def14a
SCHEDULE 14A
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Filed by the Registrant
þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
o
Check the appropriate box:
þ Definitive
Proxy Statement
o Preliminary
Proxy Statement
o Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
o Definitive
Additional Materials
o Soliciting
Material Pursuant to
§ 240.14a-12
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In
Its Charter)
N/A
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy
Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
þ
|
No fee required.
|
|
o
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act
Rules 14a-6(i)(4)
and 0-11.
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11
(set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined):
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
o
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
o
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing.
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
Dear Fellow Stockholders,
We are pleased to provide you with the proxy materials for our
2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. This year, our meeting will
be held on Friday, June 18, 2010 at
10:30 a.m. Pacific Time, at our corporate office
located at 157 Technology Drive, Irvine, California, 92618.
For Spectrum, 2009 was a watershed year financially,
strategically, and operationally. For the first time in our
history, we recorded product revenue of over $28 million.
Some of our other key accomplishments included: acquiring all
U.S. rights to
Zevalin®,
a novel drug for the treatment of non-Hodgkins Lymphoma,
and securing FDA approval for its use in the first-line setting,
thereby expanding the market opportunity substantially to more
than 40,000 addressable patients; receiving Fast-Track
designation for apaziquone
(EOquin®),
our drug in pivotal registrational trials for bladder cancer;
completing enrollment, involving over 1,600 patients, in
these Phase 3 trials, ahead of schedule; and entering into two
international alliances worth approximately $170 million.
And, despite an exceptionally challenging financial environment
in which many companies struggled to meet basic operating needs,
we were able to raise more than $100 million, allowing us
to meet most of our strategic initiatives.
All of us at Spectrum come to work with one goal in mind: How
can we improve the quality of life of cancer patients while at
the same time helping to increase stockholder value in a
challenging and rewarding environment? To succeed, we need to
constantly invest in our future. With this in mind, we recently
in-licensed belinostat, a late-stage, novel, potentially
best-in-class
histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor for the treatment of
various solid tumors and hematological malignancies, which is
currently in a registrational, pivotal trial under a Special
Protocol Assessment from the FDA requiring 100 evaluable
patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma. Belinostat has been
given a Fast Track Designation by the FDA. We plan to submit the
new drug application next year.
Spectrum has never been stronger than it is today, with two
marketed drugs, Zevalin and Fusilev, two late-stage drugs,
apaziquone and belinostat, in pivotal registrational trials, and
a strong cash position. We remain committed to our philosophy of
fiscal discipline and balanced risk management, as we continue
to develop novel treatments to help cancer patients.
At this meeting, we are asking for votes from our stockholders
on the election of our six nominees to the board of directors.
We believe that our director nominees will continue to bring
high ethical standards, significant knowledge, experience,
contacts and oversight to help us move forward with the
commercialization of our marketed drugs and development of our
clinical drugs.
Your vote is important, and whether or not you attend the annual
meeting, I encourage you to sign and return your proxy card, so
that your shares of stock will be represented and your votes
cast at the meeting. If you have any further questions, please
contact our Vice President of Finance, Mr. Shyam Kumaria,
at Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 157 Technology Drive, Irvine,
CA 92618.
We thank you for your consideration and support, and hope to see
you at this years annual meeting to learn more about our
future plans for Spectrum Pharmaceuticals.
Sincerely,
Rajesh C.
Shrotriya, M.D.
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer and President
157
Technology Drive
Irvine, CA 92618
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held Friday,
June 18, 2010
To our Stockholders:
The 2010 annual meeting of stockholders of Spectrum
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. will be held at our corporate office
located at 157 Technology Drive, Irvine, California, 92618, on
Friday, June 18, 2010, beginning at 10:30 a.m.,
Pacific Time. At the annual meeting, the holders of our
outstanding voting securities will consider and act on the
following matters:
(1) Election of six directors, each for a term of one year
expiring at the 2011 annual meeting of stockholders; and
(2) Transaction of such other business as may properly come
before the meeting.
All holders of record of shares of our common stock and
Series E Convertible Voting Preferred Stock at the close of
business on April 20, 2010 are entitled to vote at the
annual meeting and any postponements or adjournments of the
annual meeting.
Please note that registration will begin at
9:30 a.m., and seating will begin immediately thereafter.
Each stockholder may be asked to present valid picture
identification, such as a drivers license or passport.
Stockholders holding stock in brokerage accounts (street
name holders) will need to bring a copy of a brokerage
statement reflecting stock ownership as of the record date. It
is important that your shares be represented; therefore, even if
you presently plan to attend the annual meeting, PLEASE
COMPLETE, SIGN AND DATE, AND PROMPTLY RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY
CARD IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED.
Very truly yours,
Rajesh C.
Shrotriya, M.D.
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer and President
Date: April 28, 2010
Irvine, California
IMPORTANT
NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE
STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON JUNE 18, 2010
The proxy statement and annual report to our stockholders for
the year ended December 31, 2009 are available at our
Investor Relations page of our Internet website under the
heading Annual Meeting and Proxy Information. Our
web page is
http://www.sppirx.com.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
157
Technology Drive
Irvine, California 92618
PROXY STATEMENT
The enclosed Proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of
Directors of Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(Spectrum, we, our,
us or the Company) for use at our 2010
annual meeting of stockholders to be held Friday, June 18,
2010 at 10:30 a.m., Pacific Time, or at any postponement or
adjournment thereof, for the purposes set forth herein and in
the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
The annual meeting will be held at our corporate office located
at 157 Technology Drive, Irvine, California, 92618. This proxy
statement and the accompanying proxy are first being mailed to
our stockholders on or about May 17, 2010.
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 2010 ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING
What
is the purpose of the annual meeting?
At our annual meeting, stockholders will act upon the matters
outlined in the notice of annual meeting on the cover page of
this proxy statement, including the election of six directors,
each for a term of one year that expires at the annual meeting
in 2011. Stockholders will also act on any other business that
may properly come before the annual meeting. In addition,
following the annual meeting, management will report on our
performance during fiscal 2009 and early 2010.
Who is
entitled to vote at the annual meeting?
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on
April 20, 2010, the record date for the annual meeting, are
entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the annual meeting.
If you were a stockholder of record on that date, you are
entitled to vote all of the shares that you held on that date at
the annual meeting, or any postponements or adjournments of the
annual meeting. A list of such stockholders will be available
for examination by any stockholder at the annual meeting and,
for any purpose germane to the annual meeting, at our principal
business office, 157 Technology Drive, Irvine, California,
92618, for a period of ten days prior to the annual meeting.
How
many shares of our common stock and preferred stock are
outstanding and what are the voting rights of the holders of
those shares?
On April 20, 2010, the record date for the annual meeting,
49,455,998 shares of our common stock and 68 shares of
our Series E Convertible Voting Preferred Stock, or
Series E Preferred Stock, were outstanding. Holders of the
outstanding shares of our common stock on the record date will
be entitled to one vote on each matter for each share of our
common stock held as of such date. Our Series E Preferred
Stock has voting rights and powers equal to those of our common
stock. Holders of our Series E Preferred Stock as of the
record date shall be entitled to vote with respect to any matter
upon which holders of our common stock have the right to vote,
voting together with the holders of our common stock as one
class. Each holder of our Series E Preferred Stock shall be
entitled to the number of votes equal to the number of shares of
our common stock into which such shares of our Series E
Preferred Stock could be converted on the record date at the
then current conversion value, as determined pursuant to the
Certificate of Designations, Rights and Preferences of the
Series E Preferred Stock, or the Certificate of
Designations. At the current conversion value, each share of
Series E Preferred Stock is entitled to 2,000 votes
1
on each matter at the annual meeting. Consequently, the holders
of our Series E Preferred Stock shall have a total of
136,000 votes on each matter at the annual meeting. Including
both the outstanding common stock and the Series E
Preferred Stock, voting together as one class, a total of
49,591,998 votes may be cast at the annual meeting.
Who
can attend the annual meeting?
All stockholders as of the record date, or their duly appointed
proxies, may attend the annual meeting. Registration will begin
at 9:30 a.m., and seating will begin immediately
thereafter. If you attend, please note that you may be asked to
present valid picture identification, such as a drivers
license or passport. Please also note that if you hold your
shares in street name (that is, through a broker or
other nominee), you will need to bring a copy of a brokerage
statement reflecting your stock ownership as of the record date
and check in at the registration desk at the annual meeting.
What
constitutes a quorum?
The presence at the annual meeting of the holders of a majority
of the aggregate of the outstanding shares of our common stock
and our preferred stock (of which only Series E Preferred
Stock is currently outstanding), which will be counted as if
converted into common stock, in person or by proxy and entitled
to vote, will constitute a quorum, permitting the annual meeting
to conduct its business. Proxies marked withheld as
to any director nominee, abstentions and broker non-votes are
counted by us for purposes of determining the presence or
absence of a quorum at the annual meeting for the transaction of
business. Broker non-votes are shares that are not voted by the
broker who is the record holder of the shares because the broker
is not instructed to vote on such matter by the beneficial owner
and the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote on
such matter.
How do
I vote?
If you complete and properly sign the accompanying proxy card
and return it to us, it will be voted as you direct. If you are
a registered stockholder (that is, if you hold your stock in
certificate form or otherwise directly and not through a broker
or other nominee) and attend the annual meeting, you may deliver
your completed proxy card in person. We encourage you, however,
to submit the enclosed proxy card in advance of the annual
meeting. In addition, ballots will be available for registered
stockholders to vote in person at the annual meeting.
Stockholders who hold their shares in street name
may vote in person at the annual meeting only by obtaining a
proxy form from the broker or other nominee that holds their
shares.
Can I
vote by telephone or electronically?
If you are a registered stockholder, you may not vote by
telephone or electronically since we do not have that
capability. If your shares are held in street name,
i.e., by a broker or other nominee, please check the voting
instruction card you received from your broker or nominee or
contact your broker or nominee to determine whether you will be
able to vote by telephone or electronically and what deadlines
may apply to your ability to vote your shares by telephone or
electronically.
Can I
change my vote after I return my proxy card?
Yes. As a registered stockholder, you may change your vote at
any time before the proxy is voted at the annual meeting by
filing with our Secretary either a written notice of revocation
or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date. The powers of the
proxy holders will be suspended if you attend the annual meeting
in person and request that your proxy be suspended, although
attendance at the annual meeting will not by itself revoke a
previously granted proxy. Any written notice revoking a proxy
should be sent to our Secretary at our corporate offices at 157
Technology Drive, Irvine, California 92618, and must be received
prior to the commencement of the meeting. If your shares are
held in street name, please check the voting
instruction card you received from your broker or nominee or
contact your broker or nominee to determine how to change your
vote.
2
What
is the boards recommendation?
Unless you give other instructions on your proxy card, the
persons named as proxy holders on the proxy card will vote in
accordance with the recommendations of the board of directors.
The boards recommendation is set forth together with the
description of each proposal in this proxy statement. In
summary, the board recommends a vote FOR election of the
six director nominees, each for a term of one year expiring at
the 2011 annual meeting of stockholders (see Proposal
No. 1).
With respect to other business that may properly come before the
annual meeting, the proxy holders will vote as recommended by
our board of directors or, if no recommendation is given, in
their own discretion.
What
vote is required to approve the proposal?
For Proposal No. 1, the director nominees receiving
the highest number of affirmative votes cast, in person or by
proxy, at the annual meeting, up to the number of directors to
be elected at the annual meeting (six directors), will be
elected as directors. Abstentions will have no effect in
determining which directors receive the highest number of votes.
Starting this year, the election of directors is a
non-discretionary item. Therefore, if you do not
instruct your broker how to vote with respect to the election of
directors, your broker may not vote with respect to this
proposal and those votes will be counted as broker non-votes.
Broker non-votes will have no effect in determining which
directors receive the highest number of affirmative votes cast.
Stockholders
Sharing the Same Last Name and Address
Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, rules permit banks,
brokers and other nominee record holders to participate in a
practice known as householding, which means that
only one copy of the proxy statement and annual report will be
sent to multiple stockholders who share the same address.
Householding is designed to reduce printing and postage costs
and, therefore, results in cost savings for Spectrum. If you
receive a householded mailing this year and would like to have
additional copies of our proxy statement
and/or
annual report mailed to you, or if you would like to opt out of
this practice for future mailings, please contact your bank,
broker or other nominee record holder, or submit your request to
our Secretary,
c/o Spectrum
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 157 Technology Drive, Irvine, CA 92618,
by telephone at
(949) 788-6700.
Upon receipt of any such request, we agree to promptly deliver a
copy of our proxy statement
and/or
annual report to you. In addition, if you are currently a
stockholder sharing an address with another stockholder and wish
to receive only one copy of future proxy materials for your
household, please contact us using the contact information set
forth above.
3
STOCK
OWNERSHIP
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
AND DIRECTORS.
Based on information publicly filed and provided to us by
certain holders, the following table shows the amount of our
Series E Preferred Stock and common stock beneficially
owned on April 20, 2010 (unless otherwise indicated) by
holders of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of any class
of our voting securities, other than with respect to
Dr. Rajesh C. Shrotriya (our Chairman, Chief Executive
Officer and President) whose ownership is included in the second
table below. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance
with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting
and/or
investment power with respect to our voting securities, unless
footnoted to the contrary. For purposes of the following tables,
the percentage ownership is based upon 68 shares of our
Series E Preferred Stock, and 49,455,998 shares of our
common stock, outstanding as of April 20, 2010. Unless
otherwise indicated, the business address of each stockholder is
c/o Spectrum
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 157 Technology Drive, Irvine, California,
92618.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
Percent of
|
|
Common
|
|
Percent of
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Preferred
|
|
Equivalents
|
|
Common
|
|
Shares Eligible
|
Name and Address
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
Stock
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
Shares
|
|
to Vote on
|
of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Owned(1)
|
|
Outstanding(2)
|
|
Owned(3)
|
|
Outstanding(3)
|
|
April 20, 2010(4)
|
|
BlackRock, Inc.(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,579,833
|
|
|
|
5.22
|
%
|
|
|
5.20
|
%
|
40 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eastern Capital Limited(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,919,107
|
|
|
|
7.92
|
%
|
|
|
7.90
|
%
|
P.O. Box 31363/P.O. Box 31300
Grand Cayman, KY1-1206,
Cayman Islands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rockmore Investment Master
Fund, Ltd.(7)
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
70.59
|
%
|
|
|
394,847
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
150 East 58th Street, 28th Floor
New York, NY 10155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sands Brothers Venture Capital
Funds 1-IV, LLC(8)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
29.41
|
%
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
90 Park Avenue, 31st Floor
New York, NY 10016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1% |
|
(1) |
|
The amount relates to the shares of our Series E Preferred
Stock owned by the entity as of April 20, 2010. There are
no outstanding shares of any other series of our preferred stock. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the percentage ownership of the total number of our
outstanding shares of Series E Preferred Stock. |
|
(3) |
|
Shares of common stock owned as of April 20, 2010 and
shares of common stock subject to preferred stock and warrants
currently convertible or exercisable, or convertible or
exercisable within 60 days of April 20, 2010, are
deemed beneficially owned and outstanding for computing the
percentage of the person holding such securities, but are not
considered outstanding for computing the percentage of any other
person. |
|
(4) |
|
Reflects actual voting percentage. Each holder of Series E
Preferred Stock shall be entitled to the number of votes equal
to the number of shares of common stock into which such shares
of Series E Preferred Stock could be converted on the
record date at the then current conversion value as determined
pursuant to the Certificates of Designations. At the current
conversion value, each share of Series E Preferred Stock is
entitled to 2,000 votes on each matter at the annual meeting.
Consequently, the holders of our Series E Preferred Stock
shall have a total of 136,000 votes on each matter at the annual
meeting. |
|
(5) |
|
The information set forth herein is based solely on information
contained in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on
January 29, 2010 by BlackRock, Inc.
(BlackRock). On December 1, 2009, BlackRock
completed its acquisition of Barclays Global Investors, NA and
certain of its affiliates (collectively, BGI
Entities). As a |
4
|
|
|
|
|
result, substantially all of the BGI Entities are now included
as subsidiaries of BlackRock for purposes of Schedule 13G
filings. According to the Schedule 13G, BlackRock has sole
voting and dispositive power over 2,579,833 shares of our
common stock. |
|
(6) |
|
The information set forth herein is based solely on information
contained in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on
April 14, 2010 by Eastern Capital Limited. Eastern Capital
Limited is a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Portfolio
Services Ltd. Kenneth B. Dart is the beneficial owner of all of
the outstanding shares of Portfolio Services Ltd., which in
turns owns all the outstanding shares of Eastern Capital
Limited. As of the date of the Schedule 13G filing, Eastern
Capital Limited and Mr. Dart beneficially own in the
aggregate 3,919,107 shares of our common stock. Eastern
Capital Limited and Mr. Dart have shared voting and
dispositive powers with respect to 3,919,107 shares of our
common stock. |
|
(7) |
|
Based upon the information provided to us by the holder,
Rockmore Capital, LLC (Rockmore Capital) and
Rockmore Partners, LLC (Rockmore Partners), each a
limited liability company formed under the laws of the State of
Delaware, serve as the investment manager and general partner,
respectively, to Rockmore Investments (US) LP, a Delaware
limited partnership, which invests all of its assets through
Rockmore Investment Master Fund Ltd., an exempted company
formed under the laws of Bermuda (Rockmore Master
Fund). By reason of such relationships, Rockmore Capital
and Rockmore Partners may be deemed to share dispositive power
over the shares of common stock owned by Rockmore Master Fund.
Rockmore Capital and Rockmore Partners disclaim beneficial
ownership of such shares of the common stock. Rockmores
beneficial ownership includes 298,847 shares of common
stock and the effect of converting the 48 shares of
Series E Preferred Stock into 96,000 shares of common
stock. Rockmore Partners has delegated authority to Rockmore
Capital regarding the portfolio management decisions with
respect to the shares of common stock owned by Rockmore Master
Fund and, as of April 20, 2010, Mr. Bruce T. Bernstein
and Mr. Brian Daly, as officers of Rockmore Capital, are
responsible for the portfolio management decisions of the shares
of common stock owned by Rockmore Master Fund. By reason of such
authority, Messrs. Bernstein and Daly may be deemed to
share dispositive power over the shares of our common stock
owned by Rockmore Master Fund. Messrs. Bernstein and Daly
disclaim beneficial ownership of such shares of our common stock
and neither of such persons has any legal right to maintain such
authority. No other person has sole or shared voting or
dispositive power with respect to the shares of our common stock
as those terms are used for purposes under
Regulation 13D-G
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. No person or
group (as that term is used in Section 13(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the
SECs
Regulation 13D-G)
controls Rockmore Master Fund. |
|
(8) |
|
Based upon the information provided to us by the holder, SB
Venture Capital Management I-IV, LLCs are the Investment
Advisors to Sands Brothers Venture Capital LLC
(SBV), Sands Brothers Venture Capital II LLC
(SBV II), Sands Brothers Venture Capital LLC III
(SBV III) and Sands Brothers Venture Capital IV
LLC (SBV IV) (collectively, the Funds).
The Funds beneficial ownership includes the effect of
converting the 20 shares of Series E Preferred Stock
into 40,000 shares of common stock. Martin S. Sands and
Steven B. Sands are co-Member Managers of SB Venture Capital
Management LLC, SB Venture Capital Management II LLC, SB
Venture Capital Management III LLC, and SB Venture Capital
Management IV LLC, each a New York limited liability
company and each the member-manager of SBV, SBV-II, SBV-III and
SBV-IV, respectively, and are the natural persons exercising
voting and investment control over securities beneficially owned
by the Funds. |
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
beneficial ownership of our common stock as of April 20,
2010 (unless otherwise noted) by: (i) each of our directors
and director nominees, (ii) our named executive officers,
and (iii) all of our directors, director nominees and
executive officers as a group. Shares of common stock owned as
of April 20, 2010 and shares of common stock subject to
options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days
of April 20, 2010, are deemed beneficially owned and
outstanding for computing the percentage of the person holding
such securities, but are not considered outstanding for
computing the percentage of any other person. Unless otherwise
noted, each person listed below has sole voting power and sole
investment power with respect to shares shown as owned by him.
Information as to beneficial ownership is based upon statements
5
furnished to us or filed with the SEC by such persons. Unless
otherwise indicated, the business address of each stockholder is
c/o Spectrum
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 157 Technology Drive, Irvine, California,
92618.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Shares
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Options
|
|
Shares(1)
|
|
Owned
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Named Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shrotriya, Rajesh(2)
|
|
|
2,302,000
|
|
|
|
1,153,486
|
|
|
|
3,455,486
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
Kumaria, Shyam(3)
|
|
|
205,000
|
|
|
|
201,156
|
|
|
|
406,156
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Directors/Director Nominees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arora, Krishan
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Cybulski, Mitchell(4)
|
|
|
83,750
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
128,750
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Fulmer, Richard(4)
|
|
|
128,750
|
|
|
|
21,500
|
|
|
|
150,250
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Krassner, Stuart(4)
|
|
|
128,750
|
|
|
|
10,750
|
|
|
|
139,500
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Lenaz, Luigi(5)
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
21,877
|
|
|
|
66,877
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Maida, Anthony(4)
|
|
|
155,750
|
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
|
158,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Mehta, Dilip
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
112,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Vida, Julius(4)
|
|
|
175,750
|
|
|
|
15,200
|
|
|
|
190,950
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
All Executive Officers and Directors/Director Nominees as a
group (10 persons)(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,810,469
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
less than 1% |
|
(1) |
|
The holders of restricted stock are entitled to vote and receive
dividends, if declared, on the shares of common stock covered by
the restricted stock grant. |
|
(2) |
|
The number of shares includes 275,000 unvested restricted shares
of our common stock subject to future vesting. |
|
(3) |
|
The number of shares includes 27,500 unvested restricted shares
of our common stock subject to future vesting. |
|
(4) |
|
The number of shares includes 1,250 unvested restricted shares
of our common stock subject to future vesting. |
|
(5) |
|
The number of shares includes 12,500 unvested restricted shares
of our common stock subject to future vesting. |
|
(6) |
|
The number of shares includes 321,250 unvested restricted shares
of our common stock held as a group subject to future vesting. |
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS
The following table provides information regarding our executive
officers, their ages, the year in which each first became an
officer of us and descriptions of their backgrounds.
|
|
|
Name and Age
|
|
|
|
Rajesh C. Shrotriya, M.D. (66)
Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer and President
|
|
Information regarding Dr. Shrotriya is provided under
Proposal 1 Election of Directors on page
7 of this proxy statement.
|
Shyam Kumaria (60)
Vice President of Finance
|
|
Mr. Kumaria has served as Vice President of Finance since
December 2003. From 1996 to 2003, he provided financial and
management consulting services to private companies. From 1984
to 1996, he served in senior executive and management positions
for several companies including Deloitte & Touche. Mr.
Kumaria became a Chartered Accountant in London, England in 1973
and a Certified Public Accountant in 1978. He received an
Executive M.B.A. from Columbia University in 1984.
|
6
PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Our board of directors consists of six annually elected
directors. Acting upon the recommendation of our Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee, the full board of directors
nominated Krishan K. Arora, Stuart M. Krassner, Luigi Lenaz,
Anthony E. Maida, Dilip J. Mehta and Rajesh C. Shrotriya for
election to our board.
Unless you specifically withhold authority in the attached proxy
for the election of any of these directors, the persons named in
the attached proxy will vote FOR the election of
Drs. Arora, Krassner, Lenaz, Maida, Mehta and Shrotriya to
our board of directors. Each director will be elected to serve a
one-year term expiring at the annual meeting in 2011 and until
his successor has been duly elected and qualified, or until his
earlier resignation or removal.
Each of the nominees has consented to serve if elected. If any
of them becomes unavailable to serve as a director, our board
may designate a substitute nominee. In that case, the proxy
holders will vote for the substitute nominee designated by the
board. Our board of directors has no reason to believe that any
of the nominees will be unable to serve.
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE
FOLLOWING SIX NOMINEES.
|
|
|
Krishan K. Arora, Ph.D.
|
|
Dr. Arora, 69, was nominated for election by the board of
directors upon the recommendation of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee, which was acting upon the
recommendation of Dr. Stuart M. Krassner. Dr. Arora
has been providing consulting services to Spectrum since
February 2010. Dr. Arora is a business executive with
global experience in driving strategic thinking, management and
implementation of operations for drug development worldwide.
Dr. Arora has provided consulting services to senior
management at several pharmaceutical companies, including
Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc., for global drug
development, from May 2008 to June 2009, and UCB, Inc., for
applications in global regulatory affairs, electronic document
management, pharmacovigilance and worldwide quality assurance
and compliance, from November 2003 to February 2006. Prior to
that, Dr. Arora held senior management positions with
several pharmaceutical companies, including Vice President of
R&D Global Regulatory Affairs for Management Information at
Pfizer Inc. from 1998 to 2003, Senior Director of Regulatory
Affairs at Novartis AG from 1993 to 1998 and Group Director of
Biometrics Operations at Sanofi-Aventis. In addition, from 1994
to 2003, Dr. Arora served as Chairman of the Electronic
Regulatory Submissions Working Group at PhRMA, which consisted
of business and information technology experts from the FDA and
20 biopharmaceutical companies and was the PhRMA lead at ICH on
establishing electronic standards for submission of marketing
applications to regulatory authorities. Dr. Arora received
a B.Sc. in Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry from Lucknow
University in India, a B.Sc. (Honors) in Agriculture and a M.Sc.
in Animal Genetics from G. B. Pant University of Agriculture
& Technology in India and a Ph.D. in Population Genetics
from Iowa State University.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Arora has significant experience in the pharmaceutical
industry, which includes 11 years experience in
global regulatory affairs and 18 years experience in
biometrics operations, including statistics, clinical data
systems, clinical data management and medical writing.
Furthermore, Dr. Arora has operational management
experience, a keen understanding of the regulatory environment
in which pharmaceutical companies operate and extensive
knowledge in drug development operations and regulatory
submissions and approvals. As a result, Dr. Arora is well
qualified to serve on our board of directors.
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stuart M. Krassner, Sc.D., Psy.D
|
|
Dr. Krassner, 74, has been a director of Spectrum since
December 2004 and was previously a member of our Scientific
Advisory Board from 1996 to 2001. Dr. Krassners
career spans four decades of experience in various positions at
the University of California, Irvine, or UCI, most recently as
Professor Emeritus of Developmental and Cell Biology at the
School of Biological Sciences. While at UCI, he developed and
reinforced FDA and NIH compliance procedures for UCI-sponsored
human clinical trials, established UCIs first
Institutional Review Board, and at one time headed all contract
and grant activities. Dr. Krassner has also been retained
by a number of public and private pharmaceutical, medical device
and other companies to provide scientific and regulatory
advisory services, including FDA compliance.
Dr. Krassners work has been published in numerous
peer-reviewed U.S. journals. Dr. Krassner has been awarded
grants from the National Institute of Health, the National
Science Foundation and the World Health Organization.
Dr. Krassner has been a member of the American Society of
Protozoology, the American Society of Tropical Medicine and
Hygiene, the Corporation of the Marine Biological Laboratories,
Woods Hole, MA, and Sigma Xi, among others. Dr. Krassner
received a B.S. in Biology from Brooklyn College and an Sc.D.
from the Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins
University.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Krassners extensive and distinctive experience in
business and academia brings valuable perspective to our board.
He has a strong background in research in the area of
developmental and cell biology and his work in the area has been
published in numerous peer-reviewed U.S. journals. Moreover,
his expertise in scientific and regulatory advisory services,
including FDA compliance, makes him well qualified to serve on
our board of directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Lenaz, 69, was nominated for election by the board of
directors upon the recommendation of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee, which was acting upon the
recommendation of Dr. Julius Vida. Dr. Lenaz served as
Spectrums Chief Scientific Officer from February 2005 to
June 2008 and as President of Spectrums Oncology Division
from 2000 to 2005. Since retiring as Spectrums Chief
Scientific Officer in June 2008, Dr. Lenaz has provided
consulting services to Spectrum. From 1997 to 2000,
Dr. Lenaz served as Senior Vice President of Clinical
Research, Medical Affairs at SuperGen, Inc., a NASDAQ listed
pharmaceutical company dedicated to cancer drug development.
From 1978 to 1997, Dr. Lenaz held several senior management
positions with Bristol- Myers Squibb, a NYSE-listed
pharmaceutical company, including Senior Vice President of
Oncology Franchise Management from 1990 to 1997 and Director of
Scientific Affairs, Anti-Cancer from 1985 to 1990.
Dr. Lenaz is also a prominent researcher, having conducted
research in the areas of pharmacology, experimental
chemotherapy, histology, general physiology, and experimental
therapeutics at various institutions for cancer research,
including Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Memorial
Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and the National Cancer Institute
in Milan. He is a member of several scientific societies,
including the American Association for Cancer Research, American
Association for Clinical Oncology, European Society for Medical
Oncology, and International Association for the Study of Lung
Cancer.
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Lenaz has served as a director of Pharmaco-Kinesis
Corporation, a privately held medical device company, since
January 2009. Dr. Lenaz is a graduate of Liceo Scientifico
A. Righi in Bologna, Italy and he received a medical degree from
the University of Bologna Medical School in 1966.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Lenaz is a renowned and accomplished oncologist who
will bring to the board of directors over 35 years
experience in the pharmaceutical industry and a wealth of
knowledge in the field of cancer drug development.
Dr. Lenazs qualifications to serve on the board of
directors include his expertise in the development of cancer
drugs, his tenure as our Chief Scientific Officer, as well as
his subsequent consulting services for our company, his
significant management experience with Bristol-Myers Squibb, and
his prominent research in the field of oncology. As a result,
Dr. Lenaz is well qualified to serve on our board of
directors.
|
|
|
|
Anthony E. Maida, III, M.A.,
M.B.A., Ph.D.
|
|
Dr. Maida, 58, has been a director of Spectrum since
December 2003. Dr. Maida has been the acting Chairman of
Dendri Therapeutics, Inc., a startup company focused on the
clinical development of therapeutic vaccines for patients with
cancer, since 2003. Dr. Maida has been serving as Chairman,
Founder and Director of BioConsul Drug Development Corporation
and Principal of Anthony Maida Consulting International since
1999, providing consulting services to large and small
biopharmaceutical firms in the clinical development of oncology
products and product acquisitions and to venture capital firms
evaluating life science investment opportunities. Additionally,
Dr. Maida formerly served as a member of the board of
directors of Sirion Therapeutics, Inc., a privately held
ophthalmic-focused company, and GlycoMetrix, Inc., a startup
company focused on the development of tests to identify
carbohydrates that can indicate cancer. Dr. Maida served as
the President and Chief Executive Officer of Replicon
NeuroTherapeutics, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company focused on
the therapy of patients with tumors (both primary and
metastatic) of the central nervous system, where he successfully
raised financing from both venture capital and strategic
investors and was responsible for all financial and operational
aspects of the company, from June 2001 to July 2003. From 1999
to 2001, Dr. Maida held positions as Interim Chief
Executive Officer for Trellis Bioscience, Inc., a privately held
biotechnology company that addresses high clinical stage failure
rates in pharmaceutical development, and President of CancerVax
Corporation, a biotechnology company dedicated to the treatment
of cancer. From 1992 until 1999, Dr. Maida served as
President and CEO of Jenner Biotherapies, Inc., a
biopharmaceutical company. From 1980 to 1992, Dr. Maida
held senior management positions with various companies
including Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of
Data Plan, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed
Corporation. Dr. Maida serves on the Advisory Boards of
EndPoint BioCapital and Sdn Bhd (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia) and
serves or has served as a consultant and technical analyst for
several investment firms, including CMX Capital, LLC, Sagamore
Bioventures, Roaring Fork Capital, North Sound Capital, The
Bonnie J. Addario Lung Cancer Foundation and Pediaric
BioScience, Inc. Additionally, Dr. Maida has been retained
by Abraxis BioScience, Inc., Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc.,
Takeda
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Osaka, Japan), and Toucan Capital to
conduct corporate and technical due diligence on investment
opportunities. Dr. Maida is a speaker at industry
conferences and is a member of the American Society of Clinical
Oncology, the American Association for Cancer Research, the
Society of Neuro-Oncology, the International Society for
Biological Therapy of Cancer, the American Association of
Immunologists and the American Chemical Society. Dr. Maida
received a B.A. in History from Santa Clara University in
1975, a B.A. in Biology from San Jose State University in
1977, an M.B.A. from Santa Clara University in 1978, an
M.A. in Toxicology from San Jose State University in 1986
and a Ph.D. in Immunology from the University of California in
2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Maidas qualifications to serve on the board of
directors include the extensive experience he has gained holding
senior management positions, including chairman, president,
chief financial officer and chief executive officer, at various
biotechnology and biopharmaceutical companies. He has
successfully raised financing from venture capital and strategic
investors for biopharmaceutical companies and he currently
provides consulting services to hedge funds, venture capital
firms interested in biopharmaceutical firms. Furthermore,
Dr. Maidas vast knowledge in the area of clinical
development of oncology products and product acquisitions, in
addition to his continuous research in the field of oncology,
provides unique and valuable insight to our board of directors.
As a result, Dr. Maida is well qualified to serve on our
board of directors.
|
|
|
|
Dilip J. Mehta, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
Dr. Mehta, 77, was nominated for election by the board of
directors upon the recommendation of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee, which was acting upon the
recommendation of Dr. Stuart M. Krassner.
Dr. Mehta served on Spectrums board of directors from
June 2003 to July 2007. Dr. Mehta has been self-employed as
a pharmaceutical consultant since 1998 and has provided
consulting services to Spectrum since July 2007. Dr. Mehta
is a venture partner at Radius Ventures, LLC in New York. From
1982 until his retirement in 1997, Dr. Mehta held several
senior management positions with Pfizer Inc., including Senior
Vice President, U.S. Clinical Research, with responsibility for
clinical research (Phases 1, 2 and 3) including data processing
and statistical analysis for Pfizers drugs in the U.S., as
well as supervised submissions of new drug applications for
Cardura, Norvasc, Zoloft, Zithromax, Diflucan, Unasyn, Trovan,
Viagra, Geodon, and a number of other drugs/supplements.
Dr. Mehta served as Chairman of the board of directors of
Quintiles Spectral (India) Limited (Ahmedabad, India) from 1998
to 2001 and as a member of the board of directors of Bharat
Serums & Vaccines Limited (Mumbai, India) from 2006 to 2008
and Targanta Therapeutics Corporation, a NASDAQ-listed
biopharmaceutical company acquired by The Medicines Company in
February 2009, from 2005 to 2009. From 1993 to 1997,
Dr. Mehta served as Chair, Efficacy Section for the
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, or PhRMA,
in the International Conference on Harmonization and was a PhRMA
topic leader for one of the Expert Working Group in Efficacy.
From 1966 to 1982, Dr. Mehta held the position of Group
Director, Clinical Research in the U.S. for Hoechst AG with
supervision of Internal Medicine, Metabolic and Infectious
Diseases and Cardiovascular groups. Dr. Mehta received an
M.D., an M.B.B.S. (Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery
equivalent to an M.D. degree in the U.S.) and a Ph.D.
from the University of Bombay. Dr. Mehta
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
was a Research Fellow in Clinical Pharmacology at Cornell
University Medical College.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Mehta brings to the board of directors over
28 years experience in the pharmaceutical industry
and a wealth of knowledge in the field of clinical research and
drug development. Dr. Mehtas qualifications to serve
on the board of directors include his expertise in clinical
research, drug development and FDA matters, his prior service on
Spectrums board of directors, as well as his service on
the boards of directors of other publicly traded and privately
held biopharmaceutical companies and his significant management
experience with Pfizer. As a result, Dr. Mehta is well
qualified to serve on our board of directors.
|
|
|
|
Rajesh C. Shrotriya, M.D.
|
|
Dr. Shrotriya, 66, has been Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer and President since August 2002 and a director
of Spectrum since June 2001. From September 2000 to August 2002,
Dr. Shrotriya served as President and Chief Operating
Officer of Spectrum. Dr. Shrotriya also serves as a member
of the board of directors of Antares Pharma, Inc., an
AMEX-listed drug delivery systems company. Prior to joining
Spectrum, Dr. Shrotriya held the position of Executive Vice
President and Chief Scientific Officer from November 1996 until
August 2000, and as Senior Vice President and Special Assistant
to the President from November 1996 until May 1997, for
SuperGen, Inc., a publicly-held pharmaceutical company focused
on drugs for life-threatening diseases, particularly cancer.
From August 1994 to October 1996, Dr. Shrotriya held the
positions of Vice President, Medical Affairs and Vice President,
Chief Medical Officer of MGI Pharma, Inc., an oncology-focused
biopharmaceutical company. Dr. Shrotriya spent
18 years at Bristol-Myers Squibb Company in a variety of
positions, most recently as Executive Director, Worldwide CNS
Clinical Research. Previously, Dr. Shrotriya held various
positions at Hoechst Pharmaceuticals, most recently as Medical
Advisor. Dr. Shrotriya was an attending physician and held
a courtesy appointment at St. Joseph Hospital in Stamford,
Connecticut. In addition, he received a certificate for Advanced
Biomedical Research Management from Harvard University.
Dr. Shrotriya received an M.D. from Grant Medical College,
Bombay, India, in 1974; a D.T.C.D. (Post Graduate Diploma in
Chest Diseases) from Delhi University, V.P. Chest Institute,
Delhi, India, in 1971; an M.B.B.S. (Bachelor of Medicine and
Bachelor of Surgery equivalent to an M.D. degree in
the U.S.) from the Armed Forces Medical College, Poona, India,
in 1967; and a B.S. in Chemistry from Agra University, Aligarh,
India, in 1962.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Shrotriya is a demonstrated leader in the
biopharmaceutical industry. His significant leadership
experience includes 8 years of serving as our Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer as well as his service on the board of
directors of Antares Pharma, Inc. Dr. Shrotriya has held
prior leadership roles in the biopharmaceutical industry
including his positions as our President and Chief Operating
Officer, as the executive vice president and chief scientific
officer for a publicly-held pharmaceutical company, and
18 years of experience in various positions he held in
Bristol- Myers Squibb. Dr. Shrotriyas significant
leadership experience in the biopharmaceutical sector, along
with his experience as a physician and his expertise in drug
development, position him well to serve on our board of
directors.
|
11
Director
Compensation
The following table shows fiscal 2009 compensation for our
non-employee directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in Cash
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
(1)($)
|
|
|
(2)($)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
Mitchell P. Cybulski
|
|
|
57,500
|
|
|
|
186,500
|
|
|
|
244,000
|
|
Richard D. Fulmer
|
|
|
52,500
|
|
|
|
186,500
|
|
|
|
239,000
|
|
Stuart M. Krassner
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
186,500
|
|
|
|
231,500
|
|
Anthony E. Maida
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
186,500
|
|
|
|
231,500
|
|
Julius A. Vida
|
|
|
47,500
|
|
|
|
186,500
|
|
|
|
234,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This column reports the dollar amount of cash compensation paid
in 2010 for board and committee service. Effective as of
June 26, 2009, each non-employee director received annual
retainers, each retainer being payable on a semi-annual basis,
as follows: $25,000 director retainer, $25,000 retainer in
lieu of meeting fees of the board and committees of the board,
and $10,000 each to the lead director and the chairs of the
Audit and Compensation Committees. Prior to June 26, 2009,
each non-employee director received annual retainers, each
retainer being payable on a semi-annual basis, as follows:
$20,000 director retainer, $20,000 retainer in lieu of
meeting fees of the board and committees of the board, and
$5,000 each to the lead director and the chairs of the Audit and
Compensation Committees. Our directors are also reimbursed for
certain
out-of-pocket
expenses incurred in connection with attendance at board
meetings. Directors who are also our employees receive no
compensation for service as directors. |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of
option awards made to such directors calculated in accordance
with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards
Codification Topic 718, Compensation Stock
Compensation, or ASC 718. On June 26, 2009, we
granted to each non-employee director an option to purchase up
to 50,000 shares of our common stock at $6.09 per share;
25% of the shares vested on the date of grant and the remaining
shares vested equally in three annual increments from the date
of grant. For additional information, refer to note 12 of
our financial statements in the
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the SEC
on April 5, 2010. |
12
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
Board
Independence
Our board of directors has determined that each of
Drs. Arora, Krassner, Maida and Mehta are
independent within the meaning of the NASDAQ
director independence standards, as currently in effect. Our
board further determined that Dr. Shrotriya is not
independent due to his current employment as our Chief Executive
Officer and President and that Dr. Lenaz is not independent
due to his employment as our Chief Scientific Officer until June
2008 and his current consulting arrangement with us as described
in the section entitled Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions below. Dr. Julius Vida, and
Messrs. Mitchell P. Cybulski and Richard D. Fulmer, are
also independent within the meaning of the NASDAQ
director independence standards. In making its independence
determinations, the board reviewed transactions and
relationships, if any, between the director or any member of his
or her immediate family and us or one of our subsidiaries or
affiliates.
Board
Meeting Attendance
Our board of directors met 13 times and acted by unanimous
written consent one time during 2009. During the year, overall
attendance by directors averaged 97% at board meetings and 100%
at committee meetings, and each director attended 75% or more of
the aggregate meetings of our board of directors and the
committees on which such director served during the 2009 fiscal
year. Our policy is that every director is expected to attend in
person the annual meeting of our stockholders. If a director is
unable to attend a meeting, he or she shall notify the board and
attempt to participate in the meeting telephonically, if
possible. All of our board members attended the 2009 annual
stockholder meeting. Our board of directors met in executive
session without management four times during 2009.
Board
Committees
Our board of directors has standing Audit, Compensation,
Placement, Product Acquisition and Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committees. Our Audit, Compensation and Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committees each act pursuant to a
written charter. Copies of each committee charter are posted on
our website at
http://www.sppirx.com.
Board
Committee Membership
as of April 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominating and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
|
Audit
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Placement
|
|
|
Governance
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
Name
|
|
Committee
|
|
|
Committee
|
|
|
Committee
|
|
|
Committee
|
|
|
Committee
|
|
|
Mitchell P. Cybulski
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
***
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Richard D. Fulmer
|
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Stuart M. Krassner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Anthony E. Maida
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Rajesh C. Shrotriya
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
Julius A. Vida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Member. |
|
** |
|
Chair. |
|
*** |
|
Lead Director. |
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is
currently comprised of Messrs. Fulmer (Chair) and Cybulski,
and Dr. Maida, each of whom satisfies the NASDAQ and SEC
rules for Audit Committee membership. The Audit Committee held
six meetings and acted by unanimous written consent one time
during 2009. Our board of directors has determined that
Messrs. Fulmer and Cybulski, and Dr. Maida, are Audit
Committee financial experts within the meaning of SEC rules and
that all three are independent within the meaning of
the NASDAQ director
13
independence standards and SEC
Rule 10A-3.
Principal responsibilities of the Audit Committee include but
are not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
Appointing, compensating, retaining and overseeing the work of
the independent registered public accounting firm;
|
|
|
|
Reviewing independence qualifications and quality controls of
the independent registered public accounting firm;
|
|
|
|
Overseeing and monitoring internal controls, procedures, the
audit function, accounting procedures and financial reporting
process; and
|
|
|
|
Reading and discussing with management and the independent
registered public accounting firm the annual audited, and
quarterly unaudited, financial statements.
|
Compensation Committee. The Compensation
Committee is currently comprised of Drs. Krassner and Vida,
and Mr. Cybulski (Chair). The Compensation Committee held
two meetings during 2009.
The Compensation Committee of our board of directors is
comprised of three directors each of whom is
independent within the meaning of the NASDAQ
director independence standards, and a non-employee
director within the meaning of
Rule 16b-3
under the Exchange Act. The Compensation Committees
responsibilities include, but are not limited to: reviewing and
evaluating our compensation arrangements for executive officers,
reviewing our compensation philosophy, determining the
compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, and other
executive officers, and reviewing and approving bonus
compensation, including equity incentive awards. The
Compensation Committee has granted limited authority to
Dr. Shrotriya to make equity awards to employees and
consultants. The Compensation Committee determines the
compensation of our CEO independently, and the compensation of
other executive officers in consultation with the CEO. During
the past four years, the Compensation Committee has, from time
to time, consulted with outside legal counsel to the
Compensation Committee, and independent compensation consulting
firms, and has received compensation data of companies at a
similar stage of development as our company from such outside
counsel and consultants. The Compensation Committee is made up
of individuals with many years of experience in both academia as
well as the pharmaceutical industry. All of the members have had
years of experience in evaluating the performance of and
providing compensation recommendations at corporations and in
academia.
Placement Committee. The Placement Committee
is currently comprised of Dr. Shrotriya (Chair) and
Messrs. Cybulski and Fulmer. The Placement Committee has
currently the delegated authority to act on behalf of the board
for approving and evaluating all issuances of our securities,
including the authority to set the terms of each security being
issued, including, without limitation, common stock, warrants,
preferred stock or other securities convertible into common
stock. The Placement Committee held six meetings and acted by
unanimous written consent two times during 2009.
Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee. The Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee is currently comprised of
Drs. Krassner, Maida and Vida, and Messrs. Cybulski
and Fulmer. All members of the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee are non-employee directors and qualify as
independent under the current NASDAQ director
independence standards. The Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committees responsibilities include, but are not limited
to: the identification and recommendation of nominees for
election as directors by the stockholders, the identification
and recommendation of candidates to fill any vacancies on our
board, and the recommendation of policies and standards of
corporate governance. The Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee met two times in 2009.
In selecting and making recommendations to the board for
director nominees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee may consider suggestions from many sources, including
our stockholders. Any such director nominations, together with
appropriate biographical information and qualifications, should
be submitted by the stockholder(s) to the Chairman of the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our board of
directors,
c/o Spectrum
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 157 Technology Drive, Irvine, CA 92618.
Director nominees submitted by stockholders are subject to the
same review process as director nominees submitted from other
sources such as other board members or senior management.
14
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider
a number of factors when reviewing potential nominees for the
board. The factors which are considered by the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee include the following: the
candidates ability and willingness to commit adequate time
to board and committee matters; the fit of the candidates
skills and personality with those of other directors and
potential directors in building a board that is effective,
collegial and responsive to our needs; the candidates
personal and professional integrity, ethics and values; the
candidates experience in corporate management, such as
serving as an officer or former officer of a publicly held
company; the candidates experience in our industry and
with relevant social policy concerns; the candidates
experience as a board member of another publicly held company;
whether the candidate would be independent under
applicable standards; whether the candidate has practical and
mature business judgment; and the candidates academic
expertise in an area of our operations. In addition to the
factors set forth above, the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee also strives to create diversity in perspective,
background and experience in the board as a whole.
In identifying, evaluating and selecting future potential
director nominees for election at each annual meeting of
stockholders and nominees for directors to be elected by the
board to fill vacancies and newly created directorships, the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee engages in a
selection process. In identifying potential nominees, the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider as
potential director nominees candidates recommended by various
sources, including any member of the board, any of our
stockholders or senior management. In appropriate circumstances,
the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also hire
a search firm to help locate qualified candidates. Once
potential nominees are identified, they are initially reviewed
by the chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee, or in the chairmans absence, any other member
of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee delegated
to initially review director candidates. The reviewing member of
the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will make an
initial determination in his or her own independent business
judgment as to the qualifications and fit of such director
candidates based on the criteria set forth above. If the
reviewing member determines that it is appropriate to proceed,
the Chief Executive Officer and at least one member of the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will interview the
prospective director candidate(s). The full Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee may interview the candidates as
well. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will
provide informal progress updates to the board and will meet to
consider and recommend final director candidates to the entire
board of directors. Our board of directors determines which
candidates are nominated or elected to fill a vacancy.
Product Acquisition Committee. The Product
Acquisition Committee is currently comprised of
Drs. Shrotriya (Chair), Vida and Krassner, and
Messrs. Cybulski, Fulmer and Maida. The Product Acquisition
Committee is responsible for evaluating our product acquisition
opportunities. The Product Acquisition Committee did not meet
during 2009.
Board
Leadership Structure
Currently, our Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Rajesh C.
Shrotriya, also serves as Chairman of our board of directors.
Our board of directors has determined that this structure is the
most effective leadership structure for our company. The board
believes that Dr. Shrotriya is the director best situated
to identify strategic opportunities for our company and to focus
the activities of the board due to his full-time commitment to
the business and his long tenure with our company. The board
also believes that Dr. Shrotriyas dual roles as
Chairman of the board and Chief Executive Officer promotes
effective execution of our business strategy and facilitates
information flow between management and the board. Our board has
determined that maintaining the independence of a majority of
our directors helps maintain the boards independent
oversight of management and ensures that the appropriate level
independence is applied to all board decisions. In addition, our
Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committees, which oversee critical matters such as our
accounting principles, financial reporting processes and system
of disclosure controls and internal controls over financial
reporting, our executive compensation program and the selection
and evaluation of our directors and director nominees, each
consist entirely of independent directors.
15
Risk
Oversight
Management is responsible for identifying our risk exposures and
communicating such exposures to our board. Our board is
responsible for implementing our risk oversight
responsibilities. The board does not have a standing risk
management committee, but administers this function directly
through the board as a whole, as well as through committees of
the board. For example, the Audit Committee assists the board in
its risk oversight function by reviewing and discussing with
management our accounting principles and procedures, financial
reporting processes and system of disclosure controls and
internal controls over financial reporting. The Compensation
Committee assists the board in its risk oversight function by
overseeing compliance with our executive compensation programs
and considering risks relating to the design of our executive
compensation programs and arrangements. In addition, our
compliance officer monitors our corporate compliance program and
our compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations and
provides quarterly reports to our board with respect to
compliance matters and any related issues. The full board
considers strategic risks and opportunities and receives reports
from the committees regarding risk oversight in their areas of
responsibility as necessary. We believe our board leadership
structure facilitates the division of risk management oversight
responsibilities among the board committees and enhances the
boards effectiveness in fulfilling its oversight function
with respect to different areas of our business risks and our
risk mitigation practices.
Communications
with the Board of Directors
Stockholders who wish to contact members of our board of
directors may send email correspondence to: ir@sppirx.com. If
stockholders would like to write to the board of directors, they
may also send written correspondence to the following address:
Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Board of Directors, 157
Technology Drive, Irvine, CA 92618. Stockholders should provide
proof of share ownership with their correspondence. It is
suggested that stockholders also include contact information.
All stockholder communications will be received and processed by
the Investor Relations Office, and then directed to the
appropriate member(s) of the board of directors. In general,
correspondence relating to accounting, internal accounting
controls or auditing matters will be referred to the chairperson
of the Audit Committee, with a copy to the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee. All other correspondence will be
referred to the chairperson or the lead director of the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. To the extent
correspondence is addressed to a specific director or requires a
specific directors attention, it will be directed to that
director.
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions
with Related Parties
Option
Tender Offer
Due to our rapid growth over the past few years and a low
personnel turnover rate, in early 2009, we had a limited number
of shares available for future grant under our 2003 Amended and
Restated Incentive Award Plan, or the 2003 Plan. Primarily in
order to increase the pool of shares available for future grant
under the 2003 Plan, we conducted a tender offer to certain
eligible employees to acquire stock options granted to such
employees under the 2003 Plan and our Third Amended and Restated
1997 Stock Incentive Plan, or the 1997 Plan. Eligible employees
were employees of our company or of our subsidiaries who held
stock options with exercise prices in excess of $5.00. The cash
amount offered to those employees was $0.01 for stock options
with an exercise price over $10.00 and $1.15 for stock options
with an exercise price between $5.00 and $9.99.
On April 23, 2009, a total of 2,165,372 shares of
common stock underlying eligible stock options were tendered by
eligible employees (including 1,274,600 shares of common
stock tendered by Dr. Rajesh Shrotriya, M.D., our Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer, and 350,000 shares
of common stock tendered by Mr. Shyam Kumaria, our Vice
President of Finance) and accepted by us, representing 73% of
the shares of common stock underlying stock options that were
eligible to be tendered in the offer. We made an aggregate cash
payment of approximately $2.5 million to the eligible
employees participating in the offer.
16
Sale
of Common Stock
On May 6, 2009, we sold an aggregate of 432,200 shares
of common stock to certain of our employees at a purchase price
of $2.70 per share, which was the closing price of our common
stock on May 6, 2009. This offering resulted in gross
proceeds to us of approximately $1.2 million. The investors
in this offering included Dr. Shrotriya and Mr. Kumaria.
Dr. Shrotriya purchased 290,000 shares of common stock
and Mr. Kumaria purchased 85,000 shares of common
stock. We decided to conduct this offering with certain of our
employees to allow such employees to invest their personal cash
directly into our company at the current fair market value of
our stock. The purchase agreements included provisions
prohibiting the investors from disposing of the shares of common
stock purchased in the offering for ninety days. The offering
was approved by the Placement Committee of the Board of
Directors. In addition, the Audit Committee of the Board of
Directors approved the offering pursuant to our Related Party
Transaction Policies and Procedures.
Dr. Lenaz
Consulting Arrangement
On April 28, 2008, we entered into a consulting agreement
with Dr. Lenaz, our former Chief Scientific Officer and a
current director nominee, which provides for Dr. Lenaz to
provide part-time consulting services from June 30, 2008,
the date of his retirement as our Chief Scientific Officer,
through December 31, 2010.
Under the terms of the consulting agreement, as amended,
Dr. Lenaz was obligated to provide up to 10 days per
month of consulting services from July 1, 2008 through
December 31, 2008 and up to 5 days per month of
consulting services from January 1, 2009 through
December 31, 2009. Dr. Lenaz was compensated at a rate
of $10,000 per month from July 1, 2008 through
December 31, 2008, $5,000 per month from January 1,
2009 through December 31, 2009, and $400 per hour for any
services provided by Dr. Lenaz (i) in excess of the
maximum number of days per month for each year (as described
above) or (ii) after December 31, 2009 until the
termination of the consulting agreement, except for the period
of March 16, 2010 through June 18, 2010,
Dr. Lenaz will be compensated at a rate of $33,333 per
month. The term of the consulting agreement is through
December 31, 2010, unless the consulting agreement is
renewed by mutual agreement of the parties. Either party may
terminate the consulting agreement at any time upon 15 days
advance written notice.
Policy on
the Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with
Related Persons
We have adopted a written policy for approval or ratification of
all transactions with related parties that are required to be
reported under Item 404(a) of
Regulation S-K.
The policy provides that the Audit Committee of the board of
directors shall review the material facts of all transactions
and either approve or disapprove of the entry into the
transaction. If advance Audit Committee approval of a
transaction is not feasible, then the transaction shall be
considered by the Audit Committee chair and, if the Audit
Committee determines it to be appropriate, ratified by the Audit
Committee.
The Audit Committee may establish that certain transactions may
be pre-approved by the Audit Committee. However, the Audit
Committee has not established any such transactions.
No director shall participate in any approval of a transaction
for which he or she is a related party. The director shall
provide all material information concerning the transaction to
the Audit Committee.
CODE OF
BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that
applies to all of our directors, officers and employees,
including the principal executive officer, principal financial
officer, principal accounting officer, controller or persons
performing similar functions. A copy of the Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics will be provided to any person, without
charge, upon oral request to
(949) 788-6700
or upon written request to Investor Relations, Spectrum
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 157 Technology Drive, Irvine, CA 92618.
Amendments to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that apply
to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer,
principal accounting officer, controller or persons performing
similar functions, if any, will be posted on our website at
www.sppirx.com. We will disclose any waivers of provisions of
our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that apply to our
directors and principal executive, financial and accounting
officers by disclosing such information on
Form 8-K.
17
REPORT OF
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The following Report of the Audit Committee does not
constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or
incorporated by reference into any of our other filings under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act,
except to the extent we specifically incorporate this Report by
reference therein.
The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors is responsible for
assisting our Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight
responsibilities regarding Spectrums financial accounting
and reporting process, system of internal control, audit
process, and process for monitoring compliance with laws and
regulations. The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a written
charter, a copy of which is posted on our website at
www.sppirx.com. The Audit Committee met six times and acted by
unanimous written consent one time during fiscal 2009. All
members of the Audit Committee are non-employee directors and
satisfy the current NASDAQ Global Market Listing Standards and
SEC requirements with respect to independence, financial
literacy and experience.
Management of Spectrum has the primary responsibility for
Spectrums consolidated financial statements as well as
Spectrums financial reporting process, accounting
principles and internal controls. Ernst & Young LLP,
the independent registered public accounting firm, is
responsible for performing an audit of Spectrums
consolidated financial statements and internal control over
financial reporting, and expressing an opinion as to the
conformity of such financial statements with generally accepted
accounting principles and the effectiveness of Spectrums
internal control over financial reporting.
In this context, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed
the audited consolidated financial statements of Spectrum as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2009 with
Spectrums management and the independent registered public
accounting firm. The Audit Committee has discussed with the
independent registered public accounting firm the matters
required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards
No. 61, as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards,
Vol. 1. AU section 380), as adopted by the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, in Rule 3200T. The
Audit Committee has also received the written disclosures and
the letter from the independent registered public accounting
firm required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB
(Rule 3526) regarding the independent
accountants communications with the Audit Committee
concerning independence, and has discussed with the independent
registered public accounting firm the accounting firms
independence.
Based on the foregoing, the Audit Committee has recommended to
our Board of Directors the inclusion of the audited consolidated
financial statements in Spectrums Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
Richard D. Fulmer, M.B.A., Chair
Mitchell P. Cybulski, M.B.A.
Anthony E. Maida, III, M.A., M.B.A., Ph.D.
18
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Change in
Independent Registered Public Accountants
On December 3, 2009, we discontinued using
Kelly & Co., or K&C, as our independent
registered public accounting firm. The decision to change
accounting firms was approved by the Audit Committee. On the
same date, the Audit Committee approved the engagement of
Ernst & Young LLP, or E&Y, as our new independent
registered public accounting firm and as auditors of our
consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009.
K&Cs audit reports on our consolidated financial
statements as of and for each of the two fiscal years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 did not contain any adverse
opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, and were not qualified or
modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting
principles. There were no reportable events (as that term is
defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of
Regulation S-K)
during the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and
2007, and the subsequent interim period through December 3,
2009, the date of the change in accounting firms. In addition,
during those periods, there were no disagreements (as defined in
Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of
Regulation S-K
and the related instructions to Item 304 of
Regulation S-K)
with K&C on any matter of accounting principles or
practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or
procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the
satisfaction of K&C, would have caused K&C to make
reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in
connection with its reports.
We previously reported the change in accounting firms on a
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on December 8, 2009. We provided
K&C with a copy of the above disclosures and requested that
K&C furnish a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether
it agrees with the foregoing statements. A copy of
K&Cs letter dated December 3, 2009 was filed as
Exhibit 16.1 to our
Form 8-K
filed on December 8, 2009.
During the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and
2007, and the subsequent interim period through December 3,
2009, neither we nor anyone on our behalf consulted with
E&Y with respect to (a) the application of accounting
principles to a specified transaction, either completed or
proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on
our consolidated financial statements, and neither a written
report was provided to us nor oral advice was provided that
E&Y concluded was an important factor considered by us in
reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial
reporting issue; or (b) any matter that was either the
subject of a disagreement (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv)
of
Regulation S-K
and the related instructions to Item 304 of
Regulation S-K),
or a reportable event (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of
Regulation S-K).
K&C served as our independent registered public accounting
firm from December 23, 2002 to December 3, 2009.
During such time, K&C rendered audit opinions on our
consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Reports
on
Form 10-K
filed with the SEC for the fiscal years ended December 31,
2008 and 2007.
As previously reported on a Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on April 5, 2010, in connection with the
restatement of our consolidated financial statements the Audit
Committee re-engaged K&C to audit the restatement
adjustments made to our 2008 and 2007 consolidated financial
statements. With respect to E&Ys audit of our
consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009, the Audit Committee authorized K&C
to respond fully to: (i) inquiries from E&Y regarding
the restatement items in our consolidated financial statements
for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and
(ii) any other inquiries from E&Y regarding any of our
financial statements.
We provided K&C with a copy of the foregoing disclosures
and requested that K&C review such disclosures. In
addition, K&C was given an opportunity to furnish us with a
letter addressed to the SEC containing any new information,
clarifying our expression of K&Cs views, or stating
the extent to which K&C does not agree with the foregoing
statements. K&C informed us on April 2, 2010 that it
agreed with the foregoing statements and did not furnish such a
letter to us or the SEC.
19
Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firms Fees
The following summarizes aggregate fees billed to us by our
independent registered public accounting firms, E&Y and
K&C, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ernst &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Young LLP
|
|
|
Kelly & Co.
|
|
|
|
2009($)
|
|
|
2009($)(1)
|
|
|
2008($)
|
|
|
Audit Fees
|
|
|
210,000
|
|
|
|
85,280
|
|
|
|
147,300
|
|
Audit-related Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,210
|
|
|
|
38,550
|
|
Tax Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,800
|
|
|
|
13,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
210,000
|
|
|
|
137,290
|
|
|
|
199,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents fees billed to us by K&C as our independent
registered public accounting firm through December 3, 2009. |
The fees billed to us by E&Y and K&C during or related
to our 2009 and 2008 fiscal years consist solely of audit fees,
audit-related fees and tax fees, as follows:
Audit Fees. Represents the aggregate fees
billed to us for professional services rendered for the audit of
our annual consolidated financial statements and our internal
controls over financial reporting, for the reviews of our
consolidated financial statements included in our
Form 10-Q
filings for each fiscal quarter, and the preparation of comfort
letters and consents with respect to registration statements.
Audit-related Fees. Represents the aggregate
fees billed to us for assurance and related services that are
reasonably related to the performance of the audit and review of
our consolidated financial statements that are not already
reported in Audit Fees. These services include accounting
consultations and attestation services that are not required by
statute.
Tax Fees. Represents the aggregate fees billed
to us for professional services rendered for tax returns,
compliance and tax advice.
Policy on
Audit Committee Pre-approval of Audit and Permissible Non-audit
Services of Independent Auditor
All audit and permissible non-audit services by our independent
registered public accounting firms were pre-approved by our
Audit Committee. Pursuant to its charter, the Audit Committee
may establish pre-approval policies and procedures, subject to
SEC and NASDAQ rules and regulations, to approve audit and
permissible non-audit services, however, it has not yet done so.
There will be representatives from E&Y present at the 2010
annual meeting of stockholders. They may make a statement if
they desire to do so and will be available to answer appropriate
questions from stockholders.
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
Compensation
Philosophy and Objectives
Our aggressive plans for future growth, including maximizing the
growth potential of our marketed drugs,
Zevalin®
and
Fusilev®,
and managing multiple large, late-stage clinical trials for
apaziquone
(EOquin®),
have shaped the Compensation Committees executive
compensation philosophy. This philosophy, including as applied
to the CEO, is to attract and retain professionals of the
highest caliber, capable of leading us to fulfillment of our
ambitious business objectives, by offering competitive
compensation opportunities that reward executives for their
individual contributions towards our short-term and long-term
objectives. Competition for attracting the best talent in the
pharmaceutical industry is very intense, especially in Orange
County, California, where the industry has only a small presence
and the cost of living is very high. Accordingly, in light of
the intense competition for highly
20
qualified executives, our executive officers are eligible for
competitive salary adjustments, cash bonuses and equity
compensation based upon periodic evaluations of individual and
company performance, relative to goals established at the start
of the year.
The Compensation Committee believes that its compensation
philosophy aligns the interests of our executive officers with
those of our stockholders, and is necessary to incentivize
individual executives to peak performance in advancing our
short-term and long-term business objectives. It is designed to
reward hard work, dedication and the achievement of both
individual and company goals.
Key
Elements of Executive Compensation
The principal elements of compensation for our executive
officers are:
|
|
|
|
|
Base salary;
|
|
|
|
Cash bonuses; and
|
|
|
|
Equity incentive awards.
|
Base Salary. The base salaries
of our executive officers are established as part of an annual
compensation adjustment cycle. Base salaries for the year are
established either at the end of the prior year or the beginning
of the current year, i.e. the base salary for 2009 was set at
the end of 2008. In establishing those salaries, the
Compensation Committee considers the executives level of
responsibility, experience and individual performance, and our
performance, as well as information regarding salary ranges paid
to executives with comparable duties in companies at a similar
stage as ours.
Cash Bonuses. The Compensation
Committee typically grants annual cash bonuses to executives as
part of their annual overall compensation at the beginning of
the next year for prior year performance, i.e. the cash bonus
for 2009 performance was set in early 2010. Such cash bonuses
are a reward for individual achievement of goals, as well as for
enabling us to achieve key milestones. The amount of the bonuses
is determined based upon the achievement of such milestones,
reference to past bonuses paid and information regarding bonuses
paid to executives with comparable duties in similar companies.
Equity Incentive Awards. While
cash compensation is viewed as a reward for current and past
services, equity incentive awards are important short-term and
long-term compensation tools for employee retention as well as
incentivizing future performance. The Compensation Committee
endorses the position that granting equity incentive awards,
including stock options and restricted stock, to our executive
officers (such equity incentive awards are a benefit offered to
all employees) can be very beneficial to stockholders because it
aligns managements and stockholders interests in the
enhancement of stockholder value. An executive officer receives
value from these grants only if he or she remains employed by us
during the vesting period, and, with regard to stock options,
only if our common stock appreciates (typically, options are
granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of
our common stock on the date of the grant). In addition, equity
incentive awards are an important compensation tool to utilize
in attracting and retaining high caliber professionals. In
determining the number of shares subject to an equity incentive
award, the Compensation Committee takes into account the
executive officers position and level of responsibility,
the executive officers past performance and potential
future contribution, the executive officers existing stock
and unvested restricted stock holdings, the competitiveness of
the executive officers overall compensation arrangements,
including equity awards, and reference to information regarding
equity awards paid to executives with comparable duties in
similar companies. Typically, the Compensation Committee will
grant a fewer number of shares of restricted stock than stock
options because when restricted stock vests, it provides
immediate value to the recipient, reduced, however, by an
immediate tax liability payable by the grantee. In deciding
whether to grant stock options or restricted stock, the
Compensation Committee will review market factors such as our
stock price, the different benefits offered by each type of
award, past equity grants as well as the tax impact on the
executive officers of each type of grant. Typically, the
Compensation Committee grants performance-based equity incentive
awards once annually; however, it may make additional grants
based upon a number of factors, including company and individual
achievements.
21
We also maintain a 401(k) Plan and an Employee Stock Purchase
Plan, each available to all employees, to encourage employees to
save for retirement and to provide incentives for our employees
to exert maximum effort for our success. The 401(k) Plan
provides matching employee contributions in shares of our common
stock and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan provides employees
with the opportunity to purchase common stock through
accumulated payroll deductions, each in order to, among other
things, align employees interests with our stockholders.
The Compensation Committee believes that all three principal
compensation elements combined fit well into its overall
compensation objectives of attracting top talent for executive
positions, incentivizing such executive officers, rewarding them
for achievement of individual and company goals, and aligning
the interests of executive officers with those of our
stockholders. The Compensation Committee also believes that it
is necessary to compensate the executive officers competitively
in all three principal elements in order to accomplish the above
objectives.
Fiscal
2009 Compensation
Because of our current stage of development, the use of
traditional performance standards, such as profit levels and
return on equity, are not appropriate in our evaluation of
executive officer performance. Therefore, executive officer
compensation is based primarily on advancement of our business
objectives, including the achievement of product development and
regulatory milestones, the acquisition of new products, the
recruitment and retention of highly qualified personnel, the
maintenance of adequate financial resources, and the initiation
and continuation of corporate collaborations, as well as
individual contributions and achievement of individual business
objectives by our executive officers.
During the past six years, we have, from time to time, consulted
with outside legal counsel to the Compensation Committee, and
independent compensation consulting firms, and have received
compensation data of companies at a similar stage of development
as our company from such outside counsel and consultants, as
well as from management. The Compensation Committee also
received from management copies of executive employment
agreements used by comparable companies. Some of the companies
whose compensation data was considered included: Cell
Therapeutics, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc., Seattle Genetics,
Inc., Medarex, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Theravance,
Inc., ZymoGenetics, Inc., OSI Pharmaceuticals Inc., Onyx
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Arena Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Isis
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Exelixis, Dendreon, Allos Therapeutics,
Kosan Biosciences, Sangamo Biosciences and Supergen. The
Compensation Committee received input from our CEO when it made
its compensation determination for the other executive officers.
The Compensation Committee evaluated our 2009 performance as
outstanding. Under the leadership of our CEO, we transitioned
into a fully functional commercial organization and for the
first time in the history of our company we recorded product
revenue of over $28 million from sales of our marketed
anti-cancer drugs. We have continued to execute on our strategy,
and met or exceeded the goals established at the outset of 2009.
Some of the important accomplishments during 2009, and early
2010, included:
|
|
|
|
|
the generation of approximately $28.2 million in sales of
our drug products during 2009;
|
|
|
|
the acquisition of full U.S. rights to Zevalin, one of our
leading cancer drugs;
|
|
|
|
the approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or
FDA, of Zevalin for an expanded label for the treatment of
patients with previously untreated Follicular non-Hodgkins
Lymphoma who achieve a partial or complete response to
first-line chemotherapy;
|
|
|
|
the receipt of a favorable ruling from the Centers for Medicare
and Medicaid Services stating that Zevalin should be reimbursed
under an Average Sales Price methodology in the Hospital
Outpatient Prospective Payment System, creating a consistent
reimbursement standard in the hospital setting;
|
|
|
|
the successful conclusion of arbitration proceedings with Cell
Therapeutics, Inc., or CTI, relating to CTIs sale of its
membership interests in RIT Oncology, LLC, our
50/50
joint venture, resulting in our receipt of a $4.3 million
arbitration award from CTI;
|
|
|
|
the completion of enrollment of two large Phase 3 pivotal
clinical trials involving over 1,600 patients for
apaziquone (EOquin) resulting in our receipt of a
$1.5 million milestone payment from Allergan, Inc.;
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
the entrance into strategic collaborations with Nippon Kayaku
Co. Ltd. and Handok Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd. for the development
and commercialization of apaziquone (EOquin) in Asia;
|
|
|
|
the acquisition of all rights to
RenaZorb®,
a lanthanum-based nanotechnology compound with potent and
selective phosphate binding capabilities, from Altair
Nanotechnologies;
|
|
|
|
the entrance into a strategic collaboration with TopoTarget A/S
for the development and commercialization of belinostat, a drug
being studied in multiple indications, including a Phase 2
registrational trial for patients with Peripheral T-cell
Lymphoma;
|
|
|
|
the raising of more than $100 million through equity
financings in 2009 during difficult economic times and market
conditions. The funds raised were critical in meeting our
strategic goals related to our anticipated operating
requirements through 2010 and beyond;
|
|
|
|
an increase in our market capitalization of approximately 400%;
|
|
|
|
the addition of key individuals to advance our strategy; and
|
|
|
|
the maintenance of tight control over our cash used in
operations. We used approximately $18 million net cash in
operations in 2009 and accomplished much.
|
Base Salary and Cash Bonuses. At
the end of 2009, and then again in early 2010, the Compensation
Committee, with reference to the factors discussed above,
reviewed the compensation of each executive officer. Based upon
its review, the Compensation Committee awarded bonuses for 2009
contributions and increased the salary levels of our executive
officers for 2010 due to their outstanding performance in
advancing our business objectives as well as the excellent
performance of our company, particularly the advancement of our
product portfolio.
Equity Incentive Awards. Based
upon individual and company performance in 2009, and as an
incentive for continued excellence in the future, in the future,
the Compensation Committee granted equity incentive awards to
the executive officers. In determining the number of shares
subject to an equity incentive award, the Compensation Committee
took into account the factors discussed above.
Chief Executive Officer
Compensation. The Compensation
Committee subscribes to the notion that an emerging growth
company, like our company, achieves success and ultimately
substantial returns for its stockholders, based on the vision
and dedication of its management team, especially its CEO.
Dr. Rajesh C. Shrotriya, our CEO and President, set forth a
new vision for us when he was appointed CEO in 2002 and the
Compensation Committee believes that he, and the team he has
assembled, has done an excellent job in implementing that vision
over the past seven plus years. In addition,
Dr. Shrotriyas qualifications as a medical doctor and
his ability to lead us and to manage our scientific programs and
business strategy make him critical to the continued successful
implementation of that vision. The Compensation Committee
considered these factors, as well as the same factors discussed
above, in setting the compensation of Dr. Shrotriya. The
Compensation Committee also made reference to the compensation
of CEOs of similar companies in the pharmaceutical industry in
order to ensure that the total compensation paid by us to
Dr. Shrotriya, including salary, bonus, equity incentive
awards, benefits and other compensation, was competitive. The
Compensation Committee believes that a competitive compensation
package is necessary because of the importance of a CEO to a
small emerging growth company and, in particular, one with the
background, experience and track record of Dr. Shrotriya.
For 2009, the Compensation Committee determined that
Dr. Shrotriya continued to advance our strategy; his
contributions are reflected in our achievements in 2009 as set
forth above. In recognition of his outstanding performance
during 2009 and as incentive for future performance, the
Compensation Committee awarded Dr. Shrotriya a cash bonus
for 2009, together with equity incentive awards detailed in the
Grants of Plan Based Awards in 2009 table located
elsewhere in this proxy statement.
Payments
upon Termination of Employment or
Change-in-Control
Dr. Shrotriya has an employment agreement that provides for
certain guaranteed severance payments and benefits if he is
terminated by us at the expiration of the term of the agreement,
if his employment is terminated without cause, if his employment
is terminated due to a change in control or is adversely
affected due to a change in control and he resigns. The benefits
are described in this proxy statement below under
Executive Employment
23
Agreements, Termination of Employment and
Change-in-Control
Arrangements. The severance payments are designed to
protect his earned benefits against being terminated without
cause or the adverse changes that may result from a change in
control of our company. The level of payments provided under
Dr. Shrotriyas agreement reflects the Compensation
Committees assessment of market conditions to provide a
competitive level of compensation if he is impacted by a
termination without cause or a change of control of our company
as well as a recognition of the effort provided by
Dr. Shrotriya over his time of service to our company.
Impact
of Accounting and Tax Treatments on Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment, or SFAS 123(R). Under
SFAS No. 123(R), we measure compensation cost for all
stock-based awards at fair value on the date of grant and
recognize compensation expense in the consolidated statements of
operations over the service period that the awards are expected
to vest. As permitted under SFAS No. 123(R), we have
elected to recognize compensation cost for all options with
graded vesting on a straight-line basis over the vesting period
of the entire option.
As discussed above, in deciding whether to grant stock options
or restricted stock, the Compensation Committee will consider
the tax impact that such grants have on the executive officer.
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, or the Code,
currently imposes a $1 million limitation on the
deductibility, for Federal income tax purposes, of certain
compensation paid to each of its five highest paid executives.
In light of our significant net operating losses,
Section 162(m) is not considered to be a significant factor
in establishing executive officer compensation at this time.
Risk
Assessment of Compensation Policies and Practices
The Compensation Committee has reviewed our compensation
policies and practices and has concluded that our company-wide
compensation program is not reasonably likely to have a material
adverse effect on our company. In addition, the Compensation
Committee has determined that our company-wide compensation
program does not encourage or incentivize excessive or
inappropriate risk-taking by our employees.
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
The Compensation Committee is currently comprised of
Mr. Cybulski and Drs. Krassner and Vida. None of the
members of our boards Compensation Committee is or has
been an officer or employee of our company. None of our
executive officers has served as a director or member or the
compensation committee of any other entity, any of whose
executive officers served on our board of directors or our
boards Compensation Committee.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The following table summarizes all equity compensation plans
including those approved by security holders and those not
approved by security holders, as of December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
Securities to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available
|
|
|
|
be Issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Future Issuance
|
|
|
|
Upon Exercise
|
|
|
Weighted-average
|
|
|
Under Equity
|
|
|
|
of Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
Options,
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
(excluding securities
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
Warrants or Rights
|
|
|
and Rights
|
|
|
reflected in column (a))
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)
|
|
|
7,945,245
|
|
|
|
4.04
|
|
|
|
9,324,750
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(2)
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
4.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase
Plan approved by security holders
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
4,934,285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
8,295,245
|
|
|
|
4.06
|
|
|
|
14,259,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We have three stock incentive plans: the 1997 Plan, the 2003
Plan and the 2009 Incentive Award Plan, or the 2009 Plan. We
refer to the 1997 Plan, the 2003 Plan and the 2009 Plan
collectively as the Plans. We are not granting any more options
pursuant to the 1997 Plan or the 2003 Plan. The 2009 Plan
authorizes annual increases in the number of shares of our
common stock available for issuance under the 2009 Plan by an
amount equal to the greater of (i) 2,500,000 and (ii) a number
of shares such that the total number of shares available for
issuance equals 30% of the then number of shares of our common
stock issued and outstanding. Thus, the authorized and available
shares may fluctuate over time. |
|
(2) |
|
The number represents 350,000 shares of common stock
issuable upon exercise of warrants issued to our non-employees
under plans approved by our board of directors that we believe
are not required to be approved by our stockholders pursuant to
the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market. We issued these warrants
in circumstances that enable us to adequately compensate,
without the payment in cash, for outside consultant services, in
order to conserve our cash for operating activities. The number
of securities remaining available for future issuance under
these types of equity compensation plans is zero; however, our
board of directors may approve additional issuances of warrants
under circumstances that it decides are appropriate. These
warrants are typically exercisable for five years and have
equitable anti-dilution rights for stock splits, stock
dividends, reclassifications, compulsory share exchanges,
distributions of indebtedness, assets, rights, warrants or
subscriptions, merger, consolidation, sale of assets, tender
offer or other exchanges of the entire class of common stock. |
The above table does not include warrants issued to investors in
connection with financing transactions. As of December 31,
2009, there were outstanding investor warrants to purchase up to
an aggregate of 10,678,919 shares of our common stock, with
a weighted average exercise price of $6.58 per share. As of
April 20, 2010, 4,282,600 warrants expired unexercised, and
2,649,007 warrants exercisable at $7.55 are scheduled to expire
on June 20, 2010, if not exercised.
Further details regarding warrants issued by us are included in
footnote 11 to our audited consolidated financial statements
included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
25
REPORT OF
THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
The following Compensation Committee Report does not
constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or
incorporated by reference into any other company filing under
the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent we specifically incorporate it by reference therein.
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on
its review and discussions with management, the Compensation
Committee recommended to the board of directors that the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in our 2010
proxy statement.
Mitchell P. Cybulski, M.B.A., Chair
Stuart M. Krassner, Sc.D., Psy.D.
Julius A. Vida, Ph.D.
Summary
Compensation Table
The following information sets forth summary information
concerning the compensation we paid or accrued during 2009, 2008
and 2007 to our chief executive officer and vice president of
finance. In 2009, we had no other named executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Option
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
Awards
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary ($)
|
|
Bonus ($)
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
($)
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
Rajesh Shrotriya
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,159,000
|
|
|
|
33,956
|
(2)
|
|
|
3,792,956
|
|
Chairman, Chief Executive
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
388,000
|
|
|
|
839,500
|
|
|
|
34,694
|
(2)
|
|
|
2,862,194
|
|
Officer and President
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
545,000
|
|
|
|
2,612,000
|
|
|
|
56,774
|
(2)
|
|
|
3,938,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shyam Kumaria
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
275,000
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
429,900
|
|
|
|
21,449
|
(3)
|
|
|
786,349
|
|
Vice President, Finance and Secretary
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
65,850
|
|
|
|
113,000
|
|
|
|
22,113
|
(3)
|
|
|
500,963
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
109,000
|
|
|
|
351,300
|
|
|
|
22,948
|
(3)
|
|
|
768,248
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of
awards made to such named executive officers calculated in
accordance with ASC 718. For additional information, refer
to note 12 of our financial statements in the
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the SEC
on April 5, 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts include: (a) annual 401(k) matching contribution
made by us in shares of our common stock and healthcare
premiums, which is a benefit offered to all our employees,
(b) premiums paid on life insurance policies covering his
life and having as beneficiary his estate or other
beneficiaries, (c) amounts related to the personal use of a
leased company car, gas and repairs, and (d) legal fees
related to negotiations of his employment agreement. No
individual component of this amount exceeds $25,000. |
|
(3) |
|
Amounts include annual 401(k) matching contribution made by us
in shares of our common stock, and premiums paid on healthcare
and life insurance policies, which are benefits that are offered
to all of our employees. |
Grants
of Plan Based Awards in 2009
The following table provides information about equity awards
granted to the named executive officers in 2009. The amount of
the stock and option awards that were expensed in 2009 is shown
in the Summary Compensation
26
Table provided above. There can be no assurance that the grant
date fair value of stock and option awards will ever be realized
by the named executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Exercise or
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
Base Price
|
|
of Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
of Option
|
|
and Option
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
Awards ($)
|
|
Awards ($)(1)
|
|
Rajesh Shrotriya
|
|
|
01/16/09
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
|
|
294,000
|
|
|
|
|
06/26/09
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
6.09
|
|
|
|
1,865,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shyam Kumaria
|
|
|
01/16/09
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
|
|
05/21/09
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
4.89
|
|
|
|
14,900
|
|
|
|
|
06/26/09
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
6.09
|
|
|
|
373,000
|
|
The exercise price of all the option awards listed above is
equal to the fair market value on the dates of grant in
accordance with the terms of our equity incentive plans. All the
awards listed above vest annually in equal 25% increments with
25% immediately vested on the date of grant.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amounts reflect the dollar amount recognized for financial
statement reporting purposes in accordance with ASC 718. |
27
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
Plan Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Option
|
|
Option
|
|
Stock that
|
|
Stock that
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Expiration
|
|
Have Not
|
|
Have Not
|
Name
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
Price ($)
|
|
Date
|
|
Vested (#)
|
|
Vested ($)(4)
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rajesh Shrotriya
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.75
|
|
|
|
06/17/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
|
09/25/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.99
|
|
|
|
09/05/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.90
|
|
|
|
09/12/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.23
|
|
|
|
01/01/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.08
|
|
|
|
09/26/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.53
|
|
|
|
01/01/17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
111,000
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
3.15
|
|
|
|
12/06/17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.55
|
|
|
|
03/25/18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
1.43
|
|
|
|
12/06/18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
444,000
|
|
|
|
|
87,500
|
|
|
|
262,500
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
1.47
|
|
|
|
01/16/19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
375,000
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
6.09
|
|
|
|
06/26/19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shyam Kumaria
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.26
|
|
|
|
12/06/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
22,200
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
3.15
|
|
|
|
12/06/17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.55
|
|
|
|
03/25/18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
1.43
|
|
|
|
12/06/18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
66,600
|
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
1.47
|
|
|
|
01/16/19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
4.89
|
|
|
|
05/21/19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
6.09
|
|
|
|
06/26/19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Shares granted on July 20, 2007 with 25% vesting on the
grant date, and continuing to vest in equal 25% increments every
July 20th thereafter. |
|
(2) |
|
Option shares vest annually in equal 25% increments, with 25%
immediately vested on the grant date. |
|
(3) |
|
Shares granted on December 6, 2008 with 25% vesting on the
grant date, and continuing to vest in equal 25% increments every
December 6th thereafter. |
|
(4) |
|
Calculation based on the closing price of the common stock on
December 31, 2009 of $4.44 per share, the last trading day
before the end of our 2009 fiscal year. |
28
Stock
Vested Table in Fiscal Year 2009
The following table provides information regarding the number of
shares acquired upon exercise
and/or
vesting in 2009 and the value realized by the named executive
officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
No. of
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Acquired on
|
|
Realized on
|
Name
|
|
Vesting (#)
|
|
Vesting ($)(1)
|
|
Rajesh Shrotriya
|
|
|
95,000
|
|
|
|
412,050
|
|
Shyam Kumaria
|
|
|
17,500
|
|
|
|
71,725
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The value realized on vesting in the above table was calculated
based on the price of the common stock on the vesting date. |
Executive
Employment Agreements, Termination of Employment and
Change-in-Control
Arrangements
On June 20, 2008, we entered into an employment agreement
with Dr. Shrotriya, our President and Chief Executive
Officer, which became effective as of January 2, 2008 and
replaced his previous employment agreement. The employment
agreement expires on January 2, 2011, unless terminated
earlier, and automatically renews for a one-year term unless
either party gives written notice of such partys intent
not to renew the agreement at least 90 days prior to the
commencement of the next year. The employment agreement requires
Dr. Shrotriya to devote his full working time and effort to
the business and affairs of us during the term of the agreement.
The employment agreement provides for a minimum annual base
salary with annual increases, periodic bonuses and option grants
as determined by the Compensation Committee.
Compensation
and Benefits
Dr. Shrotriya shall receive an annual base salary of
$600,000, as adjusted annually based upon the performance of
Dr. Shrotriya and our company, as determined by the
Compensation Committee.
Dr. Shrotriya shall also be paid an annual performance
bonus in cash
and/or
equity based awards, no later than January 31 of the year
following, in an amount to be determined by the Compensation
Committee according to Dr. Shrotriyas achievement of
annual performance objectives mutually agreed upon by
Dr. Shrotriya and our board of directors.
Under the agreement, Dr. Shrotriya is entitled to receive
additional employment benefits, including the right to
participate in any incentive plans and to receive life, medical,
dental, paid vacation, estate planning services, a leased
vehicle and reimbursements for automobile related expenses, and
other benefits.
Termination
Dr. Shrotriyas employment may be terminated due to
non-renewal of the agreement by us, by mutual agreement of the
parties, by us for cause (as that term is defined in the
agreement) or without cause, on grounds of disability or death
of Dr. Shrotriya, by Dr. Shrotriya for no reason or
for good reason (as those terms are defined in the agreement),
or by Dr. Shrotriyas non-renewal of the agreement.
If (i) the agreement is not renewed by us,
(ii) Dr. Shrotriya is terminated without cause, or
(iii) Dr. Shrotriya resigns for good reason, then
Dr. Shrotriyas guaranteed severance payments include
the right to receive (a) a lump sum payment equivalent to
the aggregate of two years cash compensation;
(b) company-paid continued coverage for Dr. Shrotriya
and his eligible dependents under our existing health and
benefit plans for two years; and (c) immediate vesting of
all options, restricted stock and other equity based awards
granted to Dr. Shrotriya. Dr. Shrotriya shall have
three years to exercise all vested equity based awards. Since
options issued to Dr. Shrotriya pursuant to our 1997 Plan
can only be exercised for ninety days after termination, a
replacement option shall be granted to Dr. Shrotriya at
termination to allow for three years of exercisability.
29
In the event Dr. Shrotriya voluntarily resigns for good
reason, or is terminated by us without cause, we will pay or
reimburse Dr. Shrotriya for reasonable relocation expenses
up to a certain amount.
If Dr. Shrotriyas employment is terminated without
cause prior to the end of a calendar year, then our board of
directors shall determine the amount of any bonus that would
have been paid to Dr. Shrotriya had his employment
continued through the end of the calendar year and we shall pay
Dr. Shrotriya the pro rata amount of the bonus.
If the agreement is terminated due to death or disability of
Dr. Shrotriya, a lump sum equal to three months of base
salary, at the time of his termination, shall be paid to
Dr. Shrotriya, his legal representative or estate, as
applicable. All equity based awards, such as options and
restricted stock, shall immediately vest and shall remain
exercisable in accordance with the terms of the respective
equity plan and individual agreement(s) governing such options
and as otherwise set forth in the agreement.
If Dr. Shrotriya voluntarily resigns his employment for no
reason, any stock options or other equity based awards (except
for restricted stock) shall immediately become fully vested upon
the effective date of Dr. Shrotriyas resignation, and
he shall have three years to exercise all such vested equity
based awards. Dr. Shrotriya shall receive the same benefits
for any unexpired options issued pursuant to our 1997 Plan as if
he had been terminated without cause by us.
If during the term of the agreement, Dr. Shrotriya resigns
for good reason (as defined in the agreement) other than
pursuant to the circumstances of a change in control and the
board has not cured the condition(s) that constitute good
reason, then Dr. Shrotriya shall receive all of the
severance benefits he would receive if he had been terminated
without cause by us. Upon a change of control of our company, if
(i) Dr. Shrotriyas employment is terminated
(other than by Dr. Shrotriya) without cause within twelve
months thereafter; or (ii) Dr. Shrotriya is adversely
affected in certain terms outlined in the agreement, and
Dr. Shrotriya, within twelve months after an event
constituting a change of control, elects to resign his
employment with us, then in either case, Dr. Shrotriya
shall be provided with company-paid senior executive
outplacement and shall receive the same severance benefits as he
would receive if he was terminated by us without cause. However,
instead of two years cash compensation, Dr. Shrotriya
shall receive three years cash compensation. In addition, upon a
change of control, we shall pay Dr. Shrotriya a one-time
payment of $600,000.
If the agreement is terminated due to mutual agreement,
Dr. Shrotriyas non-renewal of the agreement, or by us
for cause, he shall not be entitled to any severance.
Other
If any payment or distribution by us to or for the benefit of
Dr. Shrotriya is subject to the excise tax imposed by
Section 4999 of the Code or any interest or penalties are
incurred by the Dr. Shrotriya with respect to such excise
tax, then Dr. Shrotriya shall be entitled to receive an
additional payment in an amount such that after payment by
Dr. Shrotriya of all taxes (including any interest and
penalties imposed with respect thereto) and excise tax imposed
upon such payment, Dr. Shrotriya retains an amount of the
payment equal to the excise tax imposed upon the payment.
If we determine that any payments to Dr. Shrotriya under
the agreement fail to satisfy the distribution requirement of
Section 409A(a)(2)(A) of the Code, the payment schedule of
that benefit shall be revised to the extent necessary so that
the benefit is not subject to the provisions of
Section 409A(a)(1) of the Code. We may attach conditions to
or adjust the amounts so paid to preserve, as closely as
possible, the economic consequences that would have applied in
the absence of this adjustment; provided, however, that no such
condition or adjustment shall result in the payments being
subject to Section 409A(a)(1) of the Code.
Potential
Payments Upon Termination or Following a Change in
Control
The tables below reflect the amount of compensation to each of
our named executive officers in the event of termination of such
executives employment or following a change in control of
our Company. The amount of compensation payable to each named
executive officer upon voluntary termination without cause,
retirement, involuntary termination without cause, involuntary
termination for cause or termination following a change of
control, in the event of disability or death of the executive,
and following a change in control of our Company is
30
shown below. Where applicable, the amounts shown assume that
termination was effective as of December 31, 2009 and use
the closing price of our common stock as of December 31,
2009 ($4.44), and are estimates of the amounts which would be
paid out to the executives upon their termination. In the case
of payments upon termination, the actual amounts to be paid out
can only be determined at the time of such executives
separation from our company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
Control
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
(Qualifying
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
Rajesh Shrotriya
|
|
Cause ($)
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
Death ($)
|
|
|
Disability ($)
|
|
|
Cause ($)
|
|
|
For Cause
|
|
|
Termination) ($)
|
|
|
Control ($)
|
|
|
Cash Severance payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
3,200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,800,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
Benefit payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting Acceleration Options
|
|
|
1,037,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,037,625
|
|
|
|
1,037,625
|
|
|
|
1,037,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,037,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting Acceleration Restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
555,000
|
|
|
|
555,000
|
|
|
|
555,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
555,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,037,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,742,625
|
|
|
|
1,742,625
|
|
|
|
4,948,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,629,557
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shyam Kumaria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Severance payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting Acceleration Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting Acceleration Restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
281,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash severance payments: Includes base salary,
bonus and auto allowance payable, pursuant to terms of the
employment agreement described above, for two years.
Cash payments: Consists of a one-time payment
upon a change in control of our Company pursuant to terms of the
employment agreement described above.
Benefit payments: Includes COBRA insurance
payments for healthcare insurance premiums payable, pursuant to
terms of the employment agreements described above, for two
years unless the lump-sum option is elected. Under the
Change in Control scenario, an estimated cost for
outplacement services is also included, pursuant to terms of the
employment agreement described above.
Vesting Acceleration
Options: Includes the aggregate fair value of
those stock options whose vesting is accelerated upon
termination, either pursuant to terms of the employment
agreements described above, or pursuant to terms of our equity
incentive plans. The calculation of such fair value is based on
the difference between the last closing price of our common
stock, on or before December 31, 2009, and the exercise
price of the options.
Vesting Acceleration Restricted
stock: Includes the aggregate fair value of
restricted stock whose vesting is accelerated upon termination
pursuant to terms of our equity incentive plans. The calculation
of such fair value is based on the last closing price of our
common stock, on or before December 31, 2009.
SECTION 16(A)
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive
officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more
than ten percent of our common stock, to file initial reports of
ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the SEC and
NASDAQ. Executive officers, directors and persons who
beneficially own more than ten percent of our common stock are
required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all
Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely upon our review of the copies of reporting forms
furnished to us, and written representations that no other
reports were required, we believe that all filing requirements
under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act applicable to our
directors, officers and any persons holding 10% or more of our
common stock with respect to our fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009 were satisfied on a timely basis.
31
OTHER
MATTERS
Our board of directors knows of no other business to be acted
upon at the annual meeting. However, if any other business
properly comes before the annual meeting, the persons named in
the enclosed proxy will have the discretion to vote on such
matters in accordance with their best judgment.
This proxy statement and the accompanying proxy card,
together with a copy of our 2009 annual report, are being mailed
to our stockholders on or about May 17, 2010. You may also
obtain a complete copy of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, with all
exhibits filed therewith, from the SECs web site at
www.sec.gov under EDGAR filings. We will provide to you a copy
of our
Form 10-K
by writing us at 157 Technology Drive, Irvine, California,
92618, Attn: Investor Relations. Exhibits filed with our
Form 10-K
will be provided upon written request, in the same manner noted
above, at a nominal per page charge. Information on our website,
other than our proxy statement and form of proxy, is not part of
the proxy soliciting material and is not incorporated herein by
reference.
IMPORTANT
NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE
STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON JUNE 18, 2010
The proxy statement and annual report to our stockholders for
the year ended December 31, 2009 are available at our
Investor Relations page of our Internet website under the
heading Annual Meeting and Proxy Information. Our
web page is
http://www.sppirx.com.
32
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
Stockholder Proposals for the 2011 Annual
Meeting. Under
Rule 14a-8
of the Exchange Act, any stockholder desiring to include a
proposal in our proxy statement with respect to the 2011 annual
meeting should arrange for such proposal to be delivered to us
at our principal place of business no later than
January 17, 2011, in order to be considered for inclusion
in our proxy statement relating to such annual meeting. Matters
pertaining to such proposals, including the number and length
thereof, and the eligibility of persons entitled to have such
proposals included, are regulated by the Exchange Act, the Rules
and Regulations of the SEC and other laws and regulations to
which interested persons should refer.
In addition, pursuant to our bylaws, any stockholder desiring to
submit a proposal for action or nominate one or more persons for
election as directors at the 2011 annual meeting of stockholders
must submit a notice of the proposal or nomination including the
information required by our bylaws to us between March 20,
2011 and April 19, 2011, or else it will be considered
untimely and ineligible to be properly brought before the
meeting. However, if our 2011 annual meeting of stockholders is
not held between May 19, 2011 and August 17, 2011
under our bylaws, this notice must be provided not earlier than
the ninetieth day prior to the 2011 annual meeting of
stockholders and not later than the close of business on the
later of (a) the sixtieth day prior to the 2011 annual
meeting or (b) the tenth day following the date on which
notice of the date of the 2011 annual meeting is first mailed to
stockholders or otherwise publicly disclosed, whichever first
occurs.
All such notices should be directed to our Secretary, Spectrum
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 157 Technology Drive, Irvine, CA 92618.
Proxy Solicitation Costs. The proxies being
solicited hereby are being solicited by us, and the cost of
soliciting proxies in the enclosed form will be borne by us. We
have also retained The Altman Group, Inc., 1200 Wall Street
West, 3rd Fl., Lyndhurst, NJ 07071, to aid in the
solicitation. For these services, we will pay The Altman Group a
fee of $7,000 and reimburse them for certain
out-of-pocket
disbursements and expenses. Our officers and regular employees
may, but without compensation other than their regular
compensation, solicit proxies by further mailings or personal
conversations, or by telephone, telex, facsimile or electronic
means. We will, upon request, reimburse brokerage firms and
others for their reasonable expenses in forwarding solicitation
material to the beneficial owners of stock.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Shyam K. Kumaria
Vice President, Finance and Secretary
April 28, 2010
33
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON JUNE 18, 2010 THIS
PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The undersigned, a Stockholder of SPECTRUM
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., a Delaware corporation, hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, the Annual Report to Stockholders and the accompanying Proxy Statement for
the Annual Meeting to be held on June 18, 2010, at 10:30 a.m. Pacific Time, at our corporate office
located at 157 Technology Drive, Irvine, California, 92618, and, revoking any proxy previously
given, hereby appoints Dr. Rajesh C. Shrotriya and Shyam K. Kumaria, and each of them individually,
proxies and attorneys-in-fact, each with full power of substitution and revocation, and each with
all power that the undersigned would possess if personally present, to vote SPECTRUM
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. Common Stock held by the undersigned at such meeting and any postponements or
adjournments of such meeting, as set forth on the reverse, and in their discretion upon any other
business that may properly come before the meeting. Unless otherwise specified, this proxy will be
voted FOR the election of each nominee for director listed on this proxy card in Proposal 1 and in
the discretion of the proxy holders on all other business that comes before the meeting.
IMPORTANT: SIGNATURE REQUIRED ON REVERSE SIDE |
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. JUNE 18, 2010 Please date, sign
and mail your proxy card in the envelope provided as soon as possible. DETACH PROXY CARD HERE 1. To
elect six directors to serve on the Board of Directors FOR ALL NOMINEES WITHHOLD AUTHORITY FOR
ALL NOMINEES FOR ALL EXCEPT (see Instructions below) Please Detach Here You Must Detach This
Portion of the Proxy Card Before Returning It in the Enclosed Envelope Nominees: Krishan K. Arora,
Ph.D., Stuart M. Krassner, Sc.D., Psy.D, Luigi Lenaz, M.D., Anthony E. Maida, III, M.A., M.B.A.,
Ph.D., Dilip J. Mehta, M.D., Ph.D. and Rajesh C. Shrotriya, M.D. (INSTRUCTION: To withhold
authority to vote for any individual nominees(s), mark the FOR ALL EXCEPT box and write that each
nominees name on the space below.) If no choice is indicated, the proxy will be voted FOR all
nominees listed. EXCEPTIONS: 2. To transact such other business as may properly be presented at
the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. Unless otherwise specified, this
proxy will be voted FOR the election of each nominee for director listed on this proxy card in
Proposal 1 and in the discretion of the proxy holders on all other business that comes before the
meeting. I/we plan to attend the Annual Meeting. To change the address on your account, please
check the box at right and indicate your new address in the address space below. Please note that
changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted via this method. Signature of
Stockholder Date: Signature of Stockholder Date: Note: Please sign exactly as your name or names
appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as
executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If the
signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full
title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person. |