates
for usage and often related terms of usage have not been agreed
upon. Under the Mexican Railroad Services Law and regulations,
the rates KCSM may charge for the right to use its tracks must
be agreed upon in writing between KCSM and the party to which
those rights are granted. However, if KCSM cannot reach an
agreement on rates with rail carriers entitled to trackage
rights on KCSMs rail lines, the SCT is entitled to set the
rates in accordance with Mexican law and regulation, which rates
may not adequately compensate KCSM. KCSM has not been able to
reach an agreement with Ferromex regarding the rates to be
charged for trackage rights, interline services and haulage
rights. KCSM and Ferromex are involved in judicial, civil and
commercial litigation and administrative proceedings over the
amounts payable to each other for interline services, haulage
and trackage rights. Some of those disputes continue under
litigation and therefore are pending final resolution. Any
resolution of such procedures adverse to KCSM could have a
negative impact on its business and operations. In March 2002,
the SCT issued a ruling setting the rates for trackage and
haulage rights. In August 2002, the SCT issued a ruling setting
the rates for interline and terminal services. KCSM and Ferromex
appealed both rulings. Following trial and appellate court
decisions, the Mexican Supreme Court in February 2006, in a
ruling from the bench, sustained KCSMs appeal of the
SCTs trackage and haulage rights ruling, vacating the SCT
ruling and ordering the SCT to issue a new ruling consistent
with the Courts decision. KCSM has not yet received the
written opinion of the Mexican Supreme Court decision, nor has
the Mexican Supreme Court decided the interline and terminal
services appeal. In October 2006, KCSM was served with a claim
by Ferromex, in which Ferromex asked for information concerning
the interline traffic between KCSM and Ferromex, from January
2002 to December 2004. The 29th Civil Court issued an order
directing KCSM to allow Ferromex to review certain account logs.
KCSM appealed such order to the 1st Civil District Court
and is awaiting a decision. KCSM expects this litigation to
continue over the next few years. The Company believes that,
based on its assessment of the facts in this case, there will be
no material impact to the consolidated financial statements.
KCSM and Ferromex are parties to various civil cases involving
disputes over the application and proper interpretation of the
mandatory trackage rights. In August 2002, the SCT issued
rulings determining Ferromexs trackage rights in
Monterrey, Nuevo León. KCSM and Ferromex both appealed the
SCTs rulings. At the Mexican Administrative Federal Court
level, KCSM obtained what it believed were favorable rulings in
April 2005. Ferromex appealed these rulings and the case was
returned to the Mexican Administrative Federal Court. The
Mexican Administrative Federal Court issued a ruling on
June 11, 2007, which was served on
10
KCSM on August 8, 2007. In the ruling, the Mexican
Administrative Federal Court reversed the earlier favorable
ruling and decided that Ferromex could use certain auxiliary
tracks awarded to KCSM in its Concession. KCSM appealed this
ruling at the beginning of September 2007, arguing that the
Mexican Administrative Federal Court wrongly failed to consider
the earlier favorable decision in making its revised ruling and
also failed to consider the length and limits of the trackage
rights included in KCSMs Concession Title. The Company
believes that based on its assessment of the facts in this case,
there will be no material impact to the consolidated financial
statements.
KCS
debt capitalization ratio (total debt as a percentage of total
debt plus equity) is 50.4%. KCS leverage could adversely
affect its ability to fulfill obligations under various debt
instruments and operate its business.
KCS level of debt could make it more difficult for it to
borrow money in the future, may reduce the amount of money
available to finance operations and other business activities,
exposes the Company to the risk of increased interest rates,
makes it more vulnerable to general economic downturns and
adverse industry conditions, and could reduce flexibility in
planning for, or responding to, changing business and economic
conditions. KCS failure to comply with the financial and
other restrictive covenants in its debt instruments, which,
among other things, require KCS to maintain specified financial
ratios and limit its ability to incur debt and sell assets,
could result in an event of default that, if not cured or
waived, could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys business or prospects. If the Company does not
have enough cash to service its debt, meet other obligations and
fund other liquidity needs, KCS may be required to take actions
such as requesting a waiver from lenders, reducing or delaying
capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring or
refinancing all or part of the existing debt, or seeking
additional equity capital. KCS cannot assure that any of these
remedies can be affected on commercially reasonable terms or at
all. In addition, the terms of existing or future debt
agreements may restrict the Company from adopting some of these
alternatives.
The indebtedness of KCSM exposes it to risks of exchange rate
fluctuations because any devaluation of the peso would cause the
cost of KCSMs dollar-denominated debt to increase and
could place the Company at a competitive disadvantage in Mexico,
compared to Mexican competitors that have less debt and greater
operating and financing flexibility than KCSM does.
KCS
business is capital intensive.
The Companys business is capital intensive and requires
substantial ongoing expenditures for, among other things,
additions and improvements to roadway, structures and
technology, acquisitions, and maintenance and repair of
equipment and the rail system. KCS failure to make
necessary capital expenditures to maintain its operations could
impair its ability to serve existing customers or accommodate
increases in traffic volumes.
KCS has funded, and expects to continue to fund, capital
expenditures with funds from operating cash flows, equipment
leases, debt financing and, to a lesser extent, vendor
financing. KCS may not be able to generate sufficient cash flows
from its operations or obtain sufficient funds from external
sources to fund capital expenditure requirements. Even if
financing is available, it may not be obtainable on acceptable
terms and within the limitations contained in the indentures and
other agreements relating to KCS debt.
KCSMs Concession from the Mexican government requires KCSM
to make investments and undertake capital projects. If KCSM
fails to make such capital investments, KCSMs business
plan commitments with the Mexican government may be at risk,
requiring KCSM to seek waivers of its business plan. There is no
assurance that such waivers, if requested, would be granted by
the SCT. KCSM may defer capital expenditures under its business
plan with the permission of the SCT. However, the SCT might not
grant this permission, and any failure by KCSM to comply with
the capital investment commitments in its business plan could
result in sanctions imposed by the SCT, and could result in
revocation of the Concession if sanctions are imposed on five
distinct occasions. The Company cannot assure that the Mexican
government would grant any such permission or waiver. If such
permission or waiver is not obtained in any instance and KCSM is
sanctioned, its Concession might be at risk of revocation, which
would materially adversely affect KCS financial
11
condition and results of operations. See KCSMs
Mexican Concession is subject to revocation or termination in
certain circumstances below.
KCS
business may be adversely affected by changes in general
economic, weather or other conditions.
KCS operations may be adversely affected by changes in the
economic conditions of the industries and geographic areas that
produce and consume the freight that KCS transports. The
relative strength or weakness of the United States and Mexican
economies affect the businesses served by KCS. PCRC and Panarail
are directly affected by the Panamanian local economy and
trans-Pacific trade flows. KCS investments in Mexico and
Panama expose the Company to risks associated with operating in
Mexico and Panama, including, among others, cultural
differences, varying labor, regulatory and operating practices,
political risk and differences between the United States,
Mexican and Panamanian economies. Historically, a stronger
economy has resulted in improved results for KCS rail
transportation operations. Conversely, when the economy has
slowed, results have been less favorable. If an economic
slowdown or recession occurs in key markets, the volume of rail
shipments is likely to be reduced, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
The Companys operations may also be affected by natural
disasters or adverse weather conditions. The Company operates in
and along the Gulf Coast of the United States, and its
facilities may be adversely affected by hurricanes, floods and
other extreme weather conditions. For example, hurricanes have
adversely affected some of the Companys shippers located
along the Gulf Coast and caused interruptions in the flow of
traffic within the southern United States and between the United
States and Mexico. As another example, a weak harvest in the
midwest may substantially reduce the volume of business handled
for agricultural products customers. Many of the goods and
commodities transported experience cyclical demand. KCS
results of operations can be expected to reflect this cyclical
demand because of the significant fixed costs inherent in
railroad operations. Significant reductions in the volume of
rail shipments due to economic, weather, or other conditions
could have a material adverse effect on KCS business,
financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
The transportation industry is highly cyclical, generally
tracking the cycles of the world economy. Although
transportation markets are affected by general economic
conditions, there are numerous specific factors within each
particular market segment that may influence operating results.
Some of KCS customers do business in industries that are
highly cyclical, including the oil and gas, automotive, housing
and agriculture industries. Any downturn in these industries
could have a material adverse effect on operating results. Also,
some of the products transported have had a historical pattern
of price cyclicality which has typically been influenced by the
general economic environment and by industry capacity and
demand. For example, global steel and petrochemical prices have
decreased in the past. KCS cannot assure that prices and demand
for these products will not decline in the future, adversely
affecting those industries and, in turn, the Companys
financial condition or results.
KCS
business is subject to regulation by international, federal,
state and local regulatory agencies. KCS failure to comply
with these regulations could have a material adverse effect on
its operations.
KCS is subject to governmental regulation by international,
federal, state and local regulatory agencies with respect to its
railroad operations, as well as a variety of health, safety,
labor, environmental, and other matters. Government regulation
of the railroad industry is a significant determinant of the
competitiveness and profitability of railroads. KCS
failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could
have a material adverse effect on operations, including
limitations on operating activities until compliance with
applicable requirements is achieved. These government agencies
may change the legislative or regulatory framework within which
the Company operates without providing any recourse for any
adverse effects on its business that occur as a result of such
change. Additionally, some of the regulations require KCS to
obtain and maintain various licenses, permits and other
authorizations. Any failure to maintain these licenses, permits,
and other authorizations could adversely affect our business.
12
KCS
business is subject to environmental, health, and safety laws
and regulations that could require KCS to incur material costs
or liabilities relating to environmental, health, or safety
compliance or remediation.
KCS operations are subject to extensive international,
federal, state and local environmental, health, and safety laws
and regulations concerning, among other things, emissions to the
air, discharges to waters, the handling, storage, transportation
and disposal of waste and other materials, the cleanup of
hazardous material or petroleum releases, decommissioning of
underground storage tanks and noise pollution. Violations of
these laws and regulations can result in substantial penalties,
permit revocations, facility shutdowns and other civil and
criminal sanctions. From time to time, certain KCS facilities
have not been in compliance with environmental, health and
safety laws and regulations and there can be no assurance that
KCS will always be in compliance with such laws and regulations
in the future. The Company incurs, and expects to continue to
incur, environmental compliance costs, including, in particular,
costs necessary to maintain compliance with requirements
governing chemical and hazardous material shipping operations,
refueling operations and repair facilities. New laws and
regulations, stricter enforcement of existing requirements, new
spills, releases or violations or the discovery of previously
unknown contamination could require KCS to incur costs or
subject KCS to liabilities that could have a material adverse
effect on KCS business, results of operations, financial
condition, and cash flows.
In the operation of a railroad, it is possible that derailments,
explosions, or other accidents may occur that could cause harm
to the environment or to human life or health. As a result, KCS
may incur costs in the future, which may be material, to address
any such harm, including costs relating to the performance of
clean-ups,
natural resources damages and compensatory or punitive damages
for harm to property or individuals.
The U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation
and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund)
and similar state laws (known as Superfund laws)
impose liability for the cost of remedial or removal actions,
natural resources damages and related costs at certain sites
identified as posing a threat to the environment or public
health. CERCLA imposes joint, strict and several liabilities on
the owners and operators of facilities in which hazardous waste
and other hazardous substances are deposited or from which they
are released or are likely to be released into the environment.
Liability may be imposed, without regard to fault or the
legality of the activity, on certain classes of persons,
including the current and certain prior owners or operators of a
site where hazardous substances have been released and persons
that arranged for the disposal or treatment of hazardous
substances. In addition, other potentially responsible parties,
adjacent landowners or other third parties may initiate cost
recovery actions or toxic tort litigation against sites subject
to CERCLA or similar state laws. Given the nature of its
business, KCS presently has environmental investigation and
remediation obligations at certain sites, including a former
foundry site in Alexandria, Louisiana, and will likely incur
such obligations at additional sites in the future. Liabilities
accrued for environmental costs represent the Companys
best estimate of the probable future obligation for the
remediation and settlement of these sites. Although the recorded
liability is the best estimate of all probable costs,
clean-up
costs cannot be predicted with absolute certainty, and may
exceed such estimates, due to various factors such as evolving
environmental laws and regulations, changes in technology, the
extent of other parties participation, developments in
environmental surveys and studies, and the extent of corrective
action that may ultimately be required.
The Mexican operations are subject to Mexican federal and state
laws and regulations relating to the protection of the
environment. The primary environmental law in Mexico is the
General Law of Ecological Balance and Environmental Protection
(the Ecological Law). The Mexican federal agency in
charge of overseeing compliance with and enforcement of the
Ecological Law is the Ministry of Environmental Protection and
Natural Resources (Semarnat). The regulations issued
under the Ecological Law and technical environmental
requirements issued by Semarnat have promulgated standards for,
among other things, water discharge, water supply, emissions,
noise pollution, hazardous substances and transportation and
handling of hazardous and solid waste. As part of its
enforcement powers, Semarnat is empowered to bring
administrative and criminal proceedings and impose economic
sanctions against companies that violate environmental laws and
temporarily, or even permanently, close non-complying
facilities. KCSM is also subject to the laws of
13
various jurisdictions and international conferences with respect
to the discharge of materials into the environment and to
environmental laws and regulations issued by the governments of
each of the Mexican states in which KCSMs facilities are
located. The terms of KCSMs Concession from the Mexican
government also impose environmental compliance obligations on
KCSM. The Company cannot predict the effect, if any, that
unidentified environmental matters or the adoption of additional
or more stringent environmental laws and regulations would have
on KCSMs results of operations, cash flows or financial
condition. Failure to comply with any such environmental laws or
regulations may result in the termination of KCSMs
Concession or in fines or penalties that may affect
profitability.
KCSR
has been named as a defendant in several putative class action
lawsuits that may divert managements attention from the
Companys business, cause the Company to incur substantial
expenses, and in the event of an adverse result expose the
Company to significant damages and penalties.
As described in Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K,
as of December 31, 2007, KCSR has been included along with
several other major U.S. railroads in 28 putative class
actions alleging that the individual railroads conspired to fix
fuel surcharges in violation of U.S. antitrust laws. While
the Company believes these price fixing allegations have no
merit and intends to vigorously defend these claims, no
assurance can be given regarding the outcomes of these lawsuits.
These and related matters have required, and will continue to
require, the Company to incur substantial expenses for legal and
other professional services. If the Company is found liable in
these proceedings, it could be required to pay damages (possibly
including treble damages) and penalties and might face
additional remedies that could harm its financial condition and
operating results.
KCS
business is vulnerable to rising fuel costs and disruptions in
fuel supplies. Any significant increase in the cost of fuel that
is not adequately covered by fuel surcharges, or severe
disruption of fuel supplies, would have a material adverse
effect on KCS business, results of operations and
financial condition.
KCS incurs substantial fuel costs in its railroad operations and
these costs represent a significant portion of its
transportation expenses. Significant price increases for fuel
may have a material adverse effect on operating results. Fuel
expense increased from 19% of consolidated operating costs
during 2006 to 20% of consolidated operating costs during 2007.
KCS has been able to pass the majority of these fuel cost
increases on to customers in the form of fuel surcharges applied
either in the form of an increase in the freight rate or direct
customer billings. If KCS is unable to recapture its costs of
fuel from its customers, operating results could be materially
adversely affected.
Fuel costs are affected by traffic levels, efficiency of
operations and equipment, and petroleum market conditions. The
supply and cost of fuel are subject to market conditions and are
influenced by numerous factors beyond the Companys
control, including general economic conditions, world markets,
government programs and regulations, and competition. In
addition, instability in the Middle East and interruptions in
domestic production and refining due to hurricane damage may
result in an increase in fuel prices. Fuel prices and supplies
could also be affected by any limitation in the fuel supply, any
interruptions in refining operations or by any imposition of
mandatory allocation or rationing regulations. In the event of a
severe disruption of fuel supplies resulting from supply
shortages, political unrest, a disruption of oil imports,
weather events, war, or otherwise, the resulting impact on fuel
prices could materially adversely affect KCS operating
results, financial condition, and cash flows.
KCS currently meets, and expects to continue to meet, fuel
requirements for its Mexican operations almost exclusively
through purchases at market prices from PEMEX Refinanción
(PEMEX), the national oil company of Mexico, a
government-owned entity exclusively responsible for the
distribution and sale of diesel fuel in Mexico. KCSM is party to
a fuel supply contract with PEMEX of indefinite duration. Either
party may terminate the contract upon 30 days written
notice to the other at any time. If the fuel contract is
terminated and KCSM is unable to acquire diesel fuel from
alternate sources on acceptable terms, the Mexican operations
could be materially adversely affected.
14
The
loss of key personnel could negatively affect
business.
KCS success substantially depends on its ability to
attract and retain key members of the senior management team and
the principals of its foreign subsidiaries. Recruiting,
motivating, and retaining qualified management personnel,
particularly those with expertise in the railroad industry, are
vital to operations and success. There is substantial
competition for qualified management personnel and there can be
no assurance that KCS will always be able to attract or retain
qualified personnel. Employment agreements with senior
management are terminable at any time by either party. If KCS
loses one or more of these key executives or principals, its
ability to successfully implement its business plans and the
value of its common stock could be materially adversely affected.
A
majority of KCS employees belong to labor unions. Strikes
or work stoppages could adversely affect
operations.
The Company is a party to collective bargaining agreements with
various labor unions in the United States and Mexico. As of
December 31, 2007, approximately 80% of KCSR employees and
approximately 80% of KCSM employees were covered by labor
contracts subject to collective bargaining. The Company may be
subject to, among other things, strikes, work stoppages or work
slowdowns as a result of disputes under these collective
bargaining agreements and labor contracts or KCS potential
inability to negotiate acceptable contracts with these unions.
In the United States, because such agreements are generally
negotiated on an industry-wide basis, determination of the terms
and conditions of labor agreements have been and could continue
to be beyond KCS control. KCS may, therefore, be subject
to terms and conditions in industry-wide labor agreements that
could have a material adverse affect on its results of
operations, financial position and cash flows. If the unionized
workers in the United States or Mexico were to engage in a
strike, work stoppage or other slowdown, if other employees were
to become unionized, or if the terms and conditions in future
labor agreements were renegotiated, KCS could experience a
significant disruption of its operations and higher ongoing
labor costs. Although the U.S. Railway Labor Act imposes
restrictions on the right of United States railway workers to
strike, there is no law in Mexico imposing similar restrictions
on the right of railway workers in that country to strike.
KCS
faces possible catastrophic loss and liability and its insurance
may not be sufficient to cover its damages or damages to
others.
The operation of any railroad carries with it an inherent risk
of catastrophe, mechanical failure, collision, and property
loss. In the course of KCS operations, spills or other
environmental mishaps, cargo loss or damage, business
interruption due to political developments, as well as labor
disputes, strikes and adverse weather conditions, could result
in a loss of revenues or increased liabilities and costs.
Collisions, environmental mishaps, or other accidents can cause
serious bodily injury, death, and extensive property damage,
particularly when such accidents occur in heavily populated
areas. Additionally, KCS operations may be affected from
time to time by natural disasters such as earthquakes,
volcanoes, floods, hurricanes or other storms. The occurrence of
a major natural disaster could have a material adverse effect on
KCS operations and financial condition. The Company
maintains insurance that is consistent with industry practice
against the accident-related risks involved in the conduct of
its business and business interruption due to natural disaster.
However, this insurance is subject to a number of limitations on
coverage, depending on the nature of the risk insured against.
This insurance may not be sufficient to cover KCS damages
or damages to others and this insurance may not continue to be
available at commercially reasonable rates. Even with insurance,
if any catastrophic interruption of service occurs, KCS may not
be able to restore service without a significant interruption to
operations which could have an adverse effect on KCS
financial condition.
KCS
business may be affected by future acts of terrorism or
war.
Terrorist attacks, such as an attack on the Companys
chemical transportation activities, any government response
thereto and war or risk of war may adversely affect KCS
results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.
These acts may also impact the Companys ability to raise
capital or its future business opportunities. KCS rail
lines and facilities could be direct targets or indirect
casualties of acts of terror, which
15
could cause significant business interruption and result in
increased costs and liabilities and decreased revenues. In
addition, insurance premiums charged for some or all of the
terrorism coverage currently maintained by KCS could increase
dramatically or certain coverage may not be available in the
future.
KCSMs
Mexican Concession is subject to revocation or termination in
certain circumstances which would prevent KCSM from operating
its railroad and would have a material adverse effect on the
Companys business and financial condition.
KCSM operates under a
50-year
Concession granted by the Mexican government. The Concession
gives KCSM exclusive rights to provide freight transportation
services over its rail lines for 30 years of the
50-year
Concession, subject to certain trackage and haulage rights
granted to other concessionaires. The SCT is principally
responsible for regulating railroad services in Mexico. The SCT
has broad powers to monitor KCSMs compliance with the
Concession and it can require KCSM to supply it with any
technical, administrative and financial information it requests.
Among other obligations, KCSM must comply with the investment
commitments established in its business plan, which forms an
integral part of the Concession, and must update the plan every
five years. The SCT treats KCSMs business plans
confidentially. The SCT also monitors KCSMs compliance
with efficiency and safety standards established in the
Concession. The SCT reviews, and may amend, these standards
every five years.
The Mexican Railroad Services Law and regulations provide the
Mexican government certain rights in its relationship with KCSM
under the Concession, including the right to take over the
management of KCSM and its railroad in certain extraordinary
cases, such as imminent danger to national security. In the
past, the Mexican government has used such power with respect to
other privatized industries, including the telecommunications
industry, to ensure continued service during labor disputes. In
addition, under the Concession and the Mexican Railroad Services
Law and regulations, the SCT, in consultation with the Mexican
Antitrust Commission, reserves the right to set tariffs if it
determines that effective competition does not exist in the
Mexican railroad industry. The Mexican Antitrust Commission,
however, has not published guidelines regarding the factors that
constitute a lack of competition. It is therefore unclear under
what particular circumstances the Mexican Antitrust Commission
would deem a lack of competition to exist. If the SCT intervenes
and sets tariffs, the rates it sets may be too low to allow KCSM
to operate profitably.
The Concession is renewable for up to 50 years, subject to
certain conditions. The SCT may revoke the Concession if KCSM is
sanctioned on three distinct occasions if KCSM unjustly
interrupts the operation of its rail lines or if KCSM charges
tariffs higher than the tariffs it has registered with the SCT.
In addition, the SCT may revoke the Concession if, among other
things, KCSM is sanctioned on five distinct occasions because
KCSM restricts the ability of other Mexican rail operators to
use its rail lines; KCSM fails to make payments for damages
caused during the performance of services; KCSM fails to comply
with any term or condition of the Mexican railroad services law
and regulations or the Concession; KCSM fails to make the
capital investments required under its five-year business plan
filed with the SCT; or KCSM fails to maintain an obligations
compliance bond and insurance coverage as specified in the
Mexican railroad services law and regulations. In addition, the
Concession would revoke automatically if KCSM changes its
nationality or assigns or creates any lien on the Concession, or
if there is a change in control of KCSM, without the SCTs
approval. The SCT may also terminate the Concession as a result
of KCSMs surrender of its rights under the Concession, or
for reasons of public interest or upon KCSMs liquidation
or bankruptcy. Revocation or termination of the Concession would
prevent KCSM from operating its railroad and would materially
adversely affect the Mexican operations and the ability to make
payments on KCSMs debt. If the Concession is terminated or
revoked by the SCT for any reason, KCSM would receive no
compensation and its interest in its rail lines and all other
fixtures covered by the Concession, as well as all improvements
made by it, would revert to the Mexican government.
In April 2006, the SCT initiated a proceeding against KCSM,
claiming that KCSM had failed to make certain minimum capital
investments projected for 2004 and 2005 under its five-year
business plan filed with the SCT prior to its acquisition by
KCS. KCSM believes it made capital expenditures exceeding the
required amounts. KCSM responded to the SCT by providing
evidence in support of its investments and explaining why it
believes sanctions are not appropriate. In May 2007, the Company
was served with an SCT resolution
16
regarding the sanction proceeding for 2004. In June 2007, KCSM
was served with an SCT notification that KCSM failed to make
minimum capital investments for 2004 and 2005. The SCT imposed a
fine in the amount of Ps.46,800. On August 16, 2007, KCSM
filed a nullity claim against the 2004 investment plan
resolution issued by the SCT, and on August 20, 2007, filed
a nullity claim against the 2005 plan resolution, both before
the Mexican Administrative Federal Court. If necessary, KCSM
will have the right to appeal any adverse ruling by the Mexican
Administrative Federal Court before the Mexican Federal
Magistrates Tribunal. KCSM believes that even if the threatened
sanctions become effective, there will be no material adverse
effect on the operations of KCSM. However, if these proceedings
are conclusively ruled adversely against KCSM and sanctions are
imposed, KCSM could be subject to possible future revocation of
its Concession if the SCT imposes sanctions on five distinct
occasions for the same failure over the remaining term of the
Concession.
Under the Concession, KCSM has the right to operate its rail
lines, but it does not own the land, roadway or associated
structures. If the Mexican government legally terminates the
Concession, it would own, control, and manage such public domain
assets used in the operation of KCSMs rail lines. All
other property not covered by the Concession, including all
locomotives and railcars otherwise acquired, will remain
KCSMs property. The Mexican government will have the right
to cause the Company to lease all service-related assets to it
for a term of at least one year, automatically renewable for
additional one-year terms up to five years. The Mexican
government must exercise this right within four months after
revocation of the Concession. In addition, the Mexican
government will also have a right of first refusal with respect
to certain transfers by KCSM of railroad equipment within
90 days after revocation of the Concession.
The Mexican government may also temporarily seize control of
KCSMs rail lines and its assets in the event of a natural
disaster, war, significant public disturbance or imminent danger
to the domestic peace or economy. In such a case, the SCT may
restrict KCSMs ability to exploit the Concession in such
manner as the SCT deems necessary under the circumstances, but
only for the duration of any of the foregoing events. Mexican
law requires that the Mexican government pay compensation if it
effects a statutory appropriation for reasons of the public
interest. With respect to a temporary seizure due to any cause
other than international war, the Mexican Railroad Services Law
and regulations provide that the Mexican government will
indemnify an affected concessionaire for an amount equal to
damages caused and losses suffered. However, these payments may
not be sufficient to compensate KCSM for its losses and may not
be timely made.
KCS
ownership of KCSM and operations in Mexico subject it to
economic and political risks.
The Mexican government has exercised, and continues to exercise,
significant influence over the Mexican economy. Accordingly,
Mexican governmental actions concerning the economy and
state-owned enterprises could have a significant impact on
Mexican private sector entities in general and on KCSMs
Mexican operations in particular. The national elections held on
July 2, 2000, ended 71 years of rule by the
Institutional Revolutionary Party and resulted in the increased
representation of opposition parties in the Mexican Congress and
in mayoral and gubernatorial positions. In 2006 the presidential
and federal congressional elections in Mexico were held and
after a close presidential race Felipe Calderón was elected
Mexicos president. Calderón is from the same
political party as his predecessor, Vicente Fox. Although there
have not yet been any material adverse repercussions resulting
from this political change, multiparty rule is still relatively
new in Mexico and changes in laws, president, public policies
and government programs could result in economic or political
conditions that could materially and adversely affect the
Mexican operations. KCS cannot predict the impact that this new
political landscape will have on the Mexican economy.
Furthermore, KCSMs financial condition, results of
operations and prospects may be affected by currency
fluctuations, inflation, interest rates, regulation, taxation,
social instability and other political, social and economic
developments in or affecting Mexico.
Mexican national politicians are currently focused on certain
regional political and social tension, and reforms regarding
fiscal and labor policies, gas, electricity, social security,
and oil have not been and may not be approved. The social and
political situation in Mexico could adversely affect the Mexican
economy, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on
KCS business, financial condition, and results of
operation.
17
The Mexican economy in the past has suffered balance of payment
deficits and shortages in foreign exchange reserves. There are
currently no exchange controls in Mexico. However, Mexico has
imposed foreign exchange controls in the past. Pursuant to the
provisions of NAFTA, if Mexico experiences serious balance of
payment difficulties or the threat of such difficulties in the
future, Mexico would have the right to impose foreign exchange
controls on investments made in Mexico, including those made by
United States and Canadian investors. Any restrictive exchange
control policy could adversely affect KCS ability to
obtain dollars or to convert pesos into dollars for purposes of
making interest and principal payments due on indebtedness, to
the extent KCS may have to effect those conversions, and could
adversely affect the Mexican economy or the Companys
investment in KCSM. This could have a material adverse effect on
KCS business and financial condition.
Securities of companies in emerging market countries tend to be
influenced by economic and market conditions in other emerging
market countries. Some emerging market countries, including
Argentina and Brazil, have experienced significant economic
downturns and market volatility in the past. These events have
had an adverse effect on the economic conditions and securities
markets of other emerging market countries, including Mexico.
Downturns
in the United States economy or in trade between the United
States and Asia or Mexico and fluctuations in the peso-dollar
exchange rate would likely have adverse effects on KCS
business and results of operations.
The level and timing of KCS Mexican business activity is
heavily dependent upon the level of United States-Mexican
trade and the effects of NAFTA on such trade. The Mexican
operations depend on the United States and Mexican markets for
the products KCSM transports, the relative position of Mexico
and the United States in these markets at any given time, and
tariffs or other barriers to trade. Downturns in the
United States or Mexican economy or in trade between the
United States and Mexico would likely have adverse effects on
KCS business results of operations and our ability to meet
debt service obligations. In addition, KCS has invested
significant amounts in developing its intermodal operations at
the port of Lázaro Cárdenas, in part to provide Asian
importers with an alternative to West Coast ports, and the level
of intermodal traffic depends, to an extent, on the volume of
Asian shipments routed through Lázaro Cárdenas.
Reduction in trading volumes between KCS and its Asian trading
partners, which may be caused by factors beyond KCS
control, including increased government regulations in light of
recent concerns regarding the safety and quality of
Asian-manufactured products, may adversely affect KCS
business and results of operations.
Also, fluctuations in the peso-dollar exchange rate could lead
to shifts in the types and volumes of Mexican imports and
exports. Although a decrease in the level of exports of some of
the commodities that KCSM transports to the United States may be
offset by a subsequent increase in imports of other commodities
KCSM hauls into Mexico and vice versa, any offsetting increase
might not occur on a timely basis, if at all. Future
developments in United States-Mexican trade beyond the
Companys control may result in a reduction of freight
volumes or in an unfavorable shift in the mix of products and
commodities KCSM carries.
Any devaluation of the peso would cause the peso cost of
KCSMs dollar-denominated debt to increase, adversely
affecting its ability to make payments on its indebtedness.
Severe devaluation or depreciation of the peso may result in
disruption of the international foreign exchange markets and may
limit the ability to transfer pesos or to convert pesos into
U.S. dollars for the purpose of making timely payments of
interest and principal on the non-peso denominated indebtedness.
Although the Mexican government currently does not restrict, and
for many years has not restricted, the right or ability of
Mexican or foreign persons or entities to convert pesos into
U.S. dollars or to transfer foreign currencies out of
Mexico, the Mexican government could, as in the past, institute
restrictive exchange rate policies that could limit the ability
to transfer or convert pesos into U.S. dollars or other
currencies for the purpose of making timely payments of the
U.S. dollar-denominated debt and contractual commitments.
Devaluation or depreciation of the peso against the
U.S. dollar may also adversely affect U.S. dollar
prices for KCS securities. Currency fluctuations are
likely to continue to have an effect on KCS financial
condition in future periods.
18
Mexico
may experience high levels of inflation in the future which
could adversely affect KCS results of
operations.
Mexico has a history of high levels of inflation and may
experience high inflation in the future. During most of the
1980s and during the mid and late 1990s, Mexico experienced
periods of high levels of inflation. The annual rates of
inflation for the last three years, as measured by changes in
the National Consumer Price Index, as provided by Banco de
Mexico, were 3.8% in 2007, 4.0% in 2006, and 3.3% in 2005. A
substantial increase in the Mexican inflation rate would have
the effect of increasing some of KCSMs costs, which could
adversely affect its results of operations and financial
condition. High levels of inflation may also affect the balance
of trade between Mexico and the United States, and other
countries, which could adversely affect KCSMs results of
operations.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None.
Property information is provided for each of KCS two
business segments, the United States (U.S.) and
Mexico.
U.S.
Segment.
Certain KCSR property statistics follow at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Route miles main and branch line
|
|
|
3,184
|
|
|
|
3,205
|
|
|
|
3,226
|
|
Total track miles
|
|
|
4,432
|
|
|
|
4,446
|
|
|
|
4,372
|
|
Miles of welded rail in service
|
|
|
2,346
|
|
|
|
2,321
|
|
|
|
2,320
|
|
Main line welded rail percent
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
|
|
72
|
%
|
|
|
72
|
%
|
Cross ties replaced
|
|
|
477,750
|
|
|
|
427,590
|
|
|
|
340,033
|
|
KCSR and Mexrails fleet of locomotives and rolling stock
consisted of the following at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Locomotives
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolling stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Box cars
|
|
|
4,898
|
|
|
|
1,312
|
|
|
|
5,386
|
|
|
|
1,356
|
|
|
|
5,401
|
|
|
|
1,323
|
|
Gondolas
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
Covered hoppers
|
|
|
3,695
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
4,222
|
|
|
|
743
|
|
|
|
4,323
|
|
|
|
989
|
|
Flat cars (intermodal and other)
|
|
|
1,884
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
1,985
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
844
|
|
|
|
531
|
|
Auto racks
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tank cars
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Other
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
11,501
|
|
|
|
2,435
|
|
|
|
12,852
|
|
|
|
2,696
|
|
|
|
11,883
|
|
|
|
3,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average age (in years):
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Road locomotives
|
|
|
22.6
|
|
|
|
22.9
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
|
All locomotives
|
|
|
23.3
|
|
|
|
23.9
|
|
|
|
26.1
|
|
KCSR, in support of its transportation operations, owns and
operates repair shops, depots and office buildings along its
right-of-way. A major facility, the Deramus Yard, is located in
Shreveport, Louisiana and
19
includes a general office building, locomotive repair shop, car
repair shops, customer service center, material warehouses and
fueling facilities totaling 227,000 square feet. Other
facilities owned by KCSR include a 21,000 square foot
freight car repair shop in Kansas City, Missouri and
15,000 square feet of office space in Baton Rouge,
Louisiana. A locomotive repair facility in Kansas City is owned
and operated by General Electric Company (GE) and is
used to maintain and repair locomotives that were manufactured
by GE and are leased and owned by KCSR.
KCSR owns 16.6% of the Kansas City Terminal Railway Company,
which owns and operates 80 miles of track, and operates an
additional eight miles of track under trackage rights in greater
Kansas City, Missouri. KCSR also leases, for operating purposes,
certain short sections of trackage owned by various other
railroad companies and jointly owns certain other facilities
with these railroads.
Mexico
Segment.
Under its Concession from the Mexican government, KCSM has the
right to operate the rail lines, but does not own the land,
roadway, or associated structures. The Concession requires KCSM
to make investments and undertake capital projects, including
capital projects described in a business plan filed every five
years with the Mexican government. KCSM may defer capital
expenditures with respect to its five-year business plan with
the permission of the SCT. However, should the SCT not grant
this permission, KCSMs failure to comply with the
commitments in its business plan could result in fines and
ultimately the Mexican government revoking the Concession. See
Item 1A, Risk Factors KCSMs Mexican
Concession is subject to revocation or termination in certain
circumstances which would prevent KCSM from operating its
railroad and would have a material adverse effect on the
Companys business and financial condition.
Certain KCSM property statistics follow at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Route miles main and branch line
|
|
|
2,661
|
|
|
|
2,645
|
|
|
|
2,639
|
|
Total track miles
|
|
|
3,254
|
|
|
|
3,242
|
|
|
|
3,266
|
|
Miles of welded rail in service
|
|
|
2,258
|
|
|
|
2,056
|
|
|
|
2,050
|
|
Main line welded rail percent
|
|
|
85
|
%
|
|
|
78
|
%
|
|
|
78
|
%
|
Cross ties replaced
|
|
|
230,963
|
|
|
|
214,020
|
|
|
|
239,973
|
|
KCSMs fleet of locomotives and rolling stock consisted of
the following at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Locomotives
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rolling stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Box cars
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
|
|
1,107
|
|
|
|
1,068
|
|
|
|
1,166
|
|
|
|
1,278
|
|
|
|
1,187
|
|
Gondolas
|
|
|
2,519
|
|
|
|
1,771
|
|
|
|
2,520
|
|
|
|
1,817
|
|
|
|
2,922
|
|
|
|
1,824
|
|
Covered hoppers
|
|
|
2,360
|
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
2,416
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
2,518
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
Flat cars (intermodal and other)
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
557
|
|
Auto racks
|
|
|
1,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tank cars
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
522
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
8,117
|
|
|
|
4,116
|
|
|
|
8,340
|
|
|
|
4,246
|
|
|
|
9,146
|
|
|
|
4,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average age (in years):
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Road locomotives
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
All locomotives
|
|
|
16.2
|
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
20
KCSM, in support of its transportation operations, has under its
Concession, repair shops, depots and office buildings along the
right of way. A major facility is the Monterrey Yard, located in
Monterrey, Nuevo Leon which includes the general office
building, customer service center, dispatch center, purchasing
department, and offices of transportation, commercial, and
security. Also located in the Monterrey Yard is a materials
warehouse and fuel facility, which includes a locomotive repair
shop operated by Alstom Transporte, S.A. de C.V.
(Alstom), used to maintain and repair locomotives
manufactured by GE and owned by KCSM. The Monterrey Yard also
includes a car repair shop operated by Progress Rail Services de
Mexico (Progress) to maintain and repair freight
cars. Another facility included in the Concession is a
locomotive repair shop in San Luis Potosi operated by GE
used to repair and maintain locomotives manufactured by EMD and
GE which are owned and leased by KCSM. Other car repair
facilities are located in Nuevo Laredo, Tamaulipas;
San Luis Potosi, San Luis Potosi; Ciudad Madero,
Tamaulipas; Escobedo, Guanajuato; all of which are operated by
Progress.
The response to Item 102 of
Regulation S-K
under Item 1, Business, of this
Form 10-K
and Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, is
incorporated by reference in partial response to this
Item 2.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
The matters discussed in Part II, Item 7,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates Provision for
Environmental Remediation Provision for Casualty
Claims, and Other Matters
Litigation are incorporated by reference in this
Item 3.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during
the three month period ended December 31, 2007.
Executive
Officers of KCS and Subsidiaries.
All executive officers are elected annually and serve at the
discretion of the Board of Directors. All of the executive
officers have employment agreements with KCS
and/or its
subsidiaries. The mailing address of the principal executive
officers is
427 W. 12th Street,
Kansas City, Missouri 64105.
Michael R. Haverty Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer 63 The
information in the Companys Definitive Proxy Statement
under the heading The Board of Directors
Directors Serving Until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in
2009 with respect to Mr. Haverty is incorporated by
reference.
Arthur L. Shoener KCS President and Chief
Operating Officer 61 The information in
the Companys Definitive Proxy Statement in the description
of Proposal 1 Election of Three
Directors Nominees for Directors to Serve Until the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2011 with respect to
Mr. Shoener is incorporated by reference.
Patrick J. Ottensmeyer Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer 50
Joined KCS in May 2006 as Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer. Prior to joining KCS, Mr. Ottensmeyer
served as Chief Financial Officer of Intranasal Therapeutics,
Inc. from 2001 to May 2006. From 2000 to 2001, he served as
Corporate Vice President Finance and Treasurer for Dade-Behring
Holdings, Inc. From 1993 to 1999, Mr. Ottensmeyer served as
Vice President Finance and Treasurer at BNSF Railway.
Scott E. Arvidson Executive Vice
President & Chief Information Officer
47 Served in this capacity since October
2007. Mr. Arvidson also serves as Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer of KCSR. He served as Senior Vice
President and Chief Information Officer from September 2006 to
September 2007. From January 2003 to August 2006,
Mr. Arvidson served as Vice President and Chief Information
Officer of KCSR. From May 2000 to December 2002,
Mr. Arvidson served as Chief Information Officer of KCSR.
21
Daniel W. Avramovich Executive Vice
President, Sales & Marketing 56
Joined KCS in May 2006 as Executive Vice President,
Sales & Marketing. Prior to this, Mr. Avramovich
served as President, Network Services Americas for
Exel plc from 2003 to 2006. From 2000 to 2003, he served as
President, Exel Direct for Exel plc.
Warren K. Erdman Executive Vice
President Corporate Affairs
49 Served in this capacity since October 2007. He
served as Senior Vice President-Corporate Affairs of KCS and
KCSR from January 2006 to September 2007. Mr. Erdman served
as Vice President Corporate Affairs of KCS from
April 15, 1997 to December 31, 2005 and as Vice
President Corporate Affairs of KCSR from May 1997 to
December 31, 2005. Prior to joining KCS, Mr. Erdman
served as Chief of Staff to United States Senator Kit Bond of
Missouri from 1987 to 1997.
Larry M. Lawrence Executive Vice President
and Assistant to the Chairman 45 Served
in this capacity since October 2007. Mr. Lawrence served as
Senior Vice President and Assistant to Chairman-Strategies and
Staff Studies of KCS from January 2006 to September 2007.
Mr. Lawrence served as Assistant to CEO-Staff Studies and
Planning of KCS from November 2001 until December 2005. Prior to
joining KCS in 2001, Mr. Lawrence was a strategy consultant
for 15 years with McKinsey, A. T. Kearney and KPMG.
Michael K. Borrows Senior Vice
President & Chief Accounting Officer
40 Joined KCS as the Companys principal
accounting officer in June 2006 as Vice President
Financial Reporting and Tax. In December 2006 he was also made
an officer of KCSM and appointed Chief Accounting Officer of
KCSM. In August 2007, he was appointed Senior Vice
President & Chief Accounting Officer with
responsibility for all accounting related functions of the
Company. Prior to joining KCS, Mr. Borrows worked for BNSF
Railway serving in a variety of leadership roles within the
finance organization for over a decade.
Jerry W. Heavin Senior Vice
President International Engineering of
KCSR 56 Served in this capacity since
January 2005, and a director of KCSR since July 2002.
Mr. Heavin served as Senior Vice President of Operations
from July 2002 to December 2004. Mr. Heavin joined KCSR in
September 2001 and served as Vice President of Engineering of
KCSR until July 2002. Prior to joining KCSR, Mr. Heavin
served as an independent engineering consultant from 1997
through August 2001.
Paul J. Weyandt Senior Vice
President Finance and Treasurer
54 Served in this capacity since April 2005. He
served as Vice President and Treasurer of KCS and of KCSR from
September 2001 until March 2005. Before joining KCS,
Mr. Weyandt was a consultant to the Structured Finance
Group of GE Capital Corporation from May 2001 to September 2001.
Prior to consulting, Mr. Weyandt spent 23 years with
BNSF Railway, most recently as Assistant Vice President Finance
and Assistant Treasurer.
William J. Wochner Senior Vice President and
Chief Legal Officer 60 Served in this
capacity since February 2007. He served as Vice President and
Interim General Counsel from December 2006 to January 2007. From
September 2006 to December 2006, Mr. Wochner served as Vice
President and Associate General Counsel. From March 2005 to
September 2006, Mr. Wochner served as Vice President, Sales
and Marketing/Contracts for KCSR. From February 1993 to March
2005, Mr. Wochner served as Vice President and General
Solicitor of KCSR.
Richard M. Zuza Senior Vice
President International Purchasing and
Materials 54 Joined KCS in November 2005
as the Senior Vice President International
Purchasing and Materials. Prior to joining KCS, Mr. Zuza
served as Vice President of Procurement for Allstate Insurance
Company from 1998 to 2005, Vice President of Purchasing for
Gibson Greetings, Inc. for seven years and held a variety of
purchasing positions with General Electric Company for
15 years.
There are no arrangements or understandings between the
executive officers and any other person pursuant to which the
executive officer was or is to be selected as an officer of KCS,
except with respect to the executive officers who have entered
into employment agreements designating the position(s) to be
held by the executive officer.
None of the above officers is related to another, or to any of
the directors of KCS, by family.
22
Part II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for KCS Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Market
Information.
The Companys Common Stock is traded on the New York Stock
Exchange under the ticker symbol KSU. The
information set forth in response to Item 201 of
Regulation S-K
in Note 8 and Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K
is incorporated by reference in partial response to this
Item 5.
Dividend
Policy.
Common Stock. KCS has not declared any cash
dividends on its common stock during the last five fiscal years
and it does not anticipate making any cash dividend payments to
common shareholders in the foreseeable future. Pursuant to
KCSRs credit agreement, KCS is prohibited from the payment
of cash dividends on its common stock.
Preferred Stock. Kansas City Southern is
restricted from paying dividends on its Series C Preferred
Stock and Series D Preferred Stock when its coverage ratio
(as defined in the indentures for KCSRs
71/2% Senior
Notes and
91/2% Senior
Notes) is less than 2.0:1. It is the Companys intention to
pay timely dividends on all preferred stock in either cash or
stock, depending upon the terms of the preferred stock, when
dividend payments are not restricted under the covenants of its
various debt agreements and the Company has adequate levels of
liquidity. In the event that dividends on the Series C
Preferred Stock or Series D Preferred Stock are in arrears
for six consecutive quarters (or an equivalent number of days in
the aggregate, whether or not consecutive), holders of the
Series C Preferred Stock or the Series D Preferred
Stock, as applicable, will be entitled to elect two of the
authorized number of directors at the next annual
stockholders meeting, and at each subsequent
stockholders meeting until such time as all accumulated
dividends are paid on the Series C Preferred Stock or the
Series D Preferred Stock, as applicable, or set aside for
payment.
See Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Liquidity and Capital Resources for a discussion of the
most recent amendments to the indentures for KCSRs
71/2% Senior
Notes and
91/2% Senior
Notes related to these dividend payments.
Holders.
There were 4,899 record holders of KCS common stock on
February 7, 2008; however, the number of actual holders of
KCS common stock is greater due to the practice of brokerage
firms registering many shares for clients in the brokerage
firms name.
Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation
Plans.
See Part III, Item 12, Security Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters for information about securities authorized for
issuance under KCS equity compensation plans.
23
Performance
Graph.
The following graph shows the changes in value over the five
years ended December 31, 2007, of an assumed investment of
$100 in: (i) KCS common stock; (ii) the stocks
that comprise the Dow Jones Transportation Average
Index1;
and (iii) the stocks that comprise the S&P 500
Index2.
The table following the graph shows the value of those
investments on December 31 for each of the years indicated. The
values for the assumed investments depicted on the graph and in
the table have been calculated assuming that any cash dividends
are reinvested.
COMPARISON
OF FIVE YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
Among
Kansas City Southern, the S&P 500 Index
and the Dow Jones Transportation Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
Kansas City Southern
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
119.33
|
|
|
|
|
147.75
|
|
|
|
|
203.58
|
|
|
|
|
241.50
|
|
|
|
|
286.08
|
|
S&P 500
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
128.68
|
|
|
|
|
142.69
|
|
|
|
|
149.70
|
|
|
|
|
173.34
|
|
|
|
|
182.87
|
|
Dow Jones Transportation Average
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
128.94
|
|
|
|
|
165.93
|
|
|
|
|
184.62
|
|
|
|
|
199.13
|
|
|
|
|
211.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 The
Dow Jones Transportation Average is an index prepared by Dow
Jones & Co., Inc., an independent company.
2 The
S&P 500 is an index prepared by Standard and Poors
Corporation, an independent company. The S&P 500 Index
reflects the change in weighted average market value for
500 companies whose shares are traded on the New York Stock
Exchange, American Stock Exchange and the Nasdaq Stock Market.
24
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
The selected financial data below (in millions, except per
share amounts) should be read in conjunction with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations included under
Item 7 of this
Form 10-K
as well as the consolidated financial statements and the related
notes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005(i)
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,742.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,659.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,352.0
|
|
|
$
|
639.5
|
|
|
$
|
581.3
|
|
Equity in net earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
(4.5
|
)
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change and
minority interest(ii)
|
|
|
154.2
|
|
|
|
109.2
|
|
|
|
83.1
|
|
|
|
24.4
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Earnings per common share income (loss) before
cumulative effect of accounting change:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
|
$
|
1.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1.57
|
|
|
|
1.08
|
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
4,928.2
|
|
|
$
|
4,637.3
|
|
|
$
|
4,423.6
|
|
|
$
|
2,440.6
|
|
|
$
|
2,152.9
|
|
Total debt obligations
|
|
|
1,755.9
|
|
|
|
1,757.0
|
|
|
|
1,860.6
|
|
|
|
665.7
|
|
|
|
523.4
|
|
Cash dividends per common share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) |
|
Reflects the consolidation of Mexrail effective January 1,
2005, and KCSM effective April 1, 2005. |
|
(ii) |
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
accounting change and minority interest for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003 include certain unusual
operating expenses and other income as further described in
Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Results of Operations. These costs and other income
include charges for casualty claims, costs related to the
acquisitions of Grupo KCSM and Mexrail, and hurricane related
charges. |
The response to Item 301 of
Regulation S-K
under Part II Item 7, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations of this
Form 10-K
is incorporated by reference in partial response to this
Item 6.
OTHER
FINANCIAL INFORMATION DISCLOSED
KCS reports its financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The
Companys earnings releases, presentations, and 8-K filings
use certain non-GAAP measures. These measures should be
considered in addition to, but not as a substitute or preferable
to, other information prepared in accordance with GAAP.
Management believes that these non-GAAP financial measures used
to review and in certain cases manage the Companys
business may provide its users of the financial information with
additional meaningful comparison when reviewing the
Companys results.
KCS management at times uses non-GAAP information in its
planning and forecasting processes and to further analyze its
own financial trends and operational performance, as well as
making financial comparisons to prior periods presented on a
similar basis. The Company also uses some of these measures
internally as part of its incentive compensation plans for
management employees. Management believes investors and users of
the Companys financial information should consider all of
the above factors when evaluating KCS results and believes
these can be particularly useful in assessing comparability of
the Companys performance for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005.
Non-GAAP financial information previously disclosed by the
Company used in earnings releases, presentations, or other
materials can be found on its website in the investor relations
section of content. Some of KCS non-GAAP measures may
differ from similar measures used by other companies, even if
similar terms are used to identify such measures.
25
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
The following discussion is intended to clarify and focus on
Kansas City Southerns results of operations, certain
changes in its financial position, liquidity, capital structure
and business developments for the periods covered by the
consolidated financial statements included under Item 8 of
this
Form 10-K.
This discussion should be read in conjunction with the included
consolidated financial statements, the related notes, and other
information included in this report.
CAUTIONARY
INFORMATION.
The discussions set forth in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. In addition, management may make forward-looking
statements orally or in other writings, including, but not
limited to, in press releases, quarterly earnings calls,
executive presentations, in the annual report to stockholders
and in other filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Readers can identify these forward-looking
statements by the use of such verbs as expects,
anticipates, believes or similar verbs
or conjugations of such verbs. These statements involve a number
of risks and uncertainties. Actual results could materially
differ from those anticipated by such forward-looking
statements. Such differences could be caused by a number of
factors or combination of factors including, but not limited to,
the factors identified below and those discussed under
Item 1A of this
Form 10-K,
Risk Factors. Readers are strongly encouraged to
consider these factors and the following factors when evaluating
any forward-looking statements concerning the Company:
|
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the market price for the Companys common
stock;
|
|
|
|
KCS dividend policy and restrictions on its ability to pay
dividends on its common stock;
|
|
|
|
KCS high degree of leverage;
|
|
|
|
The Companys potential need for and ability to obtain
additional financing;
|
|
|
|
KCS ability to successfully implement its business
strategy, including the strategy to convert customers from using
trucking services to rail transportation services;
|
|
|
|
the impact of competition, including competition from other rail
carriers and trucking companies in the United States and Mexico;
|
|
|
|
United States, Mexican and global economic, political and social
conditions;
|
|
|
|
the effects of the North American Free Trade Agreement, or
NAFTA, on the level of trade among the United States, Mexico and
Canada;
|
|
|
|
uncertainties regarding the litigation KCS faces and any future
claims and litigation;
|
|
|
|
the effects of employee training, technological improvements and
capital expenditures on labor productivity, operating
efficiencies and service reliability;
|
|
|
|
the adverse impact of any termination or revocation of
KCSMs Concession by the Mexican government;
|
|
|
|
legal or regulatory developments in the United States, Mexico or
Canada;
|
|
|
|
KCS ability to generate sufficient cash to pay principal
and interest on its debt, meet its obligations and fund its
other liquidity needs;
|
|
|
|
the effects of adverse general economic conditions affecting
customer demand and the industries and geographic areas that
produce and consume the commodities KCS carries;
|
|
|
|
material adverse changes in economic and industry conditions,
both within the United States and Mexico and globally;
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
natural events such as severe weather, fire, floods, hurricanes,
earthquakes or other disruptions of the Companys operating
systems, structures and equipment or the ability of customers to
produce or deliver their products;
|
|
|
|
changes in fuel prices and the Companys ability to assess
fuel surcharges;
|
|
|
|
KCS ability to attract and retain qualified management
personnel;
|
|
|
|
changes in labor costs and labor difficulties, including work
stoppages affecting either operations or customers
abilities to deliver goods for shipment;
|
|
|
|
the outcome of claims and litigation, including those related to
environmental contamination, antitrust claims, personal
injuries, and occupational illnesses arising from hearing loss,
repetitive motion and exposure to asbestos and diesel fumes;
|
|
|
|
acts of terrorism or risk of terrorist activities;
|
|
|
|
war or risk of war;
|
|
|
|
political and economic conditions in Mexico and the level of
trade between the United States and Mexico; and
|
|
|
|
legislative, regulatory, or legal developments involving
taxation, including enactment of new foreign, federal or state
income or other tax rates, revisions of controlling authority,
and the outcome of tax claims and litigation.
|
Forward-looking statements reflect only as of the date on which
they are made. The Company will not update any forward-looking
statements to reflect future events, developments, or other
information. If KCS does update one or more forward-looking
statements, no inference should be drawn that additional updates
will be made regarding that statement or any other
forward-looking statements.
CORPORATE
OVERVIEW
Kansas City Southern, a Delaware corporation, is a
transportation holding company that has railroad investments in
the U.S., Mexico and Panama. In the U.S. the Company serves the
central and south central U.S. Its international holdings serve
the northeastern and central Mexico and the port cities of
Lázaro Cárdenas, Tampico and Veracruz, and a
50 percent interest in Panama Canal Railway Company,
provides ocean-to-ocean freight and passenger service along the
Panama Canal. KCS North American rail holdings and
strategic alliances are primary components of a NAFTA Railway
system, linking the commercial and industrial centers of the
U.S., Canada and Mexico. Its principal subsidiaries and
affiliates include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company (KCSR), a
wholly-owned subsidiary;
|
|
|
|
Mexrail, Inc. (Mexrail), a wholly-owned consolidated
subsidiary; which, in turn, wholly owns The Texas Mexican
Railway Company (Tex-Mex);
|
|
|
|
Meridian Speedway, LLC (MSLLC), a seventy-six
percent owned consolidated affiliate;
|
|
|
|
Kansas City Southern de México, S.A. de C.V.
(KCSM), which became a wholly owned subsidiary as of
April 1, 2005, when KCS completed its acquisition of KCSM;
|
|
|
|
Panama Canal Railway Company (PCRC), a fifty percent
owned unconsolidated affiliate which provides international
container shipping companies with a railway transportation
option in lieu of the Panama Canal and owns all of the common
stock of Panarail Tourism Company (Panarail);
|
|
|
|
Southern Capital Corporation, LLC (Southern
Capital), a fifty percent owned unconsolidated affiliate
that owns and leases locomotives and other rail equipment; and
|
|
|
|
Ferrocarril y Terminal del Valle de México, S.A. de C.V.
(FTVM), a twenty-five percent owned unconsolidated
affiliate that provides railroad services as well as ancillary
services in the greater Mexico City area.
|
27
KCS, as the holding company, supplies its various subsidiaries
with managerial, legal, tax, financial and accounting services,
in addition to management services for various other
non-operating investments.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
2007
Financial Overview.
The Company achieved consolidated net income of
$153.8 million in 2007, as compared to net income of
$108.9 million in 2006, representing an increase in net
income of $44.9 million over the prior year.
Operating income increased $58.1 million in 2007 to
$362.4 million as compared to $304.3 million in 2006.
The increase in operating income was driven primarily by
increased revenues during the year. The Company achieved record
revenues of $1,742.8 million in 2007, which was a 5%
increase over revenues of $1,659.7 million in 2006. The
revenue increase was primarily driven by price increases, new
and expanding business in both the U.S. and Mexico, and
through the continued operational efficiencies obtained with
operations coordinated across the network system.
Cash flows from operations increased to $381.5 million in
2007 compared with $267.5 million in 2006, an increase of
$114.0 million. Capital expenditures are a significant use
of cash flows annually due to the capital intensive nature of
railroad operations. Cash used for capital expenditures in 2007
was $410.5 million as compared to $241.8 million in
2006.
2008
Outlook.
Kansas City Southern expects to continue to achieve its
operational improvement across its entire network with a
management focus on execution and realizing the full value of
the network KCS has linked together. Consolidated revenue growth
in 2008 is expected to be in the high single digits. Price
increases and intermodal growth originating at the port of
Lázaro Cárdenas are expected to be key drivers of
growth while KCS continues to position its network to increase
length of haul and cross border traffic.
With continued productivity increases in operations as well as
the projected revenue growth, the full year operating ratio for
2008 is expected to fall by a full percentage point or more;
although, the Company believes seasonality of business and the
timing of various initiatives will have an impact on the
quarter-over-quarter improvement trends in the first half of the
year.
The Company believes that liquidity will continue to improve
with anticipated improvements in operating income and continued
focus on working capital reduction.
The Company projects cash capital expenditures to maintain the
railroad and meet anticipated future demand will be about
$500 million in 2008. KCS also plans to acquire 30 new
locomotives for U.S. operations through a leveraged lease
arrangement at a cost of about $65 million.
PCRC, an equity investment of KCS, is expected to have even
stronger growth in volumes and cash flow as KCS continues to
realize the value of this investment.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Year
Ended December 31, 2007, compared with the Year Ended
December 31, 2006
Net Income. Consolidated net income increased
$44.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007,
compared to the same period in 2006. Operating income increased
by $58.1 million primarily driven by continued increases in
rates, fuel surcharge, and new and expanded existing business in
both the U.S. and Mexico segments. Operating expenses
increase was contained to about 2% in the consolidated
statements of income as a result of efficiencies from a
coordinated network.
28
The following summarizes the consolidated income statement
components of KCS (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,742.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,659.7
|
|
|
$
|
83.1
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
|
394.1
|
|
|
|
393.6
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Purchased services
|
|
|
184.7
|
|
|
|
204.7
|
|
|
|
(20.0
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
Fuel
|
|
|
270.8
|
|
|
|
253.6
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Equipment costs
|
|
|
182.4
|
|
|
|
179.7
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
160.2
|
|
|
|
155.0
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Casualties and insurance
|
|
|
71.0
|
|
|
|
53.4
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
Materials and other
|
|
|
117.2
|
|
|
|
115.4
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
1,380.4
|
|
|
|
1,355.4
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
362.4
|
|
|
|
304.3
|
|
|
|
58.1
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
Equity in net earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
56
|
%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(156.7
|
)
|
|
|
(167.2
|
)
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
Debt retirement costs
|
|
|
(6.9
|
)
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
Foreign exchange gain, (loss)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)%
|
Other income
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
(6.7
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
221.3
|
|
|
|
154.6
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
67.1
|
|
|
|
45.4
|
|
|
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest
|
|
|
154.2
|
|
|
|
109.2
|
|
|
|
45.0
|
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
153.8
|
|
|
$
|
108.9
|
|
|
$
|
44.9
|
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Segment.
Revenues. The following summarizes
U.S. revenues (in millions) and carloads statistics
(in thousands). Certain prior period amounts
have been reclassified to reflect changes in the business groups
to conform to the current period presentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Carloads and Intermodal Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Chemical and petroleum
|
|
$
|
184.4
|
|
|
$
|
162.0
|
|
|
$
|
22.4
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
148.0
|
|
|
|
137.2
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Forest products and metals
|
|
|
255.3
|
|
|
|
248.4
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
187.7
|
|
|
|
207.2
|
|
|
|
(19.5
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)%
|
Agriculture and minerals
|
|
|
195.4
|
|
|
|
189.4
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
153.3
|
|
|
|
159.3
|
|
|
|
(6.0
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total general commodities
|
|
|
635.1
|
|
|
|
599.8
|
|
|
|
35.3
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
489.0
|
|
|
|
503.7
|
|
|
|
(14.7
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
Intermodal and automotive
|
|
|
74.1
|
|
|
|
74.8
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
286.3
|
|
|
|
339.4
|
|
|
|
(53.1
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
Coal
|
|
|
170.3
|
|
|
|
154.1
|
|
|
|
16.2
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
288.6
|
|
|
|
280.1
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carload revenues, units and intermodal units
|
|
|
879.5
|
|
|
|
828.7
|
|
|
|
50.8
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
1,063.9
|
|
|
|
1,123.2
|
|
|
|
(59.3
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenue
|
|
|
50.1
|
|
|
|
57.0
|
|
|
|
(6.9
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues(i)
|
|
$
|
929.6
|
|
|
$
|
885.7
|
|
|
$
|
43.9
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) Included in revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel surcharge
|
|
$
|
80.6
|
|
|
$
|
84.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
For the year ended December 31, 2007, revenues increased
$43.9 million compared to the prior year.
U.S. operations experienced revenue increases due to
targeted rate increases partially offset by a decrease in
carload volumes primarily related to certain haulage business
reflected in the intermodal and automotive products sector. The
following discussion provides an analysis of revenues by
commodity group.
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues by commodity
|
|
|
group for 2007
|
|
Chemical and petroleum. Revenues increased
$22.4 million for chemical and petroleum products for the
year ended December 31, 2007, due to targeted rate
increases and increased traffic volumes, primarily related to
petroleum, soda ash in the chemicals channel, and plastics
products.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forest products and metals. Revenues increased
$6.9 million for forest products and metals for the year
ended December 31, 2007 due to certain rate increases
primarily in paper products, partially offset by decreases in
volume due to the declining housing market which negatively
impacted the lumber products channel.
|
|
|
Agriculture and minerals. Revenues increased
$6.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, due
to higher rates and an increase in unit train velocity over
certain corridors increasing capacity. Revenue for all products
was higher than the 2006 period with one exception where the
food products channel was flat. Grain traffic accounted for the
majority of the decrease in carloads, although, revenues related
to grain were higher than the prior year. For the later part of
the year, carload volume was adversely affected by wetter than
normal weather in the south slowing shipments and reducing
beneficial customer inventories.
|
|
|
Intermodal and automotive. Revenues decreased
$0.7 million in the intermodal and automotive sectors for
the year ended December 31, 2007. Decreases in the
intermodal business unit were primarily due to the reduction in
volume related to certain haulage business. The aforementioned
decrease in the intermodal business unit was partially offset by
new intermodal haulage business and an increase in volumes for
automotive business reflecting the increased production of U.S.
automotives.
Coal. Revenue increased $16.2 million for
the year ended December 31, 2007, as a result of increased
rates related to new and updated contracts and overall increases
in car volumes to electric generating stations driven by strong
demand.
30
Operating expenses. For the year ended
December 31, 2007, U.S. operating expenses increased
$22.7 million. The following summarizes the Companys
U.S. operating expenses (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
$
|
259.1
|
|
|
$
|
264.3
|
|
|
$
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
Purchased services
|
|
|
96.5
|
|
|
|
82.8
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
Fuel
|
|
|
151.1
|
|
|
|
140.8
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Equipment costs
|
|
|
77.2
|
|
|
|
82.7
|
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
63.5
|
|
|
|
65.7
|
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
Casualties and insurance
|
|
|
59.9
|
|
|
|
44.9
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
Materials and other
|
|
|
75.5
|
|
|
|
78.9
|
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
$
|
782.8
|
|
|
$
|
760.1
|
|
|
$
|
22.7
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits. Compensation and
benefits decreased $5.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007, compared to 2006, primarily due to
increases in the allocation of various incentive compensation to
Mexico as a result of certain process coordination, increased
overhead capitalization due to updated studies, and a favorable
decrease in estimated labor costs following certain labor
contract negotiations in the first half of 2007. Decreases were
partially offset by annual wage and salary merit increases, new
collective bargaining agreements effective in the third quarter,
and higher healthcare costs as compared to the prior year.
Purchased services. Purchased services
increased $13.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007, compared to 2006, primarily due to an
increased locomotive maintenance program, additional outsourcing
of related maintenance, and increased cost and use of facilities
jointly used by the Company and other railroads.
Fuel. Fuel expense increased
$10.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2007,
compared with 2006, primarily due to increases in the average
price per gallon of fuel while consumption remained flat.
Equipment costs. Equipment costs decreased
$5.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007,
compared to 2006. Decreases reflect lower short-term locomotive
lease expense due to a reduced reliance on short-term leased
locomotives driven by improved locomotive availability, as well
as lower rates on the use of certain other short-term leased
locomotives.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation
and amortization decreased $2.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007, compared to the same period in 2006,
primarily due to final adjustments related to the depreciation
rate study completed in the fourth quarter of 2006. Offsetting
these decreases were increases in depreciation expense driven by
a higher capital base.
Casualties and insurance. Casualties and
insurance expenses increased $15.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007, compared to 2006. The number of
derailment incidents declined in 2007 compared with the 2006
period; however, derailment costs were higher driven by an
increase in the severity of certain derailment incidents.
Materials and other. Materials and other
decreased $3.4 million for year ended December 31,
2007, compared to 2006, due to lower sales and use tax as a
result of a favorable tax ruling in the first quarter of 2007,
lower state franchise tax expense, and decreases in
miscellaneous rental expenses. Decreases were partially offset
by increased materials and supplies used for the maintenance of
locomotives and freight cars and increased costs related to
legal obligations for the removal of certain assets at the end
of their useful lives.
31
Mexico
Segment.
Revenues. The following summarizes Mexico
revenues (in millions) and carloads statistics (in
thousands). Certain prior period amounts have been
reclassified to reflect changes in the business groups to
conform to the current period presentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Carloads and Intermodal Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Chemical and petroleum
|
|
$
|
136.0
|
|
|
$
|
127.9
|
|
|
$
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
80.3
|
|
|
|
80.4
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0
|
)%
|
Forest products and metals
|
|
|
245.8
|
|
|
|
247.9
|
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
206.1
|
|
|
|
235.2
|
|
|
|
(29.1
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)%
|
Agriculture and minerals
|
|
|
208.3
|
|
|
|
195.0
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
144.6
|
|
|
|
145.0
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total general commodities
|
|
|
590.1
|
|
|
|
570.8
|
|
|
|
19.3
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
431.0
|
|
|
|
460.6
|
|
|
|
(29.6
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
Intermodal and automotive
|
|
|
179.9
|
|
|
|
162.4
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
348.5
|
|
|
|
312.0
|
|
|
|
36.5
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
Coal
|
|
|
22.7
|
|
|
|
20.8
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
25.5
|
|
|
|
24.9
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carload revenues, units and intermodal units
|
|
|
792.7
|
|
|
|
754.0
|
|
|
|
38.7
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
805.0
|
|
|
|
797.5
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenue
|
|
|
20.5
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues(i)
|
|
$
|
813.2
|
|
|
$
|
774.0
|
|
|
$
|
39.2
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) Included in revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel surcharge
|
|
$
|
52.6
|
|
|
$
|
43.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007 totaled
$813.2 million compared to $774.0 million for the
comparable year ended December 31, 2006, which represented
an increase of $39.2 million. This increase is primarily
due to targeted rate increases and increased fuel surcharge
participation, partially offset by a decrease in carload volumes
primarily in the forest products and metals commodity group. The
following discussion provides an analysis of revenues by
commodity group.
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues by commodity
|
|
|
group for 2007
|
|
Chemical and petroleum. Revenues increased
$8.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007
compared to the same period in 2006, due to targeted price
increases and increases in shipments of soda ash in the
chemicals channel and plastic import products, partially offset
by a decrease in volumes in plastic exports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forest products and metals. Revenues decreased
$2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007
compared to the same period in 2006, due to a reduction of beer
export shipments in the other channel, and reductions in pulp
paper as well as lower appliance shipments in the domestic
market.
|
|
|
Agriculture and minerals. Revenues from
agriculture and minerals products increased $13.3 million
for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to the same
period in 2006. The increase in revenue is a result of targeted
price increases across all channels and increased cross border
business due to higher import shipments of grain and grain
products, partially offset by a reduction in traffic at the
ports of Veracruz and Altamira, mainly impacting the grain
channel.
|
|
|
32
Intermodal and automotive. Revenues and
volumes increased $17.5 million for intermodal and
automotive during the year ended December 31, 2007 compared
to the same period in 2006. The intermodal revenue and volume
increase is a result of rate increases and continued increases
in traffic at the port of Lázaro Cárdenas. The
increased traffic at Lázaro Cárdenas is related to
port expansion tripling capacity, organic growth, and the
addition of two new steamship customers. Automotive revenues and
volumes have increased driven by continued development and
expansion of the automotive network in Mexico.
Coal. Revenues increased $1.9 million
during the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the
same period in 2006. Increases primarily reflect new coal
shipments from Lázaro Cárdenas to Nava.
Operating expenses. For the year ended
December 31, 2007, Mexico operating expenses increased
$2.3 million. The following summarizes Mexico operating
expenses (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
$
|
135.0
|
|
|
$
|
129.3
|
|
|
$
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Purchased services
|
|
|
106.6
|
|
|
|
131.0
|
|
|
|
(24.4
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)%
|
Fuel
|
|
|
119.7
|
|
|
|
112.8
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Equipment costs
|
|
|
106.8
|
|
|
|
97.0
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
96.7
|
|
|
|
89.3
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Casualties and insurance
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
Materials and other
|
|
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
27.4
|
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
$
|
597.6
|
|
|
$
|
595.3
|
|
|
$
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits. For the year ended
December 31, 2007, compensation and benefits increased
$5.7 million, compared to 2006, primarily due to increased
incentive compensation expense, certain fringe benefits,
pension, and severance costs. Increases were partially offset by
a decrease in the Mexico statutory profit sharing expense as
compared to prior year.
Purchased services. Purchased services expense
decreased $24.4 million in 2007 compared to 2006. This
decrease reflects a reclassification of certain customer
switching and transloading costs as revenue deductions, reduced
telecommunications expenses, and reductions in the cost of
maintenance of locomotives. Decreases were partially offset by
an increase in legal and corporate expenses.
Fuel. For the year ended December 31,
2007, fuel increased $6.9 million, compared to the same
period 2006. Fuel expense increases were driven by higher diesel
fuel prices partially offset by higher gross ton miles per
gallon in the latter half of the year.
Equipment cost. Equipment cost increased
$9.8 million, compared to 2006, primarily due to a
reclassification of customer car hire billed at the border,
which was reclassified to revenues in 2007 and an increase in
software license expenses related to operational systems.
Increases were partially offset by reduced locomotive and car
leases expense.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation
and amortization expenses for the year ended December 31,
2007 increased $7.4 million, compared to the same period in
2006, primarily due to a higher asset base as a result of
capital expenditures.
Casualties and insurance. During 2007,
casualties and insurance expense increased $2.6 million,
compared to 2006, due to higher costs associated with a few
large derailments and increased vandalism to KCMSs cars
compared to the same period last year.
Materials and other. For the year ended
December 31, 2007, materials and other cost decreased
$5.7 million, compared to the same period in 2006. The
decrease reflects reduced allowances for freight receivables
primarily due to favorable loss experience and lower
receivables. This decrease was partially offset by increases in
miscellaneous rents and inventory adjustments.
33
Consolidated
Non-Operating Expenses.
Consolidated Interest Expense. Interest
expense decreased $10.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007, compared to the same period in 2006.
Reduced interest expense reflects the refinancing of KCSMs
higher rate debt (see consolidated debt retirement costs for
more information), as well as the reversal of accrued estimated
interest expense related to KCSM post-acquisition contingencies
settled with TMM in the third quarter of 2007.
Consolidated Debt Retirement
Costs. Consolidated debt retirement costs
increased $2.1 million for the year ended December 31,
2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006. In June
of 2007, KCSM redeemed its
121/2% Senior
Notes due in 2012 and entered into a new bank credit agreement.
As a result of these transactions, there was a net
$6.9 million write-off of debt retirement costs. Included
in the debt retirement costs was a charge of $16.7 million
for the call premium on the senior notes, which was partially
offset by a $9.8 million reduction of unamortized purchase
accounting effects associated with the
121/2% Senior
Notes. During 2006, KCSR entered into an amended and restated
credit agreement and wrote off $2.2 million of unamortized
debt issuance costs and KCSM refinanced its
101/4% senior
notes and wrote off $2.6 million of unamortized debt
issuance costs.
Foreign Exchange. For the year ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006, the foreign exchange loss was
$0.9 million and $3.7 million, respectively, due to
fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar versus Mexican
peso exchange rates.
Equity in Net Earnings of Unconsolidated
Affiliates. Equity in earnings from
unconsolidated affiliates was $11.4 million and
$7.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2007 and
2006, respectively. Significant components of this change were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings from the operations of PCRC was
$3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Loss in earnings was $1.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006. The increase is primarily due to
increased revenue driven by increasing volume growth.
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of Southern Capital was $4.8 million for
the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to
$5.4 million for the same period in 2006. The decrease
primarily reflects a reduction in lease income attributed to
fewer assets being leased than the prior year period.
|
|
|
|
KCSMs equity in earnings of FTVM was $2.9 million for
the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to
$2.9 million for the same period in 2006.
|
Other Income. Other income for the year ended
December 31, 2007 was $12.0 million which consists
primarily of miscellaneous interest and dividend income as well
as gains on sales of land. For the year ended December 31,
2006, other income was $18.7 million which consisted of
miscellaneous interest income, dividend income, royalty income,
and gains on sales of land and certain other long-term assets
that were not associated with KCSs railroad operations.
Consolidated Income Tax Expense (Benefit). For
the year ended December 31, 2007, KCS income tax
expense was $67.1 million, a change of $21.7 million
as compared to an expense of $45.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2006. The effective tax rate increased
from 29.4% to 30.3% for the years ended December 31, 2006
and 2007, respectively. There were no significant items that
caused the fluctuation in the rate from the prior year.
Year
Ended December 31, 2006, compared with the Year Ended
December 31, 2005
Net Income. Consolidated net income increased
$139.9 million excluding the 2005 non-recurring VAT/Put
settlement for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared
to the same period in 2005. Results for 2005 reflect nine months
of activity for KCSM (Mexico segment) which represents the
periods after the date of acquisition, April, 1 2005. Including
the $131.9 million VAT/Put settlement in 2005, consolidated
net income increased $8.0 million. Operating income
increased by $242.0 million primarily driven by targeted
price increases and fuel surcharge, new and expanded existing
business across the rail network, and the continued
34
coordination of operations as well as a full year of
consolidated operating results for Mexico. Operating expenses
increased by only 5% due to increased efficiencies from a
coordinated network.
The following summarizes the consolidated income statement
components of KCS (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,659.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,352.0
|
|
|
$
|
307.7
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
|
393.6
|
|
|
|
381.5
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Purchased services
|
|
|
204.7
|
|
|
|
195.1
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
Fuel
|
|
|
253.6
|
|
|
|
206.9
|
|
|
|
46.7
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
Equipment costs
|
|
|
179.7
|
|
|
|
149.8
|
|
|
|
29.9
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
155.0
|
|
|
|
127.7
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
Casualties and insurance
|
|
|
53.4
|
|
|
|
103.4
|
|
|
|
(50.0
|
)
|
|
|
(48
|
)%
|
Materials and other
|
|
|
115.4
|
|
|
|
125.3
|
|
|
|
(9.9
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
1,355.4
|
|
|
|
1,289.7
|
|
|
|
65.7
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
304.3
|
|
|
|
62.3
|
|
|
|
242.0
|
|
|
|
388
|
%
|
Equity in net earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
152
|
%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(167.2
|
)
|
|
|
(133.5
|
)
|
|
|
(33.7
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
Debt retirement costs
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
(7.2
|
)
|
|
|
(206
|
)%
|
VAT/Put settlement gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131.9
|
|
|
|
(131.9
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)%
|
Other income
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
154.6
|
|
|
|
76.0
|
|
|
|
78.6
|
|
|
|
103
|
%
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
45.4
|
|
|
|
(7.1
|
)
|
|
|
52.5
|
|
|
|
(739
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest
|
|
|
109.2
|
|
|
|
83.1
|
|
|
|
26.1
|
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(17.8
|
)
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
|
(102
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
108.9
|
|
|
$
|
100.9
|
|
|
$
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
U.S.
Segment.
Revenues. The following summarizes
U.S. revenues (in millions) and carloads statistics
(in thousands). Certain prior period amounts
have been reclassified to reflect changes in the business groups
and conform to the current period presentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Carloads and Intermodal Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Chemical and petroleum
|
|
$
|
162.0
|
|
|
$
|
145.1
|
|
|
$
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
137.2
|
|
|
|
138.1
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
Forest products and metals
|
|
|
248.4
|
|
|
|
225.3
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
207.2
|
|
|
|
219.9
|
|
|
|
(12.7
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
Agriculture and minerals
|
|
|
189.4
|
|
|
|
171.5
|
|
|
|
17.9
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
159.3
|
|
|
|
172.5
|
|
|
|
(13.2
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total general commodities
|
|
|
599.8
|
|
|
|
541.9
|
|
|
|
57.9
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
503.7
|
|
|
|
530.5
|
|
|
|
(26.8
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
Intermodal and automotive
|
|
|
74.8
|
|
|
|
76.6
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
339.4
|
|
|
|
335.9
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
Coal
|
|
|
154.1
|
|
|
|
132.1
|
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
280.1
|
|
|
|
253.4
|
|
|
|
26.7
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carload revenues, units and intermodal units
|
|
|
828.7
|
|
|
|
750.6
|
|
|
|
78.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
1,123.2
|
|
|
|
1,119.8
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenue
|
|
|
57.0
|
|
|
|
53.8
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues(i)
|
|
$
|
885.7
|
|
|
$
|
804.4
|
|
|
$
|
81.3
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) Included in revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel surcharge
|
|
$
|
84.3
|
|
|
$
|
52.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2006, revenues increased
$81.3 million compared to the prior year. The
U.S. segment experienced revenue increases in all commodity
groups except for the intermodal and automotive business, which
decreased slightly due to a decline in automotive business
driven by lower output and short term plant shutdowns in 2006.
Overall, increases in most of the commodities were driven by
targeted price improvements, including increased fuel
surcharges. The following discussion provides an analysis of
revenues by commodity group.
Chemical and petroleum. Revenues increased
$16.9 million in the chemical and petroleum products for
the year ended December 31, 2006, due to targeted rate
increases in the petroleum, agricultural chemicals and
industrial gases sectors, and increased traffic volumes. Pricing
improvement and stronger economic conditions during 2006
accounted for a majority of the growth in revenue in the year,
while growth in the third and fourth quarters also reflected the
Gulf Coast refineries recovery from the past years
hurricanes.
Forest products and metals. Revenues increased
$23.1 million in forest products and metal commodities for
the year ended December 31, 2006, primarily due to targeted
rate increases. Decreases in volume can be attributed to the
lumber and chip products due to rising mortgage rates. This
volume decline was only partially offset by increases in volume
from higher production in the metals, rolled paper and military
products.
Agriculture and minerals. Revenues increased
$17.9 million in the agriculture and minerals products for
the year ended December 31, 2006, due to targeted rate
adjustments and an increase in velocity over certain corridors
and business sectors. Overall improvement in velocity of unit
grain and mineral trains accounted for a majority of the revenue
growth during 2006. Declining market conditions during the third
and fourth quarters of the year accounted for the decline in
volume with the primary decrease in export grain.
Intermodal and automotive. Revenues decreased
$1.8 million in the intermodal and automotive business for
the year ended December 31, 2006, due to declines in the
automotive business from suspended production at an automotive
plant for a majority of the year. This decrease was offset
partially by increased revenues in the intermodal business which
was driven by higher volumes from existing customers as well as
the generation of new intermodal business.
Coal. Revenues increased $22.0 million
for the year ended December 31, 2006, as a result of higher
traffic volumes at certain electric generating stations in order
to rebuild inventory stockpiles. The ability to
36
rebuild stockpiles has been made possible by improved
efficiencies at the coal mines and increased velocity achieved
by KCSR and origin carriers.
Operating expenses. For the year ended
December 31, 2006, U.S. operating expenses increased
$0.8 million. The following summarizes the Companys
U.S. operating expenses (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
$
|
264.3
|
|
|
$
|
244.8
|
|
|
$
|
19.5
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Purchased services
|
|
|
82.8
|
|
|
|
84.6
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
Fuel
|
|
|
140.8
|
|
|
|
123.8
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Equipment costs
|
|
|
82.7
|
|
|
|
68.9
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
65.7
|
|
|
|
60.0
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Casualties and insurance
|
|
|
44.9
|
|
|
|
88.7
|
|
|
|
(43.8
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)%
|
Materials and other
|
|
|
78.9
|
|
|
|
88.5
|
|
|
|
(9.6
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
$
|
760.1
|
|
|
$
|
759.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits. Compensation and
benefits expense increased $19.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006, compared to 2005, as the result of
increased incentive compensation, annual salary increases,
increased management headcount, and an increase in stock based
compensation. Incentive compensation is tied to the financial
results of the Company and accounted for about half of the
increase. Stock based compensation increased partially as a
result of the implementation of SFAS No. 123(R).
Purchased services. Purchased services expense
decreased $1.8 million for the year ended December 31,
2006, compared to the same period in 2005. The decrease was
primarily driven by decreases in legal costs, locomotive repair
costs and rental income received on locomotives leased to Mexico
operations on a short-term basis. The decreases were offset by
increases in joint facilities expenses due to higher traffic and
an increase in auto and truck repair expense.
Fuel. Fuel expense increased
$17.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006,
compared to 2005, primarily as a result of a increases in the
average price per gallon of fuel and increases in consumption
due to higher volumes.
Equipment costs. Equipment costs increased
$13.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006,
compared to 2005, as a result of entering into two new
locomotive lease agreements and new freight car leases during
the year. This increase was offset by a decrease in car hire
expense due to a reduction in the use of non-KCSR freight cars.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation
and amortization expense increased $5.7 million for the
year ended December 31, 2006, compared to the same period
in 2005, primarily due to an increase in assets placed into
service during the year. This increase was partially offset by
an updated depreciation study which was completed during the
year and resulted in a reduction in expense in the
4th quarter.
Casualties and insurance. Casualties and
insurance expense decreased $43.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2006, compared to 2005. During the third
quarter of 2005, the Company recorded a large pre-tax charge for
personal injury liabilities based upon an actuarial study in
2005. The remaining decrease in 2006 was primarily driven by a
lower number of incidences as well as a decrease in the severity
of derailments during the year compared to the prior year.
Materials and other. Other expense decreased
$9.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006,
compared to 2005 primarily due to an increase in the
reimbursement from the Mexico segment for shared service
expenses paid by the U.S. segment during 2006. This was
offset by an increase in materials and supplies primarily
reflecting significant price increases for replacement freight
car wheels.
37
Mexico
Segment.
KCS acquired a controlling interest in KCSM effective
April 1, 2005. The 2005 results reflect charges and costs
associated with the acquisition, as well as the effect of
valuation adjustments as required by purchase accounting. Since
April 1, 2005, the financial results of KCSM have been
consolidated into KCS. Prior to that date, the investment for
KCSM was accounted for under the equity method. Although not
consolidated prior to April 1, 2005, pro forma revenue
information presented below includes KCSM results for the first
quarter of 2005 as if the change of control had occurred on
January 1, 2005. Due to the acquisition, as well as the
valuation adjustments required from purchase accounting, the
expense information below is only presented for the nine months
ended December 31, 2005. Accounting policies for KCSM prior
to the acquisition were materially consistent with
U.S. operations, however, certain adjustments have been
made to the results presented for comparability.
Revenues. The following table summarizes
consolidated Mexico revenues, including the revenues (in
millions) and carloads statistics (in thousands), for the years
ended December 31, 2006 and 2005. Certain prior period
amounts have been reclassified to reflect changes in the
business groups and conform to the current period presentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Carloads and Intermodal Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005(i)
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005(i)
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
General commodities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemical and petroleum
|
|
$
|
127.9
|
|
|
$
|
117.4
|
|
|
$
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
80.4
|
|
|
|
80.7
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0
|
)%
|
Forest products and metals
|
|
|
247.9
|
|
|
|
224.7
|
|
|
|
23.2
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
235.2
|
|
|
|
249.4
|
|
|
|
(14.2
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
Agriculture and minerals
|
|
|
195.0
|
|
|
|
179.1
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
145.0
|
|
|
|
141.4
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total general commodities
|
|
|
570.8
|
|
|
|
521.2
|
|
|
|
49.6
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
460.6
|
|
|
|
471.5
|
|
|
|
(10.9
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
Intermodal and automotive
|
|
|
162.4
|
|
|
|
169.1
|
|
|
|
(6.7
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
312.0
|
|
|
|
328.5
|
|
|
|
(16.5
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
Coal
|
|
|
20.8
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
24.9
|
|
|
|
21.2
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carload revenues, units and intermodal units
|
|
|
754.0
|
|
|
|
704.9
|
|
|
|
49.1
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
797.5
|
|
|
|
821.2
|
|
|
|
(23.7
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenue
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues(ii)
|
|
$
|
774.0
|
|
|
$
|
717.6
|
|
|
$
|
56.4
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) The 2005 proforma revenues include revenues from the
three month period January 1, 2005 to March 31, 2005,
as if the change in control had occurred on January 1, 2005
|
(ii) Included in revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel surcharge
|
|
$
|
43.7
|
|
|
$
|
29.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006 totaled
$774.0 million compared to $717.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2005, which represented an increase of
$56.4 million. Revenues increased despite a decrease in
carloads mainly due to a reduction in the movement of finished
vehicles for exportation. The increase in 2006 was mainly
attributable to targeted rate increases and fuel surcharge.
Carloads are a standard measure used by KCS to determine the
volume of traffic transported over its rail lines. Imports into
Mexico from the U.S., Canada and overseas represented
approximately 56.3% and 56.2% of total revenues in 2006 and
2005, respectively. Approximately 80% of total revenues in 2006
were attributable to international freight.
Chemical and petroleum. Revenues increased
$10.5 million in 2006 primarily due to price increases and
fuel surcharge revenue volumes remained flat compared to the
same period in 2006.
Forest products and metals. Revenues increased
$23.2 million in 2006 compared to 2005, primarily due to
price strategies, longer hauls and increased fuel surcharge.
Targeted rate increases were implemented in 2006 for movements
of steel slabs and steel coil imports. Increased revenue was
seen from longer hauls to
38
Laredo as a result of a customers relocation of its
distribution center from Zacatecas to Tuxtepec. Increases in the
number of cross border paper imports were seen during the year
as well.
Agriculture and minerals. Revenues from
agriculture products increased $15.9 million compared to
2005 primarily as a result of targeted rate increases and fuel
surcharges. Volume increases in corn and sugar were partially
offset by reductions in import shipments of soybeans, sorghum
and wheat products. Revenues also grew due to an embargo on
Ferromex lines. The fructose market increased and continued to
grow without quotas on imports. The revenue increase has been
favorable with movements of grain and products from
U.S. origin to destinations on the KCSM lines. These
increases were negatively affected by a reduction of volumes of
sand and clay products, and lower traffic in route from Jaltipan
to Queretaro, due to dwell times at Ferrovalle. Additionally,
revenues were also affected by the reduction in consumption of
limestone in Lázaro Cárdenas during the second quarter
2006.
Intermodal and automotive. Intermodal revenue
increased $7.9 million during 2006 compared to 2005, as a
result of increased numbers of steamship carriers that call at
the port of Lázaro Cárdenas and consistent transit
times on intermodal trains, which partially offset the overall
decrease in the intermodal and automotive category. Automotive
revenue decreased $14.6 million in 2006 compared to 2005,
as a result of a reduction in the movement of finished vehicles
for exportation to the U.S. and Canadian markets.
Additionally, the movements of importation of finished vehicles,
as well as the domestic distribution of these vehicles, have
declined due to the logistics of their transportation.
Coal. For the year ended December 31,
2006, coal revenues increased $6.2 million compared to
2005. This increase was mainly due to petcoke volume recovery in
2006 and it reflects the price strategies, longer hauls and
increases in fuel surcharges over the prior period.
Operating expenses. The following summarizes
Mexicos operating expenses (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year
|
|
|
Nine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
$
|
129.3
|
|
|
$
|
136.7
|
|
|
$
|
(7.4
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
Purchased services
|
|
|
131.0
|
|
|
|
108.7
|
|
|
|
22.3
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
Fuel
|
|
|
112.8
|
|
|
|
83.1
|
|
|
|
29.7
|
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
Equipment costs
|
|
|
97.0
|
|
|
|
80.9
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
89.3
|
|
|
|
67.1
|
|
|
|
22.2
|
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
Casualties and insurance
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)%
|
Materials and other
|
|
|
27.4
|
|
|
|
38.5
|
|
|
|
(11.1
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
$
|
595.3
|
|
|
$
|
529.7
|
|
|
$
|
65.6
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits. For the year ended
December 31, 2006, salaries, wages, employee benefits and
employee statutory profit sharing expense decreased
$7.4 million compared to the nine months ended
December 31, 2005. For the three month period prior to the
acquisition of KCSM, compensation and benefits expense was
$29.3 million. The decrease reflects the result of four
Supreme Court decisions in May of 2005 which denied the
deductibility of NOLs in a companys profit sharing
liability calculation. As a result of these court rulings, the
Company wrote down the deferred profit sharing asset associated
with these NOLs during 2005, which resulted in a non-cash
charge to income. Additionally, the Company had reductions in
headcount which were partially offset by salary increases and an
increase in wages and fringe benefits resulting from labor
negotiations in July 2006.
Purchased services. Purchased services
increased $22.3 million in 2006 compared to the nine months
ended December 31, 2005. For the three month period prior
to the acquisition of KCSM, purchased services expense was
$36.8 million. The net decrease is due to certain trackage
rights that were not used during 2006, resulting in a cost
reduction, amortization of deferred credits established in
connection with the purchase accounting and additional
capitalization of certain overhead costs, as well as reduced
purchased services
39
during this year. These decreases were slightly offset by
increases in management and professional fees during 2006.
Fuel. Fuel expenses increased
$29.7 million in 2006 compared to the nine months ended
December 31, 2005. For the three month period prior to the
acquisition of KCSM, fuel expense was $23.2 million. The
increase is primarily due to the increase in the average price
per gallon of fuel compared to the prior period.
Equipment costs. Equipment costs increased
$16.1 million compared to the nine months ended
December 31, 2005. For the three month period prior to the
acquisition of KCSM, equipment costs expense was
$21.5 million. The net decrease was attributed mainly to a
reduction in the use of non-KCSM freight cars as a result of
operations improvement. This decrease was partially offset by
the amortization of certain deferred charges and credits
established in connection with purchase accounting adjustments
related to the value of operating leases for freight cars.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation
and amortization expenses in 2006 increased by
$22.2 million compared to the nine months ended
December 31, 2005. For the three month period prior to the
acquisition of KCSM, depreciation expense was $21.8 million.
Casualties and insurance. During 2006,
casualties and insurance decreased $6.2 million, compared
to the nine months ended December 31, 2005. For the three
month period prior to the acquisition of KCSM, casualties and
insurance expense was $2.3 million. The decrease was
primarily the result of lower costs associated with derailments
compared to activity that occurred during the second and third
quarter of 2005.
Materials and other. Materials and other
expenses decreased $11.1 million compared to the nine
months ended December 31, 2005. For the three month period
prior to the acquisition of KCSM, materials and other expense
was $8.9 million. The decrease primarily reflects lower bad
debt expense as compared to 2005, the recognition of transition
costs in 2005, a charge due to the revaluation of inventory
parts associated with the maintenance of a former catenary line
in the second quarter 2005 and losses on sale on property prior
to adoption of the mass asset group method of depreciation.
Consolidated
Non-Operating Expenses.
Consolidated Interest Expense. Consolidated
interest expense increased $33.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006, which primarily reflects the additional
three months of KCSM interest expense in 2006. The remaining
difference was due to higher average balance as well as
increased interest rates on floating rate debt in the year.
Consolidated Debt Retirement
Costs. Consolidated debt retirement costs
increased $0.4 million for the year ended December 31,
2006, compared to the year ended December 31, 2005. During
the year ended December 31, 2006, KCSR entered into an
amended and restated credit agreement and wrote off
$2.2 million of unamortized debt issuance costs and KCSM
refinanced its 10.25% senior notes and wrote off
$2.6 million of unamortized debt issuance costs. For the
year ended December 31, 2005, $4.4 million in
unamortized debt issuance costs were written off in connection
with the refinancing of KCSMs 11.75% debentures and
its first amended and restated credit agreement.
Foreign Exchange. For the year ended
December 31, 2006, the foreign exchange loss was
$3.7 million compared to a gain of $3.5 million for
the 2005 period due to fluctuations in the U.S. dollar
versus the Mexican peso exchange rate.
Equity in Net Earnings of Unconsolidated
Affiliates. Equity in earnings from
unconsolidated affiliates was $7.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2006, compared to $2.9 million for
the year ended December 31, 2005. Significant
components of this change follow:
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in losses from the operations of PCRC was
$1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006,
compared to $1.7 million for the same period in 2005. The
decrease in losses of $0.7 million is the result of higher
volumes than the prior year period.
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of Southern Capital was $5.4 million for
the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to
$2.8 million for the same period in 2005. The
$2.6 million increase in earnings is the result of a
reduction in depreciation expense as a majority of the
locomotives owned by Southern Capital became fully depreciated
during the year.
|
|
|
|
KCSMs equity in earnings of FTVM was $2.9 million for
the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to
$2.9 million for the same period in 2005.
|
|
|
|
Equity in losses of KCSM was $1.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 2005.
|
Other Income. Other income increased
$5.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2006,
primarily due to the sale of land and other long term assets
that were not associated with KCSs railroad operations
during 2006.
Consolidated Income Tax Provision
(Benefit). For the year ended December 31,
2006, KCS income tax expense was $45.4 million, as
compared to a $7.1 million benefit, a change of
$52.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.
The effective tax rate increased from (9.3%) to 29.4% for the
years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively. This
increase was primarily attributable to the absence of one-time
items such as the non-taxable VAT/Put settlement which occurred
in 2005 and the 2005 write-off of deferred profit sharing in
Mexico.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview
KCSs primary uses of cash are to support operations;
maintain and improve its railroad and information systems
infrastructure; pay debt service and preferred stock dividends;
acquire new and maintain existing locomotives, rolling stock,
and other equipment used in the operations of KCS; and meet
other obligations. See Cash Flow Information and
Contractual Obligations below.
As of December 31, 2007, KCS has a debt capitalization
ratio (total debt as a percentage of total debt plus equity) of
50.4 percent. Its primary sources of liquidity are cash
flows generated from operations, borrowings under its revolving
credit facilities and access to debt and equity capital markets.
Although KCS has had more than adequate access to the capital
markets, as a highly leveraged company, the financial terms
under which funding is obtained often contain restrictive
covenants. The covenants constrain financial flexibility by
restricting or prohibiting certain actions, including the
ability to incur additional debt for any purpose other than
refinancing existing debt, create or suffer to exist additional
liens, make prepayments of particular debt, pay dividends on
common stock, make capital investments, engage in transactions
with stockholders and affiliates, issue capital stock, sell
certain assets, and engage in mergers and consolidations or in
sale-leaseback transactions. On December 31, 2007, total
available liquidity (the unrestricted cash balance plus
revolving credit facility availability) was approximately
$122 million. Year end liquidity was reduced by about
$118 million related to the acquisition of 55 new
locomotives by KCSM. A portion of the purchase price of these
locomotives will be financed with debt in early 2008, increasing
available liquidity by about $98 million.
As a result of KCS acquiring a controlling interest in KCSM,
KCSM has become subject to the terms and conditions of the
indentures governing KCSRs two senior notes issues. The
restrictive covenants of these indentures limit the ability of
KCSM to incur additional debt for any purpose other than the
refinancing of existing debt and certain new asset financing.
The Company believes, based on current expectations, that cash
and other liquid assets, operating cash flows, access to capital
markets, and other available financing resources will be
sufficient to fund anticipated operating, capital and debt
service requirements and other commitments through 2008.
However, KCS operating cash flow and financing
alternatives can be unexpectedly impacted by various factors,
some of which are outside of its control. For example, if KCS
was to experience a substantial reduction in revenues or a
substantial increase in operating costs or other liabilities,
its operating cash flows could be significantly reduced.
Additionally, the Company is subject to economic factors
surrounding capital markets and its ability
41
to obtain financing under reasonable terms is subject to market
conditions. Recent capital market volatility and the tightening
of market liquidity could impact KCS access to capital.
Further, KCS cost of debt can be impacted by independent
rating agencies, which assign debt ratings based on certain
credit measurements such as interest coverage and leverage
ratios.
As of December 31, 2007, Standard & Poors
Rating Service (S&P) rated the senior secured
debt as BB, the senior unsecured debt as B, and the preferred
stock as CCC+. S&P also maintained a corporate rating on
KCS of B+ and gave KCS a developing outlook, which the Company
believes is positive. Moodys Investor Service
(Moodys) rated the senior secured debt as Ba2,
the senior unsecured debt of KCSR as B3, the senior unsecured
debt of KCSM as B2, and the preferred stock as Caa1.
Moodys also maintained a probability of default rating on
KCS of B2 and gave KCS a stable outlook.
Long
Term Debt and Credit Facility Activity.
On January 29, 2007, the Company commenced a consent
solicitation to amend the indentures under which KCSRs
91/2% Senior
Notes due 2008 (the
91/2% Notes)
and
71/2% Senior
Notes due 2009 (the
71/2% Notes
and together with the
91/2% Notes,
the Notes) were issued. The Company identified
certain inconsistencies in the language of the indentures which
prevented KCS from obtaining a coverage ratio of at least
2.00:1. The purpose of the consent solicitation was to
(i) resolve an inconsistency in the inclusion of certain
expenses, but not the income, of restricted subsidiaries in the
calculation of the consolidated coverage ratio under the
indentures, (ii) amend the definition of refinancing
indebtedness to allow the inclusion of certain related premiums,
interest, fees and expenses in permitted refinancing
indebtedness and (iii) obtain waivers of any defaults
arising from certain actions taken in the absence of such
proposed amendments. On February 5, 2007, the Company
obtained the requisite consents from the holders of each series
of Notes to amend their respective indentures as described above
and executed supplemental indentures containing such amendments
and waivers.
On January 31, 2007, KCS provided written notice to the
lenders under KCSRs Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
dated as of April 28, 2006 (the 2006 Credit
Agreement) of certain representation and other defaults
under the 2006 Credit Agreement arising from the potential
defaults which existed under the KCSR indentures governing the
Notes as described in the previous paragraph. These defaults
limited KCSRs access to the revolving credit facility. In
its notice of default, the Company also requested that the
lenders waive these defaults. On February 5, 2007, the
Company received a waiver of such defaults from all of the
lenders under the 2006 Credit Agreement. The Company is
currently not in default of the 2006 Credit Agreement and has
access to the revolving credit facility. At December 31,
2007, advances under the revolving credit facility were
$120.0 million, with $5.0 million remaining available
under the facility.
On May 16, 2007, KCSM issued $165.0 million principal
amount of new
73/8% senior
unsecured notes due June 1, 2014 (the
73/8% Senior
Notes). The
73/8% Senior
Notes are denominated in U.S. dollars, bear interest
semiannually at a fixed annual rate of
73/8%
and are unsecured, unsubordinated obligations and rank pari
passu in right of payment with KCSMs existing and
future unsecured, unsubordinated obligations. KCSM used the net
proceeds from the issuance of the
73/8% Senior
Notes, together with a $30.0 million bank term loan and
available cash on hand, as necessary, to pay the principal,
applicable premium and expenses associated with the redemption
of KCSMs
121/2% Senior
Notes due 2012. The
73/8% Senior
Notes are redeemable at KCSMs option, in whole but not in
part, at 100% of their principal amount, plus any accrued and
unpaid interest, at any time in the event of certain changes in
Mexican tax law, and in whole or in part, on or after
June 1, 2011, at the redemption price set forth in the
indenture under which the
73/8% Senior
Notes were issued, subject to certain limitations. The
73/8% Senior
Notes include certain covenants that restrict, limit or prohibit
certain actions.
On May 31, 2007, KCSR entered into Amendment No. 1 to
the 2006 Credit Agreement which provides for a new
$75.0 million term loan facility (the Term Loan C
Facility) with a final maturity date of April 28,
2013. The 2006 Credit Agreement, however, provides for an
earlier termination date that is 90 days prior to the
earliest final maturity date of any outstanding
91/2% Notes
and
71/2% Notes
unless the 2006 Credit Agreement facilities are rated at least
Ba3 by Moodys and BB+ by S&P in each case, with at
least stable
42
outlooks, or prior to such date, the
91/2% Notes
and
71/2% Notes
have been refinanced in full, or an amount sufficient to
indefeasibly repay such
91/2% Notes
and
71/2% Notes
has been deposited with the applicable note trustee. The
earliest final maturity date of the
91/2% Notes
and
71/2% Notes
is currently October 1, 2008. Based upon the aforementioned
termination provision, the rating criteria of S&P have not
been met resulting in a maturity date of July 3, 2008. The
Company intends to refinance the
91/2% Notes
prior to such date. During the third quarter of 2007, the
Company reclassified the obligations outstanding under the 2006
Credit Agreement from long term debt to current debt and as of
December 31, 2007, the obligations reclassified from long
term debt to current debt totaled $437.1 million. The Term
Loan C Facility bears interest at either LIBOR plus
150 basis points or an alternative base rate plus
50 basis points. Proceeds from advances under the Term Loan
C Facility were used to reduce amounts outstanding under
KCSRs revolving credit facility under the 2006 Credit
Agreement. Except as amended and supplemented by Amendment
No. 1, all terms of the 2006 Credit Agreement remain in
full force and effect.
On June 14, 2007, KCSM entered into a new credit agreement,
(the 2007 KCSM Credit Agreement), in an aggregate
amount of up to $111.0 million, consisting of a revolving
credit facility of up to $81.0 million, and a term loan
facility of up to $30.0 million with Bank of America, N.A.,
BBVA Bancomer, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple,
and the other lenders named in the 2007 KCSM Credit Agreement.
KCSM used the proceeds from the 2007 KCSM Credit Agreement to
pay (a) all amounts outstanding under KCSMs Credit
Agreement dated October 24, 2005, (the 2005 KCSM
Credit Agreement), and to pay all fees and expenses
related to the refinancing of the 2005 KCSM Credit Agreement,
(b) to pay all amounts outstanding in respect of
KCSMs
101/4% Senior
Notes due 2007, (c) to refinance a portion of KCSMs
121/2% Senior
Notes due 2012, (d) to pay all amounts outstanding under
KCSMs Bridge Loan Agreement dated April 30, 2007, and
(e) for general corporate purposes. The maturity date for
the revolving credit facility is December 30, 2011, and the
maturity date for the term loan facility is June 29, 2012.
The 2007 KCSM Credit Agreement contains covenants that restrict,
limit or prohibit certain actions that are customary for these
types of agreements. In addition, KCSM must meet certain
consolidated interest coverage ratios, consolidated leverage
ratios, and fixed charge coverage ratios. KCSM is not currently
in default of the 2007 KCSM Credit Agreement and has access to
the revolving credit facility. At December 31, 2007,
advances under the revolving credit facility were
$20.0 million, with $61.0 million remaining available
under the facility.
On December 19, 2007, KCSM entered into Amendment and
Waiver No. 1 to the 2007 KCSM Credit Agreement (KCSM
Amendment and Waiver No. 1) to modify certain terms
to permit KCSM to finance the acquisition of new locomotives by
incurring indebtedness on an accelerated basis as compared to
the original terms contained in the 2007 KCSM Credit Agreement.
The KCSM Amendment and Waiver No. 1 also waives certain
prospective defaults under the 2007 KCSM Credit Agreement as of
the quarter ended December 31, 2007, as a result of the
acquisition of the new locomotives in the fourth quarter of
2007, in order to permit the Company sufficient time to complete
its financing of the new locomotives.
Cash
Flow Information and Contractual Obligations.
Summary cash flow data follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used for):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
381.5
|
|
|
$
|
267.5
|
|
|
$
|
178.8
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(380.5
|
)
|
|
|
(166.0
|
)
|
|
|
(289.5
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(24.5
|
)
|
|
|
(53.6
|
)
|
|
|
103.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(23.5
|
)
|
|
|
47.9
|
|
|
|
(7.5
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of year
|
|
|
79.0
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
|
38.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
55.5
|
|
|
$
|
79.0
|
|
|
$
|
31.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2007, the consolidated cash position decreased
$23.5 million due to capital expenditures, payments made
under the Settlement Agreement with TMM, and the payment of
preferred stock dividends in
43
arrears, partially offset by increased operating income.
Included in capital expenditures is approximately
$118.0 million for locomotives purchased through December
2007, of which the Company intends to finance approximately
$98.0 million in the first quarter of 2008. During 2006,
the consolidated cash position increased $47.9 million due
to increased operating income which was partially offset by
additional payments for the acquisition of KCSM and the
refinancing and repayment of debt.
KCS cash flow from operations has historically been
positive and sufficient to fund operations, roadway capital
expenditures, other capital improvements and debt service.
External sources of cash (principally bank debt, public debt,
preferred stock and leases) have been used to refinance existing
indebtedness and to fund acquisitions, new investments and
equipment additions.
Operating Cash Flows. The following summarizes
consolidated operating cash flow information
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
153.8
|
|
|
$
|
108.9
|
|
|
$
|
100.9
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
160.2
|
|
|
|
155.0
|
|
|
|
127.7
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
66.3
|
|
|
|
41.0
|
|
|
|
(17.3
|
)
|
Equity in undistributed earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(11.4
|
)
|
|
|
(7.3
|
)
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
Share-based and other deferred compensation
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
42.6
|
|
VAT/Put settlement gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131.9
|
)
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(17.8
|
)
|
Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Debt retirement costs
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Changes in working capital items
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
(24.5
|
)
|
|
|
45.9
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|
|
(17.4
|
)
|
|
|
17.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
381.5
|
|
|
$
|
267.5
|
|
|
$
|
178.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating cash flows for 2007 increased $114.0 million
to $381.5 million compared to $267.5 million in 2006.
The increase in operating cash flows was primarily attributable
to better operating performance and changes in working capital
balances relating to the timing of payments and receipts. Net
operating cash flows for 2006 increased $88.7 million to
$267.5 million compared to $178.8 million in 2005.
This increase in operating cash flows was primarily attributable
to better operating performance and the consolidation of KCSM
for twelve months in 2006 as compared to nine months in 2005.
The increase was partially offset by changes in working capital
balances relating to the timing of payments and receipts.
Investing Cash Flows. Net investing cash
outflows were $380.5 million and $166.0 million during
2007 and 2006, respectively. This $214.5 million increase
was related to increased capital expenditures, decreased
property sales proceeds and proceeds from loans to affiliates.
Net investing cash outflows for 2006 decreased
$123.5 million as compared to 2005, which was related to
decreased capital expenditures, increased property sales
proceeds and the receipt of the MSLLC investment from NS.
Financing Cash Flows. Financing cash inflows
were derived from the issuance of long-term debt, including
borrowings under the revolving credit facilities, the issuance
of preferred stock and proceeds from the issuance of common
stock under employee stock plans. Financing cash outflows were
used for the repayment of debt, the repurchase of KCS
common stock, the payment of dividends on KCS preferred
stock and the payment of debt and preferred stock issuance
costs. Financing cash flows for 2007, 2006, and 2005 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Financing cash outflows for 2007 were $24.5 million,
resulting primarily from the costs associated with refinancing
debt and preferred stock dividend payments. During 2007, KCSM
issued $165.0 million of
73/8% senior
unsecured notes and used the proceeds, together with a
$30.0 million new term loan, to
|
44
redeem the KCSM
121/2% Senior
Notes and associated premium and expenses. KCSR entered into an
amendment to the 2006 Credit Agreement for a new
$75.0 million term loan facility and used the proceeds to
reduce amounts outstanding under KCSRs revolving credit
facility under the 2006 Credit Agreement. KCSM entered into a
new credit agreement for a $30.0 million term loan facility
and a revolving credit facility of up to $81.0 million.
KCSM used the proceeds to repay all amounts outstanding under
the 2005 KCSM Credit Agreement, to refinance a portion of the
121/2% Senior
Notes, to pay costs associated with these refinancings and to
pay the remaining amounts outstanding in respect of the
KCSMs
101/4% Senior
Notes.
|
|
|
|
|
Financing cash outflows for 2006 were $53.6 million,
resulting primarily from the repayment of short and long term
debt, including amounts related to the KCSM acquisition, and the
costs associated with refinancing debt. During 2006, KCSR
entered into a new $371.1 million amended and restated
credit agreement and used the proceeds to repay all amounts
outstanding under the previous credit agreement. KCS also
borrowed a net amount of $27.5 million under the Tex-Mex
RRIF loan, repaid a net amount of $2.0 million under the
KCSR revolving credit facility and repaid other amounts. KCSM
issued $175.0 million of
75/8% senior
unsecured notes and used the proceeds to purchase
$146.0 million of its
101/4% senior
unsecured notes and repay $29.0 million under its term loan
facility. KCSM also used cash on hand to repay all amounts
outstanding under its revolving credit facility.
|
|
|
|
Financing cash flows for 2005 were $103.2 million,
resulting primarily from borrowings under the revolving credit
facilities. During 2005 KCS issued $210.0 million of
preferred stock and the net proceeds were used to repurchase
9.0 million shares of KCS common stock. KCS also assumed
debt under a purchase agreement for 75 locomotives, of which
$24.3 million was outstanding at December 31, 2005,
borrowed $21.7 million under the Tex-Mex RRIF loan, and had
borrowings of $92.0 million outstanding at
December 31, 2005 under the KCSR revolving credit facility.
KCSM issued $460.0 million of
93/8% senior
unsecured notes, and entered into a $106.0 million credit
facility. The proceeds from these last two financings were used
by KCSM to repay $443.5 million of senior discount
debentures, $31.0 million under a bridge loan, the
remaining balance of $67.5 million under the previous
credit facility and the costs associated with the transactions.
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of KCS common stock pursuant to employee
stock plans were $0.7 million, $8.6 million, and
$1.7 million in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.
|
|
|
|
Payment of preferred stock cash dividends were
$23.3 million, $4.3 million and $8.7 million in
2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. Dividends of approximately
$0.2 million were paid each year on the 4.0% noncumulative
preferred stock; approximately $15.0 million,
$2.1 million and $8.5 million of dividends were paid
in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively, on the Series C
Preferred Stock; and approximately $8.1 million and
$2.0 million of dividends were paid in 2007 and 2006,
respectively, on the Series D Preferred Stock. All
cumulative dividends in arrears were paid February 15, 2007.
|
Contractual Obligations. The following table
outlines the material obligations under long-term debt,
operating lease and other contractual commitments on
December 31, 2007 (in millions). Typically, payments
for operating leases, other contractual obligations and interest
on long-term debt are funded through operating cash flows.
Principal payment obligations on long-term debt are typically
refinanced by issuing new long-term debt. If operating cash
flows are not sufficient, funds received from other sources,
including borrowings under revolving credit facilities and
proceeds from property and other asset dispositions might also
be available.
45
These obligations are customary transactions similar to those
entered into by others in the transportation industry. KCS
anticipates refinancing certain parts of the long-term debt
prior to maturity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
3-5
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
Long-term debt (including interest and capital lease obligations)
|
|
$
|
2,239.7
|
|
|
$
|
778.9
|
|
|
$
|
369.7
|
|
|
$
|
646.3
|
|
|
$
|
444.8
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
1,259.9
|
|
|
|
147.4
|
|
|
|
266.2
|
|
|
|
229.5
|
|
|
|
616.8
|
|
FIN 48 obligations
|
|
|
32.6
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditure obligations(i)
|
|
|
606.0
|
|
|
|
111.0
|
|
|
|
237.0
|
|
|
|
258.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other contractual obligations(ii)
|
|
|
430.0
|
|
|
|
75.4
|
|
|
|
95.3
|
|
|
|
98.6
|
|
|
|
160.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic cost (benefit) recognized
|
|
$
|
4,568.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,120.5
|
|
|
$
|
988.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,237.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,222.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) |
|
Capital expenditure obligations include minimum capital
expenditures under the KCSM Concession agreement. |
|
(ii) |
|
Other contractual obligations include purchase commitments and
certain maintenance agreements. |
In the normal course of business, the Company enters into
long-term contractual requirements for future goods and services
needed for the operations of the business. Such commitments are
not in excess of expected requirements and are not reasonably
likely to result in performance penalties or payments that would
have a material adverse effect on the Companys liquidity.
The Company is party to five utilization leases covering 987
railcars where car hire revenue as defined in the lease
agreements is shared between the lessor and the Company. The
leases expire at various times through 2015. Amounts that may be
due to lessors under these utilization leases vary from month to
month based on car hire rental with the minimum monthly cost to
the Company being zero. Accordingly, the utilization leases have
been excluded from contractual obligations above.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.
As further described in Note 3 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K,
KCSR holds a fifty percent interest in Southern Capital.
Southern Capitals principal operations are the acquisition
and leasing of equipment including locomotives, rolling stock
and other railroad equipment. On June 25, 2002, Southern
Capital partially refinanced the outstanding balance of certain
debt through the issuance of 5.7% pass through trust
certificates secured by all of the locomotives and rolling stock
owned by Southern Capital and rental payments payable by KCSR
under the operating leases of the equipment owned by Southern
Capital. As Southern Capital is a fifty percent owned joint
venture accounted for under the equity method, this debt is not
reflected in KCS Consolidated Balance Sheets which are
included in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K.
KCSR holds a fifty percent interest in PCRC. PCRC, as described
in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in
Item 8 of this
Form 10-K,
was awarded a concession to reconstruct and operate the Panama
Canal Railway, a
47-mile
railroad that provides international container shipping
companies with a railway transportation option across the
Isthmus of Panama.
On November 2, 2007, PCRC completed an offering of
$100 million of 7% Senior Secured Notes due November
2026 (the Notes). The Notes are senior obligations
of PCRC, secured by certain assets of PCRC. KCSR has pledged its
shares of PCRC as security for the Notes. The Notes are
otherwise non-recourse to KCS. The Company has agreed to
indemnify Mi-Jack Products, Inc, (Mi-Jack), the
other 50% owner of PCRC, for half of any claims made on a
$9.6 million letter of credit obtained by Mi-Jack to
partially fund a debt service reserve account and to fund a
liquidity account, each of which was established by PCRC in
connection with the issuance of the Notes. The Company is also a
guarantor for approximately $0.3 million of
46
an equipment loan and has issued four irrevocable standby
letters of credit totaling approximately $3.0 million to
fulfill the Companys fifty percent guarantee of other
equipment loans at PCRC.
Capital
Expenditures.
Capital improvements for track structure and other road property
have historically been funded with cash flows from operations;
however during 2005, KCS used borrowings under its revolving
credit facility to fund an expanded capital expenditure program.
KCS has historically used internally generated cash flows or
lease financing for equipment acquisition.
The following table summarizes cash capital expenditures by type
for the consolidated operations for the year ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and KCSR and
Mexrail for the year ended 2005, including KCSM for the last
nine months of 2005 (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Maintenance of Way
Track
|
|
$
|
128.1
|
|
|
$
|
74.8
|
|
|
$
|
98.2
|
|
Other
|
|
|
34.4
|
|
|
|
25.6
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total maintenance of way
|
|
|
162.5
|
|
|
|
100.4
|
|
|
|
133.2
|
|
Maintenance of equipment
|
|
|
40.3
|
|
|
|
40.4
|
|
|
|
31.7
|
|
Transportation capacity
|
|
|
47.4
|
|
|
|
70.7
|
|
|
|
64.4
|
|
Locomotive acquisitions
|
|
|
127.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
Information technology
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
20.8
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
410.5
|
|
|
$
|
241.8
|
|
|
$
|
275.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For 2008, internally generated cash flows, use of the revolving
credit facilities as needed, equipment secured debt, as well as
a potential loan under the Railroad Rehabilitation and
Improvement Financing Program, currently in the application
review process by the Federal Railroad Administration, are
expected to fund cash capital expenditures, currently estimated
at approximately $500 million.
Maintenance
and Repairs.
KCS, like other railroads, is required to maintain as well as
self-fund the maintenance of its infrastructure and equipment.
Portions of roadway and equipment maintenance costs are
capitalized and other portions are expensed (as components of
Materials and other and Purchased services), as appropriate.
Maintenance and capital improvement programs are in conformity
with GAAP as well as with the standards recognized within the
rail industry and related regulatory agencies. KCS expects to
continue funding roadway and equipment maintenance expenditures
with internally generated cash flows.
Capital
Structure.
Components of the capital structure follow (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Debt due within one year
|
|
$
|
650.9
|
|
|
$
|
92.8
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,105.0
|
|
|
|
1,664.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
1,755.9
|
|
|
|
1,757.0
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,726.3
|
|
|
|
1,582.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt plus equity
|
|
$
|
3,482.2
|
|
|
$
|
3,339.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
Shelf
Registration Statements and Public Securities
Offerings.
KCS has one current shelf registration statement on file with
the SEC (the Universal Shelf
Registration
No. 333-130112).
The Universal Shelf was filed on December 2, 2005 in
accordance with the securities offering reform rules of the SEC
that allow well-known seasoned issuers to register
an unspecified amount of different types of securities on an
immediately effective
Form S-3
registration statement. The Universal Shelf will expire on
December 2, 2008. On December 9, 2005, the Company
completed the sale and issuance of 210,000 shares of its
Series D Preferred Stock pursuant to the Universal Shelf.
There remains an unspecified amount of securities available
under the Universal Shelf.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
KCS accounting and financial reporting policies are in
conformity with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements,
and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Management believes that the following
accounting policies and estimates are critical to an
understanding of KCS historical and future performance.
Management has discussed the development and selection of the
following critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee
of KCS Board of Directors and the Audit Committee has
reviewed the selection, application and disclosure of the
Companys critical accounting policies and estimates.
Capitalization
and Depreciation of Property and Equipment.
Due to the extremely capital intensive nature of the railroad
industry, maintenance and depreciation of property and equipment
is a substantial operating expense for KCS and the railroad
industry as a whole. KCS capitalizes costs relating to additions
and replacements of property and equipment, including certain
overhead costs representing the indirect costs associated with
capital projects. Overhead factors are periodically reviewed and
adjusted to reflect current costs using the full absorption
method. Overhead costs are depreciated using the mass asset
group method of accounting consistent with industry standards
and rules established by the STB.
The cost of property and equipment normally retired, less
salvage value, is charged to depreciation expense over the
estimated life of the operating assets using asset group
straight-line rates. The STB approves the depreciation rates
used by KCSR (excluding the amortization of computer software)
but not for KCSM. Both KCSR and KCSM periodically conduct
studies of depreciation rates for property and equipment and
implements appropriate changes. These processes for KCSR and
KCSM substantially conform with each other.
These studies take into consideration the historical retirement
experience of homogeneous assets within a certain category of
group assets (e.g., ties, rail, box cars, covered hoppers,
etc.), the current condition of assets, past and current
maintenance practices, potential changes in technology and
maintenance, estimated salvage value, and industry regulations.
For all other consolidated subsidiaries, depreciation is derived
based upon the asset value in excess of estimated salvage value
using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives
of the assets.
Depreciation for property and equipment is based upon estimates
of the useful lives of assets as well as their net salvage value
at the end of their useful lives. Estimation of the useful lives
of assets that are long-lived as well as their salvage value
requires significant management judgment. Accordingly,
management believes that accounting estimates related to
depreciation expense are critical.
Currently, KCSR and KCSM depreciate property and equipment and
capitalized leases generally over a range of 3 to 50 years
depending upon the estimated life of the particular asset or
asset group. In addition to the adjustment to rates as a result
of the depreciation studies, certain other events could occur
that would materially affect the Companys estimates and
assumptions related to depreciation. Unforeseen changes in
operations or technology could substantially alter
managements assumptions regarding KCS ability to
realize the return of its investment in operating assets and,
therefore, affect the amount of depreciation expense to charge
against both current and future revenues.
48
Because depreciation expense is a function of statistical
studies made of property, plant and equipment, subsequent
studies could result in different estimates of useful lives and
net salvage values. If future depreciation studies yield results
indicating that the assets have shorter lives as a result of
obsolescence, physical condition, changes in technology or
changes in net salvage values, the estimate of depreciation
expense could increase. Likewise, if future studies indicate
that assets have longer lives, the estimate of depreciation
expense could decrease.
KCSR Depreciation Review. During the year
ended December 31, 2006, KCSR engaged a civil engineering
firm to assist management in evaluating depreciation rates for
property and equipment. The study centered on evaluating
historical replacement patterns to assess future lives and
indicated that KCSR was depreciating its property over shorter
periods than the assets were actually used. The effect of this
change in estimate was a $3.0 million decrease in
depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2006.
KCSM Depreciation Review. For the year ended
December 31, 2005, KCSM adopted the mass asset group
depreciation method for consistency with KCSR. In order to
assist management with the change to the group method, KCSM
engaged a civil engineering firm to conduct a study of
depreciation rates for property and equipment. The study
centered on evaluating historical replacement patterns to assess
future lives and indicated that KCSM was depreciating its
property over shorter periods than the assets were actually
used. As a result, depreciation expense recorded in the fourth
quarter of 2005 reflected an adjustment totaling
$5.5 million, to reduce depreciation expense as recorded in
the second and third quarter of 2005. Unlike KCSR, KCSM
depreciation rates are not subject to the approval of the STB
and the changes to the depreciation rates, as a result of the
study, were applied in 2005. Concession rights and related
assets are amortized over the useful lives as determined by the
KCSM depreciation study.
Depreciation and amortization expense for the year ended
December 31, 2007 was $160.2 million. A one percent
change in the average life of all group assets would result in a
$1.4 million change to the Companys depreciation
expense.
Provision for Environmental Remediation.
As further described in Note 11 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K,
the Companys operations are subject to extensive federal,
state and local environmental laws and regulations in the
U.S. and Mexico. KCS conducts studies, as well as site
surveys, to determine the extent of environmental remediation
necessary to clean up a site. These studies incorporate the
analysis of internal and external environmental engineering
staff and consultation with legal counsel. From these studies
and surveys, a range of estimates of the costs involved is
derived. These cost estimates are based on forecasts of the
total future direct costs related to environmental remediation
and change periodically as additional or better information
becomes available as to the extent of site remediation required,
if any. KCS accrues for the cost of remediation where the
obligation is probable and such costs can be reasonably
estimated.
Cost estimates can be influenced by advanced technologies
related to the detection, appropriate remedial course of action
and anticipated cost. Certain changes could occur that would
materially affect managements estimates and assumptions
related to costs for environmental remediation. If KCS becomes
subject to more stringent environmental remediation costs at
known sites, discovers additional contamination, discovers
previously unknown sites, or becomes subject to related personal
or property damage, KCS could incur additional costs that could
be significant in connection with its environmental remediation.
Accordingly, management believes that estimates related to the
accrual of environmental remediation liabilities are critical to
KCS results of operations.
Environmental remediation expense was $7.4 million and
$3.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2007,
and 2006, respectively and was included in casualties and
insurance expense on the consolidated statements of income.
Additionally, as of December 31, 2007, KCS had a liability
for environmental remediation of $9.9 million. KCS
environmental liabilities are not discounted. This amount was
derived from a range of reasonable estimates based upon the
studies and site surveys described above and in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5
Accounting for Contingencies
(SFAS 5). For
49
purposes of earnings sensitivity analysis, if the
December 31, 2007 environmental reserve was adjusted
(increased or decreased) by 10%, environmental expense would
change by $0.9 million.
Provision
for Casualty Claims.
Due to the nature of railroad operations, claims related to
personal injuries and third party liabilities resulting from
crossing collisions and derailments, as well as claims related
to personal property damage and other casualties is a
substantial expense to KCS. Claims are estimated and recorded
for known reported occurrences as well as for incurred but not
reported (IBNR) occurrences. Consistent with the
general practice within the railroad industry, the estimated
liability for these casualty expenses is actuarially determined
on an undiscounted basis. In estimating the liability for
casualty claims, KCS bases the estimate on an updated study of
casualty reserves, which calculates an estimate using historical
experience and estimates of claim costs as well as numerous
assumptions regarding factors relevant to the derivation of an
estimate of future claim costs.
Personal injury and other casualty claims are subject to a
significant degree of uncertainty, especially estimates related
to incurred but not reported personal injuries for which a party
has yet to assert a claim. In deriving an estimate of the
provision for casualty claims, management must make assumptions
related to substantially uncertain matters (injury severity,
claimant age and legal jurisdiction). Changes in the assumptions
used for actuarial studies could have a material effect on the
estimate of the provision for casualty claims. The most
sensitive assumptions for personal injury accruals are the
expected average cost per claim and the projected frequency
rates for the number of claims that will ultimately result in
payment. Management believes that the accounting estimate
related to the liability for personal injuries and other
casualty claims is critical to KCS results of operations.
See also Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K.
Based on the methods described above and information available
as of December 31, 2007, the liability for personal injury
casualty claims was $90.0 million. A 5% increase or
decrease in either the expected average cost per claim or the
frequency rate for claims with payments would result in an
approximate $4.5 million increase or decrease in the
Companys recorded personal injury reserves.
For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, casualty
expense equaled $55.0 million and $33.8 million,
respectively, and was included in casualties and insurance
expense in the consolidated statements of income.
Provision
for Income Taxes.
Deferred income taxes represent a substantial liability of KCS.
For financial reporting purposes, management determines the
current tax liability, as well as deferred tax assets and
liabilities, in accordance with the liability method of
accounting for income taxes as specified in Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 Accounting for
Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes is the sum of
income taxes both currently payable and deferred into the
future. Currently payable income taxes represent the liability
related to KCS U.S., state and Mexican income tax returns
for the current year and anticipated tax payments resulting from
income tax audits while the net deferred tax expense or benefit
represents the change in the balance of deferred tax assets or
liabilities as reported on the balance sheet. The changes in
deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon
the changes in differences between the basis of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the basis of
assets and liabilities for tax purposes as measured using the
enacted tax rates that management estimates will be in effect
when these differences reverse. In addition, the tax provision
for Mexico is further complicated by the impacts of inflation as
well as the exchange rate, both of which can have a significant
impact on the calculation. In addition to estimating the future
tax rates applicable to the reversal of tax differences,
management must also make certain assumptions regarding whether
tax differences are permanent or temporary. If the differences
are temporary, management must estimate the timing of their
reversal, and whether taxable operating income in future periods
will be sufficient to fully recognize any gross deferred tax
assets of KCS. Accordingly, management believes that the
estimate related to the provision for income taxes are critical
to the Companys results of operations.
50
For the year ended December 31, 2007, income tax expense
totaled $67.1 million. For every 1% change in the 2007
effective rate, income tax expense would have changed by
$2.2 million. For every 1% change in the Mexican inflation
rate the tax expense would increase or decrease by
$4.6 million. If the exchange rate used at the end of 2007
changed by 10 cents from 10.87 Mexican pesos to each
U.S. dollar to 10.77 pesos per dollar, the tax expense
would have decreased by $1.4 million.
OTHER
MATTERS
Litigation. The Company is a party to various
legal proceedings and administrative actions, all of which are
of an ordinary, routine nature and incidental to its operations.
Included in these proceedings are various tort claims brought by
current and former employees for job related injuries and by
third parties for injuries related to railroad operations. KCS
aggressively defends these matters and has established liability
reserves that management believes are adequate to cover expected
costs. Although it is not possible to predict the outcome of any
legal proceeding, in the opinion of the Companys
management, other than those proceedings described in
Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in
Item 8 of this
Form 10-K,
such proceedings and actions should not, individually, or in the
aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the Companys
financial condition.
Inflation. U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles require the use of historical cost, which
does not reflect the effects of inflation on the replacement
cost of property. Due to the capital intensive nature of
KCS business, the replacement cost of these assets would
be significantly larger than the amounts reported under the
historical cost basis.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements. Refer to
Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in
Item 8 of this
Form 10-K
for information relative to recent accounting pronouncements.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures Concerning Market Risk
|
KCS utilizes various financial instruments that have certain
inherent market risks, but these instruments have not been
entered into for trading purposes. The following information,
together with information included in Item 7,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and Note 12 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K,
describe the key aspects of certain financial instruments that
have market risk to KCS.
Interest Rate Sensitivity. Floating-rate
indebtedness totaled $487.1 million and $381.6 million
at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Two credit
agreements, each comprised of a revolving credit facility and a
term loan facility, contain variable rate debt which accrues
interest based on target interest indexes (London Interbank
Offered Rate LIBOR or an alternative
base rate) plus an applicable spread, as set forth in each
credit agreement. Given the balance of $487.1 million of
variable rate debt at December 31, 2007, KCS is sensitive
to fluctuations in interest rates. For example, a hypothetical
100 basis points increase in each of the respective target
interest indexes would result in additional interest expense of
$4.9 million on an annualized basis for the floating-rate
instruments issued by the Company as of December 31, 2007.
Based upon the borrowing rates available to KCS and its
subsidiaries for indebtedness with similar terms and average
maturities, the fair value of debt was approximately
$1,771.8 million at December 31, 2007 and
$1,814.1 million at December 31, 2006, compared with a
carrying value of $1,755.9 million and
$1,757.0 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Commodity Price Sensitivity. As described in
Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations Other
Matters Derivative Instruments of this
Form 10-K,
KCS periodically participates in diesel fuel purchase commitment
and swap transactions. At December 31, 2007, KCS did not
have any outstanding fuel swap agreements. The Company also
holds fuel inventories for use in operations. These inventories
are not material to KCS overall financial position. Fuel
costs are expected to mirror market conditions in 2008, however,
fuel cost are unpredictable and subject to a variety of factors
outside the Companys control. KCS also cushions the impact
of increased fuel costs through fuel surcharge
51
revenues from customers. Assuming annual consumption of
140 million gallons, a 10 cent change in the price per
gallon of fuel would cause a $14.0 million change in
operating expenses.
Foreign Exchange Sensitivity. KCSM uses the
dollar as its functional currency. Earnings from KCSM included
in the Companys results of operations reflect revaluation
gains and losses that KCSM records in the process of translating
certain transactions from pesos to dollars. Therefore, the
Company has exposure to fluctuations in the value of the peso.
While not currently utilizing foreign currency instruments to
hedge KCS dollar investment in KCSM, existing alternatives
are evaluated as market conditions and exchange rates fluctuate.
For example, a hypothetical 10% increase in the US dollar to the
Mexican peso exchange rate on net monetary assets of
Ps.1,325.7 million would result in a translation loss of
approximately $11.1 million and a 10% decrease in the
exchange rate would result in a translation gain of
approximately $13.5 million.
52
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
Index to
Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
Financial Statement Schedules:
|
|
|
|
|
All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, are
insignificant, or the required information is shown in the
consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
53
Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The management of Kansas City Southern is responsible for
establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting as such term is defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f).
KCS internal control over financial reporting was designed
to provide reasonable assurance to the Companys management
and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair
presentation of published financial statements.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have
inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined
to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with
respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Under the supervision and participation of the Companys
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, management
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007, based on the framework established by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission in Internal Control Integrated
Framework (commonly referred to as the COSO framework).
Based on its evaluation, management concluded that the
Companys internal control over financial reporting was
effective as of December 31, 2007, based on the criteria
outlined in the COSO framework.
The effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, has been
audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their attestation report, which
immediately follows this report.
54
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Kansas City Southern:
We have audited Kansas City Southerns internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Kansas City
Southerns management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that
receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use,
or disposition of the companys assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Kansas City Southern maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Kansas City Southern as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders equity and
comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in
the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and our
report dated February 15, 2008 expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Kansas City, Missouri
February 15, 2008
55
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Kansas City Southern:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Kansas City Southern and subsidiaries (the Company) as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders equity and
comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in
the three-year period ended December 31, 2007. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Kansas City Southern and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
Kansas City Southerns internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report
dated February 15, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on
the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
As discussed in note 7 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards
Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes, effective January 1, 2007.
Kansas City, Missouri
February 15, 2008
56
Kansas
City Southern and Subsidiaries
Years
ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
In millions, except share
|
|
|
|
and per share amounts
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,742.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,659.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,352.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
|
394.1
|
|
|
|
393.6
|
|
|
|
381.5
|
|
Purchased services
|
|
|
184.7
|
|
|
|
204.7
|
|
|
|
195.1
|
|
Fuel
|
|
|
270.8
|
|
|
|
253.6
|
|
|
|
206.9
|
|
Equipment costs
|
|
|
182.4
|
|
|
|
179.7
|
|
|
|
149.8
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
160.2
|
|
|
|
155.0
|
|
|
|
127.7
|
|
Casualties and insurance
|
|
|
71.0
|
|
|
|
53.4
|
|
|
|
103.4
|
|
Materials and other
|
|
|
117.2
|
|
|
|
115.4
|
|
|
|
125.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
1,380.4
|
|
|
|
1,355.4
|
|
|
|
1,289.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
362.4
|
|
|
|
304.3
|
|
|
|
62.3
|
|
Equity in net earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(156.7
|
)
|
|
|
(167.2
|
)
|
|
|
(133.5
|
)
|
Debt retirement costs
|
|
|
(6.9
|
)
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
VAT/put settlement gain, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131.9
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
221.3
|
|
|
|
154.6
|
|
|
|
76.0
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
67.1
|
|
|
|
45.4
|
|
|
|
(7.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest
|
|
|
154.2
|
|
|
|
109.2
|
|
|
|
83.1
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(17.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
153.8
|
|
|
|
108.9
|
|
|
|
100.9
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
19.8
|
|
|
|
19.5
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
134.0
|
|
|
$
|
89.4
|
|
|
$
|
91.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
|
$
|
1.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
1.57
|
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares outstanding (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
75,832
|
|
|
|
74,593
|
|
|
|
75,527
|
|
Potential dilutive common shares
|
|
|
21,784
|
|
|
|
17,793
|
|
|
|
17,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
97,616
|
|
|
|
92,386
|
|
|
|
92,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
57
Kansas
City Southern and Subsidiaries
December
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
In millions, except share amounts
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
55.5
|
|
|
$
|
79.0
|
|
Accounts receivable, net (Note 2)
|
|
|
243.4
|
|
|
|
334.3
|
|
Restricted funds (Note 2)
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
26.5
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
90.3
|
|
|
|
72.5
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
177.8
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
Other current assets (Note 5)
|
|
|
67.2
|
|
|
|
86.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
645.7
|
|
|
|
606.0
|
|
Investments (Note 3)
|
|
|
79.3
|
|
|
|
64.9
|
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of
$871.9 and $897.0 at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively
|
|
|
2,917.8
|
|
|
|
2,452.2
|
|
Concession assets, net
|
|
|
1,215.5
|
|
|
|
1,303.3
|
|
Deferred tax asset (Note 7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128.7
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
69.9
|
|
|
|
82.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
4,928.2
|
|
|
$
|
4,637.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt due within one year (Note 6)
|
|
$
|
650.9
|
|
|
$
|
41.9
|
|
Accounts and wages payable
|
|
|
121.1
|
|
|
|
189.9
|
|
Current liabiltiy related to KCSM acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.9
|
|
Accrued liabilities (Note 5)
|
|
|
326.7
|
|
|
|
354.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,098.7
|
|
|
|
637.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (Note 6)
|
|
|
1,105.0
|
|
|
|
1,631.8
|
|
Long-term liability related to KCSM acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.4
|
|
Deferred income taxes (Note 7)
|
|
|
499.1
|
|
|
|
417.3
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits
|
|
|
256.1
|
|
|
|
235.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other liabilities
|
|
|
1,860.2
|
|
|
|
2,317.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
243.0
|
|
|
|
100.3
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity (Notes 2,8):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$25 par, 4% noncumulative, preferred stock,
840,000 shares authorized, 649,736 shares issued,
242,170 shares outstanding
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
Series C redeemable cumulative convertible
perpetual preferred stock, $1 par, 4.25%,
400,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Series D cumulative convertible perpetual
preferred stock, $1 par, 5.125%, 210,000 shares
authorized, issued and outstanding
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
$.01 par, common stock, 400,000,000 shares authorized;
92,863,585 shares issued at December 31, 2007 and
2006, respectively; 76,975,507 and 75,920,333 shares
outstanding at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
Paid in capital
|
|
|
549.5
|
|
|
|
523.0
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
1,168.9
|
|
|
|
1,050.7
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,726.3
|
|
|
|
1,582.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
4,928.2
|
|
|
$
|
4,637.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
58
Kansas
City Southern and Subsidiaries
Years
ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
153.8
|
|
|
$
|
108.9
|
|
|
$
|
100.9
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
160.2
|
|
|
|
155.0
|
|
|
|
127.7
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
66.3
|
|
|
|
41.0
|
|
|
|
(17.3
|
)
|
Equity in undistributed earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(11.4
|
)
|
|
|
(7.3
|
)
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
Share-based and other deferred compensation
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
42.6
|
|
VAT/Put settlement gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131.9
|
)
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(17.8
|
)
|
Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Debt retirement costs
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Changes in working capital items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
90.9
|
|
|
|
(18.6
|
)
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(17.8
|
)
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
34.2
|
|
|
|
(50.9
|
)
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(99.3
|
)
|
|
|
44.6
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|
|
(17.4
|
)
|
|
|
17.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
381.5
|
|
|
|
267.5
|
|
|
|
178.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(410.5
|
)
|
|
|
(241.8
|
)
|
|
|
(275.7
|
)
|
Proceeds from disposal of property
|
|
|
16.6
|
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
Contribution from NS for MSLLC (net of change in restricted
contribution)
|
|
|
129.1
|
|
|
|
76.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property investments in MSLLC
|
|
|
(118.0
|
)
|
|
|
(37.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds and repayments from loans to equity affiliates
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
(10.5
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(12.1
|
)
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
(9.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities
|
|
|
(380.5
|
)
|
|
|
(166.0
|
)
|
|
|
(289.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
326.6
|
|
|
|
460.4
|
|
|
|
635.0
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
(311.3
|
)
|
|
|
(502.6
|
)
|
|
|
(511.8
|
)
|
Net proceeds from issuance of preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203.9
|
|
Debt costs
|
|
|
(19.6
|
)
|
|
|
(15.9
|
)
|
|
|
(16.5
|
)
|
Proceeds from stock plans
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(200.4
|
)
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(23.3
|
)
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for financing activities
|
|
|
(24.5
|
)
|
|
|
(53.6
|
)
|
|
|
103.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) during each year
|
|
|
(23.5
|
)
|
|
|
47.9
|
|
|
|
(7.5
|
)
|
At beginning of year
|
|
|
79.0
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
|
38.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At end of year
|
|
$
|
55.5
|
|
|
$
|
79.0
|
|
|
$
|
31.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments (refunds):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
141.5
|
|
|
$
|
163.5
|
|
|
$
|
132.8
|
|
Income tax payments (refunds)
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
59
Kansas
City Southern and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1 Par Cumulative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$25 Par
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
$.01 Par
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Series C
|
|
|
Series D
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
4.25%
|
|
|
5.125%
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
$
|
6.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
155.3
|
|
|
$
|
853.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,016.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.9
|
|
Fair value change of cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
Amortization of interest rate swap loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.9
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
100.3
|
|
Dividends on $25 par preferred stock ($1.00/share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
Dividends on series C cumulative preferred stock (
$21.25/share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.5
|
)
|
Options exercised and stock subscribed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
Stock plan shares issued from treasury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Stock issued in acquisition of Grupo KCSM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
304.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304.4
|
|
Issuance of series D cumulative preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202.0
|
|
Repurchase of $.01 par common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(200.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(200.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
473.1
|
|
|
|
946.1
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
1,426.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108.9
|
|
Amortization of interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108.9
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
109.3
|
|
Dividends on $25 par preferred stock ($1.00/share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
Dividends on series C cumulative preferred stock (
$5.31/share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
Dividends on series D cumulative preferred stock (
$9.40/share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
Stock issued for repayment of debt (Note X)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
Options exercised and stock subscribed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
Tax benefit from share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Adjustment to adopt FASB Statement No. 158, net of tax of
$0.8 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
523.0
|
|
|
|
1,050.7
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
1,582.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
153.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153.8
|
|
Prior service cost and amortization, net of tax of
$0.6 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153.8
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
152.9
|
|
Dividends on $25 par preferred stock ($1.00/share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
Dividends on series C cumulative preferred stock (
$37.53/share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.0
|
)
|
Dividends on series D cumulative preferred stock (
$90.67/share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
(19.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.1
|
)
|
Options exercised and stock subscribed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Tax benefit from share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
Adjustment to income tax payable upon adoption of FIN 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
6.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
549.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,168.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,726.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
60
Kansas
City Southern
|
|
Note 1.
|
Description
of the Business
|
Kansas City Southern (KCS or the
Company), a Delaware corporation, was initially
organized in 1962 as Kansas City Southern Industries, Inc. In
2002, the Company formally changed its name to Kansas City
Southern. KCS is a holding company with principal operations in
rail transportation.
KCS operates under two reportable business segments, which are
currently defined geographically as United States (U.S.) and
Mexico. As the KCS rail network and other processes continue to
coordinate as a network system, KCS will continue to evaluate
its segment reporting. In both the U.S. and the Mexico
segments, the Company generates revenues and cash flows by
providing its customers with freight delivery services both
within its regions, and throughout North America through
connections with other Class I rail carriers. KCS
customers conduct business in a number of different industries,
including electric-generating utilities, chemical and petroleum
products, paper and forest products, agriculture and mineral
products, automotive products and intermodal transportation.
KCS principal geographic business segments currently
include the following:
U.S.
Segment.
|
|
|
|
|
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company (KCSR), a
wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary;
|
|
|
|
Mexrail, Inc. (Mexrail), a wholly-owned consolidated
subsidiary; which wholly owns The Texas Mexican Railway Company
(Tex-Mex);
|
|
|
|
Meridian Speedway, LLC (MSLLC), a seventy-six
percent owned consolidated affiliate.
|
Combined with equity investments in:
|
|
|
|
|
Panama Canal Railway Company (PCRC), a fifty percent
owned unconsolidated affiliate which owns all of the common
stock of Panarail Tourism Company (Panarail);
|
|
|
|
Southern Capital Corporation, LLC (Southern
Capital), a fifty percent owned unconsolidated affiliate
that owns and leases locomotives and other rail equipment.
|
Mexico
Segment.
|
|
|
|
|
Kansas City Southern de México, S.A. de C.V.
(KCSM), is a wholly-owned subsidiary which operates
under the rights granted by the Concession acquired from the
Mexican government in 1997 (the Concession) as
described below;
|
|
|
|
Arrendadora KCSM, S. de R.L. de C.V. (Arrendadora),
a wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary, with KCSM holding
ninety-eight percent ownership and KCSM Holdings LLC, a 100%
owned KCSM subsidiary, owning the remaining two percent. It is
responsible for leasing to KCSM the locomotives and freight cars
acquired through the privatization of KCSM and subsequently sold
to Arrendadora by KCSM;
|
|
|
|
Ferrocarril y Terminal del Valle de México, S.A. de C.V.
(FTVM), a twenty-five percent owned unconsolidated
affiliate that provides railroad services as well as ancillary
services in the greater Mexico City area.
|
KCS completed its acquisition of control of Grupo KCSM, S.A. de
C.V. (Grupo KCSM), formerly known as Grupo
Transportación Ferroviaria Mexicana, S.A. de C.V., or Grupo
TFM on April 1, 2005, and Grupo KCSM became a consolidated
subsidiary of KCS. On September 12, 2005, the Company and
its subsidiaries, Grupo KCSM and KCSM, the Mexican holding
company Grupo TMM, S.A. (TMM), entered into a
settlement agreement with the Mexican government resolving the
controversies and disputes between the companies and the Mexican
government concerning the payment of a VAT refund to KCSM and
the
61
Kansas
City Southern
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
purchase of the remaining shares of KCSM owned by the Mexican
government (the Vat/Put Settlement). As a result of
this settlement, KCS wholly owns Grupo KCSM and KCSM. Grupo KCSM
was merged with KCSM effective May 8, 2007. KCSM
constituted 51% of consolidated assets at December 31, 2007
and 47% of 2007 consolidated revenues.
The KCSM Concession. KCSM holds a Concession
from the Mexican government until June 2047 (exclusive through
2027, subject to certain trackage and haulage rights granted to
other concessionaires) which is renewable under certain
conditions for additional periods of up to 50 years. The
Concession is to provide freight transportation services over
rail lines which are a primary commercial corridor of the
Mexican railroad system. These lines include the shortest, most
direct rail passageway between Mexico City and Laredo, Texas and
serve most of Mexicos principal industrial cities and
three of its major shipping ports. KCSM has the right to use,
but does not own, all track and buildings that are necessary for
the rail lines operation. KCSM is obligated to maintain
the right of way, track structure, buildings and related
maintenance facilities to the operational standards specified in
the concession agreement and to return the assets in that
condition at the end of the Concession period. KCSM is required
to pay the Mexican government a concession duty equal to 0.5% of
gross revenues during the first 15 years of the concession
period and 1.25% of such revenues during the remainder of the
period.
Under the Concession and Mexican law, the Company may freely set
rates unless the Mexican government determines that there is no
effective competition in Mexicos rail industry. KCSM is
required to register its rates with the Mexican government and
to provide railroad services to all users on a fair and
non-discriminatory basis and in accordance with efficiency and
safety standards approved periodically by the Mexican
government. In the event that rates charged are higher than the
registered rates, KCSM must reimburse customers with interest,
and risk the revocation of the Concession.
Mexican Railroad Services Law and regulations and the Concession
establish several circumstances under which the Concession will
terminate: revocation by the Mexican government, statutory
appropriation, or KCSMs voluntary surrender of its rights
or liquidation or bankruptcy. The Concession requires the
undertaking of capital projects, including those described in a
business plan filed every five years with the Mexican
government. KCSM filed its third business plan with the Mexican
government in December 2007 in which KCSM committed to certain
minimal investment and capital improvement goals, which may be
waived by the Mexican government upon application for relief for
good cause. Mexico may also revoke KCSMs exclusivity after
2017 if it determines that there is insufficient competition.
The Concession is subject to early termination or revocation
under certain circumstances. In the event that the Concession is
revoked by the Mexican government, KCSM will receive no
compensation. Rail lines and all other fixtures covered by the
Concession, as well as all improvements made by KCSM or third
parties, will revert to the Mexican government. All other
property not covered by the Concession, including all
locomotives and railcars otherwise acquired, will remain
KCSMs property. The Mexican government will have the right
to cause KCSM to lease all service-related assets to it for a
term of at least one year, automatically renewable for
additional one-year terms up to five years. The Mexican
government must exercise this right within four months after
revocation of the Concession. In addition, the Mexican
government will have a right of first refusal with respect to
certain transfers by KCSM of railroad equipment within
90 days after any revocation of the Concession. The Mexican
government may also temporarily seize the rail lines and assets
used in operating the rail lines in the event of a natural
disaster, war, significant public disturbances, or imminent
danger to the domestic peace or economy for the duration of any
of the foregoing events; provided, however, that Mexican law
requires that the Mexican government pay KCSM compensation equal
to damages caused and losses suffered if it effects a statutory
appropriation for reasons of the public interest. These payments
may not be sufficient to compensate the Company for its losses
and may not be timely made.
Employees and Labor Relations. Labor relations
in the U.S. railroad industry are subject to extensive
governmental regulation under the Railway Labor Act
(RLA). Under the RLA, national labor agreements
62
Kansas
City Southern
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
are renegotiated on an industry-wide scale when they become open
for modification, but their terms remain in effect until new
agreements are reached or the Railway Labor Acts
procedures (which include mediation, cooling-off periods, and
the possibility of Presidential intervention) are exhausted.
Contract negotiations with the various unions generally take
place over an extended period of time, and the Company rarely
experiences work stoppages during negotiations. Wages, health
and welfare benefits, work rules and other issues have
traditionally been addressed during negotiations.
Approximately 80% of KCSR employees are covered by various
collective bargaining agreements. KCSR participates in
industry-wide bargaining as a member of the National
Carriers Conference Committee. A negotiating process for
new, major collective bargaining agreements covering all of
KCSRs union employees has been underway since the
bargaining round was initiated on November 1, 2004. Long
term settlement agreements were reached during 2007 covering
approximately 60% of KCSRs unionized work force through
January 1, 2010 and have not had a material impact on the
consolidated financial statements. Negotiations continue with
the two remaining unions representing the remaining KCSR union
employees and are expected to conclude in 2008 under similar
terms to the 2007 settlements. The Company anticipates that the
expected settlements in 2008 will not have a material impact to
the consolidated financial statements.
KCSM union employees are covered by one labor agreement, which
was signed on June 23, 1997 between KCSM and the Sindicato
de Trabajadores Ferrocarrileros de la República Mexicana
(Mexican Railroad Union), for a term of 50 years, for the
purpose of regulating the relationship between the parties and
improving conditions for the union employees. Approximately 80%
of the Companys employees are covered by this labor
agreement. The compensation terms under this labor agreement are
subject to renegotiation on an annual basis and all other terms
are renegotiated every two years. The compensation terms and
other benefits are currently being renegotiated and KCSM expects
to finalize these terms during the first quarter of 2008. The
union labor negotiation with the Mexican Railroad Union has not
historically resulted in any strike, boycott, or other
disruption in KCSMs business operations. KCSM anticipates
that the expected settlements in 2008 will not have a material
impact to the consolidated financial statements.
|
|
Note 2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies
|
Principles of Consolidation. The accompanying
consolidated financial statements are presented using the
accrual basis of accounting and include the Company and its
majority owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Certain prior
year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current
year presentation.
The equity method of accounting is used for all entities in
which the Company or its subsidiaries have significant
influence, but not a controlling interest. The Company evaluates
less than majority owned investments for consolidation pursuant
to FASB Interpretation No. 46 (Revised 2003). The Company
does not have any less than majority owned investments requiring
consolidation.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Goodwill
represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value
of the net identifiable assets acquired in a business
combination. As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, the goodwill
balance was $10.6 million which is included in other assets
in the consolidated balance sheet. In accordance with Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill and intangible
assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized, but are
reviewed at least annually for impairment. An impairment loss
would be recognized to the extent that the carrying amount
exceeds the assets fair value. Intangible assets with
estimable useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis
over their respective useful lives. During 2007 and 2006, the
Company performed its annual impairment review for goodwill and
concluded there was no impairment in either year.
Use of Estimates. The accounting and financial
reporting policies of the Company conform to accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States
(U.S. GAAP). The preparation of financial
statements
63
Kansas
City Southern
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Significant items subject to such estimates and
assumptions include those related to the recoverability and
useful lives of assets, as well as liabilities for litigation,
environmental remediation, casualty claims, and the valuation of
share-based compensation and deferred tax assets. Changes in
facts and circumstances may result in revised estimates. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Currency Translation. For tax purposes, KCSM
and its subsidiaries are required to maintain their books and
records in Mexican pesos. For financial reporting purposes, KCSM
and its subsidiaries maintain records in U.S. dollars,
which is the functional currency. The dollar is the currency
that reflects the economic substance of the underlying events
and circumstances relevant to the entity (i.e., historical cost
convention). Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in
pesos are translated into dollars using current exchange rates.
The difference between the exchange rate on the date of the
transaction and the exchange rate on the settlement date, or
balance sheet date if not settled, is included in the income
statement as foreign exchange gain or loss.
Revenue Recognition. The Company recognizes
freight revenue based upon the percentage of completion of a
commodity movement as a shipment moves from origin to
destination, with the related expense recognized as incurred.
Other revenues, in general, are recognized when the product is
shipped, as services are performed or contractual obligations
fulfilled.
Cash Equivalents. Short term liquid
investments with an initial maturity of three months or less
when purchased are classified as cash and cash equivalents.
Accounts Receivable, net. Accounts receivable
are net of an allowance for uncollectible accounts as determined
by historical experience and adjusted for economic uncertainties
or known trends. Accounts are charged to the allowance when a
customer enters bankruptcy, when an account has been transferred
to a collection agent or submitted for legal action, or when a
customer is significantly past due and all available means of
collection have been exhausted. At December 31, 2007 and
2006, the allowance for doubtful accounts was $9.7 million
and $31.4 million, respectively. For the year ended
December 31, 2007, accounts receivable allowance recovery
was $2.3 million. Bad debt expense was $10.8 million
for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Restricted Funds JSIB
Consulting. In connection with KCS
acquisition of the controlling interest in KCSM, KCS entered
into a three year consulting agreement with José F. Serrano
International Business, S.A. de C.V. (JSIB), a
consulting company controlled by José Serrano, Chairman of
the Board of TMM. Under this agreement, JSIB provided consulting
services to KCS in connection with its Mexico business and
received an annual fee of $3.0 million. The consulting
agreement required KCS to deposit the total amount of annual
fees payable under the agreement ($9.0 million) in cash to
be held and released in accordance with the consulting
agreement. As of December 31, 2006, the balance in
restricted funds was $6.0 million. In February 2007, KCS
paid $3.0 million and on October 1, 2007, the final
$3.0 million fee was released. See Settlement Agreement
with TMM in Note 4 for further discussion of the
settlement.
Restricted Funds MSLLC. On
December 1, 2005, KCS and KCSR entered into a transaction
agreement with Norfolk Southern Corporation (NS) and
its wholly-owned subsidiary, The Alabama Great Southern Railroad
Company (AGS), providing for the formation of a
limited liability company between the parties relating to the
ownership and improvement of the KCSR rail line between
Meridian, Mississippi and Shreveport, Louisiana, which is the
portion of the KCSR rail line between Dallas, Texas and Meridian
known as the Meridian Speedway.
In connection with the formation of MSLLC, NS, through AGS,
contributed $100.0 million to MSLLC, representing the
initial NS investment in the joint venture. MSLLC commenced
operations on May 1, 2006. Of NS initial investment,
$76.5 million was distributed to KCS as reimbursement for
capital expenditures
64
Kansas
City Southern
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
incurred and paid by KCS for MSLLC during 2006. KCS classified
the remaining balance of $23.5 million, as funds restricted
for payment of MSLLC capital assets at December 31, 2006.
NS has contributed an additional $143.4 million as of
December 31, 2007 of which, a net $129.1 million has
been paid as reimbursement for capital expenditures and other
operating expenses. During 2007, $26.3 million of the
restricted funds was classified as investments with the
remaining balance of $11.5 million as funds restricted for
payment of MSLLC capital assets at December 31, 2007.
Substantially all of these funds will be used for capital
improvements on the Meridian Speedway. NS has a binding
commitment to fund additional cash contributions of
$56.6 million, subject to the terms of the transaction
agreement, reflecting an ultimate ownership of 30% in MSLLC,
once fully funded.
Inventories. Inventories consisting of diesel
fuel, items to be used in the maintenance of rolling stock and
items to be used in the maintenance or construction of road
property are valued at the lower of average cost or market.
Derivative Instruments. Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended,
requires that derivatives be recorded on the balance sheet as
either assets or liabilities measured at fair value. Changes in
the fair value of derivatives are recorded either through
current earnings or as other comprehensive income, depending on
hedge designation. Gains and losses on derivative instruments
classified as cash flow hedges are reported in other
comprehensive income and are reclassified into earnings in the
periods in which earnings are impacted by the variability of the
cash flow of the hedged item. The ineffective portion of all
hedge transactions is recognized in current period earnings.
Concession Rights and Related Assets. Costs
incurred by the Company to acquire the Concession rights and
related assets were capitalized and are amortized over the
estimated useful lives of the related assets and rights
acquired. Concession replacements and improvements are stated at
cost. Major repairs and track rehabilitation are capitalized.
Amortization is calculated using the straight-line method based
on the estimated useful lives of the respective improvements.
The ranges of annual depreciation rates for financial statement
purposes are 2% 7% for track structure and other
roadway property.
Property and Depreciation. Property is stated
at cost less accumulated depreciation. Additions and
improvements, including those on leased assets that increase the
life or utility of the asset, are capitalized and all property
is depreciated over the estimated useful life or lease term of
such assets. The Company capitalizes certain overhead costs
representing the indirect costs associated with construction and
improvement projects using the full absorption method. Overhead
factors are periodically reviewed and adjusted to reflect
current costs. Depreciation for property and equipment is
derived using the mass asset group-life method. This method
groups numerous homogeneous assets into depreciable categories
(e.g., rail, ties, ballast, locomotives, work equipment) and
depreciates these assets as a whole. Repairs and maintenance
costs are charged to expense as incurred.
The ranges of annual depreciation rates for financial statement
purposes are: track structure and other roadway
property 1% to 9%, rolling stock and
equipment 1% to 14%, computer software
8% to 33%, and capitalized leases 6% to 25%.
The cost of track structure, other roadway property, and
equipment normally retired, less salvage value, is charged to
accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized. The
cost of property abnormally retired, together with accumulated
depreciation thereon, is eliminated from the property accounts
and the related gains or losses are reflected in net income.
Gains or losses recognized on the sale of non-operating property
reflected in other income are not material for the periods
presented.
65
Kansas
City Southern
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
KCSR Depreciation Review. During the year
ended December 31, 2006, KCSR engaged a civil engineering
firm to assist management in evaluating depreciation rates for
property and equipment. The study centered on evaluating
historical replacement patterns to assess future lives and
indicated that KCSR was depreciating its property over shorter
periods than the assets were actually used. The effect of this
change in estimate was a $3.0 million decrease in
depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2006.
KCSM Depreciation Review. For the year ended
December 31, 2005, KCSM adopted the mass asset group
depreciation method for consistency with KCSR. In order to
assist management with the change to the group method, KCSM
engaged a civil engineering firm to conduct a study of
depreciation rates for property and equipment. The study
centered on evaluating historical replacement patterns to assess
future lives and indicated that KCSM was depreciating its
property over shorter periods than the assets were actually
used. As a result, depreciation expense recorded in the fourth
quarter of 2005 reflected an adjustment totaling
$5.5 million, to reduce depreciation expense as recorded in
the second and third quarter of 2005. Unlike KCSR, KCSM
depreciation rates are not subject to the approval of the STB
and the changes to the depreciation rates, as a result of the
study, were applied in 2005. Concession rights and related
assets are amortized over the useful lives as determined by the
KCSM depreciation study.
Computer Software Costs. Costs incurred in
conjunction with the purchase or development of computer
software for internal use is capitalized. Costs incurred in the
preliminary project stage, as well as training and maintenance
costs, are expensed as incurred. Direct and indirect costs
associated with the application development stage of internal
use software are capitalized until such time that the software
is substantially complete and ready for its intended use.
Capitalized costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over
the useful life of the software.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. The Company
reviews long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset
may not be recoverable. If impairment indicators are present and
the estimated future undiscounted cash flows are less than the
carrying cost of the long-lived assets, the carrying cost is
reduced to the estimated value as measured by the discounted
cash flows. As of December 31, 2007 and 2006 there were no
impairment indicators present.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments. The
Companys financial instruments include cash and cash
equivalents, accounts receivable, lease and contract
receivables, accounts payable, and long-term debt as described
in Note 6.
The financial statement carrying value of the Companys
cash equivalents approximates fair value due to their short-term
nature. Carrying value approximates fair value for all financial
instruments with six months or less to re-pricing or maturity
and for financial instruments with variable interest rates. The
Company estimates the fair value of long-term debt based upon
borrowing rates available at the reporting date for indebtedness
with similar terms and average maturities. Based upon the
borrowing rates currently available to the Company and its
subsidiaries for indebtedness with similar terms and average
maturities, the fair value of long-term debt was
$1,771.8 million and $1,814.1 million at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The financial
statement carrying value was $1,755.9 million and
$1,757.0 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Environmental Liabilities. The Company records
liabilities for remediation and restoration costs related to
past activities when the Companys obligation is probable
and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Costs of future
expenditures for environmental remediation are not discounted to
their present value. Recoveries of environmental remediation
costs from other parties are recorded as assets when their
receipt is deemed probable. Costs of ongoing compliance
activities related to current operations are expensed as
incurred.
Casualty Claims. Casualty claims in excess of
self-insurance levels are insured up to certain coverage
amounts, depending on the type of claim and year of occurrence.
The Companys casualty liability reserve is based on
actuarial studies performed on an undiscounted basis. The
reserve is based on claims filed and an
66
Kansas
City Southern
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
estimate of claims incurred but not yet reported. While the
ultimate amount of claims incurred is dependent on various
factors, it is managements opinion that the recorded
liability is a reasonable estimate of aggregate future claims.
Adjustments to the liability will be reflected as operating
expenses in the period in which the adjustments are known. Legal
fees related to casualty claims are recorded in operating
expense in the period incurred.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits. The
Company provides certain medical, life and other postretirement
benefits to certain active employees and retirees. The Company
uses actuaries to assist management in estimating liabilities
and expenses for pension and other post retirement benefits.
Estimated amounts are based on current and historical
information, current information and estimates regarding future
events and circumstances. Significant assumptions used in the
valuation of pension and other postretirement liabilities
include the discount rate, rate of increase in compensation
levels and the health care cost trend rate.
KCSM Employees Statutory Profit
Sharing. KCSM is subject to employee statutory
profit sharing requirements under Mexican law and calculates
profit sharing liability as 10% of KCSM net taxable income,
adjusted as prescribed by the Mexican income tax law. In
calculating its net taxable income for statutory profit sharing
purposes, KCSM previously deducted NOL carryforwards. The
application of NOL carryforwards can result in a deferred profit
sharing asset for a given period rather than a profit sharing
liability. Due to decisions by the Mexican Supreme Court in 2005
declaring that NOLs from previous years may not be deducted,
KCSM changed the method of calculating its statutory profit
sharing liability. KCSM no longer deducts NOLs from prior years
when calculating employee statutory profit sharing. This change
required KCSM to write off its deferred tax assets related to
statutory profit sharing resulting in a charge to operating
expenses of $35.6 million in 2005.
Share-Based Compensation. Effective
January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R (Revised)
Share-Based Payments (SFAS 123R)
and accounts for all share-based compensation in accordance with
the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123R. Under
this method, compensation expense is measured at grant date
based on the then fair value of the award and is recognized over
the requisite service period in which the award is earned. The
Company elected to adopt SFAS 123R on a modified
prospective basis requiring that all new awards and modified
awards after the effective date and any unvested awards at the
effective date be recognized as compensation cost ratably over
the option vesting period. SFAS 123R requires forfeitures
to be estimated at the time of the grant and revised, if
necessary, in subsequent periods should actual forfeitures
differ from those estimates. In accordance with the modified
prospective transition method, the Companys consolidated
financial statements for prior years have not been restated to
reflect, and do not include, the impact of SFAS 123R.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company accounted
for share-based compensation in accordance with Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees (APB 25) and followed the
pro forma disclosure requirements set forth in Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123).
Under this method, compensation expense was recognized ratably
over the option vesting period if an option exercise price was
less than the market price of the stock at the date of grant.
KCS practice was to set the option exercise price equal to
the market price of the stock at the date of grant; therefore,
no compensation expense was recognized for financial reporting
purposes.
67
Kansas
City Southern
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and
earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value
recognition provisions of SFAS 123R to share-based employee
compensation prior to January 1, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
100.9
|
|
Additional stock-based compensation expense determined under
fair value method, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$
|
100.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per basic share:
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
1.21
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
Earnings per diluted share:
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
1.07
|
|
The Company issues treasury stock to settle share-based awards.
The Company does not intend to repurchase any shares in 2008 to
provide shares to issue as share-based awards; however,
management continually evaluates the appropriateness of the
level of shares outstanding.
Income Taxes. Deferred income tax effects of
transactions reported in different periods for financial
reporting and income tax return purposes are recorded under the
liability method of accounting for income taxes. This method
gives consideration to the future tax consequences of the
deferred income tax items and immediately recognizes changes in
income tax laws upon enactment.
Prior to the acquisition of a controlling interest in KCSM on
April 1, 2005, KCSM provided deferred income taxes for the
difference between the financial reporting and income tax bases
of its assets and liabilities. KCS recorded its proportionate
share of these income taxes through its equity in KCSMs
earnings. Since April 1, 2005, KCSM income taxes are
reflected in the consolidated results. Although KCSM has
generated book profits, it has incurred tax losses due primarily
to the accelerated tax amortization of the concession rights.
The Company has recognized a deferred income tax asset for the
resulting net operating loss carryforwards. Management
anticipates that such net operating loss carryforwards will be
realized given the long carryforward period (through the year
2046) for amortization of the Concession, as well as the
fact that KCSM is expected to generate taxable income in the
future. The Companys tax projections take into
consideration certain assumptions, some of which are under its
control and others which are not. Key assumptions include
inflation rates, currency fluctuations, future income and future
capital expenditures. If the assumptions are not correct, a
valuation allowance may have to be recognized on the deferred
tax asset.
Prior to the acquisition of a controlling interest in KCSM on
April 1, 2005, the Company did not provide
U.S. federal income taxes for the temporary difference
between the financial reporting basis and income tax basis of
its investment in KCSM because KCSM was a foreign corporate
joint venture that was considered permanent in duration, and the
Company did not expect the reversal of the temporary difference
to occur in the foreseeable future. Following the acquisition of
control of KCSM in 2005, the Company has not provided
U.S. federal income taxes on the undistributed earnings of
KCSM since the Company intends to reinvest such earnings
indefinitely in the Mexican operations.
Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings per common
share is computed by dividing income available to common
shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect
the potential dilution that could occur if convertible
securities were converted into
68
Kansas
City Southern
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
common stock or stock based awards were exercised or earned. The
following reconciles the weighted average shares used for the
basic earnings per share computation to the shares used for the
diluted earnings per share computation at December 31 (in
thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Basic shares
|
|
|
75,832
|
|
|
|
74,593
|
|
|
|
75,527
|
|
Additional weighted average shares attributable to convertible
securities and stock options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VAT/put settlement payment due to JSIB, $9.0 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
Escrow note, $47.0 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,667
|
|
|
|
1,439
|
|
VAT/put settlement contingency payment, $110.0 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,418
|
|
|
|
918
|
|
Convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
20,389
|
|
|
|
13,389
|
|
|
|
13,389
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
1,327
|
|
|
|
1,266
|
|
|
|
1,358
|
|
Nonvested shares
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted shares
|
|
|
97,616
|
|
|
|
92,386
|
|
|
|
92,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potentially dilutive shares excluded from the calculation (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Stock options where the exercise price is greater than the
average market price of common shares
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Convertible preferred stock which are anti-dilutive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
486
|
|
The following reconciles net income available to common
stockholders for purposes of basic earnings per share to net
income for purposes of diluted earnings per share (in
millions):