e10vq
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended October 3, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-15295
TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
25-1843385 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification Number) |
|
|
|
1049 Camino Dos Rios |
|
|
Thousand Oaks, California
|
|
91360-2362 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(805) 373-4545
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class |
|
Outstanding at October 29, 2010 |
Common Stock, $.01 par value per share
|
|
36,299,810 shares |
TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE THIRD QUARTER AND NINE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 3, 2010 AND SEPTEMBER 27, 2009
(Unaudited Amounts in millions, except per-share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
443.9 |
|
|
$ |
429.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,325.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,310.8 |
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
307.6 |
|
|
|
304.2 |
|
|
|
929.7 |
|
|
|
931.8 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
89.4 |
|
|
|
81.5 |
|
|
|
263.4 |
|
|
|
256.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
397.0 |
|
|
|
385.7 |
|
|
|
1,193.1 |
|
|
|
1,188.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before other income and expense and income taxes |
|
|
46.9 |
|
|
|
43.7 |
|
|
|
132.5 |
|
|
|
122.7 |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Interest and debt expense, net |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
45.2 |
|
|
|
42.6 |
|
|
|
130.3 |
|
|
|
118.8 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
46.3 |
|
|
|
37.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before noncontrolling interest |
|
|
30.4 |
|
|
|
35.2 |
|
|
|
84.0 |
|
|
|
81.6 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Teledyne Technologies |
|
$ |
30.3 |
|
|
$ |
35.1 |
|
|
$ |
83.9 |
|
|
$ |
81.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
|
$ |
2.32 |
|
|
$ |
2.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
$ |
2.28 |
|
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding |
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
36.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Current period unaudited Amounts in millions, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
January 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
27.1 |
|
|
$ |
26.1 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
277.5 |
|
|
|
245.8 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
208.5 |
|
|
|
189.6 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net |
|
|
35.5 |
|
|
|
37.4 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
32.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
567.2 |
|
|
|
531.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost, net of accumulated
depreciation and amortization of $298.4
at October 3, 2010 and $275.9 at January 3, 2010 |
|
|
215.4 |
|
|
|
206.6 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net |
|
|
27.9 |
|
|
|
29.9 |
|
Goodwill, net |
|
|
547.5 |
|
|
|
502.4 |
|
Acquired intangibles, net |
|
|
119.9 |
|
|
|
109.6 |
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
41.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
1,527.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,421.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
122.5 |
|
|
$ |
103.8 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
173.1 |
|
|
|
176.8 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
298.7 |
|
|
|
281.1 |
|
Long-term debt and capital leases |
|
|
266.0 |
|
|
|
251.6 |
|
Accrued pension obligation |
|
|
55.4 |
|
|
|
79.8 |
|
Accrued postretirement benefits |
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
134.3 |
|
|
|
125.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
768.5 |
|
|
|
754.1 |
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; outstanding shares-none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; outstanding shares 36,288,891
at October 3, 2010 and 36,078,269 at January 3, 2010 |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
263.9 |
|
|
|
254.7 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
667.1 |
|
|
|
583.2 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(173.0 |
) |
|
|
(171.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Teledyne Technologies Stockholders Equity |
|
|
758.4 |
|
|
|
666.5 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
759.4 |
|
|
|
667.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
1,527.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,421.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 3, 2010 AND SEPTEMBER 27, 2009
(Unaudited Amounts in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
84.0 |
|
|
$ |
81.6 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
33.2 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
38.4 |
|
Stock option expense |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Excess income tax benefits from stock options exercised |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Loss on sale of fixed assets |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities,
excluding the effect of business acquired: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable |
|
|
(24.3 |
) |
|
|
19.7 |
|
Decrease (increase) in inventories |
|
|
(9.8 |
) |
|
|
14.0 |
|
Decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
Decrease in accrued liabilities |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
(18.9 |
) |
Increase in income taxes payable, net |
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
Increase in long-term assets |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
Increase in other long-term liabilities |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
Decrease in accrued pension obligation |
|
|
(34.2 |
) |
|
|
(101.1 |
) |
Decrease in accrued postretirement benefits |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
Other operating, net |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
73.8 |
|
|
|
75.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(17.4 |
) |
|
|
(26.8 |
) |
Purchase of businesses and other investments |
|
|
(63.3 |
) |
|
|
(26.9 |
) |
Proceeds from disposal of fixed assets |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
(80.6 |
) |
|
|
(53.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of Senior Notes |
|
|
250.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net repayments of debt |
|
|
(244.8 |
) |
|
|
(20.3 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Issuance of cash flow hedges |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess income tax benefits from stock options exercised |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities |
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
(20.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Cash and cash equivalentsbeginning of period |
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalentsend of period |
|
$ |
27.1 |
|
|
$ |
21.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
October 3, 2010
Note 1. General
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (Teledyne Technologies or the Company) pursuant to the rules
and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and disclosures
normally included in notes to consolidated financial statements have been condensed or omitted
pursuant to such rules and regulations, but resultant disclosures are in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States as they apply to interim
reporting. The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto in Teledyne Technologies Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2010 (2009 Form 10-K).
In the opinion of Teledyne Technologies management, the accompanying unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
adjustments) necessary to present fairly, in all material respects, Teledyne Technologies
consolidated financial position as of October 3, 2010 and the consolidated results of
operations and cash flows for the three months and nine months then ended. The results of
operations and cash flows for the period ended October 3, 2010 are not necessarily indicative
of the results of operations or cash flows to be expected for any subsequent quarter or the
full fiscal year.
Note 2. Business Combinations and Investments, Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets
The following summarizes the acquisitions made during 2010. Other than the purchase of the
assets of a marine sensor product line for $1.4 million and all of the remaining 14.1% minority
interest in Ocean Design, Inc., now known as Teledyne ODI, (ODI) for $25.5 million, no other
acquisitions were made in 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership |
|
Primary |
|
Pre-acquisition |
|
Transaction |
|
Purchase Price |
Name and Description(1) |
|
Date Acquired |
|
Purchased |
|
Location(s) |
|
Sales Volume |
|
Type |
|
(2)(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
Fiscal Year 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Optimum Optical Systems, Inc (Optimum) |
|
June 7, 2010 |
|
100.0% |
|
Camarillo, CA |
|
$5.9 million for the |
|
Stock |
|
$ |
5.7 |
|
Designs and manufacturers custom optics and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fiscal year ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
optomechanical assemblies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intelek plc (Intelek) |
|
July 26, 2010 |
|
100.0% |
|
United Kingdom |
|
£38 million for the |
|
Stock |
|
$ |
42.6 |
|
Designs and manufactures electronic systems |
|
|
|
|
|
and State |
|
fiscal year ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
for satellite and microw ave communication and |
|
|
|
|
|
College, PA |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
aerostructure manufacturing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hafmynd ehf., now know as Gavia elf. (Gavia) |
|
September 20, 2010 |
|
100.0% |
|
Reykjavik, |
|
532.4 million |
|
Stock |
|
$ |
10.1 |
|
Designs and manufactures the GaviaTM |
|
|
|
|
|
Iceland |
|
Icelandic króna for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
autonomous underw ater vehicle (AUV) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the fiscal year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1) |
|
Each of the acquisitions is part of the Electronics and Communications segment, except for
the CML division of Intelek which is part of the Engineered Systems segment. |
|
2) |
|
The purchase price represents the contractual consideration for the acquired business, net
of cash acquired, including certain acquisition transaction costs, paid as of October 3,
2010. |
|
3) |
|
On March 2, 2010, we acquired a 17% interest in Optical Alchemy, Inc., a designer and
manufacturer of ultra-light electro optical gimbal system for $4.6 million. Also in 2010,
we made scheduled payments for a prior acquisition of $0.3 million. In 2009, we paid $0.3
million related to a prior acquisition and received a purchase price adjustment of $0.3
million for a prior acquisition. |
In June 2010, Teledyne acquired an initial 16% minority interest in Intelek. In July
2010, Teledyne acquired the remaining interest in Intelek. Intelek has locations in the United
Kingdom and State College, Pennsylvania. Through its Paradise Datacom division, Intelek
designs and manufactures satellite modems, transceivers, block up-converters, solid state power
amplifiers, low noise amplifiers and associated equipment for the terrestrial segment of the
satellite communications market. Inteleks Labtech division is a manufacturer of microwave
circuits and components primarily for the defense electronics, global telecommunications, space
and satellite communications markets. Inteleks CML division manufactures
5
precision machined
and composite aerostructures for military and commercial aircraft. The three divisions have
changed their names to Teledyne Paradise Datacom, Teledyne Labtech and Teledyne CML Group. The
Teledyne Paradise Datacom and Teledyne Labtech divisions are part of the Electronics and
Communications segment and the Teledyne CML division is part of the Engineered Systems segment.
Teledyne funded the purchases primarily from borrowings and cash on hand. The primary reasons
for the above acquisitions were to strengthen and expand our core businesses through adding
complementary product and service offerings, allowing the ability to offer greater integrated
products and services, enhancing our technical capabilities or increasing our addressable
markets. The significant factors that resulted in recognition of goodwill were: (a) the
purchase price was based on cash flow and return on capital projections assuming integration
with our businesses and (b) the calculation of the fair value of tangible and intangible assets
acquired that qualified for recognition.
Teledynes
goodwill was $547.5 million at October 3, 2010 and $502.4 million at January 3,
2010. The increase in the balance of goodwill in 2010 primarily resulted from goodwill from
recent acquisitions. Teledynes net acquired intangible assets were $119.9 million at October
3, 2010 and $109.6 million at January 3, 2010. The change in the balance of acquired
intangible assets in 2010 resulted from recent acquisitions, partially offset by amortization.
The goodwill acquired as part of the Gavia ehf and the Intelek UK business is deductible for
tax purposes.
The following is a summary at the acquisition date of the estimated fair values allocated to
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed for the acquisitions made during fiscal 2010 (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
17.7 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
16.5 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
46.0 |
|
Acquired intangible assets |
|
|
21.3 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
(18.0 |
) |
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
(26.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total net assets acquired |
|
$ |
57.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 3. Comprehensive Income
Teledynes comprehensive income is comprised of net income attributable to common stockholders,
minimum pension liability adjustments, unamortized cash flow hedge losses and foreign currency
translation adjustments. Teledynes total comprehensive income for the third quarter
and first nine months of 2010 and 2009 consists of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income before noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
30.4 |
|
|
$ |
35.2 |
|
|
$ |
84.0 |
|
|
$ |
81.6 |
|
Other comprehensive gain (loss), net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation gains (losses) |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
6.3 |
|
Cash flow hedge position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive gain (loss) |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
36.9 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
82.7 |
|
|
|
87.9 |
|
Less: Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
Foreign currency translation gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to common
stockholders |
|
$ |
36.8 |
|
|
$ |
35.9 |
|
|
$ |
82.6 |
|
|
$ |
87.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
Note 4. Earnings Per Share
Basic and diluted earnings per share were computed based on net earnings. The weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the period was used in the calculation of basic
earnings per share. This number of shares was increased by contingent shares that could be
issued under various compensation plans as well as by the dilutive effect of stock options
based on the treasury stock method in the calculation of diluted earnings per share.
The following table sets forth the computations of basic and diluted earnings per share
(amounts in millions, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
30.3 |
|
|
$ |
35.1 |
|
|
$ |
83.9 |
|
|
$ |
81.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
|
$ |
2.32 |
|
|
$ |
2.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
30.3 |
|
|
$ |
35.1 |
|
|
$ |
83.9 |
|
|
$ |
81.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
|
Dilutive effect of exercise of options outstanding |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding |
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
36.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
$ |
2.28 |
|
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5. Stock-Based Compensation Plans
Teledyne has long-term incentive plans pursuant to which it has granted non-qualified stock
options, restricted stock and performance shares to certain employees. The Company also has
non-employee director stock compensation plans, pursuant to which non-qualified stock options
and common stock have been issued to its directors.
The following disclosures are based on stock options granted to Teledynes employees and
directors. The Company recorded a total of $1.2 million and $3.7 million in stock option
compensation expense for the third quarter and first nine months of 2010, respectively. For
the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, the Company recorded a total of $1.3 million
and $4.1 million, respectively in stock option expense. Employee stock option grants are
expensed evenly over the three year vesting period. In 2010, the Company currently expects
approximately $5.0 million in stock option compensation expense based on stock options already
granted and current assumptions regarding the estimated fair value of stock option grants
expected to be issued during the remainder of the year. However, our assessment of the
estimated compensation expense will be affected by our stock price and actual stock option
grants during the remainder of the year as well as assumptions regarding a number of complex
and subjective variables and the related tax impact. These variables include, but are not
limited to, the volatility of our stock price and employee stock option exercise behaviors.
The Company issues shares of common stock upon the exercise of stock options.
7
The Company used a combination of its historical stock price volatility and the volatility of
exchange traded options on the Company stock to compute the expected volatility for purposes of
valuing stock options issued. The period used for the historical stock price corresponded to
the expected term of the options and was six years. The period used for the exchange traded
options included the longest-dated options publicly available, generally three months. The
expected dividend yield is based on Teledynes practice of not paying dividends. The risk-free
rate of return is based on the yield of U. S. Treasury Strips with terms equal to the expected
life of the options as of the grant date. The expected life in years is based on historical
actual stock option exercise experience. The following assumptions were used in the valuation
of stock options granted in 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
35.3 |
% |
|
|
38.8 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
Expected life in years |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
Based on the assumptions in the table above, the grant date fair value of stock options granted
in 2010 and 2009 was $16.44 and $10.02, respectively.
Stock option transactions for Teledynes employee stock option plans for the third quarter and
nine months ended October 3, 2010 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Beginning balance |
|
|
2,594,529 |
|
|
$ |
32.70 |
|
|
|
2,249,050 |
|
|
$ |
30.40 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
433,094 |
|
|
$ |
42.09 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(32,825 |
) |
|
$ |
22.49 |
|
|
|
(107,823 |
) |
|
$ |
19.66 |
|
Canceled or expired |
|
|
(22,939 |
) |
|
$ |
39.14 |
|
|
|
(35,556 |
) |
|
$ |
36.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
|
2,538,765 |
|
|
$ |
32.75 |
|
|
|
2,538,765 |
|
|
$ |
32.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable
at end of period |
|
|
2,013,177 |
|
|
$ |
29.90 |
|
|
|
2,013,177 |
|
|
$ |
29.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option transactions for Teledynes non-employee director stock option plan for the third
quarter and nine months ended October 3, 2010 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Beginning balance |
|
|
438,644 |
|
|
$ |
28.38 |
|
|
|
418,817 |
|
|
$ |
26.66 |
|
Granted |
|
|
3,551 |
|
|
$ |
25.61 |
|
|
|
40,314 |
|
|
$ |
39.81 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
(14,936 |
) |
|
$ |
13.50 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
$ |
14.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
|
442,195 |
|
|
$ |
28.36 |
|
|
|
442,195 |
|
|
$ |
28.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable
at end of period |
|
|
400,683 |
|
|
$ |
27.03 |
|
|
|
400,683 |
|
|
$ |
27.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In February 2010, Teledyne issued 44,751 shares of common stock in connection with the second
installment of the 2006 to 2008 Performance Share Plan. Also in February 2010, the
restriction was removed for 31,305 shares of Teledyne common stock related to the 2007 to 2009
restricted stock performance period.
8
Note 6. Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid money-market mutual funds and bank deposits with
maturities of three months or less when purchased. Cash equivalents totaled $7.4 million at
October 3, 2010 and $11.2 million at January 3, 2010.
Note 7. Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, less progress payments. Inventories are
valued under the LIFO method, FIFO method and average cost method. Interim LIFO calculations
are based on the Companys estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and costs since an
actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of each year
based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Because these are subject to many
factors beyond the Companys control, interim results are subject to the final year-end LIFO
inventory valuation. Inventories consist of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
October 3, 2010 |
|
|
January 3, 2010 |
|
Raw materials and supplies |
|
$ |
103.1 |
|
|
$ |
107.5 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
116.7 |
|
|
|
100.4 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236.2 |
|
|
|
223.8 |
|
Progress payments |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
(8.9 |
) |
LIFO reserve |
|
|
(24.2 |
) |
|
|
(25.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories, net |
|
$ |
208.5 |
|
|
$ |
189.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories at cost determined on the LIFO method were $118.6 million at October 3, 2010 and
$117.3 million at January 3, 2010. The remainder of the inventories using average cost or the
FIFO methods, were $117.6 million at October 3, 2010 and $106.5 million at January 3, 2010.
Note 8. Supplemental Balance Sheet Information
Other long-term assets included amounts related to a deferred compensation plan of $29.4
million and $26.7 million at October 3, 2010 and January 3, 2010, respectively. Accrued
liabilities included salaries and wages and other related compensation liabilities of $75.7
million and $76.0 million at October 3, 2010 and January 3, 2010, respectively. Accrued
liabilities also included customer related deposits and credits of $29.4 million and $30.8
million at October 3, 2010 and January 3, 2010, respectively. Other long-term liabilities
included aircraft product liability reserves of $44.9 million and $42.4 million at October 3,
2010 and January 3, 2010, respectively. Other long-term liabilities also included amounts
related to a deferred compensation plan of $29.6 million and $26.7 million at October 3, 2010
and January 3, 2010, respectively, as well as reserves for workers compensation,
environmental liabilities and the long-term portion of compensation liabilities.
9
Some of the Companys products are subject to specified warranties and the Company provides for
the estimated cost of product warranties. The adequacy of the pre-existing warranty
liabilities is assessed regularly and the reserve is adjusted as necessary based on a review of
historic warranty experience with respect to the applicable business or products, as well as
the length and actual terms of the warranties, which are typically one year. The product
warranty reserve is included in current and long term accrued liabilities on the balance sheet.
Changes in the Companys product warranty reserve during the first nine months of 2010 and
2009 are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
15.9 |
|
|
$ |
14.0 |
|
Accruals for product warranties
charged to expense |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product warranty claims |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
15.6 |
|
|
$ |
14.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company establishes reserves for product returns and replacements on a
product-specific basis when circumstances giving rise to the return become known. Facts and
circumstances related to a return, including where the product affected by the return is
located (e.g., the end user, customers inventory, or in Teledynes inventory) and cost
estimates to return, repair and/or replace the product are considered when establishing a
product return reserve. The reserve is reevaluated each period and is adjusted when the
reserve is either not sufficient to cover or exceeds the estimated product return expenses.
Note 9. Income Taxes
The Companys effective income tax rate for the third quarter and first nine months of 2010 was
32.9% and 35.5%, respectively. The Companys effective income tax rate for the third quarter
and first nine months of 2009 was 17.3% and 31.3%, respectively. The third quarter and first
nine months of 2010 included tax credits of $2.9 million and $3.5 million, respectively.
Included in these amounts are credits related to a research and development income tax credit
of $2.9 million, recorded in the third quarter and tax credits of $0.6 million recorded in the
first half of 2010. Excluding these amounts, the effective income tax rate for the
third quarter and first nine months of 2010 would have been 39.3% and 38.2%, respectively. The
effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2009 reflected the impact of a research and
development income tax credit of $8.2 million recorded in the third quarter, the recognition of
$1.1 million of uncertain tax benefits recorded in the third quarter, and also reflects
additional income tax expense of $0.3 million primarily related to the impact of California
income tax law changes, which was recorded in the first quarter of 2009. Excluding these
amounts, the Companys effective tax rate for the third quarter and first nine months of 2009
would have been 39.1% and 38.8%, respectively.
Except for claims for refunds related to credits for research and development activities, the
Company has concluded all U.S. federal income tax matters for all years through 2006.
Substantially all other material state, local and foreign income tax matters have been
concluded for years through 2005. The Company believes appropriate provisions for all
outstanding issues have been made for all jurisdictions and all open years.
During the next twelve months, it is reasonably possible that tax audit resolutions and
expirations of the statute of limitations could reduce unrecognized tax benefits by $2.4
million, either because our tax positions are sustained on audit, because the Company agrees to
their disallowance, or the expiration of the statute of limitations.
10
Note 10. Long-Term Debt and Capital Leases
On September 15, 2010, the Company issued $250.0 million in aggregate principal amount of
private placement Senior Notes at par. The notes consist of $75.0 million of 4.04% Senior
Notes due September 15, 2015, $100.0 million of 4.74% Senior Notes due September 15, 2017 and
$75.0 million of 5.30% Senior Notes due September 15, 2020. The interest rates for the notes
were determined on April 14, 2010. The Company used the proceeds of the private placement
Senior Notes to pay down amounts outstanding under the Companys existing credit facility The
credit agreements requires the Company to comply with various financial and operating
covenants, including maintaining certain consolidated leverage and interest coverage ratios, as
well as minimum net worth levels and limits on acquired debt. At October 3, 2010, the Company
was in compliance with these covenants. At October 3, 2010, Teledyne had $250.0 million of
outstanding indebtedness under its Senior Notes.
At October 3, 2010, Teledyne had $1.0 million of outstanding indebtedness under its $590.0
million credit facility. Excluding interest and fees, no payments are due under the credit
facility until it matures in July 2011. Available capacity under the $590.0 million
credit facility was $586.9 million at October 3, 2010. The credit agreement requires the
Company to comply with various financial and operating covenants, including maintaining certain
consolidated leverage and interest coverage ratios, as well as minimum net worth levels and
limits on acquired debt. At October 3, 2010, the Company was in compliance with these
covenants. The maximum amount that could be borrowed under our credit facility as of October
3, 2010 while still remaining in compliance with our consolidated leverage ratio covenant was
$406.0 million. The Company also has a $11.5 million
uncommitted credit line of which $9.3
million is utilized for letters of credit and $2.2 million is available as of October 3, 2010.
This credit line is utilized, as needed, for periodic cash needs and letters of credit.
Total debt at October 3, 2010, includes $250.0 million in Senior Notes and $1.0 million
outstanding under the $590.0 million credit facility. The Company also has $18.1 million in
capital leases, of which $2.1 million is current. At October 3, 2010, Teledyne had $11.4
million in outstanding letters of credit.
In the first and second quarters of 2010, Teledyne entered into cash flow hedges of forecasted
interest payments associated with the then anticipated issuance of fixed rate debt. The
objective of these cash flow hedges was to protect against the risk of changes in the interest
payments attributable to changes in the designated benchmark, which is the LIBOR interest rate
leading up to the fixed rate on the issuance of fixed rate debt being locked. The notional
amount of the debt hedged was $150.0 million. In the second quarter, concurrent with the
interest rates being determined on the fixed rate debt, Teledyne terminated the cash flow
hedges for a total payment of $0.6 million. Since the cash flow hedges were considered
effective, changes in the fair value of the hedge contracts as of the termination date were
deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss. Remaining amounts deferred in accumulated
other comprehensive loss of $0.6 million, will be reclassified to interest expense over the
same period of time that interest expense is recognized on the borrowings beginning September
15, 2010.
Note 11. Lawsuits, Claims, Commitments, Contingencies and Related Matters
The Company is subject to federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations which
require that it investigate and remediate the effects of the release or disposal of materials
at sites associated with past and present operations, including sites at which the Company has
been identified as a potentially responsible party under the federal Superfund laws and
comparable state laws.
In accordance with the Companys accounting policy disclosed in Note 2 to the consolidated
financial statements in the 2009 Form 10-K, environmental liabilities are recorded when the
Companys liability is probable and the costs are reasonably estimable. In many cases,
however, investigations are not yet at a stage where the Company has been able to determine
whether it is liable or, if liability is probable, to reasonably estimate the loss or range of
loss, or certain components thereof. Estimates of the Companys liability are subject to
uncertainties as described in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2009 Form
10-K. As investigation and remediation of these sites proceeds, it is likely that adjustments
in the Companys accruals will be necessary to reflect new information. The amounts of any
such adjustments could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations in
a given period, but the amounts, and the
11
possible range of loss in excess of the amounts
accrued, are not reasonably estimable. Based on currently available information, management
does not believe that future environmental costs in excess of those accrued, with respect to
sites with which the Company has been identified, are likely to have a material adverse effect
on the Companys financial condition or results of operations. The Company cannot provide
assurance that additional future developments, administrative actions or liabilities relating
to environmental matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial
condition or results of operations.
At October 3, 2010, the Companys reserves for environmental remediation obligations totaled
$5.4 million, of which $0.3 million is included in current accrued liabilities. The Company
periodically evaluates whether it may be able to recover a portion of future costs for
environmental liabilities from its insurance carriers and from third parties. The timing of
expenditures depends on a number of factors that vary by site, including the nature and extent
of contamination, the number of potentially responsible parties, the timing of regulatory
approvals, the complexity of the investigation and remediation, and the standards for
remediation. The Company expects that it will expend present accruals over many years, and
will complete remediation of all sites with which it has been identified in up to 30 years.
Various claims (whether based on U.S. Government or Company audits and investigations or
otherwise) may be asserted against the Company related to its U.S. Government contract work,
including claims based on business practices and cost classifications and actions under the
False Claims Act. Although such claims are generally resolved by detailed fact-finding and
negotiation, on those occasions when they are not so resolved, civil or criminal legal or
administrative proceedings may ensue. Depending on the circumstances and the outcome, such
proceedings could result in fines, penalties, compensatory and treble damages or the
cancellation or suspension of payments under one or more U.S. Government
contracts. Under government regulations, a company, or one or more of its operating divisions
or units, can also be suspended or debarred from government contracts based on the results of
investigations. Although the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty,
management does not believe there is any audit, review or investigation currently pending
against the Company, of which management is aware, that is likely to result in suspension or
debarment of the Company, or that is otherwise likely to have a material adverse effect on the
Companys financial condition. The resolution in any reporting period of one or more of these
matters could, however, have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations
for that period.
A number of other lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been or may be asserted against the
Company, including those pertaining to product liability, patent infringement, commercial
contracts, employment and employee benefits. While the outcome of litigation cannot be
predicted with certainty, and some of these lawsuits, claims or proceedings may be determined
adversely to the Company, management does not believe that the disposition of any such pending
matters is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition. The
resolution in any reporting period of one or more of these matters could have a material
adverse effect on the Companys results of operations for that period. Teledyne has aircraft
and product liability insurance with an annual self-insured retention for general aviation
aircraft liabilities incurred in connection with products manufactured by Teledyne Continental
Motors of $5.0 million for its current aircraft product liability insurance policies which
expire on May 31, 2011. At October 3, 2010, the Companys reserves for aircraft product
liabilities totaled $44.9 million all of which is included in other long-term liabilities. The
reserve is developed based on several factors, including the number and nature of claims, the
level of annual self-insurance retentions, historic payments and consultations with our
insurers and outside counsel, all of which are used as a basis for estimating future losses.
Note 12. Pension Plans and Postretirement Benefits
Teledyne has a domestic defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all domestic
employees hired before January 1, 2004. The Companys assumed discount rate on plan
liabilities is 6.25% for both 2010 and 2009. The Companys assumed long-term rate of return on
plan assets is 8.25% for both 2010 and 2009.
Teledynes net periodic pension expense was $1.3 million and $3.9 million for third quarter and
first nine months of 2010, respectively, compared with net periodic pension expense of $5.7
million and $16.9 million for the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, respectively.
Pension expense allocated to contracts pursuant to U.S. Government Cost Accounting Standards
(CAS) was $2.4 million and $7.2 million for the third quarter and first nine months of 2010,
respectively, compared with $3.1 million and $9.3 million for the
12
third quarter and first nine
months of 2009, respectively. Pension expense determined under CAS can generally be recovered
through the pricing of products and services sold to the U.S. Government. The decrease in 2010
pension expense reflects higher investment returns in 2009 and the impact of pension
contributions made since 2007. The Company made a $37.0 million pretax voluntary contribution
to its pension plan in the third quarter of 2010, compared
with $80.0 million and $37.0 million of pretax voluntary contributions to its pension plan in
the first and third quarters of 2009, respectively.
The Company sponsors several postretirement defined benefit plans that provide health care and
life insurance benefits for certain eligible retirees.
The following tables set forth the components of net periodic pension benefit expense for
Teledynes domestic defined benefit pension plans and postretirement benefit plans for the
third quarter and first nine months of 2010 and 2009 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
Pension Benefits |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Service cost benefits earned during the period |
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
$ |
10.3 |
|
|
$ |
11.1 |
|
Interest cost on benefit obligation |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
30.5 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(14.4 |
) |
|
|
(12.1 |
) |
|
|
(43.0 |
) |
|
|
(36.4 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Recognized actuarial loss |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit expense |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
5.7 |
|
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
|
$ |
16.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
Postretirement Benefits |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Service cost benefits earned during the period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest cost on benefit obligation |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
Recognized actuarial gain |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit (income) expense |
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the acquisition of Intelek, the Company assumed responsibility for a defined
benefit pension plan based in the United Kingdom covering certain employees of Intelek. The
plan was closed to new members in January 2000 and ceased further service accruals to members
in September 2002. In the third quarter of 2010, the Company recorded $0.1 million in expense
related to the plan. The funding deficit for this plan, as of the acquisition date of July 26,
2010, was $9.4 million based on plan assets of $20.6 million and plan liabilities of $30.0
million.
Note 13. Industry Segments
Teledyne is a leading provider of sophisticated electronic components and subsystems,
instrumentation and communications products, engineered systems and information technology
services, general aviation engines and components, and energy generation, energy storage and
small propulsion products. Its customers include government agencies, aerospace prime
contractors, energy exploration and production companies, major industrial companies, and
airlines and general aviation companies.
Teledyne operates in four business segments: Electronics and Communications, Engineered
Systems, Aerospace Engines and Components and Energy and Power Systems. The factors for
determining the reportable segments were based on the distinct nature of their operations.
They are managed as separate business units because each requires and is responsible for
executing a unique business strategy.
Segment operating profit includes other income and expense directly related to the segment, but
excludes minority interest, interest income and expense, gains and losses on the disposition of
assets, sublease rental income and non-revenue licensing and royalty income, domestic and
foreign income taxes and corporate office expenses.
13
The following table presents Teledynes interim industry segment disclosures for net sales and
operating profit (loss) including other segment income. The table also provides a
reconciliation of segment operating profit (loss) and other segment income to total net income
attributable to common stockholders (amounts in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third |
|
|
Third |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine |
|
|
Nine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
% |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
Net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electronics and Communications |
|
$ |
325.2 |
|
|
$ |
295.2 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
% |
|
$ |
959.4 |
|
|
$ |
910.3 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
Engineered Systems |
|
|
66.9 |
|
|
|
82.0 |
|
|
|
(18.4 |
)% |
|
|
212.6 |
|
|
|
260.5 |
|
|
|
(18.4 |
)% |
Aerospace Engines and Components |
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
30.5 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
|
102.9 |
|
|
|
86.2 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
% |
Energy and Power Systems |
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
|
(18.4 |
)% |
|
|
50.7 |
|
|
|
53.8 |
|
|
|
(5.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
443.9 |
|
|
$ |
429.4 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
$ |
1,325.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,310.8 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss) and other segment
income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electronics and Communications |
|
$ |
43.3 |
|
|
$ |
39.7 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
$ |
125.0 |
|
|
$ |
117.9 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Engineered Systems |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
23.6 |
|
|
|
(5.9 |
)% |
Aerospace Engines and Components |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
(16.7 |
)% |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
Energy and Power Systems |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
(30.4 |
)% |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating profit and other
segment income |
|
|
53.4 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
152.8 |
|
|
|
141.7 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
% |
Corporate expense |
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
(20.3 |
) |
|
|
(19.0 |
) |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
27.3 |
% |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
(16.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
45.2 |
|
|
|
42.6 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
130.3 |
|
|
|
118.8 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
% |
Provision for income taxes (a) |
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
46.3 |
|
|
|
37.2 |
|
|
|
24.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before noncontrolling interest |
|
|
30.4 |
|
|
|
35.2 |
|
|
|
(13.6 |
)% |
|
|
84.0 |
|
|
|
81.6 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(80.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Teledyne Technologies |
|
$ |
30.3 |
|
|
$ |
35.1 |
|
|
|
(13.7 |
)% |
|
$ |
83.9 |
|
|
$ |
81.1 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The first nine months of 2010 includes tax credits of $2.9 million recorded in the
third quarter and tax credits of $0.6 million in the first half of 2010. The first nine
months of 2009 includes tax credits of $9.3 million recorded in the third quarter and
additional income tax expense of $0.3 million primarily related to the impact of California
income tax law changes recorded in the first quarter. |
|
* |
|
percentage change not meaningful |
14
Electronics and Communications
Through the first nine months of 2010, the Electronics and Communications segment represented
72.4% of total company sales. This business segment includes three business areas: Defense
Electronics; Electronic Instrumentation; and Other Commercial Electronics. The Defense
Electronics businesses provide a range of highly specialized electronic subsystems to our
government and other defense contractors. The Electronic Instrumentation businesses provide
products that power subsea oil production systems, help locate new energy reserves, report
subtle changes to the environment, and detect trace contaminant in air and water. Our Other
Commercial Electronics businesses provide aircraft information management solutions that are
designed to increase flight safety and efficiency of aircraft transportation, and also provide
precision electronics for other commercial markets. The table below provides a summary of the
segments sales by business area and the percentage that each contributed to the Electronics
and Communications segment total sales for the third quarter and first nine months of 2010 (in
millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter 2010 |
|
|
Nine Months 2010 |
|
Business Area |
|
Sales |
|
|
% |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
% |
|
Defense Electronics |
|
$ |
139.3 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
$ |
409.0 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
Electronic Instrumentation |
|
|
149.8 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
445.7 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
Other Commercial Electronics |
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
104.7 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Electronics and Communications segment |
|
$ |
325.2 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
959.4 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Strategy
Our strategy continues to emphasize growth in our core markets of instrumentation, defense
electronics and government engineered systems. Our core markets are characterized by high barriers
to entry and include specialized products and services not likely to be commoditized. We intend to
strengthen and expand our core businesses with targeted acquisitions. We intend to aggressively
pursue operational excellence to continually improve our margins and earnings. At Teledyne,
operational excellence includes the rapid integration of the businesses we acquire. Over time, our
goal is to create a set of businesses that are truly superior in their niches. We continue to
evaluate our product lines to ensure that they are aligned with our strategy.
Our Recent Acquisitions
The following summarizes the acquisitions made during 2010. Other than the purchase of the assets
of a marine sensor product line for $1.4 million and all of the remaining 14.1% minority interest
in Ocean Design, Inc., now known as Teledyne ODI, (ODI) for $25.5 million, no other acquisitions
were made in 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership |
|
Primary |
|
Pre-acquisition |
|
Transaction |
|
Purchase Price |
|
Name and Description(1) |
|
Date Acquired |
|
Purchased |
|
Location(s) |
|
Sales Volume |
|
Type |
|
(2)(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions) |
|
Fiscal Year 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Optimum Optical Systems, Inc (Optimum) |
|
June 7, 2010 |
|
100.0% |
|
Camarillo, CA |
|
$5.9 million for the |
|
Stock |
|
$ 5.7 |
|
Designs and manufacturers custom |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fiscal year ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
optics and optomechanical assemblies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intelek plc (Intelek) |
|
July 26, 2010 |
|
100.0% |
|
United Kingdom and |
|
£38 million for the |
|
Stock |
|
$42.6 |
|
Designs and manufactures electronic |
|
|
|
|
|
State College, PA |
|
fiscal year ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
systems for satellite and microw ave |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
communication and aerostructure
manufacturing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hafmynd ehf., now know as Gavia elf. (Gavia) |
|
September 20, 2010 |
|
100.0% |
|
Reykjavik, Iceland |
|
532.4 million |
|
Stock |
|
$10.1 |
|
Designs and manufactures the Gavia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Icelandic króna for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
autonomous
under water vehicle (AUV) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the fiscal year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1) |
|
Each of the acquisitions is part of the Electronics and Communications segment, except for
the CML division of Intelek which is part of the Engineered Systems segment. |
|
2) |
|
The purchase price represents the contractual consideration for the acquired business, net
of cash acquired, including certain acquisition transaction costs, paid as of October 3,
2010. |
|
3) |
|
On March 2, 2010, we acquired a 17% interest in Optical Alchemy, Inc., a designer and
manufacturer of ultra-light electro optical gimbal system for $4.6 million. Also in 2010,
we made scheduled payments for a prior acquisition of $0.3 million. In 2009, we paid $0.3
million related to a prior acquisition and received a purchase price adjustment of $0.3
million for a prior acquisition. |
In June 2010, Teledyne acquired an initial 16% minority interest in Intelek. In July 2010,
Teledyne acquired the remaining interest in Intelek. Intelek has locations in the United Kingdom
and State College, Pennsylvania. Through its Paradise Datacom division, Intelek designs and
manufactures satellite modems, transceivers, block up-converters, solid state power amplifiers, low
noise amplifiers and associated equipment for the terrestrial segment of the satellite
communications market. Inteleks Labtech division is a manufacturer of microwave circuits and
components primarily for the defense electronics, global telecommunications, space and satellite
communications markets. Inteleks CML division manufactures precision machined and
composite aerostructures for military and commercial aircraft. The three divisions have changes
their names to Teledyne Paradise Datacom, Teledyne Labtech and Teledyne CML Group. The Teledyne
Paradise Datacom and Teledyne Labtech divisions are part of the Electronics and Communications
segment and the Teledyne CML division is part of the Engineered Systems segment.
Teledyne funded the acquisitions primarily from borrowings and cash on hand.
16
Results of Operations
Third quarter of 2010 compared with the third quarter of 2009
Our third quarter 2010 sales were $443.9 million, compared with sales of $429.4 million for
the same period of 2009, an increase of 3.4%. Net income attributable to common stockholders for
the third quarter of 2010 was $30.3 million ($0.82 per diluted share) compared with net income
attributable to common stockholders of $35.1 million ($0.96 per diluted share) for the third
quarter of 2009, a decrease of 13.7%.
The third quarter of 2010, compared with the same period in 2009, reflected higher sales in the
Electronics and Communication segment and the Aerospace Engines and Components segment. The
increase in the Electronics and Communication segment reflected higher sales of marine and
environmental instrumentation products, as well as, the contribution from recent acquisitions. The
increase in the Aerospace Engines and Components segment reflected higher sales of engines for new
OEM aircraft. The decrease in the Engineered Systems segment reflected lower sales of missile
defense programs, primarily the Ground-based Midcourse Defense engineering services as well as gas
centrifuge service modules, partially offset by the contribution from the acquisition of the CML
division of Intelek. We continue to anticipate reduced sales of gas centrifuge service modules and
missile defense engineering services in 2010 due to program funding. In addition, we anticipate
reduced sales to NASA in 2010 due to government funding reductions in certain programs. The
decrease in the Energy and Power Systems segment primarily reflected lower sales related to the
Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM) turbine engine program, partially offset by higher
battery product sales. Incremental revenue in the third quarter of 2010 from the business acquired
in 2010 was $11.3 million.
The decrease in net income for the third quarter of 2010, compared with the same period of 2009,
reflected improved operating profit in the Electronics and Communications segment and the
Engineered Systems segment. Operating profit reflected lower pension expense and the impact of
cost reductions, partially offset by charges of $3.0 million, related to acquisition activity. The
third quarters of 2010 and 2009, included net tax credits of $2.9 million and $9.3 million,
respectively. The incremental operating loss included in the results for the third quarter of
2010 from businesses acquired in 2010 was $3.5 million and included charges of $3.0 million,
related to acquisition activity, as well as, intangible asset amortization.
The third quarter of 2010 included pension expense of $1.3 million, compared with pension expense
of $5.7 million in the third quarter of 2009. Pension expense allocated to contracts pursuant to
U.S. Government Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) was $2.4 million in the third quarter of 2010,
compared with pension expense of $3.1 million in the third quarter of 2009. The decrease in 2010
pension expense reflects higher investment returns in 2009 and the impact of pension contributions
made since 2007. In addition to the above amounts, the Company recorded $0.1 million in pension
expense for 2010 related to the Intelek pension plan.
Stock option compensation expense was $1.2 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared with $1.3
million for the third quarter of 2009.
Cost of sales in total dollars was slightly higher in the third quarter of 2010, compared with the
third quarter of 2009. Cost of sales as a percentage of sales for the third quarter of 2010
decreased to 69.3% from 70.8% for the third quarter of 2009 and reflected the impact of cost
reductions, product mix and lower pension expense.
Selling, general and administrative expenses, including research and development and bid and
proposal expense, in total dollars were higher in the third quarter of 2010, compared with the
third quarter of 2009, and primarily reflected higher general and administrative expenses. The
increase in general and administrative expenses reflected acquisition related expenses, as well as,
intangible asset amortization for recent acquisitions. Selling, general and administrative
expenses for the third quarter of 2010, as a percentage of sales, increased to 20.1%, compared with
19.0% in the third quarter of 2009, and reflected the impact of higher general and administrative
expenses as noted earlier.
Interest expense, net of interest income, was $1.4 million in the third quarter of 2010, compared
with $1.1 million for the third quarter of 2009. The increase in net interest expense primarily
reflected the impact of higher outstanding debt levels. Interest expense is expected to be higher
in the fourth quarter of 2010 and total year 2011 relative to prior period amounts due to the fixed
interest rate on the $250.0 million Senior Notes issued in September 2010.
The Companys effective income tax rate for the third quarter of 2010 was 32.9% compared with 17.3%
for the third quarter of 2009. The third quarters of 2010 and 2009 included tax credits of $2.9
million and $9.3 million,
17
respectively. Excluding the tax credits, the effective tax rates for the
third quarter of 2010 and 2009, would have been 39.3% and 39.1%, respectively. The third quarter
of 2010 included tax credits of $2.9 million related to a research and development tax credit. The
effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2009 reflected the impact of a research and development
income tax credit of $8.2 million and the recognition of $1.1 million in uncertain tax benefits.
Noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries earnings in 2010 and 2009 reflected the minority ownership
interest in Teledyne Energy Systems, Inc.
First nine months of 2010 compared with the first nine months of 2009
Teledynes sales for the first nine months of 2010 were $1,325.6 million, compared with sales
of $1,310.8 million for the same period of 2009, an increase of 1.1%. Net income attributable to
common stockholders for the first nine months of 2010 was $83.9 million ($2.28 per diluted share)
compared with net income attributable to common stockholders of $81.1 million ($2.22 per diluted
share) for the first nine months of 2009, an increase of 3.5%.
The first nine months of 2010, compared with the same period in 2009, reflected higher sales in the
Electronics and Communication segment and the Aerospace Engines and Components segment. The
increase in the Electronics and Communication segment reflected higher sales of marine and
environmental instrumentation products, as well as, the contribution from recent acquisitions. The
increase in the Aerospace Engines and Components segment reflected higher sales of engines for new
OEM aircraft, well as increased sales of aftermarket engines and spare parts. The decrease in the
Engineered Systems segment reflected lower sales of missile defense programs, primarily the
Ground-based Midcourse Defense engineering services as well as gas centrifuge service modules,
partially offset by the contribution from the acquisition of the CML division of Intelek. The
decrease in the Energy and Power Systems segment primarily reflected lower sales related to the
JASSM turbine engine program, partially offset by higher battery product sales. Incremental
revenue in the first nine months of 2010 from the business acquired in 2010 was $11.7 million.
The increase in net income for the first nine months of 2010, compared with the same period of
2009, reflected improved operating profit in each operating segment except the Engineered Systems
segment. Operating profit reflected lower pension expense and the impact of cost reductions,
partially offset by charges of $3.0 million, related to acquisition activity and by second quarter
charges of $8.2 million, primarily to correct inventory valuations incorrectly recorded in previous
periods at a business unit. The first nine months of 2010 and 2009 included net tax credits of
$3.5 million and $9.0 million, respectively. The incremental operating loss included in the
results for the first nine months of 2010 from businesses acquired in 2010 was $3.4 million and
included charges of $3.0 million, related to acquisition activity, as well as, intangible asset
amortization.
The first nine months of 2010 included pension expense of $3.9 million, compared with pension
expense of $16.9 million in the first nine months of 2009. The decrease in 2010 pension expense
reflects higher investment returns in 2009 and the impact of pension contributions made in since
2007. Pension expense allocated to contracts pursuant to CAS was $7.2 million in the first nine
months of 2010, compared with pension expense of $9.3 million in the first nine months of 2009. In
addition to the above amounts, the Company recorded $0.1 million in pension expense for 2010
related to the Intelek pension plan.
For the first nine months of 2010 and 2009, included stock option compensation expense of $3.7
million and $4.1 million, respectively.
Cost of sales in total dollars was lower in the first nine months of 2010, compared with the first
nine months of 2009, and reflected the impact of lower pension expense and cost reductions. Cost
of sales as a percentage of sales for the first nine months of 2010 decreased to 70.1% from 71.1%
for the first nine months of 2009 and reflected the impact of cost reductions, product mix and
lower pension expense, partially offset by the impact of the inventory write-down.
Selling, general and administrative expenses, including research and development and bid and
proposal expense, in total dollars were higher in the first nine months of 2010, compared with the
first nine months of 2009 and reflected higher general and administrative expense. The higher
general and administrative expense included acquisition related expenses, as well as, intangible
asset amortization for recent acquisitions. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the
first nine months of 2010, as a percentage of sales, increased to 19.9% from 19.6% in 2009, and
reflected higher general and administrative expense as noted earlier.
18
Interest expense, net of interest income, was $3.1 million in the first nine months of 2010,
compared with $3.7 million for the first nine months of 2009. The decrease in net interest expense
primarily reflected the impact of lower outstanding debt levels. Other income in 2010 includes an
insurance benefit of $0.7 million.
The Companys effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2010 was 35.5% compared with 31.3%
for the first nine months of 2009. The first nine months of 2010 and 2009 included tax credits of
$3.5 million and $9.0 million, respectively. Excluding the tax credits, the effective tax rates
for the first nine months of 2010 and 2009, would have been 38.2% and 38.8%, respectively. The
first nine months of 2010 included credits related to a research and development tax credit of $2.9
million and other tax credits of $0.6 million. The first nine months of 2009 reflected the impact
of a research and development income tax credit of $8.2 million, the recognition of $1.1 million
in uncertain tax benefits, and also reflects additional
income tax expense of $0.3 million primarily related to the impact of California income tax law
changes
Noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries earnings in 2009 reflects the minority ownership interest
in Ocean Design, Inc., now known as Teledyne ODI, (ODI) and Teledyne Energy Systems, Inc.
Review of Operations:
The following table sets forth the sales and operating profit (loss) for each segment (amounts in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third |
|
|
Third |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine |
|
|
Nine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
% |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
Net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electronics and Communications |
|
$ |
325.2 |
|
|
$ |
295.2 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
% |
|
$ |
959.4 |
|
|
$ |
910.3 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
Engineered Systems |
|
|
66.9 |
|
|
|
82.0 |
|
|
|
(18.4 |
)% |
|
|
212.6 |
|
|
|
260.5 |
|
|
|
(18.4 |
)% |
Aerospace Engines and Components |
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
30.5 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
|
102.9 |
|
|
|
86.2 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
% |
Energy and Power Systems |
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
|
(18.4 |
)% |
|
|
50.7 |
|
|
|
53.8 |
|
|
|
(5.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
443.9 |
|
|
$ |
429.4 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
$ |
1,325.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,310.8 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss) and other segment
income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electronics and Communications |
|
$ |
43.3 |
|
|
$ |
39.7 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
$ |
125.0 |
|
|
$ |
117.9 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Engineered Systems |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
23.6 |
|
|
|
(5.9 |
)% |
Aerospace Engines and Components |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
(16.7 |
)% |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
Energy and Power Systems |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
(30.4 |
)% |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
operating profit and other segment income |
|
|
53.4 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
152.8 |
|
|
|
141.7 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
% |
Corporate expense |
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
(20.3 |
) |
|
|
(19.0 |
) |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
27.3 |
% |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
(16.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
45.2 |
|
|
|
42.6 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
130.3 |
|
|
|
118.8 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
% |
Provision for income taxes (a) |
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
46.3 |
|
|
|
37.2 |
|
|
|
24.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before noncontrolling interest |
|
|
30.4 |
|
|
|
35.2 |
|
|
|
(13.6 |
)% |
|
|
84.0 |
|
|
|
81.6 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
Less: net income attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(80.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Teledyne
Technologies |
|
$ |
30.3 |
|
|
$ |
35.1 |
|
|
|
(13.7 |
)% |
|
$ |
83.9 |
|
|
$ |
81.1 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The first nine months of 2010 includes tax credits of $2.9 million recorded in the third
quarter and tax credits of $0.6 million in the first half of 2010. The first nine months of
2009 includes tax credits of $9.3 million recorded in the third quarter and additional
income tax expense of $0.3 million primarily related to the impact of California income tax
law changes recorded in the first quarter. |
|
* |
|
percentage change not meaningful |
19
Electronics and Communications
Third quarter of 2010 compared with the third quarter of 2009
Our Electronics and Communications segments third quarter 2010 sales were $325.2 million,
compared with $295.2 million for the third quarter of 2009, an increase of 10.2%. Third quarter
2010 operating profit was $43.3 million, compared with operating profit of $39.7 million for the
third quarter of 2009, an increase of 9.1%.
The third quarter 2010 sales change resulted primarily from higher sales of electronic
instrumentation and defense electronics. Revenue growth of $21.8 million in electronic
instrumentation primarily reflected higher sales of marine and environmental instrumentation
products. Sales of defense electronics increased by $7.5 million and included $8.5 million in
sales from recent acquisitions. Sales growth of $0.7 million in other commercial electronics
primarily reflected higher sales for relay products, partially offset by reduced sales from product
lines which the company is exiting, such as commercial electronic manufacturing services and
telecommunication subsystems. The increase in operating profit reflected the impact of higher
sales, cost reductions, lower pension expense and product mix, partially offset by acquisition
related charges of $3.0 million. The incremental operating loss included in the results for the
third quarter of 2010 from businesses acquired in 2010 was $3.4 million and included charges of
$3.0 million, related to acquisition activity, as well as, intangible asset amortization.
Operating profit included pension expense of $0.8 million in the third quarter of 2010, compared
with $2.3 million for the third quarter of 2009. Pension expense allocated to contracts pursuant
to CAS was $0.6 million for both the third quarter of 2010 and 2009.
First nine months of 2010 compared with the first nine months of 2009
Our Electronics and Communications segments first nine months 2010 sales were $959.4 million,
compared with first nine months 2009 sales of $910.3 million, an increase of 5.4%. First nine
months 2010 operating profit was $125.0 million, compared with operating profit of $117.9 million
in the first nine months of 2009, an increase of 6.0%.
The first nine months 2010 sales improvement resulted from revenue growth in defense electronics
and electronic instruments, partially offset by lower sales of other commercial electronics.
Revenue growth of $36.5 million in electronic instrumentation primarily reflected higher sales of
marine and environmental instrumentation products. Revenue growth of $19.2 million in defense
electronics primarily reflected higher sales of manufacturing services, microwave subsystems and
also included $8.9 million in sales from recent acquisitions. Lower sales of $6.6 million in other
commercial electronics primarily reflected reduced sales from product lines which the company is
exiting, such as commercial electronic manufacturing services and telecommunication subsystems
partially offset by higher sales for relay products. The increase in operating profit reflected
the impact of higher sales, cost reductions, lower pension expense and product mix, partially
offset by charges of $8.2 million, primarily to correct inventory valuations incorrectly recorded
in previous periods at a business unit and acquisition related charges of $3.0 million. The
incremental operating loss included in the results for the first nine months of 2010 from
businesses acquired in 2010 was $3.3 million and included charges of $3.0 million, related to
acquisition activity, as well as, intangible asset amortization. Operating profit included pension
expense of $2.3 million in the first nine months of 2010, compared with $7.1 million for the first
nine months of 2009. Pension
expense allocated to contracts pursuant to CAS was $1.9 million in the first nine months of 2010,
compared with $1.8 million for the first nine months of 2009.
Engineered Systems
Third quarter of 2010 compared with the third quarter of 2009
Our Engineered Systems segments third quarter 2010 sales were $66.9 million, compared with
$82.0 million for the third quarter of 2009, a decrease of 18.4%. The third quarter 2010 operating
profit was $7.5 million, compared with operating profit of $6.8 million for the third quarter of
2009, an increase of 10.3%.
The third quarter 2010 sales decrease primarily reflected lower sales of missile defense programs,
primarily the Ground-based Midcourse Defense engineering services as well as gas centrifuge service
modules, partially offset by $2.8 million in sales from the acquisition of the CML division of
Intelek. The higher operating profit in the third quarter of 2010 reflected lower pension expense
partially offset by the impact of lower sales. Operating profit included pension expense of $0.4
million in the third quarter of 2010, compared with $2.8 million in the third quarter of 2009.
Pension expense allocated to contracts pursuant to CAS was $1.7 million in the third quarter of
2010, compared with $2.4 million in the third quarter of 2009.
20
Our Engineered Systems segment manufactures gas centrifuge service modules for Fluor Enterprises,
Inc., acting as agent for USEC Inc., used in the American Centrifuge Plant. We continue to
anticipate reduced sales of gas centrifuge service modules in 2010 due to a suspension of work
notice received on August 13, 2009, caused by the U.S. Department of Energys delayed decision
regarding USECs application for a loan guarantee to complete construction of the American
Centrifuge Plant. In May 2010, USEC announced that Toshiba and Babcock and Wilcox signed
definitive agreements to provide co-investments of $100 million each in the American Centrifuge
Plant payable in three installments. In late July 2010, USEC updated its application to the
Department of Energy, which triggered the initial investment of $75.0 million from Toshiba and
Babcock and Wilcox. In anticipation of a favorable adjudication of its loan application and in
light of the investment from the new partners, USEC began remobilization of the project in early
September 2010. As a consequence, we anticipate additional sales in the fourth quarter of this
year. Should the loan guarantee be ultimately approved, this could result in additional revenue in
2011. In addition, given reduced program funding, as well as changes to contracting policy by the
U.S. Government relating to organizational conflicts of interest, we expect reduced sales of
missile defense engineering services in 2010. Finally, we anticipate reduced sales to NASA in the
fourth quarter of 2010 due to government funding reductions in certain programs.
First nine months of 2010 compared with the first nine months of 2009
Our Engineered Systems segments first nine months 2010 sales were $212.6 million, compared
with first nine months 2009 sales of $260.5 million, a decrease of 18.4%. First nine months 2010
operating profit was $22.2 million, compared with operating profit of $23.6 million for the first
nine months of 2009, a decrease of 5.9%.
The first nine months 2010 sales reflected lower sales of missile defense programs, primarily the
Ground-based Midcourse Defense engineering services as well as gas centrifuge service modules,
partially offset by $2.8 million in sales from the acquisition of the CML division of Intelek.
Operating profit in the first nine months of 2010 primarily reflected the impact of lower sales, partially
offset by lower pension expense. Operating profit included pension expense of $1.2 million in the
first nine months of 2010, compared with $8.3 million in the first nine months of 2009. Pension
expense allocated to contracts pursuant to CAS was $5.1 million in the first nine months of 2010
and $7.3 million for the first nine months of 2009.
Aerospace Engines and Components
Third quarter of 2010 compared with the third quarter of 2009
Our Aerospace Engines and Components segments third quarter 2010 sales were $34.1 million,
compared with $30.5 million for the third quarter of 2009, an increase of 11.8%. The third quarter
2010 operating profit was $1.0 million, compared with operating profit of $1.2 million for the
third quarter of 2009, a decrease of 16.7%.
Third quarter 2010 sales reflected higher sales of engines for new OEM aircraft due to improved
demand in the general aviation market relative to 2009. Operating profit in 2010 included higher
LIFO income of $0.9 million. Operating profit in 2009 included $1.3 million from the reduction in
certain insurance reserves.
First nine months of 2010 compared with the first nine months of 2009
Our Aerospace Engines and Components segments first nine months 2010 sales were $102.9
million, compared with first nine months 2009 sales of $86.2 million, an increase of 19.4%. The
first nine months 2010 operating profit was $2.6 million, compared with an operating loss of $2.4
million in the first nine months of 2009.
The increase in revenue reflected higher sales of engines for new OEM aircraft, as well as
increased sales of aftermarket engines and spare parts due to improved demand in the general
aviation market relative to 2009. Operating profit in 2010 reflected the impact of higher sales
and included the reversal of $1.3 million of product recall and replacement reserves that were no
longer needed as the programs neared completion as well as higher LIFO income of $0.9 million.
Operating profit in 2009 included a $0.3 million charge related to past due accounts receivable, a
favorable workers compensation settlement of $0.9 million and a $1.3 million reduction in certain
insurance reserves.
21
Energy and Power Systems
Third quarter of 2010 compared with the third quarter of 2009
Our Energy and Power Systems segments third quarter 2010 sales were $17.7 million, compared
with $21.7 million for the third quarter of 2009, a decrease of 18.4%. Operating profit was $1.6
million for the third quarter 2010, compared with operating profit of $2.3 million for the third
quarter of 2009, a decrease of 30.4%.
Third quarter 2010 primarily reflected lower sales related to the JASSM turbine engine program,
partially offset by higher battery product sales. Operating profit reflected the impact of lower
sales and higher LIFO expense of $0.3 million.
First nine months of 2010 compared with the first nine months of 2009
Our Energy and Power Systems segments first nine months 2010 sales were $50.7 million, compared
with $53.8 million for the first nine months of 2009, a decrease of 5.8%. Operating profit was
$3.0 million for the first nine months of 2010, compared with $2.6 million for the first nine
months of 2009, an increase of 15.4%.
The first nine months 2010 sales primarily reflected lower sales related to the JASSM turbine
engine program, partially offset by higher sales of commercial hydrogen generators and power
systems for government applications as well as higher battery product sales. Operating profit
reflected the impact of lower sales and higher LIFO expense of $0.9 million. Operating profit in
2009 reflected a $1.2 million product replacement reserve for commercial energy systems.
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our net cash provided by operating activities was $73.8 million for the first nine months of 2010,
compared with $75.1 million for the same period of 2009. The Company made a $37.0 million
voluntary pretax pension contribution in the first nine months of 2010, compared with a $117.0
million voluntary pretax pension contributions in the first nine months of 2009. The 2010 amount
also reflected tax payments of $35.7 million compared with net tax refunds of $5.4 million in 2009.
Cash provided by operating activities in the first nine months of 2010, compared with the first
nine months of 2009, also reflected higher working capital requirements, which primarily reflected
higher deferred accounts receivable in 2010 and the early collection of accounts receivable in the
fourth quarter of 2009.
Our net cash used by investing activities was $80.6 million for the first nine months of 2010,
compared with net cash used by investing activities of $53.6 million for the first nine months of
2009. The 2010 amount included $63.3 million for acquisitions, compared with $26.9 million for
2009.
We funded the purchases primarily from borrowings and cash on hand.
Capital expenditures for the first nine months of 2010 and 2009 were $17.4 million and $26.8
million, respectively.
Our goodwill was $547.5 million at October 3, 2010 and $502.4 million at January 3, 2010. The
increase in the balance of goodwill in 2010 primarily resulted from goodwill from recent
acquisitions. Our net acquired intangible assets were $119.9 million at October 3, 2010 and $109.6
million at January 3, 2010. The increase in the balance of acquired intangible assets in 2010
resulted from recent acquisitions, partially offset by amortization.
Financing activities provided cash of $7.8 million for the first nine months of 2010, compared with
cash used by financing activities of $20.3 million for the first nine months of 2009. Cash
provided by financing activities for the first nine months of 2010 included net borrowings of $5.2
million. Cash used by financing activities for the first nine months of 2009 included net
repayments of debt of $20.3 million. Proceeds from the exercise of stock options were $2.3 million
and $0.5 million for the first nine months of 2010 and 2009, respectively. The first nine months
of 2010 and 2009 included $0.9 million and $0.3 million in excess tax benefits related to
stock-based compensation, respectively. In 2009, Teledyne paid $0.8 million to repurchase 36,239
shares of Teledyne common stock under a now expired stock repurchase program.
Working capital was $268.5 million at October 3, 2010, compared with $250.6 million at January 3,
2010. The higher amount at October 3, 2010 primarily reflects working capital from recent
acquisitions and higher trade receivables.
The Company made a scheduled $37.0 million voluntary pretax pension contribution in the first nine
months of 2010, compared with $117.0 million in voluntary pretax pension contributions in the first
nine months of 2009.
22
Our principal cash and capital requirements are to fund working capital
needs, capital expenditures, pension contributions and debt service requirements, as well as
acquisitions. It is anticipated that operating cash flow, together with available borrowings under
the credit facility described below, will be sufficient to meet these requirements over the next
twelve months, however, to support acquisitions, we may need to raise additional capital. As of
October 3, 2010, we do not believe our ability to undertake additional debt financing, if needed,
is reasonably likely to be materially impacted by debt restrictions under our credit agreements
subject to our complying with required financial covenants listed in the table below. We currently
expect capital expenditures to be approximately $30.0 million in 2010, of which $17.4 million has
been spent in the first nine months of 2010.
Our credit facility has lender commitments totaling $590.0 million and expires on July 14, 2011.
Excluding interest and fees, no payments are due under the credit facility until it matures. On
September 15, 2010 the Company issued $250.0 million in aggregate principal amount of private
placement Senior Notes at par. The notes consist of $75.0 million of 4.04% Senior Notes due
September 15, 2015, $100.0 million of 4.74% Senior Notes due September 15, 2017 and $75.0 million
of 5.30% Senior Notes due September 15, 2020. The interest rates for the notes were determined on
April 14, 2010. The Company used the proceeds of the private placement Senior Notes to pay down
amounts outstanding under the Companys existing credit facility. The credit agreements requires
the Company to comply with various financial and operating covenants, including maintaining certain
consolidated leverage and interest coverage ratios, as well as minimum net worth levels and limits
on acquired debt. At October 3, 2010, the Company was in compliance with these covenants. As of
October 3, 2010 the Company had a significant amount of margin between required financial covenant
ratios and our actual ratios. At October 3, 2010 the required financial covenant ratios and the
actual ratios were as follows:
$590M Credit Facility expires July 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Covenant |
|
Required Covenant |
|
Actual Covenant |
Consolidated Net Worth (1)
|
|
No less than $459.5M
|
|
$759.4M |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Leverage Ratio (Debt/EBITDA) (2)
|
|
No more than 3.0 to 1
|
|
1.2 to 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio(EBIT/Interest) (3)
|
|
No less than 3.0 to 1
|
|
40.4 to 1 |
$250M Private Placement Notes due 2015, 2017 and 2020
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Covenant |
|
Required Covenant |
|
Actual Covenant |
Consolidated Leverage Ratio (Net Debt/EBITDA) (4)
|
|
No more than 3.25 to 1
|
|
1.2 to 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio(EBITDA/Interest) (5)
|
|
No less than 3.0 to 1
|
|
51.4 to 1 |
|
|
|
1) |
|
The Actual Covenant is equal to the Consolidated Stockholders Equity for the Quarter
Ended. The Required Covenant is equal to $240 million plus 50% of Cumulative Consolidated
Net Income as defined in our credit agreement for each quarter ending after April 2, 2006
plus 75% of the amount of Equity Issuances after the Closing Date as defined in our credit
agreement. |
|
2) |
|
The Consolidated Leverage Ratio is equal to Debt/Earnings before Interest Taxes and
Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) as defined in our credit agreement. |
|
3) |
|
The Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio is equal to Earnings before Interest Taxes
(EBIT)/Interest as defined in our credit agreement. |
|
4) |
|
The Consolidated Leverage Ratio is equal to Net Debt/EBITDA as defined in our private
placement note purchase agreement. |
|
5) |
|
The Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio is equal to EBITDA/Interest as defined in our
private placement note purchase agreement. |
Available capacity under the $590.0 million credit facility was $586.9 million at October 3,
2010. The maximum amount that could be borrowed under our credit facility as of October 3, 2010
while still remaining in compliance with our consolidated leverage ratio covenant was $406.0
million. The Company is planning to refinance the $590.0 million credit facility prior to its
scheduled maturity.
In the first and second quarters of 2010, Teledyne entered into cash flow hedges of forecasted
interest payments associated with the then anticipated issuance of fixed rate debt. The objective
of these cash flow hedges was to protect against the risk of changes in the interest payments
attributable to changes in the designated benchmark,
23
which is the LIBOR interest rate leading up to
the fixed rate on the anticipated issuance of fixed rate debt being locked. The notional amount of
the debt hedged was $150.0 million. In the second quarter, concurrent with the interest rates
being determined on the fixed rate debt, Teledyne terminated the cash flow hedges for a total
payment of $0.6 million. Since the cash flow hedges were considered effective, changes in the fair
value of the hedge contract as of the termination date were deferred in accumulated other
comprehensive loss. Amounts deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss will be reclassified
to interest expense over the same period of time that interest expense is recognized on the
borrowings beginning September 15, 2010. As of October 3, 2010, the remaining unamortized loss of
$0.6 million was included in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the stockholders equity
section of the balance sheet.
Our liquidity is not dependent upon the use of off-balance sheet financial arrangements. We have
no off-balance sheet financing arrangements that incorporate the use of special purpose entities or
unconsolidated entities.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our critical accounting policies are those that are reflective of significant judgments and
uncertainties, and may potentially result in materially different results under different
assumptions and conditions. Our critical accounting policies are the following: revenue
recognition; aircraft product liability reserve; accounting for pension plans; accounting for
business combinations, goodwill and other long-lived assets; and accounting for income taxes. For
additional discussion of the application of these and other accounting policies, see Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Critical Accounting
Policies and Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Teledyne
Technologies Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2010 (2009 Form
10-K).
Safe Harbor Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
From time to time we make, and this report contains, forward looking statements, as defined in the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, relating to earnings, growth opportunities,
product sales, pension matters, stock option compensation expense, interest expense, credit
facility renewal, taxes, American Centrifuge Plant remobilization, and strategic plans. All
statements made in this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations that are not historical in nature should be considered forward-looking. Actual results
could differ materially from these forward-looking statements. Many factors could change the
anticipated results: including continuing disruptions in the global economy; insurance and credit
markets; changes in demand for products sold to the defense electronics, instrumentation and energy
exploration and production, commercial aviation, semiconductor and communications markets; funding,
continuation and award of government programs; continued liquidity of our suppliers and customers
(including commercial aviation customers); availability of credit to our suppliers and customers;
and a potential decrease in offshore oil production and exploration activity due to the April 2010
oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Increasing fuel costs could negatively affect the markets of our
commercial aviation businesses. Lower oil and natural gas prices could negatively affect our
business units that supply the oil and gas industry. In addition, financial market fluctuations
affect the value of our pension assets.
Global responses to terrorism and other perceived threats increase uncertainties associated with
forward-looking statements about our businesses. Various responses to terrorism and perceived
threats could realign government programs, and affect the composition, funding or timing of our
programs. Changes in the policies of U.S. and foreign governments could result, over time, in
reductions and realignment in defense or other government spending and further changes in programs
in which the Company participates including anticipated reductions in the Companys missile defense
engineering services, as well as certain NASA programs.
We continue to take action to assure compliance with the internal controls, disclosure controls and
other requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. While we believe our control systems are
effective, there are inherent limitations in all control systems, and misstatements due to error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.
While our growth strategy includes possible acquisitions, we cannot provide any assurance as to
when, if or on what terms any acquisitions will be made. Acquisitions involve various inherent
risks, such as, among others, our ability to integrate acquired businesses and retain customers and
to achieve identified financial and operating synergies. There are additional risks associated with
acquiring, owning and operating businesses outside of the United States, including those arising
from U.S. and foreign government policy changes or actions and exchange rate fluctuations.
24
Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from
those projected in the forward-looking statements is contained in Teledyne Technologies periodic
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its 2009 Form 10-K and this Form
10-Q. We assume no duty to update forward-looking statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There were no material changes to the information provided under Item 7A, Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk included in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Interest Rate Exposure
We are exposed to market risk through the interest rate on our borrowings under our amended
and restated credit facility. Borrowings under our credit facility are at variable rates which are
at our option tied to a eurodollar base rate equal to LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) plus an
applicable rate or a base rate as defined in our credit agreement. LIBOR based loans under the
facility typically have terms of one, two, three or six months and the interest rate for each such
loan is subject to change if the loan is continued or converted following the applicable maturity
date. Base rate loans have interest rates that primarily fluctuate with changes in the prime rate.
Interest rates are also subject to change based on our debt to earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) ratio. As of October 3, 2010, we had $1.0 million in
outstanding indebtedness under our amended and restated credit facility. Our interest rate
exposure at this debt level is not material.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, are
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and
forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission and to provide reasonable assurance that
information required to be disclosed by us in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the
Companys management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer and our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, with the
participation and assistance of other members of management, have reviewed the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures and have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of October 3, 2010, are effective at the reasonable assurance level.
In connection with our evaluation during the quarterly period ended October 3, 2010, we have made
no change in our internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected or are
reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.
25
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There are no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our 2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K in response to Item 1A to Part 1 of Form 10-K, except as disclosed in Item 3 Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk under Interest Rate Exposure.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
(a) |
|
Exhibits |
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.1 302 Certification Robert Mehrabian |
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.2 302 Certification Dale A. Schnittjer |
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.1 906 Certification Robert Mehrabian |
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.2 906 Certification Dale A. Schnittjer |
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 101 The following materials from the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended October 3, 2010 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language
(XBRL): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders
Equity, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) related
notes, tagged as blocks of text |
26
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DATE: November 9, 2010
|
|
By: /s/ Dale A. Schnittjer
Dale A. Schnittjer, Senior Vice President and
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer and Authorized Officer) |
|
|
27
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
Index to Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.1
|
|
302 Certification Robert Mehrabian |
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.2
|
|
302 Certification Dale A. Schnittjer |
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.1
|
|
906 Certification Robert Mehrabian |
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.2
|
|
906 Certification Dale A. Schnittjer |
|
|
|
Exhibit 101 |
|
The following materials from the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended October 3, 2010 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language
(XBRL): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders
Equity, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) related
notes, tagged as blocks of text |
28