Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For
the Transition period from
to
Commission file number 001-32935
ARCADIA RESOURCES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
NEVADA
|
|
88-0331369 |
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification |
|
|
Number) |
|
|
|
9229 DELEGATES ROW, SUITE 260 |
|
|
INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
|
|
46240 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (317) 569-8234
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer þ
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of August 12, 2009, 161,255,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, of the Registrant were
outstanding.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements |
ARCADIA RESOURCES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
517 |
|
|
$ |
1,522 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $3,571 and $3,386, respectively |
|
|
14,803 |
|
|
|
15,679 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
863 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
1,577 |
|
|
|
1,764 |
|
Current assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
5,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
18,495 |
|
|
|
25,286 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
2,180 |
|
|
|
2,308 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
17,053 |
|
|
|
17,053 |
|
Acquired intangible assets, net |
|
|
8,146 |
|
|
|
8,305 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
590 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
5,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
47,037 |
|
|
$ |
59,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lines of credit, current portion |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
437 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
2,579 |
|
|
|
2,765 |
|
Accrued expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and related taxes |
|
|
2,662 |
|
|
|
2,986 |
|
Interest |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
Health insurance |
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
545 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,046 |
|
|
|
917 |
|
Payable to affiliated agencies |
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
1,284 |
|
Long-term obligations, current portion |
|
|
1,235 |
|
|
|
596 |
|
Capital lease obligations, current portion |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
2,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
10,033 |
|
|
|
11,715 |
|
Lines of credit, less current portion |
|
|
7,749 |
|
|
|
10,889 |
|
Long-term obligations, less current portion |
|
|
23,646 |
|
|
|
26,918 |
|
Capital lease obligations, less current portion |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
41,492 |
|
|
|
49,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.001 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized; 161,291,415
shares and 161,249,529 shares issued, respectively |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
136,205 |
|
|
|
135,920 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(130,821 |
) |
|
|
(126,248 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
5,545 |
|
|
|
9,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
47,037 |
|
|
$ |
59,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
ARCADIA RESOURCES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Month Period Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues, net |
|
$ |
26,409 |
|
|
$ |
26,778 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
18,961 |
|
|
|
18,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
7,448 |
|
|
|
8,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
9,666 |
|
|
|
10,244 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
10,077 |
|
|
|
10,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(2,629 |
) |
|
|
(2,593 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
956 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
248 |
|
Other |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expenses |
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
1,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
(3,503 |
) |
|
|
(3,807 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(3,596 |
) |
|
|
(4,003 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income / (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
(1,193 |
) |
|
|
717 |
|
Net gain on disposal |
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
from discontinued operations |
|
|
(977 |
) |
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS |
|
$ |
(4,573 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,286 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
160,552 |
|
|
|
131,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
ARCADIA RESOURCES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance, April 1, 2009 |
|
|
161,249,529 |
|
|
$ |
161 |
|
|
$ |
135,920 |
|
|
$ |
(126,248 |
) |
|
$ |
9,833 |
|
Stock-based compensation
expense |
|
|
64,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285 |
|
Cashless exercise of warrants |
|
|
(22,489 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,573 |
) |
|
|
(4,573 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2009 |
|
|
161,291,415 |
|
|
$ |
161 |
|
|
$ |
136,205 |
|
|
$ |
(130,821 |
) |
|
$ |
5,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
ARCADIA RESOURCES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the period |
|
$ |
(4,573 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,286 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used
in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
811 |
|
Depreciation of property and equipment |
|
|
531 |
|
|
|
1,012 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
Gain on business disposals |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discounts |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
(792 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
(228 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
1,176 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(547 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(1,146 |
) |
|
|
625 |
|
Due to affiliated agencies |
|
|
(327 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
(1,616 |
) |
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(363 |
) |
Proceeds from business disposal |
|
|
9,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in restricted cash |
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from disposals of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(264 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
8,392 |
|
|
|
(608 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net payments on lines of credit |
|
|
(3,577 |
) |
|
|
(3,299 |
) |
Payments on notes payable and capital lease obligations |
|
|
(4,204 |
) |
|
|
(438 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(7,781 |
) |
|
|
(3,737 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(1,005 |
) |
|
|
(3,970 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
6,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
517 |
|
|
$ |
2,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
209 |
|
|
$ |
480 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Non-cash investing / financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable converted to notes payable |
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants issued in conjunction with line of credit amendment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
248 |
|
Prior period liability satisfied with equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
Accrued interest converted to notes payable |
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
See accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
ARCADIA RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 1 Description of Company and Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Description of Company
Arcadia Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation, together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the
Company), is a national provider of home care, medical staffing, and pharmacy services operating
under the service mark Arcadia HealthCare. In May and June 2009, the Company disposed of its Home Health
Equipment (HHE), industrial staffing and retail pharmacy software businesses. Subsequent to
these divestitures, the Company operates in three reportable business segments: Home Care/Medical
Staffing Services (Services), Pharmacy and Catalog. The Companys corporate headquarters are
located in Indianapolis, Indiana. The Company conducts its business from approximately 70
facilities located in 21 states. The Company operates pharmacies in Indiana and Minnesota and has
customer service centers in Michigan and Indiana.
Unaudited Interim Financial Information
The accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2009, the consolidated statements of
operations for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the consolidated statements of
cash flows for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and the consolidated statement
of stockholders equity for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 are unaudited but include
all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) that are, in the opinion of
management, necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position at such dates and the
results of operations and cash flows for the periods then ended, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). The consolidated balance sheet as of
March 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date
but, in accordance with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC), does not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete
financial statements. Operating results for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 are not
necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year. The financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2009 included in the Companys Form 10-K filed with the SEC on July 14, 2009.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts presented in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to current period
presentations including the reflection of discontinued operations separately from continuing
operations.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2008, FASB issued FSP No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets
(FSP No. 142-3), which amends the factors that must be considered in developing renewal or
extension assumptions used to determine the useful life over which to amortize the cost of a
recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. FSP No. 142-3
requires an entity to consider its own assumptions about renewal or extension of the term of the
arrangement, consistent with its expected use of the asset. FSP No. 142-3 also requires the
disclosure of the weighted-average period prior to the next renewal or extension for each major
intangible asset class, the accounting policy for the treatment of costs incurred to renew or
extend the term of a recognized intangible assets and for intangible assets renewed or extended
during the period, if renewal or extension costs are capitalized, the costs incurred to renew or
extend the asset and the weighted-average period prior to the next renewal or extension for each
major intangible asset class. FSP No. 142-3 is effective for financial statements for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company adopted FSP No. 142-3 on April 1, 2009, resulting in
no impact to its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2008, the FASB ratified the consensus reached on Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
No. 07-05, Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entitys Own
Stock (EITF Issue No. 07-5). EITF Issue No. 07-05 clarifies the determination of whether an
instrument (or an embedded feature) is indexed to an entitys own stock, which would qualify as a
scope exception under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
EITF Issue No. 07-05 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008. The Company
adopted this pronouncement on April 1, 2009, resulting in no impact to its consolidated financial
statements.
6
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. The statement amends and expands the
disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 133 to provide users of financial statements with an enhanced
understanding of (i) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; (ii) how derivative
instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related
interpretations, and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys
financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. The statement also requires
(i) qualitative disclosures about objectives for using derivatives by primary underlying risk
exposure, (ii) information about the volume of derivative activity, (iii) tabular disclosures about
balance sheet location and gross fair value amounts of derivative instruments, income statement,
and other comprehensive income location and amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments
by type of contract, and (iv) disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in
derivative agreements. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
or interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of this pronouncement did not
have a significant impact on the Companys financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS No.
141R), which replaces SFAS 141. The statement retains the purchase method of accounting for
acquisitions, but requires a number of changes, including changes in the way assets and liabilities
are recognized in purchase accounting. It also changes the recognition of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed arising from contingencies, requires the capitalization of in-process research
and development at fair value, and requires the expensing of acquisition-related costs as
incurred. SFAS No. 141R is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and
will apply prospectively to business combinations completed on or after that date. The Company
adopted SFAS No. 141R on April 1, 2009, and the impact of adopting this pronouncement will be
dependent on the future business combinations that the Company may pursue.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments. FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 requires entities to provide
disclosure in interim reporting periods of the fair value of all financial instruments for which it
is practicable to estimate that value, whether recognized or not recognized at fair value in the
balance sheet. Prior to the issuance of FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, such disclosures were
required only in annual reporting periods. As of June 30, 2009, the Company adopted FSP No. FAS
107-1 and APB 28-1, which was effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. The
recorded amounts of the Companys financial instruments at June 30, 2009 approximate fair value.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events, which establishes general standards
of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before
financial statements are issued for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The
Company adopted this standard as of June 30, 2009 and considered the accounting and disclosure of
events occurring after the balance sheet date through the date and time the Companys financial
statements were issued on August 13, 2009. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on
the Companys financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles a replacement of SFAS No. 162 to become
the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP; all existing accounting standards are
superseded as described in SFAS No. 168. All other accounting literature not included in the
Codification is non-authoritative. SFAS No. 168 is effective for financial statements issued for
interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of this standard is not
expected to have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
7
Note 2 Managements Plan
Since fiscal 2008, the Company has been focused on the implementation of a new board approved
strategic plan designed to focus on expanding certain core businesses; restructuring the Companys
long-term debt; closing or selling non-strategic businesses and assets; improving operating
margins; reducing selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses; and establishing a more
disciplined approach to cash management. To date, management has made progress in each of these
areas as discussed below.
On March 25, 2009, the Company restructured $24 million of debt with its two largest equity holders
and received an additional $3 million in debt financing as part of the transaction. The debt
maturity was extended through April 1, 2012, and the Company will continue to have the option to
add the accrued interest to the principal balance on a quarterly basis. The debt agreements
include a formula for splitting the cash proceeds upon the sale of assets. Specifically, the
first $2 million in proceeds are to be retained by the Company. The next $5 million in proceeds
are then paid to the lenders as provided in the promissory notes. After these amounts are paid,
proceeds up to $20,000,000 are split 50% to the Company and 50% to be paid pro-rata to these
lenders. Thereafter, proceeds are split 25% to the Company and 75% to the lenders.
On July 13, 2009, the Company executed an amendment to its line of credit agreement with Comerica
Bank. The amendment reduced the total availability from $19 million to $14 million; extended the
maturity from October 2009 to August 2011; and increased the interest rate from the prime rate plus
1% to the prime rate plus 2.75%.
In May and June 2009, the Company sold its HHE, industrial staffing and pharmacy software
businesses and received an aggregate of $9,157,000 in cash proceeds at the closings. In addition
to the cash proceeds received at closing, the transactions included holdback provisions for an
additional $1,475,000 in cash, which is to be released over the next 18 months assuming certain
criteria are met. Consistent with the terms of the debt agreements described above, the Company
paid certain lenders a total of $3,941,000 from the cash proceeds to reduce outstanding debt. The
Company plans to use the cash received upon the release of the holdback amounts to further reduce
debt. The Company also paid AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation $1,980,000 from the proceeds of the
pharmacy software business divestiture plus an additional $145,000 in order to pay off the
outstanding line of credit balance. Cash proceeds received at the closings, net of fees, less
amounts used to pay down debt were $2,629,000.
The Company has expanded revenues in the Pharmacy segment over the last three quarters and has seen
steady increases in Home Care revenue. Management believes that it will make further progress with
implementing its strategic plan during the remainder of fiscal 2010. The Company believes that its
focus on two core businesses will enable it to realize operational improvements in both the
Services and Pharmacy segments. These planned operational improvements include growth in Home Care
revenues, growth in DailyMed revenues, improved gross margins in the Pharmacy segment and more
efficient operation of its pharmacy facilities as the DailyMed volumes grow. In addition to these
operational improvements, the Company intends to make further reductions in corporate expenses in
order to bring these expenses more in line with current and projected revenues.
With the Companys reduced debt levels (described above) and its focus on two core business
platforms, management believes that it would be able to raise additional capital to
support operating cash requirements, if necessary, and to fund investment in growth opportunities.
This capital could be in the form of debt financing, private equity placements and/or investments
in its core business platforms by strategic business partners. At the same time, because of normal
fluctuations in the timing of the Companys cash receipts and disbursements, management is focused
on disciplined management of its cash flow. While management believes that it will be successful
in managing its cash requirements, and has developed alternatives for addressing short-term cash
shortfalls, no assurance can be made that these alternatives can be successfully implemented in the
time frame required. In such a case, the Company would need to consider other strategies,
including the divestiture of additional assets or business lines, to meet its cash requirements
and/or fund its investment in growth opportunities.
8
Note 3 Discontinued Operations
Industrial Staffing Operations
On May 29, 2009, the Company finalized the sale of substantially all of the assets of its
industrial and non-medical staffing business for cash proceeds of $250,000, which will be paid in
five equal installments through September 2009. Additionally, the Company will receive 50% of the
future earnings of the business until the total payments equal $1.6 million. Such payments, if
any, will be recorded as additional gains when earned. The Company retained all accounts
receivable for services provided prior to May 29, 2009.
HHE Operations
On January 5, 2009, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Braden Partners, L.P.
to sell the assets of its HHE business in San Fernando, California. Total proceeds were $503,000,
less fees of $24,000. $126,000 of the purchase price is being held by the buyer to cover the
Companys contingent obligations. The Company retained all accounts receivables for services
provided prior to January 2009.
On May 18, 2009, the Company completed the sale of its ownership interest in Lovell Medical Supply,
Inc., Beacon Respiratory Services of Georgia, Inc., and Trinity Healthcare of Winston-Salem, Inc.
to Aerocare Holdings, Inc. for total proceeds of $4,750,000, less fees of $150,000. $475,000 of
the purchase price is being held by the buyer to cover the Companys contingent obligations. The
entities sold represented the Southeast region of the Companys HHE business.
On May 19, 2009, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Braden Partners, L.P. to
sell the assets of its Midwest region of the Companys HHE business. Total proceeds were
$4,000,000, less fees of $150,000. $1,000,000 of the purchase price is being held by the buyer to
cover the Companys contingent obligations. The Company retained all accounts receivable for
services provided prior to May 2009.
As of May 2009, the Company had sold all of its HHE operations.
Retail Pharmacy Software Business
On June 11, 2009, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with a leading pharmacy
management company to sell substantially all of the assets of JASCORP, LLC (JASCORP) for proceeds
of $2,200,000, less estimated fees of $100,000. $220,000 of the purchase price is being held back
by the buyer until December 2011 in order to cover the Companys contingent obligations. JASCORP
operated the retail pharmacy software business that the Company acquired in September 2007. As
part of the divestiture, the Company entered into a License and Services Agreement with the buyer
which provides the Company the right to continue to use the software for internal purposes.
The assets and liabilities associated with these discontinued business operations have been
classified as assets and liabilities of discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets. The results of the above are reported in discontinued operations in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations, and the prior period consolidated statement of
operations have been recast to conform to this presentation. The segment results in Note 11 also
reflect the reclassification of the discontinued operations. The discontinued operations do not
reflect the costs of certain services provided to these operations by the Company. Such costs,
which were not allocated by the Company to the various operations, included internal employee costs
associated with administrative functions, including accounting, information technology, human
resources, compliance and contracting as well as external costs for legal fees, insurance, audit
fees, payroll processing, and various public-company expenses. The Company uses a centralized
approach to cash management and financing of its operations, and, accordingly, debt and the related
interest expense were also not allocated specifically to these operations. The consolidated
statements of cash flows do not separately report the cash flows of the discontinued operations.
9
The components of the assets and liabilities of the discontinued operations are presented below (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Services - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pharmacy - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Staffing |
|
|
HHE |
|
|
Software |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $845 |
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
$ |
431 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
570 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets of discontinued
operations |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
757 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets of discontinued operations |
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
$ |
568 |
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
$ |
791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
555 |
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
$ |
631 |
|
Accrued compensation and related taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
Accrued other |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
736 |
|
|
$ |
248 |
|
|
$ |
1,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Services - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pharmacy - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Staffing |
|
|
HHE |
|
|
Software |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $968 |
|
$ |
972 |
|
|
$ |
3,199 |
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
4,309 |
|
Inventory, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
829 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
849 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
1,007 |
|
|
|
4,203 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
5,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1,716 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
1,865 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
1,430 |
|
Acquired intangibles assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,822 |
|
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
2,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets of discontinued
operations |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
4,045 |
|
|
|
1,788 |
|
|
|
5,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets of discontinued operations |
|
$ |
1,024 |
|
|
$ |
8,248 |
|
|
$ |
2,036 |
|
|
$ |
11,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
986 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
$ |
1,064 |
|
Accrued compensation and related taxes |
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
Accrued other |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
Long-term obligations, current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
$ |
316 |
|
|
$ |
1,494 |
|
|
$ |
227 |
|
|
$ |
2,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
The components of the earnings/(loss) from discontinued operations are presented below (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services Industrial Staffing |
|
$ |
1,223 |
|
|
$ |
5,218 |
|
Home Health Equipment |
|
|
1,423 |
|
|
|
4,832 |
|
Pharmacy Software |
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,002 |
|
|
|
10,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services Industrial Staffing |
|
$ |
(37 |
) |
|
$ |
475 |
|
Home Health Equipment |
|
|
(1,061 |
) |
|
|
190 |
|
Pharmacy Software |
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,193 |
) |
|
$ |
717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain / (loss) on disposal: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services Industrial Staffing |
|
$ |
126 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Home Health Equipment |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pharmacy Software |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
216 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services Industrial Staffing |
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
475 |
|
Home Health Equipment |
|
|
(941 |
) |
|
|
190 |
|
Pharmacy Software |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(977 |
) |
|
$ |
717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4 Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets
Goodwill by segment as of June 30 and March 31, 2009 was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
|
Pharmacy |
|
|
Catalog |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance |
|
$ |
14,553 |
|
|
$ |
2,500 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For tax purposes, goodwill of approximately $24.0 million is amortizable over 15 years. The
difference between the book and tax balance of goodwill is due to certain impairment charges
incurred for book purposes in previous periods.
11
Acquired intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
Trade name |
|
$ |
6,664 |
|
|
$ |
724 |
|
|
$ |
6,664 |
|
|
$ |
682 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
4,720 |
|
|
|
2,514 |
|
|
|
4,720 |
|
|
|
2,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,384 |
|
|
$ |
3,238 |
|
|
|
11,384 |
|
|
$ |
3,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less accumulated
amortization |
|
|
(3,238 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,079 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net acquired
intangible assets |
|
$ |
8,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense for acquired intangible assets included in continuing operations was $159,000
and $301,000 for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The estimated amortization expense related to acquired intangible assets in existence as of June
30, 2009 was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of fiscal 2010 |
|
$ |
476 |
|
Fiscal 2011 |
|
|
571 |
|
Fiscal 2012 |
|
|
518 |
|
Fiscal 2013 |
|
|
476 |
|
Fiscal 2014 |
|
|
382 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
5,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4 Lines of Credit
The following table summarizes the lines of credit for the Company (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
Lending Institution |
|
Maturity date |
|
Borrowing |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Interest rate |
|
Comerica Bank |
|
August 1, 2011 |
|
$ |
10,220 |
|
|
$ |
7,749 |
|
|
$ |
9,126 |
|
|
Prime plus 2.75 |
% |
AmerisourceBergen Drug
Corporation |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total lines of credit obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,220 |
|
|
|
7,749 |
|
|
|
11,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(437 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,749 |
|
|
$ |
10,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comerica Bank
Arcadia Services, Inc. (ASI), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and three of ASIs
wholly-owned subsidiaries have an outstanding line of credit agreement with Comerica Bank. As of
June 30, 2009, advances under the Comerica Bank line of credit agreement cannot exceed the lesser
of the revolving credit commitment amount of $19 million or the aggregate principal amount of
indebtedness permitted under the advance formula amount at any one time. The advance formula base
is 85% of the eligible accounts receivable, plus the lesser of 85% of eligible unbilled accounts or
$3,000,000. The line of credit agreement contains a subjective acceleration clause and requires the
Company to maintain a lockbox. However, the Company has the ability to control the funds in the
deposit account and to determine the amount used to pay down the line of credit balance. As such,
the line of credit is not automatically classified as a current obligation in the consolidated
balance sheets. Arcadia Services, Inc. agreed to various financial covenant ratios, to have any
person who acquires Arcadia Services, Inc.s capital stock to pledge such stock to Comerica Bank,
and to customary negative covenants. If an event of default occurs, Comerica Bank may, at its
option, accelerate the maturity of the debt and exercise its right to foreclose on the issued and
outstanding capital stock of Arcadia Services, Inc. and on all of the assets of Arcadia Services,
Inc. and its subsidiaries. On June 30, 2009, the interest rate on this line of credit agreement
was the banks prime rate plus 1.0% (4.25%), and the availability under the line was $2,471,000.
12
RKDA, Inc. (RKDA), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and the holding company of Arcadia
Services, Inc. and Arcadia Products, Inc., granted Comerica Bank a first priority security interest
in all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Arcadia Services, Inc. Arcadia Services,
Inc. granted Comerica Bank a first priority security interest in all of its assets. The
subsidiaries of Arcadia Services, Inc. granted the bank security interests in all of their assets.
RDKA is restricted from paying dividends to the Company. RKDA executed a guaranty to Comerica Bank
for all indebtedness of Arcadia Services, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Any such default and
resulting foreclosure would have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition. As
of June 30, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all financial covenants.
On July 13, 2009, ASI executed an amendment to its line of credit agreement with Comerica Bank.
The amendment reduced the total availability from $19 million to $14 million; extended the maturity
from October 2009 to August 2011; and increased the interest rate from the prime rate plus 1% to
the prime rate plus 2.75%. The advance formula will remain the same as described above. The
amended agreement requires the Company to maintain a deposit account with a minimum balance of
$500,000. ASI agreed to the following financial covenants: tangible effective net worth of $2
million as of June 30, 2009 and gradually increasing on a quarterly basis to $2.8 million by
September 2011; minimum quarterly net income of $400,000; and, minimum subordination of
indebtedness to Arcadia Resources, Inc. of $15.5 million. As a result of this amendment, the
Company classified the outstanding balance as a long-term liability as of June 30, 2009 and March
31, 2009. As of June 30, 2009, the Company was in compliance with the loan covenants.
AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation
In connection with the acquisition of PrairieStone in February 2007, PrairieStone entered into a
line of credit agreement with AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation (ABDC), which previously
maintained an ownership interest in PrairieStone. The line of credit was secured by a security
interest in all of the assets of PrairieStone and SSAC, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company, and was guaranteed by the Company.
On June 10, 2009, the Company entered into an amendment to the line of credit agreement. The
amendment included terms whereby if the Company paid down the remaining balance outstanding on the
line of credit, ABDC would defer the payment of certain inventory purchases up to $750,000 until
April 1, 2010, and the deferred balance would accrue interest at 8.0%. Additionally, ABDC agreed
to negotiate in good faith the extension of an existing Prime Vendor Agreement relating to the
Pharmacy segment which expires in September 2010 and a new credit agreement. On June 11, 2009 and
simultaneous with the divestiture of JASCORP, the Company paid ABDC a total of $2,125,000 in order
to pay off the line of credit balance. During June 2009, the Company deferred $750,000 in
inventory purchasing payments. To date, the Company and ABDC have not yet negotiated the new
credit agreement relating to the $750,000 or the Prime Vendor Agreement. The $750,000 is included
in current long-term obligation as of June 30, 2009 on the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets.
13
Note 5 Long-Term Obligations
Long-term obligations consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Note payable to JANA in the amount of $18.0 million, dated March 25, 2009
bearing an effective interest rate of 10% with unpaid accrued interest and
principal due in full on April 1, 2012. Cash interest that would otherwise be
payable on such quarterly interest payment dates may be added to the principal
balance of the note payable at the Companys option. The note payable is
unsecured. |
|
$ |
16,579 |
|
|
$ |
18,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable to Vicis Capital Master Fund (Vicis) in the amount of $7.8
million, dated March 25, 2009 bearing an effective interest rate of 10% with
unpaid accrued interest and principal due in full on April 1, 2012. Cash
interest that would otherwise be payable on such quarterly interest payment
dates may be added to the principal balance of the note payable at the
Companys option. The note payable is unsecured. |
|
|
6,040 |
|
|
|
7,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable to LSP Partners, LP (LSP) in the amount of $1.0 million, dated
March 25, 2009 bearing an effective interest rate of 10% with unpaid accrued
interest and principal due in full on April 1, 2012. Cash interest that would
otherwise be payable on such quarterly interest payment dates may be added to
the principal balance of the note payable at the Companys option. The note
payable is unsecured. |
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable due
to AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation consistent with the terms of an amendment to a line of credit agreement date June 10, 2009 bearing an
effective interest rate of 8.0% with unpaid accrued interest and principal due
in full on April 1, 2010. The note payable is secured by the assets of the
Pharmacy segment. |
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-closing risk share obligation relating to the PrairieStone acquisition
due to Lunds, bearing an effective interest rate of 10%, maturing on February
17, 2010 with monthly principal payments of $37,000. The balance is
unsecured. |
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable, unsecured bearing interest at prime plus 1% due on July 31, 2009. |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term obligations |
|
|
24,881 |
|
|
|
27,514 |
|
Less current portion of long-term obligations |
|
|
(1,235 |
) |
|
|
(596 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term obligations, less current portion |
|
$ |
23,646 |
|
|
$ |
26,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On March 25, 2009, the Company entered into a Master Exchange Agreement with JANA (related
entity), Vicis (related entity) and LSP. Pursuant to the agreement, Vicis purchased $2,000,000 of
the principal balance of promissory note held by JANA. Additionally, JANA and LSP advanced the
Company $2,000,000 and $1,000,000 of cash, respectively. JANA and Vicis then exchanged their
previously outstanding promissory notes for new notes with terms as described above. The new
promissory notes due to JANA, Vicis, and LSP include covenants relating to, among other items,
limitations of additional indebtedness, issuance of new equity securities and the application of
proceeds from future asset sales. Specifically, the notes provide that the first $2,000,000 in
proceeds would be retained by the Company. Additional proceeds are then paid to JANA, Vicis and
LSP as provided in the promissory notes. After these promissory note prepayments are made,
proceeds up to $20,000,000 are split 50% to the Company and 50% to be paid pro-rata to these three
lenders. Thereafter, proceeds are split 25% to the Company and 75% to the lenders.
14
As of June 30, 2009 future maturities of long-term obligations are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of fiscal 2010 |
|
$ |
485 |
|
Fiscal 2011 |
|
|
750 |
|
Fiscal 2012 |
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2013 |
|
|
23,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
24,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average interest rate of outstanding long-term obligations as of June 30, 2009 and
March 31, 2009 and 2008 was 10.0%.
Note 6 Stockholders Equity
Warrants
The following represents warrants outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Description |
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Granted |
|
Expiration |
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Class A |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
May 2004 |
|
May 2011 |
|
|
3,593,836 |
|
|
|
3,593,836 |
|
Class B-1 |
|
$ |
0.001 |
|
|
September 2005 |
|
September 2009 |
|
|
444,444 |
|
|
|
444,444 |
|
Class B-2 |
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
September 2005 |
|
May 2014 |
|
|
44,444 |
|
|
|
44,444 |
|
ABDC issuance |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
June 2008 |
|
June 2015 |
|
|
490,000 |
|
|
|
490,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,572,724 |
|
|
|
4,572,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The outstanding warrants have no voting rights and provide the holder with the right to
convert one warrant for one share of the Companys common stock at the stated exercise price. The
majority of the outstanding warrants have a cashless exercise feature.
During the three-month period ended June 30, 2009, the Company accounted for 22,489 shares of
common stock forfeited to the Company as part of the cashless exercise of 8,545,833 B-1 warrants in
March 2009. No warrants were exercised during the three-month period ended June 30, 2008.
Note 7 Contingencies
Contingencies
As a health care provider, the Company is subject to extensive federal and state government
regulation, including numerous laws directed at preventing fraud and abuse and laws regulating
reimbursement under various government programs. The marketing, billing, documenting and other
practices of health care companies are all subject to government scrutiny. To ensure compliance
with Medicare and other regulations, audits may be conducted, with requests for patient records and
other documents to support claims submitted for payment of services rendered to customers,
beneficiaries of the government programs. Violations of federal and state regulations can result in
severe criminal, civil and administrative penalties and sanctions, including disqualification from
Medicare and other reimbursement programs.
The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course
of business. The Company does not believe that the resolution of such actions will materially
affect the Companys business, results of operations or financial condition.
15
Note 8 Stock-Based Compensation
On August 18, 2006, the Board of Directors unanimously approved the Arcadia Resources, Inc. 2006
Equity Incentive Plan (the 2006 Plan), which was subsequently approved by the stockholders on
September 26, 2006. The 2006 Plan provides for grants of incentive stock options, non-qualified
stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted shares (collectively Awards). The 2006
Plan will terminate and no more Awards will be granted after August 2, 2016, unless terminated by
the Board of Directors sooner. The termination of the 2006 Plan will not affect previously granted
Awards. The total number of shares of common stock that may be issued pursuant to Awards under the
2006 Plan may not exceed an aggregate of 2.5% of the Companys authorized and unissued shares of
common stock as of the date the Plan was approved by the shareholders or 5,000,000 shares. All
non-employee directors, executive officers and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries are
eligible to receive Awards under the 2006 Plan. As of June 30, 2009, approximately 200,000 shares
were available for grant under the 2006 Plan.
On January 27, 2009, the Board of Directors approved and adopted the Second Amendment (the
Amendment) to the 2006 Plan. The Amendment proposes to increase the number of shares available
to be issued under the Plan to 5% of the Companys authorized shares of common stock as of the date
the Amendment is approved by the Companys stockholders. The Amendment is subject to approval by
the Companys stockholders at the next regularly scheduled or special meeting of stockholders.
Stock Options
Prior to the adoption of the 2006 Plan, stock options were granted to certain members of management
and the Board of Directors. The terms of these options varied depending on the nature and timing
of the grant. The maximum contractual term for the options granted to date is seven years.
The fair value of each stock option award is estimated on the date of the grant using a
Black-Scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. The
Company estimated the volatility of its common stock by using historical stock price volatility.
The Company based the risk-free interest rate that it uses in the option pricing model on U.S.
Treasury constant maturity issues having remaining terms similar to the expected terms of the
options. The Company does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future and
therefore used an expected dividend yield of zero in the option pricing model. The expected life of
employee stock options represents the calculation using the simplified method for plain vanilla
options applied consistently to all plain vanilla options, consistent with the guidance in Staff
Accounting Bulletin (SAB) SAB 107. In December 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
issued SAB110 to amend the SECs views discussed in SAB 107 regarding the use of the simplified
method in developing an estimate of expected life of share options in accordance with SFAS 123R.
Due to a lack of adequate historical experience to provide a reasonable estimate, the Company will
continue to use the simplified method until it has the historical data necessary to provide a
reasonable estimate of expected life in accordance with SAB 107, as amended by SAB 110. For the
expected option life, the Company has what SAB 107 defines as plain-vanilla stock options, and
therefore use a simple average of the vesting period and the contractual term for options as
permitted by SAB 107. All share-based payment awards are amortized on a straight-line basis over
the requisite service periods, which is generally the vesting period.
Following are the specific valuation assumptions used for each respective period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Weighted-average |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
73 |
% |
Expected dividend yields |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
Expected terms (in years) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
3.19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Stock option activity for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Value |
|
Options |
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Term (Years) |
|
|
(thousands) |
|
Outstanding at April 1, 2009 |
|
|
3,771,225 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
(31,667 |
) |
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
3,739,558 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
395,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
3,196,920 |
|
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
285,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In fiscal 2009, the Board determined that certain members of executive management would be granted
a number of options which would vest over three years. On April 3, 2008, the Board authorized the
issuance of one-third of these total option grants for executive management (such portion which
vested quarterly over fiscal 2009) and determined that the remaining two-thirds were to be issued
as soon as the Company has option shares available to do so. Following approval of the Amendment
of the Plan as describe above, on January 27, 2009, the Board of Directors granted the remaining
two-thirds of these options to the executives (an aggregate of 2,253,334 options), such options (i)
having an exercise price of $0.72 per share (the closing share price on April 2, 2008), (ii)
vesting in equal installments on March 31, 2010 and 2011, and (iii) expiring on January 26, 2016.
In the event shareholder approval of the Amendment to the Plan is not received at the next special
or annual meeting of the Companys shareholders, these option grants shall be terminated and voided
in all respects and shall not vest or be exercisable by the participants at any time. The
2,253,334 options are not included in the above table, and to date, the Company has not recognized
compensation expense associated with these options.
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Exercise |
|
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Price |
|
$0.18 $0.25 |
|
|
524,000 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
509,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
$0.26 $1.00 |
|
|
2,446,978 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
|
1,919,340 |
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
$1.01 $1.50 |
|
|
650,967 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.37 |
|
|
|
650,967 |
|
|
$ |
1.37 |
|
$1.51 $2.25 |
|
|
43,000 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
|
43,000 |
|
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
$2.92 |
|
|
74,613 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
$ |
2.92 |
|
|
|
74,613 |
|
|
$ |
2.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
3,739,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
|
3,196,920 |
|
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during the three-month period
ended June 30, 2008 was $0.40. No stock options were granted during the three-month period ended
June 30, 2009.
No stock options were exercised during either the three-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
The Company recognized $185,000 and $206,000 in stock-based compensation expense from all
operations relating to stock options during the three-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
As of June 30, 2009, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to stock options
was $1,039,000, which is expected to be expensed through 2011.
17
Restricted Stock
Restricted stock is measured at fair value on the date of the grant, based on the number of shares
granted and the quoted price of the Companys common stock. The value is recognized as compensation
expense ratably over the corresponding employees specified service period. Restricted stock vests
upon the employees fulfillment of specified performance and service-based conditions.
The following table summarizes the activity for restricted stock awards during the three-month
period ended June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
per Share |
|
Unvested at April 1, 2009 |
|
|
656,092 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(244,375 |
) |
|
|
1.37 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
1.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
401,717 |
|
|
$ |
1.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company recognized $99,000 and
$128,000, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense from all operations related to
restricted stock.
During the three-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the total fair value of restricted
stock vested was $97,000 and $165,000, respectively.
As of June 30, 2009, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to unvested
restricted stock awards was $569,000, which is expected to be expensed over a weighted-average
period of 1.85 years.
Note 9 Income Taxes
The Company incurred state and local tax expense of $93,000 and $196,000 during the three-month
periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
SFAS No. 109 requires that a valuation allowance be established when it is more likely than not
that all or a portion of deferred income tax assets will not be realized. A review of all available
positive and negative evidence needs to be considered, including a companys performance, the
market environment in which the company operates, the length of carryback and carryforward periods,
and expectation of future profits. SFAS No. 109 further states that forming a conclusion that a
valuation allowance is not needed is difficult when there is negative evidence such as the
cumulative losses in recent years. Therefore, cumulative losses weigh heavily in the overall
assessment. The Company will provide a full valuation allowance on future tax benefits until it can
sustain a level of profitability that demonstrates its ability to utilize the assets, or other
significant positive evidence arises that suggests the Companys ability to utilize such assets.
Note 10 Related Party Transactions
On June 30, 2009, the Company had an outstanding balance of $16.6 million related to a note payable
with JANA dated March 25, 2009. JANA held greater than 15% of the outstanding shares of Company
common stock on June 30, 2009. The Company incurred interest expense relating to the debt due JANA
in the amounts of $444,000 and $408,000 during the three-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively. See Note 5 Long-term Obligations for additional information pertaining to
this debt instrument.
On June 30, 2009, the Company had an outstanding balance of $6.0 million related to a note payable
with Vicis Capital Master Fund dated March 25, 2009. Vicis held greater than 15% of the
outstanding shares of Company common stock on June 30, 2009. The Company incurred interest expense,
including amortization of debt discount, relating to the debt in the amounts of $158,000 and
$150,000 during the three-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. See Note 5
Long-term Obligations for additional information pertaining this debt instrument.
18
One of the members of the Board of Directors of the Company has minority ownership interests in
each of Lunds, Inc. and LFHI Rx, LLC and serves as the Chairman and CEO of Lunds, Inc. These two
entities held an ownership interest in PrairieStone prior to its acquisition by the Company. Lunds,
Inc. and LFHI Rx, LLC received 2,400,000 shares of Company common stock at the closing of the
transaction and an additional 47,437 shares in February 2008 due to a stock price guarantee
provision relating to the acquisition. Immediately prior to Companys acquisition of PrairieStone,
PrairieStone closed on the sale of the assets of fifteen retail pharmacies located within grocery
stores owned and operated by Lunds, Inc. and Byerlys, Inc. to Lunds, Inc., which transaction
included execution of a five-year Management Services Agreement and a five-year Licensed Services
Agreement between Lunds, Inc. and PrairieStone. Under the terms of the Management Services
Agreement, PrairieStone provided such services that were appropriate for the day-to-day management
of the pharmacies. In conjunction with these two agreements, the Company recognized $27,000 and
$64,000 in revenue during the three-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The
Asset Purchase Agreement with Lunds also included a post-closing risk-share clause whereby
PrairieStone will pay Lunds 50% of the first two years losses, if any, up to a cumulative total
loss of $914,000. $457,000 was accrued during the fiscal 2007. In March 2009, the Company entered
into an Override Agreement with Lunds whereby the Company agreed to pay the post-closing risk-share
balance of $457,000 with an initial payment of $50,000 and then eleven monthly equal installments
plus interest through February 2010. As of June 30, 2009, the remaining principal balance of
$296,000 is included in the current portion of long-term obligations in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets. The Override Agreement also terminated the Management Services
Agreement and provided for the granting of 100,000 shares of the Companys common stock to Lunds.
Another member of the Board of Directors of the Company is the Director of Private Equity of CMS
Companies. Entities affiliated with CMS Companies purchased 4,201,681 shares of the Companys
common stock for $5,000,000 as part of the May 2007 private placement. In addition, these entities
received 1,050,420 warrants to purchase shares of common stock at $1.75 per share for a period of
seven years. These warrants were converted to 1,050,420 shares of common stock in conjunction with
the March 25, 2009 debt refinancing.
The Companys Chief Operating Officer has a beneficial ownership interest in an affiliated agency
and thereby has an interest in the affiliates transactions with the Company, including the
payments of commissions to the affiliate based on a specified percentage of gross margin. The
affiliate is responsible to pay its selling, general and administrative expenses. Commissions
totaled $212,000 and $371,000 for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. In addition, the Company has an agreement with this affiliate, which is terminable
under certain circumstances, to purchase the business under certain events, but in no event later
than 2011.
19
Note 11 Segment Information
The Company reports net revenue from continuing operations and operating income/(loss) from
continuing operations by reportable segment. Reportable segments are components of the Company for
which separate financial information is available that is evaluated on a regular basis by the chief
operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.
The Companys continuing operations include three segments: Services, Pharmacy and Catalog.
Segments include operations engaged in similar lines of business and in some cases, may utilize
common back office support services. Prior period segment information has been reclassified in
order to conform to the current year presentation.
The Services segment is a national provider of home care services, including skilled and personal
care, and medical staffing services (per diem and travel nursing) to numerous types of acute care
and sub-acute care medical facilities. In May 2009, the Company sold its industrial staffing
business, which was previously included in the Services segment and is included in discontinued
operations as of June 30, 2009.
The Pharmacy segment includes the Companys proprietary medication management system called
DailyMed. The Companys pharmacies in Indiana and Minnesota dispense patients prescriptions,
over-the-counter medications and vitamins, and organize them into pre-sorted packets clearly marked
with the date and time they should be taken. The DailyMed approach is designed to improve the
safety and efficacy of the medications being dispensed. In June 2009, the Company sold its
pharmacy dispensing and billing software business, which was previously included in the Pharmacy
segment and is included in discontinued operations as of June 30, 2009.
The Catalog segment operates a home-health oriented mail-order catalog and related website. In May
2009, the Company sold its HHE business, which sold respiratory and medical equipment throughout
the United States. The Catalog and HHE businesses were previously combined as one segment. The
HHE business is included in discontinued operations as of June 30, 2009.
20
Management evaluates performance based on profit or loss from operations, excluding corporate,
general and administrative expenses, as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenue, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
$ |
22,680 |
|
|
$ |
25,006 |
|
Pharmacy |
|
|
3,218 |
|
|
|
1,106 |
|
Catalog |
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
26,409 |
|
|
|
26,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
$ |
1,207 |
|
|
$ |
1,105 |
|
Pharmacy |
|
|
(1,313 |
) |
|
|
(851 |
) |
Catalog |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
Unallocated corporate overhead |
|
|
(2,485 |
) |
|
|
(2,856 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income (loss) |
|
|
(2,629 |
) |
|
|
(2,593 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
956 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
248 |
|
Other |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before income tax expense |
|
|
(3,503 |
) |
|
|
(3,807 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(3,596 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,003 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
$ |
193 |
|
|
$ |
282 |
|
Pharmacy |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
Catalog |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
411 |
|
|
$ |
459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Capital expenditures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
Pharmacy |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures |
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
$ |
264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
$ |
38,848 |
|
|
$ |
39,183 |
|
Pharmacy |
|
|
5,462 |
|
|
|
5,514 |
|
Catalog |
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
Unallocated corporate assets |
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
|
3,166 |
|
Assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
11,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
47,037 |
|
|
$ |
59,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
Managements Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations |
The following discussion and analysis provides information we believe is relevant to an assessment
and understanding of our results of operations and financial condition for the three-month periods
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included herein, the consolidated financial
statements and notes and the related Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2009 filed
with the SEC on July 14, 2009, which is incorporated herein by this reference.
Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
The MD&A should be read in conjunction with the other sections of this report on Form 10-Q,
including the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto beginning on page 2 of this
Report. Historical results set forth in the financial statements beginning on page 2 and this
section should not be taken as indicative of our future operations.
We caution you that statements contained in this report (including our documents incorporated
herein by reference) include forward-looking statements. The Company claims all safe harbor and
other legal protections provided to it by law for all of its forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, assumptions, uncertainties and other
factors about our Company, which could cause actual financial or operating results, performances or
achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements not to occur or be realized.
Such forward-looking statements generally are based on our reasonable estimates of future results,
performances or achievements, predicated upon current conditions and the most recent results of the
companies involved and their respective industries. Forward-looking statements are also based on
economic and market factors and the industry in which we do business, among other things.
Forward-looking statements are not guaranties of future performance. Forward-looking statements may
be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as may, can, will, could,
should, project, expect, plan, predict, believe, estimate, aim, anticipate,
intend, continue, potential, opportunity or similar terms, variations of those terms or the
negative of those terms or other variations of those terms or comparable words or expressions.
Unless otherwise provided, Arcadia, we, us, our, and the Company refer to Arcadia
Resources, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
Actual events and results may differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in
forward-looking statements due to a number of factors. Important factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially include, but are not limited to (1) our ability to compete with our
competitors; (2) our ability to obtain additional debt or equity financing, if necessary, and/or to
restructure existing indebtedness, which may be difficult due to our history of operating losses
and negative cash flows; (3) the ability of our affiliated agencies to effectively market and sell
our services and products; (4) our ability to procure product inventory for resale; (5) our ability
to recruit and retain temporary workers for placement with our customers; (6) the timely collection
of our accounts receivable; (7) our ability to attract and retain key management employees; (8) our
ability to timely develop new services and products and enhance existing services and products; (9)
our ability to execute and implement our growth strategy; (10) the impact of governmental
regulations; (11) marketing risks; (12) our ability to adapt to economic, political and regulatory
conditions affecting the health care industry; (13) our ability to successfully integrate
acquisitions; (14) the ability of our management team to successfully pursue our business plan;
(15) other unforeseen events that may impact our business; and (16) the risks, uncertainties and
other factors described in Part II, Item 1A of this Report which are incorporated herein by this
reference.
Overview
Arcadia Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation, together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the
Company), is a national provider of home care, medical staffing, and pharmacy services operating
under the service mark Arcadia HealthCare. In May 2009, the Company disposed of its Home Health
Equipment (HHE), industrial staffing and retail pharmacy software businesses. Subsequent to
these divestitures, the Company operates in three reportable business segments: Home Care/Medical
Staffing Services (Services), Pharmacy and Catalog. The Companys corporate headquarters are
located in Indianapolis, Indiana. The Company conducts its business from approximately 70
facilities located in 21 states. The Company operates pharmacies in Indiana and Minnesota and has
customer service centers in Michigan and Indiana.
22
Critical Accounting Policies
See Part II, Item 7 Critical Accounting Policies, our consolidated financial statements and
related notes in Part IV, Item 15 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31,
2009 filed with the SEC on July 14, 2009 for accounting policies and related estimates we believe
are the most critical to understanding our condensed consolidated financial statements, financial
condition and results of operations and which require complex management judgment and assumptions,
or involve uncertainties.
Three-Month Period Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to the Three-Month Period Ended June 30, 2008
Results of Continuing Operations, (in thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-Month Period |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues, net |
|
$ |
26,409 |
|
|
$ |
26,778 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
18,961 |
|
|
|
18,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
7,448 |
|
|
|
8,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
9,666 |
|
|
|
10,244 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
10,077 |
|
|
|
10,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(2,629 |
) |
|
|
(2,593 |
) |
Other expenses |
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
1,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before income tax expense |
|
|
(3,503 |
) |
|
|
(3,807 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(3,596 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,003 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares basic and diluted |
|
|
160,552 |
|
|
|
131,688 |
|
Net loss from continuing operations per share
basic and diluted |
|
|
($0.02 |
) |
|
|
($0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Revenues, Cost of Revenues and Gross Profits
The following summarizes revenues, cost of revenues and gross profits by segment for the
three-month periods ended June 30, (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
$ Increase/ |
|
|
% Increase/ |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Revenues, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
$ |
22,680 |
|
|
|
85.9 |
% |
|
$ |
25,006 |
|
|
|
93.4 |
% |
|
$ |
(2,326 |
) |
|
|
-9.3 |
% |
Pharmacy |
|
|
3,218 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
2,112 |
|
|
|
191.0 |
% |
Catalog |
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
-23.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,409 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
26,778 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
(369 |
) |
|
|
-1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
$ |
15,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,635 |
) |
|
|
-9.4 |
% |
Pharmacy |
|
|
2,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,949 |
|
|
|
213.2 |
% |
Catalog |
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
-5.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margin % |
|
|
|
|
|
Margin % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margins: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
|
6,916 |
|
|
|
30.5 |
% |
|
|
7,607 |
|
|
|
30.4 |
% |
|
|
(691 |
) |
|
|
-9.1 |
% |
Pharmacy |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
% |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
84.9 |
% |
Catalog |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
% |
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
46.7 |
% |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
-43.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,448 |
|
|
|
28.2 |
% |
|
$ |
8,110 |
|
|
|
30.3 |
% |
|
$ |
(662 |
) |
|
|
-8.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the components of the Services segment revenues for the
three-month periods ended June 30, (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
$ Increase/ |
|
|
% Increase/ |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home care |
|
$ |
17,688 |
|
|
|
78.0 |
% |
|
$ |
16,900 |
|
|
|
67.6 |
% |
|
$ |
788 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
Medical staffing |
|
|
3,574 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
% |
|
|
5,508 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
% |
|
|
(1,934 |
) |
|
|
-35.1 |
% |
Travel staffing |
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
2,598 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
(1,180 |
) |
|
|
-45.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Services |
|
$ |
22,680 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
25,006 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
(2,326 |
) |
|
|
-9.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services Segment
The Services segment remains the largest source of revenue for the Company. During first quarter
of fiscal 2010, home care revenues increased 4.7% over the same period a year ago. A majority of
this increase represents organic growth in several of the Companys main geographic markets. The
increase in sales included growth in government programs served, as well as private pay and
insurance clients.
The growth in home care revenues was more than offset by significant declines in revenue in the
medical staffing and travel staffing markets, which declined by 35.1% and 45.4%, respectively, as
compared with the prior year quarter. Demand for the Companys per diem and travel medical staffing
services declined as compared with the same period a year ago. Several factors have contributed to
the lower level of overall demand. Market conditions for temporary medical staffing are currently
not favorable, driven by lower patient censuses in facilities; constraints on facility staffing
budgets; the return of part-time staff to full-time status and increases in overtime accepted by
permanent staff of our potential customers, largely in response to overall economic conditions; and
delays in the construction and opening of new facilities that often drives short-term staffing
requirements. In addition to these market conditions, travel staffing revenues have been adversely
affected by state budget constraints with a major correctional institution customer.
24
Gross margins in the Services segment remained approximately flat at 30.5% during the three-month
period ended June 30, 2009 compared to 30.4% for the prior year quarter. The cost of revenues in
this segment consists primarily of employee costs, including wages, taxes, fringe benefits and
workers compensation expense.
Pharmacy Segment
The revenue in the Pharmacy segment increased by $2,112,000, or 191%, to $3,218,000 during the
first quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to the same period last year. This growth was primarily due
to the Companys DailyMed program. During the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2009, revenue
generated from the DailyMed medication management program began to increase at a more rapid pace
than in previous quarters, and the Company continues to pursue additional opportunities with
government entities, managed care organizations, assisted living and group home facilities,
existing home care customers and in direct-to-consumer initiatives. The Company expects these
growth trends to continue during fiscal 2010 and beyond. The revenue growth over the last several
quarters was primarily driven by the Companys relationship with Indiana Medicaid. The Company
continues to work with the Indiana Medicaid program and its managed care providers to identify and
enroll those patients who will benefit most from participation in the DailyMed. Additionally, in
June 2009, the Company announced the signing of an agreement with WellPoint. Under this agreement,
the Company will initiate the DailyMed medication management program to WellPoints high-risk
Medicaid members in five states where WellPoint companies provide Medicaid managed care benefits.
The program launch is underway for WellPoints high risk members in Virginia and will be rolled out
to additional states during the next few quarters.
The costs of revenue in the Pharmacy segment include the cost of medications sold to clients and
packaging costs for the DailyMed proprietary dispensing system. The reduction in the gross margin
percentage from 17.5% in during the fiscal 2009 first quarter to 11.0% for the quarter ended June
30, 2009 was primarily due to larger than normal inventory adjustment at the Companys Minnesota
pharmacy facility. One of the Companys primary on-going initiatives is to improve and maximize
the Pharmacy segments margins. Management has identified various purchasing and operational
improvements and believes that Pharmacy margins will improve in future periods.
Catalog Segment
Revenue from the Companys catalog and internet-based home health products business decreased 23.3%
to $511,000 during the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period last
year. The decrease in revenue is consistent the Companys change in approach, which began in
mid-2008, with the goal of becoming more profitable in part by mailing fewer catalogs to a more
targeted audience. The gross margin decreased to 34.6% for the three-month period ended June 30,
2009 compared to 46.7% for the same period last year primarily due to change in the mix of the
products being sold.
25
Selling, General and Administrative
The following summarizes selling, general and administrative expenses by segment for the
three-month periods ended June 30, (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
$ Increase/ |
|
|
% Increase/ |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
SG&A |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
SG&A |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
$ |
5,515 |
|
|
|
57.1 |
% |
|
$ |
6,221 |
|
|
|
60.7 |
% |
|
$ |
(706 |
) |
|
|
-11.3 |
% |
Pharmacy |
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
% |
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
73.4 |
% |
Catalog |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
-25.6 |
% |
Corporate |
|
|
2,355 |
|
|
|
24.4 |
% |
|
|
2,822 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
% |
|
|
(467 |
) |
|
|
-16.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,666 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
10,244 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
(578 |
) |
|
|
-5.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SG&A as a % of net
revenue |
|
|
36.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services Segment
The Services segment selling, general and administrative expense decreased to $5,515,000 for the
three-month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to $6,221,000 for the same period in the prior
year. This $706,000, or 11.3%, decrease was primarily due to a $370,000 decrease in commissions
paid to the affiliates and a $270,000 decrease in employee costs. Affiliate commissions are based
on the gross margins of the individual affiliates, and the decrease reflects a decrease in revenues
and gross margins generated from the affiliate owned locations. The decrease in employee costs was
a direct result of the Companys efforts to reduce headcount in certain areas.
Pharmacy Segment
The Pharmacy segment selling, general and administrative expense increased by $669,000, or 73.4%,
to $1,581,000 during the first quarter of fiscal 2010. In general, the increase in Pharmacy
expenses was due to the significant growth in revenue in this segment over the last several
quarters. Specifically, total employee costs increased by $328,000 during the three-months ended
June 30, 2009 as the Company hired additional pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, and customer
service representatives in order to process the increased volume. Additionally, the Company used
more contract and temporary labor as well as consultants during the current year quarter, and this
contributed an additional $53,000 in expense. Bad debt also increased during the quarter by
$66,000, which was consistent with the revenue growth. The remaining increase during the current
year quarter was due to various other administrative expenses that increased with the growth in
revenue and headcount that has occurred over the last three quarters.
Catalog Segment
The Catalog segment selling, general and administrative expensed decreased by $74,000, or 25.6%,
during the three-month period ended June 30, 2009. The decrease was primarily due to a $55,000
decrease in the costs to produce and mail catalogs.
Corporate
Corporate selling, general and administrative expenses were not allocated to the discontinued
operations for either of the periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
Corporate selling, general and administrative expense decreased to $2,355,000 for the three-month
period ended June 30, 2009 compared to $2,822,000 for the same period in the prior year. This
$467,000, or 16.5%, decrease was primarily due a decrease in severance costs and professional fees.
During the first quarter of the prior fiscal year, the Company recognized $192,000 in severance
costs primarily associated with two former executives. No similar expense was recognized during
the three-month period ended June 30, 2009. Professional fees decreased primarily due to a
decrease in audit-related expenses.
The Company divested of its home health equipment, industrial staffing and retail pharmacy software
businesses during the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Subsequent to these divestitures, the Company
began to reduce Corporate expenses in order to reduce Corporate overhead for the remaining business
lines. These expense reduction initiatives will continue over the next several quarters.
26
Depreciation and Amortization
The following summarizes depreciation and amortization expense for the three-month periods ended
June 30, (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ Increase/ |
|
|
% Increase/ |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Depreciation and amortization of property
and equipment |
|
$ |
252 |
|
|
$ |
158 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
|
59.5 |
% |
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
-47.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
411 |
|
|
$ |
459 |
|
|
$ |
(48 |
) |
|
|
-10.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment increased by approximately $94,000, or
59.5%, during the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period last year.
The increase reflects the increase in depreciation associated with various software and Pharmacy
equipment acquired during the last year.
Amortization of acquired intangible assets decreased by $142,000, or 47.2%, during the fiscal first
quarter 2010 compared to 2009. The decrease reflects the fact that as of March 31, 2009, the
Company recognized certain impairment charges relating to amortizable intangible assets associated
with the Pharmacy and Catalog segments.
Other Expenses
The following summarizes net interest expense for the three-month periods ended June 30, (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ Increase/ |
|
|
% Increase/ |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
845 |
|
|
$ |
974 |
|
|
$ |
(129 |
) |
|
|
-13.2 |
% |
Interest income |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
-61.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
838 |
|
|
$ |
956 |
|
|
|
($118 |
) |
|
|
-12.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 decreased by $129,000, or
13.2%, to $845,000 as compared to the same period last year. The average interest bearing
liabilities balance (balance of the beginning of the period plus the end of the period divided by
two) for fiscal 2010 was $35.9 million compared to $37.8 million for fiscal 2009, which represents
a reduction of 5%.
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt
On June 5, 2008, the Company issued AmerisourceBergen 490,000 warrants to purchase common stock at
an exercise price of $0.75 per share. The warrants were issued in conjunction with obtaining a
waiver for a financial covenant violation relating to the AmerisourcBergen line of credit, which
was paid in full in June 2009. The fair value of the warrants was determined to be $248,000 and
was recorded as a loss on extinguishment of debt during the three-month period ended June 30, 2008.
No similar expense was recognized during the three-month period ended June 30, 2009.
27
Income Taxes
Income tax expense was $93,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to $196,000
for the three-month period ended June 30, 2008, a decrease of $103,000, or 52.5%. The income tax
expense is primarily the result of state income tax liabilities of the subsidiary operating
companies.
Due to the Companys losses in recent years, it has paid nominal federal income taxes. For federal
income tax purposes, the Company had significant permanent and timing differences between book
income and taxable income resulting in combined net deferred tax assets of $32 million to be
utilized by the Company for which an offsetting valuation allowance has been established for the
entire amount. The Company has a net operating loss carryforward for tax purposes totaling $59.2
million that expires at various dates through 2029. Internal Revenue Code Section 382 rules limit
the utilization of certain of these net operating loss carryforwards upon a change of control of
the Company. It has been determined that a change in control took place at the time of the reverse
merger in 2004, and as such, the utilization of $700,000 of the net operating loss carryforwards
will be subject to severe limitations in future periods.
Loss from Discontinued Operations
Industrial Staffing Operations
On May 29, 2009, the Company finalized the sale of substantially all of the assets of its
industrial and non-medical staffing business for cash proceeds of $250,000, which will be paid in
five equal installments through September 2009. Additionally, the Company will receive 50% of the
future earnings of the business until the total payments equal $1.6 million. Such payments, if
any, will be recorded as additional gains when earned. The Company retained all accounts
receivable for services provided prior to May 29, 2009.
The net loss for the Industrial Staffing discontinued operations was $37,000 for the fiscal first
quarter 2010, and the Company recognized an $126,000 gain on the disposal of discontinued
operations.
HHE Operations
On January 5, 2009, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Braden Partners, L.P.
to sell the assets of its HHE business in San Fernando, California. Total proceeds were $503,000,
less fees of $24,000. $126,000 of the purchase price is being held by the buyer to cover the
Companys contingent obligations. The Company retained all accounts receivables for services
provided prior to January 2009.
On May 18, 2009, the Company completed the sale of its ownership interest in Lovell Medical Supply,
Inc., Beacon Respiratory Services of Georgia, Inc., and Trinity Healthcare of Winston-Salem, Inc.
to Aerocare Holdings, Inc. for total proceeds of $4,750,000, less fees of $150,000. $475,000 of
the purchase price is being held by the buyer to cover the Companys contingent obligations. The
entities sold represented the Southeast region of the Companys HHE business.
On May 19, 2009, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Braden Partners, L.P. to
sell the assets of its Midwest region of the Companys HHE business. Total proceeds were
$4,000,000, less fees of $150,000. $1,000,000 of the purchase price is being held by the buyer to
cover the Companys contingent obligations. The Company retained all accounts receivable for
services provided prior to May 2009.
As of May 2009, the Company had sold all of its HHE operations.
The net loss for the HHE discontinued operations was $1,061,000 for the fiscal first quarter 2010,
and the Company recognized a $120,000 gain on the disposal of discontinued operations.
Pharmacy Operations
On June 11, 2009, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with a leading pharmacy
management compay to sell substantially all of the assets of JASCORP, LLC (JASCORP) for proceeds
of $2,200,000, less estimated fees of $100,000. $220,000 of the purchase price is being held back
by the buyer until December 2011 in order to cover the Companys contingent obligations. JASCORP
operated the retail pharmacy software business that the Company acquired in September 2007. As
part of the divestiture, the Company entered into a License and Services Agreement with the buyer
that provides the Company the right to continue to use the software for internal purposes.
28
The net loss for the Pharmacy discontinued operations was $95,000 for the fiscal first quarter
2010, and the Company recognized a $30,000 loss on the disposal of discontinued operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since fiscal 2008, the Company has been focused on the implementation of a new board approved
strategic plan designed to focus on expanding certain core businesses; restructuring the Companys
long-term debt; closing or selling non-strategic businesses and assets; improving operating
margins; reducing selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses; and establishing a more
disciplined approach to cash management. To date, management has made progress in each of these
areas as discussed below.
On March 25, 2009, the Company restructured $24 million of debt with its two largest equity holders
and received an additional $3 million in debt financing as part of the transaction. The debt
maturity was extended through April 1, 2012, and the Company will continue to have the option to
add the accrued interest to the principal balance on a quarterly basis. The debt agreements
include a formula for splitting the cash proceeds upon the sale of assets. Specifically, the
first $2 million in proceeds are to be retained by the Company. The next $5 million in proceeds
are then paid to the lenders as provided in the promissory notes. After these amounts are paid,
proceeds up to $20,000,000 are split 50% to the Company and 50% to be paid pro-rata to these
lenders. Thereafter, proceeds are split 25% to the Company and 75% to the lenders.
On July 13, 2009, the Company executed an amendment to its line of credit agreement with Comerica
Bank. The amendment reduced the total availability from $19 million to $14 million; extended the
maturity from October 2009 to August 2011; and increased the interest rate from the prime rate plus
1% to the prime rate plus 2.75%.
In May and June 2009, the Company sold its HHE, industrial staffing and pharmacy software
businesses and received an aggregate of $9,157,000 in cash proceeds at the closings. In addition
to the cash proceeds received at closing, the HHE divestiture transactions included holdback
provisions for an additional $1,475,000 in cash, which is to be released over the next 18 months
assuming certain criteria are met. Consistent with the terms of the debt agreements described
above, the Company paid certain lenders a total of $3,941,000 from the cash proceeds to reduce
outstanding debt. The Company plans to use the cash received upon the release of the holdback
amounts to further reduce debt. The Company also paid AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation
$1,980,000 from the proceeds of the pharmacy software business divestiture plus an additional
$145,000 in order to pay off the outstanding line of credit balance. Cash proceeds received at the
closings, net of fees, less amounts used to pay down debt were $2,629,000.
The Company has expanded revenues in the Pharmacy segment over the last three quarters and has seen
steady increases in Home Care revenue. Management believes that it will make further progress with
implementing its strategic plan during the remainder of fiscal 2010. The Company believes that its
focus on two core businesses will enable it to realize operational improvements in both the
Services and Pharmacy segments. These planned operational improvements include growth in Home Care
revenues, growth in DailyMed revenues, improved gross margins in the Pharmacy segment and more
efficient operation of its pharmacy facilities as the DailyMed volumes grow. In addition to these
operational improvements, the Company intends to make significant further reductions in corporate
expenses in order to bring these expenses more in line with current and projected revenues.
With the Companys reduced debt levels (described above) and its focus on two core business
platforms, management believes that it would be able to raise additional capital to
support operating cash requirements, if necessary, and to fund investment in growth opportunities.
This capital could be in the form of debt financing, private equity placements and/or investments
in its core business platforms by strategic business partners. At the same time, because of normal
fluctuations in the timing of the Companys cash receipts and disbursements, management is focused
on disciplined management of its cash flow. While management believes that it will be successful
in managing its cash requirements, and has developed alternatives for addressing short-term cash
shortfalls, no assurance can be made that these alternatives can be successfully implemented in the
time frame required. In such a case, the Company would need to consider other strategies,
including the divestiture of additional assets or business lines, to meet its cash requirements
and/or fund its investment in growth opportunities.
29
The following summarizes the Companys cash flows for the three-month periods ended June 30, (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
(1,615 |
) |
|
$ |
375 |
|
Net cash provided (used in) investing activities |
|
|
8,392 |
|
|
|
(608 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(7,782 |
) |
|
|
(3,737 |
) |
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(1,005 |
) |
|
|
(3,970 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
2,381 |
|
Availability under line of credit agreements |
|
$ |
2,471 |
|
|
$ |
2,022 |
|
At June 30, 2009, the Company had $2,988,000 in cash and line of credit availability compared to
$4,467,000 at March 31, 2009, a decrease of $1,479,000. The line of credit balance fluctuates
based on working capital needs. The line of credit availability is based on the eligible accounts
receivable within the Services segment, and subsequent to the divestiture of the industrial
staffing business in May 2009, the Services receivables and borrowing based decreased.
Net cash used in operating activities was $1,615,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009
compared to cash flows provided from operating activities of $375,000 for the same period of the
prior year. The loss from discontinued operations during the three-month period ended June 30,
2009 accounted for $1,193,000 of the total $4,573,000 net loss during the period. Discontinued
operations contributed $717,000 in income during the prior year quarter.
Cash provided by investing activities of $8,392,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009
included $9,157,000 of cash received for the divestitures of the HHE, industrial staffing and
retail pharmacy software businesses. This amount was offset by $190,000 in cash payments relating
to prior year business acquisitions as well as $75,000 in capital expenditures. Additionally, in
conjunction with the Comerica Bank line of credit extension in June 2009, the Company invested
$500,000 of restricted cash in order to collateralize the liability. During the three-month period
ended June 30, 2008, the Company used $363,000 of cash for business acquisitions and an additional
$264,000 for capital expenditures.
Cash used in financing activities of $7,782,000 for the three-month period end June 30, 2009
consisted entirely of debt payments, including the reduction in the outstanding balance on the
lines of credit. The Company used $6,050,000 of the cash proceeds from the various business
divestitures to pay down amounts due to JANA, Vicis and AmerisourceBergen. Additionally, the
Company reduced its balance due Comerica Bank under its line of credit facility by $1,377,000. The
reduction in the line of credit balance primarily reflects the reduction in the borrowing base
subsequent to the divestiture of the industrial staffing business as the receivables of this
business were included in the borrowing base calculation. Cash used in financing activities of
$3,737,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 represents reductions in outstanding
debt, including lines of credit.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had total debt obligations of $32,767,000, of which $16,579,000
was payable to JANA and $6,040,000 was payable to Vicis. Both JANA and Vicis own greater than 15%
of the Companys outstanding common stock. Additionally, the Company had outstanding balances of
$7,749,000 and $750,000 due to Comerica Bank and AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, respectively.
On July 13, 2009, the Company executed an amendment to its line of credit agreement with Comerica
Bank. The amendment reduced the total availability from $19 million to $14 million; extended the
maturity from October 2009 to August 2011; and increased the interest rate from the prime rate plus
1% to the prime rate plus 2.75%. The amendment also required the Company to establish a restricted
cash at account at Comerica Bank in the amount of $500,000.
Net accounts receivable were $14,803,000 and $15,679,000 at June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009,
respectively. The Services segment accounted for 94% and 95% of total account receivables at June
30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively.
30
The Company has a limited number of customers with individually large amounts due at any given
balance sheet date. The Companys payer mix for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare |
|
|
0 |
% |
Medicaid/other government |
|
|
28 |
% |
Commercial insurance |
|
|
15 |
% |
Institution/facilities |
|
|
35 |
% |
Private pay |
|
|
22 |
% |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Please see Note 1 Description of Company and Recent Accounting Pronouncements of this Report for
recent accounting pronouncements that may have an impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. |
The majority of our cash balances are held primarily in highly liquid commercial bank accounts. The
Company utilizes lines of credit to fund operational cash needs. The risk associated with
fluctuating interest rates is primarily limited to our borrowings. We do not believe that a 10%
change in interest rates would have a significant effect on our results of operations or cash
flows. All our revenues since inception have been in the U.S. and in U.S. Dollars; therefore, we
have not yet adopted a strategy for the future currency rate exposure as it is not anticipated that
foreign revenues are likely to occur in the near future.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures. |
The Company maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures which are designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits to the
Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), including this report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely
basis. These disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to
the Companys management on a timely basis to allow decisions regarding required disclosure.
At March 31, 2009, we reported that we had one material weakness relating to the interpretation and
application of certain technical accounting standards. This material weakness specifically related
to the accounting for certain non-routine transactions that occurred near the end of the fiscal
year and subsequent to year end, including restructuring of our debt refinancing, accounting for
discontinued operations, and changes to projections associated with our goodwill impairment
valuation.
Since the prior fiscal year end, we have implemented a remediation plan to address the material
weakness described above. The Company has taken the following actions to improve internal control
over financial reporting: (1) we required all significant or non-routine transactions to be
thoroughly researched, analyzed, approved at the appropriate level, and documented by qualified
accounting personnel; (2) in addition, all major or non-routine transactions will require the
additional review and approval of the Chief Financial Officer; (3) we have also implemented an
additional review by subject matter experts for complex accounting estimates and accounting
treatment, where appropriate. While all non-routine transactions are unique in nature, we believe
that this plan had improved the effectiveness of our internal controls.
As of June 30, 2009, the Companys management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer
(CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)). Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Other than as described above, there has been no change in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the
quarter ended June 30, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
31
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings. |
We are a defendant from time to time in lawsuits incidental to our business in the ordinary course
of business. We are not currently subject to, and none of our subsidiaries are subject to, any
material legal proceedings.
We have a history of operating losses and negative cash flow that may continue into the foreseeable
future.
We have a history of operating losses and negative cash flow. While we have achieved positive cash
flow from operations in recent quarters, which was partially due to deferring certain interest
amounts, net cash flow has been negative, and we continue to follow a very disciplined approach to
cash management. If we fail to execute our strategy to achieve and maintain profitability in the
future, investors could lose confidence in the value of our common stock, which could cause our
stock price to decline, adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital, and adversely
affect our ability to meet the financial covenants contained in our credit agreement. Further, if
we continue to incur operating losses and negative cash flow, we may have to implement significant
cost cutting measures, which could include a substantial reduction in work force, location
closures, and/or the sale or disposition of certain subsidiaries. We cannot assure that any of the
cost cutting measures we implement will be effective or result in profitability or positive cash
flow. To achieve profitability, we will also need to, among other things, increase our revenue
base, reduce our cost structure and realize economies of scale. If we are unable to achieve and
maintain profitability, our stock price could be materially adversely affected.
Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition and operations and prevent us from
fulfilling our debt service obligations and our ability to operate our business.
Our indebtedness could have important consequences, including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
We may be unable to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital
expenditures, acquisitions and general corporate or other purposes. |
|
|
|
We may be unable to plan for, or react to, changes in our business and general market
conditions. We may be more vulnerable in a volatile market and at a competitive
disadvantage to less leveraged competitors. |
|
|
|
Our operating flexibility is more limited due to financial and other restrictive
covenants, including restrictions on incurring additional debt, creating liens on our
properties, making acquisitions and paying dividends. |
|
|
|
We are subject to the risks that interest rates and our interest expense will
increase. |
|
|
|
Our ability to use operating cash flow in other areas of our business may be limited
because we must dedicate a substantial portion of these funds to make principal and
interest payments on our indebtedness. |
|
|
|
Our ability to make investments or take other actions or borrow additional funds may
be limited based on the financial and other restrictive covenants in our indebtedness. |
32
|
|
|
The amount we are permitted to draw on our revolving credit facilities may be limited
and we may be unable to fund our early-stage pharmacy product and patient care services
and home care staffing business strategies. |
|
|
|
We may be forced to implement cost reductions, which could impact our product and
service offerings. |
|
|
|
We may be unable to successfully implement our growth strategy to establish home care
staffing business and spread our cost structure over a rapidly growing and larger revenue
base and ultimately become profitable. |
Due to our debt level, our history of operating losses and negative cash flows, and the current
credit crisis, we may not be able to increase the amount we can draw on our revolving credit
facility with Comerica Bank, or to obtain credit from other sources, to fund our future needs for
working capital, funding early-stage strategies and ongoing business operations, or acquisitions.
Due to our debt level and the current credit crisis, there is the risk that Comerica Bank or other
sources of credit may decline to increase the amount we are permitted to draw on the revolving
credit facilities or to lend additional funds for working capital, funding our early-stage pharmacy
product and patient care services and home care staffing business strategies, making acquisitions
and for other purposes. This development could result in various consequences to the Company,
ranging from implementation of cost reductions, which could impact our product and service
offerings, to the need to revise managements business plan for fiscal 2010 that depends on
improvements in profitability and a disciplined approach to cash management, to the modification or
abandonment of these strategies.
We may not be able to meet the financial covenants contained in our credit facilities, and we may
not be able to obtain waivers for any violations of those covenants should they occur.
Under certain of our existing credit facilities, we are required to adhere to certain financial
covenants. We were not in compliance with certain financial covenants under our lines of credit as
of March 31, 2008, but we received waivers of those non-compliances from our lenders. If there are
future covenant violations, our lenders could declare a default under the applicable credit
facility and, among other actions, refuse to make additional advances, increase our borrowing
costs, further restrict our operations, take possession or control of any asset (including our
cash) and demand the immediate repayment of all amounts outstanding under the credit facility. Any
of these actions could have a material adverse affect on our financial condition and liquidity.
Based on our history of operating losses, we cannot guarantee that we would be able to refinance or
obtain alternative financing.
In addition to the financial covenants, our existing credit facility with Comerica Bank includes a
subjective acceleration clause and requires the Company to maintain a lockbox. Currently, the
Company has the ability to control the funds in the deposit account and determine the amount issued
to pay down the line of credit balance. The bank reserves the right under the security agreement to
request that the indebtedness be on a remittance basis in the future, whether or not an event of
default has occurred. If the bank exercises this right, then the Company would be forced to use its
cash to pay down this indebtedness rather than for other needs, including day-to-day operations,
expansion initiatives or the pay down of debt which accrues interest at a higher rate.
The terms of our credit agreements with various lenders subject us to the risk of foreclosure on
certain property.
Our wholly-owned subsidiary RKDA, Inc. granted Comerica Bank a first priority security interest in
all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of its wholly-owned subsidiary Arcadia Services,
Inc. Arcadia Services, Inc. and its subsidiaries granted Comerica Bank security interests in all of
their assets. Consistent with the terms of the financing agreements with JANA, Vicis and LSP,
PrairieStone Pharmacy, LLC will work to provide these lenders a subordinated security interest in
its assets. If an event of default occurs under the applicable credit agreements, each lender may,
at its option, accelerate the maturity of the debt and exercise its respective right to foreclose
on the issued and outstanding capital stock and/or on all of the
assets of Arcadia Services, Inc. and its subsidiaries, and/or PrairieStone Pharmacy, LLC and its
subsidiaries. Any such default and resulting foreclosure would have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition and our ability to continue operations.
33
In order to repay our debt obligations, as well as to pursue our growth strategies, we may seek
additional equity financing, which could result in dilution to our security holders.
We may continue to raise additional financing through the equity markets to repay debt obligations
and to fund operations. Further, because of the capital requirements needed to pursue our
early-stage pharmacy growth strategies, we may access the public or private equity markets whenever
conditions appear to us to be favorable, even if we do not have an immediate need for additional
capital at that time. We also plan to continue to expand product and service offerings. To the
extent we access the equity markets, the price at which we sell shares may be lower than the
current market prices for our common stock. If we obtain financing through the sale of additional
equity or convertible debt securities, this could result in dilution to our security holders by
increasing the number of shares of outstanding stock. We cannot predict the effect this dilution
may have on the price of our common stock.
To the extent we are unable to generate sufficient cash from operations or raise adequate funds
from the equity or debt markets, we would need to sell assets or modify or abandon our growth
strategy.
We raised $3.0 million in additional debt financing in March 2009. In addition, through the sale
of various non-strategic assets in May and June 2009, we generated $9.1 million in additional cash,
$6.0 million of which was used to repay indebtedness. Our cash on hand, combined with presently
available lines of credit, may not be adequate to satisfy our cash needs. To the extent that we
are unable to generate sufficient cash from operations, or to raise additional funds from the
equity or debt markets, we may be required to sell assets or modify or abandon our growth strategy.
Asset sales and modification or abandonment of our growth strategy could negatively impact our
profitability and financial position, which in turn could negatively impact the price of our common
stock.
Due to our operating losses during recent fiscal years, our stock could be at risk of being
delisted by the NYSE Amex Equities Exchange.
Our stock currently trades on the NYSE Amex Equities Exchange (Amex). The Amex, as a matter of
policy, will consider the suspension of trading in, or removal from listing of any stock when, in
the opinion of the Amex (i) the financial condition and/or operating results of an issuer of stock
listed on the Amex appear to be unsatisfactory, (ii) it appears that the extent of public
distribution or the aggregate market value of the stock has become so reduced as to make further
dealings on the Amex inadvisable, (iii) the issuer has sold or otherwise disposed of its principal
operating assets, or (iv) the issuer has sustained losses which are so substantial in relation to
its overall operations or its existing financial condition has become so impaired that it appears
questionable, in the opinion of the Amex, whether the issuer will be able to continue operations
and/or meet its obligations as they mature. We have sustained net losses and our stock has been
trading at relatively low prices. Delisting of our common stock would adversely affect the price
and liquidity of our common stock.
Changes in federal and state laws that govern our financial relationships with physicians and other
health care providers may impact potential or current referral sources.
We offer certain healthcare-related products and services that are subject to federal and state
laws restricting our relationship with physicians and other healthcare providers. Generally
referred to as anti-kickback laws, these laws prohibit certain direct and indirect payments or
other financial arrangements that are designed to encourage the referral of patients to a
particular medical services provider. In addition, certain financial relationships, including
ownership interests and compensation arrangements, between physicians and providers of designated
health services, such as our Company, to whom those physicians refer patients, are prohibited by
the federal physician self-referral prohibition, known as the Stark Law, and similar state laws.
Violations of these laws could lead to fines or sanctions that could have a material adverse effect
on our business. In addition, changes in healthcare law or new interpretations of existing laws
may have a material impact on our business and results of operations.
We are required to comply with laws governing the transmission of privacy of health information.
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, requires us to comply
with standards for the exchange of health information within our Company and with third parties,
such as payors, business associates and consumers. These include standards for common health care
transactions,
such as claims information, plan eligibility, payment information, the use of electronic
signatures, unique identifiers for providers, employers, health plans and individuals and security,
privacy and enforcement. New standards and regulations may be adopted governing the use, disclosure
and transmission of health information with which we may be required to comply. We could be subject
to criminal penalties and civil sanctions if we fail to comply with these standards.
34
Because we depend on key management, the loss of the services or advice of any of these persons
could have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects.
Our success is dependent on our ability to attract and retain qualified and experienced management
and personnel. We do not presently maintain key person life insurance for any of our personnel.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to attract and retain key personnel in the future,
and our inability to do so could have a material adverse effect on us. Our management team will
need to work together effectively to successfully develop and implement our business strategies and
financial operations. In addition, management will need to devote significant attention and
resources to preserve and strengthen relationships with employees, customers and the investor
community. If our management team is unable to achieve these goals, our ability to grow our
business and successfully meet operational challenges could be impaired.
We do not have long-term agreements or exclusive guaranteed order contracts with our home care,
hospital and healthcare facility clients.
The success of our business depends upon our ability to continually secure new orders from home
care clients, hospitals and other healthcare facilities and to fill those orders with our temporary
healthcare professionals. We do not have long-term agreements or exclusive guaranteed order
contracts with our home care, hospital and healthcare facility clients. We rely on our agencies to
establish and maintain positive relationships with these clients. If we, or our agents, fail to
maintain positive relationships with our home care, hospital and healthcare facility clients, we
may be unable to generate new temporary healthcare professional orders and our business may be
adversely affected. In addition, many of these clients may have devised strategies to reduce the
expenditures on temporary healthcare workers and to limit overall agency utilization. If current
pressures to control agency usage continue and escalate, we will have fewer business opportunities,
which could harm our business.
Our operations subject us to risk of litigation.
Operating in the homecare industry exposes us to an inherent risk of wrongful death, personal
injury, professional malpractice and other potential claims or litigation brought by our consumers
and employees. These claims may include allegations that we did not properly treat or care for a
consumer or that we failed to follow internal or external procedures that resulted in death or harm
to a consumer.
In addition, regulatory agencies may initiate administrative proceedings alleging violations of
statutes and regulations arising from our services and seek to impose monetary penalties on us. We
could be required to pay substantial amounts to respond to regulatory investigations or, if we do
not prevail, damages or penalties arising from these legal proceedings. We also are subject to
potential lawsuits under the False Claims Act or other federal and state whistleblower statutes
designed to combat fraud and abuse in our industry. These lawsuits can involve significant monetary
awards or penalties which may not be covered by our insurance. If our third-party insurance
coverage and self-insurance reserves are not adequate to cover these claims, it could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Even if we
are successful in our defense, civil lawsuits or regulatory proceedings could distract management
from running our business or irreparably damage our reputation.
A significant decline in sales in our home care and staffing businesses would adversely impact our
revenue, operating income and cash flow and our ability to repay indebtedness and invest in new
products and services.
Our home care and staffing businesses have traditionally accounted for the majority of our revenue,
operating profit and cash flow. Our business strategy is premised upon continued growth in these
segments consistent with underlying market trends. While we believe we are well-positioned to
increase sales in these segments, there can be no assurance that we will do so. Failure to achieve
our sales targets in these market segments would adversely impact our revenue. While operating
expense reductions and other actions would be taken in response to a decline in projected sales,
there is a risk that such a reduction would adversely affect our projected operating income and
cash flow. If this were to occur, we would have less cash available to repay short-term and
long-term indebtedness. We may also have to reduce our investment in other segments of the
business and modify our business strategy.
35
Sales of certain of our services and products are largely dependent upon payments from governmental
programs and private insurance, and cost containment initiatives by these payers may reduce our
revenues, thereby harming our performance.
In the U.S., healthcare providers and consumers who purchase home care services, prescription drug
products and related products and services generally rely on third party payers, such as Medicare
and Medicaid, to reimburse all or part of the cost of the healthcare product or service. Our
sales and profitability are affected by the efforts of healthcare payors to contain or reduce the
cost of healthcare by lowering reimbursement rates, limiting the scope of covered services, and
negotiating reduced or capitated pricing arrangements. Any changes which lower reimbursement levels
under Medicare, Medicaid or private pay programs, including managed care contracts, could reduce
our future revenue. Furthermore, other changes in these reimbursement programs or in related
regulations could reduce our future revenue. These changes may include modifications in the timing
or processing of payments and other changes intended to limit or decrease the growth of Medicare,
Medicaid or third party expenditures. In addition, our profitability may be adversely affected by
any efforts of our suppliers to shift healthcare costs by increasing the net prices on the products
we obtain from them.
The markets in which we operate are highly competitive and we may be unable to compete successfully
against competitors with greater resources.
We compete in markets that are constantly changing, intensely competitive (given low barriers to
entry), highly fragmented and subject to dynamic economic conditions. Increased competition is
likely to result in price reductions, reduced gross margins, loss of customers, and loss of market
share, any of which could harm our net revenue and results of operations. Many of our competitors
and potential competitors have more capital and marketing and technical resources than we do. These
competitors and potential competitors include large drugstore chains, pharmacy benefits managers,
on-line marketers, national wholesalers, and national and regional distributors. Further, the
Company may face a significant competitive challenge from alliances entered into between and among
its competitors, major HMOs or chain drugstores, as well as from larger competitors created
through industry consolidation. These potential competitors may be able to respond more quickly
than we can to emerging market changes or changes in customer needs. To the extent competitors seek
to gain or retain market share by reducing prices or increasing marketing expenditures, we could
lose revenues or clients. In addition, relatively few barriers to entry exist in local healthcare
markets. As a result, we could encounter increased competition in the future that may increase
pricing pressure and limit our ability to maintain or increase our market share for our mail order
pharmacy and related businesses.
We cannot predict the impact that registration of shares may have on the price of the Companys
shares of common stock.
We cannot predict the impact, if any, that sales of, or the availability for sale of, shares of our
common stock by selling security holders pursuant to a prospectus or otherwise will have on the
market price of our securities prevailing from time to time. The possibility that substantial
amounts of our common stock might enter the public market could adversely affect the prevailing
market price of our common stock and could impair our ability to fund acquisitions or to raise
capital in the future through the sales of securities. Sales of substantial amounts of our
securities, including shares issued upon the exercise of options or warrants, or the perception
that such sales could occur, could adversely effect prevailing market prices for our securities.
The price of our common stock has been, and will likely continue to be, volatile, which could
diminish the ability to recoup an investment, or to earn a return on an investment, in our common
stock.
The market price of our common stock has fluctuated over a wide range, and it is likely that it
will continue to do so in the future. Limited demand for our common stock has resulted in limited
liquidity, and it may be difficult to dispose of our securities. Due to the volatility of the price
of our common stock, an investor may be unable to resell shares of our common stock at or above the
price paid for them, thereby exposing an investor to the risk that he may not recoup an investment
in our common stock or earn a return on such an investment. In the past, securities class action
litigation has been brought against companies following periods of volatility in the market price
of their securities. If we are the target of similar litigation in the future, we would be exposed
to incurring significant litigation costs. This would also divert managements attention and
resources, all of which could substantially harm our business and results of operations.
36
Resale of our securities by any holder may be limited and affected by state blue-sky laws, which
could adversely affect the price of our securities and the holders investment in our Company.
Under the securities laws of some states, shares of common stock and warrants can be sold in such
states only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers. In addition, in some states,
warrants and shares of common stock may not be sold unless these shares have been registered or
qualified for sale in the state or an exemption from registration or qualification is available and
is complied with. The requirement of a seller to comply with the requirements of state blue sky
laws may lead to delay or inability of a holder of our securities to dispose of such securities,
thereby causing an adverse effect on the resale price of our securities.
The issuance of our preferred stock could materially impact the market price of our common stock
and the rights of holders of our common stock.
We are authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of serial preferred stock, par value $0.001. Shares of
preferred stock may be issued from time to time in one or more series as may be determined by our
Board of Directors. Except as otherwise provided in our Restated Articles of Incorporation, the
Board of Directors has the authority to fix by resolution adopted before the issuance of any shares
of each particular series of preferred stock, the designation, powers, preferences, and relative
participating, optional and other rights, and the qualifications, limitations, and restrictions of
that series. The issuance of our preferred stock could materially impact the price of our common
stock and the rights of holders of our common stock, including voting rights. The issuance of
preferred stock could decrease the amount of earnings and assets available for distribution to
holders of common stock, and may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in
control of our company, despite such change of control being in the best interest of the holders of
our common stock. The existence of authorized but unissued preferred stock may enable the Board of
Directors to render more difficult or to discourage an attempt to obtain control of us by means of
a merger, tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise.
The exercise of common stock warrants and stock options may depress our stock price and may result
in dilution to our common security holders.
Warrants to purchase approximately 4.6 million shares of our common stock were issued and
outstanding as of June 30, 2009. Options to purchase approximately 3.7 million shares of our common
stock were issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2009. The Arcadia Resources, Inc. 2006 Equity
Incentive Plan (the Plan) allows for the granting of additional incentive stock options,
non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted shares up to 5 million shares
(2.5% of our authorized shares of common stock as of the date the Plan was approved). The Board of
Directors has approved an amendment to the Plan, subject to shareholder approval, which would
increase the number of shares authorized to be issued under the Plan to 5.0% of our authorized
shares, or 10 million shares. If approved, the Plan would permit the issuance of additional shares
of restricted stock or stock options. Following approval of the amendment of the Plan, the Board of
Directors granted 2,253,334 options to certain executives. In the event shareholder approval of
the amendment to the Plan is not received at the next special or annual meeting of our
shareholders, these option grants shall be terminated and voided. These options are in addition to
those described above.
If the market price of our common stock is above the exercise price of some of the outstanding
warrants or options; the holders of those warrants or options may exercise their warrants or
options and sell the common stock acquired upon exercise of such derivative security in the public
market. Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market may
depress the prevailing market price for our common stock and could impair our ability to raise
capital through the future sale of our equity securities. Additionally, if the holders of
outstanding warrants exercise those warrants, our common security holders will suffer dilution. The
exercise price and the number of shares subject to the warrant or option is subject to adjustment
upon stock dividends, splits and combinations, as well as certain anti-dilution adjustments as set
forth in the respective common stock warrants.
We depend on our affiliated agencies and our internal sales force to sell our services and
products, the loss of which could adversely affect our business.
We rely upon our affiliated agencies and our internal sales force to sell our staffing and home
care services and our internal sales force to sell our pharmacy products and services. Arcadia
Services affiliated agencies are owner-operated businesses. The primary responsibilities of
Arcadia Services affiliated agencies include the recruitment and training of field staff employed
by Arcadia Services and generating and maintaining sales to Arcadia Services customers. The
arrangements with affiliated agencies are
formalized through a standard contractual agreement, which state performance requirements of the
affiliated agencies. Our employees provide the services to our customers and the affiliated agents
and internal sales force are restricted by non-competition agreements. In the event of loss of our
affiliated agents or internal sales force personnel, we would recruit new sales and marketing
personnel and/or affiliated agents, which could cause our operating costs to increase and our sales
to fall in the interim.
37
Declines in prescription volumes may negatively affect our net revenues and profitability.
We dispense significant volumes of brand-name and generic drugs and our Pharmacy business, which we
expect to be a significant source of our net revenues and profitability. Demand for prescription
drugs can be negatively affected by a number of factors, including increased safety risk problems,
manufacturing issues, regulatory action, and negative press or media coverage. Certain
prescriptions may also be withdrawn by their manufacturer or transition to over-the-counter
products. A reduction in the use of prescription drugs may negatively affect our volumes, net
revenues, profitability and cash flows.
The success of our business depends on maintaining a well-secured pharmacy operation and technology
infrastructure and failure to execute could adversely impact our business.
We depend on our infrastructure, including our information systems, for many aspects of our
business operations, particularly our pharmacy operations. A fundamental requirement for our
business is the secure storage and transmission of personal health information and other
confidential data and we must maintain our business processes and information systems, and the
integrity of our confidential information. Although we have developed systems and processes that
are designed to protect information against security breaches, failure to protect such information
or mitigate any such breaches may adversely affect our operations. Malfunctions in our business
processes, breaches of our information systems or the failure to maintain effective and up-to-date
information systems could disrupt our business operations, result in customer and member disputes,
damage our reputation, expose us to risk of loss or litigation, result in regulatory violations,
increase administrative expenses or lead to other adverse consequences.
Negative publicity or changes in public perception of our services may adversely affect our ability
to receive referrals, obtain new agreements and renew existing agreements.
Our success in receiving referrals, obtaining new agreements and renewing our existing agreements
depends upon maintaining our reputation as a quality service provider among governmental
authorities, physicians, hospitals, discharge planning departments, case managers, nursing homes,
rehabilitation centers, advocacy groups, consumers and their families, other referral sources and
the public. Negative publicity, changes in public perceptions of our services or government
investigations of our operations could damage our reputation and hinder our ability to receive
referrals, retain agreements or obtain new agreements. Increased government scrutiny may also
contribute to an increase in compliance costs and could discourage consumers from using our
services. Any of these events could have a negative effect on our business, financial condition and
operating results.
Several anti-takeover measures under Nevada law could delay or prevent a change of control, despite
such change of control being in the best interest of the holders of our common stock.
Several anti-takeover measures under Nevada law could delay or prevent a change of control, despite
such change of control being in the best interest of the holders of our common stock. This could
make it more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of us by means of a merger,
tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise. This could negatively impact the value of an investment
in our common stock, by discouraging a potential suitor who may otherwise be willing to offer a
premium for shares of our common stock.
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Other Information. |
Effective
August 12, 2009, the Company entered into amended and restated
employment agreements with Marvin R. Richardson, President and Chief
Executive Officer, Matthew R. Middendorf, Chief Financial Officer,
and Steven L. Zeller, Chief Operating Officer of the Company (the
Executive Officers). Complete texts of the agreements are attached
hereto as exhibits.
In
summary, the changes made by the amendments to compensation and
benefits of the Executive Officers, whether payable pursuant or in
addition to provisions of existing employment agreements, benefit
plan award agreements or otherwise (i) expressly document a
voluntary 10% reduction in base pay for the period April 1, 2009
to March 31, 2010, (ii) eliminate payment of automobile
allowances, (iii) specifically reference each Executive
Officers eligibility to participate in executive bonus plans
approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors,
including the 2008 Executive Performance Based Compensation Plan,
(iv) provide that upon termination of employment of the
Executive Officer by the Company without cause or by the Executive
Officer for good reason (A) each will immediately receive the
total amount of their base pay reduction referenced in (i) above in
the form of a lump sum payment, (B) each will immediately
receive 50% of the pro-rata amount of any incentive bonus plan target
award likely to be achieved for the fiscal year in which termination
occurs, with the remaining 50% payable within 60 days following
the end of that fiscal year, (C) the continuation of base
compensation payments to each of Mr. Middendorf and
Mr. Zeller will be extended from 6 months to one year,
(D) all of Mr. Zellers currently unvested restricted stock
awards will vest in accordance with their associated award agreement
schedule as if employment had continued (previously, a portion would
have vested immediately with others forfeited), (E) each will
have one year, instead of 90 days, following termination to
exercise previously vested stock options, and (F) any unvested
stock options will immediately vest, instead of being forfeited, in
the event that termination occurs within one year following a
change of control of the Company as currently defined in
the Companys 2006 Equity Incentive Plan.
The Exhibits included as part of this report are listed in the attached Exhibit Index, which is
incorporated herein by this reference.
38
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 13, 2009
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Marvin R. Richardson
Marvin R. Richardson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) and Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 13, 2009
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Matthew R. Middendorf
Matthew R. Middendorf
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
39
EXHIBIT INDEX
The following documents are filed as part of this report. Exhibits not required for this report
have been omitted. The Companys Commission file number is 001-32935.
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
10.1 |
|
|
Amended
and Restated Employment Agreement dated August 12, 2009, by and
between Arcadia Resources, Inc. and Marvin Richardson. |
|
10.2 |
|
|
Amended
and Restated Employment Agreement dated August 12, 2009, by and
between Arcadia Resources, Inc. and Matthew R. Middendorf. |
|
10.3 |
|
|
Amended
and Restated Employment Agreement dated August 12, 2009, by and
between Arcadia Resources, Inc. and Steven L. Zeller. |
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer required by rule 13a 14(a) or rule 15d 14(a). |
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of the Principal Accounting and Financial Officer required by rule 13a 14(a)
or rule 15d 14(a). |
|
32.1 |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as Adopted Pursuant to §906
of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.2 |
|
|
Principal Accounting and Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. |
40