10-Q
Table of Contents

 
 
FORM 10-Q
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
OR
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM                      to                     
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 001-34209
 
MONSTER WORLDWIDE, INC.
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
     
DELAWARE   13-3906555
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF   (I.R.S. EMPLOYER
INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION)   IDENTIFICATION NO.)
     
622 Third Avenue, New York, New York   10017
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL   (ZIP CODE)
EXECUTIVE OFFICES)    
(212) 351-7000
(REGISTRANT’S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
             
Large accelerated filer þ   Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer o   Smaller reporting company o
        (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
         
    Outstanding as of  
Class   October 26, 2009  
Common Stock
    125,702,245  
 
 

 

 


 

MONSTER WORLDWIDE, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
         
    Page  
    No.  
 
       
     
 
       
     
 
       
     
 
       
     
 
       
     
 
       
    21   
 
       
    22   
 
       
    43   
 
       
    44   
 
       
 
       
    44   
 
       
    45   
 
       
    45   
 
       
    46   
 
       
 Exhibit 15.1
 Exhibit 31.1
 Exhibit 31.2
 Exhibit 32.1
 Exhibit 32.2

 

2


Table of Contents

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.  
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MONSTER WORLDWIDE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
Revenue
  $ 214,533     $ 332,189     $ 691,993     $ 1,052,955  
 
                       
Salaries and related
    112,833       136,506       348,702       412,833  
Office and general
    59,841       71,834       181,816       221,091  
Marketing and promotion
    45,757       57,684       164,401       238,514  
(Reversal of) Provision for legal settlements, net
    (6,850 )           (6,850 )     40,100  
Restructuring and other special charges
          3,592       16,105       13,251  
 
                       
Total operating expenses
    211,581       269,616       704,174       925,789  
 
                       
Operating income (loss)
    2,952       62,573       (12,181 )     127,166  
Interest and other, net
    (48 )     5,283       1,231       15,723  
 
                       
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and equity interests
    2,904       67,856       (10,950 )     142,889  
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes
    (30,891 )     22,734       (35,463 )     50,030  
Loss in equity interests, net
    (1,044 )     (2,086 )     (3,473 )     (7,500 )
 
                       
Income from continuing operations
    32,751       43,036       21,040       85,359  
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax
          (258 )           10,840  
 
                       
Net income
  $ 32,751     $ 42,778     $ 21,040     $ 96,199  
 
                       
 
                               
Basic earnings per share:
                               
Income from continuing operations
  $ 0.27     $ 0.36     $ 0.18     $ 0.70  
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
                      0.09  
 
                       
Basic earnings per share
  $ 0.27     $ 0.36     $ 0.18     $ 0.79  
 
                       
 
                               
Diluted earnings per share:
                               
Income from continuing operations
  $ 0.27     $ 0.36     $ 0.17     $ 0.70  
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
                      0.09  
 
                       
Diluted earnings per share *
  $ 0.27     $ 0.35     $ 0.17     $ 0.79  
 
                       
 
                               
Weighted average shares outstanding:
                               
Basic
    119,473       120,057       119,206       121,213  
Diluted
    121,676       120,722       120,853       121,884  
     
*-  
Earnings per share may not add in certain periods due to rounding.
See accompanying notes.

 

3


Table of Contents

MONSTER WORLDWIDE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (unaudited)        
ASSETS
               
Current assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 187,477     $ 222,260  
Marketable securities, current
    20,482       1,425  
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $15,169 and $14,064
    243,033       376,720  
Prepaid and other
    87,058       82,416  
 
           
Total current assets
    538,050       682,821  
 
           
Marketable securities, non-current
    75,953       90,347  
Goodwill
    930,231       894,546  
Property and equipment, net
    150,963       161,282  
Intangibles, net
    45,893       52,335  
Other assets
    33,142       35,259  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 1,774,232     $ 1,916,590  
 
           
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Current liabilities:
               
Accounts payable
  $ 37,452     $ 41,524  
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
    146,666       205,005  
Deferred revenue
    265,573       414,312  
Current portion of long-term debt and borrowings under credit facilities
    5,017       54,971  
Income taxes payable
    20,284       7,896  
 
           
Total current liabilities
    474,992       723,708  
 
           
Long-term income taxes payable
    82,963       119,951  
Deferred income taxes
    33,234       24,658  
Long-term debt, less current portion
    45,000        
Other long-term liabilities
    3,160       1,000  
 
           
Total liabilities
    639,349       869,317  
 
           
Commitments and contingencies
               
Stockholders’ equity:
               
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, authorized 800 shares; issued and outstanding: none
           
Common stock, $.001 par value, authorized 1,500,000 shares; issued: 134,287 and 133,335 shares, respectively; outstanding: 119,565 and 118,614 shares, respectively
    134       133  
Class B common stock, $.001 par value, authorized 39,000 shares; issued and outstanding: none
           
Additional paid-in capital
    1,388,609       1,367,373  
Accumulated deficit
    (324,993 )     (346,034 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    71,133       25,801  
 
           
Total stockholders’ equity
    1,134,883       1,047,273  
 
           
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 1,774,232     $ 1,916,590  
 
           
See accompanying notes.

 

4


Table of Contents

MONSTER WORLDWIDE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
                 
    Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
    2009     2008  
Cash flows provided by operating activities:
               
Net income
  $ 21,040     $ 96,199  
 
           
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
          (10,840 )
Depreciation and amortization
    50,684       40,503  
(Reversal of) Provision for legal settlements, net
    (6,850 )     40,100  
Provision for doubtful accounts
    8,566       11,174  
Non-cash compensation
    30,349       22,630  
Deferred income taxes
    5,739       (7,142 )
Non-cash restructuring write-offs, accelerated amortization and loss on disposal of assets
    4,744       3,009  
Loss in equity interests, net
    3,473       7,500  
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of purchase transactions:
               
Accounts receivable
    127,523       131,891  
Prepaid and other
    856       21,620  
Deferred revenue
    (152,688 )     (112,567 )
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other
    (81,468 )     (4,924 )
Receipts for legal settlement, net
          5,700  
Net cash used for operating activities of discontinued operations
          (4,091 )
 
           
Total adjustments
    (9,072 )     144,563  
 
           
Net cash provided by operating activities
    11,968       240,762  
 
           
Cash flows (used for) provided by investing activities:
               
Capital expenditures
    (38,664 )     (71,224 )
Cash funded to equity investees
    (4,953 )     (5,000 )
Purchase of marketable securities
    (7,476 )     (182,147 )
Sales and maturities of marketable securities
    3,317       502,305  
Payments for acquisitions and intangible assets, net of cash acquired
    (300 )     (126,195 )
Dividends received from unconsolidated investee
    763       1,011  
 
           
Net cash (used for) provided by investing activities
    (47,313 )     118,750  
 
           
Cash flows (used for) provided by financing activities:
               
Proceeds from borrowings on credit facilities
    199,203       247,000  
Payments on borrowings on credit facilities
    (256,196 )     (156 )
Proceeds from borrowings on term loan
    50,000        
Excess tax benefits from equity compensation plans
    12       981  
Repurchase of common stock
    (4,304 )     (128,133 )
Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options
    55       1,156  
 
           
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities
    (11,230 )     120,848  
 
           
Effects of exchange rates on cash
    11,792       (4,980 )
 
           
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
    (34,783 )     475,380  
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    222,260       129,744  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 187,477     $ 605,124  
 
           
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
               
Cash (refunded) paid for income taxes
  $ (664 )   $ 26,632  
Cash paid for interest
  $ 4,722     $ 1,303  
Non-cash financing and investing activities:
               
Liabilities created in connection with business combinations
  $ 298     $ 4,049  
See accompanying notes.

 

5


Table of Contents

MONSTER WORLDWIDE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
1.  
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS, BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Description of Business
Monster Worldwide, Inc. (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, the “Company” or “Monster Worldwide”) has continuing operations that consist of three reportable segments: Careers — North America, Careers — International and Internet Advertising & Fees. Revenue in the Company’s Careers segments are primarily earned from the placement of job postings on the websites within the Monster network, access to the Company’s resume databases, recruitment media services and other career-related services. Revenue in the Company’s Internet Advertising & Fees segment is primarily earned from the display of advertisements on the Monster network of websites, “click-throughs” on text based links and leads provided to advertisers. The Company’s Careers segments provide online services to customers in a variety of industries throughout North America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region, while Internet Advertising & Fees delivers online services primarily in North America.
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated interim financial statements included herein are unaudited and have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, however the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The consolidated interim financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
These statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for fair presentation of the information contained herein. These consolidated interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The Company adheres to the same accounting policies in preparing interim financial statements. As permitted under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, interim accounting for certain expenses, including income taxes are based on full year assumptions. Such amounts are expensed in full in the year incurred. For interim financial reporting purposes, income taxes are recorded based upon estimated annual income tax rates.
Certain reclassifications of prior year amounts have been made for consistent presentation.
Adoption of New Accounting Standards
Accounting Standards Codification
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (the “Codification”). This standard replaces SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, and establishes only two levels of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), authoritative and nonauthoritative. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) will become the source of authoritative, nongovernmental GAAP, except for rules and interpretive releases of the SEC, which are sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All other nongrandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become nonauthoritative. This standard is effective for financial statements for interim or annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification changed the Company’s references to GAAP accounting standards but did not impact the Company’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

 

6


Table of Contents

Participating Securities Granted in Share-Based Transactions
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted a new accounting standard included in ASC 260, Earnings Per Share (formerly FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities). The new guidance clarifies that non-vested share-based payment awards that entitle their holders to receive nonforfeitable dividends or dividend equivalents before vesting should be considered participating securities and included in basic earnings per share. The Company’s adoption of the new accounting standard did not have a material effect on previously reported or current earnings per share.
Business Combinations and Noncontrolling Interests
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted a new accounting standard included in ASC 805, Business Combinations (formerly SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations). The new standard applies to all transactions or other events in which an entity obtains control of one or more businesses. Additionally, the new standard requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all (and only) the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction; establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement date for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed; and requires the acquirer to disclose additional information needed to evaluate and understand the nature and financial effect of the business combination. The Company’s adoption of the new accounting standard did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted a new accounting standard included in ASC 810, Consolidations (formerly SFAS 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements). The new accounting standard establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest (or minority interests) in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary by requiring all noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries be reported in the same way, as equity in the consolidated financial statements. As such, this guidance has eliminated the diversity in accounting for transactions between an entity and noncontrolling interests by requiring they be treated as equity transactions. The Company’s adoption of this new accounting standard did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted a new accounting standard included in ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”) (formerly FASB FSP No 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157), which delayed the effective date for disclosing all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually). This standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance for determining when a transaction is not orderly and for estimating fair value when there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability. The new guidance, which is now part of ASC 820 (formerly FSP 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly), requires disclosure of the inputs and valuation techniques used, as well as any changes in valuation techniques and inputs used during the period, to measure fair value in interim and annual periods. In addition, the presentation of the fair value hierarchy is required to be presented by major security type as described in ASC 320, Investments — Debt and Equity Securities. The provisions of the new standard were effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of the new standard on April 1, 2009 did not have a material on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the Company adopted a new accounting standard included in ASC 820, (formerly FSP 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments). The new standard requires disclosures of the fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies in addition to the annual disclosure required at year-end. The provisions of the new standard were effective for the interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company’s adoption of this new accounting standard did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted a new accounting standard included in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”) (SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of SFAS No. 133). The new accounting standard requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities and is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. Since the new accounting standard only required additional disclosure, the adoption did not impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

7


Table of Contents

Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
In April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance for the accounting for other-than-temporary impairments. Under the new guidance, which is part of ASC 320, Investments — Debt and Equity Securities (“ASC 320”) (formerly FSP 115-2 and 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments), an other-than-temporary impairment is recognized when an entity has the intent to sell a debt security or when it is more likely than not that an entity will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery in value. The new guidance does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities and is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company’s adoption of the new guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Subsequent Events
In May 2009, the FASB issued new guidance for subsequent events. The new guidance, which is part of ASC 855, Subsequent Events (formerly SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events) is intended to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. Specifically, this guidance sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements, and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods ended after June 15, 2009 and will be applied prospectively. The Company’s adoption of the new guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company evaluated subsequent events through the date the accompanying financial statements were issued, which was October 30, 2009.
Accounting Standards Not Yet Effective
Accounting for the Transfers of Financial Assets
In June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance relating to the accounting for transfers of financial assets. The new guidance, which was issued as SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment to SFAS No. 140, has not yet been adopted into Codification. The new standard eliminates the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity,” changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and requires additional disclosures in order to enhance information reported to users of financial statements by providing greater transparency about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and an entity’s continuing involvement in and exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company will adopt the new guidance in 2010 and is evaluating the impact it will have to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Accounting for Variable Interest Entities
In June 2009, the FASB issued revised guidance on the accounting for variable interest entities. The revised guidance, which was issued as SFAS No. 167, Amending FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), has not yet been adopted into Codification. The revised guidance amends FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, in determining whether an enterprise has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. This determination identifies the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity as the enterprise that has both the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impacts the entity’s economic performance, and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. The revised guidance requires ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary and eliminates the quantitative approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary. The Company does not expect that the provisions of the new guidance will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
Fair Value Measurement of Liabilities
In August 2009, the FASB issued new guidance relating to the accounting for the fair value measurement of liabilities. The new guidance, which is now part of ASC 820, provides clarification that in certain circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a company is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following valuation techniques: the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset, the quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets, or another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of fair value measurements. The new guidance clarifies that a company is not required to include an adjustment for restrictions that prevent the transfer of the liability and if an adjustment is applied to the quoted price used in a valuation technique, the result is a Level 2 or 3 fair value measurement. The new guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after August 27, 2009. The Company does not expect that the provisions of the new guidance will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

 

8


Table of Contents

2. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share is calculated using the Company’s weighted-average outstanding common shares. When the effects are not anti-dilutive, diluted earnings per share is calculated using the weighted-average outstanding common shares, participating securities and the dilutive effect of all other stock-based compensation awards as determined under the treasury stock method. Certain stock options and shares of non-vested stock are excluded from the computation of earnings per share due to their anti-dilutive effect. A reconciliation of shares used in calculating basic and diluted earnings per share follows:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
(thousands of shares)   2009     2008     2009     2008  
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
    119,473       120,057       119,206       121,213  
Effect of common stock equivalents — stock options and non-vested stock under employee compensation plans
    2,203       665       1,647       671  
 
                       
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
    121,676       120,722       120,853       121,884  
 
                       
 
                               
Weighted average anti-dilutive common stock equivalents
    7,614       8,864       8,701       7,982  
 
                       
3. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense ratably over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period, net of estimated forfeitures. The Company presents excess tax benefits from the exercise of stock options as a financing activity in the consolidated statement of cash flows. Excess tax benefits are realized benefits from tax deductions for exercised options in excess of the deferred tax asset attributable to stock-based compensation costs for such options.
The Company awards non-vested stock to employees, directors and executive officers in the form of Restricted Stock Awards (“RSA”) and Restricted Stock Units (“RSU”), market-based RSA and RSU, stock options and performance-based RSA and RSU. The Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”) approves all stock-based compensation awards. The Company uses the fair-market value of the Company’s common stock on the date the award is approved to measure fair-value for service-based awards, a Monte Carlo simulation model to determine both the fair-value and requisite service period of market-based awards and the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair-value of stock option awards. The awards are amortized over the requisite service period on a straight-line basis, net of estimated forfeitures.
The Company recognized pre-tax compensation expense in the consolidated statement of operations related to stock-based compensation as follows:
                                 
    Three Months Ended
September 30,
    Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
Non-vested stock, included in salaries and related
  $ 9,924     $ 7,437     $ 29,889     $ 20,994  
 
                               
Non-vested stock, included in restructuring and other special charges
                      1,162  
Stock options, included in salaries and related
    157       165       460       474  
 
                       
Total
  $ 10,081     $ 7,602     $ 30,349     $ 22,630  
 
                       
During the first quarter of 2009, certain accrued bonuses were paid with 339,550 shares of common stock with a fair value of $2,275.
During the first nine months of 2009, the Company granted RSA of 2,910,905 shares and RSU of 1,099,259 shares to approximately 3,000 employees, executive officers and directors that vest in various increments on the anniversaries of the individual grant dates through July 28, 2013, subject to the recipient’s continued employment or service through each applicable vesting date.

 

9


Table of Contents

The Company’s non-vested stock activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 is as follows:
                 
            Weighted  
            Average Fair  
            Value at Grant  
(thousands of shares)   Shares     Date  
Non-vested at January 1, 2009
    5,612     $ 24.57  
Granted
    4,010       6.89  
Forfeited
    (650 )     21.02  
Vested
    (1,070 )     31.44  
 
             
Non-vested at September 30, 2009
    7,902     $ 15.64  
 
             
As of September 30, 2009, the unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock was approximately $94,072 and is expected to be recognized over a period of 4 years. These awards are being amortized over the requisite service periods on a straight-line basis.
The Company’s stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 is as follows:
                                 
                    Weighted        
            Weighted     Average     Aggregate  
            Average Exercise     Contractual     Intrinsic  
(thousands of shares)   Shares     Price     Term (in years)     Value  
Outstanding at January 1, 2009
    6,290     $ 30.58                  
Exercised
    (6 )     9.47                  
Forfeited/expired/cancelled
    (1,391 )     30.77                  
 
             
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
    4,893     $ 30.96       2.32     $ 4,942  
 
                             
Options exercisable at September 30, 2009
    4,737     $ 30.95       2.19     $ 4,942  
 
                             
Aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the closing market price of the Company’s common stock as of September 30, 2009 and the exercise price of the underlying options. During nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised was $26 and $486, respectively. As of September 30, 2009, the unrecognized compensation expense for stock options was $1,108 and is expected to be recognized over a period of 2.3 years.
4. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
The following table summarizes the Company’s business combinations completed from January 1, 2008 through September 30, 2009. Although the following acquired businesses were not considered to be significant subsidiaries, either individually or in the aggregate, they do affect the comparability of results from period to period. The acquisitions, acquisition dates and business segments are as follows:
         
Acquired Business   Acquisition Date   Business Segment
Cinchouse LLC
  July 28, 2009   Internet Advertising & Fees
China HR.com Holdings Ltd. (“ChinaHR”)
  October 8, 2008   Careers — International
Trovix Inc.
  July 31, 2008   Careers — North America
Affinity Labs Inc.
  January 3, 2008   Internet Advertising & Fees
On July 28, 2009, the Company’s Internet Advertising & Fees segment purchased Cinchouse LLC, a business that provides a social networking site for women in the military and military spouses. Consideration for the acquisition was $600, of which $300 was paid in cash in the third quarter of 2009 with the remaining consideration to be paid in future periods.
On October 8, 2008, the Company’s Careers — International segment completed its acquisition of the remaining 55.6% ownership interest in ChinaHR not already owned by the Company. ChinaHR is a leading recruitment website in China and provides online recruiting, campus recruiting and other human resource solutions. Consideration for the acquisition was approximately $166,641 in cash, net of cash acquired. The Company recorded $239,126 of goodwill (on a preliminary basis), $16,456 of intangible assets, $4,568 of property and equipment, $4,192 of receivables, $1,074 of other assets, $1,055 of deferred tax assets, net, $8,281 of deferred revenue, $23,814 for transactional and acquired liabilities and $893 of short-term credit facility debt. The Company also consolidated its ChinaHR related assets of $41,588 in investment in unconsolidated affiliates and $25,254 in notes and interest receivable (recorded in Other Assets prior to consolidation of ChinaHR) into the purchase accounting for ChinaHR. The goodwill recorded in connection with the acquisition will not be deductible for tax purposes.

 

10


Table of Contents

On July 31, 2008, the Company’s Careers — North America segment purchased Trovix Inc., a business that provides career-related products and services that utilize advanced search technology focusing on key attributes such as skills, work history and education. Consideration for the acquisition was approximately $64,290 in cash, net of cash acquired. The Company recorded $55,482 of goodwill, $3,902 of deferred tax assets, $1,421 of receivables, $6,475 of purchased technology, $545 of property and equipment, $115 of other assets and $3,650 for transactional and acquired liabilities. The goodwill recorded in connection with the acquisition will not be deductible for tax purposes. The Company also placed $3,437 into escrow related to future compensation for the former owners, which is being amortized as compensation expense over the service period.
On January 3, 2008, the Company’s Internet Advertising & Fees segment purchased Affinity Labs Inc., a business that operates a portfolio of professional and vocational communities for people entering, advancing and networking in certain occupations including law enforcement, healthcare, education, government and technology. Consideration for the acquisition was $61,567 in cash, net of cash acquired. The Company recorded $56,259 of goodwill, $2,563 of deferred tax assets, $1,251 of receivables, $2,500 of intangible assets, $183 of property and equipment, $22 of other assets and $1,211 of liabilities. The goodwill recorded in connection with the acquisition will not be deductible for tax purposes.
5. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
The Company values its assets and liabilities using the methods of fair-value as described in ASC 820 (formerly SFAS 157). ASC 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. Level 1 is defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2 is defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3 is defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible, as well as considering counter-party credit risk in its assessment of fair value. The Company has certain assets and liabilities that are required to be recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with accounting principals generally accepted in the United States. These assets include cash equivalents, available-for-sale securities, the UBS AG and affiliates (collectively, “UBS”) put option (as discussed in Note 6) and lease exit liabilities. The following table summarizes those assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2009:
                                 
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total  
Assets:
                               
Money market funds
  $ 14,094     $     $     $ 14,094  
Bank time deposits
          46,849             46,849  
Commercial paper
          93,157             93,157  
Government bonds foreign
          8,884             8,884  
Tax exempt auction rate bonds (Note 6)
                89,565       89,565  
UBS put option (Note 6)
                142       142  
 
                       
Total Assets
  $ 14,094     $ 148,890     $ 89,707     $ 252,691  
 
                       
Liabilities:
                               
Lease exit liability
  $     $     $ 25,085     $ 25,085  
 
                       
Total Liabilities
  $     $     $ 25,085     $ 25,085  
 
                       
The lease exit liabilities relate to vacated facilities associated with previous discontinued operations and realignment activities of the Company. The fair value of the Company’s lease exit liabilities within the Level 3 classification is based on a discounted cash flow model over the remaining term of the leased property.

 

11


Table of Contents

The changes in the fair value of the Level 3 assets are as follows:
         
    Tax Exempt  
    Auction Rate  
    Bonds  
Balance, December 31, 2008
  $ 90,347  
Redemptions
    (900 )
Unrealized gain included in other comprehensive income
    306  
Unrealized loss included in interest and other, net
    (188 )
 
     
Balance, September 30, 2009
  $ 89,565  
 
     
         
    UBS Put Option  
Balance, December 31, 2008
  $  
Unrealized gain included in interest and other, net
    142  
 
     
Balance, September 30, 2009
  $ 142  
 
     
         
    Lease
Exit Liability
 
Balance, December 31, 2008 *
  $  
Transfers into Level 3
    25,085  
 
     
Balance, September 30, 2009
  $ 25,085  
 
     
     
*-  
Prior to the effective date of ASC 820.
The carrying value for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, deferred revenue and other current liabilities approximate fair value because of the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments. The Company’s debt relates to borrowings under its credit facility (see Note 11), which approximates fair value due to market interest rates.
6. INVESTMENTS
Marketable Securities
As of September 30, 2009, the Company held $91,050 (at par and cost value) of investments in auction rate securities. These securities are variable-rate debt instruments whose underlying agreements have contractual maturities of up to 33 years. The majority of these securities have been issued by state-related higher-education agencies and are collateralized by student loans guaranteed by the U.S. Department of Education. These auction rate securities were intended to provide liquidity via an auction process that resets the applicable interest rate at predetermined calendar intervals, usually every 35 days, allowing investors to either roll over their holdings or gain immediate liquidity by selling such auction rate securities at par. Since mid-February 2008, liquidity issues in the global credit markets have resulted in the failure of auctions representing all of the Company’s auction rate securities, as the amount of securities submitted for sale in those auctions exceeded the amount of bids. The funds associated with failed auctions will not be accessible until a successful auction occurs, a buyer is found outside of the auction process, the issuers redeem their bonds or the bonds mature according to contractual terms. The Company currently has the ability and intent to hold these auction rate securities until a recovery of the auction process, until maturity or until these investments can be otherwise liquidated at par. As a result of the persistent failed auctions, and the uncertainty of when these investments could be successfully liquidated at par, the Company has classified all of its investments in auction rate bonds as available-for-sale securities, which are recorded as non-current marketable securities (with the exception of the $5,500 auction rate securities redeemed at par value on October 9, 2009 by the issuer and the $8,300 par value auction rate securities marketed and sold by UBS as of September 30, 2009, see below) in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009. Typically, when auctions are successful, the fair value of auction rate securities approximates par value due to the frequent interest rate resets.
While the Company continues to earn interest on its auction rate securities at the maximum contractual rate (which was a blended rate of 0.78% at September 30, 2009) and there has been no payment default with respect to such securities, these investments are not currently trading and therefore do not currently have a readily determinable market value. Accordingly, the estimated fair value of these auction rate securities no longer approximates par value. The Company uses third party valuation and other available market observables that considered, among other factors, (a) the credit quality of the underlying collateral (typically student loans); (b) the financial strength of the counterparties (typically state related higher education agencies) and the guarantors (including the U.S. Department of Education); (c) an estimate of when the next successful auction date will occur; and (d) the formula applicable to each security which defines the interest rate paid to investors in the event of a failed auction, forward projections of the interest rate benchmarks specified in such formulas, a tax exempt discount margin for the cash flow discount and all applicable embedded options such as the put, call and sinking fund features.
The Company also used available data sources for market observables, which were primarily derived from third party research provided by or available from well-recognized research entities and sources. To the extent market observables were not available as of the valuation date, a statistical model was used to project the variables based on the historical data and in cases where historical data was not available comparable securities or a benchmark index was identified and used for estimation. When comparable securities or a benchmark index were not available, industrial averages were used or standard assumptions based on industry practices were used.

 

12


Table of Contents

Based on these valuations, the auction rate securities with an original par value and cost of $91,050 were written down to an estimated fair value of $89,565 as of September 30, 2009. The write-down of these securities resulted in an unrealized loss of $188, reported in interest and other, net in the consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 (relating to the auction rate securities marketed and sold by UBS, see below), and an unrealized gain of $306 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 that has been reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income, a component of stockholders’ equity. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recorded an unrealized loss of $1,603, which was reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income. The losses in accumulated other comprehensive income are deemed to be a temporary impairment because the Company does not intend to sell these securities and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis. The instability in the credit markets may affect the Company’s ability to liquidate these auction rate securities in the short term. The Company believes that the failed auctions experienced to date are not a result of the deterioration of the underlying credit quality of the securities and the Company believes that it will ultimately recover all amounts invested in these securities, with the exception of the auction rate securities marketed and sold by UBS, as described below. The Company will continue to evaluate the fair value of its investments in auction rate securities each reporting period for a potential other-than-temporary impairment.
Included in the Company’s auction rate securities portfolio are approximately $8,300 of auction rate securities which were marketed and sold by UBS. On November 11, 2008, the Company accepted a settlement with UBS pursuant to which UBS issued to the Company Series C-2 Auction Rate Securities Rights (the “ARS Rights”). The ARS Rights provide the Company the right to receive the par value of our UBS-brokered auction rate securities plus accrued but unpaid interest. The settlement provides that the Company may require UBS to purchase its UBS-brokered auction rate securities at par value at any time between June 30, 2010 and July 2, 2012. The ARS Rights are not transferable, tradable or marginable, and will not be listed or quoted on any securities exchange or any electronic communications network. As part of the settlement, UBS agrees to provide loans through June 30, 2010 up to 75% of the market value, as determined by UBS, of the UBS-brokered auction rate securities which the Company will pledge as collateral. The interest rates for such UBS loans will be equivalent to the interest rate we earn on our UBS-brokered auction rate securities. Accordingly, the Company has recorded the unrealized losses of $188 as a charge to interest and other in the consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 due to the impairment being other-than-temporary. Since the Company may require UBS to purchase its UBS-brokered auction rate securities at par value at any time beginning on June 30, 2010, the Company has classified the fair value of these UBS-brokered auction rate securities as current in the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009.
The ARS Rights represent a firm agreement in accordance with ASC 815 (formerly SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative and Hedging Activities). The enforceability of the ARS Rights results in the creation of an asset akin to a put option, which is a free standing asset separate from the UBS-brokered auction rate securities. We valued the put option using a discounted cash flow model with the following key assumptions: (a) contractual interest on the underlying UBS-brokered auction rate securities continues to be received, (b) discount rates ranging from 1.86% to 2.05%, which incorporates a spread for credit, liquidity, downgrade and default risks and (c) the Company selects the optimal exercise between June 30, 2010 and July 2, 2012. This discounted cash flow model valued the put option as of September 30, 2009 at $142, which was recorded as a non-current asset in the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009 with the corresponding credit to interest and other in the consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The put option does not meet the definition of a derivative instrument under ASC 815 because the terms of the put option do not provide for net settlement, as the Company must tender the auction rate securities to receive the settlement and the auction rate securities are not readily convertible to cash. Therefore, the Company has elected to measure the put option at fair value under ASC 825, Financial Instruments (formerly SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities), which permits an entity to elect the fair value option for recognized financial assets, in order to match the changes in the fair value of the auction rate securities. As a result, unrealized gains and losses from changes in fair value will be included in earnings in future periods.
The Company’s available-for-sale investments reported as current and non-current marketable securities as of September 30, 2009 are as follows:
                                 
            Gross unrealized     Gross unrealized     Estimated fair  
    Cost     losses     gains     value  
Current
                               
Government bonds foreign
  $ 6,870     $     $     $ 6,870  
Tax-exempt auction rate bonds
    13,800       188     $     $ 13,612  
 
                       
Total
  $ 20,670     $ 188     $     $ 20,482  
 
                       
Non-current
                               
Tax-exempt auction rate bonds
  $ 77,250     $ 1,297     $     $ 75,953  
 
                       
Total
  $ 77,250     $ 1,297     $     $ 75,953  
 
                       

 

13


Table of Contents

The Company reviews impairments associated with the above to determine the classification of the impairment as “temporary” or “other-than-temporary” in accordance with ASC 320 (formerly FASB Staff Position Nos. SFAS 115-1 and 124-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary-Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investment and FSP 115-1 and 124-2). A temporary impairment charge results in an unrealized loss being recorded in the other comprehensive income component of stockholders’ equity. Such an unrealized loss does not reduce net income for the applicable accounting period because the loss is not viewed as other-than-temporary. As of September 30, 2009, the Company believes that all of the impairment of its auction rate securities investments, with the exception of the UBS-brokered auction rate securities, is temporary. The factors evaluated to differentiate between temporary and other-than-temporary include the projected future cash flows, credit ratings actions and assessment of the credit quality of the underlying collateral. While the recent auction failures may limit the Company’s future ability to liquidate these investments, the Company does not believe the auction failures will materially impact its ability to fund its working capital needs, capital expenditures, stock repurchases, acquisitions or other business requirements. Investments with temporary impairments that have continuously been in a loss position for more than 12 months have an original par value and cost of $77,250 and gross unrealized losses of $1,297.
Equity Investments
The Company has a 25% equity investment in a company located in Finland related to a business combination completed in 2001. The carrying value of the investment was $171 as of September 30, 2009 and was recorded on the consolidated balance sheet as a component of other assets.
In the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company acquired a 50% equity interest in a company located in Australia. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company funded additional working capital requirements and incurred additional transaction costs of $4,953. The carrying value of the investment was $355 as of September 30, 2009 and was recorded on the consolidated balance sheet as a component of other assets.
On October 8, 2008, the Company completed its acquisition of the remaining 55.6% ownership interest in ChinaHR not previously owned by the Company. See Note 4 for additional details on the ChinaHR business combination. Accordingly, prior to October 8, 2008, the Company included its percentage of the results of ChinaHR in income and loss in equity interests, net.
Income and loss in equity interests, net are based upon unaudited financial information and are as follows (by equity investment):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
ChinaHR
  $     $ (2,323 )   $     $ (8,324 )
Finland
    41       237       142       824  
Australia
    (1,085 )           (3,615 )      
 
                       
Loss in equity interests, net
  $ (1,044 )   $ (2,086 )   $ (3,473 )   $ (7,500 )
 
                       
7. RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER SPECIAL CHARGES
On July 30, 2007, the Company announced a strategic restructuring plan intended to position the Company for sustainable long-term growth in the rapidly evolving global online recruitment and advertising industry. The restructuring plan was originally designed to reduce the Company’s workforce by approximately 800 associates. Subsequent to the announcement of this plan, the Company identified approximately 100 associates in the customer service function who will now be staying with the Company. Through June 30, 2009, when all the initiatives relating to the 2007 restructuring program were complete, the Company had notified or terminated approximately 700 associates and approximately 140 associates had voluntarily left the Company. These initiatives were introduced to reduce the growth rate of operating expenses and provide funding for investments in new product development and innovation, enhanced technology, global advertising campaigns and selective sales force expansion. Since the inception of the 2007 restructuring program through the completion of the program in the second quarter of 2009, the Company has incurred $49,109 of restructuring expenses. The Company will not incur any new charges in the future relating to this program.

 

14


Table of Contents

Restructuring and other special charges and related liability balances are as follows:
                                         
    December 31,
2008
    Expense     Cash
Payments
    Non-Cash
Utilization
    September 30,
2009
 
Workforce reduction
  $ 2,749     $ 7,731     $ (6,800 )   $     $ 3,680  
Fixed asset write-offs and accelerated amortization
          4,721             (4,721 )      
 
                                       
Consolidation of office facilities
    869       2,876       (761 )           2,984  
Other costs and professional fees
    101       777       (340 )           538  
 
                             
Total
  $ 3,719     $ 16,105     $ (7,901 )   $ (4,721 )   $ 7,202  
 
                             
8. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
                 
    September 30, 2009     December 31, 2008  
Capitalized software costs
  $ 184,359     $ 169,497  
Furniture and equipment
    31,463       30,500  
Leasehold improvements
    32,557       30,265  
Computer and communications equipment
    178,074       165,198  
 
           
 
    426,453       395,460  
Less: accumulated depreciation
    275,490       234,178  
 
           
Property and equipment, net
  $ 150,963     $ 161,282  
 
           
Depreciation expense was $43,479 and $36,253 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Additionally, during 2009, the Company recorded $3,848 of restructuring charges relating to accelerated amortization associated with certain capitalized software costs which were abandoned in the second quarter of 2009 as well as $873 of asset impairment write-offs associated with the consolidation of office facilities.
9. FINANCIAL DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
The Company uses forward foreign exchange contracts as cash flow hedges to offset risks related to foreign currency transactions. These transactions primarily relate to non-functional currency denominated inter-company funding loans and non-functional currency inter-company accounts receivable.
The fair value gain (loss) position (recorded in interest and other in the consolidated statements of operations) of our derivatives at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are as follows:
                         
    September 30, 2009  
    Notional Balance     Maturity Date     Accrued
Expenses
 
Designated as Hedges under ASC 815
                       
None
                 
Not Designated as Hedges under ASC 815
                       
Foreign currency exchange forwards
  $29,778 consisting of 7 different currency pairs     October — December 2009     $ 3  
 
                     
Total Derivative Instruments
                  $ 3  
 
                     
 
    December 31, 2008  
    Notional Balance     Maturity Date     Accrued
Expenses
 
Designated as Hedges under ASC 815
                       
None
                 
Not Designated as Hedges under ASC 815
                       
Foreign currency exchange forwards
  $33,200 consisting of 3 different currency pairs     January 2009   $ (100 )
 
                     
Total Derivative Instruments
                  $ (100 )
 
                     
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, net losses of $640, from realized net losses and changes in the fair value of our forward contracts, were recognized in other income in the consolidated statement of operations.

 

15


Table of Contents

10. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
During the second quarter of 2008, the Company decided to wind-down the operations of Tickle, an online property within the Internet Advertising & Fees segment, and have classified the historical results of Tickle as a component of discontinued operations. The Company’s decision was based upon Tickle’s non-core product offerings, which no longer fit the Company’s long-term strategic growth plans, and Tickle’s lack of profitability. Tickle’s discontinued operations for the first nine months of 2008 included the write-down of $13,201 of long-lived assets, an income tax benefit of $29,494 and a net loss of $5,453 from its operations. The income tax benefit included $25,639 of current tax benefits for current period operating losses and tax losses incurred upon Tickle’s discontinuance and $3,855 of deferred tax benefits for the reversal of deferred tax liabilities on long-term assets.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the revenue and costs related to the Company’s discontinued and disposed businesses were segregated from continuing operations and reflected as discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of operations and are as follows:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
(dollars in thousands)   2009     2008     2009     2008  
Revenue
  $     $ 190     $     $ 6,348  
Loss before income taxes
          (397 )           (18,654 )
Income tax benefit
          139             29,494  
 
                       
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
  $     $ (258 )   $     $ 10,840  
 
                       
11. FINANCING AGREEMENTS
In December 2007, the Company entered into a senior unsecured revolving credit facility that provided for maximum borrowings of $250,000. On August 31, 2009 (the “Amendment Closing Date”), with the objective of availing itself of the benefits of an improved credit market in an ongoing unstable macroeconomic environment, the Company amended certain terms and increased its borrowing capability under its existing credit agreement (the “Amended Credit Agreement”). The Amended Credit Agreement maintains the Company’s existing $250,000 revolving credit facility and provides for a new $50,000 term loan facility, providing for a total of $300,000 in credit available to the Company. The revolving credit facility and the term loan facility each mature on December 21, 2012. The term loan is subject to annual amortization of principal with $5,000 payable on each anniversary of the Amendment Closing Date and the remaining $35,000 due at maturity.
The Amended Credit Agreement provides for increases in the interest rates applicable to borrowings and increases in certain fees. Borrowings under the Amended Credit Agreement will bear interest at a rate equal to (i) LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 300 basis points to 400 basis points depending on the Company’s ratio of consolidated funded debt to trailing four-quarter consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (the “Consolidated Leverage Ratio”) as defined in Amended Credit Agreement or (ii) for Dollar-denominated loans only and upon the Company’s election, the sum of (A) the highest of (1) the credit facility’s administrative agent’s prime rate, (2) the sum of 0.50% plus the overnight federal funds rate on such day or (3) subject to certain exceptions, the sum of 1.00% plus the 1-month LIBOR rate, plus (B) a margin ranging from 200 basis points to 300 basis points depending on the Company’s Consolidated Leverage Ratio. In addition, the Company will be required to pay the following fees: (i) a fee on all outstanding amounts of letters of credit at a rate per annum ranging from 300 basis points to 400 basis points (which rate is based on the Consolidated Leverage Ratio); and (ii) a commitment fee on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility at a rate per annum ranging from 50 basis points to 75 basis points (which rate is based on the Consolidated Leverage Ratio). The Company is no longer required to pay a utilization fee on outstanding loans and letters of credit under any circumstances.
The Amended Credit Agreement also increases the maximum permitted Consolidated Leverage Ratio to: (a) 3.50:1.00 for the period beginning on August 31, 2009 and ending on September 29, 2010; (b) 3.00:1.00 for the period beginning on September 30, 2010 and ending on September 29, 2011; and (c) 2.75:1.00 beginning on September 30, 2011 and any time thereafter. The Company may repay outstanding borrowings at any time during the term of the credit facility without any prepayment penalty. The credit agreement contains covenants which restrict, among other things, the ability of the Company to borrow, create liens, pay dividends, repurchase its common stock, acquire businesses and other investments, enter into new lines of business, dispose of property, guarantee debts of others, lend funds to affiliated companies and contains requirements regarding the criteria on the maintenance of certain financial statement amounts and ratios, all as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement. As of September 30, 2009, the Company was in full compliance with its covenants.

 

16


Table of Contents

Also on the Amendment Closing Date, the Company entered into the U.S. Pledge Agreement which along with subsequent separate pledge agreements shall cause the obligations under the Amended Credit Agreement to be secured by a pledge of: (a) all of the equity interests of the Company’s domestic subsidiaries (other than certain specified inactive subsidiaries) and (b) 65% of the equity interests of each first-tier material foreign subsidiary of the Company.
At September 30, 2009, the utilized portion of this credit facility was $50,000 in borrowings on the term loan facility, no borrowings on the revolving credit facility and $1,772 for standby letters of credit. As of September 30, 2009, $248,228 was unused on the Company’s revolving credit facility. At September 30, 2009, the one month US Dollar LIBOR rate, the credit facility’s administrative agent’s prime rate, and the overnight federal funds rate were 0.25%, 3.25% and 0.07%, respectively. As of September 30, 2009, the Company used the one month US Dollar LIBOR rate for the interest rate on these term loan borrowings with an interest rate of 3.26%.
12. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
The Company’s comprehensive income (loss) is as follows:
                                 
    Three Months ended     Nine Months ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
Net income
  $ 32,751     $ 42,778     $ 21,040     $ 96,199  
Foreign currency translation adjustment
    42,592       (56,153 )     45,026       (29,906 )
Net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities
    181       349       306       (1,021 )
 
                       
Comprehensive income (loss)
  $ 75,524     $ (13,026 )   $ 66,372     $ 65,272  
 
                       
13. INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes consists of provisions for federal, state and foreign income taxes. The Company operates globally with operations in various locations outside the United States. Accordingly, the effective income tax rate is a composite rate reflecting the earnings in the various locations and the applicable rates.
The gross liability for uncertain tax positions (inclusive of estimated interest and penalties thereon) at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 is recorded as long-term taxes payable of $82,963 and $119,951, respectively. Interest and penalties related to underpayment of income taxes are classified as a component of income tax expense in the consolidated statement of operations.
Due to the expiration of the statute of limitations in the third quarter of 2009, the Company reversed $30,599 of accrued tax attributable to uncertain tax positions of which $26,571 impacts the effective tax rate. The Company also reversed accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions of $8,979, which on a net tax basis impacts the effective rate by $5,687. The total benefit reflected in the third quarter income tax provision due to the reversal of tax and interest is $32,258.
The Company is currently under examination in several domestic and international tax jurisdictions. Presently, no material adjustments have been proposed. The Company estimates that it is reasonably possible that unrecorded tax benefits may be reduced by as much as $20,000 in the next twelve months due to the expiration of the statute of limitations.
14. SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC DATA
The Company conducts business in three reportable segments: Careers—North America; Careers—International; and Internet Advertising & Fees. Corporate operating expenses are not allocated to the Company’s reportable segments. See Note 1 for a description of the Company’s operating segments.

 

17


Table of Contents

The Company’s operations by business segment and by geographic region are as follows:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
Revenue   2009     2008     2009     2008  
Careers — North America
  $ 95,204     $ 155,165     $ 316,187     $ 502,983  
Careers — International
    84,737       142,441       277,000       452,386  
Internet Advertising & Fees
    34,592       34,583       98,806       97,586  
 
                       
Revenue
  $ 214,533     $ 332,189     $ 691,993     $ 1,052,955  
 
                       
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
Operating Income (Loss)   2009     2008     2009     2008  
Careers — North America
  $ 6,057     $ 43,120     $ 17,804     $ 141,230  
Careers — International
    (2,181 )     30,231       (4,871 )     71,790  
Internet Advertising & Fees
    5,091       4,726       13,574       7,951  
Corporate expenses
    (6,015 )     (15,504 )     (38,688 )     (93,805 )
 
                       
Operating income (loss)
  $ 2,952     $ 62,573     $ (12,181 )   $ 127,166  
 
                       
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
Depreciation and Amortization   2009     2008     2009     2008  
Careers — North America
  $ 7,997     $ 6,372     $ 22,959     $ 17,322  
Careers — International
    7,391       6,560       22,082       18,281  
Internet Advertising & Fees
    1,929       1,661       5,338       4,547  
Corporate expenses
    102       117       305       353  
 
                       
Depreciation and amortization
  $ 17,419     $ 14,710     $ 50,684     $ 40,503  
 
                       
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
Restructuring and Other Special Charges   2009     2008     2009     2008  
Careers — North America
  $     $ 651     $ 3,758     $ 4,607  
Careers — International
          2,236       10,368       6,752  
Internet Advertising & Fees
          251       616       1,370  
Corporate expenses
          454       1,363       522  
 
                       
Restructuring and other special charges
  $     $ 3,592     $ 16,105     $ 13,251  
 
                       
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
Revenue by Geographic Region   2009     2008     2009     2008  
United States
  $ 125,322     $ 183,208     $ 401,476     $ 579,469  
Germany
    16,423       33,669       56,322       108,664  
Other foreign
    72,788       115,312       234,195       364,822  
 
                       
Revenue
  $ 214,533     $ 332,189     $ 691,993     $ 1,052,955  
 
                       
 
                               

 

18


Table of Contents

The following table reconciles each reportable segment’s assets to total assets reported on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets:
                 
Total Assets by Segment   September 30, 2009     December 31, 2008  
Careers — North America
  $ 574,698     $ 657,730  
Careers — International
    717,150       843,007  
Internet Advertising & Fees
    186,697       188,507  
Corporate
    152,577       83,217  
Shared assets (a)
    143,110       144,129  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 1,774,232     $ 1,916,590  
 
           
     
(a)  
Shared assets represent assets that provide economic benefit to all of the Company’s operating segments. Shared assets are not allocated to operating segments for internal reporting or decision-making purposes.
The Company’s long-lived assets by geographic region are as follows:
                 
Long-lived Assets by Geographic Region (a)   September 30, 2009     December 31, 2008  
United States
  $ 111,089     $ 117,738  
International
    39,874       43,544  
 
           
Total long-lived assets
  $ 150,963     $ 161,282  
 
           
     
(a)  
Long-lived assets are composed of only property and equipment, net.
15. STOCK OPTION INVESTIGATIONS AND LITIGATION
The Company is involved in various legal proceedings that are incidental to the conduct of its business. Aside from the matters discussed below, the Company is not involved in any pending or threatened legal proceedings that it believes could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
Remaining Litigation Arising from the Company’s Historical Stock Option Granting Practices
The Company is currently party to one civil action (captioned as Taylor v. McKelvey, et al., 06 CV 8322 (S.D.N.Y)(AKH) (the “ERISA Class Action”)) pending against it (as well as certain former officers and directors of the Company) in connection with the Company’s historical stock option granting practices. The ERISA Class Action was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in October 2006 as a putative class action litigation, purportedly brought on behalf of all participants in the Company’s 401(k) Plan (the “Plan”). The complaint, as amended in February 2007 and February 2008, alleges that the defendants breached their fiduciary obligations to Plan participants under Sections 404, 405, 409 and 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) by allowing Plan participants to purchase and to hold and maintain Company stock in their Plan accounts without disclosing to those Plan participants the Company’s historical stock option grant practices. On September 14, 2009, the plaintiffs and the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (the “Memorandum of Understanding”) that memorializes the terms pursuant to which the parties intend, subject to Court approval and certification of the proposed class described in the second amended complaint, to settle the ERISA Class Action. The Memorandum of Understanding provides for a payment of $4,250 in full settlement of the claims asserted in the ERISA Class Action, a substantial majority of which will be paid by insurance and contribution from another defendant. The parties to the ERISA Class Action expect to enter into a formal settlement agreement in the near future and to thereafter seek Court approval.

 

19


Table of Contents

Upon the conclusion of the settlement of the ERISA Class Action, all of the actions seeking recoveries from the Company as an outgrowth of the Company’s historical stock option grant practices will have been settled. As a result, in the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, the Company has reversed a previously recorded accrual of $6,850 relating to these matters.
Litigation Relating to the Company’s Discontinued Tickle Business
In May 2008, Fotomedia Technologies, LLC filed suit against the Company’s Tickle business for allegedly infringing three patents by operating photo sharing services on a website operated by Tickle. The lawsuit—entitled Fotomedia Technologies, LLC v. Fujifilm U.S.A., Inc., et al. (Civil Action No. 2:08-cv-203)—is pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and there are 23 other named defendants. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction and monetary relief. The Court has not yet entered a schedule in the case. The Company took down the website accused of infringement for reasons unrelated to the lawsuit and intends to vigorously defend this matter.

 

20


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Monster Worldwide, Inc.
New York, New York
We have reviewed the consolidated balance sheet of Monster Worldwide, Inc. (the “Company”) as of September 30, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 and cash flows for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 included in the accompanying Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the consolidated balance sheet of Monster Worldwide, Inc. as of December 31, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 10, 2009, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008 is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP
BDO Seidman, LLP
New York, NY
October 30, 2009

 

21


Table of Contents

ITEM 2.  
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Monster Worldwide, Inc. (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, the “Company,” “Monster Worldwide,” “we,” “our” or “us”) makes forward-looking statements in this report and in other reports and proxy statements that we file with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Except for historical information contained herein, the statements made in this report constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties, including statements regarding our strategic direction, prospects and future results. Certain factors, including factors outside of our control, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. These factors include, among other things, the global economic crisis; our ability to maintain and enhance the value of our brands, particularly Monster; competition; fluctuations in our quarterly operating results; our ability to adapt to rapid developments in technology; our ability to continue to develop and enhance our information technology systems; concerns related to our privacy policies and our compliance with applicable data protection laws and regulations; intrusions on our systems; interruptions, delays or failures in the provision of our services; our vulnerability to intellectual property infringement claims brought against us by others; our ability to protect our proprietary rights and maintain our rights to use key technologies of third parties; our ability to identify future acquisition opportunities; our ability to manage future growth; the ability of our divested businesses to satisfy obligations related to their operations; risks related to our foreign operations; our ability to expand our operations in international markets; our ability to attract and retain talented employees; potential write-downs if our goodwill or amortizable intangible assets become impaired; adverse determinations by domestic and/or international taxation authorities related to our estimated tax liabilities; effects of anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents; volatility in our stock price; risks associated with government regulation; risks related to the investigations and the litigation associated with our historical stock option grant practices; the outcome of pending litigation; and other risks and uncertainties set forth from time to time in our reports and other filings made with the SEC, including under Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Overview
Monster Worldwide is the premier global online employment solution provider, inspiring people to improve their lives, with a presence in approximately 50 countries around the world. We have built on Monster’s brand and created worldwide awareness by offering online recruiting solutions that we believe are redefining the way employers and job seekers connect. For employers, our goal is to provide the most effective solutions and easiest to use technology to simplify the hiring process and deliver access to our community of job seekers. For job seekers, our purpose is to help improve their careers by providing work-related content, services and advice.
Our services and solutions include searchable job postings, a resume database, recruitment media solutions throughout our network and other career related content. Job seekers can search our job postings and post their resumes for free on each of our career websites. Employers pay to post jobs, search our resume database and access other career related services.
Our strategy has been to grow our business both organically and through strategic acquisitions and alliances in which the perceived growth prospects fit our long-term strategic growth plan. Despite the continued weakness in the global economy, we believe the long term growth opportunities overseas are particularly large and believe that we are positioned to benefit from our expanded reach and increased brand recognition around the world. We are positioned to benefit from the continued secular shift towards online recruiting. In addition, through a balanced mix of investment, strategic acquisitions and disciplined operating focus and execution, we believe we can take advantage of this online migration to significantly grow our international business over the next several years.
We also operate a network of websites that connect companies to highly targeted audiences at critical stages in their life. Our goal is to offer compelling online services for the users through personalization, community features and enhanced content. We believe that there are significant opportunities to monetize this web traffic through lead generation, display advertising and other consumer related products. We believe that these properties appeal to advertisers and other third parties as they deliver certain discrete demographics entirely online.

 

22


Table of Contents

Restructuring Program
We have recorded significant charges and accruals in connection with our 2007 restructuring initiatives and prior business reorganization programs. These accruals include estimates pertaining to future lease obligations, employee separation costs and the settlements of contractual obligations resulting from our actions. These initiatives were introduced to reduce the growth rate of operating expenses and provide funding for investments in new product development and innovation, enhanced technology, global advertising campaigns and selective sales force expansion. The Company completed all of the initiatives relating to the 2007 restructuring program in the second quarter of 2009 and no new charges will be incurred in the future relating to this program. Since the inception of the 2007 restructuring program, we have incurred $49.1 million of restructuring expenses.
Business Combinations
For the period from January 1, 2008 through September 30, 2009, we completed four business combinations. Although the following acquired businesses were not considered to be significant subsidiaries, either individually or in the aggregate, they do affect the comparability of results from period to period.
         
Acquired Business   Acquisition Date   Business Segment
Cinchouse LLC
  July 28, 2009   Internet Advertising & Fees
China HR.com Holdings Ltd. (“ChinaHR”)
  October 8, 2008   Careers — International
Trovix Inc.
  July 31, 2008   Careers — North America
Affinity Labs Inc.
  January 3, 2008   Internet Advertising & Fees
Discontinued Operations
During the second quarter of 2008, we decided to wind-down the operations of Tickle, an online property within the Internet Advertising & Fees segment, and have classified the historical results of Tickle as a component of discontinued operations. Our decision was based upon Tickle’s product offerings, which no longer fit our long-term strategic growth plans, and Tickle’s lack of profitability. Tickle’s discontinued operations for the first nine months of 2008 included the write-down of $13.2 million of long-lived assets, an income tax benefit of $29.5 million and a net loss of $5.5 million from its operations. The income tax benefit included $25.6 million of current tax benefits for current period operating losses and tax losses incurred upon Tickle’s discontinuance and $3.9 million of deferred tax benefits for the reversal of deferred tax liabilities on long-term assets.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the revenue and costs related to the Company’s discontinued and disposed businesses were segregated from continuing operations and reflected as discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of operations and are as follows:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
(dollars in thousands)   2009     2008     2009     2008  
Revenue
  $     $ 190     $     $ 6,348  
Loss before income taxes
          (397 )           (18,654 )
Income tax benefit
          139             29,494  
 
                       
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
  $     $ (258 )   $     $ 10,840  
 
                       

 

23


Table of Contents

Results of Operations
Consolidated operating results as a percentage of revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
Revenue
    100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
 
                       
Salaries and related
    52.6 %     41.1 %     50.4 %     39.2 %
Office and general
    27.9 %     21.6 %     26.3 %     21.0 %
Marketing and promotion
    21.3 %     17.4 %     23.8 %     22.7 %
(Reversal of) provision for legal settlements, net
    (3.2 )%     0.0 %     (1.0 )%     3.8 %
Restructuring and other special charges
    0.0 %     1.1 %     2.3 %     1.3 %
 
                       
Total operating expenses
    98.6 %     81.2 %     101.8 %     87.9 %
 
                       
Operating income (loss)
    1.4 %     18.8 %     (1.8 )%     12.1 %
Interest and other, net
    (0.0 )%     1.6 %     0.2 %     1.5 %
 
                       
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and loss in equity interests
    1.4 %     20.4 %     (1.6 )%     13.6 %
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes
    (14.4 )%     6.8 %     (5.1 )%     4.8 %
Loss in equity interests, net
    (0.5 )%     (0.6 )%     (0.5 )%     (0.7 )%
 
                       
Income from continuing operations
    15.3 %     13.0 %     3.0 %     8.1 %
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
    0.0 %     (0.1 )%     0.0 %     1.0 %
 
                       
Net income
    15.3 %     12.9 %     3.0 %     9.1 %
 
                       
The Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
Consolidated Revenue, Operating Expenses and Operating Income
Consolidated revenue, operating expenses and operating income for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
                                                 
            % of             % of     Increase     % Increase  
(dollars in thousands)   2009     Revenue     2008     Revenue     (Decrease)     (Decrease)  
Revenue
  $ 214,533       100.0 %   $ 332,189       100.0 %   $ (117,656 )     (35.4 )%
 
                                     
Salaries and related
    112,833       52.6 %     136,506       41.1 %     (23,673 )     (17.3 )%
Office and general
    59,841       27.9 %     71,834       21.6 %     (11,993 )     (16.7 )%
Marketing and promotion
    45,757       21.3 %     57,684       17.4 %     (11,927 )     (20.7 )%
(Reversal of) provision for legal settlements, net
    (6,850 )     (3.2 )%           0.0 %     (6,850 )     (100.0 )%
Restructuring and other special charges
          0.0 %     3,592       1.1 %     (3,592 )     (100.0 )%
 
                                         
Operating expenses
    211,581       98.6 %     269,616       81.2 %     (58,035 )     (21.5 )%
 
                                         
Operating income
  $ 2,952       1.4 %   $ 62,573       18.8 %   $ (59,621 )     (95.3 )%
 
                                         
Our consolidated revenue decreased $117.7 million, or 35.4%, in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008, which includes $7.4 million of negative foreign translation impact relating to the effect of the strengthening U.S. dollar in 2009 as compared to 2008. Careers — International experienced a 40.5% decrease in revenue and Careers — North America experienced a 38.6% decrease in revenue with both segments negatively impacted by the ongoing global recession which has reduced overall hiring demand and forced our customers to reduce their job posting and resume database usage. Internet Advertising & Fees revenue remained relatively flat.
Our consolidated operating expenses declined $58 million, or 21.5%, in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. This reduction in operating expenses primarily relates to our continued focus on cost reductions and operating efficiencies to partially offset the effects of lower revenue as well as the 2009 results including a $6.9 million reversal of a previously recorded provision for legal settlements. The strengthening U.S. dollar favorably impacted our consolidated operating expenses by approximately $6.9 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared to the third quarter of 2008.

 

24


Table of Contents

Salary and related expenses decreased $23.7 million, or 17.3%, in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. This reduction in salaries and related expenses resulted primarily from lower variable compensation due to reduced sales volume, targeted global headcount reductions, a benefit in 2009 resulting from a change in actuarial assumptions related to a statutory pension plan as well as the benefit of certain cost reduction initiatives implemented in the first quarter of 2009 that resulted in modifications to employee incentive compensation programs. These reductions in salary and related expenses were partially offset by increased severance costs associated with our targeted global headcount reductions and an increase in stock-based compensation resulting from our broader equity and incentive programs. The strengthening U.S. dollar favorably impacted consolidated salary and related expenses by approximately $3.9 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared to the third quarter of 2008.
Office and general expenses decreased $12.0 million, or 16.7%, in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. This reduction in office and general expenses resulted primarily from a reduction in consulting fees and lower travel and entertainment expenses. These reductions were partially offset by increased costs associated with exiting certain facilities in the third quarter of 2009 and additional depreciation expense primarily associated with increased capitalized costs related to our newly designed website and our continued commitment to funding investments in our product, new technology and other assets in order to sustain long-term growth. The strengthening U.S. dollar favorably impacted consolidated office and general expenses by approximately $1.9 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared to the third quarter of 2008. Included in office and general expenses in each of the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, are a net benefit of $0.5 million and a charge of $3.9 million of professional fees and expenses related to the ongoing investigation of our historical stock option grant practices.
Marketing and promotion expenses decreased $11.9 million, or 20.7%, in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. This reduction in marketing and promotion expenses resulted primarily from a more focused and efficient spending program in the third quarter of 2009 which included significant reductions in all categories of marketing and promotion and concentration on effective and productive investments. The Company also continues to refine its alliance partnership arrangements to expand the level of performance-based partnerships. Partially offsetting these decreases are additional costs incurred in 2009 relating to the Company’s continuation of the “Keep America Working” tour and the launch of similar initiatives in Europe as well as increased investment in ChinaHR, which the Company acquired 100% ownership of in the fourth quarter of 2008. The Company believes that these marketing initiatives have resulted in a build up of relevant traffic to Monster.com and our affiliate sites. The strengthening U.S. dollar favorably impacted consolidated marketing and promotion expenses by approximately $1.1 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared to the third quarter of 2008.
In the second quarter of 2008, the Company recorded a provision for legal settlements (net of insurance reimbursements) of $40.1 million related to the proposed and anticipated settlement of the class action and related lawsuits relating to the Company’s historical stock option grant practices. Upon the conclusion of the settlement of the ERISA class action described in Part II, Item 1, “Legal Proceedings,” of this Quarterly Report, all of the actions seeking recoveries from the Company as an outgrowth of the Company’s historical stock option grant practices will have been settled. As a result, in the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, the Company has reversed a previously recorded accrual of $6.9 million relating to these matters. As a consequence of the Company’s settlement of the ERISA class action and the settlement of the Company’s claims against a former member of senior management, we do not expect to continue to incur significant professional fees or legal fees paid on behalf of former employees and former members of senior management related to or in connection with matters relating to our historical stock option grant practices.
The 2007 restructuring program was complete in the second quarter of 2009 and, accordingly, there are no restructuring charges recorded in the third quarter of 2009.
Our consolidated operating income was $3.0 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared to operating income of $62.6 million in the third quarter of 2008.

 

25


Table of Contents

Careers — North America
The operating results of our Careers — North America segment for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
                                                 
            % of             % of     Increase     % Increase  
(dollars in thousands)   2009     Revenue     2008     Revenue     (Decrease)     (Decrease)  
Revenue
  $ 95,204       100.0 %   $ 155,165       100.0 %   $ (59,961 )     (38.6 )%
 
                                     
Salaries and related
    47,470       49.9 %     53,714       34.6 %     (6,244 )     (11.6 )%
Office and general
    23,599       24.8 %     30,469       19.6 %     (6,870 )     (22.5 )%
Marketing and promotion
    18,078       19.0 %     27,211       17.5 %     (9,133 )     (33.6 )%
Restructuring and other special charges
          0.0 %     651       0.4 %     (651 )     (100.0 )%
 
                                         
Operating expenses
    89,147       93.6 %     112,045       72.2 %     (22,898 )     (20.4 )%
 
                                         
Operating income
  $ 6,057       6.4 %   $ 43,120       27.8 %   $ (37,063 )     (86.0 )%
 
                                         
Revenue in our Careers — North America segment decreased $60.0 million, or 38.6%, in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008. The continued weakness in the U.S. economy reduced overall hiring demand, which led our customers to reduce their job posting and resume database usage.
Salary and related expenses decreased by $6.2 million, or 11.6%, in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. This reduction in salaries and related expenses resulted primarily from $4.9 million of decreased variable compensation expense due to declining sales, $3.2 million in lower incentive compensation as a result of a modified incentive compensation structure in 2009 and decreased expenses related to temporary employees of $1.3 million. These reductions were partially offset by an increase in severance expense of $2.8 million resulting from targeted headcount reductions in the third quarter of 2009 primarily associated with the Company’s plans for a new Technology Center of Excellence and Innovation in Cambridge, Massachusetts which will allow the Company to shift and add talent and skills to support the Company’s innovation strategy.
Office and general expenses decreased $6.9 million, or 22.5%, in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. This reduction in office and general expenses resulted primarily from $5.0 million in decreased consulting fees, which resulted from our continued effort to reduce operating expenses and $1.3 million in lower travel related expenses. These decreases in expenses were partially offset by $1.3 million of additional depreciation expense primarily associated with increased capitalized costs related to our newly designed website and our continued commitment to funding investment in our product, new technology and other assets in order to sustain long-term growth.
Marketing and promotion expenses decreased $9.1 million, or 33.6%, in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. This reduction in marketing and promotion expenses resulted primarily from a more focused and efficient spending program in the third quarter of 2009, which included significant reductions in all categories of marketing and promotion and concentration on effective and productive investments. The Company also continues to refine its alliance partnership arrangements to expand the level of performance-based partnerships. Partially offsetting these decreases are additional costs incurred in 2009 relating to the Company’s continuation of the “Keep America Working” tour.
The 2007 restructuring program was complete in the second quarter of 2009 and, accordingly, there are no restructuring charges recorded in the third quarter of 2009.
Our Careers — North America operating income was $6.1 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared to $43.1 million in the third quarter of 2008.

 

26


Table of Contents

Careers — International
The operating results of our Careers — International segment for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
                                                 
            % of             % of     Increase     % Increase  
(dollars in thousands)   2009     Revenue     2008     Revenue     (Decrease)     (Decrease)  
Revenue
  $ 84,737       100.0 %   $ 142,441       100.0 %   $ (57,704 )     (40.5 )%
 
                                     
Salaries and related
    45,915       54.2 %     63,524       44.6 %     (17,609 )     (27.7 )%
Office and general
    25,373       29.9 %     27,328       19.2 %     (1,955 )     (7.2 )%
Marketing and promotion
    15,630       18.4 %     19,122       13.4 %     (3,492 )     (18.3 )%
Restructuring and other special charges
          0.0 %     2,236       1.6 %     (2,236 )     (100.0 )%
 
                                         
Operating expenses
    86,918       102.6 %     112,210       78.8 %     (25,292 )     (22.5 )%
 
                                         
Operating (loss) income
  $ (2,181 )     (2.6 )%   $ 30,231       21.2 %   $ (32,412 )     (107.2 )%
 
                                         
Our Careers — International segment revenue decreased $57.7 million, or 40.5%, in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008. Due to the global economic recession, we are continuing to experience challenging markets across most countries and geographic regions in Europe and Asia, although we did experience stronger performance in certain countries within Asia. Our Careers — International revenue accounted for 39.5% of consolidated revenue in 2009, compared to 42.9% in 2008. The effect of the strengthening U.S. dollar contributed approximately $7.1 million to the decrease in reported revenue, or 5.0% of the percentage decline. The decrease in revenue was partially offset by revenue from ChinaHR, which the Company acquired 100% ownership of in the fourth quarter of 2008.
Salary and related expenses decreased by $17.6 million, or 27.7%, in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. This reduction in salaries and related expenses resulted primarily from $10.8 million of decreased regular salary and benefit costs resulting from decreased headcount in European and a benefit in 2009 resulting from a change in actuarial assumptions related to a statutory pension plan, $3.8 million in lower incentive compensation as a result of a modified incentive compensation structure in 2009, decreased expenses related to temporary employees of $2.1 million, which resulted from our continued effort to reduce operating expenses, and $1.8 million of lower variable compensation due to lower sales. These reductions were partially offset by increased severance costs of $1.1 million associated with our targeted global headcount reduction as well as increased salary expenses associated with ChinaHR, which the Company acquired 100% ownership of in the fourth quarter of 2008.
Office and general expenses decreased $2.0 million, or 7.2%, in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. This reduction in office and general expenses resulted primarily from $2.2 million in lower consulting fees and $1.3 million in lower travel related expenses, partially offset by $1.3 million of increased costs primarily associated with exiting certain facilities in the third quarter of 2009.
Marketing and promotion expenses decreased $3.5 million, or 18.3%, in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. This reduction in marketing and promotion expenses resulted primarily from a more focused and efficient spending program in the third quarter of 2009 which included significant reductions in all categories of marketing and promotion and concentration on effective and productive investments. These reductions were partially offset by increased costs associated with initiatives in Europe similar to the “Keep America Working” tour in the United States as well as marketing and promotion costs for ChinaHR, which the Company acquired 100% ownership of in the fourth quarter of 2008.
The 2007 restructuring program was complete in the second quarter of 2009 and, accordingly, there are no restructuring charges recorded in the third quarter of 2009.
Our Careers — International operating loss was $2.2 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared to operating income of $30.2 million in the third quarter of 2008.

 

27


Table of Contents

Internet Advertising & Fees
During the second quarter of 2008, the Company decided to wind-down the operations of Tickle, an online property within the Internet Advertising & Fees segment, and has classified the results of Tickle as a discontinued operation. The operating results of our Internet Advertising & Fees segment for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
                                                 
            % of             % of     Increase     % Increase  
(dollars in thousands)   2009     Revenue     2008     Revenue     (Decrease)     (Decrease)  
Revenue
  $ 34,592       100.0 %   $ 34,583       100.0 %   $ 9       0.0 %
 
                                   
Salaries and related
    11,516       33.3 %     12,386       35.8 %     (870 )     (7.0 )%
Office and general
    6,064       17.5 %     6,055       17.5 %     9       0.1 %
Marketing and promotion
    11,921       34.5 %     11,165       32.3 %     756       6.8 %
Restructuring and other special charges
          0.0 %     251       0.7 %     (251 )     (100.0 )%
 
                                         
Operating expenses
    29,501       85.3 %     29,857       86.3 %     (356 )     (1.2 )%
 
                                         
Operating income
  $ 5,091       14.7 %   $ 4,726       13.7 %   $ 365       7.7 %
 
                                         
Revenue at our Internet Advertising & Fees segment remained flat at $34.6 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008. Revenue associated with lead generation and display advertising has experienced growth in 2009 despite the challenging advertising climate. This growth was offset by decreased revenue from certain one-time project-based revenue as well as discontinued product offerings. We continue to concentrate our resources on recurring revenue streams, such as lead generation and display advertising, innovation of new product offerings and increased audience reach.
Operating expenses decreased $0.4 million in 2009 primarily resulting from $1.0 million of decreased regular salary and benefit costs and $0.7 million of decreased incentive compensation resulting from a modified incentive compensation structure in 2009, partially offset by $0.8 million of increased marketing costs resulting from increased lead generation business and $0.7 million of increased severance costs associated with targeted headcount reductions in the third quarter of 2009.
The 2007 restructuring program was complete in the second quarter of 2009 and, accordingly, there are no restructuring charges recorded in the third quarter of 2009.
Our Internet Advertising & Fees operating income was $5.1 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared to operating income of $4.7 million in the third quarter of 2008. Operating margin increased to 14.7% in the third quarter of 2009, compared to 13.7% in the third quarter of 2008.
Interest and Other, net
Interest and other, net for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 resulted in a net expense of $0.05 million and a net benefit of $5.3 million, respectively. Interest and other, net primarily relates to interest expense on the Company’s outstanding debt, interest income associated with the Company’s various investments and foreign currency gains or losses. The decrease in interest and other, net of $5.35 million resulted from decreased interest income, primarily associated with the significant decline in investment interest rates during 2009 and the Company having lower investment balances, foreign currency gains in 2008 resulting from hedging activities relating to the funding of the ChinaHR acquisition, as well as increased interest expense related to additional borrowings in 2009.
Income Taxes
Income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
                                 
(dollars in thousands)   2009     2008     $ Change     % Change  
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
  $ 2,904     $ 67,856     $ (64,952 )     (95.7 )%
Income taxes
    (30,891 )     22,734       (53,625 )     (235.9 )%
Effective tax rate
    -1063.7 %     33.5 %                
Due to the expiration of the statute of limitations in the third quarter of 2009, the Company reversed $30.6 million of accrued tax attributable to uncertain tax positions of which $26.6 million impacts the effective tax rate. The Company also reversed accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions of $9.0 million, which on a net tax basis impacts the effective rate by $5.7 million. The total benefit reflected in the third quarter income tax provision due to the reversal of tax and interest is $32.3 million.
Our effective tax rates differ from the statutory rate due to the impact of state and local income taxes, tax exempt interest income, certain nondeductible expenses, foreign earnings taxed at different tax rates, valuation allowances and accrual of interest on accrued tax liabilities. Our future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by earnings being lower than anticipated in countries where we have lower statutory rates, changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets or liabilities, or changes in tax laws or interpretations thereof. In addition, our filed tax returns are subject to the examination by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes.

 

28


Table of Contents

The Company is currently under examination in several domestic and international tax jurisdictions. Presently, no material adjustments have been proposed. The Company estimates that it is reasonably possible that unrecorded tax benefits may be reduced by as much as $20.0 million in the next twelve months due to the expiration of the statute of limitations.
Diluted Earnings Per Share
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations in the third quarter of 2009 was $0.27 compared to diluted earnings per share from continuing operations of $0.36 in the third quarter of 2008, primarily resulting from lower operating income from Careers — North America and Careers — International, partially offset by a tax benefit recorded in the third quarter of 2009 relating to the reversal of income tax reserves due to the expiration of the statute of limitations on uncertain tax positions.
The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
Consolidated Revenue, Operating Expenses and Operating (Loss) Income
Consolidated revenue, operating expenses and operating (loss) income for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
                                                 
            % of             % of     Increase     % Increase  
(dollars in thousands)   2009     Revenue     2008     Revenue     (Decrease)     (Decrease)  
Revenue
  $ 691,993       100.0 %   $ 1,052,955       100.0 %   $ (360,962 )     (34.3 )%
 
                                   
Salaries and related
    348,702       50.4 %     412,833       39.2 %   (64,131 )     (15.5 )%
Office and general
    181,816       26.3 %     221,091       21.0 %     (39,275 )     (17.8 )%
Marketing and promotion
    164,401       23.8 %     238,514       22.7 %     (74,113 )     (31.1 )%
(Reversal of) provision for legal settlements, net
    (6,850 )     (1.0 )%     40,100       3.8 %     (46,950 )     (117.1 )%
Restructuring and other special charges
    16,105       2.3 %     13,251       1.3 %     2,854       21.5 %
 
                                         
Operating expenses
    704,174       101.8 %     925,789       87.9 %     (221,615 )     (23.9 )%
 
                                         
Operating (loss) income
  $ (12,181 )     (1.8 )%   $ 127,166       12.1 %   $ (139,347 )     (109.6 )%
 
                                         
Our consolidated revenue decreased $361.0 million, or 34.3%, in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008, which includes $50.2 million of negative foreign translation impact relating to the effect of the strengthening U.S. dollar in 2009. Careers — International experienced a 38.8% decrease in revenue and Careers — North America experienced a 37.1% decrease in revenue with both segments negatively impacted by the ongoing global recession which has reduced overall hiring demand and forced our customers to reduce their job posting and resume database usage. Internet Advertising & Fees revenue increased $1.2 million, or 1.2%.
Our consolidated operating expenses declined $221.6 million, or 23.9%, in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. This reduction in operating expenses primarily relates to our continued focus on cost reductions and operating efficiencies to partially offset the effects of the decreased revenue as well as the first nine months of 2008 including $40.1 million of legal settlement provisions, $6.9 million of which was reversed in the first nine months of 2009. The strengthening U.S. dollar favorably impacted our consolidated operating expenses by approximately $46.5 million in the first nine months of 2009, compared to the first nine months of 2008. Included in office and general expenses in each of the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, are $4.8 million and $11.1 million of professional fees and expenses related to the ongoing investigation of our historical stock option grant practices.
Salary and related expenses decreased $64.1 million, or 15.5%, in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. This reduction in salaries and related expenses resulted primarily from lower variable compensation due to reduced sales volume, targeted global headcount reductions and the benefit of certain cost reduction initiatives implemented in the first quarter of 2009 that resulted in modifications to employee incentive compensation programs, partially offset by an increase in stock-based compensation resulting from our broader equity and incentive programs. The strengthening U.S. dollar favorably impacted consolidated salary and related expenses by approximately $25.0 million in the first nine months of 2009, compared to the first nine months of 2008.

 

29


Table of Contents

Office and general expenses decreased $39.3 million, or 17.8%, in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. This reduction in office and general expenses resulted primarily from lower travel and entertainment expenses, a reduction in consulting fees and reduced professional fees associated with previously outsourced customer service functions. These reductions were partially offset by additional depreciation expense, primarily associated with increased capitalized costs related to our newly designed website and our continued commitment to funding investments in our product, new technology and other assets in order to sustain long-term growth, and increased costs resulting from the exiting of certain facilities in the third quarter of 2009. The strengthening U.S. dollar favorably impacted consolidated office and general expenses by approximately $10.7 million in the first nine months of 2009, compared to the first nine months of 2008.
Marketing and promotion expenses decreased $74.1 million, or 31.1%, in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. This reduction in marketing and promotion expenses resulted primarily from a more focused and efficient spending program in 2009, which included significant reductions in offline media and concentration on effective and productive online media investments. The Company also continues to refine its alliance partnership arrangements to expand the level of performance-based partnerships. Additionally, the Company continues to promote the Monster brand globally through creative marketing platforms such as the “Keep America Working” tour and the launch of similar initiatives in Europe. The Company believes that these marketing initiatives have resulted in a build up of relevant traffic to Monster.com and our affiliate sites. The first quarter of 2009 included incremental marketing costs associated with supporting our newly redesigned seeker website and employer product launched in January 2009 and the first quarter of 2008 included incremental marketing costs associated with our global brand re-launch in January 2008. The strengthening U.S. dollar favorably impacted consolidated marketing and promotion expenses by approximately $8.5 million in the first nine months of 2009, compared to the first nine months of 2008.
In the second quarter of 2008, the Company recorded a provision for legal settlements (net of insurance reimbursements) of $40.1 million related to the proposed and anticipated settlement of the class action and related lawsuits relating to the Company’s historical stock option grant practices. Upon the conclusion of the settlement of the ERISA class action described in Part II, Item 1, “Legal Proceedings,” of this Quarterly Report, all of the actions seeking recoveries from the Company as an outgrowth of the Company’s historical stock option grant practices will have been settled. As a result, the Company has reversed a previously recorded accrual of approximately $6.9 million relating to these matters in the third quarter of 2009. As a consequence of the settlement of the ERISA class action and settlement of the Company’s claims against a former member of senior management, we do not expect to continue to incur significant professional fees or legal fees paid on behalf of former employees and former members of senior management related to or in connection with matters relating to our historical stock option grant practices.
Restructuring and other special charges increased $2.9 million in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008, primarily resulting from increased costs in 2009 relating to severance, accelerated amortization associated with certain capitalized software which were abandoned in the second quarter of 2009 and facilities consolidations. The 2007 restructuring program was complete in the second quarter of 2009 and, accordingly, all charges in 2009 relate to the six month period ended June 30, 2009.
Our consolidated operating loss was $12.2 million in the first nine months of 2009, compared to operating income of $127.2 million in the first nine months of 2008.
Careers — North America
The operating results of our Careers — North America segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
                                                 
            % of             % of     Increase     % Increase  
(dollars in thousands)   2009     Revenue     2008     Revenue     (Decrease)     (Decrease)  
Revenue
  $ 316,187       100.0 %   $ 502,983       100.0 %   $ (186,796 )     (37.1 )%
 
                                     
Salaries and related
    145,606       46.1 %     158,724       31.6 %     (13,118 )     (8.3 )%
Office and general
    69,467       22.0 %     87,114       17.3 %     (17,647 )     (20.3 )%
Marketing and promotion
    79,552       25.2 %     111,308       22.1 %     (31,756 )     (28.5 )%
Restructuring and other special charges
    3,758       1.2 %     4,607       0.9 %     (849 )     (18.4 )%
 
                                         
Operating expenses
    298,383       94.4 %     361,753       71.9 %     (63,370 )     (17.5 )%
 
                                         
Operating income
  $ 17,804       5.6 %   $ 141,230       28.1 %   $ (123,426 )     (87.4 )%
 
                                         

 

30


Table of Contents

Revenue in our Careers — North America segment decreased $186.8 million, or 37.1%, in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the first nine months of 2008. The continued weakness in the U.S. economy reduced overall hiring demand, which led our customers to reduce their job posting and resume database usage.
Salary and related expenses decreased by $13.1 million, or 8.3%, in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. This reduction in salaries and related expenses resulted primarily from $17.3 million of decreased variable compensation expense due to declining sales, $9.5 million in lower incentive compensation as a result of a modified incentive compensation structure in 2009 and decreased expenses related to temporary employees of $3.5 million. These reductions were partially offset by an increase in regular salary and related benefits of $12.9 million, primarily from higher headcount associated with in-sourcing customer service functions and the targeted expansion of our sales force, increased stock-based compensation expense of $3.0 million, resulting from our broader equity and incentive programs, as well as an additional $3.0 million of severance costs associated with our targeted headcount reduction which primarily occurred in the third quarter of 2009.
Office and general expenses decreased $17.6 million, or 20.3%, in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. This reduction in office and general expenses resulted primarily from $13.0 million in decreased consulting fees, which resulted from our continued effort to reduce operating expenses, $6.0 million in lower travel related expenses and $3.6 million of lower professional fees associated with previously outsourced customer service functions, which in 2009 are being performed by our employees as part of our strategic decision to build a world-class customer service center in Florence, South Carolina. These decreases in expenses were partially offset by $4.6 million of additional depreciation expense primarily associated with increased capitalized costs related to our newly designed website and our continued commitment to funding investment in our product, new technology and other assets in order to sustain long-term profitability.
Marketing and promotion expenses decreased $31.8 million, or 28.5%, in the first nine of months of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. This reduction in marketing and promotion expenses resulted primarily from a more focused and efficient spending program in 2009 which included significant reductions in offline media and concentration on effective and productive online media investments. The Company also continues to refine its alliance partnership arrangements to expand the level of performance-based partnerships. Partially offsetting these reductions are additional costs incurred in 2009 relating to the Company’s continuation of the “Keep America Working” tour. The first quarter of 2009 included incremental marketing costs associated with supporting our newly redesigned seeker website and employer product launched in January 2009 and the first quarter of 2008 included incremental marketing costs associated with our global brand re-launch in January 2008.
Restructuring and other special charges decreased $0.8 million in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008, primarily relating to decreased severance costs in 2009, partially offset by increased costs in 2009 for accelerated amortization associated with certain capitalized software which were abandoned in the second quarter of 2009. The 2007 restructuring program was complete in the second quarter of 2009 and, accordingly, all charges in 2009 relate to the six month period ended June 30, 2009.
Our Careers — North America operating income was $17.8 million in the first nine months of 2009, compared to $141.2 million in the first nine months of 2008.
Careers — International
The operating results of our Careers — International segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
                                                 
            % of             % of     Increase     % Increase  
(dollars in thousands)   2009     Revenue     2008     Revenue     (Decrease)     (Decrease)  
Revenue
  $ 277,000       100.0 %   $ 452,386       100.0 %   $ (175,386 )     (38.8 )%
 
                                   
Salaries and related
    144,449       52.1 %     192,198       42.5 %     (47,749 )     (24.8 )%
Office and general
    75,208       27.2 %     87,214       19.3 %     (12,006 )     (13.8 )%
Marketing and promotion
    51,846       18.7 %     94,432       20.9 %     (42,586 )     (45.1 )%
Restructuring and other special charges
    10,368       3.7 %     6,752       1.5 %     3,616       53.5 %
 
                                         
Operating expenses
    281,871       101.8 %     380,596       84.1 %     (98,725 )     (25.9 )%
 
                                         
Operating (loss) income
  $ (4,871 )     (1.8 )%   $ 71,790       15.9 %   $ (76,661 )     (106.8 )%
 
                                         

 

31


Table of Contents

Our Careers — International segment revenue decreased $175.4 million, or 38.8%, in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the first nine months of 2008. Due to the global economic recession, we are continuing to experience challenging markets across most countries and geographic regions in Europe and Asia, although we did experience stronger performance in certain countries within Asia. Our Careers — International revenue accounted for 40.0% of consolidated revenue in 2009, compared to 43.0% in 2008. The effect of the strengthening U.S. dollar in the first nine months of 2009 contributed approximately $47.6 million to the decrease in reported revenue, or 10.5% of the percentage decline, compared to the first nine months of 2008. The decrease in revenue was partially offset by revenue from ChinaHR, which the Company acquired 100% ownership of in the fourth quarter of 2008.
Salary and related expenses decreased by $47.7 million, or 24.8%, in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. This reduction in salaries and related expenses resulted primarily from $23.3 million of decreased regular salary and benefit costs resulting from decreased headcount in Europe as well as a benefit in 2009 resulting from a change in actuarial assumptions related to a statutory pension plan, $9.0 million in lower incentive compensation as a result of a modified incentive compensation structure in 2009, $7.3 million of lower variable compensation due to lower sales and decreased expenses related to temporary employees of $6.4 million, which results from our continued effort to reduce operating expenses. These reductions in expenses were partially offset by additional stock-based compensation expenses of $2.3 million resulting from our broader equity and incentive programs.
Office and general expenses decreased $12.0 million, or 13.8%, in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. This reduction in office and general expenses resulted primarily from $7.9 million in lower travel related expenses and $7.6 million in lower consulting fees. These decreases in expenses were partially offset by $3.2 million of increased facility costs primarily relating to the exiting of certain facilities in the third quarter of 2009 as well as $2.2 million of increased depreciation expense primarily associated with the capitalized labor related to our newly designed website and our continued commitment to funding investment in our product, new technology and other assets in order to sustain long-term profitability.
Marketing and promotion expenses decreased $42.6 million, or 45.1%, in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. This reduction in marketing and promotion expenses resulted primarily from a more focused and efficient spending program in 2009 which included significant reductions in offline media and concentration on effective and productive online media investments. These reductions were partially offset by increased costs associated with initiatives in Europe similar to the “Keep America Working” tour in the United States as well as marketing and promotion costs for ChinaHR, which the Company acquired 100% ownership of in the fourth quarter of 2008. The first quarter of 2009 included incremental marketing costs associated with supporting our newly redesigned seeker website and employer product launched in January 2009 and the first quarter of 2008 included incremental marketing costs associated with our global brand re-launch in January 2008.
Restructuring and other special charges increased $3.6 million in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008, primarily relating to increased costs in 2009 for accelerated amortization associated with certain capitalized software which were abandoned in the second quarter of 2009 and increased severance costs. The 2007 restructuring program was complete in the second quarter of 2009 and, accordingly, there are no restructuring charges recorded in the third quarter of 2009.
Our Careers — International operating loss was $4.9 million in the first nine months of 2009, compared to operating income of $71.8 million in the first nine months of 2008.

 

32


Table of Contents

Internet Advertising & Fees
During the second quarter of 2008, the Company decided to wind-down the operations of Tickle, an online property within the Internet Advertising & Fees segment, and has classified the results of Tickle as a discontinued operation. The operating results of our Internet Advertising & Fees segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
                                                 
            % of             % of     Increase     % Increase  
(dollars in thousands)   2009     Revenue     2008     Revenue     (Decrease)     (Decrease)  
Revenue
  $ 98,806       100.0 %   $ 97,586       100.0 %   $ 1,220       1.2 %
 
                                   
Salaries and related
    34,674       35.1 %     37,992       38.9 %     (3,318 )     (8.7 )%
Office and general
    17,670       17.9 %     18,933       19.4 %     (1,263 )     (6.7 )%
Marketing and promotion
    32,272       32.7 %     31,340       32.1 %     932       3.0 %
Restructuring and other special charges
    616       0.6 %     1,370       1.4 %     (754 )     (55.0 )%
 
                                         
Operating expenses
    85,232       86.3 %     89,635       91.9 %     (4,403 )     (4.9 )%
 
                                         
Operating income
  $ 13,574       13.7 %   $ 7,951       8.1 %   $ 5,623       70.7 %
 
                                         
Revenue at our Internet Advertising & Fees segment increased $1.2 million, or 1.2%, in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the first nine months of 2008. The increase in revenue is primarily attributed to growth in lead generation, principally associated with the education and military recruiting sales channels, as well as increases in display advertising relating to consumer and recruitment media. These increases were partially offset by decreases in revenue from certain one-time project-based revenue as well as discontinued product offerings. We continue to concentrate our resources on recurring revenue streams, such as lead generation and display advertising, innovation of new product offerings and increased audience reach.
Operating expenses decreased $4.4 million in 2009, primarily as the result of $3.1 million of decreased incentive compensation, resulting from a modified incentive compensation structure in 2009, $1.4 million of decreased consulting fees in 2009 and $0.8 million of decreased travel and entertainment, partially offset by increased marketing and promotion expenses of $0.9 million.
Restructuring and other special charges decreased $0.8 million in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. The 2007 restructuring program was complete in the second quarter of 2009 and, accordingly, there are no restructuring charges recorded in the third quarter of 2009.
Our Internet Advertising & Fees operating income was $13.6 million in the first nine months of 2009, compared to operating income of $8.0 million in the first nine months of 2008. Operating margin increased to 13.7% in 2009 compared to 8.1% in 2008.
Interest and Other, net
Interest and other, net for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 resulted in a net benefit of $1.2 million and a net benefit of $15.7 million, respectively. Interest and other, net primarily relates to interest expense on the Company’s outstanding debt, interest income associated with the Company’s various investments and foreign currency gains or losses. The decrease in interest and other, net of $14.5 million resulted from decreased interest income, primarily associated with the significant decline in investment interest rates during 2009 and the Company having lower investment balances, foreign currency gains in 2008 primarily resulting from the settlement of intercompany balances with several European subsidiaries, as well as increased interest expense related to additional borrowings in 2009.
Income Taxes
Income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
                                 
(dollars in thousands)   2009     2008     $ Change     % Change  
(Loss) income loss from continuing operations before income taxes
  $ (10,950 )   $ 142,889     $ (153,839 )     (107.7 )%
Income taxes
    (35,463 )     50,030       (85,493 )     (170.9 )%
Effective tax rate
    323.9 %     35.0 %                
Due to the expiration of the statute of limitations in the third quarter of 2009, the Company reversed $30.6 million of accrued tax attributable to uncertain tax positions of which $26.6 million impacts the effective tax rate. The Company also reversed accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions of $9.0 million, which on a net tax basis impacts the effective rate by $5.7 million. The total benefit reflected in the third quarter income tax provision due to the reversal of tax and interest is $32.3 million.

 

33


Table of Contents

Our effective tax rates differ from the statutory rate due to the impact of state and local income taxes, tax exempt interest income, certain nondeductible expenses, foreign earnings taxed at different tax rates, valuation allowances and accrual of interest on accrued tax liabilities. Our future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by earnings being lower than anticipated in countries where we have lower statutory rates, changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets or liabilities, or changes in tax laws or interpretations thereof. In addition, our filed tax returns are subject to the examination by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes.
The Company is currently under examination in several domestic and international tax jurisdictions. Presently, no material adjustments have been proposed. The Company estimates that it is reasonably possible that unrecorded tax benefits may be reduced by as much as $20.0 million in the next twelve months due to the expiration of the statute of limitations.
Diluted Earnings Per Share
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations in the first nine months of 2009 was $0.17 compared to diluted earnings per share from continuing operations of $0.70 in the first nine months of 2008, primarily resulting from lower operating income from Careers — North America and Careers — International, partially offset by a tax benefit recorded in the third quarter of 2009 relating to the reversal of income tax reserves due to the expiration of the statute of limitations on uncertain tax positions.
Financial Condition
The following tables detail our cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities and cash flow components:
                                 
    September 30,     December 31,     Change  
(dollars in thousands)   2009     2008     $     %  
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 187,477     $ 222,260     $ (34,783 )     (15.6 )%
Marketable securities (current and non-current)
    96,435       91,772       4,663       5.1 %
 
                         
Cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities
  $ 283,912     $ 314,032     $ (30,120 )     (9.6 )%
 
                         
Percentage of total assets
    16.0 %     16.4 %                
 
                           
Our borrowings under our credit facility decreased in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to $50.0 million from $55.0 million as of December 31, 2008.
Consolidated cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
                                 
    September 30,     September 30,     Change  
(dollars in thousands)   2009     2008     $     %  
Cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations
  $ 11,968     $ 244,853     $ (232,885 )     (95.1 )%
Cash (used for) provided by investing activities of continuing operations
    (47,313 )     118,750       (166,063 )     (139.8 )%
Cash (used for) provided by financing activities of continuing operations
    (11,230 )     120,848       (132,078 )     (109.3 )%
Cash used in discontinued operations
          (4,091 )     4,091       100.0 %
Effect of exchange rates on cash
    11,792       (4,980 )     16,772       336.8 %
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal capital requirements have been to fund (i) working capital, (ii) marketing and development of our Monster network, (iii) acquisitions, (iv) capital expenditures and (v) share repurchases.

 

34


Table of Contents

Historically, we have relied on funds provided by operating activities, equity offerings, short and long-term borrowings and seller-financed notes to meet our liquidity needs. We invest our excess cash predominantly in bank time deposits, money market funds and commercial paper that matures within three months of its origination date and in marketable securities. Due to the current state of the financial markets, we have redeployed our excess cash during 2008 and 2009 in conservative investment vehicles such as money market funds that invest solely in U.S. treasuries, top foreign sovereign debt obligations, bank deposits at prime money center banks and municipal bonds. We actively monitor the third-party depository institutions that hold our cash and cash equivalents. Our emphasis is primarily on safety of principal while secondarily maximizing yield on those funds. We can provide no assurances that access to our invested cash and cash equivalents will not be impacted by adverse conditions in the financial markets.
At any point in time we have funds in our operating accounts and customer accounts that are with third party financial institutions. These balances in the U.S. may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits. While we monitor the cash balances in our operating accounts and adjust the cash balances as appropriate, these cash balances could be impacted if the underlying financial institutions fail or could be subject to other adverse conditions in the financial markets. We have marketable securities primarily invested in tax-exempt auction rate bonds. As a result of persistent failed auctions beginning in February 2008, and the uncertainty of when these investments could be successfully liquidated at par, we have classified all of these investments in auction rate bonds as available-for-sale securities, which are recorded as non-current marketable securities (with the exception of the $5.5 million auction rate securities redeemed at par value on October 9, 2009 by the issuer and the $8.3 million par value auction rate securities marketed and sold by UBS AG and its affiliates (collectively, “UBS”) as of September 30, 2009, as described below) in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009.
As of September 30, 2009, we held $91.1 million (at par and cost value) of investments in auction rate securities. These securities are variable-rate debt instruments whose underlying agreements have contractual maturities of up to 33 years. The majority of these securities have been issued by state-related higher education agencies and are collateralized by student loans guaranteed by the U.S. Department of Education. While we continue to earn interest on its auction rate securities at the maximum contractual rate (which was a blended rate of 0.78% at September 30, 2009) and there has been no payment default with respect to such securities, these investments are not currently trading and therefore do not currently have a readily determinable market value. Accordingly, the estimated fair value of these auction rate securities no longer approximates par value. We used third party valuation and other available market observables that considered, among other factors, (a) the credit quality of the underlying collateral (typically student loans); (b) the financial strength of the counterparties (typically state related higher education agencies) and the guarantors (including the U.S. Department of Education); (c) an estimate of when the next successful auction date will occur; and (d) the formula applicable to each security which defines the interest rate paid to investors in the event of a failed auction, forward projections of the interest rate benchmarks specified in such formulas, a tax exempt discount margin for the cash flow discount and all applicable embedded options such as the put, call and sinking fund features. We also used available data sources for market observables, which were primarily derived from third party research provided by or available from well-recognized research entities and sources. To the extent market observables were not available as of the valuation date, a statistical model was used to project the variables based on the historical data and in cases where historical data was not available comparable securities or a benchmark index was identified and used for estimation. When comparable securities or a benchmark index were not available, industrial averages were used or standard assumptions based on industry practices were used.
Based on these valuations, the auction rate securities with an original par value and cost of $91.1 million were written down to an estimated fair value of $89.6 million as of September 30, 2009. The write-down of these securities resulted in an unrealized loss of $0.2 million, reported in interest and other, net in the consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 (relating to the auction rate securities marketed and sold by UBS, see below), and an unrealized gain of $0.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 that has been reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income, a component of stockholders’ equity. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recorded an unrealized loss of $1.6 million, which was reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income. The losses in accumulated other comprehensive income are deemed to be a temporary impairment.
Included in the Company’s auction rate securities portfolio are approximately $8.3 million of auction rate securities which were marketed and sold by UBS. On November 11, 2008, the Company accepted a settlement with UBS pursuant to which UBS issued to the Company Series C-2 Auction Rate Securities Rights (the “ARS Rights”). The ARS Rights provide the Company the right to receive the par value of our UBS-brokered auction rate securities plus accrued but unpaid interest. The settlement provides that the Company may require UBS to purchase its UBS-brokered auction rate securities at par value at any time between June 30, 2010 and July 2, 2012. The ARS Rights are not transferable, tradable or marginable, and will not be listed or quoted on any securities exchange or any electronic communications network. As part of the settlement, UBS agreed to provide loans through June 30, 2010 up to 75% of the market value, as determined by UBS, of the UBS-brokered auction rate securities which the Company will pledge as collateral. The interest rates for such UBS loans would be equivalent to the interest rate we earn on our UBS-brokered auction rate securities. Accordingly, the Company has recorded the unrealized losses of $0.2 million as a charge to interest and other in the consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 due to the impairment being other-than-temporary. Since the Company may require UBS to purchase its UBS-brokered auction rate securities at par value at any time beginning on June 30, 2010, the Company has classified the fair value of these UBS-brokered auction rate securities as current in the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009.

 

35


Table of Contents

We believe that our current cash and cash equivalents, revolving credit facility and cash we anticipate generating from operating activities will provide us with sufficient liquidity to satisfy our working capital needs, capital expenditures and meet our investment requirements and commitments through at least the next twelve months. Our cash generated from operating activities is subject to fluctuations in the global economy and overall hiring demand.
In December 2007, the Company entered into a senior unsecured revolving credit facility that provided for maximum borrowings of $250.0 million. On August 31, 2009 (the “Amendment Closing Date”), with the objective of availing itself of the benefits of an improved credit market in an ongoing unstable macroeconomic environment, the Company amended certain terms and increased its borrowing capability under its existing credit agreement (the “Amended Credit Agreement”). The Amended Credit Agreement maintains the Company’s existing $250.0 million revolving credit facility and provides for a new $50.0 million term loan facility, providing for a total of $300.0 million in credit available to the Company. The revolving credit facility and the term loan facility each mature on December 21, 2012. The term loan is subject to annual amortization of principal with $5.0 million payable on each anniversary of the Amendment Closing Date and the remaining $35.0 million due at maturity.
The Amended Credit Agreement provides for increases in the interest rates applicable to borrowings and increases in certain fees. Borrowings under the Amended Credit Agreement will bear interest at a rate equal to (i) LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 300 basis points to 400 basis points depending on the Company’s ratio of consolidated funded debt to trailing four-quarter consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (the “Consolidated Leverage Ratio”) as defined in Amended Credit Agreement or (ii) for Dollar-denominated loans only upon the Company’s election, the sum of (A) the highest of (1) the credit facility’s administrative agent’s prime rate, (2) the sum of 0.50% plus the overnight federal funds rate on such day or (3) subject to certain exceptions, the sum of 1.00% plus the 1-month LIBOR rate, plus (B) a margin ranging from 200 basis points to 300 basis points depending on the Company’s Consolidated Leverage Ratio. In addition, the Company will be required to pay the following fees: (i) a fee on all outstanding amounts of letters of credit at a rate per annum ranging from 300 basis points to 400 basis points (which rate is based on the Consolidated Leverage Ratio); and (ii) a commitment fee on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility at a rate per annum ranging from 50 basis points to 75 basis points (which rate is based on the Consolidated Leverage Ratio). The Company is no longer required to pay a utilization fee on outstanding loans and letters of credit under any circumstances.
The Amended Credit Agreement also increases the maximum permitted Consolidated Leverage Ratio to: (a) 3.50:1.00 for the period beginning on August 31, 2009 and ending on September 29, 2010; (b) 3.00:1.00 for the period beginning on September 30, 2010 and ending on September 29, 2011; and (c) 2.75:1.00 beginning on September 30, 2011 and any time thereafter. The Company may repay outstanding borrowings at any time during the term of the credit facility without any prepayment penalty. The credit agreement contains covenants which restrict, among other things, the ability of the Company to borrow, create liens, pay dividends, repurchase its common stock, acquire businesses and other investments, enter into new lines of business, dispose of property, guarantee debts of others, lend funds to affiliated companies and contains requirements regarding the criteria on the maintenance of certain financial statement amounts and ratios, all as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement. As of September 30, 2009, the Company was in full compliance with its covenants. Also on the Amendment Closing Date the Company entered into the U.S. Pledge Agreement which along with subsequent separate pledge agreements shall cause the obligations under the Amended Credit Agreement to be secured by a pledge of: (a) all of the equity interests of the Company’s domestic subsidiaries (other than certain specified inactive subsidiaries) and (b) 65% of the equity interests of each first-tier material foreign subsidiary of the Company.
At September 30, 2009, the utilized portion of this credit facility was $50.0 million in borrowings on the term loan facility, no borrowings on the revolving credit facility and $1.8 million for standby letters of credit. As of September 30, 2009, $248.2 million was unused on the Company’s revolving credit facility. At September 30, 2009, the one month US Dollar LIBOR rate, the credit facility’s administrative agent’s prime rate, and the overnight federal funds rate were 0.25%, 3.25% and 0.07%, respectively. As of September 30, 2009, the Company used the one month US Dollar LIBOR rate for the interest rate on these term loan borrowings with an interest rate of 3.26%.
In 2009, we are incurring tax losses and are not paying significant taxes in the United States. We expect to claim a tax loss carry back refund after the year closes. We continue to have taxable income in certain foreign tax jurisdictions in which we pay taxes on a quarterly basis.

 

36


Table of Contents

We have recorded significant charges and accruals in connection with our 2007 restructuring initiatives, prior business reorganization plans and discontinued operations. These accruals include estimates pertaining to future lease obligations, employee separation costs and the settlements of contractual obligations resulting from our actions. Although we do not anticipate significant changes, the actual costs may differ from these estimates. As of June 30, 2009, the Company had completed all of the initiatives relating to the 2007 restructuring program and no new charges will be incurred in the future relating to this program.
Cash Flows
As of September 30, 2009, we had cash, cash equivalents and total marketable securities of $283.9 million, compared to $314.0 million as of December 31, 2008. Our decrease in cash, cash equivalents and total marketable securities of $30.1 million in the first nine months of 2009 primarily results from $38.7 million of capital expenditures, partially offset by $12.0 million of cash provided by operating activities.
Cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations was $12.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, lower by $232.9 million from $244.9 million in 2008, primarily resulting from decreases in net income of $75.2 million, accounts payable, accrued expense and other liabilities of $76.5 million and deferred revenue of $40.1 million.
Cash used for investing activities was $47.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, lower by $166.1 million from cash provided by investing activities of $118.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. This decrease is primarily a result of reduced sales and maturities of marketable securities of $499.0 million, partially offset by $174.7 million of lower purchases of marketable securities, the 2008 period including $126.2 million in payments for acquisitions and decreased capital expenditures in 2009 of $32.6 million.
Cash used for financing activities was $11.2 million for the first nine months ended September 30, 2009, lower by $132.1 million from cash provided by financing activities of $120.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. This decrease is primarily a result of decreased net borrowings on our credit facility of $253.8 million, partially offset by decreased purchases of common stock of $123.8 million.
Share Repurchase Plan
As of September 30, 2009, we have no authorization to purchase shares of our Common Stock under any share repurchase plan.
Fair Value Measurement
The Company values its assets and liabilities using the methods of fair-value as described in ASC 820 (formerly SFAS 157). ASC 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. Level 1 is defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2 is defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3 is defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible, as well as considering counter-party credit risk in its assessment of fair value. The Company has certain assets and liabilities that are required to be recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with accounting principals generally accepted in the United States. These assets include cash equivalents, available-for-sale securities, the UBS put option (as discussed above under the heading Liquidity and Capital Resources) and lease exit liabilities. The following table summarizes those assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2009:
                                 
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total  
Assets:
                               
Money market funds
  $ 14,094     $     $     $ 14,094  
Bank time deposits
          46,849             46,849  
Commercial paper
          93,157             93,157  
Government bonds foreign
          8,884             8,884  
Tax exempt auction rate bonds
                89,565       89,565  
UBS put option
                142       142  
 
                       
Total Assets
  $ 14,094     $ 148,890     $ 89,707     $ 252,691  
 
                       
Liabilities:
                               
Lease exit liability
  $     $     $ 25,085     $ 25,085  
 
                       
Total Liabilities
  $     $     $ 25,085     $ 25,085  
 
                       

 

37


Table of Contents

The changes in the fair value of the Level 3 assets are as follows:
         
    Tax Exempt  
    Auction Rate  
    Bonds  
Balance, December 31, 2008
  $ 90,347  
Redemptions
    (900 )
Unrealized gain included in other comprehensive income
    306  
Unrealized loss included in interest and other, net
    (188 )
 
     
Balance, September 30, 2009
  $ 89,565  
 
     
         
    UBS Put Option  
Balance, December 31, 2008
  $  
Unrealized gain included in interest and other, net
    142  
 
     
Balance, September 30, 2009
  $ 142  
 
     
         
    Lease Exit  
    Liability  
Balance, December 31, 2008
  $  
Transfers into Level 3
    25,085  
 
     
Balance, September 30, 2009
  $ 25,085  
 
     
The carrying value for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, deferred revenue and other current liabilities approximate fair value because of the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments. The Company’s debt relates to borrowings under its credit facility, which approximates fair value due to market interest rates.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). In connection with the preparation of our financial statements, we are required to make assumptions and estimates about future events, and apply judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses and the related disclosures. We base our assumptions, estimates and judgments on historical experience, current trends and other factors that management believes to be relevant at the time our consolidated financial statements are prepared. On a regular basis, management reviews the accounting policies, assumptions, estimates and judgments to ensure that our financial statements are presented fairly and in accordance with GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates, and such differences could be material.
Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 1, Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in “Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Management believes that the following accounting policies are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results, and they require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, resulting from the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Management has reviewed these critical accounting estimates and related disclosures with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.
Revenue Recognition and Accounts Receivable
Careers (North America and International). Our Careers segments primarily earn revenue from the placement of job postings on the websites within the Monster network, access to the Monster network’s online resume database and other career related services. We recognize revenue at the time that job postings are displayed on the Monster network websites, based upon customer usage patterns. Revenue earned from subscriptions to the Monster network’s resume database is recognized over the length of the underlying subscriptions, typically from two weeks to twelve months. Revenue associated with multiple element contracts is allocated based on the relative fair value of the services included in the contract. Unearned revenues are reported on the balance sheet as deferred revenue. We review accounts receivable for those that may potentially be uncollectible and any accounts receivable balances that are determined to be uncollectible are included in our allowance for doubtful accounts. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written off against the allowance.

 

38


Table of Contents

Internet Advertising & Fees. Our Internet Advertising & Fees segment primarily earns revenue from the display of advertisements on the Monster network of websites, “click-throughs” on text based links, leads provided to advertisers and subscriptions to premium services. We recognize revenue for online advertising as “impressions” are delivered. An “impression” is delivered when an advertisement appears in pages viewed by our users. We recognize revenue from the display of click-throughs on text based links as click-throughs occur. A click-through occurs when a user clicks on an advertiser’s listing. Revenue from lead generation is recognized as leads are delivered to advertisers. In addition, we recognize revenue for certain subscription products, ratably over the length of the subscription. We review accounts receivable for those that may potentially be uncollectible and any accounts receivable balances that are determined to be uncollectible are included in our allowance for doubtful accounts. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written off against the allowance.
Fair Value Measurements
The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expense and other current liabilities approximate fair value because of the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments. Our debt consists of borrowings under our credit facility, which approximates fair value due to market interest rates.
Asset Impairment
Business Combinations, Goodwill and Intangible Assets. We account for business combinations in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations. The acquisition method of accounting requires that assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recorded at their fair values on the date of a business acquisition. Our consolidated financial statements and results of operations reflect an acquired business from the completion date of an acquisition.
The judgments that we make in determining the estimated fair value assigned to each class of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as asset lives, can materially impact net income in periods following a business combination. We generally use either the income, cost or market approach to aid in our conclusions of such fair values and asset lives. The income approach presumes that the value of an asset can be estimated by the net economic benefit to be received over the life of the asset, discounted to present value. The cost approach presumes that an investor would pay no more for an asset than its replacement or reproduction cost. The market approach estimates value based on what other participants in the market have paid for reasonably similar assets. Although each valuation approach is considered in valuing the assets acquired, the approach ultimately selected is based on the characteristics of the asset and the availability of information.
We evaluate our goodwill annually for impairment or more frequently if indicators of potential impairment exist. The determination of whether or not goodwill has become impaired involves a significant level of judgment in the assumptions underlying the approach used to determine the value of our reporting units. Changes in our strategy and/or market conditions could significantly impact these judgments and require reductions to recorded amounts of intangible assets.
Long-lived assets. We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Determining whether an impairment has occurred typically requires various estimates and assumptions, including determining which cash flows are directly related to the potentially impaired asset, the useful life over which cash flows will occur, their amount and the asset’s residual value, if any. In turn, measurement of an impairment loss requires a determination of fair value, which is based on the best information available. We use internal discounted cash flows estimates, quoted market prices when available and independent appraisals, as appropriate, to determine fair value. We derive the required cash flow estimates from our historical experience and our internal business plans and apply an appropriate discount rate.
Income Taxes
We utilize the liability method of accounting for income taxes as set forth in ASC 740, Income Taxes. Under the liability method, deferred taxes are determined based on the temporary differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using tax rates expected to be in effect during the years in which the basis differences reverse. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In determining the need for valuation allowances we consider projected future taxable income and the availability of tax planning strategies. If in the future we determine that we would not be able to realize our recorded deferred tax assets, an increase in the valuation allowance would be recorded, decreasing earnings in the period in which such determination is made.

 

39


Table of Contents

We assess our income tax positions and record tax benefits for all years subject to examination based upon our evaluation of the facts, circumstances and information available at the reporting date. For those tax positions where there is a greater than 50% likelihood that a tax benefit will be sustained, we have recorded the largest amount of tax benefit that may potentially be realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. For those income tax positions where there is less than 50% likelihood that a tax benefit will be sustained, no tax benefit has been recognized in the financial statements.
Stock-Based Compensation
We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, Stock Compensation. Under the fair value recognition provisions of ASC 718, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense ratably over the requisite service period, net of estimated forfeitures. We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair-value of stock option awards and measure non-vested stock awards using the fair market value of our common stock on the date the award is approved. For certain 2008 awards, which were market-based grants, we estimated the fair value of the award utilizing a Monte Carlo simulation model. We award stock options, non-vested stock, market-based non-vested stock and performance-based non- vested stock to employees, directors and executive officers.
Restructuring and Other Operating Lease Obligations
We recognize a liability for costs to terminate an operating lease obligation before the end of its term and we no longer derive economic benefit from the lease. The liability is recognized and measured at its fair value when we determine that the cease use date has occurred and the fair value of the liability is determined based on the remaining lease rentals due, reduced by estimated sublease rental income that could be reasonably obtained for the property. The estimate of subsequent sublease rental income may change and require future changes to the fair value of the liabilities for the lease obligations.
Equity Investments
Gains and losses in equity interest for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, resulting from our equity method investments in businesses in Finland and Australia, are based on unaudited financial information of those businesses. Although we do not anticipate material differences, audited results may differ.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Adoption of New Accounting Standards
Accounting Standards Codification
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (the “Codification”). This standard replaces SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, and establishes only two levels of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), authoritative and nonauthoritative. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) will become the source of authoritative, nongovernmental GAAP, except for rules and interpretive releases of the SEC, which are sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All other nongrandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become nonauthoritative. This standard is effective for financial statements for interim or annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification changed the Company’s references to GAAP accounting standards but did not impact the Company’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
Participating Securities Granted in Share-Based Transactions
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted a new accounting standard included in ASC 260, Earnings Per Share (formerly FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities). The new guidance clarifies that non-vested share-based payment awards that entitle their holders to receive nonforfeitable dividends or dividend equivalents before vesting should be considered participating securities and included in basic earnings per share. The Company’s adoption of the new accounting standard did not have a material effect on previously issued or current earnings per share.

 

40


Table of Contents

Business Combinations and Noncontrolling Interests
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted a new accounting standard included in ASC 805, Business Combinations (formerly SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations). The new standard applies to all transactions or other events in which an entity obtains control of one or more businesses. Additionally, the new standard requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all (and only) the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction; establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement date for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed; and requires the acquirer to disclose additional information needed to evaluate and understand the nature and financial effect of the business combination. The Company’s adoption of the new accounting standard did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted a new accounting standard included in ASC 810, Consolidations (formerly SFAS 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements). The new accounting standard establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest (or minority interests) in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary by requiring all noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries be reported in the same way, as equity in the consolidated financial statements. As such, this guidance has eliminated the diversity in accounting for transactions between an entity and noncontrolling interests by requiring they be treated as equity transactions. The Company’s adoption of this new accounting standard did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted a new accounting standard included in ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”) (formerly FASB FSP No 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157), which delayed the effective date for disclosing all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually). This standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance for determining when a transaction is not orderly and for estimating fair value when there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability. The new guidance, which is now part of ASC 820 (formerly FSP 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly), requires disclosure of the inputs and valuation techniques used, as well as any changes in valuation techniques and inputs used during the period, to measure fair value in interim and annual periods. In addition, the presentation of the fair value hierarchy is required to be presented by major security type as described in ASC 320, Investments — Debt and Equity Securities. The provisions of the new standard were effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of the new standard on April 1, 2009 did not have a material on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the Company adopted a new accounting standard included in ASC 820, (formerly FSP 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments). The new standard requires disclosures of the fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies in addition to the annual disclosure required at year-end. The provisions of the new standard were effective for the interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company’s adoption of this new accounting standard did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted a new accounting standard included in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of SFAS No. 133). The new accounting standard requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities and is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. Since the new accounting standard only required additional disclosure, the adoption did not impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
In April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance for the accounting for other-than-temporary impairments. Under the new guidance, which is part of ASC 320, Investments — Debt and Equity Securities (formerly FSP 115-2 and 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments), an other-than-temporary impairment is recognized when an entity has the intent to sell a debt security or when it is more likely than not that an entity will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery in value. The new guidance does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities and is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company’s adoption of the new guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

41


Table of Contents

Subsequent Events
In May 2009, the FASB issued new guidance for subsequent events. The new guidance, which is part of ASC 855, Subsequent Events (formerly SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events) is intended to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. Specifically, this guidance sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements, and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods ended after June 15, 2009 and will be applied prospectively. The Company’s adoption of the new guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company evaluated subsequent events through the date the accompanying financial statements were issued, which was October 30, 2009.
Accounting Standards Not Yet Effective
Accounting for the Transfers of Financial Assets
In June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance relating to the accounting for transfers of financial assets. The new guidance, which was issued as SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment to SFAS No. 140, has not yet been adopted into Codification. The new standard eliminates the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity,” changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and requires additional disclosures in order to enhance information reported to users of financial statements by providing greater transparency about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and an entity’s continuing involvement in and exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company will adopt the new guidance in 2010 and is evaluating the impact it will have to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Accounting for Variable Interest Entities
In June 2009, the FASB issued revised guidance on the accounting for variable interest entities. The revised guidance, which was issued as SFAS No. 167, Amending FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), has not yet been adopted into Codification. The revised guidance amends FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, in determining whether an enterprise has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. This determination identifies the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity as the enterprise that has both the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impacts the entity’s economic performance, and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. The revised guidance requires ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary and eliminates the quantitative approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary. The Company does not expect that the provisions of the new guidance will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
Fair Value Measurement of Liabilities
In August 2009, the FASB issued new guidance relating to the accounting for the fair value measurement of liabilities. The new guidance, which is now part of ASC 820, provides clarification that in certain circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a company is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following valuation techniques: the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset, the quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets, or another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of fair value measurements. The new guidance clarifies that a company is not required to include an adjustment for restrictions that prevent the transfer of the liability and if an adjustment is applied to the quoted price used in a valuation technique, the result is a Level 2 or 3 fair value measurement. The new guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after August 27, 2009. The Company does not expect that the provisions of the new guidance will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

 

42


Table of Contents

ITEM 3.  
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information in this section should be read in connection with the information on financial market risk related to non-U.S. currency exchange rates, changes in interest rates and other financial market risks in Part II, Item 7A, “ Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk ,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Foreign Exchange Risk
During the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2009, revenue from our international operations accounted for 39.5% and 40.0%, respectively, of our consolidated revenue. Revenue and related expenses generated from our international websites are generally denominated in the functional currencies of the local countries. Our primary foreign currencies are Euros, British Pounds, and Czech Korunas. The functional currency of our subsidiaries that either operate or support these websites is the same as the corresponding local currency. The results of operations of, and certain of our intercompany balances associated with, our internationally-focused websites are exposed to foreign exchange rate fluctuations. Upon consolidation, as exchange rates vary, revenue and other operating results may differ materially from expectations, and we may record significant gains or losses on the remeasurement of intercompany balances. The effect of the strengthening U.S. dollar in the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2009 contributed approximately $7.4 million and $50.2 million, respectively, to the decrease in reported revenue, compared to the corresponding periods of 2008.
We have foreign exchange risk related to foreign-denominated cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities (“foreign funds”). Based on the balance of foreign funds as of September 30, 2009 of $177.4 million, an assumed 5%, 10% and 20% negative currency movement would result in fair value declines of $8.9 million, $17.7 million and $35.5 million, respectively.
We use forward foreign exchange contracts as cash flow hedges to offset risks related to certain foreign currency transactions. These transactions primarily relate to non-functional currency denominated inter-company funding loans, non-functional currency denominated accounts receivable and non-functional currency denominated accounts payable. We do not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.
The financial statements of our non-U.S. subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars using current rates of exchange, with gains or losses included in the cumulative translation adjustment account, a component of stockholders’ equity. During the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2009, our cumulative translation adjustment account decreased $42.6 million and $45.0 million, respectively, primarily attributable to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the Euro, Korean Won and British Pound.
Interest Rate Risk
Credit Facility
As of September 30, 2009, our debt was comprised of borrowings under our credit facility. The interest rates under our credit facility may be reset due to fluctuation in a market-based index, such as the federal funds rate, the 1-month LIBOR rate or the credit facility’s administrative agent’s prime rate. Assuming the amount of borrowings available under our credit facility was fully drawn during the third quarter of 2009, we would have had $300.0 million outstanding under such facility, and a hypothetical 1.00% (100 basis-point) change in the interest rate of our credit facility would have changed our pre-tax earnings by approximately $0.7 million for the three month period ended September 30, 2009. Assuming the amount of borrowings under our credit facility was equal to the amount of outstanding borrowings on September 30, 2009, we would have had $51.8 million of total usage and a hypothetical 1.00% (100 basis-point) change in the interest rate of our credit facility would have changed our pre-tax earnings by approximately $0.1 million for the three month period ended September 30, 2009. We do not manage the interest rate risk on our debt through the use of derivative instruments.
Investment Portfolio
Our investment portfolio is comprised primarily of cash and cash equivalents and investments in a variety of debt instruments of high quality issuers, money market funds which invest in U.S Treasuries, sovereign commercial paper, bank time deposits and government bonds that mature within six months of their origination date, as well as auction rate securities. A hypothetical 1.00% (100 basis-point) change in interest rates would have changed our annual pretax earnings by approximately $0.7 million for the three month period ended September 30, 2009.

 

43


Table of Contents

Other Market Risks
Investments in Auction Rate Securities
As of September 30, 2009, the Company held $91.1 million (at par and cost value) of investments in auction rate securities. Given current conditions in the auction rate securities market as described in Note 6, Investments, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the auction rate securities with the original par value and cost of $91.1 million were written down to an estimated fair value of $89.6 million, resulting in an unrealized loss of $0.2 million, reported in interest and other, net in the consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 (relating to the auction rate securities marketed and sold by UBS, see Note 6, Investments, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q), and an unrealized gain of $0.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 that has been reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income, a component of stockholders’ equity. This loss recorded to other comprehensive income is deemed to be a temporary impairment. We may incur additional temporary unrealized losses or other-than-temporary realized losses in the future if market conditions persist and we are unable to recover the cost of our auction rate bond investments. A hypothetical 100-basis-point loss from the par value of these investments would have resulted in a $0.9 million impairment as of September 30, 2009.
ITEM 4.  
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Monster Worldwide maintains “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined under Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, Monster Worldwide’s management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and Monster Worldwide’s management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Monster Worldwide has carried out an evaluation, as of the end of the period covered by this report, under the supervision and with the participation of Monster Worldwide’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of Monster Worldwide’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon their evaluation and subject to the foregoing, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that Monster Worldwide’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
There have been no significant changes in Monster Worldwide’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.  
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is involved in various legal proceedings that are incidental to the conduct of its business. Aside from the matters discussed below, the Company is not involved in any pending or threatened legal proceedings that it believes could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
Remaining Litigation Arising from the Company’s Historical Stock Option Granting Practices
The Company is currently party to one civil action (captioned as Taylor v. McKelvey, et al., 06 CV 8322 (S.D.N.Y)(AKH) (the “ERISA Class Action”)) pending against it (as well as certain former officers and directors of the Company) in connection with the Company’s historical stock option granting practices. The ERISA Class Action was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in October 2006 as a putative class action litigation, purportedly brought on behalf of all participants in the Company’s 401(k) Plan (the “Plan”). The complaint, as amended in February 2007 and February 2008, alleges that the defendants breached their fiduciary obligations to Plan participants under Sections 404, 405, 409 and 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) by allowing Plan participants to purchase and to hold and maintain Company stock in their Plan accounts without disclosing to those Plan participants the Company’s historical stock option grant practices. On September 14, 2009, the plaintiffs and the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (the “Memorandum of Understanding”) that memorializes the terms pursuant to which the parties intend, subject to Court approval and certification of the proposed class described in the second amended complaint, to settle the ERISA Class Action. The Memorandum of Understanding provides for a payment of $4.3 million in full settlement of the claims asserted in the ERISA Class Action, a substantial majority of which will be paid by insurance and contribution from another defendant. The parties to the ERISA Class Action expect to enter into a formal settlement agreement in the near future and to thereafter seek Court approval.

 

44


Table of Contents

Upon the conclusion of the settlement of the ERISA Class Action, all of the actions seeking recoveries from the Company as an outgrowth of the Company’s historical stock option grant practices will have been settled. As a result, in the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, the Company has reversed a previously recorded accrual of $6.9 million relating to these matters.
Litigation Relating to the Company’s Discontinued Tickle Business
In May 2008, Fotomedia Technologies, LLC filed suit against the Company’s Tickle business for allegedly infringing three patents by operating photo sharing services on a website operated by Tickle. The lawsuit—entitled Fotomedia Technologies, LLC v. Fujifilm U.S.A., Inc., et al. (Civil Action No. 2:08-cv-203)—is pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and there are 23 other named defendants. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction and monetary relief. The Court has not yet entered a schedule in the case. The Company took down the website accused of infringement for reasons unrelated to the lawsuit and intends to vigorously defend this matter.
ITEM 1A.  
RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, which could materially affect our business, financial position and results of operations. There are no material changes from the risk factors set forth in Part I, “Item 1A., Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
ITEM 6.  
EXHIBITS
The following exhibits are filed as a part of this report:
         
Exhibit    
Number   Description
       
 
  10.1    
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated August 31, 2009, by and among Monster Worldwide, Inc., certain of Monster Worldwide, Inc.’s subsidiaries that may be designated as borrowers, Bank of America, N.A., in its capacity as administrative agent, swing line lender and l/c issuer and the lenders identified therein. (1)
       
 
  10.2    
Amended and Restated Subsidiary Guaranty, dated August 31, 2009, by the domestic subsidiaries of Monster Worldwide, Inc. party thereto in favor of Bank of America, N.A., in its capacity as administrative agent. (2)
       
 
  10.3    
U.S. Pledge Agreement, dated August 31, 2009, by Monster Worldwide, Inc. and Monster (California), Inc. in favor of Bank of America, N.A., in its capacity as administrative agent. (3)
       
 
  15.1    
Letter from BDO Seidman, LLP regarding unaudited interim financial information.
       
 
  31.1    
Certification by Salvatore Iannuzzi pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
       
 
  31.2    
Certification by Timothy T. Yates pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
       
 
  32.1    
Certification by Salvatore Iannuzzi pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
       
 
  32.2    
Certification by Timothy T. Yates pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
     
(1)  
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 3, 2009.
 
(2)  
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 3, 2009.
 
(3)  
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 3, 2009.

 

45


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
  MONSTER WORLDWIDE, INC. (Registrant)
 
 
Dated: October 30, 2009  By:   /s/ SALVATORE IANNUZZI    
    Salvatore Iannuzzi   
    Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)   
 
     
Dated: October 30, 2009  By:   /s/ TIMOTHY T. YATES    
    Timothy T. Yates   
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)   
 
     
Dated: October 30, 2009  By:   /s/ JAMES M. LANGROCK    
    James M. Langrock   
    Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting Officer (principal accounting officer)   

 

46


Table of Contents

         
EXHIBIT INDEX
         
Exhibit    
Number   Description
       
 
  10.1    
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated August 31, 2009, by and among Monster Worldwide, Inc., certain of Monster Worldwide, Inc.’s subsidiaries that may be designated as borrowers, Bank of America, N.A., in its capacity as administrative agent, swing line lender and l/c issuer and the lenders identified therein. (1)
       
 
  10.2    
Amended and Restated Subsidiary Guaranty, dated August 31, 2009, by the domestic subsidiaries of Monster Worldwide, Inc. party thereto in favor of Bank of America, N.A., in its capacity as administrative agent. (2)
       
 
  10.3    
U.S. Pledge Agreement, dated August 31, 2009, by Monster Worldwide, Inc. and Monster (California), Inc. in favor of Bank of America, N.A., in its capacity as administrative agent. (3)
       
 
  15.1    
Letter from BDO Seidman, LLP regarding unaudited interim financial information.
       
 
  31.1    
Certification by Salvatore Iannuzzi pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
       
 
  31.2    
Certification by Timothy T. Yates pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
       
 
  32.1    
Certification by Salvatore Iannuzzi pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
       
 
  32.2    
Certification by Timothy T. Yates pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
     
(1)  
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 3, 2009.
 
(2)  
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 3, 2009.
 
(3)  
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 3, 2009.

 

47