e20vf
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
|
|
|
o
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
OR
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal
year ended December 31,
2009
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
OR
|
o
|
|
SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
Date of event requiring this
shell company report
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file
number: 1-14251
SAP AG
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
SAP CORPORATION
(Translation of
Registrants name into English)
Federal Republic of
Germany
(Jurisdiction of incorporation
or organization)
Dietmar-Hopp-Allee 16
69190 Walldorf
Federal Republic of Germany
(Address of principal
executive offices)
Wendy Boufford
c/o SAP
Labs
3410 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, United States of
America
650-849-4000
(Tel)
650-849-2650
(Fax)
(Name, Telephone,
Email and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact
Person)
Securities registered or to be
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
American Depositary Shares, each Representing
one Ordinary Share, without nominal value
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Ordinary Shares, without nominal value
|
|
New York Stock Exchange*
|
Securities
registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of
the Act: None
Securities for which there is a
reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None
Indicate
the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers
classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period
covered by the annual report:
|
|
|
Ordinary Shares, without nominal value: (as of December 31,
2009)**
|
|
1,226,039,608
|
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer,
as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
If
this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check
mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
Note
Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required
to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under
those Sections.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such files.)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated
filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a
smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and
smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller Reporting company o
|
Indicate
by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used
to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
U.S. GAAP o International
Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International
Accounting Standards
Board þ Other o
If
Other has been checked in response to the previous
question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item
the registrant has elected to follow.
If
this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
|
|
*
|
Listed not for trading or quotation
purposes, but only in connection with the registration of
American Depositary Shares representing such ordinary shares
pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
|
** Including 37,262,465
treasury shares.
[THIS
PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
ii
INTRODUCTION
SAP AG is a German stock corporation (Aktiengesellschaft) and is
referred to in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F,
together with its subsidiaries, as SAP, or as
Company, Group, we,
our, or us. Our Consolidated Financial
Statements included in Item 18. Financial
Statements in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F
have been prepared in accordance with International Financial
Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting
Standards Board, referred to as IFRS throughout this report.
In this Annual Report on
Form 20-F:
(i) references to US$, $, or
dollars are to U.S. dollars;
(ii) references to or euro
are to the euro. Our financial statements are denominated in
euros, which is the currency of our home country, Germany.
Certain amounts that appear in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F
may not add up because of differences due to rounding.
Unless otherwise specified herein, euro financial data have been
converted into dollars at the noon buying rate in New York City
for cable transfers in foreign currencies as certified for
customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the
Noon Buying Rate) on December 31, 2009, which
was US$1.4332 per 1.00. No representation is made that
such euro amounts actually represent such dollar amounts or that
such euro amounts could have been or can be converted into
dollars at that or any other exchange rate on such date or on
any other dates. The rate used for the convenience translations
also differs from the currency exchange rates used for the
preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements. This
convenience translation is not a requirement under IFRS and,
accordingly, our independent registered public accounting firm
has not audited these US$ amounts. For information regarding
recent rates of exchange between euro and dollars, see
Item 3. Key Information Exchange
Rates. On March 10, 2010, the Noon Buying Rate for
converting euro to dollars was US$1.3658 per 1.00.
Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Annual
Report on
Form 20-F
to ordinary shares are to SAP AGs ordinary shares, without
nominal value. References in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F
to ADRs are to SAP AGs American Depositary
Receipts, each representing one SAP ordinary share.
SAP, R/3, SAP NetWeaver, Duet, PartnerEdge, ByDesign, SAP
Business ByDesign, and other SAP products and services mentioned
herein as well as their respective logos are trademarks or
registered trademarks of SAP AG in Germany and other countries.
Business Objects and the Business Objects logo, BusinessObjects,
BusinessObjects Explorer, Crystal Reports, Crystal Decisions,
Web Intelligence, Xcelsius, and other Business Objects products
and services mentioned herein as well as their respective logos
are trademarks or registered trademarks of Business Objects S.A.
in the United States and in other countries. Business Objects is
an SAP company. All other product and service names mentioned
are the trademarks of their respective companies. Data contained
in this report serves informational purposes only. National
product specifications may vary.
Throughout this Annual Report on
Form 20-F,
whenever a reference is made to our website, such reference does
not incorporate by reference into this Annual Report the
information contained on our website.
We intend to make this Annual Report on
Form 20-F
and other periodic reports publicly available on our Web site
(www.sap.com) without charge immediately following our filing
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). We
assume no obligation to update or revise any part of this Annual
Report on
Form 20-F,
whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise, unless we are required to do so by law.
1
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on
Form 20-F
contains forward-looking statements and information based on the
beliefs of, and assumptions made by, our management using
information currently available to them. Any statements
contained in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F
that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements as
defined in the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. We have based these forward-looking statements on
our current expectations, assumptions and projections about
future conditions and events. As a result, our forward-looking
statements and information are subject to uncertainties and
risks. A broad range of uncertainties and risks, many of which
are beyond our control, could cause our actual results and
performance to differ materially from any projections expressed
in or implied by our forward looking statements. These
uncertainties and risks include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
claims and lawsuits against us that could result in adverse
outcomes, including third party infringement claims;
|
|
|
|
our ability to procure new licenses, renew existing maintenance
agreements and to sell additional professional services,
particularly with respect to our installed customer base;
|
|
|
|
economic conditions in general and trends in our business,
particularly the current global economic crisis and general
global economic uncertainty;
|
|
|
|
the effectiveness of our IT security measures and
Internet-related privacy concerns and risks associated with
undetected errors in our products;
|
|
|
|
our ability to use our intellectual property and intellectual
property licensed to us by third parties;
|
|
|
|
competitive risks associated with new delivery and licensing
models, such as Software as a Service (SaaS), Business Process
Outsourcing (BPO) and cloud computing;
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain, license and enforce intellectual property
rights;
|
|
|
|
liquidity and the valuation of our financial assets,
particularly on the increased risk of default on receivables and
financial assets in the current economic climate;
|
|
|
|
variances or slowdowns in our software license sales and its
impact on our future maintenance and service revenue;
|
|
|
|
our ability to effectively manage our headcount and our
geographically dispersed employee base;
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully integrate newly acquired businesses;
|
|
|
|
international economic and regulatory requirements and
constraints, including governance-related regulations;
|
|
|
|
more onerous corporate governance laws in both Germany and the
United States;
|
|
|
|
current and future accounting pronouncements and managements
estimates and judgements made in order to comply with IFRS;
|
|
|
|
our liquidity management; and
|
|
|
|
our ability to protect our critical information or assets or
safeguard our business operations against disruption.
|
We describe these and other risks and uncertainties in more
detail under Item 3 Key Information Risk
Factors.
If one or more of these uncertainties or risks materializes, or
if managements underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our
actual results may differ materially from those described in or
inferred from our forward-looking statements and information.
2
The words aim, anticipate,
assume, believe, continue,
could, counting on, is
confident, estimate, expect,
forecast, guidance, intend,
may, outlook, plan,
project, predict, seek,
should, strategy, want,
will, would, and similar expressions as
they relate to us are intended to identify such forward-looking
statements. Such information includes, for example, the
statements made in Item 5. Operating and Financial
Review and Prospects and our quantitative and qualitative
disclosures about market pursuant to IFRS 7 in
Item 18., Financial Statements, but also
appears in other parts of this Annual Report on
Form 20-F.
The factors that could affect our future financial results are
discussed more fully under Item 3. Key
Information Risk Factors, as well as elsewhere
in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F
and in our other filings with the SEC. Readers are cautioned not
to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements,
which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on
Form 20-F.
Except where legally required we undertake no obligation to
publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements as a
result of new information that we receive about conditions that
existed upon issuance of this report, future events or
otherwise, unless we are required to do so by law.
This Annual Report includes statistical data about the IT
industry that comes from information published by sources
including Gartner, Inc., or Gartner, a provider of market
information and strategic information for the IT industry;
International Data Group, or IDC, a provider of market
information and advisory services for the information
technology, telecommunications, and consumer technology markets;
investment bank Goldman Sachs; financial services company UBS;
Forrester Research, a major market research company, Altimeter
Group, a digital strategies company; SiteIQ, a contact center
outsourcing company; and TNS Infratest, an independent customer
survey company. This type of data represents only the estimates
of Gartner, IDC, Goldman Sachs, UBS, Forrester Research,
Altimeter Group, SiteIQ and other sources of industry data. SAP
does not adopt nor endorse any of the statistical information
provided by sources such as Gartner, IDC, Goldman Sachs, UBS,
Forrester Research, Altimeter Group, SiteIQ or other similar
sources that is contained in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F.
In addition, although we believe that data from these companies
are generally reliable, this type of data is inherently
imprecise. We caution you not to place undue reliance on this
data.
FINANCIAL
MEASURES CITED IN THIS REVIEW
Reporting
Standards
Since 2007, we have been required by German and European law to
prepare Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with
IFRS. In addition to our reporting under IFRS we continued to
prepare Consolidated Financial Statements under U.S. GAAP.
Beginning with our audited Consolidated Financial Statements as
of and for the year ended December 31, 2009, we fully
migrated to IFRS and discontinued preparing U.S. GAAP
financial information as of the end of 2009. Therefore, our
press release announcing our preliminary fourth quarter and full
year 2009 financial results was the last document in which we
provided U.S. GAAP financial information. Our 2009 Annual
Report as well as our Annual Report on
Form 20-F
for fiscal year 2009 and for the subsequent years will only
present IFRS financial statements. As such, our business outlook
for 2010 announced on January 27, 2010, is for the first
time on the basis of non-IFRS numbers derived from IFRS numbers.
Concurrently with this change in our external financial
communication, we modified our internal management reporting,
planning and forecasting, and variable compensation plans, which
are now aligned with the IFRS and non-IFRS numbers that we
provide in our external communications.
Managing
for Value
In 2009 and in 2008, we expressed our internal management
reporting and operational objectives and targets in terms of
financial measures derived from U.S. GAAP numbers, adjusted
by eliminating currency and certain extraordinary effects
including those related to acquisitions. We refer to these
measures as constant currency non-GAAP measures. This non-GAAP
information differs from our numbers reported according to
3
U.S. GAAP. Starting in 2010, we base our internal
management reporting and operational objectives and targets on
constant currency non-IFRS measures as more fully described
below.
We use various value-based performance measures to help promote
our primary goal of sustained growth in corporate value and our
ancillary goal of profitable revenue growth.
In 2009 and in 2008, for purposes of our internal management
reporting, we eliminated a deferred support revenue write-down
resulting from an acquisition, as well as recurring
acquisition-related charges from certain key
U.S. GAAP-derived measures we mainly used to manage our
operational business, which are non-GAAP software and
software-related service revenue, non-GAAP operating income and
non-GAAP operating margin. In 2008, we focused on non-GAAP
growth of software and software-related service revenue and
non-GAAP operating margin, whereas in 2009 we had a stronger
focus on non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin
and added the cash conversion rate as our group targeted
measure. The cash conversion rate is the ratio of the net cash
provided by operating activities from continuing operations to
the income from continuing operations, based on U.S. GAAP.
Starting in 2010, we will manage our operational business based
on constant currency non-IFRS measures rather than the constant
currency non-GAAP measures we used in 2009 and in 2008.
To compare rates of growth in underlying business volumes, we
use measures both before and after we exclude currency effects
from the numbers being compared by translating them at the
exchange rates from the immediately preceding year, i.e. we
translate the relevant 2009 numbers at 2008 exchange rates
before comparing them to the relevant 2008 numbers. We refer to
measures from which currency effects have been eliminated as
constant currency measures. The following are some of the key
measures we use before and after we exclude currency effects:
|
|
|
|
|
Our software and software-related service revenue includes
software and support revenue plus subscription and other
software-related service revenue. The principal source of
software revenue is the fees customers pay for software
licenses. Software revenue is the key revenue driver because it
tends to affect our other revenue streams. Generally, customers
that buy software licenses also enter into maintenance
contracts, and after the software sale these generate recurring
software-related service revenue in the form of support revenue.
Maintenance contracts cover support services, regular software
maintenance, and software updates and enhancements. We also
generate software-related service revenue when we provide
software on subscription or obligatory hosting terms. Software
revenue also tends to stimulate service revenue from consulting
and training sales.
|
|
|
|
In 2009 and 2008, we used non-GAAP operating margin and constant
currency non-GAAP operating margin to measure our overall
operational process efficiency and the performance of our core
business (software licenses, support, and other software-related
service revenue). Non-GAAP operating margin is the ratio of our
non-GAAP operating income, which includes support revenue from
an acquired company that would have been reported had it been an
independent company and excludes acquisition-related charges, to
total non-GAAP revenue, expressed as a percentage. See below for
a discussion of the IFRS and non-IFRS measures we use beginning
in 2010.
|
The cash conversion rate is defined as the ratio of our net cash
flows from operating activities from continuing operations to
income from continuing operations (U.S. GAAP). The cash
conversion rate measures the proportion of our income from
continuing operations that is converted to cash flow.
We also use performance measures mainly financial
income, net and the effective Group tax rate to
manage non-operating items.
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income, net provides insight especially into the
return on liquid assets and capital investments and the cost of
borrowed funds. To manage our financial income, net, we focus on
cash flow, the composition of our liquid asset and capital
investment portfolio, and the average rate of interest at which
assets are invested. We also monitor average outstanding
borrowings and the associated finance costs.
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
Another aspect is management of working capital by controlling
the days sales outstanding for receivables, DSO (defined
as average number of days from the raised invoice to cash
receipt from the customer) and the days payables
outstanding for liabilities, DPO (defined as average number of
days from the received invoice to cash payment to the vendor).
|
|
|
|
In 2009 and in 2008 we defined our effective Group tax rate as
the ratio of income taxes to income from continuing operations
before income taxes (in accordance with U.S. GAAP),
expressed as a percentage. Starting in 2010, we will calculate
the effective Group tax rate on an IFRS basis.
|
Earnings per share (EPS) is a measure of the overall performance
of the Group, because it captures all operating and
non-operating elements of profit. It represents the portion of
profit after tax allocable to each SAP share outstanding (using
the weighted average number of shares outstanding over the
reporting period). EPS is influenced not only by our operating
and non-operating business but also by the weighted average
number of shares outstanding. We believe that stock repurchases
and dividend distributions are a good means to return value to
shareholders in accordance with the authorizations granted by
them.
Our holistic view of the performance measures described above
together with our associated analyses make up the information
base we use for value-based management. We use planning and
control processes to manage the compilation of these key
measures and their availability to the decision makers.
The Companys long-term strategic plans are the point of
reference for our other planning and controlling processes,
including creating a multi-year plan. We identify future growth
and profitability drivers at a highly aggregated level. This
process is intended to identify the best areas in which to
target sustained investment. The next step is to evaluate
multi-year plans for areas of development and for
customer-facing and support functions, and to break them down by
sales region. We allocate resources to achieve targets we derive
from detailed annual plans. We also have processes in place to
forecast on a quarterly basis, internal revenue and income, to
quantify whether we have realized our goals and to identify any
deviations from plan. We closely monitor the concerned units in
the Group to analyze these developments and define any
appropriate actions.
The entire network of planning, control, and reporting processes
is implemented in integrated planning and information systems
across all organizational units so that we can conduct the
evaluations and analyses needed to make informed decisions.
Measures
Used in this Report
We provided our 2009 outlook on the basis of certain non-GAAP
measures as described above. Therefore, this report contains a
comparison of our actual performance in 2009 against that
outlook. Our outlook for 2010 is expressed in non-IFRS terms
which are explained in the following section.
This introductory section provides:
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures we used in 2009 and in
2008 to the related non-IFRS measures, and a reconciliation of
those non-IFRS measures to the related IFRS measures.
|
|
|
|
An explanation of the non-GAAP and non-IFRS measures we disclose
in this report. We believe it is critical to provide these
reconciliations and the explanatory information for both the
relevant non-GAAP and non-IFRS measures to ensure transparency
and clarity in our financial reporting particularly as we
started providing our outlook based on non-IFRS measures instead
of the non-GAAP measures beginning in 2010.
|
5
Reconciliations
from IFRS to Non-IFRS to Non-GAAP Numbers for 2009 and
2008
The following tables reconcile from our IFRS numbers to the
respective and most comparable non-IFRS numbers, and then
reconcile from those non-IFRS numbers to the respective and most
comparable non-GAAP numbers, in each case for 2009 and 2008. Due
to rounding, numbers presented in these tables may not add up
precisely to the totals we provide.
Reconciliation
from IFRS to Non-IFRS to Non-GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Constant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vs. Non-
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-IFRS
|
|
|
GAAP
|
|
|
GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Constant
|
|
|
Constant
|
|
|
Constant
|
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Non-IFRS
|
|
|
Effect
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
|
millions, unless otherwise stated
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software revenue
|
|
|
2,607
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,607
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
2,624
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,624
|
|
Support revenue
|
|
|
5,285
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
5,296
|
|
|
|
−19
|
|
|
|
5,277
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5,277
|
|
Subscription and other software-related service revenue
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
−7
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
Software and software-related service revenue
|
|
|
8,198
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
8,209
|
|
|
|
−8
|
|
|
|
8,201
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
8,201
|
|
Consulting revenue
|
|
|
2,074
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,074
|
|
|
|
−11
|
|
|
|
2,063
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,063
|
|
Training revenue
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
Other service revenue
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Professional services and other service revenue
|
|
|
2,432
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,432
|
|
|
|
−11
|
|
|
|
2,421
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,421
|
|
Other revenue
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
10,672
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
10,683
|
|
|
|
−19
|
|
|
|
10,664
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
10,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of software and software-related services
|
|
|
−1,714
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
−1,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of professional services and other services
|
|
|
−1,851
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
−1,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
−1,591
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
−1,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
−2,199
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
−2,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administration
|
|
|
−564
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
−560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
−198
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
−194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income/expense, net
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
−8,084
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
−7,756
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
−7,720
|
|
|
|
−11
|
|
|
|
−7,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit and margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
2,588
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
2,927
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
2,944
|
|
|
|
−11
|
|
|
|
2,933
|
|
Operating margin in %
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
Reconciliation
from IFRS to Non-IFRS to Non-GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vs. Non-
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Non-IFRS
|
|
|
GAAP
|
|
|
GAAP
|
|
|
|
millions, unless otherwise stated
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software revenue
|
|
|
3,606
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,606
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,606
|
|
Support revenue
|
|
|
4,602
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
4,759
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,759
|
|
Subscription and other software-related service revenue
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
Software and software-related service revenue
|
|
|
8,466
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
8,623
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
8,623
|
|
Consulting revenue
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
Training revenue
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
Other service revenue
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
Professional services and other service revenue
|
|
|
3,039
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,039
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,039
|
|
Other revenue
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
−1
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
11,575
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
11,732
|
|
|
|
−1
|
|
|
|
11,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of software and software-related services
|
|
|
−1,743
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
−1,453
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
−1,453
|
|
Cost of professional services and other services
|
|
|
−2,285
|
|
|
|
−6
|
|
|
|
−2,291
|
|
|
|
−5
|
|
|
|
−2,296
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
−1,627
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
−1,615
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
−1,614
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
−2,546
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
−2,456
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
−2,454
|
|
General and administration
|
|
|
−624
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
−623
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
−622
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
−60
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
−3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Other income/expense, net
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
−8,874
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
−8,431
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
−8,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit and margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
2,701
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
3,301
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3,303
|
|
Operating margin in %
|
|
|
23.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This report discloses certain financial measures, such as
non-GAAP revenue, non-GAAP expenses,
non-GAAP
operating income, non-GAAP operating margin, non-IFRS revenue,
non-IFRS expenses,
non-IFRS operating
profit, non-IFRS operating margin, constant currency revenue,
and constant currency operating income measures that are not
prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP or IFRS and are
therefore considered non-GAAP and non-IFRS financial measures.
Our non-GAAP and non-IFRS financial measures may not correspond
to non-GAAP and non-IFRS financial measures that other companies
report. The non-GAAP and non-IFRS financial measures that we
report should be considered in addition to, and not as
substitutes for or superior to, revenue, operating income,
operating margin, or other measures of financial performance
prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP or IFRS.
Explanations
of Non-GAAP Measures
We believe that the supplemental historical and prospective
non-GAAP financial information presented here provides useful
supplemental information to investors because it is the same
information used by our management in running our business and
making financial, strategic and operational
decisions in addition to financial data prepared in
accordance with U.S. GAAP or IFRS to attain a
more transparent understanding
7
of our past performance and our future results. Beginning in
2008, we used these non-GAAP measures as defined below
consistently in our planning and forecasting, reporting,
compensation and external communication until the end of 2009.
Specifically:
|
|
|
|
|
Our management primarily used these non-GAAP measures rather
than U.S. GAAP measures as the basis for making financial,
strategic and operating decisions.
|
|
|
|
The variable remuneration components of our board members and
employees that are compensated with regard to our Group-targeted
measures were based in 2009 on SAPs achievement of its
targets for non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP operating margin
at constant currencies and cash flow conversion ratio.
|
|
|
|
The annual budgeting process involving all management units,
which includes costs such as share-based compensation and
restructuring, was based on non-GAAP revenue and non-GAAP
operating income numbers rather than U.S. GAAP numbers.
|
|
|
|
All monthly forecast and performance reviews with all senior
managers globally were based on these non-GAAP measures, which
are derived from U.S. GAAP measures rather than
U.S. GAAP numbers.
|
|
|
|
Both company-internal target setting and guidance provided to
the capital markets were based on non-GAAP revenue and non-GAAP
income measures rather than U.S. GAAP numbers.
|
We believe that our non-GAAP measures are useful to investors
for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
The non-GAAP measures provide investors with insight into
managements decision-making since management used these
non-GAAP measures to run our business and make financial,
strategic and operating decisions.
|
|
|
|
The non-GAAP measures provide investors with additional
information that enables a comparison of
year-over-year
operating performance by eliminating certain direct effects of
acquisitions.
|
Our non-GAAP financial measures reflect adjustments based on the
items below:
Non-GAAP Revenue
Revenues in this report identified as non-GAAP revenue have been
adjusted from the respective U.S. GAAP and IFRS numbers by
including the full amount of support revenue that would have
been recorded by the acquired entity had it remained a
stand-alone entity but which we are not permitted to record as
revenue under U.S. GAAP and IFRS due to fair value
accounting for the support contracts in effect at the time of
the respective acquisition.
Under U.S. GAAP and IFRS, we record at fair value the
support contracts in effect at the time an entity was acquired.
Consequently, our U.S. GAAP and IFRS support revenue, our
U.S. GAAP and IFRS software and software-related service
revenue, and our U.S. GAAP and IFRS total revenue for
periods subsequent to acquisitions do not reflect the full
amount of support revenue that would have been recorded for
these support contracts absent the acquisition by SAP. Adjusting
revenue numbers for this revenue impact (if significant)
provides additional insight into the comparability across
periods of our ongoing performance.
Non-GAAP Operating
Expense
Operating expense figures in this report that are identified as
non-GAAP operating expense have been adjusted by excluding the
following acquisition-related charges:
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense/impairment charges of intangibles acquired
in business combinations and certain standalone acquisitions of
intellectual property
|
|
|
|
Expense from purchased in-process research and development
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring expenses and settlements of pre-existing
relationships incurred in connection with a business combination
|
|
|
|
Acquisition-related third-party costs (since our early adoption
of SFAS 141R and the revision of IFRS 3) as of
January 1, 2009, which are required to be expensed. The
previous version of SFAS 141 and IFRS 3 required
capitalization.
|
Non-GAAP Operating
Income and Non-GAAP Operating Margin
Operating income and operating margin in this report identified
as non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin have
been adjusted from the respective operating income and operating
margin as recorded under U.S. GAAP and IFRS by adjusting
for the above-mentioned non-GAAP revenue and non-GAAP expenses.
We include these non-GAAP revenues and exclude these non-GAAP
expenses for the purpose of calculating non-GAAP operating
income and non-GAAP operating margin when evaluating the
continuing operational performance of the Company because these
expenses generally cannot be changed or influenced by management
after the relevant acquisition other than by disposing of the
acquired assets. Since management at levels below the Executive
Board has no influence on these expenses, we generally do not
consider these expenses for the purpose of evaluating the
performance of management units. As we believe that our
Company-wide performance measures need to be aligned with the
measures generally applied by management at varying levels
throughout the Company, we include these revenues and exclude
these expenses when making decisions to allocate resources, both
on a Company level and at lower levels of the organization. In
addition, we use these non-GAAP measures to gain a better
understanding of the Companys comparative operating
performance from period to period.
We believe that our non-GAAP financial measures described above
have limitations, which include but are not limited to the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
The eliminated amounts may be material to us.
|
|
|
|
Without being analyzed in conjunction with the corresponding
U.S. GAAP or IFRS measures, the non-GAAP measures are not
indicative of our present and future performance, foremost for
the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
|
While our non-GAAP income numbers reflect the elimination of
certain acquisition-related expenses, no eliminations are made
for the additional revenues and other revenues that result from
the acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
The acquisition-related charges that we eliminate in deriving
our non-GAAP income numbers are likely to recur should SAP enter
into material business combinations in the future.
|
|
|
|
The acquisition-related amortization expense that we eliminate
in deriving our non-GAAP income numbers is a recurring expense
that will impact our financial performance in future years.
|
|
|
|
The revenue adjustment for the fair value accounting of the
acquired entities support contracts and the expense
adjustment for acquisition-related charges do not arise from a
common conceptual basis. This is because the revenue adjustment
aims to improve the comparability of the initial
post-acquisition period with future post-acquisition periods
while the expense adjustment aims to improve the comparability
between post-acquisition periods and pre-acquisition periods.
This should particularly be considered when evaluating our
non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin numbers
as these combine our non-GAAP revenue and non-GAAP expenses
despite the absence of a common conceptual basis.
|
We believe, however, that the presentation of the non-GAAP
measures in conjunction with the corresponding IFRS or
U.S. GAAP measures, as well as the relevant
reconciliations, provides useful information
9
to management and investors regarding present and future
business trends relating to our financial condition and results
of operations. We therefore do not evaluate our growth and
performance without considering both non-GAAP or non-IFRS
measures and the relevant U.S. GAAP or IFRS measures. We
caution the readers of this report to follow a similar approach
by considering our non-GAAP or non-IFRS measures only in
addition to, and not as a substitute for or superior to,
revenues or other measures of our financial performance prepared
in accordance with U.S. GAAP or IFRS.
Constant
Currency
Period-Over-Period
Changes
We believe it is important for investors to have information
that provides insight into our sales. Revenue measures
determined under U.S. GAAP or IFRS provide information that
is useful in this regard. However, both sales volume and
currency effects impact
period-over-period
changes in sales revenue. We do not sell standardized units of
products and services, so we cannot provide relevant information
on sales volume by providing data on the changes in product and
service units sold. To provide additional information that may
be useful to investors in breaking down and evaluating changes
in sales volume, we present information about our revenue and
various values and components relating to operating income that
are adjusted for foreign currency effects. We calculate constant
currency
year-over-year
changes in non-GAAP revenue and non-GAAP operating income by
translating foreign currencies using the average exchange rates
from the previous year instead of the report year.
We believe that data on constant currency
period-over-period
changes has limitations, particularly as the currency effects
that are eliminated constitute a significant element of our
revenue and expenses and may severely impact our performance. We
therefore limit our use of constant currency
period-over-period
changes to the analysis of changes in volume as one element of
the full change in a financial measure. We do not evaluate our
results and performance without considering both constant
currency
period-over-period
changes in non-GAAP revenue and non-GAAP operating income on the
one hand and changes in revenue, expenses, income, or other
measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with
U.S. GAAP or IFRS on the other. We caution the readers of
this report to follow a similar approach by considering data on
constant currency
period-over-period
changes only in addition to, and not as a substitute for or
superior to, data on changes in revenue, expenses, income, or
other measures of financial performance prepared in accordance
with U.S. GAAP or IFRS.
Explanations
of Non-IFRS Measures
Upon discontinuing our U.S. GAAP accounting and the full
transition to IFRS, we have replaced our non-GAAP measures with
non-IFRS measures beginning in 2010.
We have adjusted both our non-GAAP measures and our non-IFRS
measures from the respective U.S. GAAP and IFRS numbers by:
|
|
|
|
|
Including the full amount of support revenue that the acquired
entity would have recognized had it remained a stand-alone
entity but that we are not permitted to recognize as revenue
under U.S. GAAP and IFRS as a result of fair value
accounting for support contracts in effect at the time of the
respective acquisition.
|
|
|
|
Excluding acquisition-related charges.
|
However, the adjustment amounts for acquisition-related charges
differ between our non-GAAP measures and our non-IFRS measures,
due to differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. Specifically:
|
|
|
|
|
For acquisitions taking place up to the end of 2008,
U.S. GAAP required that certain acquisition-related
restructuring expenses be accounted for as liabilities assumed
in a business combination; however, these expenses are required
to be charged to expense under IFRS. Consequently, these
acquisition-related restructuring expenses are eliminated only
in our non-IFRS numbers.
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
For acquisitions taking place up to the end of 2008, purchased
in-process research and development was charged to expense
immediately under U.S. GAAP, while being capitalized and
amortized over the expected life under IFRS. Consequently, the
immediate charge to expense is eliminated in our non-GAAP
measures while only the amortization is eliminated in our
non-IFRS measures.
|
Starting on January 1, 2009, we aligned our accounting for
acquisitions through the adoption of new accounting standards
under both U.S. GAAP and IFRS. Therefore, we do not expect
material differences for upcoming acquisitions with respect to
acquisition-related restructuring expenses and purchased
in-process research and development.
Additionally, our non-IFRS measures have been adjusted from the
respective IFRS numbers for the results of the discontinued
operations that qualify as such in all respects except that they
do not represent a major line of business. We will refer to
these activities as discontinued activities. Under
U.S. GAAP, we present the results of operations of the
TomorrowNow entities as discontinued operations. Under IFRS,
results of discontinued operations may only be presented as
discontinued operations if a separate major line of business or
geographical area of operations is discontinued. Our TomorrowNow
operations were not a separate major line of business and thus
did not qualify for separate presentation under IFRS. We believe
that this additional adjustment to our IFRS numbers for the
results of our discontinued TomorrowNow activities is useful to
investors for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
Despite the migration from U.S. GAAP to IFRS, we will
continue to internally view the ceased TomorrowNow activities as
discontinued activities and thus will continue to exclude
potential future TomorrowNow results, which are expected to
mainly comprise of expenses in connection with the Oracle
lawsuit, from our internal management reporting, planning,
forecasting, and compensation plans. Therefore, adjusting our
non-IFRS measures for the results of the discontinued
TomorrowNow activities provides insight into the financial
measures that SAP will use internally beginning in 2010 with our
migration to IFRS.
|
|
|
|
By adjusting the non-IFRS numbers for the results from our
discontinued TomorrowNow operations, the non-IFRS numbers are
more comparable to the non-GAAP measures that SAP used through
the end of 2009, which makes SAPs performance measures
before and after the full IFRS migration easier to compare.
|
Free Cash
Flow (IFRS)
We use our free cash flow measure to estimate the cash flow
remaining after all expenditures required to maintain or expand
the organic business have been paid off. This assists management
with supplemental information to assess our liquidity needs. We
calculate free cash flow as net cash flows from operating
activities minus additions to non-current assets, excluding
additions from acquisitions. Free cash flow should be considered
in addition to, and not as a substitute for or superior to, cash
flow or other measures of liquidity and financial performance
prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP or IFRS.
FREE CASH FLOW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
3,015
|
|
|
|
2,158
|
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
Additions to non-current assets excluding additions from
acquisitions
|
|
|
−225
|
|
|
|
−339
|
|
|
|
−34
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow
|
|
|
2,790
|
|
|
|
1,819
|
|
|
|
53
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
PART I
ITEM 1.
IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
Not applicable.
ITEM 2.
OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
Not applicable.
ITEM 3. KEY
INFORMATION
SELECTED FINANCIAL
DATA
The following table sets forth our selected consolidated
financial data as of and for each the years in the four-year
period ended December 31, 2009. The consolidated financial
data has been derived from, and should be read in conjunction
with, our Consolidated Financial Statements prepared in
accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as
issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IFRS),
presented elsewhere in this document.
For an extended period of time prior to 2009, SAPs primary
financial reporting was prepared in accordance with United
States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(U.S. GAAP). During this period, all financial reporting
for the purpose of the
Form 20-F
was based upon U.S. GAAP. In 2007, SAP adopted IFRS 1 and
began including Consolidated Financial Statements based upon
IFRS in its published Annual Report to Shareholders, but not in
its Annual Report on
Form 20-F.
Beginning with our Annual Report on
Form 20-F
for the fiscal year 2009, SAP no longer prepares financial
statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Our selected financial data and our Consolidated Financial
Statements are presented in euros. Financial data as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2009 has been translated into
U.S. dollars for the convenience of the reader.
12
SELECTED FINANCIAL
DATA: IFRS
Years Ended and as
at December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
millions, unless otherwise stated
|
|
|
Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
15,295
|
|
|
|
10,672
|
|
|
|
11,575
|
|
|
|
10,256
|
|
|
|
9,402
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
3,709
|
|
|
|
2,588
|
|
|
|
2,701
|
|
|
|
2,698
|
|
|
|
2,503
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Profit after tax
|
|
|
2,508
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
1,848
|
|
|
|
1,908
|
|
|
|
1,836
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Profit attributable to owners of parent
|
|
|
2,505
|
|
|
|
1,748
|
|
|
|
1,847
|
|
|
|
1,906
|
|
|
|
1,835
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic in
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
|
|
1.55
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Diluted in
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
|
|
1.55
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
|
|
1.49
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1,188
|
|
|
|
1,188
|
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1,189
|
|
|
|
1,189
|
|
|
|
1,191
|
|
|
|
1,210
|
|
|
|
1,231
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Statement of Financial Position Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
|
|
1,884
|
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
|
1,608
|
|
|
|
2,399
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Total
assets(2)
|
|
|
19,168
|
|
|
|
13,374
|
|
|
|
13,900
|
|
|
|
10,161
|
|
|
|
9,332
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Total
equity(3)
|
|
|
12,169
|
|
|
|
8,491
|
|
|
|
7,171
|
|
|
|
6,478
|
|
|
|
6,123
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Issued capital
|
|
|
1,757
|
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
1,268
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Current bank
loans(4)(5)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2,319
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Non-current bank
loans(4)(5)
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amounts presented in US$ have been
translated for the convenience of the reader at 1.00 to
US$1.4332, the Noon Buying Rate for converting 1.00 into
dollars on December 31, 2009. See Item 3. Key
Information Exchange Rates for recent exchange
rates between the Euro and the dollar. This convenience
translation is not a requirement under IFRS and, accordingly,
our independent registered public accounting firm has not
audited these US$ amounts.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The large increase in total assets
from 2007 to 2008 was due to the acquisition of Business Objects
in 2008. See Note 4 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements in Item 18. Financial Statements for
more information on the acquistion of Business Objects.
|
|
(3)
|
|
On December 15, 2006 there
was a four-to-one stock split pursuant to German law that
resulted in an increase to subscribed capital of approximately
950 million common shares. Furthermore, the 2007 and 2008
figures reflect cancellations of 23 million and
21 million treasury shares effective September 7, 2007
and September 4, 2008, respectively. See Item 9.
The Offer and Listing General for more detail
on the cancellation of shares.
|
|
(4)
|
|
The balances include financial
debt, other bank loans and overdrafts. Current is defined as
having a remaining life of one year or less; non-current is
defined as having a remaining term exceeding one year. The
significant increase in current debt during 2008 was due to
financial debt incurred to finance the acquisition of Business
Objects.
|
EXCHANGE RATES
The prices for ordinary shares traded on German stock exchanges
are denominated in euro. Fluctuations in the exchange rate
between the euro and the dollar affect the dollar equivalent of
the euro price of the ordinary shares traded on the German stock
exchanges and, as a result, may affect the price of the ADRs
traded
13
on the NYSE in the United States. See Item 9. The
Offer and Listing for a description of the ADRs. In
addition, SAP AG pays cash dividends, if any, in euro. As a
result, any exchange rate fluctuations will also affect the
dollar amounts received by the holders of ADRs on the conversion
into dollars of cash dividends paid in euro on the ordinary
shares represented by the ADRs. Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas is the depositary (the Depositary) for SAP AGs
ADR program. The deposit agreement with respect to the ADRs
requires the Depositary to convert any dividend payments from
euro into dollars as promptly as practicable upon receipt. For
additional information on the Depositary and the fees associated
with SAPS ADR program see Item 12 Description
of Securities Other Than Equity Securities American
Depositary Shares.
A significant portion of our revenue and expense is denominated
in currencies other than the euro. Therefore, fluctuations in
the exchange rate between the euro and the respective currencies
to which we are exposed may materially affect our business,
financial position, income or cash flows. See Item 5.
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects Foreign
Currency Exchange Rate Exposure for details on the impact of
these exchange rate fluctuations.
The following table sets forth (i) the average, high and
low Noon Buying Rates for the euro expressed as
U.S. dollars per 1.00 for the past five years on an
annual basis and (ii) the high and low Noon Buying Rates on
a monthly basis from July 2009 through March 10, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Average(1)
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
2005
|
|
|
1.2400
|
|
|
|
1.3476
|
|
|
|
1.1667
|
|
2006
|
|
|
1.2661
|
|
|
|
1.3327
|
|
|
|
1.1860
|
|
2007
|
|
|
1.3797
|
|
|
|
1.4862
|
|
|
|
1.2904
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1.4695
|
|
|
|
1.6010
|
|
|
|
1.2446
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1.3955
|
|
|
|
1.5100
|
|
|
|
1.2547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July
|
|
|
1.4279
|
|
|
|
1.3852
|
|
August
|
|
|
1.4416
|
|
|
|
1.4075
|
|
September
|
|
|
1.4795
|
|
|
|
1.4235
|
|
October
|
|
|
1.5029
|
|
|
|
1.4532
|
|
November
|
|
|
1.5085
|
|
|
|
1.4658
|
|
December
|
|
|
1.5100
|
|
|
|
1.4243
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January
|
|
|
1.4536
|
|
|
|
1.3870
|
|
February
|
|
|
1.3955
|
|
|
|
1.3476
|
|
March (through March 10, 2010)
|
|
|
1.3731
|
|
|
|
1.3516
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The average of the applicable Noon
Buying Rates on the last day of each month during the relevant
period.
|
The Noon Buying Rate on March 10, 2010 was US$1.3658 per
1.00.
In 2009, the foreign currency translation effects resulting from
a slightly weaker euro had a slight positive impact on our total
revenue, while in 2008 and 2007, the strength of the euro
reduced the euro value of revenue generated in other currencies
during those years. Foreign currency translation effects from
the strengthening value of the euro negatively impacted our
total revenue by 4% in 2008 and 2007, respectively.
14
DIVIDENDS
Dividends are jointly proposed by SAP AGs Supervisory
Board (Aufsichtsrat) and Executive Board
(Vorstand) based on SAP AGs year-end stand-alone
statutory financial statements, subject to approval by the
shareholders. Dividends are officially declared for the prior
year at SAP AGs Annual General Meeting of Shareholders.
Dividends paid to holders of the ADRs may be subject to German
withholding tax. See Item 8. Financial
Information Other Financial Information
Dividend Policy and Item 10. Additional
Information Taxation, for further information.
The following table sets forth in euro the annual dividends paid
or proposed to be paid per ordinary share in respect of each of
the years indicated. The amounts shown in the table for 2005 are
retrospectively adjusted for the effect of the fourfold increase
in the number of shares resulting from the capital increase
effective December 15, 2006 pursuant to German law. One SAP
ADR currently represents one SAP AG ordinary share. Accordingly,
the final dividend per ADR is equal to the dividend for one SAP
AG ordinary share and is dependent on the euro/U.S. dollar
exchange rate. The table does not reflect tax credits that may
be available to German taxpayers who receive dividend payments.
If you own our ordinary shares or ADRs and if you are a
U.S. resident, refer to Item 10. Additional
Information Taxation, for further information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend Paid
|
|
|
per Ordinary
|
|
|
Share
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
US$
|
|
2005
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
(1)
|
2006
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
|
|
0.62
|
(1)
|
2007
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
0.77
|
(1)
|
2008
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
0.68
|
(1)
|
2009 (proposed)
|
|
|
0.50
|
(2)
|
|
|
0.68
|
(2)(3)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Translated for the convenience of
the reader from euro into U.S. dollars at the Noon Buying Rate
for converting euro into U.S. dollars on the dividend payment
date. The Depositary is required to convert any dividend
payments received from SAP as promptly as practicable upon
receipt.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Subject to approval at the Annual
General Meeting of Shareholders of SAP AG currently scheduled to
be held on June 10, 2010.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Translated for the convenience of
the reader from euro into U.S. dollars at the Noon Buying Rate
for converting euro into U.S. dollars on March 10, 2010 of
US$1.3658 per 1.00. The dividend paid may differ due to
changes in the exchange rate.
|
The amount of dividends paid on the ordinary shares depends on
the amount of profits to be distributed by SAP AG, which depends
in part upon our performance. The timing and amount of future
dividend payments will depend upon our future earnings, capital
needs and other relevant factors in each case as proposed by the
Executive Board and the Supervisory Board of SAP AG and approved
at the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders.
RISK FACTORS
Economic, Political,
and Regulatory Risk
The widespread uncertainty in the global economy and in
political conditions has negatively impacted our business,
financial position, income, and cash flows, and may continue to
do so in the future.
Our customers willingness to invest in acquiring and
implementing SAP products generally varies with economic and
other business conditions. In the regions in which we do
business and the industries in which our customers operate,
persistent economic uncertainty may continue to have negative
effects, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Generally declining IT investment
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
Decreased customer demand for our software and services,
including delayed, cancelled and smaller orders
|
|
|
|
Customers inability to obtain credit on acceptable terms,
or at all, to finance purchases of our software and services
|
|
|
|
Increased incidence of default and insolvency of customers,
business partners, and key suppliers
|
|
|
|
Increased default risk, which may lead to significant
write-downs in the future
|
|
|
|
Greater pressure on the prices of our products and services
|
|
|
|
Pressure on our operating margin
|
In 2009, the economic crisis negatively impacted our business.
If current economic conditions persist or further worsen, we
expect a sustained negative impact on our revenue growth, more
defaults, and a consequent negative impact on our income.
Moreover, continued or further economic deterioration could
exacerbate the other risks we describe in this report.
Our global business activities subject us to regulatory
requirements and economic and other risks that could harm our
business, financial position, income, or cash flows.
We currently market our products and services in over 120
countries in the Americas, APJ, and EMEA regions. Sales in these
countries are subject to risks inherent in international
business operations. Among others, these risks include:
|
|
|
|
|
Regional and local economic decline or instability and resulting
market uncertainty
|
|
|
|
General economic or political conditions in each country or
region
|
|
|
|
Conflict and overlap among different tax regimes
|
|
|
|
Possible tax constraints impeding business operations in certain
countries
|
|
|
|
The management of an organization spread over various
jurisdictions
|
|
|
|
Exchange rate fluctuations
|
|
|
|
Longer payment cycles
|
|
|
|
Regulatory constraints such as import and export restrictions,
competition law regimes, legislation governing the use of the
Internet, additional requirements for the development,
certification, and distribution of software and services, trade
restrictions, changes in tariff and freight rates and travel and
communication costs
|
|
|
|
Expenses associated with the customization of our products on a
local level and transacting business in the local currency
|
|
|
|
Differing demands from works councils and labor unions in the
different countries
|
|
|
|
The higher cost of doing business internationally
|
As we expand further into new regions and markets, these risks
could intensify. One or more of these factors could negatively
impact our operations globally or in one or more countries or
regions. As a result, our business, financial position and
reputation, income, or cash flows could be impacted.
Social and political instability caused, for example, by
terrorist attacks, war or international hostilities, pandemic
disease outbreaks, or natural disasters could negatively impact
our business.
Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war, pandemic
disease outbreaks, or natural disasters could have a negative
impact on the world economy. The resultant social and political
instability could contribute further to the current economic
decline and economic and political uncertainty in many regions
in which we do
16
business. That could negatively impact our revenue and
investment decisions, and those of our customers. Our corporate
headquarters, which includes our main research and development
departments and certain other critical business functions, is
located in the German state of Baden-Württemberg. A
catastrophic event affecting the northern part of
Baden-Württemberg could have a highly material impact on
our operations. Catastrophic events at other SAP centers,
notably Buenos Aires (Argentina), São Paulo (Brazil),
Shanghai (China), Prague (Czech Republic), Bangalore (India),
Dublin (Ireland), Paris, Raanana (Israel), Tokyo, Mexico
City, London, Vancouver (Canada), or Singapore, or at our
U.S. locations in New York, Palo Alto (California), or
Newtown Square (Pennsylvania), could also impact our operations.
A catastrophic event that results in the loss of significant
percentages of personnel or the destruction or disruption of
operations at our headquarters or other key locations could
affect our ability to provide normal business services and to
generate the expected income.
Market Risks
If our established customers do not buy additional software
products, renew maintenance agreements, or purchase additional
professional services, our business, financial position, income,
or cash flows could be negatively impacted.
Our large installed customer base traditionally generates
additional new software, maintenance, consulting, and training
revenue. In 2009, we continued to roll out SAP Enterprise
Support, a wide-ranging set of value-adding support services
that helps our customers operate their IT systems more
effectively. To achieve our business goals, we depend materially
on the success of our support portfolio and on our own ability
to deliver high-quality services. If existing customers cancel
or do not renew their maintenance contracts, or if they seek
alternative offerings from other vendors or decide not to buy
additional products and services, this will have a material
negative impact on our business, financial position, income, or
cash flows.
Our market share and income may decline due to the intense
competition and consolidation in the software industry.
The software industry continues to evolve rapidly, due to
consolidation and technological innovation. As a result, the
market for our products and services remains intensely
competitive. Over the last ten years, we have expanded from our
traditional large ERP offerings to new products and services,
which expose us to competitors varying in size, geographic
location, and specialty. Competitors may gain market share
because of acquisitions, or because the growing popularity of
new development models, such as service-oriented architecture
(SOA), and new delivery and licensing models, such as software
as a service (SaaS), business process outsourcing (BPO), and
cloud computing, enables them to also offer integrated package
solutions that compete with ours. For example, IBM, Oracle, and
Microsoft have acquired companies to extend their solutions
portfolios or market share, which has increased competitive
pressure on SAP. SaaS providers such as Salesforce.com, part of
a growing SaaS ecosystem for applications, also compete with SAP
for segment share. Current and potential competitors are
establishing or may in the future establish or extend
cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties
to better address their customers needs. This increased
competition could result in increased price pressure, cost
increases, and loss of market share for SAP.
Business Strategy
Risks
Demand for our new products may not develop as planned and
our midmarket strategy may not be successful.
Especially in the current economic climate, the demand for the
products and services we have recently introduced, and
customers acceptance of them, are subject to a high level
of uncertainty. Gaining new midsize customers with the aim of
building on our leading position in the midmarket is a key part
of our strategy. In that context, introducing a new business
model, expanding our partner ecosystem, and creating the
infrastructure for volume business are all of great importance.
Despite our efforts, demand for our products and services in the
midmarket may fail to develop as planned, and this could have a
material negative impact on our business,
17
financial position, income, or cash flows. In addition, entering
new market segments exposes us to the risks associated with
developing and launching new products. For more information, see
the Product Risks section.
If we fail to develop new relationships and enhance existing
relationships with channel partners, software suppliers, system
integrators, value-added resellers, and independent software
vendors (ISVs) that contribute to the sale of our products and
services, our business, financial position, income, or cash
flows may be adversely impacted.
We have entered into cooperation agreements with channel
partners and leading software and hardware vendors. Most of
these agreements are of relatively short duration and are
nonexclusive. The parties concerned typically maintain similar
arrangements with our competitors, and some compete with us
themselves. Additionally, we maintain a network of ISVs that
develop their own business applications for the SAP NetWeaver
technology platform. These third-party relationships carry
numerous risks. For example:
|
|
|
|
|
The relevant counterparties may not renew their agreements with
us at all or on terms acceptable to us
|
|
|
|
The relevant counterparties may fail to provide high-quality
products and services
|
|
|
|
The relevant counterparties may not devote sufficient resources
to promote, sell, support, and integrate their products within
our portfolio
|
If one or more of these risks materialize, the marketing of and
demand for our products and services may be negatively impacted
and we may not be able to compete successfully with other
software vendors, which could harm our reputation or negatively
impact our business, financial position, income, or cash flows.
Human Capital Risks
If we do not effectively manage our geographically dispersed
workforce, our business may not operate efficiently, and this
could have a negative impact on our income.
Our success is dependent on appropriate alignment of our
workforce planning process and location strategy with our
mid-term strategy. Changes in headcount and infrastructure needs
could result in a mismatch between our costs and revenue.
Additionally, it is critical that we manage our geographically
dispersed employee base well. If we do not manage our headcount
and our geographically dispersed employee base effectively, our
business may not operate efficiently and this could have a
negative impact on our financial position, income, or cash flows.
If we are unable to attract and retain management and
employees with specialized knowledge and technology skills, we
may not be able to manage our operations effectively or develop
successful new products and services.
Our highly qualified employees and managers provide the
foundation for our continued success. Competition in our
industry for highly skilled and specialized personnel and
leaders is intense. If we are unable to attract well qualified
personnel or if our highly skilled and specialized personnel
leave SAP and qualified replacements are not available, we may
not be able to manage our operations effectively or develop
successful new products and services. This is particularly true
as we continue to introduce new and innovative technology
offerings. Hiring such personnel may also expose us to claims by
other companies seeking to prevent their employees from working
for a competitor.
Organizational and
Governance-Related Risks
Both in Germany and in the United States, corporate
governance laws have become much more onerous.
As a stock corporation domiciled in Germany with securities
listed in Germany and the United States, we are subject to
German, European, and U.S. governance-related regulatory
requirements. The standards have
18
become significantly more onerous in recent years, notably with
the implementation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and more rigorous
application of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in the United
States, and the increasing degree of regulation in Germany. The
rules are highly complex, and there can be no assurance that we
will not be held in breach of regulatory requirements if, for
example, individual employees behave fraudulently or
negligently, or if we fail to comply with certain formal
documentation requirements. Any related allegations of
wrongdoing against us, whether merited or not, could have a
material negative impact on our reputation as well as on the
trading price of our common stock and ADRs.
Principal shareholders may be able to exert control over our
future direction and operations.
If SAP AGs principal shareholders and the holdings of
entities controlled by them vote in the same manner, this could
delay, prevent or facilitate a change in control of SAP or other
significant changes to SAP AG or its capital structure. See
Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related-Party
Transactions Major Shareholders, for further
information.
Sales of ordinary shares by principal shareholders could
adversely affect the price of our capital stock.
The sale of a large number of ordinary shares by any of the
principal shareholders and related entities could have a
negative effect on the trading price of our ADRs or our ordinary
shares. We are not aware of any restrictions on the
transferability of the shares owned by any of the principal
shareholders or related entities.
U.S. judgments may be difficult or impossible to enforce
against us or our Board members.
Currently, except for Bill McDermott and Vishal Sikka, all
members of SAP AGs Executive Board and all members of the
Supervisory Board are non-residents of the United States. A
substantial portion of the assets of SAP and our Board members
are located outside the United States. As a result, it may not
be possible to effect service of process within the United
States upon
non-U.S. resident
persons or SAP or to enforce against
non-U.S. resident
persons judgments obtained in U.S. courts predicated upon
the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the
United States. In addition, awards of punitive damages in
actions brought in the United States or elsewhere may be
unenforceable in Germany.
SAPs sustainability strategy may be difficult to
maintain, and a failure by us to meet customer or partner
expectations or generally accepted sustainability standards
could have an adverse impact on our results of operations, our
business, and our reputation.
For SAP, sustainability is a standard that guides our engagement
in new business opportunities holistically
encompassing profitable growth, environmental value, and
societal benefit. Therefore, we address sustainability risks,
especially relating to climate change, corporate integrity,
human resources management, the ethical behavior of suppliers,
the accessibility, user-friendliness, and safety of our
products, privacy and data protection in connection with the use
of SAP products. If our sustainability strategy is not
sufficient to meet the expectations of our customers and
partners or generally accepted sustainability standards, this
could harm our reputation and have an adverse impact on our
business, income, financial position, or cash flows.
Communication and
Information Risks
We may not be able to prevent unauthorized disclosure of our
future strategies, technologies, and products, or of information
that is subject to data protection or privacy law, and such
disclosure may harm our business.
We have taken a range of measures in recent years to mitigate
the risk that internal confidential communications and
information about sensitive subjects, such as our future
strategies, technologies, and products, or information that is
subject to data protection or privacy law, are improperly or
prematurely disclosed to the public. However, there is no
guarantee that the protective mechanisms we have established
will work in every case. Our competitive position could sustain
serious damage if, for example, confidential information about
the future direction of our product development became public
knowledge, resulting in reduced revenue in the future. Any such
premature disclosure could have a negative impact on our
business, assets, income, or cash flows.
19
Financial Risks
Our revenue mix may vary and may negatively impact our profit
margins.
Variances or slowdowns in our software license sales may
negatively impact current or future revenue from maintenance and
services, since such revenue typically follows and is dependent
on software sales. Any decrease in the percentage of our total
revenue derived from software licensing could have a material
negative impact on our business, financial position, income, or
cash flows. We have introduced new licensing models such as
on-demand and subscription models which typically result in
revenue being recognized over an extended period. A significant
portion of the related cost of developing, marketing, and
providing our solutions to customers under such new models could
be incurred prior to the recognition of revenue, thus impacting
our profit margin in the short term.
The economic crisis has led to an increased risk of default
on receivables and financial assets and may negatively impact
our financial assets. A continuation or deepening of the
economic crisis may lead to more such losses.
If we experience a higher risk of default on our receivables and
financial assets, our business, financial position, income, or
cash flows may be negatively impacted. SAPs policy with
regard to investment in financial assets is set out in our
internal treasury guideline document, which is a collection of
uniform rules that apply globally to all companies in the Group.
Among its stipulations, it requires that we invest only in
assets from issuers or funds with a rating of A- or better. The
weighted average rating of our financial assets is in the range
of AA- to A+. We pursue a policy of cautious investment
characterized by wide portfolio diversification with a variety
of counterparties, predominantly short-term investments, and the
use of standard investment instruments. However, there can be no
guarantee that those measures will prove successful.
Our future liquidity may be impacted by a negative
development in the global economy.
We use global centralized financial management to control liquid
assets, interest, and currencies. The primary aim is to maintain
liquidity in the Group at a level that is adequate to meet our
obligations. Our net liquidity on December 31, 2009, was
1.6 billion. In September 2009, we replaced our
existing 1 billion syndicated credit facility, which
was due to expire in November 2009. The new syndicated credit
facility totals 1.5 billion and has a maturity of
three years (September 2012). We also have other bilateral
credit facilities on which we can draw if necessary. However, we
cannot exclude the possibility that uncertainties in the credit
market may lead to increased financing expenses and negatively
affect our financial position, income, or cash flows.
Managements use of estimates may affect our income and
financial position.
To comply with IFRS, management is required to make many
judgments, estimates, and assumptions. The facts and
circumstances on which management bases these estimates and
judgments, and managements judgment of the facts and
circumstances, may change from time to time and this may result
in significant changes in the estimates, with a negative impact
on our assets or income.
Current and future accounting pronouncements and other
financial reporting standards, especially but not only
concerning revenue recognition, may adversely affect the
financial information we present.
We regularly monitor our compliance with all of the financial
reporting standards that are applicable to us and any new
pronouncements that are relevant to us. Findings of our
monitoring activity or new financial reporting standards may
require us to change our internal accounting policies,
especially but not only concerning revenue recognition, to alter
our operational policy so that it reflects new or amended
financial reporting standards, or to restate our published
financial accounts. We cannot exclude the possibility that this
may have a material impact on our assets, income, or cash flows.
For a summary of significant accounting policies, see the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements section,
Note 3.
20
Our sales are subject to quarterly fluctuations and our sales
forecasts may not be accurate, which could cause our revenue and
results of operations to fall below our expectations.
Our revenue and operating results can vary and have varied in
the past, sometimes substantially, from quarter to quarter. Our
revenue in general, and in particular our software revenue, is
difficult to forecast for a number of reasons, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the relatively long sales cycles for our products;
|
|
|
|
the large size and extended timing of individual license
transactions;
|
|
|
|
the timing of the introduction of new products or product
enhancements by us or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
changes in customer budgets;
|
|
|
|
seasonality of a customers technology purchases; and
|
|
|
|
other general economic, social and market conditions, such as
the global economic crisis that emerged in late 2008 and
continued through 2009.
|
As many of our customers make and plan their IT purchasing
decisions at or near the end of calendar quarters, and with a
significant percentage of those decisions being made during the
fourth quarter, even a small delay in purchasing decisions could
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
While our dependence on single, large scale sales transactions
has decreased in recent years due to a relative increase in the
number of license transactions and a decrease in average deal
size concluded by SAP, we cannot guarantee that our results will
not be adversely affected by the loss or delay of one or a few
large sales, which continue to occur especially in the large
enterprise segment.
We use a pipeline system to forecast sales and
trends in our business. While this pipeline analysis may provide
us with some guidance in business planning, budgeting and
forecasting, these pipeline estimates do not necessarily always
consistently correlate to revenue in a particular quarter and
could cause us to improperly plan, budget or forecast. Because
our operating expenses are based upon anticipated revenue levels
and because a high percentage of our expenses are relatively
fixed in the near term, any shortfall in anticipated revenue or
delay in recognition of revenue could result in significant
variations in our results of operations from quarter to quarter
or year to year. Continued deterioration in global economic
conditions would make it increasingly difficult for us to
accurately forecast demand for our products and services, and
could cause our revenue, results of operations and cash flows to
fall short of our expectations and public forecasts, which could
have a negative impact on our stock price.
In 2009, we limited our expenditures to respond to the global
economic crisis. However, we may in the future increase the
following expenditures in comparison to 2009 depending on, among
other things, economic conditions, ongoing results and evolving
business needs:
|
|
|
|
|
expansion of our operations;
|
|
|
|
research and development directed towards new products and
product enhancements; and
|
|
|
|
development of new distribution and resale channels,
particularly for small and midsize enterprises.
|
To the extent any future expenses precede or are not
subsequently followed by increased revenue, our quarterly or
annual operating results may be materially adversely affected
and may vary significantly from preceding or subsequent periods.
The market price for our ADRs and ordinary shares may be
volatile.
The trading prices of our ADRs and ordinary shares have
experienced and may continue to experience significant
volatility in response to various factors including, but not
limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
the announcement of new products or product enhancements by us
or our competitors;
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
technological innovation by us or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
quarterly variations in our results of operations or results
that fail to meet our or our financial analysts
expectations;
|
|
|
|
changes in revenue and revenue growth rates on a consolidated
basis or for specific geographic areas, business units, products
or product categories;
|
|
|
|
changes in externally communicated guidance;
|
|
|
|
changes in our capital structure, for example due to the
potential future issuance of addition debt instruments;
|
|
|
|
general market conditions specific to particular industries;
|
|
|
|
litigation to which we are a party;
|
|
|
|
general and country specific economic or political conditions
(particularly wars, terrorist attacks, etc.);
|
|
|
|
proposed and completed acquisitions or other significant
transactions by us or our competitors; and
|
|
|
|
general market conditions.
|
Many of these factors are beyond our control. In the past,
companies that have experienced volatility in the market price
of their stock have been subject to shareholder lawsuits
including securities class action litigation. Any such lawsuits
against us, with or without merit, could result in substantial
costs and the diversion of managements attention and
resources, resulting in a decline in our results of operations
and our stock price.
Because we conduct operations throughout the world, our
assets, income, or cash flows may be affected by currency and
interest-rate fluctuations.
Our management and external accounting is in euros.
Nevertheless, a significant portion of our business is conducted
in currencies other than the euro. Approximately 64% of our
consolidated revenue in 2009 was attributable to operations
outside the euro area and was translated into euros.
Consequently,
period-over-period
changes in the euro rates for particular currencies can
significantly affect our reported revenue and income. In
general, appreciation of the euro relative to another currency
has a negative effect while depreciation of the euro has a
positive effect. Variable-interest balance-sheet items are also
subject to changes in interest rates, so there is the risk that
these balance-sheet items may result in a negative impact on our
income or cash flows. For more information about our currency
and interest-rate risks and our related hedging activity, see
the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements section,
Note 26.
The cost of using derivative instruments to hedge share-based
compensation plans may exceed the benefits of hedging them.
To reduce the impact of our STAR and SAP SOP share-based
compensation plans on our income statement, we use derivative
instruments to reduce risks resulting from future expenses
associated with those plans. We decide on an individual basis if
and to what extent we hedge this risk. However, we cannot
exclude the possibility that the expense of hedging the STAR and
SOP plans may exceed the benefit achieved by hedging them or
that a decision not to hedge may prove disadvantageous.
Project Risks
Implementation of SAP software often involves a significant
commitment of resources by our customers and is subject to a
number of significant risks over which we often have no
control.
These risks include, for example:
|
|
|
|
|
Our SAP trained consultants may not be immediately available to
assist customers in the implementation of our products.
|
|
|
|
The features of the implemented software may not meet the
expectations or the software may not fit the business model of
the customer.
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
Third-party consultants may not have the expertise or resources
to successfully implement the software.
|
|
|
|
Customer-specific factors may destabilize the implementation of
the software.
|
|
|
|
Customers and partners may not implement the measures offered by
SAP to safeguard against technical risks.
|
As a result of these and other risks, some of our customers have
incurred significant third-party consulting costs in connection
with the purchase and installation of SAP software products.
Also, some customers implementation projects have taken
longer than planned. We cannot guarantee that we can reduce or
eliminate protracted installation or significant third-party
consulting costs, that shortages of our trained consultants will
not occur, or that our costs will not exceed the agreed fees on
fixed-price contracts. Unsuccessful customer implementation
projects could result in claims from customers, harm SAPs
reputation, and cause a loss of future revenues.
Product Risks
Undetected security flaws in our software may be exploited by
other persons, damaging SAP or our customers.
Our products include security features that are intended to
protect the privacy and integrity of our customers data.
Despite these security features, our products may be vulnerable
to attacks by unauthorized individuals or organizations
succeeding, for example, in bypassing firewalls and
misappropriating confidential information. Such attacks or other
disruptions could jeopardize the security of information stored
in and transmitted through the computer systems of our customers
or business partners and lead to significant claims for damages
against us. Resolving problems and claims associated with actual
or alleged defects may be costly and may have a material impact
on our reputation or operations.
We use technologies under license from third parties. Losing
these technologies could delay implementation of our products or
force us to pay higher license fees.
We have taken numerous third-party technologies under license
and incorporated them into our products. We may be highly
dependent on those technologies in the aggregate. There can be
no assurance that the licenses for these third-party
technologies will not be terminated, that the licenses will be
available in the future on terms acceptable to us, or that we
will be able to license third-party software for future
products. Changes in or the loss of third-party licenses could
lead to a material increase in the cost of licensing, or SAP
software products may become unusable or materially reduced in
their functionality. As a result, we may need to incur
additional development or licensing costs to ensure the
continued functionality of our products. The risk increases if
we acquire a company or a companys intellectual property
assets that have been subject to third-party technology
licensing and product standards less rigorous than our own.
If we are unable to keep up with rapid technological
innovations, we may not be able to compete effectively.
Our future success depends in part on our ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
Continue to enhance and expand our existing products and
services; and
|
|
|
|
Develop and introduce new products and provide new services that
satisfy increasingly sophisticated customer requirements, keep
pace with technological developments, and are accepted in the
market.
|
There can be no assurance that the product enhancements, new
solutions, and services we develop will successfully anticipate
and adequately reflect changing technologies and customer
requirements. Nor can there be any assurance that we will bring
new solutions, solution enhancements, and services to market
before our competitors, or that we will be able to generate
enough revenue to offset the significant research and
development costs we incur in bringing the products and services
to market. We may not anticipate and develop
23
technological improvements. In addition, we may not succeed in
adapting our products to technological change, changing
regulatory requirements, emerging industry standards, and
changing customer requirements. Finally, we may not succeed in
producing high-quality products, enhancements, and releases in a
timely and cost-effective manner to compete with applications
and other technologies offered by our competitors.
Undetected defects or delays in new products and product
enhancements may result in increased costs to us and reduced
demand for our products.
To achieve customer acceptance, our new products and product
enhancements often require long development and testing periods.
Development work is subject to various risks. For example,
scheduled market launches could be delayed, or products may not
completely satisfy our stringent quality standards, meet market
needs or the expectations of customers, or comply with local
standards and requirements. New products may contain undetected
defects or they may not be mature enough to process large
volumes of data. In some circumstances, we may not be in a
position to rectify such defects or entirely meet the
expectations of customers. As a result, we may be faced with
customer claims for cash refunds, damages, replacement software,
or other concessions. The risk of defects and their adverse
consequences may increase as we seek to introduce a variety of
new software products simultaneously. Significant undetected
defects or delays in introducing new products or product
enhancements could affect market acceptance of SAP software
products, and could have a material negative impact on our
business and reputation.
The use of SAP software products by customers in
business-critical applications and processes and the relative
complexity of our software products entail a risk that customers
or third parties may pursue warranty, performance, or other
claims against us for actual or alleged defects in SAP software
products, in our provision of services, or in our application
hosting services. We have in the past been, and may in the
future be, subject to warranty, performance, or other similar
claims.
Although our contracts generally contain provisions designed to
limit our exposure arising out of actual or alleged defects in
SAP software products or in our provision of services, these
provisions may not cover every eventuality or be effective under
the applicable law. Regardless of its merits, any claim could
entail substantial expense and require the devotion of
significant time and attention by key management personnel.
Publicity surrounding such claims could affect our reputation
and the demand for our software.
Our SAP NetWeaver technology platform strategy may not
succeed or may make some of our products less desirable.
The continued success of the SAP NetWeaver technology platform
depends on our maintaining a dynamic network of independent
software vendors developing their own business applications for
SAP NetWeaver. In addition, as with any open platform design,
the greater flexibility provided to customers to use data
generated by non-SAP software might reduce customer demand to
select and use certain SAP software products. If SAP NetWeaver
is not well received by customers, if competitors develop
superior technology, or if the solution has significant defects,
there may be a material adverse impact on our business,
financial position, income, or cash flows.
Other Operational
Risks
Third parties may claim we infringe their intellectual
property rights; that could result in damages being awarded
against us and limit our ability to utilize certain technologies
in the future.
Third parties have claimed, and may claim in the future, that we
have infringed their intellectual property rights. We believe
our software products will increasingly be subject to such
claims as the number of products in our industry segment grows,
and as we expand into new industry segments with our products,
resulting in greater overlap in the functional scope of
products. Any claims, with or without merit, and negotiations or
litigation relating to such claims, could preclude us from
utilizing certain technologies in our products, be
time-consuming, result in costly litigation, or require us to
pay damages to third parties and, under certain circumstances,
pay fines. They could also require us to enter into royalty and
licensing arrangements on terms that are not favorable to us,
24
cause product shipment delays, subject our products to
injunctions, require a complete or partial redesign of key
products, result in delays to our customers investment
decisions, and damage our reputation.
Software in general includes many components or modules that
provide different features and perform different functions. Some
of these features or functions may be subject to intellectual
property rights. It can happen that rights of another party
refer to technical aspects that are similar to one or more
technologies in one or more of our products. SAP respects the
intellectual property rights of third parties. We cannot exclude
the possibility that intellectual property rights of third
parties may preclude us from utilizing certain technologies in
our products or require us to enter into royalty and licensing
arrangements on unfavorable or expensive terms.
The software industry is making increasing use of open source
software in its development work on solutions. We also integrate
certain open source software components from third parties into
our software. The open source license may require that the
software code in those components or the software into which
they are integrated be freely accessible under open source
terms. While we take precautions to protect open source
software, we cannot exclude the possibility that third-party
claims may require us to make freely accessible under open
source terms a product of ours or non-SAP software upon which we
depend. We cannot exclude the possibility of a resultant
material impact on our assets, financial position, or income.
Claims and lawsuits against us may have adverse outcomes.
A variety of claims and lawsuits are brought against us,
including claims and lawsuits involving businesses we have
acquired. Adverse outcomes in some or all of the claims and
lawsuits pending against us might result in the award of
significant damages or injunctive relief against us that could
negatively impact our ability to conduct our business. We
currently believe that resolving these pending claims and suits,
individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial position, income, or
cash flows. However, the outcome of litigation and other claims
is intrinsically subject to considerable uncertainty.
Managements view of the cases may also change in the
future. Actual outcomes of litigation and other claims may
differ from the assessments made by management in prior periods,
which could result in a material negative impact on our
business, financial position, income, cash flows, or reputation.
We might not integrate acquired companies effectively or
successfully and our strategic alliances might not be
successful.
To complement or expand our business, we have in the past made
acquisitions of businesses, products, and technologies. We
expect to continue to make such acquisitions in the future.
Managements negotiation of potential acquisitions and
alliances and integration of acquired businesses, products, or
technologies demands time, focus, and resources of management
and of its workforce. Acquisitions carry many additional risks.
These include, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
It may not be possible to successfully integrate the acquired
business, and its different business and licensing models.
|
|
|
|
It may not be possible to integrate the acquired technologies or
products with current products and technologies.
|
|
|
|
It may not be possible to retain key personnel of the acquired
business.
|
|
|
|
We may assume material unknown liabilities of acquired
companies, including legal or intellectual property
contingencies or other significant risks that may not be
detected by the due diligence process.
|
|
|
|
We may incur debt or significant cash expenditures.
|
|
|
|
We may have difficulty implementing, restoring, or maintaining
internal controls, procedures, and policies.
|
|
|
|
There may be a negative impact on relationships with customers,
partners, or third-party providers of technology or products.
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
We may have difficulty integrating the acquired companys
accounting, human resource, and other administrative systems.
|
|
|
|
There may be regulatory constraints.
|
|
|
|
The acquired business may have practices or policies that are
incompatible with our compliance requirements.
|
In addition, acquired businesses might not perform as
anticipated, resulting in charges for the impairment of goodwill
and other intangible assets. Such charges may have a significant
negative impact on operating margins and income. Furthermore, we
have entered into, and expect to continue to enter into,
alliance arrangements for a variety of purposes including the
development of new products and services. There can be no
assurance that any such products or services will be
successfully developed or that we will not incur significant
unanticipated liabilities in connection with such arrangements.
We may not be successful in overcoming these risks and we may
therefore not benefit as anticipated from acquisitions or
alliances. We cannot exclude the possibility that our business,
financial position, income, or cash flows will be negatively
impacted.
Our IT security measures may be breached or compromised and
we may sustain unplanned IT system unavailability.
Our core processes, such as software development, sales and
marketing, customer service, and financial transactions, rely on
our IT infrastructure and IT applications. Outage of our
infrastructure may be caused by malware or virus attacks,
sabotage by hackers, natural disasters, or the failure of an
underlying technology (such as the Internet). Such events could
lead to a substantial denial of service or alteration or
compromise of data from SAP, our customers, or our partners,
giving rise to production downtime, recovery costs, and customer
claims. A breach of our IT security measures and the resources
we expend attempting to avoid such breaches could have a
negative impact on our financial position or income.
We may not be able to obtain adequate title to or licenses
in, or to enforce, intellectual property.
We use a variety of different means to protect our intellectual
property. These include applying for patents, registering
trademarks and other marks and copyright and rights of
authorship, taking appropriate action to stop copyright and
trademark infringement, entering into licensing,
confidentiality, and nondisclosure agreements, and deploying
protection technology. Despite our efforts, there can be no
assurance that we can prevent third parties from obtaining,
using, or selling without authorization what we regard as our
proprietary technology and information. All of these measures
afford only limited protection, and our proprietary rights could
be challenged, invalidated, held unenforceable, or otherwise
affected. Some intellectual property may be vulnerable to
disclosure or misappropriation by employees, partners, or other
third parties. There can also be no assurance that third parties
will not independently develop technologies that are
substantially equivalent or superior to our technology. Also, it
may be possible for third parties to reverse-engineer or
otherwise obtain and use technology and information that we
regard as proprietary. Accordingly, we might not be able to
protect our proprietary rights against unauthorized third-party
copying or utilization, which could negatively impact our
competitive position and result in reduced sales. Any legal
action we bring to enforce our proprietary rights could be
costly, distract management from
day-to-day
operations, and lead to claims against us, which could
negatively impact our income. Such actions by us could also
involve enforcement against a partner or other third party,
thereby adversely affecting our ability, and our customers
ability, to use that partner or other third parties
products. In addition, the laws and courts of certain countries
may not offer effective means to enforce our intellectual
property rights.
We may not be able to protect our critical information or
assets or safeguard our business operations against
disruption.
As a global software business, we are to a substantial extent
dependent on the exchange of a wide range of information and on
the availability of our communications and IT networks. We have
implemented a number
26
of barriers designed to ensure the security of our information,
IT resources, and other assets. Nonetheless, there is a danger
of industrial espionage and of misuse or theft of information or
assets by trespassers in our facilities or by people who have
gained authorized access to our facilities, systems, or
information. Any misuse, theft, or breach of security could have
a negative impact on our business, financial position, income,
or cash flows.
Our insurance coverage may not be sufficient to prevent claim
settlements from negatively impacting our financial position,
income, or cash flows.
We maintain insurance coverage against a diverse portfolio of
risks. Our objective is to ensure that financial effects of
occurrences are excluded or minimized to the extent practicable
at reasonable cost. Despite these measures, certain categories
of risks are not currently insurable at reasonable cost. Even if
we obtain insurance, our coverage may be subject to exclusions
that limit or prevent our indemnification under the policies.
Further, we cannot guarantee the ability of the insurance
companies to meet their liabilities from claims. If this risk
materializes, it may have a significant negative impact on our
business, financial position, income, or cash flows.
We may incur losses in connection with venture capital
investments.
We plan to continue investing in technology businesses. Many of
these enterprises currently generate net losses and require
additional capital outlay from their investors. Changes to
planned business operations have in the past, and also may in
the future, affect the performance of companies in which SAP
holds investments, and that could negatively affect the value of
our investments. Moreover, for tax purposes, the use of capital
losses and impairments of equity securities is often restricted,
which may negatively affect our effective tax rate.
ITEM 4.
INFORMATION ABOUT SAP
Our legal corporate name is SAP AG. SAP AG is translated in
English to SAP Corporation. SAP AG, formerly known as SAP
Aktiengesellschaft Systeme, Anwendungen, Produkte in der
Datenverarbeitung, was incorporated under the laws of the
Federal Republic of Germany in 1972. Where the context requires
in the discussion below, SAP AG refers to our predecessors,
Systemanalyse und Programmentwicklung GbR
(1972-1976)
and SAP Systeme, Anwendungen, Produkte in der Datenverarbeitung
GmbH
(1976-1988).
SAP AG became a stock corporation (Aktiengesellschaft) in
1988. Our principal executive offices, headquarters and
registered office are located at Dietmar-Hopp-Allee 16, 69190
Walldorf, Germany. Our telephone number is +49-6227-7-47474.
In 2008, we acquired Business Objects. With that acquisition, we
expanded our core solutions to address the needs of business
users. In addition, as part of our legal entity rationalization
activities, we have integrated certain Business Objects
subsidiaries into the following significant SAP subsidiaries:
SAP Deutschland AG &Co. KG, SAP (Schweiz) AG, SAP
Japan Co., Ltd., SAP Australia Pty Ltd, SAP Canada Inc., SAP
(UK) Limited, SAP America, Inc. and SAP France S.A.
For a (i) description of our principal capital expenditures
and divestitures for the last three years, including the amount
invested until the date of this Annual Report on
Form 20-F
and (ii) a discussion of our principal capital expenditures
and divestitures currently in progress, including the
distribution of these investments geographically and the method
of financing, see Item 4. Description of
Property Capital Expenditures.
THE SAP GROUP OF
COMPANIES
Founded in 1972, SAP is one of the leading international
providers of business software and, based on market
capitalization, we are the worlds third-largest
independent software manufacturer. We have more than 95,000
customers in over 120 countries and employ more than
47,500 people at locations in more than 50 countries in the
European, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA); Americas; and Asia
Pacific Japan (APJ) regions. SAP is headquartered in Walldorf,
Germany.
27
Our core business is selling licenses for software solutions and
related services. Our solutions, which cover standard business
applications and technologies, as well as specific industry
applications, are designed to help companies make their business
processes more efficient and agile and create sustainable new
value.
In 2009, the SAP product portfolio featured the following key
software applications, which are delivered through multiple
deployment and consumption options:
|
|
|
|
|
SAP Business Suite software for large organizations and
international corporations. The software supports core business
operations ranging from supplier relationships to production to
warehouse management, sales, and all administrative functions,
through to customer relationships. There are specific solutions
for industries, for instance, high tech, oil and gas, utilities,
chemicals, healthcare, retail, consumer products, and the public
sector.
|
|
|
|
SAP Business
All-in-One
solutions, the SAP Business ByDesign solution, and the SAP
Business One application, which address the needs of small
businesses and midsize companies.
|
|
|
|
The SAP BusinessObjects portfolio, which covers a variety of
demands from small to large companies with solutions for
business users who need to analyze and report information, make
informed strategic and tactical decisions, build business plans,
and manage risk and compliance.
|
|
|
|
SAP solutions for sustainability to help enable
organizations sustainability initiatives. These solutions
include the measurement of sustainability key performance
indicators, energy and carbon management, and solutions for
product safety, environment, health, and safety.
|
|
|
|
The SAP NetWeaver technology platform, which integrates
information and business processes across diverse technologies
and organizational structures.
|
In addition, we offer consulting, maintenance, and training
services for our software solutions. We develop our products in
close cooperation with customers and independent business
partners.
Our management reporting breaks our activities down into three
segments: Product, Consulting, and Training. For more
information about our segments, see Note 29 in the Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements section.
All of the information in this Report relates to the situation
on December 31, 2009, or the fiscal year ended on that date
unless otherwise stated.
Sustainability
SAP is committed to improving its own operations to be more
sustainable, and to delivering customer solutions to improve
sustainability on a grand scale. Over the past 10 years,
SAP has been recognized by the Dow Jones Sustainability Index
for upholding ethical, environmental, social, and governance
values in our products and services. For the last three years,
the index has named SAP as the leader in the software sector. In
2008 our Sustainability Report, which is located on our
website, we provide more detailed information about our efforts
in corporate environmental, social, and economic performance,
and about products and services of ours that support sustainable
operations.
28
The following table presents the key performance indicators that
SAP uses to measure, review, and monitor its sustainability
performance. The numbers for 2009 will be presented in a
separate sustainability report, which will be published on our
website in the near future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Carbon footprint in
kilotons(1)
|
|
|
500
|
|
Total electricity consumption in gigawatt hours
|
|
|
326
|
|
Data center energy in gigawatt hours
|
|
|
167
|
|
Employee turnover in %
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
Women in management (% of women in senior management)
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
Customer satisfaction (TRI*M Index, scale from -66 to +134)
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
In 2009, we improved the way we
measure our carbon footprint by including more Scope 3 emissions
from our logistics chain and from business travel in private
vehicles and we improved our reporting on company cars and
external data centers. This also involved correcting results
from the past.
|
In 2009, we used the following key performance indicators to
measure, review, and monitor our sustainability performance:
|
|
|
|
|
Carbon footprint: SAPs goal is to reduce total greenhouse
gas emissions to 2000 levels by 2020. This equates to lowering
emissions by about 50% from 2007 levels. We selected 2000 as our
target year even though we have almost doubled in size as a
company over the last eight years, including our acquisitions
(we had approximately 24,000 employees in 2000, compared to
approximately 47,500 today). We therefore feel that striving for
2000 levels is ambitious. Based on our preliminary calculations,
CO2
emissions for 2009 totaled approximately 425 kilotons, which
represents a 15% decrease compared to 2008.
|
|
|
|
Total electricity consumption: Our electricity consumption
relates to our facilities and our data centers. SAP has around
400 locations in over 50 countries. We seek to follow
sustainable design and facility management practices. We strive
to achieve high energy and environmental standards for new
office buildings. We are also making improvements to existing
facilities to reduce our energy and water consumption and our
waste. Together with the efforts of our employees, this has
resulted in a decrease in electricity consumption of about 7%
compared to 2008.
|
|
|
|
Data center energy: We focus on reducing energy consumption in
SAP data centers as well as on addressing the impact of SAP
software on customers IT infrastructures. As we discover
ways to make our own data centers more efficient, we can
introduce these best practices to our customers to help them
lower their own carbon footprint. Our efforts will also drive
benchmarks for comparing IT efficiency.
|
|
|
|
Employee turnover: A talented workforce is essential to
corporate success, especially in the software industry, where
intellectual property is crucial. We recognize that our people
and their rich diversity and cultural wealth are our strongest
assets. In fact, excellence in human resource management has
always been a strategic priority for us. We are committed to
attracting and retaining gifted people to foster innovation for
the benefit of our customers and society. Turnover rate is the
ultimate measure of our ability to retain the best talent.
|
|
|
|
Women in management: Due to the low number of women choosing to
study information technology (IT), the entire IT industry
struggles to attract a sufficiently large group of women into
our talent pipeline. We recognize that we need to make a
conscious effort to look for candidates with diverse backgrounds
for vacant positions. We track the number of women in management
as a critical diversity metric. Currently, that number is not at
satisfactory levels. In 2009, we therefore rolled out a program
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
to increase the profile of women working at SAP as well as the
advancement of women into leadership positions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer satisfaction: One very important indicator of our
success is customer satisfaction, which is a leading driver of
future revenue and profitability. We monitor customer
satisfaction on a quarterly basis. TNS Infratest, an independent
agency, conducts a customer survey and reports the results to
the Supervisory Board. Results are measured using the TRI*M
Index. The TRI*M Index scale ranges from -66 to +134, with +134
being the best measure. In 2009, our overall customer
satisfaction scores decreased slightly, after having improved
for four consecutive years. In some regions, negative
perceptions resulted from a change in our software support
model. As a reaction to this, we have seen declining customer
loyalty to SAP, particularly in Europe. As a consequence, we are
engaging with user groups to articulate and measure the added
value of the new support model. The second half of 2009 showed a
stabilizing trend in customer satisfaction and loyalty.
|
In addition to the key indicators presented in the table above
we measure the following key performance indicators:
|
|
|
|
|
Employee satisfaction: While the turnover rate is the ultimate
measure of our ability to retain the best talent, employee
commitment and employee satisfaction are important indicators of
our ability to train and retain the best workforce.
|
|
|
|
Business Health Culture Index: SAPs health management
service has developed a holistic and comprehensive program to
meet the needs of our employees. Our extensive employee health
program is focused on the needs of employees with sedentary,
highly demanding intellectual jobs. The Business Health Culture
Index measures the stress/satisfaction balance of employees,
indicating organizational health and readiness to meet strategic
objectives.
|
|
|
|
Social investment: Our Clear Purpose engagement program
coordinates our contributions in the areas of education; good
governance and transparency; bridging the digital divide, and
environmental stewardship. Our target for social investment is
about 1% of our profit before tax and is comprised of corporate
giving, technology donations, and SAP-sponsored volunteering. By
applying our collective expertise and resources, our corporate
social responsibility initiatives directly and indirectly impact
many global and local programs.
|
|
|
|
Renewable energy consumed: SAP is using more and more
electricity from renewable sources. We purchase some of this
green electricity from local utility companies and produce some
using solar panels on SAP facilities.
|
Mission and Strategy
Market
The market for business software is a global growth market.
Factors such as constantly developing corporate-governance law
and reporting regulations, increasingly globalized business and
trade, the drive for sustainability, and the pressure of
competition compel businesses to continuously adapt in a
changing environment. They must not only bring innovative and
competitive products to market, they must also continuously
optimize their own structures, streamline processes, and extend
customer and partner networks. Without leading-edge IT
solutions, these are impossible challenges for
companies whether in the advanced economies or in
developing countries and emerging economies.
Trends
and Orientation
Companies face increasing complexity of entrepreneurial
activities and need to rethink how they conduct business in
todays global, fast-paced, and volatile environment. To
stay competitive and minimize risk,
30
business leaders and their employees need to understand and
successfully manage an ever-changing web of global markets,
products, regulations, and partners. At the same time, openness
and transparency have become business imperatives. Todays
customer marketplace and society are demanding transparency from
companies.
The best businesses have a comprehensive view of what is
happening within their environment and share key information
with an extended business network of partners, suppliers, and
customers. Now, more than ever, companies need clarity to
refocus business strategies and streamline execution. In
addition, they need transparency to demonstrate accountability
and to protect their reputations.
Technology solutions can increase visibility across the
organization and throughout the business network to ensure that
organizations can close the gap between strategy and execution,
linking decision-making systems to integrated,
end-to-end
processes.
Mission
Our mission is to help the world run better in order to create
enduring prosperity for people everywhere. We help customers
around the globe perform at a significantly higher level of
effectiveness and efficiency by enabling closed-loop performance
optimization to achieve profitable, sustainable growth. To
succeed, we strive to build from our established leading
position in the business software market and accelerate business
and IT innovation for firms and industries. In reaching for this
goal, we are also contributing to global economic development on
a grand scale.
We offer both on-premise and on-demand solutions that help
companies of all sizes close the gap between strategy and
execution. Our portfolio of software and services can help
customers attain the insight, efficiency, and flexibility that
enables them to respond to changes in the business environment
with more agility and effectiveness and capture the full
benefits of business networks.
At the heart of our strategy stands accountability to our
customers by helping them increase value and lower total cost of
ownership. We intend to widen the market we address with
additional valuable offerings for our customers including, for
example, a growing portfolio of on-demand solutions, and
software solutions scaled to the demands of small businesses and
midsize companies.
Competition
In terms of software and software-related service revenue, we
are the world market leader in business software applications.
We define business application software as comprising enterprise
resource planning and related applications. In the midmarket, we
are also the worldwide market leader in terms of software and
software-related service revenue. In the global market, our
chief competitors are Oracle, Microsoft, and IBM. Whereas SAP
concentrates on the business software segment, our competitors
also address other segments of the IT market, such as database
management applications (Oracle, IBM, Microsoft), operating
systems (Microsoft, Oracle, IBM), desktop applications
(Microsoft), IT services (IBM), and servers (Oracle).
Our competitors in the on-demand software segment include, among
others, Salesforce.com and NetSuite. Unlike most competitors,
SAP can also offer customers flexible models such as hybrids of
the on-premise and on-demand models.
Our competitors in the business intelligence segment offering
solutions that address the needs of business users include among
others SAS Institute, Inc., Oracle (through its acquisition of
Hyperion in 2007), and IBM (through its acquisition of Cognos in
2007).
On a regional level there are additional competitors, especially
in the midmarket. These companies are more focused on certain
industries and/or company sizes.
31
Strategy
for Growth
Our customer base includes many large global enterprises as well
as midsize companies. Such global companies use the SAP
portfolio to automate their business transactions, enabling
better management and governance. In our traditional core
business, we seek to win a greater share of our existing
customers IT budget. We also aim to win new customers, for
instance, companies that have been using competitor or custom
software.
Our solutions for industries are crucial for the strength of our
product portfolio. In 2009, we focused on strategic industries
with exceptional growth potential, including, for example,
banking, retail, utilities, and the public sector. Additionally,
we introduced SAP solutions for sustainability focused on
tackling energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, product
safety, healthcare, and sustainability performance management.
Solutions to address the needs of business users remain a
central element of our strategy for growth. In 2009, we focused
efforts on further integrating products from our acquisition of
Business Objects into our solutions portfolio.
The SAP Business ByDesign solution is designed to open up a new
segment of the global market for us, smaller businesses with
between 100 and 500 employees. They have distinctly
different software needs: Getting their new IT solution running
quickly, at minimum risk and predictable cost, is often more
important for these customers than specific functional depth.
Many such companies do not believe that their needs can be met
by traditional software offerings or by the available on-demand
solutions.
We intend to combine the following measures to help us realize
our full growth potential:
|
|
|
|
|
Organic growth: Our primary growth strategy is to continue to
develop our own product portfolio and our own base of direct
customers, focusing on rapid innovation and speed to market.
|
|
|
|
Co-innovation: Collaborating with customers and partners remains
one of our core policies. We continue to invest in our partner
ecosystem to support the development of solutions built on the
SAP NetWeaver technology platform and leverage partner sales
forces to address the various market and customer segments.
|
|
|
|
Focused acquisitions: With targeted strategic and
fill-in acquisitions that add to our broad solution
offerings, we gain specific technologies and capabilities to
meet the needs of our customers.
|
SOFTWARE AND
SERVICE PORTFOLIO
Our portfolio of SAP software and services can help customers
respond to changes in the business environment with more agility
and effect, survive global competition, and grow profitably. The
goal at the heart of our portfolio of software and services is
therefore the best possible combination of efficiency, insight,
and flexibility:
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency Innovative business processes to optimize
operations: SAP connects and streamlines processes across our
customers businesses to drive efficiency and help enable
business operations to achieve strategic goals.
|
|
|
|
Insight Improved decisions for greater success: SAP
enables business people to make more insightful and timely
strategic decisions based on better information in the context
of specific business issues.
|
|
|
|
Flexibility Strategic and operational agility: With
SAP software, customers can more easily pursue new strategies
and capture the full benefits of business networks, because
business processes are flexible and the platform is extensible.
|
32
Software Portfolio
SAP
Business Suite
SAP Business Suite software can help customers execute and
optimize their business and IT strategies by providing modular
applications that improve their ability to perform their
end-to-end
business processes within the organization and across the
business network. The applications are designed to be extensible
so that they work with other SAP and non-SAP software
applications. Organizations and departments in all industries
can incrementally deploy SAP Business Suite to address specific
business challenges in line with their business
priorities without costly upgrades. SAP Business
Suite software aims to provide better insight and visibility
across organizations, improve operational effectiveness and
efficiency, and increase the flexibility to address business
change.
The SAP Business Suite software includes the following
applications:
|
|
|
|
|
The SAP ERP application is designed to optimize business and IT
processes by reducing IT complexity, increasing adaptability,
and delivering more IT value at a lower cost than traditional
enterprise resource planning solutions. It can support
mission-critical,
end-to-end
business processes for finance, human capital management, asset
management, sales, procurement, and other essential corporate
functions. SAP ERP can also support industry-specific processes
by providing industry-specific business functions that can be
activated selectively via the switch framework, keeping the
application core stable and helping ensure maximum performance.
|
|
|
|
The SAP Customer Relationship Management (SAP CRM) application
provides a comprehensive application to help marketing, sales,
and service professionals obtain complete customer intelligence
that they can leverage to effectively manage customer
relationships and customer-related processes. SAP CRM can enable
multichannel customer interactions, including mobile smart
phones, the Internet, and social media, and also offers a
communications infrastructure that is designed to help
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
connecting with other users anytime, anywhere. SAP offers
customer relationship management solutions in both on-premise
and on-demand deployment models.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The SAP Product Lifecycle Management (SAP PLM) application helps
companies manage, track, and control all product-related
information over the complete product and asset life cycle as
well as throughout the extended supply chain. SAP PLM is
designed to facilitate creativity and to free the process of
product innovation from organizational constraints.
|
|
|
|
The SAP Supplier Relationship Management (SAP SRM) application
provides a procurement application that helps organizations in
all industries improve their centralized sourcing and contract
management and interact with suppliers through multiple
channels. SAP SRM is designed to accelerate and optimize the
entire
end-to-end
procure-to-pay
process by supporting integrated processes and by enforcing
contract compliance, which can result in realizable savings.
|
|
|
|
The SAP Supply Chain Management (SAP SCM) application helps
companies adapt their supply-chain processes to the rapidly
changing competitive environment. SAP SCM helps transform
traditional supply chains from linear, sequential processes into
open, configurable, responsive supply networks in which
customer-centric, demand-driven companies can monitor and
respond more smartly and quickly to demand and supply dynamics
across a globally distributed environment.
|
We first delivered enhancement packages for SAP Business Suite
in 2007, providing regular updates for SAP ERP. This delivery
model, which we introduced for the entire SAP Business Suite in
2008, is designed to make it simpler and faster for customers
running SAP Business Suite applications to adopt new product
functions, industry-specific features, and enterprise services.
It also shields customers from some of the complexity of
multiple upgrades and offers them an opportunity to reduce
information technology (IT) costs by consolidating their systems
on a single platform and reducing the number of separate
software instances that need to be maintained. Our enhancement
package model is also designed to give customers planning
security.
Industry
Solutions
SAP delivers distinct solution portfolios serving organizations
in major industries and sectors. These solution portfolios
deliver industry-specific functions along with best practices we
have developed with our customers. Our industry solutions are
designed to meet the needs of the major industry sectors listed
below. The portfolio also includes applications for numerous
subsectors and segments of these industries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Process Manufacturing Industries
|
|
Service Industries
|
|
|
Chemicals Life sciences Mill
products Mining Oil and gasDiscrete
Manufacturing Industries Aerospace and
defense Automotive Engineering,
construction, and operations High
tech Industrial machinery and components Consumer
Industries Consumer
products Retail Wholesale distribution
|
|
Media Professional
services Telecommunications Transportation
and logistics UtilitiesFinancial Services
Industries Banking InsurancePublic
Service Industries Defense and
security Healthcare Higher education and
research Public sector
|
34
Solutions for Small
Businesses and Midsize Companies
SAP offers a portfolio of solutions designed specifically to
meet the needs of small businesses and midsize companies. Like
large companies, these firms need to find ways to drive growth
and increase profitability, and that begins with having access
to the right information at the right time. This is essential
for maintaining market competitiveness, building and preserving
close relationships with customers and suppliers, and
streamlining business processes to reduce bottlenecks and thus
improve customer service. Optimizing cash flow is also essential
to increase financial strength and the flexibility required to
support business operations and growth. Because SAP recognizes
that one size does not fit all, we provide a solution portfolio
and release strategy to meet the needs of a broad range of small
businesses and midsize companies.
SAP
Business
All-in-One
SAP Business
All-in-One
solutions are comprehensive and flexible business management
software with built-in support for industry best practices. The
solutions best fit the needs of midsize companies with 100 to
2,500 employees that are looking for a comprehensive,
integrated industry solution to power their business end to end.
In one configurable solution, SAP Business
All-in-One
helps companies manage everything from financials, human
resources, procurement, inventory, manufacturing, logistics,
product development, and corporate services, to customer
service, sales, and marketing. SAP Business
All-in-One
solutions are available from a wide network of qualified
partners that deliver more than 700 industry-specific solutions
in more than 50 countries. SAP aims to provide all the
deployment tools and methodologies that partners need to deliver
fast, predictable implementation with low risk, low cost, and
rapid time to value.
SAP
Business One
The SAP Business One application provides a single, integrated
solution for managing the entire business, including support for
financials, sales, customer relationships, inventory, and
operations. It is designed to fit the needs of small businesses
typically with fewer than 100 employees that have outgrown
their accounting-only systems and are looking to streamline
their business operations with an integrated, on-premise
solution. With SAP Business One, small businesses can streamline
their
end-to-end
operations, get instant and complete information, and accelerate
profitable growth. With its published software development kit
and over 550 industry-specific solutions and functional add-ons,
SAP Business One can be tailored and extended to meet specific
business processes and changing needs.
SAP
Business ByDesign
SAP Business ByDesign is a single on-demand solution that
comprises functions of SAP Business Suite and therefore delivers
best practices for financial management, customer relationship
management (CRM), human resources (HR), project management,
procurement, and supply chain management. It is designed to fit
companies with 100 to 500 employees that want the benefits
of large-scale and integrated business management applications
without a large and complex IT infrastructure. SAP Business
ByDesign can unify multiple business operations. It can enable
companies to implement preconfigured business processes to solve
immediate problems.
SAP Business ByDesign is designed to enable customers to improve
transparency and improve visibility across the business by
unifying business processes. With better visibility,
information, and processes, people can make faster,
better-informed decisions. In addition, the solution can enable
companies to comply with increasing regulatory demands. SAP
Business ByDesign is designed to help customers increase
employee productivity in all business operations by improving
productivity and reducing software-related training needs with a
single user interface, personalized business portals for each
employee, and built-in help. SAP Business ByDesign provides
analytics and dashboards that can facilitate smarter, faster
decision-making. Collaboration features can enhance the way
employees work together.
35
SAP Business ByDesign is designed to help customers realize
lower and more predictable IT costs by using an on-demand
solution. It is managed, monitored, and maintained by SAP
experts in hosted data centers. In addition, SAP Business
ByDesign provides built-in service and support that can help to
ensure smooth, predictable deployment and operation.
Currently, the solution is available in China, France, Germany,
India, the United Kingdom, and the United States. We are
controlling the
ramp-up
process, carefully selecting new customers and working in close
collaboration with them and with partners, and feeding their
experience back into product development.
There are further solutions for small businesses and midsize
companies in the SAP BusinessObjects portfolio. For more
information, see the SAP BusinessObjects Portfolio
section.
Additional
Solutions for Small Businesses and Midsize Companies
The SAP BusinessObjects portfolio also includes solutions
specially designed for small businesses and midsize companies.
|
|
|
|
|
SAP BusinessObjects Edge solutions are powerful and versatile
business intelligence (BI) and enterprise performance management
(EPM) solutions designed for midsize companies that can address
several requirements from flexible ad-hoc reporting and analysis
to dashboards, data visualization, data integration, and high
data quality as well as budgeting, planning and consolidation,
and strategy management.
|
|
|
|
Xcelsius is
point-and-click
data visualization software designed for creating interactive
dashboards and visual business models from Excel spreadsheets
and corporate data sources to share via Microsoft Office, Adobe
PDF, the Internet, and corporate portals all without
any programming. The Xcelsius software comprises two product
groupings to meet two distinct needs: visual presentations and
dashboarding.
|
|
|
|
Crystal Reports software helps users design interactive reports
from any data source and can enable them to answer business
questions with fewer reports, and reduced IT costs. Documents
created using Crystal Reports can be shared in an on-premise
mode or in an on-demand mode.
|
|
|
|
Crystal Reports Server is reporting and dashboard management
software that can enable small businesses and midsize companies
to securely view, interact with, and share reports and
dashboards on the Internet, by
e-mail, on
corporate portals, and in Microsoft Office applications. It is
designed to empower business users to get better insight into
their business performance with access to summary dashboards and
detailed reports all in one place.
|
|
|
|
The desktop edition of SAP BusinessObjects Interactive Analysis
software is designed to provide ad-hoc query and analysis
functions in a self-service environment for data-savvy business
professionals. An intuitive interface enables customers to
combine many types of data from different sources into
interactive documents, and helps them uncover trusted, shareable
answers to spontaneous and iterative business questions.
|
|
|
|
The SAP BusinessObjects Access Control application, available in
a version for midsize companies, is designed to enable efficient
protection of information and prevention of fraud by controlling
access and authorizations across the company. The application
can help minimize the time and cost of enforcing segregation of
duties across applications, and can help prevent improper access
to IT systems.
|
|
|
|
The SAP BusinessObjects Global Trade Services application,
available in a version for midsize companies, can enable
organizations to streamline complex export processes, automate
compliance, ensure expedited customs clearance, and gain the
visibility needed to optimize trade processes which can lower
risk and minimize duties. The application is certified for
electronic communication with multiple customs systems around
the globe and fully integrates with SAP and non-SAP software.
|
36
SAP BusinessObjects
Portfolio
The SAP BusinessObjects solutions aim to help business users
optimize their business performance by supporting strategic
targets of our customers, predictable results, and sound
decisions.
Business
Intelligence Solutions and Information Management
Solutions
With the SAP BusinessObjects business intelligence (BI)
solutions and SAP BusinessObjects information management
(IM) solutions, companies can gain an intelligence platform
that provides every constituent in a business network with
trusted business information, helping them respond faster and
make better, timelier decisions. These solutions can enable
customers to implement BI and enterprise information management
strategies for both SAP and non-SAP software environments,
reflecting SAPs commitment to openness and
interoperability in heterogeneous software landscapes.
|
|
|
|
|
SAP BusinessObjects BI solutions are available in both on-demand
and on-premise deployment options. They include a flexible,
scalable business intelligence platform with integrated services
that are back-end, not user-facing. Examples of integrated
platform services include security (who can access the system
and what information they can see), load balancing (plug in
extra servers, and work is shared across them), and scheduling
(refresh reports during the night when system usage is low). The
BI solutions also enable users to interact with business
information and accurately answer ad hoc questions without
advanced knowledge of the underlying data sources and
structures. They can help customers access data across all
sources and formats and deliver it as useful, consumable
information inside and outside the organization. Customers can
use these tools to uncover trends and patterns and solve
business problems, to anticipate business changes, and to help
reach organizational goals. Customers can also use BI solutions
to support their forecasting of future business conditions, to
track and analyze key business metrics via dashboards, to
interact with sophisticated visual representations of
information, and to take advantage of user-friendly capabilities
that provide self-service access to critical business
information. Self-service access enables business users to
create reports and perform analyses themselves without depending
on their IT support.
|
|
|
|
SAP BusinessObjects IM solutions provide functions for data
integration, data quality management, and metadata
management working seamlessly with functions in the
SAP NetWeaver technology platform, such as data warehousing,
master data management, and information life-cycle management to
help build a trustworthy data foundation that offers agile
support for business or IT initiatives. The solutions help
enable world-class information management in both SAP and
non-SAP software environments. Customers can access, profile,
integrate, transform, move, or cleanse structured or
unstructured data to deliver timely, unified, and high-quality
information. With metadata management and text analysis
solutions, customers can collect and unify data from disparate
sources for
end-to-end
impact analysis.
|
Enterprise
Performance Management Solutions and Governance, Risk, and
Compliance Solutions
SAP BusinessObjects enterprise performance management (EPM)
solutions and governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) solutions
enable customers to maximize business profitability, manage risk
and compliance, and optimize corporate systems, people, and
processes. These solutions are designed to integrate with
non-SAP data sources or systems as well as SAP Business Suite
applications, SAP BusinessObjects BI solutions, and SAP
BusinessObjects IM solutions.
|
|
|
|
|
SAP BusinessObjects EPM solutions help companies benefit from
increased levels of strategic alignment, making performance more
predictable and ultimately improve decision-making. SAP
BusinessObjects EPM solutions are optimized for both SAP and
non-SAP environments, across multiple lines of business
including finance, the supply chain and procurement, and they
include solutions for strategy management; planning, budgeting
and forecasting; financial consolidation; and profitability
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
and cost management. The solutions are integrated with SAP
BusinessObjects BI solutions and SAP BusinessObjects GRC
solutions to further help companies close the gap between
strategy and execution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAP BusinessObjects GRC solutions enable companies to aggregate
and manage the key risks of their business, automate controls
across processes, and monitor risks and controls across
disparate systems. The solutions can help increase visibility
across risk and compliance initiatives, reduce cost, and manage
risk across the enterprise. They can also help support
sustainability efforts.
|
Additional
Solutions for Business Users
Business users need direct access to people, processes, and
information to support their
day-to-day
activities. The Duet and Alloy solutions are designed to provide
direct access to SAP Business Suite software from the familiar
Microsoft Office and IBM Lotus Notes software, respectively. As
a result, business users can become more productive, their
decision-making can improve, and their compliance with corporate
policies can increase.
Solutions
for Sustainability
Our vision for a sustainable enterprise is presented in a
sustainability map that catalogs the full landscape of
sustainability-related solutions and business processes. It
serves as an anchor to our ongoing stakeholder engagement and as
a guide to help us prioritize our solution road map.
SAP already has a broad set of sustainability solutions, and we
have committed significant resources to ensure increasing
breadth and depth of coverage through organic development and
partnership.
Solutions
for Sustainability Performance Management
The SAP BusinessObjects Sustainability Performance Management
application helps enterprises focus on strategic execution of
their sustainability initiatives balancing social,
environmental, and economic
38
performance. It provides a comprehensive sustainability
reporting process, from reporting framework definition (for
instance, in accordance with the Global Reporting Initiative) to
data collection workflow and reporting.
The application helps reduce the time, cost, and errors
associated with disclosure and enables enterprises to focus on
identifying inefficiencies and opportunities for improvement. It
provides predefined integration with SAP applications such as
SAP Environment, Health, and Safety Management and SAP ERP
applications, the SAP Carbon Impact on-demand solution, SAP
BusinessObjects EPM solutions, and SAP BusinessObjects GRC
solutions. It integrates with non-SAP software using Web
services and guided data collection functions.
SAP BusinessObjects Sustainability Performance Management
provides automated, accurate multidimensional reporting and
planning for compliance, visibility, and control.
Solutions
for Energy and Carbon Management
SAP Carbon Impact is an on-demand solution to assist enterprises
in implementing strategies for reporting and profitably reducing
their carbon and environmental footprint. The solution helps
companies measure, mitigate, and monetize carbon emissions and
other environmental impacts across business operations.
The SAP AMI Integration for Utilities software provides support
for the processes that utilities need to handle complex billing
arising from advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) and smart
meters.
Customers use SAP Manufacturing Integration and Intelligence
(SAP MII) to connect plant operating data held in control
systems or data historians to dashboards and other analytical
technologies. This allows rapid identification of energy usage,
quality results, and other plant trends so companies can take
quick action to optimize their operations.
Solutions
for Environment, Health, and Safety
The SAP Environment, Health, and Safety Management (SAP EHS
Management) application addresses industry needs for product
safety, hazardous substances, and dangerous goods handling of
products across a wide range of industries, including chemicals,
consumer products and high tech. Companies can also use this
software to manage compliance with European law concerning the
registration, evaluation, authorization, and restriction of
chemicals (REACH), which can help them secure the right to
market their products. The SAP Recycling Administration
application can help ensure compliance with worldwide recycling
legislation for packaging, batteries, and waste electrical and
electronic equipment.
SAP EHS Management can help companies comply with environmental
laws and policies. It supports health and safety, industrial
hygiene, and occupational health processes, and can help reduce
associated costs, efforts, and risks on plant and corporate
levels.
Customers are challenged to implement effective sustainability
programs, because data must flow across business processes and
because progress towards goals must be visible to drive results.
SAP solutions for sustainability are already integrated with SAP
Business Suite software. SAP BusinessObjects Integration
software allows data from SAP applications and SAP
BusinessObjects BI solutions to be displayed in interactive
analytics and dashboards, so that customers can monitor
operations and identify environment, health, and safety risks at
their companies. Customers can then take action as needed within
SAP applications to address those risks.
SAP NetWeaver
The SAP NetWeaver technology platform is a reliable, secure, and
scalable foundation that can run mission-critical business
processes for SAP applications. As the technical foundation for
services-oriented architecture (SOA), SAP NetWeaver is designed
to deliver a comprehensive set of modular, middleware functions
to reduce IT complexity and increase business flexibility across
heterogeneous IT landscapes. The platform can provide IT
organizations the lowest cost of operation and optimal business
availability for SAP
39
applications through lifecycle management, identity management,
secure communications, and
end-to-end
business activity monitoring.
SAP NetWeaver is designed to provide customers with a flexible
way to integrate and extend business processes that run across
SAP, SAP-certified partner-built, and custom-built applications
by delivering prebuilt integration content, enterprise services,
and deployment and model-driven tools. With support for business
process management, mission-critical business processes can be
monitored for efficiency, integrity, and security. Business
users can also use SAP NetWeaver to define business rules to
ensure consistent processes across the business network.
Advanced user interface technologies, such as Web-based portals,
enterprise search, desktop applications, and mobile devices can
help improve user experience and efficiency with secure and
personalized access to business applications and information.
Through integration with the SAP BusinessObjects portfolio, SAP
NetWeaver aims to help customers implement an enterprise
information management strategy to ensure trusted information.
Customers can integrate, cleanse, manage, govern, and archive
structured and unstructured data information to meet compliance
mandates, promote business insight, and improve decision-making.
Options
for Purchasing and Deploying Software
Recent technological developments and new purchasing models have
made it possible for companies to adjust how they consume and
deploy software. Recognizing the evolving needs of our
customers, SAP delivers multiple options for consuming and
deploying enterprise software by taking advantage of these new
technologies and models. SAP bases its consumption and
deployment options on the following guiding principles:
|
|
|
|
|
Delivery of modular applications across multiple lines of
business
|
|
|
|
Integrated processes and information across
solutions regardless of deployment model
|
|
|
|
Flexible, subscription-based models to enable even cost
distribution
|
|
|
|
Focused services for rapid implementations
|
|
|
|
Extend solutions with the global ecosystem to increase value for
customers
|
SAP on-demand solutions help customers quickly and easily
implement enterprise-wide business solutions, and
reduce or even eliminate the need for
on-site IT
resources to manage infrastructure. They can help customers
shift to operational expenses, create less volatile cash flows,
and gradually scale the use of the solutions to match the needs
of the organization. SAP delivers multiple levels of on-demand
solutions aimed at empowering our customers to analyze business
activities and improve business processes:
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise-wide processes for smaller organizations and
subsidiaries drive efficient business processes across the
entire organization with SAP Business ByDesign
|
|
|
|
Process-based solutions address
line-of-business
requirements for customer relationship management, sourcing,
contract management, and carbon trading. Currently available
on-demand solutions include SAP CRM, SAP
E-Sourcing,
SAP Contract Lifecycle Management, and SAP Carbon Impact
|
|
|
|
Enterprise-level or department-level analysis and reporting with
the SAP BusinessObjects BI OnDemand solution. This solution can
store, share, browse, search, report, and analyze information at
the level specified by the company
|
SAP on-premise solutions aim to provide strategic value to our
customers, including
end-to-end,
industry-specific business processes and business and domain
expertise embedded in the applications. However, business trends
regarding new usage and pricing models of on-demand software
have an impact on the overall system landscape of customers. As
a result, we provide many options that aim to help our customers
reduce costs and increase agility:
|
|
|
|
|
Rapidly implementing new innovations using enhancement packages
|
|
|
|
Leveraging virtualization technologies
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
Using shared services implementations to realize economies of
scale for common functions, such as purchasing
|
|
|
|
Hosting applications through ecosystem partners to reduce IT
costs for application maintenance
|
|
|
|
Leveraging SAP Enterprise Support services to identify
opportunities for improving efficiency and reducing IT costs
|
Many SAP customers have indicated that they wish to continue to
leverage their existing investments in on-premise applications
while extending business capabilities in a rapid,
cost-effective, and integrated manner using on-demand
applications and other SAP capabilities. The ability of SAP
solutions to integrate and combine can help customers to
leverage the benefits of both on-demand and on-premise
applications. With this approach, SAP customers can rely on a
single vendor for all lines of business, rather than using
multiple vendors with specializations for only a single
department. SAP customers can gain the benefit of leveraging
on-demand solutions that are complementary to SAP on-premise
solutions to avoid additional integration costs and gain faster
and more effective deployments of new business solutions. With
SAPs integrated, combined model, companies can continue to
ensure process efficiency and business insight across all
systems and data privacy and compliance regardless
of deployment model. SAP offers flexible license agreements
(FLAs) and global enterprise agreements (GEAs) as long-term
engagement models for our customers. An FLA provides flexible
access to SAP solutions based on the agreed value of software
and defined payments for a contract term. A GEA is a strategic
relationship with SAPs most important customers, in which
defined customer goals are met and measured regularly. Both help
align execution of customers IT to business strategy.
The SAP ecosystem also gives companies greater choice and
flexibility by providing a combination of resources that help
best address unique operational situations. Software,
technology, and service partners extend deployment and
consumption options for SAP customers by providing offerings
that include:
|
|
|
|
|
Business process outsourcing
|
|
|
|
Applications that provide rapid deployment and accelerated
results over virtual platforms
|
|
|
|
A broad set of integrated complementary software applications
|
|
|
|
Services that help customers accelerate commercial impact and
deliver better results
|
Finance
Plan for SAP Solutions
Implementing business software solutions can represent a major
investment. With a global partner of ours, Siemens Financial
Services GmbH (SFS), we offer SAP Financing, a service that
helps companies invest in SAP solutions. SAP Financing is
offered to customers in more than 45 countries by SFS and other
leading IT financing specialists. Interest in the plan, which is
now a firmly established SAP Services offering, is high: It has
helped arrange almost 2,000 finance deals since inception. SAP
customers from all segments small businesses,
midsize companies, and large enterprises are
benefiting from the attractive financing solutions. The plan
offers all of the popular finance models, with their various
advantages: They can help conserve liquidity by avoiding initial
investment and provide an alternative to credit from the bank.
That gives customers more options and potential economic
benefits.
Services Portfolio
The comprehensive SAP Services portfolio is designed to optimize
our customers success, helping customers to manage their
transformation to become more transparent about their business
while lowering total cost of ownership. SAP provides a holistic
approach with application lifecycle management, incorporating a
broad array of methodologies, tools, and certified partner
offerings to help our customers gain value from their SAP
investment while meeting their business needs. The tight
integration between our professional
41
services and our support services aims to offer customers
benefits at every level and in every stage of their solution
life cycle. Customers feedback directly influences our
product development.
The SAP Services portfolio includes consulting, education,
custom development, support services, and managed services. The
offerings are categorized into professional services and
software-related services. Our professional services are
provided by SAP Consulting and SAP Education. Software-related
services are support services provided by SAPs support
units (SAP Active Global Support, SAP BusinessObjects Customer
Assurance, and SME Service and Support) and custom development
provided by the SAP Custom Development organization.
SAP Services has a local presence in more than 50 countries and
runs more than 70 training centers, seven global support
centers, and nine custom development centers in Europe, Asia,
and the Americas. With around 19,000 SAP services professionals
around the world, customers needs can be met around the
clock to support SAP-centric solutions.
Software-Related
Services
SAP
Custom Development
The SAP Custom Development organization develops individualized,
customer-specific solutions and business functions on the SAP
platform covering the life cycle of services to develop and
support custom solutions at every stage.
Support
Services
To support customers increasingly complex solution
landscapes and their respective needs, SAP offers several
support packages.
SAPs support units offer a range of services to support
our customers before, during, and after implementation of our
software solutions. We provide
around-the-clock
technical support in every region. The organizations also offer
proactive, preventive support services to protect and enhance
our customers investments in SAP technology and
applications.
SAP Enterprise Support services are our comprehensive, proactive
support and maintenance offering, providing our customers with
an application life-cycle management approach that can help them
manage increased IT complexity and integrate solutions across
their IT ecosystems. Our main support product, SAP Enterprise
Support, aims to ensure that our customers businesses can
manage continuous and accelerated innovation with controllable
impact on business operations. SAP Enterprise Support services
provide an overall blueprint to help customers optimize the
operation of their entire landscape. Mission-critical support
provides continuous quality checks that analyze technical risks.
We implement continuous improvement activities, maintain custom
code, access the mission control center, and generate
service-level agreements for corrective action. We aim to
deliver the quality management methodology, processes, and tools
needed to perform advanced testing and implement solutions
deployment, operations, and continuous improvement initiatives
using the SAP Solution Manager application management solution
for all customers and partners.
SAP Standard Support delivers support services to enable
continuous and effective IT operations. This level of support
provides our customers with the services and tools to minimize
the cost and risk associated with keeping IT systems up and
running. SAP Standard Support ensures that customers SAP
solutions run efficiently, and that they enable the technical
execution of their business objectives by delivering
improvements, quality management, knowledge transfer, and
problem resolution.
The SAP MaxAttention support option expands SAP Enterprise
Support, covering all stages of an SAP solutions life
cycle in a tailored format for customers from
planning and implementation to operations and
optimization with a full range of services that help
organizations safeguard complex solutions, plan for new releases
and upgrades, and implement continuous improvement practices for
productive solution operations.
42
SAP MaxAttention is designed to provide customers our highest
level of customer support built on a dedicated engagement model
with a technical support advisor and service-level agreements,
supported by long-term commitments delivered by the SAP Active
Global Support organization.
SAP Safeguarding services help our customers mitigate the
technical risks of an implementation, integration, migration, or
upgrade project. They smooth the go-live process and help
customers prepare for live use of the software. An
on-site
technical quality manager helps ensure that customers receive
the support they need, that knowledge transfer takes place, and
that our customers improve the performance, data consistency,
and availability of their IT solution from SAP.
Professional Services
SAP
Consulting
SAP Consulting offers planning, implementation, and optimization
services for business solutions, and is designed to help
customers gain the greatest value from their new or existing SAP
software investments. The SAP Services portfolio includes
business transformation services, such as Executive Advisory
Services and Business Process and Platform Services, that
support organizations in responding to business challenges in a
rapidly changing business environment. Executive Advisory
Services are business transformation services aimed to guide
executives toward better insights by bridging IT and business
processes. Business Process and Platform Services can help
customers streamline their operations while taking advantage of
SAP software to automate business processes on a business
process platform. We advise and support customers on designing
business processes and IT infrastructure and help customers with
project management and solution implementation and integration.
We also help customers optimize solutions and IT landscapes
accommodating challenges from mergers and acquisitions or
divestiture of business units.
SAP can also assist customers in minimizing the environmental
impact of their data centers, supporting a Green IT
approach. SAP can assist customers with professional services to
minimize the number of servers through landscape consolidation
and through work with technology partners to provide the most
energy-efficient infrastructure, using virtualization and other
techniques.
SAP
Education
The offerings of SAP Education assist SAP customers and partners
with knowledge transfer, maximizing the value they can create
with their SAP solutions. SAP Education offerings include
training needs analysis, certification assessments, learning
software, and tools. We provide a consistent curriculum for
learners around the world and deliver these offerings through a
number of delivery models, including online
e-learning,
virtual live classroom, learning on demand, and classroom
training. Every year, hundreds of thousands of individuals are
trained by SAP Education, making it one of the largest IT
training organizations in the world.
Other
Services
Chief among the other services in the portfolio are SAP Managed
Services offerings. The SAP Managed Services organization
provides application management services and hosting services,
running and managing SAP solutions on behalf of customers.
Partner Ecosystem
When customers choose SAP software, they also gain access to the
SAP ecosystem, one of the leading business networks in the
software industry. Its members are a host of software partners,
system integrators and resellers, technology partners,
developers, industry specialists and SAP software users.
43
To provide customers access to a rich set of complementary
hardware, software, and service solutions, SAP focuses on global
and local partnership opportunities for numerous business areas
and customer needs. Our rich partner community includes software
and hardware partners and providers of outsourcing, content,
hosting, education, and support services. Among them are
well-known vendors, such as Adobe, Cisco, EMC, HP, IBM, Intel,
Microsoft, Novell, and Research In Motion, as well as thousands
of smaller companies.
|
|
|
|
|
The SAP NetWeaver technology platform enables our partners to
develop products and services that fit into our customers
IT environments. At the same time, it is intended to help us
increase revenue from the many vendors that license our
technology platform. The SAP NetWeaver community continues to
gain momentum, with independent software vendors (ISVs)
currently developing more than 1,700 applications based on SAP
NetWeaver.
|
|
|
|
In April 2009, SAP announced the opening of SAP Co-Innovation
Lab in Bangalore, complementing our global network of
co-innovation labs. SAP Co-Innovation Lab offers an environment
in which ISVs, system integrators, and technology partners can
work with us and with customers on new technologies.
|
|
|
|
In 2009, SAP continued to develop the breadth of offerings
available on SAP EcoHub, an online solution marketplace enabling
SAP customers to discover, evaluate and buy solutions from SAP
partners to complement their existing IT landscapes from SAP.
SAP EcoHub brings together the full scope of the SAP ecosystem
by linking community content to information about offerings from
SAP partners that are designed and selected to address specific
business challenges SAP customers face. The additions to SAP
EcoHub in 2009 included packaged offerings of software and
services in specific regions, the addition of services partners
and the delivery of SAPs sustainability road map and
associated products.
|
Communities
of Innovation
To encourage continuous co-innovation, collaboration, and
ongoing improvement in a wide range of products, services, and
business processes, we foster various communities of
innovation interactive networks of developers,
customers, and partners that come together to collaborate on a
variety of topics. These are some of the major communities in
SAP Community Network:
|
|
|
|
|
The SAP Developer Network (SDN) community offers nearly
2 million members in more than 200 countries the chance to
trade experience and insights, pursue business opportunities,
and learn from each other. It is the biggest innovation
community associated with SAP. SDN includes discussion forums,
blogs, wikis, software and tool downloads, and
e-learning.
A wealth of technical assets attracts more than half a million
visitors to SDN every month.
|
|
|
|
The Business Process Expert community is a business process
community with more than 600,000 members covering 18 industries
and a wide variety of horizontal subjects. Collaboration in the
community, the sharing of best practices, and advanced training
offerings are among the catalysts that can generate process
innovation. Community members, including, for example,
specialists on diverse industries, business and application
consultants, CIOs, and business process experts, find ample
opportunities to exchange ideas in moderated forums, wikis, and
expert blogs.
|
|
|
|
The Industry Value Network program provides a collaborative
environment for ISVs, system integrators, and technology vendors
to work together with SAP and our customers in various
industries. There are now 16 different Industry Value Network
groups. The work they do is designed to help companies develop
solutions using enterprise services.
|
|
|
|
The Enterprise Services Community program provides a forum in
which customers, partners, and employees of SAP form
collaborative groups focused on defining requirements for
business process platforms and specifications for enterprise
services. The community currently has over 340 members working
more than 130 definition groups. So successful is this
collaborative approach that the majority
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
of the enterprise services included in the third enhancement
package for SAP ERP software sprang from requests by customers
and partners working together in the community.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following the acquisition of Business Objects, SAP added the SAP
BusinessObjects community to SAP Community Network. This
community, with more than 295,000 members provides an
environment for SAP BusinessObjects users and developers to
share best practices and pursue innovation opportunities on SAP
BusinessObjects offerings.
|
|
|
|
In February 2009, SAP Community Network opened the SAP
University Alliances community. With more than 85,000 members,
this community focuses on bringing real-life SAP knowledge and
skills into university classrooms. This is part of SAPs
corporate citizenship commitment to the education and mentoring
of university students and graduates who are the business
experts and IT leaders of the future.
|
|
|
|
SAP Community Network launched a community job board in 2009,
providing SAP developers and customers the ability to more
easily network and identify job opportunities that take
advantage of the rich SAP skill base in the SAP communities.
|
|
|
|
In October 2009, SAP announced a partnership with leading social
networking site LinkedIn. This partnership builds on the efforts
to better highlight SAP product skills in the global marketplace
by allowing SAP Community Network members to position their
community involvement and overall SAP product knowledge on
LinkedIn profiles.
|
Independent market intelligence firms including Forrester,
Gartner, and International Data Corporation (IDC) also
report on our community strategy, mentioning the strategic edge
and business advantages gained from SAPs customer-centric
network. In 2009, the communities from SAP were recognized by
independent research organizations Altimeter Group and SiteIQ as
leading the industry on criteria including overall engagement,
quality of information and ease of use.
Sharing
Knowledge Among Users
To share knowledge and influence SAP development efforts, our
customers have established user groups in regions around the
world. The two largest are the Americas SAP Users
Group (ASUG), with more than 75,000 members, and the
German-Speaking SAP User Group (DSAG), which has around 30,000
members in German-speaking countries. In 2007, SAP initiated a
program that encouraged all of these groups to share their
expertise and recommended practices with the wider user-group
community. It kindled some valuable discussion, which, in the
end, is good for all SAP stakeholders. An umbrella organization,
SAP User Group Executive Network (SUGEN), embraces 12 national
SAP user groups with the shared aim of defining priorities and
agreeing plans of action to bring greater focus to the dialog
between SAP and its user groups on the global plane.
Development
Partnerships
In 2009, we continued to forge partnerships and shared projects
that we believe will help shape our future, securing and
enhancing global relationships. We now have 21 global services
partners, more than 1,200 service partners worldwide, and 34
global technology partners, and the SAP solution extension
offerings continue to grow. These are some examples:
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing to identify opportunities to work with partners and
bringing additional value to customers, SAP and Atos Origin, a
global services partner, extended their partnership to focus on
reducing customer risk and streamlining upgrading and go-live
processes, for customers in key European countries including
France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, and the United Kingdom.
|
|
|
|
As adoption of SAP BusinessObjects solutions continued to grow
among SAPs installed base, we secured additional
partnerships in an effort to complement the product offering.
SAP signed a global
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
sales agreement with APOS Systems. The agreement focuses on
offering customers APOS extensions to SAP BusinessObjects
XI solutions to enhance management, monitoring, and control of
their deployments of this software.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As part of our release of SAP Business Suite 7 software, we
secured certified system integrator partnerships with Atos
Origin, Cap Gemini, IBM, and Wipro to drive adoption of SAP
Business Suite and deliver certified consultants to the
marketplace in 2009.
|
|
|
|
To offer customers accelerated, unified access to detailed
enterprise data for better business visibility, SAP and Teradata
Corporation, the worlds largest company for data
warehousing and enterprise analytics, agreed to provide the SAP
NetWeaver Business Warehouse component on the Teradata database.
With this agreement, customers using both SAP and Teradata
products can benefit from an integrated
end-to-end
offering including data warehouse infrastructure and management
as well as business intelligence tools.
|
|
|
|
In support of SAP Enterprise Support services, SAP partners
focused on certification and adoption of the Run SAP
methodology. During the year, partners including IBM Global
Business Services and EDS announced their certification in Run
SAP methodology.
|
|
|
|
SAP and IBM delivered Alloy, co-innovation software featuring
SAP Business Suite and IBM Lotus Notes, to the marketplace.
Alloy presents information and data from SAP software processes
in the context of the desktop familiar to Lotus Notes users.
|
|
|
|
As part of our global mobility product strategy, SAP entered
into partnerships focused on enabling customers to bring the SAP
Business Suite to mobile devices. We started a co-innovation
offering with Sybase, focused on enabling mobile users to access
SAP solutions for increased productivity and efficiency. In
addition, we started a development project with the software
manufacturer Syclo to deliver mobile asset and service
management solutions to customers.
|
|
|
|
The SAP ecosystem was a core component of the launch of the SAP
BusinessObjects Explorer software in May. The company secured
partners as contributors to the technology offering including
Intel and Adobe. Partners that focused on providing hardware
components to complement the software included Dell, Fujitsu,
IBM, and HP.
|
|
|
|
The IT consulting and outsourcing company Cognizant became a
global services partner of SAP in May. This marked the evolution
of a successful relationship between SAP and Cognizant. In SAP
Co-Innovation Lab and the Cognizant Touchstone Center in
Bangalore, we aim to develop and deliver value-added solutions
across a variety of industries to provide our joint customers
enhanced flexibility, agility, and efficiencies in their
enterprise applications.
|
|
|
|
We continued to add to our list of SAP solution extensions.
Focused on identifying qualified products that easily integrate
into existing SAP landscapes and meet criteria for global
customer demand, we secured new offerings from partners to add
to our price list. New solution extensions in 2009 include SAP
Enterprise Inventory Optimization application by SmartOps, SAP
Data Maintenance application for ERP by Vistex, and SAP Extended
Enterprise Content Management application by Open Text.
|
|
|
|
We continued to develop our partnership with Novell, focusing on
GRC solutions. In October the companies announced their
intention to deliver integrated GRC solutions through product
integration and planning and a collaborative
go-to-market
strategy. The combination of SAP BusinessObjects GRC solutions
and Novells security and identity products will bridge the
gap between business process and IT security and controls.
|
|
|
|
In April, our virtualization community shifted its focus to
solutions addressing Green IT. Partners, customers, and
manufacturers including AMD, Cisco, Citrix, EMC, HP, Intel,
Network Appliance, Novell, Red Hat, Sun, and VMware agreed to
work with SAP to directly identify and develop solutions that
enable technology to assist companies in running their IT
operations more efficiently.
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
We broadened our relationship with Intel to optimize the
operation of SAP Business One applications with the Intel Xeon
Processor. This step in the relationship was designed to enable
small businesses to achieve faster time to value for their IT
investments, therefore saving costs. This combination offering
was made available as industry-specific bundles delivered
through original equipment manufacturers.
|
|
|
|
Continuing to work with partners to better enable customers in
the midmarket, we announced a collaborative fast-start program
together with HP. This effort provides customers the SAP
Business
All-in-One
solution on HP hardware.
|
|
|
|
In November 2009, several regional announcements were made
affecting SAPs global ecosystem. In Canada, SAP announced
three new members of the SAP Extended Business program certified
to deliver SAP Business
All-in-One
solutions to midsize Canadian firms. In China, new offerings
were announced for that countrys ecosystem, including
content relevant for the Chinese market published via new online
discussion areas, forums, wikis, and blogs for its SAP Community
Network China. Meanwhile, in India, news of developments at the
recently opened SAP Co-Innovation Lab in Bangalore included
mention of three new solutions now available to the wider
markets based on the joint development efforts of SAP and its
partners at the lab.
|
RESEARCH AND
DEVELOPMENT
In order to capitalize on the power of diversity, SAP
distributes the development of its software solutions across
locations in strategic markets worldwide. In addition, together
with leading universities, partners, and customers, we cultivate
new IT trends and technologies on a global scale.
Worldwide
Distribution of Development
SAP employs 14,813 people in software development centers
in 11 countries. The largest of these SAP Labs is in Walldorf,
Germany, followed by Bangalore, India and Palo Alto, California
in the United States. With the integration of SAP
BusinessObjects development centers, SAP now has three new
development centers in Vancouver, Canada, Dublin, Ireland, and
Paris, France.
Thinking globally and acting locally, the network of SAP Labs
benefits from highly qualified employees with different cultural
backgrounds. With their diverse expertise, these employees use
our resources in an intelligent and efficient way, aiming to
generate a significant and lasting competitive advantage for SAP.
We devised the structure of the SAP Labs network to accelerate
product innovation and raise productivity. Due to the
networks flexibility, we can quickly react to new customer
and market requirements. Furthermore, the global arrangement of
our development organization enables us to develop products and
services in collaboration with leading customers and partners
worldwide.
47
In 2009, SAP invested 1.6 billion (2008:
1.6 billion) in research and development for business
software solutions.
SAP Research
SAP Research, our global research organization, identifies and
shapes emerging IT trends and generates breakthrough
technologies through applied research. Its findings
significantly contribute to our product portfolio and help us to
maintain our technological edge. Each SAP Research center is
collocated with either a partner university or an SAP
development center, creating a solid foundation for
collaborative research.
48
The
Global Research Network
SAP Research explores opportunities that have not yet been
developed into products. A structured approach to research and
trend management ensures that we generate the utmost value out
of creativity to make innovation happen. The group plays a
leading role in multiple research projects, collaborating with
scientists and researchers throughout its co-innovation network,
as well as with customers and partners. In addition, SAP
Research constantly works on the transfer of customer-driven
research results to improve our existing portfolio.
Prospective SAP solutions are turned into tangible experiences
in living labs. The Future Public Security Center in
Darmstadt, Germany, for example, demonstrates technological
research results in real-world settings in the area of public
safety. Users are introduced to new technologies at an early
stage and play an active part in the research process. This
research approach is also based on close collaboration with
customers and partners.
Next Big
Things
Through its exploration of various business areas and based on
the findings of its research projects, SAP Research is able to
identify potential next big things
maximum impact, next-generation technologies and applications.
The following examples highlight some of these topics:
|
|
|
|
|
Cloud computing is the generic umbrella term for flexible,
IT-related services, such as storage, computing power, software
development environments, and applications, combined with
service delivery through the Internet to consumers and
businesses. Clouds provide major opportunities for new business
models by restructuring the value chains in the IT industry. In
addition, cloud computing dramatically changes the dynamics for
new service offerings since it considerably lowers the entry
barriers for newcomers by shifting from huge initial capital
investments to pay-what-you-use business models. The
infrastructure demands of the visions for the Internet of
Services and the Internet of Things can be met
most economically by the cloud computing model. It is especially
small, innovative companies that will use cloud computing as a
scalable service.
|
|
|
|
The Internet of Things fuses the digital world and the physical
world by bringing together different concepts and technical
components. Everyday objects and machines, even houses and
industrial buildings, have sensors and can
communicate with each other via the Internet. One
practical dimension, introduced at SAP TechEd 2009 in Vienna, is
the topic of product counterfeiting security or global brand
protection service. Product counterfeiting, smuggling, and other
illegal trading practices are evolving as fast as emerging
trends and technologies worldwide and are increasingly finding
their way into various business sectors such as the
pharmaceutical industry and aircraft and automobile spare-parts
manufacturing. In a joint venture called Original1 with partners
Nokia and Giesecke & Devrient, we are developing the
possibility for brand owners to use a service protecting their
original products along the whole supply chain. Experts predict
that the Internet of Things will lead to tremendous efficiency
gains in many industries, such as manufacturing and energy
supply. Applications, services, middleware components, networks,
and endpoints will be structurally connected in entirely new
ways. This will make new models possible for business processes,
collaboration, miniaturization of devices, and in the area of
mobile communications.
|
|
|
|
Thanks to the Internet of Services, the ability to create a
Web-based service industry is becoming a reality. In the future,
people should be able to do more than buy books, book flights,
or plan trips on the Internet. They should also be able to make
appointments with their childs pediatrician, coordinate
exports to foreign countries, and provide consulting advice for
businesses. In this type of virtual world, software and service
providers, brokers, and users can collaborate using a service
delivery platform to build flexible and dynamically-integrated
applications. The platform supports the whole life cycle of a
service offering from its creation and introduction to redesign
with incorporated user feedback. SAP
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
Research is looking to further explore services that can be
managed using IT and, when combined, lend themselves into
value-added services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
A further research focus area is the development of technologies
for emerging economies. The overall aim is to engage in research
activities that investigate the unique requirements of emerging
economies in order to make a direct impact on their social and
economic development. The research agenda includes innovative
business solutions for very small businesses, thus giving
preference to the identification and inception of new
technologies. Such initiatives contribute to job creation
(social impact) and poverty alleviation (economic impact).
|
New
Research Group
In July 2009, SAP Research established a new research group in
Bangalore, the main campus of SAP Labs India. With its stellar
development over the years, an ever-growing number of
world-leading enterprises, and a long tradition of academic
excellence, India offers a wealth of opportunities for
innovation and is one of SAPs key markets.
The researchers in Bangalore are focusing mostly on topics in
the areas of decision support systems for text understanding,
service infrastructures, and Web information quality.
Global
Business Incubator
We started the Global Business Incubator in 2008 as the
successor to SAP Inspire. This program, based in Palo Alto,
California, in the United States, and Walldorf, Germany, focuses
on creating innovative new businesses for SAP. The Global
Business Incubator group accelerates the identification and
commercialization of new business opportunities adjacent to
SAPs core business. By bringing together teams of internal
and external entrepreneurs and using a milestone-gated funding
process, the group incubates new businesses inside
the company from idea to commercialization. The Global Business
Incubator has been starting new initiatives since 2008 at the
pace of roughly one per quarter.
Investments in
Innovative Companies
SAPs investment in other companies adds to the process of
innovation by acting as a window on external innovation. Founded
in 1996, SAP Ventures is the corporate venture capital arm of
SAP, and invests in companies that develop promising
technologies and applications.
SAP Ventures can make investment decisions that do not
necessarily reflect our current business strategy and is
therefore able to invest in entirely new fields that offer the
prospect of high growth and profitability. The idea behind SAP
Ventures is to bring substantial benefit to its portfolio
companies by facilitating interaction between innovative young
companies and the SAP ecosystem and to aid SAP in identifying
disruptive trends, new market opportunities, and potential
acquisition candidates, partners and suppliers.
SAP Ventures invests globally and has portfolio companies in
Europe, India, and the United States. In 2009, SAP Ventures
focused on digital media and online marketing and channeled
investment in aspiring enterprises such as Tremor Media and
Return Path. The SAP Ventures portfolio includes startups like
Alfresco, Connectiva, Greenplum, iYogi, JasperSoft, LinkedIn,
Loglogic, Newgen, Qumu, Right Hemisphere, and Vendavo.
The SAP NetWeaver Fund program, capitalized with
US$125 million, aims to invest in companies to fuel
innovation and growth within the SAP ecosystem and in
technologies based on the SAP NetWeaver technology platform.
Since the inception of the SAP NetWeaver Fund in 2006, SAP has
made investments in several companies resulting in significant
product development and co-innovation that has delivered value
to our customers. The SAP NetWeaver Fund portfolio includes
companies such as Nakisa, a leader in the visual workforce
management market, and Innocentive, a provider of open
innovation solutions for the enterprise.
50
Committing Resources
to Research and Development
We must continuously improve our portfolio of products if we
wish to maintain and build on our current leading position as a
vendor of business software. In 2009, our research and
development (R&D) expense decreased slightly by 2% to
1,591 million (2008: 1,627 million), but
we spent 14.9% of total revenue on R&D in 2009 (2008:
14.1%). The increase in the R&D quotient in spite of the
cost-saving measures implemented in 2009 reflects our engagement
in development. The R&D quotient was influenced by an 8%
decrease in revenue and by a 5% reduction in the number of
R&D employees. However, the personnel expense for the
R&D employees was negatively impacted in 2009 by an
increase in variable pay due to overachievement of Company goals.
R&D expenditures include expense for externally procured
development services, in addition to HR costs. The importance of
R&D was also reflected in the breakdown of employee
profiles. At the end of 2009, our total full-time equivalent
(FTE) count in development work was 14,813 (2008: 15,547).
R&D employees account for 31% (prior year: 30%) of all SAP
employees worldwide.
Development News and
New Offerings
In 2009, we extended our solution portfolio focusing primarily
on increasing integration between product lines to help our
customers close the gap between strategy and execution. Working
with our customers and partners, we created new capabilities in
all core areas of our solutions portfolio: enterprise
applications and industry solutions in SAP Business Suite,
solutions for small businesses and midsize companies, solutions
addressing the needs of business users, and the SAP NetWeaver
technology platform. We also expanded our service offerings.
Expanded
Offerings for Enterprise Applications and Industry
Solutions
SAP Business Suite applications and all SAP industry solutions
were improved to adapt to the accelerating rate of change of the
market and customer expectations:
|
|
|
|
|
SAP ERP: In May 2009, we delivered the fourth enhancement
package for the SAP ERP application. Functional improvements
provide stronger support for parallel accounting and reporting,
treasury and risk management, and electronic payments. Human
capital management capabilities were improved to support
recruiting, learning, and performance management processes.
Search, reporting, and self-service capabilities improved
usability for casual and business users. Enhancement packages
continue to enable our customers to add functions to their SAP
applications without upgrades, reducing the total cost of
managing or extending the capabilities of their enterprise
processes.
|
|
|
|
SAP Customer Relationship Management (SAP CRM): The new version
of the SAP CRM application, SAP CRM 7.0, delivered in May 2009,
is continuing to gain momentum with our customers, and is
experiencing strong adoption by our customers users. SAP
CRM is characterized by ease of use and adaptability to meet
rapidly changing market conditions, combined with the power of
integrated
end-to-end
sales, marketing, and service business processes (such as the
new loyalty management capabilities), and we are becoming the
solution of choice for SAP customers. We are continuing to grow
thought leadership through several exciting innovations such as
the mobility partnership with Sybase, social CRM, and
communications-enabled business processes to help our customers
stay current and ahead of their competition.
|
|
|
|
SAP Supplier Relationship Management (SAP SRM): In February
2009, we announced the general availability of the latest
version of the SAP SRM application, SAP SRM 7.0, as part of SAP
Business Suite software. SAP SRM now extends compliance
capabilities with enhancements to centralized sourcing and
contract management, services procurement, catalog management,
supplier enablement, usability, and accessibility to
information. Furthermore, SAP supports SRM customers in
complying with regulatory and internal guidelines. SAP SRM also
helps fully deliver on the important procurement
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
processes for our customers. We also plan to release new
versions of the SAP
E-Sourcing
and SAP Contract Lifecycle Management on-demand solutions in
2010. These new versions are designed to improve the amount of
negotiated savings, optimize cost visibility, increase
sustainable savings, and provide more advanced on-demand support.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAP Supply Chain Management (SAP SCM): In May 2009, a new
version of SAP SCM became generally available with capabilities
that leverage
point-of-sales
data to improve planning accuracy and visibility, provide new
forecasting methods, and enable attribute- or
characteristics-based planning. The supply network collaboration
capabilities were enhanced to improve coordination and
collaboration with contract manufacturers. We introduced major
enhancements to warehouse and transportation management, such as
graphical warehouse layout modeling, improved visualization,
tighter integration of export controls, and increased
utilization, through enhanced integrated processes. We expanded
the radio-frequency identification (RFID) and auto-ID solution
footprint of SAP SCM with support for serialization technology
and the EPCIS standard, a global communications standard by
EPCglobal that improves transparency in the tracking of goods.
|
|
|
|
SAP Product Lifecycle Management (SAP PLM): With its fourth
enhancement package generally available in May 2009, SAP PLM
introduced a new user interface with simplified access to
information within the context of specific roles to improve
productivity, reduce training, eliminate manual activities, and
make decisions more rapidly. This intuitive new user interface
delivers information from units across an organization to
establish a product-centric view. Direct collaboration
capabilities within SAP PLM enable intercompany design networks
with a sophisticated authorization concept. The result is a
better and faster collaboration, which can improve the quality
of product development resulting in fewer change cycles.
Integrated product labeling helps companies to reduce the risk
of product recalls caused by improper labeling and helps them
save time by automating the various steps in the
product-labeling process.
|
New
Developments for Small Businesses and Midsize
Companies
We delivered innovative developments for our many customers in
the small and midsize enterprise (SME) segment in 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
SAP Business ByDesign: In July 2009, we delivered feature pack
2.0 for the SAP Business ByDesign solution. This new version,
available in six key markets under controlled release,
significantly expands functionality and provides more value to
customers by offering business support for 35
end-to-end
process scenarios. Through integration with software from the
SAP BusinessObjects portfolio, including Crystal Reports
software and dashboards from Xcelsius software, executives of
midsize companies can benefit from increased transparency into
their business operation and can utilize comprehensive analytics
to make decisions that can improve their business performance.
This latest feature pack also integrates customer relationship
management,
order-to-cash
with automated billing, project profitability and resource
management, time and expense reimbursement,
procure-to-pay,
and service and repair. Finally, companies can collaborate more
effectively internally, as well as with customers, suppliers,
and partners through new groupware integration with Microsoft
Office. For example, groupware integration with desktop tools
such as Microsoft Office enables users to synchronize tasks,
appointments, and
e-mail and,
for instance, export standard letters and listings to work on
them in Microsoft Office applications. This helps companies work
more effectively internally and with their
customers, vendors, and other business partners.
|
|
|
|
SAP Business
All-in-One:
In 2009, we continued to enhance the SAP Business
All-in-One
solution to include integrated preconfigured SAP BusinessObjects
solutions in addition to the comprehensive,
preconfigured best practices delivered for SAP CRM and SAP ERP
applications in 2008. These solutions provide customers with
instant access to trusted and timely data at the core of their
business operations. Additionally, we continued investing in the
SAP Business
All-in-One
fast-start program by
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
extending the solution configurator to configure CRM functions
online. Partners participating in the SAP Business
All-in-One
fast-start program can now deploy the solution configurator on
their Web sites and feature their unique offerings to prospects.
Several of our partners already have it live on their sites.
Finally, we delivered the SAP BusinessObjects Data Integrator
software for data migration to SAP Business
All-in-One.
It helps reduce project risks and speed the implementation of
SAP Business
All-in-One
solutions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAP Business One: In 2009, we released enhancements to the 2007
version of the SAP Business One application that offer a bundle
of legal enhancements, streamlined business processes, improved
usability, built-in local best practices, and integration with
Web-based CRM and
e-commerce.
|
|
|
|
SAP BusinessObjects Edge solutions: In April 2009, we launched
new solutions, including SAP BusinessObjects Edge BI, our
comprehensive business intelligence software for small
businesses and midsize companies. Now, as part of SAP
BusinessObjects Edge, BI midmarket companies can use SAP
BusinessObjects Explorer software that helps business users
quickly and easily explore information from diverse sources and
instantly answer business questions. We also delivered the SAP
BusinessObjects Edge Strategy Management application, which
helps small businesses and midsize companies improve their
performance and align execution with strategy by connecting
goals, initiatives and metrics. We also delivered the SAP
BusinessObjects Edge Planning and Consolidation application,
which helps these organizations create, execute, and monitor
budgets that are aligned to financial plans and resources.
|
Expanded
SAP BusinessObjects Portfolio
In 2009, we extended our portfolio of solutions to meet the
needs of business users with new enhancements to the SAP
BusinessObjects solutions and new versions of Duet and Alloy.
|
|
|
|
|
SAP-BusinessObjects business intelligence (BI) solutions: In
2009, we delivered SAP BusinessObjects Explorer software. SAP
BusinessObjects Explorer software, accelerated version for SAP
NetWeaver Business Warehouse (SAP NetWeaver BW), combines
intuitive information search and exploration functions with the
high performance and scalability of SAP NetWeaver BW
Accelerator, so it can empower the organization and put BI
within the reach of more business users in a company. With
immediate insights into vast amounts of data, users can improve
their ability to make sound, timely decisions.
|
|
|
|
The accelerated version of SAP BusinessObjects Explorer software
delivers powerful functions, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search across data fields and metadata: Users simply enter
a few keywords to instantly find the most relevant information
from across all data sources. They need no previous knowledge
about what data exists or where to find it.
|
|
|
|
Intuitive exploration of data and charts: The software
complements results with contextually relevant details. The
experience is comparable to Internet-style search and browsing
an online store. Users do not need data models or data knowledge.
|
|
|
|
Automated relevancy and chart generation: SAP
BusinessObjects Explorer presents the most relevant search
results first and automatically generates the chart that best
represents the information.
|
|
|
|
High performance and scalability: The combined software and
hardware solution delivers the high performance and scalability
that users need for immediate response and answers when they
browse very large data sets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAP BusinessObjects information management (IM) solutions:
In June 2009, we delivered enhancements to SAP BusinessObjects
Data Federator and SAP BusinessObjects Data Services software.
These
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
solutions support both SAP and non-SAP software environments.
They offer greater support for SAP customers by integrating with
SAP NetWeaver BW. In addition, there is deeper integration
between SAP BusinessObjects Data Services and the SAP NetWeaver
Master Data Management component (SAP NetWeaver MDM) for
improved data cleansing. We also delivered application-specific
versions of SAP BusinessObjects Data Quality Management software
to help customers solve data quality problems with SAP,
Informatica, and Siebel applications. With the new version of
SAP BusinessObjects Metadata Management software, customers can
consolidate metadata to gain visibility into SAP NetWeaver BW
objects. They can thus obtain information on data lineage and
usage and conduct change impact analyses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAP BusinessObjects governance, risk, and compliance (GRC)
solutions: We delivered a new version of the SAP BusinessObjects
Global Trade Services application that continued the evolution
of this product and focused on managing supply chain risk and
compliance across all of an organizations trade processes.
Execution of our road map continued with new versions of the SAP
BusinessObjects Process Control and SAP BusinessObjects Risk
Management applications, built on the SAP NetWeaver technology
platform. The process control application offers customers a
comprehensive concept with which to realize automated control
mechanisms that help them ensure compliance with numerous legal
and regulatory requirements. The latest release of the risk
management application enables companies to automatically
monitor and proactively identify enterprise risks. The
combination of these two solutions enables customers to take a
risk-based approach to controls. These were our first
applications to deliver embedded SAP BusinessObjects BI
capabilities through integration with Crystal Reports and
Xcelsius software notably as part of our updating of
SAP BusinessObjects Access Control. The first version of the SAP
BusinessObjects Sustainability Performance Management
application helps organizations define and communicate their
sustainability objectives, appropriately manage risks, and
report on sustainability performance. It does so by providing a
reporting and management framework that enables organizations to
focus on driving sustainability performance rather than data
collection and report compilation.
|
|
|
|
SAP BusinessObjects enterprise performance management (EPM)
solutions: The release of SAP BusinessObjects EPM 7.5 delivered
the second phase of our five-year road map and included new
versions of the SAP BusinessObjects Planning and Consolidation
application on both the SAP NetWeaver and Microsoft platforms to
help customers streamline their planning, budgeting, and
forecasting processes. A new version of the SAP BusinessObjects
Strategy Management application was released with new
visualization and reporting capabilities enabled by SAP
BusinessObjects BI solutions. We enhanced the SAP
BusinessObjects Financial Consolidation application with new
accounting compliance features and rich integration with SAP ERP
and SAP NetWeaver BW to further help companies meet demands for
a faster, more accurate financial close process. We also
released a new version of the SAP BusinessObjects Profitability
and Cost Management application, which helps customers gain more
insight into cost drivers and their effect on profitability. A
second version of the SAP BusinessObjects Spend Performance
Management application was released to help customers identify
cost-saving opportunities and identify risk in the supply chain.
In February 2009, we delivered the new SAP BusinessObjects XBRL
Publishing solution by UBmatrix, designed to help customers meet
new regulatory requirements for the electronic communication of
financial and business data. Also in February, we launched the
SAP BusinessObjects Supply Chain Performance Management
application, which continues to extend our performance
management vision beyond finance. It helps companies measurably
improve supply chain effectiveness, create responsive supply
chain networks, and deliver improved cost control.
|
In addition to updates for SAP BusinessObjects solutions, we
delivered the first version of Alloy software, a joint
development with IBM, in March 2009. In October 2009, we
delivered a new version of Duet software.
54
Enhancements
to SAP NetWeaver
Enhancements made to the SAP NetWeaver technology platform in
2009 focus on helping our customers run business applications
efficiently, accelerate the design and integration of
applications to enhance business processes, manage and access
relevant data across the entire enterprise, and simplify the way
users access applications and information.
|
|
|
|
|
SAP NetWeaver Composition Environment: In May 2009, we released
the first enhancement package for the SAP NetWeaver Composition
Environment offering, which provides a lean, integrated,
standards-based development, modeling, and runtime environment.
Software developers and technical consultants can use the
enhanced composite designer and composite life-cycle management
capabilities to improve productivity. As part of this
enhancement package, we also delivered the SAP NetWeaver
Business Process Management component and the SAP NetWeaver
Business Rules Management component the next
generation of tools for increasing process flexibility with new
business process management and business rules management
capabilities. Business process experts can use these tools to
generate a consistent view of core and composite processes for
both business and IT.
|
|
|
|
SAP NetWeaver Process Integration (SAP NetWeaver PI): With the
release of the first enhancement package for SAP NetWeaver
Process Integration in May 2009, our customers can now take
advantage of Enterprise Services Repository enhancements to
improve SOA design governance. SAP NetWeaver PI also supports
higher data volumes and centralized administration capabilities.
|
|
|
|
SAP NetWeaver Information Lifecycle Management: SAP has
delivered a three-pronged approach to information life-cycle
management that meets the complex information management needs
of todays organizations: data archiving, which focuses on
keeping the growth of data volume in check; retention
management, which deals with the life cycle of data from the
time it is created until it is destroyed; and a retention
warehouse, which addresses the decommissioning of legacy
applications and systems.
|
|
|
|
SAP NetWeaver Identity Management: In 2009, we released a new
version of SAP NetWeaver Identity Management. Key enhancements
in this release include integration with SAP BusinessObjects
Access Control for compliant user provisioning, standards-based
integration (Service Provisioning Markup Language) with SAP
Business Suite (employee scenarios) to enable business-driven
identity management, identity services to enable access to
identity management functions from external applications and SOA
environments, and greater integration with the SAP NetWeaver
infrastructure including Web Dynpro-based Web user interfaces
for more consistent
look-and-feel
and easier management.
|
New
Developments for Services
With expertise in a wide range of industries, the SAP Services
organization continues to develop and deliver services to align
IT and business strategies. These services enable customers to
realize maximum benefits from IT investments more quickly, free
up IT budget, and respond rapidly to market changes. From
planning and implementation to running applications, SAP
Services offerings support organizations along the entire
application life cycle. Customers can leverage IT landscapes
more effectively to optimize processes and drive innovation.
Additional service developments focus on giving customers an
accurate view of where maximum value can be achieved, while
consistently keeping business costs at a minimum. Leveraging
best practices, tools, methodologies and repeatable, quick time
to value, metric-driven offerings are key to our strategy. By
doing this, SAP Services can deliver customer services that
scale faster significantly reducing implementation
cost and ensuring customer satisfaction.
55
|
|
|
|
|
In April 2009, SAP and SAP User Group Executive Network (SUGEN)
announced the rollout of the SUGEN SAP Enterprise Support
program using key performance indicators (KPIs) to define and
measure how SAP customers derive value from SAP Enterprise
Support.
|
|
|
|
In December 2009, SAP announced that the KPIs achieved under the
program showed clear value to participating SAP customers.
|
|
|
|
In January 2010, SAP announced a tiered support model for
customers worldwide. This support offering includes SAP
Enterprise Support services and the SAP Standard Support option,
and will enable all customers to choose the option that best
meets their requirements.
|
ACQUISITIONS
In 2009, we reinforced our strategy of organic growth
complemented by share or asset acquisitions aimed at enriching
our product portfolio in terms of both technology and functions.
We made the following acquisitions in 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
In May, we acquired the assets of Sky Data Systems Inc., a
U.S. company. Sky Data Systems specializes in mobile CRM
solutions.
|
|
|
|
In June, we acquired Clear Standards Inc., a U.S. company.
Clear Standards provides enterprise carbon management solutions
and helps organizations measure and control greenhouse gas
emissions and other environmental impacts across internal
operations. The software also supports sustainability reporting.
Our objective in extending our product portfolio in the field of
sustainability is to help our customers meet the carbon
management requirements in this time of increasingly stringent
government regulations and public expectations of better
transparency.
|
|
|
|
In June, we also acquired Highdeal S.A., a French company.
Highdeal delivers sophisticated pricing, charging and rating
solutions designed to support communication service providers.
SAP has integrated the Highdeal solutions in a business process
platform that provides customers with a comprehensive real-time
transaction management system.
|
|
|
|
In September, we acquired a majority of the shares of SAF AG, a
Swiss public company. SAF develops ordering and forecasting
software for the retail, logistics, and industrial sectors. The
company employs an innovative conceptual demand chain management
approach that allows the process chain to be controlled and
optimized by its central driving force the
customers buying behavior. SAP offered SAF shareholders an
amount of 11.50 per share, which represents a 9.5% premium
according to the XETRA closing price of 10.50 for the SAF
share on July 17, 2009, and a 33.9% premium to the
volume-weighted average price of the SAF shares in XETRA trading
on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange over the three months prior to
the offer date. As of September 24, 2009, the aggregate
number of SAF shares attributable to SAP amounted to 3,914,041
SAF shares in total; corresponding to approximately 70.67% of
the share capital and the voting rights of SAF AG. As of
March 10, 2010 the amount of share capital and the voting
rights of SAF AG attributable to SAP had not changed
significantly.
|
|
|
|
In December we acquired the assets of SOALogix, Inc., a
U.S. company. SOALogix specializes in packaged software to
map information flows between employees, processes, and
applications. Its product portfolio includes solutions for
integrating industry-specific project management software with
SAP applications for portfolio and project management.
|
SEASONALITY
Our business has historically experienced the highest revenue in
the fourth quarter of each year, due primarily to year-end
capital purchases by customers. Such factors have resulted in
2009, 2008, and 2007 first quarter revenue being lower than
revenue in the prior years fourth quarter. We believe that
this trend will
56
continue in the future and that our revenue will continue to
peak in the fourth quarter of each year and decline from that
level in the first quarter of the following year.
SALES, MARKETING AND
DISTRIBUTION
SAP primarily uses its worldwide network of subsidiaries to
market and distribute SAPs products and services locally.
Those subsidiaries have entered into license agreements with SAP
AG pursuant to which the subsidiary acquires the right to
sublicense SAP AGs products to customers within a specific
territory. Under these agreements, the subsidiaries retain a
certain percentage of the revenue generated by the sublicensing
activity. We began operating in the United States in 1988
through SAP America, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of SAP AG.
Since then, the United States has become one of our most
important markets.
In addition to our subsidiaries sales forces, we have
developed an independent sales and support force through
value-added resellers unrelated to SAP who assume responsibility
for the licensing, implementation and some initial level of
support of SAP solutions, particularly with regard to the SAP
Business One application and qualified SAP Business
All-in-One
partner solutions. We have also entered into partnerships with
major system integration firms, telecommunication firms and
computer hardware providers to offer certain SAP Business Suite
applications.
We establish partnerships with hardware and software suppliers,
systems integrators and third-party consultants with the goal of
providing customers with a wide selection of third-party
competencies. The role of the partner ranges from pre-sales
consulting for business solutions to the implementation of our
software products to project management and end-user training
for customers and, in the case of certain hardware and software
suppliers, to technology support. Beyond these partnerships, a
significant amount of consulting and training regarding SAP
products is handled by third-party organizations that have no
formal relationship or partnership with SAP.
Traditionally, our sales model has been to charge a one-time, up
front license fee for a perpetual license to our software
(without any rights to future products) which is typically
installed at the customer site. We now offer our solutions in a
variety of ways which include on-demand, hosted solutions, and
subscription-based models. Although revenues from these new
types of models currently are not material, we expect these
revenues to increase in the future.
Our marketing efforts cover large, multinational groups of
companies as well as small and midsize enterprises. We believe
our broad portfolio of solutions and services enables us to meet
the needs of customers of all sizes and across industries.
Capitalizing on the possibilities of the Internet, we actively
make use of online marketing. Some of our solutions can be
tested online via the Internet demonstration and evaluation
system, which also offers special services to introduce
customers and prospects to new solutions and services.
INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY, PROPRIETARY RIGHTS AND LICENSES
We rely on a combination of the protections provided by
applicable statutory and common law rights, including trade
secret, copyright, patent, and trademark laws, license and
non-disclosure agreements, and technical measures to establish
and protect our proprietary rights in our products. For further
details on risks related to SAPs intellectual property
rights, see Item 3 Key Information Risk
Factors Other Operational Risks.
We may be dependent in the aggregate on technology that we
license from third parties that is embedded into our products or
that we resell to our customers. We have licensed and will
continue to license numerous third-party software products that
we incorporate into
and/or
distribute with our existing products. We endeavor to protect
ourselves in the respective agreements by obtaining certain
rights in case such agreements are terminated.
57
We are a party to certain patent cross-license agreements with
certain third parties.
We are named as a defendant in various legal proceedings for
alleged intellectual property infringements. See Note 24 to
our Consolidated Financial Statements for a more detailed
discussion of these legal proceedings.
ORGANIZATIONAL
STRUCTURE
As of December 31, 2009, SAP AG was the parent of 163
subsidiaries. Our subsidiaries perform various tasks such as the
distribution of SAPs products and providing SAP services
on a local basis, research and development, customer support,
marketing, and administration. Our primary research and
development facilities, the overall group strategy and the
corporate administration functions are concentrated at our
headquarters in Walldorf, Germany.
The following table illustrates our most significant
subsidiaries based on revenues as of December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Country of
|
|
|
Name of Subsidiary
|
|
%
|
|
Incorporation
|
|
Function
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAP Deutschland AG & Co. KG, Walldorf
|
|
100
|
|
Germany
|
|
Sales, consulting and training
|
Rest of EMEA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAP (UK) Limited, Feltham
|
|
100
|
|
Great Britain
|
|
Sales, consulting and training
|
SAP (Schweiz) AG, Biel
|
|
100
|
|
Switzerland
|
|
Sales, consulting and training
|
SAP France S.A., Paris
|
|
100
|
|
France
|
|
Sales, consulting and training
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAP America, Inc., Newtown Square
|
|
100
|
|
USA
|
|
Sales, consulting and training
|
Rest of Americas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAP Canada Inc., Toronto
|
|
100
|
|
Canada
|
|
Sales, consulting, training,
and research and development
|
Japan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales, consulting, training,
|
SAP JAPAN Co., Ltd., Tokyo
|
|
100
|
|
Japan
|
|
and research and development
|
Rest of APJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAP Australia Pty Limited, Sydney
|
|
100
|
|
Australia
|
|
Sales, consulting and training
|
DESCRIPTION OF
PROPERTY
Our principal office is located in Walldorf, Germany, where we
own and occupy approximately 395,000 square meters of
office space including our facilities in neighboring St.
Leon-Rot. We also own and lease office space in various other
locations in Germany, totaling approximately 130,000 square
meters. In approximately 70 countries worldwide, we occupy
roughly 1,300,000 square meters. The space in most
locations other than our principal office in Germany is leased.
We also own certain real properties in Newtown Square and Palo
Alto, United States; Bangalore; and a few other locations in and
outside of Germany.
The office space we occupy includes approximately
295,000 square meters in the EMEA region, excluding
Germany, approximately 295,000 square meters in the region
North and Latin America, and approximately 185,000 square
meters in the APJ Region.
The space is being utilized for various corporate functions
including research and development, customer support, sales and
marketing, consulting, training, and administration. For a
discussion on our property, plant, and equipment by geographic
region see Note 29 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements. Also see, Item 6. Directors, Senior
Management and Employees, which discusses the numbers of
our employees by business area and by geographic region, which
may be used to approximate the productive capacity of our
workspace in each region.
58
We believe that our facilities are in good operating condition
and adequate for our present usage. We do not have any
significant encumbrances on our properties. We are currently
undertaking construction activities in various locations to
increase our capacity for future expansion of our business. Some
of our significant construction activities are described below,
under the heading Capital Expenditures.
Capital Expenditures
Principal
Capital Expenditures and Divestitures Currently in
Progress
In the US, we finalized the construction for the expansion of
the U.S. Headquarters campus in Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania where we had invested around
100 million. The building has been occupied since the
second quarter of 2009.
In 2008 we began construction of a guesthouse in our Walldorf,
Germany location to save future travel costs for visiting SAP
employees. We estimated the total cost of the construction to be
approximately 17 million, of which we had paid
approximately 14 million as of December 31,
2009. We funded the construction with internally generated cash
flows. The construction was completed at the end of February
2010. Occupancy started in the middle of March 2010.
The construction of a new office building in St. Ingbert,
Germany was also started in 2008. The building has been occupied
since the middle of March 2010. The total investment was
approximately 14 million.
In Brazil, we commenced construction for the expansion of the
São Leopoldo office in the fourth quarter of 2007, which
added 400 workspaces. Total costs were about
14 million. The building has been occupied since the
second quarter of 2009.
In Singapore, we will commence a project in the second half of
2010 to consolidate three of our current offices into one new
building. The project will involve moving approximately
830 employees to the new location. We estimate the total
cost of this project to be approximately 11 million.
We are funding this project with internally generated cash
flows. We estimate that the consolidation of these offices will
take place by the end of 2010.
We believe that our facilities are in good operating condition
and adequate for our present usage. We do not have any
significant encumbrances on our properties. We are currently
undertaking construction activities in various locations to
increase our capacity for future expansion of our business. Some
of our significant construction activities are described below,
under the heading Capital Expenditures.
Principal
Capital Expenditures and Divestitures for the Last Three
Years
Our capital expenditures for property, plant, and equipment
amounted to 207 million for 2009 (2008:
344 million; 2007: 342 million). Capital
expenditures in 2009 for property, plant, and equipment
decreased compared to 2008 and 2007. This decrease was mainly
due to a decrease in spending on real estate and buildings. For
a related discussion on our property, plant, and equipment see
Note 17 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in
Item 18. Financial Statements.
Our capital expenditures for intangible assets such as software
licenses, acquired technologies and customer contracts decreased
significantly to 51 million in 2009 from
1,043 million in 2008 (2007: 238 million).
Our investments allocated to goodwill also decreased
significantly to 41 million in 2009 from
3,511 million in 2008 (2007: 520 million).
The significant decrease from 2008 to 2009 as well as the
increase in Goodwill and intangible assets from 2007 to 2008 was
primarily attributable to the acquisition of Business Objects in
2008. For further details on acquisitions and related capital
expenditures, see Note 4 and Note 16 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
59
The significant decreases in our capital expenditures in 2009
when comparing our investments in 2008 and 2007, aside from the
acquisition of Business Objects in 2008, was primarily the
result of the tightening of our budgets in response to the
economic crisis.
For further details regarding capital expenditures by geographic
region, see Note 29 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements. For further information regarding the principal
markets in which SAP competes, including a breakdown of total
revenues by category of activity and geographic market for each
of the last three years, see Item 5 Operating and
Financial Review and Prospects Operating
Results of this Annual Report on
Form 20-F.
ITEM 4A.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable.
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
OPERATING
AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
|
OVERVIEW
Our principal sources of revenue are sales of software products
and related services. Software revenue is primarily derived from
software license fees that customers pay to use SAP products. We
derive support revenue from offering support services which
provide the customer with unspecified upgrades, updates and
enhancements and software support. Our professional service
revenue consists of consulting, training and other service
revenue; consulting revenue is primarily derived from the
services rendered with respect to implementation of our software
products and training revenue from rendering training for
customer project teams and end-users, as well as training
third-party consultants with respect to SAP software products.
See Item 4. Information about SAP The
Software and Service Portfolio for a more detailed
description of the products and services we offer.
Subscription revenues flow from contracts that have both a
software element and a support element. Subscription contracts
typically give our customers the use of current software and the
right to unspecified future products. We typically charge a
fixed monthly or quarterly fee for a definite term up to five
years. Software rental revenue flows from software rental
contracts, which include software and support service elements.
Such contracts provide the customer with current software
products and support but do not provide the right to receive
unspecified future software products. Customers pay a periodic
fee over the rental term and we recognize fees from software
rental contracts ratably over the term of the arrangement. Our
revenue from other software-related services includes revenue
from our on-demand offerings, for example the SAP CRM on-demand
solution, any future on-demand revenue from our new midmarket
product SAP Business ByDesign, revenue from hosting contracts
that do not entitle the customer to readily exit the
arrangement, and revenue from software-related revenue-sharing
arrangements, for example our share of revenue from
collaboratively developed products.
We also report revenue from other services within professional
services and other service revenue. This item includes revenue
from non-mandatory hosting services, application management
services (AMS), and sales commission received from
third-parties. Non-mandatory hosting services revenue consists
of revenue from hosting contracts from which the customer can
readily exit if it wishes to run the software on its own systems.
The following discussion is provided to enable a better
understanding of our operating results for the periods covered,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
the economic conditions that we believe impacted our performance
in 2009;
|
|
|
|
our outlook for 2009 compared to our actual performance
(non-GAAP);
|
|
|
|
a discussion of our operating results for 2009 compared to 2008
and for 2008 compared to 2007;
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
the economic conditions we believe will impact our performance
in 2010; and
|
|
|
|
our operational targets for 2010 (non-IFRS).
|
The preceding overview should be read in connection with the
more detailed discussion and analysis of our financial condition
and results of operations in this Item 5,
Item 3. Key Information Risk
Factors and Item 18. Financial Statements.
ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
Global Economic
Trends
For the global economy, 2009 was a year of crisis: The
International Monetary Fund (IMF) calls it the deepest worldwide
recession in recent history, while Credit Suisse, a major Swiss
bank, refers to it as the new Great Depression. The United
Nations also reports that the downturn was steep and
simultaneous throughout the world.
Beginning in late 2008, many governments introduced stimulus
measures of unprecedented dimensions, which helped to bring some
respite in 2009 from mid-year in the emerging
economies, and during the final quarter in the advanced
economies. Since then, international trade and global industrial
output have begun to recuperate.
While recovery began earlier than originally expected, global
economic output still declined in 2009, although only by a small
single-digit percentage. There was considerable variation among
the regions.
Within the Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) region, the
upturn toward the end of 2009 was uneven. The European Central
Bank (ECB) reported that while there was only slight improvement
in the economies of Central and Eastern Europe, exports from the
euro area started to pick up after mid-year
especially from Germany. At the beginning of 2009, its exports
were still in decline. Government stimulus packages and the
growth of trade were among the factors that encouraged economic
recovery in the euro area.
An upturn also started in the Americas region in the second half
of the year. The major impetus in the United States was
governmental support for the economy, which prompted
unexpectedly high levels of consumer spending. Above all, the
government measures stimulated the markets for automobiles and
homes. The third quarter saw a return to economic growth, and
exports grew in response to increased demand from the emerging
economies. Nonetheless, Credit Suisse calculates that at the end
of 2009, overall economic activity in the United States was
still well below the levels achieved in the years before the
crisis. The ECB notes that rapidly rising imports and decreasing
investment in commercial property weighed down the
U.S. economy.
The overall economy of Latin America contracted in 2009 by a
percentage in the lower single digits. However, the ECB believes
there is sufficient evidence to support the view that most
countries were in recovery by the end of the year. In November,
Brazil even posted moderate single-digit growth in industrial
production as compared with 2008.
The gap between emerging and advanced economies was especially
wide in the Asia-Pacific region in 2009. The emerging economies
implemented massive stimulus packages, which brought them
continued growth through the year, albeit at a reduced pace.
This was the first sign of an upturn that was to spread across
the world. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development (OECD) notes that in the emerging Asian economies
there was already discussion by late 2009 about how and when
government stimulus measures should be wound down.
On the other hand, Credit Suisse reports that the Japanese
economy fared worse in 2009 than had initially been expected.
Finding themselves in intense international competition to
reduce costs, companies were reluctant to invest while they
still had unutilized capacity. But the ECB believes that in
recent months the mood has improved even in Japan, and that the
economy has started to recover.
61
The IT Market
The IT market was impacted by the global economic crisis in
2009. IT spending declined noticeably, as, wherever they could,
businesses and retail customers postponed purchases and selected
less expensive products or configurations. U.S. IT market
analyst International Data Corporation (IDC) reports that
the market reached bottom in the third quarter of 2009.
The hardware sector was affected more seriously than the
software business. In the IT services segment, the effect was
first felt a few months later, and recovery also occurred later
than in the hardware and software sectors. According to IDC,
sales in the software market grew only very little in 2009. They
were flat in IT services, and declined sharply in the hardware
segment. UBS, a major Swiss bank, reports that sales to
consumers held up better than sales to companies.
However, analysts say the final quarter of 2009 marked the
beginning of the economic recovery. For instance, investment
bank Goldman Sachs reports that IT spending grew more quickly
than expected. It believes the economic year was reverting to
the normal cycle, in which companies spend what is left of their
budget at the end of the year. In 2009, that was a relatively
large amount because of cost-saving efforts in the first nine
months.
In the EMEA region, the crisis affected the European countries
most seriously. Until the third quarter, the IT sector in Europe
contracted continuously as the hostile economic climate
discouraged capital spending by companies. IDC reports that in
Western Europe the market for software expanded only minimally
over the full year, while the IT services market contracted a
little. At the same time, spending on hardware decreased in the
range of double-digit percentage points. Germany was
particularly affected: Although in 2008 market analysts had
still been predicting double-digit percentage growth there in
2009, actual growth was in the lower single digits from the
beginning of the year. The downward trend continued, and from
the third quarter it especially affected the IT services segment.
IDC reports that the contraction was dramatic in Central and
Eastern Europe. There, the software and IT services segments
suffered declines well into double-digit percentages, and the
hardware market was the most seriously affected. By contrast,
its analysts described the Middle East and Africa as oases of
stability early in 2009. However, when oil prices decreased and
international investors withdrew their funds in the second
quarter, the crisis came to these regions as well. It was
relatively harmless, though: Software spending declined
slightly, services budgets grew slightly, and there was only a
single-digit percentage decrease in hardware sales.
The IT market in the Americas region was also uneven in 2009.
While the numbers from North America were comparable with those
from other advanced economies, in Latin America there was
double-digit percentage growth in the software segment,
substantial growth in the services market, and only a little
lost ground in the hardware sector. This was because while many
companies planned fewer new IT projects, they did protect their
established IT budgets. IDC reported signs that the market in
the Americas region was stabilizing from the third quarter. In
UBSs analysis, low prices and government economic stimulus
packages led to greater demand for software than had been
expected. The impact of the recession on hardware and services
spending was more sustained.
In the United States, the governments wide-ranging
measures to support the economy began to take effect from the
third quarter, forestalling further contraction in the IT
sector, according to IDC. Its market analysts report modest
single-digit percentage growth in the software and services
segments over the full year. Only the results from the hardware
sector drove the IT market into negative territory, IDC reasons.
Goldman Sachs presents a different analysis: It believes the
software market suffered a double-digit percentage contraction
at the bottom of the crisis in the second and third quarters.
Goldman Sachs concludes that full-year spending on software
declined more steeply in the United States than in the world as
a whole, although sales in the fourth quarter were better than
it had expected.
Nor did the APJ region escape the economic crisis in 2009. IDC
says the difference there between advanced and emerging
economies was very marked. In the emerging economies, IT budget
growth merely slowed in response to the global economic
downturn and government economic stimulus packages
were already
62
bearing fruit as early as the third quarter. This was most
noticeable in China, where low prices and government stimulation
soon restored demand, according to UBS. The advanced economies
that rely more on exports, notably Japan, recorded substantial
decline. They also had the longest to wait for the upturn. IDC
believes full-year sales decreased in every segment of the IT
sector.
OUTLOOK FOR 2009
Performance Against
Outlook for 2009 (Non-GAAP)
We expressed our 2009 operating income-related internal
management goals and published outlook in non-GAAP terms. For
this reason, in the following section we discuss performance
against our outlook exclusively and expressly in terms of
non-GAAP numbers derived from U.S. GAAP measures. All
subsequent discussions in the Operating Results section
are in terms of IFRS measures. As a result, the numbers in that
section are not explicitly identified as IFRS measures.
Outlook for 2009
(Non-GAAP)
At the beginning of 2009, we projected that our 2009 non-GAAP
operating margin, which excluded a nonrecurring deferred support
revenue write-down from the acquisition of an acquired entity
and acquisition-related charges, to be in the range of 24.5% to
25.5% at constant currencies. That included nonrecurring
restructuring costs of between 200 million and
300 million, which we expected to incur as we reduced
our workforce and which we expected would negatively impact our
non-GAAP operating margin by approximately two to three
percentage points.
Due to our results for the first half of 2009, we updated our
outlook in July 2009 by increasing our expected non-GAAP
operating margin to a range of 25.5% to 27.0% at constant
currencies. Our July 2009 outlook included nonrecurring
restructuring costs of 200 million, which we expected
to incur as we reduced our workforce and which we expected would
negatively impact our non-GAAP operating margin by approximately
two percentage points. At the beginning of 2009, our non-GAAP
operating margin outlook was based on the assumption that our
2009 non-GAAP software and software-related service revenue,
which excludes a nonrecurring deferred support revenue
write-down from an acquisition, would decline not more than 1%
at constant currencies (2008: 8,623 million). In July
2009, we updated our assumption to the effect that our 2009
non-GAAP software and software-related service revenue would
decline in a range of 4% to 6% at constant currencies.
In October 2009, we confirmed our outlook regarding the 2009
non-GAAP operating margin but decreased the underlying revenue
assumption. We continued to expect our full-year 2009 non-GAAP
operating margin to be in the range of 25.5% to 27.0% at
constant currencies. The 2009 non-GAAP operating margin outlook
was now based on the assumption that our 2009 non-GAAP software
and software-related service revenue would decline in a range of
6% to 8% at constant currencies.
We announced in January 2009 and confirmed in April, July, and
October, that in order to enable our Company to adapt its size
to todays market conditions and the broader impact of the
global recession, we were implementing a global reduction of our
workforce to 48,500 by year-end 2009, taking full advantage of
attrition as a factor in reaching this goal. In January 2009, we
also announced that we expected the reduction of our workforce
to trigger one-time restructuring expenses of between
200 million and 300 million for 2009. In
July, we clarified this one-time restructuring expense
expectation by announcing total restructuring expenses for 2009
to be approximately 200 million.
At the beginning of 2009, we projected an effective tax rate of
between 29.5% and 30.5% (based on U.S. GAAP income from
continuing operations) for 2009 (2008: 30.0%). In October 2009,
we updated our outlook for the 2009 effective tax rate to
between 27.0% and 28.0%.
63
To assist in understanding our 2009 performance as compared to
our 2009 outlook a reconciliation from our non-GAAP financial
measures to our U.S. GAAP financial measures is provided
below. These non-GAAP measures reconcile to the nearest
U.S. GAAP equivalents as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Support
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Non-GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Not
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on the
|
|
|
Fiancial
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Acquisition-
|
|
|
Non-GAAP
|
|
|
Non-GAAP
|
|
|
Measure at
|
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
Under U.S.
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
Constant
|
|
|
|
Measure
|
|
|
GAAP
|
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
Measure
|
|
|
Measure
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
|
millions, except operating margin
|
|
|
Software and software-related service revenue
|
|
|
8,198
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
8,209
|
|
|
|
−8
|
|
|
|
8,201
|
|
Total
revenue(1)
|
|
|
10,672
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
10,683
|
|
|
|
−19
|
|
|
|
10,664
|
|
Operating
income(1)
|
|
|
2,639
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
2,915
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
2,933
|
|
Operating margin in %
|
|
|
24.7
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
27.5
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
These financial measures are the
numerator or the denominator in the calculation of our non-GAAP
operating margin and the comparable U.S. GAAP operating margin,
and are included in this table for the convenience of the reader.
|
2009
Actual Performance Compared to Outlook (Non-GAAP)
Our 2009 non-GAAP operating margin on a constant currency basis
was 27.5%, surpassing the outlook we provided at the beginning
of 2009 (24.5% to 25.5%), updated in July (25.5% to 27.0%), and
confirmed in October 2009. It was 0.7 percentage points
narrower than the previous years non-GAAP operating margin
of 28.2%. This contraction was due primarily to the slowdown in
revenue brought about by the global financial crisis. In
addition, restructuring expenses of 196 million
resulting from the workforce reduction announced in early 2009
negatively impacted our non-GAAP operating margin by
1.8 percentage points. This operating margin result
exceeded the outlook we confirmed in October 2009 for non-GAAP
operating margin at constant currency, due to the fact that we
surpassed our assumption for non-GAAP software and
software-related service revenue on a constant currency basis
with a 5%
year-over-year
decline. In addition, we realized this margin by continuing our
comprehensive cost savings implemented in late 2008, which
included a significant reduction of spending on external service
providers, business travel, and other variable costs.
On a constant currency basis over the full year, our non-GAAP
software and software-related service revenue declined 5% to
8,201 million (2008: 8,623 million),
missing the assumptions provided in January (decline of 1%),
meeting the updated assumption provided in July (decline in a
range of 4% to 6%) and surpassing the assumption provided in
October 2009 (decline in a range of 6% to 8%). This result was
achieved due to a
better-than-expected
result in software revenue in the fourth quarter of 2009.
We achieved an effective tax rate of 28.1% (based on
U.S. GAAP income from continuing operations), which was
lower than the effective tax rate projected in January of 2009
(29.5% to 30.5%) and slightly higher than our updated projection
of October 2009 (27.0% to 28.0%).
OPERATING RESULTS
(IFRS)
The following Operating Results section discusses, our results
only in terms of IFRS measures. As a result, the numbers are not
explicitly identified as IFRS measures. In addition, the 2008
and 2007 figures are different than the figures disclosed in our
2008 Annual Report on
Form 20-F
since our figures are now based on IFRS instead of
U.S. GAAP.
64
Our 2009
Results Compared to our 2008 Results (IFRS)
Revenue (IFRS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009 vs 2008
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software revenue
|
|
|
2,607
|
|
|
|
3,606
|
|
|
|
−28
|
%
|
Support revenue
|
|
|
5,285
|
|
|
|
4,602
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Subscription and other software-related service revenue
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
Software and software-related service revenue
|
|
|
8,198
|
|
|
|
8,466
|
|
|
|
−3
|
%
|
Consulting revenue
|
|
|
2,074
|
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
|
−17
|
%
|
Training revenue
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
−37
|
%
|
Other service revenue
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
−21
|
%
|
Professional services and other service revenue
|
|
|
2,432
|
|
|
|
3,039
|
|
|
|
−20
|
%
|
Other revenue
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
−40
|
%
|
Total Revenue
|
|
|
10,672
|
|
|
|
11,575
|
|
|
|
−8
|
%
|
Total Revenue
Total revenue decreased from 11,575 million in 2008
to 10,672 million in 2009, representing a decrease of
903 million or 8%. This entire decrease was caused by
changes in volumes and prices. The decline mainly relates to a
decrease in software revenue of 999 million or 28% as
compared to 2008. This decrease was offset in part by increased
support and subscription revenue, which resulted in software and
software-related service revenue of 8,198 million in
2009. Software and software-related service revenue represented
77% of our total revenue in 2009 compared to 73% in 2008.
Professional services and other service revenue contributed
2,432 million to our total revenue in 2009. This
represents a decrease of 20% compared to 2008. Professional
services and other service revenue accounted for 23% of our
total revenue in 2009 compared to 26% in 2008. The other revenue
component of total revenue was immaterial for both 2008 and 2009.
For an analysis of our total revenue by region and industry, see
the Revenue by Region and Revenue by Industry
sections.
Software and
Software-Related Service Revenue
Software revenue represents fees earned from the sale or license
of software to customers. Support revenue represents fees earned
from providing customers with technical support services and
unspecified software upgrades, updates, and enhancements.
Subscription and other software-related service revenue
represents fees earned from subscriptions, software rentals, and
other types of software-related service contracts.
In 2009, software and software-related service revenue decreased
from 8,466 million in 2008 to
8,198 million, representing a decrease of
268 million or 3%. This entire decrease was caused by
changes in volumes and prices.
Software revenue decreased from 3,606 million in 2008
to 2,607 million in 2009, representing a decrease of
999 million or 28%. The software revenue decline
consists of a 27% decrease from changes in volumes and prices
and a 1% decrease from currency effects.
In 2009, we continued to focus on our established product
portfolio: SAP Business Suite, our platform-related products
based on SAP NetWeaver, and the solutions aimed at business
users primarily available in the SAP Business Objects portfolio.
We continued to integrate our SAP BusinessObjects solutions with
products from SAP Business Suite and SAP NetWeaver to provide
added value to our customers.
65
SAP Business Suite revenue contributed most to the overall
decrease of software revenue with a 38% decrease, but a recovery
started in the second half of 2009. Positive contribution to
software revenue development came from customer development
projects, which rose 35% compared to 2008.
Throughout 2009 our customer base remained relatively stable.
Based on the number of deals closed, 37% of our software revenue
in 2009 was attributable to contracts with new customers (2008:
32%). The total number of new software deals settled decreased
by 10% to 42,639 (2008: 47,572). The value of software order
entry declined 28% year over year. Based on the order entry
value, the new customer share increased from 13% in 2008 to 17%
in 2009.
Our stable customer base and the continued sale of software to
existing and new customers throughout 2009 resulted in an
increase in support revenue from 4,602 million in
2008 to 5,285 million in 2009, representing an
increase of 683 million or 15%. The support revenue
growth reflects a 14% increase from changes in volumes and
prices and a 1% increase from currency effects.
Subscription and other software-related service revenue
increased 48 million or 19% to 306 million
compared to 258 million in 2008. The increase in
revenue reflects a 16% increase from volumes and prices and a 3%
increase from currency effects. The increase was primarily
related to new general license agreements and flexible license
agreements representing a foundation for future subscription and
other software-related service revenue growth.
Professional
Services and Other Service Revenue
Professional services and other service revenue consists
primarily of consulting and training revenue. Consulting revenue
is primarily derived from the implementation of our software
products. Training revenue results mainly from providing
educational services on the use of our software products and
related topics to customers and partners.
Professional services and other service revenue decreased from
3,039 million in 2008 to 2,432 million in
2009, representing a decrease of 607 million or 20%
entirely reflected by changes in volumes and prices. The
decrease in professional services and other service revenue is
mainly due to economic conditions, which caused our customers to
decrease their spending on software, postpone implementation
projects, and reduce training activities.
Consulting revenue decreased from 2,498 million in
2008 to 2,074 million in 2009, representing a
decrease of 17% which is entirely due to changes in volumes and
prices. Our 2009 consulting revenue declined primarily due to
the economic conditions, which led to decreased customer
spending on software investments, and continued strict cost
control policies. In 2009, consulting contributed to 85% of our
revenue result in professional services and other service
revenue compared to 82% in 2008. Consulting revenue as a
percentage of total revenue decreased to 19% in 2009 compared to
22% in 2008.
Training revenue decreased from 434 million in 2008
to 273 million in 2009, representing a decrease of
37% entirely due to changes in volumes and prices. The decline
in training revenue resulted primarily from economic conditions,
which led customers to implement tight cost controls on software
projects and related user enabling. This led to a significant
decrease of attendee rates in our training offerings.
Other service revenue mainly consists of revenue generated by
the SAP Managed Services organization, which operates, manages
and maintains SAP solutions. Other service revenue decreased
from 107 million in 2008 to 85 million in
2009, representing a decrease of 21%. All of this decrease was
caused by changes in volumes and prices.
66
Revenue by Region
and Industry (IFRS)
Revenue by Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in %
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009 vs 2008
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
2,029
|
|
|
|
2,193
|
|
|
|
−7
|
%
|
Rest of EMEA
|
|
|
3,614
|
|
|
|
4,013
|
|
|
|
−10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total EMEA
|
|
|
5,643
|
|
|
|
6,206
|
|
|
|
−9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
2,695
|
|
|
|
2,890
|
|
|
|
−7
|
%
|
Rest of Americas
|
|
|
925
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
−7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Americas
|
|
|
3,620
|
|
|
|
3,880
|
|
|
|
−7
|
%
|
Japan
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
−8
|
%
|
Rest of APJ
|
|
|
933
|
|
|
|
974
|
|
|
|
−4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total APJ
|
|
|
1,409
|
|
|
|
1,489
|
|
|
|
−5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
10,672
|
|
|
|
11,575
|
|
|
|
−8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue by Industry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in %
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009 vs. 2008
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Process Industries
|
|
|
2,008
|
|
|
|
2,367
|
|
|
|
−15
|
%
|
Discrete Industries
|
|
|
2,127
|
|
|
|
2,434
|
|
|
|
−13
|
%
|
Consumer Industries
|
|
|
1,976
|
|
|
|
2,235
|
|
|
|
−12
|
%
|
Service Industries
|
|
|
2,516
|
|
|
|
2,706
|
|
|
|
−7
|
%
|
Financial Services
|
|
|
909
|
|
|
|
774
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
Public Services
|
|
|
1,136
|
|
|
|
1,059
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
10,672
|
|
|
|
11,575
|
|
|
|
−8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue by Region
We operate our business in three principal geographic regions:
the Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) region; the Americas
region, which comprises North and Latin America; and the Asia
Pacific Japan (APJ) region, which comprises Japan, Australia,
and other parts of Asia. We allocate revenue amounts to each
region based on where the customer is located. For additional
information with respect to operations by geographic region, see
the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
section, Note 29.
The EMEA Region
In 2009, 53% (2008: 54%) of our total revenue was derived from
the EMEA region. Our total revenue from the EMEA region was
5,643 million, which represents a decline of 9%
compared to 2008 (2008: 6,206). This decrease reflects a
7% decrease from changes in volumes and prices and a 2% decrease
from currency effects. Total revenue in Germany decreased 7% to
2,029 million in 2009 (2008:
2,193 million). Germany contributed 36% to our total
revenue from the EMEA region, which is a slight increase of
0.6 percentage points compared to 2008. Most of the rest of
our EMEA revenue in 2009 originated from the United Kingdom,
France, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Italy, and Spain.
67
The Americas Region
Of our 2009 total revenue, 34% (2008: 34%) was recognized in the
Americas region. Total revenue in the region decreased 7% to
3,620 million in 2009. Total revenue from the United
States declined 7% in 2009, which represents a decrease of 10%
from changes in volumes and prices and a 3% increase from
currency effects. The United States contributed 74% (2008: 74%)
of our total revenue from the Americas region. The rest of the
Americas region saw a 7% decrease in total revenue to
925 million, which represents a decrease of 3% from
changes in volumes and prices and a 4% decrease from currency
effects. This revenue was principally generated in Canada,
Brazil, and Mexico.
The APJ Region
In 2009, the APJ region contributed 13% (2008: 13%) to our total
revenue, with most of this revenue being derived from Japan. In
the APJ region, total revenue declined by 5% to
1,409 million in 2009. Revenue from Japan decreased
8% to 476 million, which represents 34% (2008: 35%)
of our total revenue from the APJ region. The revenue decline in
Japan reflects a 19% decrease due to changes in volumes and
prices and an 11% increase from currency effects. The rest of
the APJ region saw a decrease in total revenue of 4%, which was
all caused by changes in volumes and prices. Revenue from the
APJ region was principally generated in Australia, China, and
India.
Revenue by Industry
We have identified six industry sectors on which to focus our
development efforts in the key industries of our existing and
potential customers. We provide best business practices and
specific integrated business solutions to those industries. We
allocate our customers to an industry at the outset of an
initial arrangement. All subsequent revenues from a particular
customer are recorded under that industry sector.
In comparison with total revenue change in 2009, we outperformed
in the financial services industry sector with revenue of
909 million, which represents a growth rate of 17%,
and in public services, where our total revenue amounted to
1,136 million, representing an increase of 7%
compared to 2008. In financial services, we performed
particularly well due to our increased industry focus in banking
and insurance.
In our mature industry sectors, notably in the process and
discrete manufacturing industries, the market was difficult as a
result of the financial crisis. Customers reduced their
spending, especially on new software and professional services.
Compared to 2008, our total revenue from the process
manufacturing industries declined 15%, and from the discrete
manufacturing industries it declined 13%.
Operating Profit and
Margin (IFRS)
Total Operating
Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009 vs. 2008
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of software and software-related services
|
|
|
−1,714
|
|
|
|
−1,743
|
|
|
|
−2
|
%
|
Cost of professional services and other services
|
|
|
−1,851
|
|
|
|
−2,285
|
|
|
|
−19
|
%
|
Research and development
|
|
|
−1,591
|
|
|
|
−1,627
|
|
|
|
−2
|
%
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
−2,199
|
|
|
|
−2,546
|
|
|
|
−14
|
%
|
General and administration
|
|
|
−564
|
|
|
|
−624
|
|
|
|
−10
|
%
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
−198
|
|
|
|
−60
|
|
|
|
>100
|
%
|
Other operating income/expense, net
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
>100
|
%
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
−8,084
|
|
|
|
−8,874
|
|
|
|
−9
|
%
|
68
Operating Profit and
Operating Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009 vs. 2008
|
|
|
million, except for operating margin
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
2,588
|
|
|
|
2,701
|
|
|
−4%
|
Operating Margin in %
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
|
|
1.0pp
|
Cost-Containment
Measures in 2009
We announced in January that to enable our company to adapt its
size to market conditions and the broader impact of the global
recession, we were implementing a global reduction of our
workforce to 48,500 by year-end 2009, taking full advantage of
attrition as a factor in reaching this goal. We confirmed the
announcement in July and October. We expected the reduction of
our workforce would trigger one-time restructuring expenses of
between 200 million and 300 million for
2009. In July, we clarified this expectation, announcing total
restructuring expenses for 2009 of approximately
200 million. In 2009, we actually incurred a
restructuring charge of 198 million, which was
recorded in total operating expenses. To counter these
additional costs and to react to the global financial crisis,
throughout 2009 we continued the cost-containment measures we
initially implemented in the fourth quarter of 2008.
Total Operating
Expenses
Our total operating expenses for 2009 decreased to
8,084 million compared to 8,874 million in
2008 representing a decrease of 790 million or 9%.
The main driver for this decrease was the cost-containment
measures implemented in the fourth quarter of 2008 and continued
through 2009. These cost savings realized through the
cost-containment measures were partially offset by the
restructuring charges mentioned above and an increase in
variable compensation, especially in Germany, in comparison to
2008.
Cost of Software and
Software-Related Services
Cost of software and software-related services consists
primarily of various customer support costs, cost of developing
custom solutions that address customers unique business
requirements and license fees and commissions paid to third
parties for databases and the other complementary third-party
products sublicensed by us to our customers.
The cost of software and software-related services decreased 2%
from 1,743 million in 2008 to
1,714 million in 2009. As a percentage of software
and software-related service revenue, cost of software and
software-related services remained stable at 21% in 2009.
Throughout 2009 the support organization continued its efforts
to improve the efficiency of our processes by continuing the
focus of moving into low-cost locations (Bulgaria, China, and
India). Approximately 23% of our global support resources were
based in the low-cost locations at the end of 2009, which is an
increase of 1.5 percentage points compared to 2008.
Cost of Professional
Services and Other Services
Cost of professional services and other services consist
primarily of consulting and training personnel expenses as well
as expenses for third-party consulting and training resources.
This item also includes sales and marketing expenses related to
our professional services and other services resulting from
sales and marketing efforts that cannot be clearly distinguished
from providing the services.
69
Cost of professional services and other services declined 19%
from 2,285 million in 2008 to
1,851 million in 2009 as a result of strict cost
controls. As a percentage of professional services and other
services revenue, cost of professional services increased
slightly from 75% in 2008 to 76% in 2009. Despite the strict
cost controls on our professional services and other services,
our decreased revenue in 2009 resulted in a contraction of our
professional services and other services margin.
Research and
Development
Our R&D expenses consist primarily of personnel expenses
for our R&D employees, costs incurred for independent
contractors retained by us to assist in our R&D activities,
and amortization of computer hardware and software in our
R&D activities.
R&D expenses in 2009 decreased by 2% to
1,591 million compared to 1,627 million in
2008. The decrease in R&D expense was mainly the result of
a decline in third-party non-customer-related costs. As a
percentage of total revenue, R&D expenses increased from
14% in 2008 to 15% in 2009. This increase was primarily due to a
reduction in total revenue of 8%. This decline in revenue was
partially offset by a R&D headcount reduction of 5%.
Despite the reduction in R&D headcount, personnel expenses
for the R&D employees increased due to an increase in
variable compensation resulting from overachievement of our
company targets in 2009.
Sales and Marketing
Sales and marketing costs consist mainly of personnel expenses
and direct sales costs to support our sale and marketing lines
of business in selling and marketing our products and services.
Sales and marketing expenses decreased 14% from
2,546 million in 2008 to 2,199 million in
2009. The decrease in sales and marketing expenses was mainly
the result of lower personnel expenses due to headcount
reduction and tight cost controls in all areas. As a percentage
of total revenue, sales and marketing expenses decreased from
22% in 2008 to 21% in 2009.
General and
Administration
Our general and administration (G&A) expenses consist
mainly of personnel expenses to support our finance and
administration functions.
G&A expenses decreased from 624 million in 2008
to 564 million in 2009. This represents a decrease of
10%. This decrease was driven by lower personnel expenses due to
the reduction in headcount and cost savings in the area of
non-customer-related third-party and travel expenses. As a
percentage of total revenue, G&A expenses remained
relatively stable compared to the 2008 at 5%.
Operating Profit
Our 2009 operating profit decreased by 4% to
2,588 million (2008: 2,701 million). We
were able to achieve this result despite the slowdown in revenue
(8%) brought about by the global financial crisis and the
additional one-time impact from the restructuring charges
(198 million) incurred in 2009 due to the savings
realized from the cost-containment measures, which partially
offset the negative impacts on our margin.
Operating Margin
Our operating margin, which is the ratio of operating profit to
total revenue, expressed as a percentage was 24.3%, one
percentage point higher than in the previous year (2008: 23.3%).
The 198 million in restructuring charges resulting
from the reduction of positions announced in January 2009
negatively impacted our operating margin by 1.9 percentage
points.
70
Segment Discussions
Currently we have three reportable operating segments: Product,
Consulting, and Training. Total revenue and profit figures for
each of our operating segments differ from the respective
revenue and profit figures classified in our Consolidated
Statements of Income because of several differences between our
internal management reporting and our external IFRS reporting.
For further details of our segment reporting and a
reconciliation from our internal management reporting to our
external IFRS reporting, see the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements section, Note 29.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in %
|
Product Segment
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009 vs. 2008
|
|
|
millions, unless otherwise stated
|
|
|
|
|
External revenue
|
|
|
7,846
|
|
|
|
8,366
|
|
|
−6
|
Segment expenses
|
|
|
−3,120
|
|
|
|
−3,655
|
|
|
−15
|
Segment contribution
|
|
|
4,726
|
|
|
|
4,711
|
|
|
0
|
Segment profitability
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
56
|
%
|
|
4pp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in %
|
Consulting Segment
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009 vs. 2008
|
|
External revenue
|
|
|
2,499
|
|
|
|
2,824
|
|
|
−12
|
Segment expenses
|
|
|
−1,724
|
|
|
|
−2,040
|
|
|
−15
|
Segment contribution
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
|
784
|
|
|
−1
|
Segment profitability
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
3pp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in %
|
Training Segment
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009 vs. 2008
|
|
External revenue
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
−37
|
Segment expenses
|
|
|
−217
|
|
|
|
−300
|
|
|
−28
|
Segment contribution
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
−49
|
Segment profitability
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
−8pp
|
Product Segment
The Product segment is primarily engaged in marketing and
licensing our software products and providing support for them.
Support includes technical support for our products, assistance
in resolving problems, providing user documentation, unspecified
software upgrades, updates, and enhancements. The Product
segment also performs certain custom development projects. The
Product segment includes the sales, marketing, and service and
support lines of business.
Product segment revenue decreased 6% from
8,366 million in 2008 to 7,846 million in
2009. All of the decrease resulted from changes in volumes and
prices. The reason for the decrease is that the decline in
revenue from software solution licensing was greater than the
increase in our support revenue. Software revenue as part of the
total Product segment revenue decreased 29% from
3,356 million in 2008 to 2,373 million in
2009. The change in software revenue in the Product segment
results entirely from changes in volumes and prices. Support
revenue increased 10% from 4,596 million in 2008 to
5,076 million in 2009. This growth results entirely
from changes in volumes and prices. Subscription and other
software-related service revenue increased 18% from
257 million in 2008 to 304 million in 2009.
Product segment expenses decreased 15% from
3,655 million in 2008 to 3,120 million in
2009. Expenses from the sales line of business account for
roughly 55% of the entire Product segment expenses, while
expenses from the marketing line of business account for roughly
20% and expenses from the service and support line of business
account for roughly 25% of overall Product segment expenses. The
decrease in Product segment expenses was the result of our
cost-containment measures.
71
Product segment contribution increased from
4,711 million in 2008 to 4,726 million in
2009, or 60% of total segment revenue compared to 56% of total
segment revenue in 2008.
Consulting Segment
The Consulting segment is primarily engaged in the
implementation of our software products.
Consulting segment revenue decreased 12% from
2,824 million in 2008 to 2,499 million in
2009. This decrease was all caused by changes in volumes and
prices. Geographically the EMEA region, North America, and the
APJ region have all contributed to the segment revenue decline.
In Latin America revenue also declined, but at a lower rate. We
reacted to a decrease in demand for our consulting services by
decreasing our Consulting segment resources by 11%. Our
headcount reduction was highest in North America and the APJ
region at 17% and 16%, respectively. We were able to mitigate
this revenue decrease with cost savings realized from the
reduction in third-party non-customer-related costs.
Consulting segment expenses decreased 15% from
2,040 million in 2008 to 1,724 million in
2009. This expense decrease is primarily the result of the
reduction of our workforce, decreased purchase of third party
services, and other savings realized from our cost-containment
measures.
Consulting segment contribution decreased 1% from
784 million in 2008 to 775 million in
2009. Consulting segment profitability increased three
percentage points to 31%.
Training Segment
The Training segment is primarily engaged in providing
educational services on the use of our software products and
related topics for customers and partners. Training services
include traditional classroom training at SAP training
facilities, customer and partner-specific training and end-user
training, as well as
e-learning.
Training segment revenue was 332 million in 2009,
which represents a decrease of 37% from 525 million
in 2008. This revenue decrease was due entirely to changes in
volumes and prices. Our training revenue shortfall was
especially high in the Americas region with a 47% decrease.
Revenue decreased 31% in both the EMEA and APJ regions. The
primary drivers for this revenue decline were in the area of
traditional classroom training (40%) and in education consulting
(53%).
Our Training segment expenses decreased 28%, from
300 million in 2008 to 217 million in
2009, mainly due to the decline in demand for our training
services and to our cost-containment measures.
The Training segment contribution decreased 49% from
225 million in 2008 to 115 million in
2009. Training segment profitability decreased eight percentage
points to 35%.
Financial Income, Net
Financial income, net, decreased to -80 million
(2008: -50 million). Our finance income in 2009 was
32 million (2008: 72 million) and our
finance costs were 101 million (2008:
123 million). Our finance income substantially
comprised income from cash and cash equivalents and from other
financial assets. Our 2009 finance costs arose principally in
connection with the financing for our acquisition of Business
Objects and with our issuance of private placement transactions
(schuldschein) in 2009.
The decrease in finance costs in 2009 was mainly due to the
repayment of our outstanding credit facility in connection with
the Business Objects acquisition. Finance costs associated with
our schuldschein transactions offset part of that effect. The
decrease in finance income in 2009 resulted mainly from
significant interest-rate reductions, which were only partly
offset by an increase in average liquidity since 2008.
72
Income Tax
Our effective tax rate decreased to 28.1% in 2009 from 29.6% in
the previous year. The decrease in our effective tax rate and in
our income tax expense in 2009 mainly resulted from nonrecurring
acquisition-related items. For more information, see the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements section,
Note 11.
Our 2008 Results
Compared to our 2007 Results (IFRS)
Revenue (IFRS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software revenue
|
|
|
3,606
|
|
|
|
3,407
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Support revenue
|
|
|
4,602
|
|
|
|
3,852
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
Subscription and other software-related service revenue
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
Software and software-related service revenue
|
|
|
8,466
|
|
|
|
7,441
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Consulting revenue
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
|
2,221
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
Training revenue
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Other service revenue
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
−5
|
%
|
Professional services and other service revenue
|
|
|
3,039
|
|
|
|
2,744
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
Other revenue
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
−1
|
%
|
Total Revenue
|
|
|
11,575
|
|
|
|
10,256
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
Total Revenue
As a result of our acquisition of Business Objects in January
2008, our revenue numbers for 2008 and 2007 are not fully
comparable.
Total revenue increased from 10,256 million in 2007
to 11,575 million in 2008, representing an increase
of 1,319 million or 13%. The revenue growth reflects
a 17% increase from changes in volumes and prices and a 4%
decrease from currency effects. This increase is mainly related
to the strong performance in software and software-related
service revenue, which grew by 1,025 million or 14%
compared to 2007. A significant portion of this growth was due
the acquisition of Business Objects. In 2008, software and
software-related service revenue represented 73% of our total
revenue, which was flat compared to 2007. Professional services
and other service revenue contributed 295 million to
the overall growth in 2008. This represents an increase of 11%
compared to 2007. Professional services and other service
revenue accounted for 26% of our total revenue compared to 27%
in 2007.
Software and
Software-Related Service Revenue
Software and software-related service revenue increased from
7,441 million in 2007 to 8,466 million in
2008, representing an increase of 1,025 million or
14%. A significant portion of this growth was due the
acquisition of Business Objects. The revenue growth reflects an
18% increase from changes in volumes and prices and a 4%
decrease from currency effects.
Software revenue rose from 3,407 million in 2007 to
3,606 million in 2008, accounting for an increase of
199 million, or 6%. The software revenue growth
consists of a 10% increase from changes in volumes and prices
and a 4% decrease from currency effects.
The strong performance in software and software-related service
revenue for the full year 2008 was the result of well balanced
growth in all regions. See section Revenue by Region and
Industry for our results per region.
73
The extension of our established product portfolio, SAP Business
Suite and our platform-related products based on SAP NetWeaver,
especially towards the business user solutions, led to an
overall increase software revenue. In 2008, we continued to
derive software revenue from our strong customer base.
Nevertheless, the number of software contracts coming from new
customers remained stable at 31%. Based on the order entry
value, the new customer share decreased from 21% in 2007 to 13%
in 2008 influenced fundamentally by lower deal sizes in the
extended business user area.
The SAP NetWeaver-related revenue decreased from
997 million in 2007 to 942 million in
2008, representing a decrease of 55 million or 6%.
The portion relating specifically to the underlying SAP
NetWeaver stand-alone revenue increased by
55 million, or 17%, to 384 million in 2008
compared to 329 million in 2007. The decrease was
mainly due to the global economic crisis that emerged during the
second half of 2008 since we recorded a 31% increase during the
first half of 2008.
Our stable customer base and the continued sale of software to
existing and new customers throughout 2008 resulted in an
increase in support revenue from 3,852 million in
2007 to 4,602 million in 2008, representing an
increase of 750 million or 19%. The support revenue
growth reflects a 23% increase from changes in volumes and
prices and a 4% decrease from currency effects. The largest
contributor to the 2008 increase in support revenue based on
volume was the Americas region. See section Revenue by
Region and Industry for our results per region.
Subscription and other software-related service revenue
increased by 76 million or 42% to
258 million compared to 182 million in
2007. The increase was primarily due to the signing of new major
subscription contracts.
Professional
Services and Other Service Revenue
Professional services and other service revenue increased from
2,744 million in 2007 to 3,039 million in
2008, representing an increase of 295 million or 11%.
This revenue growth reflects a 15% increase from changes in
volumes and prices and a 4% decrease from currency effects.
Consulting revenue increased from 2,221 million in
2007 to 2,498 million in 2008, representing an
increase of 12%. The consulting revenue growth reflects a 17%
increase from changes in volumes and prices and a 5% decrease
from currency effects. In 2008, consulting contributed strongly
to the revenue growth in professional services and other service
revenue representing a payoff for past headcount investments in
the consulting area. Consulting revenue as a percentage of total
revenue remained quite stable at 22% in 2008, contributing to
SAPs total revenue double-digit growth rate.
Training revenue increased from 410 million in 2007
to 434 million in 2008, representing an increase of
6%. The training revenue growth reflects a 10% increase from
changes in volumes and prices and a 4% decrease from currency
effects. Strong contribution to the growth in training revenue
was achieved by higher demand for
E-Learning
and on-site
customer training. The training business also benefited from
growth in the certification area.
Other service revenue decreased from 113 million in
2007 to 107 million in 2008, representing a decrease
of 5%. The other service revenue decline reflects a 2% decrease
from changes in volumes and prices and a 3% decrease from
currency effects. Other service revenue mainly consists of
revenue generated by the SAP Managed Services organization,
which operates, manages and maintains SAP solutions.
74
Revenue by Region
and Industry (IFRS)
Revenue by Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in %
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
2,193
|
|
|
|
2,005
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Rest of EMEA
|
|
|
4,013
|
|
|
|
3,387
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total EMEA
|
|
|
6,206
|
|
|
|
5,392
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
2,890
|
|
|
|
2,717
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Rest of Americas
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
872
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Americas
|
|
|
3,880
|
|
|
|
3,589
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Rest of APJ
|
|
|
974
|
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total APJ
|
|
|
1,489
|
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
11,575
|
|
|
|
10,256
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue by Industry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in %
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Process Industries
|
|
|
2,367
|
|
|
|
2,143
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Discrete Industries
|
|
|
2,434
|
|
|
|
2,224
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Consumer Industries
|
|
|
2,235
|
|
|
|
1,952
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Service Industries
|
|
|
2,706
|
|
|
|
2,372
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Financial Services
|
|
|
774
|
|
|
|
679
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Public Services
|
|
|
1,059
|
|
|
|
886
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
11,575
|
|
|
|
10,256
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue by Region
The EMEA Region
In 2008, 54% (2007: 53%) of our total revenues were derived from
the EMEA region. Our total revenues in the EMEA region grew to
6,206 million, or by 15%, in 2008. The EMEA region
revenue growth reflects a 17% increase from changes in volumes
and prices and a 2% decrease from currency effects. Revenues in
Germany, SAPs home market, increased by 9% to
2,193 million in 2008 (2007:
2,005 million). Germany contributed 35% (2007: 37%)
of EMEAs total revenues, which is a slight decrease of
2 percentage points compared to 2007. The remainder of
revenues for the EMEA region in 2008 originated mainly from the
following countries: the United Kingdom, France, Switzerland,
the Netherlands, Italy and Russia.
The Americas Region
34% (2007: 35%) of our 2008 total revenues were recognized
in the Americas region. Revenues increased by 8% to
3,880 million in 2008. Revenues from the United
States grew by 6% in 2008, which represents a growth of 15% from
changes in volumes and prices and a 9% decrease from currency
effects. The United States contributed 74% (2007: 76%) of our
total revenues in the Americas region. The rest of the Americas
region increased revenues by 14% to 990 million,
which represents growth of 19% from changes in volumes and
prices
75
and a 5% decrease from currency effects. These revenues were
principally generated in Canada, Brazil and Mexico.
The APJ Region
In 2008, the Asia Pacific Japan region contributed 13% (2007:
12%) of our total revenues, with most of this revenue being
derived mainly from the following major contributing countries:
Japan, Australia, India, China and South Korea. In the Asia
Pacific Japan region, revenues rose by 17% to
1,489 million in 2008. Japan increased by 15% to
515 million, which represents 35% (2007: 35%) of
total revenues in the Asia Pacific Japan region. The revenue
growth in Japan reflects a 6% increase from changes in volumes
and prices and a 9% increase from currency effects. The rest of
the Asia Pacific Japan region (Japan excluded) increased
revenues by 18%, which represents a growth of 26% from changes
in volumes and prices and an 8% decrease from currency effects.
Revenue by Industry
In 2008, our revenue grew in all six industry sectors. Total
revenue increased 13%
year-over-year.
Sectors in which our growth was greater than average included
Public Services, in which we achieved a 20% increase to
1,059 million in 2008. Our growth in Services was
also stronger than average: Revenue in this sector increased 14%
over the year to 2,706 million. We did slightly less
well in the Process Industry sector, where our revenue grew 10%,
and in Discrete Manufacturing, where our revenue grew 9%.
Operating Profit and
Operating Margin (IFRS)
Total Operating
Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of software and software-related services
|
|
|
−1,743
|
|
|
|
−1,350
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
Cost of professional services and other services
|
|
|
−2,285
|
|
|
|
−2,091
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Research and development
|
|
|
−1,627
|
|
|
|
−1,461
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
−2,546
|
|
|
|
−2,173
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
General and administration
|
|
|
−624
|
|
|
|
−499
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
−60
|
|
|
|
−2
|
|
|
|
>100
|
%
|
Other operating income/expense, net
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
−39
|
%
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
−8,874
|
|
|
|
−7,558
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
Operating Profit and
Operating Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
million, except for operating margin
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
2,701
|
|
|
|
2,698
|
|
|
0%
|
Operating Margin in %
|
|
|
23.3
|
|
|
|
26.3
|
|
|
−3.0pp
|
As a result of our acquisition of Business Objects in January
2008, our operating profit and operating margin numbers for 2008
and 2007 are not fully comparable.
Despite our response to the effects of the financial and
economic crisis of introducing cost-saving measures, which
resulted in a saving of more than 200 million in the
final quarter of 2008, our total operating expenses for 2008
increased to 8,874 million compared to
7,558 million in 2007, representing an increase of
76
1,316 million or 17%. As described below, the main
driver for this increase was the acquisition of Business Objects.
Cost of Software and
Software-Related Services
The cost of software and software-related services increased
from 1,350 million in 2007 to
1,743 million in 2008, or by 29%, which was mainly
due the acquisition of Business Objects, but also due to the
expansion of support resources, 32 million relating
to license disputes and increased expenses for third-party
license fees. As a percentage of software and software-related
service revenue, cost of software and software-related services
increased from 18% in 2007 to 21% in 2008.
Overall, the workforce in this area increased from 5,965 FTEs in
2007 to 6,466 FTEs in 2008, representing an increase of 8%. The
support organization has continued its efforts to improve the
efficiency of our processes by moving into low-cost locations
(Bulgaria, China and India). Approximately 24% of our global
support resources were based in the low-cost locations at the
end of 2008, which is an increase of 2 percentage points
compared to 2007.
Cost of Professional
Services and Other Services
Cost of professional services and other services rose from
2,091 million in 2007 to 2,285 million in
2008, or 9%. As a percentage of professional services and other
services revenue, cost of professional services and other
service revenue decreased by one percentage point to 75%. The
lower cost increase compared to a slightly higher revenue growth
led to a positive professional services and other services
margin development in 2008, although that improvement was mainly
offset by increased costs resulting from our focused efforts to
rapidly integrate the Business Objects professional services
activities into our service portfolio. These increased costs
negatively influenced our professional services and other
services margin by 1.4 percentage points.
The increase in cost of professional services and other services
was also due to increased personnel expenses, resulting from the
integration of Business Objects employees.
Research and
Development
R&D expenses in 2008 increased by 11% to
1,627 million compared to 1,461 million in
2007. As a percentage of total revenue, research and development
expenses were 14% in 2008, which is consistent with 2007.
Our R&D expenses in 2008 increased mainly due to
incremental headcount. The number of development employees
increased by 2,596 FTE, or 20%, to 15,547 FTE as of
December 31, 2008, primarily due to the Business Objects
acquisition.
Sales and Marketing
Sales and marketing expenses increased from
2,173 million in 2007 to 2,546 million in
2008 or 17%. As a percentage of total revenue, sales and
marketing expenses rose slightly from 21% in 2007 to 22% in
2008. The cost increase resulted primarily from the 2,391 FTE,
or 29%, additional headcount adding up to 10,701 FTE. Of these,
2,184 FTE were integrated into our organization as a result of
the acquisition of Business Objects.
General and
Administration
General and administration (G&A) expenses increased from
499 million in 2007 to 624 million in
2008. This represents an increase of 25%. This increase was
driven by increased personnel expenses and other headcount
related costs mainly due to the acquisition of Business Objects.
As a percentage of total revenue, G&A expenses remained
flat from 2008 at 5% compared to 2007.
77
The number of G&A employees increased by 447 FTE, or 16%,
to 3,244 FTE in 2008. As in the prior year, we continued to
expand our shared service centers in all regions to support
efficient growth in this area.
Operating Profit
Our operating profit grew slightly to 2,701 million
(2007: 2,698 million), which was not as great a
percentage increase as the percentage increase in our total
revenue. This was primarily caused by the slowdown in revenue
growth brought about by the financial and economic crisis, the
35 million cost associated with acquiring Business
Objects, and the discontinuation of the activities of
TomorrowNow.
Operating Margin
At 23.3%, our operating margin, which is the ratio, expressed as
a percentage, of operating profit to total revenue, was
3.0 percentage points lower than in the previous year
(2007: 26.3%). Despite our thorough cost-containment measures in
the final quarter of 2008, our operating margin decreased
because the increase in our total revenue in 2008 was more than
offset by the increase in operating expenses and
acquisition-related charges in connection with the Business
Objects acquisition.
Segment Discussions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in %
|
Product Segment
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
millions, unless otherwise stated
|
|
|
|
|
External revenue
|
|
|
8,366
|
|
|
|
7,369
|
|
|
14
|
Segment expenses
|
|
|
−3,655
|
|
|
|
−3,062
|
|
|
19
|
Segment contribution
|
|
|
4,711
|
|
|
|
4,307
|
|
|
9
|
Segment profitability
|
|
|
56
|
%
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
|
−2pp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in %
|
Consulting Segment
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
External revenue
|
|
|
2,824
|
|
|
|
2,369
|
|
|
19
|
Segment expenses
|
|
|
−2,040
|
|
|
|
−1,738
|
|
|
17
|
Segment contribution
|
|
|
784
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
24
|
Segment profitability
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
1pp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in %
|
Training Segment
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
External revenue
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
6
|
Segment expenses
|
|
|
−300
|
|
|
|
−284
|
|
|
6
|
Segment contribution
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
8
|
Segment profitability
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
1pp
|
Product Segment
Product segment revenue increased by 14% from
7,369 million in 2007 to 8,366 million in
2008, of which approximately 850 million was due to
acquisitions. The increase was driven by an increase in customer
licensing of our software solutions, which in turn contributed
to an increase in support revenue. This growth reflects a 17%
increase from changes in volumes and prices and a 3% decrease
from currency effects. Approximately 98% of revenue within the
product segment is derived from software and software-related
service revenue. Approximately 2% of revenue within the product
segment is derived from non-software related transactions (e.g.,
professional services, other services, and other revenues)
initiated by employees of the product segment. Software revenue,
as a part of the total product segment revenue increased by 3%
from 3,269 million in 2007 to
78
3,356 million in 2008. This growth reflects a 7%
increase from changes in volumes and prices and a 4% decrease
from currency effects. Support revenue increased by 23% from
3,737 million in 2007 to 4,596 million in
2008. This growth reflects a 27% increase from changes in
volumes and prices and a 4% decrease from currency effects.
Subscription and other software-related service revenue
increased by 42% from 181 million in 2007 to
257 million in 2008.
Product segment expenses increased by 19% from
3,062 million in 2007 to 3,655 million in
2008. Expenses from the sales line of business account for about
half of the entire product segment expenses, while expenses from
the marketing line of business account for roughly 20% and
expenses from the service and support line of business account
for roughly 30% of overall product segment expenses. The
increase in product segment expenses results mainly from
headcount growth of roughly 20%, predominantly due to the
acquisition of Business Objects.
Product segment contribution increased by 9% from
4,307 million in 2007 to 4,711 million in
2008, or 56% of total segment revenue compared to 58% of total
segment revenue in 2007.
Consulting Segment
Consulting segment revenue increased by 19% from
2,369 million in 2007 to 2,824 million in
2008. Of this increase, 131 million was due to
acquisitions. This growth reflects a 24% increase from changes
in volumes and prices and a 5% decrease from currency effects.
Consulting segment expenses increased by 17% from
1,738 million in 2007 to 2,040 million in
2008. Consulting segment contribution increased by 24% from
631 million in 2007 to 784 million in
2008. Consulting segment profitability increased by
1 percentage point to 28%.
Geographically EMEA, Americas and APJ have all contributed to
the growth in our consulting segment revenue while increased
demand has been managed through a 10% increase in resources,
predominantly in the global delivery organization which accounts
for 30% of this headcount increase, and the newly introduced
global hubs which have a focus on strategic solutions and
industries. In addition to this increase in workforce,
customer-related third party delivery costs have increased 3% to
support the revenue growth. This growth reflects a 6% increase
from changes in volumes and prices and 3% decrease from currency
effects.
Training Segment
Training segment revenue was 525 million in 2008,
which represents an increase of 6% from 493 million
in 2007. This growth reflects an 11% increase from changes in
volumes and prices and a 5% decrease from currency effects. The
primary driver of this growth was traditional classroom
training, where revenue growth of 16% was achieved. Revenue in
the other sectors, such as academy and certification, customer
specific training and
e-learning,
experienced marginal growth.
Of the 525 million training segment revenue
recognized in 2008, 39 million resulted from
businesses acquired in 2008. Of the core SAP business, before
acquisitions, EMEA and APJ grew 6% and 18% respectively, while
the Americas decreased by 18% from 192 million to
158 million. North America shrank by 22%,
counteracting the 4% growth shown in Latin America.
Training segment expenses increased from 284 million
in 2007 to 300 million in 2008, or 6% mainly due to
acquisition-related headcount growth.
Training segment contribution increased by 8% from
209 million in 2007 to 225 million in
2008. Training segment margin increased by 1 percentage
point to 43%.
79
Financial Income, Net
In 2008, we incurred significantly higher finance costs than in
2007 due to an additional acquisition-related bank loan that was
taken out in connection with the Business Objects acquisition.
Our finance income/cost, net declined by approximately 138% in
2008, resulting in a net finance cost of 51 million.
(2007: 135 million net finance income). Consequently,
our financial income, net decreased from a net financial income
of 124 million in 2007 to a net financial expense of
50 million in 2008.
Income Tax
Our effective tax rate decreased in 2008 to 29.6% from the
previous years 32.4%. The decrease in our effective tax
rate and the corresponding income tax expense in 2008 mainly
results from a reduction of the German corporate income tax rate
from 25% to 15% and from a reduction of trade tax under the 2008
German Business Tax Reform, effective January 1, 2008. See
Note 11 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for more
information on income tax.
OUTLOOK
Future Trends in the
Global Economy
Many analysts agree that the nascent global upturn will continue
in 2010. The reasons they give are the recovery on the financial
markets and the return of consumer confidence in response, for
example, to measures by governments in many countries to support
and stimulate the economy.
However, they say the recovery is weak in the advanced economies
and will not gain substantial momentum even in 2011. Output in
the advanced economies at the end of 2011 will still be below
pre-crisis levels. This recovery will therefore be slower than
those of the past, they conclude. Nonetheless, the International
Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Organisation for Economic
Co-operation and Development (OECD) have revised their
projections upward in their latest reports, as compared with
their forecasts at the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2009.
In comparison, the emerging and developing economies are moving
ahead strongly, they say. In these countries, the IMF predicts
mid-range single-digit percentage growth in 2010 and even
greater progress in 2011, driven chiefly by high levels of
domestic demand. Major Swiss bank Credit Suisse sees
particularly good prospects for Brazil, China, Korea, and India.
In sum, global economic growth in 2010 will not match previous
periods of recovery, according to the European Central Bank
(ECB). In the view of the ECB, sustained global growth will come
not from temporary measures such as government stimulus packages
but from a continued improvement in funding conditions.
Some growth is expected in the economies of the Europe, Middle
East, and Africa (EMEA) region, but it is thought it will remain
in the lower single-digit range until 2011 and output will stay
below pre-crisis levels until then. The ECB says investment
activity will continue to decline during this period, though at
a progressively slower rate.
In the euro area, the situation remains problematic, because
high unemployment is holding back consumer spending and
compromising confidence in economic recovery, companies are
struggling with underutilization of capacity, and government
stimulus packages are only temporary. Nonetheless, growing
overseas demand, notably in the emerging economies of Asia, is
reviving export sales. What is true for the euro area is true
for Germany in particular: The German economy is expanding
appreciably in 2010, but not as strongly as in previous times of
recovery.
The countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the Middle East,
and Africa are said to be faring better. Credit Suisse, for
example, is more optimistic than it was: It projects low
single-digit percentage growth for 2010,
80
and expects a stronger recovery in 2011. Petroleum-exporting
countries may even benefit substantially from rising oil prices
in 2010, it believes.
The signs are that the economy is also recovering in the
Americas region in 2010. Whereas Latin America can expect growth
in the middle of the single-digit range, the upturn in North
America will prove to be modest, according to Credit Suisse. The
U.S. economy is making progress, thanks primarily to the
growth of demand in Asia. The steps taken to stimulate the
economy are also proving successful, because according to the
OECD the financial sector is recuperating and the housing market
is stabilizing. The United Nations (UN) believes the United
States will see growth near the bottom of the single-digit
percentage range in 2010, and Credit Suisse also expects
economic growth to be unusually slow for the beginning of a
recovery.
The Asia Pacific region is an example of the difference in
performance between emerging and developing economies on the one
hand and advanced economies on the other. The IMF notes that
emerging economies, most notably India and China, are in the
vanguard of the global recovery, even though growth is slower
than it was before the crisis. Credit Suisse expects high
single-digit growth rates, reflecting another increase in
domestic demand and double-digit percentage export growth.
On the other hand, the OECD and the UN report that the upturn in
the advanced economies, such as Japan, is not expected to be
strong. Japan is benefiting from an increase in demand from
emerging economies in Asia, but domestic demand remains weak
despite government stimulus measures. The prospects for 2011 are
no better, according to Credit Suisse.
Whether these predictions turn out to be right depends chiefly
on whether governments continue to take stimulative measures,
the analysts say. Ending such measures too soon would jeopardize
the recovery. Only the OECD urges that the stimulus packages
should not be continued much longer because it believes
withdrawing them would signal the end of the crisis.
The predictions are also subject to changes and trends in levels
of unemployment and consumer spending, oil and other commodity
prices, the health of the financial sector, and the strength of
the euro. Recovery may be quicker or slower, depending on which
way these factors affect confidence in the economy. Taken
together, analysts see these risks as balancing one another.
IT Market Outlook
for 2010
The IT market will be distinctly more positive in 2010 than in
2009, say analysts. They only differ in their views on the
extent of the recovery. UBS, a major Swiss bank, foresees growth
in the high single-digit percentage range in 2010. This is a
downward revision from its earlier projections: Because the
market was better than expected in 2009, it believes there is
now less potential for 2010. IT market analysis firm
International Data Corporation (IDC) is more circumspect,
and expects market growth to be in the low single-digit range.
Investment bank Goldman Sachs expects a slow improvement in the
advanced economies but not enough to make up the
ground lost in 2009. It believes there may be double-digit
growth in the emerging economies.
In any event, the IT industry will profit this year from the
internal cost-saving measures implemented during the crisis and
enter the economic recovery with lower internal costs. This is
based on the assumption that the IT industry will be able to
avoid significant cost increases resulting, for example, from
new hirings or rehirings, during recovery. These companies will
then be able to improve their liquidity for greater resilience
against any renewed deterioration in the economic climate.
The driver of recovery in 2010 is expected to be the hardware
sector, because many companies are replacing or upgrading their
hardware. But many will also invest in new software, so the
analysts are also optimistic about the software market in 2010.
Goldman Sachs considers that software companies which launched
new solutions or versions in 2009 have the best prospects.
The most important software trend in 2010, and the one with the
most robust chances for the future, is software as a service
(SaaS), according to Goldman Sachs. SaaS is a delivery model in
which customers access the
81
software they use from an Internet server, committing only very
limited investments of their own. Goldman Sachs expects
companies that offer SaaS to grow twice as quickly as others. It
also believes mergers and acquisitions will consolidate the
suppliers in the SaaS market over the next two to three years.
As hardware companies seek to add service offerings to their
portfolio in 2010, the software services segment will also see
more mergers and acquisitions, according to UBS. In consequence,
it believes competition will stiffen in the services market, and
that this will hold back growth in that segment. Current
contracts in the services segment still include low-budget
contracts from the crisis year, 2009.
IDC expects a recovery in small steps in the EMEA region in 2010
and 2011. This area can benefit from its existing technological
landscape as a launch pad for expansion. However, recovery is
expected to progress slowly in Western Europe: Prices are still
under great pressure, and customers are reluctant to invest. IDC
forecasts that in Germany, for example, spending growth in all
segments of the IT market will be in the low single-digit
percentage range. In Central and Eastern Europe and the Middle
East, however, it expects that once the economic climate
improves, there will be a much faster recovery in 2010.
IDC predicts that in 2010 the IT market in the Americas region
will also recuperate from the crisis. In view of the
unexpectedly positive economic trend at the end of 2009, IDC is
even more optimistic now than it was last year, and expects
single-digit expansion of all segments in the IT market.
Goldman Sachs believes prospects are especially good in the
United States. It expects IT spending to grow more quickly than
previously forecast, although companies will remain cautious
about investing. IDC shares this view and forecasts modest
single-digit expansion. In the software segment, cloud computing
and SaaS are expected to provide vigorous revenue and profit
growth. The software segment is also expected to benefit from
the anticipated replacement of old hardware at many companies.
A slight expansion of the IT market has been apparent in the
Asia Pacific region since the end of 2009, and is expected to
gain momentum in 2010. The emerging and advanced economies are
expected still to show very different rates of recovery. IDC
believes the IT markets in the emerging economies, especially in
China and India, will expand by high single-digit or possibly
double-digit percentages in 2010. IDC notes that advanced
economies most notably Japan, which depends heavily
on exports are still laboring through the crisis. It
expects only a limited recovery in the software services
segment, and possibly further contraction in the software and
hardware segments. This is because although industrial
production is beginning to grow again there, unemployment
remains high and consumer confidence low, impeding vigorous
economic recovery.
All analysis of the IT market is based on the assumption that it
will develop in a similar way as the economy as a whole. Whether
matters develop as described depends on whether the underlying
predictions about the progress of the economy are right. In
particular, for the IT sector it depends on whether government
stimulus packages continue and whether they are effective in
increasing consumer demand.
FORECAST FOR SAP
Strategic
Perspectives
SAP strives to enable growth across businesses,
across industries, across entire economies and an
enhanced level of optimization for value chains. Our ambition is
to make businesses and institutions around the world more
efficient and effective, thus allowing them to take on the
challenge of achieving clarity within the enterprise. To do
that, we strive to deliver performance optimization
not only for our customers, but for their entire business
network.
Our strategy is to deliver superior software applications,
services, and a global ecosystem that enable closed-loop
performance optimization for companies of all sizes, thereby
helping them to drive sustainable, profitable growth. We intend
to help our customers achieve performance optimization by
delivering solution and technology excellence, creating a more
holistic customer experience, and enhancing our ecosystem to
deliver whole solutions.
82
Delivering Solution
and Technology Excellence
SAP plans to evolve its tightly integrated packaged applications
to ease adoption through increased modularity. Specifically, we
intend to augment our extensible business process platform with
point solutions that address specific industry or line of
business needs, create a complementary information platform and
performance optimization capabilities, deliver business process
modeling capabilities to enable customers to develop their own
solutions, and provide a scalable on-demand platform to ease
deployment and consumption of new solutions.
Creating a More
Holistic Customer Experience
SAP intends to develop the business model to more effectively
support the
end-to-end
requirements of our customers, which includes delivering
solutions focused on the needs of the lines of business and
business users, providing new software purchasing models which
align to the budgetary concerns of our customers, and continuing
to cultivate and protect our relationship with our existing
customers.
SAP intends to increase the level of engagement with the
ecosystem to deliver
end-to-end
customer value with whole solutions. We believe that
these whole solutions will bring together SAP solutions with
partner offerings and broader community resources. In doing so,
we will enable our ecosystem to effectively leverage the SAP
platforms and hence create joint monetization and revenue
opportunities.
Organic Growth and
Targeted Acquisitions
Our strategy remains primarily focused on organic growth. As a
result, we will continue to invest in product development work
of our own, along with our investment in infrastructure, sales,
and marketing. Our platform strategy also enables us to leverage
the innovative potential of our partners for the use of our
customers. In addition we expect to continue to make targeted
acquisitions to improve our coverage in key strategic fields.
Operational Targets
for 2010 (Non-IFRS)
We are providing the following outlook for 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
We expect non-IFRS software and software-related service revenue
to increase in the range 4% to 8% at constant currencies in 2010
(2009: 8.2 billion).
|
|
|
|
We expect the non-IFRS operating margin to be in the range 30%
to 31% at constant currencies in 2010 (2009: 27.4%).
|
|
|
|
We project a corresponding increase in our operating profit.
|
|
|
|
We project an effective tax rate of 27.5% to 28.5% (based on
IFRS) for 2010 (2009: 28.1%).
|
|
|
|
If the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders so resolves, in
2010 we will pay a dividend that provides a payout ratio of
approximately 34%.
|
|
|
|
Excepting acquisitions, our planned capital expenditures for
2010 will be covered in full by operating cash flow and will
chiefly be spent on completing new office buildings at various
locations as well as on IT equipment.
|
Among the premises on which this outlook is based are those
presented concerning economic conditions and our expectation
that we will not benefit from any positive effects in 2010 from
a major acquisition.
83
Medium-Term
Perspectives
We expect our business, our revenue, and our profit to grow,
assuming there is a sustained recovery in the financial markets
and assuming the current financial crisis does not result in
longer-term consequences. Our strategy is to increase software
and software-related service revenue, which comprises software
and maintenance revenue and subscriptions and other
software-related services, while also increasing our operating
margin through greater efficiency across all sales channels,
services, the support infrastructure, and research and
development. We intend to achieve a non-IFRS operating margin of
35% in the mid-term.
We are seeing significant structural changes in the enterprise
software space, and with anticipated change comes opportunity.
Our objective is to bring to our customers the best business
solutions, leveraging all relevant technology innovations and do
this so that they are as reliable and easy to consume as
possible.
We understand our customers want stability from the core
business suite and lower cost to operate. As a result, we will
continue our focus on innovation, and making our solutions more
affordable and easier to use. We will continue innovating on
multiple fronts, providing capabilities that are modular, which
can be deployed side by side with the solutions that customers
can already run. We intend to meet our promise of true value
delivery to our customers.
FOREIGN CURRENCY
EXCHANGE RATE EXPOSURE
Although our reporting currency is the euro, a significant
portion of our business is conducted in currencies other than
the euro. Movements in the exchange rates between the euro and
the foreign currencies that many of our subsidiaries operate in
may materially affect our business, financial position, income
or cash flows. For additional information on foreign currencies,
see Notes 3, 25 and 26 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements in Item 18. Financial Statements.
Approximately 64% of our consolidated revenue in 2009 and
approximately 64% in 2008 was attributable to operations in
non-euro participating countries. As a result, those revenues
had to be translated into euros for financial reporting
purposes. Fluctuations in the value of the euro had a favorable
impact on our total revenue of 18 million and our
profit after tax of 1 million, whereas the euro had
unfavorable impacts on our profit before tax of
12 million for 2009, and had unfavorable impacts on
our total revenue of 402 million, profit before tax
of 141 million and profit after tax of
122 million for 2008.
The impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations
discussed in the preceding paragraph is calculated by
translating current period figures in local currency to euros at
the monthly average exchange rate for the corresponding month in
the prior year. Our revenue analysis, included within the
Operating Results, section of this Item 5,
discusses at times increases and decreases due to currency
effects, which are calculated in the same manner.
LIQUIDITY AND
CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our primary source of cash, cash equivalents and current
investments are funds generated from our business operations.
Over the past several years, our principal use of cash has been
to support continuing operations and our capital expenditure
requirements resulting from our growth, to pay dividends on our
shares, to buy back SAP shares in the open market and to acquire
businesses. Cash, cash equivalents and current investments are
primarily held in euros and U.S. dollars as at
December 31, 2009.
We use global centralized financial management to control liquid
assets as well as monitor exposure to interest rates and
currencies with the goal of maintaining adequate liquidity for
the SAP Group. High levels of liquid assets and marketable
securities provide a strategic reserve, helping keep SAP
flexible, sound, and independent. In September 2009, we replaced
our existing 1 billion syndicated credit facility,
which was scheduled to mature in November 2009. The new
syndicated credit facility amounts to 1.5 billion and
has a
84
maturity of 3 years (scheduled to mature in September
2012). This facility and our other bilateral lines of credit are
currently available for additional liquidity if required.
We believe that our liquidity is sufficient to meet our present
operational needs and, together with expected cash flows from
operations, will support our currently planned capital
expenditure requirements for the next twelve months. However,
given the current uncertain economic environment, there can be
no assurance that a further downturn in the economy worldwide,
in a particular region, or in demand for our products and
services in general, will not have a material adverse impact on
our liquidity.
To complement or expand our business in the future, we have made
and expect to make acquisitions of businesses, products and
technologies, and to enter into joint venture arrangements.
These acquisitions and joint venture arrangements may require
additional financing.
Due to the current global economic conditions and the credit
markets in particular, refinancing conditions have become more
difficult. Therefore, we monitor funding options available in
the capital markets and trends in the availability of funds, as
well as the cost of such funding. Depending on our future cash
needs and future market conditions, we might issue debt
instruments available to us with a view to maintaining financial
flexibility and limiting repayment risk.
Analysis of Total
Net Group Liquidity
Total group liquidity consists of cash and cash equivalents
(e.g. cash at banks, highly liquid investments with original
maturity of three months or less, money market funds and time
deposits), restricted cash and current investments (e.g.
investments with original maturities of greater than three
months and remaining maturities of less than one year) as
reported in our IFRS Consolidated Financial Statements.
Total financial debt consists of current (e.g. overdrafts and
current bank loans) and non-current bank liabilities (e.g.
private placements and long-term bank loans).
Total net group liquidity results from total group liquidity
less total financial debt. Total net group liquidity should be
considered in addition to, and not as a substitute to cash and
cash equivalents, other financial assets and financial
liabilities included in the Consolidated Financial Statements as
presented in accordance with IFRS.
The table below presents our total group liquidity, total
financial debt and total net group liquidity as of
December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change in %
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,884
|
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Current
investments(1)
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total group
liquidity(2)
|
|
|
2,284
|
|
|
|
1,662
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Current bank loans
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2,319
|
|
|
|
−100
|
|
Non-current bank loans
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
>100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial debt
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
2,321
|
|
|
|
−70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net group liquidity/debt
|
|
|
1,581
|
|
|
|
−659
|
|
|
|
>100
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Current investments are included
within other financial assets on the statement of financial
position.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Total group liquidity mainly
consisted of amounts held in U.S. dollars (approximately
153 million) and in euro (approximately
1,532 million) as of December 31, 2009.
|
The increase in total group liquidity from 2008 was mainly due
to proceeds from our operations. The decrease in total financial
debt from 2008 was mainly due to the repayment of our
outstanding credit facility in connection with the Business
Objects acquisition, which was partially offset by the issuance
of private placement transactions in 2009.
85
Regarding the impact of cash and cash equivalents, current
investments as well as our bank loans on our income statements
see an analysis of our finance income, net in the section,
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects Finance Income, net.
Analysis of
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Change in %
|
|
|
Change in %
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009 vs. 2008
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
3,015
|
|
|
|
2,158
|
|
|
|
1,932
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
−299
|
|
|
|
−3,766
|
|
|
|
−1,391
|
|
|
|
−92
|
|
|
|
>100
|
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities
|
|
|
−2,166
|
|
|
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
−1,287
|
|
|
|
>−100
|
|
|
|
>100
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by
857 million or 40% in 2009 over 2008 mainly
attributable to effective management of our working capital. On
the other hand, the average collection period, which is measured
in days sales outstanding, or DSO (defined as average number of
days from revenue recognition to cash receipt from the customer)
increased from 71 days in 2008 to 79 days in 2009,
mainly as a result of the difficult economic environment in
2009, which led to an extension of payment terms and more late
payments. Net cash used in investing activities decreased
significantly from 3,766 million in 2008 to
299 million in 2009. The prior year figure resulted
mainly from our acquisition of Business Objects. In 2009 we
invested 225 million in our technology and business
infrastructure by purchasing intangible assets and property,
plant and equipment, a significant portion of which represented
the purchase of vehicles, IT hardware and the cost of
constructing office buildings. Net cash used in financing
activities decreased by 3,447 million mainly due to
repayment of the credit facility we entered into in connection
with our acquisition of Business Objects. In addition, we issued
private placement transactions (Schuldschein)
totaling 697 million. The dividend distributed in
2009 was 594 million, unchanged since the previous
year (2008: 594 million). We did not buy back any
shares for treasury in 2009 (2008: 487 million).
Although profit after tax decreased slightly compared to
2007 net cash provided by operating activities increased by
226 million or 12% in 2008 over 2007. This was mainly
attributable to effective management of our working capital. Net
cash used in investing activities increased significantly from
1,391 million in 2007 to 3,766 million in
2008 mainly due to our acquisition of Business Objects in 2008.
Also, in 2008 we invested 339 million in our
technology and business infrastructure by purchasing intangible
assets and property, plant and equipment, a significant portion
of which represented the cost of constructing office buildings,
the purchase of vehicles and IT hardware. Net cash provided by
financing activities increased by 2,568 million
mainly due to proceeds from the credit facility we entered into
in connection with our acquisition of Business Objects, but also
due to decreased spending on purchases of treasury stock (2008:
487 million; 2007: 1,005 million). The
dividend distribution in 2008 was 594 million, an
increase of 7% compared to the previous year (2007: 556).
Credit Lines
We are party to a revolving 1.5 billion syndicated
credit facility agreement with an initial term of 3 years
ending in September 2012. The use of the facility is not
restricted by any financial covenants. Potential proceeds are
for general corporate purposes. Borrowings under the facility
bear interest of EURIBOR or LIBOR for the respective currency
plus a margin ranging from 1.10% to 1.60% depending on the
amount drawn. We are also required to pay a commitment fee of
0.44% per annum on unused amounts of the available credit. We
entered into this credit facility to replace our existing credit
facility which matured in November 2009. The facility amount was
increased from 1 billion to 1.5 billion,
which further enhances our financial flexibility. We did not,
however, draw down the facility in 2009, neither did we ever
draw down on the previous facility, nor do we
86
currently intend to use the new facility. Consequently, there
were no borrowings outstanding under the facility as at
December 31, 2009.
As at December 31, 2009, SAP AG had additional available
lines of credit totaling approximately 545 million.
As at December 31, 2009, there were no borrowings
outstanding under these lines of credit. Furthermore, certain of
our foreign subsidiaries have lines of credit available that
allow them to borrow funds in their respective local currencies
at prevailing interest rates, generally to the extent SAP AG has
guaranteed such amounts. As at December 31, 2009,
approximately 51 million was available through such
arrangements. Total aggregate borrowings of our foreign
subsidiaries amounted to 6 million as at
December 31, 2009.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET
ARRANGEMENTS
Several entities of the SAP Group have entered into operating
leases for office facilities, computer hardware and certain
other equipment. These arrangements are sometimes referred to as
a form of off-balance sheet financing. Rental expenses under
these operating leases are set forth below under
Contractual Obligations. We believe we do not have
other forms of material off-balance sheet arrangements that
would require disclosure other than those already disclosed.
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS
The table below presents our on- and off-balance sheet
contractual obligations as of December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than
|
|
Contractual obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
1-3 years
|
|
|
3-5 years
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
Short-term debt
obligations(1)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Long-term debt
obligations(1)
|
|
|
778
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Operating lease
obligations(2)
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
Purchase
obligations(3)
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Other long-term liabilities reflected on the statement of
financial
positions(4)
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,833
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
807
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
This represents bank loans and
interest thereon.
|
|
(2)
|
|
See Note 23 to our
consolidated financial statements for additional information
about operating lease obligations and the related rental expense.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Purchase obligations represent
agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable
and legally binding on us that specify all significant terms,
including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed,
minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing
of the transaction. The outstanding obligations include the
construction of facilities, office equipment and car purchase
commitments, food and security services and other facility
commitments.
|
|
|
|
Our expected contributions to our
pension and other post employment benefit plans are not included
in the table above. We expect to contribute in 2010 statutory
minimum and discretionary amounts of 1 million to our
German defined benefit plans and 31 million to our
foreign defined benefit plans, all of which are expected to be
paid as cash contributions. Our contributions to our German and
foreign defined contribution plans have ranged from
91 million to 132 million in 2007 through
2009; we expect similar contributions to be made in 2010. See
Note 19a to our Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional information on estimated future pension benefits to
be paid.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Amounts mainly consist of
employee-related liabilities (12 million) derivatives
(27 million) and deferred rent
(33 million). Not included in the table are
non-current tax payables of 239 million, which
include provisions for uncertainties in income taxes. Other
noncurrent liabilities on the statement of financial position
such as pension and other post employment
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
benefit liabilities, deferred
compensation, deferred income and deferred tax liabilities are
not included in this table. For additional information on
liabilities see Notes 18 and 19b to our Consolidated
Financial Statements.
|
We expect to meet these contractual obligations with existing
cash and our cash flows from operations. The timing of payments
for the above contractual obligations is based on payment
schedules for those obligations where set payments exist. For
other obligations with no set payment schedules, estimates as to
the most likely timing of cash payments have been made. The
ultimate timing of these future cash flows may differ from these
estimates.
Obligations under
Indemnifications and Guarantees
Our software license agreements generally include certain
provisions for indemnifying customers against liabilities if our
software products infringe a third partys intellectual
property rights. In addition, we occasionally provide function
or performance guarantees in routine consulting contracts and
development arrangements. We also generally provide a six to
twelve month warranty on our software. Our warranty liability is
included in other provisions. For more information on other
provisions see Note 19b to our Consolidated Financial
Statements. For more information on obligations and contingent
liabilities refer to Note 3 and Note 23 in our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
RESEARCH AND
DEVELOPMENT
For information on our R&D activities see
Item 4. Information about SAP Research
and Development. For information on our R&D costs see
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects Operating Results and for
information related to our R&D employees see Item 6.
Directors, Senior Management and Employees
Employees.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING
ESTIMATES
Our Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared based on the
accounting policies described in Note 3 to our Consolidated
Financial Statements in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F.
The application of such policies requires management to make
judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application
of policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities,
revenues and expenses in our Consolidated Financial Statements.
We base our judgments, estimates and assumptions on historical
and forecast information, as well as regional and industry
economic conditions in which we or our customers operate,
changes to which could adversely affect our estimates. Although
we believe we have made reasonable estimates about the ultimate
resolution of the underlying uncertainties, no assurance can be
given that the final outcome of these matters will be consistent
with what is reflected in our assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses. Actual results could differ from original estimates.
The accounting policies that most frequently require us to make
judgments, estimates, and assumptions, and therefore are
critical to understanding our results of operations, are:
|
|
|
|
|
revenue recognition;
|
|
|
|
valuation of trade receivable;
|
|
|
|
accounting for share-based compensation;
|
|
|
|
accounting for income tax;
|
|
|
|
business combinations;
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
subsequent accounting for goodwill and other intangibles;
|
|
|
|
accounting for legal contingencies; and
|
|
|
|
recognition of internally generated intangible assets from
development.
|
Our management periodically discusses these critical accounting
policies with the Audit Committee of the Supervisory Board. See
Note 3c to our Consolidated Financial Statements for
further discussion on our critical accounting estimates and
critical accounting policies.
NEW ACCOUNTING
STANDARDS NOT YET ADOPTED
See Note 3e to our Consolidated Financial Statements for
our discussion on new accounting standards not yet adopted.
89
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
DIRECTORS,
SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
|
SUPERVISORY BOARD
The current members of the Supervisory Board of SAP AG, each
members principal occupation, the year in which each was
first elected and the year in which the term of each expires,
respectively, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
Term
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Principal Occupation
|
|
Elected
|
|
Expires
|
|
Prof. Dr. h.c. mult. Hasso Plattner,
Chairman(1)(2)(4)(6)(7)(8)(11)
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
Chairman of the Supervisory Board
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pekka
Ala-Pietilä(1)(7)(8)(11)
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Co-founder and CEO Blyk Ltd.
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Prof. Dr. Wilhelm
Haarmann(1)(2)(4)(5)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Attorney at Law, Certified Public Auditor and Certified Tax
Advisor; HAARMANN Partnerschaftsgesellschaft,
Rechtsanwälte, Steuerberater, Wirtschaftsprüfer
|
|
|
1988
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Bernard
Liautaud(7)(12)
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
General Partner, Balderton Capital
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Dr. h.c. Hartmut
Mehdorn(1)(5)(6)
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
Independent Consultant
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr. h.c. mult. Dr.-Ing. E.h. mult. Joachim
Milberg(1)(2)(3)(4)(7)(8)
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
Chairman of the Supervisory Board of BMW AG
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Dr. Erhard
Schipporeit(1)(3)(10)(11)
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
Management Consultant
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr.-Ing. E.h. Klaus
Wucherer(1)(7)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
Managing Director of Dr. Klaus Wucherer Innovations- und
Technologieberatung GmbH
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Lars Lamadé, Vice
Chairman(4)(6)(9)
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
Employee, Project Manager Service & Support
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Thomas
Bamberger(3)(9)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Employee, Chief Operating Officer Global Service & Support
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Panagiotis
Bissiritsas(2)(5)(9)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Employee, Support Expert
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Willi
Burbach(4)(7)(9)
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Employee, Developer
|
|
|
1993
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Peter
Koop(4)(7)(9)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Employee, Industry Business Development Expert
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Christiane
Kuntz-Mayr(7)(13)
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Employee, Deputy Chairperson of the Works Council of SAP AG
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Dr. Gerhard
Maier(2)(3)(9)
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Employee, Development Project Manager
|
|
|
1989
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Stefan
Schulz(5)(6)(7)(9)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Employee, Development Project Manager
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Elected by SAP AGs
shareholders on May 10, 2007.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Member of the Compensation
Committee.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Member of the Audit Committee.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Member of the General Committee.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Member of the Finance and
Investment Committee.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Member of the Mediation Committee.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Member of the Technology and
Strategy Committee.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Member of the Nomination Committee.
|
|
(9)
|
|
Elected by SAP AGs employees
on April 23, 2007.
|
|
(10)
|
|
Member of the Audit Committee and
determined to be the Audit Committee financial expert.
|
90
|
|
|
(11)
|
|
Member of the Special Committee.
|
|
(12)
|
|
Elected by SAP AGs
shareholders on June 3, 2008, replaced August-Wilhelm
Scheer who resigned from the Supervisory Board on the same day.
|
|
(13)
|
|
Replaced Helga Classen who left
the Supervisory Board on December 31, 2008.
|
For detailed information on the Supervisory Board committees and
their tasks, including the Audit Committee and Compensation
Committee, please refer to Item 10 Additional
Information Corporate Governance.
Pursuant to the German Co-determination Act of 1976
(Mitbestimmungsgesetz), members of the Supervisory Board
of SAP AG consist of eight representatives of the shareholders
and eight representatives of the employees. Of the eight
employee representatives, two must be nominated by the trade
unions. The elected employees must be at least 18 years of
age and must have been in the employment of SAP AG or one of its
German subsidiaries for at least one year. They must also
fulfill the other qualifications for election codified in
Section 8 of the German Works Council Constitution Act.
These qualifications include, among other things, not having
been declared ineligible or debarred from holding public office
by a court.
Certain current members of the Supervisory Board of SAP AG were
members of supervisory boards and comparable governing bodies of
enterprises other than SAP AG in Germany and other countries as
of December 31, 2009. See Note 30 to our Consolidated
Financial Statements for more detail. Apart from pension
obligations towards employees, SAP AG has not entered into
contracts with any member of the Supervisory Board that provide
for benefits upon a termination of the employment or service of
the member.
EXECUTIVE BOARD
The current members of the Executive Board, the year in which
each member was first appointed and the year in which the term
of each expires, respectively, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year First
|
|
Year Current
|
Name
|
|
Appointed
|
|
Term Expires
|
|
Bill McDermott, Co-CEO
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Jim Hagemann Snabe, Co-CEO
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Dr. Werner Brandt
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Gerhard Oswald
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Vishal Sikka
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
The following changes occurred in the Executive Board in 2009
and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
Claus Heinrich left SAP on May 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
On June 1, 2009 Léo Apotheker became the sole CEO as
Henning Kagermann retired from SAP as planned on May 31,
2009.
|
|
|
|
In February 2010, Léo Apotheker resigned as a member
of the Executive Board and CEO.
|
|
|
|
In February 2010, Bill McDermott and Jim Hagemann Snabe
became Co-CEOs, succeeding Léo Apotheker.
|
|
|
|
In February 2010, Vishal Sikka became a member of the
Executive Board.
|
|
|
|
In February 2010, John Schwarz resigned as a member of the
Executive Board.
|
|
|
|
In February 2010, Gerhard Oswald became COO replacing Erwin
Gunst who stepped down.
|
91
A description of the management responsibilities and backgrounds
of the current members of the Executive Board are as follows:
Bill McDermott, Co-CEO (Vorstandssprecher),
48 years old, holds a masters degree in business
administration. He joined SAP in 2002 and became a member of its
Executive Board on July 1, 2008. On February 7, 2010
he became Co-CEO alongside Jim Hagemann Snabe. He is responsible
for global field operations and the Global Ecosystem &
Partner Group.
Jim Hagemann Snabe, Co-CEO
(Vorstandssprecher), 44 years old, holds a
master degree in operational research. He joined SAP in 1990 and
became a member of its Executive Board on July 1, 2008. On
February 7, 2010 he became Co-CEO alongside Bill McDermott.
He is responsible for product development. This includes
solutions for large enterprises, small and medium size
enterprises, and the technology platform.
Werner Brandt, CFO, 56 years old, business
administration graduate. Werner Brandt joined SAP in early 2001
as the Chief Financial Officer and member of the Executive
Board. Prior to joining SAP, Werner Brandt was CFO and member of
the Executive Board of Fresenius Medical Care AG since 1999. In
this role, he was also responsible for labor relations. Before
joining Fresenius Medical Care AG, Werner Brandt headed the
finance function of the European operations of Baxter
International Inc. He is responsible for global finance
including shared services, global legal, global intellectual
property, SAP Ventures and Corporate Development, Global HR
(acting). Further, he is SAPs Labor Relations Director
(acting).
Gerhard Oswald, COO, 56 years old, economics
graduate. Gerhard Oswald joined SAP in 1981 and became a member
of the Executive Board in 1996. He became Chief Operating
Officer on February 11, 2010. In this position he is
responsible for company operations and processes as well as
internal IT. He is further responsible for global service and
support.
Vishal Sikka, CTO, 42 years old, holds a PH.D.
degree in computer science from Stanford University. He joined
SAP in 2002 and became a member of its Executive Board on
February 7, 2010 as the Chief Technology Officer. Before
joining SAP he was area vice president for platform technologies
at Peregrine Systems.
The members of the Executive Board of SAP AG as of
December 31, 2009 that are members on other supervisory
boards and comparable governing bodies of enterprises, other
than SAP, in Germany and other countries, are set forth in
Note 30 to our Consolidated Financial Statements. Apart
from pension obligations, SAP AG has not entered into contracts
with any member of the Executive Board that provide for benefits
upon a termination of the employment of service of the member.
To our knowledge, there are no family relationships among the
Supervisory Board and Executive Board members.
COMPENSATION REPORT
This compensation report outlines the criteria that we apply to
determine compensation for Executive Board and Supervisory Board
members, discloses the amount of compensation paid, and
describes the compensation systems. It also contains information
about Executive Board members share-based compensation
plans, shares held by Executive Board and Supervisory Board
members, and the directors dealings required to be
disclosed in accordance with the German Securities Trading Act.
Compensation for
Executive Board Members
Compensation
System
In a departure from previous practice, in 2009 the Executive
Board members compensation system was not set by the
Compensation Committee of the Supervisory Board. Instead, the
Compensation Committee prepared proposals, which (as is the case
for individual Executive Board members total remuneration)
were approved by the full Supervisory Board.
92
Executive Board members compensation is intended to
reflect the Groups size and global presence as well as our
economic and financial standing. The level is internationally
competitive to reward committed, successful work in a dynamic
environment.
The compensation of the Executive Board as a body is
performance-based. It has three elements: a fixed element
(salary), a performance-related element (directors
profit-sharing), and a long-term incentive element (share-based
compensation).
A compensation target is set for the total of fixed and
performance-related elements. This target is reviewed and, if
necessary, updated every year in light of our business
performance and directors compensation at comparable
companies on the international stage. Every year, the
Supervisory Board sets the target performance-related
compensation, reflecting the relevant values in SAPs
budget for that year. The number of virtual stock options issued
to each member of the Executive Board in 2009 by way of
share-based compensation was decided by the Compensation
Committee on May 6, 2009, and reflected the fair value of
the options.
The following criteria apply to the elements of Executive Board
compensation for 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
The fixed element is paid as a monthly salary.
|
|
|
|
The amount of performance-related compensation to be paid out in
respect of 2009 depended on the SAP Groups achievement of
its targets for (non-GAAP) operating margin, (non-GAAP)
operating income, and the cash-flow conversion ratio
(U.S. GAAP).
|
|
|
|
On February 11, 2010, the Supervisory Board assessed
SAPs performance against the agreed targets and determined
how much performance-related compensation was payable. The
payment will be made after the Annual General Meeting of
Shareholders in June 2010.
|
|
|
|
The regular form of share-based compensation was the issue of
virtual stock options under the terms of the 2009 stock option
plan (SOP Performance Plan 2009). The terms and details of
the SOP Performance Plan 2009 are described in Note 28
in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements section.
|
Clauses are included in the contracts of Executive Board members
Bill McDermott and, with effect from 2009, John Schwarz to fix
euro-denominated compensation in their local currencies.
Amount of
Compensation
Executive Board members compensation was as follows in
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regular
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance-Related
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Elements
|
|
|
Element
|
|
|
Incentive Elements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors
|
|
|
Share-Based
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit-
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Other(1)
|
|
|
Sharing
|
|
|
(SAP SOP
2009)(2)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann (Co-CEO and Member until
May 31, 2009)
|
|
|
312.5
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
2,026.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,346.1
|
|
Léo Apotheker (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
750.0
|
|
|
|
137.3
|
|
|
|
4,862.8
|
|
|
|
950.0
|
|
|
|
6,700.1
|
|
Dr. Werner Brandt
|
|
|
455.0
|
|
|
|
19.1
|
|
|
|
2,950.1
|
|
|
|
577.0
|
|
|
|
4,001.2
|
|
Erwin Gunst
|
|
|
455.0
|
|
|
|
36.0
|
|
|
|
2,950.1
|
|
|
|
577.0
|
|
|
|
4,018.1
|
|
Prof. Dr. Claus E. Heinrich (until May 31, 2009)
|
|
|
189.6
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
658.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
857.7
|
|
Bill
McDermott(3)
|
|
|
900.4
|
|
|
|
74.9
|
|
|
|
2,776.7
|
|
|
|
577.0
|
|
|
|
4,329.0
|
|
Gerhard Oswald
|
|
|
455.0
|
|
|
|
437.5
|
|
|
|
2,950.1
|
|
|
|
577.0
|
|
|
|
4,419.6
|
|
John
Schwarz(4)
|
|
|
581.5
|
|
|
|
28.2
|
|
|
|
2,910.7
|
|
|
|
577.0
|
|
|
|
4,097.4
|
|
Jim Hagemann Snabe
|
|
|
455.0
|
|
|
|
131.1
|
|
|
|
2,950.1
|
|
|
|
577.0
|
|
|
|
4,113.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,554.0
|
|
|
|
880.8
|
|
|
|
25,035.6
|
|
|
|
4,412.0
|
|
|
|
34,882.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Insurance contributions, benefits
in kind, expenses for maintenance of two households due to work
abroad, reimbursement legal and tax advice fees, leave
compensation
|
|
(2)
|
|
Fair value at the time of
allocation
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes discrete payments arising
through application of the fixed exchange-rate clause to the
following items: salary for 2008: 29,600; profit-sharing
bonus for 2008: 53,200; salary for 2009: 47,500;
profit-sharing bonus for 2009: 91,900
|
|
(4)
|
|
Includes discrete payments arising
through application of the fixed exchange-rate clause to the
following items: salary for 2009: 5,000; profit-sharing
bonus for 2009: 29,000
|
The values for regular share-based compensation in the table
above result from the following allocations of virtual stock
options granted in 2009 under the SOP Performance Plan 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Allocations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
per Right
|
|
|
Elements
|
|
|
per Right on
|
|
|
Total Value on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at Time of
|
|
|
at Time of
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann (CEO and Member until
May 31,
2009)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Léo Apotheker (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
169,040
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
|
|
|
950.0
|
|
|
|
4.89
|
|
|
|
275.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Werner Brandt
|
|
|
102,670
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
|
|
|
577.0
|
|
|
|
4.89
|
|
|
|
167.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erwin Gunst
|
|
|
102,670
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
|
|
|
577.0
|
|
|
|
4.89
|
|
|
|
167.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Claus E.
Heinrich(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bill McDermott
|
|
|
102,670
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
|
|
|
577.0
|
|
|
|
4.89
|
|
|
|
167.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerhard Oswald
|
|
|
102,670
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
|
|
|
577.0
|
|
|
|
4.89
|
|
|
|
167.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Schwarz
|
|
|
102,670
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
|
|
|
577.0
|
|
|
|
4.89
|
|
|
|
167.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jim Hagemann Snabe
|
|
|
102,670
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
|
|
|
577.0
|
|
|
|
4.89
|
|
|
|
167.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
785,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,412.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,279.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1)
|
|
Retired May 31, 2009. No
allocations in 2009.
|
The following table shows total Executive Board compensation in
2008, including SAP SOP 2007 stock options granted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance-
|
|
|
Regular Long-Term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Incentive Elements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Element
|
|
|
Share-Based
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Elements
|
|
|
Directors
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Other(1)
|
|
|
Profit-Sharing
|
|
|
(SAP SOP
2007)(2)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann (Co-CEO and member until
May 31, 2009)
|
|
|
750.0
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
2,606.1
|
|
|
|
948.4
|
|
|
|
4,320.2
|
|
Léo Apotheker (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
687.5
|
|
|
|
334.5
|
|
|
|
2,388.9
|
|
|
|
632.3
|
|
|
|
4,043.2
|
|
Dr. Werner Brandt
|
|
|
455.0
|
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
|
|
1,581.0
|
|
|
|
577.3
|
|
|
|
2,636.8
|
|
Erwin
Gunst(3)
|
|
|
227.5
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
|
790.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,036.1
|
|
Prof. Dr. Claus E. Heinrich
|
|
|
455.0
|
|
|
|
19.8
|
|
|
|
1,581.0
|
|
|
|
577.3
|
|
|
|
2,633.1
|
|
Bill
McDermott(3)
|
|
|
395.2
|
|
|
|
142.4
|
|
|
|
631.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,168.9
|
|
Gerhard Oswald
|
|
|
455.0
|
|
|
|
627.9
|
|
|
|
1,581.0
|
|
|
|
577.3
|
|
|
|
3,241.2
|
|
John
Schwarz(4)
|
|
|
424.9
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
1,295.2
|
|
|
|
577.3
|
|
|
|
2,311.7
|
|
Jim Hagemann
Snabe(3)
|
|
|
227.5
|
|
|
|
22.3
|
|
|
|
790.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,040.3
|
|
Dr. Peter Zencke (member until Dec. 31, 2008)
|
|
|
455.0
|
|
|
|
27.8
|
|
|
|
1,581.0
|
|
|
|
577.3
|
|
|
|
2,641.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,532.6
|
|
|
|
1,246.3
|
|
|
|
14,826.5
|
|
|
|
4,467.2
|
|
|
|
25,072.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Insurance contributions, benefits
in kind, expenses for maintenance of two households due to work
abroad, compensation from seats on other governing bodies in the
SAP Group, reimbursement of legal fees.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Fair value at the time of
allocation.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Member of the Executive Board from
July 1, 2008. (The table shows compensation since that
date.)
|
|
(4)
|
|
Member of the Executive Board from
March 1, 2008. (The table shows compensation since that
date.)
|
Share-Based
Compensation Under SAP SOP 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Allocations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
per Right
|
|
|
Elements
|
|
|
per Right on
|
|
|
Total Value on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at Time of
|
|
|
at Time of
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann (Co-CEO and Member until
May 31,
2009)(3)
|
|
|
133,396
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
948.4
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
623.0
|
|
Léo Apotheker (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
88,933
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
632.3
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
415.3
|
|
Dr. Werner Brandt
|
|
|
81,200
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
577.3
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
379.2
|
|
Erwin
Gunst(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Claus E.
Heinrich(4)
|
|
|
81,200
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
577.3
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
379.2
|
|
Bill
McDermott(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerhard Oswald
|
|
|
81,200
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
577.3
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
379.2
|
|
John
Schwarz(2)
|
|
|
81,200
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
577.3
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
379.2
|
|
Jim Hagemann
Snabe(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Peter
Zencke(5)
|
|
|
81,200
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
577.3
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
379.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
628,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,467.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,934.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Member of the Executive Board
from July 1, 2008. (No allocations since that date.)
|
|
(2)
|
|
Member of the Executive Board from
March 1, 2008. (The table shows allocations since that
date.)
|
|
(3)
|
|
Retired May 31, 2009. Subject
to expiration of term, options remain open under a two-year
grace period.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Retired May 31, 2009. The
options can be exercised until end of term.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Retired December 31, 2008.
The options can be exercised until end of term.
|
End-of-Service
Benefits
Normal
End-of-Service
Undertakings
Retirement
Pension Plan
Members of the Executive Board receive a retirement pension when
they reach the retirement age of 60 and vacate their Executive
Board seat or a disability pension if, before reaching the
regular retirement age, they become subject to occupational
disability or permanent incapacity. A surviving dependants
pension is paid on the death of a former member of the Executive
Board. The disability pension is 100% of the vested retirement
pension entitlement and is payable until the beneficiarys
60th birthday, after which it is replaced by a retirement
pension. The surviving dependants pension is 60% of the
retirement pension or vested disability pension entitlement at
death. Entitlements are enforceable against SAP AG.
95
The benefit payable has been agreed with the active Executive
Board members. If service is ended prematurely, pension
entitlement is reduced in proportion as the actual length of
service stands in relation to the maximum possible length of
service.
On January 1, 2000, SAP AG introduced a contributory
retirement pension plan. At that time, the performance-based
retirement plan was discontinued for Executive Board members.
Entitlements accrued up to December 31, 1999, were
unaffected. The pension benefits are derived from any accrued
entitlements on December 31, 1999, under performance-based
pension agreements and a salary-linked contribution for the
period commencing January 1, 2000. The contribution is 4%
of applicable compensation up to the applicable income threshold
plus 14% of applicable compensation above the applicable income
threshold. For this purpose, applicable compensation is 180% of
annual base salary. The applicable income threshold is the
statutory annual income threshold for the state pension plan in
Germany (West), as amended from time to time.
Exceptional retirement pension agreements apply to the following
Executive Board members:
|
|
|
|
|
Léo Apothekers agreement provides only for a
retirement pension, but not for a surviving dependants or
disability pension. The pension contribution reflects his
participation in the French social security system in that the
employer contributions paid by SAP under the French social
insurance plan are deducted from it.
|
|
|
|
Henning Kagermanns rights to retirement pension benefits
were increased by further annual contributions because he
remained a member of the Executive Board after his
60th birthday until his retirement on May 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
Bill McDermott has rights to future benefits under the pension
plan of SAP America. The pension plan of SAP America is a cash
balance plan that on retirement provides either monthly pension
payments or a lump sum. The pension becomes available from the
beneficiarys 65th birthday. Subject to certain
conditions, the plan also provides earlier payment or invalidity
benefits. SAP also made contributions to a third-party pension
plan for Bill McDermott. In 2009, SAP paid contributions
totaling 199,600 (2008: 474,500). SAPs
contributions reflect Bill McDermotts payments into this
pension plan. The SAP America pension plan closed with effect
from January 1, 2009. Interest continues to be paid on the
earned rights to benefits. In view of these circumstances, SAP
adjusted its payments to a non-SAP pension plan.
|
|
|
|
Instead of paying for entitlements under the pension plan for
Executive Board members, SAP pays equivalent amounts to a
non-SAP pension plan for Jim Hagemann Snabe. In 2009, SAP paid
contributions totaling 108,400 (2008: 92,100).
|
|
|
|
SAP made no retirement pension plan contributions in respect of
John Schwarz in 2008 and 2009.
|
96
The following table shows the change in total projected benefit
obligation (PBO) and in the total accruals for pension
obligations to Executive Board members:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Henning
|
|
|
Léo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kagermann
|
|
|
Apotheker
|
|
|
Dr. Werner
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claus E.
|
|
|
Bill
|
|
|
Gerhard
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Co-CEO)(2)
|
|
|
(Co-CEO)
|
|
|
Brandt
|
|
|
Erwin
Gunst(1)
|
|
|
Heinrich3)
|
|
|
McDermott
|
|
|
Oswald
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
PBO January 1, 2008
|
|
|
5,865.2
|
|
|
|
422.5
|
|
|
|
613.7
|
|
|
|
280.3
|
|
|
|
2,730.9
|
|
|
|
588.4
|
|
|
|
3,014.8
|
|
|
|
13,515.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less plan assets market value January 1, 2008
|
|
|
5,228.0
|
|
|
|
630.4
|
|
|
|
510.7
|
|
|
|
272.9
|
|
|
|
2,028.7
|
|
|
|
45.0
|
|
|
|
2,316.4
|
|
|
|
11,032.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued January 1, 2008
|
|
|
637.2
|
|
|
|
−207.9
|
|
|
|
103.0
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
702.2
|
|
|
|
543.4
|
|
|
|
698.4
|
|
|
|
2,483.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PBO change in 2008
|
|
|
−277.2
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
|
|
88.1
|
|
|
|
108.9
|
|
|
|
81.0
|
|
|
|
366.6
|
|
|
|
84.3
|
|
|
|
469.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan assets change in 2008
|
|
|
277.2
|
|
|
|
28.4
|
|
|
|
113.3
|
|
|
|
−224.8
|
|
|
|
282.6
|
|
|
|
−11.7
|
|
|
|
320.2
|
|
|
|
785.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PBO December 31, 2008
|
|
|
5,588.0
|
|
|
|
439.8
|
|
|
|
701.8
|
|
|
|
389.2
|
|
|
|
2,811.9
|
|
|
|
955.0
|
|
|
|
3,099.1
|
|
|
|
13,984.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less plan assets market value December 31, 2008
|
|
|
5,505.2
|
|
|
|
658.8
|
|
|
|
624.0
|
|
|
|
48.1
|
|
|
|
2,311.3
|
|
|
|
33.3
|
|
|
|
2,636.6
|
|
|
|
11,817.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued December 31, 2008
|
|
|
82.8
|
|
|
|
−219.0
|
|
|
|
77.8
|
|
|
|
341.1
|
|
|
|
500.6
|
|
|
|
921.7
|
|
|
|
462.5
|
|
|
|
2,167.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PBO change in 2009
|
|
|
317.4
|
|
|
|
88.4
|
|
|
|
201.0
|
|
|
|
92.0
|
|
|
|
−58.0
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
527.1
|
|
|
|
1,171.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan assets change in 2009
|
|
|
255.0
|
|
|
|
29.2
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
|
97.4
|
|
|
|
436.2
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
237.6
|
|
|
|
1,095.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PBO December 31, 2009
|
|
|
5,905.4
|
|
|
|
528.2
|
|
|
|
902.8
|
|
|
|
481.2
|
|
|
|
2,753.9
|
|
|
|
958.1
|
|
|
|
3,626.2
|
|
|
|
15,155.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less plan assets market value December 31, 2009
|
|
|
5,760.2
|
|
|
|
688.0
|
|
|
|
655.1
|
|
|
|
145.5
|
|
|
|
2,747.5
|
|
|
|
42.5
|
|
|
|
2,874.2
|
|
|
|
12,913.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued December 31, 2009
|
|
|
145.2
|
|
|
|
−159.8
|
|
|
|
247.7
|
|
|
|
335.7
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
915.6
|
|
|
|
752.0
|
|
|
|
2,242.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
When Erwin Gunst joined the
Executive Board and his employment with SAPs Switzerland
affiliate ended, his vested plan funds were transferred to an
external vested benefits account.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Member of Executive Board and
Co-CEO until May 31, 2009
|
|
(3)
|
|
Member of Executive Board until
May 31, 2009
|
The following table shows the annual pension entitlement of each
member of the Executive Board on reaching age 60 based on
entitlements from SAP under performance-based and salary-linked
plans vested on December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested on
|
|
|
Vested on
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Henning
Kagermann(2)
|
|
|
340.4(1
|
)
|
|
|
334.9(1
|
)
|
Léo Apotheker (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
45.5
|
|
|
|
45.5
|
|
Dr. Werner Brandt
|
|
|
54.1
|
|
|
|
48.0
|
|
Erwin Gunst
|
|
|
34.4
|
|
|
|
32.8
|
|
Prof. Dr. Claus E.
Heinrich(3)
|
|
|
189.7
|
|
|
|
186.1
|
|
Bill McDermott
|
|
|
124.2
|
|
|
|
121.8
|
|
Gerhard Oswald
|
|
|
208.4
|
|
|
|
201.2
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Due to the extension of Henning
Kagermanns contract beyond his 60th birthday, these values
represent the retirement pension entitlement that he received
after his current Executive Board contract expired on
May 31, 2009, based on the entitlements vested on
May 31, 2009, and on December 31, 2008, respectively.
|
97
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Member of Executive Board and
Co-CEO until May 31, 2009
|
|
(3)
|
|
Member of Executive Board until
May 31, 2009
|
These are vested entitlements. To the extent that members
continue to serve on the Executive Board and that therefore more
contributions are made for them in the future, pension actually
payable at age 60 will be more than shown in the table.
Postcontractual
Noncompete Provisions
During the agreed
12-month
postcontractual noncompete period, Executive Board members
receive abstention payments corresponding to 50% of their final
average contractual compensation as members.
Early
End-of-Service
Undertakings
Severance
Payments
The standard contract for all Executive Board members since
January 1, 2006, provides that on termination before full
term (for example, where the members appointment is
revoked, where the member becomes occupationally disabled, or in
connection with a change of control), SAP AG will pay to the
member the outstanding part of the compensation target for the
entire remainder of the term, appropriately discounted for early
payment. A member has no claim to that payment if he or she
leaves SAP for reasons for which he or she is responsible.
If an Executive Board members post on the Executive Board
expires or ceases to exist because of, or as a consequence of,
change or restructuring or due to a change of control, SAP AG
and each Executive Board member has the right to terminate the
employment contract within eight weeks of the occurrence by
giving six months notice. A change of control is deemed to
occur when a third party is required to make a mandatory
takeover offer to the shareholders of SAP AG under the German
Securities Acquisition and Takeover Act, when SAP AG merges with
another company and becomes the subsumed entity, or when a
control or profit transfer agreement is concluded with SAP AG as
the dependent company. An Executive Board members contract
can also be terminated before full term if his or her
appointment as an SAP AG Executive Board member is revoked in
connection with a change of control.
Postcontractual
Noncompete Provisions
Abstention compensation for the postcontractual noncompete
period as described above is also payable on early contract
termination.
Payments
to Retiring Executive Board Members in 2009
Henning Kagermanns term of office on the Executive Board
expired on May 31, 2009, as did the notice period in his
contract of employment. He received the following payments in
2009 in connection with his retirement:
|
|
|
|
|
Henning Kagermann receives monthly abstention compensation of
163,200, corresponding to 50% of his final average
contractual compensation, in consideration of an agreed
12-month
postcontractual noncompete period.
|
|
|
|
He receives a monthly retirement pension of 28,400.
|
|
|
|
Upon termination of his employment contract, Henning Kagermann
received compensation for unused leave totaling 1,199,400.
|
98
Claus Heinrichs contract as an Executive Board member was
ended with effect from May 31, 2009. He received the
following payments in 2009 in connection with his retirement:
|
|
|
|
|
Claus Heinrich received a payment of 4,120,600 in relation
to the early termination of his contract, in accordance with the
agreements on payments for early termination.
|
|
|
|
Upon termination of his employment contract, Claus Heinrich
received compensation for unused leave totaling 235,800.
|
|
|
|
The terms of the stock-based compensation plan notwithstanding,
it was agreed that Claus Heinrich may exercise his rights
pertaining to allocations under SAP SOP 2007 without
limitation until they expire.
|
|
|
|
We have set aside the postcontractual noncompete provisions in
his contract.
|
Payments
to Former Executive Board Members
In 2009, we paid pension benefits of 764,000 to Executive
Board members who had retired before January 1, 2009 (2008:
763,000). At the end of the year, the PBO for former
Executive Board members was 15,777,000 (2008:
11,367,000). Plan assets of 16,512,000 are available
to service these obligations (2008: 12,646,000).
Additionally, until December 2009 former Executive Board member
Peter Zencke received monthly abstention compensation of
98,700, corresponding to 50% of his final average
contractual compensation, in consideration of an agreed
12-month
postcontractual noncompete period.
Executive
Board Members Long-Term Incentives
Members of the Executive Board hold virtual stock options under
the SOP Performance Plan 2009 and SAP SOP 2007, stock
appreciation rights (STARs) under the Incentive Plan 2010, stock
options under SAP SOP 2002, and stock options and
convertible bonds under the LTI Plan 2000, which were granted to
them in previous years. For information about the terms and
details of these plans, see the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements section, Note 28.
SOP PERFORMANCE
PLAN 2009
The table below shows Executive Board members holdings, on
December 31, 2009, of virtual stock options issued under
the SOP Performance Plan 2009.
The strike price for an option varies with the performance of
SAP stock over time against the TechPGI index. The gross profit
per option is limited to 30.80, corresponding to 110% of
the SAP share price on the date of issue.
The issued options have a term of five years and can only be
exercised on specified dates after the two-year vesting period.
Therefore, none of the options held could be exercised on
December 31, 2009.
99
SOP Performance Plan 2009 Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding on
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
per Unit on
|
|
|
Accrual on
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
per Unit at
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Time of Grant
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quantity of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann (Co-CEO until May 31,
2009)(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Léo Apotheker (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
169,040
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
|
|
|
4.89
|
|
|
|
275.5
|
|
Dr. Werner Brandt
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
102,670
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
|
|
|
4.89
|
|
|
|
167.4
|
|
Erwin Gunst
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
102,670
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
|
|
|
4.89
|
|
|
|
167.4
|
|
Prof. Dr. Claus E.
Heinrich(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bill McDermott
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
102,670
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
|
|
|
4.89
|
|
|
|
167.4
|
|
Gerhard Oswald
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
102,670
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
|
|
|
4.89
|
|
|
|
167.4
|
|
John Schwarz
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
102,670
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
|
|
|
4.89
|
|
|
|
167.4
|
|
Jim Hagemann Snabe
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
102,670
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
|
|
|
4.89
|
|
|
|
167.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
785,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,279.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Retired May 31, 2009. No
allocations in 2009.
|
SAP
SOP 2007
The table below shows Executive Board members holdings, on
December 31, 2009, of virtual stock options issued to them
under the SAP SOP 2007 plan since its inception, including
virtual stock options issued to them both during and before
their respective membership of the Executive Board.
The strike price for an option is 110% of the base price. The
premium of 10% on the base price is to discourage exercise of
the options unless the market price of SAP stock has risen by at
least 10% compared with the base price. The issued options have
a term of five years and can only be exercised on specified
dates after the two-year vesting period. The options issued in
2007 could be exercised with effect from June 2009, following
expiration of the two-year vesting period.
100
SAP
SOP 2007 Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding on
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
per Unit on
|
|
|
Accrual on
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
per Unit at
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Time of Grant
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quantity of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann (Co-CEO until May 31,
2009)(3)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
118,637
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
3.09
|
|
|
|
366.6
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
133,396
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
5.21
|
|
|
|
637.0
|
|
Léo Apotheker (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
79,093
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
3.09
|
|
|
|
244.4
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
88,933
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
5.21
|
|
|
|
424.7
|
|
Dr. Werner Brandt
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
72,216
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
3.09
|
|
|
|
223.1
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
81,200
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
5.21
|
|
|
|
387.8
|
|
Erwin
Gunst(1)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
56,258
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
3.09
|
|
|
|
173.8
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
70,284
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
5.21
|
|
|
|
335.7
|
|
Prof. Dr. Claus E.
Heinrich(4)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
72,216
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
3.09
|
|
|
|
223.1
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
81,200
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
5.21
|
|
|
|
387.8
|
|
Bill
McDermott(1)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
62,508
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
3.09
|
|
|
|
193.1
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
70,284
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
5.21
|
|
|
|
335.7
|
|
Gerhard Oswald
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
72,216
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
3.09
|
|
|
|
223.1
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
81,200
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
5.21
|
|
|
|
387.8
|
|
John
Schwarz(2)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
81,200
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
5.21
|
|
|
|
387.8
|
|
Jim Hagemann
Snabe(1)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
37,505
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
3.09
|
|
|
|
115.9
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
56,228
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
5.21
|
|
|
|
268.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,314,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,315.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Member from July 1, 2008. The
holding was allocated before appointment to the Executive Board.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Member from March 1, 2008.
Only allocations since appointment to the Executive Board are
shown.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Retired May 31, 2009. Subject
to expiration of term, options remain open under a two-year
grace period.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Retired May 31, 2009. The
options can be exercised until end of term.
|
Incentive Plan
2010
The additional nonrecurring share-based compensation awarded in
2006 comprises STARs for the Incentive Plan
2010 share-based compensation plan. The Incentive Plan 2010
is a share-based compensation plan intended to reward a
substantial increase in our market capitalization. The Executive
Board will qualify for payout under the plan only if, not later
than the end of 2010, SAPs average market capitalization
during the last six months of a year is not less than 50%
greater than its average value between July 1 and
December 31, 2005, and SAP stock outperforms the S&P
North Software-Software Index (which is the successor of the
GSTI Software index) over the same period. Payouts are scaled as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
If market capitalization does not increase by 50% or more, the
Executive Board will not receive a payout.
|
|
|
|
If market capitalization increases by more than 50% but less
than 100%, target achievement will be measured progressively.
|
|
|
|
If SAPs market capitalization increases not less than
twofold during the said period, the Executive Board will receive
a payout of 100 million.
|
101
The STARs awarded to Executive Board members under this plan
expire on December 31, 2010. For information about the
terms and details of these plans, see the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements section, Note 28.
Nonrecurring Share-Based Compensation: Incentive Plan 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value per
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original
|
|
|
Fair Value per
|
|
|
Unit on
|
|
|
Accrual on
|
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
Unit at Time of
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
|
Rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann (Co-CEO until May 31,
2009)(2)
|
|
|
188,182
|
|
|
|
24.87
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
Léo Apotheker (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
125,455
|
|
|
|
24.87
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
Dr. Werner Brandt
|
|
|
62,727
|
|
|
|
24.87
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
Erwin
Gunst(1)
|
|
|
28,815
|
|
|
|
14.02
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Prof. Dr. Claus E
Heinrich(2)
|
|
|
62,727
|
|
|
|
24.87
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
Bill
McDermott(1)
|
|
|
45,345
|
|
|
|
14.02
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
Gerhard Oswald
|
|
|
62,727
|
|
|
|
24.87
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
Jim Hagemann
Snabe(1)
|
|
|
17,290
|
|
|
|
14.02
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
593,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Member from July 1, 2008.
These rights were allocated before appointment to the Executive
Board.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Retired May 31, 2009. Subject
to expiration of term, options remain open under a two-year
grace period.
|
SAP SOP 2002
The table below shows Executive Board members
December 31, 2009, holdings of stock options issued in
previous years under the SAP SOP 2002 plan since its
inception.
The strike price for an SAP SOP 2002 stock option is 110%
of the base price of one SAP share. The base price is the
arithmetic mean closing auction price for SAP stock in the Xetra
trading system (or its successor system) over the five business
days immediately before the issue date of that stock option. The
strike price cannot be less than the closing auction price on
the day before the issue date. The issued options have a term of
five years and can only be exercised on specified dates after
the two-year vesting period.
As a result of the issue on December 21, 2006, of bonus
shares at a
one-to-three
ratio under a capital increase from corporate funds, on exercise
each stock option now entitles its beneficiary to four shares.
For better comparability with the price of SAP stock since
implementation of the capital increase, the following table
shows not the number (quantity) of options but the number
(quantity) of shares to which they entitle the holder.
Consequently, the strike prices shown are prices per share and
not per option. The number of shares shown in the table is four
times the number of options, and the strike price for an option
is four times the strike price per share shown in the table.
In December 2009, the Supervisory Board agreed an amendment to
the terms of SAP SOP 2002 for options granted in 2005. For
details of the amendment, see the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements section, Note 28.
The right to exercise options issued in 2004 expired in 2009.
102
SAP
SOP 2002 Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding on
|
|
|
Rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2009
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
in 2009
|
|
|
Price on
|
|
|
Shares(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Strike Price
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
Term in
|
|
|
Quantity of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Quantity of
|
|
|
Quantity of
|
|
|
Term in
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Day
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann (Co-CEO and Member until
May 31,
2009)(3)
|
|
|
2004
|
(2)
|
|
|
37.50
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
33.55
|
|
|
|
267,820
|
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267,820
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
46.48
|
|
|
|
143,404
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,404
|
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
Léo Apotheker (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
2004
|
(2)
|
|
|
37.50
|
|
|
|
112,000
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
33.55
|
|
|
|
149,980
|
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,980
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
46.48
|
|
|
|
95,604
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,604
|
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
Dr. Werner Brandt
|
|
|
2004
|
(2)
|
|
|
37.50
|
|
|
|
112,000
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
33.55
|
|
|
|
149,980
|
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,980
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
46.48
|
|
|
|
87,292
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,292
|
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
Erwin
Gunst(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
33.55
|
|
|
|
61,264
|
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,264
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
46.48
|
|
|
|
44,596
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,596
|
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
Prof. Dr. Claus E.
Heinrich(3)
|
|
|
2004
|
(2)
|
|
|
37.50
|
|
|
|
112,000
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
33.55
|
|
|
|
149,980
|
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,980
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
46.48
|
|
|
|
87,292
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,292
|
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
Bill
McDermott(1)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
46.48
|
|
|
|
77,296
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,296
|
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
Gerhard Oswald
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
33.55
|
|
|
|
149,980
|
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,980
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
46.48
|
|
|
|
87,292
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,292
|
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
Jim Hagemann
Snabe(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
33.55
|
|
|
|
51,180
|
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,180
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
46.48
|
|
|
|
37,164
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,164
|
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,176,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
536,000
|
|
|
|
1,640,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1)
|
|
Member from July 1, 2008.
These rights were allocated before appointment to the Executive
Board.
|
|
2)
|
|
The options from the 2004 tranche
were forfeited on February 16, 2009 (Plan end date).
|
|
3)
|
|
Retired May 31, 2009. Subject
to expiration of term, options remain open under a two-year
grace period.
|
LTI Plan
2000
Beneficiaries under the LTI Plan 2000 could choose between
convertible bonds and stock options. The chief difference was in
the way the exercise or conversion price was determined. The
bond conversion price depends on the closing price of SAP stock
the day before the bond was issued, while the option strike
price varies with the performance of SAP stock over time against
the S&P North Software-Software Index (the successor of the
GSTI Software index). The issued options have a term of ten
years and could only be exercised in portions of one-third each
on specified dates after two-year, three-year, or four-year
vesting periods respectively.
The table below shows stock options held by members of the
Executive Board on December 31, 2009, granted in earlier
years under the LTI Plan 2000. The strike prices for LTI Plan
2000 stock options reflect the prices payable by an Executive
Board member for one SAP common share on exercise of the option
on December 31, 2009. The strike prices vary with the
performance of SAP stock over time against the S&P North
Software-Software Index. As a result of the issue on
December 21, 2006, of bonus shares at a
one-to-three
ratio under a capital increase from corporate funds, on exercise
each stock option now entitles its beneficiary to four shares.
For better comparability with the price of SAP stock since
implementation of the capital increase, the following table
shows not the number (quantity) of options but the number
(quantity) of shares to which they entitle the holder.
Consequently, the strike prices shown are prices per share and
not per option. The number of shares
103
shown in the table is four times the number of options, and the
strike price for an option is four times the strike price per
share shown in the table.
LTI
Plan 2000 Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding on
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2009
|
|
|
in 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price on
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Strike Price
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
Term in
|
|
|
Quantity of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Quantity of
|
|
|
Term in
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann (Co-CEO and Member until
May 31,
2009)(1)
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
18.65
|
|
|
|
112,128
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
112,128
|
|
|
|
34.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
22.67
|
|
|
|
157,500
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,500
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
|
Léo Apotheker
(Co-CEO)(2)
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
28.00
|
|
|
|
87,500
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,500
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Retired May 31, 2009. Subject
to expiration of term, options remain open under a two-year
grace period.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Member from August 1, 2002.
This holding was allocated before appointment to the Executive
Board.
|
The table below shows convertible bonds held by members of the
Executive Board on December 31, 2009, granted in earlier
years under the LTI Plan 2000. The strike prices for LTI Plan
2000 convertible bonds reflect the prices payable by an
Executive Board member for one SAP share on conversion of the
bond. The strike prices are fixed and correspond to the quoted
price of one SAP share on the business day immediately preceding
the grant of the convertible bond. As a result of the issue on
December 21, 2006, of bonus shares at a
one-to-three
ratio under a capital increase from corporate funds, on
conversion each bond now entitles its beneficiary to four
shares. For better comparability with the price of SAP stock
since implementation of the capital increase, the following
table shows not the number (quantity) of convertible bonds but
the number (quantity) of shares to which they entitle the
holder. Consequently, the strike prices shown are prices per
share and not per bond. The number of shares shown in the table
is four times the number of bonds, and the strike price for a
bond is four times the strike price per share shown in the table.
LTI
Plan 2000 Convertible Bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding on
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2009
|
|
|
in 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price on
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Strike Price
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Quantity of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Quantity of
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
in Years
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Day
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
in Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Henning
Kagermann (Co-CEO
and Member until
May 31,
2009)(1)
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
72.58
|
|
|
|
89,700
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,700
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
47.81
|
|
|
|
126,000
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,000
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
37.88
|
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
Léo Apotheker
(Co-CEO)(2)
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
83.67
|
|
|
|
95,400
|
|
|
|
1.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,400
|
|
|
|
0.19
|
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
47.81
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
37.88
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
Dr. Werner Brandt
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
47.81
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
37.88
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
Prof. Dr. Claus E
Heinrich(1)
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
72.58
|
|
|
|
65,700
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,700
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
47.81
|
|
|
|
88,000
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,000
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
37.88
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
Gerhard Oswald
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
72.58
|
|
|
|
65,700
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,700
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
47.81
|
|
|
|
88,000
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,000
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,508,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,508,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Retired May 31, 2009. Subject
to expiration of term, the convertible bonds remain open under a
two-year grace period.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Member from August 1, 2002.
This holding was allocated before appointment to the Executive
Board.
|
Total
Expense for Share-Based Compensation
In the report year and the prior year, total expense for the
share-based compensation plans of Executive Board members was
recorded as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann (Co-CEO and Member until
May 31, 2009)
|
|
|
167,9
|
|
|
|
55.9
|
|
Léo Apotheker (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
376,3
|
|
|
|
37.3
|
|
Dr. Werner Brandt
|
|
|
351,8
|
|
|
|
98.9
|
|
Erwin
Gunst(1)
|
|
|
343,1
|
|
|
|
108.0
|
|
Prof. Dr. Claus E. Heinrich
|
|
|
184,5
|
|
|
|
98.9
|
|
Bill
McDermott(1)
|
|
|
339,3
|
|
|
|
97.4
|
|
Gerhard Oswald
|
|
|
351,8
|
|
|
|
98.9
|
|
John
Schwarz(2)
|
|
|
397,0
|
|
|
|
158.1
|
|
Jim Hagemann
Snabe(1)
|
|
|
318,3
|
|
|
|
95.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,830.0
|
(3)
|
|
|
848.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Member of the Executive Board from
July 1, 2008
|
|
(2)
|
|
Member of the Executive Board
from March 1, 2008
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes incremental expense of
430,000 resulting from the amendment of the exercise
conditions for the 2005 grant of SAP SOP 2002
|
SHAREHOLDINGS AND
TRANSACTIONS OF EXECUTIVE BOARD MEMBERS
No member of the Executive Board holds more than 1% of the
common stock of SAP AG. Members of the Executive Board held a
total of 15,336 SAP shares on December 31, 2009. On
December 31, 2008, members of the Executive Board held a
total of 88,527 SAP shares. The difference is due primarily to
the retirement of two members.
The table below shows transactions by Executive Board members
and persons closely associated with them notified to SAP
pursuant to the German Securities Trading Act, section 15a,
in 2009.
Transactions in SAP Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction Date
|
|
Transaction
|
|
Quantity
|
|
Unit Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Werner Brandt
|
|
|
October 29, 2009
|
|
|
|
Stock purchase
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
31.95
|
|
Executive
Board: Other Information
We did not grant any compensation advance or credit to, or enter
into any commitment for the benefit of, any member of our
Executive Board in 2009 or the previous year.
As far as the law permits, SAP AG and its affiliated companies
in Germany and elsewhere indemnify and hold harmless their
respective directors and officers against and from the claims of
third parties. To this end, we maintain directors and
officers (D&O) group liability insurance. The policy
is annual and is renewed from year to year. The insurance covers
the personal liability of the insured group for financial loss
caused by its
105
managerial acts and omissions. The current D&O policy,
which does not provide for an individual deductible, does not
expire until March 31, 2010, so in 2009 no deductible, as
envisaged in the German Corporate Governance Code of 2008,
applied.
Compensation for
Supervisory Board Members
Compensation
System
Supervisory Board members compensation is governed by our
Articles of Incorporation, section 16. Each member of the
Supervisory Board receives, in addition to the reimbursement of
his or her expenses, compensation composed of fixed elements and
a variable element. The variable element depends on the dividend
paid by SAP on common shares.
The fixed element is 75,000 for the chairperson,
50,000 for the deputy chairperson, and 37,500 for
other members. For membership of a Supervisory Board committee,
members receive additional fixed compensation of 2,500
(provided that the relevant committee meets during the fiscal
year) and the chairperson of the committee receives 5,000.
The fixed remuneration element is due for payment after the end
of the fiscal year.
The variable compensation element is 8,000 for the
chairperson, 6,000 for the deputy chairperson, and
4,000 for the other members of the Supervisory Board for
each 0.01 by which the dividend distributed per share
exceeds 0.25.
However, the aggregate compensation excluding compensation for
committee memberships must not exceed 200,000 for the
chairperson, 150,000 for the deputy chairperson, and
100,000 for other members.
Any member of the Supervisory Board having served for less than
the entire fiscal year receives one-twelfth of their respective
remuneration for each month of service commenced. This also
applies to the higher compensation levels for the chairperson
and deputy chairperson and to the additional compensation for
committee chairs and memberships.
106
Amount of
Compensation
Subject to the resolution on the appropriation of retained
earnings by the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders on
June 8, 2010, the compensation paid to Supervisory Board
members in respect of fiscal year 2009 will be as set out in the
table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
Variable
|
|
|
for Committee
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
Variable
|
|
|
for Committee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Work
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Work
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. h.c. mult. Hasso Plattner (chairperson)
|
|
|
75.0
|
|
|
|
125,0
|
|
|
|
20,0
|
|
|
|
220,0
|
|
|
|
75.0
|
|
|
|
125.0
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
225.0
|
|
Lars Lamadé (deputy chairperson)
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
2,5
|
|
|
|
152,5
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
152.5
|
|
Pekka Ala-Pietilä
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62,5
|
|
|
|
5,0
|
|
|
|
105,0
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
107.5
|
|
Thomas Bamberger
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62,5
|
|
|
|
2,5
|
|
|
|
102,5
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
102.5
|
|
Panagiotis Bissiritsas
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62,5
|
|
|
|
5,0
|
|
|
|
105,0
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
105.0
|
|
Willi Burbach
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62,5
|
|
|
|
5,0
|
|
|
|
105,0
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
105.0
|
|
Helga Classen (until December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
0,0
|
|
|
|
0,0
|
|
|
|
0,0
|
|
|
|
0,0
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
102.5
|
|
Prof. Dr. Wilhelm Haarmann
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62,5
|
|
|
|
10,0
|
|
|
|
110,0
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
109.0
|
|
Peter Koop
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62,5
|
|
|
|
4,8
|
|
|
|
104,8
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
102.5
|
|
Christiane Kuntz-Mayr (from January 1, 2009)
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62,5
|
|
|
|
2,3
|
|
|
|
102,3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Bernard Liautaud (from June 3, 2008)
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62,5
|
|
|
|
2,5
|
|
|
|
102,5
|
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
36.5
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
59.8
|
|
Dr. Gerhard Maier
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62,5
|
|
|
|
5,0
|
|
|
|
105,0
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
105.0
|
|
Dr. h.c. Hartmut Mehdorn
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62,5
|
|
|
|
2,5
|
|
|
|
102,5
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
101.5
|
|
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr. h.c. Dr.-Ing. E.h. Joachim Milberg
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62,5
|
|
|
|
10,0
|
|
|
|
110,0
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
111.5
|
|
Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. August-Wilhelm Scheer (until
April 4, 2008)
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0,0
|
|
|
|
0,0
|
|
|
|
0,0
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
20.8
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
35.8
|
|
Dr. Erhard Schipporeit
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62,5
|
|
|
|
7,5
|
|
|
|
107,5
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
107.5
|
|
Stefan Schulz
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62,5
|
|
|
|
5,0
|
|
|
|
105,0
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
105.0
|
|
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr.-Ing. E.h. Klaus Wucherer
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62,5
|
|
|
|
2,5
|
|
|
|
102,5
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
102.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
650,0
|
|
|
|
1.100,0
|
|
|
|
92,1
|
|
|
|
1.842,1
|
|
|
|
646.9
|
|
|
|
1,094.8
|
|
|
|
98.3
|
|
|
|
1,840.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, we reimburse to members of the Supervisory Board
their expenses and the value-added tax payable on their
compensation.
The total compensation of all Supervisory Board members in 2009
for work for SAP excluding compensation relating to the office
of Supervisory Board member was 1,095,100 (2008:
1,050,300). Those amounts are composed entirely of
remuneration received by employee representatives on the
Supervisory Board relating to their position as SAP employees in
2008 and 2009 respectively.
Long-Term
Incentives for the Supervisory Board
We do not offer members stock options or other share-based
compensation for their Supervisory Board work. Any stock options
or other share-based compensation received by employee-elected
members relate to their position as SAP employees and not to
their work on the Supervisory Board.
Shareholdings
and Transactions of Supervisory Board Members
Supervisory Board chairperson Hasso Plattner and the companies
he controlled held 127,186,143 SAP shares on December 31,
2009 (December 31, 2008: 128,987,982 SAP shares),
representing 10.374% (2008: 10.523%) of
107
SAPs capital stock. No other member of the Supervisory
Board held more than 1% of the SAP AG common stock at the end of
2009 or of the previous year. Members of the Supervisory Board
held a total of 127,193,136 SAP shares on December 31, 2009
(December 31, 2008: 128,995,306 SAP shares).
The table below shows transactions by Supervisory Board members
and persons closely associated with them notified to SAP
pursuant to the German Securities Trading Act, section 15a,
in 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions in SAP Shares
|
|
|
Transaction Date
|
|
Transaction
|
|
Quantity
|
|
Unit Price in
|
|
Dr. Gerhard Maier
|
|
|
August 17, 2009
|
|
|
|
Stock sale
|
|
|
|
6,384
|
|
|
|
32.65
|
|
Hasso Plattner GmbH & Co. Beteiligungs KG
|
|
|
September 14, 2009
|
|
|
|
Stock sale
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
On September 14, 2009, the
notifying party concluded a contract with a bank, which acts as
commission agent, under which the notifying party is selling a
total of 240,000,000 of SAP stock in monthly tranches of
15,000,000 until the term ends on December 31, 2010.
The number of shares sold is the result of dividing the value
sold by the share price current at the time of sale.
|
Supervisory
Board: Other Information
We did not grant any compensation advance or credit to, or enter
into any commitment for the benefit of, any member of our
Supervisory Board in 2009 or the previous year.
Hasso Plattner, the chairperson of the Supervisory Board,
entered into a consulting contract with SAP after he joined the
Supervisory Board in May 2003. The contract does not provide for
any compensation. The only cost we incurred under the contract
was the reimbursement of expenses.
As far as the law permits, we indemnify Supervisory Board
members against, and hold them harmless from, claims brought by
third parties. To this end, we maintain directors and
officers group liability insurance. For more information
about this insurance, see the Executive Board: Other
Information section.
EMPLOYEES
The average number of employees for 2009 were 48,471 FTEs
worldwide (2008: 51,638; 2007: 42,303), which represented a
decrease of 6% from 2008. Of the total headcount,
14,925 employees were based in Germany and 8,101 in the
United States.
In October 2008, in response to the downturn of the economy, we
implemented a headcount freeze under which recruiting was
limited to rare exceptions. In January 2009 we announced our
intention to reduce the number of positions globally to 48,500
by the end of the year, and to take advantage of any attrition
during this time to assist in meeting our year end goal.
Approximately 3,000 positions were eliminated under the
cost-containment program announced at the beginning of 2009. In
addition, roughly 1,000 employees left who were not covered
by this program.
108
The following tables set forth the average number of employees,
measured in full-time equivalents by functional area and by
geographic region, including employees from discontinued
operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Employees (in Full-Time Equivalents)
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
FTEs
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
APJ
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
APJ
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
APJ
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Software and software-related services
|
|
|
3,228
|
|
|
|
1,264
|
|
|
|
1,868
|
|
|
|
6,360
|
|
|
|
3,284
|
|
|
|
1,405
|
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
|
|
6,601
|
|
|
|
3,006
|
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
1,759
|
|
|
|
5,764
|
|
Professional services and other services
|
|
|
6,857
|
|
|
|
3,574
|
|
|
|
2,346
|
|
|
|
12,777
|
|
|
|
7,236
|
|
|
|
4,304
|
|
|
|
2,538
|
|
|
|
14,078
|
|
|
|
6,476
|
|
|
|
3,724
|
|
|
|
2,125
|
|
|
|
12,325
|
|
Research and Development
|
|
|
8,606
|
|
|
|
2,566
|
|
|
|
3,869
|
|
|
|
15,041
|
|
|
|
8,542
|
|
|
|
2,710
|
|
|
|
4,034
|
|
|
|
15,286
|
|
|
|
7,624
|
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
|
|
3,113
|
|
|
|
12,437
|
|
Sales & Marketing
|
|
|
4,315
|
|
|
|
3,600
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
9,715
|
|
|
|
4,649
|
|
|
|
4,143
|
|
|
|
2,014
|
|
|
|
10,806
|
|
|
|
3,578
|
|
|
|
3,040
|
|
|
|
1,320
|
|
|
|
7,938
|
|
General & Administration
|
|
|
1,950
|
|
|
|
743
|
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
3,114
|
|
|
|
2,006
|
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
3,318
|
|
|
|
1,738
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
2,672
|
|
Infrastructure
|
|
|
877
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
1,464
|
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
1,549
|
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
1,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAP Group
|
|
|
25,833
|
|
|
|
12,156
|
|
|
|
10,482
|
|
|
|
48,471
|
|
|
|
26,631
|
|
|
|
13,851
|
|
|
|
11,156
|
|
|
|
51,638
|
|
|
|
23,180
|
|
|
|
10,296
|
|
|
|
8,826
|
|
|
|
42,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The actual net FTEs decreased by 3,960. The percentage decreases
were 11% in the Americas region, 5% in the EMEA region and 9% in
the Asia Pacific Japan region. We reduced 1,488 positions in the
Americas region and 1,466 positions in the EMEA region in 2009.
Of the 1,006 positions reduced in the Asia Pacific Japan region,
most were in India (384) and Japan (273). Of the total
headcount change in 2009, acquisitions accounted for additions
of 232 FTEs worldwide.
Certain employees who are employed by SAP but who are not
currently working or who work part-time while finishing a
university degree are excluded from the above figures. Also,
certain temporary employees are not included in the above
figures. The number of such temporary employees is not material.
On a worldwide basis, we believe that our employee relations are
excellent. Employees of SAP France S.A. and Business Objects
S.A. are subject to a collective bargaining agreement.
On the legal entity level, the employees of SAP AG are
represented by a works council with 37 members and the employees
of SAP Germany are represented by a works council with 31
members. For different areas of co-determination the
entity-level works councils have elected committees. By law, the
works council is entitled to consultation, and in some areas, to
co-determination rights concerning labor conditions at SAP AG
and SAP Germany. Therefore, the implementation of some labor and
employment measures may take longer and be more costly than in
countries without a works council, but these processes offer the
possibility of a better acceptance and understanding of measures
by the employees. Other employee representatives include the
group works council currently having six members (members of the
Works Councils of SAP and SAP Germany); the
representatives of severely disabled persons in all entities and
on a group level (Germany); the Spokespersons Committee as the
representation of the executives; and the employee
representatives on the Supervisory Board.
On December 31 2009, as a result of the grouping of operational
and R&D teams into one single legal entity called SAP
France (formerly referred to as Business Objects S.A.), the
French staffs of SAP France are represented by a French central
works council and by two secondary works councils,
one for R&D and one for operations. Such a representation
is transitional and will last until new elections take place in
the 4th quarter of 2010. The central works council is
entitled to receive information and to be consulted on matters
that are expected to have an impact on the Company structure or
on the overall workforce. Secondary works councils
are entitled to the same prerogatives for matters that are
expected to have a specific impact at their own level i.e. (on
operational or on R&D line of service).
SAP Labs France staffs are also represented by a French works
council.
A French works council is responsible for protecting the
employees collective interests by ensuring that management
considers the interests of employees in making decisions on
behalf of the company. In addition,
109
the employees of our subsidiaries SAP Spain, SAP Belgium and SAP
Netherlands are also represented by works councils. An employee
consultation forum has been established at our SAP (U.K.)
Limited subsidiary.
SHARE OWNERSHIP
Beneficial Ownership
of Shares
The ordinary shares beneficially owned by the persons listed in
Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and
Employees Compensation Report are disclosed in
Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related-Party
Transactions Major Shareholders.
SHARE-BASED
COMPENSATION PLANS
Share-Based
Compensation
We maintain certain share-based compensation plans. The
share-based compensation from these plans result from
cash-settled and equity-settled awards issued to employees. For
more information on our share-based compensation plans refer to
Item 6. Directory, Senior Management and Employees
Compensation Report and Note 28 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 18.
Financial Statements.
ITEM 7. MAJOR
SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS
The share capital of SAP AG consists of ordinary shares, which
are issued only in bearer form. Accordingly, SAP AG generally
has no way of determining who its shareholders are or how many
shares a particular shareholder owns. SAPs ordinary shares
are traded in the United States by means of ADRs. Each ADR
currently represents one SAP AG ordinary share. On
March 10, 2010, based upon information provided by the
Depositary there were 67,892,173 ADRs held of record by 906
registered holders. The ordinary shares underlying such ADRs
represented 5.53% of the then-outstanding ordinary shares
(including treasury stock). Because SAPs ordinary shares
are issued in bearer form only, we are unable to determine the
number of ordinary shares directly held by persons with
U.S. addresses.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
beneficial ownership of the ordinary shares to the extent known
to SAP as of March 10, 2010 of: (i) each person or
group known by SAP AG to own beneficially 5% or more of the
outstanding ordinary shares; and (ii) the beneficial
ownership of all members of the Supervisory Board and all
members of the Executive Board, individually and as a group, in
each case as reported to SAP AG by such persons. There was, as
far as we are able to tell given the nature of our shares, no
significant change in the percentage ownership held by any major
shareholder during the past three years. None of the major
shareholders have special voting rights. On October 28,
2008, Capital Research and Management Company informed us that
the level of their holdings exceeded 3% and was then 3.19%. On
December 7, 2009 BlackRock Inc., New York, USA notified us
as follows: The percentage of voting shares of BlackRock
Financial Management, Inc., New York, USA exceeded 3% on
December 1, 2009 and was then 3.13%. The percentage of
voting shares of BlockRock Holdco 2, Inc., New York, USA
exceeded 3% on December 1, 2009 and was then 3.13%.
110
The percentage of voting shares of BlockRock, Inc., New York,
USA exceeded 3% on December 1, 2009 and was then 3.21%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary Shares
|
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
Major Shareholders
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Dietmar Hopp,
collectively(1)
|
|
|
75,273,200
|
|
|
|
6.136
|
%
|
Hasso Plattner, Chairperson Supervisory Board,
collectively(2)
|
|
|
122,946,427
|
|
|
|
10.023
|
%
|
Klaus Tschira,
collectively(3)
|
|
|
103,429,595
|
|
|
|
8.432
|
%
|
Executive Board Members as a group (5 persons)
|
|
|
12,327
|
|
|
|
0.001
|
%
|
Supervisory Board Members as a group (16 persons)
|
|
|
122,953,313
|
|
|
|
10.023
|
%
|
Executive Board Members and Supervisory Board Members as a
group
(21 persons)(4)
|
|
|
122,965,640
|
|
|
|
10.024
|
%
|
Options and convertible bonds that are vested and exercisable
within 60 days of March 10, 2010, held by Executive
Board Members and Supervisory Board Members,
collectively(5)
|
|
|
145.037
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Represents 75,273,200 ordinary shares beneficially owned by
Dietmar Hopp, including 3,404,000 ordinary shares owned by DH
Besitzgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (formerly known as
Golf Club St. Leon-Rot GmbH & Co. Betriebs-oHG) of
which DH Verwaltungs-GmbH is the general partner and 71,869,200
ordinary shares owned by Dietmar Hopp Stiftung, GmbH.
Mr. Hopp exercises voting and dispositive powers of the
ordinary shars held by such entities. The foregoing information
is based solely on a Schedule 13G filed by Dietmar Hopp and
Dietmar Hopp Stiftung, GmbH on February 16, 2010.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes Hasso Plattner Förderstiftung gGmbH and Hasso
Plattner GmbH & Co. Beteiligungs-KG in which Hasso
Plattner exercises sole voting and dispositive power.
|
|
(3)
|
Represents 103,429,595 ordinary shares beneficially owned by
Dr. h. c. Klaus Tschira, including 67,860,955 ordinary
shares owned by Klaus Tschira Stiftung gGmbH and 32,830,640
ordinary shares owned by Dr. h. c. Tschira Beteiligungs
GmbH & Co. KG. Dr. Tschira exercises the voting
and dispositive powers over the ordinary shares held by such
entities. The foregoing information is based solely on a
Schedule 13G filed by Dr. hc. Klaus Tschira,
Dr. h. c. Tschira Beteiligungs GmbH & Co. KG,
Dr. h. c. Tschira Verwaltungs GmbH and Klaus Tschira
Stiftung gGmbH on February 10, 2010.
|
|
(4)
|
We believe each of the other members of the Supervisory Board
and the Executive Board beneficially owns less than 1% of SAP
AGs ordinary shares as of March 10, 2010.
|
|
(5)
|
Includes 81,112 stock options and 63,925 convertible bonds. Each
of these stock options and convertible bonds entitles the
holder, if exercised or converted, to four SAP AG ordinary
shares.
|
We at present have no knowledge about any arrangements, the
operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change
in control of the company.
RELATED-PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
See Note 31 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in
Item 18. Financial Statements.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
See Item 18. Financial Statements, pages F-1
through F-105 and pages S-1 through S-4.
111
OTHER FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Legal Proceedings
We are subject to legal proceedings and claims, either asserted
or unasserted, which arise in the ordinary course of business.
Although the outcome of such proceedings and claims cannot be
predicted with certainty, management does not believe that the
outcome of any of the matters currently pending against us will
have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations, financial position or cash flows. Any litigation,
however, involves potential risk and potentially significant
litigation costs, and therefore there can be no assurance that
any litigation which is now pending or which may arise in the
future will not have such a material adverse effect on our
business, financial position, income or cash flows.
See a detailed discussion of our legal proceedings in
Note 24 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in
Item 18. Financial Statements.
Dividend Policy
Dividends are jointly proposed by SAP AGs Supervisory
Board and Executive Board based on SAP AGs year-end
stand-alone financial statements, subject to approval at the
Annual General Meeting of Shareholders. Dividends are officially
declared for the prior year at SAP AGs Annual General
Meeting of Shareholders. SAP AGs Annual General Meeting of
Shareholders usually convenes during the second quarter of each
year. Since ordinary shares are in bearer form, dividends are
usually remitted to the custodian bank on behalf of the
shareholder within one business day following the Annual General
Meeting of Shareholders. Record holders of the ADRs on the
dividend record date will be entitled to receive payment of the
dividend declared in respect of the year for which it is
declared. Cash dividends payable to such holders will be paid to
the Depositary in euro and, subject to certain exceptions, will
be converted by the Depositary into U.S. dollars. The
amount of dividends received by holders of ADRs may be affected
by fluctuations in exchange rates (see Item 3. Key
Information Exchange Rates). The timing and
amount of future dividend payments will depend upon our future
earnings, capital needs and other relevant factors.
Significant Changes
In January 2010, SAP announced that it is offering a
comprehensive tiered support model to customers worldwide. This
offering includes SAP Enterprise Support services and the SAP
Standard Support option and will enable customers to choose the
option that best meets their requirements.
In February 2010, SAP announced various changes in the Executive
Board which are described in detail in Item 6.
Directors, Senior Management and Employees Executive
Board.
ITEM 9. THE
OFFER AND LISTING
GENERAL
Our ordinary shares are officially listed on the Frankfurt Stock
Exchange, the Berlin Stock Exchange and the Stuttgart Stock
Exchange. The principal trading market for the ordinary shares
is Xetra, the electronic dealing platform of Deutsche Boerse AG.
The ordinary shares are issued only in bearer form.
ADRs representing SAP AG ordinary shares are listed on the New
York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol SAP, and
currently each ADR represents one ordinary share.
112
TRADING ON THE
FRANKFURT STOCK EXCHANGE AND THE NYSE
The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high
and low closing sales prices for the ordinary shares on the
Xetra trading System of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange together
with the closing highs and lows of the DAX, and the high and low
closing sales prices for the ADRs on the NYSE (information is
provided by Reuters):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary Share (1)
|
|
|
DAX(2)
|
|
|
Price per ADR
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
|
In
|
|
|
In
|
|
|
In US$
|
|
|
Annual Highs and Lows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
38.95
|
|
|
|
28.63
|
|
|
|
5,458.58
|
|
|
|
4,178.10
|
|
|
|
46.43
|
|
|
|
36.96
|
|
2006
|
|
|
46.86
|
|
|
|
34.56
|
|
|
|
6,611.81
|
|
|
|
5,292.14
|
|
|
|
57.00
|
|
|
|
43.57
|
|
2007
|
|
|
42.27
|
|
|
|
33.37
|
|
|
|
8,105.69
|
|
|
|
6,447.70
|
|
|
|
59.86
|
|
|
|
44.45
|
|
2008
|
|
|
39.93
|
|
|
|
23.45
|
|
|
|
7,949.11
|
|
|
|
4,127.41
|
|
|
|
58.98
|
|
|
|
29.70
|
|
2009
|
|
|
35.26
|
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
|
|
6,011.55
|
|
|
|
3,666.41
|
|
|
|
52.37
|
|
|
|
31.69
|
|
Quarterly Highs and Lows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
34.88
|
|
|
|
29.96
|
|
|
|
7,949.11
|
|
|
|
6,182.30
|
|
|
|
51.93
|
|
|
|
45.77
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
35.52
|
|
|
|
31.50
|
|
|
|
7,225.94
|
|
|
|
6,418.32
|
|
|
|
55.20
|
|
|
|
48.72
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
39.93
|
|
|
|
32.38
|
|
|
|
6,609.63
|
|
|
|
5,807.08
|
|
|
|
58.98
|
|
|
|
51.40
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
36.98
|
|
|
|
23.45
|
|
|
|
5,806.33
|
|
|
|
4,127.41
|
|
|
|
51.85
|
|
|
|
29.70
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
29.64
|
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
|
|
5,026.31
|
|
|
|
3,666.41
|
|
|
|
38.61
|
|
|
|
31.69
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
31.25
|
|
|
|
27.00
|
|
|
|
5,144.06
|
|
|
|
4,131.07
|
|
|
|
44.87
|
|
|
|
35.73
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
35.26
|
|
|
|
27.32
|
|
|
|
5,736.31
|
|
|
|
4,572.65
|
|
|
|
51.70
|
|
|
|
37.87
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
35.08
|
|
|
|
30.09
|
|
|
|
6,011.55
|
|
|
|
5,353.35
|
|
|
|
52.37
|
|
|
|
44.28
|
|
Monthly Highs and Lows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July
|
|
|
33.00
|
|
|
|
27.32
|
|
|
|
5,360.66
|
|
|
|
4,572.65
|
|
|
|
47.25
|
|
|
|
37.87
|
|
August
|
|
|
34.06
|
|
|
|
32.58
|
|
|
|
5,557.09
|
|
|
|
5,201.61
|
|
|
|
49.01
|
|
|
|
45.88
|
|
September
|
|
|
35.26
|
|
|
|
33.17
|
|
|
|
5,736.31
|
|
|
|
5,301.42
|
|
|
|
51.70
|
|
|
|
47.83
|
|
October
|
|
|
35.08
|
|
|
|
30.80
|
|
|
|
5,854.14
|
|
|
|
5,414.96
|
|
|
|
52.37
|
|
|
|
45.27
|
|
November
|
|
|
32.91
|
|
|
|
31.30
|
|
|
|
5,804.82
|
|
|
|
5,353.35
|
|
|
|
49.09
|
|
|
|
46.00
|
|
December
|
|
|
33.00
|
|
|
|
30.09
|
|
|
|
6,011.55
|
|
|
|
5,647.84
|
|
|
|
48.19
|
|
|
|
44.28
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January
|
|
|
35.35
|
|
|
|
32.18
|
|
|
|
6,048.30
|
|
|
|
5,540.33
|
|
|
|
51.19
|
|
|
|
45.14
|
|
February
|
|
|
34.05
|
|
|
|
31.12
|
|
|
|
5,722.05
|
|
|
|
5,434.34
|
|
|
|
47.46
|
|
|
|
42.81
|
|
March (through March 10, 2010)
|
|
|
34.08
|
|
|
|
33.45
|
|
|
|
5,936.72
|
|
|
|
5,713.51
|
|
|
|
46.48
|
|
|
|
45.27
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Share prices for 2006 and prior are retrospectively adjusted for
the effect of the fourfold increase in the number of shares
resulting from the capital increase which became effective
December 15, 2006.
|
|
(2)
|
The DAX is a continuously updated, capital-weighted performance
index of 30 German blue chip companies. In principle, the shares
included in the DAX are selected on the basis of their stock
exchange turnover and the issuers free-float market
capitalization. Adjustments to the DAX are made for capital
changes, subscription rights and dividends.
|
On March 10, 2010, the closing sales price per ordinary
share on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange (Xetra Trading System) was
34.02 the closing sales price per ADR on the NYSE was
US$46.48, as reported by Reuters.
113
ITEM 10.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
ARTICLES OF
INCORPORATION
Organization and
Register
SAP AG is a stock corporation organized in the Federal Republic
of Germany under the Stock Corporation Act
(Aktiengesetz). SAP AG is registered in the Commercial
Register (Handelsregister) at the Lower Court of
Mannheim, Germany, under the entry number HRB
350269. SAP AG publishes its official notices in the
Internet version of the Federal Gazette
(www.ebundesanzeiger.de).
Objects and Purposes
SAPs Articles of Incorporation state that our objects
involve, directly or indirectly, the development, production and
marketing of products and the provision of services in the field
of information technology, including:
|
|
|
|
|
developing and marketing integrated product and service
solutions for
e-commerce;
|
|
|
|
developing software for information technology and the licensing
of its use to others;
|
|
|
|
organization and deployment consulting, as well as user
training, for
e-commerce
and other software solutions;
|
|
|
|
selling, leasing, renting and arranging the procurement and
provision of all other forms of use of information technology
systems and related equipment; and
|
|
|
|
making capital investments in enterprises active in the field of
information technology to promote the opening and advancement of
international markets in the field of information technology.
|
SAP is authorized to act in all the business areas listed above
and to delegate such activities to affiliated enterprises within
the meaning of the German Stock Corporation Act; in particular
SAP is authorized to delegate its business in whole or in part
to such enterprises. SAP AG is authorized to establish branch
offices in Germany and other countries, as well as to form,
acquire or invest in other companies of the same or related kind
and to enter into collaboration and joint venture agreements.
SAP is further authorized to invest in enterprises of all kinds
principally for the purpose of placing financial resources. SAP
is authorized to dispose of investments, to consolidate the
management of enterprises in which it participates, to enter
into affiliation agreements with such enterprises, or limits its
activities to manage its shareholdings.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Introduction
SAP AG, as a German stock corporation, is governed by three
separate bodies: the Supervisory Board, the Executive Board and
the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders. Their rules are
defined by German law and by SAPs Articles of
Incorporation (Satzung) and are summarized below. See
Item 16G. Differences in Corporate Governance
Practices for additional information on our corporate
governance practices.
The Supervisory Board
The Supervisory Board appoints and removes the members of the
Executive Board and oversees and advises the management of the
corporation. At regular intervals it meets to discuss current
business as well as business development and planning. The SAP
Executive Board must consult with the Supervisory Board
concerning the corporate strategy, which is developed by the
Executive Board. The Supervisory Board maintains
114
a list of transactions for which the Executive Board requires
the Supervisory Boards consent. Accordingly, the
Supervisory Board must also approve the annual budget of SAP
upon submission by the Executive Board and certain subsequent
deviations from the approved budget. The Supervisory Board is
also responsible for representing SAP AG in transactions between
SAP AG and Executive Board members.
The Supervisory Board, based on a recommendation by its Audit
Committee, provides its proposal for the election of the
independent public accountant to the Annual General Meeting of
Shareholders. The Supervisory Board is also responsible for
monitoring the auditors independence, a task it has
delegated to its audit committee.
The German Co-determination Act of 1976
(Mitbestimmungsgesetz) requires supervisory boards of
corporations with more than 2,000 employees to consist of
an equal number of representatives of the shareholders and
representatives of the employees. The minimum total number of
supervisory board members, and thus the minimum number of
shareholder representatives and employee representatives, is
legally fixed and depends on the number of employees employed by
the corporation and its German subsidiaries. Our Supervisory
Board currently consists of sixteen members, of which eight
members have been elected by SAP AGs shareholders at the
Annual General Meeting of Shareholders and eight members which
have been elected by the employees of the German SAP entities
(i.e. entities of the SAP Group having their registered office
in Germany).
Any Supervisory Board member elected by the shareholders at the
Annual General Meeting of Shareholders may be removed by
three-quarters of the votes cast at the Annual General Meeting
of Shareholders. Any Supervisory Board member elected by the
employees may be removed by three quarters of the votes cast by
the employees of the German SAP entities.
The Supervisory Board elects a chairperson and a deputy
chairperson among its members by a majority of vote of its
members. If such majority is not reached on the first vote, the
chairperson will be chosen solely by the members elected by the
shareholders and the deputy chairperson will be chosen solely by
the members elected by the employees. Unless otherwise provided
by law, the Supervisory Board acts by simple majority. In the
case of any deadlock the chairperson has the deciding vote.
The members of the Supervisory Board cannot be elected for a
longer term than approximately 5 years. The term expires at
the close of the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders giving
its formal approval of the acts of the Supervisory Board and the
Executive Board in the fourth fiscal year following the year in
which the Supervisory Board was elected unless the Annual
General Meeting of Shareholders specifies a shorter term of
office when electing individual members of the Supervisory Board
or the entire Supervisory Board. Re-election is possible. The
Supervisory Board normally meets four times a year. The
remuneration of the members of the Supervisory Board is
determined by the Articles of Incorporation.
As stipulated in the German Corporate Governance Code (GCGC), an
adequate number of our Supervisory Board members are
independent. To be considered for appointment to the Supervisory
Board and for as long as they serve, members must comply with
certain criteria concerning independence, conflicts of interest
and multiple memberships of management, supervisory and other
governing bodies. They must be loyal to SAP in their conduct and
must not accept any position in companies that are in
competition with SAP. Members are subject to insider trading
prohibition and the respective directors dealing rules of
the German Securities Trading Act. A member of the Supervisory
Board may not vote on matters relating to certain contractual
agreements between such members and SAP AG. Further, as the
compensation of the Supervisory Board members is laid down in
the Articles of Incorporation, Supervisory Board members are
unable to vote on their own compensation.
The Supervisory Board may appoint committees from among its
members and may, to the extent permitted by law, entrust such
committees with the authority to make decisions. Currently the
Supervisory Board maintains the following committees:
The focus of the Audit Committee
(Prüfungsausschuss) is the oversight of
SAPs external financial reporting as well as SAPs
risk management, internal controls (including internal controls
over financial reporting), internal
115
audit and compliance matters. Among the tasks of the Audit
Committee are the discussion of SAPs quarterly and yearend
financial reporting prepared under German and
U.S. regulations, including SAPs Annual Report on
Form 20-F.
The Audit Committee proposes the appointment of the external
auditor to the Supervisory Board, determines focus audit areas,
discusses critical accounting policies and estimates with and
reviews the audit reports issued and audit issues identified by
the auditor and monitors the auditors independence. Both
SAPs Global Internal Audit Services (GIAS) and SAPs
Global Compliance Office (GCO) report upon request or at the
occurrence of certain findings, but in any case at least once a
year (GCO) or twice a year (GIAS), directly to the Audit
Committee.
The Audit Committee has established procedures regarding the
prior approval of all audit and non-audit services provided by
our independent auditor. See Item 16C. Principal
Accountant Fees and Services for details. Furthermore the
Audit Committee monitors the effectiveness of our internal risk
management and other monitoring processes that are or need to be
established.
The Audit Committee is currently composed of 4 members: Erhard
Schipporeit, Thomas Bamberger, Gerhard Maier and Joachim
Milberg. The Supervisory Board has determined Erhard Schipporeit
to be an audit committee financial expert as defined by the
regulations of the SEC issued under Section 407 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act as well as an independent financial expert as
defined by the German Stock Corporation Act. See
Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert for
details. He is also the chairperson of the Audit Committee.
The General Committee (Präsidialausschuss)
coordinates the Supervisory Board agenda, meetings and deals
with corporate governance issues. Furthermore, it was assigned
the authority to approve the grant of virtual stock options
under the SAP SOP 2009 performance plan to all recipients
with the exception of Executive Board members.
The Compensation Committee (Personalausschuss) deals with
the employment contracts of Executive Board members. It prepares
proposals for the Executive Board members compensation and
the Executive Board compensation system for approval by the
Supervisory Board.
The Finance and Investment Committee (Finanz- und
Investitionsausschuss) addresses general financing issues.
Furthermore, it regularly discusses venture capital investments
and other equity investments with the Executive Board and
reports to the Supervisory Board on such investments. It is also
responsible for the approval of such investments if the
individual investment amount exceeds certain specified limits.
Required by the German Co-determination Act of 1976
(Mitbestimmungsgesetz), the Mediation Committee
(Vermittlungsausschuss) convenes only if the two-thirds
majority required for appointing/revoking the appointment of
Executive Board members is not attained. This committee has
never held a meeting in SAP AGs history.
The Strategy and Technology Committee (Strategie- und
Technologieausschuss) monitors technology transactions and
provides the Supervisory Board with in-depth technical advice.
The Nomination Committee (Nominierungsausschuss) is
exclusively composed of shareholder representatives and is
responsible for identifying suitable candidates for membership
of the Supervisory Board for recommendation to the Annual
General Meeting of Shareholders.
The Special Committee (Sonderausschuss),
established on June 3, 2008, is tasked with coordinating
and managing the Supervisory Boards external legal
advisors concerned with the investigation and analysis of the
facts in connection with the legal action brought by Oracle
Corporation.
The duties, procedures and committees of the Supervisory Board
are specified in their respective bylaws which reflect the
requirements of the German Stock Corporation Act and the GCGC.
According to the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, SAP does
not grant loans to the members of the Executive Board or the
Supervisory Board.
116
The Executive Board
The Executive Board manages the Companys business, is
responsible for preparing its strategy and represents it in
dealings with third parties. The Executive Board reports
regularly to the Supervisory Board about SAP operations and
business strategies and prepares special reports upon request. A
person may not serve on the Executive Board and on the
Supervisory Board at the same time.
The Executive Board and the Supervisory Board must cooperate
closely for the benefit of the Company. Without being asked, the
Executive Board must provide to the Supervisory Board regular,
prompt and comprehensive information about all of the essential
issues affecting the SAP Groups business progress and its
potential business risks. Furthermore, the Executive Board must
maintain regular contact with the chairperson of the Supervisory
Board. The Executive Board must inform the chairperson of the
Supervisory Board promptly about exceptional events that are of
significance to SAPs business. The chairperson must inform
the Supervisory Board accordingly.
Pursuant to the Articles of Incorporation, the Executive Board
must consist of at least 2 members. Currently, SAP AGs
Executive Board is composed of 5 members. Any 2 members of the
Executive Board jointly or one member of the Executive Board and
the holder of a special power of attorney (Prokurist)
jointly may legally represent SAP AG. The Supervisory Board
appoints each member of the Executive Board for a maximum term
of 5 years, with the possibility of re-appointment. Under
certain circumstances, a member of the Executive Board may be
removed by the Supervisory Board prior to the expiration of that
members term. A member of the Executive Board may not vote
on matters relating to certain contractual agreements between
such member and SAP AG, and may be liable to SAP AG if such
member has a material interest in any contractual agreement
between SAP and a third party which was not disclosed to and
approved by the Supervisory Board. Further, as the compensation
of the Executive Board members is set by the Supervisory Board,
Executive Board members are unable to vote on their own
compensation.
Under German law SAP AGs Supervisory Board members and
Executive Board members have a duty of loyalty and care towards
SAP AG. They must exercise the standard of care of a prudent and
diligent businessman and bear the burden of proving they did so
if their actions are contested. Both bodies must consider the
interest of SAP AG shareholders and our employees and, to some
extent, the common interest. Those who violate their duties may
be held jointly and severally liable for any resulting damages,
unless they acted pursuant to a lawful resolution of the Annual
General Meeting of Shareholders.
SAP has implemented a Code of Business Conduct for employees
(see Item 16B. Code of Ethics for details). The
employee code is equally applicable to managers and members of
the Executive Board.
Under German law the Executive Board of SAP AG has to assess all
major risks for the SAP Group. In addition, all measures taken
by management to reduce and handle the risks have to be
documented. Therefore, SAPs management has adopted
suitable measures such as implementing an enterprise-wide
monitoring system to ensure that adverse developments
endangering the corporate standing are recognized at a
reasonably early point in time.
The Global Compliance Office (GCO), an extension of SAPs
Global Legal Department, was created by the SAP Executive Board
in 2006 to oversee and coordinate legal and regulatory policy
compliance at SAP. Effective March 1, 2007, the Company
appointed a new Chief Global Compliance Officer who reports to
the General Counsel, and also has direct communication channels
and reporting obligations to the Executive Board and the Audit
Committee of the Supervisory Board. The GCO manages a network of
more than 100 local subsidiary Compliance Officers who act as
the point of contact for local questions or issues under the SAP
Code of Business Conduct for employees. The GCO provides
training and communication to SAP employees to raise awareness
and understanding of legal and regulatory compliance policies.
Employee help lines are also supported in each region where
questions can be raised or questionable conduct can be
reported without fear of repercussion.
117
The Annual General
Meeting of Shareholders
Shareholders of the Company exercise their voting rights at
shareholders meetings. The Executive Board calls the
Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, which must take place
within the first eight months of each fiscal year. The
Supervisory Board or the Executive Board may call an
extraordinary meeting of the shareholders if the interests of
the stock corporation so require. Additionally, shareholders of
SAP AG holding in the aggregate a minimum of 5% of SAP AGs
issued share capital may call an extraordinary meeting of the
shareholders. Shareholders as of the record date are entitled to
attend and participate in shareholders meetings if they
have provided timely notice of their intention to attend the
meeting.
At the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, the shareholders
are asked, among other things, to formally approve the actions
taken by the Executive Board and the Supervisory Board in the
preceding fiscal year, to approve the distribution of the
corporations profits, to appoint an independent auditor
and to ratify amendments of our Articles of Incorporation.
Shareholder representatives of the Supervisory Board are elected
at the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders for a term of
approximately five years. Shareholders may also be asked to
resolve on measures to raise or reduce the capital of the
Company. The Annual General Meeting of Shareholders can make
management decisions only if requested to do so by the Executive
Board.
CHANGE IN CONTROL
There are no provisions in the Articles of Incorporation of SAP
AG that would have an effect of delaying, deferring or
preventing a change in control of SAP AG and that would only
operate with respect to a merger, acquisition or corporate
restructuring involving it or any of its subsidiaries.
On January 1, 2002, the German Securities Purchase and
Takeover Act (Wertpapiererwerbs- und
Übernahmegesetz) became effective. It requires, among
other things, that a bidder seeking control of a company with
its corporate seat in Germany and traded on a European Union
stock exchange must publish advance notice of a tender offer,
submit a draft offer statement to the Federal Financial
Supervisory Authority (Bundesanstalt für
Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht) for review, and obtain
certification from a qualified financial institution that
adequate financing is in place to complete the offer. Once a
bidder has acquired shares representing 30% of the voting power
of the target company, it must make an offer for all remaining
shares. The Securities Purchase and Takeover Act requires the
executive board of the target company to refrain from taking any
measures that may frustrate the success of the takeover offer.
However, the target executive board is permitted to take any
action that a prudent and diligent management of a company that
is not the target of a takeover bid would also take. Moreover,
the target executive board may search for other bidders and,
with the prior approval of the supervisory board, may take other
defensive measures, provided that both boards act within the
parameters of their general authority under the German Stock
Corporation Act. An executive board may also adopt specific
defensive measures if such measures have been approved by the
supervisory board and were specifically authorized by the
shareholders no later than 18 months in advance of a
takeover bid by resolution of 75% of the votes cast.
Effective as of July 14, 2006 the German Implementation Act
for the European Takeover Directive amended the German Purchase
and Takeover Act. Under the European Takeover Directive member
states may choose whether EU restrictions on frustrating action
apply to companies that are registered in their territory.
Germany decided to opt out and to retain its current
restrictions on a board taking frustrating action (as described
above). As required by the Directive if a country decides to opt
out the German Purchase and Takeover Act grants companies the
option of voluntarily applying the European standard by a change
of the Articles of Incorporation (opt-in). SAP AG has not made
use of this option.
CHANGE IN SHARE
CAPITAL
Under German law, the capital stock may be increased in
consideration of contributions in cash or in kind, or by
establishing authorized capital or contingent capital or by an
increase of the companys capital
118
reserves. Authorized capital provides the Executive Board with
the flexibility to issue new shares for a period of up to five
years. The Executive Board must obtain the approval of the
Supervisory Board before issuing new shares with regard to the
authorized capital. Contingent capital allows the issuance of
new shares for specified purposes, including employee stock
option plans and the issuance of shares upon conversion of
convertible bonds and exercise of stock options. By law, the
Executive Board may only issue new shares with regard to the
contingent capital for the specified purposes. Capital increases
require an approval by 75% of the issued shares present at the
Annual General Meeting of Shareholders in which the increase is
proposed, and requires an amendment to the Articles of
Incorporation.
The share capital may be reduced by an amendment to the Articles
of Incorporation approved by 75% of the issued shares present at
the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders. In addition, the
Executive Board of SAP AG is allowed to authorize a reduction of
the companys capital stock by canceling a defined number
of repurchased treasury shares if this repurchasing and the
subsequent reduction have already been approved by the Annual
General Meeting of Shareholders.
The Articles of Incorporation do not contain conditions
regarding changes in the share capital that are more stringent
than those required by German law.
RIGHTS ACCOMPANYING
OUR SHARES
There are no limitations imposed by German law or the Articles
of Incorporation of SAP AG on the rights to own securities,
including the rights of non-residents or foreign holders to hold
the ADRs or ordinary shares, to exercise voting rights or to
receive dividends or other payments on such shares.
According to the German stock corporation law, the rights of
shareholders cannot be amended without shareholders
consent. The Articles of Incorporation do not provide more
stringent conditions regarding changes of the rights of
shareholders than those required by German law.
Voting Rights
Each ordinary share represents one vote. Cumulative voting is
not permitted under German law. SAP AGs Articles of
Incorporation provide that resolutions may be passed at the
Annual General Meeting of Shareholders by the majority as
required by law. This means that resolutions may be passed by a
majority of votes cast, unless the law requires a higher vote.
German law requires that the following matters, among others, be
approved by the affirmative vote of 75% of the issued shares
present at the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders in which
the matter is proposed:
|
|
|
|
|
changing the corporate purpose of the company set out in the
articles of incorporation;
|
|
|
|
capital increases and capital decreases;
|
|
|
|
excluding preemptive rights of shareholders to subscribe for new
shares;
|
|
|
|
dissolution;
|
|
|
|
a merger into, or a consolidation with, another company;
|
|
|
|
a transfer of all or virtually all of the assets; and
|
|
|
|
a change of corporate form.
|
Dividend Rights
See Item 3. Key Information
Dividends and Item 8. Financial
Information Dividend Policy.
119
Preemptive Rights
Shareholders have preemptive rights to subscribe
(Bezugsrecht) for any issue of additional shares in
proportion to their shareholdings in the issued capital. The
preemptive rights may be excluded under certain circumstances by
a shareholders resolution (approved by 75% of the issued
shares present at the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders) or
by the Executive Board authorized by such shareholders
resolutions and subject to the consent of the Supervisory Board.
Liquidation
If SAP AG were to be liquidated, any liquidation proceeds
remaining after all of our liabilities were paid would be
distributed to our shareholders in proportion to their
shareholdings.
Disclosure of
Shareholdings
SAP AGs Articles of Incorporation do not require
shareholders to disclose their share holdings. The German
Securities Trading Act (Wertpapierhandelsgesetz),
however, requires holders of voting securities of SAP AG to
notify SAP AG and the Federal Financial Supervisory Authority of
the number or shares they hold if that number reaches, exceeds
of falls below specified thresholds. These thresholds are 3%,
5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 50% and 75% of the
corporations outstanding voting rights.
In addition, the German Securities Trading Act also obliges
anyone who holds, directly or indirectly, financial instruments
that result in an entitlement to acquire, on ones
initiative alone and under a legally binding agreement, shares
in SAP AG, to notify without undue delay to SAP AG and the
Federal Financial Supervisory Authority if the thresholds
mentioned above have been reached, exceeded or fallen below,
with the exception of the 3% threshold. Furthermore, the German
Risk Limitation Act (Risikobegrenzungsgesetz) provides
for an aggregation of positions in voting rights and other
financial instruments effective as of March 1, 2009.
Exchange Controls
and Other Limitations Affecting Security Holders
The euro is a fully convertible currency. At the present time,
Germany does not restrict the export or import of capital,
except for investments in certain areas in accordance with
applicable resolutions adopted by the United Nations and the
European Union. However, for statistical purposes only, every
individual or corporation residing in Germany
(Resident) must report to the German Central Bank
(Deutsche Bundesbank), subject only to certain immaterial
exceptions, any payment received from or made to an individual
or a corporation residing outside of Germany
(Non-Resident) if such payment exceeds 12,500
(or the equivalent in a foreign currency). In addition, German
Residents must report any claims against or any liabilities
payable to Non-Residents if such claims or liabilities, in the
aggregate, exceed 5 million (or the equivalent in a
foreign currency) at the end of any calendar month. Residents
are also required to report annually to the German Central Bank
any shares or voting rights of 10% or more which they hold
directly or indirectly in non-resident corporations with total
assets of more than 3 million. Corporations residing
in Germany with assets in excess of 3 million must
report annually to the German Central Bank any shares or voting
rights of 10% or more held directly or indirectly by a
Non-Resident.
TAXATION
General
The following discussion is a summary of certain material German
tax and U.S. federal income tax consequences of the
acquisition, ownership and disposition of our ADRs or ordinary
shares to a U.S. Holder. In general, a U.S. Holder (as
hereinafter defined) is any beneficial owner of our ADRs or
ordinary shares that (i) is a citizen or resident of the
U.S. or a corporation organized under the laws of the
U.S. or any political subdivision
120
thereof, an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal
income tax regardless of its source or a trust, if a
U.S. court can exercise primary supervision over its
administration and one or more U.S. persons are authorized
to control all substantial decisions of the trust; (ii) is
not a resident of Germany for purposes of the income tax treaty
between the U.S. and Germany (Convention between the
Federal Republic of Germany and the United States of America for
the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal
Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and Capital and to
certain other Taxes, as amended by the Protocol of June 1,
2006 and as published in the German Federal Law Gazette 2008
vol. II pp. 611/851; the Treaty); (iii) owns
the ADRs or ordinary shares as capital assets; (iv) does
not hold the ADRs or ordinary shares as part of the business
property of a permanent establishment or a fixed base in
Germany; and (v) is fully entitled to the benefits under
the Treaty with respect to income and gain derived in connection
with the ADRs or ordinary shares.
THE FOLLOWING IS NOT A COMPREHENSIVE DISCUSSION OF ALL GERMAN
TAX AND U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES THAT MAY BE
RELEVANT FOR U.S. HOLDERS OF OUR ADRS OR ORDINARY SHARES.
THEREFORE, U.S. HOLDERS ARE STRONGLY URGED TO CONSULT THEIR
OWN TAX ADVISORS REGARDING THE OVERALL GERMAN TAX AND
U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE ACQUISITION,
OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF OUR ADRS OR ORDINARY SHARES IN
LIGHT OF THEIR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES, INCLUDING THE EFFECT OF
ANY STATE, LOCAL OR OTHER FOREIGN OR DOMESTIC LAWS.
German
Taxation
The summary set out below is based on German tax laws,
interpretations thereof and applicable tax treaties to which
Germany is a party that are in force at the date of this Annual
Report on
Form 20-F
and is subject to any changes in such authority occurring after
that date, potentially with retroactive effect, that could
result in German tax consequences different from those discussed
below. This discussion is also based, in part, on
representations of the Depositary and assumes that each
obligation of the Deposit Agreement and any related agreements
will be performed in accordance with its terms. For additional
information on the Depository and the fees associated with
SAPS ADR program see Item 12 Description of
Securities Other Than Equity Securities American
Depository Shares.
For purposes of applying German tax law and the applicable tax
treaties to which Germany is a party, a holder of ADRs will
generally be treated as owning the ordinary shares represented
thereby.
German Taxation of
Dividends
Under German income tax law from January 1, 2009 onwards,
the full amount of dividends distributed by a company are
generally subject to German withholding tax at a domestic rate
of 25% plus a solidarity surtax of 5.5% (effectively 1.375% of
dividends before withholding tax), resulting in an aggregate
withholding tax rate from dividends of 26.375%. Corporate
non-resident shareholders will generally be entitled to a refund
in the amount of two fifths of the withholding tax (including
solidarity surtax). This does not preclude a further reduction
of withholding tax, if any, available under a relevant tax
treaty.
Generally, for many non-resident shareholders the withholding
tax rate is currently reduced under applicable income tax
treaties. Rates and procedures may vary according to the
applicable treaty. To reduce the withholding tax to the
applicable treaty tax rate a non-resident shareholder must apply
for a refund of withholding taxes paid. Claims for refund, if
any, are made on a special German claim for refund form, which
must be filed with the German Federal Tax Office
(Bundeszentralamt für Steuern, D-53221 Bonn, Germany;
http://www.bzst.bund.de).
The relevant forms can be obtained from the German Federal Tax
Office or from German embassies and consulates. For details,
such non-resident shareholders are urged to consult their own
tax advisors. Special rules apply for the refund to
U.S. Holders (we refer to the below section Refund
Procedures for U.S. Holders).
121
Refund
Procedures for U.S. Holders
Under the Treaty, a partial refund of the 25% withholding tax
equal to 10% of the gross amount of the dividend and a full
refund of the solidarity surtax can be obtained by a
U.S. Holder. Thus, for each US$100 of gross dividends paid
by SAP AG to a U.S. Holder, the dividends (which are
dependent on the euro/dollar exchange rate at the time of
payment) will be initially subject to a German withholding tax
of US$26.375, of which US$11.375 may be refunded under the
Treaty. As a result, a U.S. Holder effectively would
receive a total dividend of US$85.
To claim the refund of amounts withheld in excess of the Treaty
rate, a U.S. Holder must submit (either directly or, as
described below, through the Data Medium Procedure participant)
a claim for refund to the German tax authorities, with, in the
case of a direct claim, the original bank voucher (or certified
copy thereof) issued by the paying entity documenting the tax
withheld, within four years from the end of the calendar year in
which the dividend is received. Claims for refund are made on a
special German claim for refund form, which must be filed with
the German Federal Tax Office (Bundeszentralamt für
Steuern, D-53221 Bonn, Germany). The German claim for refund
form may be obtained from the German tax authorities at the same
address where applications are filed, from the Embassy of the
Federal Republic of Germany, 4645 Reservoir Road, N.W.,
Washington, D.C.
20007-1998,
or can be downloaded from the homepage of the German Federal Tax
Office
(http://www.bzst.bund.de).
U.S. Holders must also submit to the German tax authorities
a certification of their U.S. residency status (IRS
Form 6166). This certification can be obtained from the
Internal Revenue Service by filing a request for certification
(generally on an IRS Form 8802, which will not be processed
unless a user fee is paid) with the Internal Revenue Service,
P.O. Box 71052, Philadelphia, PA
19176-6052.
U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors
regarding how to obtain an IRS Form 6166.
The former simplified refund procedure for U.S. Holders by
the Depository is not available for dividends received after
December 31, 2008 as it has been revoked by the German
Ministry of Finance as of year-end 2008. Instead an IT-supported
quick-refund procedure is available (the Data Medium
Procedure DMP) for dividends received after
December 31, 2008. If the U.S. Holders bank or
broker elects to participate in the DMP, it will perform
administrative functions necessary to claim the Treaty refund
for the beneficiaries. The refund beneficiaries must confirm to
the DMP participant that they meet the conditions of the Treaty
provisions and that they authorize the DMP participant to file
applications and receive notices and payments on their behalf.
Further each refund beneficiary must confirm that (i) it is
the beneficial owner of the dividends received; (ii) it is
resident in the U.S. in the meaning of the Treaty;
(iii) it does not have its domicile, residence or place of
management in Germany; (iv) the dividends received do not
form part of a permanent establishment or fixed base in Germany;
and (v) it commits, due to its participation in the DMP,
not to claim separately for refund.
The beneficiaries also must provide an IRS Form 6166
certification with the DMP participant. The DMP participant is
required to keep these documents in its files and prepare and
file a combined claim for refund with the German tax authorities
by electronic media. The combined claim provides evidence of a
U.S. Holders personal data including its
U.S. Tax Identification Number.
The German tax authorities reserve the right to audit the
entitlement to tax refunds for several years following their
payment pursuant to the Treaty in individual cases. The DMP
participant must assist with the audit by providing the
necessary details or by forwarding the queries to the respective
refund beneficiaries.
The German tax authorities will issue refunds denominated in
euros. In the case of shares held through banks or brokers
participating in the Depository, the refunds will be issued to
the Depository, which will convert the refunds to dollars. The
resulting amounts will be paid to banks or brokers for the
account of the U.S. Holders.
122
German
Taxation of Capital Gains
Under German income tax law, a capital gain derived from the
sale or other disposition of ADRs or ordinary shares by a
non-resident shareholder is subject to income tax in Germany
only if such shareholder has held, directly or indirectly, ADRs
or ordinary shares representing 1% or more of the registered
share capital of a company at any time during the five-year
period immediately preceding the sale or other disposition.
Generally, a capital gain derived from the sale or other
disposition of ADRs or ordinary shares by a corporate
non-resident shareholder is, in principle, exempt from
corporation tax. However, a portion of 5% of a capital gain
derived is treated as non-deductible business expenses.
Therefore, effectively a portion of 95% of a capital gain
derived from the sale or other disposition of ADRs or ordinary
shares by a corporate non-resident shareholder is exempt and a
portion of 5% of a capital gain derived is subject to
corporation tax.
However, a U.S. Holder of ADRs or ordinary shares that
qualifies for benefits under the Treaty is not subject to German
income or corporation tax on the capital gain derived from the
sale or other disposition of ADRs or ordinary shares.
German
Gift and Inheritance Tax
Generally, a transfer of ADRs or ordinary shares by a
non-resident shareholder at death or by way of gift will be
subject to German gift or inheritance tax, respectively, if
(i) the decedent or donor, or the heir, donee or other
transferee is resident in Germany at the time of the transfer,
or with respect to German citizens who are not resident in
Germany, if the decedent or donor, or the heir, donee or other
transferee has not been continuously outside of Germany for a
period of more than five years; (ii) the ADRs or ordinary
shares are part of the business property of a permanent
establishment or a fixed base in Germany; or (iii) the ADRs
or ordinary shares subject to such transfer form part of a
portfolio that represents 10% or more of the registered share
capital of a company and has been held, directly or indirectly,
by the decedent or donor, respectively, actually or
constructively together with related parties.
However, the right of the German government to impose gift or
inheritance tax on a non-resident shareholder may be limited by
an applicable estate tax treaty. In the case of a
U.S. Holder, a transfer of ADRs or ordinary shares by a
U.S. Holder at death or by way of gift generally will not
be subject to German gift or inheritance tax by reason of the
estate tax treaty between the U.S. and Germany (Convention
between the Federal Republic of Germany and the United States of
America for the Avoidance of Double Taxation with respect to
Estate, Gift and Inheritance Taxes, German Federal Law Gazette
1982 II page 847, as amended by the Protocol of
December 14, 1998 as published on December 21, 2000,
German Federal Law Gazette 2001 II, page 65; the
Estate Tax Treaty) so long as the decedent or donor,
or the heir, donee or other transferee was not domiciled in
Germany for purposes of the Estate Tax Treaty at the time the
gift was made, or at the time of the decedents death, and
the ADRs or ordinary shares were not held in connection with a
permanent establishment or a fixed base in Germany. In general,
the Estate Tax Treaty provides a credit against the
U.S. federal gift or estate tax liability for the amount of
gift or inheritance tax paid in Germany, subject to certain
limitations, in a case where the ADRs or ordinary shares are
subject to German gift or inheritance tax and U.S. federal
gift or estate tax.
Other German Taxes
There are currently no German net worth, transfer, stamp or
other similar taxes that would apply to a U.S. Holder on
the acquisition, ownership, sale or other disposition of ADRs or
ordinary shares.
U.S. Taxation
The following discussion applies to U.S. Holders only if
the ADRs and ordinary shares are held as capital assets for tax
purposes. It does not address tax considerations applicable to
U.S. Holders that may be subject to
123
special tax rules, such as dealers or traders in securities,
financial institutions, insurance companies, tax-exempt
entities, regulated investment companies, U.S. Holders that
hold ordinary shares or ADRs as a part of a straddle, conversion
transaction or other arrangement involving more than one
position, U.S. Holders that own (or are deemed for
U.S. tax purposes to own) 10% or more of the total combined
voting power of all classes of voting stock of SAP AG,
U.S. Holders that have a principal place of business or
tax home outside the United States or
U.S. Holders whose functional currency is not
the dollar and U.S. Holders that hold ADRs or ordinary
shares through partnerships or other pass-through entities.
The summary set out below is based upon the U.S. Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), the
Treaty and regulations, rulings and judicial decisions
thereunder at the date of this Annual Report on
Form 20-F.
Any such authority may be repealed, revoked or modified,
potentially with retroactive effect, so as to result in
U.S. federal income tax consequences different from those
discussed below. No assurance can be given that the conclusions
set out below would be sustained by a court if challenged by the
IRS. The discussion below is based, in part, on representations
of the Depositary, and assumes that each obligation in the
Deposit Agreement and any related agreements will be performed
in accordance with its terms.
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, a U.S. Holder of
ADRs will be considered to own the ordinary shares represented
thereby. Accordingly, unless the context otherwise requires, all
references in this section to ordinary shares are deemed to
refer likewise to ADRs representing an ownership interest in
ordinary shares.
U.S. Taxation of
Dividends
Subject to the discussion below under Passive Foreign
Investment Company Considerations, distributions made by
SAP AG with respect to ordinary shares (other than distributions
in liquidation and certain distributions in redemption of
stock), including the amount of German tax deemed to have been
withheld in respect of such distributions, will generally be
taxed to U.S. Holders as ordinary dividend income.
As discussed above, a U.S. Holder may obtain a refund of
German withholding tax under the Treaty to the extent that the
German withholding tax exceeds 15% of the dividend distributed.
Thus, for each US$100 of gross dividends paid by SAP AG to a
U.S. Holder, the dividends (which are dependent on the
euro/dollar exchange rate at the time of payment) will be
initially subject to German withholding tax of US$25 plus
US$1.375 solidarity surtax, and the U.S. Holder will
receive US$73.625. A U.S. Holder who obtains the Treaty
refund will receive an additional US$11.375 from the German tax
authorities. For U.S. tax purposes, such U.S. Holder
will be considered to have received a total distribution of
US$100, which will be deemed to have been subject to German
withholding tax of US$15 (15% of US$100) resulting in the net
receipt of US$85.
In the case of a distribution in euro, the amount of the
distribution generally will equal the dollar value of the euro
distributed (determined by reference to the spot currency
exchange rate on the date of receipt of the distribution, or
receipt by the Depositary in the case of a distribution on
ADRs), regardless of whether the holder in fact converts the
euro into dollars, and the U.S. Holder will not realize any
separate foreign currency gain or loss (except to the extent
that such gain or loss arises on the actual disposition of
foreign currency received).
Dividends paid by SAP AG generally will constitute
portfolio income for purposes of the limitations on
the use of passive activity losses (and, therefore, generally
may not be offset by passive activity losses) and as
investment income for purposes of the limitation on
the deduction of investment interest expense. Dividends paid by
SAP AG will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction
generally allowed to U.S. corporations under
Section 243 of the Code. Dividends paid by SAP AG to an
individual after December 31, 2002 and received prior to
January 1, 2011 are treated as qualified
dividends subject to capital gains rates, i.e. at a
maximum rate of 15%, if SAP AG was not in the prior year and, is
not in the year in which the dividend is paid, a passive foreign
investment company (PFIC). Based on our audited
financial statements and relevant market and shareholder data,
we believe that we were not treated as a PFIC for
U.S. federal income taxes with respect to our 2009 tax
year. In addition, based on our audited financial statements and
our current expectations regarding the value and
124
nature of our assets, the sources and nature of our income, and
relevant market and shareholder data, we do not anticipate
becoming a PFIC for the 2010 tax year.
U.S. Taxation of
Capital Gains
In general, assuming that SAP AG at no time is a PFIC, upon a
sale or exchange of ordinary shares to a person other than SAP
AG, a U.S. Holder will recognize gain or loss in an amount
equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale
or exchange and the U.S. Holders adjusted tax basis
in the ordinary shares. Such gain or loss will be a capital gain
or loss and will be considered a long-term capital gain (taxable
at a reduced rate for individuals) if the ordinary shares were
held for more than one year. The deductibility of capital losses
is subject to significant limitations. Upon a sale of ordinary
shares to SAP AG, a U.S. Holder may recognize a capital
gain or loss or, alternatively, may be considered to have
received a distribution with respect to the ordinary shares, in
each case depending upon the application to such sale of the
rules of Section 302 of the Code.
Deposit and withdrawal of ordinary shares in exchange for ADRs
by a U.S. Holder will not result in its realization of gain
or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
U.S. Foreign Tax
Credit
In general, in computing its U.S. federal income tax
liability, a U.S. Holder may elect for each taxable year to
claim a deduction or, subject to the limitations on foreign tax
credits generally, a credit for foreign income taxes paid or
accrued by it. For U.S. foreign tax credit purposes,
subject to the applicable limitations under the foreign tax
credit rules, German tax withheld from dividends paid to a
U.S. Holder, up to the 15% provided under the Treaty, will
be eligible for credit against the U.S. Holders
federal income tax liability or, if the U.S. Holder has
elected to deduct such taxes, may be deducted in computing
taxable income.
For U.S. foreign tax credit purposes, dividends paid by SAP
AG generally will be treated as foreign-source income and as
passive category income (or in the case of certain
holders, as general category income). Gains or
losses realized by a U.S. Holder on the sale or exchange of
ordinary shares generally will be treated as
U.S.-source
gain or loss.
Passive
Foreign Investment Company Considerations
Special and adverse U.S. tax rules apply to a
U.S. Holder that holds an interest in a passive foreign
investment company (PFIC). Based on current projections
concerning the composition of SAP AGs income and assets,
SAP AG does not believe that it will be treated as a PFIC for
its current or future taxable years. However, because this
conclusion is based on our current projections and expectations
as to its future business activity, SAP AG can provide no
assurance that it will not be treated as a PFIC in respect of
its current or any future taxable years.
MATERIAL CONTRACTS
We are party to material contracts, as follows:
2009 Three-Year
Revolving Credit Facility
To increase its financial flexibility, in September 2009 SAP AG
negotiated a three-year 1.5 billion syndicated credit
facility with a group of international banks. This facility
replaced a 1 billion facility that had been available
to SAP AG until that time. Neither the previous facility, which
was established in 2004, nor the new facility has yet been drawn
on. The credit facility agreement contains a
change-of-control
clause. This clause obliges SAP AG to notify the banks if it
learns that in the meaning of the German Securities Acquisition
and Takeover Act any person or any group of persons acting
together has acquired control of more than 50% of
125
the voting shares. If, on receiving the notification, banks that
represent at least two-thirds of the credit volume so require,
the banks have the right to cancel the credit facility and
demand complete repayment of the outstanding debt. If no
continuation agreement is reached, the credit facility would end
and the obligation to repay would become effective at an
ascertainable time.
This description is a summary of the Credit Facility and is
qualified in its entirety by the Credit Facility, which is filed
as Exhibit 4.6 to this Annual Report on
Form 20-F.
Private Placement
Transaction
In April and May 2009, SAP AG issued several tranches of a
private placement transaction (Schuldschein) outside
of the United States. The total schuldschein is for
697 million, with three-year and five-year tranches.
The underlying agreements contain
change-of-control
clauses. These clauses give the lenders special termination
rights if in the meaning of the German Securities Acquisition
and Takeover Act any person or any group of persons acting
together acquires control of more than 50% of the voting shares
of SAP. If no continuation agreement is reached within
30 days after a change of control, the lenders would be
entitled to declare the loan due and demand repayment of the
outstanding debt without delay.
Other Material
Contracts and Agreements
In agreements between SAP AG and various banks for bilateral
credit facilities that totaled 545 million on
December 31, 2009, we have agreed to material adverse
change clauses permitting the banks to terminate if events occur
that are materially adverse to SAP AGs economic standing.
A change of control could be considered materially adverse
pursuant to those agreements. These clauses are customary. In
the past, we have utilized these bilateral credit facilities
only infrequently for a few days. We believe that in view of our
current liquidity situation, termination of these credit
facilities would not have a materially adverse effect, at least
in the near term.
We have entered into relationships with various companies to
jointly develop and market new software products. These
relationships are governed by development and marketing
agreements with the respective companies. Some of the agreements
include provisions that, in the event of a change of control
over one of the parties, give the other party a right to consent
to the assignment of the agreement or to terminate it.
Agreements have been concluded with the members of the Executive
Board concerning compensation in the event of a change of
control. These agreements, which are encountered with increasing
frequency in Germany and elsewhere, are described in the
Compensation Report section. We have no analogous compensation
agreements with employees.
DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY
We are subject to the informational requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In accordance with
these requirements, we file reports and furnish other
information as a foreign private issuer with the SEC. These
materials, including this Annual Report on
Form 20-F
and the exhibits thereto, may be inspected and copied at the
SECs Public Reference Room at 100 F Street,
N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. The SEC also
maintains a Web site at www.sec.gov that contains reports
and other information regarding registrants that file
electronically with the SEC. Our annual report and some of the
other information submitted by us to the SEC may be accessed
through this Web site. In addition, information about us is
available at our Web site: www.sap.com.
ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to various financial risks, such as market risks,
including changes in foreign currency exchange rates, interest
rates and equity prices, as well as credit risk and liquidity
risk. We manage these risks on
126
a Group-wide basis. Selected derivatives are exclusively used
for this purpose and not for speculation, which is defined as
entering into derivative instruments without a corresponding
underlying transaction. Financial risk management is done
centrally. The risk management and hedging strategy is set by
our Treasury guideline and other internal guidelines and is
subject to continuous internal risk analysis. See Note 25
and 26 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for our
quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk in
Item 18. Financial Statements.
ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION
OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
American Depositary
Shares
Fees and
Charges Payable by ADR Holders
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas is the Depositary for
SAP AGs ADR program. ADR holders may be required to pay
the following charges:
|
|
|
|
|
taxes and other governmental charges;
|
|
|
|
registration fees as may be in effect from time to time for the
registration of transfers of SAP ordinary shares on any
applicable register to the Depositary or its nominee or the
custodian or its nominee in connection with deposits or
withdrawals under the Deposit Agreement;
|
|
|
|
applicable air courier, cable, telex and facsimile expenses of
the Depositary;
|
|
|
|
expenses incurred by the Depositary in the conversion of foreign
currency;
|
|
|
|
$5.00 or less per 100 ADSs (or portion thereof) to the
Depositary for the execution and delivery of ADRs (including in
connection with the depositing of SAP ordinary shares or the
exercising of rights) and the surrender of ADRs as well as for
the distribution of other securities;
|
|
|
|
a maximum aggregate service fee of U.S. $2.00 per 100 ADSs
(or portion thereof) per calendar year to the Depositary for the
services performed by the Depositary in administering the ADR
program, including for processing any cash dividends and other
cash distributions; and
|
|
|
|
$5.00 or less per 100 ADSs (or portion thereof) to the
Depositary for distribution of securities other than SAP
ordinary shares or rights.
|
These charges are described more fully in Section 5.9 of
the Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement dated
November 25, 2009, incorporated by reference as
Exhibit 4.1.2 to this Annual Report on
Form 20-F.
Applicable service fees are either deducted from any cash
dividends or other cash distributions or charged separately to
holders in a manner determined by the Depositary, depending on
whether ADSs are registered in the name of investors (whether
certificated or in book-entry form) or held in brokerage and
custodian accounts (via DTC). In the case of distributions of
securities other than SAP ordinary shares or rights, the
Depositary charges the applicable ADS record date holder
concurrent with the distribution. In the case of ADSs registered
in the name of the investor, whether certificated or in book
entry form, the Depositary sends invoices to the applicable
record date ADS holders. For ADSs held in brokerage and
custodian accounts via DTC, the Depositary may, if permitted by
the settlement systems provided by DTC, collect the fees through
those settlement systems from the brokers and custodians holding
ADSs in their DTC accounts. The brokers and custodians who hold
their clients ADSs in DTC accounts in such case may in
turn charge their clients accounts the amount of the
service fees paid to the Depositary.
In the event of a refusal to pay applicable fees, the Depositary
may refuse the requested services until payment is received or
may set off the amount of the service from any distribution to
be made to the ADR holder, all in accordance with the Deposit
Agreement.
127
If any taxes or other governmental charges are payable by the
holders
and/or
beneficial owners of ADSs to the Depositary, the Depositary, the
custodian or SAP may withhold or deduct from any distributions
made in respect of the deposited SAP ordinary share and may sell
for the account of the holder
and/or
beneficial owner any or all of the deposited ordinary shares and
apply such distributions and sale proceeds in payment of such
taxes (including applicable interest and penalties) or charges,
with the holder and the beneficial owner thereof remaining fully
liable for any deficiency.
Fees and
Other Payments Payable by the Depositary to SAP
The Depositary has agreed to make certain payments to SAP as
reimbursement for expenses incurred by SAP in connection with
its ADR program and in support of SAPs ongoing investor
relations activities related to the ADR program. For the year
ended December 31, 2009, the Depositary has made the
following direct and indirect payments to SAP:
|
|
|
|
|
US $72,531 for the 2009 NYSE ADR listing fees; and
|
|
|
|
US $2,000,000 for investor relations activities related to the
ADR program, including the production of annual reports and
Form 20-F
filings, 2010 NYSE listing fees, road shows, production of
investor targeting, peer analysis, shareholder identification
reports and perception studies, postage for mailing annual and
interim reports and other communications to ADR holders and
participation in retail investor activities, broker conferences,
SAP sponsored analyst events and capital markets days.
|
PART II
ITEM 13. DEFAULTS,
DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES
None.
ITEM 14. MATERIAL
MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 15. CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
EVALUATION OF
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other
procedures of SAP that are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by SAP in the reports that it files or
submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure controls and
procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
SAP in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange
Act is accumulated and communicated to SAP management, including
SAPs principal executive and financial officers (i.e.
SAPs co-chief executive officers (Co-CEOs) and chief
financial officer (CFO)), or persons performing similar
functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure. SAPs management evaluated, with the
participation of SAPs Co-CEOs and CFO the effectiveness of
SAPs disclosure controls and procedures as of
December 31, 2009. The evaluation was led by SAPs
Global Governance Risk & Compliance function,
including dedicated SOX Champions in all of
SAPs major entities and business units with the
participation of process owners, SAPs key corporate senior
management, senior management of each business group, and as
indicated above under the supervision of SAPs Co-CEOs and
CFO. Based on the foregoing, SAPs management, including
SAPs Co-CEOs and CFO, concluded that as of
December 31, 2009, SAPs disclosure controls and
procedures were effective.
128
MANAGEMENTS
ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The management of SAP is responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting
as such term is defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. SAPs internal
control over financial reporting is a process designed under the
supervision of SAPs Co-CEOs and CFO to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external reporting
purposes in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards
Board.
SAPs management assessed the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2009. In making this assessment, it used the
criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal
Control Integrated Framework.
Based on the assessment under these criteria, SAP management has
concluded that, as of December 31, 2009, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting was effective.
KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, our independent
registered public accounting firm has issued its attestation
report on the effectiveness of SAPs internal control over
financial reporting, which is included in Item 18.
Financial Statements, Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL
CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
There has been no change in our internal control over financial
reporting during the period covered by this Annual Report on
Form 20-F
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 16. [RESERVED]
ITEM 16A. AUDIT
COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
Our Supervisory Board determined that Erhard Schipporeit is an
audit committee financial expert, as defined by the
regulations of the Commission issued pursuant to
Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and meeting
the requirements of Item 16A. He is
independent, as such term is defined in
Rule 10A-3
under the Exchange Act.
ITEM 16B. CODE
OF ETHICS
In 2003, SAP adopted a Code of Business Conduct that applies to
all employees (including all personnel in the accounting and
controlling departments) and the members of SAPs Executive
Board (including our CEO and CFO). Our Code of Business Conduct
constitutes a code of ethics as defined in
Item 16.B of
Form 20-F.
Our Code of Business Conduct sets standards for all dealings
with customers, partners, competitors and suppliers and
includes, among others, regulations with regard to
confidentiality, loyalty, preventing conflicts of interest,
preventing bribery, and avoiding anti-competitive practices.
International differences in culture, language, and legal and
social systems make the adoption of uniform Codes of Business
Conduct across an entire global company challenging. As a
result, SAP has set forth a master code containing minimum
standards. In turn, each company within the SAP Group has been
required to adopt a similar code that meets at least these
minimum standards, but may also include additional or more
stringent rules of conduct. Newly acquired companies also are
required to meet the minimum standards set forth in the Code of
Business Conduct.
We have made our Code of Business Conduct publicly available by
posting the full text on our Web site under
www.sap.com/corpgovernance (section Policies and
Statutes).
129
ITEM 16C. PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
AUDIT FEES,
AUDIT-RELATED FEES, TAX FEES AND ALL OTHER FEES
Refer to Note 32 to our Consolidated Financial Statements
for information on fees paid to our independent registered
public accounting firm, KPMG, for audit services and other
professional services.
AUDIT
COMMITTEES PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
As required under German law, our shareholders appoint our
independent auditors to audit our financial statements, based on
a proposal that is legally required to be submitted by the
Supervisory Board. The Supervisory Boards proposal is
based on a proposal by the Audit Committee. See also the
description under the heading Corporate Governance
in Item 10. Additional Information.
In 2002 our Audit Committee adopted a policy with regard to the
pre-approval of audit and non-audit services to be provided by
our independent auditors. This policy, which is designed to
assure that such engagements do not impair the independence of
our auditors, was amended and expanded in 2003, 2007 and 2009
(changes in 2009 only related to information requirements). The
policy requires prior approval of the Audit Committee for all
services to be provided by our independent auditors for any
entity of the SAP Group. With regard to non-audit services the
policy distinguishes among three categories of services:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Prohibited services: This category includes services
that our independent auditors must not be engaged to perform.
These are services that are not permitted by applicable law or
that would be inconsistent with maintaining the auditors
independence.
|
|
|
2.
|
Services requiring universal approval: Services of
this category may be provided by our independent auditors up to
a certain aggregate amount in fees per year that is determined
annually by the Audit Committee.
|
|
|
3.
|
Services requiring individual approval:
Services of this category may only be provided by our
independent auditors if they have been individually
(specifically) pre-approved by the Audit Committee or an Audit
Committee member who is authorized by the Audit Committee to
make such approvals.
|
Our Chief Accounting Officer reviews all individual requests to
engage our independent auditors as a service provider in
accordance with this policy and determines the category to which
the requested service belongs. All requests for engagements with
expected fees over a specified limit are additionally reviewed
by our CFO. Based on the determination of the category the
request is (i) declined if it is a prohibited
service, (ii) approved if it is a service
requiring universal approval and the maximum aggregate
amount fixed by the Audit Committee has not been reached or
(iii) forwarded to the Audit Committee for individual
approval if the service requires individual approval
or is a service requiring universal approval and the
maximum aggregate amount fixed by the Audit Committee has been
exceeded.
Our Audit Committees pre-approval policies also include
information requirements to ensure the Audit Committee is kept
aware of the volume of engagements involving our independent
auditors that were not individually pre-approved by the Audit
Committee itself.
All services performed by our independent auditors in the last
two fiscal years were authorized pursuant to our pre-approval
policies.
Substantially all of the work performed to audit our
Consolidated Financial Statements was performed by our principal
accountants full-time, permanent employees.
130
ITEM 16D. EXEMPTIONS
FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES
Rule 10A-3
of the Exchange Act requires that all members of our audit
committee be independent, subject to certain exceptions. In
accordance with German law, the Audit Committee consists of both
employee and shareholder elected members.
Rule 10A-3
provides an exception for an employee of a foreign private
issuer such as SAP who is not an executive officer of that
issuer and who is elected to the supervisory board or audit
committee of that issuer pursuant to the issuers governing
law. In this case, the employee is exempt from the independence
requirements of
Rule 10A-3
and is permitted to sit on the audit committee.
We rely on this exemption. Our Audit Committee includes two
members who are non-executive employees of SAP AG, Thomas
Bamberger and Gerhard Maier, who were named to our Supervisory
Board pursuant to the German Co-determination Act (see
Item 6 for details). We believe that the reliance on this
exemption does not materially adversely affect the ability of
our Audit Committee to act independently and to satisfy the
other requirements of
Rule 10A-3.
ITEM 16E. PURCHASES
OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED
PURCHASERS
We did not purchase any of our ordinary shares or ADRs in 2009.
However, we typically purchase our ordinary shares under our
supported Employee Discount Stock Purchase Programs, Long-Term
Incentive Plans, Stock Option Plans and other share buy-back
activities. The maximum number of shares that may yet be
purchased as of December 31, 2009 were 85,341,496.
Purchases between January 1, 2009 and May 19, 2009
would have been made in accordance with the authorization to
acquire and use treasury shares granted at the Annual General
Meeting of Shareholders on June 3, 2008, pursuant to which the
Executive Board was authorized to acquire, on or before
November 30, 2009, up to 120 million shares of SAP.
Purchases between May 20, 2009 and December 31, 2009
would have been made in accordance with the authorization to
acquire and use treasury shares granted at the Annual General
Meeting of Shareholders on May 19, 2009, pursuant to which
the Executive Board was authorized to acquire, on or before
October 31, 2010, up to 120 million shares of SAP. The
authorization from May 19, 2009 replaced the authorization
from June 3, 2008.
Both authorizations were subject to the provision that the
shares to be purchased, together with any other shares already
acquired and held by SAP, do not account for more than 10% of
SAPs capital stock.
ITEM 16F. CHANGES
IN REGISTRANTSS CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT
Not applicable.
ITEM 16G. DIFFERENCES
IN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES
The following summarizes the principal ways in which our
corporate governance practices differ from the New York Stock
Exchange (NYSE) corporate governance rules applicable to
U.S. domestic issuers (the NYSE Rules.)
Introduction
SAP is incorporated under the laws of Germany, with securities
publicly traded on markets in Germany (Frankfurt Exchange) and
the United States (NYSE).
The NYSE Rules permit foreign private issuers to follow
applicable home country corporate governance practices in lieu
of the NYSE corporate governance standards, subject to certain
exceptions. Foreign private issuers electing to follow home
country corporate governance rules are required to disclose the
principal differences in their corporate governance practices
from those required under the NYSE Rules. This Item 16G
131
summarizes the principal ways in which SAPs corporate
governance practices differ from the NYSE Rules applicable to
domestic issuers.
Legal Framework
The primary source of law relating to the corporate governance
of a German stock corporation is the German Stock Corporation
Act (Aktiengesetz). Additionally, the Securities Trading
Act (Wertpapierhandelsgesetz), the German Securities
Purchase and Take Over Act (Wertpapiererwerbs- und
Übernahmegesetz), the Stock Exchange Admission
Regulations, the German Commercial Code
(Handelsgesetzbuch) and certain other German statutes
contain corporate governance rules applicable to SAP. In
addition to these mandatory rules, the German Corporate
Governance Code (GCGC) summarizes the mandatory
statutory corporate governance principles found in the German
Stock Corporation Act and other provisions of German law.
Further, the GCGC contains supplemental recommendations and
suggestions for standards on responsible corporate governance
intended to reflect generally accepted best practices.
The German Stock Corporation Act requires the executive and the
supervisory board of exchange-listed companies like SAP to
declare annually that the recommendations set forth in the GCGC
have been and are being complied with, and to identify any
recommendations not being applied. SAP has disclosed deviations
from a few of the GCGC recommendations in its Declaration of
Compliance on a yearly basis since 2003. Since 2004, these
declarations are available on the SAP website
(www.sap.com/about/governance/statutes/index.epx).
Significant
Differences
We believe the following to be the significant differences
between German corporate governance practices, as SAP has
implemented them, and those applicable to domestic companies
under the NYSE Rules.
German Stock
Corporations are Required to have a Two-Tier Board System
SAP is governed by three separate bodies: (i) the
Supervisory Board, which counsels, supervises and controls the
Executive Board; (ii) the Executive Board, which is
responsible for the
day-to-day
management of SAP; and (iii) the General Shareholders
Meeting. The rules applicable to these governing bodies are
defined by German law and by SAPs Articles of
Incorporation. This corporate structure differs from the unitary
board of directors established by the relevant laws of all
U.S. states and the NYSE Rules. Under the German Stock
Corporation Act, the Supervisory Board and Executive Board are
separate and no individual may be a member of both boards. See
Item 10. Additional Information Corporate
Governance for additional information on the corporate
structure.
Director
Independence Rules
The NYSE Rules require that a majority of the members of the
board of directors of a listed issuer and each member of its
nominating, corporate governance, compensation and audit
committee be independent. The NYSE Rules stipulate
that no director qualifies as independent unless the
board of directors has made an affirmative determination that
the director has no material direct or indirect relationship
with the listed company. However, under the NYSE Rules a
director may still be deemed independent even if the director or
a member of a directors immediate family has received
during a 12 month period within the prior three years up to
$120,000 in direct compensation. In addition, a director may
also be deemed independent even if a member of the
directors immediate family works for the companys
auditor in a non-partner capacity and not on the companys
audit. By contrast, the GCGC requires that the Supervisory Board
ensure that proposed candidates are persons with the necessary
knowledge, competencies and applicable experience, and that the
Supervisory Board includes what it considers an adequate number
of independent members. A Supervisory Board member is considered
independent if he or she has no business or personal relations
with SAP or its Executive Board that could give rise to a
conflict of interest. The members of the Supervisory Board must
have enough time to
132
perform their board duties and must carry out their duties
carefully and in good faith. For as long as they serve, they
must comply with the criteria that are enumerated in relation to
the selection of candidates for the Supervisory Board concerning
independence, conflict of interest and multiple memberships of
management, supervisory and other governing bodies. They must be
loyal to SAP in their conduct and they must not accept
appointment in companies that are in competition with SAP.
Supervisory Board members must disclose any planned non-ordinary
course business transactions with SAP to the Supervisory Board
promptly. The Supervisory Board members cannot carry out such
transactions before the Supervisory Board has given its
permission. The Supervisory Board may grant its permission for
any such transaction only if the transaction is based on terms
and conditions that are standard for the type of transaction in
question and if the transaction is not contrary to SAPs
interest. SAP complies with these GCGC director independence
requirements.
German corporate law requires that for listed stock corporations
at least one member of the Supervisory Board who has expert
knowledge in the areas of financial accounting and audit of
financial statements must be independent. Mr. Erhard
Schipporeit who is the Chairman of SAPs Audit Committee
meets these requirements. However, German corporate law and the
GCGC do not require the Supervisory Board to make an affirmative
determination for each individual director that is independent
or that a majority of Supervisory Board members or the members
of a specific committee are independent.
The NYSE independence requirements are closely linked with risks
specific to unitary boards of directors that are customary for
U.S. companies. In contrast, the two-tier board structure
requires a strict separation of the executive board and
supervisory board. In addition, the supervisory board of large
German stock corporations is subject to the principle of
employee codetermination as outlined in the German
Co-Determination Act of 1976 (Mitbestimmungsgesetz). As a
result, the Supervisory Board of SAP AG consists of 16 members,
of which eight have been elected by SAP AGs shareholders
at the Annual General Meeting and eight members have been
elected by employees of SAP AG and its German subsidiaries.
Typically, the chairperson of the supervisory board is a
shareholder representative. In case of a tie vote, the
supervisory board chairperson may cast the decisive tie-breaking
vote. This board structure creates a different system of checks
and balances, including employee participation, and cannot be
directly compared with a unitary board system.
Audit Committee
Independence
As a foreign private issuer, the NYSE Rules require SAP to
establish an Audit Committee that satisfies the requirements of
Rule 10A-3
of the Exchange Act with respect to audit committee
independence. SAP is in compliance with these requirements. The
Chairman of SAPs Audit Committee and Mr. Joachim
Milberg meet the independence requirements of
Rule 10A-3
of the Exchange Act. The other two Audit Committee members,
Messrs. Thomas Bamberger and Gerhard Maier, are employee
representatives who are eligible for the exemption provided by
Rule 10
A-3 (b) (1)
(iv) (C) (see Item 16.D for details).
The Audit Committee independence requirements are similar to the
Board independence requirements under German corporate law and
GCGC. See the section above under Director Independent
Rules for the same elected member for the Audit committee.
Nonetheless, SAP meets the NYSE Rules on audit committee
independence applicable to foreign private issuers.
Rules on
Non-Management Board Meetings are Different
Section 303 A.03 of the NYSE Rules stipulates that the
non-management board of each listed issuer must meet at
regularly scheduled executive sessions without the management.
Under German corporate law and the GCGC the Supervisory Board is
entitled but not required to exclude Executive Board members
from its meetings. The Supervisory Board exercises this right
temporarily during its meetings, for example when it discusses
or decides Executive Board member affairs like the appointment
of new Executive Board members.
133
Rules on
Establishing Committees Differ
Pursuant to Section 303 A.04 and 303 A.05 of the NYSE Rules
listed companies are required to set up a Nominating/Corporate
Governance Committee and a Compensation Committee, each composed
entirely of independent directors and having a written charter
specifying the committees purpose and responsibilities. In
addition, each committees performance must be reviewed
annually. With one exception, German corporate law does not
mandate the creation of specific supervisory board committees.
Required by the German Co-Determination Act of 1976
(Mitbestimmungsgesetz), the Mediation Committee
(Vermittlungsausschuss) convenes only if the
2/3
majority required for appointing/revoking the appointment of
Executive Board Members is not attained. This committee has
never been convened in SAPs history. In addition, the GCGC
recommends that the Supervisory Board establish an Audit
Committee and a Nomination Committee. In addition to the legally
required Mediation Committee, SAP has the following committees,
which are in compliance with the GCGC: General Committee,
Compensation Committee, Audit Committee, Strategy and Technology
Committee, Finance and Investment Committee, Nomination
Committee, and Special Committee (See Item 10.
Additional Information Corporate Governance
for more information).
Rules on
Shareholders Compulsory Approval are Different
Section 312 of the NYSE Rules requires U.S. companies
to seek shareholder approval of all equity-compensation plans,
including certain material revisions thereto (subject to certain
exemptions as described in the rules), issuances of common
stock, including convertible stock, if the common stock has, or
will have upon issuance, voting power of or in excess of 20% of
the then outstanding common stock, and issuances of common stock
if they trigger a change of control.
According to the German Stock Corporation Act and other
applicable German laws, shareholder approval is required for a
broad range of matters, such as amendments to the articles of
association, certain significant corporate transactions
(including inter-company agreements and material
restructurings), the offering of stock options and similar
equity compensation to its employees by a way of a conditional
capital increase or by using treasury shares (including
significant aspects of such an equity compensation plan as well
as the exercise thresholds), the issuance of new shares, the
authorization to purchase the corporations own shares, and
other essential issues, such as transfers of all, or
substantially all, of the assets of the stock corporation,
including shareholdings in subsidiaries.
Specific Principles
of Corporate Governance
Under the NYSE Rules Section 303 A.09 listed companies
must adopt and disclose corporate guidelines. Since October
2007, SAP has applied the recommended corporate governance
standards of the GCGC rather than company-specific principles of
corporate governance. The CGCG recommendations differ from the
NYSE Standards primarily as outlined in this Item 16G.
Specific Code of
Business Conduct
NYSE Rules Section 303 A.10 requires listed companies
to adopt and disclose a code of business conduct and ethics for
directors, officers and employees, and to disclose promptly any
waivers of the code for directors or executive officers.
Although not required under German law, SAP has adopted a Code
of Business Conduct, which is equally applicable to employees,
managers and members of the Executive Board. SAP complies with
the requirement to disclose the Code of Business Conduct and any
waivers of the code with respect to directors and executive
officers.
134
PART III
ITEM 17. FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Not applicable.
ITEM 18. FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
The financial statements are included herein on pages F-1
through F-105. The financial statement schedule is included
herein on pages S-1 through S-4.
The following are filed as part of this Annual Report on
Form 20-F:
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Income Statements for the years ended 2009, 2008
and 2007.
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Statement Schedule I Reconciliations
from U.S. GAAP to IFRS for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006.
|
ITEM 19. EXHIBITS
The following documents are filed as exhibits to this Annual
Report on
Form 20-F:
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Articles of Incorporation (Satzung) of SAP AG, as amended
to date (English translation).
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Form of global share certificate for ordinary shares (English
translation).(1)
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
Form of American Depositary Receipt.(2)
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement among SAP AG,
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Depositary, and
all owners and holders from time to time of American Depositary
Receipts issued thereunder, including the form of American
Depositary Receipts, dated as of December 3, 2004.(3)
|
|
4
|
.1.1
|
|
Amendment No. 1 dated as of December 20, 2006 to
Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement among SAP AG, Deutsche
Bank Trust Company Americas, as Depository, and all owners
and holders from time to time of American Depositary Receipts
issued thereunder, including the form of American Depositary
Receipts.(1)
|
|
4
|
.1.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement dated as of
November 25, 2009 among SAP AG, Deutsche Bank
Trust Company Americas as Depositary, and all owners and
holders from time to time of American Depositary Receipts issued
thereunder, including the form of American Depositary
Receipts.(2)
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility dated September 16, 2009 by and
among SAP AG (Borrower), Deutsche Bank AG, J.P. Morgan plc
and The Royal Bank of Scotland plc (as lead arrangers and book
runners).
|
|
12
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Bill McDermott, Co-Chief Executive Officer,
required by
Rule 13a-14(a)
or
Rule 15d-14(a).
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Jim Hagemann Snabe, Co-Chief Executive Officer,
required by
Rule 13a-14(a)
or
Rule 15d-14(a).
|
|
12
|
.3
|
|
Certification of Werner Brandt, Chief Financial Officer,
required by
Rule 13a-14(a)
or
Rule 15d-14(a).
|
|
13
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Bill McDermott, Co-Chief Executive Officer,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
13
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Jim Hagemann Snabe, Co-Chief Executive Officer,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
13
|
.3
|
|
Certification of Werner Brandt, Chief Financial Officer,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
15
|
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on
Form 20-F
of SAP AG filed on March 22, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Post Effective Amendment #1 to
Registration Statement on
Form F-6
of SAP AG filed on November 25, 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on
Form 6-K
of SAP AG, filed on December 13, 2004. |
136
SIGNATURES
The Registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the
requirements for filing on
Form 20-F
and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to
sign this Annual Report on its behalf.
SAP AG
(Registrant)
Name: Bill McDermott
Title: Co-Chief Executive Officer
Dated: March 25, 2010
|
|
|
|
By: /s/
|
JIM
HAGEMANN SNABE
|
Name: Jim Hagemann Snabe
Title: Co-Chief Executive Officer
Dated: March 25, 2010
Name: Dr. Werner Brandt
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Dated March 25, 2010
137
SAP AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
|
|
|
F-8 to F-105
|
|
|
|
|
S-1-S-5
|
|
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Supervisory Board of SAP AG:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of
financial position of SAP AG and subsidiaries (SAP
or the Company) as of December 31, 2009 and
2008, and the related consolidated statements of income,
comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2009. In connection with our audits of the consolidated
financial statements, we also have audited the financial
statement schedule. We also have audited SAPs internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009,
based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). SAPs
management is responsible for these consolidated financial
statements, and the financial statement schedule, for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting,
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these consolidated financial statements, and the financial
statement schedule, and an opinion on the Companys
internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement and whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements
included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a
material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the
assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of SAP AG and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009
and 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2009, in conformity with International
Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board (IASB). Also, in our opinion, the
related financial statement schedule when considered in relation
to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects,
F-1
the information set forth therein. Also in our opinion, SAP AG
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the COSO.
As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial
statements, on January 1, 2009 the Company changed its
method of accounting for business combinations, non-controlling
interests and customer loyalty programmes due to the adoption of
IFRS 3 Business Combinations (2008), International
Accounting Standards 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial
Statements (2008), and International Financial Reporting
Interpretation Committee (IFRIC) Interpretation 13 Customer
Loyalty Programmes.
KPMG AG
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft
Mannheim, Germany
March 11, 2009
F-2
SAP AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
INCOME STATEMENTS OF SAP GROUP
for the
years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
|
2009(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
millions, unless otherwise stated
|
|
|
Software revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,736
|
|
|
|
2,607
|
|
|
|
3,606
|
|
|
|
3,407
|
|
Support revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,574
|
|
|
|
5,285
|
|
|
|
4,602
|
|
|
|
3,852
|
|
Subscription and other software-related service revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
Software and software-related service revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,749
|
|
|
|
8,198
|
|
|
|
8,466
|
|
|
|
7,441
|
|
Consulting revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,972
|
|
|
|
2,074
|
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
|
2,221
|
|
Training revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
Other service revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
Professional services and other service revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,486
|
|
|
|
2,432
|
|
|
|
3,039
|
|
|
|
2,744
|
|
Other revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
15,295
|
|
|
|
10,672
|
|
|
|
11,575
|
|
|
|
10,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of software and software-related services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,457
|
)
|
|
|
(1,714
|
)
|
|
|
(1,743
|
)
|
|
|
(1,350
|
)
|
Cost of professional services and other services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,653
|
)
|
|
|
(1,851
|
)
|
|
|
(2,285
|
)
|
|
|
(2,091
|
)
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,280
|
)
|
|
|
(1,591
|
)
|
|
|
(1,627
|
)
|
|
|
(1,461
|
)
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,152
|
)
|
|
|
(2,199
|
)
|
|
|
(2,546
|
)
|
|
|
(2,173
|
)
|
General and administration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(808
|
)
|
|
|
(564
|
)
|
|
|
(624
|
)
|
|
|
(499
|
)
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(284
|
)
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Other operating income/expense, net
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,586
|
)
|
|
|
(8,084
|
)
|
|
|
(8,874
|
)
|
|
|
(7,558
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,709
|
|
|
|
2,588
|
|
|
|
2,701
|
|
|
|
2,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-operating income/expense, net
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
Finance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Other financial gains/losses, net
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Financial income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit before tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,490
|
|
|
|
2,435
|
|
|
|
2,624
|
|
|
|
2,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(982
|
)
|
|
|
(685
|
)
|
|
|
(776
|
)
|
|
|
(916
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit after tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,508
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
1,848
|
|
|
|
1,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit attributable to non-controlling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Profit attributable to owners of parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,505
|
|
|
|
1,748
|
|
|
|
1,847
|
|
|
|
1,906
|
|
Basic earnings per share, in
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
|
|
1.55
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
Diluted earnings per share, in
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
|
|
1.55
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The 2009 figures have been
translated solely for the convenience of the reader at an
exchange rate of US$1.4332 to 1.00, the Noon Buying Rate
certified by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on
December 31, 2009.
|
The accompanying Notes are an
integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-3
SAP AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
for
the years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
Profit after tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
1,848
|
|
|
|
1,908
|
|
Gains (losses) on exchange differences on translation, before tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustments on exchange differences on
translation, before tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Exchange differences on translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
Gains (losses) on remeasuring
available-for-sale
financial assets, before tax
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustments on
available-for-sale
financial assets, before tax
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, before tax
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
89
|
|
Reclassification adjustments on cash flow hedges, before tax
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
Cash flow hedges
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
Actuarial gains (losses) on defined benefit plans, before
tax
|
|
|
(19a
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income, before tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
Income tax relating to components of other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other comprehensive income after tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
(195
|
)
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,864
|
|
|
|
1,698
|
|
|
|
1,713
|
|
- attributable to non-controlling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
- attributable to owners of parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,862
|
|
|
|
1,697
|
|
|
|
1,711
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an
integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-4
SAP AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
as at
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
|
2009(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
|
|
1,884
|
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
Other financial assets
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
697
|
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
588
|
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
3,649
|
|
|
|
2,546
|
|
|
|
3,178
|
|
Other non-financial assets
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
Tax assets
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,531
|
|
|
|
5,255
|
|
|
|
5,571
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
7,157
|
|
|
|
4,994
|
|
|
|
4,975
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
1,965
|
|
|
|
1,371
|
|
|
|
1,405
|
|
Other financial assets
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Other non-financial assets
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Tax assets
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,636
|
|
|
|
8,119
|
|
|
|
8,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,168
|
|
|
|
13,374
|
|
|
|
13,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity and Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
599
|
|
Tax liabilities
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
Bank loans
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2,319
|
|
Other financial liabilities
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
Financial liabilities
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
2,563
|
|
Other non-financial liabilities
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
2,260
|
|
|
|
1,577
|
|
|
|
1,428
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
857
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,896
|
|
|
|
3,416
|
|
|
|
5,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax liabilities
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loans
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Other financial liabilities
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Financial liabilities
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
1,045
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Other non-financial liabilities
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,103
|
|
|
|
1,467
|
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,998
|
|
|
|
4,883
|
|
|
|
6,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued
capital2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,757
|
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
Treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,892
|
)
|
|
|
(1,320
|
)
|
|
|
(1,362
|
)
|
Share premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,284
|
|
|
|
8,571
|
|
|
|
7,422
|
|
Other components of equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(454
|
)
|
|
|
(317
|
)
|
|
|
(437
|
)
|
Equity attributable to owners of parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,149
|
|
|
|
8,477
|
|
|
|
7,169
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
12,169
|
|
|
|
8,491
|
|
|
|
7,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,168
|
|
|
|
13,374
|
|
|
|
13,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The 2009 figures have been
translated solely for the convenience of the reader at an
exchange rate of US$1.4332 to 1.00, the Noon Buying Rate
certified by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on
December 31, 2009.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Authorized not issued
or outstanding: 480 million no-par shares at
December 31, 2009 and 2008; Authorized issued
and outstanding: 1,226 million no-par shares at
December 31, 2009 and 2008
|
The accompanying Notes are an
integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-5
SAP AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
as at
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Components of Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for-Sale
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
Flow
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
to Owners of
|
|
|
Controlling
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Differences
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Hedges
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
January 1, 2007 prior to IFRIC 13 adoption
|
|
|
1,268
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
6,380
|
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(1,742
|
)
|
|
|
6,114
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
6,123
|
|
Cumulated difference from the first-time adoption of IFRIC 13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2007 after IFRIC 13 adoption
|
|
|
1,268
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
6,368
|
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(1,742
|
)
|
|
|
6,102
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
6,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit after tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,906
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1,908
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(195
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(195
|
)
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(556
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(556
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(556
|
)
|
Cancellation of treasury shares
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(796
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury shares transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(811
|
)
|
|
|
(799
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(799
|
)
|
Convertible bonds and stock options exercised
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other changes non-controlling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
6,925
|
|
|
|
(330
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(1,734
|
)
|
|
|
6,465
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit after tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,847
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,848
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(594
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(594
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(594
|
)
|
Cancellation of treasury shares
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(723
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury shares transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(372
|
)
|
|
|
(378
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(378
|
)
|
Convertible bonds and stock options exercised
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
7,422
|
|
|
|
(393
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(1,362
|
)
|
|
|
7,169
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
7,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit after tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,748
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(594
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(594
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(594
|
)
|
Treasury shares transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Convertible bonds and stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Addition of non-controlling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
8,571
|
|
|
|
(319
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(1,320
|
)
|
|
|
8,477
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
8,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an
integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-6
SAP AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
as at
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
Profit after tax
|
|
|
2,508
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
1,848
|
|
|
|
1,908
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile profit after tax to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
Gains/losses on disposals of non-current assets
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Gains/losses on disposals of financial assets
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Impairment loss on financial assets recognized in profit
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Decrease/increase in sales and bad debt allowances on trade
receivables
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Other adjustments for non-cash items
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
Decrease/increase in trade receivables
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(521
|
)
|
Decrease/increase in other assets
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
Decrease/increase in trade payables, provisions and other
liabilities
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
|
|
375
|
|
Decrease/increase in deferred income
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
4,321
|
|
|
|
3,015
|
|
|
|
2,158
|
|
|
|
1,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of non-controlling interests
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
Business combinations, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
(3,773
|
)
|
|
|
(672
|
)
|
Repayment of acquirees debt in business combinations
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(450
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
Purchase of intangible assets and property, plant, and equipment
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
(225
|
)
|
|
|
(339
|
)
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of intangible assets or property, plant and
equipment
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Cash transferred to restricted cash
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(448
|
)
|
|
|
(550
|
)
|
Use of restricted cash
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,001
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Purchase of equity or debt instruments of other entities
|
|
|
(1,538
|
)
|
|
|
(1,073
|
)
|
|
|
(396
|
)
|
|
|
(788
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of equity or debt instruments of other
entities
|
|
|
1,472
|
|
|
|
1,027
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
(429
|
)
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
|
|
(3,766
|
)
|
|
|
(1,391
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(851
|
)
|
|
|
(594
|
)
|
|
|
(594
|
)
|
|
|
(556
|
)
|
Purchase of treasury shares
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(487
|
)
|
|
|
(1,005
|
)
|
Proceeds from reissuance of treasury shares
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
Proceeds from issuing shares (share-based compensation)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Proceeds from private placement transaction
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Proceeds from borrowings
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
697
|
|
|
|
3,859
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Repayments of borrowings
|
|
|
(3,301
|
)
|
|
|
(2,303
|
)
|
|
|
(1,571
|
)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
Purchase of equity-based derivative instruments (hedge for
cash-settled share-based payment plans)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
Proceeds from the exercise of equity-based derivative financial
instruments
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Net cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
(3,104
|
)
|
|
|
(2,166
|
)
|
|
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
(1,287
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rates on cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
(328
|
)
|
|
|
(791
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period
|
|
|
1,834
|
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
|
1,608
|
|
|
|
2,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
|
|
1,884
|
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
|
1,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1)
|
|
The 2009 figures have been
translated solely for the convenience of the reader at an
exchange rate of US$1.4332 to 1.00, the Noon Buying Rate
certified by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on
December 31, 2009.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Interest paid in 2009, 2008, and
2007 amounted to 69 million,
105 million, and 6 million, respectively, and
interest received in 2009, 2008, and 2007 amounted to
22 million, 72 million and
142 million, respectively. Income taxes paid in 2009, 2008,
and 2007, net of refunds, were 722 million,
882 million, and 811 million, respectively.
|
The accompanying Notes are an
integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-7
SAP AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
(1)
|
GENERAL INFORMATION
ABOUT CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements of SAP AG and
its subsidiaries (collectively, we, us,
our, SAP, Group, and
Company) have been prepared in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The
designation IFRS includes all standards issued by
the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and related
interpretations issued by the International Financial Reporting
Interpretations Committee (IFRIC).
We have applied all standards and interpretations that were
effective on and endorsed by the European Union (EU) as at
December 31, 2009. There were no standards or
interpretations impacting our Consolidated Financial Statements
for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 that
were effective but not yet endorsed. Therefore our Consolidated
Financial Statements comply with both IFRS as issued by the IASB
and with IFRS as endorsed by the EU.
SAPs Executive Board approved the Consolidated Financial
Statements on March 10, 2010 for submission to the
Companys Supervisory Board.
All amounts included in the Consolidated Financial Statements
are reported in millions of euros ( millions) except
where otherwise stated. Due to rounding, numbers presented
throughout this document may not add up precisely to the totals
we provide and percentages may not precisely reflect the
absolute figures.
|
|
(2)
|
SCOPE OF
CONSOLIDATION
|
The Consolidated Financial Statements include SAP AG and all
entities that are controlled directly or indirectly by SAP AG.
We fully consolidate one entity in which we hold only 49% of the
voting shares, due to an agreement with the majority shareholder
which provides that SAP fully controls the entity, receives all
benefits, and incurs all risks. All other consolidated entities
are majority-owned.
All SAP entities prepare their financial statements as at
December 31. All financial statements were prepared
applying the same Group IFRS accounting and valuation
principles. Intercompany transactions and balances relating to
consolidated entities have been eliminated.
The following table summarizes the change in the number of legal
entities included in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Overview of Legal
Entities Consolidated in the Financial Statements
The additions relate to legal entities added in connection with
acquisitions and foundations. The disposals are due to mergers
and liquidations of consolidated or acquired legal entities.
F-8
The 2009 changes in the scope of companies included in the
Consolidated Financial Statements have no impact on the
comparability with the 2008 Consolidated Financial Statements.
In 2008, we acquired Business Objects, which was material to SAP
and affected comparability with our 2007 Consolidated Financial
Statements. For additional information on our business
combinations and the effect on our Consolidated Financial
Statements, see Note (4).
|
|
(3)
|
SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
|
|
(3a)
|
Bases of Measurement
|
The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared on the
historical cost basis except for the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments,
available-for-sale
financial assets (except for investments in certain equity
instruments without a quoted market price), and liabilities for
cash-settled share-based payment arrangements are measured at
fair value
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange receivables and payables are translated at
period-end exchange rates; and
|
|
|
|
Pensions are measured according to IAS 19 Employee Benefits (IAS
19) as described in Note (19a)
|
Where applicable, information about the methods and assumptions
used in determining the respective measurement bases and fair
values is disclosed in the Notes specific to that asset or
liability.
|
|
(3b)
|
Relevant Accounting
Policies
|
Reclassifications
We have reclassified and renamed certain items in our
Consolidated Financial Statements, mainly to show our
restructuring expenses separately on the face of our
Consolidated Income Statements, to align our financial
statements to the XBRL taxonomy for IFRS, and to combine
immaterial line items. We have adjusted our prior years
accordingly. We do not believe that these reclassifications have
a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements for
prior periods.
Acquisitions
We adopted IFRS 3 Business Combinations (IFRS 3 (2008)) with
effect from January 1, 2009. We account for all business
combinations using the acquisition method. The change in
accounting policy was applied prospectively and had no material
impact on earnings per share. We have applied the acquisition
method for business combinations disclosed in Note (4). We
measure the acquired assets and liabilities at their acquisition
date fair values with limited exceptions as required by IFRS 3
(2008). The results of operations of acquired entities are
included in our Consolidated Income Statements beginning at the
respective acquisition date. If we do not acquire all shares of
an entity we determine for each business combination
transaction, whether we will measure any non-controlling
interest at fair value or at the non-controlling interests
proportionate share of the acquirees identifiable net
assets.
Foreign Currencies
Assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries, that use a
functional currency other than the euro, are translated at the
exchange rate on the date of the Statement of Financial
Position. Revenues and expenses are translated at average rates
of exchange computed on a monthly basis. Translation adjustments
resulting from this process are charged or credited to other
components of equity. Exchange differences from monetary items
F-9
denominated in foreign currency transactions that are part of a
long-term investment are also included in other components of
equity.
Transactions in foreign currencies are translated to the
respective functional currencies of Group entities at the
exchange rates at the dates of the transactions. Monetary assets
and liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies are
remeasured at the period-end closing rate with resulting gains
and losses reflected in other non-operating income/expense, net
in the Consolidated Income Statements. When a foreign operation
is disposed of, the foreign currency translation adjustments
applicable to that entity are recognized in profit or loss.
Operating cash flows are translated into euros using average
rates of exchange computed on a monthly basis. Investing and
financing cash flows are translated into euros using the
exchange rates in effect at the time of the respective
transaction. The effects on cash due to fluctuations in exchange
rates are shown in a separate line in the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows.
The exchange rates of key currencies affecting the Company were
as follows:
Exchange Rates
Revenue Recognition
We derive our revenues from the sale or license of our software
products and of support, subscription, consulting, development,
training, and other services. The vast majority of our software
arrangements include support services and many also include
professional services and other elements.
Software and software-related service revenue as shown in our
Consolidated Income Statements is the sum of our software
revenue, support revenue, and revenue from subscriptions and
other software-related services. Professional services and other
service revenue as shown in our Consolidated Income Statements
is the sum of our consulting revenue, training revenue, and
other service revenue. Other revenue as shown in our
Consolidated Income Statements mainly consists of revenue from
SAP marketing events. Revenue information by segment and
geographic region is disclosed in Note (29).
Software revenue represents fees earned from the sale or license
of software to customers. Support revenue represents fees earned
from providing customers with unspecified future software
updates, upgrades, and enhancements, and technical product
support. We recognize support revenues ratably over the term of
the support arrangement. We do not separately sell technical
support services or unspecified software upgrades, updates, and
enhancements. Accordingly, we do not distinguish within software
and software-related service revenue or within cost of software
and software-related services the amounts attributable to
technical support services and unspecified software upgrades,
updates, and enhancements.
Subscription and other software-related service revenue
represents fees earned from subscription and software rental
arrangements, on-demand solutions, and other software-related
services. Subscription contracts combine software and support
service elements, as they provide the customer with current
software products, rights to receive unspecified future software
products, and rights to support services during the subscription
F-10
term. Customers pay an annual fee for a defined subscription
term, usually five years, and we recognize such fees ratably
over the term of the arrangement beginning with the delivery of
the first product.
Software rental contracts also combine software and support
service elements. Such contracts provide the customer with
current software products and support but not the right to
receive unspecified future software products. Customers pay a
periodic fee over the rental term and we recognize fees from
software rental contracts ratably over the term of the
arrangement.
Revenue from on-demand solutions relate to software hosting
arrangements that provide the customer with the right to use
certain software functionality but do not include the right to
terminate the hosting contract and take possession of the
software without significant penalty. On-demand solution
revenues are generally recognized ratably over the term of the
arrangement. Other software-related service revenue mainly
consists of software-related revenue-sharing agreements with
other software vendors.
We recognize consulting, training, and other professional
services revenues when the respective services are performed.
Consulting revenue primarily results from implementation support
contracts to install and configure our software products.
Consulting contracts do not usually involve significant
production, modification, or customization of software and are
recognized using the percentage of completion method of
accounting. Training revenue results from contracts to provide
educational services to customers and partners regarding the use
of our software products.
Other service revenue consists of fees from cancelable hosting
contracts, application management services (AMS), and referral
fees. Cancelable hosting contracts allow the customer to
terminate the arrangement at any time and to take possession of
the software without significant penalty. Our AMS contracts
provide post-implementation application support, optimization,
and improvements to a customers IT solution. Fees from
referral services are commissions from partners to which we have
referred customers. Other service revenue is recognized when the
respective services are performed.
Revenue from the sale of perpetual licenses is recognized in
line with the requirements for selling goods stated in IAS 18
Revenue (IAS 18) when persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, delivery has occurred, the risks and rewards of
ownership have been transferred to the customer, the amount of
revenue can be measured reliably, and collection of the related
receivable is reasonably assured. The sale is recognized net of
returns and allowances, trade discounts, and volume rebates.
As authorized by IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in
Accounting Estimates and Errors (IAS 8), we follow the guidance
provided by FASB ASC Subtopic
985-605,
Software Revenue Recognition (formerly Statement of Position
(SOP) 97-2
Software Revenue Recognition), as amended, in order to determine
the recognizable amount of license revenue in multiple-element
arrangements. Revenue from multiple-element arrangements is
recognized using the residual method of revenue recognition when
company-specific objective evidence of fair value exists for all
of the undelivered elements (for example, support services,
consulting services, or other services) in the arrangement, but
does not exist for one or more delivered elements (generally
software). We determine the fair value of and allocate revenue
to each undelivered element based on its respective
company-specific objective evidence of fair value, which is the
price charged when that element is sold separately or, for
elements not yet sold separately, the price established by our
management if it is probable that the price will not change
before the element is sold separately. We allocate revenue to
undelivered support services based on the rates charged to renew
the support services annually after an initial period. Such
renewal rates generally represent a fixed percentage of the
discounted software license fee charged to the customer. The
vast majority of our customers renew their annual support
service contracts at these rates. We allocate revenue to future
incremental discounts whenever customers are granted the right
to license additional software at a higher discount than the one
given for the initial software license arrangement, or to
purchase or renew support or services at rates below
company-specific objective evidence of fair value of the
respective service.
F-11
We defer revenue for all undelivered elements and recognize the
residual amount of the arrangement fee attributable to the
delivered elements, if any, when the revenue criteria described
above have been met and company-specific objective evidence of
fair value exists for the undelivered elements.
Revenue recognition for multiple-element arrangements consisting
of software and consulting, training, or other professional
services depends on:
|
|
|
|
|
whether the arrangement involves significant production,
modification, or customization of the software and
|
|
|
|
whether the services are not available from third-party vendors
and are therefore deemed essential to the software.
|
If none of the features above is met, revenue for the software
element and the other element are recognized separately. In
contrast if one or both of these features are met the elements
of the arrangement are not accounted for separately but the
entire arrangement fee is recognized using the percentage of
completion method, based on contract costs incurred to date as a
percentage of total estimated project costs required to complete
the service. If we do not have a sufficient basis to measure the
progress of completion or to estimate the total contract
revenues and costs, revenue is recognized only to the extent of
contract cost incurred for which we believe recoverability to be
probable. If the arrangement includes multiple elements, we
exclude those elements from contract accounting (for example
support services or hosting) that meet the criteria for separate
recognition, provided that the elements have stand-alone value.
When it becomes probable that total contract costs exceed total
contract revenues in an arrangement, the expected losses are
recognized immediately as an expense based on the costs
attributable to the contract.
If at the outset of an arrangement we determine that the amount
of revenue cannot be measured reliably, we defer revenue until
the arrangement fee becomes due and payable by the customer. If
at the outset of an arrangement we determine that collectability
is not probable, we defer revenue recognition until the earlier
of when collectability becomes probable or payment is received.
If collectability becomes unlikely before all revenue from an
arrangement is recognized, we stop recognizing revenue except to
the extent of fees that have already been successfully
collected. In general, our software license agreements do not
include acceptance testing provisions. If an arrangement allows
for customer acceptance testing of the software, we defer
revenue until the earlier of customer acceptance or when the
acceptance right lapses.
We usually sell or license software on a perpetual basis.
Occasionally, we license software for a specified time. Revenue
from short-term time-based licenses, which usually include
support services during the license period, is recognized
ratably over the license term. Revenue from multi-year
time-based licenses that include support services, whether
separately priced or not, is recognized ratably over the license
term unless a substantive support service renewal rate exists,
in which case the amount allocated to the delivered software is
recognized based on the residual approach as software revenue
once the basic criteria described above have been met.
We recognize revenue from arrangements involving resellers on
evidence of sell-through by the reseller to the end-customer,
because the inflow of the economic benefits associated with the
arrangements to us is not probable before sell-through has
occurred.
Sometimes we enter into joint development agreements with
customers to leverage their industry expertise and provide
standard software solutions for selected vertical markets. These
customers generally contribute cash, resources, and industry
expertise in exchange for license rights for the future
solution. We recognize software revenue in conjunction with
these arrangements based on the percentage of completion method
as outlined above. We account for
out-of-pocket
expenses invoiced by SAP and reimbursed by customers as support,
consulting, and training revenues, depending on the nature of
the service for which the
out-of-pocket
expenses were incurred.
F-12
If a customer is specifically identified as a bad debtor, we
stop recognizing revenue except to the extent of fees that have
already been collected.
Our contributions to resellers that allow our resellers to
execute qualified and approved marketing activities are
recognized as an offset to revenue unless we obtain a separate
identifiable benefit for the contribution and the fair value of
the benefit is reasonably estimable.
Cost of Software and
Software-Related Services
Cost of software and software related services includes the cost
incurred in producing the goods and providing the services that
generate software and software-related service revenue.
Consequently this line item includes employee expenses relating
to these services, amortization of acquired intangibles, third
party licenses, shipping and
ramp-up
cost, etc.
Cost of Professional
Services and Other Services
Cost of professional services and other services includes the
cost incurred in providing the services that generate
professional service and other service revenue. The item also
includes sales and marketing expenses related to our
professional services and other services that result from sales
and marketing efforts that cannot be clearly separated from
providing the services.
Research and
Development
Research and development includes the costs incurred by
activities related to the development of software solutions (new
products, updates and enhancements) including resource and
hardware costs for the development systems.
Development activities involve the application of research
findings or other knowledge to a plan or design of new or
substantially improved software products before the start of
commercial use. Development expenditures are capitalized only if
all of the following criteria are met:
|
|
|
|
|
The development cost can be measured reliably
|
|
|
|
The product is technically and commercially feasible
|
|
|
|
Future economic benefits are probable
|
|
|
|
We intend to complete development and market the product
|
We have determined that these criteria are not cumulatively met
until shortly before the products are available for sale.
Development costs incurred after the recognition criteria are
met have not been material. Consequently, all research and
development costs are expensed as incurred.
Sales and Marketing
Sales and marketing includes costs incurred for the selling and
marketing activities related to our software solutions and
software-related service portfolio.
General and
Administration
General and administration includes costs related to finance and
administrative functions as long as they are not directly
attributable to one of the other operating expense line items.
F-13
Government Grants
and Assistance
We record government grants when it is reasonably assured that
we will comply with the relevant conditions and that the grant
will be received. Our government grants generally represent
subsidies for activities specified in the grant. As a result,
government grants are recognized when earned as a reduction of
the expenses recorded for the cost that the grants are intended
to compensate. Government assistance that takes the form of a
tax credit is recognized as a reduction of income tax.
Leases
We are a lessee of property, plant, and equipment, mainly
buildings and vehicles, under operating leases that do not
transfer to us the substantive risks and rewards of ownership.
Rent expense on operating leases is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the life of the lease including renewal
terms if, at inception of the lease, renewal is reasonably
assured.
Some of our operating leases contain lessee incentives, such as
up-front payments of costs or free or reduced periods of rent.
The incentives are amortized over the life of the lease and the
rent expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the
life of the lease. The same applies to contractually-agreed
future increases of rents.
Income Tax
Deferred taxes are accounted for under the liability method. We
recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax
consequences attributable to differences between the carrying
amounts of existing assets and liabilities in the Statements of
Financial Position and their respective tax bases and on the
carryforwards of unused tax losses and unused tax credits.
Deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent that it is
probable that future taxable income will be available against
which the deductible temporary differences, unused tax losses,
and unused tax credits can be utilized.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax
rates that are expected to apply to the period when the asset is
realized or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and
tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the
end of the reporting period. The effect on deferred tax assets
and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in profit
or loss, unless related to items directly recognized in equity,
in the period that includes the respective enactment date.
The carrying amount of a deferred tax asset is reviewed at the
end of each reporting period and is reduced to the extent that
it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be
available to allow the benefit of part or all of the deferred
tax assets to be utilized.
Share-Based
Compensation
Share-based compensation covers cash-settled and equity-settled
awards issued to employees.
The fair values of both equity-settled and cash-settled awards
are measured at grant date using an option-pricing model.
The fair value of equity-settled awards is not subsequently
remeasured. The grant-date fair value of equity-settled awards
is recognized as personnel expense in profit or loss over the
period in which the employees become unconditionally entitled to
the rights, with a corresponding increase in share premium. The
amount recognized as an expense is adjusted to reflect the
actual number of equity-settled awards options that ultimately
vest.
For the share-based payment plans that are settled by paying
cash rather than by issuing equity instruments, a liability is
recorded for the rights granted reflecting the vested portion of
the fair value of the
F-14
rights at the reporting date. Personnel expense
including the effects of any changes in fair value of the
awards is accrued over the period the beneficiaries
are expected to perform the related service (vesting period),
with a corresponding increase in liabilities. Cash-settled
awards are remeasured to fair value at each Statement of
Financial Position date until the award is settled. Any changes
in the fair value of the liability are recognized as personnel
expense in profit or loss. The amount of unrecognized
compensation expense related to non-vested share-based payment
arrangements granted under our cash-settled plans is dependent
on the final intrinsic value of the awards. The amount of
unrecognized compensation expense is dependent on the future
price of our common share which we cannot reasonably predict.
In the event we hedge our exposure to cash-settled awards,
changes in the fair value of the respective hedging instruments
are also recognized as personnel expense in profit or loss. The
fair values for hedged programs are based on market data
reflecting current market expectations.
For more information about our share-based compensation plans,
see Note (28).
Other Components of
Equity
Other components of equity include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Currency effects arising from the translation of the financial
statements of our foreign operations as well as the currency
effects from intercompany long-term monetary items for which
settlement is neither planned nor likely to occur in the
foreseeable future
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains and losses on
available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
|
Gains and losses on cash flow hedges comprised of the net change
in fair value of the effective portion of the respective cash
flow hedges that have not yet impacted profit or loss.
|
Earnings per Share
We present basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS). Basic
earnings per share is determined by dividing profit after tax
attributable to equity holders of the parent by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings
per share reflect the potential dilution that would occur if all
in the money securities to issue common shares were
exercised or converted.
Financial Assets
Our financial assets comprise cash and cash equivalents (highly
liquid investments with original maturities of three months or
less), loans and receivables, acquired equity and debt
investments, and derivative financial instruments (derivatives)
with positive fair values.
These assets are recognized and measured in accordance with IAS
39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement (IAS 39).
Accordingly, financial assets are recognized in the Consolidated
Statements of Financial Position if we have a contractual right
to receive cash or other financial assets from another entity.
Regular way purchases or sales of financial assets are recorded
at the trade date. Financial assets are initially recognized at
fair value plus, in the case of financial assets not at fair
value through profit or loss, directly attributable transaction
costs. Interest-free or below-market-rate loans and receivables
are initially reflected at the present value of the expected
future cash flows. The subsequent measurement depends on the
classification of our financial assets to the following
categories according to IAS 39:
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and receivables: Loans and receivables are non-derivative
financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are
neither quoted in an active market nor intended to be sold in
the near term. This category comprises trade receivables,
receivables and loans included in other financial assets, and
cash and cash equivalents. We carry loans and receivables at
amortized cost less impairment losses. Interest income from
items assigned to this category is determined using the
effective interest
|
F-15
|
|
|
|
|
method if the time value of money is material. For further
information on trade receivables see the Trade and other
Receivables section.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
financial assets:
Available-for-sale
financial assets are non-derivative financial assets that are
not assigned to any of the two other categories and mainly
include equity investments and debt investments. If readily
determinable from market data,
available-for-sale
financial assets are accounted for at fair value, with changes
in fair value being reported net of tax in other components of
equity. Fair value fluctuations are not recognized in profit or
loss until the assets are sold or impaired.
Available-for-sale
financial assets for which no market price is available and
whose fair value cannot be reliably estimated in the absence of
an active market are carried at cost less impairment losses.
|
|
|
|
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss: Financial
assets at fair value through profit or loss only comprise those
financial assets that are held for trading as we do not
designate financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
on initial recognition. This category solely contains positive
fair values from embedded and freestanding derivatives, except
where hedge accounting is applied. All changes in the fair value
of financial assets in this category are immediately recognized
in profit or loss. For further information on derivatives see
the Derivatives section.
|
All financial assets not accounted for at fair value through
profit or loss are assessed for impairment at each reporting
date or if we become aware of objective evidence of impairment
as a result of one or more events that indicate that the
carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Objective
evidence includes but is not limited to a significant or
prolonged decline of the fair value below its carrying amount, a
high probability of insolvency, or a material breach of contract
by the issuer such as a significant delay or a shortfall in
payments due. Impairment charges in the amount of the difference
of the assets carrying amount and the present value of the
expected future cash flows or current fair value, respectively,
are recognized in finance income, net. For
available-for-sale
financial assets such impairment charges directly reduce the
assets carrying amount while impairments on loans and
receivables are recorded using allowance accounts. Account
balances are charged off against the respective allowance after
all collection efforts have been exhausted and the likelihood of
recovery is considered remote. Impairment losses are reversed if
the reason for the original impairment loss no longer exists. No
such reversals are made for
available-for-sale
equity investments.
Income/expenses and gains/losses on financial assets consist of
impairment charges and reversals, interest income and expenses,
dividends, and gains and losses from the disposal of such
assets. Dividend income is recognized when earned. Interest
income is recognized based on the effective interest method.
Neither dividend nor interest income are included in net
gains/losses at the time of disposal. Financial assets are
derecognized when contractual rights to receive cash flows from
the financial assets expire or the financial assets are
transferred together with all material risks and benefits.
Investments in
Associates
Companies in which we do not have a controlling financial
interest, but over which we can exercise significant operating
and financial influence (associates) are accounted for using the
equity method.
Derivatives
We account for derivatives and hedging activities in accordance
with IAS 39 at fair value.
Derivatives without
Designated Hedge Relationship
Many transactions constitute economic hedges and therefore
contribute effectively to the securing of financial risks but do
not qualify for hedge accounting under IAS 39. For the hedging
of currency risks inherent in foreign currency denominated,
recognized monetary assets and liabilities we do not designate
our
held-for-trading
derivative financial instruments as accounting hedges, as the
realized profits and losses from
F-16
the underlying transactions are recognized in profit or loss in
the same periods as the realized profits or losses from the
derivatives.
Embedded Derivatives
We occasionally have contracts that require payment streams in
currencies other than the functional currency of either party to
the contract. Such embedded foreign currency derivatives are
separated from the host contract and accounted for separately if
the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract and
the embedded derivative are not closely related, a separate
instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative would
meet the definition of a derivative, and the combined instrument
is not measured at fair value through profit or loss.
Derivatives with
Designated Cash Flow Hedge Relationship
Derivatives which are part of a hedging relationship that
qualifies for hedge accounting under IAS 39 are carried at their
fair value. We designate and document the hedge relationship
including the nature of the risk, the identification of the
hedged item, the hedging instrument, and how we will assess the
hedge effectiveness. The accounting for changes in fair value of
the hedging instrument depends on the effectiveness of the
hedging relationship. The effective portion of the unrealized
gain or loss on the derivative instrument determined to be an
effective hedge is recognized in other components of equity. We
subsequently reclassify the portion of gains or losses in the
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income to the
Consolidated Income Statements when the hedged transaction
affects profit or loss. The ineffective portion of gains or
losses is recognized in the Consolidated Income Statements
immediately. For detailed information on our hedges, see Note
(26).
Valuation and
Testing of Effectiveness
The fair value of our derivatives is calculated by discounting
the expected future cash flows using relevant interest rates,
and spot rates over the remaining lifetime of the contracts.
Gains or losses on the spot price and the intrinsic values of
the derivatives designated and qualifying as cash-flow hedges
are recognized directly in other components of equity, while
gains and losses on the interest element and on the time values
excluded from the hedging relationship are recognized in profit
or loss immediately.
The effectiveness of the hedging relationship is tested
prospectively and retrospectively. Prospectively, we apply the
critical terms match for our foreign currency hedges as
currencies, maturities, and the amounts are identical for the
forecasted transactions and the spot element of the forward
exchange rate contract or intrinsic value of the currency
options, respectively. For interest rate swaps, we also apply
the critical terms match as the notional amounts, currencies,
maturities, basis of the variable legs (EURIBOR), reset dates,
and the dates of the interest and principal payments are
identical for the debt instrument and the corresponding interest
rate swaps. Therefore, over the life of the hedging instrument,
the changes in cash flows of the hedging relationship components
will offset the impact of fluctuations of the underlying
forecasted transactions.
Retrospectively, effectiveness is tested on a cumulative basis
applying the Dollar Offset Method by using the Hypothetical
Derivative Method. Under this approach, the change in fair value
of a constructed hypothetical derivative with terms reflecting
the relevant terms of the hedged item is compared to the change
in the fair value of the hedging instrument employing its
relevant terms. The hedge is deemed highly effective if the
results are within the range 80% to 125%.
F-17
Trade and Other
Receivables
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables are recorded at invoiced amounts less sales
allowances and an allowance for doubtful accounts. We record
these allowances on a specific review of all significant
outstanding invoices. When analyzing the recoverability of our
trade receivables, we consider the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
First, we consider the financial solvency of specific customers
and record an allowance for specific customer balances when we
believe it is probable that we will not collect the amount due
according to the contractual terms of the arrangement.
|
|
|
|
Second, we evaluate homogenous portfolios of trade receivables
according to their default risk primarily based on the age of
the receivable and historical loss experience, but also taking
into consideration general market factors that might impact our
trade receivable portfolio, such as the current economic crisis.
We record a general bad debt allowance to record impairment
losses for a portfolio of trade receivables when we believe that
the age of the receivables indicates that it is probable that a
loss has occurred and we will not collect some or all of the
amounts due.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all
collection efforts have been exhausted and the likelihood of
recovery is considered remote.
|
|
|
|
In our Consolidated Income Statements bad debt allowances for a
portfolio of trade receivables are recorded as other operating
expense, whereas bad debt allowances for specific customer
balances are recorded in cost of software and software-related
services or cost of professional services and other services,
depending on the transaction from which the respective trade
receivable results. Sales allowances are recorded as an offset
to the respective revenue item.
|
|
|
|
Included in trade receivables are unbilled receivables related
to fixed-fee and
time-and-material
consulting arrangements for contract work performed to date.
|
Other Non-financial
Assets
Other non-financial assets are recorded at amortized cost, which
approximates fair value due to their short-term nature.
We capitalize the discount of our loans to employees as prepaid
expenses and release it ratably to personnel expenses.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the fair value of the
consideration transferred, the amount of any non-controlling
interest in the acquired business and the fair value of any
previously held equity interest of the acquired business, over
the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired.
We do not amortize goodwill but test it for impairment at least
annually and when events occur or changes in circumstances
indicate that the recoverable amount of a cash-generating unit
is less than its carrying value. In respect to at-equity
investments, the carrying amount of goodwill is included in the
carrying amount of the investment.
Intangible Assets
Purchased intangible assets with finite useful lives are
recorded at acquisition cost and are amortized either based on
expected usage or on a straight-line basis over their estimated
useful lives ranging from two to 16 years. All of our
intangible assets, with the exception of goodwill, have finite
useful lives and are therefore subject to amortization.
F-18
We recognize acquired in-process research and development
projects as an intangible asset separate from goodwill if a
project meets the definition of an asset. Amortization for these
intangible assets starts when the projects are complete and the
developed software is taken to the market. We typically amortize
these intangibles over five years.
Property, Plant, and
Equipment
Property, plant, and equipment are carried at acquisition cost
plus the fair value of related asset retirement costs, if any
and if reasonably estimable, and less accumulated depreciation.
Interest incurred during the construction of qualifying assets
is capitalized and amortized over the related assets
estimated useful lives.
Property, plant, and equipment are depreciated over their
expected useful lives, generally using the straight-line method.
Land is not depreciated.
Useful Lives of
Property, Plant, and Equipment
Leasehold improvements are depreciated using the straight-line
method over the shorter of the term of the lease or the useful
life of the asset. If a renewal option exists, the term used
reflects the additional time covered by the option if exercise
is reasonably assured when the leasehold improvement is first
put into operation.
Impairment of
Goodwill and Non-current Assets
The recoverable amount of goodwill is estimated each year at the
same time. Furthermore, we review non-current assets, such as
property, plant, equipment, and acquired intangible assets for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets may not
be recoverable.
For the purpose of impairment testing, assets that cannot be
tested individually are grouped together into the smallest group
of assets that generates cash inflows from continuing use that
are largely independent of the cash inflows of other assets or
groups of assets (the cash-generating unit, or CGU). The
recoverable amount of an asset or cash-generating unit is the
greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs to
sell. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows
are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount
rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value
of money and the risks specific to the asset.
Goodwill acquired in a business combination is allocated to
segments that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the
combination. This allocation represents our management approach.
As a result, we measure impairment for goodwill at the segment
level.
The Groups corporate assets do not generate separate cash
inflows. If there is an indication that a corporate asset may be
impaired, then the recoverable amount is determined for the CGU
to which the corporate asset belongs.
An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of an
asset or its CGU exceeds its estimated recoverable amount.
Impairment losses are recognized in profit or loss.
F-19
Impairment losses for non-current tangible and intangible assets
recognized in the prior periods are assessed at each reporting
date for indicators that the loss has decreased or no longer
exists. Accordingly, if there is an indication that the reasons
that caused the impairment no longer exist we would consider the
need to reverse all or a portion of the impairment through
profit or loss.
Contingent Assets
We carry insurance policies to offset the expenses associated
with defending against litigation matters. We recognize these
reimbursements in profit or loss when it is virtually certain
that the reimbursement will be received and retained by us when
we settle the related obligation.
Liabilities
Financial Liabilities
Financial liabilities include trade and other payables, bank
loans and other financial liabilities which comprise derivative
and non-derivative financial liabilities.
They are recognized and measured in accordance with IAS 39.
Accordingly, financial liabilities are recognized in the
Consolidated Financial Statements if we have a contractual
obligation to transfer cash or another financial asset to
another party. Financial liabilities are initially recognized at
fair value, which in the case of financial liabilities not at
fair value through profit or loss includes directly attributable
transaction costs. If material, financial liabilities are
discounted to present value based on prevailing market rates
adjusted for credit risk, with the discount being recognized
over time as interest expense. The subsequent measurement
depends on the allocation of financial liabilities to the
following categories according to IAS 39:
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss only
comprise those financial liabilities that are held for trading
as we do not designate financial liabilities at fair value
through profit or loss on initial recognition. This category
solely contains negative fair values from embedded and other
derivatives, except where hedge accounting is applied. All
changes in the fair value of financial liabilities in this
category are immediately recognized in profit or loss. For
further information on derivatives, see the Derivatives section.
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities at amortized cost include all
non-derivative financial liabilities not quoted in an active
market which are measured at amortized cost using the effective
interest method.
|
Expenses and gains/losses on financial liabilities consist of
interest expenses, and gains and losses from the disposal of
such liabilities. Interest expense is recognized based on the
effective interest method.
Financial liabilities are derecognized when the contractual
obligation is discharged, canceled or has expired.
Non-financial
Liabilities
Other non-financial liabilities with fixed or determinable
payments that are not quoted in an active market are mainly the
result of obligations to employees and fiscal authorities and
are generally measured at amortized cost.
Provisions
Provisions are recorded when it is more likely than not that we
have a legal or constructive obligation to third parties as a
result of a past event, the amount can be reasonably estimated,
and it is probable that there will be an outflow of future
economic benefits. We regularly adjust provisions as further
information develops or circumstances change. Non-current
provisions are reported at the present value of their expected
settlement
F-20
amounts as at the date of Statement of Financial Position.
Discount rates are regularly adjusted to current market interest
rates.
Our software contracts usually contain general warranty
provisions guaranteeing that the software will perform according
to SAPs stated specifications for six to twelve months. At
the time of the sale or license of our software covered by such
warranty provisions, we record a provision for warranty
obligations based on the historical average cost of fulfilling
our obligations, which we classify as a current obligation.
A provision for restructuring is recognized when we have
approved a detailed and formal restructuring plan and the
restructuring has commenced or has been announced.
Post-Employment
Benefits
We measure our pension-benefit liabilities and other
post-employment benefits based on actuarial computations using
the
projected-unit-credit
method in accordance with IAS 19. The assumptions used to
calculate pension liabilities and costs are shown in Note (19a).
As a result of the actuarial calculation for each plan we
recognize an asset or liability for the overfunded or
underfunded status of the respective defined benefit plan. We
classify a portion of the liability as current (determined on a
plan-by-plan
basis) if the amount by which the actuarial present value of
benefits included in the benefit obligation payable within the
next 12 months exceeds the fair value of plan assets.
Changes in the amount of the defined benefit obligation or plan
assets resulting from demographic and financial data different
than originally assumed and from changes in assumptions can
result in actuarial gains and losses. We recognize all actuarial
gains and losses directly in retained earnings.
SAPs pension benefits are classified as defined
contribution plans if the payment to a separate fund relieves
SAP of all obligations from the pension plan. Obligations for
contributions to defined contribution pension plans are
recognized as an expense in profit or loss when paid or due.
Deferred Income
Deferred income is recognized as software revenue, support
revenue, professional service revenue, or other revenue,
depending on the reasons for the deferral, once the basic
applicable revenue recognition criteria have been met, for
example, when the related services are performed or when the
discounts are used.
Treasury Shares
Treasury shares are recorded at acquisition cost and are
presented as a deduction from total equity. Gains and losses on
the subsequent reissuance of treasury shares are credited or
charged to share premium on an after-tax basis. On cancellation
of treasury shares any excess over the calculated par value is
charged to retained earnings.
Presentation in the
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
We classify interest and taxes paid as well as interest and
dividends received as cash flows from operating activities.
Dividends paid are classified as financing activities.
|
|
(3c)
|
Management Judgments
and Sources of Estimation Uncertainty
|
The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in
conformity with IFRS requires management to make judgments,
estimates, and assumptions that affect the application of
accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues, and expenses, as well as disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities.
F-21
We base our judgments, estimates, and assumptions on historical
and forecast information, as well as regional and industry
economic conditions in which we or our customers operate,
changes to which could adversely affect our estimates. Although
we believe we have made reasonable estimates about the ultimate
resolution of the underlying uncertainties, no assurance can be
given that the final outcome of these matters will be consistent
with what is reflected in our assets, liabilities, revenues, and
expenses. Actual results could differ from original estimates.
The accounting policies that most frequently require us to make
judgments, estimates, and assumptions, and therefore are
critical to understanding our results of operations, are:
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue recognition
|
|
|
|
Valuation of trade receivables
|
|
|
|
Accounting for share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
Accounting for income tax
|
|
|
|
Accounting for business combinations
|
|
|
|
Subsequent accounting for goodwill and other intangibles
|
|
|
|
Accounting for legal contingencies
|
|
|
|
Recognition of internally generated intangible assets from
development
|
Our management periodically discusses these critical accounting
policies with the Audit Committee of the Supervisory Board.
Revenue Recognition
As described in the Revenue Recognition section of Note (3b), we
do not recognize revenue before persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the risks and rewards
of ownership have been transferred to the customer, the amount
of revenue can be measured reliably, and collection of the
related receivable is reasonably assured. The determination of
whether the amount of revenue can be measured reliably or
whether the fees are collectible is inherently judgmental as it
requires estimates as to whether and to what extent subsequent
concessions may be granted to customers and whether the customer
is expected to pay the contractual fees. The timing and amount
of revenue recognition can vary depending on what assessments
have been made.
In most of our revenue-generating arrangements we sell to the
customer more than one product solution or service.
Additionally, we have ongoing relationships with many of our
customers and often enter into several transactions with the
same customer within close proximity in time. We therefore have
to determine:
|
|
|
|
|
Which arrangements with the same customer are to be accounted
for as one arrangement
|
|
|
|
Which deliverables under one arrangement are to be accounted for
separately and
|
|
|
|
How to allocate the total arrangement fee to the individual
elements of one arrangement
|
The determination of whether different arrangements with the
same customer are to be accounted for as one arrangement is
highly judgmental as it requires us to evaluate whether the
arrangements are negotiated together or linked in any other way.
The timing and amount of revenue recognition can vary depending
on whether two arrangements are accounted for separately or as
one arrangement.
We do not account separately for software and other deliverables
under an arrangement if one of the other deliverables (such as
consulting services) is deemed to be essential to the
functionality of the software. The determination whether an
undelivered element is essential to the functionality of the
delivered element
F-22
requires the use of judgment. The timing and amount of revenue
recognition can vary depending on how that judgment is exercised
because software revenue which may otherwise have been
recognized up front is recognized over the term of providing the
essential deliverable.
We also do not account separately for different deliverables
under an arrangement if we have no basis for allocating the
overall arrangement fee to the different elements of the
arrangement. We believe that such allocation basis exists if we
can demonstrate for each undelivered element of the arrangement
a company-specific objective evidence of fair value as further
defined in the Revenue Recognition section of Note (3b).
Judgment is required in the determination of company-specific
evidence of fair value which may impact the timing and amount of
revenue recognized depending on:
|
|
|
|
|
Whether company-specific evidence of fair value can be
demonstrated for the undelivered elements of a software
arrangement
|
|
|
|
The approaches used to demonstrate company-specific evidence of
fair value
|
Additionally, our revenues would be significantly different if
we applied a revenue allocation policy other than the residual
method.
Revenues from consulting, other professional service, as well as
custom software development projects are determined by applying
the percentage of completion method of revenue recognition. The
percentage of completion method requires us to make estimates
about total revenues, total cost to complete the project, and
the stage of completion. The assumptions, estimates, and
uncertainties inherent in determining the stage of completion
affect the timing and amounts of revenues recognized and
expenses reported. If we do not have a sufficient basis to
measure the progress of completion or to estimate the total
contract revenues and costs, revenue recognition is limited to
the amount of contract costs incurred. The determination of
whether a sufficient basis to measure the progress of completion
exists is judgmental. Changes in estimates of progress towards
completion and of contract revenues and contract costs are
accounted for as cumulative
catch-up
adjustments to the reported revenues for the applicable contract.
Valuation of Trade
Receivables
As described in the Trade and Other Receivables section in Note
(3b), we account for impairments of trade receivables by
recording sales allowances and allowances for doubtful accounts
on an individual receivable basis and on a portfolio basis. The
assessment of whether a receivable is collectible is inherently
judgmental and requires the use of assumptions about customer
defaults that could change significantly. Judgment is required
when we evaluate available information about a particular
customers financial situation to determine whether it is
probable that a credit loss will occur and the amount of such
loss is reasonably estimable and thus an allowance for that
specific account is necessary. Basing the general allowance for
the remaining receivables on our historical loss experience,
too, is highly judgmental as history may not be indicative of
future development, particularly in the unusual and extreme
global economic circumstances resulting from the global
financial crisis. Changes in our estimates about the allowance
for doubtful accounts could materially impact the reported
assets and expenses in our financial statements, and our net
income could be adversely affected if actual credit losses
exceed our estimates.
Accounting for
Share-Based Compensation
As described in Note (28), we have issued both equity-settled as
well as cash-settled share-based compensation plans.
We use certain assumptions in estimating the fair values for our
share-based compensation plans, including expected future stock
price volatility and expected option life (which represents our
estimate of the average amount of time remaining until the
options are exercised or expire unexercised). In addition, final
payout for these plans also depends on our share price at the
respective exercise dates. All these assumptions
F-23
may significantly impact the fair value determination and thus
the amount and timing of our share-based compensation expenses.
Furthermore, the fair values of the options granted under our
2009 plans (STAR PP and SOP PP) are dependent on our
outperformance against the Tech Peer Group Index (TechPGI) since
grant date, the volatility and the expected correlation between
the market price of this index, and our share price.
For the purpose of determining the estimated fair value of our
stock options, we believe expected volatility is the most
sensitive assumption. Regarding future payout under the plans,
the development of our share price will be the most relevant
factor. In respect to our plans granted in 2009 (SOP PP and
STAR PP), we believe that future payout will be significantly
impacted not only by our share price but also by the requirement
to outperform the TechPGl. Changes in these factors could
significantly affect the estimated fair values as calculated by
the option-pricing model respectively future payout.
Accounting for
Income Tax
We conduct operations and earn income in numerous foreign
countries and are subject to changing tax laws in multiple
jurisdictions within the countries in which we operate. Our
ordinary business activities also include transactions where the
ultimate tax outcome is uncertain, such as those involving
revenue sharing and cost reimbursement arrangements between SAP
Group entities. In addition, the amount of income tax we pay is
generally subject to ongoing audits by domestic and foreign tax
authorities. As a result, judgments are necessary in determining
our worldwide income tax provisions. We have made reasonable
estimates about the ultimate resolution of our tax uncertainties
based on current tax laws and our interpretation thereof. Such
judgments can have a material effect on our income tax expense,
income tax provision, and net income.
The carrying amount of a deferred tax asset is reviewed at the
end of each reporting period and is reduced to the extent that
it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be
available to allow the benefit of part or all of the deferred
tax assets to be utilized. This assessment requires management
judgments, estimates, and assumptions. In evaluating our ability
to utilize our deferred tax assets, we consider all available
positive and negative evidence, including our past operating
results and our forecast of future taxable profit. Our judgments
regarding future taxable profit are based on expectations of
market conditions and other facts and circumstances. Any adverse
change to the underlying facts or our estimates and assumptions
could require that we reduce the carrying amount of our net
deferred tax assets.
For further information on our income tax, see Note (11).
Accounting for
Business Combinations
In our accounting for business combinations, judgment is
required in identifying whether an intangible asset is
identifiable, i.e. to be recorded separately from goodwill.
Additionally, estimating the acquisition date fair values of the
identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed involves
considerable management judgment. The necessary measurements are
based on information available at the acquisition date and are
based on expectations and assumptions that have been deemed
reasonable by management. These judgments, estimates, and
assumptions can materially affect our results of operations for
several reasons, among which are the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Fair values assigned to assets subject to depreciation and
amortization affects the amounts of depreciation and
amortization to be recorded in operating profit in the periods
following the acquisition.
|
|
|
|
Subsequent negative changes in the estimated fair values of
assets may result in additional expense from impairment charges.
|
|
|
|
Subsequent changes in the estimated fair values of liabilities
and provisions may result in additional expense (if increasing
the estimated fair value) or additional income (if decreasing
the estimated fair value).
|
F-24
Subsequent
Accounting for Goodwill and Other Intangibles
As described in the Intangible Assets section in Note (3b), all
our intangible assets other than goodwill have finite useful
lives. Consequently, the depreciable amount of the intangible
assets is allocated on a systematic basis over their useful
lives. Judgment is required in:
|
|
|
|
|
The determination of the useful life of an intangible asset as
this determination is based on our estimates regarding the
period over which the intangible asset is expected to produce
economic benefits to us.
|
|
|
|
The determination of the amortization method as IFRS requires
the straight-line method to be used unless we can reliably
determine the pattern in which the assets future economic
benefits are expected to be consumed by us.
|
Both, the amortization period and the amortization method have
an impact on the amortization expenses that are recorded in each
period.
In making impairment assessments for our intangible assets and
goodwill, we use certain assumptions and estimates about future
cash flows, which are complex and require significant judgment
and assumptions about future developments. They can be affected
by a variety of factors, including changes in our business
strategy, our internal forecasts and estimation of our
weighted-average cost of capital. Due to these factors, actual
cash flows and values could vary significantly from the
forecasted future cash flows and related values derived using
the discounted cash flow method. Although we believe the
assumptions and estimates we have made in the past have been
reasonable and appropriate, different assumptions and estimates
could materially affect our reported financial results.
Additionally, the results of goodwill impairment tests may
depend on the allocation of goodwill to cash-generating units.
This allocation is judgmental as it is based on our estimates
regarding which cash-generating units are expected to benefit
from the synergies of the respective business combination.
We did not record any significant impairment charges on our
goodwill or intangible assets during fiscal year 2009. Although
we do not currently have an indication of any significant
impairment, there can be no assurance that impairment charges
will not occur in the future. For more information, see Note
(16).
Accounting for Legal
Contingencies
As described in Note (24), currently we are involved in various
claims and legal proceedings. We review the status of each
significant matter on at least a quarterly basis and assess our
potential financial and business exposures related to such
matters. Significant judgment is required in the determination
of whether a provision is to be recorded and what the
appropriate amount for such provision should be. This judgment
is particularly required in:
|
|
|
|
|
The determination whether an obligation exists,
|
|
|
|
The determination of the probability of outflow of economic
benefits,
|
|
|
|
The determination whether the amount of obligation is
estimable, and
|
|
|
|
The estimate of the obligation.
|
Due to uncertainties relating to these matters, provisions are
based on the best information available at the time.
At the end of each reporting period, we reassess the potential
obligations related to our pending claims and litigation and
adjust our respective provisions to reflect the current best
estimate. In addition, we monitor and evaluate new information
that we receive after the end of the respective reporting period
but before the Consolidated Financial Statements are authorized
for issue to determine whether this provides additional
F-25
information regarding conditions that existed at the end of the
reporting period. Such revisions to our estimates of the
potential obligations could have a material impact on our
results of operations and financial position. The effects of
changes in estimates of potential liabilities related to our
legal contingencies had no material impact on 2009, 2008, or
2007 results.
Recognition of
Internally Generated Intangible Assets from Development
Under IFRS, internally generated intangible assets from the
development phase are recognized if certain conditions are met.
These conditions include the technical feasibility, intention to
complete, the ability to use or sell the asset under development
and the demonstration how the asset will generate probable
future economic benefits. The cost of a recognized internally
generated intangible asset comprises all directly attributable
cost necessary to make the asset capable of being used as
intended by management. In contrast, all expenditures arising
from the research phase are expensed as incurred.
We believe that the determination whether internally generated
intangible assets from development are to be recognized as
intangible assets requires significant judgment, particularly in
the following areas:
|
|
|
|
|
The determination whether activities should be considered
research activities or development activities;
|
|
|
|
The determination whether the conditions for recognizing an
intangible asset are met requires assumptions about future
market conditions, customer demand and other developments;
|
|
|
|
The term technical feasibility is not defined in
IFRS, and therefore the determination whether completing an
asset is technically feasible requires a company-specific and
necessarily judgmental approach;
|
|
|
|
The determination of the future ability to use or sell the
intangible asset arising from the development and the
determination of probability of future benefits from sale or
use, and
|
|
|
|
The determination whether a cost is directly or indirectly
attributable to an intangible asset and whether a cost is
necessary for completing a development.
|
|
|
(3d)
|
New Accounting
Standards Adopted / Early Adopted in the Current Period
|
In March 2007, the IASB issued an amendment to IAS 23 Borrowing
Costs (IAS 23). The amendment mainly relates to the elimination
of the option to immediately recognize borrowing costs as an
expense attributable to the acquisition, construction, or
production of a qualifying asset. An entity is, therefore,
required to capitalize borrowing costs as part of the cost of
such qualifying assets defined as assets that take a substantial
period of time to get ready for use or sale. IAS 23 does not
require the capitalization of borrowing costs relating to assets
measured at fair value, and inventories that are manufactured or
produced in large quantities on a repetitive basis, even if they
take a substantial period of time to get ready for use or sale.
IAS 23 applies to borrowing costs relating to qualifying assets
for which the commencement date for capitalization is on or
after January 1, 2009. We have historically capitalized
borrowing costs for qualifying assets. Therefore, the adoption
of IAS 23 had no impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2007, the IFRIC issued IFRIC Interpretation 13 Customer
Loyalty Programmes (IFRIC 13), which addresses accounting by
entities that grant loyalty award credits (such as points or
travel miles) to customers who buy goods or services.
Specifically, it explains how such entities should account for
their obligations to provide free or discounted goods or
services to customers who redeem award credits. IFRIC 13 is
effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1,
2009 and required to be applied retrospectively. As a result of
the retrospective first-time application, we adjusted the
January 1, 2007 retained earnings balance by
12 million. The effect on the Consolidated Income
Statements as well as earnings per share was immaterial for the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007.
F-26
In September 2007, the IASB issued a revision to IAS 1
Presentation of Financial Statements (IAS 1). The standard
separates owner and non-owner changes in equity. Therefore, the
statement of changes in equity will include only details of
transactions with owners, with all non-owner changes in equity
presented in a reconciliation of each component of equity. IAS 1
sets overall requirements for the presentation of financial
statements, guidelines for their structure and minimum
requirements for their content. The revisions include
non-mandatory changes in the titles of some of the financial
statements to reflect their function more clearly (for example,
the balance sheet is renamed to statement of financial position,
the cash flow statement is renamed to the statement of cash
flows and the statement of comprehensive income has been
introduced). The statement of comprehensive income presents all
items of recognized income and expense, either in one single
statement, or in two linked statements. The revision of IAS 1 is
effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1,
2009. The adoption of IAS 1 did not significantly change the
current presentation of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In January 2008, the IASB issued IFRS 2 (revised
2008) Vesting Conditions and Cancellations (IFRS 2).
IFRS 2 amends IFRS 2 Share-Based Payment to clarify
the terms vesting condition and
cancellations. IFRS 2 is effective for fiscal
years beginning on or after January 1, 2009. The adoption
of IFRS 2 did not have a significant impact on our Consolidated
Financial Statements.
In January 2008, the IASB issued the revised standards IFRS 3
Business Combinations (IFRS 3 (2008)) and IAS 27 Consolidated
and Separate Financial Statements (IAS 27). The revisions result
in several changes in the accounting for business combinations.
One of those changes requires us to expense acquisition-related
charges immediately, whereas the previous version of IFRS 3
required capitalization of these charges. IFRS 3 (2008) and
IAS 27 are effective for fiscal years beginning on or after
July 1, 2009, with early adoption permitted. SAP has
decided to adopt these revisions as of January 1, 2009. The
adoption of these revisions did not have a significant impact on
our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In February 2008, the IASB issued an amendment to IAS 32
Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation
Puttable Instruments and Obligations Arising on Liquidation (IAS
32). The purpose of the amendment is to provide detailed
guidance on the presentation of puttable financial instruments
and obligations arising only on liquidation in the Statement of
Financial Position. The amendment of IAS 32 is effective for
fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2009. The
adoption of IAS 32 did not have an impact on our Consolidated
Financial Statements.
In May 2008, the IASB issued Improvements to IFRSs a
collection of amendments to several International Financial
Reporting Standards as part of its program of annual
improvements to its standards, which is intended to make
necessary, but non-urgent, amendments to standards that will not
be included as part of another major project. The amendments
resulting from this standard are mainly effective for annual
periods beginning on or after January 1, 2009. The adoption
of these amendments did not have a significant impact on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In July 2008, the IFRIC issued IFRIC Interpretation 16 Hedges of
a Net Investment in a Foreign Operation (IFRIC 16), which
provides interpretative guidance on several aspects of hedge
accounting. IFRIC 16 is effective for fiscal years beginning on
or after October 1, 2008. The adoption of IFRIC 16 did not
have an impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In October 2008, the IASB issued an amendment to IAS 39
Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement:
Reclassification of Financial Assets (IAS 39). The amendment
permits reclassification of some financial instruments out of
the fair-value-through-profit-or-loss category (FVTPL) and out
of the available-for- sale category. In the event of
reclassification, additional disclosures are required under IFRS
7. IAS 39 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after
July 1, 2008. We did not reclassify any financial
instruments based on the application of the amendment; therefore
the adoption of the amendment to IAS 39 did not have an impact
on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-27
In January 2009, the IFRIC issued IFRIC Interpretation 18
Transfers of Assets from Customers (IFRIC 18), which clarifies
the requirements of IFRSs for agreements in which an entity
receives from a customer an item of property, plant, and
equipment that the entity must then use either to connect the
customer to a network or to provide the customer with ongoing
access to a supply of goods or services. IFRIC 18 must be
applied prospectively to transfers of assets from customers
received on or after July 1, 2009. The adoption of IFRIC 18
did not have an impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In March 2009, the IASB issued an amendment to IFRS 7 Improving
Disclosures about Financial Instruments (IFRS 7). The amendments
require enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements and
liquidity risk. Among other things, the new disclosure
requirements:
|
|
|
|
|
Clarify that the existing IFRS 7 fair value disclosures must be
made separately for each class of financial instrument
|
|
|
|
Add disclosure for any change in the method of determining fair
value and the reasons for the change
|
|
|
|
Establish a three-level hierarchy for making fair value
measurements:
|
1. Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities (Level 1)
2. Inputs other than quoted prices included within
Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability,
either directly (that is, as prices) or indirectly (that is,
derived from prices) (Level 2)
3. Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on
observable market data (unobservable inputs) (Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
Add disclosure, for each fair value measurement in the statement
of financial position, of which level in the hierarchy was used
and any transfers between levels, with additional disclosures
whenever level 3 is used including a measure of sensitivity
to a change in input data
|
|
|
|
Clarify that the current maturity analysis for non-derivative
financial instruments should include issued financial guarantee
contracts
|
|
|
|
Add disclosure of a maturity analysis for derivative financial
liabilities
|
The amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning on or
after January 1, 2009. Earlier application is permitted.
The adoption resulted in additional disclosures but did not have
an effect on any assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, or
cash flows.
In March 2009, the IASB issued Embedded Derivatives: Amendments
to IFRIC 9 and IAS 39 (IFRIC 9). IFRIC 9 amends IFRIC 9
Reassessment of Embedded Derivatives and IAS 39 Financial
Instruments: Recognition and Measurement to clarify the
accounting treatment of embedded derivatives for entities that
make use of the reclassification amendment issued by the IASB in
October 2008 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement:
Reclassification of Financial Assets, which is described above.
IFRIC 9 also clarifies that, on reclassification of a financial
asset out of the fair value through profit or loss category, all
embedded derivatives have to be assessed and, if necessary,
separately accounted for in financial statements. The amendments
apply retrospectively and are required to be applied for annual
periods ending on or after June 30, 2009. The adoption of
these amendments did not have an impact on our Consolidated
Financial Statements since we have not made use of the
reclassification amendment.
|
|
(3e)
|
New Accounting
Standards Not Yet Adopted
|
In July 2008, the IASB issued an amendment to IAS 39 Financial
Instruments: Recognition and Measurement: Eligible Hedged Items
(IAS 39). The amendment addresses the designation of a one-sided
risk in a hedged item and the designation of inflation in
particular situations. The amendment applies to hedging
relationships in the scope of IAS 39. The amendment is effective
for fiscal years beginning on or after July 1, 2009.
Earlier application is permitted. We do not expect that the
amendment of IAS 39 will have a significant impact on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-28
In April 2009, the IASB issued Improvements to IFRSs
a collection of amendments to several International Financial
Reporting Standards as part of its program of annual
improvements to its standards, which is intended to make
necessary, but non-urgent, amendments to standards that will not
be included as part of another major project. The amendments
resulting from this standard mainly have effective dates for
annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2010,
although entities are permitted to adopt them earlier. The
European Union has not yet endorsed these improvements. We do
not expect these amendments to have a significant impact on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In October 2009, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 32 Financial
Instruments: Presentation (IAS 32), which addresses the
accounting for rights issues (rights, options, or warrants to
acquire a fixed number of the entitys own equity
instruments for a fixed amount of currencies) that are
denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of
the issuer. Previously such rights issues were accounted for as
derivative liabilities. However, the amendment issued requires
that, provided certain conditions are met, such rights issues
are classified as equity regardless of the currency in which the
exercise price is denominated. The amendments are effective for
annual periods beginning on or after February 1, 2010, with
earlier application permitted. We do not expect this amendment
to have an impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In November 2009, the IASB issued an amendment to IAS 24
(revised 2009) Related Party Disclosures (IAS 24). The
purpose of the revision is to simplify the definition of a
related party, clarifying its intended meaning and eliminating
inconsistencies from the definition. In addition, IAS 24
provides a partial exemption from the disclosure requirements
for government-related entities by focusing disclosure on
significant transactions. The revision is effective for fiscal
years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. Earlier
application is permitted. IAS 24 has not yet been adopted by the
European Union. We do not expect the revision of IAS 24 to have
a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In November 2009, the IASB issued IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
on the classification and measurement of financial assets. The
new standard represents the first part of a three-part project
to replace IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and
Measurement (IAS 39) with IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
(IFRS 9). IFRS 9 uses a single approach to determine whether a
financial asset is measured at amortized cost or fair value,
replacing the many different rules in IAS 39. The approach in
IFRS 9 is based on how an entity manages its financial
instruments (its business model) and the contractual cash flow
characteristics of the financial assets. IFRS 9 is effective for
fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2013. Earlier
application is permitted. IFRS 9 has not yet been adopted by the
European Union. We are currently determining what impact the
adoption of IFRS 9 will have on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In November 2009, the IASB issued an amendment to IFRIC 14 IAS
19 The Limit on a Defined Benefit Asset, Minimum
Funding Requirements and their Interaction (IFRIC 14). The
amendments apply when an entity is subject to minimum funding
requirements and makes an early payment of contributions to
cover those requirements. The amendments require such an entity
to treat the benefit of such an early payment as an asset. The
amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or
after January 1, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The
amendments must be applied retrospectively. The European Union
has not yet endorsed IFRIC 14. We do not expect this amendment
to have an impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In November 2009, the IFRIC issued Extinguishing Financial
Liabilities with Equity Instruments (IFRIC 19), which provides
guidance on how to account for the extinguishment of a financial
liability by the issuance of equity instruments. IFRIC 19 is
effective for annual periods beginning on or after July 1,
2010, with early adoption permitted. The European Union has not
yet endorsed these amendments. We do not expect this amendment
to have an impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-29
|
|
(4)
|
BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
|
In 2009, we concluded the following business combinations which
are immaterial individually and in the aggregate to SAP:
Acquired
Businesses
The results of these acquired businesses have been included in
our Consolidated Income Statements since the respective
acquisition dates. All of the acquired businesses develop
and/or sell
software in specific areas of strategic interest to us. The
aggregate consideration transferred of all acquisitions amounted
to 68 million net of cash received, and was paid in
cash. The acquisition-related cost recognized in general and
administration expense is 2 million.
F-30
The amounts recognized as of the acquisition dates for each
major class of assets acquired and liabilities assumed were as
follows:
Total changes to goodwill amount to 41 million, of
which 42 million are attributable to 2009
acquisitions. Due to a lower than expected contingent
consideration payment the goodwill for an acquisition in
previous years was reduced by 1 million.
The non-controlling interest related to our acquisition of SAF
AG has been recognized at the proportionate share of the
identifiable assets and liabilities. We have therefore elected
not to recognize goodwill for the non-controlling interests of
SAF AG.
Due to the fact that we integrate our acquired businesses into
our overall operations very quickly and that some business
combinations were concluded in the form of asset deals, the
additional revenue and net operating result attributable to
these entities since the acquisition date and included in the
Consolidated Income Statements is not representative of the
benefit these entities provide to SAP. Our revenue and profit
after tax would not have been materially different from the
numbers presented in our Consolidated Income Statements had
January 1, 2009, been the acquisition date for all business
combinations that occurred in 2009.
We have not yet finalized the purchase price allocation of our
business combinations concluded during the second half of 2009,
because we acquired intangible assets and contingent liabilities
for which we are still evaluating our acquisition date fair
value assumptions.
F-31
We assigned the following amounts to identifiable intangible
assets:
Identifiable
Intangible Assets Acquired as Part of Business Combinations in
2009
There were no identifiable intangible assets that have not been
separately recorded.
Goodwill recognized for our 2009 business combinations were
assigned to our Product, Consulting, and Training segment as
follows:
Assignment of
Acquired Goodwill to Segments
Factors that make up the goodwill recognized include synergies
from combining the acquirees operations with our
operations and the workforce of the acquirees, which do not
qualify for separate recognition as intangible assets. We expect
3 million of the goodwill recognized in 2009 to be
deductible for tax purposes.
F-32
Prior Year Business
Combinations
In 2008, we acquired the outstanding shares of two unrelated
companies and the net assets of two other unrelated businesses.
The results of these acquired businesses have been included in
our Consolidated Income Statements since the respective
acquisition dates. Business combinations in 2008 were as follows:
Prior
Year Business Combinations
All transactions, except the acquisition of Business Objects,
were immaterial to SAP individually and in the aggregate. All of
the acquired businesses developed
and/or sold
software in specific areas of strategic interest to us. The
aggregate purchase price of all business combinations, excluding
Business Objects, amounted to
F-33
91 million net of cash received. This was paid in
cash except for earn-out conditions which were recognized as
liabilities. The purchase price was allocated as follows:
Purchase
Price Allocation Prior Year (excl. Business Objects)
Due to the fact that we integrate our acquired businesses into
our overall operations very quickly and that some business
combinations were concluded in the form of asset deals, we
cannot determine the additional revenue and net operating profit
attributable to these entities since the acquisition date or for
the full year.
Acquisition of
Business Objects
Business Objects is a provider of business intelligence
solutions. Through a combination of technology, consulting,
education services, and its partner network, Business Objects
provides information and business decision-making resources to
small and large companies. Business Objects had dual
headquarters in San José, California, and
Levallois-Perret, France. Before our acquisition, its stock was
traded on both the NASDAQ (in the form of American
depositary receipts - ADRs) and the Euronext Paris stock
exchanges. We acquired substantially all of the outstanding
shares of Business Objects during the first two months of 2008,
except a very small number of shares (0.02% of the share
capital) that were held by employees and were restricted under
local law. Our acquisition took the form of a tender offer under
French and U.S. law for all Business Objects common
stock, all ADRs representing Business Objects common
stock, and all convertible bonds and warrants issued by Business
Objects.
Under the terms of the tender offer agreement, we made a cash
offer of 42.00 per share of common stock and the
U.S. dollar equivalent of 42.00 per Business Objects
ADR, determined using the euro to U.S. dollar
F-34
exchange rate on settlement of the tender offers, of 50.65
per convertible bond, and a range of 12.01 to 24.96
per warrant, depending on the warrant grant date. After reaching
the initial minimum tender condition of more than 50% on
January 21, 2008, the tender offer period was reopened
under the same conditions until January 29, resulting in an
ownership level of more than 95%. This allowed SAP to commence
an immediate squeeze-out acquisition of the outstanding shares
of the remaining shareholders. The acquisition cost of
4.2 billion net of cash acquired was partly financed
by a syndicated bank loan.
The following table shows the components of our acquisition cost
for Business Objects:
Business
Objects Acquisition Cost
As part of the business combination, we purchased substantially
all shares outstanding, all warrants, and all convertible bonds.
The convertible bonds have been converted and the face value of
the bond (450 million) has been paid to SAP since the
acquisition. In addition, we assumed Business Objects
employee share-based payment programs without changing the
parameters of these programs. The fair value of employee stock
options assumed and awards exchanged was determined using a
binomial based valuation model with the following assumptions: A
risk-free interest rate of 3.42% to 3.74%, an expected
volatility of 29%, and a dividend yield of 1.3%. For the
purposes of purchase accounting, we used the cash offer price of
42 to determine the fair value of the exchanged Business
Objects stock option awards. The fair value of unvested Business
Objects options and restricted stock awards related to future
service is being amortized based on the accelerated attribution
method over the remaining service period, while the value of
vested options is included in the total purchase price.
Acquisition-related transaction costs include investment banking
fees, legal fees, and other fees for external advisors directly
related to the acquisition.
The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded in the
accompanying Consolidated Statement of Financial position at
their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date,
January 21, 2008. The excess of the acquisition cost of the
business combination over the estimated fair values of the
identifiable net assets acquired were recognized in goodwill.
Factors that contributed to the recognition of goodwill of
3.5 billion were expected synergies from combining
the activities of SAP and Business Objects, as well as assets,
which cannot be recognized separately apart from goodwill
because they are not identifiable (such as the quality and level
of education of the workforce).
F-35
The following table shows the allocation of the acquisition
costs to the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed as of the acquisition date and the respective carrying
amounts determined in accordance with IFRS immediately before
the acquisition date:
Purchase
Price Allocation of Business Objects
In 2009, new facts and circumstances arose that led us to change
estimates underlying our original determination of the fair
values of certain liabilities assumed in 2008. We consequently
adjusted the carrying amounts of these liabilities to reflect
the updated estimates. These adjustments resulted in the
recognition of tax gains from reducing provisions relating to
tax uncertainties (48 million excluding accrued
interest) which we recorded as a reduction in tax expense and
operating gains from reducing employee-related liabilities
(18 million excluding accrued interest) which we
recorded as a reduction in operating expenses. The release of
related accrued interest of 13 million reduced our
interest expense.
In connection with the acquisition we incurred restructuring
costs resulting from severance and workforce relocation costs
(18 million), elimination of duplicate facilities
(35 million), and settlements with vendors to end
service contracts (2 million). Those costs were
recognized in operating profit in 2008.
The following pro-forma financial information presents
SAPs results as if the acquisition had occurred at the
beginning of 2008. These pro-forma results have been prepared
for comparative purposes only. The pro-forma results are not
necessarily indicative either of the results of operations that
actually would have occurred had the acquisition been in effect
at the beginning of the respective periods or of future results.
F-36
Business
Objects Pro - Forma Information
A loss after tax of the Business Objects group included in our
profit after tax for 2008 amounted to 32 million.
This amount does not include any revenue and results that SAP
entities have generated with Business Objects products. The loss
after tax contained the amortization of all acquired Business
Objects intangibles, deferred revenue writedowns, and other
impacts resulting from the acquisition.
This amount does not include the results of Business Objects
entities that have been legally merged into SAP entities since
the acquisition date.
In connection with the 2008 transactions discussed above, we
assigned the following amounts to identifiable intangible assets:
Identifiable
Intangible Assets Acquired as Part of Business Combinations in
2008
There were no identifiable intangible assets that have not been
separately recorded. All in-process research and development
assets were completed in 2008 and are now subject to
amortization.
Goodwill additions in 2008 (including -35 million
adjustments for acquisitions of prior years) were assigned to
our Product, Consulting, and Training segment as follows:
Assignment
of Acquired Goodwill
to Segments
F-37
Factors that made up the goodwill recognized included synergies
from combining the acquirees operations with our
operations and the workforce of the acquirees, which does not
qualify for separate recognition as intangible assets.
Detailed information on our revenue recognition policies is
disclosed in Note (3).
Revenue information by segment and geographic region is
disclosed in Note (29).
Revenues from construction-type contracts (contract revenues)
are included in software revenue and consulting revenue
depending on the type of project. During fiscal years 2009,
2008, and 2007 we recognized 635 million,
634 million, and 559 million of contract
revenue, respectively. The status of our construction projects
in progress at the end of the reporting period was as follows:
Construction
Projects in Progress
|
|
(6)
|
EXPENSES BY NATURE
AND HEADCOUNT
|
Employee Compensation
Employee compensation comprises the following:
Employee
Compensation
F-38
Number of Employees
The average number of employees, measured in full-time
equivalents and presented according to their function in SAP,
was as follows:
Depreciation and
Amortization
Total depreciation and amortization expense for 2009, 2008, and
2007 was 499 million, 539 million, and
262 million, respectively.
Government Grants
During fiscal year 2009 we received 38 million (2008:
32 million; 2007: 16 million) of
government grants and similar assistance, which we have offset
against the related expenses. All conditions required to obtain
these grants have either been met or are reasonably assured of
being met.
In addition, we received conditional promises of a further
36 million, relating mostly to research and
development expenses, that we have not recorded on
December 31, 2009, because the conditions required to
obtain them are not yet reasonably assured of being achieved.
In January 2009, we announced that we would continue with our
cost-saving measures initiated in October 2008 and would reduce
the workforce from 51,544 positions to 48,500 by year-end 2009.
As a result, we started to implement the restructuring plan in
the first quarter of 2009 and continued with it throughout the
year. Although part of the workforce reduction was achieved
through attrition we eliminated 2,983 positions in 2009 by
terminations and early retirement plans. Due to the reduced
number of employees, we also consolidated certain facilities.
Employee- and facility-related restructuring expenses of
55 million that were recognized in 2008 related to
restructuring activities incurred as a result of the acquisition
of Business Objects. The remaining 5 million related
to employee-related restructuring activities in connection with
discontinuing our TomorrowNow activities.
F-39
For additional information on the roll-forward of our
restructuring provision, see Note (19b).
Restructuring
Expenses
As restructuring expenses were material to our operations in
2009, we have presented those expenses separately in our
Consolidated Income Statements in accordance with IAS 1.97. If
not presented separately, these expenses would break down as
follows:
Restructuring
Expenses
|
|
(8)
|
OTHER OPERATING
INCOME/EXPENSE, NET
|
Other operating income/expense for the years ended
December 31, was as follows:
Other
Operating Income/Expenses
F-40
|
|
(9)
|
OTHER NON-OPERATING
INCOME/EXPENSE, NET
|
Other non-operating income/expense for the years ended
December 31, was as follows:
Other
Non-Operating Income/Expense, Net
|
|
(10)
|
FINANCIAL INCOME, NET
|
Finance income and finance costs in 2009 amounted to
32 million (72 million in 2008;
142 million in 2007) and 101 million
(123 million in 2008; 7 million in 2007),
respectively. We derive finance income primarily from cash and
cash equivalents and other financial assets. The increase in
finance costs in 2008 was mainly due to the credit facility we
entered into in connection with the acquisition of Business
Objects.
Other financial gains/losses, net for the years ended December
31 were as follows:
Other
financial Gains/Losses, Net
The line items income/expense from securities and income/expense
from loans and other financial assets relate to
241 million of collateral held to secure financing
investments in 2007.
For additional information about gains and losses from financial
assets and financial liabilities recognized in profit or loss
and other components of equity, see Note (27). For information
about our hedging activities, see Note (26).
F-41
Income tax expense for the years ended December 31 comprised the
following components:
Income
Tax Expense
Current tax expense includes -59 million for prior
years (2008: 14 million; 2007: 36 million).
Of the deferred tax expense (income) in 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, -48 million, -109 million
and 9 million relate to the origination and reversal
of temporary differences and 9 million,
18 million and -1 million relate to unused
tax losses.
In 2009, 2008, and 2007, the German government enacted several
new tax laws. For us, the most significant effect resulted from
the 2008 Business Tax Reform which was enacted in 2007 and led
to a reduction of the German corporate income tax rate from 25%
to 15%, effective January 1, 2008. The impact of the
remaining tax law changes enacted in 2007, and of the tax laws
enacted in 2008 and 2009, was not material to our Consolidated
Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008, and 2007.
Profit before tax consisted of the following:
Profit
Before Tax
The effective income tax rate for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, was 28.1%, 29.6% and
32.4%, respectively. The following table reconciles the expected
income tax expense computed by applying our combined German
corporate tax rate of 26.21% (2008: 26.33%; 2007: 35.49%) to the
actual income tax expense. Our 2009 combined German corporate
tax rate includes a corporate income tax rate of 15.00% (2008:
15.00%;
F-42
2007: 21.91%; 2007 after the benefit of trade tax deductibility
which ceased in 2008), plus a solidarity surcharge of 5.5%
thereon, and trade taxes of 10.38% (2008: 10.50%; 2007: 12.38%).
Reconciliation
of Tax Expense
F-43
Deferred tax assets and liabilities on a gross basis as at
December 31, 2009 and 2008, are summarized (referring to
the underlying items) as follows:
Deferred
Tax Assets and Liabilities
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we
consider whether it is probable that some portion or all of the
deferred tax assets will not be utilized. The ultimate
utilization of deferred tax assets depends on the generation of
future taxable income during the periods in which those
temporary differences become deductible. Based on the level of
historical taxable income and projections for future taxable
income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are
recoverable, we believe it is probable that we will realize the
benefits of these deductible differences, net of the existing
valuation allowances at December 31, 2009. The amount of
the deferred tax asset considered realizable, however, could be
reduced in the near term if our estimates of future taxable
income during the carryforward period are reduced.
At December 31, 2009, we had net operating loss
carryforwards amounting to 301 million (2008:
395 million; 2007: 138 million). Deferred
tax assets have not been recognized for tax loss carryforwards
in the amount of 147 million (2008:
188 million; 2007: 51 million). As at
December 31, 2009, 1 million (2008:
4 million; 2007: 1 million) of the
unrecognized tax loss carryforwards expire in the following
period and 138 million (2008: 176 million;
2007: 45 million) expire after one up to twenty
years. The remaining unrecognized tax loss carryforwards in the
amount of 8 million (2008: 8 million;
2007: 5 million) do not expire.
F-44
We recognized deferred tax liabilities of 6 million
(2008: 14 million) for income tax on future dividend
distributions from foreign subsidiaries, which is based on
368 million (2008: 696 million) of
cumulative undistributed profits of those foreign subsidiaries
because such profits are intended to be repatriated. We have not
recognized a deferred tax liability on approximately
3.60 billion (2008: 2.76 billion) for
undistributed profits of our foreign subsidiaries that arose in
2009 and prior years because we plan to indefinitely reinvest
those undistributed profits. It is not practicable to estimate
the amount of unrecognized tax liabilities for these
undistributed foreign profits.
The proposed dividend payment of 0.50 per share for the
year ended December 31, 2009, will not have any effects on
the income tax of SAP AG.
Total income tax including the items charged or credited
directly to related components of equity for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, consists of the
following:
Total
Income Tax
The income tax recorded in share premium is related to our
equity-settled share-based compensation.
Convertible bonds and stock options granted to employees under
our share-based compensation programs are included in the
diluted earnings per share calculations to the extent they have
a dilutive effect. The dilutive impact is calculated using the
treasury share method. The computation of diluted earnings per
share does not include certain convertible bonds and stock
options issued in connection with the SAP AG 2000 Long Term
Incentive Plan (LTI 2000 Plan) and the SAP Stock Option Plan
2002 (SAP SOP 2002) because their effect is
antidilutive. Such convertible bonds and stock options, if
converted or exercised, represented 35.8 million SAP common
shares in 2009 (2008: 43.6 million SAP common shares; 2007:
37.3 million SAP common shares). The number of outstanding
stock options and convertible bonds is presented in Note (28).
F-45
Earnings
per Share
|
|
(13)
|
OTHER FINANCIAL
ASSETS
|
Other
Financial Assets
Loans and Other
Financial Receivables
Loans and other financial receivables mainly consist of time
deposits (2009: 405 million; 2008:
0 million), investments in insurance policies
relating to pension assets (2009: 91 million; 2008:
81 million), loans to employees (2009:
50 million; 2008: 53 million) and other
receivables (2009: 39 million; 2008:
44 million). These spread over the geographic areas
as follows:
Most of our time deposits have a maturity of less than six
months.
Investments in insurance policies relate to semiretirement and
time accounts for which the corresponding liability is included
in employee-related obligations (see Note 19b).
Loans to third parties are presented net of allowances for
credit losses. Changes in the allowance for credit losses of
third-party loans were not significant in any period presented.
F-46
As at December 31, 2009, there were no loans and other
financial receivables past due but not impaired. We have no
indications as at the reporting date of impairments of loans and
other financial receivables that are not past due and not
impaired. For general information on financial risk and the
nature of risk, see Note (25).
Available-for-Sale
Financial Assets
The decline in debt investments, which at December 31, 2008
consisted mainly of investments in money market funds of
193 million and investment grade bonds of
189 million, is due to these investments reaching
their maturity and being paid back in full.
Our equity investments consist of securities with and without
quoted market prices. Our equity investments without quoted
market prices primarily consist of venture capital investments
with a carrying value of 62 million and
63 million as at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Available-for-sale
financial assets are denominated in the following currencies:
Sales of equity investments accounted for at cost were
immaterial in all periods presented. As of December 31,
2009, we do not intend to dispose of any equity investments at
cost in the near future. For information on fair value
measurement with regard to our equity investments at cost, see
Note (27).
In all periods presented, impairment charges relating to equity
securities at fair value were immaterial. For our equity
investments at cost, we recorded 11 million,
12 million, and 6 million, respectively,
in losses related to impairments during 2009, 2008, and 2007.
Derivatives
Detailed information about our derivative financial instruments
is presented in Note (26).
|
|
(14)
|
TRADE AND OTHER
RECEIVABLES
|
Trade and
Other Receivables
Trade receivables, net include unbilled receivables related to
fixed-fee and
time-and-material
consulting services of 211 million and
221 million as at December 31, 2009, and 2008,
respectively.
F-47
The carrying amounts of our trade receivables as at December 31
are as follows:
Carrying
Amounts of Trade Receivables
Changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts were as follows:
Increase
(Decrease) in Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Concentrations of credit risks are limited due to our large
customer base and its distribution across many different
industries and countries worldwide. No single customer accounted
for 10% or more of total revenue or total trade receivables, net
in 2009, 2008, or 2007. The aging of trade receivables as at
December 31 was:
Aging of
Trade Receivables
Total past due and not individually impaired trade receivables
of 547 million and 812 million as at
December 31, 2009, and 2008, respectively, consist of past
due trade receivables which are not impaired on an individual
receivable basis as outlined under Note (3b). Individually
impaired trade receivables, net of allowances of
100 million and 42 million as at
December 31, 2009, and 2008, respectively, consist of past
due and not past due trade receivables that are fully or partly
impaired on an individual receivables basis.
F-48
We believe that the recorded sales and bad debt allowances
adequately provide for the credit risk inherent in trade
receivables.
For more information about financial risk and how we manage it,
see Note (25) and (26).
|
|
(15)
|
OTHER NON-FINANCIAL
ASSETS
|
Other
Non-financial Assets
Prepaid expenses primarily consist of prepayments for operating
leases, support services and software royalties that will be
charged to expense in future periods.
F-49
(16) GOODWILL
AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
The additions to goodwill result from our acquisitions
(42 million) and adjustments to goodwill of previous
acquisitions ( -1 million). For more information
about acquisitions, see Note (4). We do not have contractual
commitments for the acquisition of intangibles.
Software and database licenses consist primarily of technology
for internal use whereas acquired technology consists primarily
of purchased software to be incorporated into our product
offerings and in-process research and development. The additions
to software and database licenses in 2009 and 2008 were
individually acquired from third parties and include cross
license agreements and patents, whereas the additions to
acquired technology and other intangibles primarily result from
our business combinations discussed in Note (4).
Other intangibles consist primarily of acquired trademark
licenses and customer contracts.
F-50
We carry the following significant intangible assets:
Significant
Intangible Assets
Amortization expenses of intangible assets are included in cost
of software and software-related services, cost of professional
services and other services, research and development, sales and
marketing as well as general and administration based on usage.
Impairment charges are recognized in other operating income.
For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill is allocated to
our reportable segments Product, Consulting and Training which
represent the lowest level of cash-generating units within the
Group at which the goodwill is monitored for internal management
purposes.
The carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment at
December 31, 2009, and 2008, was as follows:
Goodwill
by Segments
For more information about our segments see Note (29).
The recoverable amount of our cash-generating units, which equal
our segments, has been determined based on the value in use
calculation. The segments are in complementary businesses and
consequently the recoverable amounts are based to a certain
extent on the same key assumptions.
The key assumptions that we have used for purposes of goodwill
impairment testing in 2009 are as follows:
F-51
The calculations use cash flow projections based on actual
operating results and a five-year business plan (2008: two-year
business plan) approved by management. Cash flows for periods
beyond this five-year business plan were extrapolated using a
segment-specific growth rate. This growth rate does not exceed
the long-term average growth rate for the market in which our
cash-generating units operate. Our estimated cash flow
projections are discounted to present value by means of a
pre-tax discount rate between 10.75% and 11.15% (2008: 10.78%
and 10.86%). The discount rate is based on a weighted average
cost of capital approach (WACC).
Management believes that no reasonably possible change in any of
the above key assumptions would cause the carrying value of any
cash-generating unit to exceed its recoverable amount. Even if
we applied a growth rate of only 0% for extrapolating cash flow
projections beyond the years covered by our 2009 business plan
(2008: value in use based on growth rates of 0%) for calculating
the
value-in-use
for all cash-generating units, the calculated amounts would
still exceed the carrying amounts.
|
|
(17)
|
PROPERTY, PLANT, AND
EQUIPMENT
|
Property,
Plant, and Equipment
F-52
The additions and disposals in other property, plant, and
equipment relate primarily to the replacement and purchase of
computer hardware and cars acquired in the normal course of
business.
Interest capitalized was not material to any period presented.
|
|
(18)
|
TRADE AND OTHER
PAYABLES, FINANCIAL LIABILITIES AND OTHER NON-FINANCIAL
LIABILITIES
|
Trade and other payables, financial liabilities and other
non-financial liabilities classified based on due dates as at
December 31 were as follows:
Trade and
Other Payables, Financial Liabilities and Other Non-financial
Liabilities
Liabilities are unsecured, except for the retention of title and
similar rights customary in our industry. Effective interest
rates on bank loans were 4.32% in 2009, 4.30% in 2008 and 8.03%
in 2007.
Provisions based on due dates as at December 31 were as follows:
Provisions
|
|
(19a)
|
Pension Plans and
Similar Obligations
|
We maintain several defined benefit and defined contribution
plans for our employees in Germany and at foreign subsidiaries,
which provide for old age, disability, and survivors
benefits. The measurement dates for the domestic and foreign
benefit plans are December 31. Individual benefit plans
have also been established for
F-53
members of our Executive Board. Furthermore, in certain
countries we provide termination indemnity benefits to employees
regardless of the cause for termination. These types of benefits
are typically defined by law in these foreign countries.
The liabilities accrued for pensions and other similar
obligations on December 31 consist of the following:
Liabilities
Accrued for Pensions and Other Similar Obligations
Defined Benefit
Pension Plans and Similar Obligations
The Consolidated Statements of Financial Position include the
following significant components related to defined benefit
pension plans as at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively:
Significant
Components Related to Defined Benefit Pension Plans
Our domestic defined benefit plans provide participants with
pension benefits that are based on the length of service and
compensation of employees.
There is also a domestic employee-financed pension plan for
which SAP guarantees a minimum return on investment which is
equivalent to the return guaranteed by the insurer. Even though
the risk that SAP would be liable for a return that cannot be
met by the insurance company is very remote, these
employee-financed plans do not qualify as defined contribution
plans under IFRS and are included in domestic plan assets and
plan liabilities.
Foreign defined benefit plans provide participants with pension
benefits that are based on compensation levels, age, and length
of service.
Certain of our foreign subsidiaries are required to provide to
their employees termination indemnity benefits regardless of the
reason for termination (retirement, voluntary, or involuntary).
We treat these plans as defined benefit plans if the substance
of the post-employment plan is a pension-type arrangement. Most
of these arrangements provide the employee with a one-time
payout based on compensation levels, age, and years of service
on termination independent of the reason (retirement, voluntary,
or involuntary).
Our subsidiaries in the United States decided in 2008 to freeze
their defined benefit plan effective December 31, 2008, and
instead offered additional and improved benefits under their
defined contribution plan
(401k-Plan
regulations). As a result, we recognized a curtailment gain in
the amount of 9 million related to the reduction of
the defined benefit obligation in 2008.
F-54
The following table shows the development of the present values
of the defined benefit obligations and the fair value of the
plan assets with a reconciliation of the funded status to net
amounts:
Change in
the Present Value of the DBO and the Fair Value of the Plan
Assets
F-55
The following weighted average assumptions were used for the
actuarial valuation of our domestic and foreign pension
liabilities as well as other post-employment benefit obligations
as at the respective measurement date:
Actuarial
Assumptions for Defined Benefit Liabilities
The assumed discount rates are derived from rates available on
high-quality corporate bonds and government bonds for which the
timing and amounts of payments match the timing and the amounts
of our projected pension payments.
The components of total expense of defined benefit plans for the
years 2009, 2008, and 2007 recognized in operating expense were
as follows:
Total
Expense of Defined Benefit Plans
Due to the fact that our domestic defined benefit plans
primarily consist of an employee financed post-retirement plan
that is fully financed with qualifying insurance policies,
current service cost may turn into a credit. This results from
the fact that initially the plan assets and benefit liability
are independently calculated based on actuarial assumptions, but
then IAS 19.104 is applied and adjusts the defined benefit
liability to the fair value of the qualifying plan assets. This
adjustment is reflected as service cost.
F-56
We have recognized the following amounts of actuarial gains and
losses for our defined benefit plans as other comprehensive
income directly in retained earnings:
Actuarial
Gains (Losses) on Defined Benefit Plans
For the calculation of the total expense for the years 2009,
2008, and 2007, the projection of the defined benefit obligation
and the fair value of the plan assets as at December 31,
2009, 2008, and 2007, our actuary has used the following
principal actuarial assumptions (expressed as weighted averages
for our foreign and post-employment benefit plans):
Actuarial
Assumptions for Total Expense
Pension Assets
Our investment strategy on domestic benefit plans is to invest
all contributions in stable insurance policies. The expected
rate of return on plan assets for our domestic benefit plans is
calculated by reference to the expected returns achievable on
the insured policies given the expected asset mix of the
policies.
The expected return assumptions for our foreign plan assets are
based on weighted average expected long-term rates of return for
each asset class, estimated based on factors such as historical
return patterns for each asset class and forecasts for
inflation. We review historical return patterns and other
relevant financial factors for appropriateness and
reasonableness and make modifications to eliminate certain
effects when
F-57
considered necessary. Our foreign benefit plan asset allocation
at December 31, 2009, and our target asset allocation for
the year 2010 are as follows:
Plan
Asset Allocation for Foreign Plans and Other Post-Employment
Obligations
The investment strategies for foreign benefit plans vary
according to the respective conditions in the country in which
the benefit plans are situated. Generally, a long-term
investment horizon has been adopted for all major foreign
benefit plans. Our policy is to invest in a risk-diversified
portfolio consisting of a mix of assets within the above target
asset allocation range.
Expected Future
Contributions and Benefits
Our expected contribution in 2010 is 1 million for
domestic defined benefit plans and 31 million for
foreign defined benefit plans, all of which is expected to be
paid in cash.
The estimated future pension benefit payments to be made over
the next 10 years by our domestic and foreign benefit plans
for the years ended December 31 are as follows:
Estimated
Future Pension Benefit Payments
F-58
The amounts for the current year and three preceding years of
pension obligation, plan assets, funded status, and experience
adjustments are as follows:
Pension
Obligation, Plan Assets, Funded Status and Experience
Adjustments
Defined Contribution
Pensions Plans
We also maintain domestic and foreign defined contribution
plans. Amounts contributed by us under such plans are based on a
percentage of the employees salaries or the amount of
contributions made by employees. The expenses associated with
defined contribution plans were 132 million in 2009,
100 million in 2008, and 91 million in
2007.
State Plans
In Germany, as well as some other countries, the legislator has
established pension benefit arrangements that are operated by
national or local government or a similar institution. The
expenses associated with these plans were 120 million
in 2009, 118 million in 2008, and
96 million in 2007.
Other provisions developed in the reporting year as follows:
Additions to our provisions also include interest components
which are not material individually and in the aggregate.
F-59
Provisions related to share-based compensation programs
comprise the obligations for our cash-settled share-based
compensation which are described in detail in Note (28).
Other employee-related provisions primarily comprise
obligations for time credits, severance payments, jubilee
expenses, and semiretirement. While most of these
employee-related provisions could be claimed within the next
12 months, we do not expect the related cash flows within
this time period.
Customer-related provisions include performance
obligations as well as expected contract losses. The associated
cash outflows are substantially short-term in nature.
Restructuring provisions primarily include personnel
costs, which result from severance payments for employee
terminations, and contract termination costs, including those
relating to the termination of lease contracts. For more
details, see Note (7). Prior year restructuring balances relate
to restructuring activities incurred in connection with our
acquisition of Business Objects (see Notes (4) and (7)) and
the abandoning of TomorrowNow. The cash outflows associated with
employee-related restructuring costs are substantially short-
term in nature. The timing of the cash flows associated with
facility-related provisions is dependent on the remaining term
of the associated lease.
Warranty provisions represent the estimated future cost
of fulfilling our contractual obligations associated with sales
of our software. We determine the warranty accrual based on the
historical average cost of fulfilling our obligations under
these commitments. The related outflow of economic benefits is
of short-term nature.
Litigation-related provisions relate primarily to
litigation matters described in Note (24). After taking legal
advice, we have established provisions taking into account the
facts of each case. The timing of the cash outflows associated
with legal claims cannot be reasonably determined in all cases.
We anticipate that part of the litigation-related expenses will
be recovered through insurance. As of December 31, 2009, we
have received 14 million from insurance policies
(December 31, 2008: 6 million) which will be
recognized when it is virtually certain that these amounts do
not have to be repaid.
Other provisions relate mainly to asset retirement
obligations associated with leased facilities and onerous
contracts. For asset retirement obligations we record the
present value of these obligations in the period in which the
obligation is incurred. The associated cash outflows are
generally expected to occur at the dates of exit of the
facilities to which they relate, which are typically long-term
in nature.
Deferred income consists mainly of prepayments made by our
customers for support services and professional services, fees
from multiple element arrangements allocated to undelivered
elements, and amounts recorded in purchase accounting at fair
value for obligations to perform under acquired support
contracts in connection with acquisitions.
F-60
Issued Capital
The following table shows the changes in the number and the
value of issued shares and treasury shares. Each share of no-par
issued capital has a nominal value of 1 per share.
Number of Shares
The change in issued capital due to convertible bonds and stock
options exercised relates to the exercise of awards granted to
employees under certain share-based payment plans.
Authorized Shares
The Articles of Incorporation authorize the Executive Board of
SAP AG (the Executive Board) to increase the issued capital:
|
|
|
|
|
Up to a total amount of 60 million through the
issuance of new common shares in return for contributions in
cash until May 11, 2010 (Authorized Capital I). The
issuance is subject to the statutory subscription rights of
existing shareholders.
|
|
|
|
Up to a total amount of 180 million through the
issuance of new common shares in return for contributions in
cash until May 8, 2011 (Authorized Capital Ia). The
issuance is subject to the statutory subscription rights of
existing shareholders.
|
|
|
|
Up to a total amount of 60 million through the
issuance of new common shares in return for contributions in
cash or in kind until May 11, 2010 (Authorized Capital II).
Subject to certain preconditions and the consent of the
Supervisory Board, the Executive Board is authorized to exclude
the shareholders statutory subscription rights.
|
|
|
|
Up to a total amount of 180 million through the
issuance of new common shares in return for contributions in
cash or in kind until May 8, 2011 (Authorized Capital IIa).
Subject to certain preconditions and the consent of the
Supervisory Board, the Executive Board is authorized to exclude
the shareholders statutory subscription rights.
|
F-61
Contingent Shares
SAP AGs issued capital is subject to a contingent increase
of common shares. The contingent increase may be effected only
to the extent that the holders of the convertible bonds and
stock options that were issued by SAP AG under certain
share-based payment plans (see Note 28) exercise their
conversion or subscription rights. Contingent shares amounted to
208 million as at December 31, 2009, which is
unchanged compared to the prior year.
Share Premium
Share premium represents all capital contributed to SAP with the
proceeds resulting from the issuance of issued capital in excess
of their calculated par value. Share premium arises mainly from
issuance of issued capital, treasury shares transactions and
share-based compensation transactions.
Retained Earnings
Retained earnings contain prior years undistributed profit
after tax and unrecognized pension costs. Unrecognized pension
costs comprise actuarial gains and losses relating to defined
benefit pension plans and similar obligations.
Treasury Shares
By resolution of SAP AGs Annual General Meeting of
Shareholders held on May 19, 2009, the Executive Board of
SAP AG was authorized to acquire, on or before October 31,
2010, up to 120 million shares in the Company on the
condition that such share purchases, together with any
previously acquired shares, do not account for more than 10% of
SAP AGs issued capital. Although treasury shares are
legally considered outstanding, there are no dividend or voting
rights associated with shares held in treasury. We may redeem or
resell shares held in treasury or may use treasury shares for
the purpose of servicing subscription rights and conversion
rights under the Companys share-based payment plans. Also,
we may use the shares held in treasury as consideration in
connection with the acquisition of other companies.
The Company purchased no SAP ADRs in 2009, 2008, or 2007 (each
ADR represents one common share of SAP AG). The Company held no
SAP ADRs as at December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
respectively.
Miscellaneous
Under the German Stock Corporation Act (Aktiengesetz), the total
amount of dividends available for distribution to SAP AGs
shareholders is based on the earnings of SAP AG as reported in
its statutory financial statements which are determined under
the accounting rules stipulated by the German Commercial Code
(Handelsgesetzbuch). For the year ended December 31, 2009,
the Executive Board and the Supervisory Board of SAP AG intend
to propose a dividend of 0.50 per share (estimated to be
594 million ).
Dividends per share for both 2008 and 2007 were 0.50 and
were paid in the succeeding year.
|
|
(22)
|
ADDITIONAL CAPITAL
DISCLOSURES
|
The primary objective of our capital management is to ensure
that we maintain a stable capital structure with the focus on
total equity to uphold investor, creditor, and customer
confidence and to ensure future development of our business. We
are focused on keeping our total equity base solid to ensure
independence, security, as well as a high financial flexibility
through a favorable impact on the conditions of potential future
borrowings, if required.
F-62
We currently do not have a credit rating with any rating agency.
Our debt ratio is at 37% (2008: 48%), and we do not believe that
a rating would have a substantial effect on our current or
future borrowing conditions and financing options.
Our goal is to continue to be able to return excess liquidity to
our shareholders by distributing annual dividends as well as
repurchasing treasury shares in future periods. The amount of
future dividends and the extent of future purchases of treasury
shares will be balanced with our effort to continue to maintain
an adequate liquidity status.
Furthermore, we manage our financial liabilities, for example by
entering into interest rate swaps on our borrowings.
The capital structure at the statement of financial position
date was as follows:
Capital
Structure
In 2009, repayment of the loan we entered into to finance the
acquisition of Business Objects decreased our total liabilities.
In the contrary, a Schuldscheindarlehen
(SSD a private placement transaction) totaling
697 million was placed on the euro-denominated
capital markets in the first half of 2009.
We are predominantly equity-financed. This is also evident from
the fact that bank loans and overdrafts represented only 5% of
total assets as of December 31, 2009 (2008: 17%).
In 2009 and 2008, respectively, we were able to distribute
594 million in dividends from our 2008 and 2007
profit compared to 556 million distributed in 2007.
Aside from the distributed dividend, in 2008 we also returned
487 million to our shareholders by repurchasing our
own shares, compared to 1,005 million in 2007.
Commitments exist to reissue treasury shares or issue common
shares in connection with our equity-settled share-based payment
plans as described in Note (28). In all years presented we have
satisfied and we expect to continue to satisfy commitments
resulting from our equity-settled share-based payment plans
through both reissuance of treasury shares and capital increases.
|
|
(23)
|
OTHER FINANCIAL
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
|
Other Financial
Commitments
Operating
Leases
Other financial commitments were 974 million,
1,112 million, and 850 million as at
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and
primarily comprise commitments under rental contracts and
operating leases of
F-63
727 million, 863 million and
649 million as at December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007, respectively. Those commitments relate primarily to the
lease of office space, cars, and office equipment.
Purchase
Commitments
In addition, contractual commitments for acquisition of
property, plant, and equipment totaling 24 million in
2009 (79 million in 2008; 97 million in
2007) exist. These commitments relate primarily to
construction on new and existing facilities, office equipment
and car purchase commitments. The remaining commitments totaling
223 million in 2009 (170 million in 2008;
104 million in 2007) relate to marketing,
consulting, maintenance, license agreements and other
third-party agreements. Historically, the majority of such
purchase commitments have been realized.
Commitments under operating leasing contracts and purchase
obligations as at December 31, 2009, were as follows:
Other
Financial Commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Commitments
|
|
millions
|
|
|
Operating Leases
|
|
|
|
Purchase Commitments
|
|
Due 2010
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
Due from 2011 to 2014
|
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Due thereafter
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2009, the future minimum sublease
payments were 13 million, 16 million, and
16 million for the years 2009, 2008, and 2007,
respectively. Our sublease payments received were immaterial for
all years reported.
Our rental and operating lease expense was
264 million, 274 million, and
210 million for the years 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Contingent
Liabilities
In the normal course of business, we usually indemnify our
customers against liabilities arising from a claim that our
software products infringe a third partys patent,
copyright, trade secret, or other proprietary rights. In
addition, we occasionally grant function or performance
guarantees in routine consulting contracts or development
arrangements. Also, our software license agreements generally
include a clause guaranteeing that the software substantially
conforms to the specifications as described in applicable
documentation for a period of six to 12 months from
delivery. Our product and service warranty liability, which is
measured based on historical experience and evaluation, is
included in other obligations (see Note (19b)).
For contingent liabilities related to litigation matters, see
Note (24).
|
|
(24)
|
LITIGATION AND CLAIMS
|
We are subject to a variety of other claims and lawsuits that
arise from time to time in the ordinary course of our business,
including proceedings and claims that relate to companies which
we have acquired, and claims that relate to customers demanding
indemnification for proceedings initiated against them based on
their use of SAP software. We will continue to vigorously defend
against all claims and lawsuits against us. We record a
provision for such matters when it is probable that we have a
present obligation that results from a past event, is reliably
estimable and the settlement of which is probable to require an
outflow of resources embodying economic benefits. For further
information regarding the development of the provisions recorded
for litigations please refer to note (19b). We currently believe
that resolving all claims and lawsuits against us, individually
or in aggregate, did not and will not have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial position, income, or cash
flows.
F-64
However, all claims and lawsuits involve risk and could lead to
significant financial and reputational damage to the parties
involved. Because of significant inherent uncertainties related
to these matters, there can be no assurance that our business,
financial position, income or cash flows will not be materially
adversely affected nor can we reliably estimate the maximum
possible loss in case of an unfavorable outcome.
Intellectual
Property Litigation
In October 2006,
U.S.-based
Sky Technologies LLC (Sky) instituted legal proceedings in the
United States against SAP and Oracle. Sky alleges that
SAPs products infringe one or more of the claims in each
of five patents held by Sky. In its complaint, Sky seeks
unspecified monetary damages and permanent injunctive relief.
The legal proceedings have been re-activated and trial is
scheduled for October 2010.
In January 2007, German-based CSB-Systems AG (CSB) instituted
legal proceedings in Germany against SAP. CSB alleges that
SAPs products infringe one or more of the claims of a
German patent and a German utility model held by CSB. In its
complaint, CSB has set the amount in dispute at
1 million and is seeking permanent injunctive relief.
Within these proceedings CSB is not precluded from requesting
damages in excess of the amount in dispute. In July 2007, SAP
filed its response in the legal proceedings including a nullity
action and cancellation proceeding against the patent and
utility model, respectively. The nullity hearing on the German
patent was held in January 2009 and the German Court determined
that the patent is invalid. The cancellation hearing for the
utility model was held in May 2009 and the Court determined that
the utility model was invalid. CSB is appealing, however, the
infringement hearing has been stayed pending the appeals.
In March 2007,
U.S.-based
Oracle Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries (Oracle)
instituted legal proceedings in the United States against
TomorrowNow, Inc. and its parent company, SAP America, Inc. and
SAP Americas parent company SAP AG (SAP). Oracle filed an
amended complaint in June 2007, a second amended complaint in
July 2008 and a third amended complaint in October 2008 and a
fourth amended complaint in August 2009. SAP and TomorrowNow
have answered the fourth amended complaint, subject to and as
revised by the Courts ruling on motion to dismiss the
preceding third amended complaint. As amended, the lawsuit
alleges copyright infringement, violations of the Federal
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and the California Computer Data
Access and Fraud Act, unfair competition, intentional and
negligent interference with prospective economic advantage, and
civil conspiracy. The lawsuit alleges that SAP unlawfully copied
and misappropriated proprietary, copyrighted software products
and other confidential materials developed by Oracle to service
its own customers. The lawsuit seeks injunctive relief and
monetary damages including punitive damages in the billions of
U.S. dollars. The trial has been re-scheduled for November
2010. Additionally, in June 2007, SAP became aware that the
United States Department of Justice had opened an investigation
concerning related issues and had issued subpoenas to SAP and
TomorrowNow; SAP and TomorrowNow are cooperating with the
investigation and are responding to the original subpoenas and
additional subpoenas issued by the Department of Justice. In
November 2009 a settlement conference was held. No settlement
was reached. The next settlement conference is scheduled for
June 2010. SAP has recorded a provision for these legal
proceedings in the amount of US$100 million plus legal
expenses as of December 31, 2009.
In April 2007,
U.S.-based
Versata Software, Inc. (formerly Trilogy Software, Inc.)
(Versata) instituted legal proceedings in the United States
against SAP. Versata alleges that SAPs products infringe
one or more of the claims in each of five patents held by
Versata. In its complaint, Versata seeks unspecified monetary
damages and permanent injunctive relief. The trial was held in
August 2009. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Versata and
awarded Versata US$138.6M for past damages. With prejudgment
interest, approximately 167 Mio. USD is in dispute. The parties
have filed post-trial motions and a hearing has been scheduled
for March 2010.
In August 2007,
U.S.-based
elcommerce.com, Inc.(elcommerce) instituted legal proceedings in
the United States against SAP. elcommerce alleges that
SAPs products infringe one or more of the claims in one
patent held by elcommerce. In its complaint, elcommerce seeks
unspecified monetary damages and permanent injunctiverelief. The
Court in East Texas granted SAPs request to transfer the
litigation from East Texas to Pennsylvania. The trial in
Pennsylvania has not yet been scheduled.
F-65
In August 2007, Canadian-based JuxtaComm, Inc. (JuxtaComm)
instituted legal proceedings in the United States against
Business Objects and several other defendants. JuxtaComm alleges
that Business Objects products infringe one or more of the
claims in one patent held by JuxtaComm. In its complaint,
JuxtaComm seeks unspecified monetary damages and permanent
injunctive relief. SAP and JuxtaComm have resolved this dispute
for an amount immaterial to SAPs business, financial
position, results of operations, and cash flows.
In November 2007,
U.S.-based
Diagnostic Systems Corp. (DSC) instituted legal proceedings in
the United States against SAP and several other defendants.
Among the defendants is Business Objects, which was sued by DSC
prior to it being acquired by SAP. DSC alleges that SAPs
products infringe one or more of the claims in one patent held
by DSC. In its complaint against SAP, DSC seeks unspecified
monetary damages and permanent injunctive relief. In its
complaint against Business Objects, which also alleges
infringement of one or more claims in one DSC patent, DSC seeks
unspecified monetary damages and permanent injunctive relief.
The trial was scheduled for February 2010. SAP and DSC have
resolved this dispute for an amount immaterial to SAPs
business, financial position, results of operations, and cash
flows.
In May 2008,
U.S.-based
InfoMentis, Inc. (InfoMentis) instituted legal proceedings in
the United States against SAP. InfoMentis alleges copyright
infringement and unfair competition. The lawsuit seeks
unspecified monetary damages and a permanent injunction. SAP
filed its response in August 2008. The March 2010 trial date has
been taken off the calendar and no new trial date has been set.
In July 2008,
U.S.-based
Implicit Networks (Implicit) instituted legal proceedings in the
United States against SAP and several other defendants. Implicit
alleges that SAPs products infringe one or more of the
claims of two patents held by Implicit. In its complaint,
Implicit seeks unspecified monetary damages and permanent
injunctive relief. SAP filed its response in November 2008. The
legal proceedings have been transferred from Seattle, Washington
to San Francisco, California. SAP and Implicit have
resolved this dispute for an amount immaterial to SAPs
business, financial position, results of operations, and cash
flows.
In July 2008 and July 2009,
U.S.-based
Aloft Media (Aloft) instituted legal proceedings in the United
States against SAP and several other defendants. In the
proceedings instituted in July 2008 Aloft alleges that
SAPs products infringe one or more of the claims of two
patents held by Aloft. In its complaint, Aloft seeks unspecified
monetary damages and permanent injunctive relief. SAP filed its
response in October 2008. The trial was scheduled for June 2010.
In the proceedings instituted in July 2009, Aloft alleges that
SAPs products infringe one or more of the claims of one
patent held by Aloft. In its complaint, Aloft seeks unspecified
monetary damages. SAP and Aloft have resolved this dispute for
an amount immaterial to SAPs business, financial position,
results of operations, and cash flows.
In February 2010,
U.S.-based
TecSec, Inc. instituted legal proceedings in the United States
against SAP. TecSec alleges that SAPs products infringe
one or more of the claims in five patents held by TecSec. In its
complaint, TecSec seeks unspecified monetary damages and
permanent injunctive relief. The trial has not yet been
scheduled.
Other Litigation
In April 2008, South African-based Systems Applications
Consultants (PTY) Limited (Securinfo) instituted legal
proceedings in South Africa against SAP. Securinfo alleges that
SAP has caused one of its subsidiaries to breach a software
distribution agreement with Securinfo. In its complaint,
Securinfo seeks damages of approximately 610 million
euro plus interest. In September 2009, SAP filed a motion to
dismiss. A trial date has not yet been set.
In April 2008,
U.S.-based
Wellogix, Inc. (Wellogix) instituted legal proceedings in the
United States against SAP as well as several other defendants.
Wellogix alleges several causes of action including, but not
limited to, breach of joint venture/partnership agreement,
breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, negligent misrepresentation,
and misappropriation of confidential information. The lawsuit
seeks unspecified monetary damages. SAP filed
F-66
its responds in May 2008. In December 2008, the Court granted
SAPs motion to dismiss indicating the legal proceedings
were improperly initiated in Texas. Wellogix has appealed.
Wellogix has dropped its appeal.
In March 2008,
U.S.-based
Waste Management, Inc. and USA Waste Management Resources, LLC.
(Waste Management) instituted legal proceedings in the United
States against SAP alleging several causes of action, including
but not limited to, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and
breach of contract. SAP filed an answer denying plaintiffs
allegations and filed a counterclaim alleging breach of
contract. In December 2009 the Court dismissed plaintiffs
claim for negligent misrepresentation. In February 2010, SAP
filed two motions for partial summary judgment. In response,
Waste Management filed an amended petition re-writing their
fraud allegations, asserting new claims, including but not
limited to, civil conspiracy and joint enterprise, re-filed its
claim for negligent misrepresentation to preserve its appeal
rights, and filed various motions for partial summary judgment.
In its amended petition, plaintiffs allege actual damages
exceeding US$400 million and seeks an award of exemplary
damages exceeding US$800 million. In March 2010, SAP filed
special exceptions under Texas Rules of Civil Procedure to the
amended petition. The parties continue to engage in motion
practice and the trial is currently schedule for May 2010.
|
|
(25)
|
FINANCIAL RISK
FACTORS
|
We are exposed to various financial risks, such as market risks,
including changes in foreign currency exchange rates, interest
rates, and equity prices, as well as credit risk and liquidity
risk.
Foreign Currency
Exchange Rate Risk
Foreign currency exchange rate risk is the risk of loss due to
adverse changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Under IFRS,
foreign currency exchange rate risks arise on account of
monetary financial instruments denominated in currencies other
than the functional currency where the non-functional currency
is the respective risk variable; translation risks are not taken
into consideration.
As a globally active enterprise, we are subject to risks
associated with fluctuations in foreign currencies with regard
to our ordinary operations. Since the Groups entities
mainly conduct their operating business in their respective
functional currencies, our risk of exchange rate fluctuations
from ongoing ordinary operations is not considered significant.
However, occasionally we generate foreign currency-denominated
receivables, payables, and other monetary statement of financial
position items by transacting in a currency other than the
functional currency with the majority then being hedged as
described in Note (26).
In rare circumstances, transacting in a currency other than the
functional currency also leads to embedded foreign currency
derivatives being separated and measured at fair value through
profit or loss.
In addition, SAP AG is exposed to risk associated with
forecasted intercompany cash flows in foreign currencies
resulting from intercompany royalty payments by the SAP
Groups entities linked to their external revenue. This
leads to a centralization of the foreign currency exchange rate
risk with SAP AG in Germany, as the royalties are mostly
denominated in the respective subsidiarys local currency
while the functional currency of SAP AG is the euro. Here, the
highest foreign currency exchange rate exposure relates to
currencies of subsidiaries with significant operations for
example the U.S. dollar, the pound sterling, the Japanese
yen, the Swiss franc, the Canadian dollar, and the Australian
dollar.
With regard to our investing and financing activities we are not
exposed to any significant foreign currency exchange rate risk,
as all such activities are conducted in the respective
functional currency.
Interest-Rate Risk
Interest-rate risks result from changes in market interest rates
which can cause changes in the fair values of fixed-rate
instruments and in the interest to be paid or received for
variable-rate instruments. This interest-rate risk arises for
our investing and financing activities.
F-67
As at December 31, 2009, our liquidity was mainly invested
in current time deposits with fixed yields and money market
funds with variable yields, held as cash equivalents and other
financial assets. Since we do not account for the fixed-yield
investments held at year-end at fair value, we are only exposed
to a cash flow interest-rate risk with regard to our
variable-rate investments, namely money market funds, in the
euro zone and in the United States of America.
In 2009, financing activities focused on an interest-bearing
private placement transaction (Schuldscheindarlehen, SSD), which
closed in the second quarter of 2009, totaling
697 million with maturities of three and five years.
The SSD has a 149.5 million fixed-rate tranche
exposing us to a fair value risk of the liability and a
547.5 million variable-rate tranche, which gives rise
to a cash-flow risk, as the interest payments are based on the
prevailing EURIBOR rates. Hence, on the financing side, we are
exposed to interest-rate risks mainly in the euro zone.
Equity-Price Risk
Equity-price risk is the risk of loss due to adverse changes in
equity markets which we are exposed to with regard to our
investments in equity securities and our share-based
compensation plans.
Our investments consist of equity securities with and without
quoted market prices in active markets classified as
available-for-sale.
Our investments in equity instruments with quoted market prices
in active markets are monitored based on the current market
value that is affected by the fluctuation in the volatile stock
markets worldwide.
Also, we are exposed to risks resulting from future cash flows
associated with share-based compensation granted to employees,
which is described in detail in Note (28).
Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk of economic loss of principal or
financial rewards stemming from counterpartys failure to
repay or service debt according to the contractual obligations.
In 2009, we entered into an agreement to insure part of our
trade receivables against credit losses. Except for this, we
have not concluded significant agreements reducing the overall
credit risk exposure, such as master netting arrangements.
Therefore, the total amounts recognized as cash and cash
equivalents, short-term investments, loans and other financial
receivables and derivative financial assets represent our
maximum exposure to credit risks.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk results from the potential inability to meet
financial obligations, such as payments to suppliers or
employees. A maturity analysis that provides the remaining
contractual maturities of all our financial liabilities held at
December 31, 2009, is shown in the table below. The cash
flows for unrecognized but contractually agreed financial
commitments are shown in Note (23). Financial liabilities for
which repayment can be requested by the contract partner at any
time are assigned to the earliest possible period. Variable
interest payments were calculated using the last relevant
interest rate fixed before December 31, 2009. As we settle
our derivative contracts gross, we show the pay and receive legs
separately for all our currency and interest rate derivatives,
whether or not the fair value of the derivative is negative. The
cash outflows for the currency derivatives are translated using
the respective forward rate.
F-68
Contractual
Maturities of Financial Liabilities
The overall decrease of cash outflows for our non-derivative
financial liabilities compared to year-end 2008 is due to the
full repayment of a syndicated term loan in 2009.
The overall increase of cash outflows and inflows for our
derivative financial liabilities is due to hedging an
intercompany short-term loan in U.S. dollars.
F-69
|
|
(26)
|
FINANCIAL RISK
MANAGEMENT
|
We manage credit, liquidity, interest rate, equity price, and
foreign currency exchange rate risks on a Group-wide basis.
Selected derivatives are exclusively used for this purpose and
not for speculation, which is defined as entering into
derivative instruments without a corresponding underlying
transaction. Financial risk management is done centrally. The
risk management and hedging strategy is set by our Treasury
guideline and other internal guidelines and is subject to
continuous internal risk analysis.
In the following sections we provide details on the management
of each respective financial risk and our risk exposure. For the
presentation of market risk exposure, IFRS 7 requires
sensitivity analyses that show the effects of hypothetical
changes of relevant risk variables on profit or other components
of equity. The periodic effects are determined by relating the
hypothetical changes in the risk variables to the balance of
financial instruments at the reporting date.
Foreign Currency
Exchange Rate Risk Management
We continually monitor our exposure to currency fluctuation
risks based on monetary items and forecasted transactions and
pursue a Group-wide foreign currency exchange rate
risk-management strategy using derivative financial instruments,
primarily foreign exchange forward contracts, as appropriate,
with the primary aim of reducing profit or loss volatility.
Currency Hedges
without Designated Hedge Relationship
Foreign exchange forward contracts entered into by us to offset
exposure relating to foreign currency-denominated monetary
assets and liabilities from our operating activities are not
designated as being in a hedge accounting relationship, because
the realized currency gains and losses from the underlying
transactions are recognized in profit in the same periods as the
gains and losses from the derivatives.
In addition, currency hedges without a designated hedge
relationship also contain foreign currency derivatives embedded
in non-derivative host contracts that are separated and
accounted for as derivatives according to the requirements of
IAS 39.
Currency Hedges
with Designated Hedge Relationship (Cash-Flow Hedges)
We enter into derivative instruments, primarily foreign exchange
forward contracts, to hedge significant forecasted cash flows
(royalties) from foreign subsidiaries denominated in foreign
currencies, generally within a 40% to 80% range of the
forecasted exposure out to 15 months. Specifically, we
exclude the interest component and only designate the spot rate
of the foreign exchange forward contracts as the hedging
instrument to offset anticipated cash flows relating to the
subsidiaries with significant operations, including the United
States, the United Kingdom, Japan, Switzerland, Canada, and
Australia. We generally use foreign exchange derivatives that
have maturities of 15 months or less, which may be rolled
over to provide continuous coverage until the applicable
royalties are received.
In 2009, net losses totaling 18 million (2008: net
losses of 32 million; 2007: net gains of
48 million) resulting from the change in the
component of the derivatives designated as hedging instruments
were taken directly to other components of equity.
For the years ended December 31, 2009, and 2008, no highly
probable transaction designated as a hedged item in a foreign
currency cash flow hedge relationship ceased to be probable of
occurring. Therefore, we did not discontinue any of our cash
flow hedge relationships. Also, we only identified immaterial
ineffectiveness for these hedges in 2009 and no ineffectiveness
in 2008 and 2007. In 2009, we reclassified net losses of
37 million (2008: net losses of
16 million; 2007: net losses of
38 million) out of other components of equity to
profit or loss due to the hedged items affecting income.
Generally, the cash flows of the forecasted transactions are
expected to
F-70
occur and affect profit or loss monthly within a time frame of
15 months from the statement of financial position date. It
is estimated that 7 million of the net losses
recognized directly in other components of equity at
December 31, 2009, will be reclassified into profit during
fiscal year 2010.
Foreign Currency
Exchange Rate Exposure
In line with our internal risk reporting process, we use the
value-at-risk
method to quantify our risk positions and to manage foreign
currency exchange rate risk. Our calculation of the
value-at-risk
not only includes all foreign currency-denominated financial
instruments but also forecasted intercompany transactions that
are scoped out of IFRS 7. As our internal calculation of
value-at-risk
is not in line with the requirements of IFRS 7, we have opted to
disclose our risk exposure based on a sensitivity analysis
considering the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Since the SAP Groups entities generally operate in their
functional currencies, the majority of our non-derivative
monetary financial instruments such as cash, trade receivables,
trade payables, loans to employees and third parties, bank
liabilities, and other financial liabilities, are denominated in
the respective entities functional currency. Thus, a
foreign currency exchange rate risk in these transactions is
non-existent. In exceptional cases and limited economic
environments, operating transactions are denominated in
currencies other than the functional currency, leading to a
currency risk for the related monetary instruments. Where we
hedge against currency impacts on cash flows, these foreign
currency-denominated financial instruments are economically
converted into the functional currency by the use of forward
exchange contracts or options. Therefore, fluctuations in
foreign currency exchange rates neither have a significant
impact on profit nor on other components of equity with regard
to our non-derivative monetary financial instruments.
|
|
|
|
Income or expenses on the non-derivative monetary financial
instruments discussed above are always recognized in the
relevant entitys functional currency. Therefore,
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates neither have a
significant impact on profit nor on other components of equity
in this regard.
|
|
|
|
Our free-standing derivatives designed for hedging currency
risks almost completely balance the changes in the fair values
of the hedged item attributable to exchange rate movements in
the consolidated income statements in the same period. As a
consequence, the hedged items and the hedging instruments are
not exposed to currency risks with an effect on profit or other
components of equity.
|
Consequently, we are only exposed to foreign currency exchange
rate fluctuations with regard to:
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives held within a designated cash-flow hedging
relationship, and
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency embedded derivatives.
|
With respect to the nominal amounts, the data at year-end is not
representative of the year as a whole. On average, our exposure
to foreign currency exchange rate risk in 2009 was based on
nominal amounts of 898 million, with a range of
exposure on nominal amounts from a low of 819 million
to a high of 960 million, which was also the year-end
exposure.
The interest element which is not part of the assigned cash flow
hedging relationship and is posted to profit is not affected by
currency fluctuations. As we do not have a significant exposure
to a single currency, we disclose our exposure to our major
currencies (as described in Note (25)) in total. If, at
December 31, 2009, the euro had gained (lost) 10% against
all our major currencies, the effective portion of the foreign
currency cash-flow hedge in other components of equity would
have been 55 million higher (lower)
(December 31, 2008: 68 million higher (lower);
December 31, 2007: 64 million higher (lower))
than presented.
Any change in the value of our foreign-currency embedded
derivatives is recorded in profit or loss. If, at
December 31, 2009, the euro had gained (lost) 10% against
the Swiss franc (which is the currency accounting for the
majority of our respective exposure), the effect on other
non-operating income would have been 38 million
F-71
higher (lower) (December 31, 2008: 40 million
higher (lower); December 31, 2007: 37 million
higher (lower)) than presented.
Our sensitivity to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations
has decreased during the current period, mainly due to the
reduction of the nominal amounts hedged in a cash-flow hedging
relationship and the reduction of the volume of the underlying
executory contracts of foreign-currency embedded derivatives.
Interest-Rate Risk
Management
The primary aim of our interest-rate risk management is to
reduce profit or loss volatility.
In order to hedge the cash-flow risk resulting from fluctuations
in future interest payments related to the variable-rate SSD, we
entered into interest rate payer swaps, thus economically
converting the underlying floating rate of the SSD into a fixed
rate, as the changes in the cash flows of the hedged items
resulting from changes in EURIBOR are offset against the changes
in the cash flows of the interest rate swaps. At
December 31, 2009, the nominal volume of the interest rate
derivatives covered the total volume of the variable-rate SSD.
Hence, virtually all of our interest rate sensitive liabilities
denominated in euros and of the total of our interest rate
sensitive liabilities had a fixed interest rate.
Derivatives with
Designated Hedge Relationship (Cash-Flow Hedges)
At December 31, 2009, we held interest rate derivatives
with a designated hedge relationship that had a negative fair
value of 5 million (2008: 16 million) for
which net losses of 14 million of the 2009 financial
year (2008: 15 million net losses of the 2008
financial year; 2007: 0 million) were recorded in
other components of equity due to the designation as cash-flow
hedging instruments. In 2009, we reclassified net losses of
26 million (2008: 0 million; 2007:
0 million) out of other components of equity to
interest expense due to the hedged items affecting income. We
did not record any ineffectiveness for these hedges for the
fiscal years 2009, 2008, and 2007.
The following table shows the contractual maturities of the cash
flows for the SSD interest payments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Start Date
|
|
End Date
|
|
Nominal Volume
|
|
Reference Rate
|
|
April 9, 2009
|
|
April 9, 2012
|
|
359.5 million
|
|
3-month-EURIBOR
|
April 9, 2009
|
|
April 9, 2014
|
|
158 million
|
|
3-month-EURIBOR
|
June 2, 2009
|
|
June 2, 2014
|
|
30 million
|
|
3-month-EURIBOR
|
Interest Rate Exposure
In order to reduce profit or loss volatility, we manage
interest-rate risk by adding interest-rate-related derivative
instruments to a given portfolio of debt financing.
Due to the short maturities of our investments, we do not have a
significant interest-rate risk-related to financial assets (see
Note (13)).
As noted above, we entered into derivative financial instruments
to hedge the interest rate risk resulting from the variable
interest-rate SSD.
A sensitivity analysis is provided to show our interest rate
risk exposure at the statement of financial position date
considering the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in interest rates only affect non-derivative fixed-rate
financial instruments if they are recognized at fair value. As
at December 31, 2009 we did not have non-derivative
fixed-rate financial assets classified as
available-for-sale
or non-derivative fixed-rate financial liabilities designated as
at fair value through profit or loss, an equity-related
sensitivity calculation is not necessary. As our investment
portfolio also contained fixed-rate financial assets from the
euro zone during 2009, the data at year-end is not
representative of the entire year of 2009. On average, our
exposure to fair value
|
F-72
|
|
|
|
|
risk in 2009 with regards to investing activities was based on
investments of 77 million, with a range of exposure
on investments from a high of 199 million to a low of
0 million, which was also the
year-end
exposure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income or expenses for non-derivative financial instruments with
variable interest are subject to interest rate risk if they are
not hedged items in an effective hedging relationship. We
therefore have no significant interest-rate risk arising from
our financial liabilities and consider interest rate changes for
our variable interest-rate investments in the profit-related
sensitivity calculation. With respect to the invested amounts,
the data at year-end is not representative of the year as a
whole. On average, our exposure to cash flow interest rate risk
in 2009 was based on investments of 847 million, with
a range of exposure on investments from a high of
1.0 billion to a low of 330 million, which
was also the year-end exposure.
|
|
|
|
Due to the aforementioned designation of interest rate
derivatives to a cash flow-hedge relationship, the respective
interest rate changes affect the respective amounts recorded in
other components of equity. The movements related to the
interest rate swaps variable leg are not reflected in the
sensitivity calculation as they offset the variable
interest-rate payments for the credit facility. We therefore
only consider interest rate sensitivity in discounting the
interest rate swaps fixed leg cash flows in the
equity-related sensitivity calculation for the interest swaps in
a hedge relationship. With respect to the borrowing and
therefore hedged amounts, the data at year-end is not
representative for the year as a whole, as significant debt
amounts from a syndicated term loan raised in connection with
the acquisition of Business Objects were paid back in 2009. On
average, our exposure to interest rate risk in 2009 with regard
to financing activities was based on borrowings of
2.03 billion, with a range of exposure on borrowings
from a high of 3.0 billion to a low of
697 million, which was also the
year-end
exposure.
|
While in the previous years we used a yield curve shift of
+100/-100 basis points, the 2009 sensitivity analysis
is due to the current low interest level
based on a yield curve shift of +100/-20 basis points to
avoid negative interest rates. If, on December 31, 2009,
interest rates had been 100 basis points higher
(20 basis points lower) (2008/2007: 100 basis points
higher (lower)), this would not have had a material effect on:
|
|
|
|
|
The gains/losses on
available-for-sale
financial assets positions in other components of equity.
|
|
|
|
The financial income, net for our variable interest-rate
investments.
|
|
|
|
The effective portion of the interest rate cash-flow hedge in
other components of equity.
|
Only the sensitivity analysis for the
available-for-sale
financial assets is not representative for the year as a whole,
as during 2009 we held fixed interest-rate financial assets.
Our sensitivity to interest rate fluctuations has decreased
during the current period mainly due to the reduction of
variable-rate debt instruments and liabilities.
Equity-Price Risk
Management
Our equity investments in listed securities are affected by the
fluctuation in the volatile stock markets worldwide. An assumed
20% increase (decrease) in equity prices as at December 31,
2009, would only have an insignificant impact on the value of
our investments in marketable securities and the corresponding
entries in other components of equity.
The equity investments in non-listed securities are monitored
individually. Those securities are recognized at cost, because
market values are generally not observable. They are subject to
an annual impairment test.
In order to reduce profit or loss volatility, we hedge certain
cash flow exposures associated with share-based compensation
through the purchase of derivative instruments, but do not
establish a designated hedge
F-73
relationship. Based on the valuation of the share-based
compensation hedges, share-based compensation expense increased
5 million (2008: increase of 41 million;
2007: increase of 31 million).
Credit Risk
Management
To mitigate the credit risk for our investing activities, we
conduct all our activities only with approved major financial
institutions and issuers that carry high external ratings, as
required by our internal treasury guideline. Among its
stipulations, the guideline requires that we invest only in
assets from issuers with a minimum rating of at least A-. The
weighted average rating of our financial assets is in the range
AA- to A+. We pursue a policy of cautious investments
characterized by predominantly short-term investments, standard
investment instruments, as well as a wide portfolio
diversification by doing business with a variety of
counterparties. This approach is assured by detailed guidelines
for the management of financial risks, stipulating that the
business volume with individual counterparties is restricted to
a defined limit which depends on the lowest official long-term
credit rating available by at least one of the major rating
agencies, or participation in the German Depositors
Guarantee Fund or any other protection scheme. We continuously
monitor strict compliance with these counterparty limits.
The default risk of trade receivables is managed separately,
mainly based on assessing the creditworthiness of customers
through external ratings and our historical experience with
respective customers, and it is partially covered by merchandise
credit insurance. Outstanding receivables are continuously
monitored locally. Credit risks are accounted for through
individual and portfolio impairments (described in detail in
Note (3)). The impact of trade receivables from single customers
is mitigated by our large customer base and its distribution
across many different industries and countries worldwide. For
information about the credit quality of trade receivables, see
Note (14). For information on the maximum exposure to credit
risk, see Note (25).
To mitigate the credit risk for our derivative financial assets,
we only purchase such instruments from approved major financial
institutions that carry high external credit ratings as laid out
in our internal treasury guideline. In addition, the
concentration of credit risk that exists when counterparties are
involved in similar activities by instrument, sector or
geographic area is further mitigated by diversification of
counterparties throughout the world and adherence to an internal
limit system for each counterparty stipulating that the business
volume with individual counterparties is restricted to a defined
limit which depends on the lowest official long-term credit
rating available by at least one of the major rating agencies,
or participation in the German Depositors Guarantee Fund
or any other protection scheme. The limit utilization is
continuously monitored. As the premium for credit default swaps
mainly depends on the market participants assessment of
the creditworthiness of a debtor, we also closely observe the
development of CDS spreads in the market to evaluate probable
risk developments to timely react to changes if these should
manifest.
Liquidity Risk
Management
Our Group-wide liquidity is generally managed by our global
treasury department with the primary aim of maintaining
liquidity in the Group at a level that is adequate to meet our
financial obligations.
Our primary source of liquidity is funds generated from our
business operations, which have historically mainly provided the
liquid funds needed to maintain our investing and financing
strategy. Unless restricted by local regulations, subsidiaries
pool their cash surplus to our global treasury department, which
then arranges to fund other subsidiaries requirements or
invest any net surplus in the market, seeking to optimize
yields, while ensuring liquidity, by investing only with
counterparties and issuers of high credit quality, as explained
above. Hence, high levels of liquid assets and marketable
securities provide a strategic reserve, helping keep SAP
flexible, sound, and independent.
Apart from effective working capital and cash management, SAP
has reduced its liquidity risk by arranging an adequate volume
of available credit facilities with various financial
institutions on which we can draw if necessary.
F-74
As at October 1, 2007, SAP AG entered into a
5 billion credit facility with Deutsche Bank AG in
connection with our acquisition of Business Objects S.A. As at
December 31, 2008, there were borrowings of
2.3 billion outstanding under the facility. The
credit facility was fully repaid in October 2009 before maturity
date December 31, 2009.
As mentioned above, in the second quarter of 2009 SAP AG placed
an SSD in the total volume of 697 million. In
addition, in order to retain high financial flexibility, as at
September 15, 2009, SAP AG entered into a
1.5 billion three-year revolving credit facility,
effectively replacing the 1 billion syndicated
revolving credit facility signed in November 2004. The use of
the facility is not restricted by any financial covenants.
Borrowings under the facility bear interest of EURIBOR or LIBOR
for the respective currency plus a margin of 110 basis
points to 160 basis points, depending on the amount drawn.
We are also required to pay a commitment fee of 44 basis
points per annum on the unused available credit. As at
December 31, 2009, there were no borrowings outstanding
under the facility.
Additionally, as at December 31, 2009 and 2008, SAP AG had
available lines of credit totaling 545 million and
597 million, respectively. As at December 31,
2009 and 2008, there were no borrowings outstanding under these
lines of credit. As at December 31, 2009 and 2008, certain
subsidiaries had lines of credit available that allowed them to
borrow in local currencies at prevailing interest rates up to
51 million and 52 million, respectively.
Total aggregate borrowings under these lines of credit amounted
to 6 million and 21 million as at
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
|
|
(27)
|
ADDITIONAL FAIR
VALUE DISCLOSURES ON FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
|
Fair Value of
Financial Instruments
We use various types of financial instruments in the ordinary
course of business which are grouped into the following
categories: loans and receivables (L&R),
available-for-sale
(AFS), held for trading (HFT) and amortized cost (AC).
F-75
The carrying amounts and fair values of our financial
instruments as at December 31 were as follows:
Fair
Values of Financial Instruments
Determination of
Fair Values
IAS 39 defines fair value as the amount for which an asset could
be exchanged, or a liability settled, between knowledgeable,
willing parties in an arms length transaction.
Accordingly, best evidence of fair value is quoted prices in an
active market. Where market prices are not readily available,
valuation techniques have to be used to establish fair value. We
have classified our financial instruments into those that are
subsequently measured at fair value and those which are measured
at cost or amortized cost.
Financial
Instruments Measured at Fair Value
Depending on the inputs used for determining fair value, we have
categorized our financial instruments at fair value into a
three-level fair value hierarchy as mandated by IFRS 7.
The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
(Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable
inputs (Level 3). The inputs used to measure fair value for
one single instrument may fall into different levels of the fair
value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value
hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its
entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level
input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its
entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular
input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires
judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or
liability.
F-76
The levels of the fair value hierarchy, its application to our
financial assets and liabilities and the respective
determination of fair value are described below:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
debt and equity investments: The fair values of
these marketable securities are based on quoted market prices as
at December 31.
|
|
|
|
Level 2: Inputs other than observable,
either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices in active
markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for
identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are
not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be
corroborated by observable market data for substantially the
full term of the assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments: The fair
value of foreign exchange forward contracts is based on
discounting the expected future cash flows over the respective
remaining term of the contracts using the respective deposit
interest rates and spot rates. The fair value of the derivatives
entered into to hedge our share-based compensation programs are
calculated considering risk-free interest rates, the remaining
term of the derivatives, the dividend yields, the stock price
and the volatility of our share. Fair values of our derivative
interest-rate contracts are calculated by discounting the
expected future cash flows by taking the prevailing market and
future rates for the remaining term of the contracts as a basis.
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
equity investments in public companies: Certain
of our equity investments in public companies are restricted
from being sold for a limited period. Therefore, fair value is
determined based on quoted market prices as at December 31,
deducting a discount for the disposal restriction based on the
premium for a respective put option.
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are
supported by little or no market activity and that are
significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
equity investments in private companies: For
these investments in equity instruments primarily consisting of
venture capital investments fair values could not readily be
observed as they do not have a quoted market price in an active
market. Also, calculating fair value by discounting estimated
future cash flows is not possible as a determination of cash
flows is not reliable. Therefore, for equity instruments in
private companies, a Level 3 valuation technique is not
applicable; such investments are accounted for at cost
approximating fair value with impairment being assessed based on
revenue multiples of similar companies and review of each
investments cash position, financing needs, earnings and
revenue outlook, operational performance, management and
ownership changes, and competition.
|
F-77
The following table allocates those financial assets and
liabilities that are measured at fair value in accordance with
IAS 39 either through profit or loss or other components of
equity as of December 31, 2009 to the three levels of the
fair value hierarchy according to IFRS 7.
Classification
of Financial Instruments
Financial
Instruments Measured at Cost / at Amortized
Cost
The fair values of these financial instruments are determined as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, other
non-derivative financial assets: Because the
financial assets are primarily short-term it is assumed that
their carrying values approximate their fair values. Non-
interest-bearing or below market-rate loans to third parties or
employees are discounted to the present value of estimated
future cash flows using the original effective interest rate the
respective borrower would have to pay to a bank for a similar
loan.
|
|
|
|
Bank liabilities: As the majority of our bank
liabilities are variable interest debts, their carrying values
in general approximate their fair values.
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, and other non-derivative financial
liabilities: Because these financial liabilities
are mainly short-term, their fair values approximate their
carrying values.
|
Income and Expenses,
Gains and Losses on Financial Instruments
Income and expenses, gains and losses on financial instruments
presented in the categories defined in IAS 39 are as follows:
Net
Gains/Losses on Financial Instruments
F-78
The difference between the net gains/losses on financial
instruments and the financial income, net of the respective year
is due to:
|
|
|
|
|
The financial income, net also contains a share of the result of
associates while associates are not financial
instruments and
|
|
|
|
The net gains/losses on financial instruments containing
income/expenses from the changes in the allowance for accounts
receivables which are not included in financial income, net.
|
For the unrealized gains/losses with regard to our
available-for-sale
financial assets recognized in other components of equity and
reclassified out of other components of equity, respectively,
see our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
(28) SHARE-BASED
PAYMENT PLANS
SAP has granted awards under various equity-settled and
cash-settled share-based compensation plans to its employees. In
addition, the Company offers its employees in various countries
the opportunity to buy its shares at a discount. All of these
programs are described in the following sections.
|
|
a)
|
Employee Discounted
Stock Purchase Programs (EDSP)
|
The Company offers its employees the opportunity to purchase its
shares on a monthly basis at a discount of 15%. Employees may
invest up to 10% of their gross salary in this plan. The
compensation expense recognized in 2009 for this plan amounted
to 2.8 million (2008: 3.3 million; 2007:
3.4 million). In addition, employees in Germany are
granted the opportunity to receive a 260 discount on the
purchase of SAP shares once a year under the Stock Award Program
(Vermögensbeteiligung). The total expense recorded under
this program in 2009 was 3.8 million (2008:
3.6 million; 2007: 3.3 million).
|
|
b)
|
Cash-Settled
Share-Based Payment Plans
|
SAPs stock appreciation rights are cash-settled
share-based payment plans and include the following programs,
which are described in detail below: Stock Appreciation Rights
(STAR) program, STAR PP STAR Performance Plan 2009 (STAR PP),
Incentive 2010, Virtual Stock Option Plan (SOP) program,
SOP Performance Plan 2009 (SOP PP), and BO Rights
(former Business Objects awards assumed in connection with
Business Objects acquisition in 2008).
The following parameters and assumptions were used for the
computation of the fair value at grant date:
F-79
As of December 31, 2009, the valuation of our outstanding
cash-settled plans was based on the following parameters and
assumptions:
Expected volatilities of the SAP share price are based on
implied volatilities from traded options with corresponding
lifetimes and exercise prices. For the STAR PP and the
SOP PP valuation, the expected volatility of the Tech Peer
Group Index (ISIN DE000A0YKR94) (TechPGI) is based on the
historical volatility derived from the index price history.
Expected life of the investments reflects both the contractual
term and the expected, or historical, exercise behavior.
Risk-free interest rate has a range that depends on the term and
is derived from German government bonds. Dividend yield is based
on expectations of future dividends.
In total, we recognized compensation expense of
49 million, 59 million, and
77 million for the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively for our cash-settled programs.
F-80
Changes in our plans for the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008, and 2007 were as follows:
b.1) STAR Plans
(STAR)
Under the STAR Plans we granted stock appreciation rights, the
value of which was dependent on the quarterly performance of the
SAP share.
The 2008, 2007, and 2006 STAR grant-base values of 32.69,
35.71, and 42.12, respectively, were based on the
average fair market value of one common share over the 20
business days commencing the day after the announcement of the
Companys preliminary results for the preceding fiscal
year. The valuation of the STARs is calculated quarterly over a
period of two years. Each of the eight quarterly valuations is
weighted as follows in determining the final STAR value:
F-81
Weighting
Factor for Valuation Calculation of STAR Awards Quarter
Ended
The valuations for quarters ended December 31, are
calculated on the basis of the amount by which the grant price
is exceeded by the average fair market value of one common
share, as quoted on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, over the 20
consecutive business days following the announcement date of the
Companys preliminary annual results. The other quarterly
valuations are calculated on the basis of the amount by which
the grant price is exceeded by the average fair market value of
one common share over the five consecutive business days
following the announcement of the Companys quarterly
results. Because each quarterly valuation is conducted
independently, it is unaffected by any other quarterly valuation.
The cash payout value of each STAR is calculated quarterly as
follows: (i) 100% of the first 12.50 value
appreciation for such quarter; (ii) 50% of the next
12.50 value appreciation; and (iii) 25% of any
additional value appreciation. Beneficiaries will receive
payments with respect to the 2008 STARs as follows: 50% on both
March 31, 2010 and January 31, 2011. Under the terms
of the 2007 STAR program, beneficiaries are scheduled to receive
an initial payment of 50% on March 31, 2009, and a second
installment on January 31, 2010. Beneficiaries will receive
STAR payments provided that they are still employees of the
Company on the payment dates, subject to certain exceptions.
The fair values of the STARs granted in 2007 are the same as the
fair values of the derivatives that are entered into to hedge
the compensation expense because the terms of the STAR awards
and the derivatives are the same.
b.2) STAR
Performance Plan 2009 (STAR PP)
Under the STAR Performance Plan we granted stock appreciation
rights, the value of which depends on the quarterly performance
of the SAP share relative to an industry-specific share price
index.
The STAR PP grant value of 28.00 is based on the average
fair market value of one common share over the 20 business days
commencing the day after the announcement of the Companys
preliminary results for the preceding fiscal year. As for the
STAR plans, the valuation of the STAR PP is calculated
quarterly, over a period of two years, with a similar weighting
allocated to each of the eight quarters.
The quarterly valuation under the STAR PP is based on the
outperformance of the SAP stock price compared to the TechPGI,
which includes 10 publicly traded companies in the software and
hardware industry. For that purposes, the STAR PP agreement sets
the initial value of the index (97.54) as well as the SAP
grant value (28.00 per share). The quarterly valuation
will be performed on eight defined target dates from
June 10, 2009 to March 10, 2011. The outperformance of
SAP stock price over the TechPGI price is measured over the last
10 trading days prior to the target date. The final STAR PP
value will be the sum of the eight quarterly appreciations. The
maximum total payout per STAR PP is capped at 110% of the STAR
grant value.
F-82
Beneficiaries will receive payments with respect to the STARs as
follows: 50% on both March 31, 2011 and January 31,
2012, provided that they are still employees of the Company on
the payment dates, subject to certain exceptions.
b.3) Incentive Plan
2010
Under the Incentive Plan 2010 we granted stock appreciation
rights, the value of which was dependent on the multi-year
performance of the SAP share relative to an industry-specific
share price index.
These stock appreciation rights were granted to top performers
and top executives under the Incentive Plan 2010. The plan
provides for a maximum payout of 144.60 per right if the
market capitalization of SAP AG doubles by December 31,
2010.
The rights will only be exercisable if SAPs common share
outperforms the S&P North Software-Software
Indextm
(formerly GSTI Software Index) during the period between the
issue of the rights and December 31, 2010. If the increase
between the grant value and the relevant actual market
capitalization is below 200% of the base market capitalization,
the payout per award will be based on the following scale:
b.4) SAP Stock
Option Plan 2007 (SOP)
Under the SAP Stock Option Plan we granted virtual stock
options, the value of which was dependent on the multi-year
performance of the SAP share. The awards were granted to top
executives and top performers.
The plan provides for cash settlement only and is available to
top executives and top performers. The awards granted in 2008
and 2007 have a grant-base value of 32.69 and 35.71,
respectively, which is based on the average fair market value of
one common share over the 20 business days following the
announcement date of the Companys preliminary results for
the preceding fiscal year.
Under the SOP Plan, beneficiaries receive stock
appreciation rights based on the SAP share price, which give
them the right to receive a certain amount of money by
exercising the options under the terms and conditions of this
plan. The plan provides for 11 predetermined exercise dates
every calendar year (one date per month except in April) until
the rights lapse.
Rights granted under this plan may be exercised after a vesting
period of two years starting on the grant date. The contractual
term of the virtual stock options is five years, that is, the
rights will expire five years after the grant date if not
exercised by the holder before that date.
The exercise price is 110% of the base value. Thus, the right
can only be exercised if the share price at exercise exceeds the
grant price by at least 10%. Monetary benefits will be capped at
a share price of 200% of the exercise price (78.56 for
options granted in 2007, and 71.92 for options granted in
2008).
F-83
b.5)
SOP Performance Plan 2009 (SOP PP)
Under the SOP Performance Plan 2009 we grant virtual stock
options, the value of which depends on the multi-year
performance of the SAP share relative to an industry-specific
share price index.
These rights were granted to top executives and top performers.
The rights granted under this plan may be exercised after a
vesting period of two years starting on the grant date and their
contractual term is five years.
The future payout at exercise date will be based on the
outperformance of the SAP share price since the grant date,
which is compared with the TechPGI. For that purpose, the
SOP PP 2009 agreement defines the initial value of the
TechPGI (97.54) as well as the SAP exercise price
(28.00 per share). As a consequence, exercise is only
possible if the performance of the SAP share price since grant
date has been better than the TechPGI performance. The plan
provides for 12 predetermined exercise dates every calendar year
(one date per month) until the rights lapse.
The employee benefit is capped at 110% of the exercise price,
that is, 30.80.
b.6) Business
Objects Cash-Settled Awards Replacing Pre-Acquisition Business
Objects Awards (BO Rights)
Prior to being acquired by SAP, the employees of Business
Objects companies were granted equity-settled awards giving
rights to Business Objects shares. Following the Business
Objects acquisition in 2008, the Business Objects shares were no
longer publicly traded and mechanisms were implemented to allow
the employees to cash out their awards either by receiving cash
instead of Business Objects shares (cash payment mechanism or
CPM) or by receiving Business Objects shares that they
subsequently sell to SAP France (liquidity agreement mechanism
or LAM). In substance, the implementation of CPM and LAM
resulted in a conversion of the equity-settled awards to
cash-settled share-based payment awards (replacing awards) which
replaced the stock options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)
originally granted (replaced awards).
The replaced awards had vesting periods in the range two to five
years and contractual terms in the range two to ten years.
The replacing awards closely mirror the terms of the replaced
awards (including conditions such as exercise price and vesting)
except that
|
|
|
|
|
The replaced awards were planned to be settled by issuing equity
instruments whereas the replacing awards are settled in cash
either via the CPM or via the LAM.
|
|
|
|
The replaced awards were indexed to Business Objects share
price whereas the replacing awards are indexed to SAPs
share price as follows: SAPs offering price for Business
Objects shares during the tender offer (42) is divided by
SAP AGs share price at the tender offer closing date
(32.28) and the result is multiplied by the weighted
average closing price of the SAP share during the 20 trading
days preceding the exercise or disposition date.
|
The benefit resulting from the stock option exercise or the RSU
vesting is either paid directly to the employees (in countries
where the CPM applies) or the employees continue to receive
shares of Business Objects on stock options exercise or RSU
vesting (in countries where the LAM applies). In these cases,
the employees have a put option to resell the shares to SAP
within 3 months from exercise, while SAP has a call option
on these shares.
In both cases, these awards are accounted for as a cash-settled
award because the obligation to the employee is ultimately
settled in cash, both under the CPM and the LAM mechanism.
F-84
|
|
c)
|
Equity-Settled
Share-Based Payment Plans
|
Equity-settled plans include the Stock Option Plan 2002 (Note
(28) c.1) and the Long Term Incentive Plan 2000 (Note
(28) c.2).
As a result of the issuance on December 21, 2006, of bonus
shares at a
one-to-three
ratio under a capital increase from corporate funds, on exercise
each stock option issued under the Stock Option Plan 2002 or
under the LTI 2000 Plan now entitles its beneficiary to four
shares. For better comparability with the price of SAP stock
since December 21, 2006, the following tables have been
adjusted to show the number of shares to which the options or
bonds entitle the holder rather than the number of rights.
Consequently, the strike prices shown are prices per share and
not per option. The number of shares shown in the table is four
times the number of options, and the exercise price for an
option is four times the price per share shown in the table.
c.1) Stock Option
Plan 2002
Under the Stock Option Plan 2002 we granted stock options, the
value of which was dependent on the multi-year performance of
the SAP share. The last grants under the Stock Option Plan 2002
occurred in 2006. The awards were granted to top executives and
top performers.
Each stock option granted under the SAP SOP 2002 plan
entitles its holder to subscribe to four shares of the
Companys common stock by tendering payment of an exercise
price per option equal to a base price and a premium of 10% of
the base price. The base price is calculated as the average
market price of SAP AGs common share on the Frankfurt
Stock Exchange during the five trading days preceding the issue
of the respective stock option, calculated on the basis of the
arithmetic mean of the closing auction prices of the stock. The
options cannot be exercised at an exercise price that is less
than the closing auction stock price on the day before the issue
date. The contractual term of the stock options is five years.
The fair value of such options was assessed using the
Black-Scholes Merton option pricing model.
For options granted to members of the Executive Board during and
after February 2004, the SAP SOP 2002 terms cap the
subscription rights if the Supervisory Board determines that an
option holder would make a windfall profit on exercising the
rights. A windfall profit is defined for this purpose as a
profit that, when combined with the profit from earlier
exercises of awards issued to the option holder at the same
issuing date, exceeds twice the product of (i) the number
of awards received by the option holder and (ii) the
exercise price.
F-85
Activities in 2008 and 2009 under SAP SOP 2002 were as
follows:
Activities
Under SAP SOP 2002
As all the options issued under SAP SOP 2002 were fully
vested in prior years, we incurred no regularly scheduled
compensation expense for this plan in 2009 (2008:
0.8 million; 2007: 26.0 million). The
total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 was less than
1 million, 21 million, and
59 million, respectively.
In December 2009, we modified the exercise conditions of SAP
SOP 2002 of all of the remaining outstanding options
(5,382,780) granted in March 2005. The final exercise date for
this tranche was February 1, 2010. At the time the
modification was implemented, we anticipated that the last
exercise notice had to be submitted by December 15 due to the
quiet period before publication of the fourth-quarter interim
results. The terms of the original plan required that in cases
where exercise notice had been given, the options had to be
exercised even if the stock price fell below the exercise price
subsequent to providing such notice. Participants risked taking
a loss as a result of the long wait between the point when the
notice was required to be provided and the actual exercise date.
To prevent such losses, the procedure for exercising the options
was amended for the final exercise date. Based on the amendment,
these options will only be exercised if the resulting SAP shares
can be sold for a price not lower than 33.66 (strike price
of 33.55 plus 0.3% administration fees at the exercise
date). Based on the provisions of IFRS 2, this plan amendment
was measured at fair value at the modification date resulting in
recording an incremental expense of 2.1 million in
2009.
F-86
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding as at December 31, 2009 and 2008, under SAP
SOP 2002:
Stock
Options Outstanding unter SAP SOP 2002 as at
December 31, 2009, and 2008
The weighted average share price of SAP AG common shares on the
SAP SOP 2002 exercise dates in 2009, 2008, and 2007 was
34.19, 34.32 and 37.87, respectively.
c.2) Long Term
Incentive 2000 Plan (LTI 2000 Plan)
Under the LTI 2000 Plan we granted convertible bonds, the value
of which were dependent on the multi-year performance of the SAP
share and stock options, the value of which were dependent on
the multi-year performance of the SAP share relative to an
industry-specific share price index. The last grants under the
LTI 2000 Plan occurred in 2002. The awards were granted to top
executives and top performers.
The LTI 2000 Plan offered a choice between convertible bonds,
stock options, or a 50% mixture of each. Beneficiaries were
offered 25% more units if they chose stock options than if they
chose convertible bonds. Under the LTI 2000 Plan, each
convertible bond having a 1 nominal value is convertible
into four common shares over a maximum of 10 years, subject
to service vesting requirements. The conversion price is equal
to the market price of a common share as quoted on the Xetra
trading system on the day immediately preceding the grant. Each
stock option may be exercised in exchange for four common shares
over a maximum of 10 years, subject to the same vesting
requirements. The exercise price varies with the outperformance
of the common share price appreciation against the appreciation
of the S&P North Software-Software
Indextm
(formerly GSTI Software Index) from the day immediately
preceding grant to the day on which the exercise price is
determined. Both the convertible bonds and stock options vested
as follows: 33% after two years from date of grant, 33% after
three years, and 34% after four years. Forfeited convertible
bonds or stock options are disqualified and may not be reissued.
In total, 49.2 million conversion and subscription rights
were issued under the LTI 2000 Plan through March 14, 2002.
At the 2002 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, the
Companys shareholders revoked the authorization to issue
further convertible bonds and stock options under the LTI 2000
Plan.
F-87
A summary of the LTI 2000 Plan activity for both convertible
bonds and stock options was as follows in 2008 and 2009:
Activities
under the LTI Plan 2000
All convertible bonds and stock options outstanding as at
December, 31, 2009 are exercisable.
F-88
The following tables summarize information about stock options
and convertible bonds outstanding as at December 31, 2009:
LTI 2000
Plan Awards Outstanding as at December 31, 2009
The weighted average share price of SAP AG common shares on the
LTI 2000 Plan option exercise dates in 2009, 2008, and 2007 was
31.30, 35.59 and 37.97, respectively. The
weighted average price of SAP AG common shares on the LTI 2000
Plan convertible bond exercise dates in 2008 and 2007 was
37.44 and 39.14, respectively (no exercise in 2009).
Due to the fact that all LTI 2000 Plans were fully vested during
2006, we recorded no compensation expense in 2007 and
thereafter. The fair value of the options and convertible bonds
granted under that plan was assessed using the Black-Scholes
Merton option pricing model. The total intrinsic value of stock
options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008, and 2007 was 8.9 million,
5.1 million, and 4.9 million,
respectively. The total intrinsic value of convertible bonds
exercised during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
was 0 million and 0.5 million,
respectively (no exercise in 2009).
|
|
(29)
|
SEGMENT AND
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
|
Our internal reporting system produces reports in which business
activities are presented in a variety of ways, for example, by
line of business, geography and areas of responsibility of the
individual Executive Board members (Board areas). Based on these
reports, the Executive Board, which is responsible for assessing
the performance of various company components and making
resource allocation decisions as our Chief Operating Decision
Maker (CODM), evaluates business activities in a number of
different ways. We have determined that
F-89
our lines of business constitute operating segments. We have
three reportable operating segments which are organized based on
products and services: Product, Consulting, and Training.
The Product segment is primarily engaged in marketing and
licensing our software products, performing custom software
development services for customers, and providing support
services for our software products. The Consulting segment
performs various professional services, mainly implementation of
our software products. The Training segment provides educational
services on the use of our software products and related topics
for customers and partners.
Our management reporting system reports our inter-segment
services as cost reductions and does not track them as internal
revenue. Inter-segment services mainly represent utilization of
manpower resources of one segment by another segment on a
project-by-project
basis. Inter-segment services are charged based on internal cost
rates including certain indirect overhead costs but without
profit margin.
The accounting policies applied in the internal reporting to our
CODM are based on accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States, U.S. GAAP (continuing operations) and
differ from IFRS accounting principles described in Note
(3) as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
The internal reporting to our CODM generally attributes revenue
to the segment that is responsible for the related transaction
regardless of revenue classification in our income statement.
Thus, for example, the Training segments revenue includes
certain amounts classified as software revenue in our
Consolidated Income Statements.
|
|
|
|
The internal reporting to our CODM excludes share-based
compensation expenses and since 2009
restructuring costs on segment level. These expenses are managed
and reviewed at Group level only.
|
|
|
|
Differences in foreign currency translations result in
deviations between the amounts reported internally to our CODM
and the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
|
|
|
|
The revenue numbers in the internal reporting to our CODM
include the support revenue that would have been reflected by
acquired entities had it remained a stand-alone entity but which
are not reflected as revenue under IFRS as a result of purchase
accounting for support contracts in effect at the time of an
acquisition.
|
|
|
|
The income measures in the internal reporting to our CODM
include the full amount of support revenue and exclude the
following acquisition-related charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense/impairment charges of intangibles acquired
in business combinations and certain stand-alone acquisitions of
intellectual property.
|
|
|
|
Expenses from purchased in-process research and development.
|
|
|
|
Restructuring expenses and settlements of pre-existing
relationships.
|
|
|
|
Acquisition-related third-party costs that are required to be
expensed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2009 we have modified the disclosure of the allocation of
depreciation and amortization expense to our segments. For
comparison purposes, the 2008 and 2007 figures in the tables
presented have been adjusted accordingly.
|
F-90
Segment
Revenue and Results
F-91
Reconciliation
of Revenues and Segment Results
Segment Revenues
Since our segments are organized on the basis of products and
services, the amounts of external revenue for the Product,
Consulting, and Training segments are materially consistent with
the amounts of Software and software-related service revenue,
Consulting revenue, and Training revenue, respectively, as
reported in the Consolidated Income Statements, except for the
differences in accounting policies discussed above.
External revenue from activities outside of the reportable
segments (2009: 7 million; 2008:
16 million; 2007: 11 million) mainly
represents revenue incidental to our main business activities
and minor currency translation differences.
Segment Result
Segment result reflects operating expenses directly attributable
or reasonably allocable to the segments, including costs of
revenue, and sales and marketing expenses. Costs that are not
directly attributable or reasonably allocable to the segments
such as administration and other corporate expenses are not
included in the segment result. Development expense is excluded
from the segment result because our CODM reviews segment
performance without taking development expense into account.
Depreciation and amortization expenses reflected in the segment
result include the amounts directly attributable to each segment.
Development expense and administration and other corporate
expense disclosed in the reconciliation above are based on a
management view and do not equal the amounts under the
corresponding caption in the Consolidated Income Statements. The
differences are mainly due to the fact that the management view
focuses on organizational structures and cost centers rather
than cost classification to functional areas.
F-92
Segment
Assets/Liabilities
Segment asset/liability information is not provided to our CODM.
Goodwill by reportable segment is disclosed in Note (16).
Geographic
Information
The following tables present revenue by location of customers
and by location of SAP entities, which reflects the location of
our subsidiary responsible for the sale, and information about
certain long-lived assets detailed by geographic region.
Total
Revenue by Location
|
|
|
1)
|
|
Europe, Middle East, Africa
|
Software
and Software-Related Service Revenue by Location
|
|
|
1)
|
|
Europe, Middle East, Africa
|
F-93
Software
Revenue by Location
|
|
|
1)
|
|
Europe, Middle East, Africa
|
Property,
Plant, and Equipment and Intangible Assets
|
|
|
1)
|
|
Europe, Middle East, Africa
|
F-94
|
|
|
|
|
Membership on supervisory boards and other comparable
|
|
|
governing bodies of enterprises, other than subsidiaries
of
|
EXECUTIVE BOARD
|
|
SAP on December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Bill McDermott (from February 7, 2010)
Co-Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Board of Directors, ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA Board of
Directors, Under Armour, Inc., Baltimore, MD, USA Board of
Directors, PAETEC Communications, Inc.,
Fairport, NY, USA
|
Jim Hagemann Snabe (from February 7, 2010)
|
|
|
Co-Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Board of Directors, Linkage A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark Board of
Directors, Mannaz A/S, Horsholm, Denmark (until September 23,
2009) Board of Directors, Thrane & Thrane A/S, Lyngby,
Denmark Supervisory Board, Crossgate AG, Munich, Germany
|
Dr. Werner Brandt
Chief Financial Officer
Labor Relations Director (acting)
|
|
Supervisory Board, Deutsche Lufthansa AG, Frankfurt am Main,
Germany Supervisory Board, QIAGEN N.V., Venlo, the Netherlands
Supervisory Board, Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG, Heidelberg,
Germany
|
Gerhard Oswald
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vishal Sikka (from February 7, 2010)
Chief Technology Officer
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Claus E. Heinrich (until May 31, 2009)
Labor Relations Director (until December 31, 2008)
Global Human Resources (until December 31, 2008)
Internal SAP IT Organisation (until
December 31, 2008)
SAP Labs Network (until December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann (until May 31, 2009)
Co-Chief Executive Officer
Overall responsibility for SAPs
strategy and business development,
Internal Audit, Top Talent Management
|
|
Supervisory Board, Deutsche Bank AG, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Supervisory Board, Münchener
Rückversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG, Munich, Germany Board of
Directors, Nokia Corporation, Espoo, Finland Supervisory Board,
Deutsche Post AG, Bonn, Germany (from March 10, 2009) Board of
Directors, Wipro Ltd., Bangalore, India (from October 27, 2009)
|
|
|
|
Erwin Gunst (until January 31, 2010)
Chief Operating Officer Labor Relations Director Company
Operations and Processes, Global Human Resources, Internal SAP
IT, SAP Labs Network
|
|
|
|
|
|
Léo Apotheker (until February 7, 2010)
Chief Executive Officer Overall responsibility for
SAPs strategy, Marketing, Industry Solutions, Internal
Audit, Global Communications
|
|
Supervisory Board, AXA, Paris, France Supervisory Board,
Schneider Electric, Rueil-Malmaison, France
|
|
|
|
John Schwarz (until February 11, 2010)
SAP BusinessObjects business unit, Global
Ecosystem & Partner Group, Corporate Development
|
|
Board of Directors, Synopsys, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA
|
F-95
|
|
|
|
|
Membership on other supervisory boards and comparable
|
SUPERVISORY BOARD
|
|
governing bodies of enterprises other than SAP on
December 31, 2009
|
|
Prof. Dr. h.c. mult. Hasso Plattner
(2),(4),(5),(7),(8),(9)
Chairman
|
|
|
Lars
Lamadé(1),
(4),(7)
Deputy Chairman
Project Manager Service & Support
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pekka Ala-Pietilä
(5),(8),(9)
Co-founder and CEO Blyk Ltd. London, UK
|
|
Board of Directors, Pöyry Plc, Vantaa, Finland
Board of Directors, CVON Group Limited, London, UK
Board of Directors, CVON Limited, London, UK
Board of Directors, CVON Innovations Limited, London, UK
Board of Directors, Blyk Services Oy, Helsinki, Finland
Board of Directors, CVON Innovation Services Oy, Turku,
Finland
Board of Directors, CVON Future Limited, London, UK
Board of Directors, HelloSoft Inc., San José, USA
Board of Directors, Blyk (NL) Ltd., London, UK
Board of Directors, Blyk (DE) Ltd., London, UK
Board of Directors, Blyk (ES) Ltd., London, UK
Board of Directors, Blyk (BE) Ltd., London, UK
Board of Directors, Blyk.nl NV, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Board of Directors, Blyk.be SA, Hoeilaart, Belgium
Board of Directors, Blyk International Ltd., London, UK
(from December 10, 2009)
|
Thomas Bamberger
(1),(3)
COO Global Service & Support
|
|
|
Panagiotis Bissiritsas
(1),(2),(6)
Support Expert
|
|
|
Willi Burbach
(1),(5),(7)
Developer
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Wilhelm Haarmann
(2),(6),(7)
Attorney-at-law,
certified public auditor, certified tax advisor HAARMANN
Partnerschaftsgesellschaft, Rechtsanwälte, Steuerberater,
Wirtschaftsprüfer, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
|
|
Supervisory Board, Aareon AG, Mainz, Germany (until July 1,
2009) Supervisory Board, Vodafone Holding GmbH, Düsseldorf,
Germany
|
Peter Koop
(1),(5),(7)
Industry Business Development Expert
|
|
|
Christiane Kuntz-Mayr
(1),(5)
Deputy Chairperson of the Works Council of SAP AG
|
|
|
Bernard Liautaud (5)
General Partner Balderton Capital, London, UK
|
|
Board of Directors, Clinical Solutions Holdings Ltd.,
Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK Board of Directors, nlyte Software
Ltd., London, UK Board of Directors, Talend SA, Suresnes, France
Board of Directors der Cap Gemini, Paris, France (from April 30,
2009) Board of Directors, Quickbridge (UK) Ltd., London, UK
Board of Directors, Scansafe, Inc., Delaware, USA (from July 6,
2009 until December 4, 2009)
|
Dr. Gerhard Maier
(1),(2),(3)
Development Project Manager
|
|
|
Dr. h. c. Hartmut Mehdorn
(4),(6)
Independent Consultant
|
|
Supervisory Board, DB Netz AG, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (until
April 30, 2009) Supervisory Board, DEVK Deutsche Eisenbahn
Versicherung Lebensversicherungsverein a.G., and DEVK Deutsche
Eisenbahn Versicherung Sach- und HUK-Versicherungsverein a.G.,
Cologne, Germany (until June 5, 2009) Supervisory Board,
Dresdner Bank AG, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (until May 11,
2009) Board of Directors, Air Berlin PLC, Rickmansworth, UK
(from July 1, 2009) Advisory Board, Fiege-Gruppe, Greven,
Germany (from August 1, 2009)
|
F-96
|
|
|
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr. h. c. Dr.-Ing. E. h. Joachim
Milberg(2),(3),(5),(7),(8)
Chairman of the Supervisory Board BMW AG, Munich,
Germany
|
|
Supervisory Board, Bertelsmann AG, Gütersloh, Germany
Supervisory Board, Festo AG, Esslingen, Germany Board of
Directors, Deere & Company, Moline, Illinois, USA
Supervisory Board, ZF Friedrichshafen AG, Friedrichshafen,
Germany
|
Dr. Erhard Schipporeit
(3),(9)
Management Consultant
|
|
Supervisory Board, Talanx AG, Hanover, Germany Supervisory
Board, Deutsche Börse AG, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Supervisory Board, HDI V.a.G., Hanover, Germany Supervisory
Board, Hannover Rückversicherung AG, Hanover, Germany
Supervisory Board, Career Concept AG, Munich, Germany (until
June 9, 209) Supervisory Board, TUI Travel PLC, London, UK
Supervisory Board, Fuchs Petrolub AG, Mannheim Board of
Directors, Fidelity Advisor World Funds, Bermuda (from October
1, 2009) Board of Directors, Fidelity Funds SICAV, Luxemburg
(from October 1, 2009)
|
Stefan
Schulz(1),(4),(5),
(6)
Development Project Manager
|
|
|
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr.-Ing. E. h. Klaus Wucherer (5)
Managing Director of Dr. Klaus Wucherer Innovations-
und Technologieberatung GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
|
|
Supervisory Board, BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH,
Munich, Germany Supervisory Board, Dürr AG,
Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany (from November 3, 2009)
Supervisory Board, Infineon Technologies AG, Munich, Germany
Supervisory Board, LEONI AG, Nürnberg, Germany
|
Information as at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
(1) Elected by the employees
|
|
(6) Member of the Companys Finance and Investment Committee
|
(2) Member of the Companys Compensation Committee
|
|
(7) Member of the Companys General Committee
|
(3) Member of the Companys Audit Committee
|
|
(8) Member of the Companys Nomination Committee
|
(4) Member of the Companys Mediation Committee
|
|
(9) Member of the Companys Special Committee
|
(5) Member of the Companys Technology and Strategy
|
|
|
Committee
|
|
|
The total compensation of the Executive Board members for the
years 2009, 2008, and 2007 is as follows:
Executive
Board Compensation
The share-based compensation is based on the grant date fair
value of the 785,060 virtual stock options (2008: 628,329; 2007:
486,594), issued to Executive Board members during the year. The
expense in accordance with IFRS 2 for instruments held by
Executive Board members in connection with share-based
compensation was 3 million in 2009 (2008:
1 million; 2007: 4 million). In 2009, the
projected benefit obligation for pensions to Executive Board
members increased 1 million to 15 million
(2008: 14 million; 2007: 17 million). The
annual pension entitlement of the members of the Executive Board
on reaching age 60 based on entitlements from
performance-based and salary-linked plans amounted to
1 million as at December 31, 2009
(1 million as at December 31, 2008;
1 million as at December 31, 2007).
Subject to the adoption of the dividend resolution by the
shareholders at the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders on
June 8, 2010, the total annual compensation of the
Supervisory Board members amounted to
F-97
2 million (2008: 2 million; 2007:
2 million). This amount includes 1 million
(2008: 1 million; 2007: 1 million) fixed,
1 million (2008: 1 million; 2007:
1 million) variable compensation, and
0.09 million (2008: 0.1 million; 2007:
0.08 million) committee remuneration. The Supervisory
Board members do not receive any share-based compensation for
their services. As far as members who are employee
representatives on the Supervisory Board receive share-based
compensation: such compensation is for their services as
employees only and is unrelated to their status as members of
the Supervisory Board.
During fiscal year 2009, payments to former Executive Board
members were 1 million (2008: 1 million;
2007: 1 million). The projected benefit obligation of
pensions as at December 31, 2009, for former Executive
Board members was 16 million (2008:
12 million; 2007: 12 million).
SAP did not grant any compensation advance or credit to, or
enter into any commitment for the benefit of any member of the
Executive Board or Supervisory Board in fiscal year 2009, 2008,
or 2007 other than the agreements described above.
On December 31, 2009, members of the Executive Board held a
total of 15,336 SAP shares (December 31, 2008: 88,527;
December 31, 2007: 86,515), and members of the Supervisory
Board held a total of 127,193,136 SAP shares (December 31,
2008: 128,995,306; December 31, 2007: 128,993,710).
|
|
(31)
|
RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
|
Certain Executive Board and Supervisory Board members of SAP AG
currently hold, or held within the last year, positions of
significant responsibility with other entities as presented in
Note (30). We have relationships with certain of these entities
in the ordinary course of business, whereby we buy and sell a
wide variety of products and services at prices believed to be
consistent with those negotiated at arms length between
unrelated parties.
After his move from SAPs Executive Board to SAPs
Supervisory Board in May 2003, Hasso Plattner entered into a
contract with SAP AG under which he provides consulting services
for SAP. The contract provides for the reimbursement of
out-of-pocket
expenses only which were immaterial to SAP in all periods
presented.
Hasso Plattner is the sole proprietor of H.P. Beteiligungs GmbH,
which itself holds 90% of Bramasol, Inc., Palo Alto, United
States. Bramasol is an SAP partner with which we generated
revenues which were immaterial to SAP in all periods presented.
The amounts charged to SAP for the services of Bramasol were
immaterial to SAP in all periods presented.
Wilhelm Haarmann practices as a partner of the law firm HAARMANN
Partnerschaftsgesellschaft in Frankfurt am Main, Germany. The
amounts charged to SAP for the services of HAARMANN
Partnerschaftsgesellschaft were immaterial to SAP in all periods
presented.
|
|
(32)
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT
FEES AND SERVICES
|
At SAP AGs Annual General Meeting of Shareholders held on
May 19, 2009, SAPs shareholders mandated KPMG AG
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft to serve as SAP AGs
independent auditor for 2009. KPMG
F-98
AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft and other firms in the
global KPMG network billed the following fees to SAP for audit
and other professional services related to 2009 and the previous
years:
Fees for
Audit and Other Professional Services
Audit fees are the aggregate fees billed by KPMG for the audit
of our Consolidated Financial Statements as well as audits of
statutory financial statements of SAP AG and its subsidiaries.
Audit-related fees are fees charged by KPMG for assurance and
related services that are reasonably related to the performance
of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not
reported under audit fees. This category comprises fees billed
for accounting advice on actual or contemplated transactions and
other agreed procedures. Tax fees are fees for professional
services rendered by KPMG for tax advice on transfer pricing,
restructuring and tax compliance on current, past or
contemplated transactions. The all other fees category includes
other support services, such as training and advisory services
on issues unrelated to accounting and taxes.
For services provided by KPMG AG
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft and its affiliates we
recorded expenses of 3.1 million in 2009 (2008:
4.1 million; 2007: 2.7 million) of which
2.8 million (2008: 3.3 million; 2007:
2.5 million) relate to audit services,
0.2 million (2008: 0.4 million; 2007:
0.0 million) relate to audit related services,
0.1 million (2008: 0.2 million; 2007:
0.0 million) relate to tax services, and
0.0 million (2008: 0.1 million; 2007:
0.2 million) relate to other services.
(33) SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
After December 31, 2009, the following changes took place
on our Executive Board:
|
|
|
|
|
On February 7, 2010, we announced that the Supervisory
Board had reached a mutual agreement with CEO Léo Apotheker
not to extend his contract as a member of the Executive Board.
Léo Apotheker resigned as CEO and from the Executive Board
with immediate effect.
|
|
|
|
On the same day, Bill McDermott (head of our global field
organization) and Jim Hagemann Snabe (head of business solutions
and technology) were appointed as Co-CEOs.
|
|
|
|
At the same time, Vishal Sikka, our chief technology officer,
was appointed to the Executive Board.
|
|
|
|
Shortly thereafter, on February 11, 2010, SAP announced
that Gerhard Oswald, Executive Board member responsible for our
global service and support, had also been appointed chief
operating officer, replacing Erwin Gunst, who stepped down for
health reasons.
|
|
|
|
At the same time, the Supervisory Board accepted the resignation
of John Schwarz, the member of the Executive Board responsible
for SAP BusinessObjects, our ecosystem, and corporate
development, with immediate effect.
|
F-99
(34) SUBSIDIARIES,
ASSOCIATES, AND OTHER EQUITY INVESTMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit/Loss(-)
|
|
|
Total Equity
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
|
After Tax for
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
Employees as
|
|
as of December 31, 2009
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
in
20091)
|
|
|
20091)
|
|
|
12/31/20091)
|
|
|
of
12/31/20092)
|
|
Name and Location of Company
|
|
%
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GERMANY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAP Deutschland AG & Co. KG,
Walldorf9)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
2.438.214
|
|
|
|
553.229
|
|
|
|
1.185.136
|
|
|
|
4.628
|
|
Steeb Anwendungssysteme GmbH,
Abstatt8),9)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
62.584
|
|
|
|
2.660
|
|
|
|
11.984
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
SAP Puerto Rico GmbH,
Walldorf7)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
12.694
|
|
|
|
−1.612
|
|
|
|
822
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
SAP Passau GmbH & Co. KG,
Passau9)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
2.679
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
SAF Germany GmbH,
Konstanz3)4)
|
|
|
70,9
|
|
|
|
1.003
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
−421
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
SAP Beteiligungs GmbH, Walldorf
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
SAP Dritte Beteiligungs- und Vermögensverwaltung GmbH,
Walldorf4),5),9)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
48.588
|
|
|
|
527.070
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
SAP Projektverwaltungs- und Beteiligungs GmbH,
Walldorf4),5),9)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
19.775
|
|
|
|
329.179
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
SAP Retail Solutions Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH, Walldorf
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
12.915
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
SAP Portals Europe GmbH,
Walldorf4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
123.234
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
SAP Foreign Holdings GmbH, Walldorf
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
OutlookSoft Deutschland GmbH,
Walldorf4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
−128
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Wicommunications GmbH,
Munich4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
SAP Investment- und Beteiligungs GmbH, Walldorf
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
SAP Hosting Beteiligungs GmbH, St. Leon-Rot
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
SAP Zweite Beteiligungs- und Vermögensverwaltung GmbH,
Walldorf5),9)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
SAP Vierte Beteiligungs- und Vermögensverwaltung GmbH,
Walldorf
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
SAP Portals Holding Beteiligungs GmbH,
Walldorf4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
−3.761
|
|
|
|
925.295
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
SAP Erste Beteiligungs- und Vermögensverwaltung GmbH,
Walldorf5),9)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
−29.549
|
|
|
|
804.562
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
REST OF EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST, AFRICA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Objects Software Limited, Dublin,
Ireland4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
595.179
|
|
|
|
40.365
|
|
|
|
689.553
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
SAP (UK) Limited, Feltham, United Kingdom
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
511.257
|
|
|
|
169.698
|
|
|
|
53.892
|
|
|
|
1.040
|
|
SAP France Holding S.A., Paris, France
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
430.200
|
|
|
|
61.954
|
|
|
|
4.793.481
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
SAP (Schweiz) AG, Biel, Switzerland
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
422.569
|
|
|
|
61.558
|
|
|
|
95.729
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
S.A.P. Nederland B.V., s-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
314.003
|
|
|
|
45.440
|
|
|
|
285.142
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
SAP Italia Sistemi Applicazioni Prodotti in Data Processing
S.p.A., Milan,
Italy4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
305.545
|
|
|
|
24.628
|
|
|
|
213.148
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
SAP France S.A., Paris, France
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
248.598
|
|
|
|
123.188
|
|
|
|
1.709.117
|
|
|
|
1.482
|
|
Spain4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
225.282
|
|
|
|
28.221
|
|
|
|
150.445
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
Limited Liability Company SAP CIS, Moscow, Russia
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
197.626
|
|
|
|
19.773
|
|
|
|
109.594
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
SAP Belgium Systems Applications and Products NV/SA,
Brussels,
Belgium4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
172.912
|
|
|
|
13.235
|
|
|
|
85.300
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
SAP Österreich GmbH, Vienna, Austria
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
171.946
|
|
|
|
20.087
|
|
|
|
25.046
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
Systems Applications Products South Africa (Proprietary)
Limited, Johannesburg, South
Africa4)
8)
|
|
|
89,5
|
|
|
|
147.018
|
|
|
|
15.804
|
|
|
|
23.781
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
F-100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit/Loss(-)
|
|
|
Total Equity
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
|
After Tax for
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
Employees as
|
|
as of December 31, 2009
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
in
20091)
|
|
|
20091)
|
|
|
12/31/20091)
|
|
|
of
12/31/20092)
|
|
Name and Location of Company
|
|
%
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAP Danmark A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
136.501
|
|
|
|
18.036
|
|
|
|
42.051
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
SAP Svenska Aktiebolag, Stockholm, Sweden
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
99.866
|
|
|
|
6.005
|
|
|
|
23.513
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
SAP ČR, spol. s r.o., Prague, Czech Republic
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
93.644
|
|
|
|
12.784
|
|
|
|
35.192
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
SAP Finland Oy, Espoo, Finland
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
91.828
|
|
|
|
11.689
|
|
|
|
54.110
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
SAP Norge AS, Lysaker, Norway
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
59.398
|
|
|
|
3.071
|
|
|
|
27.278
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
SAP Service and Support (Ireland) Limited, Dublin, Ireland
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
54.731
|
|
|
|
1.639
|
|
|
|
25.692
|
|
|
|
639
|
|
SAP Polska Sp. z o.o., Warsaw, Poland
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
53.798
|
|
|
|
5.660
|
|
|
|
22.317
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
SAP Middle East and North Africa L.L.C., Dubai, United Arab
Emirates
7)
|
|
|
49,0
|
|
|
|
52.596
|
|
|
|
−9.148
|
|
|
|
37.041
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
SAP Portugal Sistemas, Aplicações e
Produtos Informáticos, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda.,
Paço de Arcos, Portugal
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
50.632
|
|
|
|
3.883
|
|
|
|
22.436
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Business Objects (UK) Limited, London, United
Kingdom4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
50.330
|
|
|
|
31.455
|
|
|
|
30.600
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
SAP Portals Israel Ltd., Raanana,
Israel4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
47.084
|
|
|
|
12.529
|
|
|
|
60.994
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
SAP Hungary Rendszerek, Alkalmazások és Termékek
az Adatfeldolgozásban Informatikai Kft., Budapest, Hungary
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
45.634
|
|
|
|
3.374
|
|
|
|
17.785
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
SAP Labs Israel Ltd., Raanana, Israel
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
42.109
|
|
|
|
2.129
|
|
|
|
9.015
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
SAP Türkiye Yazilim Üretim ve Ticaret A.S., Istanbul,
Turkey
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
36.044
|
|
|
|
2.225
|
|
|
|
13.711
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
SAP Slovensko s.r.o., Bratislava, Slovakia
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
35.524
|
|
|
|
2.289
|
|
|
|
16.865
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
SAP HELLAS SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS AND DATA PROCESSING S.A, Athens,
Greece
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
32.566
|
|
|
|
2.159
|
|
|
|
5.522
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
SAP LABS France S.A.S., Mougins, France
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
25.269
|
|
|
|
1.597
|
|
|
|
10.911
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
Systems Applications Products Africa Region (Proprietary)
Limited, Johannesburg, South Africa
4)8)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
19.276
|
|
|
|
−187
|
|
|
|
11.740
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
SAP Labs Bulgaria EOOD, Sofia, Bulgaria
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
17.804
|
|
|
|
811
|
|
|
|
3.568
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
SAP Business Services Center Europe, s.r.o., Prague, Czech
Republic
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
17.043
|
|
|
|
1.165
|
|
|
|
5.547
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
SAP Saudi Arabia Software Trading Limited, Riyadh, Kingdom of
Saudi Arabia
|
|
|
51,0
|
|
|
|
15.621
|
|
|
|
810
|
|
|
|
8.541
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
SAF Simulation, Analysis and Forecasting AG, Tägerwilen,
Switzerland3)
|
|
|
70,9
|
|
|
|
15.342
|
|
|
|
526
|
|
|
|
30.070
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
SAP Romania SRL, Bucharest, Romania
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
15.022
|
|
|
|
1.943
|
|
|
|
2.501
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
SAP Saudi Arabia Software Services Limited, Riyadh, Kingdom of
Saudi Arabia
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
12.662
|
|
|
|
966
|
|
|
|
25.531
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
SAP Israel Ltd., Raanana, Israel
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
12.489
|
|
|
|
−778
|
|
|
|
−3.188
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
SAP sistemi, aplikacije in produkti za obdelavo podatkov d.o.o.,
Ljubljana, Slovenia
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
11.667
|
|
|
|
1.054
|
|
|
|
5.238
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Limited Liability Company SAP Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
8.851
|
|
|
|
−2.369
|
|
|
|
−1.080
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
Highdeal S.A., Caen,
France3)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
8.784
|
|
|
|
−1.367
|
|
|
|
24.416
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
SAP EMEA Inside Sales S.L., Barcelona, Spain
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
8.582
|
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
1.201
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
SAP d.o.o., Zagreb, Croatia
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
8.438
|
|
|
|
−822
|
|
|
|
607
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
SAP Labs Finland Oy, Espoo,
Finland4)8)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
7.379
|
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
|
45.320
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
F-101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit/Loss(-)
|
|
|
Total Equity
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
|
After Tax for
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
Employees as
|
|
as of December 31, 2009
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
in
20091)
|
|
|
20091)
|
|
|
12/31/20091)
|
|
|
of
12/31/20092)
|
|
Name and Location of Company
|
|
%
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merlin Systems Oy, Espoo,
Finland4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
7.246
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
1.401
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Limited Liability Company SAP Kazakhstan, Almaty, Kazakhstan
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
7.152
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
1.102
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Systems Applications Products Nigeria Limited, Abuja,
Nigeria4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
6.171
|
|
|
|
984
|
|
|
|
822
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
SAP West Balkans d.o.o., Belgrade, Serbia
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
6.071
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
989
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
SAP Ireland Limited, Dublin, Ireland
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
5.719
|
|
|
|
−262
|
|
|
|
−1.958
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
SAP CYPRUS Ltd, Nicosia,
Cyprus4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
2.893
|
|
|
|
−14
|
|
|
|
−1.821
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
SAP BULGARIA EOOD, Sofia,
Bulgaria4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
2.798
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
980
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Crystal Decisions France S.A.S., Levallois-Perret,
France4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
2.575
|
|
|
|
−56
|
|
|
|
7.324
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
SAP UAB (Lithuania), Vilnius, Lithuania
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
1.701
|
|
|
|
−378
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
SAF Simulation, Analysis and Forecasting Slovakia s.r.o.,
Bratislava,
Slovakia3),4)
|
|
|
70,9
|
|
|
|
1.199
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
SAP Estonia OÜ, Tallinn, Estonia
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
1.140
|
|
|
|
−6
|
|
|
|
−1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
SAP Latvia SIA, Riga, Latvia
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
838
|
|
|
|
−363
|
|
|
|
−646
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
SAP Public Serv. Hungary, Budapest,
Hungary3)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Systems Applications Products (Africa) (Proprietary) Limited,
Johannesburg, South Africa
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.592
|
|
|
|
83.945
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Armstrong Laing Limited, London, United
Kingdom4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2.128
|
|
|
|
2.885
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Crystal Decisions UK Limited, London, United
Kingdom4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1.608
|
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Crystal Decisions Holding Limited, Dublin,
Ireland4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
77.495
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
TomorrowNow (UK) Limited, Feltham, United
Kingdom4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
−392
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Business Objects Holding B.V., s-Hertogenbosch, the
Netherlands4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
35.973
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Crystal Decisions (Ireland) Limited, Dublin,
Ireland4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
44.408
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
OutlookSoft EURL, Paris,
France4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
−1.337
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Set Analyzer UK Limited, London, United
Kingdom4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
978
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Blue-Edge Software Limited, London, United
Kingdom4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Edgewing Limited, London, United
Kingdom4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
−378
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
SAP Nederland Holding B.V., s-Hertogenbosch, The
Netherlands3)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
517.988
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Maxware AS , Trondheim,
Norway4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
7.638
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Wicom Communications AB, Enebyberg,
Sweden4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Armstrong Laing (North America) Limited, London, United
Kingdom4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
−1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Cartesis UK Limited, London, United
Kingdom4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
−3
|
|
|
|
1.081
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Visiprise UK Limited, Aberdeenshire, United
Kingdom4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
−8
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
SAP Commercial Services Ltd., Valetta, Malta
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
−14
|
|
|
|
−5
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
SAP Malta Investments Ltd., Valetta, Malta
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
−14
|
|
|
|
−5
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Inxight Software UK Limited, London, United
Kingdom4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
−22
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Ambin Properties (Proprietary) Limited, Johannesburg, South
Africa4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
−50
|
|
|
|
−412
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
F-102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit/Loss(-)
|
|
|
Total Equity
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
|
After Tax for
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
Employees as
|
|
as of December 31, 2009
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
in
20091)
|
|
|
20091)
|
|
|
12/31/20091)
|
|
|
of
12/31/20092)
|
|
Name and Location of Company
|
|
%
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maxware UK Limited, Feltham, United
Kingdom4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
−85
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
TomorrowNow Nederland B.V., Amsterdam, the Netherlands
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
−434
|
|
|
|
−2.901
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
OutlookSoft Italia S.r.l., Milan,
Italy4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
−4
|
|
|
|
−14
|
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Millsgate Holding B.V., Amsterdam, the
Netherlands4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMERICAS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAP America, Inc., Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, USA
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
2.757.437
|
|
|
|
253.588
|
|
|
|
−169.097
|
|
|
|
5.097
|
|
SAP Canada Inc., Toronto, Canada
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
484.649
|
|
|
|
32.494
|
|
|
|
339.651
|
|
|
|
1.966
|
|
SAP LABS, LLC, Palo Alto, California,
USA4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
356.171
|
|
|
|
12.799
|
|
|
|
88.112
|
|
|
|
1.742
|
|
SAP Brasil Ltda, São Paulo, Brazil
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
272.156
|
|
|
|
16.507
|
|
|
|
90.085
|
|
|
|
816
|
|
SAP Public Services , Inc., Washington , D.C.,
USA4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
269.441
|
|
|
|
26.918
|
|
|
|
215.015
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
SAP Global Marketing , Inc., New York, USA
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
180.515
|
|
|
|
3.320
|
|
|
|
15.713
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
SAP México S.A. de C .V., Mexico City, Mexico
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
170.809
|
|
|
|
−11.786
|
|
|
|
28.385
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
SAP Industries, Inc., Scottsdale, Arizona,
USA4),7)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
130.072
|
|
|
|
11.398
|
|
|
|
330.651
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
SAP ARGENTINA S.A., Buenos Aires, Argentina
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
88.080
|
|
|
|
2.450
|
|
|
|
15.172
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
SAP Governance Risk & Compliance, Inc., Palo Alto,
California,
USA4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
54.750
|
|
|
|
17.192
|
|
|
|
351.595
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Visiprise, LLC, Alpharetta, Georgia,
USA4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
44.633
|
|
|
|
9.496
|
|
|
|
94.055
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
SAP International, Inc., Miami, Florida,
USA4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
43.687
|
|
|
|
1.782
|
|
|
|
10.267
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
SAP Colombia S.A.S., Bogota,
Colombia3)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
40.841
|
|
|
|
4.408
|
|
|
|
−14.840
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
SAP Andina y del Caribe C.A., Caracas,
Venezuela7)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
40.300
|
|
|
|
−43.232
|
|
|
|
−18.014
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
Business Objects Data Integration, Inc., Wilmington, Delaware,
USA4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
34.037
|
|
|
|
12.519
|
|
|
|
77.582
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
OutlookSoft Corporation, Stamford, Connecticut,
USA4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
33.097
|
|
|
|
8.396
|
|
|
|
262.273
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
SAP PERU S.A.C., Inc., Lima,
Peru3)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
16.798
|
|
|
|
−655
|
|
|
|
−2.930
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
SAP Government Support & Services, Inc., Newtown
Square, Pennsylvania,
USA4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
12.862
|
|
|
|
2.512
|
|
|
|
2.247
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Frictionless Commerce, Inc., Newtown Square, Pennsylvania,
USA4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
4.176
|
|
|
|
1.135
|
|
|
|
33.675
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
SAF Simulation, Analysis and Forecasting U.S.A., Inc.,
Grapevine, Texas,
USA3),4)
|
|
|
70,9
|
|
|
|
3.804
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Highdeal, Inc., New York,
USA3),4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
2.188
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
−211
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Clear Standards, Inc., Sterling, Virginia,
USA3),4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
−1.317
|
|
|
|
16.018
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
HMS Software, LLC, Alpharetta, Georgia,
USA4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
541
|
|
|
|
−275
|
|
|
|
42.330
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Maxware, Inc., Newtown Square, Pennsylvania,
USA4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
−72
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
SAP Georgia, LLC, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania,
USA4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
−107
|
|
|
|
8.927
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
SAP Financial Inc., Toronto,
Canada4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
22.989
|
|
|
|
6.522
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
SAP Investments, Inc., Wilmington, Delaware,
USA4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
6.890
|
|
|
|
561.101
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
110405, Inc., Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, USA
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
14.503
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Cartesis Canada, Inc., Toronto, Canada
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Business Objects Argentina S.R.L., Buenos Aires,
Argentina4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Advance Info Systems, Inc., Toronto,
Canada4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
F-103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit/Loss(-)
|
|
|
Total Equity
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
|
After Tax for
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
Employees as
|
|
as of December 31, 2009
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
in
20091)
|
|
|
20091)
|
|
|
12/31/20091)
|
|
|
of
12/31/20092)
|
|
Name and Location of Company
|
|
%
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Objects Option, LLC, Wilmington, Delaware,
USA4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
−20
|
|
|
|
57.006
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Enterprise Performance Improvement Organizational Software
Consultants, Inc., Toronto,
Canada4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
−36
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
INEA Corporation USA, Wilmington, Delaware,
USA4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
−415
|
|
|
|
−5.519
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
TomorrowNow, Inc., Bryan, Texas,
USA4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
−20.022
|
|
|
|
−18.899
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Inxight Federal Systems Group, Inc., Wilmington, Delaware,
USA4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
−44
|
|
|
|
−285
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Khimetrics Canada, Inc., Montreal,
Canada4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liberia LLC, Wilmington, Delaware,
USA3),
4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASIA PACIFIC JAPAN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAP JAPAN Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
494.540
|
|
|
|
29.251
|
|
|
|
326.856
|
|
|
|
1.140
|
|
SAP Australia Pty Limited, Sydney, Australia
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
341.950
|
|
|
|
34.758
|
|
|
|
136.889
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
SAP (Beijing) Software System Co., Ltd., Beijing, China
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
195.273
|
|
|
|
8.563
|
|
|
|
59.953
|
|
|
|
1.889
|
|
SAP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, Bangalore,
India4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
180.514
|
|
|
|
14.212
|
|
|
|
129.002
|
|
|
|
1.163
|
|
SAP Asia Pte Limited, Singapore
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
170.001
|
|
|
|
10.242
|
|
|
|
14.136
|
|
|
|
607
|
|
SAP Labs India Private Limited, Bangalore, India
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
111.079
|
|
|
|
−6.668
|
|
|
|
17.358
|
|
|
|
4.082
|
|
SAP Korea Limited, Seoul, South Korea
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
74.395
|
|
|
|
4.422
|
|
|
|
17.283
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
SAP Malaysia Sdn. Bhd., Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
44.485
|
|
|
|
3.829
|
|
|
|
14.766
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
SAP TAIWAN CO., LTD., Taipei , Taiwan
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
32.696
|
|
|
|
2.104
|
|
|
|
12.280
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
SAP HONG KONG CO. LIMITED, Hong Kong, China
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
25.148
|
|
|
|
−277
|
|
|
|
4.494
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
SAP New Zealand Limited, Auckland, New Zealand
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
23.085
|
|
|
|
1.894
|
|
|
|
19.667
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Business Objects Software (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
16.019
|
|
|
|
4.071
|
|
|
|
3.396
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
SAP SYSTEMS, APPLICATIONS AND PRODUCTS IN DATA PROCESSING
(THAILAND) LTD., Bangkok,
Thailand10)
|
|
|
49,0
|
|
|
|
15.872
|
|
|
|
−215
|
|
|
|
24.415
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
PT SAP Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
14.812
|
|
|
|
4.473
|
|
|
|
16.881
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
SAP PHILIPPINES, INC., Makati, Philippines
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
13.543
|
|
|
|
1.584
|
|
|
|
5.630
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Business Objects Australia Pty Limited, Sydney,
Australia4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
5.365
|
|
|
|
−927
|
|
|
|
13.080
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
SAP R&D Center Korea, Inc., Seoul, South
Korea4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
4.697
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
13.710
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
TomorrowNow Australia Pty Limited, Sydney,
Australia4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Business Objects Asia Pacific Pte Limited,
Singapore4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
33.584
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Business Objects Greater China Limited, Hong Kong, China
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
SAP INDIA (HOLDING) PTE LTD, Singapore
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Crystal Decisions (Hong Kong) Limited, Hong Kong,
China4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Edgewing Australia Pty Limited, Sydney,
Australia4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
−15
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Business Objects Malaysia Sdn. Bhd., Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
−16
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
TomorrowNow Singapore Pte Limited,
Singapore4)
|
|
|
100,0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
−107
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
F-104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit/Loss(-)
|
|
|
Total Equity
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
|
After Tax for
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
Employees as
|
|
as of December 31, 2009
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
in
20091)
|
|
|
20091)
|
|
|
12/31/20091)
|
|
|
of
12/31/20092)
|
|
Name and Location of Company
|
|
%
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
II. INVESTMENTS IN ASSOCIATES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RIB Software AG, Stuttgart, Germany
|
|
|
7,15
|
|
|
|
29.900
|
|
|
|
5.900
|
|
|
|
42.300
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
ArisGlobal Holdings, LLC, Stamford, Connecticut,
USA4)
|
|
|
16,00
|
|
|
|
28.193
|
|
|
|
2.190
|
|
|
|
4.373
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
Procurement Negócios Eletrônicos S/A, Rio de Janeiro,
Brazil4)
|
|
|
17,00
|
|
|
|
9.693
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
13.101
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Original1 GmbH in Gründung, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
|
|
|
40,00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Greater Pacific Capital (Cayman), L.P., Grand Cayman, Cayman
Islands
|
|
|
5,35
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
1)
|
|
These figures are based on our
local IFRS financial statements prior to eliminations resulting
from consolidation and therefore do not reflect the contribution
of these companies included in the Consolidated Financial
Statements. The translation of the equity into group currency is
based on period-end closing exchange rates, and on average
exchange rates for revenue and net income/loss.
|
|
2)
|
|
As at December 31, 2009,
including managing directors, in FTE.
|
|
3)
|
|
Consolidated for the first time in
2009.
|
|
4)
|
|
Wholly or majority-owned entity of
a subsidiary.
|
|
5)
|
|
Entity with profit and loss
transfer agreement.
|
|
6)
|
|
The remaining shares are held by a
trustee.
|
|
7)
|
|
Restructured and/or renamed in
2009.
|
|
8)
|
|
Entity w ith profit and loss
transfer agreement: Statement before the posting of prof it/loss
transfer for previous year.
|
|
9)
|
|
Pursuant to HGB, section 264
(3) or section 264b, the subsidiaries are exempt from
applying certain legal requirements to their statutory
stand-alone financial statements including the requirement to
prepare notes to the financial statements and a review of
operations, the requirement of independent audit and the
requirement of public disclosure.
|
F-105
|
|
|
|
|
as of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Location of Company
|
|
|
|
|
III. OTHER EQUITY INVESTMENTS (ownership 5 or more
percent)
|
|
|
|
|
ABACO Mobile, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, USA
|
|
|
|
|
Apriso Corporation, Long Beach, California, USA
|
|
|
|
|
Connectiva Systems, Inc., New York, USA
|
|
|
|
|
Crossgate AG, Munich, Germany
|
|
|
|
|
Dacos Software GmbH, Saarbrücken, Germany
|
|
|
|
|
Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz
GmbH, Kaiserslautern, Germany
|
|
|
|
|
Ignite Technologies, Inc., Frisco, Texas, USA
|
|
|
|
|
InnovationLab GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany
|
|
|
|
|
iTAC Software AG, Dernbach, Germany
|
|
|
|
|
iYogi Holdings Pvt. Ltd., Port Louis, Mauritius
|
|
|
|
|
MVP Strategic Partnership Fund GmbH & Co. KG,
Grünwald, Germany
|
|
|
|
|
Onventis GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany
|
|
|
|
|
Orbian Corporation Limited, Hamilton, Bermuda, United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
|
Particle Computer GmbH i.L., Karlsruhe, Germany
|
|
|
|
|
Post for Systems, Cairo, Egypt
|
|
|
|
|
Powersim Corporation, Herndon, Virginia, USA
|
|
|
|
|
QCLS Corporation, San Jose, California, USA
|
|
|
|
|
Qumu, Inc., San Bruno, California, USA
|
|
|
|
|
Realize Corporation, Tokyo, Japan
|
|
|
|
|
Retail Solutions, Inc. (legal name: T3C, Inc.), Sunnyvale,
California, USA
|
|
|
|
|
Return Path, Inc., New York, USA
|
|
|
|
|
Smart City Planning, Inc., Tokyo, Japan
|
|
|
|
|
SupplyOn AG, Hallbergmoos, Germany
|
|
|
|
|
Venture-Capital Beteiligung GbR mbH (in Liquidation), Stuttgart,
Germany
|
|
|
|
|
Zend Technologies Ltd., Ramat Gan, Israel
|
|
|
|
|
F-106
Financial Statement
Schedule I Reconciliations from U.S. GAAP to
IFRS for the Years Ended December 31, 2007 and
2006
Reconciliation from
U.S. GAAP to IFRS
The Consolidated Financial Statements of SAP AG and its
subsidiaries have been prepared in accordance with International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Starting with the year
ending December 31, 2007 we have prepared Consolidated
Financial Statements based on IFRS as required by German and
European law. The transition date to IFRS was January 1,
2006.
Up to and including fiscal year 2008, we prepared and published
two sets of Consolidated Financial Statements, one based on IFRS
and one based on U.S. GAAP. In prior years, through the
year 2008, our Annual Report on
Form 20-F
included U.S. GAAP Consolidated Financial Statements.
Beginning with our Consolidated Financial Statements as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2009, we fully migrated to
IFRS and discontinued preparation of U.S. GAAP financial
information as of the end of 2009 for our Annual Report on
Form 20-F.
We provide the following disclosures of our transition from
U.S. GAAP to IFRS:
Basis of Transition
to IFRS
Our effective date of transition to IFRS is January 1,
2006. As required by IFRS 1, we have applied all IFRS standards
and interpretations that were effective as of December 31,
2007, our reporting date for the first IFRS Consolidated
Financial Statements for the year ending December 31, 2007,
consistently and retrospectively through the transition date,
January 1, 2006. The resulting differences between the IFRS
carrying amounts and the carrying amounts of the assets and
liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet under
U.S. GAAP as at January 1, 2006, were recognized
directly in equity at the date of transition to IFRS. However,
IFRS 1 provides exemptions and exceptions, of which we applied
the following:
Business Combination
Exemption
We have applied the business combination exemption in IFRS 1 and
therefore have not restated business combinations that took
place prior to January 1, 2006 compared to U.S.GAAP, our
previous GAAP. The goodwill arising from these prior
acquisitions did not contain additional identifiable intangible
assets that should have been separated under IFRS. We have
adjusted goodwill from past business combinations for contingent
considerations for which payment was estimated to be probable.
Employee Benefits
Exemption
We have elected to recognize all actuarial gains and losses and
vested past service cost as at January 1, 2006 in equity.
All actuarial gains and losses not previously recognized through
application of the corridor approach under U.S. GAAP have
been recognized in equity at the date of transition.
Any actuarial gains and losses generated after January 1,
2006, have been recognized directly in retained earnings for all
of our defined benefit plans as allowed under IAS 19.93A.
Cumulative Currency
Translation Differences Exemption
We have elected to set the previously accumulated cumulative
translation adjustment to zero as at January 1, 2006. This
exemption has been applied to all subsidiaries in accordance
with IFRS 1. The cumulative currency translation losses
resulting from the translation of the financial statements of
subsidiaries and associated companies were recognized in
retained earnings.
S-1
Reconciliation from
U.S. GAAP to IFRS and Related Explanations
The following reconciliation and notes present the effect of
major differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS on
shareholders equity and net income as of December 31,
2007 and 2006, respectively:
Reconciliation of
equity from U.S. GAAP to IFRS
Reconciliation of
net income
S-2
|
|
(a)
|
Pensions and Similar
Obligations
|
Under IFRS, pension costs and similar obligations are accounted
for in accordance with IAS 19. Under U.S. GAAP, we
accounted for our pension-benefit liabilities in accordance with
FASB ASC Topic 715, Retirement Benefits (Topic 715).
The differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP relating to the
accounting for pensions comprise the following:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
As allowed under IFR 1, we elected to recognize all cumulative
actuarial gains and losses at January 1, 2006 (SAPs
transition date to IFRS) with a corresponding offset in retained
earnings. The full recognition of the defined benefit obligation
in the opening balance sheet led to a lower amount in retained
earnings under IFRS. We also recognized actuarial gains and
losses after the initial adoption of IFRS in retained earnings.
In contrast, the derecognition of the additional minimum
liability provided for in accordance with Topic 715, resulted in
a lower amount in retained earnings under U.S. GAAP.
|
|
|
2.
|
Under U.S. GAAP, the cumulative actuarial gains and losses
are presented as a component of other comprehensive income.
Under IFRS, these are presented within retained earnings, thus
resulting in a reclassification adjustment.
|
Under IFRS, we account for our German semiretirement program and
certain other termination benefits in accordance with IAS 19
Employee Benefits while under U.S. GAAP, we
applied FASB ASC Topic 712, Nonretirement Postemployment
Benefits and FASB ASC Topic 710, Compensation.
The bonus feature element (Aufstockungsbetrag) of
the semiretirement provision is considered a termination benefit
under IFRS, so the expected amount for the bonus feature has to
be accrued at the time the early retirement agreement is signed.
In addition, employers offers to encourage voluntary
retirements qualify as termination benefits under IFRS, so
obligations for probable bonus feature payments to employees are
recorded based on managements best estimate of the number
of employees expected to enter into early retirement agreements.
Under U.S. GAAP in contrast, only the benefits for the
inactive period of contractually bound participants are ratably
recognized over the period from signing an early retirement
agreement to the end of employment as they are considered
post-employment benefits.
Under IFRS, where appropriate we record a provision for the
estimated litigation costs as part of the accrual of the
respective lawsuit. Under U.S. GAAP in contrast, we
recorded attorneys fees and other legal costs associated
with litigation and claims when incurred.
|
|
(d)
|
Customer-Related
Obligations
|
Under U.S. GAAP, we account for certain fixed fee
consulting projects using the proportional performance method.
Consequently, in case of loss projects we do not record any
accruals for losses resulting from these projects. Instead, they
are recognized as incurred.
Under IFRS, contract accounting is applied for all fixed fee
consulting, development and other projects that meet the
criteria of IAS 11. Under IFRS, generally the percentage of
completion method is applied; in exceptional cases the zero
profit margin approach. In general, our projects meet the
criteria for applying the percentage of completion method, which
also results in the accrual of estimated losses resulting from
those projects.
S-3
|
|
(e)
|
Share-Based
Compensation Programs
|
Under U.S. GAAP, we have accounted for share-based
compensation programs using the intrinsic value-based method
according to Accounting Principles Board Opinion 25 Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees until December 31, 2005. As
of January 1, 2006, we started applying the fair value
recognition provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation,
Stock Compensation (Topic 718).
Under IFRS, all share-based payment programs are recorded at
fair value. Equity-settled programs are recorded based on
grant-date fair value, while liabilities for cash-settled
programs are adjusted to current fair value at each reporting
date. From January 1, 2006, onwards, the method of
accounting for our share-based compensation programs is
essentially the same under U.S. GAAP and IFRS.
For our cash-settled and equity-settled share-based payment
arrangements we have not used the exemption of IFRS 1 in our
opening balance sheet but adopted IFRS 2 Share-based
payment retrospectively. As a result, the difference between the
intrinsic value method and the fair value method was recorded in
the opening balance sheet. Due to the fact that certain
cash-settled share-based payment programs have been hedged, the
increase in liabilities was offset by the recognized portion of
the hedge instrument in Other components of equity.
The increase in accumulated other comprehensive income under
U.S. GAAP compared to the amount of other components of
equity under IFRS was the result of setting foreign currency
losses to zero at January 1, 2006 (SAPs transition
date to IFRS) with a corresponding adjustment in retained
earnings as allowed under IFRS 1.
|
|
(g)
|
Change in
Presentation of Minority Interest and Adjustments
|
During the period in which we prepared our Consolidated
Financial Statements on the basis of U.S. GAAP, minority
interests were required to be presented as a separate line item
between equity and liabilities in the Consolidated Statements of
Financial Position and net income under U.S. GAAP only
included the income attributable to SAP AGs shareholders.
Under IFRS, minority interests are included in
shareholders equity. Profit after taxes under IFRS also
includes the portion attributable to the minority interest
holders.
|
|
(h)
|
Other Reconciling
Items
|
Both, under U.S. GAAP and IFRS, a liability has to be
recorded if it is probable that there will be future economic
outflows based on past events and the amount of the obligation
can be measured reliably. However, the interpretation of
probable is not the same under IFRS and
U.S. GAAP. While under IFRS probable means more likely than
not, under U.S. GAAP probable indicates a higher
probability than it does under IFRS. Therefore, we recognized
certain provisions under IFRS we did not record under
U.S. GAAP.
Loans granted to employees primarily consist of interest free or
below-market-rate building loans to be recorded at present
value. Under U.S. GAAP, we recognize the discount as
employee expenses immediately when the loan is granted. IFRS
requires capitalizing the discount as prepaid expenses and
releasing it ratably over the term of the loan to employee
expenses.
Restructuring obligations in certain scenarios include
provisions for unused lease space which are recognized earlier
under IFRS than under U.S. GAAP.
S-4
As the transition from U.S. GAAP to IFRS led to various
changes in the valuation of balance sheet positions while the
national statutory income tax values remained changed, we have
recalculated deferred taxes in accordance with IAS 12 to reflect
these valuation differences.
In June 2007, the International Financial Reporting
Interpretation Committee issued IFRIC Interpretation 13,
Customer Loyalty Programmes (IFRIC 13), which
addresses the accounting for loyalty award credits (such as
points or travel miles) to customers who
buy goods or services. Specifically, it explains how such
entities should account for their obligations to provide free or
discounted goods or services to customers who redeem award
credits. IFRIC 13 became effective on January 1, 2009 and
was required to be applied retrospectively. As a result of the
retrospective first time application, we adjusted the
January 1, 2006 retained earnings balance by
12 million. The effect on the Consolidated Income
Statements was immaterial for the years ending December 31,
2007 and 2006, respectively.
S-5