e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
August 1,
2010
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number
001-33608
lululemon athletica
inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
20-3842867
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
2285 Clark Drive,
Vancouver, British Columbia
|
|
V5N 3G9
(Zip Code)
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
604-732-6124
Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if
changed since last report:
N/A
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
At September 7, 2010, there were 51,781,740 shares of the
registrants common stock, par value $0.01 per share,
outstanding.
Exchangeable and Special Voting Shares:
At September 7, 2010, there were outstanding 19,110,042
exchangeable shares of Lulu Canadian Holding, Inc., a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the registrant. Exchangeable shares
are exchangeable for an equal number of shares of the
registrants common stock.
In addition, at September 7, 2010, the registrant had
outstanding 19,110,042 shares of special voting stock, through
which the holders of exchangeable shares of Lulu Canadian
Holding, Inc. may exercise their voting rights with respect to
the registrant. The special voting stock and the
registrants common stock generally vote together as a
single class on all matters on which the common stock is
entitled to vote.
PART I
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
lululemon
athletica inc. and Subsidiaries
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 1,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
178,172
|
|
|
$
|
159,573
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
7,851
|
|
|
|
8,238
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
66,520
|
|
|
|
44,070
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
6,507
|
|
|
|
4,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
259,050
|
|
|
|
216,410
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
64,609
|
|
|
|
61,591
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets, net
|
|
|
24,735
|
|
|
|
8,050
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
11,715
|
|
|
|
15,102
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
3,587
|
|
|
|
6,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
363,696
|
|
|
$
|
307,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
7,275
|
|
|
$
|
11,028
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
17,414
|
|
|
|
17,207
|
|
Accrued compensation and related expenses
|
|
|
10,090
|
|
|
|
10,626
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
2,419
|
|
|
|
7,742
|
|
Unredeemed gift card liability
|
|
|
9,266
|
|
|
|
11,699
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,713
|
|
|
|
58,678
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
18,385
|
|
|
|
15,472
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
5,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,382
|
|
|
|
74,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undesignated preferred stock, $0.01 par value,
5,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchangeable stock, no par value, 30,000 shares authorized,
issued and outstanding 19,169 and 19,383 shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special voting stock, $0.00001 par value,
30,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding 19,169 and
19,383 shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 200,000 shares
authorized, issued and outstanding 51,723 and 51,126 shares
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
168,616
|
|
|
|
158,921
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
109,189
|
|
|
|
67,809
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
11,032
|
|
|
|
5,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
289,354
|
|
|
|
233,108
|
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
|
3,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293,314
|
|
|
|
233,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
363,696
|
|
|
$
|
307,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the interim consolidated financial
statements
3
lululemon
athletica inc. and Subsidiaries
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks
|
|
|
Twenty-Six Weeks
|
|
|
Twenty-Six Weeks
|
|
|
|
Ended August 1,
|
|
|
Ended August 2,
|
|
|
Ended August 1,
|
|
|
Ended August 2,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
152,208
|
|
|
$
|
97,721
|
|
|
$
|
290,505
|
|
|
$
|
179,401
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
71,910
|
|
|
|
52,557
|
|
|
|
135,850
|
|
|
|
99,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
80,298
|
|
|
|
45,164
|
|
|
|
154,655
|
|
|
|
80,188
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
46,055
|
|
|
|
30,832
|
|
|
|
87,938
|
|
|
|
56,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
34,243
|
|
|
|
14,332
|
|
|
|
66,717
|
|
|
|
24,185
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
2,092
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
2,254
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
36,335
|
|
|
|
14,355
|
|
|
|
68,971
|
|
|
|
24,286
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
14,628
|
|
|
|
5,111
|
|
|
|
27,676
|
|
|
|
8,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
21,707
|
|
|
|
9,244
|
|
|
|
41,295
|
|
|
|
15,762
|
|
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to lululemon athletica inc.
|
|
$
|
21,792
|
|
|
$
|
9,244
|
|
|
$
|
41,380
|
|
|
$
|
15,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
Net diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.58
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
Basic weighted-average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
70,820
|
|
|
|
69,948
|
|
|
|
70,708
|
|
|
|
70,176
|
|
Diluted weighted-average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
71,750
|
|
|
|
70,401
|
|
|
|
71,692
|
|
|
|
70,473
|
|
See accompanying notes to the interim consolidated financial
statements
4
lululemon
athletica inc. and Subsidiaries
(Amounts
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchangeable
|
|
|
Special Voting
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controlling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2010
|
|
|
19,383
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
19,383
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
51,126
|
|
|
$
|
511
|
|
|
$
|
158,921
|
|
|
$
|
67,809
|
|
|
$
|
5,867
|
|
|
$
|
233,108
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
233,108
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,380
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,165
|
|
|
|
5,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,545
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,563
|
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
Common stock issued upon exchange of exchangeable shares
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock issuance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,338
|
|
Non-controlling interest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contributions from
non-controlling
interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,045
|
|
|
|
4,045
|
|
Net loss attributable to
non-controlling
interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at August 1, 2010
|
|
|
19,169
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
19,169
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
51,723
|
|
|
$
|
517
|
|
|
$
|
168,616
|
|
|
$
|
109,189
|
|
|
$
|
11,032
|
|
|
$
|
289,354
|
|
|
$
|
3,960
|
|
|
$
|
293,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the interim consolidated financial
statements
5
lululemon
athletica inc. and Subsidiaries
(Amounts
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twenty-Six Weeks
|
|
|
Twenty-Six Weeks
|
|
|
|
Ended August 1,
|
|
|
Ended August 2,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
41,295
|
|
|
$
|
15,762
|
|
Items not affecting cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
11,990
|
|
|
|
9,552
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
3,563
|
|
|
|
2,816
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
12,475
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(3,800
|
)
|
|
|
(397
|
)
|
Gain on investment
|
|
|
(1,792
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other, including net changes in other non-cash balances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(1,973
|
)
|
|
|
(2,269
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(17,777
|
)
|
|
|
8,514
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(4,721
|
)
|
|
|
(1,955
|
)
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
(2,996
|
)
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
(5,129
|
)
|
|
|
(1,882
|
)
|
Other non-cash balances
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
34,552
|
|
|
|
28,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(11,571
|
)
|
|
|
(5,344
|
)
|
Investments in and advances to franchises
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(959
|
)
|
Acquisition of franchises
|
|
|
(12,482
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(24,053
|
)
|
|
|
(6,303
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
2,338
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
6,138
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
1,962
|
|
|
|
4,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
18,599
|
|
|
|
27,000
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
159,573
|
|
|
$
|
56,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
178,172
|
|
|
$
|
83,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the interim consolidated financial
statements
6
lululemon
athletica inc. and Subsidiaries
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share and store count information,
unless otherwise indicated)
|
|
NOTE 1.
|
NATURE OF
OPERATIONS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
|
Nature
of operations
lululemon athletica inc., a Delaware corporation
(lululemon and, together with its subsidiaries
unless the context otherwise requires, the Company)
is engaged in the design, manufacture and distribution of
healthy lifestyle inspired athletic apparel, which is sold
through a chain of corporate-owned and operated retail stores,
direct to consumer through
e-commerce,
through independent franchises and through a network of
wholesale accounts. The Companys primary markets are
Canada, the United States and Australia, where 45, 71 and 10
corporate-owned stores were in operation as of August 1,
2010, respectively. There were 126 and 110 corporate-owned
stores in operation as of August 1, 2010 and
January 31, 2010, respectively.
Basis
of presentation
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements as of
August 1, 2010 and for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks
ended August 1, 2010 and August 2, 2009 are presented
using the United States dollar and have been prepared by the
Company under the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC). In the opinion of
management, the financial information is presented in accordance
with United States generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) for interim financial information and,
accordingly, do not include all of the information and footnotes
required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The
financial information as of January 31, 2010 is derived
from the Companys audited consolidated financial
statements and notes for the fiscal year ended January 31,
2010, included in Item 8 in the Companys fiscal 2009
Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements
reflect all adjustments which are in the opinion of management
necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim
periods presented. These unaudited interim consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
Companys consolidated financial statements and related
notes included in the Companys fiscal 2009 Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
filed with the SEC on March 25, 2010.
The Companys fiscal year ends on the Sunday closest to
January 31 of the following year, typically resulting in a
52-week
year, but occasionally giving rise to an additional week,
resulting in a 53-week year. Fiscal 2010 will end on
January 30, 2011 and will be a 52 week year.
The Companys business is affected by the pattern of
seasonality common to most retail apparel businesses. The
results for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative
of future financial results.
|
|
NOTE 2.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
United States income taxes and foreign withholding taxes are not
provided for on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries
which are considered to be indefinitely reinvested in the
operations of such subsidiaries. The amount of these earnings
was approximately $117,387 and $110,849 at August 1, 2010
and January 31, 2010, respectively. The Company recorded a
deferred tax liability of $5,284 in the first two quarters of
fiscal 2010 for the estimated future income taxes and foreign
withholding taxes attributable to the undistributed earnings of
foreign subsidiaries for which it does not have plans for
reinvestment in the operations of such subsidiaries.
Recent
accounting pronouncements
In February 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) amended Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) Topic 855 Subsequent Events (ASC
855). Under the amended guidance, SEC filers are no longer
required to disclose the date through which subsequent events
have been evaluated in originally issued and revised financial
statements. This guidance was effective immediately and the
Company adopted these new requirements in the first quarter of
fiscal 2010.
7
lululemon
athletica inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In April 2010, the FASB amended ASC Topic 718 Compensation
(ASC 718) to clarify that a share-based payment
award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a
market in which a substantial portion of the entitys
equity securities trades should not be considered to contain a
market, performance or service condition. Therefore, an entity
should not classify such an award as a liability if it otherwise
qualifies for classification in equity. This guidance is
effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after
December 15, 2010 and is to be applied prospectively. The
Company is evaluating the impact the amendment will have on its
consolidated financial statements.
|
|
NOTE 3.
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
Share
option plans
The Companys employees participate in various stock-based
compensation plans, which are either provided by a principal
stockholder of the Company or by the Company directly.
Stock-based compensation expense charged to income for the plans
was $3,563 and $2,816 for the twenty-six weeks ended
August 1, 2010 and August 2, 2009, respectively. Total
unrecognized compensation cost as at August 1, 2010 was
$15,336 for all stock option plans, which is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.5 years.
Company
stock options and performance stock units
A summary of the Companys stock option, performance stock
unit and restricted share activity as of August 1, 2010 and
changes during the period then ended is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2010
|
|
|
2,194
|
|
|
$
|
14.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
13.83
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
$
|
35.93
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
41.15
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
38.74
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
$
|
6.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
13.83
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
$
|
19.02
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
41.22
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
13.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at August 1, 2010
|
|
|
1,852
|
|
|
$
|
15.65
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
41.15
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
38.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at August 1, 2010
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
$
|
12.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys performance stock units are awarded to
eligible employees and entitle the grantee to receive up to
1.5 shares of common stock per performance stock unit if
the Company achieves specified performance goals and the grantee
remains employed during the vesting period. The fair value of
performance stock units is based on the closing price of the
Companys common stock on the award date. Expense for
performance stock units is recognized when it is probable the
performance goal will be achieved.
Stockholder-
sponsored stock options
During the thirteen weeks ended August 1, 2010, holders of
exchangeable shares converted 214 exchangeable shares into
214 shares of common stock of the Company for no additional
consideration. In connection with the exchange of exchangeable
shares, an equal number of outstanding shares of the
Companys special voting stock were cancelled.
During the thirteen weeks ended August 1, 2010, there were
no grants or forfeitures related to any of the stock options
issued and outstanding under the stockholder-sponsored awards.
Employee
stock purchase plan
The Companys Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(ESPP) allows for the purchase of common stock of
the Company by all eligible employees. Eligible employees may
elect to have whatever portion of his or her base salary
equates, after deduction of applicable taxes, to either 3%, 6%
or 9% of his or her base salary withheld during each payroll
period for purposes of purchasing shares of the Companys
common stock under the ESPP. Additionally, the Company or the
8
lululemon
athletica inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
subsidiary of the Company employing the participant, will make a
cash contribution as additional compensation to each participant
equal to one-third of the aggregate amount of that
participants contribution for that pay period, which will
be used to purchase shares of the Companys common stock,
subject to certain limits as defined in the ESPP. The maximum
number of shares available under the ESPP is 3,000 shares.
During the quarter ended August 1, 2010, there were
9 shares purchased under the ESPP, which were funded by the
Company through open market purchases.
|
|
NOTE 4.
|
REACQUISITION
OF FRANCHISED STORES
|
On May 12, 2010, the Company increased its investment in
lululemon athletica australia PTY (lululemon
australia) from 13 percent to 80 percent. The
transaction provides the Company control over lululemon
australia, which became a subsidiary of the Company on this
date. lululemon australia is engaged in the distribution of
healthy lifestyle inspired athletic apparel, which is sold
through a chain of corporate-owned retail locations and through
a network of wholesale accounts, in Australia. The Company
previously accounted for its 13 percent interest in
lululemon australia as an equity investment.
The acquired business contributed net revenues of $3,782 and
losses from operations of $456 to the Company from the date of
acquisition to August 1, 2010. The following unaudited pro
forma summary presents consolidated information of the Company
as if the business combination had occurred on February 2,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks
|
|
|
Twenty-Six Weeks
|
|
|
Twenty-Six Weeks
|
|
|
|
Ended August 1,
|
|
|
Ended August 2,
|
|
|
Ended August 1,
|
|
|
Ended August 2,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
153,855
|
|
|
$
|
97,226
|
|
|
$
|
291,985
|
|
|
$
|
177,939
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
$
|
35,102
|
|
|
$
|
14,186
|
|
|
$
|
67,968
|
|
|
$
|
23,864
|
|
These amounts have been calculated after applying the
Companys accounting policies and adjusting the results of
lululemon australia to reflect the additional depreciation and
amortization that would have been charged assuming the fair
value adjustments to inventory, and intangible assets had been
applied from February 1, 2010, together with the
consequential tax effects.
In 2010, the Company incurred $173 of acquisition-related costs.
These expenses are included in general and administrative
expense in the Companys consolidated statement of income
for the first two quarters of fiscal 2010.
The following tables summarize the consideration transferred to
acquire lululemon australia and the preliminary amounts of
identified assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the
acquisition date, as well as the preliminary fair value of the
noncontrolling interest in lululemon australia at the
acquisition date:
Fair Value of Consideration Transferred:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
5,872
|
|
Conversion of note receivable to equity
|
|
|
3,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
9,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in lululemon australia held prior to the business
combination
|
|
|
2,345
|
|
Fair value of the noncontrolling interest in lululemon australia
|
|
|
3,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
lululemon
athletica inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Preliminary
amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
$
|
3,477
|
|
Prepaid and other assets
|
|
|
709
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
1,812
|
|
Under-market leases
|
|
|
546
|
|
Reacquired franchise rights
|
|
|
10,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
17,448
|
|
Current and non-current liabilities
|
|
|
2,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
2,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total identifiable net assets
|
|
$
|
15,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a result of the Company obtaining control over lululemon
australia, the Companys previously held 13 percent
interest was remeasured to fair value, resulting in a gain of
$1,792. This has been recognized in the line item Other
income (expense), net in the consolidated statement of income.
The preliminary fair value of the noncontrolling interest of
$3,554 in lululemon australia was estimated by applying a market
approach and an income approach. This fair value measurement is
based on significant inputs not observable in the market and
thus represents a Level 3 measurement as defined in
ASC 820. The fair value estimates use standard valuation
techniques, including discounted cash flows, comparable
transactions and internal projections, and include assumed
adjustments due to the lack of control or lack of marketability
that market participants would consider when estimating the fair
value of the noncontrolling interest in lululemon australia.
On July 20, 2010, the Company reacquired in an asset
purchase transaction a franchised store in Saskatoon,
Saskatchewan for total cash consideration of $6,610. Included in
the Companys consolidated statements of income for the
unaudited thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended
August 1, 2010 are the results of the reacquired Saskatoon
franchised store from the date of acquisition to August 1,
2010.
The following table summarizes the preliminary fair values of
the net assets acquired as of August 1, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
$
|
325
|
|
Prepaid and other current assets
|
|
|
9
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
174
|
|
Reacquired franchise rights
|
|
|
6,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
6,879
|
|
Current and non-current liabilities
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
6,610
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reacquisition of the franchised stores is part of
managements vertical retail growth strategy. The
reacquired franchise rights are amortized on a straight-line
basis over their estimated useful lives. Reacquired franchise
rights with indefinite useful lives are reviewed for impairment
annually, or as events occur or circumstances arise which may
reduce the fair value of indefinite lived reacquired franchise
rights below carrying value. These are preliminary values that
may change as the Companys fair value assessment is
ongoing.
|
|
NOTE 5.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
On April 2, 2009, three former hourly Company employees
filed a class action lawsuit in San Diego Superior Court,
California, entitled Mia Stephens et al v. lululemon
athletica inc. The lawsuit alleges that the Company violated
various California Labor Code sections by requiring employees to
wear lululemon clothing during working hours without reimbursing
such employees for the cost of the clothing and by paying
certain bonus payments to its employees in the
10
lululemon
athletica inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
form of lululemon gift cards redeemable only for lululemon
merchandise. The complaint also alleges that the Company owes
waiting time penalties as the result of failing to pay employees
all wages due at the time of termination. The Company and the
plaintiffs have reached an agreement on settlement terms and the
agreement has received tentative approval from the court.
Plaintiffs and the Company must now go through the process of
obtaining final court approval.
On March 26, 2009, a former hourly Company employee filed a
class action lawsuit in Orange County Superior Court,
California, entitled Brett Kohlenberg et al v.
lululemon athletica inc. The lawsuit alleges that the Company
violated various California Labor Code sections by failing to
pay its employees for certain rest and meal breaks and off
the clock work, and for penalties related to waiting times
and failure to provide itemized wage statements. The Company and
the plaintiffs have reached an agreement on settlement terms and
the agreement has received tentative approval from the court.
Plaintiffs and the Company must now go through the process of
obtaining final court approval.
The Company is a party to various other legal proceedings
arising in the ordinary course of its business, but the Company
is not currently a party to any legal proceeding that management
believes would have a material adverse effect on the
Companys consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
|
|
NOTE 6.
|
EARNINGS
PER SHARE
|
The details of the computation of basic and diluted earnings per
share are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks
|
|
|
Twenty-Six Weeks
|
|
|
Twenty-Six Weeks
|
|
|
|
Ended August 1,
|
|
|
Ended August 2,
|
|
|
Ended August 1,
|
|
|
Ended August 2,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net income attributable to lululemon athletica inc.
|
|
$
|
21,792
|
|
|
$
|
9,244
|
|
|
$
|
41,380
|
|
|
$
|
15,762
|
|
Basic weighted-average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
70,820
|
|
|
|
69,948
|
|
|
|
70,708
|
|
|
|
70,176
|
|
Effect of stock options assume exercised
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
984
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
71,750
|
|
|
|
70,401
|
|
|
|
71,692
|
|
|
|
70,473
|
|
Net basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
Net diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.58
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
The Companys calculation of weighted-average shares
includes the common stock of the Company as well as the
exchangeable shares. Exchangeable shares are the equivalent of
common shares in all material respects. All classes of stock
have in effect the same rights and share equally in
undistributed net income. For the twenty-six weeks ended
August 1, 2010 and August 2, 2009, 64 and 896 stock
options, respectively, were anti-dilutive to earnings and
therefore have been excluded from the computation of diluted
earnings per share.
11
lululemon
athletica inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 7.
|
SUPPLEMENTARY
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
A summary of certain balance sheet accounts is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 1,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Accounts receivable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
3,375
|
|
|
$
|
4,656
|
|
Miscellaneous receivables
|
|
|
4,476
|
|
|
|
3,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,851
|
|
|
$
|
8,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
$
|
67,765
|
|
|
$
|
45,181
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
2,370
|
|
|
|
1,461
|
|
Provision to reduce inventory to market value
|
|
|
(3,615
|
)
|
|
|
(2,572
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
66,520
|
|
|
$
|
44,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
$
|
73,503
|
|
|
$
|
63,999
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
18,002
|
|
|
|
17,776
|
|
Computer hardware and software
|
|
|
30,135
|
|
|
|
25,194
|
|
Equipment and vehicles
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
Accumulated amortization and depreciation
|
|
|
(57,796
|
)
|
|
|
(45,806
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
64,609
|
|
|
$
|
61,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
738
|
|
|
$
|
738
|
|
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reacquired franchise rights
|
|
|
27,423
|
|
|
|
10,162
|
|
Non-competition agreements
|
|
|
694
|
|
|
|
694
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(6,148
|
)
|
|
|
(4,868
|
)
|
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates
|
|
|
1,836
|
|
|
|
1,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,805
|
|
|
|
7,151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
24,735
|
|
|
$
|
8,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid rent and security deposits
|
|
$
|
1,659
|
|
|
$
|
945
|
|
Deferred lease cost
|
|
|
1,928
|
|
|
|
1,487
|
|
Advances to and investments in franchise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,587
|
|
|
$
|
6,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory purchases
|
|
$
|
5,875
|
|
|
$
|
7,664
|
|
Sales tax collected
|
|
|
4,106
|
|
|
|
2,758
|
|
Accrued rent
|
|
|
1,566
|
|
|
|
1,771
|
|
Lease exit costs
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,067
|
|
|
|
4,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,414
|
|
|
$
|
17,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred lease liability
|
|
$
|
12,056
|
|
|
$
|
10,822
|
|
Tenant inducements
|
|
|
6,269
|
|
|
|
4,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,385
|
|
|
$
|
15,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
lululemon
athletica inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 8.
|
SEGMENT
REPORTING
|
The Company reports segments based on the financial information
it uses in managing its business. Previously, the Company
reported its franchise channel as an operating segment, however
it has accounted for less than 10% of net revenue from
operations in each of fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008. Opening new
franchise stores is not a significant part of the Companys
near-term growth strategy and the Company does not expect that
the revenue derived from franchises to be greater than 10% of
net revenue in future years. Therefore, the Company has
re-evaluated segment reporting in the first quarter of fiscal
2010. The Companys reportable segments are comprised of
corporate-owned stores, direct to consumer and other. Direct to
consumer includes sales from the Companys
e-commerce
website and phone sales. Franchise sales, wholesale, showrooms
sales and outlet sales have been combined into other.
Information for these segments is detailed in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks
|
|
|
Twenty-Six Weeks
|
|
|
Twenty-Six Weeks
|
|
|
|
Ended August 1,
|
|
|
Ended August 2,
|
|
|
Ended August 1,
|
|
|
Ended August 2,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate-owned stores
|
|
$
|
129,443
|
|
|
$
|
85,091
|
|
|
$
|
245,017
|
|
|
$
|
157,993
|
|
Direct to consumer
|
|
|
9,634
|
|
|
|
3,029
|
|
|
|
18,776
|
|
|
|
3,898
|
|
Other
|
|
|
13,131
|
|
|
|
9,601
|
|
|
|
26,712
|
|
|
|
17,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
152,208
|
|
|
$
|
97,721
|
|
|
$
|
290,505
|
|
|
$
|
179,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations before general corporate expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate-owned stores
|
|
$
|
44,353
|
|
|
$
|
23,548
|
|
|
$
|
84,263
|
|
|
$
|
41,648
|
|
Direct to consumer
|
|
|
2,817
|
|
|
|
1,199
|
|
|
|
6,106
|
|
|
|
1,571
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,310
|
|
|
|
2,818
|
|
|
|
7,674
|
|
|
|
3,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,480
|
|
|
|
27,565
|
|
|
|
98,043
|
|
|
|
47,031
|
|
General corporate
|
|
|
16,237
|
|
|
|
13,233
|
|
|
|
31,326
|
|
|
|
22,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income
|
|
|
34,243
|
|
|
|
14,332
|
|
|
|
66,717
|
|
|
|
24,185
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
2,092
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
2,254
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
$
|
36,335
|
|
|
$
|
14,355
|
|
|
$
|
68,971
|
|
|
$
|
24,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate-owned stores
|
|
$
|
1,875
|
|
|
$
|
1,919
|
|
|
$
|
4,117
|
|
|
$
|
3,011
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
3,818
|
|
|
|
1,066
|
|
|
|
7,454
|
|
|
|
2,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,693
|
|
|
$
|
2,985
|
|
|
$
|
11,571
|
|
|
$
|
5,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate-owned stores
|
|
$
|
3,920
|
|
|
$
|
3,463
|
|
|
$
|
7,760
|
|
|
$
|
6,583
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
2,614
|
|
|
|
1,811
|
|
|
|
4,162
|
|
|
|
2,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,534
|
|
|
$
|
5,274
|
|
|
$
|
11,922
|
|
|
$
|
9,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
Some of the statements contained in this
Form 10-Q
and any documents incorporated herein by reference constitute
forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements, other
than statements of historical facts, included or incorporated in
this
Form 10-Q
are forward-looking statements, particularly statements which
relate to expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans and
strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar expressions
concerning matters that are not historical facts, such as
statements regarding our future financial condition or results
of operations, our prospects and strategies for future growth,
the development and introduction of new products, and the
implementation of our marketing and branding strategies. In many
cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such
as may, will, should,
expects, plans, anticipates,
believes, estimates,
intends, predicts, potential
or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology.
The forward-looking statements contained in this
Form 10-Q
and any documents incorporated herein by reference reflect our
current views about future events and are subject to risks,
uncertainties, assumptions and changes in circumstances that may
cause events or our actual activities or results to differ
significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking
statement. Although we believe that the expectations reflected
in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot
guarantee future events, results, actions, levels of activity,
performance or achievements. Readers are cautioned not to place
undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. A number of
important factors could cause actual results to differ
materially from those indicated by the forward-looking
statements, including, but not limited to, those factors
described in Risk Factors and elsewhere in this
report.
The forward-looking statements contained in this
Form 10-Q
reflect our views and assumptions only as of the date of this
Form 10-Q
and are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary
statements included in this
Form 10-Q.
Except as required by applicable securities law, we undertake no
obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect
events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is
made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Our fiscal year ends on the Sunday closest to January 31 of the
following year, typically resulting in a 52 week year, but
occasionally gives rise to an additional week, resulting in a
53 week year. Fiscal 2010 will end on January 30, 2011
and will be a 52 week year.
Overview
The world economy and capital markets have shown some signs of
improvement, however, many companies and consumers continue to
be impacted by uncertainty in the macro-economy. This has proven
to be challenging for retailers in past periods, where declines
in comparable store sales were posted. Although our current
quarter results demonstrate the success of our efforts to
overcome instability in the economy, the current market
volatility may still negatively affect our financial results in
future periods.
We believe that through strong execution of our strategic plans,
we are well placed to succeed in this market. In fiscal 2009, we
were able to introduce our new
e-commerce
sales channel which has further increased our brand awareness
and has made our product available in new markets, including
those outside of North America. In fiscal 2010 we have begun to
execute a new plan for growth, which includes increasing our
store base, when and where we see opportunities for success. For
example, we have opened 16 net new corporate-owned stores
and 33 net new showrooms in North America and Australia since
the second quarter of fiscal 2009, including reacquired
franchises. We believe our strong cash flow generation, solid
balance sheet and healthy liquidity provide us with the
financial flexibility to continue executing the initiatives
which we believe will benefit our company.
While we have committed to investment in stores, people and
infrastructure enhancements and funding working capital
requirements in fiscal 2010, we remain conscious of our
discretionary spending. These expenditures are designed to
position our business for long-term profitable growth and
protect our brand integrity. We expect to continually assess the
economic environment and market conditions to guide our
decisions regarding our timing of investments.
14
Operating
Segment Overview
lululemon is a designer and retailer of technical athletic
apparel operating primarily in North America and Australia. Our
yoga-inspired apparel is marketed under the lululemon athletica
and ivivva athletica brand names. We offer a comprehensive line
of apparel and accessories including fitness pants, shorts, tops
and jackets designed for athletic pursuits such as yoga, running
and general fitness, and dance-inspired apparel for female
youth. As of August 1, 2010, our branded apparel was
principally sold through 130 corporate-owned and franchise
stores that are primarily located in Canada, the United States
and Australia, and via our retail website through our direct to
consumer channel. We believe our vertical retail strategy allows
us to interact more directly with and gain insights from our
customers while providing us with greater control of our brand.
For the second quarter of fiscal 2010, approximately 53% of our
net revenue was derived from sales of our products in Canada,
44% of our net revenue was derived from the sales of our
products in the United States and 3% of our net revenue was
derived from sales of our products outside of North America.
Our net revenue increased from $179.4 million in the first
two quarters of fiscal 2009 to $290.5 million in the first
two quarters of fiscal 2010, representing a 62% increase. Our
ability to open new stores and grow sales in existing stores has
been driven by increasing demand for our technical athletic
apparel and a growing recognition of the lululemon athletica
brand. We believe our superior products, strategic store
locations, inviting store environment, grassroots marketing
approach and distinctive corporate culture are responsible for
our strong financial performance.
We have three reportable segments: corporate-owned stores,
direct to consumer and other. We report our segments based on
the financial information we use in managing our businesses.
While we receive financial information for each corporate-owned
store, we have aggregated all of the corporate-owned stores into
one reportable segment due to the similarities in the economic
and other characteristics of these stores. Our direct to
consumer segment is an increasingly substantial part of our
business, representing 7% of our net revenues in the first two
quarters of fiscal 2010, 4% of our net revenue in fiscal 2009
and less than 1% of our net revenue in fiscal 2008. Expanding
this sales channel is a significant part of our near-term growth
strategy, and we therefore expect the revenue derived from our
direct to consumer sales to comprise more than 10% of the net
revenue we report in future fiscal years. Our other operations,
which include franchise sales, wholesale, showrooms sales and
outlet sales, accounted for less than 10% of our net revenues
from continuing operations in each of the first two quarters of
fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008. We previously reported
our franchise channel as an operating segment; however, opening
new franchise stores is not a significant part of our near-term
store growth strategy, and as such we expect net revenue from
our franchise stores to continue to decrease, including as a
percentage of total net revenue, in future years.
15
Results
of Operations
Thirteen
Week Results
The following table summarizes key components of our results of
operations for the thirteen week periods ended August 1,
2010 and August 2, 2009. The operating results are
expressed in dollar amounts as well as relevant percentages,
presented as a percentage of net revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended August 1, 2010 and
|
|
|
|
August 2, 2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(Percentages)
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
152,208
|
|
|
$
|
97,721
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
71,910
|
|
|
|
52,557
|
|
|
|
47.2
|
|
|
|
53.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
80,298
|
|
|
|
45,164
|
|
|
|
52.8
|
|
|
|
46.2
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
46,055
|
|
|
|
30,832
|
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
|
|
31.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
34,243
|
|
|
|
14,332
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
2,092
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
36,335
|
|
|
|
14,355
|
|
|
|
23.9
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
14,628
|
|
|
|
5,111
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
21,707
|
|
|
|
9,244
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to lululemon athletica inc.
|
|
$
|
21,792
|
|
|
$
|
9,244
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Revenue
Net revenue increased $54.5 million, or 56%, to
$152.2 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 from
$97.7 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
Assuming the average exchange rate between the Canadian and
United States dollars for the second quarter of fiscal 2009
remained constant, our net revenue would have increased
$47.6 million, or 49%, for the second quarter of fiscal
2010.
The net revenue increase was driven by increased sales at
locations in our comparable stores base, sales from new stores
and showrooms opened, sales from franchised stores that were
reacquired during the quarter and the growth of our
e-commerce
website sales included in our direct to consumer segment. The
constant dollar increase in comparable store sales was driven
primarily by the strength of our existing product lines, our
successful introduction of new products and increasing
recognition of the lululemon athletica brand name, especially at
our U.S. stores.
Our net revenue on a segment basis for the thirteen week periods
ended August 1, 2010 and August 2, 2009 are expressed
in dollar amounts as well as relevant percentages, presented as
a percentage of total net revenue below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended August 1, 2010 and
|
|
|
|
August 2, 2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(Percentages)
|
|
|
Corporate-owned stores
|
|
$
|
129,443
|
|
|
$
|
85,091
|
|
|
|
85.1
|
|
|
|
87.1
|
|
Direct to consumer
|
|
|
9,634
|
|
|
|
3,029
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
13,131
|
|
|
|
9,601
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
152,208
|
|
|
$
|
97,721
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Corporate-Owned Stores. Net revenue from our
corporate-owned stores segment increased $44.4 million, or
52%, to $129.4 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010
from $85.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
The following contributed to the $44.4 million increase in
net revenue from our corporate-owned stores segment:
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable store sales increase of 31% in the second quarter of
fiscal 2010 resulted in a $25.6 million increase to net
revenue, excluding the effect of foreign currency fluctuations.
Including the effect of foreign currency fluctuations,
comparable store sales increased 38%, or $31.1 million, in
the second quarter of fiscal 2010; and
|
|
|
|
Net revenue from corporate-owned stores we opened subsequent to
August 2, 2009, and therefore not included in the
comparable store sales growth, contributed $13.3 million of
the increase. Net new store openings since the second quarter of
fiscal 2009 included three stores in Canada (including the
Saskatoon franchised store that was reacquired), ten stores in
the United States, and nine stores in Australia (including nine
franchised stores that were reacquired).
|
Direct to Consumer. Net revenue from our
direct to consumer segment increased $6.6 million, or 218%,
to $9.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 from
$3.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. The
increase was a result of net revenue from our
e-commerce
website, which was launched towards the end of the first quarter
of fiscal 2009. Prior to the launch of our
e-commerce
website, our direct to consumer segment consisted only of phone
sales.
Other. Net revenue from our other segment
increased $3.5 million, or 37%, to $13.1 million in
the second quarter of fiscal 2010 from $9.6 million in the
second quarter of fiscal 2009. There were increases in net
revenues across most of our operating channels included in our
other segment: wholesale, showrooms and outlets. Net revenues
from our franchise channel decreased due to our reacquisition of
ten franchised stores in Australia and Canada. Our other segment
continues to grow year over year through new showroom and outlet
locations, new wholesale partners and net revenue growth at
existing locations attributable to a strong product offering and
brand interest. We continue to employ our other segment strategy
to increase interest in our product in markets we have not
otherwise entered with corporate-owned stores.
Gross
Profit
Gross profit increased $35.1 million, or 78%, to
$80.3 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 from
$45.2 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
Increased net revenues as well as a strengthening Canadian
dollar relative to the U.S. dollar improved product margin
in all of our operating segments, and ultimately resulted in an
increased gross profit.
The increase in gross profit was partially offset by increases
in fixed costs, such as occupancy costs and depreciation, as
well as increased costs related to our production, design,
distribution and merchandising departments.
Gross profit as a percentage of net revenue, or gross margin,
increased by 660 basis points, to 52.8% in the second
quarter of fiscal 2010 from 46.2% in the second quarter of
fiscal 2009. The increase in gross margin resulted primarily
from:
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in fixed costs, such as occupancy costs and
depreciation, relative to the increase in net revenue, which had
a leveraging effect on gross margin and contributed to an
increase in gross margin of 260 basis points;
|
|
|
|
an improvement in the Canadian dollar, relative to the
U.S. dollar, decreased foreign exchange impacts on product
costs and contributed to an increase in gross margin of
220 basis points; and
|
|
|
|
an increase in corporate-owned stores, direct to consumer and
other product margins, which contributed to an increase in gross
margin of 210 basis points as a result of improved product
costing on our summer merchandise.
|
The increases were partially offset by an increase in discounts
relative to net revenue compared to discounts in the second
quarter of fiscal 2009. Our other expenses including those
related to our production, design, distribution and
merchandising departments, remained constant relative to the
increase in net revenue, and had no significant impact on gross
margin.
Our cost of goods sold in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and
fiscal 2009 included $0.4 million and $0.2 million,
respectively, of stock-based compensation.
17
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased
$15.2 million, or 49%, to $46.1 million in the second
quarter of fiscal 2010 from $30.8 million in the second
quarter of fiscal 2009. The $15.2 million increase in
selling, general and administrative expenses was principally
comprised of:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in employee costs of $5.0 million as we
experience natural growth in labor hours associated with new
corporate-owned stores, showrooms and outlets and growth at
existing locations;
|
|
|
|
an increase in variable administrative costs related to our
direct to consumer segment, primarily associated with revenue
growth in this segment, of $3.1 million;
|
|
|
|
an increase in other costs, including occupancy costs,
depreciation and distribution not included in cost of goods
sold, of $2.7 million as a result of the expansion of our
business;
|
|
|
|
an increase in head office employee costs, including options
expense and management incentive-based compensation, of
$2.2 million incurred in order to position us for long-term
growth;
|
|
|
|
an increase in administrative costs related to our Australian
business, in which we increased our investment significantly in
the second quarter of fiscal 2010, of $1.7 million; and
|
|
|
|
an increase in professional fees of $0.4 million, which
includes consulting fees for recruiting and information systems.
|
As a percentage of net revenue, selling, general and
administrative expenses decreased 140 basis points, to
30.2% in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 from 31.6% in the
second quarter of fiscal 2009. This improvement was largely due
to leverage associated with increased net revenues.
Our selling, general and administrative expenses in the second
quarter of fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009 included
$1.5 million and $1.2 million, respectively, of
stock-based compensation expense.
Income
from Operations
Income from operations increased $19.9 million, or 139%, to
$34.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 from
$14.3 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. The
increase was a result of increased gross profit of
$35.1 million, partially offset by increased selling,
general and administrative costs of $15.2 million. The
increase in selling, general and administrative costs was
primarily driven by the increase in our business, as seen in our
net revenue increases.
On a segment basis, we determine income from operations without
taking into account our general corporate expenses such as
corporate employee costs, travel expenses and corporate rent.
For purposes of our managements analysis of our financial
results, we have allocated some general product expenses to our
corporate-owned stores segment. For example, all expenses
related to our production, design, distribution and
merchandising departments have been allocated to this segment.
Income from operations (before general corporate expenses) for
the thirteen weeks ended August 1, 2010 and August 2,
2009 are expressed in dollar amounts as well as percentages,
presented as a percentage of net revenue of their respective
operating segments below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended August 1, 2010 and
|
|
|
|
August 2, 2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(Percentages)
|
|
|
Corporate-owned stores
|
|
$
|
44,353
|
|
|
$
|
23,548
|
|
|
|
34.3
|
|
|
|
27.7
|
|
Direct to consumer
|
|
|
2,817
|
|
|
|
1,199
|
|
|
|
29.2
|
|
|
|
39.6
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,310
|
|
|
|
2,818
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
|
|
|
29.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations before general corporate expense
|
|
$
|
50,480
|
|
|
$
|
27,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate-Owned Stores. Net income from our
corporate-owned stores segment increased $20.8 million, or
80%, to $44.4 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2010
from $23.5 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2009
primarily due to an increase of $32.8 million in gross
profit, which was offset partially by a natural increase in
selling, general and
18
administrative expenses related to employee costs as well as
operating expenses associated with new stores and net revenue
growth at existing stores.
Direct to Consumer. Net income from our direct
to consumer segment increased $1.6 million, or 135%, to
$2.8 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 from
$1.2 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Prior
to the launch of our
e-commerce
website, our direct to consumer segment consisted only of phone
sales. The addition of our
e-commerce
website towards the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2009 has
driven the increase in income from operations for our direct to
consumer segment. Income from operations as a percentage of
direct to consumer revenues decreased in the second quarter of
fiscal 2010 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2009 due to
the introduction of promotional shipping.
Other. Net income from our other segment
increased $0.5 million, or 17%, to $3.3 million for
the second quarter of fiscal 2010 from $2.8 million for the
second quarter of fiscal 2009. Gross profit related to our other
segment increased $0.7 million in the second quarter of
fiscal 2010 from the second quarter of fiscal 2009 primarily due
to a higher proportion of full margin sales channels in the
current period, such as our showroom sales channel, than in the
same period of last year.
Other
Income (Expense), Net
Other Income (Expense), Net increased $2.1 million, or
9144%, to $2.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010
from $0.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. The
increase was primarily a result of re-measuring our
13 percent non-controlling equity investment in Australia
immediately before obtaining control of the same business.
Provision
for Income Taxes
Provision for income taxes increased $9.5 million, or 186%,
to $14.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 from
$5.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. In the
second quarter of fiscal 2010, our effective tax rate was 40.3%
compared to 35.6% in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. The
increase in the effective tax rate was primarily a result of
recording a deferred tax liability of $3.1 million in the
second quarter of fiscal 2010 for estimated future income taxes
and foreign withholding taxes attributable to the undistributed
earnings of Canadian subsidiaries which are in excess of our
reinvestment plans for those subsidiaries.
Net
Income
Net income increased $12.5 million to $21.7 million
for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 from $9.2 million for
the second quarter of fiscal 2009. The increase in net income of
$12.5 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 was a
result of an increase in gross profit of $35.1 million
resulting from decreased product costs, including improved
foreign exchange differences, and an increase in Other Income
(Expense), Net of $2.1 million, offset by increases in
selling, general and administrative expenses of
$15.2 million and an increase of $9.5 million in
provision for income taxes.
19
Twenty-Six
Week Results
The following table summarizes key components of our results of
operations for the twenty-six week periods ended August 1,
2010 and August 2, 2009. The operating results are
expressed in dollar amounts as well as relevant percentages,
presented as a percentage of net revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twenty-Six Weeks Ended August 1, 2010 and
|
|
|
|
August 2, 2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(Percentages)
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
290,505
|
|
|
$
|
179,401
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
135,850
|
|
|
|
99,213
|
|
|
|
46.8
|
|
|
|
55.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
154,655
|
|
|
|
80,188
|
|
|
|
53.2
|
|
|
|
44.7
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
87,938
|
|
|
|
56,003
|
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
66,717
|
|
|
|
24,185
|
|
|
|
22.9
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
2,254
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
68,971
|
|
|
|
24,286
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
27,676
|
|
|
|
8,524
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
41,295
|
|
|
|
15,762
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to lululemon athletica inc.
|
|
$
|
41,380
|
|
|
$
|
15,762
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Revenue
Net revenue increased $111.1 million, or 62%, to
$290.5 million for the first two quarters of fiscal 2010
from $179.4 million for the first two quarters of fiscal
2009. Assuming the average exchange rate between the Canadian
and United States dollars for the first two quarters of fiscal
2009 remained constant, our net revenue would have increased
$90.7 million, or 51%, for the first two quarters of fiscal
2010.
The net revenue increase was driven by increased sales at
locations in our comparable stores base, sales from new stores
opened, sales from franchised stores that were reacquired during
the second quarter and the growth of our
e-commerce
website sales included in our direct to consumer segment. The
constant dollar increase in comparable store sales was driven
primarily by the strength of our existing product lines, our
successful introduction of new products and increasing
recognition of the lululemon athletica brand name, especially at
our U.S. stores.
Our net revenue on a segment basis for the twenty-six week
periods ended August 1, 2010 and August 2, 2009 are
expressed in dollar amounts as well as relevant percentages,
presented as a percentage of total net revenue below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twenty-Six Weeks Ended August 1, 2010 and
|
|
|
|
August 2, 2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(Percentages)
|
|
|
Corporate-owned stores
|
|
$
|
245,017
|
|
|
$
|
157,993
|
|
|
|
84.3
|
|
|
|
88.1
|
|
Direct to consumer
|
|
|
18,776
|
|
|
|
3,898
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Other
|
|
|
26,712
|
|
|
|
17,510
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
290,505
|
|
|
$
|
179,401
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate-Owned Stores. Net revenue from our
corporate-owned stores segment increased $87.0 million, or
55%, to $245.0 million in the first two quarters of fiscal
2010 from $158.0 million in the first two quarters of
fiscal 2009. The following contributed to the $87.0 million
increase in net revenue from our corporate-owned stores segment:
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable store sales increase of 33% in the first two quarters
of fiscal 2010 resulted in a $49.4 million increase to net
revenue, excluding the effect of foreign currency fluctuations.
Including the effect of foreign currency fluctuations,
comparable store sales increased 44%, or $66.0 million, in
the first two quarters of fiscal 2010; and
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue from corporate-owned stores we opened subsequent to
August 2, 2009, and therefore not included in the
comparable store sales growth, contributed $22.3 million of
the increase. Net new store openings since the first two
quarters of fiscal 2009 included three stores in Canada
(including a franchised store that was reacquired), ten stores
in the United States, and nine stores in Australia (including
nine franchised stores that were reacquired).
|
The increase was partially offset by a decrease in net revenue
related to gift card breakage. In the first quarter of fiscal
2009 we recorded a one-time credit of $1.3 million related
to a change in our estimated rate of redemption.
Direct to consumer. Net revenue from our
direct to consumer segment increased $14.9 million, or
382%, to $18.8 million in the first two quarters of fiscal
2010 from $3.9 million in the first two quarters of fiscal
2009. The increase was a result of net revenue from our
e-commerce
website, which was launched towards the end of the first quarter
of fiscal 2009. Prior to the launch of our
e-commerce
website, our direct to consumer segment consisted only of phone
sales.
Other. Net revenue from our other segment
increased $9.2 million, or 53%, to $26.7 million in
the first two quarters of fiscal 2010 from $17.5 million in
the first two quarters of fiscal 2009. There were increases in
net revenues across all operating channels included in our other
segment: franchises, wholesale, showrooms and outlets. Net
revenues from our other segment continues to grow year over year
through new showroom and outlet locations, new wholesale
partners and net revenue growth at existing locations
attributable to a strong product offering and brand interest. We
continue to employ our other segment strategy to increase
interest in our product in markets we have not otherwise entered
with corporate-owned stores.
Gross
Profit
Gross profit increased $74.5 million, or 93%, to
$154.7 million for the first two quarters of fiscal 2010
from $80.2 million for the first two quarters of fiscal
2009. Increased net revenues as well as a strengthening Canadian
dollar relative to the U.S. dollar improved product margin
in all of our operating segments, and ultimately resulted in an
increased gross profit.
The increase in gross profit was partially offset by increases
in fixed costs, such as occupancy costs and depreciation, as
well as increased costs related to our production, design,
distribution and merchandising departments.
Gross profit as a percentage of net revenue, or gross margin,
increased by 850 basis points, to 53.2% in the first two
quarters of fiscal 2010 from 44.7% in the first two quarters of
fiscal 2009. The increase in gross margin resulted primarily
from:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in corporate-owned stores, direct to consumer and
other product margins, which contributed to an increase in gross
margin of 350 basis points as a result of improved product
costing on our spring and summer merchandise;
|
|
|
|
a decrease in fixed costs, such as occupancy costs and
depreciation, relative to the increase in net revenue, which had
a leveraging effect on gross margin and contributed to an
increase in gross margin of 310 basis points; and
|
|
|
|
an improvement in the Canadian dollar, relative to the
U.S. dollar, decreased foreign exchange impacts on product
costs and contributed to an increase in gross margin of
210 basis points.
|
The increases were partially offset by an increase in discounts
relative to net revenue compared to discounts in the first two
quarters of fiscal 2009. Our other expenses including those
related to our production, design, distribution and
merchandising departments, remained constant relative to the
increase in net revenue, and had no significant impact on gross
margin.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased
$31.9 million, or 57%, to $87.9 million in the first
two quarters of fiscal 2010 from $56.0 million in the first
two quarters of fiscal 2009. The $31.9 million increase in
selling, general and administrative expenses was principally
comprised of:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in employee costs of $11.4 million as we
experience natural growth in labor hours associated with new
corporate-owned stores, showrooms, outlets and other and growth
at existing locations;
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in variable administrative costs related to our
direct to consumer segment, primarily associated with revenue
growth in this segment, of $5.4 million;
|
|
|
|
an increase in other costs, including occupancy costs,
depreciation and distribution not included in cost of goods
sold, of $5.4 million as a result of the expansion of our
business;
|
|
|
|
an increase in head office employee costs, including options
expense and management incentive-based compensation, of
$4.1 million incurred in order to position us for long-term
growth;
|
|
|
|
an increase in professional fees, of $2.6 million, which
includes consulting fees for recruiting, store development and
information systems, legal fees associated with reacquisition of
franchise rights, employment matters and legal settlement costs;
|
|
|
|
an increase in administrative costs related to our Australian
business, in which we increased our investment significantly in
the second quarter of fiscal 2010, of $1.7 million
; and
|
|
|
|
an increase in marketing efforts, including initiatives
associated with the Olympic games, of $1.1 million to
increase our brand awareness in both new and existing markets.
|
As a percentage of net revenue, selling, general and
administrative expenses decreased 90 basis points, to 30.3%
in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 from 31.2% in the second
quarter of fiscal 2009. The improvement was largely due to
leverage associated with increased net revenues.
Our selling, general and administrative expenses in the first
two quarters of fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009 included
$2.8 million and $2.4 million, respectively, of
stock-based compensation expense.
Income
from Operations
Income from operations increased $42.5 million, or 176%, to
$66.7 million in the first two quarters of fiscal 2010 from
$24.2 million in the first two quarters of fiscal 2009. The
increase was a result of increased gross profit of
$74.5 million, partially offset by increased selling,
general and administrative costs of $31.9 million. The
increase in selling, general and administrative costs was
primarily driven by the increase in our business, as seen in our
net revenue increases.
On a segment basis, we determine income from operations without
taking into account our general corporate expenses such as
corporate employee costs, travel expenses and corporate rent.
For purposes of our managements analysis of our financial
results, we have allocated some general product expenses to our
corporate-owned stores segment. For example, all expenses
related to our production, design, distribution and
merchandising departments have been allocated to this segment.
Income from operations (before general corporate expenses) for
the twenty-six week periods ended August 1, 2010 and
August 2, 2009 are expressed in dollar amounts as well as
percentages, presented as a percentage of net revenue of their
respective operating segments below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twenty-Six Weeks Ended August 1, 2010 and August 2,
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(Percentages)
|
|
|
Corporate-owned stores
|
|
$
|
84,263
|
|
|
$
|
41,648
|
|
|
|
34.4
|
|
|
|
26.4
|
|
Direct to consumer
|
|
|
6,106
|
|
|
|
1,571
|
|
|
|
32.5
|
|
|
|
40.3
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7,674
|
|
|
|
3,812
|
|
|
|
28.7
|
|
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations before general corporate expense
|
|
$
|
98,043
|
|
|
$
|
47,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate-Owned Stores. Net income from our
corporate-owned stores segment increased $42.6 million, or
102%, to $84.3 million for the first two quarters of fiscal
2010 from $41.6 million for the first two quarters of
fiscal 2009 primarily due to an increase of $63.8 million
in gross profit, which was offset partially by a natural
increase in selling, general and administrative expenses related
to employee costs as well as operating expenses associated with
new stores and net revenue growth at existing stores.
22
Direct to consumer. Net income from our direct
to consumer segment increased $4.5 million, or 289%, to
$6.1 million for the first two quarters of fiscal 2010 from
$1.6 million for the first two quarters of fiscal 2009.
Prior to the launch of our
e-commerce
website, our direct to consumer segment consisted only of phone
sales. The addition of our
e-commerce
website towards the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2009 has
driven the increase in income from operations for our direct to
consumer segment. Income from operations as a percentage of
direct to consumer revenues decreased in the first two quarters
of fiscal 2010 compared to the first two quarters of fiscal 2009
due to the introduction of promotional shipping.
Other. Net income from our other segment
increased $3.9 million, or 101%, to $7.7 million for
the first two quarters of fiscal 2010 from $3.8 million for
the first two quarters of fiscal 2009. Gross profit related to
our other segment increased in the first two quarters of fiscal
2010 from the first two quarters of fiscal 2009 primarily due to
a higher proportion of full margin sales channels in the current
period, such as our showroom sales channel, than in the same
period of last year. There was an increase in selling, general
and administrative expenses as a result of opening and operating
an increased number of showrooms in the first two quarters of
fiscal 2010 compared to the first two quarters of fiscal 2009,
which offset a portion of the gross profit increase.
Other
Income (Expense), Net
Other Income (Expense), Net increased $2.2 million, or
2132%, to $2.3 million in the first two quarters of fiscal
2010 from $0.1 million in the first two quarters of fiscal
2009. The increase was primarily a result of re-measuring our
13 percent non-controlling equity investment in Australia
immediately before obtaining control of the same business.
Provision
for Income Taxes
Provision for income taxes increased $19.2 million, or
225%, to $27.7 million in the first two quarters of fiscal
2010 from $8.5 million in the first two quarters of fiscal
2009. In the first two quarters of fiscal 2010, our effective
tax rate was 40.1% compared to 35.1% in the first two quarters
of fiscal 2009. The increase in the effective tax rate was
primarily a result of recording a deferred tax liability of
$5.2 million in the first two quarters of fiscal 2010 for
estimated future income taxes and foreign withholding taxes
attributable to the undistributed earnings of Canadian
subsidiaries which are in excess of our reinvestment plans for
those subsidiaries.
Net
Income
Net income increased $25.5 million to $41.3 million
for the first two quarters of fiscal 2010 from
$15.8 million for the first two quarters of fiscal 2009.
The increase in net income of $25.5 million for the first
two quarters of fiscal 2010 was a result of an increase in gross
profit of $74.5 million resulting from decreased product
costs, including improved foreign exchange differences, and an
increase in Other Income (Expense), Net of $2.2 million,
offset by increases in selling, general and administrative
expenses of $31.9 million and an increase of
$19.2 million in provision for income taxes.
Seasonality
Historically, we have recognized a significant portion of our
income from operations in the fourth fiscal quarter of each year
as a result of increased sales during the holiday selling
season. Despite the fact that we have experienced a significant
amount of our net revenue and gross profit in the fourth quarter
of each fiscal year, we believe that the true extent of the
seasonality or cyclical nature of our business may have been
overshadowed by our rapid growth to date.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity are our current balances of
cash and cash equivalents, cash flows from operations and
borrowings available under our revolving credit facility. Our
primary cash needs are capital expenditures for opening new
stores and remodeling existing stores, making information
technology system enhancements and funding working capital
requirements. Cash and cash equivalents in excess of our needs
are held in interest bearing accounts with financial
institutions.
At August 1, 2010, our working capital (excluding cash and
cash equivalents) was $34.2 million and our cash and cash
equivalents were $178.2 million.
23
The following table summarizes our net cash flows provided by
and used in operating, investing and financing activities for
the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twenty-Six Weeks
|
|
|
Twenty-Six Weeks
|
|
|
|
Ended August 1,
|
|
|
Ended August 2,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Total cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
34,552
|
|
|
$
|
28,733
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(24,053
|
)
|
|
|
(6,303
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
6,138
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
1,962
|
|
|
|
4,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
18,599
|
|
|
$
|
27,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Activities
Operating Activities consist primarily of net income
adjusted for certain non-cash items, including depreciation and
amortization, deferred income taxes, stock-based compensation
expense and the effect of the changes in non-cash working
capital items, principally accounts receivable, inventories,
accounts payable and accrued expenses.
Cash provided by operating activities increased
$6.0 million, to $34.7 million for the first two
quarters of fiscal 2010 compared to $28.7 million for the
first two quarters of fiscal 2009. The $6.0 million
increase was primarily a result of an increase in net income
from operations due to improvement in store productivity, an
increase in our store base, and a net decrease in the change in
other working capital balances.
Investing
Activities
Investing Activities relate entirely to capital
expenditures, advances to and investments in franchises and
reacquisition of franchises.
Cash used in investing activities increased $17.8 million,
to $24.1 million for the first two quarters of fiscal 2010
from $6.3 million for the first two quarters of fiscal
2009. The $17.8 million increase was a result of our
reacquisition of franchised stores in Australia and Saskatoon,
Saskatchewan as well as increased corporate-owned store
openings. In the first two quarters of fiscal 2010 we opened six
new corporate-owned stores compared to three new corporate-owned
stores we opened in the first two quarters of fiscal 2009.
Financing
Activities
Financing Activities consist primarily of cash received
on the exercise of stock options and excess tax benefits from
stock-based compensation. Cash provided by financing activities
increased to $6.1 million for the first two quarters of
fiscal 2010 from $0.6 million for the first two quarters of
fiscal 2009.
We believe that our cash from operations and borrowings
available to us under our revolving credit facility will be
adequate to meet our liquidity needs and capital expenditure
requirements for at least the next 24 months. Our cash from
operations may be negatively impacted by a decrease in demand
for our products as well as the other factors described in
Risk Factors and elsewhere in this report. In
addition, we may make discretionary capital improvements with
respect to our stores, distribution facility, headquarters, or
other systems, which we would expect to fund through the
issuance of debt or equity securities or other external
financing sources to the extent we were unable to fund such
capital expenditures out of our cash from operations.
Revolving
Credit Facility
In April 2007, we executed a credit facility with the Royal Bank
of Canada that provided for a CDN$20,000,000 uncommitted demand
revolving credit facility to fund our working capital
requirements. This agreement canceled our previous CDN$8,000,000
credit facility. Borrowings under this uncommitted credit
facility are made on a
when-and-as-needed
basis at our discretion.
24
Borrowings under the credit facility can be made either as
i) Revolving Loans Revolving loan
borrowings will bear interest at a rate equal to the banks
CA$ or US$ annual base rate (defined as zero% plus the
lenders annual prime rate) per annum, ii) Offshore
Loans Offshore rate loan borrowings will bear
interest at a rate equal to a base rate based upon LIBOR for the
applicable interest period, plus 1.125% per annum,
iii) Bankers Acceptances Bankers
acceptance borrowings will bear interest at the bankers
acceptance rate plus 1.125% per annum, or iv) Letters of
Credit and Letters of Guarantee Borrowings drawn
down under letters of credit or guarantee issued by the banks
will bear a 1.125% per annum fee.
At August 1, 2010, aside from letters of credit and
guarantees, there were no borrowings outstanding under this
credit facility.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We enter into documentary letters of credit to facilitate the
international purchase of merchandise. We also enter into
standby letters of credit to secure certain of our obligations,
including insurance programs and duties related to import
purchases. As of August 1, 2010, letters of credit and
letters of guarantee totaling $1.8 million have been issued.
Other than these standby letters of credit and guarantee, we do
not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, investments in
special purpose entities or undisclosed borrowings or debt. In
addition, we have not entered into any derivative contracts or
synthetic leases.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions.
Predicting future events is inherently an imprecise activity
and, as such, requires the use of judgment. Actual results may
vary from estimates in amounts that may be material to the
financial statements. An accounting policy is deemed to be
critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based
on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the
time the estimate is made, and if different estimates that
reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting
estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically,
could materially impact our consolidated financial statements.
Our critical accounting policies and estimates are discussed in
our fiscal 2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the SEC on March 25, 2010, and in Note 2
included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q.
We believe that there have been no other significant changes
during the twenty-six weeks ended August 1, 2010 to our
critical accounting policies.
25
Operating
Locations
Our operating locations by Canadian province, U.S. state
and internationally as of August 1, 2010, and the overall
totals as of August 1, 2010 and January 31, 2010, are
summarized in the table below. While most of our stores are
branded lululemon athletica, three of our corporate-owned stores
are branded ivivva athletica and specialize in dance-inspired
apparel for female youth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate-Owned
|
|
|
Franchise
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Stores
|
|
|
Stores
|
|
|
Stores
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alberta
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
British Columbia
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Manitoba
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Nova Scotia
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Ontario
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Québec
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Saskatchewan
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Canada
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
California
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Colorado
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Connecticut
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
District of Columbia
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Hawaii
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Illinois
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Maryland
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Massachusetts
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Missouri
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Nevada
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
New York
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Oregon
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Virginia
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Washington
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total United States
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total International
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall total, as of August 1, 2010
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall total, as of January 31, 2010
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our
financial position due to adverse changes in financial market
prices and rates. Our market risk exposure is primarily a result
of fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange
rates. We do not hold or issue financial instruments for trading
purposes.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. We currently
generate a majority of our net revenue in Canada. The reporting
currency for our consolidated financial statements is the United
States dollar. Historically, our operations were based largely
in Canada. As of August 1, 2010, we operated 45 stores in
Canada. As a result, we have been impacted by changes in
exchange rates and may be impacted materially for the
foreseeable future. For example, because we recognize net
revenue from sales in Canada in Canadian dollars, if the United
States dollar strengthens it would have a negative impact on our
Canadian operating results upon translation of those results
into United States dollars for the purposes of consolidation.
Any hypothetical loss in net revenue could be partially or
completely offset by lower cost of sales and lower selling,
general and administrative expenses that are generated in
Canadian dollars. A 10% depreciation in the relative value of
the Canadian dollar compared to the U.S. dollar would have
resulted in lost income from operations of approximately
$4.1 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. To the
extent the ratio between our net revenue generated in Canadian
dollars increases as compared to our expenses generated in
Canadian dollars, we expect that our results of operations will
be further impacted by changes in exchange rates. We do not
currently hedge foreign currency fluctuations. However, in the
future, in an effort to mitigate losses associated with these
risks, we may at times enter into derivative financial
instruments, although we have not historically done so. These
may take the form of forward sales contracts and option
contracts. We do not, and do not intend to, engage in the
practice of trading derivative securities for profit.
Interest Rate Risk. In April 2007, we entered
into an uncommitted senior secured demand revolving credit
facility with Royal Bank of Canada which replaced our previous
credit facility. Because our revolving credit facility bears
interest at a variable rate, we are exposed to market risks
relating to changes in interest rates, if we have a meaningful
outstanding balance. At August 1, 2010, we had no
outstanding borrowings on our revolving facility. We do not
believe we currently are significantly exposed to changes in
interest rate risk. We currently do not engage in any interest
rate hedging activity and currently have no intention to do so
in the foreseeable future. However, in the future, if we have a
meaningful outstanding balance, in an effort to mitigate losses
associated with these risks, we may at times enter into
derivative financial instruments, although we have not
historically done so. These may take the form of forward sales
contracts, option contracts, and interest rate swaps. We do not,
and do not intend to, engage in the practice of trading
derivative securities for profit.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed
to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the
reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, or the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs
rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial
Officer (principal financial officer), to allow timely decisions
to be made regarding required disclosure. We have established a
Disclosure Committee, consisting of certain members of
management, to assist in this evaluation. The Disclosure
Committee meets on a quarterly basis, and as needed.
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
promulgated under the Exchange Act), at August 1, 2010.
Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that, at August 1, 2010, our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
There was no change in internal control over financial reporting
during the fiscal quarter ended August 1, 2010 that has
materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect
our internal control over financial reporting.
27
PART II
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
On April 2, 2009, three of our former hourly employees
filed a class action lawsuit in San Diego Superior Court,
California, entitled Mia Stephens et al v. lululemon
athletica inc. The lawsuit alleges that we violated various
California Labor Code sections by requiring employees to wear
lululemon clothing during working hours without reimbursing such
employees for the cost of the clothing and by paying certain
bonus payments to our employees in the form of lululemon gift
cards redeemable only for lululemon merchandise. The complaint
also alleges that we owe waiting time penalties as the result of
failing to pay employees all wages due at the time of
termination. We and the plaintiffs have reached an agreement on
settlement terms and the agreement has received tentative
approval from the court. The parties must now go through the
process of obtaining final court approval.
On March 26, 2009, one of our former hourly employees filed
a class action lawsuit in Orange County Superior Court,
California, entitled Brett Kohlenberg et al v. lululemon
athletica inc. The lawsuit alleges that we violated various
California Labor Code sections by failing to pay our employees
for certain rest and meal breaks and off the clock
work, and for penalties related to waiting times and failure to
provide itemized wage statements. We and the plaintiffs have
reached an agreement on settlement terms and the agreement has
received tentative approval from the court. The parties must now
go through the process of obtaining final court approval.
We are, from time to time, involved in routine legal matters
incidental to our business. Management believes that the
ultimate resolution of any such current proceedings will not
have a material adverse effect on our continued financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
Our past performance may not be a reliable indicator of future
performance because actual future results and trends may differ
materially depending on a variety of factors, including, but not
limited to, the risks and uncertainties discussed below. In
addition, historical trends should not be used to anticipate
results or trends in future periods. Factors that might cause
our actual results to differ materially from the forward looking
statements discussed elsewhere in this report, as well as affect
our ability to achieve our financial and other goals, include,
but are not limited to, those set forth below.
General
economic conditions and volatility in the worldwide economy has
adversely affected consumer spending, which has negatively
affected our results of operations and may continue to do so in
the future.
Our operations and performance depend significantly on economic
conditions, particularly those in Canada and the United States,
and their impact on levels of consumer spending. Consumer
spending on non-essential items is affected by a number of
factors, including consumer confidence in the strength of
economies, fears of recession, the tightening of credit markets,
higher levels of unemployment, higher tax rates, the cost of
consumer credit and other factors. The current volatility in the
United States economy in particular has resulted in an overall
slowing in growth in the retail sector because of decreased
consumer spending, which may remain depressed for the
foreseeable future. These unfavorable economic conditions may
continue to lead our customers to delay or reduce purchase of
our products.
In addition, we could experience reduced traffic in our stores
and limitations on the prices we can charge for our products,
which may include price discounts, either of which could reduce
our sales and profit margins. Economic factors such as those
listed above and increased transportation costs, inflation,
higher costs of labor, insurance and healthcare, and changes in
other laws and regulations may increase our cost of sales and
our operating, selling, general and administrative expenses.
These and other economic factors could have a material adverse
affect on the demand for our products and on our financial
conditions, operating results and stock price.
28
We
have grown rapidly in recent years and we have limited operating
experience at our current scale of operations; if we are unable
to manage our operations at our current size or to manage any
future growth effectively, our brand image and financial
performance may suffer.
We have expanded our operations rapidly since our inception in
1998 and we have limited operating experience at our current
size. We opened our first store in Canada in 1999 and our first
store in the United States in 2003. Our net revenue increased
from $40.7 million in fiscal 2004 to $452.9 million in
fiscal 2009, representing a compound annual increase of
approximately 62%. We expect our net revenue growth rate to slow
as the number of new stores that we open in the future declines
relative to our larger store base. Our substantial growth to
date has placed a significant strain on our management systems
and resources. If our operations continue to grow, of which
there can be no assurance, we will be required to continue to
expand our sales and marketing, product development and
distribution functions, to upgrade our management information
systems and other processes, and to obtain more space for our
expanding administrative support and other headquarters
personnel. Our continued growth could increase the strain on our
resources, and we could experience serious operating
difficulties, including difficulties in hiring, training and
managing an increasing number of employees, difficulties in
obtaining sufficient raw materials and manufacturing capacity to
produce our products, and delays in production and shipments.
These difficulties would likely result in the erosion of our
brand image and lead to a decrease in net revenue, income from
operations and the price of our common stock.
Any
material disruption of our information systems could disrupt our
business and reduce our sales.
We are increasingly dependent on information systems to operate
our website, process transactions, respond to customer
inquiries, manage inventory, purchase, sell and ship goods on a
timely basis and maintain cost-efficient operations. Throughout
fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, we upgraded certain of our
information systems to support recent and expected future
growth. These system upgrades improved our ability to capture,
process and ship customer orders, and transfer product between
channels. We incurred additional costs associated with these
upgrades in fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008. We believe these
systems are stable upon implementation, but there can be no
assurance that future disruptions will not occur. We may
experience operational problems with our information systems as
a result of system failures, viruses, computer
hackers or other causes. Any material disruption or
slowdown of our systems, including a disruption or slowdown
caused by our failure to successfully upgrade our systems, could
cause information, including data related to customer orders, to
be lost or delayed which could especially if the
disruption or slowdown occurred during the holiday
season result in delays in the delivery of
merchandise to our stores and customers or lost sales, which
could reduce demand for our merchandise and cause our sales to
decline. Moreover, we may not be successful in developing or
acquiring technology that is competitive and responsive to the
needs of our customers and might lack sufficient resources to
make the necessary investments in technology to compete with our
competitors. Accordingly, if changes in technology cause our
information systems to become obsolete, or if our information
systems are inadequate to handle our growth, we could lose
customers.
Our direct to consumer channel, which includes
e-commerce,
is an increasingly substantial part of our business,
representing approximately 7% of our net revenue in the first
two quarters of fiscal 2010, 4% of our revenue in fiscal 2009
and less than 1% of our net revenue in fiscal 2008. In addition
to changing consumer preferences and buying trends relating to
e-commerce,
we are vulnerable to certain additional risks and uncertainties
associated with
e-commerce,
including changes in required technology interfaces, website
downtime and other technical failures, security breaches, and
consumer privacy concerns. Our failure to successfully respond
to these risks and uncertainties could reduce
e-commerce
sales and damage our brands reputation.
We have taken over certain portions of our information systems
needs that were previously outsourced to a third-party and are
making upgrades to our information systems. We may take over
other outsourced portions of our information systems in the near
future. If we are unable to manage these aspects of our
information systems or the planned upgrades, our receipt and
delivery of merchandise could be disrupted, which could result
in a decline in our sales.
Problems
with our distribution system could harm our ability to meet
customer expectations, manage inventory, complete sales and
achieve objectives for operating efficiencies.
We rely on our distribution facilities in Vancouver, British
Columbia and Sumner, Washington for substantially all of our
product distribution. Our distribution facilities include
computer controlled and automated equipment, which means their
operations are complicated and may be subject to a number of
risks related to security or computer viruses, the proper
29
operation of software and hardware, electronic or power
interruptions or other system failures. In addition, because
substantially all of our products are distributed from two
locations, our operations could also be interrupted by labor
difficulties, or by floods, fires or other natural disasters
near our distribution centers. If we encounter problems with our
distribution system, our ability to meet customer expectations,
manage inventory, complete sales and achieve objectives for
operating efficiencies could be harmed.
We are
subject to risks associated with leasing retail space subject to
long-term non-cancelable leases and are required to make
substantial lease payments under our operating leases, and any
failure to make these lease payments when due would likely harm
our business, profitability and results of
operations.
We do not own any of our store facilities or real estate, but
instead lease all of our corporate-owned stores under operating
leases. Our leases generally have initial terms of between five
and 10 years, and generally can be extended only in
five-year increments if at all. All of our leases require a
fixed annual rent, and most require the payment of additional
rent if store sales exceed a negotiated amount. Generally, our
leases are net leases, which require us to pay all
of the cost of insurance, taxes, maintenance and utilities. We
generally cannot cancel these leases at our option. Payments
under these operating leases account for a significant portion
of our cost of goods sold. For example, as of August 1,
2010, we were a party to operating leases associated with our
corporate-owned stores as well as other corporate facilities
requiring future minimum lease payments aggregating
$141.1 million through January 31, 2015 and
approximately $68.3 million thereafter. We expect that any
new stores we open will also be leased by us under operating
leases, which will further increase our operating lease expenses.
Our substantial operating lease obligations could have
significant negative consequences, including:
|
|
|
|
|
increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and
industry conditions;
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing;
|
|
|
|
requiring a substantial portion of our available cash to pay our
rental obligations, thus reducing cash available for other
purposes;
|
|
|
|
limiting our flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes
in our business or in the industry in which we compete; and
|
|
|
|
placing us at a disadvantage with respect to some of our
competitors.
|
We depend on cash flow from operations to pay our lease expenses
and to fulfill our other cash needs. If our business does not
generate sufficient cash flow from operating activities, and
sufficient funds are not otherwise available to us from
borrowings under our available credit facilities or from other
sources, we may not be able to service our operating lease
expenses, grow our business, respond to competitive challenges
or fund our other liquidity and capital needs, which would harm
our business.
The
cost of raw materials could increase our cost of goods sold and
cause our results of operations and financial condition to
suffer.
The fabrics used by our suppliers and manufacturers include
synthetic fabrics whose raw materials include petroleum-based
products. Our products also include natural fibers, including
cotton. Significant price fluctuations or shortages in petroleum
or other raw materials may increase our cost of goods sold and
cause our results of operations and financial condition to
suffer.
We may
not be able to successfully open new store locations in a timely
manner, if at all, which could harm our results of
operations.
Our growth will largely depend on our ability to successfully
open and operate new stores. Our ability to successfully open
and operate new stores depends on many factors, including, among
others, our ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
identify suitable store locations, the availability of which is
outside of our control;
|
|
|
|
negotiate acceptable lease terms, including desired tenant
improvement allowances;
|
|
|
|
hire, train and retain store personnel and field management;
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
assimilate new store personnel and field management into our
corporate culture;
|
|
|
|
source sufficient inventory levels; and
|
|
|
|
successfully integrate new stores into our existing operations
and information technology systems.
|
Successful new store openings may also be affected by our
ability to initiate our grassroots marketing efforts in advance
of opening our first store in a new market. We typically rely on
our grassroots marketing efforts to build awareness of our brand
and demand for our products. Our grassroots marketing efforts
are often lengthy and must be tailored to each new market based
on our emerging understanding of the market. Accordingly, there
can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully
implement our grassroots marketing efforts in a particular
market in a timely manner, if at all. Additionally, we may be
unsuccessful in identifying new markets where our technical
athletic apparel and other products and brand image will be
accepted or the performance of our stores will be considered
successful. Further, we will encounter pre-operating costs and
we may encounter initial losses while new stores commence
operations.
We plan to open new stores in the near future to add to our
existing store base. Of the 130 stores in operation as of
August 1, 2010, we reacquired the franchise rights for one
store in Canada, opened five new stores in the United States,
reacquired the franchise rights for nine stores in Australia and
opened one new store in Australia in the first two quarters of
fiscal 2010. We expect to open a total of seven to nine
additional stores during the remainder of fiscal 2010 in Canada,
the United States and Australia. We estimate that we will incur
between approximately $4.4 million and $6.3 million of
capital expenditures in fiscal 2010 to open these seven to nine
additional stores. In addition, our new stores may not be
immediately profitable and we may incur losses until these
stores become profitable. There can be no assurance that we will
open the planned number of new stores in fiscal 2010. Any
failure to successfully open and operate new stores will harm
our results of operations.
If we
fail to maintain the value and reputation of our brand, our
sales are likely to decline.
Our success depends on the value and reputation of the lululemon
brand. The lululemon name is integral to our business as well as
to the implementation of our strategies for expanding our
business. Maintaining, promoting and positioning our brand will
depend largely on the success of our marketing and merchandising
efforts and our ability to provide a consistent, high quality
customer experience. We rely on social media, as one of our
marketing strategies, to have a positive impact on both our
brand value and reputation. Our brand could be adversely
affected if we fail to achieve these objectives or if our public
image or reputation were to be tarnished by negative publicity.
Any of these events could result in decreases in sales.
Our
limited operating experience and limited brand recognition in
new markets may limit our expansion strategy and cause our
business and growth to suffer.
Our future growth depends, to a considerable extent, on our
expansion efforts outside of Canada, especially in the United
States. Our current operations are based largely in Canada and
the United States. As of August 1, 2010, we had 45
corporate-owned stores in Canada, 71 corporate-owned stores in
the United States, ten corporate-owned stores in Australia and
four franchise stores in North America. We have limited
experience with regulatory environments and market practices
outside of Canada and the United States, and cannot guarantee
that we will be able to penetrate or successfully operate in any
market outside of North America. As previously disclosed, we
have discontinued our operations in Japan. In connection with
our initial expansion efforts outside of North America, we have
encountered many obstacles we do not face in Canada or the
United States, including cultural and linguistic differences,
differences in regulatory environments and market practices,
difficulties in keeping abreast of market, business and
technical developments and foreign customers tastes and
preferences.
We may also encounter difficulty expanding into new markets
because of limited brand recognition leading to delayed
acceptance of our technical athletic apparel by customers in
these new markets. In particular, we have no assurance that our
grassroots marketing efforts will prove successful outside of
the narrow geographic regions in which they have been used in
the United States and Canada. We anticipate that as our business
expands into new markets and as the market becomes increasingly
competitive, maintaining and enhancing our brand may become
increasingly difficult and expensive. Conversely, as we
penetrate these markets and our brand becomes more widely
available, it could potentially detract from the appeal stemming
from the scarcity of our brand. Our brand may also be adversely
affected if our public image or reputation is tarnished by
negative publicity. Maintaining and enhancing our brand will
depend
31
largely on our ability to be a leader in the athletic apparel
industry, to offer a unique store experience to our customers
and to continue to provide high quality products and services,
which we may not do successfully. Failure to develop new markets
outside of North America or disappointing growth outside of
North America will harm our business and results of operations.
In addition, if we are unable to maintain or enhance our brand
image our results of operations may suffer and our business may
be harmed.
Our
ability to attract customers to our stores depends heavily on
successfully locating our stores in suitable locations and any
impairment of a store location, including any decrease in
customer traffic, could cause our sales to be less than
expected.
Our approach to identifying locations for our stores typically
favors street locations and lifestyle centers where we can be a
part of the community. As a result, our stores are typically
located near retailers or fitness facilities that we believe are
consistent with our customers lifestyle choices. Sales at
these stores are derived, in part, from the volume of foot
traffic in these locations. Store locations may become
unsuitable due to, and our sales volume and customer traffic
generally may be harmed by, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
economic downturns in a particular area;
|
|
|
|
competition from nearby retailers selling athletic apparel;
|
|
|
|
changing consumer demographics in a particular market;
|
|
|
|
changing lifestyle choices of consumers in a particular
market; and
|
|
|
|
the closing or decline in popularity of other businesses located
near our store.
|
Changes in areas around our store locations that result in
reductions in customer foot traffic or otherwise render the
locations unsuitable could cause our sales to be less than
expected.
We
operate in a highly competitive market and the size and
resources of some of our competitors may allow them to compete
more effectively than we can, resulting in a loss of our market
share and a decrease in our net revenue and
profitability.
The market for technical athletic apparel is highly competitive.
Competition may result in pricing pressures, reduced profit
margins or lost market share or a failure to grow our market
share, any of which could substantially harm our business and
results of operations. We compete directly against wholesalers
and direct retailers of athletic apparel, including large,
diversified apparel companies with substantial market share and
established companies expanding their production and marketing
of technical athletic apparel, as well as against retailers
specifically focused on womens athletic apparel. We also
face competition from wholesalers and direct retailers of
traditional commodity athletic apparel, such as cotton T-shirts
and sweatshirts. Many of our competitors are large apparel and
sporting goods companies with strong worldwide brand
recognition, such as Nike, Inc. and adidas AG, which includes
the adidas and Reebok brands. Because of the fragmented nature
of the industry, we also compete with other apparel sellers,
including those specializing in yoga apparel. Many of our
competitors have significant competitive advantages, including
longer operating histories, larger and broader customer bases,
more established relationships with a broader set of suppliers,
greater brand recognition and greater financial, research and
development, marketing, distribution and other resources than we
do. In addition, our technical athletic apparel is sold at a
premium to traditional athletic apparel.
Our competitors may be able to achieve and maintain brand
awareness and market share more quickly and effectively than we
can. In contrast to our grassroots marketing
approach, many of our competitors promote their brands primarily
through traditional forms of advertising, such as print media
and television commercials, and through celebrity athlete
endorsements, and have substantial resources to devote to such
efforts. Our competitors may also create and maintain brand
awareness using traditional forms of advertising more quickly in
new markets than we can. Our competitors may also be able to
increase sales in their new and existing markets faster than we
do by emphasizing different distribution channels than we do,
such as catalog sales or an extensive franchise network, as
opposed to distribution through retail stores, wholesale or
internet, and many of our competitors have substantial resources
to devote toward increasing sales in such ways.
32
In addition, because we own no patents or exclusive intellectual
property rights in the technology, fabrics or processes
underlying our products, our current and future competitors are
able to manufacture and sell products with performance
characteristics, fabrication techniques and styling similar to
our products.
Our
inability to maintain recent levels of comparable store sales or
average sales per square foot could cause our stock price to
decline.
We may not be able to maintain the levels of comparable store
sales that we have experienced historically. In addition, we may
not be able to replicate outside of North America our historic
average sales per square foot. Our sales per square foot in
stores we have opened in new markets, which have primarily been
in the United States, have generally been lower than those we
have been able to achieve in Canada. As sales in new markets
grow to become a larger percentage of our overall sales, our
average sales per square foot will likely decline. The aggregate
results of operations of our stores have fluctuated in the past
and can be expected to continue to fluctuate in the future. For
example, for the three most recently ended fiscal years, our
comparable store sales have ranged from a decrease of 22% in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 to an increase of 51% in the first
quarter of fiscal 2010. A variety of factors affect both
comparable store sales and average sales per square foot,
including foreign exchange fluctuations, fashion trends,
competition,current economic conditions, pricing, inflation, the
timing of the release of new merchandise and promotional events,
changes in our merchandise mix, the success of marketing
programs and weather conditions. These factors may cause our
comparable store sales results to be materially lower than
recent periods and our expectations, which could harm our
results of operations and result in a decline in the price of
our common stock.
Our
net sales are affected by direct to consumer
sales.
We sell merchandise over the Internet through our website. Our
e-commerce
operations, included in our direct to consumer channel, are
subject to numerous risks, including reliance on third party
computer hardware/software, rapid technological change,
diversion of sales from our stores, liability for online
content, violations of state or federal laws, including those
relating to online privacy, credit card fraud, risks related to
the failure of the computer systems that operate our websites
and their related support systems, including computer viruses,
telecommunications failures and electronic break-ins and similar
disruptions. There is no assurance that our
e-commerce
operations will continue to achieve sales and profitability
growth.
Failure
to comply with trade and other regulations could lead to
investigations or actions by government regulators and negative
publicity.
The labeling, distribution, importation and sale of our products
are subject to extensive regulation by various federal agencies,
including the Federal Trade Commission, or the FTC, state
attorneys general in the U.S., the Competition Bureau and Health
Canada in Canada as well as by various other federal, state,
provincial, local and international regulatory authorities in
the countries in which our products are distributed or sold. If
we fail to comply with those regulations, we could become
subject to significant penalties or claims, which could harm our
results of operations or our ability to conduct our business. In
addition, the adoption of new regulations or changes in the
interpretation of existing regulations may result in significant
compliance costs or discontinuation of product sales and may
impair the marketing of our products, resulting in significant
loss of net sales.
In addition, our failure to comply with FTC or state
regulations, or with regulations in foreign markets that cover
our product claims and advertising, including direct claims and
advertising by us, may result in enforcement actions and
imposition of penalties or otherwise harm the distribution and
sale of our products.
Our
plans to improve and expand our product offerings may not be
successful, and implementation of these plans may divert our
operational, managerial and administrative resources, which
could harm our competitive position and reduce our net revenue
and profitability.
In addition to our store expansion strategy, we plan to grow our
business by improving and expanding our product offerings, which
includes introducing new product technologies, increasing the
range of athletic activities our products target, growing our
mens and female youth businesses and expanding our
accessories, undergarments and outerwear
33
offerings. The principal risks to our ability to successfully
carry out our plans to improve and expand our product offering
are that:
|
|
|
|
|
introduction of new products may be delayed, allowing our
competitors to introduce similar products in a more timely
fashion, which could hurt our goal to be viewed as a leader in
technical athletic apparel innovation;
|
|
|
|
if our expanded product offerings fail to maintain and enhance
our distinctive brand identity, our brand image may be
diminished and our sales may decrease;
|
|
|
|
implementation of these plans may divert managements
attention from other aspects of our business and place a strain
on our management, operational and financial resources, as well
as our information systems; and
|
|
|
|
incorporation of novel technologies into our products that are
not accepted by our customers or that are inferior to similar
products offered by our competitors.
|
In addition, our ability to successfully carry out our plans to
improve and expand our product offerings may be affected by
economic and competitive conditions, changes in consumer
spending patterns and changes in consumer athletic preferences
and style trends. These plans could be abandoned, could cost
more than anticipated and could divert resources from other
areas of our business, any of which could impact our competitive
position and reduce our net revenue and profitability.
We
rely on third-party suppliers to provide fabrics for and to
produce our products, and we have limited control over them and
may not be able to obtain quality products on a timely basis or
in sufficient quantity.
We do not manufacture our products or the raw materials for them
and rely instead on third-party suppliers. Many of the specialty
fabrics used in our products are technically advanced textile
products developed and manufactured by third parties and may be
available, in the short-term, from only one or a very limited
number of sources. For example, Luon fabric, which is included
in many of our products, is supplied to the mills we use by a
single manufacturer in Taiwan, and the fibers used in
manufacturing Luon fabric are supplied to our Taiwanese
manufacturer by a single company. In fiscal 2009, approximately
85% of our products were produced by our top 10 manufacturing
suppliers.
If we experience significant increased demand, or need to
replace an existing manufacturer, there can be no assurance that
additional supplies of fabrics or raw materials or additional
manufacturing capacity will be available when required on terms
that are acceptable to us, or at all, or that any supplier or
manufacturer would allocate sufficient capacity to us in order
to meet our requirements or fill our orders in a timely manner.
Even if we are able to expand existing or find new manufacturing
or fabric sources, we may encounter delays in production and
added costs as a result of the time it takes to train our
suppliers and manufacturers in our methods, products and quality
control standards. Delays related to supplier changes could also
arise due to an increase in shipping times if new suppliers are
located farther away from our markets or from other participants
in our supply chain. Any delays, interruption or increased costs
in the supply of fabric or manufacture of our products could
have an adverse effect on our ability to meet customer demand
for our products and result in lower net revenue and income from
operations both in the short and long-term.
In addition, there can be no assurance that our suppliers and
manufacturers will continue to provide fabrics and raw materials
or manufacture products that comply with our technical
specifications and are consistent with our standards. We have
occasionally received, and may in the future continue to
receive, shipments of products that fail to comply with our
technical specifications or that fail to conform to our quality
control standards. In that event, unless we are able to obtain
replacement products in a timely manner, we risk the loss of net
revenue resulting from the inability to sell those products and
related increased administrative and shipping costs.
Additionally, if defects in the manufacture of our products are
not discovered until after such products are purchased by our
customers, our customers could lose confidence in the technical
attributes of our products and our results of operations could
suffer and our business may be harmed.
We do
not have long-term contracts with our suppliers and accordingly
could face significant disruptions in supply from our current
sources.
We generally do not enter into long-term formal written
agreements with our suppliers, including those for Luon, and
typically transact business with our suppliers on an
order-by-order
basis. There can be no assurance that there will not be a
significant disruption in the supply of fabrics or raw materials
from current sources or, in the event of a disruption, that we
34
would be able to locate alternative suppliers of materials of
comparable quality at an acceptable price, or at all.
Identifying a suitable supplier is an involved process that
requires us to become satisfied with their quality control,
responsiveness and service, financial stability and labor and
other ethical practices. Any delays, interruption or increased
costs in the supply of fabric or manufacture of our products
arising from a lack of long-term contracts could have an adverse
effect on our ability to meet customer demand for our products
and result in lower net revenue and income from operations both
in the short and long-term. Similarly, there can no assurance
that the suppliers of our fabrics, such as Luon, will not sell
the same fabric to our competitors.
We do
not have patents or exclusive intellectual property rights in
our fabrics and manufacturing technology. If our competitors
sell similar products to ours, our net revenue and profitability
could suffer.
The intellectual property rights in the technology, fabrics and
processes used to manufacture our products are owned or
controlled by our suppliers and are generally not unique to us.
Our ability to obtain intellectual property protection for our
products is therefore limited and we currently own no patents or
exclusive intellectual property rights in the technology,
fabrics or processes underlying our products. As a result, our
current and future competitors are able to manufacture and sell
products with performance characteristics, fabrics and styling
similar to our products. Because many of our competitors, such
as Nike, Inc. and adidas AG, which includes the adidas and
Reebok brands, have significantly greater financial,
distribution, marketing and other resources than we do, they may
be able to manufacture and sell products based on our fabrics
and manufacturing technology at lower prices than we can. If our
competitors do sell similar products to ours at lower prices,
our net revenue and profitability could suffer.
Our
future success is substantially dependent on the continued
service of our senior management.
Our future success is substantially dependent on the continued
service of our senior management. The loss of the services of
our senior management could make it more difficult to
successfully operate our business and achieve our business goals.
We also may be unable to retain existing management, technical,
sales and client support personnel that are critical to our
success, which could result in harm to our customer and employee
relationships, loss of key information, expertise or know-how
and unanticipated recruitment and training costs.
We do not maintain a key person life insurance policy on
Mr. Wilson, Ms. Day or any of the other members of our
senior management team. As a result, we would have no way to
cover the financial loss if we were to lose the services of
members of our senior management team.
Our
operating results are subject to seasonal and quarterly
variations in our net revenue and income from operations, which
could cause the price of our common stock to
decline.
We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience,
significant seasonal variations in our net revenue and income
from operations. Seasonal variations in our net revenue are
primarily related to increased sales of our products during our
fourth fiscal quarter, reflecting our historical strength in
sales during the holiday season. We generated approximately 39%,
29% and 39% of our full year gross profit during the fourth
quarters of fiscal 2009, fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007,
respectively. Historically, seasonal variations in our income
from operations have been driven principally by increased net
revenue in our fourth fiscal quarter.
Our quarterly results of operations may also fluctuate
significantly as a result of a variety of other factors,
including, among other things, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the timing of new store openings;
|
|
|
|
net revenue and profits contributed by new stores;
|
|
|
|
increases or decreases in comparable store sales;
|
|
|
|
increases or decreases in our
e-commerce
sales;
|
|
|
|
changes in our product mix; and
|
|
|
|
the timing of new advertising and new product introductions.
|
35
As a result of these seasonal and quarterly fluctuations, we
believe that comparisons of our operating results between
different quarters within a single fiscal year are not
necessarily meaningful and that these comparisons cannot be
relied upon as indicators of our future performance.
Any future seasonal or quarterly fluctuations in our results of
operations may not match the expectations of market analysts and
investors. Disappointing quarterly results could cause the price
of our common stock to decline. Seasonal or quarterly factors in
our business and results of operations may also make it more
difficult for market analysts and investors to assess the
longer-term profitability and strength of our business at any
particular point, which could lead to increased volatility in
our stock price. Increased volatility could cause our stock
price to suffer in comparison to less volatile investments.
If we
are unable to accurately forecast customer demand for our
products our manufacturers may not be able to deliver products
to meet our requirements, and this could result in delays in the
shipment of products to our stores and may harm our results of
operations and customer relationships.
We stock our stores based on our estimates of future demand for
particular products. If our inventory and planning team fails to
accurately forecast customer demand, we may experience excess
inventory levels or a shortage of products available for sale in
our stores. There can be no assurance that we will be able to
successfully manage our inventory at a level appropriate for
future customer demand.
Inventory levels in excess of customer demand may result in
inventory write-downs or write-offs and the sale of excess
inventory at discounted prices, which would cause our gross
margin to suffer and could impair the strength and exclusivity
of our brand. We wrote-off $0.8 million, $0.9 million
and $0.8 million of inventory in fiscal 2009, fiscal 2008
and fiscal 2007, respectively. In addition, if we underestimate
customer demand for our products, our manufacturers may not be
able to deliver products to meet our requirements, and this
could result in delays in the shipment of products to our stores
and may damage our reputation and customer relationships. There
can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully manage
our inventory at a level appropriate for future customer demand.
Our
current and future joint ventures may not be
successful.
As part of our long-term growth strategy, we plan to expand our
stores and sales of our products into new locations outside
North America. Our successful expansion and operation of new
stores outside North America may depend on our ability to find
suitable partners and to successfully implement and manage joint
venture relationships. If we are able to find a joint venture
partner in a specific geographic area, there can be no guarantee
that such a relationship will be successful. Such a relationship
often creates additional risk. For example, our partners in
joint venture relationships may have interests that differ from
ours or that conflict with ours, such as the timing of new store
openings and the pricing of our products, or our partners may
become bankrupt which may as a practical matter subject us to
such partners liabilities in connection with the joint
venture. In addition, joint ventures can magnify several other
risks for us, including the potential loss of control over our
cultural identity in the markets where we enter into joint
ventures and the possibility that our brand image could be
impaired by the actions of our partners. Although we generally
will seek to maintain sufficient control of any investment to
permit our objectives to be achieved, we might not be able to
take action without the approval of our partners. Reliance on
joint venture relationships and our partners exposes us to
increased risk that our joint ventures will not be successful
and will result in competitive harm to our brand image that
could cause our expansion efforts, profitability and results of
operations to suffer.
If our
independent manufacturers fail to use ethical business practices
and comply with applicable laws and regulations, our brand image
could be harmed due to negative publicity.
Our core values, which include developing the highest quality
products while operating with integrity, are an important
component of our brand image, which makes our reputation
particularly sensitive to allegations of unethical business
practices. While our internal and vendor operating guidelines
promote ethical business practices such as environmental
responsibility, fair wage practices, and compliance with child
labor laws, among others, and we, along with a third-party that
we retain for this purpose, monitor compliance with those
guidelines, we do not control our independent manufacturers or
their business practices. Accordingly, we cannot guarantee their
compliance with our guidelines. A lack of demonstrated
compliance could lead us to seek alternative suppliers, which
could increase our costs and result in delayed delivery of our
products, product shortages or other disruptions of our
operations.
36
Violation of labor or other laws by our independent
manufacturers or the divergence of an independent
manufacturers labor or other practices from those
generally accepted as ethical in Canada, the United States or
other markets in which we do business could also attract
negative publicity for us and our brand. This could diminish the
value of our brand image and reduce demand for our merchandise
if, as a result of such violation, we were to attract negative
publicity. Other apparel manufacturers have encountered
significant problems in this regard, and these problems have
resulted in organized boycotts of their products and significant
adverse publicity. If we, or other manufacturers in our
industry, encounter similar problems in the future, it could
harm our brand image, stock price and results of operations.
Monitoring compliance by independent manufacturers is
complicated by the fact that expectations of ethical business
practices continually evolve, may be substantially more
demanding than applicable legal requirements and are driven in
part by legal developments and by diverse groups active in
publicizing and organizing public responses to perceived ethical
shortcomings. Accordingly, we cannot predict how such
expectations might develop in the future and cannot be certain
that our guidelines would satisfy all parties who are active in
monitoring and publicizing perceived shortcomings in labor and
other business practices worldwide.
Because
a significant portion of our sales are generated in Canada,
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates have negatively
affected our results of operations and may continue to do so in
the future.
The reporting currency for our consolidated financial statements
is the U.S. dollar. In the future, we expect to continue to
derive a significant portion of our sales and incur a
significant portion of our operating costs in Canada, and
changes in exchange rates between the Canadian dollar and the
U.S. dollar may have a significant, and potentially
adverse, effect on our results of operations. Our primary risk
of loss regarding foreign currency exchange rate risk is caused
by fluctuations in the exchange rates between the
U.S. dollar, Canadian dollar and Australian dollar. Because
we recognize net revenue from sales in Canada in Canadian
dollars, if the Canadian dollar weakens against the
U.S. dollar it would have a negative impact on our Canadian
operating results upon translation of those results into
U.S. dollars for the purposes of consolidation. The
exchange rate of the Canadian dollar against the
U.S. dollar has increased over fiscal 2009 and our results
of operations have benefited from the strength in the Canadian
dollar. If the Canadian dollar were to weaken relative to the
U.S. dollar, our net revenue would decline and our income
from operations and net income could be adversely affected. A
10% depreciation in the relative value of the Canadian dollar
compared to the U.S. dollar would have resulted in lost
income from operations of approximately $4.1 million in the
first two quarters of fiscal 2010 and approximately
$5.0 million in the first two quarters of fiscal 2009. We
have not historically engaged in hedging transactions and do not
currently contemplate engaging in hedging transactions to
mitigate foreign exchange risks. As we continue to recognize
gains and losses in foreign currency transactions, depending
upon changes in future currency rates, such gains or losses
could have a significant, and potentially adverse, effect on our
results of operations.
The
operations of many of our suppliers are subject to additional
risks that are beyond our control and that could harm our
business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Almost all of our suppliers are located outside the United
States. During fiscal 2009, approximately 5% of our products
were produced in Canada, approximately 75% in China,
approximately 8% in Southeast Asia and the remainder in the
United States, Israel, Peru and Taiwan. As a result of our
international suppliers, we are subject to risks associated with
doing business abroad, including:
|
|
|
|
|
political unrest, terrorism, labor disputes and economic
instability resulting in the disruption of trade from foreign
countries in which our products are manufactured;
|
|
|
|
the imposition of new laws and regulations, including those
relating to labor conditions, quality and safety standards,
imports, duties, taxes and other charges on imports, as well as
trade restrictions and restrictions on currency exchange or the
transfer of funds;
|
|
|
|
reduced protection for intellectual property rights, including
trademark protection, in some countries, particularly China;
|
|
|
|
disruptions or delays in shipments; and
|
|
|
|
changes in local economic conditions in countries where our
manufacturers, suppliers or customers are located.
|
37
These and other factors beyond our control could interrupt our
suppliers production in offshore facilities, influence the
ability of our suppliers to export our products cost-effectively
or at all and inhibit our suppliers ability to procure
certain materials, any of which could harm our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Our
ability to source our merchandise profitably or at all could be
hurt if new trade restrictions are imposed or existing trade
restrictions become more burdensome.
The United States and the countries in which our products are
produced or sold internationally have imposed and may impose
additional quotas, duties, tariffs, or other restrictions or
regulations, or may adversely adjust prevailing quota, duty or
tariff levels. For example, under the provisions of the World
Trade Organization, or the WTO, Agreement on Textiles and
Clothing, effective as of January 1, 2005, the United
States and other WTO member countries eliminated quotas on
textiles and apparel-related products from WTO member countries.
In 2005, Chinas exports into the United States surged as a
result of the eliminated quotas. In response to the perceived
disruption of the market, the United States imposed new quotas,
which remained in place through the end of 2008, on certain
categories of natural-fiber products that we import from China.
These quotas were lifted on January 1, 2009, but we have
expanded our relationships with suppliers outside of China,
which among other things has resulted in increased costs and
shipping times for some products. Countries impose, modify and
remove tariffs and other trade restrictions in response to a
diverse array of factors, including global and national economic
and political conditions, which make it impossible for us to
predict future developments regarding tariffs and other trade
restrictions. Trade restrictions, including tariffs, quotas,
embargoes, safeguards and customs restrictions, could increase
the cost or reduce the supply of products available to us or may
require us to modify our supply chain organization or other
current business practices, any of which could harm our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may
be subject to potential challenges relating to overtime pay and
other regulations that impact our employees, which could cause
our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows to suffer.
Various labor laws, including U.S. federal, U.S. state
and Canadian provincial laws, among others, govern our
relationship with our employees and affect our operating costs.
These laws include minimum wage requirements, overtime pay,
unemployment tax rates, workers compensation rates and
citizenship requirements. These laws change frequently and may
be difficult to interpret and apply. In particular, as a
retailer, we may be subject to challenges regarding the
application of overtime and related pay regulations to our
employees. A determination that we do not comply with these laws
could harm our brand image, business, financial condition and
results of operation. Additional government-imposed increases in
minimum wages, overtime pay, paid leaves of absence or mandated
health benefits could also cause our business, financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows to suffer.
Our
franchisees may take actions that could harm our business or
brand, and franchise regulations and contracts limit our ability
to terminate or replace under-performing
franchises.
As of August 1, 2010, we had four franchise stores in the
United States. Franchisees are independent business operators
and are not our employees, and we do not exercise control over
the
day-to-day
operations of their retail stores. We provide training and
support to franchisees, and set and monitor operational
standards, but the quality of franchise store operations may
decline due to diverse factors beyond our control. For example,
franchisees may not successfully operate stores in a manner
consistent with our standards and requirements, or may not hire
and train qualified employees, which could harm their sales and
as a result harm our results of operations or cause our brand
image to suffer.
Franchisees, as independent business operators, may from time to
time disagree with us and our strategies regarding the business
or our interpretation of our respective rights and obligations
under applicable franchise agreements. This may lead to disputes
with our franchisees, and we expect such disputes to occur from
time to time, such as the collection of royalty payments or
other matters related to the franchisees successful
operation of the retail store. Such disputes could divert the
attention of our management and our franchisees from our
operations, which could cause our business, financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows to suffer.
In addition, as a franchisor, we are subject to Canadian,
U.S. federal, U.S. state and international laws
regulating the offer and sale of franchises. These laws impose
registration and extensive disclosure requirements on the offer
and sale of franchises, frequently apply substantive standards
to the relationship between franchisor and franchisee and limit
the ability of a franchisor to terminate or refuse to renew a
franchise. We may therefore be required to retain an under-
38
performing franchise and may be unable to replace the
franchisee, which could harm our results of operations. We
cannot predict the nature and effect of any future legislation
or regulation on our franchise operations.
Our
failure or inability to protect our intellectual property rights
could diminish the value of our brand and weaken our competitive
position.
We currently rely on a combination of copyright, trademark,
trade dress and unfair competition laws, as well as
confidentiality procedures and licensing arrangements, to
establish and protect our intellectual property rights. We
cannot assure you that the steps taken by us to protect our
intellectual property rights will be adequate to prevent
infringement of such rights by others, including imitation of
our products and misappropriation of our brand. In addition,
intellectual property protection may be unavailable or limited
in some foreign countries where laws or law enforcement
practices may not protect our intellectual property rights as
fully as in the United States or Canada, and it may be more
difficult for us to successfully challenge the use of our
intellectual property rights by other parties in these
countries. If we fail to protect and maintain our intellectual
property rights, the value of our brand could be diminished and
our competitive position may suffer.
Our
trademarks and other proprietary rights could potentially
conflict with the rights of others and we may be prevented from
selling some of our products.
Our success depends in large part on our brand image. We believe
that our trademarks and other proprietary rights have
significant value and are important to identifying and
differentiating our products from those of our competitors and
creating and sustaining demand for our products. We have
obtained and applied for some United States and foreign
trademark registrations, and will continue to evaluate the
registration of additional trademarks as appropriate. However,
we cannot guarantee that any of our pending trademark
applications will be approved by the applicable governmental
authorities. Moreover, even if the applications are approved,
third parties may seek to oppose or otherwise challenge these
registrations. Additionally, we cannot assure you that obstacles
will not arise as we expand our product line and the geographic
scope of our sales and marketing. Third parties may assert
intellectual property claims against us, particularly as we
expand our business and the number of products we offer. Our
defense of any claim, regardless of its merit, could be
expensive and time consuming and could divert management
resources. Successful infringement claims against us could
result in significant monetary liability or prevent us from
selling some of our products. In addition, resolution of claims
may require us to redesign our products, license rights from
third parties or cease using those rights altogether. Any of
these events could harm our business and cause our results of
operations, liquidity and financial condition to suffer.
We
will continue to incur significant expenses as a result of being
a public company, which will negatively impact our financial
performance and could cause our results of operations and
financial condition to suffer.
We will continue to incur significant legal, accounting,
insurance and other expenses as a result of being a public
company. We expect that compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, as well as related rules implemented by the SEC and the
securities regulators in each of the provinces and territories
of Canada and by The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, will continue to
impact our expenses, including our legal and accounting costs,
and make some activities more time consuming and costly. We also
expect these laws, rules and regulations to make it more
expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability
insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy
limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to
obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more
difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to
serve on our board of directors or as officers. As a result of
the foregoing, we have experienced a substantial increase in
legal, accounting, insurance and certain other expenses and we
expect we may incur higher expenses in the future, which will
negatively impact our financial performance and could cause our
results of operations and financial condition to suffer.
Failure
to maintain adequate financial and management processes and
controls could lead to errors in our financial reporting, which
could harm our business and cause a decline in our stock
price.
Ongoing reporting obligations as a public company and our
continued growth are likely to place a considerable strain on
our financial and management systems, processes and controls, as
well as on our personnel. In addition, as a public company we
are required to document and test our internal controls over
financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 so that our management can certify
the effectiveness of our internal controls and our independent
registered public accounting firm can render an opinion on our
internal control over financial reporting on an
39
annual basis. As a result, we have implemented the required
financial and managerial controls, reporting systems and
procedures and we incurred substantial expenses to test our
systems and to make additional improvements and to hire
additional personnel. If our management is unable to certify the
effectiveness of our internal controls or if our independent
registered public accounting firm cannot render an opinion on
the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting, or if material weaknesses in our internal controls
are identified, we could be subject to regulatory scrutiny and a
loss of public confidence, which could harm our business and
cause a decline in our stock price. In addition, if we do not
maintain adequate financial and management personnel, processes
and controls, we may not be able to accurately report our
financial performance on a timely basis, which could cause a
decline in our stock price and harm our ability to raise
capital. Failure to accurately report our financial performance
on a timely basis could also jeopardize our continued listing on
the Nasdaq Global Select Market, the Toronto Stock Exchange or
any other stock exchange on which our common stock may be
listed. Delisting of our common stock on any exchange would
reduce the liquidity of the market for our common stock, which
would reduce the price of our stock and increase the volatility
of our stock price.
Our
stock price has been volatile and your investment in our common
stock could suffer a decline in value.
The market price of our common stock has been subject to
significant fluctuations and may continue to fluctuate or
decline. Since our initial public offering in July 2007 until
August 1, 2010, the price of our common stock has ranged
from a low of $4.33 to a high of $60.70 on the Nasdaq Global
Select Market and from a low of CDN $5.60 to a high of CDN
$58.77 on the Toronto Stock Exchange. Broad market and industry
factors may harm the price of our common stock, regardless of
our actual operating performance. Factors that could cause
fluctuation in the price of our common stock may include, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated fluctuations in quarterly operating
results or other operating metrics, such as comparable store
sales, that may be used by the investment community;
|
|
|
|
changes in financial estimates by us or by any securities
analysts who might cover our stock;
|
|
|
|
reductions in consumer spending and macroeconomic factors that
may adversely affect consumer spending;
|
|
|
|
speculation about our business in the press or the investment
community;
|
|
|
|
conditions or trends affecting our industry or the economy
generally, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates;
|
|
|
|
stock market price and volume fluctuations of other publicly
traded companies and, in particular, those that are in the
technical athletic apparel industry;
|
|
|
|
announcements by us or our competitors of new products,
significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships or divestitures;
|
|
|
|
changes in product mix between high and low margin products;
|
|
|
|
capital commitments;
|
|
|
|
our entry into new markets;
|
|
|
|
timing of new store openings;
|
|
|
|
percentage of sales from new stores versus established stores;
|
|
|
|
additions or departures of key personnel;
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated sales of our common stock, including sales
by our directors, officers or significant stockholders;
|
|
|
|
significant developments relating to our manufacturing,
distribution, joint venture or franchise relationships;
|
|
|
|
customer purchases of new products from us and our competitors;
|
|
|
|
investor perceptions of the apparel industry in general and our
company in particular;
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance,
interpretation or principles; and
|
|
|
|
speculative trading of our common stock in the investment
community.
|
40
In the past, securities class action litigation has often been
instituted against companies following periods of volatility in
their stock price. This type of litigation, even if it does not
result in liability for us, could result in substantial costs to
us and divert managements attention and resources.
A
significant number of our outstanding shares are eligible for
resale and may be sold on the Nasdaq Global Select Market and
the Toronto Stock Exchange. The large number of shares eligible
for public sale could depress the market price of our common
stock.
The market price of our common stock could decline as a result
of sales of a large number of shares of our common stock in the
market, and the perception that these sales could occur may also
depress the market price of our common stock. On July 31,
2008, we filed a registration statement on
Form S-3ASR
(as subsequently amended by a post-effective amendment on
Form S-3
filed on March 30, 2009) in the United States
registering the issuance of up to 20,935,041 shares of our
common stock upon the exchange of the then-outstanding
exchangeable shares of Lulu Canadian Holding, Inc. Sales of our
common stock in the public market may make it more difficult for
us to sell equity securities in the future at a time and at a
price that we deem appropriate. Additionally, we filed a
universal shelf registration statement on
Form S-3
on July 6, 2010, registering the possible issuance
and/or
resale of shares of our common stock, preferred stock, debt
securities, warrants and units. These sales also could cause our
stock price to fall and make it more difficult for you to sell
shares of our common stock.
Our
principal stockholders and management own a significant
percentage of our stock and will be able to exercise significant
influence over our affairs.
Our current directors and executive officers beneficially own
34% of our common stock. As a result, these stockholders, if
acting together, would be able to influence or control matters
requiring approval by our stockholders, including the election
of directors and the approval of mergers, acquisitions or other
extraordinary transactions. They may also have interests that
differ from yours and may vote in a way with which you disagree
and which may be adverse to your interests. This concentration
of ownership may have the effect of delaying, preventing or
deterring a change of control of our company, could deprive our
stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their
common stock as part of a sale of our company and might
ultimately affect the market price of our common stock.
Anti-takeover
provisions of Delaware law and our certificate of incorporation
and bylaws could delay and discourage takeover attempts that
stockholders may consider to be favorable.
Certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and
bylaws and applicable provisions of the Delaware General
Corporation Law may make it more difficult or impossible for a
third-party to acquire control of us or effect a change in our
board of directors and management. These provisions include:
|
|
|
|
|
the classification of our board of directors into three classes,
with one class elected each year;
|
|
|
|
prohibiting cumulative voting in the election of directors;
|
|
|
|
the ability of our board of directors to issue preferred stock
without stockholder approval;
|
|
|
|
the ability to remove a director only for cause and only with
the vote of the holders of at least
662/3%
of our voting stock;
|
|
|
|
a special meeting of stockholders may only be called by our
chairman or Chief Executive Officer, or upon a resolution
adopted by an affirmative vote of a majority of the board of
directors, and not by our stockholders;
|
|
|
|
prohibiting stockholder action by written consent; and
|
|
|
|
our stockholders must comply with advance notice procedures in
order to nominate candidates for election to our board of
directors or to place stockholder proposals on the agenda for
consideration at any meeting of our stockholders.
|
In addition, we are governed by Section 203 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law which, subject to some specified
exceptions, prohibits business combinations between
a Delaware corporation and an interested
stockholder, which is generally defined as a stockholder
who becomes a beneficial owner of 15% or more of a Delaware
corporations voting stock, for a three-year period
following the date that the stockholder became an interested
stockholder. Section 203 could have the effect of delaying,
deferring or preventing a change in control that our
stockholders might consider to be in their best interests.
41
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
UNREGISTERED
SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
|
The following table provides information regarding our purchases
of our common stock during the thirteen-week period ended
August 1, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
of Shares that
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
May Yet Be
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Purchased Under
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
Announced Plans
|
|
|
the Plans
|
|
Period(1)
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
or
Programs(2)
|
|
|
or
Programs(2)
|
|
|
May 3, 2010 May 30, 2010
|
|
|
2,869
|
|
|
$
|
40.80
|
|
|
|
2,869
|
|
|
|
2,859,763
|
|
May 31, 2010 July 4, 2010
|
|
|
2,713
|
|
|
|
43.05
|
|
|
|
2,713
|
|
|
|
2,857,050
|
|
July 5, 2010 August 1, 2010
|
|
|
2,923
|
|
|
|
40.60
|
|
|
|
2,923
|
|
|
|
2,854,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
8,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Monthly information is presented by reference to our fiscal
months during our second quarter of fiscal 2010.
|
|
(2)
|
Our Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP) was approved by our
Board of Directors and stockholders in September 2007. All
shares purchased under the ESPP are purchased on the Toronto
Stock Exchange or the Nasdaq Global Select Market (or such other
stock exchange as we may designate from time to time). Unless
our Board of Directors terminates the ESPP earlier, the ESPP
will continue until all shares authorized for purchase under the
ESPP have been purchased. The maximum number of shares
authorized to be purchased under the ESPP is 3,000,000.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Filed
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
No.
|
|
Exhibit Title
|
|
Herewith
|
|
Form
|
|
No.
|
|
File No.
|
|
Date
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Exchange
Act
Rule 13a-14(a)
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Exchange
Act
Rule 13a-14(a)
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
lululemon athletica inc.
John E. Currie
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
Dated: September 9, 2010
43
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Filed
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
No.
|
|
Exhibit Title
|
|
Herewith
|
|
Form
|
|
No.
|
|
File No.
|
|
Date
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Exchange
Act
Rule 13a-14(a)
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Exchange
Act
Rule 13a-14(a)
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44