e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-13883
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
77-0448994 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer identification No.) |
of incorporation or organization) |
|
|
|
|
|
1720 North First Street, San Jose, CA.
|
|
95112 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
408-367-8200
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by checkmark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or
a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule
12b-2 or the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date. Common shares outstanding as of
November 1, 2007 20,666,869.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The condensed consolidated financial statements presented in this filing on Form 10-Q have
been prepared by management and are unaudited.
3
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Unaudited
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utility plant: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utility plant |
|
$ |
1,420,585 |
|
|
$ |
1,344,415 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(429,319 |
) |
|
|
(402,940 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net utility plant |
|
|
991,266 |
|
|
|
941,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
26,491 |
|
|
|
60,312 |
|
Receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers |
|
|
29,514 |
|
|
|
19,526 |
|
Other |
|
|
7,549 |
|
|
|
6,700 |
|
Unbilled revenue |
|
|
14,711 |
|
|
|
11,341 |
|
Materials and supplies at average cost |
|
|
4,789 |
|
|
|
4,515 |
|
Prepaid pension expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,696 |
|
Taxes and other prepaid expenses |
|
|
5,300 |
|
|
|
5,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
88,354 |
|
|
|
109,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory assets |
|
|
93,907 |
|
|
|
93,785 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
22,377 |
|
|
|
20,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
116,284 |
|
|
|
113,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,195,904 |
|
|
$ |
1,165,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value |
|
$ |
207 |
|
|
$ |
207 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
211,782 |
|
|
|
211,513 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
171,607 |
|
|
|
166,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common stockholders equity |
|
|
383,596 |
|
|
|
378,302 |
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
3,475 |
|
|
|
3,475 |
|
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
|
|
291,051 |
|
|
|
291,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization |
|
|
678,122 |
|
|
|
673,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
1,832 |
|
|
|
1,778 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
39,086 |
|
|
|
33,130 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
40,747 |
|
|
|
35,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
81,665 |
|
|
|
70,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized investment tax credits |
|
|
2,541 |
|
|
|
2,541 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net |
|
|
69,517 |
|
|
|
69,503 |
|
Pension and postretirement benefits other than pensions |
|
|
48,584 |
|
|
|
48,584 |
|
Regulatory and other liabilities |
|
|
33,724 |
|
|
|
33,411 |
|
Advances for construction |
|
|
167,719 |
|
|
|
157,660 |
|
Contributions in aid of construction |
|
|
114,032 |
|
|
|
109,504 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,195,904 |
|
|
$ |
1,165,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Unaudited
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
For the three months ended: |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Operating revenue |
|
$ |
113,851 |
|
|
$ |
107,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water production costs |
|
|
45,063 |
|
|
|
43,998 |
|
Other operations |
|
|
26,495 |
|
|
|
23,756 |
|
Maintenance |
|
|
4,233 |
|
|
|
4,173 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
8,392 |
|
|
|
7,717 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
8,426 |
|
|
|
8,552 |
|
Property and other taxes |
|
|
3,707 |
|
|
|
3,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
96,316 |
|
|
|
91,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income |
|
|
17,535 |
|
|
|
16,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-regulated revenue |
|
|
3,418 |
|
|
|
2,358 |
|
Non-regulated expense |
|
|
(2,136 |
) |
|
|
(1,610 |
) |
Gain (loss) on sale of non-utility property |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: income taxes on other income and expenses |
|
|
(522 |
) |
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income and expenses |
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
4,936 |
|
|
|
5,031 |
|
Less: capitalized interest |
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
(1,125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest expense |
|
|
4,486 |
|
|
|
3,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,809 |
|
|
$ |
12,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
20,667 |
|
|
|
18,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
20,691 |
|
|
|
18,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per share of common stock |
|
$ |
0.2900 |
|
|
$ |
0.2875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Unaudited
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
For the nine months ended: |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Operating revenue |
|
$ |
281,203 |
|
|
$ |
254,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water production costs |
|
|
108,147 |
|
|
|
95,637 |
|
Other operations |
|
|
75,425 |
|
|
|
70,943 |
|
Maintenance |
|
|
13,983 |
|
|
|
11,503 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
25,173 |
|
|
|
23,066 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
13,761 |
|
|
|
12,593 |
|
Property and other taxes |
|
|
10,548 |
|
|
|
9,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
247,037 |
|
|
|
223,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income |
|
|
34,166 |
|
|
|
30,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-regulated revenue |
|
|
9,883 |
|
|
|
6,713 |
|
Non-regulated expenses |
|
|
(5,853 |
) |
|
|
(4,948 |
) |
Gain (loss) on sale of non-utility property |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
348 |
|
Less: income taxes on other income and expenses |
|
|
(1,608 |
) |
|
|
(861 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income and expenses |
|
|
2,339 |
|
|
|
1,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
14,788 |
|
|
|
14,698 |
|
Less: capitalized interest |
|
|
(1,400 |
) |
|
|
(1,975 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
13,388 |
|
|
|
12,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
23,117 |
|
|
$ |
19,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
20,664 |
|
|
|
18,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
20,688 |
|
|
|
18,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per share of common stock |
|
$ |
0.8700 |
|
|
$ |
0.8625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
6
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Unaudited
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
For the nine months ended: |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
23,117 |
|
|
$ |
19,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
25,173 |
|
|
|
23,065 |
|
Amortization of debt |
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits,
regulatory assets and liabilities, net |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
1,120 |
|
(Gain) loss on sale of non-utility property |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
(348 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
(10,744 |
) |
|
|
(9,789 |
) |
Unbilled revenue |
|
|
(3,371 |
) |
|
|
(3,250 |
) |
Taxes and other prepaid expenses |
|
|
(1,283 |
) |
|
|
(196 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
10,270 |
|
|
|
8,299 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
(273 |
) |
|
|
(254 |
) |
Other current liabilities |
|
|
5,430 |
|
|
|
17,676 |
|
Other changes, net |
|
|
(1,923 |
) |
|
|
(621 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net adjustments |
|
|
23,989 |
|
|
|
36,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
47,106 |
|
|
|
55,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utility plant expenditures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company funded |
|
|
(61,660 |
) |
|
|
(67,065 |
) |
Developer funded |
|
|
(17,904 |
) |
|
|
(19,258 |
) |
Acquisitions |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(509 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of non-utility property |
|
|
|
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(79,594 |
) |
|
|
(86,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
Net repayment of long-term debt |
|
|
(905 |
) |
|
|
(842 |
) |
Proceeds from long-term debt, net of expenses |
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
19,879 |
|
Advances for construction |
|
|
14,724 |
|
|
|
18,766 |
|
Refunds of advances for construction |
|
|
(4,665 |
) |
|
|
(4,647 |
) |
Contributions in aid of construction |
|
|
7,139 |
|
|
|
6,511 |
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(18,092 |
) |
|
|
(15,989 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(1,333 |
) |
|
|
25,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(33,821 |
) |
|
|
(5,227 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
60,312 |
|
|
|
9,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
26,491 |
|
|
$ |
4,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued payables for investments in utility plant |
|
$ |
6,164 |
|
|
$ |
5,288 |
|
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
7
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2007
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Note 1. Organization and Operations
California Water Service Group (the Company) is a holding company with five wholly owned
subsidiaries that provide water utility and other related services in California, Washington,
New Mexico and Hawaii. California Water Service Company (Cal Water), Washington Water Service
Company (Washington Water), New Mexico Water Service Company (New Mexico Water), and Hawaii
Water Service Company, Inc. (Hawaii Water) provide regulated utility services under the rules
and regulations of their respective states regulatory commissions (Commissions). In addition,
these entities and CWS Utility Services provide non-regulated water utility and utility-related
services.
The Company operates primarily in one business segment providing water utility services.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The interim financial information is unaudited. The condensed consolidated financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the Companys consolidated financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2006, included in its Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) on March 14, 2007.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
reflect all adjustments that are necessary to provide a fair presentation of the results for the
periods covered. The adjustments consist only of normal recurring adjustments. The results for
interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for any future period.
The preparation of the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements necessarily
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the condensed
consolidated balance sheet dates, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the
periods presented.
Certain prior years amounts have been reclassified, where necessary, to conform to the current
presentation as follows: on the income statement, non-regulated income and non-regulated
expenses which were previously netted in the income statement have been presented separately:
also, prior year amounts for income taxes associated with other income and expenses were
reclassified from income taxes included in operating expenses to income taxes on other income
and expenses. On the statements of cash flows, prior year amounts for company-funded utility
plant expenditures and accounts payable have been reduced for non-cash activities.
8
Revenue
Revenue consists of monthly cycle billings for regulated water and wastewater services at rates
authorized by the Commissions and billings to certain non-regulated customers. Billings include
a fee that is paid to the Commissions. This amount is recorded in revenue and other operations
expense. Fees paid to the Commissions for the nine months ending September 30, 2007, and
September 30, 2006, were $3,783 and $3,454, respectively.
Other Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157 Fair Value Measurements. The statement defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair values in generally accepted accounting
principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The statement is effective
for years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoption of this statement is not expected to
have a material impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. The statement
permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value. The statement is effective for years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoption of
this statement is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys financial position,
results of operations, or cash flows.
Note 3. Seasonal Business
Due to the seasonal nature of the water business, the results for interim periods are not
indicative of the results for a twelve-month period. Revenue and income are generally higher in
the warm, dry summer months when water usage and sales are greater. Revenue and income are
lower in the winter months when cooler temperatures and rainfall curtail water usage and sales.
Note 4. Stock-based Compensation
Long-Term Incentive Plan
The Company had a stockholder-approved Long-Term Incentive Plan (which was replaced on April 27,
2005, by a stockholder-approved Equity Incentive Plan) that allowed granting of non-qualified
stock options. The Company accounted for options issued under the Long-Term Incentive Plan
using the intrinsic value method under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees. All outstanding options under the Long-Term Incentive Plan have
an exercise price equal to the market price on the date they were granted, and are fully vested.
No compensation expense was recorded for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and
2006 related to stock options issued under the Long-Term Incentive Plan.
9
The table below reflects the stock options granted under the Long-Term Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Stock Options: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
90,500 |
|
|
$ |
24.94 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
- 0 - |
|
|
|
- 0 - |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
- 0 - |
|
|
|
- 0 - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2007 |
|
|
90,500 |
|
|
$ |
24.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2007 |
|
|
90,500 |
|
|
$ |
24.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Incentive Plan
Pursuant to the Equity Incentive Plan, which was approved by shareholders in April 2005, the
Company is authorized to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock. In the first nine months
of 2007 and 2006, the Company granted Restricted Stock Awards (RSAs) of 10,170 and 9,467 shares,
respectively, of common stock to employees and directors of the Company. Employee awards vest
ratably over 48 months, while director awards generally vest at the end of 12 months. The
shares were valued at the weighted average price of $38.20 and $38.65 per share, respectively,
based upon the fair market value of the Companys common stock on the date of grant. In the
first nine months of 2007 and 2006, the Company granted Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs)
equivalent to 24,140 and 40,000 shares, respectively, to employees, which vest ratably over 48
months and expire at the end of 10 years. The grant-date fair value for SARs was determined
using the Black Scholes model, which arrived at a fair value of $10.41 and $7.73 per share,
respectively. Upon exercise of a SAR, the appreciation is payable in common shares of the
Company.
The assumptions utilized in calculation of the SAR fair value were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
2.99 |
% |
|
|
2.99 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
32.79 |
% |
|
|
21.90 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.48 |
% |
|
|
4.19 |
% |
Expected holding period in years |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
The Company did not apply a forfeiture rate in the expense computation relating to RSAs and SARs
issued to employees as they vest monthly and, as a result, the expense is recorded for actual
vesting during the period. For outside directors the Company did not apply a forfeiture rate in
the expense computation relating to RSAs, as the Company expects 100% to vest at the end of
twelve months.
10
The table below reflects SARs granted under the Equity Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Stock Appreciation Rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
37,969 |
|
|
$ |
38.77 |
|
Granted |
|
|
24,140 |
|
|
|
38.30 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
- 0 - |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(469 |
) |
|
|
38.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2007 |
|
|
61,640 |
|
|
$ |
38.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2007 |
|
|
18,220 |
|
|
$ |
38.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has recorded compensation costs for the RSAs and SARs in Operating Expense, net of
related tax effects, in the amount of $101 and $73 for the quarter ending September 30, 2007,
and September 30, 2006, respectively, and $270 and $216 for the nine months ending September 30,
2007 and 2006, respectively.
Note 5. Earnings Per Share Calculations
The computations of basic and diluted earnings per share are noted below. RSAs are included in
the weighted stock outstanding used to calculate basic and dilutive earnings per share as the
shares have all voting and dividend rights as issued and unrestricted common stock. Diluted
earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other
contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.
11
All options are dilutive and for 2007 all SARs are antidilutive. The dilutive effect is shown
in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,809 |
|
|
$ |
12,619 |
|
Less preferred dividends |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
13,771 |
|
|
$ |
12,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares, basic |
|
|
20,667 |
|
|
|
18,407 |
|
Dilutive common stock options and SARs
(treasury method) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used for dilutive computation |
|
|
20,691 |
|
|
|
18,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share basic |
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
23,117 |
|
|
$ |
19,161 |
|
Less preferred dividends |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
23,002 |
|
|
$ |
19,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares, basic |
|
|
20,664 |
|
|
|
18,405 |
|
Dilutive common stock options and SARs
(treasury method) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used for dilutive computation |
|
|
20,688 |
|
|
|
18,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share basic |
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share diluted |
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6. Pension Plan and Other Postretirement Benefits
The Company provides a qualified, defined-benefit, non-contributory pension plan for
substantially all employees. The Company makes annual contributions to fund the amounts accrued
for the qualified pension plan. The Company also maintains an unfunded, non-qualified,
supplemental executive retirement plan. The costs of the plans are charged to expense and
utility plant as appropriate.
12
The Company offers medical, dental, vision, and life insurance benefits for retirees and their
spouses and dependents. Participants are required to pay a premium, which offsets a portion of
the cost.
Cash payments by the Company related to pension plans and other postretirement benefits were
$4,088 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The estimated cash contribution to the
pension plans for 2007 is $7,913. The estimated contribution to the other benefits plan for
2007 is $2,400.
The following table lists components of the pension plans and other postretirement benefits. The
data listed under pension plan includes the qualified pension plan and the non-qualified
executive supplemental retirement plan. The data listed under other benefits is for all other
postretirement benefits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Pension Benefit |
|
Other Benefits |
|
Pension Benefit |
|
Other Benefits |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Service cost |
|
$ |
1,322 |
|
|
$ |
1,337 |
|
|
$ |
289 |
|
|
$ |
288 |
|
|
$ |
3,968 |
|
|
$ |
4,010 |
|
|
$ |
866 |
|
|
$ |
865 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
1,631 |
|
|
|
1,514 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
4,892 |
|
|
|
4,541 |
|
|
|
988 |
|
|
|
858 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(1,426 |
) |
|
|
(1,465 |
) |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
(4,278 |
) |
|
|
(4,336 |
) |
|
|
(352 |
) |
|
|
(391 |
) |
Recognized net initial APBO(1) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
1,404 |
|
|
|
1,429 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
2,048 |
|
|
$ |
2,055 |
|
|
$ |
630 |
|
|
$ |
564 |
|
|
$ |
6,544 |
|
|
$ |
6,220 |
|
|
$ |
1,891 |
|
|
$ |
1,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
APBO Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation |
Note 7. Income Taxes
The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), on January 1, 2007. This
interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attributes for the financial
statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax
return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition of tax benefits, classification on the
balance sheet, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods and disclosure and
transition. At the adoption date and as of September 30, 2007, we had no material unrecognized
tax benefits and no adjustments to liabilities or operations were required.
In connection with the adoption of FIN 48, the Company will include interest and penalties
related to uncertain tax positions as a component of income taxes. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, there was no interest or penalties.
13
Tax years 2003 through 2006 and 2002 through 2006 are subject to examination by the federal and
state taxing authorities, respectively. There is a federal tax examination currently in
progress by the Internal Revenue Service for the 2005 fiscal year.
Note 8. Short-term Borrowings
During the second quarter, the Company and Cal Water signed bank lines of credit of $20 million
and $55 million, respectively. The lines of credit agreements expire on April 30, 2012. The
agreement with the Company requires a debt to capitalization ratio less than 0.667:1.0 and an
interest coverage ratio of at least 2.5:1.0. As of September 30, 2007, the Company and Cal
Water were in compliance with the bank covenants contained in the loan agreements. As of
September 30, 2007, there were no borrowings outstanding under the Companys or Cal Waters
lines of credit.
Note 9. Contingencies
In December 2006, Cal Water filed an application to allow it to recover additional funding
associated with its postretirement benefit other than pensions (PBOP) or retiree healthcare
plan. Currently, Cal Water funds and recognizes expenses associated with the plan on a
pay-as-you-go basis. The excess expense between pay-as-you-go and accrual during the employees
expected service period has been recognized as a regulatory asset. As of December 31, 2006, the
regulatory asset was approximately $9.8 million. In February 2007, the Division of Rate Payer
Advocates (DRA) filed its protest to our PBOP application. In their protest, the DRA requested
to dismiss the application with prejudice. The DRA further noted that prior to their protest;
the parties met several times to discuss our application. During the discussions it became
apparent to the DRA that negotiations would extend beyond the deadline for filing their protest.
The DRA further noted that subsequent to this filing, the parties will continue their
discussions to achieve a settlement that is reasonable, consistent with the law, and in the
public interest. Cal Water intends to increase its funding so the plan is funded during the
employees service period. Cal Water has established two Voluntary Employee Beneficiary
Associations (VEBAs) to allow for increased funding and a current period income tax deduction.
While the DRA has filed its protest, the ultimate outcome will be determined by the CPUC. Cal
Water believes that the CPUC will recognize in rates the recovery of the regulatory asset and
the additional funding of the plan. If the CPUC does not permit us to recover the full amount
of our regulatory asset, the regulatory asset, to the extent not allowed in recovery, will be
written off.
14
Item 2
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This quarterly report, including all documents incorporated by reference, contains
forward-looking statements within the meaning established by the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 (Act). Forward-looking statements in this quarterly report are based on
currently available information, expectations, estimates, assumptions and projections, and our
managements beliefs, assumptions, judgments and expectations about us, the water utility
industry and general economic conditions. These statements are not statements of historical
fact. When used in our documents, statements that are not historical in nature, including words
like expects, intends, plans, believes, may, estimates, assumes, anticipates,
projects, predicts, forecasts, should, seeks, or variations of these words or similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements
are not guarantees of future performance. They are based on numerous assumptions that we believe
are reasonable, but they are open to a wide range of uncertainties and business risks.
Consequently, actual results may vary materially from what is contained in a forward-looking
statement.
Factors which may cause actual results to be different than those expected or anticipated
include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
governmental and regulatory commissions decisions, including decisions on proper
disposition of property; |
|
|
|
|
changes in regulatory commissions policies and procedures; |
|
|
|
|
the timeliness of regulatory commissions actions concerning rate relief; |
|
|
|
|
new legislation; |
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting valuations and estimates; |
|
|
|
|
the ability to satisfy requirements related to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other
regulations on internal controls; |
|
|
|
|
electric power interruptions; |
|
|
|
|
increases in suppliers prices and the availability of supplies including water and
power; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in interest rates; |
|
|
|
|
changes in environmental compliance and water quality requirements; |
|
|
|
|
acquisitions and the ability to successfully integrate acquired companies; |
|
|
|
|
the ability to successfully implement business plans; |
|
|
|
|
changes in customer water use patterns; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of weather on water sales and operating results; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the capital markets and access to sufficient capital on satisfactory terms; |
|
|
|
|
civil disturbances or terrorist threats or acts, or apprehension about the possible
future occurrences of acts of this type; |
|
|
|
|
the involvement of the United States in war or other hostilities; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to attract and retain qualified employees; |
|
|
|
|
labor relations matters as we negotiate with the unions; |
15
|
|
|
restrictive covenants in or changes to the credit ratings on current or future debt that
could increase financing costs or affect the ability to borrow, make payments on debt, or
pay dividends; and |
|
|
|
|
the risks set forth in Risk Factors included elsewhere in our annual report on Form
10-K. |
In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, investors are cautioned not to place
undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this quarterly
report or as of the date of any document incorporated by reference in this report, as
applicable. When considering forward-looking statements, investors should keep in mind the
cautionary statements in this quarterly report and the documents incorporated by reference. We
are not under any obligation, and we expressly disclaim any obligation, to update or alter any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
We maintain our accounting records in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States and as directed by the regulatory commissions to which we are subject. The
process of preparing financial statements requires the use of estimates on the part of
management. The estimates used by management are based on historical experience and an
understanding of current facts and circumstances. Management believes that the following
accounting policies are critical because they involve a higher degree of complexity and
judgment, and can have a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
Revenue Recognition
Our revenue consists of monthly cycle customer billings for regulated water and wastewater
services at rates authorized by the governmental and regulatory commissions and billings to
certain non-regulated customers.
Revenue from metered customers includes billings to customers based on monthly meter readings
plus an estimate for water used between the customers last meter reading and the end of the
accounting period. At September 30, 2007, our unbilled revenue amount was $14.7 million and at
December 31, 2006, the amount was $11.3 million. The unbilled revenue amount is generally
higher during the summer months when water sales are higher. The amount recorded as unbilled
revenue varies depending among other factors on:
|
|
|
water usage in the preceding period; |
|
|
|
|
the number of days between meter reads for each billing cycle; and |
|
|
|
|
the number of days between each cycles meter reading and the end of the accounting
cycle. |
Flat rate customers are billed in advance at the beginning of the service period. The revenue
is prorated so that the portion of revenue applicable to the current accounting period is
included in that periods revenue. The portion related to a subsequent accounting period is
recorded as unearned revenue on the balance sheet and recognized as revenue when earned in the
subsequent accounting period. Our unearned revenue liability was $2.3 million as of September
30, 2007, and $2.2 million as
of December 31, 2006. This liability is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on
our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
16
Expense-Balancing and Memorandum Accounts
We use expense-balancing accounts and memorandum accounts to track suppliers rate changes for
purchased water, purchased power, and pump taxes that are not included in customer water rates.
The cost changes are referred to as offsetable expenses, because under certain circumstances,
they are refundable from customers (or refunded to customers) in future rates designed to offset
cost changes from suppliers. We do not record the balancing and memorandum accounts until the
commission has authorized a change in customer rates and the customer has been billed. The
cumulative net amount in the expense balancing accounts and memorandum accounts as of September
30, 2007, was approximately $3.9 million. This amount includes certain amounts that have been
filed for recovery but have not yet been authorized, and amounts that have not yet been filed
for recovery. See Regulatory Matters below for a description of cumulative net balances of
expense balancing and memorandum accounts that have been authorized for recovery.
Regulated Utility Accounting
Because we operate extensively in a regulated business, we are subject to the provisions of SFAS
No. 71, Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation. Regulators establish rates
that are expected to permit the recovery of the cost of service and a return on investment. If
a portion of our operations were no longer subject to the provisions of SFAS No. 71, we would be
required to write off related regulatory assets and liabilities that are not specifically
recoverable and determine if other assets might be impaired. If a regulatory commission
determined that a portion of our assets were not recoverable in customer rates, we would be
required to determine if we had suffered an asset impairment that would require a write-down in
the assets valuation. There have been no such asset impairments as of September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
bases. We measure deferred tax assets and liabilities at enacted tax rates expected to apply to
taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or
settled. We recognize the effect on the deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax
rate in the period that includes the enactment date. We must also assess the likelihood that
deferred tax assets will be recovered in future taxable income and, to the extent recovery is
unlikely, a valuation allowance would be recorded. If a valuation allowance were required, it
could significantly increase income tax expense. In our managements view, a valuation
allowance was not required at September 30, 2007 or December 31, 2006.
We anticipate that future rate action by the regulatory commissions will reflect revenue
requirements for the tax effects of temporary differences recognized, which have previously been
passed through to customers. The regulatory commissions have granted us rate increases to
reflect the normalization of the tax benefits of the federal accelerated methods and available
Investment Tax Credits (ITCs) for all assets placed in service after 1980. ITCs are deferred
and amortized over the lives of the related properties for book purposes.
Pension Benefits
We incur costs associated with our pension and postretirement health care benefits plans. To
measure the expense of these benefits, our management must estimate compensation increases,
mortality rates,
17
future health cost increases and discount rates used to value related
liabilities and to determine appropriate funding. Different estimates used by our management
could result in significant variances in the cost recognized for pension benefit plans. The
estimates used are based on historical experience, current facts, future expectations, and
recommendations from independent advisors and actuaries. We use an investment advisor to
provide advice in managing the plans investments. We anticipate any increase in funding for the
pension and postretirement health care benefits plans will be recovered in future rate filings,
thereby mitigating the financial impact.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158 Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Post Retirement Plans An Amendment of FASB Statement Nos. 87, 88, 106 and
132(R). We adopted SFAS No.158 as of December 31, 2006 which required the full recognition of
the projected benefit obligation over the fair value of plan assets, reflecting the funded
status of the benefit plans, on the balance sheet.
18
RESULTS OF THIRD QUARTER 2007 OPERATIONS COMPARED TO THIRD QUARTER 2006 OPERATIONS
Overview
Third quarter net income was $13.8 million equivalent to $0.67 per common share on a diluted
basis, compared to net income of $12.6 million or $0.68 common per share on a diluted basis in
the third quarter of 2006. The higher net income was primarily due to the increase in rates
approved by the Commissions and we earned higher investment income due in part to the cash
proceeds from the equity offering in the fall of 2006. The effect of the higher number of
common shares outstanding reduced earnings per share by $0.08 on a diluted basis in the third
quarter of 2007.
We filed in July 2007 the General Rate Case (GRC) for Cal Water. The filing includes General
Office (which covers the significant corporate costs) and eight of our districts. We are
working with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) as they implement their Water
Action Plan. The plan focuses on four key principles, among other things, including safe, high
quality water; highly reliable water supplies; efficient use of water; and reasonable rates and
viable utilities.
Operating Revenue
Operating revenue increased $6.1 million or 6% to $113.9 million in the third quarter of 2007.
As disclosed in the following table, the increase was due to increases in rates, increased usage
by existing customers and usage by new customers.
The factors that impacted the operating revenue for the third quarter of 2007 compared to 2006
are presented in the following table (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Rate increases |
|
$ |
5,066 |
|
Usage by new customers |
|
|
796 |
|
Increase in usage by existing customers |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenue increase |
|
$ |
6,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the rate increases are listed in the following table (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Step Rate Increase |
|
$ |
2,113 |
|
Purchased Water Offset Increases |
|
|
1,841 |
|
General Rate Case (GRC) Increases |
|
|
1,035 |
|
Balancing Account Adjustments |
|
|
48 |
|
Other |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Increase in Rates |
|
$ |
5,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses were $96.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007,
versus $91.7 million for the same period in 2006, a 5% increase.
19
Water production expense consists of purchased water, purchased power, and pump taxes. It
represents the largest component of total operating expenses, accounting for approximately 47%
of total operating expenses. Water production expenses increased 2% compared to the same period
last year. Proceeds from the leases of unused water rights during the quarter were deducted from
purchased water expense. These leases reduced water costs by $1.4 million for the three months
ending September 30, 2007 and $0.4 million in the same period last year.
Sources of water as a percent of total water production are listed in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Well production |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
51 |
% |
Purchased |
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
45 |
% |
Surface |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our wholly owned subsidiaries, Washington Water, New Mexico Water and Hawaii Water obtain all of
their water supply from wells. The components of water production costs are shown in the table
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30 |
|
|
|
(amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
Purchased water |
|
$ |
32,790 |
|
|
$ |
31,418 |
|
|
$ |
1,372 |
|
Purchased power |
|
|
9,164 |
|
|
|
9,334 |
|
|
|
(170 |
) |
Pump taxes |
|
|
3,109 |
|
|
|
3,246 |
|
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
45,063 |
|
|
$ |
43,998 |
|
|
$ |
1,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased water costs increased primarily due to higher wholesale water prices. Total water
production measured in acre feet decreased by 3.5% during the third quarter of 2007 as compared
with the third quarter of 2006 due to lower customer usage late in the quarter.
Other operations expense increased 12% to $26.5 million. Payroll and benefits charged to
operations increased 6%, including wage increases and an increase in the number of employees.
At September 30, 2007, there were 878 employees and at September 30, 2006, there were 865
employees.
Maintenance expenses increased by 1.5% to $4.2 million in the third quarter of 2007.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $0.7 million, or 8.7%, because of 2006 capital
additions.
Total federal and state income taxes remained at $8.9 million for the third quarter of 2006 and
2007. The effective tax rate was 39.3% in the current quarter and 41.2% for the same quarter
last year. The current quarter reflected revisions to certain components of our expected 2007
tax provision. We expect the effective tax rate for the year to be between 40% and 41%.
20
Other Income and Expense
Non-regulated income, net of related expenses, was $0.8 million for the quarter ended September
30, 2007, compared to $0.4 million in the same period last year, which is an increase of $0.4
million, driven primarily by an increase in investment income on short term cash and other
investments.
Interest Expense
Net interest expense increased $0.6 million to $4.5 million. This increase of interest expense
was primarily due to lower deduction of capitalized interest expense as compared to the prior
year.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 2007 COMPARED TO THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 2006
Overview
Net income for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, was $23.1 million, or $1.11 per
common share on a diluted basis, compared to net income of $19.2 million or $1.03 per share on a
diluted basis, for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. These positive results were
primarily due to increased water usage by our customers due to dryer weather during the first
half of the year when compared with the prior year and an increase in rates approved by the
Commissions. In addition, we earned higher investment income from the cash proceeds from the
equity offering in the fall of 2006. The effect of the higher number of common shares
outstanding impacted earnings per share by $0.14 on a dilutive basis during the nine months
ended September 30, 2007.
Operating Revenue
Operating revenue increased $27.1 million, or 11%, to $281.2 million in the nine-month period
ended September 30, 2007. As disclosed in the following table, the increase was due to
increased usage by existing customers due to dryer weather and less precipitation than the prior
year, increases in rates, and new customers.
The factors that affected the operating revenue for the nine-month period ending September 30,
2007 compared to 2006 are presented in the following table (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Usage by existing customers |
|
$ |
13,283 |
|
Rate increases (net) |
|
|
11,678 |
|
Usage by new customers |
|
|
2,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net changes in operating revenue |
|
$ |
27,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
21
The components of the net rate increases are listed in the following table (amounts in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Step Rate Increase |
|
$ |
5,151 |
|
General Rate Case (GRC) Increase |
|
|
3,341 |
|
Purchased Water Offset Increase |
|
|
3,180 |
|
Balancing Account Adjustments |
|
|
(107 |
) |
Other |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total increase in rates |
|
$ |
11,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses were $247.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007,
versus $223.4 million for the same period in 2006, an 11% increase.
Water production expense consists of purchased water, purchased power and pump taxes. Water
production expense represents the largest component of total operating expenses, accounting for
approximately 44% of total operating expenses. Water production expenses increased $12.5
million in the nine months ended September 30, 2007, or 13% compared to the same period last
year.
Sources of water production as a percent of total water production are listed on the following
table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Well production |
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
Purchased |
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
45 |
% |
Surface |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our wholly-owned operating subsidiaries, Washington Water, New Mexico Water and Hawaii Water,
obtain all of their water supply from wells. The components of water production costs are shown
in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|
|
|
(amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
Purchased water |
|
$ |
82,154 |
|
|
$ |
71,063 |
|
|
$ |
11,091 |
|
Purchased power |
|
|
19,263 |
|
|
|
17,874 |
|
|
|
1,389 |
|
Pump taxes |
|
|
6,731 |
|
|
|
6,700 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
108,148 |
|
|
$ |
95,637 |
|
|
$ |
12,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased water cost increased due to higher prices from wholesaler and higher usage by
customers. Included in purchased water are proceeds from the lease of unused water rights. The
amounts of the proceeds were $2.1 million and $1.0 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2007 and
September 30, 2006, respectively. The increase in purchased power and pump taxes is primarily
due to increased well production.
22
Other operations expenses were $75.4 million, increasing $4.5 million, or 6%, for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007. Payroll and benefits charged to operations expense increased
$2.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Wages for union employees increased
4%, effective January 1, 2007. Overall payroll costs (expensed and capitalized) increased 8%
for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, due to increases in the number of employees and
higher wage rates. At September 30, 2007, there were 878 employees and at September 30, 2006,
there were 865 employees. Outside services increased $0.5 million due to various initiatives.
Maintenance expense was up for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, increasing $2.5
million, or 22%. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $2.2 million, or 9%, because
of 2006 capital additions.
Federal and state income taxes increased $1.9 million, or 14.2%, for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, due to the change in taxable income. We expect the effective tax rate to be
between 40% and 41% for 2007.
Other Income and Expense
Other income, net of income taxes, was $2.3 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2007, compared to $1.3 million for the first nine-months of 2006, primarily due to increased
investment income.
Interest Expense
Net interest expense increased $0.7 million to $13.4 million for the period ended September 30,
2007 compared to the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006.
REGULATORY MATTERS
Rates and Regulations
The state regulatory commissions have plenary powers setting rates and operating standards. As
such, state commission decisions significantly impact our revenues, earnings, and cash flow.
The amounts discussed are generally annual amounts, unless specifically stated, and the
financial impact to recorded revenue is expected to occur over a 12-month period from the
effective date of the decision. In California, water utilities are required to make several
different types of filings. Most filings result in rate changes that remain in place until the
next GRC. As explained below, surcharges and surcredits to recover balancing and memorandum
accounts as well as the catch-up are temporary rate changes, which have specific time frames for
recovery.
GRCs, step rate increase filings, and offset filings change rates to amounts that will remain in
effect until the next GRC. The CPUC follows a rate case plan, which requires Cal Water to file
a GRC for each of its 24 regulated operating districts every three years. In a GRC proceeding,
the CPUC not only considers the utilitys rate setting requests, but may consider other issues
that affect the utilitys rates
and operations. Effective in 2004, Cal Waters GRC schedule was shifted from a calendar year to
a fiscal year with test years commencing on July 1st of each year. The CPUC is
generally required to issue its GRC decision prior to the first day of the test year or
authorize interim rates. As such, Cal
23
Waters GRC decisions, prior to 2005, were generally
issued in the fourth quarter, but are expected to be issued in the second quarter of each year
until 2011, when the updated rate case plan takes effect. A decision on the eight GRCs filed in
July of 2006 was delayed beyond July 1, 2007. As required by state law, the Commission
authorized interim rates incorporating the last twelve months change in CPI. Cal Water expects
a final decision on the GRCs filed in July of 2006 to be issued in the fourth quarter of 2007.
Rates from the final decision will have an effective date of July 1, 2007 for any subsequent
final decision.
Between GRC filings, utilities may file step rate increases, which allow the utility to recover
cost increases, primarily from inflation and incremental investment, during the second and third
years of the rate case cycle. However, step rate increases are subject to a weather-normalized
earnings test. Under the earnings test, the CPUC may reduce the step rate increase to prevent
the utility from earning in excess of the authorized rate of return for that district. Step
rate increases, which were previously approved in January, were approved in July until 2011,
when the updated rate case plan takes effect.
In addition, utilities are entitled to file offset filings. Offset filings may be filed to
adjust revenues for construction projects authorized in GRCs when the plant is placed in service
or for rate changes charged to Cal Water for purchased water, purchased power, and pump taxes
(referred to as offsettable expenses). Such rate changes approved in offset filings remain in
effect until a GRC is approved.
Surcharges and surcredits, which are usually effective for a twelve-month period, are authorized
by the CPUC to recover the memorandum and balancing accounts under- and over- collections
usually due to changes in offsettable expenses. However, significant under-collection may be
authorized over multiple years. Typically, an expense difference occurs during the time period
from when an offsettable expense rate changes and we are allowed to adjust its water rates.
Expense changes for this regulatory lag period, which is approximately two months, are booked
into memorandum and balancing accounts for later recovery. These accounts are subject to
reasonableness review. Future recovery of balancing account balances will be addressed in
general rate cases or by advice letter filings if the account balance is greater than 2% of
revenues. As of June 30, 2007 and September 30, 2007, the amount in the balancing accounts was
$3.8 million and $3.9 million, respectively.
Cal Water does not record an asset (or liability) for the recovery (or refund) of expense
balancing or memorandum accounts in its financial statements as revenue (refunds), nor as a
receivable (or payable), until the CPUC and other regulators have authorized recovery and the
customer is billed. Therefore, a timing difference may occur between the time when costs are
recorded as an expense and when the associated revenues are received (or refunds are made) and
booked.
24
Rate Case Plan
In December 2005, the CPUC issued the California Water Action Plan. The plan focuses on four
key principles, among other things, including safe, high quality water; highly reliable water
supplies; efficient use of water; and reasonable rates and viable utilities. In accordance with
the Water Action Plans objective to streamline regulatory decision-making the Commission issued
R.06-12-016 in December 2006, to address streamlining of its water rate case plan. The
Commission issued D.07-05-062 on May 24, 2007 adopting a new rate case plan. As a result, Cal
Water will be filing a company-wide general rate case every three years beginning in July 2009.
Rates would be effective approximately 18 months from the filing date or January 1, 2011 in the
first cycle. As an interim measure, the Commission will allow Cal Water to incorporate general
operations costs including company benefits in rates for all districts after a decision in its
2007 general rate case. In addition, for the sixteen districts that have a delayed effective
date, the Commission will authorize interim rates from the authorized effective date under the
old rate case plan. These interim rates will be subject to adjustment based on a final
determination in the 2009 general rate case filing.
Pending Filings as of September 30, 2007
Cal Water has pending its 2006 GRC filings covering eight districts. The Commission has
authorized interim rates and an effective date of July 1, 2007 for the general rate change.
This means that when the Commission issues a final rate determination, expected in the fourth
quarter of 2007, the rates will be made effective on July 1, 2007. Any over- or under-collected
rates between July 1, 2007 and the date of a final decision will be refunded or surcharged to
customers in the affected districts. The amount requested in the 2006 GRCs is approximately
$19.1 million in 2007/2008, $3.8 million in 2008/2009, and $3.8 million in 2009/2010. The
amounts granted may vary due to a variety of factors. Over the past few years, the amount
approved by the CPUC has been substantially less than the requested amount. The GRCs also
requested the CPUC to consider several modifications to CPUC rate-setting procedures. The GRCs
request a water revenue adjustment mechanism that would allow us to recover (refund) water
revenues when actual water sales are below (above) adopted water sales in the GRCs. This
proposal would decouple our revenues from conservation efforts and inaccurate weather forecasts,
putting in place a mechanism similar to that employed by Californias investor-owned electric
utilities. The GRCs also request a full-cost balancing account that would allow us to recover
changes in source of supply mix as well as price changes under current procedures. Finally, we
requested that the Commission adjust our authorized rate of return if modifications are not
adopted to change certain rate-setting procedures. We are unable to predict the timing and
final outcome of the filings at this time.
Additionally, Decision 06-08-011 directed Cal Water to file an application to implement
conservation rates and a sales decoupling mechanism. On October 23, 2006, Cal Water filed
Application 06-10-026 requesting a water revenue balancing account, a conservation memorandum
account, and conservation rates. This request was consolidated with applications filed by other
water companies in the Commissions Order Instituting Investigation 07-01-022. As of September
30, 2007, this proceeding is still open and pending CPUC approval.
25
2007 Regulatory Activity
Cal Water filed a general rate case application on July 3, 2007 for eight districts requesting
$44.4 million in July 2008, $16.1 million in July 2009, and $14.8 million in July 2010.
Included in the filing is a review of the companys general operations costs including company
benefits. At the conclusion of the proceeding, Cal Water would be allowed to increase rates in
its other 16 districts to incorporate their portion of the adopted general operations costs. As
filed, additional rate increases attributable to other districts would be $23.1 million in July
2008 and $5.9 million in July 2009. The amounts granted may vary due to a variety of factors.
Over the past few years, the amount approved by the CPUC has been substantially less than the
requested amount.
In January 2007, Cal Water requested step rate increases for seven districts and was authorized
an increase of $1.8 million.
In April 2007, Cal Water requested an offset rate increase for increased purchased water and
pump tax costs in its Stockton District. Cal Water was authorized an increase of $1.7 million
in May 2007.
In May 2007, Cal Water requested a drought memorandum account to track lost revenue and
corresponding production cost changes in three districts that purchase water from the San
Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC). The SFPUC has requested 10% water conservation
in its suburban service areas in 2007 due to low rainfall in the winter of 2006-2007. The
requested memorandum account was granted in June 2007.
In May 2007, Cal Water requested step rate increases for fourteen districts and was authorized
an increase of $4.6 million on July 1, 2007.
In June 2007, Cal Water filed for interim rates for eight districts in the 2006 GRC for which a
decision was delayed. Cal Water was authorized an interim increase of $2.0 million in July
2007. These rates are subject to refund or adjustment based upon the final rates set in a
decision on the 2006 general rate case.
In August 2007, Cal Water filed three advice letters to offset purchased water rate increases of
$1.5 million from SFPUC. These advice letters were approved in September 2007.
In September 2007, Cal Water filed an advice letter to recover the difference between interim
rates approved in D.06-08-014 and final rates approved in D.06-08-011 for the 2005 GRC. The
recovery of $0.5 million is through a twelve-month temporary surcharge. This advice letter was
approved in September 2007.
In December 2006, Cal Water filed six advice letters to offset purchased water and pump tax
increases of $3.4 million from wholesale suppliers effective January 1, 2007. These advice
letters were approved in January and February 2007.
In December 2006, Cal Water filed an application to allow it to recover additional funding
associated with its postretirement benefit other than pensions (PBOP) or retiree healthcare
plan. Currently, Cal Water funds and recognizes expenses associated with the plan on a
pay-as-you-go
basis. The excess expense between pay-as-you-go and accrual during the employees expected
service period has been recognized as a regulatory asset. As of December 31, 2006, the
regulatory asset was approximately $9.8 million. In February 2007, the Division of Rate Payer
Advocates (DRA) filed its protest to our PBOP application. In their protest, the DRA requested
to dismiss the application with prejudice. The DRA further noted that prior to their protest;
the
26
parties met several times to discuss our application. During the discussions it became
apparent to the DRA that negotiations would extend beyond the deadline for filing their protest.
The DRA further noted that subsequent to this filing, the parties will continue their
discussions to achieve a settlement that is reasonable, consistent with the law, and in the
public interest. Cal Water intends to increase its funding so the plan is funded during the
employees service period. Cal Water has established two Voluntary Employee Beneficiary
Associations (VEBAs) to allow for increased funding and a current period income tax deduction.
While the DRA has filed its protest, the ultimate outcome will be determined by the CPUC. Cal
Water believes that the CPUC will recognize in rates the recovery of the regulatory asset and
the additional funding of the plan. If the CPUC does not permit us to recover the full amount
of our regulatory asset, the regulatory asset, to the extent not allowed in recovery, will be
written off.
LIQUIDITY
Cash flow from Operations
Cash flow from operations was $47.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Cash
flow from operations is primarily generated by net income, non-cash expenses for depreciation
and amortization, and changes in our operating assets and liabilities. Cash generated by
operations varies during the year.
The water business is seasonal. Revenue is lower in the cool, wet winter months when less water
is used compared to the warm, dry summer months when water use is highest. This seasonality
results in the possible need for short-term borrowings under the bank lines of credit in the
event cash is not available during the winter period. The increase in cash flow during the
summer allows short-term borrowings to be paid down. Customer water usage can be lower than
normal in years when more than normal precipitation falls in our service areas or temperatures
are lower than normal, especially in the summer months. The reduction in water usage reduces
cash flow from operations and increases the need for short-term bank borrowings. In addition,
short-term borrowings are used to finance capital expenditures until long-term financing is
arranged.
Investing Activities
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we had company-funded capital cash expenditures
of $61.7 million. For 2007, our capital budget is approximately $85 million.
Financing Activities
During the quarter ended September 30, 2007, there were no debt or equity offerings, as we had
adequate funds from the equity offering of 2006. Dividend payments were higher than the prior
year due to additional shares outstanding and a higher dividend rate in the current year.
Short-Term and Long-Term Debt
Short-term liquidity is provided by bank lines of credit and by internally generated funds.
Long-term financing is accomplished through the use of both debt and equity. There were no
short-term bank borrowings at September 30, 2007 and at December 31, 2006. Cash and cash
equivalents were $26.5 million at September 30, 2007, and $60.3 million at December 31, 2006.
27
Cal Water has a $55 million credit facility agreement that expires April 30, 2012. The
agreement requires debt as a percent of total capitalization to be less than 67%, and an
interest coverage ratio of at least 2.5:1.0. As of September 30, 2007, we have met all covenant
requirements and are eligible to use the full amount of the commitment. In addition to
borrowings, the credit facility allows for letters of credit up to $10 million, which reduces
the available amount to borrow when utilized. One letter of credit was outstanding at September
30, 2007, for $0.5 million related to an insurance policy. Interest is charged on a variable
basis and fees are charged for unused amounts.
A separate credit facility for $20 million also exists for use by us and our subsidiaries,
including Washington Water, New Mexico Water, and Hawaii Water. In addition to borrowings, the
credit facility allows for letters of credit up to $5 million, which would reduce the amount
available to borrow. No letters of credit were outstanding at September 30, 2007. Interest is
charged on a variable basis and fees are charged for unused amounts.
There were additions to long-term debt of $0.2 million in the nine-month period ended September
30, 2007, and we made principal payments on our first mortgage bonds and other long-term debt
payments of $0.9 million during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007.
Long-term financing, which includes senior notes, other debt securities, and common stock, has
been used to replace short-term borrowings and fund capital expenditures. Internally generated
funds, after making dividend payments, provide positive cash flow, but have not been at a level
to meet the needs of our capital expenditure requirements. Management expects this trend to
continue given our capital expenditures plan for the next 5 years. Some capital expenditures
are funded by payments received from developers for contributions in aid of construction or
advances for construction. Funds received for contributions in aid of construction are
non-refundable, whereas funds classified as advances in construction are refundable. Management
believes long-term financing will be available to meet our cash flow needs through issuances in
both debt and equity markets.
In September 2004, the CPUC issued a decision granting Cal Water authority to complete up to
$250 million of equity and debt financing through 2010, subject to certain restrictions.
During 2006, we raised approximately $103 million of capital. Of this amount, $20 million was
raised through privately placed senior unsecured notes in August, and the remaining
approximately $83 million was raised through the issuance of 2,250,000 shares of common stock in
October. We anticipate that the majority of our 2007 capital needs will be covered by the $103
million raised in 2006. In future periods, management anticipates funding our capital needs
through a relatively balanced approach between long term debt and equity.
In September 2006, we filed a shelf registration statement with the SEC for up to $150 million
in preferred stock and common stock in addition to our prior shelf permitting up to $35.6
million in preferred stock and common stock. On October 12, 2006, we completed an underwritten
public offering of 2,250,000 shares of our common stock (including 250,000 shares pursuant to
the exercise, in part, by the underwriters of their over-allotment option) at a price per share
of $36.75 to the public, raising approximately $83 million in gross proceeds. For additional
information please reference our Form 8-K, dated October 12, 2006 on file with the SEC. After
issuance of these shares, we had
28
approximately $101 million in remaining securities available
for future issuance under our shelf registration.
We do not utilize off-balance-sheet financing or utilize special purpose entity arrangements for
financing. We do not have equity ownership through joint ventures or partnership arrangements.
Credit Ratings
Cal Waters first mortgage bonds are rated by Moodys Investors Service (Moodys) and Standard &
Poors (S&P). Previously, the two major credit facility agreements contained covenants related
to these debt ratings. The current agreements do not contain such covenants. Since 2004, the
two credit rating agencies maintained their ratings of A2 for Moodys and A+ for S & P. Both
agencies characterized us as stable. In the past, the agencies have been concerned over the
rate-setting process and decisions by the CPUC. Also, concerns were raised about our present
level of capital expenditures, which will need to be partially financed through long-term
borrowings or equity offerings. Management believes we would be able to meet financing needs
even if ratings were downgraded, but a rating change could result in a higher interest rate on
new debt.
Dividends, Book Value and Shareholders
The third quarter common stock dividend of $0.2900 per share was paid on August 17, 2007,
compared to a quarterly dividend in the third quarter of 2006 of $0.2875. This was Cal Waters
251st consecutive, quarterly dividend. Annualized, the 2007 dividend rate is $1.16
per common share, compared to $1.15 in 2006. Based on the previous 12-month earnings per share
at September 30, 2007, the dividend payout ratio is 81%. For the full year 2006, the payout
ratio was 86% of net income. On a long-term basis, our goal is to achieve a dividend payout
ratio of 60% of net income accomplished through future earnings growth.
At its October 24, 2007 meeting, the Board declared the fourth quarter dividend of $0.2900 per
share payable on November 16, 2007, to stockholders of record on November 5, 2007. This will be
our 252nd consecutive, quarterly dividend.
2008 Financing Plan
Cal Water is currently reviewing its financing needs for 2008. We may consider issuing equity
or long-term debt to meet our financing needs. We intend to fund our capital needs in future
periods through a relatively balanced approach between long-term debt and equity.
Book Value and Stockholders of Record
Book value per common share was $18.56 at September 30, 2007 compared to $18.31 at December 31,
2006.
There are approximately 2,830 stockholders of record for our common stock as of November 1,
2007.
Utility Plant Expenditures
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, capital expenditures totaled $79.6 million;
$61.7 million was from company-funded projects and $17.9 million was from third-party-funded
projects. The planned 2007 company-funded capital expenditure budget is approximately $85
million. The actual amount may vary from the budget number due to timing of actual payments
related to current
29
year projects and prior year projects. We do not control third-party-funded
capital expenditures and therefore are unable to estimate the amount of such projects for 2007.
At September 30, 2007, construction work in progress was $82.6 million compared to $35.7 million
at December 31, 2006. Work in progress includes projects that are under construction but not
yet complete and in service. In the fall we anticipate the completion of a substantial portion
of the work in progress.
WATER SUPPLY
Based on information from water management agencies and internally developed data, we believe
that our various sources of water supply are sufficient to meet customer demand for the
remainder of the year. Historically, about half of the water is purchased from wholesale
suppliers with the other half pumped from underground wells. A small portion is developed
through three local surface treatment plants.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, there were no material changes in contractual
obligations outside the normal course of business.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On October 21, 2007, we completed negotiations and signed a two year agreement with the Utility
Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO, which represents 496 field and office employees. The
agreement, which is subject to ratification by members of the union, included a wage increase of
3.1% effective January 1, 2008. Wage increases for 2009 will be negotiated separately in the
fall of 2008.
Negotiations with the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, AFL-CIO,
which represents 45 engineering and water quality personnel, will be conducted in November 2007,
with expected ratification in December 2007. The agreement is expected to include wage
increases effect January 1, 2008.
In September 2007 our Washington subsidiary received Commission approval to acquire a water and
waste water system which serves approximately 391 customers at the Rosario resort on Orcas
Island. In October 2007 a purchase agreement was signed for the asset acquisition in the
amount of $0.9 million. We will begin operating the system on November 5, 2007.
30
Item 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
We do not hold, trade in or issue derivative financial instruments and therefore is not exposed
to risks these instruments present. Our market risk to interest rate exposure is limited
because the cost of long-term financing and short-term bank borrowings, including interest
costs, is covered in consumer water rates as approved by the commissions. We do not have
foreign operations; therefore, we do not have a foreign currency exchange risk. Our business is
sensitive to commodity prices and is most affected by changes in purchased water and purchased
power costs.
Historically, the CPUCs balancing account or offsetable expense procedures allowed for
increases in purchased water and purchased power costs to be passed on to consumers.
Traditionally, a significant percentage of our net income and cash flows comes from California
regulated operations; therefore the CPUCs actions have a significant impact on our business.
See Item 2, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Critical Accounting Policies Expense Balancing and Memorandum Accounts and
Regulatory Matters.
Item 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) |
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
|
|
|
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision of and with the participation of our
management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the
end of the period covered by this report, pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. Based on their review of our disclosure controls and procedures, the
principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures are functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the
information required to be disclosed in periodic SEC filings is reported within the time periods
specified by SEC rules and regulations. |
|
(b) |
|
Changes to Internal Control Over Financial Reporting |
|
|
|
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting. |
31
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
As previously disclosed, the Company and a number of co-defendants were served with a complaint
in the Superior Court County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC360406, for personal injury allegedly
caused by exposure to asbestos. The plaintiff claims to have worked for three of the Companys
contractors on pipeline projects during the period 1958-1999, including Palos Verdes Water
Company, a water utility we acquired in 1970. The plaintiff alleges that the Company and other
defendants are responsible for his asbestos-related injuries. On April 20, 2007, the Superior
Court sustained the Companys demurrer without leave to amend all Plaintiffs claims alleging
products liability and intentional torts. The Court also sustained the Companys demurrer with
leave to amend Plaintiffs claim for premise owner contractor liability, a negligence claim,
alleging misconduct that may allow for punitive damages (the Premise/Owner Claim) and severed
the Company from the accelerated trial with other named defendants. On July 3, 2007, the Court
sustained the Companys demurrer with leave to amend the Plaintiffs third amended complaint
alleging the Premise/Owner Claim. Plaintiff filed a fourth amended complaint restating the
Premise/Owner Claim. The Court overruled the Companys demurrer on the Plaintiffs fourth
amended complaint, but the Court sustained the Companys motion to strike punitive damages.
Under the plaintiffs remaining cause of action, the Company does not believe that a liability
is probable, and the Company can not reasonably estimate any liability amount at this time.
The Company used asbestos cement pipe and fittings, which were widely used in the water industry
and permitted for such use by regulatory agencies, and the Company only hired qualified
contractors to install the pipe and fittings in accordance with laws and regulations at the
time. The Company intends to aggressively defend itself. The Companys insurance carrier has
accepted the defense of the claim, reserving certain rights along with one of the contractors
insurance companies. If the Company is found liable any liability would most likely be paid by
the Companys or contractors insurers. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded any
liability associated with the claim.
As previously disclosed, on May 30, 2007, the Company and a number of co-defendants were served
with a complaint in the Superior Court County of San Francisco, Case No. CGC-07-274213, for
personal injury allegedly caused by exposure to asbestos. The Plaintiff dismissed the Company
from the complaint without prejudice prior to setting a trial date. The Company sustained no
liability.
From time to time, we are involved in various disputes and litigation matters that arise in the
ordinary course of business. Periodically, we review the status of each significant matter and
assess its potential financial exposure. If the potential loss from any claim or legal
proceeding is considered
probable and the amount or the range of loss can be estimated, we accrue a liability for the
estimated loss in accordance with SFAS No 5, Accounting for Contingencies. Legal proceedings
are subject to uncertainties, and the outcomes are difficult to predict. Because of such
uncertainties, accruals are based only on the best information available at the time. As
additional information becomes available, we reassess the potential liability related to pending
claims and litigation matters and may revise estimates.
While the outcome of these disputes and litigation matters cannot be predicted with any
certainty, management does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will
materially affect our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
32
Item 5.
OTHER INFORMATION
On October 24, 2007, the Board of Directors of California Water Service Group adopted an
amendment to our Restated Bylaws amending the provision of the Restated Bylaws relating to
annual meetings of stockholders. The Amendment provides that annual meetings of stockholders
will be held at such time on such date as shall be designated from time to time by resolution of
the Board of Directors, in accordance with applicable law. Prior to the adoption of the
Amendment, the Restated Bylaws provided that annual meetings of stockholders were to be held
during the month of April on such a date and time as designated by the Board. The Company will
hold its 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 27, 2008. The date of this meeting has been
changed by more than 30 days from the anniversary of the Companys 2007 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders. Thus, any stockholder proposal submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for inclusion in the Companys proxy statement for the 2008
Annual Meeting of Stockholders must be received by the Company at its principal executive
offices no later than January 6, 2008.
Item 6.
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of California Water Service
Group. Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on
October 30, 2007. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Chief Executive Officer certification of financial
statements pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Chief Financial Officer certification of financial
statements pursuant to Section302 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 202 |
33
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registrant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 6, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Martin A. Kropelnicki |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martin A. Kropelnicki |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer |
|
|
34
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Chief Executive Officer certification of financial
statements pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Chief Financial Officer certification of financial
statements pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002 |
35