e10vqza
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q/A
Amendment No. 1
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period From TO
Commission file number: 0-50090
AMERICAN POST TENSION, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
13-3926203
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1179 Center Point Drive, Henderson, NV
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
89074
(Zip Code) |
(702) 565-7866
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer þ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
o Yes þ
No
As of November 13, 2007, the registrant had 34,291,600 shares of Common Stock ($0.0001 par value)
outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
To the extent that the information presented in this Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A
for the quarter and the nine months ended September 30, 2007 discusses financial projections,
information or expectations about our products or markets, or otherwise makes statements about
future events or statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of American Post
Tension, Inc. and its subsidiary (collectively the Company), its directors or its officers with
respect to, among other things, future events and financial trends affecting the Company, such
statements are forward-looking. We are making these forward-looking statements in reliance on the
safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although we believe
that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable
assumptions, there are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to
differ materially from such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are typically
identified by the words believes, expects, anticipates, and similar expressions. In addition,
any statements that refer to expectations or other characterizations of future events or
circumstances are forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking
statements are not guarantees of future performance and that matters referred to in such
forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which
may cause actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different
from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements. Such factors include, among other things, the pace of residential construction in our
geographic markets, changes in mortgage interest rates, prices and availability of raw materials
and supplies, our ability to locate, acquire, pay for, and integrate other businesses that
complement ours, our ability to expand our business into the commercial construction field, our
ability to attract and retain qualified personnel if and as our business grows, and risks
associated with our stock being classified as a penny stock. We undertake no obligation to
publicly update or revise these forward-looking statements because of new information, future
events or otherwise, except as required by law.
1
Explanatory Note
We are amending our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007
filed on November 14, 2007 (the Original Filing) to restate our condensed consolidated financial
statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 and the related disclosures to conform this report
to our audited financial statements for the calendar year 2007 as reported in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K, filed on May 8, 2008. See Note 4, Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements,
Special Committee and Company Findings of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements. for a detailed discussion of the effect of the restatement.
The restatement of the Original Filing reflected in this amended Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q/ A includes adjustments arising from the determinations of a Special Committee of our Board of
Directors, consisting of independent members of the Board of Directors, which was formed on
November 30, 2007, and our then Chief Financial Officer to conduct an internal review of our prior
recording of compensation expense for stock issued in connection with the merger of the Companys
subsidiary and Post Tension of Nevada on April 12, 2007.
For more information on these matters, please refer to Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Restatement of Consolidated Financial
Statements, Special Committee and Company Findings and Note 4 of the Notes to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
As a result of the findings of the Special Committee as well as our internal review, we
concluded that we needed to amend the Original Filing to restate our condensed consolidated
financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 and the related disclosures. We have
restated the June 30, 2007 financial statements included in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for
the quarter ended June 30, 2007. We have not amended and we do not intend to amend any of our
other previously filed annual reports on Form 10-K or quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the
periods affected by the restatement or adjustments other than (i) this amended Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 and (ii) an amended Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2007. The changes contained in this Form 10-Q/A have already
been reflected in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 filed on May 8, 2008.
All of the information in this amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A is as of September 30,
2007 and does not reflect events occurring after the date of the Original Filing, other than the
restatement, or modify or update disclosures (including, the exhibits to the Original Filing,
except for the updated Exhibits 31.1, 31.2, 32.1, and 32.2 described below) affected by subsequent
events. For the convenience of the reader, this amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/ A sets forth
the Original Filing in its entirety, as amended by, and to reflect, the restatement. The following
sections of this Form 10-Q/A were adjusted to reflect the findings of the Special Committee as well
as our internal review:
Part I Item 1 Unaudited Financial Statements;
Part I Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations;
This amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A should be read in conjunction with our amended
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended June 30, 2007, our Annual Report for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 on Form 10-K, our periodic filings made with the SEC subsequent
to the date of the Original Filing and any Current Reports filed on Form 8-K subsequent to the date
of the Original Filing. In addition, in accordance with applicable SEC rules, this amended
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A includes updated certifications from our Chief Executive Officer
(CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) as Exhibits 31.1, 31.2, 32.1, and 32.2.
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION ITEM 1.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AMERICAN POST TENSION, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
(As restated)(1) |
|
|
2006 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,076,606 |
|
|
$ |
2,937,178 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $240,275 at September 30, 2007 and
$191,100 at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
2,258,228 |
|
|
|
1,885,808 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
1,267,398 |
|
|
|
2,752,337 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
17,218 |
|
|
|
116,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
5,619,450 |
|
|
|
7,692,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of
$1,198,548 at September 30, 2007 and $1,107,309 at
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
1,034,546 |
|
|
|
1,065,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
6,653,996 |
|
|
$ |
8,757,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
723,031 |
|
|
$ |
498,939 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
9,700 |
|
|
|
9,700 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
150,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
1,311 |
|
|
|
9,577 |
|
Shareholder loans current portion |
|
|
321,100 |
|
|
|
530,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,206,015 |
|
|
|
1,048,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
203,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,206,015 |
|
|
|
1,252,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value authorized,
1,000,000 shares at September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006; no shares issued or outstanding
at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.0001 par value authorized,
50,000,000 shares at September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006; issued, 34,291,600 and
25,400,160 shares at September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, respectively |
|
|
3,429 |
|
|
|
2,540 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
5,151,799 |
|
|
|
7,574 |
|
Retained Earnings |
|
|
292,753 |
|
|
|
7,495,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
5,447,981 |
|
|
|
7,505,162 |
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
6,653,996 |
|
|
$ |
8,757,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 4, Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements, Special Committee and
Company Findings of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed financial statements.
3
AMERICAN POST TENSION, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated)(1 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
(As restated)(1 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
4,166,195 |
|
|
$ |
6,351,282 |
|
|
$ |
12,777,236 |
|
|
$ |
26,350,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
2,980,306 |
|
|
|
4,135,396 |
|
|
|
9,235,323 |
|
|
|
17,752,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
1,185,889 |
|
|
|
2,215,886 |
|
|
|
3,541,913 |
|
|
|
8,598,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
1,270,564 |
|
|
|
947,401 |
|
|
|
3,293,304 |
|
|
|
2,987,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
(84,675 |
) |
|
|
1,268,485 |
|
|
|
248,609 |
|
|
|
5,610,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income and (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger related expenses and costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,219,400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
56,853 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
793,219 |
|
|
|
22,210 |
|
Interest income, net |
|
|
15,429 |
|
|
|
42,046 |
|
|
|
63,973 |
|
|
|
105,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,282 |
|
|
|
42,013 |
|
|
|
(2,362,208 |
) |
|
|
127,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before income tax |
|
$ |
(12,393 |
) |
|
$ |
1,310,498 |
|
|
$ |
(2,113,599 |
) |
|
$ |
5,738,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(4,207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
173,410 |
|
|
|
29,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
(8,186 |
) |
|
|
1,310,498 |
|
|
|
2,287,009 |
) |
|
|
5,709,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share basic |
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share diluted |
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions per share |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
34,275,296 |
|
|
|
25,400,160 |
|
|
|
30,981,946 |
|
|
|
25,400,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
34,275,296 |
|
|
|
25,400,160 |
|
|
|
30,981,946 |
|
|
|
25,400,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 4, Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements, Special Committee and Company
Findings of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed financial statements.
4
AMERICAN POST TENSION, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
(As restated)(1) |
|
2006 |
|
(As restated)(1 |
|
2006 |
Net Income |
|
$ |
(8,186 |
) |
|
$ |
1,310,498 |
|
|
$ |
(2,287,009 |
) |
|
$ |
5,709,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash
provided (used in) by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
93,719 |
|
|
|
29,144 |
|
|
|
139,132 |
|
|
|
87,433 |
|
Shares issued as part of merger in lieu of cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,142,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued to employees and BOD members |
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
244,531 |
|
|
|
936,341 |
|
|
|
(372,420 |
) |
|
|
2,032,363 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
(154,603 |
) |
|
|
(675,983 |
) |
|
|
1,484,939 |
|
|
|
(839,136 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
25,827 |
|
|
|
15,650 |
|
|
|
99,478 |
|
|
|
53,719 |
|
Increase (decrease) in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
239,971 |
|
|
|
69,416 |
|
|
|
224,092 |
|
|
|
382,048 |
|
Accrued income taxes payable |
|
|
(4,207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
463,238 |
|
|
|
374,568 |
|
|
|
4,946,264 |
|
|
|
1,716,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used in) operating
activities |
|
|
455,052 |
|
|
|
1,685,066 |
|
|
|
2,659,255 |
|
|
|
7,425,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution of property and equipment to
shareholders in lieu of cash compensation |
|
|
21,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from the sale/retirement of
property and equipment |
|
|
(1,601 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,220 |
) |
|
|
(33,546 |
) |
Acquisition (sale) of property and equipment |
|
|
(84,366 |
) |
|
|
(9,220 |
) |
|
|
(130,722 |
) |
|
|
(15,212 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) in investing
activities |
|
|
(64,085 |
) |
|
|
(9,220 |
) |
|
|
(125,060 |
) |
|
|
(48,758 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,103,999 |
) |
|
|
(2,994,769 |
) |
|
|
(5,680,796 |
) |
Issuance of shares for public shell net assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in line of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(989,925 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,359,400 |
) |
Increase (repayment) of loans payable |
|
|
(3,573 |
) |
|
|
(17,005 |
) |
|
|
8,266 |
|
|
|
(28,125 |
) |
Proceeds from shareholder loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
904,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
904,166 |
|
Repayment of shareholder loans |
|
|
(133,662 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(412,690 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
(137,235 |
) |
|
|
(1,206,763 |
) |
|
|
(3,394,786 |
) |
|
|
(6,164,155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
253,732 |
|
|
|
469,083 |
|
|
|
(860,592 |
) |
|
|
1,212,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
1,822,874 |
|
|
|
2,999,380 |
|
|
|
2,937,178 |
|
|
|
2,255,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
2,076,606 |
|
|
$ |
3,468,463 |
|
|
$ |
2,076,606 |
|
|
$ |
3,468,463 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 4, Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements, Special Committee and Company
Findings of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed financial statements.
5
AMERICAN POST TENSION, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balances at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
25,400,160 |
|
|
$ |
2,540 |
|
|
$ |
7,574 |
|
|
$ |
7,495,048 |
|
|
$ |
7,505,162 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
622,428 |
|
|
|
622,428 |
|
Distributions to shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(438,050 |
) |
|
|
(438,050 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at March 31, 2007 |
|
|
25,400,160 |
|
|
$ |
2,540 |
|
|
$ |
7,574 |
|
|
$ |
7,679,426 |
|
|
$ |
7,689,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(567,452 |
) |
|
|
(567,452 |
) |
Distributions to shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,556,718 |
) |
|
|
(2,556,718 |
) |
Issuance of restricted shares
for consulting services |
|
|
5,325,840 |
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
1,916,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,917,302 |
|
Issuance of restricted shares
to employees of PTNV |
|
|
101,600 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
36,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,576 |
|
American Post Tension, Inc.
reclassification upon merger
on April 12, 2007 |
|
|
3,414,600 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
4,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,407 |
|
Reclassification of PTNV
retained earnings at the time
of S Corporation revocation
in April 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,168,829 |
|
|
|
(3,168,829 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at June 30, 2007 |
|
|
34,241,600 |
|
|
$ |
3,424 |
|
|
$ |
5,133,804 |
|
|
$ |
300,939 |
|
|
$ |
5,438,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,186 |
) |
|
|
(8,186 |
) |
Issuance of restricted shares
to BOD members |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
17,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
Balances at September 30, 2007 |
|
|
34,291,600 |
|
|
$ |
3,429 |
|
|
$ |
5,151,799 |
|
|
$ |
292,752 |
|
|
$ |
5,447,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 4, Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements, Special Committee and Company
Findings of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed financial statements.
6
AMERICAN POST TENSION, INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
NOTE 1: ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF BUSINESS
Company Overview
Magic Communications, Inc. (Magic) was originally formed as a New York corporation on
January 16, 1997 and reincorporated as a Delaware corporation in November 2002 for the purpose of
offering Internet kiosks where the public could access the Internet for a fee. Magic did not
develop that business, and, from June 1997 until April 2007 Magic engaged in the business of
contracting with various locations such as malls, gas stations, stores and office buildings to
install pay phones that were an alternative to those provided by the primary local service provider
(Verizon). As discussed below, immediately following the completion of the Merger (as defined
below), Magic sold substantially all of its assets relating to this business to Illusions, LLC, a
Florida limited liability company controlled by Stephen Rogers, Magics President and Chief
Executive Officer immediately prior to the consummation of the Merger and a director prior to the
Merger. Illusions also assumed most of Magics liabilities in connection with the sale of those
assets. Magic is no longer engaged in the business of installing or operating pay telephones. Magic
Communications, Inc., subsequent to the merger, changed its name to American Post Tension, Inc.
(APTI) on September 24, 2007.
Merger Agreement with Post Tension of Nevada
On July 15, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted final rules amending the use
of Form S-8 and Form 8-K for shell companies like us. The amendments expand the definition of a
shell company to mean a company, other than an asset-backed issuer, with no or nominal
operations/assets or assets consisting of cash and cash equivalents and no or nominal other assets,
the amendments prohibit the use of a Form S-8 (a form used by a corporation to register securities
issued to an employee, director, officer, consultant or advisor, under certain circumstances), and
revise the Form 8-K to require a shell company to include current Form 10 or Form 10-SB
information, including audited financial statements, in the filing on Form 8-K that the shell
company files to report the acquisition of the business opportunity. The rules are designed to
assure that investors in shell companies that acquire operations or assets have access on a timely
basis to the same kind of information as is available to investors in public companies with
continuing operations.
On December 28, 2006, Magic entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with Post Tension of
Nevada, a Nevada corporation (PTNV), which became firm, and was announced in a Current Report on
Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on February 20, 2007. On April 12, 2007, a Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the SEC reported the completion of the definitive Agreement and Plan of Merger (the
Merger Agreement) with PTNV and PTNV Acquisition Corp, a Florida corporation and a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Magic (Acquisition Corp.). The Merger Agreement provided that, upon the terms and
subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Acquisition Corp. would merge with and
into PTNV (the Merger). As a result of the Merger, PTNV became a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Magic. Each outstanding share of PTNV common stock was converted into the right to receive
10,160.064 shares of the Companys common stock as set forth in the Merger Agreement. Under the
terms of the Merger Agreement at closing, the Company issued, and the PTNV stockholders received,
in a tax-free exchange, shares of Company common stock such that PTNV stockholders now own
approximately 90% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company. Magic Communications, Inc.,
subsequent to the merger, changed its name to American Post Tension, Inc. (APTI) on September 24,
2007.
As a result of the Merger, as the acquired entitys shareholders exercise control over APTI,
the transaction is deemed to be a capital transaction whereby APTI is treated as a non-business
entity. Therefore, the accounting for the business combination is identical to that resulting from
a reverse merger, except no goodwill or other intangible assets will be recorded as a result of the
Merger. Accordingly, the Company did not recognize goodwill or any other intangible assets in
connection with the transaction.
7
PTNV is treated as the acquirer for accounting purposes. Therefore, the historic financial
statements prior to merger are those of PTNV and post merger, the financial statements represent
the consolidated financial position and operating results of American Post Tension, Inc. and its
wholly-owned subsidiary, Post Tension of Nevada. All references to shares and per share amounts in
the accompanying financial statements have been restated to reflect the aforementioned share
exchange.
In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations and SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 141 requires business combinations initiated after September 30, 2001
to be accounted for using the purchase method of accounting, and broadens the criteria for
recording intangible assets separate from goodwill. Recorded goodwill and intangibles will be
evaluated against these new criteria and may result in certain intangibles being subsumed into
goodwill, or alternatively, amounts initially recorded as goodwill may be separately identified and
recognized apart from goodwill. SFAS No. 142 requires the use of a non-amortization approach to
account for purchased goodwill and certain intangibles. Under a non-amortization approach, goodwill
and certain intangibles is more than its fair value. Goodwill is the excess of the acquisition
costs of the acquired entity over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired. The
Company is required to test goodwill and intangible assets that are determined to have an
indefinite life for impairments at least annually. The provisions of SFAS No. 142 require the
completion of an annual impairment test with any impairment recognized in current earnings. The
provisions of SFAS No. 141 and SFAS No. 142 may be applicable to any business combination that we
may enter into in the future.
On April 23, 2007, APTI filed a Schedule 14F-1 and as amended by a Schedule 14F-1/A filed on
June 6, 2007 regarding a change in the majority of directors to comply with Rule 14f-1. The
description of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement set forth herein does not
purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the
exhibit in a Current Report on Form 8-K/A, Amendment No.2, filed on June 28, 2007 and incorporated
by this reference.
The Company now operates its business through PTNV, a Henderson, Nevada based company. We
provide post-tension components and systems that reinforce concrete construction for the
residential and commercial markets of the western United States. PTNV is 20 years old, and we
believe that PTNV is one of the largest domestically owned post tension companies. PTNV provides
both full service and freight-on-board components. The full-service business accounts for 90% of
PTNVs revenues, and the margins for the full-service residential SOG market are typically higher
than for product sales. Before concrete slab (slab-on-ground (SOG)) foundations are poured, PTNV
installs the post-tension system. After the foundation is poured, with the system in place, when
the proper pressure is achieved, the post-tension cables are then tensioned to thirty-three
thousand pounds each tendon. This creates a stronger base that eliminates unwanted expansion
movement and settling that can otherwise damage interior and exterior walls. PTNV designs disburse
the load throughout the slab, not only on perimeter or load-bearing walls. In 2006, PTNV installed
approximately fifty-one million square feet of post tension foundations, utilizing approximately 50
million linear feet of post-tensioning cable. PTNV serves it customers from its 4 officesLas
Vegas, Nevada (corporate headquarters), Phoenix Arizona, Tucson Arizona, and Denver Colorado.
Product and Service
According to the Post-Tensioning Institute, Post-Tensioning is a method of reinforcing
concrete, masonry, and other structural elements. Post-Tensioning is a method of prestressing.
Prestressed concrete or masonry has internal stresses (forces) induced into it during the
construction phase for the purpose of counteracting the anticipated external loads that it will
encounter during its lifecycle. There are two methods of prestressing. One is called
pre-tensioning. This method consists of stressing the reinforcing inside of large steel buttresses,
and then casting the concrete around the reinforcing. This method can only be done at a precast
manufacturing facility and requires the completed prestressed concrete members to be trucked out to
the job site and then assembled. The other method of prestressing is called post-tensioning.
Instead of stressing the reinforcing inside of large steel buttresses at a manufacturing plant, the
reinforcing is simply installed on the job site after the contractor forms up the slabs or
constructs the walls. The reinforcing steel is housed in sheathing or duct that prevents the steel
from bonding to the concrete so that it
8
can be stressed after the concrete cures (hardens). Using the post-tensioning method of
prestressing enables a builder to get all the advantages of prestressed concrete while still
enabling the freedom to construct the member (slab, wall, column, etc,) on the job site.
Today, a post-tension slab costs no more than a rebar slab (a slab with reinforcing steel
built into it at a manufacturing plant) and in some instances, even less. Post tension inhibits
unwanted expansion movement and settling that can damage interior and exterior walls. Post tension
designs disburse the load throughout the slab, not only on perimeter or load-bearing walls, and,
for more than 30 years, post tension construction has demonstrated excellent performance,
especially in poor soil, which is common in most regions of the country.
We purchase raw cable, anchors, rebar, wedges, stressing equipment and parts, splice chucks,
end protectors, dead-end spacers and pocket formers from a small number of high quality suppliers
and enjoy excellent relationships with our suppliers. We depend on our suppliers for all of our raw
materials. Like other users of steel products, we have experienced increases of the cost of our
materials over recent years. We have been able to manage these cost increases and maintain our
margins by effective management but remain susceptible to further vagaries in the price of these
raw materials. The company is also affected by the market of our main customer, subcontractors to
the housing and commercial builders.
Currently PTNV has 110 employees. We do not outsource our labor; however, we have used on
occasion temporary services to hire office personnel. None of our employees were represented by a
union during the quarter ended September 30, 2007, and we believe relationships with our employees
are good.
Markets and Marketing
We are a well known and respected company with high saturation throughout the western United
States. Within the residential housing markets of Las Vegas, Nevada and Phoenix, Arizona, we have a
70% market share and an 80% market share in Denver, Colorado and Tucson, Arizona. In 1994, we
became the first company to provide post tension services in Arizona. We currently operate in
several high growth markets with new construction. Residential construction accounts for the
majority of our slab-on-ground revenues, while commercial construction is much smaller at this
time. We intend to expand our workforce in 2007 by hiring additional salespeople and draft
engineers. Starting in Las Vegas, we will attempt to generate sales in the high rise market, which
is expected to see $10 billion of new construction on the Las Vegas Strip in the next five years.
We can provide no assurance, however, that we will be successful in obtaining a significant, or
any, market share in the commercial construction market.
In addition to the SOG post-tensioning products and services described above, we also provide
materials to our customers on a freight-on-board (FOB) basisthe buyer assumes the
responsibility for the shipment and shipping charges of the materials purchased from us. Today, we
offer this service to clients in Utah and California Our plans are to attempt to expand the reach
of our FOB business, although we cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to increase this
segment of our business in accordance with our plans, if at all. It is our intention to expand our
presence in this market segment by expanding our workforce and marketing to this customer base as
well as acquisition of other companies with an existing presence in this market. At this time, we
have no definitive plans to acquire any other businesses, and we cannot provide assurances that we
will be able to acquire businesses in this area on terms that are favorable to us.
We have a reputation for providing superior services to our clients. Some clients have been
depending on us for 20 years, though there are no long term contracts with them. However, the
company is currently negotiating with one of the largest home builders in the United States to make
us the exclusive provider of post tension services to all concrete contractors used by the builder,
in the states of Nevada, Arizona and Colorado. We cannot provide any assurances that we will be
able to successfully negotiate this arrangement or that, if we are able to negotiate such an
arrangement, the arrangement will be on terms that we prefer. The company has 99 customers. Most of
them are contractors, concrete suppliers and other subcontractors to the construction industry. The
top 10 customers each accounted for $7.4 million in our revenues for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007.
9
Competition
Our competition in supplying full-service post tension technology and FOB service to the
target markets consists primarily of other post tension companies located in the United States,
some of which are owned by European companies. We believe that we are the largest domestic owned
post tension company in the United States. Other smaller domestic companies have no distinct
advantage, other than geographic location, over PTNV. The two largest international companies of
which we are aware have more completed high rise projects, but we do not believe that will
significantly diminish our ability to provide full service to similar projects in the future.
Of the 25 companies that belong to the Post Tensioning Institute, PTNV is the third largest.
Our two main competitors are Suncoast Post Tension, a Keller Company, and DSI (Dywidag-Systems
International) both owned by European companies. Regionally, there are a handful of firms that
provide similar services. Throughout the entire United States there are approximately 40 companies
like us. It is well known throughout the industry that both Suncoast and DSI are able to handle
larger high rise projects but struggle in the SOG market because we offer labor as part of the
total service and the others offer only materials. When they compete in our markets they have to
add the labor to be competitive from a service perspective.
Note 2: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation. The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for
interim financial statements and with Form 10-Q and Item 310 of Regulation S-K of the Securities
and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not contain all the information and footnotes
required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for annual
financial statements. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and
its wholly owned subsidiary. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of the Companys management, the accompanying unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements contain all the adjustments necessary (consisting only
of normal recurring accruals) to make the financial position of the Company as of September 30,
2007 and the results of operations and cash flows for the three months and nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006 not misleading. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements contained in Form
8-K/A filed on June 28, 2007 and the audited financial statements contained in our Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2007 filed on May 8, 2008.
Use of EstimatesThe preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reporting amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Revenue and Cost RecognitionRevenues from fixed-price construction contracts are recorded
using the completed contract method whereby revenues are earned when the contract is substantially
completed. Contracts are considered substantially completed when the concrete slab has been poured.
Revenue from sales of materials only is recorded upon shipment of the materials. Contract costs
include all direct material and labor as well as those indirect costs related to contract
performance such as indirect labor, supplies, tools, repairs, and depreciation. Selling, general,
and administrative costs are charged to expense as incurred.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Concentration of Credit RiskThe Company considers all highly
liquid temporary cash investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased,
to be cash equivalents. Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant
concentrations of credit risk consist of cash. The Company maintains its cash accounts at high
quality financial institutions
10
with balances, at times, in excess of federally insured limits. As of September 30, 2007, the
Company had cash balances of $2,076,606, which is in excess of the federally insured limit of
$100,000. The Company has substantial cash balances which are invested in a money market account
with a bank.
Fair Value of Financial InstrumentsThe carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for
accounts payable, accrued expenses, and due to related parties approximate fair value based on the
short-term maturity of these instruments.
Accounts receivable, tradeAccounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not
bear interest. The Company extends unsecured credit to its customers in the ordinary course of
business but mitigates the associated risks by performing credit checks and actively pursuing past
due accounts. An allowance for doubtful accounts is established and determined based on
managements assessment of known requirements, aging of receivables, payment history, the
customers current credit worthiness and the economic environment. Trade receivables are written
off when deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of trade receivables previously written off are recorded
when received. The Company follows the practice of filing statutory mechanics liens on
construction projects where collection problems are anticipated. The liens serve, as collateral for
those accounts receivable.
Material and Supplies InventoryInventory consists of raw materials, processed inventory, and
inventory on site and is stated at the lower of cost or market using the first-in first-out method.
Equipment and Leasehold ImprovementsEquipment and leasehold improvements are stated at cost.
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
related assets, which range from 5 to 7 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser
of the estimated life of the asset or the lease term. The lease term for buildings leased from
shareholders is considered to be the economic life of the building. Expenditures for maintenance
and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Renewals and betterments are capitalized. Upon
retirement or other disposition of equipment, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are
removed from the accounts and the resulting gains or losses are reflected in earnings.
Equipment Under Capital LeasesCapital leases, which transfer substantially the entire
benefits and risks incident to the ownership of the property to the Company, are accounted for as
the acquisition of an asset and the incurrence of an obligation. Under this method of accounting,
the cost of the leased asset is amortized principally using the straight-line method over its
estimated useful life, the obligation including interest thereon, is liquidated over the life of
the lease. Depreciation expense on equipment under a capital lease is included with that of owned
equipment.
Advertising CostsAdvertising costs are expensed as incurred.
Income TaxesIncome taxes are accounted for in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No.
109. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using
enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized as income in the period that includes the
enactment date. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets
to the amounts expected to be realized, but no less than quarterly.
Comprehensive IncomeSFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for
reporting and display of comprehensive income, its components and accumulated balances.
Comprehensive income as defined includes all changes in equity during a period from non-owner
sources. The Company has not identified any sources of comprehensive income for the periods
presented.
Related PartiesFor the purposes of these financial statements, parties are considered to be
related if one party has the ability, directly or indirectly, to control the party or exercise
significant influence over the party in making financial and operating decisions, or vice versa, or
where the Company
11
and the party are subject to common control or common significant influence. Related parties
may be individuals or other entities.
Basic and Diluted Earnings/(Loss) Per Share Net earnings and loss per share is computed in
accordance with Statement of Financial Standards No. 128, Earnings Per Share (SFAS No. 128).
SFAS No. 128 requires the presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share. Basic net
earnings and loss per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share reflects the potential dilution that could
occur through the potential effect of common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options,
warrants and convertible securities. The calculation assumes: (i) the exercise of stock options and
warrants based on the treasury stock method; and (ii) the conversion of convertible preferred stock
only if an entity records earnings from continuing operations, as such adjustments would otherwise
be anti-dilutive to earnings per share from continuing operations.
Note 3: RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections a
replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3 (SFAS 154). SFAS 154 changes the
requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. These
requirements apply to all voluntary changes and changes required by an accounting pronouncement in
the unusual instance that the pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions. SFAS
154 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS 154 did
not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements or results of operations.
In September 2005, the FASBs Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a final consensus on
Issue 04-13, Accounting for Purchases and Sales of Inventory with the Same Counterparty (EITF
04-13). EITF 04-13 requires that two or more legally separate exchange transactions with the same
counterparty be combined and considered a single arrangement for purposes of applying APB Opinion
No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions, when the transactions are entered into in
contemplation of one another. EITF 04-13 is effective for new arrangements entered into, or
modifications or renewals of existing arrangements, in interim or annual periods beginning after
March 15, 2006. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this statement will have a
material effect on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
In February 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial
Instruments, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140. SFAS 155 clarifies certain issues
relating to embedded derivatives and beneficial interests in securitized financial assets. The
provisions of SFAS 155 are effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after fiscal
years beginning after September 15, 2006. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a
material impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In July 2006, FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). This interpretation establishes for all
entities a minimum threshold for financial statement recognition of the benefit of tax positions,
and requires certain expanded disclosures. Additionally, FIN 48 provides guidance on measurement,
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting for income taxes in interim
periods, as well as the required disclosures and transition. This interpretation is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2006, and is to be applied to all open tax years as of
the date of effectiveness. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the
Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows. There were no unrecognized tax
benefits as of January 1, 2007.
In September 2006, the SEC released SAB No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year
Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements (SAB 108). SAB
108 provides interpretive guidance on the SECs views on how the effects of the carryover or
reversal of prior year misstatements should be considered in quantifying a current year
misstatement. The provision of SAB 108 is effective for the Company for fiscal year ending December
31, 2006. The Company is
12
currently evaluating the impact of SAB 108 but does not believe that the application of SAB 108
will have a material effect on its financial position, cash flows nor results of operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (Statement 157),
which addresses how companies should measure fair value when they are required to use a fair value
measure for recognition or disclosure purposes under generally accepted accounting principles.
Statement 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally
accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Statement 157
is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and
should be applied prospectively, except in the case of a limited number of financial instruments
that require retrospective application. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of
Statement 157 on our financial statements.
In December 2006, the FASB approved FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. EITF 00-19-2, Accounting for
Registration Payment Arrangements (FSP EITF 00-19-2), which specifies that the contingent
obligation to make future payments or otherwise transfer consideration under a registration payment
arrangement, whether issued as a separate agreement or included as a provision of a financial
instrument or other agreement, should be separately recognized and measured in accordance with SFAS
No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies. FSP EITF 00-19-2 also requires additional disclosure
regarding the nature of any registration payment arrangements, alternative settlement methods, the
maximum potential amount of consideration and the current carrying amount of the liability, if any.
The guidance in FSP EITF 00-19-2 amends FASB Statements No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, and No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments
with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity, and FASB Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors
Accounting and Disclosure requirement for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness
of Others, to include scope exceptions for registration payment arrangements. FSP EITF 00-19-2 is
effective immediately for registration payment arrangements and the financial instruments subject
to those arrangements that are entered into or modified subsequent to the issuance date of this
FSP, or for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, and
interim periods within those fiscal years, for registration payment arrangements entered into prior
to the issuance date of this FSP. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of FSP EITF
00-19-2 on our financial statements. We do not expect the impact will be material.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities-including an amendment of FAS 115 (Statement 159). Statement 159 allows
entities to choose, at specified election dates, to measure eligible financial assets and
liabilities at fair value that are not otherwise required to be measured at fair value. If a
company elects the fair value option for an eligible item, changes in that items fair value in
subsequent reporting periods must be recognized in current earnings. Statement 159 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of
Statement 159 on our financial statements. We do not expect the impact will be material.
PTNV was formed as an S Corporation and terminated its Sub S tax status and elected to operate
as a C corporation in tandem with the completion of the Merger Agreement. Based on the Companys
evaluation, it has been concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring
recognition in the Companys financial statements. The Company believes that its income tax
positions and deductions would be sustained on audit and does not anticipate any adjustments that
would result in a material change to its financial position. Consequently, the Company did not
record any cumulative effect adjustment related to the adoption of FIN 48. The Company does not
expect its tax position to change during the next twelve months. Management is currently unaware of
any issues under review that could result in significant payments, accruals or material deviation
from its position.
Note 4: RESTATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, SPECIAL COMMITTEE AND COMPANY FINDINGS
On November 30, 2007, our Board of Directors created a Special Committee comprised of the two
independent directors to work with the Companys then Chief Financial Officer to conduct a voluntary, internal review of the Companys recording and
valuation of stock issued to employees and consultants
13
related to the merger transaction completed by the Company in April 2007. The Special
Committee retained outside counsel and a valuation expert to assist with this review.
Based on the final report issued by the Companys retained valuation expert dated February 28,
2008, the Special Committee determined that the prior valuation of $0.16 per share recorded by the
Company should be adjusted to a revised Fair Market Value of $0.36 per share. The valuation expert
considered various factors including the restrictive period of transferability associated with the
shares issued, lack of marketability and other factors in determining the fair market value of the
shares of common stock issued. Subsequently, in consultation with our independent auditors, we
determined that the prior valuation should be adjusted to $0.59 per share. The Company issued
5,325,840 shares of common stock to consultants and 101,600 shares of common stock to employees
prior to the Merger. The additional expense of $0.43 per share of common stock issued results in an
additional non-cash compensation expense of $2,333,799 during the three months ended June 30, 2007.
Compensation expense is recorded in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
123(R) (revised) Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123(R)) and SFAS 157. In September 2006, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (Statement 157), which addresses how companies
should measure fair value when they are required to use a fair value measure for recognition or
disclosure purposes under generally accepted accounting principles. Statement 157 defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles
and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
There was no effect on the balance sheet accounts as reported in the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q/A for the three months ended June 30, 2007. As a result of the Merger, as the acquired
entitys shareholders exercise control over the Company, the transaction is deemed to be a capital
transaction whereby the Company is treated as a non-business entity. Therefore, the accounting for
the business combination is identical to that resulting from a reverse merger, except no goodwill
or other intangible assets will be recorded as a result of the Merger. Accordingly, the Company did
not recognize goodwill or any other intangible assets in connection with the transaction. PTNV is
treated as the acquirer for accounting purposes. Therefore, the historic financial statements prior
to the Merger are those of PTNV and post merger, the financial statements represent the
consolidated financial position and operating results of Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary,
Post Tension of Nevada. All retained earnings of PTNV were recapitalized to retained earnings as of
the merger date. The shares in question were issued by PTNV prior to the Merger and thus increased
valuation of the shares issued resulted in an increase to additional paid in capital and a
corresponding decrease to retained earnings of PTNV. Because all retained earnings of PTNV were
recapitalized to additional paid in capital on the merger date, there was no effect upon the
previously reported balance sheets as of June 30, 2007 or September 30, 2007.
In considering the causes of the accounting errors set forth below, the Special Committee
concluded that the evidence does not support a finding of intentional manipulation of stock grant
pricing by any member of existing management.
The following table sets forth the impact of the additional non-cash charges for stock-based
compensation expense and on our unaudited consolidated condensed statements of operations for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously |
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
Previously |
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
Reported |
|
Adjustments |
|
Restated |
|
Reported |
|
Adjustments |
|
Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
4,166,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,166,195 |
|
|
$ |
12,777,236 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,777,236 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
2,980,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,980,306 |
|
|
|
9,235,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,235,323 |
|
Gross Margin |
|
|
1,185,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,185,889 |
|
|
|
3,541,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,541,913 |
|
Other costs
and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously |
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
Previously |
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
Reported |
|
Adjustments |
|
Restated |
|
Reported |
|
Adjustments |
|
Restated |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
1,282,564 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
1,270,564 |
|
|
|
3,261,616 |
|
|
|
31,688 |
|
|
|
3,293,304 |
|
Income from operations |
|
|
(96,675 |
) |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
(84,675 |
) |
|
|
280,297 |
|
|
|
(31,688 |
) |
|
|
248,609 |
|
Other income and (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger related expenses and costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(929,289 |
) |
|
|
(2,290,111 |
) |
|
|
(3,219,400 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
56,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,853 |
|
|
|
793,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
793,219 |
|
Interest income, net |
|
|
15,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,429 |
|
|
|
63,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,973 |
|
Net income before income tax |
|
|
(24,393 |
) |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
(12,393 |
) |
|
|
208,200 |
|
|
|
(2,321,799 |
) |
|
|
(2,113,599 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(8,527 |
) |
|
|
4,320 |
|
|
|
(4,207 |
) |
|
|
169,090 |
|
|
|
4,320 |
|
|
|
173,410 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
(15,866 |
) |
|
$ |
7,680 |
|
|
$ |
(8,186 |
) |
|
$ |
39,110 |
|
|
$ |
(2,326,119 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,287,009 |
) |
Net income per share basic |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
Net income per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
The following table sets forth the impact of the additional non-cash charges for stock-based
compensation expense on our unaudited consolidated condensed statements of cash flows for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously |
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
Previously |
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
Reported |
|
Adjustments |
|
Restated |
|
Reported |
|
Adjustments |
|
Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
(15,866 |
) |
|
$ |
7,680 |
|
|
$ |
(8,186 |
) |
|
$ |
39,100 |
|
|
$ |
(2,326,119 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,287,009 |
) |
|
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash
provided (used in) by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
93,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,719 |
|
|
|
139,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139,132 |
|
Shares issued as part of merger in lieu of cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
852,134 |
|
|
|
2,290,111 |
|
|
|
3,142,245 |
|
Shares issued to employees and BOD members |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
46,256 |
|
|
|
31,688 |
|
|
|
77,944 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
244,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
244,531 |
|
|
|
(372,420 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(372,420 |
) |
Inventory |
|
|
(154,603 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(154,603 |
) |
|
|
1,484,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,484,939 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
25,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,827 |
|
|
|
99,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,478 |
|
Increase (decrease) in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
239,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239,971 |
|
|
|
224,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224,092 |
|
Accrued income taxes payable |
|
|
(8,527 |
) |
|
|
4,320 |
|
|
|
(4,207 |
) |
|
|
146,533 |
|
|
|
4,320 |
|
|
|
150,873 |
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
470,917 |
|
|
|
(7,680 |
) |
|
|
463,238 |
|
|
|
2,620,145 |
|
|
|
2,326,119 |
|
|
|
4,946,264 |
|
Net cash provided (used in) operating activities |
|
|
455,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
455,052 |
|
|
|
2,659,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,659,255 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution of property and equipment to
shareholders in lieu of cash compensation |
|
|
21,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,882 |
|
|
|
21,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,882 |
|
Net proceeds from the sale/retirement of
property and equipment |
|
|
(1,601 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,601 |
) |
|
|
(16,220 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,220 |
) |
Acquisition (sale) of property and equipment |
|
|
(84,366 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84,366 |
) |
|
|
(130,723 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(130,722 |
) |
Net cash provided (used) in investing activities |
|
|
(64,085 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,085 |
) |
|
|
(125,060 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125,060 |
) |
|
Cash from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,994,769 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,994,769 |
) |
Issuance of shares for public shell net assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,407 |
|
Decrease in line of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (repayment) of loans payable |
|
|
(3,573 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,573 |
) |
|
|
8,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,266 |
|
Proceeds from shareholder loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously |
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
Previously |
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
Reported |
|
Adjustments |
|
Restated |
|
Reported |
|
Adjustments |
|
Restated |
Repayment of shareholder loans |
|
|
(133,662 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(133,662 |
) |
|
|
(412,690 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(412,690 |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
(137,235 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(137,235 |
) |
|
|
(3,394,786 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,394,786 |
) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
253,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253,732 |
|
|
|
(860,591 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(860,591 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
1,822,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,822,874 |
|
|
|
2,937,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,937,178 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
2,076,606 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,076,606 |
|
|
$ |
2,076,606 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,076,606 |
|
Note 5: ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Accounts receivable are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
2,498,503 |
|
|
$ |
2,176,908 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(240,275 |
) |
|
|
(291,100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount |
|
$ |
2,258,228 |
|
|
$ |
1,885,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys top ten customers comprised 58% of sales during the three and nine month period
ending September 30, 2007. The top ten customers comprised 64% of sales during the twelve months
ended December 31, 2006.
Note 6: PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
As of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Companys property and equipment, net is
comprised of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Buildings |
|
$ |
372,564 |
|
|
$ |
356,124 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
219,140 |
|
|
|
219,140 |
|
Transportation equipment |
|
|
563,606 |
|
|
|
575,229 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
945,808 |
|
|
|
941,152 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment |
|
|
33,060 |
|
|
|
27,046 |
|
Computers |
|
|
49,409 |
|
|
|
43,204 |
|
Software |
|
|
49,509 |
|
|
|
10,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,233,096 |
|
|
|
2,172,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(1,198,550 |
) |
|
|
(1,107,309 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net fixed assets |
|
$ |
1,034,546 |
|
|
$ |
1,065,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization related to property and equipment was $93,719 and $29,144 for
the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, and $139,132 and $87,433 for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Note 7: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accounts payable and accrued expenses at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 consisted of
the following:
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
635,194 |
|
|
$ |
428,560 |
|
Payroll accrual and payroll taxes |
|
|
87,827 |
|
|
|
48,312 |
|
Sales/Use tax |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
22,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts payable and accrued expense |
|
$ |
723,031 |
|
|
$ |
498,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8: RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company leases substantially all of its office, maintenance and warehouse facilities from
Ed Hohman, President, and John Hohman, Chief Operating Officer. Rents were paid or accrued in favor
of the shareholders in the amount of $62,040 and $160,945 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007.
Note 9: SHAREHOLDER LOANS AND LONG TERM DEBT
At September 30 2007 and December 31, 2006 the Company had loans due to its shareholders
aggregating $321,100 and $733,790, respectively. The loans are due on April 15, 2008 and bear
interest at 7% per annum. Additionally the Company has notes payable for vehicle purchases
aggregating $1,311 and $9,577 at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. The notes
bear interest at rates from 6.5% and 8% per annum and are due in monthly installments aggregating
$1,938.
Note 10: STOCK OPTION PLAN
The board of directors, on November 24, 2002, adopted the Companys 2002 Non-Statutory Stock
Option Plan (Plan) so as to provide a critical long-term incentive for employees, non-employee
directors, consultants, attorneys and advisors of the Company and its subsidiaries, if any. The
board of directors believes that the Companys policy of granting stock options to such persons
will continue to provide it with a critical advantage in attracting and retaining qualified
candidates. In addition, the Plan is intended to provide the Company with maximum flexibility to
compensate plan participants. It is expected that such flexibility will be an integral part of the
Companys policy to encourage employees, non-employee directors, consultants, attorneys and
advisors to focus on the long-term growth of stockholder value. The board of directors believes
that important advantages to the Company are gained by an option program such as the 2002 Plan
which includes incentives for motivating employees of the Company, while at the same time promoting
a closer identity of interest between employees, non-employee directors, consultants, attorneys and
advisors on the one hand, and the stockholders on the other. As of September 30, 2007, no options
have been issued.
Note 11: STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
PTNV was incorporated as a Subchapter S corporation. During April 2007 and prior to the
consummation of the Merger, the Company became a C corporation. As a result of the Merger, PTNV
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of APTI. Each outstanding share of PTNV common stock was converted
into the right to receive 10,160.064 shares of APTIs common stock as set forth in the Merger
Agreement. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement at closing, APTI issued, and the PTNV
stockholders received, in a tax-free exchange, shares of APTI common stock such that PTNV
stockholders now own approximately 90% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company.
As a result of the Merger, as the acquired entitys shareholders exercise control over APTI,
the transaction is deemed to be a capital transaction whereby APTI is treated as a non-business
entity. Therefore, the accounting for the business combination is identical to that resulting from
a reverse merger, except that no goodwill or other intangible assets will be recorded as a result
of the Merger. Accordingly, the Company did not recognize goodwill or any other intangible assets
in connection with the transaction. The Merger was accounted for as a reverse merger transaction
and PTNV was deemed to be the acquirer. The assets, liabilities and the historical operations prior
to the Merger are those of PTNV. Subsequent to the Merger, the consolidated financial statements
include the assets and liabilities of PTNV and American Post Tension, Inc. and the historical operations
of PTNV and the operations of American Post Tension, Inc. from the closing date of the Merger.
17
PTNV issued 526 shares of common stock to consultants and advisors prior to the consummation
of the Merger. The shares were exchanged for 5,327,840 shares of common stock of American Post
Tension, Inc. on the consummation of the Merger. PTNV issued 10 shares of common stock to employees
prior to the consummation of the Merger that were converted into 101,600 shares of American Post
Tension, Inc. upon the consummation of the Merger agreement. The 5,327,840 shares of common stock
and 101,600 shares of common stock were originally valued at $0.16 per share. As discussed
previously in Note 4, on November 30, 2007, our Board of Directors created a Special Committee
comprised of the two independent directors to work with the Companys then Chief Financial Officer
to conduct a voluntary, internal review of the Companys recording and valuation of stock issued to
employees and consultants related to the merger transaction completed by the Company in April 2007.
The Special Committee retained outside counsel and a valuation expert to assist with this review.
Based on the final report issued by the Companys retained valuation expert dated February 28,
2008, the Special Committee determined that the prior valuation of $0.16 per share recorded by the
Company should be adjusted to a revised Fair Market Value of $0.36 per share. The valuation expert
considered various factors including the restrictive period of transferability associated with the
shares issued, lack of marketability and other factors in determining the fair market value of the
shares of common stock issued. Subsequently, in consultation with our independent auditors, we
determined that the prior valuation should be adjusted to $0.59 per share. The additional expense
of $0.43 per share of common stock issued results in an additional non-cash compensation expense of
$2,333,799 during the three months ended June 30, 2007.
PTNV reclassified $3,168,829 from Retained earnings to Additional paid in capital when PTNV
terminated is Subchapter S election in April 2007. PTNV prior to the consummation of the Merger
made distributions to shareholders in the amount of $438,050 during the three months ended March
31, 2007 and $2,556,718 during the three months ended June 30, 2007. The distributions to
shareholders were recorded as a reduction to Retained earnings.
PTNV reclassified $3,168,829 from Retained earnings to Additional paid in capital when PTNV
terminated is Subchapter S election in April 2007. PTNV prior to the consummation of the Merger
made distributions to shareholders in the amount of $438,050 during the three months ended March
31, 2007 and $2,556,718 during the three months ended June 30, 2007. No distributions were made to
shareholders during the three months ended September 30, 2007. The distributions to shareholders
were recorded as a reduction to Retained earnings.
All references to shares and per share amounts in the accompanying financial statements have
been restated to reflect the aforementioned share exchange. All retained earnings of PTNV were
reclassified to Additional Paid in Capital on the date of the termination of its Subchapter S
election in April 2007.
The Company issued 25,000 shares of restricted stock to two independent members of the Board
of Directors in July 2007 (for a total issuance of 50,000 shares of restricted common stock). The
Company originally recorded compensation expense in the amount of $30,000 at a rate of $0.60 per
share to reflect the estimated value of the 50,000 shares of common stock. As a result of the
revaluation of the shares, as discussed previously, the shares were revalued at $0.36 per share,
resulting in a revised amount to recorded compensation expense in the amount of $18,000 at a rate
of $0.36 per share to reflect the estimated value of the 50,000 shares of common stock as of the
later date of their issue than the shares issued in connection with the merger.
Note 12: INCOME TAXES
Under Sections 382 and 269 (the shell corporation rule) of the Code following an ownership
change, special limitations (Section 382 Limitations) apply to the use by a corporation of its
net operating loss, or NOL, carryforwards arising before the ownership change and various other
carryforwards of tax attributes (referred to collectively as the Applicable Tax Attributes). The
Company had NOL carryforwards due to historical losses of the public shell of approximately
$364,393 at December 31, 2006 and $257,969 at September 30, 2007. These NOL carryforwards will
expire through calendar year 2026 if
18
not utilized and are subject to review and possible adjustment
by the IRS. As a result of the Merger, the
Company experienced an ownership change, and Section 382 Limitation will apply to the
Applicable Tax Attributes of the Company.
The Company did not record a provision for income taxes for the three months ended March 31,
2007, as PTNV was a Subchapter S corporation until April 2007. All retained earnings of PTNV were
reclassified to Additional paid in capital on the Subchapter S election termination by PTNV. The
Company has had taxable income of $431,605 post merger and post termination of the Subchapter S
election by PTNV. The Company recorded a $155,080 accrual for Federal Income taxes during the three
months ended June 30, 2007 and recorded a reduction in accrual in the amount of ($4,320) during the
three months ended September 30, 2007.
The Company has adopted the provisions of FIN 48. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48,
the Company performed a comprehensive review of its uncertain tax positions in accordance with
recognition and measurement standards established by FIN 48. In this regard, an uncertain tax
position represents the Companys expected treatment of a tax position taken in a filed tax return,
or expected to be taken in a tax return, that has not been reflected in measuring income tax
expense for financial reporting purposes. The Company does not expect any reasonably possible
material changes to the estimated amount of liability associated with uncertain tax positions
through January 1, 2008. The Companys continuing policy is to recognize accrued interest and
penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.
Note 13: NET INCOME PER SHARE
Net (loss) income per share is calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share,
which requires presentation of basic and diluted net (loss) income per share. Basic net (loss)
income per share excludes dilution, and is computed by dividing net (loss) income by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period. During the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007 and for all prior periods, diluted net income per share is computed in the
same manner as basic net income per share after assuming issuance of common stock for all
potentially dilutive equivalent shares, which includes (1) stock options (using the treasury stock
method), and (2) the effect of unvested shares of common stock outstanding. Anti-dilutive
instruments are not considered in this calculation.
The following is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted
earnings per share computation for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30 |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|
|
2007 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
As Previously |
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
As Previously |
|
As |
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
Restated |
|
2006 |
|
Reported |
|
Restated |
|
2006 |
NUMERATOR: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(15,866 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,186 |
) |
|
$ |
1,310,498 |
|
|
$ |
39,100 |
|
|
$ |
(2,287,009 |
) |
|
$ |
5,709,050 |
|
Numerator for net income per common
share diluted |
|
$ |
(15,866 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,186 |
) |
|
$ |
1,310,498 |
|
|
$ |
39,100 |
|
|
$ |
(2,287,900 |
) |
|
$ |
5,709,050 |
|
DENOMINATOR: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares |
|
|
34,275,296 |
|
|
|
34,275,296 |
|
|
|
25,400,160 |
|
|
|
34,275,296 |
|
|
|
30,981,946 |
|
|
|
25,400,160 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for net income per common
sharediluted |
|
|
34,275,296 |
|
|
|
34,275,296 |
|
|
|
25,400,160 |
|
|
|
34,275,296 |
|
|
|
30,981,946 |
|
|
|
25,400,160 |
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net incomeBasic |
|
$ |
0.00 |
) |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
Net incomeDiluted |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
19
Note 14: SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
A summary of additions and deductions related to the allowance for doubtful accounts for the
year ended December 31, 2006 and the three ended March 31, 2007, three months ended June 30, 2007
and the three months ended September 30, 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Beginning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of |
|
|
of Period |
|
Additions |
|
Deductions |
|
Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
291,100 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
291,100 |
|
Three Months ended March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
291,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
291,100 |
|
Three Months ended June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
291,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
291,000 |
|
Three Months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
291,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,725 |
|
|
$ |
240,275 |
|
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Merger Agreement with Post Tension of Nevada
On July 15, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted final rules amending the use
of Form S-8 and Form 8-K for shell companies like us. The amendments expand the definition of a
shell company to mean a company, other than an asset-backed issuer, with no or nominal
operations/assets or assets consisting of cash and cash equivalents and no or nominal other assets,
the amendments prohibit the use of a Form S-8 (a form used by a corporation to register securities
issued to an employee, director, officer, consultant or advisor, under certain circumstances), and
revise the Form 8-K to require a shell company to include current Form 10 or Form 10-SB
information, including audited financial statements, in the filing on Form 8-K that the shell
company files to report the acquisition of the business opportunity. The rules are designed to
assure that investors in shell companies that acquire operations or assets have access on a timely
basis to the same kind of information as is available to investors in public companies with
continuing operations.
On December 28, 2006, APTI entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with PTNV, which became
firm, and was announced in a Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on February 20, 2007.
On April 12, 2007, a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC reported the completion of the
definitive Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement) with PTNV and PTNV Acquisition
Corp, a Florida corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of APTI (Acquisition Corp.). The Merger
Agreement provided that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger
Agreement, Acquisition Corp. would merge with and into PTNV (the Merger). As a result of the
Merger, PTNV became a wholly-owned subsidiary of APTI. Each outstanding share of PTNV common stock
was converted into the right to receive 10,160.064 shares of the Companys common stock as set
forth in the Merger Agreement. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement at closing, the Company
issued, and the PTNV stockholders received, in a tax-free exchange, shares of Company common stock
such that PTNV stockholders now own approximately 90% of the issued and outstanding shares of the
Company.
These transactions were accounted for as a recapitalization, whereby PTNV was treated as the
acquirer for accounting purposes. Therefore, the historic financial statements prior to merger are
those of PTNV and post merger, the financial statements represent the consolidated financial
position and operating results of American Post Tension, Inc and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Post
Tension of Nevada. As a result of the business combination, if the acquired entitys shareholders
will exercise control over us, the transaction is deemed to be a capital transaction where we are
treated as a non-business entity. Therefore, the accounting for the business combination is
identical to that resulting from a reverse merger, except no goodwill or other intangible assets
will be recorded. The Company did not recognize goodwill or any other intangible assets in
connection with the transaction.
20
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA FOR POST TENSION OF NEVADA
You should read the selected historical financial data of PTNV below in conjunction the
amended Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 28, 2007. As stated previously, the
Merger was accounted for as a recapitalization, whereby PTNV was treated as the acquirer for
accounting purposes. Therefore, the historic financial statements prior to merger are those of PTNV
and post merger, the financial statements represent the consolidated financial position and
operating results of American Post Tension, Inc and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Post Tension of
Nevada. The information below is being presented to give the financial reader a historical
financial performance of PTNV, since PTNV is currently the sole operating entity of the Company.
The selected consolidated historical financial data may not be indicative of future performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
30,222,079 |
|
|
$ |
39,080,007 |
|
|
$ |
32,957,035 |
|
|
$ |
22,487,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Sales |
|
|
19,969,739 |
|
|
|
27,767,247 |
|
|
|
23,968,096 |
|
|
|
16,375,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin |
|
|
10,252,340 |
|
|
|
11,312,760 |
|
|
|
8,988,939 |
|
|
|
6,111,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
4,460,243 |
|
|
|
4,928,149 |
|
|
|
3,433,581 |
|
|
|
3,673,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
5,792,097 |
|
|
|
6,384,611 |
|
|
|
5,555,358 |
|
|
|
2,437,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income and (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
167,830 |
|
|
|
72,775 |
|
|
|
113,239 |
|
|
|
17,667 |
|
Interest income (expense), net |
|
|
(71,759 |
) |
|
|
(89,900 |
) |
|
|
(156,749 |
) |
|
|
(1,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before income tax |
|
|
5,888,168 |
|
|
|
6,367,486 |
|
|
|
5,511,848 |
|
|
|
2,453,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
5,888,168 |
|
|
|
6,367,626 |
|
|
|
5,511,848 |
|
|
|
2,453,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions per share |
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
25,400,160 |
|
|
|
25,400,160 |
|
|
|
25,400,160 |
|
|
|
25,400,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
25,400,160 |
|
|
|
25,400,160 |
|
|
|
25,400,160 |
|
|
|
25,400,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
7,743,292 |
|
|
$ |
6,297,773 |
|
|
$ |
3,682,968 |
|
|
$ |
1,120,647 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
132,483 |
|
|
|
(589,804 |
) |
|
|
(399,109 |
) |
|
|
(63,855 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
(6,614,000 |
) |
|
|
(5,129,254 |
) |
|
|
(1,774,714 |
) |
|
|
(932,612 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(132,483 |
) |
|
|
589,804 |
|
|
|
399,109 |
|
|
|
63,855 |
|
Current tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,937,178 |
|
|
$ |
2,255,889 |
|
|
$ |
1,677,183 |
|
|
$ |
168,038 |
|
Working capital |
|
|
6,539,390 |
|
|
|
6,845,594 |
|
|
|
5,415,506 |
|
|
|
3,996,375 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
8,837,267 |
|
|
|
9,850,168 |
|
|
|
8,249,359 |
|
|
|
5,269,919 |
|
Long-term debt and other liabilities (including current portion) |
|
|
9,577 |
|
|
|
28,125 |
|
|
|
54,455 |
|
|
|
163,285 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
7,594,962 |
|
|
|
7,977,579 |
|
|
|
6,087,359 |
|
|
|
4,232,188 |
|
Preliminary Note of Restated Financial Data:
On November 30, 2007, our Board of Directors created a Special Committee comprised of the two
independent directors to work with the Companys then Chief Financial Officer to conduct a
voluntary,
21
internal review of the Companys recording and valuation of stock issued to employees
and consultants
related to the merger transaction completed by the Company in April 2007. The Special
Committee retained outside counsel and a valuation expert to assist with this review.
Based on the final report issued by the Companys retained valuation expert dated February 28,
2008, the Special Committee determined that the prior valuation of $0.16 per share recorded by the
Company should be adjusted to a revised Fair Market Value of $0.36 per share. The valuation expert
considered various factors including the restrictive period of transferability associated with the
shares issued, lack of marketability and other factors in determining the fair market value of the
shares of common stock issued. Subsequently, in consultation with our independent auditors, we
determined that the prior valuation should be adjusted to $0.59 per share. The Company issued
5,325,840 shares of common stock to consultants and 101,600 shares of common stock to employees
prior to the Merger. The additional expense of $0.43 per share of common stock issued results in
additional non-cash compensation expense of $2,333,799 during the three months ended June 30, 2007.
Compensation expense is recorded in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
123(R) (revised) Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123(R)) and SFAS 157. In September 2006, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (Statement 157), which addresses how companies
should measure fair value when they are required to use a fair value measure for recognition or
disclosure purposes under generally accepted accounting principles. Statement 157 defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles
and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
There was no effect on the balance sheet accounts as reported in the 10-Q for the three months
ended June 30, 2007. As a result of the Merger, as the acquired entitys shareholders exercise
control over the Company, the transaction is deemed to be a capital transaction whereby the Company
is treated as a non-business entity. Therefore, the accounting for the business combination is
identical to that resulting from a reverse merger, except no goodwill or other intangible assets
will be recorded as a result of the Merger. Accordingly, the Company did not recognize goodwill or
any other intangible assets in connection with the transaction. PTNV is treated as the acquirer for
accounting purposes. Therefore, the historic financial statements prior to merger are those of PTNV
and post merger, the financial statements represent the consolidated financial position and
operating results of Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Post Tension of Nevada. All retained
earnings of PTNV were recapitalized to retained earnings as of the merger date. The shares in
question were issued by PTNV prior to the merger and thus increased valuation of the shares issued
resulted in an increase to additional paid in capital and a corresponding decrease to retained
earnings of PTNV. Because all retained earnings of PTNV were recapitalized to additional paid in
capital on the merger date, there was no effect upon the previously reported balance sheets.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 as compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2006
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain information related to our
operations, expressed in dollars and as a percentage of our net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended Sept. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended Sept. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended Sept. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Adjustment |
|
|
Restated |
|
|
% |
|
|
30, 2006 |
|
|
% |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
4,166,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,166,195 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
6,351,282 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
2,980,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,980,306 |
|
|
|
71.5 |
% |
|
|
4,135,396 |
|
|
|
65.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
1,185,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,185,889 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
% |
|
|
2,215,886 |
|
|
|
34.9 |
% |
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
1,282,564 |
|
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
|
|
1,270,564 |
|
|
|
30.5 |
% |
|
|
947,401 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended Sept. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended Sept. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended Sept. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Adjustment |
|
|
Restated |
|
|
% |
|
|
30, 2006 |
|
|
% |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
1,282,564 |
|
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
|
|
1,270,564 |
|
|
|
30.5 |
% |
|
|
947,401 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
(96,675 |
) |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
(84,675 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
)% |
|
|
1,268,485 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
% |
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income (expense), net |
|
|
15,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,429 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
42,046 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
56,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,853 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
% |
Merger related expenses and costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
72,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,282 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
42,013 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income
taxes |
|
|
(24,393 |
) |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
(12,393 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
|
|
1,310,498 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
8,527 |
|
|
|
(4,320 |
) |
|
|
4,207 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
(15,866 |
) |
|
|
7,680 |
|
|
$ |
(8,186 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
|
$ |
1,310,498 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
Net sales totaled $4,166,195 for the three months ended September 30, 2007, as compared to
$6,351,282 for the same period in 2006, or a decrease of 34%. Home Builders Research reported that
new home sales are down 43.8 percent in Las Vegas and permit activity is down 34.4 percent from a
year ago. The year to date 2007 metro Phoenix housing market continues at a pace 23% below that of
last year. Our revenue is derived from new construction of residential housing and is directly
related to new home sales and permits for new residential construction. The decreased activity of
new residential home construction has been pronounced in Las Vegas, Nevada and Phoenix, Arizona has
resulted in reduced sales level and gross margin.
Cost of sales
Cost of sales, including all installation expenses, during the three months ended September
30, 2007 was 71.5% of net sales, as compared to 65.1% in 2006. We are anticipating competition to
increase and downward pressure on our gross margin during the next year as current and potential
competitors seek new revenue streams.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 were
$1,270,564 or 30.5% of net sales as compared to $947,401 or 14.9% of net sales during the same
period of the prior year. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $323,163 for
the three month period ending September 30, 2007 versus the same three month period ending
September 30, 2006. We hired additional sales and marketing personnel to launch our Commercial
Division, hired a full time Chief Financial Officer and incurred consulting fees related to being a
Public Company. Effective August 6, 2006, we appointed a full-time Chief Financial Officer, as
reported in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 9, 2007. Our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Operating Office, whom together own approximately 75% of the outstanding shares
of common stock, have salaries of $500,000 per year. Last year they had salaries of $200,000 and
also received distributions of the Subchapter S Earnings (a non income cash disbursement). The
increase in the salaries of the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and CFO resulted
in additional expense of $191,666 versus the same period in the prior year.
Provision for income taxes
The Company did not record a provision for income taxes for the three months ended March 31,
2007, as PTNV was a Subchapter S corporation until April 2007. All retained earnings of PTNV were
reclassified to Additional paid in capital on the Subchapter S election termination by PTNV. The
Company has had taxable income of $431,605 post merger and post termination of the Subchapter S
election by PTNV. The Company recorded a $155,080 accrual for Federal Income taxes during the three
months ended
23
June 30, 2007 and recorded a reduction in accrual in the amount of ($4,207) during the
three months ended September 30, 2007.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 as compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain information related to our
operations, expressed in dollars and as a percentage of our net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended Sept. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended Sept. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended Sept. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Adjustment |
|
|
Restated |
|
|
% |
|
|
30, 2006 |
|
|
% |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
12,777,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,777,236 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
26,350,852 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
9,235,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,235,323 |
|
|
|
72.3 |
% |
|
|
17,752,520 |
|
|
|
67.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
3,541,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,541,913 |
|
|
|
27.7 |
% |
|
|
8,598,332 |
|
|
|
32.6 |
% |
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
3,261,616 |
|
|
|
31,688 |
|
|
|
3,293,304 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
% |
|
|
2,987,761 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
3,261,616 |
|
|
|
31,688 |
|
|
|
3,293,304 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
% |
|
|
2,987,761 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
280,297 |
|
|
|
(31,688 |
) |
|
|
248,609 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
5,610,571 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
% |
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income (expense), net |
|
|
63,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,973 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
105,695 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
793,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
793,219 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
22,210 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Merger related expenses and costs |
|
|
(929,289 |
) |
|
|
(2,290,111 |
) |
|
|
(3,219,400 |
) |
|
|
(25.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
(72,097 |
) |
|
|
(2,290,111 |
) |
|
|
(2,362,208 |
) |
|
|
(18.5 |
)% |
|
|
127,905 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income
taxes |
|
|
208,200 |
|
|
|
(2,321,799 |
) |
|
|
(2,113,599 |
) |
|
|
(16.5 |
)% |
|
|
5,738,476 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
169,090 |
|
|
|
4,320 |
|
|
|
173,410 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
29,426 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
39,110 |
|
|
|
(2,326,119 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,287,009 |
) |
|
|
(17.9 |
)% |
|
$ |
5,709,050 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
Net sales totaled $12,777,236 for the nine months ended September 30 31, 2007, as compared to
$26,350,852 for the same period in 2006, or a decrease of 52%. Home Builders Research reported that
new home sales are down 43.8 percent in Las Vegas and permit activity is down 34.4 percent from a
year ago. The year to date 2007 metro Phoenix housing market continues at a pace 23% below that of
last year. Our revenue is derived from new construction of residential housing and is related to
new home sales and permits for new residential construction. Our revenue is derived from new
construction of residential housing and is directly related to new home sales and permits for new
residential construction. The decreased activity of new residential home construction has been
pronounced in Las Vegas, Nevada and Phoenix, Arizona has resulted in reduced sales level and gross
margin.
Cost of sales
Cost of sales, including all installation expenses, during the nine months ended September 30,
2007 was 72.3% of net sales, as compared to 67.4% in 2006, in part due to more significant
competitive pressures we are experiencing. We are anticipating competition to increase and downward
pressure on our gross margin during the next year as current and potential competitors seek new
revenue streams.
24
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 were
25.8% of net sales as compared to 11.3% of net sales during the same period of the prior year.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased to approximately $3,293,304 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 compared to approximately $2,987,761 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006. We hired additional sales and marketing personnel to launch our Commercial
Division, hired a full time Chief Financial Officer and incurred consulting fees related to being a
Public Company. Effective August 6, 2006, we appointed a full-time Chief Financial Officer, as
reported in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 9, 2007. Our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Operating Office, whom together own approximately 75% of the outstanding shares
of common stock, have salaries of $500,000 per year. Last year they had salaries of $200,000 and
also received distributions of the Subchapter S Earnings (a non income cash disbursement).
Acquisition related expenses and costs
PTNV issued 526 shares of common stock to consultants and advisors prior to the consummation
of the Merger. The shares were exchanged for 5,327,840 shares of common stock of Magic
Communications, Inc. upon the consummation of the Merger. PTNV issued 10 shares of common stock to
employees prior to the consummation of the Merger that were converted into 101,600 shares of Magic
Communications, Inc. upon the consummation of the Merger agreement. The 5,325,840 shares of common
stock and 101,600 shares of common stock originally valued at $0.16 per share. We adjusted the per
share value to $0.59 per share as discussed earlier, resulting in the Company recording an
additional $2,290,111 to Merger related expenses and costs (5,325,840 Common shares of stock X
$0.43 = $2,290,111). The Company incurred legal, accounting and other professional services of
$77,155 during the three month period ending June 30, 2007 as a result of being a public company
and consummating the Merger.
Other income (expense), net
The Companys workmans compensation insurance company, Employers Insurance Company (EIC),
went public. The Company was a member of EIC. EIC gave to the Company stock when EIC went public.
The Company sold the shares in EIC on March 19, 2007 for net proceeds of $695,334 which resulted in
a gain on sale of stock.
Provision for income taxes
The Company did not record a provision for income taxes for the three months ended March 31,
2007, as PTNV was a Subchapter S corporation until April 2007. All retained earnings of PTNV were
reclassified to Additional paid in capital on the Subchapter S election termination by PTNV. The
Company has had taxable income of $431,605 post merger and post termination of the Subchapter S
election by PTNV. The Company recorded a $155,080 accrual for Federal Income taxes during the three
months ended June 30, 2007 and recorded a reduction in accrual in the amount of ($4,207) during the
three months ended September 30, 2007.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Significant sources of liquidity are cash on hand, cash flows from operating activities,
working capital, borrowings from our revolving line of credit and equity proceeds raised. As of
September 30, 2007 we had approximately $2,076,606 in cash on hand.
Cash flows provided from operating activities were $455,052 and $1,685,066 for the three
months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively and $2,659,275 and $7,425,477 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006.
25
Cash flows (used in) investing activities were ($64,085) and ($9,220), respectively, for the
three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 and ($125,060) and ($48,758) for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 and 2006. The investing activities were for the purchase of fixed assets.
The Company installed Microsoft Dynamics GP as its new accounting system during the three months
ended September 30, 2007.
Cash flows (used in) financing activities were ($137,235) and ($1,206,763), respectively, for
the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 and ($3,394,786) and ($6,164,155) for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006. The financing activities are comprised of distributions
to the shareholders of PTNV prior to the merger and repayment of loans due Edward Hohman and John
Hohman.
ITEM 3. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and former Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design
and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)). Based on this evaluation, our
Chief Executive Officer and our then Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures that are designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in
the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures
include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required
to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to
management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements, Special Committee and Company Findings
On November 30, 2007, our Board of Directors created a Special Committee comprised of the two
independent directors to work with the Companys then Chief Financial Officer to conduct a
voluntary, internal review of the Companys recording and valuation of stock issued to employees
and consultants related to the merger transaction completed by the Company in April 2007. The
Special Committee retained outside counsel and a valuation expert to assist with this review.
Based on the final report issued by the Companys retained valuation expert dated February 28,
2008, the Special Committee determined that the prior valuation of $0.16 per share recorded by the
Company should be adjusted to a revised Fair Market Value of $0.36 per share. The valuation expert
considered various factors including the restrictive period of transferability associated with the
shares issued, lack of marketability and other factors in determining the fair market value of the
shares of common stock issued. Subsequently, in consultation with our independent auditors, we
determined that the prior valuation should be adjusted to $0.59 per share. The Company issued
5,325,840 shares of common stock to consultants and 101,600 shares of common stock to employees
prior to the Merger. The additional expense of $0.43 per share of common stock issued results in an
additional non-cash compensation expense of $2,333,799 during the three months ended June 30, 2007.
All of the foregoing charges were non-cash and had no impact on our reported net sales or cash
or cash equivalents. There was no effect upon the balance sheet accounts as reported in the 10-Q
for the three months ended June 30, 2007 or September 30, 2007. As a result of the Merger, as the
acquired entitys shareholders exercise control over the Company, the transaction is deemed to be a
capital transaction whereby the Company is treated as a non-business entity. Therefore, the
accounting for the business combination is identical to that resulting from a reverse merger,
except no goodwill or other intangible
26
assets will be recorded as a result of the Merger. Accordingly, the Company did not recognize
goodwill or any other intangible assets in connection with the transaction. PTNV is treated as the
acquirer for accounting purposes. Therefore, the historic financial statements prior to merger are
those of PTNV and post merger, the financial statements represent the consolidated financial
position and operating results of Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Post Tension of Nevada.
All retained earnings of PTNV were recapitalized to retained earnings as of the merger date. The
shares in question were issued by PTNV prior to the merger and thus increased valuation of the
shares issued resulted in an increase to additional paid in capital and a corresponding decrease to
retained earnings of PTNV. Because all retained earnings of PTNV were recapitalized to additional
paid in capital on the merger date, there was no effect upon the previously reported balance
sheets.
As a result of the findings of the Special Committee as well as our internal review, we
concluded that we needed to amend this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2007 to restate our condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarter
ended September 30, 2007 and the related disclosures. We have restated the September 30, 2007
financial statements included in our September30, 2007 Form 10-Q. We also amended our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 filed on August 14, 2007, and as amended in
Amendment No. 1 thereto, also filed on August 14, 2007. The changes to our financial statements
included in these two amended reports are already reflected in our audited financial statements
included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed on May 8, 2008, and the
changes in these two amended reports were made so they would conform to our audited financial
reports for the full year.
Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and then principal
financial officer, are responsible for the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d- 15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act)) believed that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as
of September 30, 2007. As a result of the findings of the Special Committee as well as our internal
review and our need to restate our condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarters
ended June 30, 2007 and September 30, 2007, we determined that there were material weaknesses as of
June 30, 2007, as more fully described below. For these reasons our principal executive officer and
then principal financial officer concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was
not effective as of June 30, 2007.
Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.
A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that
results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim
financial statements will not be prevented or detected. We identified the following material
weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2007:
We did not maintain effective governance and oversight, controls to prevent or detect
instances of management override, and risk assessment procedures. Specifically, we failed to
establish effective governance and oversight by the Board of Directors of our activities related to
the granting of restricted shares of common stock related to the merger between the Companys
subsidiary and Post Tension of Nevada. Additionally, controls were not effective in adequately
identifying, assessing and addressing
27
significant risks associated with the granting of restricted shares of common stock that could
impact our financial reporting and the tax consequences of such shares being granted. Finally, our
controls were not adequate to prevent or detect instances of members of senior management lacking
technical expertise regarding requirements of generally accepted accounting principles and tax
requirements prior to issuing the shares of restricted securities. This control deficiency resulted
in the following findings of the Special Committee:
|
|
Policies and procedures were inadequate and we failed to verify
purported actions of Senior Management and their discussions with our
outside legal counsel, auditor and consultants were accurately and
timely documented; including evaluating the transactions concerning
the issuance of restricted shares to ensure reporting was completed in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Inadequate
documentation was prepared concerning the tax consequences and
benefits to specific parties concerning the fair market value price
assigned to such restricted shares and how the fair market value of
such restricted shares were determined; |
|
|
|
We failed to recognize restricted share grant practices as a
significant risk and to assure that managers and other personnel
involved in the restricted share grants process understood their
appropriate roles and responsibilities and the consequences of their
actions; and |
|
|
|
We failed to assure that our prior Chief Financial Officer received
adequate supervision and training on how to comply with the
requirements of generally accepted accounting principles applicable to
the issuance of restricted shares of common stock. |
This control deficiency, and related findings of the Special Committee, resulted in the
restatement of our consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 and the
quarter ended September 30, 2007. Additionally, this control deficiency could result in
misstatements of our financial statement accounts and disclosures that would result in a material
misstatement of the annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented
or detected. Accordingly, our management has determined that this control deficiency constituted a
material weakness. This material weakness also contributed to the existence of the following
additional material weakness.
We did not maintain effective controls over our accounting for and disclosure of our
restricted stock-based compensation expense. Specifically, effective controls, including
monitoring, were not maintained to ensure the existence, completeness, accuracy, valuation and
documentation of discussions between our prior Chief Financial Officer and our external counsel,
auditors and consultants. This control deficiency resulted in the misstatement of our restricted
stock-based compensation expense and related disclosures, and in the restatement of our
consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 and for the quarter ended
September 30, 2007. Additionally, this control deficiency could result in misstatements of the
aforementioned accounts and disclosures that would result in a material misstatement of our interim
consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Accordingly, our
management determined that this control deficiency constituted a material weakness.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Special Committee discussed the above issues with the entire Board of Directors on
February 29, 2008 and we commenced remediation of the material weaknesses described above, which is
now complete. Our Board of Directors has approved additional control procedures to remediate the
material weaknesses including the following:
|
|
|
Creation and implementation of formal, documented restricted stock
grant procedures and practices to ensure systematic approval and
execution of restricted stock grants and the proper recording of such
grants in our financial statements; |
|
|
|
|
Establishment of additional training for personnel and directors in
areas associated with the restricted stock granting processes and
other compensation practices to increase competency levels of the
personnel involved. |
28
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Certain of the risks related to
an investment in our common stock were disclosed in an amended Current Report on form 8-K, which we
filed with the SEC on June 28, 2007. The portion of that amended Current Report under the caption
Risk Factors is hereby incorporated into this report by this reference. You should carefully
consider those risk factors, as well as the following additional risk factors and other information
in this report, before deciding whether to invest in shares of our common stock.
We recently amended our bylaws to make it easier for or majority stockholders, primarily
Edward Hohman and John Hohman, to approve corporate actions that require the consent of our
stockholders. In addition to those risk factors disclosed in the amended Current Report referred
to in the preceding paragraph, on June 28, 2007, we amended our bylaws to make it easier for our
majority stockholders to approve corporate actions without the need to call a meeting of all of our
stockholders to vote on such corporate actions. The Delaware corporation laws that govern us
require that certain corporate actions, such as a merger or sale of the Company, changes to our
Certificate of Incorporation, and other actions, be approved by our stockholders prior to those
actions becoming effective. Such stockholder approval can be obtained either by holding a
stockholder meeting or, if our bylaws permit, by obtaining the written consent to such actions of
stockholders owning a sufficient number of shares of stock to approve the actions (typically a
majority of the outstanding shares of our stock). Our bylaws previously permitted action to be
approved by written consent of our stockholders, but the bylaws required the written consent of
all stockholders. We believe that obtaining the written consent of all stockholders to
approve corporate action would be impracticable, due the time and cost that would be required.
Similarly, holding a meeting of stockholders to approve certain actions would involve additional
legal and other expenses to the Corporation. Accordingly, our board of directors amended our
bylaws to permit stockholder approval of corporate actions by the written consent of the holders of
a majority of our outstanding voting shares, as permitted by Delaware law. On August 3, 2007, our
board approved, and the Companys stockholders owning a majority of the outstanding voting shares,
approved an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation to change our name to American Post
Tension, Inc.
The decreased activity of new residential home construction has been pronounced in Las Vegas,
Nevada and Phoenix, Arizona and has resulted in significantly reduced sales and gross margin. Our
revenue is derived primarily from new construction of residential housing and is directly related
to new home sales and permits for new residential construction. The recent downturn in residential
construction in Las Vegas, Nevada and Phoenix, Arizona has resulted in a significant reduction in
our revenues for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007. We cannot
predict whether or when residential construction activity will rebound in those markets. Prolonged
sluggishness in residential construction, however, can be expected to continue to have a negative
impact on our revenues and earnings.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
PTNV issued 526 shares of common stock to consultants and advisors prior to the consummation
of the Merger. The shares were exchanged for 5,327,840 shares of common stock of American Post
Tension, Inc. upon the consummation of the Merger. PTNV issued 10 shares of common stock of PTNV to
employees prior to the consummation of the Merger that were converted into 101,600 shares of
American Post Tension, Inc. upon the consummation of the Merger agreement. All of the shares issued
are restricted securities. APTI issued 50,000 of restricted shares of common stock during the three
months ended September 30, 2007 to two members of the Board of Directors (25,000 shares each).
29
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
There were no defaults upon senior securities during the three and nine month period ended
September 30, 2007.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item 5. Other Information
Effective August 6, 2007, our board of Directors (the Board) appointed Mr. Dean Homayouni,
Esq., CPA, 49, as our Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Homayouni replaced Mr. Kelly T. Hickel, who had
been our acting Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Hickel subsequently resigned as a member of our Board
as well. Mr. Homayouni remained as our Chief Financial Officer until April 4, 2008, when he
resigned due to an on-going dispute over compensation, as reported in a Form 8-K filed on April 9,
2008. On July 10, 2008, we filed a Report on Form 8-K reporting that we have retained CF
Consulting, LLC, a financial and legal consulting firm, to undertake the functions of Chief
Financial Officer and corporate counsel on a consulting basis, as a result of which Mr. Robert
Hipple now serves as our Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Hipple is not an elected officer, employee
or director of the Company.
Item 6. Exhibits
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
July 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Post Tension, Inc.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Edward Hohman
|
|
|
|
Edward Hohman |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
30
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
31