pre14a
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
|
|
|
Check the appropriate box: |
þ
|
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
o
|
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
o
|
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
o
|
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
o
|
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to Sec. 240.14a-11(c) or Sec. 240.14a-12 |
KAYNE ANDERSON MLP INVESTMENT COMPANY
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
|
|
|
|
|
þ |
|
No fee required. |
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
Title of each class of securities to which transactions applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identity the filing for which the
offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing
by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the
date of its filing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.
|
|
Date Filed: |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1800 Avenue of the Stars, Second Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
1-877-657-3863/ MLP-FUND
May [ ], 2005
Dear Fellow Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the annual meeting of
stockholders of Kayne Anderson MLP Investment Company (the
Company) on Tuesday, June 15, 2005 at
9:00 a.m., Pacific Time, at 1800 Avenue of the Stars,
Second Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90067.
The matters scheduled for consideration at the meeting are the
election of one director of the Company and a proposal to
authorize the Company to sell shares of its common stock for
less than net asset value per share, subject to certain
conditions, as more fully discussed in the enclosed proxy
statement.
Enclosed with this letter are answers to questions you may have
about the proposals, the formal notice of the meeting, the proxy
statement, which gives detailed information about the proposals
and why the Board of Directors recommends that you vote to
approve them, and an actual written proxy for you to sign and
return. If you have any questions about the enclosed proxy or
need any assistance in voting your shares, please call
1-877-657-3863/ MLP-FUND.
Your vote is important. Please complete, sign, and date the
enclosed proxy card and return it in the enclosed envelope. This
will ensure that your vote is counted, even if you cannot attend
the meeting in person.
|
|
|
Sincerely, |
|
|
/s/ Kevin S. McCarthy |
|
|
|
Kevin S. McCarthy |
|
Chief Executive Officer, President and
Chairman of the Board of Directors |
ANSWERS TO SOME IMPORTANT QUESTIONS
|
|
|
Q |
|
WHAT AM I BEING ASKED TO VOTE FOR ON THIS
PROXY? |
|
A. |
|
This proxy contains two proposals:
(i) Proposal One the election of one
Director to serve until the 2008 Annual Stockholder Meeting and
until his successor is duly elected and qualifies; and
(ii) Proposal Two a proposal to authorize
the Company to sell shares of its common stock at a price less
than net asset value per share, subject to certain conditions,
for a period expiring on the date of the Companys 2006
Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Companys common
stockholders and preferred stockholders will vote together, as a
single class, on the proposals. |
|
Q. |
|
HOW DOES THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS SUGGEST THAT I VOTE? |
|
A. |
|
The Board of Directors of the Company unanimously recommends
that you vote FOR all proposals on the enclosed
proxy card. |
|
Q. |
|
HOW CAN I VOTE? |
|
A. |
|
If your shares are held in Street Name by a broker
or bank, you will receive information regarding how to instruct
your bank or broker to vote your shares. If you are a
stockholder of record, you may authorize the persons named as
proxies on the enclosed proxy card to cast the votes you are
entitled to cast at the meeting by completing, signing, dating
and returning the enclosed proxy card. Stockholders of record or
their duly authorized proxies also may vote in person if able to
attend the meeting. However, even if you plan to attend the
meeting, we urge you to return your proxy card. That will ensure
that your vote is cast should your plans change. |
This information summarizes information that is included in more
detail in the Proxy Statement. We urge you to
read the Proxy Statement carefully.
If you have questions, call 1-877-657-3863/ MLP-FUND.
1800 Avenue of the Stars, Second Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
1-877-657-3863/ MLP-FUND
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To the Stockholders of Kayne Anderson MLP Investment Company:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
of Kayne Anderson MLP Investment Company, a Maryland
corporation (the Company), will be held on Tuesday,
June 15, 2005 at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time at 1800 Avenue
of the Stars, Second Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90067, to consider
and vote on the following matters as more fully described in the
accompanying proxy statement:
|
|
|
1. To elect one Director of the Company, to hold office for
a term of three years and until his successor is duly elected
and qualifies; |
|
|
2. To approve a proposal to authorize the Company to sell
shares of its common stock at a price less than net asset value
per share; and |
|
|
3. To transact any other business that may properly come
before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. |
Stockholders of record as of the close of business on
May 4, 2005 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the
meeting (or any adjournment or postponement of the meeting).
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors of the Company, |
|
|
/s/ David J. Shladovsky |
|
|
|
David J. Shladovsky |
|
Secretary |
May [ ], 2005
Los Angeles, California
1800 Avenue of the Stars, Second Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
1-877-657-3863/ MLP-FUND
PROXY STATEMENT
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
JUNE 15, 2005
This proxy statement is being sent to you by the Board of
Directors of Kayne Anderson MLP Investment Company, a
Maryland corporation (the Company). The Board of
Directors is asking you to complete, sign, date and return the
enclosed proxy card, permitting your shares of the Company to be
voted at the annual meeting (the Annual Meeting) of
stockholders called to be held on June 15, 2005 at
9:00 a.m. Pacific Time at 1800 Avenue of the Stars, Second
Floor, Los Angeles, California 90067. Stockholders of record at
the close of business on May 4, 2005 (the Record
Date) are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. You are
entitled to one vote for each share of common stock and for each
share of preferred stock you hold on each matter on which
holders of such shares are entitled to vote. This proxy
statement and enclosed proxy are first being mailed to
stockholders on or about
May [ ], 2005.
You should have received the Companys Annual Report to
stockholders for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004.
If you would like another copy of the Annual Report, please
write the Company at the address shown at the top of this page
or call the Company at 1-877-657-3863/ MLP-FUND. The report will
be sent to you without charge. The Companys reports can be
accessed on its website (www.kaynemlp.com) or on the website of
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) at
(www.sec.gov).
Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, LP (Kayne Anderson)
is the Companys investment adviser. As of April 30,
2005, Kayne Anderson had approximately $3.7 billion of
client assets under management. Kayne Anderson may be
contacted at the address listed above.
PROPOSAL ONE
ELECTION OF DIRECTOR
At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will consider and vote on
the election of one Director to serve for a term of three years
and until his successor is duly elected and qualifies. The
initial term of the Class I Director of the Company,
Michael Targoff, expires at the Annual Meeting and
Mr. Targoff is not standing for reelection. The Board of
Directors unanimously nominated Gerald I. Isenberg to stand for
election as a Director at the Annual Meeting. Mr. Isenberg
has agreed to serve if elected, and the Company has no reason to
believe that he will be unavailable to serve.
The persons named as proxies on the accompanying proxy card
intend to vote at the Annual Meeting (unless otherwise directed)
FOR the election of Mr. Isenberg as a Director of the
Company. Currently the Company has five Directors. In accordance
with the Companys charter, its Board of Directors is
divided into three classes of approximately equal size. The
three-year terms of the Directors are staggered. The initial
terms of Steven C. Good and Kevin S. McCarthy expire at the 2006
Annual Meeting of stockholders and the terms of Anne K. Costin
and Terrence J. Quinn expire at the 2007 Annual Meeting of
stockholders and, in each case, when their successors are duly
elected and qualify. If Mr. Isenberg is elected at the
Annual Meeting, he will serve until the 2008 Annual Meeting of
stockholders and until his successor is duly elected and
qualifies. If Mr. Isenberg is unable to serve or for good
cause will not serve because of an event not now anticipated,
the persons named as proxies may vote for another person
designated by the Board of Directors.
Mr. Isenberg, if elected, will be a Class I Director.
Pursuant to the terms of the Companys preferred stock, the
preferred stockholders have the exclusive right to elect two
Directors to the Board. The Board of Directors has designated
Steven C. Good and Terrence J. Quinn as the Directors the
preferred stockholders shall have the right to elect.
The following tables set forth the nominees and each
Directors name and birth year; position(s) with the
Company and length of time served; principal occupation during
the past five years; and other directorships currently held by
the nominee and each Director. The address for the nominee and
all Directors and officers is 1800 Avenue of the Stars, Second
Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90067. As of May 12, 2005, the
Company is currently the only investment company in the Kayne
Anderson fund complex that is overseen by the Directors and
officers.
NOMINEE FOR DIRECTOR WHO IS NOT AN INTERESTED PERSON:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s) |
|
Initial |
|
|
|
Other |
Name |
|
Held with |
|
Term of |
|
Principal Occupations |
|
Directorships |
(Year Born) |
|
Registrant |
|
Office |
|
During Past Five Years |
|
Held by Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerald I. Isenberg (born 1940) |
|
Current nominee for a term to expire at the 2008 Annual Meeting |
|
3-year term |
|
Mr. Isenberg is a Professor at the University of Southern
California School of Cinema-Television. Since 2004 he has been a
member of the board of trustees of Partners for Development, a
non-governmental organization dedicated to developmental work in
third-world countries. From 1998 to 2002, Mr. Isenberg was
a board member of the Kayne Anderson Rudnick Mutual Funds.* From
1989 to 1995, he was President of Hearst Entertainment
Productions, a producer of television movies and programming for
major broadcast and cable networks. |
|
Partners for Development |
|
|
* |
The investment adviser to the Kayne Anderson Rudnick Mutual
Funds, Kayne Anderson Rudnick Investment Management, LLC, may be
deemed an affiliate of Kayne Anderson. |
REMAINING DIRECTORS WHO ARE NOT INTERESTED PERSONS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s) |
|
of Office/ |
|
|
|
Other |
Name |
|
Held with |
|
Time of |
|
Principal Occupations |
|
Directorships |
(Year Born) |
|
Registrant |
|
Service |
|
During Past Five Years |
|
Held by Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anne K. Costin** (born 1950) |
|
Director |
|
3-year term/ served since July 2004 |
|
Ms. Costin is currently an Adjunct Professor in the Finance and
Economics Department of Columbia University Graduate School of
Business in New York. As of March 1, 2005, Ms. Costin
retired after a 28-year career at Citigroup. During the last
five years she was Managing Director and Global Deputy Head of
the Project & Structured Trade Finance product group
within Citigroups Investment Banking Division. |
|
None. |
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s) |
|
of Office/ |
|
|
|
Other |
Name |
|
Held with |
|
Time of |
|
Principal Occupations |
|
Directorships |
(Year Born) |
|
Registrant |
|
Service |
|
During Past Five Years |
|
Held by Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven C. Good (born 1942) |
|
Director |
|
2-year term/ served since July 2004 |
|
Mr. Good is a senior partner at Good Swartz Brown &
Berns LLP, which offers accounting, tax and business advisory
services to middle market private and publicly-traded companies,
their owners and their management. Mr. Good founded Block,
Good and Gagerman in 1976, which later evolved in stages into
Good Swartz Brown & Berns LLP. |
|
Arden Realty, Inc.; OSI Systems, Inc.; and Big Dog Holdings, Inc. |
Terrence J. Quinn (born 1951) |
|
Director |
|
3-year term/ served since July 2004 |
|
Mr. Quinn is Chairman and CEO of Total Capital Corp., a start-up
specialty commercial finance company. From 2000 to 2003,
Mr. Quinn was a co-founder and managing partner of MTS
Health Partners, a private merchant bank providing services to
publicly traded and privately held small to mid-sized companies
in the healthcare industry. Mr. Quinn was a director and
vice chairman of The Park Associates, Inc., a privately owned
nursing home company chain. |
|
None. |
|
|
** |
Due to her ownership of securities issued by one of the
underwriters in the Companys offering of preferred stock,
Ms. Costin was treated as an interested person
of the Company, as such term is defined in the Investment
Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act),
during and until the completion of such offering, which closed
on April 12, 2005, and, in the future, may be treated as an
interested person during any subsequent offerings of
the Companys securities that may be underwritten by the
underwriter in which Ms. Costin owns securities. |
REMAINING DIRECTOR WHO IS AN INTERESTED PERSON:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s) |
|
of Office/ |
|
|
|
Other |
Name |
|
Held with |
|
Time of |
|
Principal Occupations |
|
Directorships |
(Year Born) |
|
Registrant |
|
Service |
|
During Past Five Years |
|
Held by Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin S. McCarthy*** (born 1959) |
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors; President and Chief
Executive Officer |
|
2-year term as a director, 1-year term as an officer/ served
since July 2004 |
|
Mr. McCarthy has served as a Senior Managing Director of Kayne
Anderson since June 2004. From November 2000 to May 2004, he was
Global Head of Energy for UBS Securities LLC. In this role, he
had senior responsibility for all of UBS energy investment
banking activities, including direct responsibility for
securities underwriting and mergers and acquisitions in the MLP
industry. From July 1997 to November 2000, Mr. McCarthy led
the energy investment banking activities of Paine Webber
Incorporated. From July 1995 to March 1997, he was head of the
Energy Group at Dean Witter Reynolds. |
|
None. |
|
|
*** |
Mr. McCarthy is an interested person of the
Company by virtue of his employment relationship with Kayne
Anderson. |
3
OFFICERS
The preceding table gives information regarding
Mr. McCarthy, the President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company. The following table sets forth each other
officers name; position(s) with the Company and length of
time served; principal occupation during the past five years;
and other directorships held by each such officer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s) |
|
Term of |
|
|
|
Other |
Name |
|
Held with |
|
Office/Time |
|
Principal Occupations |
|
Directorships |
(Year Born) |
|
Registrant |
|
of Service |
|
During Past Five Years |
|
Held by Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ralph Collins Walter (born 1946) |
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|
1-year term/ served since inception |
|
Mr. Walter has served as the Chief Operating Officer and
Treasurer of Kayne Anderson since 2000. Before joining Kayne
Anderson, he was the Chief Administrative Officer at ABN AMRO
Inc., the U.S. based investment-banking arm of
ABN-AMRO Bank. |
|
Knox College |
David J. Shladovsky (born 1960) |
|
Secretary and Chief Compliance Officer |
|
1-year term/ served since inception |
|
Mr. Shladovsky has served as a Managing Director and General
Counsel of Kayne Anderson since 1997. |
|
None. |
J.C. Frey (born 1968) |
|
Portfolio Manager, Assistant Treasurer and Assistant Secretary |
|
1-year term/ served since inception |
|
J.C. Frey has served as Senior Managing Director of Kayne
Anderson since December 2003, Managing Director from April 2001
to December 2003, and portfolio manager of Kayne Andersons
MLP funds since their inception in 2000. Mr. Frey joined Kayne
Anderson in 1997. |
|
None. |
The Directors who are not interested persons, as
defined in the 1940 Act, of Kayne Anderson or the Companys
underwriters are referred to herein as Independent
Directors. Unless noted otherwise, references to the
Companys Independent Directors include Ms. Costin.
None of the Companys Independent Directors nor any of
their immediate family members, has ever been a director,
officer or employee of Kayne Anderson or its affiliates. From
1998 to 2002, Mr. Isenberg was a director of the Kayne
Anderson Rudnick Mutual Funds. The investment adviser to the
Kayne Anderson Rudnick Mutual Funds, Kayne Anderson Rudnick
Investment Management, LLC, may be deemed an affiliate of
Kayne Anderson.
The following table sets forth the dollar range of the
Companys equity securities beneficially owned by the
Companys Directors and the nominee as of December 31,
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity Securities | |
|
|
|
|
in All Registered Investment Companies | |
|
|
Dollar Range | |
|
Overseen or to be Overseen by Director | |
|
|
of the Companys | |
|
or Nominee in Family of Investment | |
Director or Nominee |
|
Equity Securities | |
|
Companies(1) as of December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Anne K. Costin
|
|
|
$10,000-$50,000 |
|
|
|
$10,000-$50,000 |
|
Steven C. Good
|
|
|
$10,000-$50,000 |
|
|
|
$10,000-$50,000 |
|
Terrence J. Quinn
|
|
|
$10,000-$50,000 |
|
|
|
$10,000-$50,000 |
|
Gerald I. Isenberg
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
Kevin S. McCarthy
|
|
|
Over $100,000 |
|
|
|
Over $100,000 |
|
|
|
(1) |
As of April 30, 2005, the Directors and the nominee did not
oversee any other investment companies managed by Kayne Anderson. |
4
As of April 30, 2005, the Independent Directors (excluding
Mr. Targoff, who is not standing for reelection) and their
respective immediate family members did not own beneficially or
of record any class of securities of Kayne Anderson or any
person directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or
under common control with Kayne Anderson. As of that same date,
the Independent Directors, other than Ms. Costin, did not
own beneficially or of record any class of securities of the
underwriters of the recent offering of the Companys
preferred stock or any person directly or indirectly
controlling, controlled by, or under common control with such
underwriters. As of April 30, 2005, Ms. Costin owned
securities issued by one of such underwriters in the offering of
the Companys preferred stock and may continue to own
securities in such issuer at the time of any future offering of
the Companys securities in which such company could be
considered for participation as an underwriter. Accordingly,
Ms. Costin was treated as an interested person
of the Company as defined in the 1940 Act during and until the
completion of the offering of the Companys preferred
stock, which closed on April 12, 2005, and, in the future,
may be treated as an interested person during
subsequent offerings of the Companys securities if the
relevant offering is underwritten by the company in which
Ms. Costin owns securities. Such offerings may include the
kind described in the second proposal of this proxy statement.
The table below sets forth information about securities owned by
the nominee and his immediate family members, as of
March 31, 2005, in entities directly or indirectly
controlling, controlled by, or under common control with, the
Companys investment adviser or underwriters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Owners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
Value of |
|
Percent of | |
Nominee |
|
to Nominee |
|
Company |
|
Title of Class |
|
Securities |
|
Class | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Gerald I. Isenberg
|
|
Self |
|
Kayne Anderson Capital Income Partners (QP), L.P.(1) |
|
Partnership units |
|
$2,034,049 |
|
|
0.36% |
|
|
|
(1) |
Kayne Anderson may be deemed to control this fund by
virtue of its role as the funds general partner. |
Certain officers of Kayne Anderson, including all of the
Companys officers, own, in the aggregate, approximately
$5 million of the Companys common stock.
Committees of the Board of Directors
The Companys Board of Directors currently has three
standing committees:
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Committee. Messrs. Good, Targoff and Quinn
serve on the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee operates under
a written charter (the Audit Committee Charter)
adopted and approved by the Board of Directors and was
established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Audit Committee
Charter conforms to the applicable listing standards of the New
York Stock Exchange. The Audit Committee Charter is attached
hereto as Appendix A and will be attached at least every
third year going forward. The Audit Committee approves and
recommends to the Board of Directors the election, retention or
termination of independent auditors; approves services to be
rendered by the auditors; monitors the auditors
performance; reviews the results of the Companys audit;
determines whether to recommend to the Board of Directors that
the Companys audited financial statements be included in
the Companys Annual Report; and responds to other matters
as outlined in the Audit Committee Charter. Each audit committee
member is independent under the applicable New York
Stock Exchange listing standard. |
|
|
|
Valuation Committee. Ms. Costin and
Messrs. Good, McCarthy and Quinn serve on the Valuation
Committee. The Valuation Committee is responsible for the
oversight of the Companys pricing procedures and the
valuation of its securities in accordance with such procedures.
The Valuation Committee operates under a written charter adopted
and approved by the Board, a copy of which is available on the
Companys website (www.kaynemlp.com). |
|
|
|
Nominating Committee. Ms. Costin and
Messrs. Good, Quinn, and Targoff are members of the
Nominating Committee, none of whom are interested
persons of the Company as defined in the 1940 Act (other
than as previously noted for Ms. Costin). The Nominating
Committee is responsible |
5
|
|
|
|
|
for appointing and nominating Independent Directors to the
Companys Board of Directors. Each Nominating Committee
member is independent under the applicable New York
Stock Exchange listing standard. The committee operates under a
written charter adopted and approved by the Board, a copy of
which is available on the Companys website
(www.kaynemlp.com). The Nominating Committee has not established
specific, minimum qualifications that must be met by an
individual for the Committee to recommend that individual for
nomination as a Director. The Nominating Committee expects to
seek referrals for candidates to consider for nomination from a
variety of sources, including current Directors, management of
the Company, the investment adviser of the Company and counsel
to the Company, and may also engage a search firm to identify or
evaluate or assist in identifying or evaluating candidates. As
set forth in the Nominating Committee Charter, in evaluating
candidates for a position on the Board, the Committee considers
a variety of factors, including, as appropriate: |
|
|
|
|
|
the candidates knowledge in matters relating to the
investment company industry; |
|
|
|
any experience possessed by the candidate as a director or
senior officer of public companies; |
|
|
|
the candidates educational background; |
|
|
|
the candidates reputation for high ethical standards and
personal and professional integrity; |
|
|
|
any specific financial, technical or other expertise possessed
by the candidate, and the extent to which such expertise would
complement the Boards existing mix of skills and
qualifications; |
|
|
|
the candidates perceived ability to contribute to the
ongoing functions of the Board, including the candidates
ability and commitment to attend meetings regularly and work
collaboratively with other members of the Board; |
|
|
|
the candidates ability to qualify as an independent
director for purposes of the 1940 Act, the candidates
independence from Company service providers and the existence of
any other relationships that might give rise to conflict of
interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest; and |
|
|
|
such other factors as the Nominating Committee determines to be
relevant in light of the existing composition of the Board of
Directors and any anticipated vacancies or other transitions
(e.g., whether or not a candidate is an audit
committee financial expert under the federal securities
laws). |
|
|
|
Prior to making a final recommendation to the Board, the
Nominating Committee may conduct personal interviews with the
candidates it concludes are the most qualified. The Nominating
Committee met with Mr. Isenberg before recommending to the
Board of Directors that he be nominated to stand for election as
a Director. |
|
|
If there is no vacancy on the Board, the Board of Directors will
not actively seek recommendations from other parties, including
stockholders. When a vacancy on the Board of Directors occurs
and nominations are sought to fill such vacancy, the Nominating
Committee may seek nominations from those sources it deems
appropriate in its discretion, including the Companys
stockholders. |
|
|
To submit a recommendation for nomination as a candidate for a
position on the Board, stockholders shall mail such
recommendation to the Secretary of the Company, at the
Companys address, 1800 Avenue of the Stars, Second
Floor, Los Angeles, California 90067. Such recommendation shall
include the following information: (a) evidence of stock
ownership of the person or entity recommending the candidate (if
submitted by one of the Companys stockholders), (b) a
full description of the proposed candidates background,
including his or her education, experience, current employment,
and date of birth, (c) names and addresses of at least
three professional references for the candidate,
(d) information as to whether the candidate is an
interested person in relation to us, as such term is
defined in the 1940 Act, and such other information that may be
considered to impair the candidates independence and
(e) any other information that may be helpful to the
Nominating Committee in evaluating the candidate. Any such
recommendation must contain sufficient background information
concerning the candidate to |
6
|
|
|
enable the Nominating Committee to make a proper judgment as to
the candidates qualifications. If a recommendation is
received with satisfactorily completed information regarding a
candidate during a time when a vacancy exists on the Board of
Directors or during such other time as the Nominating Committee
is accepting recommendations, the recommendation will be
forwarded to the Chair of the Nominating Committee and will be
evaluated in the same manner as other candidates for nomination.
Recommendations received at any other time will be kept on file
until such time as the Nominating Committee is accepting
recommendations, at which point they may be considered for
nomination. |
Board of Director and Committee Meetings Held
The following table shows the number of meetings held for the
Company during the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
Board of Directors
|
|
|
4 |
|
Audit Committee
|
|
|
2 |
|
Valuation Committee
|
|
|
0 |
|
Nominating Committee
|
|
|
0 |
|
All of the Directors then serving attended at least 75% of the
meetings of the Board of Directors and applicable committees
held during the fiscal year.
Audit and Related Fees
Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP during the Companys initial
fiscal year ended November 30, 2004 to the Company for
professional services rendered with respect to the audit of the
Companys financial statements was $85,000. The Company was
formed in June 2004, and thus did not pay PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP any fees prior to that date.
Audit-Related Fees. The Company was not billed by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for any fees for assurance and
related services reasonably related to the performance of the
audits of the Companys annual financial statements for its
initial fiscal year.
Tax Fees. For professional services for tax compliance,
tax advice and tax planning for its last fiscal year, the
Company was billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for fees in the
approximate amount of $23,000.
All Other Fees. The Company was not billed by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for any fees for services other than
those described above during its initial fiscal year.
Aggregate Non-Audit Fees. The Company was not billed by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for any amounts for any non-audit
services during the Companys initial fiscal year. In
addition, neither Kayne Anderson nor any entity
controlling, controlled by, or under common control with Kayne
Anderson that provides ongoing services to the Company, was
billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for any non-audit services
during the Companys initial fiscal year.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
Before the auditor is (i) engaged by the Company to render
audit, audit related or permissible non-audit services to the
Company or (ii) with respect to non-audit services to be
provided by the auditor to Kayne Anderson or any entity in
the investment Company complex, if the nature of the services
provided relate directly to the operations or financial
reporting of the Company, either: (a) the Audit Committee
shall pre-approve such engagement; or (b) such engagement
shall be entered into pursuant to pre-approval policies and
procedures established by the Audit Committee. Any such policies
and procedures must be detailed as to the particular service and
not involve any delegation of the Audit Committees
responsibilities to Kayne Anderson. The Audit Committee may
delegate to one or more of its members the authority to grant
pre-approvals. The pre-approval policies and procedures shall
include the requirement that the decisions of any member to whom
authority is delegated under this provision shall be presented
to the full Audit
7
Committee at its next scheduled meeting. Under certain limited
circumstances, pre-approvals are not required if certain de
minimis thresholds are not exceeded, as such thresholds are
set forth by the Audit Committee and in accordance with
applicable SEC rules and regulations.
For engagements with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Audit
Committee approved in advance all audit services and non-audit
services that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP provided to the Company
and to Kayne Anderson (with respect to the operations and
financial reporting of the Company). None of the services
rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to the Company or Kayne
Anderson were pre-approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to
the pre-approval exception under Rule 2.01(c)(7)(i)(C) or
Rule 2.01(c)(7)(ii) of Regulation S-X. The Audit
Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit
services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to Kayne
Anderson and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under
common control with Kayne Anderson that were not required to be
pre-approved by the Audit Committee is compatible with
maintaining PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPs independence.
Appointment of Independent Auditors
The Board of Directors has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,
independent registered public accounting firm, as independent
auditors to audit the books and records of the Company for its
current fiscal year. A representative of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting to make a statement,
if such representative so desires, and to respond to
stockholders questions. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has
informed the Company that it has no direct or indirect material
financial interest in the Company or Kayne Anderson.
Director and Officer Compensation.
The Company does not compensate any of the Directors or officers
who are employed by Kayne Anderson. Each of the
Companys Independent Directors receives a $25,000 annual
retainer for serving as a Director. In addition, the
Companys Independent Directors receive fees for each
meeting attended, as follows: $2,500 per Board meeting;
$1,500 per Audit Committee meeting; and $500 for other
committee meetings. Committee meeting fees are not paid unless
the meeting is held on a day when there is not a Board meeting
and the meeting is more than 15 minutes in length. The Directors
are reimbursed for expenses incurred as a result of attendance
at meetings of the Board of Directors and its committees.
The following table sets forth estimated compensation to be paid
by the Company during its first full fiscal year to the
Independent Directors and the Director nominee. We have no
retirement or pension plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Total | |
|
|
Estimated Aggregate | |
|
Compensation from | |
|
|
Compensation from | |
|
the Company and | |
Name of Director or Nominee |
|
the Company | |
|
Fund Complex(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Anne K. Costin
|
|
$ |
42,000 |
|
|
$ |
42,000 |
|
Steven C. Good
|
|
$ |
42,000 |
|
|
$ |
42,000 |
|
Terrence J. Quinn
|
|
$ |
42,000 |
|
|
$ |
42,000 |
|
Gerald I. Isenberg
|
|
$ |
21,000 |
|
|
$ |
21,000 |
|
Kevin S. McCarthy
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
(1) |
As of April 30, 2005, the Directors and the nominee did not
oversee any other investment companies managed by Kayne Anderson. |
Required Vote.
The election of Mr. Isenberg as a Class I Director
requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of
shares of common stock and preferred stock outstanding as of the
Record Date, voting together as a single class. For the purposes
of determining whether the majority of the votes entitled to be
cast by the common and preferred stockholders voting together as
a single class approved the proposal, each common share and each
preferred share is entitled to one vote. For purposes of the
vote on the election of
8
Gerald Isenberg as a Class I Director, abstentions and
broker non-votes, if any, will have the same effect as votes
against the election of Mr. Isenberg, although they will be
considered present for purposes of determining the presence of a
quorum at the Annual Meeting.
BOARD RECOMMENDATION
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS
OF THE COMPANY VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF GERALD
ISENBERG AS A CLASS I DIRECTOR.
PROPOSAL TWO
APPROVAL TO SELL SHARES OF
COMMON STOCK BELOW NET ASSET VALUE
The 1940 Act prohibits the Company from selling shares of its
common stock at a price below the current net asset value per
share of such stock, except with the consent of a majority of
its common stockholders or under certain other circumstances.
Pursuant to this provision, the Company is seeking the consent
of a majority of its common stockholders so that it may, in one
or more public or private offerings of its common stock, sell
shares of its common stock at a price below its then-current net
asset value per share, subject to certain conditions discussed
below. If approved, the authorization would be effective for a
period expiring on the date of the Companys 2006 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, which is expected to be held in June
2006.
Generally, equity securities sold in public securities offerings
are priced based on market prices, rather than net asset value
per share. The Company is seeking the approval of a majority of
its common stockholders of record to offer and sell shares of
its common stock at prices that may be less than net asset value
so as to permit the flexibility in pricing that market
conditions generally require.
The Companys common stock has a limited trading history
and has traded both at a premium and at a discount in relation
to its net asset value. Although the Companys common stock
recently has been trading at a premium above net asset value,
there can be no assurance that this will continue or that its
common stock will not trade at a discount in the future. The
continued development of alternatives to the Company as a
vehicle for investment in a portfolio of MLPs, including other
publicly traded investment companies and private funds, may
reduce or eliminate any tendency of the Companys common
stock to trade at a premium in the future. Shares of closed-end
investment companies frequently trade at a discount from net
asset value. Without the approval of a majority of its common
stockholders to sell stock at prices below its current net asset
value per share, the Company would be precluded from selling
shares of its common stock to raise capital during periods where
the market price for its common stock is below its current net
asset value.
The Company believes that having the ability to issue its common
stock below net asset value in certain instances will benefit
all of its stockholders. The Company expects that it will be
periodically presented with attractive opportunities to acquire
securities of midstream energy companies that require the
Company to make an investment commitment quickly. Because the
Company generally attempts to remain fully invested and it does
not intend to maintain cash for the purpose of making these
investments, the Company may be unable to capitalize on
investment opportunities presented to it unless it quickly
raises capital. The market value of the Companys common
stock may periodically fall below its net asset value, which is
not uncommon for a closed-end investment companies like the
Company. If this decline were to occur, absent the approval of
this proposal by a majority of common stockholders, the Company
will not be able to effectively access capital markets to enable
it to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities.
If this proposal is approved, the Company does not anticipate
selling its common stock below its net asset value unless it has
identified attractive near term investment opportunities that
Kayne Anderson reasonably believes will lead to a long-term
increase in net asset value. In determining whether or not to
sell additional shares of the Companys common stock at a
price below the net asset value per share, the Board of
Directors will have duties to act in the best interest of the
Company and its stockholders. Further, to the extent the
9
Company issues shares of its common stock below net asset value
in a publicly registered transaction, the Companys market
capitalization and the amount of its publicly tradable common
stock will increase, thus affording all common stockholders
greater liquidity.
The Company will only sell shares of its common stock at a price
below net asset value per share if the following conditions are
met:
|
|
|
|
|
The per share offering price, before deduction of underwriting
fees, commissions and offering expenses, will not be less than
the net asset value per share of the Companys stock, as
determined at any time within 2 business days of pricing of
the common stock to be sold in the offering. |
|
|
|
Immediately following the offering, after deducting offering
expenses and underwriting fees and commissions, the net asset
value per share of the Companys common stock, as
determined at any time within 2 business days of pricing of
the common stock to be sold, would not have been diluted by
greater than a total of 1% of such value per share of all
outstanding common stock. The Company will not be subject to a
maximum number of shares that can be sold or a defined minimum
sales price per share in any offering so long as the aggregate
number of shares offered and the price at which such shares are
sold together would not result in dilution of the net asset
value per share of the Companys common stock in excess of
the 1% limitation. |
|
|
|
A majority of the Companys Independent Directors makes a
determination, based on information and a recommendation from
Kayne Anderson, that Kayne Anderson reasonably expects that the
investment(s) to be made with the net proceeds of such issuance
will lead to a long-term increase in net asset value. |
Before voting on this proposal or giving proxies with regard to
this matter, common stockholders should consider the potentially
dilutive effect of the issuance of shares of the Companys
common stock at less than net asset value per share on the net
asset value per outstanding share of common stock. Any sale of
common stock at a price below net asset value would result in an
immediate dilution to existing common stockholders and could
potentially cause the further erosion on the net asset value per
share. The 1940 Act establishes a connection between common
share sale price and net asset value because when stock is sold
at a sale price below net asset value per share, the resulting
increase in the number of outstanding shares is not accompanied
by a proportionate increase in the net assets of the issuer.
Common stockholders should also consider that holders of the
Companys common stock have no subscription, preferential
or preemptive rights to additional shares of the common stock
proposed to be authorized for issuance, and thus any future
issuance of common stock will dilute such stockholders
holdings of common stock as a percentage of shares outstanding.
The issuance of the additional shares of common stock will also
have an effect on the gross amount of management fees paid by
the Company to Kayne Anderson. The Companys investment
advisory agreement with Kayne Anderson provides for a management
fee payable to Kayne Anderson as compensation for managing the
investment portfolios of the Company computed as a percentage of
assets under management. The increase in the Companys
asset base that would result from any issuance of shares of
common stock proposed to be authorized by common stockholders in
this proposal would increase assets of the Company under
management, and would cause a corresponding increase in the
gross amount of management fees paid to Kayne Anderson, but
would not increase or decrease the management fee as a
percentage of assets under management. However, by increasing
the size of the Companys asset base and number of shares
outstanding, the Company may be able to reduce its fixed
expenses both as a percentage of total assets and on a per share
basis.
Approval of Proposal Two requires: (1) the affirmative
vote of a majority of all common stockholders of record as of
the Record Date and (2) the affirmative vote of a majority
of the votes cast by the holders of common stock and preferred
stock, voting together as a single class.
For the purpose of determining whether a majority of the common
stockholders of record approved this proposal, abstentions and
broker non-votes, if any, will have the effect of a vote against
Proposal Two. For the
10
purpose of determining whether a majority of votes cast approved
this proposal, abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will
have no effect on the outcome.
BOARD RECOMMENDATION
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS
OF THE COMPANY VOTE FOR THE PROPOSAL TO ALLOW
THE COMPANY TO SELL SHARES OF ITS COMMON STOCK AT A PRICE BELOW
NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE, SUBJECT TO CERTAIN CONDITIONS.
OTHER MATTERS
The Board of Directors of the Company knows of no other matters
that are intended to be brought before the meeting. If other
matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the
proxies named in the enclosed form of proxy will vote on those
matters in their sole discretion.
MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING
Stockholders. At the Record Date, the Company had the
following numbers of shares of stock issued and outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Common Stock | |
|
Shares of Preferred Stock | |
| |
|
| |
|
33,676,442 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
At April 30, 2005, each Director beneficially owned equity
securities of the Company having values within the indicated
dollar ranges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Dollar Range of | |
Director or Nominee |
|
Equity Securities in the Company(1) | |
|
|
| |
Anne K. Costin
|
|
|
$50,000-$100,000 |
|
Steven C. Good
|
|
|
$50,000-$100,000 |
|
Terrence J. Quinn
|
|
|
$10,000-$50,000 |
|
Gerald I. Isenberg
|
|
|
$0 |
|
Kevin S. McCarthy
|
|
|
Above $100,000 |
|
|
|
(1) |
As of May 12, 2005, the Directors and the nominee do not
oversee any other investment companies managed by Kayne Anderson. |
At April 30, 2005, no Director or officer held shares of
preferred stock of the Company.
To the knowledge of the Companys management, as of
April 30, 2005: there were no other entities holding
beneficially more than 5% of the Companys outstanding
common stock; none of the Companys Directors owned 1% or
more of its outstanding common stock; and the Companys
officers and Directors owned, as a group, less than 1% of its
outstanding common stock.
Investment Management Agreement. Pursuant to the
terms of an Investment Management Agreement between the Company
and Kayne Anderson, the Company has agreed to pay Kayne Anderson
a basic management fee at an annual rate of 1.75% of the
Companys average total assets, adjusted upward or downward
(by up to 1.00% of the Companys average total assets, as
defined), depending on to what extent, if any, the
Companys investment performance for the relevant
performance period exceeds or trails the Companys
Benchmark over the same period. The Companys
Benchmark is the total return (capital appreciation and
reinvested dividends) of the Standard & Poors 400
Utilities Index plus 600 basis points (6.00%). Each 0.01%
of difference of the Companys performance compared to the
performance of the Benchmark is multiplied by a performance fee
adjustment of 0.002%, up to a maximum adjustment of 1.00% (as an
annual rate). The Company calculates the total management fee
based on the average total assets for
11
the prior 12 months. For the period beginning with the
commencement of the Companys operations through the end of
the Companys first 12 months of operations (the
Initial Period), on a quarterly fiscal basis the
Company pays Kayne Anderson a minimum management fee calculated
at an annual rate of 0.75%. After this Initial Period, the basic
management fee and the performance fee adjustment will be
calculated and paid quarterly beginning with the quarter ending
November 30, 2005, using a rolling 12-month performance
period. Management fees in excess of those paid will be accrued
monthly.
The performance record for the Benchmark is based on the change
in value of the Benchmark during the relevant performance
period. During the Companys first fiscal year, for
purposes of calculating the performance fee adjustment, the
Companys initial net asset value is calculated net of the
underwriter discount. At November 30, 2004, the Company had
recorded accrued management fees at the annual rate of 0.75%
based on the Companys investment performance for the
period September 28, 2004 through November 30, 2004.
For purposes of calculating the management fee, the
Companys total assets are equal to the Companys
average monthly gross asset value (which includes assets
attributable to or proceeds from the Companys use of
preferred stock, commercial paper or notes issuances and other
borrowings), minus the sum of the Companys accrued and
unpaid dividends on any outstanding common stock and accrued and
unpaid dividends on any outstanding preferred stock and accrued
liabilities (other than liabilities associated with borrowing or
leverage by the Company and any accrued taxes). Liabilities
associated with borrowing or leverage by the Company include the
principal amount of any borrowings, commercial paper or notes
issued by the Company, the liquidation preference of any
outstanding preferred stock, and other liabilities from other
forms of borrowing or leverage such as short positions and put
or call options held or written by the Company.
How Proxies Will Be Voted. All proxies solicited
by the Board of Directors that are properly executed and
received at or prior to the Annual Meeting, and that are not
revoked, will be voted at the Annual Meeting. Votes will be cast
in accordance with the instructions marked on the enclosed proxy
card. If no instructions are specified, the persons named as
proxies will cast such votes FOR the proposals. We know of
no other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting. However,
if another proposal is properly presented at the Annual Meeting,
the votes entitled to be cast by the persons named as proxies on
the enclosed proxy card will cast such votes in their sole
discretion.
How To Vote. If your shares are held in
Street Name by a broker or bank, you will receive
information regarding how to instruct your bank or broker to
vote your shares. If you are a stockholder of record, you may
authorize the persons named as proxies to cast the votes you are
entitled to cast at the meeting by completing, signing dating
and returning the enclosed proxy card. Stockholders of record or
their duly authorized proxies may vote in person if able to
attend the Annual Meeting.
Expenses and Solicitation of Proxies. The expenses
of preparing, printing and mailing the enclosed proxy card, the
accompanying notice and this proxy statement and all other
costs, in connection with the solicitation of proxies will be
borne by the Company. The Company may also reimburse banks,
brokers and others for their reasonable expenses in forwarding
proxy solicitation material to the beneficial owners of shares
of the Company. In order to obtain the necessary quorum at the
meeting, additional solicitation may be made by mail, telephone,
telegraph, facsimile or personal interview by representatives of
the Company, Kayne Anderson, the Companys transfer
agent, or by brokers or their representatives or by a
solicitation firm that may be engaged by the Company to assist
in proxy solicitations. Any costs associated with such
additional solicitation are not anticipated to be significant.
The Company will not pay any representatives of the Company or
Kayne Anderson any additional compensation for their efforts to
supplement proxy solicitation.
Revoking a Proxy. At any time before it has been
voted, you may revoke your proxy by: (1) sending a letter
revoking your proxy to the Secretary of the Company at the
Companys offices located at 1800 Avenue of the Stars,
Second Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90067; (2) properly executing
and sending a later-dated proxy; or (3) attending the
Annual Meeting, requesting return of any previously delivered
proxy, and voting in person.
Quorum and Adjournment. The presence, in person or
by proxy, of holders of shares entitled to cast a majority of
the votes entitled to be cast (without regard to class)
constitutes a quorum. If a quorum is not
12
present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting, the
chairman of the Annual Meeting may adjourn the meeting to a date
not more than 120 days after the original Record Date
without notice other than announcement at the Annual Meeting.
Failure of a quorum to be present at the Annual Meeting will
necessitate adjournment and will subject the Company to
additional expense.
No Appraisal or Dissenter Rights. Stockholders do
not have any appraisal or dissenter rights in connection with
any of the matters discussed in this proxy statement.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL INTEREST REPORTING
COMPLIANCE
Section 30(h) of Investment Company Act of 1940 and
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
require the Companys directors and officers, investment
adviser, affiliated persons of the investment advisor and
persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the
Companys equity securities to file forms reporting their
affiliation with the Company and reports of ownership and
changes in ownership of the Companys shares with the SEC
and the New York Stock Exchange. Those persons and entities are
required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies
of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based on a review of
those forms furnished to the Company, the Company believes that
its Directors and officers, Kayne Anderson and affiliated
persons of Kayne Anderson have complied with all applicable
Section 16(a) filing requirements during the last fiscal
year. To the knowledge of management of the Company, no person
owns beneficially more than 10% of a class of the Companys
equity securities.
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the
Board) of Kayne Anderson MLP Investment Company (the
Company) is responsible for assisting the Board in
monitoring (1) the accounting and reporting policies and
procedures of the Company, (2) the quality and integrity of
the Companys financial statements, (3) the
Companys compliance with regulatory requirements, and
(4) the independence and performance of the Companys
independent and internal auditors. Among other responsibilities,
the Audit Committee reviews, in its oversight capacity, the
Companys annual financial statements with both management
and the independent auditors and the Audit Committee meets
periodically with the independent and internal auditors to
consider their evaluation of the Companys financial and
internal controls. The Audit Committee also selects, retains,
evaluates and may replace the Companys independent
auditors and determines their compensation, subject to
ratification of the Board, if required. The Audit Committee is
currently composed of three Directors. The Audit Committee
operates under a written charter (the Audit Committee
Charter) adopted and approved by the Board, a copy of
which is attached as Appendix A. Each committee member is
independent as defined by New York Stock Exchange
listing standards.
The Audit Committee, in discharging its duties, has met with and
held discussions with management and the Companys
independent and internal auditors. The Audit Committee has
reviewed and discussed the Companys audited financial
statements with management. Management has represented to the
independent auditors that the Companys financial
statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. The Audit Committee has also discussed
with the independent auditors the matters required to be
discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61
(Communications with Audit Committees). The Companys
independent auditors provided to the Audit Committee the written
disclosures and the letter required by Independence Standards
Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit
Committees), and the Audit Committee discussed with
representatives of the independent auditors their firms
independence. As provided in the Audit Committee Charter, it is
not the Audit Committees responsibility to determine, and
the considerations and discussions referenced above do not
ensure, that the Companys financial statements are
complete and accurate and presented in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles.
13
Based on the Audit Committees review and discussions with
management and the independent auditors, the representations of
management and the report of the independent auditors to the
Audit Committee, the committee has recommended that the Board
include the audited financial statements in the Companys
Annual Report.
|
|
|
Michael Targoff |
|
Steven C. Good |
|
Terrence J. Quinn |
ADMINISTRATOR
Bear Stearns Funds Management Inc. (Administrator)
provides certain administrative services to us, including but
not limited to preparing and maintaining books, records, and tax
and financial reports, and monitoring compliance with regulatory
requirements. The Administrator is located at 383 Madison
Avenue, 23rd Floor, New York, New York 10179.
STOCKHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS
Stockholders may send communications to the Board of Directors.
Communications should be addressed to the Secretary of the
Company at its principal offices at 1800 Avenue of the Stars,
Second Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90067. The Secretary will
forward any communications received directly to the Board of
Directors. The Company does not have a policy with regard to
Board attendance at annual meetings. The Annual Meeting is the
Companys first annual meeting.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
The Companys current Bylaws provide that in order for a
stockholder to nominate a candidate for election as a Director
at an annual meeting of stockholders or propose business for
consideration at such meeting, written notice containing the
information required by the current Bylaws must be delivered to
the Secretary of the Company at 1800 Avenue of the Stars, Second
Floor, Los Angeles, California, 90076, not later than
5:00 p.m. (Pacific Time) on the 120th day, and not earlier
than the 150th day, prior to the first anniversary of the
mailing of the notice for the preceding years annual
meeting. Accordingly, a stockholder nomination or proposal
intended to be considered at the 2006 Annual Meeting must be
received by the Secretary of the Company on or after
[ ],
2006, and prior to 5:00 p.m. (Pacific Time) on
[ ],
2006. However, under the rules of the SEC, if a stockholder
wishes to submit a proposal for possible inclusion in the
Companys 2006 proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company must receive
it on or before
[ ],
2006. All nominations and proposals must be in writing.
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors |
|
|
/s/ David J. Shladovsky |
|
|
|
David J. Shladovsky |
|
Secretary |
May [ ], 2005
14
APPENDIX A
KAYNE ANDERSON MLP INVESTMENT COMPANY
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
The Board of Directors (the Board) of Kayne Anderson
MLP Investment Company (the Company) shall have an
Audit Committee (the Audit Committee).
|
|
I. |
Statement of Purpose and Function |
The function of the Audit Committee is oversight; it is
managements responsibility to maintain appropriate systems
for accounting and internal controls, and the Auditors
responsibility to plan and carry out the audit in accordance
with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States.
The Auditor is ultimately responsible to the Board and the Audit
Committee.
The purposes of the Audit Committee are to:
|
|
|
|
|
assist the Board in its oversight of (1) the integrity,
quality and objectivity of the Companys financial
statements and the independent audit thereof, (2) the
Companys compliance with legal and regulatory
requirements, (3) the independent auditors
qualifications and independence, and (4) the performance of
the Companys internal audit function and the
Companys independent auditor (the Auditor),
(5) the Companys accounting and financial reporting
policies and practices by reviewing disclosures made to the
Audit Committee by the Companys certifying officers and
the Auditor about any significant deficiency in, or material
change in the operation of, the Companys internal controls
or material weaknesses therein, and any fraud involving Kayne
Anderson Capital Advisors, L.P. (the Advisor) or any
employees or other persons who have a significant role in the
Companys internal controls; |
|
|
|
prepare an audit committee report as required by the Securities
and Exchange Commission to be included in the Companys
annual proxy statement; |
|
|
|
select, oversee and approve the compensation of the Auditor and
to act as liaison between the Auditor and the Board; and |
|
|
|
conduct an annual performance evaluation of the Audit Committee. |
The Audit Committee shall have the resources and authority
appropriate to discharge its responsibilities, including the
authority to retain special counsel and other experts or
consultants at the expense of the Company.
|
|
II. |
Committee Composition |
The Audit Committee shall be comprised of at least three
directors, all of whom shall be independent directors
(i.e., directors who are not interested
persons of the Company as defined in the Investment
Company Act of 1940, as amended, and who are free of any other
relationship that, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere
with their exercise of independent judgment as Audit Committee
members). Each member shall be appointed by the Board, and a
majority of the independent directors of the Board also shall
approve each appointment.
The Board shall designate one member as Audit Committee Chairman.
Members of the Audit Committee shall be financially literate, as
such qualification is interpreted by the Board in its business
judgment, or shall become financially literate within a
reasonable period of time after his or her appointment to the
Audit Committee. In addition, at least one member of the Audit
Committee shall have accounting or related financial management
expertise, as the Board interprets such qualification in its
business judgment.
A-1
The Audit Committee shall consider whether one or more members
of the Audit Committee is an Audit Committee financial
expert,(1) as such term is defined by the Securities and
Exchange Commission, and whether any such expert is
independent.(2) The Audit Committee shall report the
results of its deliberations to the Board for further action as
appropriate, including, but not limited to, a determination by
the Board that the Audit Committee membership includes or does
not include one or more Audit Committee financial
experts and any related disclosure to be made concerning
this matter.
|
|
III. |
Duties and Responsibilities |
The Audit Committee shall meet with the finance and other
personnel of the Company and the Advisor as necessary and
appropriate to fulfill the Committees oversight role. The
Audit Committee shall have unrestricted access to the Auditor
and the Companys administrator.
To carry out its purposes, the Audit Committee shall have the
following duties and powers (such listing is not intended to
limit the authority of the Audit Committee in achieving its
purposes):
|
|
|
1. Selection of Auditor and Approval of Fees. |
|
|
(a) The Audit Committee shall pre-approve the selection of
the Auditor and shall recommend the selection, retention or
termination of the Auditor to the Board and, in connection
therewith, shall evaluate the independence of the Auditor,
including an evaluation of the extent to which the Auditor
provides any consulting, auditing or non-audit services to the
Advisor or its affiliates. The Audit Committee shall review the
Auditors specific representations as to its independence. |
|
|
(b) The Audit Committee shall review and approve the fees
charged by the Auditor for audit and non-audit services to be
provided to the Company in accordance with the pre-approval
requirements set forth below. The Company shall provide for
appropriate funding, as determined by the Audit Committee, to
compensate the Auditor for any authorized service provided to
the Company. |
|
|
2. Meetings with Auditor. The Audit Committee
shall meet with the Auditor prior to the commencement of
substantial work on the audit and following the conclusion of
the audit, as well as such other times as the Committee shall
deem necessary or appropriate. The Chairman of the Audit
Committee shall meet with the Auditor informally as needed. The
Audit Committee shall ensure that the Auditor reports directly
to the Audit Committee. |
|
|
3. Reports by Auditor. The Audit Committee
shall request the Auditor to report at least annually
concerning, and shall engage the Auditor in discussions
regarding, the following and other pertinent matters: |
|
|
|
(a) the arrangements for and scope of the annual audit and
any special audits; |
|
|
(b) all critical accounting policies and practices to be
used; |
|
|
(c) any matters of concern relating to the Companys
annual audited financial statements and quarterly financial
statements, including: (i) any adjustments to such
statements recommended by the Auditor, or other results of said
audit(s), and (ii) all alternative treatments of financial
information within generally accepted accounting principles that
have been discussed with manage- |
(1) Notwithstanding any such identification, each member of
the Audit Committee is expected to contribute significantly to
the work of the Committee. Moreover, identification as an
audit committee financial expert will not increase
the duties, obligations or liability of the identified person as
compared to the duties, obligations and liability imposed on
that person as a member of the Audit Committee and of the Board.
(2) For purposes of this finding of independence only, in
order to be considered independent, any such expert
must not only be independent for purposes of the Investment
Company Act but also must satisfy the additional requirement
that he or she may not, other than in his or her capacity as a
member of the Audit Committee, the Board, or any other Board
committee, accept directly or indirectly any consulting,
advisory, or other compensatory fee from the Company.
A-2
ment, the ramifications of the use of such alternative
disclosures and treatments, and the treatment preferred by the
Auditor;
|
|
|
(d) any audit problems or difficulties and
managements response; |
|
|
(e) any material written communication between the Auditor
and management such as any management letter or schedule of
unadjusted differences; |
|
|
(f) all non-audit services provided to any entity in the
Investment Company Complex(3) that were not
pre-approved by the Audit Committee; |
|
|
(g) the amount of all fees received by the Auditor for
providing services of any type to the Advisor and any affiliate
controlled by the Advisor, and confirmation that the Auditor has
not provided any prohibited non-audit services; |
|
|
(h) the Auditors comments with respect to the
Companys financial policies, procedures and internal
accounting controls and responses thereto by the Companys
officers, the Advisor and administrator, as well as other
personnel; |
|
|
(i) confirmation of the form of written opinion the Auditor
proposes to render to the Board and stockholders of the Company,
and discussion or reporting on the general nature of the
disclosures to be made in Form N-CSR; |
|
|
(j) the adequacy and effectiveness of relevant accounting
internal controls and procedures and the quality of the staff
implementing those controls and procedures; |
|
|
(k) periodic reports concerning relevant regulatory changes
and new accounting pronouncements that significantly affect the
value of the Companys assets and its financial reporting; |
|
|
(l) disclosures to the Auditors and the Audit
Committee by the Companys chief executive or chief
financial officer of (i) any material weaknesses in
internal controls, (ii) any significant deficiencies in the
design or operation of internal controls that could adversely
affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize,
and report financial data and, (iii) any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management of other employees who
have a significant role in the Companys internal controls,
and (iv) any other matters that could jeopardize the
Companys ability to file its financial statements with the
Securities and Exchange Commission or the certifying
officers ability to certify the Companys N-CSR; |
|
|
(m) confirmation that the Auditor is in compliance with the
audit partner rotation requirements applicable to the engagement
with the Company; |
|
|
(n) the Auditors internal quality-control procedures,
including any material issues raised by the most recent internal
quality-control review, or peer review, of the Auditor, or by
any inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional
authorities, within the preceding five years, respecting one or
more independent audits carried out by the Auditor, and any
steps taken to deal with any such issues; |
|
|
(o) all relationships between the Auditor and the Company,
and between the Auditor and the Advisor (to assess the
Auditors independence); and |
|
|
(p) the opportunity to report on any other matter that the
Auditor deems necessary or appropriate to discuss with the Audit
Committee. |
(3) Investment Company Complex means the
Company, the Advisor and any entity controlled by, controlling
or under common control with the Advisor if such entity is an
investment adviser or is engaged in the business of providing
administrative, custodian, underwriting or transfer agent
services to the Company or the Advisor.
A-3
|
|
|
In order to ensure that the Audit Committee has had an
opportunity to review the Auditors report and other
required communications relating to the annual audit of the
Companys financial statements prior to the date the
audited financial statements are filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and released to the public (i.e.,
within 60 days following the end of the Companys
fiscal year), the Audit Committee shall either meet with the
Auditor or, in lieu of a meeting, require the Auditor to deliver
a written report to the Audit Committee concerning these matters
prior to the date the audited financial statements are filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and released to the
public. |
|
|
|
4. Meetings with Management and the Advisor.
The Audit Committee shall periodically meet with its management
and the Advisor to discuss such items as it deems appropriate,
including but not limited to the Companys annual audited
financial statements, including the Companys disclosures
under Managements Discussion of
Fund Performance. |
|
|
5. Discussion of Other Important Items. The
Audit Committee shall meet to discuss and give due consideration
to the following items: |
|
|
|
(a) major issues regarding accounting principles and
financial statement presentations, including any significant
changes in the Companys selection or application of
accounting principles and their effect on the Company, and major
issues as to the adequacy of the Companys internal
controls and any special audit steps adopted in light of
material control deficiencies; |
|
|
(b) analyses prepared by management and/or the Auditor
setting forth significant financial reporting issues and
judgments made in connection with the preparation of the
financial statements, including analyses of the effects of
alternative GAAP methods on the financial statements; |
|
|
(c) the effect of regulatory and accounting initiatives on
the financial statements of the Company; |
|
|
(d) earnings press releases, and financial information and
earnings guidance provided to analysts and rating agencies (such
discussion may be done generally, i.e., discussion of the types
of information to be disclosed and the type of presentation to
be made), and the Audit Committee is not required to discuss in
advance each earnings release or each instance in which the
Company may provide earnings guidance; |
|
|
(e) policies with respect to risk assessment and risk
management; and |
|
|
(f) hiring policies with respect to employees or former
employees of the Auditor. |
|
|
|
6. Evaluation of Audit Related Services and
Permissible Non-Audit Services. |
|
|
(a) The Audit Committee shall evaluate all audit related
services performed or to be performed by the Auditor for the
Company. The Audit Committee shall regularly review with the
Auditor any difficulties the Auditor encountered in the course
of the audit work, including any restrictions on the scope of
the Auditors activities or on access to requested
information, and any significant disagreements with management.
Among the items the Audit Committee may want to review with the
Auditor are: any accounting adjustments that were noted or
proposed by the Auditor but were passed (as
immaterial or otherwise); any communications between the audit
team and the Auditors national office respecting auditing
or accounting issues presented by the engagement; and any
management or internal control letter
issued, or proposed to be issued, by the Auditor to the Company.
The review should also include discussion of the
responsibilities, budget and staffing of the Companys
internal audit function. |
|
|
(b) The Audit Committee shall also evaluate all permissible
non-audit services performed or to be performed by the Auditor
for the Company or (i) the Advisor and (ii) any entity
controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the
Advisor that provides ongoing services to the Company, if the
nature of the services provided relate directly to the
operations or financial reporting of the Company, to ensure that
such services do not impair the independence of the Auditor.
Audit related services are assurance and related services that
are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review
of the |
A-4
|
|
|
Companys financial statements or that are traditionally
performed by the independent auditor that do not impair the
independence of the Auditor. Permissible non-audit services
include tax compliance, tax planning, tax advice and other
routine and recurring services that do not impair the
independence of the Auditor. |
|
|
7. Pre-Approval of Auditor Services. |
|
|
(a) Pre-Approval Requirements for Services to
Company. Before the Auditor is engaged by the Company to
render audit related or permissible non-audit services,
either: |
|
|
|
(i) The Audit Committee shall pre-approve such
engagement; or |
|
|
(ii) Such engagement shall be entered into pursuant to
pre-approval policies and procedures established by the Audit
Committee. Any such policies and procedures must (1) be
detailed as to the particular service and (2) not involve
any delegation of the Audit Committees responsibilities to
the Advisor. The Audit Committee may delegate to one or more of
its members the authority to grant pre-approvals. The
pre-approval policies and procedures shall include the
requirement that the decisions of any member to whom authority
is delegated under this Section shall be presented to the full
Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. |
|
|
(iii) De Minimis Exceptions to Pre-Approval
Requirements. Pre-approval for a service provided to the
Company other than audit, review or attest services is not
required if: (1) the aggregate amount of all such non-audit
services provided to the Company constitutes not more than
5 percent of the total amount of revenues paid by the
Company to the Auditor during the fiscal year in which the
non-audit services are provided; (2) such services were not
recognized by the Company at the time of the engagement to be
non-audit services; and (3) such services are promptly
brought to the attention of the Audit Committee and are approved
by the Audit Committee or by one or more members of the Audit
Committee to whom authority to grant such approvals has been
delegated by the Audit Committee. |
|
|
|
(b) Pre-Approval of Non-Audit Services Provided to the
Advisor and Others. The Audit Committee shall pre-approve
any non-audit services proposed to be provided by the Auditor to
(i) the Advisor and (ii) any entity in the investment
company complex (see note 3), if the nature of the services
provided relate directly to the operations or financial
reporting of the Company. |
Application of De Minimis Exception: The De Minimis
exceptions set forth above under Section 5(a) apply to
pre-approvals under this Section (b) as well, except
that the total amount of revenues calculation for
Section 5(b) services is based on the total amount of
revenues paid to the Auditor by the Company and any other entity
that has its services approved under this
Section (i.e., the Advisor or any control person).
|
|
|
8. Prohibited Activities of the Auditor. The
Audit Committee shall confirm with the Auditor that the Auditor
who is performing the audit for the Company is not performing
contemporaneously (during the audit and professional engagement
period) any impermissible non-audit services for the Company or
the Advisor (see Section III.2(f)). |
|
|
9. Establishment of Procedures Regarding Concerns or
Complaints. The Audit Committee shall establish
procedures for (i) the receipt, retention, and treatment of
complaints received by the Company regarding accounting,
internal accounting controls, or auditing matters, and
(ii) the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of
the Company, the Advisor, the administrator, the lead
underwriters, or any other provider of accounting related
services for the Company, of concerns regarding questionable
accounting or auditing matters. |
A-5
|
|
|
10. Reporting. The Audit Committee Chairman
shall report to the Board the recommendations and determinations
of the Audit Committee, as well as the results of any Audit
Committee reviews.(4) |
|
|
11. Minutes. The Audit Committee shall
prepare minutes of all meetings of the Committee. |
The Audit Committee shall review this Charter on an annual basis
and recommend any changes to the Board. This Charter may be
amended by a vote of a majority of the Board.
(4) This report shall include any issues that arise with
respect to the quality or integrity of the Companys
financial statements, the Companys compliance with legal
or regulatory requirements, the performance and independence of
the Auditor, or the performance of the Companys internal
compliance function.
A-6
KAYNE ANDERSON MLP INVESTMENT COMPANY
PROXY SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR
THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS JUNE 15, 2005
The undersigned stockholder of Kayne Anderson MLP Investment Company, a Maryland corporation (the
Company), hereby appoints David J. Shladovsky and J.C. Frey, or either of them, as proxies for
the undersigned, with full power of substitution in each of them, to attend the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of the Company to be held at 1800 Avenue of the Stars,
Second Floor, Los Angeles, CA, on June 15, 2005, at 9:00 a.m.,
Pacific Time, and any adjournment or postponement thereof, to cast on behalf of the undersigned all
votes that the undersigned is entitled to cast at such Annual Meeting and otherwise to represent
the undersigned at the Annual Meeting with all powers possessed by the undersigned if personally present
at the Annual Meeting. The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders and revokes any proxy heretofore given with respect to such Annual Meeting.
The votes entitled to be cast by the undersigned will be cast as instructed below. If this Proxy
is executed but no instruction is given, the votes entitled to be cast by the undersigned will be
cast for the nominee for director and for Proposal 2. Additionally, the votes entitled to be
cast by the undersigned will be cast in the discretion of the Proxy holder on any other matter that
may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS
PROXY PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED POSTMARKED ENVELOPE.
6 PLEASE DETACH AT PERFORATION BEFORE MAILING 6
KAYNE ANDERSON MLP INVESTMENT COMPANY
ANNUAL MEETING PROXY CARD
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURES
THIS SECTION MUST BE COMPLETED
Please sign exactly as your name appears. If the
shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When
signing as an attorney, executor, administrator,
trustee, guardian, officer of a corporation or other
entity or in another representative capacity, please
give the full title under signature(s).
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature(s)(if held jointly):
|
|
Date |
(continued from reverse side)
KAYNE ANDERSON MLP
INVESTMENT COMPANY
ANNUAL MEETING PROXY CARD
THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED BELOW
AND, IF NO CHOICE IS INDICATED, WILL BE VOTED FOR THE PROPOSAL.
1. |
THE ELECTION OF GERALD I. ISENBERG FOR A TERM OF THREE YEARS AND UNTIL HIS SUCCESSOR IS
ELECTED AND QUALIFIES. |
2. |
AS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN THE PROXY STATEMENT, TO AUTHORIZE THE COMPANY TO SELL SHARES OF
ITS COMMON STOCK AT A PRICE LESS THAN NET ASSET VALUE. |
o FOR o AGAINST o ABSTAIN
3. |
TO VOTE AND OTHERWISE REPRESENT THE UNDERSIGNED ON ANY OTHER
MATTER THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENT
OR POSTPONEMENT THEREOF IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXY HOLDER. |