Edgar Filing: SUMMIT FINANCIAL GROUP INC

f10q063010.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10 – Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010.

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ___________ to __________.

Commission File Number 0-16587

Summit Financial Group, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

West Virginia		55-0672148
(State or other jurisdiction of		(IRS Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

	300 North Main Street
	Moorefield, West Virginia	26836
	(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(304) 530-1000

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ	No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes o

No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filero

Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting companyþ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o

No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of Common Stock as of the latest practicable date.

Common Stock, $2.50 par value

7,425,472 shares outstanding as of August 13, 2010

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Table of Contents

			Page
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Financial Statements

		Consolidated balance sheets June 30, 2010 (unaudited), December 31, 2009, and June 30, 2009 (unaudited)	4

		Consolidated statements of income for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)	5

		Consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)	6

		Consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)	7-8

		Notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited)	9-33

	Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	34-48

	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	49

	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	50

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Table of Contents


PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		51

	Item 1A.	Risk Factors		51

	Item 2.	Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds		None

	Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities		None

	Item 4.	Removed and Reserved

	Item 5.	Other Information		None

	Item 6.	Exhibits

		Exhibits
		Exhibit 11	Statement re: Computation of Earnings per Share – Information contained in Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 15 of this Quarterly Report is incorporated herein by reference.

		Exhibit 31.1	Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer

		Exhibit 31.2	Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer

		Exhibit 32.1	Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer

		Exhibit 32.2	Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer

SIGNATURES				52

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)

	June 30,		December 31,			June 30,
	2010		2009			2009
Dollars in thousands	(unaudited)			(*)		(unaudited)
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	4,190	$	6,813		$	4,281
Interest bearing deposits with other banks		24,810		34,247			10,505
Federal funds sold		-		-			-
Securities available for sale		258,971		271,654			289,267
Other investments		24,006		24,008			24,000
Loans held for sale, net		525		1			841
Loans, net		1,065,118		1,137,336			1,165,653
Property held for sale		69,478		40,293			20,435
Premises and equipment, net		23,762		24,234			23,776
Accrued interest receivable		6,108		6,323			6,760
Intangible assets		9,178		9,353			9,529
Other assets		33,460		30,363			28,863
Total assets	$	1,519,606	$	1,584,625		$	1,583,910

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Liabilities
Deposits
Non interest bearing	$	73,519	$	74,119		$	69,878
Interest bearing		947,619		943,219			884,346
Total deposits		1,021,138		1,017,338			954,224
Short-term borrowings		2,739		49,739			104,718
Long-term borrowings		361,175		381,492			396,802
Subordinated debentures		16,800		16,800			16,000
Subordinated debentures owed to unconsolidated subsidiary trusts		19,589		19,589			19,589
Other liabilities		9,311		9,007			8,824
Total liabilities		1,430,752		1,493,965			1,500,157

Commitments and Contingencies

Shareholders' Equity
Preferred stock and related surplus - authorized 250,000 shares
Series 2009, 8% Non-cumulative convertible preferred stock,
par value $1.00; issued 2009 - 3,710 shares		3,519		3,519			-
Common stock and related surplus, authorized 20,000,000 shares,
$2.50 par value; issued and outstanding 2010 - 7,425,472 shares,
December 2009 - 7,425,472 shares;
June 2009 - 7,425,472 shares		24,508		24,508			24,508
Retained earnings		60,567		63,474			62,579
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		260		(841	)		(3,334	)
Total shareholders' equity		88,854		90,660			83,753

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	1,519,606	$	1,584,625		$	1,583,910


(*) - December 31, 2009 financial information has been extracted from audited consolidated financial statements
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,			June 30,			June 30,			June 30,
Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts	2010			2009			2010			2009
Interest income
Interest and fees on loans
Taxable	$	16,533		$	17,937		$	33,490		$	36,083
Tax-exempt		81			113			164			220
Interest and dividends on securities
Taxable		3,140			4,194			6,278			8,418
Tax-exempt		452			516			907			1,029
Interest on interest bearing deposits with other banks		2			1			13			1
Total interest income		20,208			22,761			40,852			45,751
Interest expense
Interest on deposits		5,378			6,358			10,876			12,979
Interest on short-term borrowings		20			145			77			358
Interest on long-term borrowings and subordinated debentures		4,874			5,151			9,732			9,972
Total interest expense		10,272			11,654			20,685			23,309
Net interest income		9,936			11,107			20,167			22,442
Provision for loan losses		8,500			5,500			13,850			9,500
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		1,436			5,607			6,317			12,942
Other income
Insurance commissions		1,223			1,283			2,432			2,627
Service fees		828			857			1,535			1,593
Realized securities gains (losses)		1,256			39			1,520			295
Gain (loss) on sale of assets		183			(115	)		195			(124	)
Writedown of OREO		(2,194	)		-			(2,194	)		-
Other		385			362			739			691
Total other-than-temporary impairment loss on securities		-			(5,219	)		(454	)		(5,434	)
Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income		-			451			425			451
Net impairment loss recognized in earnings		-			(4,768	)		(29	)		(4,983	)
Total other income		1,681			(2,342	)		4,198			99
Other expense
Salaries, commissions, and employee benefits		3,839			4,308			7,563			8,587
Net occupancy expense		509			466			1,031			1,063
Equipment expense		634			527			1,264			1,095
Supplies		134			248			243			442
Professional fees		262			403			536			737
Amortization of intangibles		88			88			176			176
FDIC premiums		625			1,245			1,450			1,628
OREO expense		244			100			476			156
Other		1,321			1,324			2,527			2,576
Total other expense		7,656			8,709			15,266			16,460
Income (loss) before income taxes		(4,539	)		(5,444	)		(4,751	)		(3,419	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		(1,661	)		(1,994	)		(1,993	)		(1,734	)
Net Income (loss)		(2,878	)		(3,450	)		(2,758	)		(1,685	)
Dividends on preferred shares		74			-			148			-
Net Income (loss) applicable to common shares	$	(2,952	)	$	(3,450	)	$	(2,906	)	$	(1,685	)


Basic earnings per common share	$	(0.40	)	$	(0.47	)	$	(0.39	)	$	(0.23	)
Diluted earnings per common share	$	(0.40	)	$	(0.46	)	$	(0.39	)	$	(0.23	)


See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity (unaudited)

								Accumulated
	Common		Preferred					Other			Total
	Stock and		Stock and					Compre-			Share-
	Related		Related		Retained			hensive			holders'
Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts	Surplus		Surplus		Earnings			Income (Loss)			Equity

Balance, December 31, 2009	$	24,508	$	3,519	$	63,474		$	(841	)	$	90,660
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
Comprehensive income:
Net income (loss)		-		-		(2,758	)		-			(2,758	)
Other comprehensive income:
Non-credit related other-than-temporary
impairment on available for sale debt securities
of $425, net of deferred taxes of $161		-		-		-			(264	)		(264	)
Net unrealized gain on available for sale debt
securities of $2,202 net of deferred taxes of
$837 and reclassification adjustment for net
realized gains included in net income of $1,520		-		-		-			1,365			1,365
Total comprehensive income												(1,657	)
Exercise of stock options		-		-		-			-			-
Stock compensation expense		-		-		-			-			-
Preferred stock cash dividends declared ($40.00 per share)		-		-		(149	)		-			(149	)

Balance, June 30, 2010	$	24,508	$	3,519	$	60,567		$	260		$	88,854


Balance, December 31, 2008	$	24,453	$	-	$	64,709		$	(1,918	)	$	87,244
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Comprehensive income:
Net income (loss)		-		-		(1,685	)		-			(1,685	)
Other comprehensive income:
Net unrealized loss on securities available
for sale of ($1,711), net of deferred taxes of
$868 and reclassification adjustment
for gains included in net income of $295		-		-		-			(1,416	)		(1,416	)
Total comprehensive income												(3,101	)
Exercise of stock options		55		-		-			-			55
Stock compensation expense		-		-		-			-			-
Cash dividends declared of $0.06 per common share		-		-		(445	)		-			(445	)

Balance, June 30, 2009	$	24,508	$	-	$	62,579		$	(3,334	)	$	83,753









See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,			June 30,
Dollars in thousands	2010			2009
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net (loss)	$	(2,758	)	$	(1,685	)
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		809			803
Provision for loan losses		13,850			9,500
Deferred income tax (benefit)		(2,047	)		(2,477	)
Loans originated for sale		(3,770	)		(13,390	)
Proceeds from loans sold		3,246			13,553
(Gain) on sales of loans held for sale		-			(26	)
Securities (gains)		(1,520	)		(295	)
Writedown of equity investment		-			215
Other-than-temporary impairment of debt securities		29			4,768
(Gain) loss on sale of assets		(195	)		120
Writedown of OREO		2,194
Accretion of securities premiums, net		(677	)		(1,436	)
Amortization of goodwill and purchase accounting
adjustments, net		181			181
Decrease in accrued interest receivable		214			457
(Increase) in other assets		(2,452	)		(1,061	)
Increase in other liabilities		304			239
Net cash provided by operating activities		7,408			9,466
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net (increase) decrease in interest bearing deposits
with other banks		9,437			(10,398	)
Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities available for sale		31,671			12,540
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale		32,778			9,696
Principal payments received on securities available for sale		25,692			40,063
Purchases of securities available for sale		(73,516	)		(29,496	)
Purchases of other investments		(2,998	)		(982	)
Proceeds from maturities and calls of other investments		3,000			-
Net decrease in Federal funds sold		-			2
Net (loans made) principal payments received on loans		24,445			3,772
Purchases of premises and equipment		(338	)		(2,145	)
Proceeds from sales of other repossessed assets & property held for sale		3,463			789
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		53,634			23,841
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net increase in demand deposit, NOW and
savings accounts		1,390			39,718
Net increase (decrease) in time deposits		2,411			(51,344	)
Net (decrease) in short-term borrowings		(47,001	)		(48,382	)
Proceeds from long-term borrowings		-			42,656
Repayment of long-term borrowings		(20,317	)		(28,602	)
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated debentures		-			5,962
Exercise of stock options		-			43
Dividends paid on common stock		-			(433	)
Dividends paid on preferred stock		(148	)		-
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(63,665	)		(40,382	)
Increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks		(2,623	)		(7,075	)
Cash and due from banks:
Beginning		6,813			11,356
Ending	$	4,190		$	4,281
(Continued)
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)


	Six Months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,
Dollars in thousands	2010		2009

Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
Cash payments for:
Interest	$	20,960	$	23,556
Income taxes	$	-	$	1,395

Supplemental Schedule of Noncash Investing and Financing Activities
Other assets acquired in settlement of loans	$	33,923	$	13,232
































See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

We, Summit Financial Group, Inc. and subsidiaries, prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with instructions to Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for annual year end financial statements. In our opinion, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included and are of a normal recurring nature.

The presentation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates. For the second quarter of 2010, we evaluated subsequent events through August 16, 2010, the filing date of this report.

The results of operations for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The consolidated financial statements and notes included herein should be read in conjunction with our 2009 audited financial statements and Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain accounts in the consolidated financial statements for December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, as previously presented, have been reclassified to conform to current year classifications.

NOTE 2. SIGNIFICANT NEW AUTHORITATIVE ACCOUNTING GUIDANCE

ASU No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) - Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements, requires expanded disclosures related to fair value measurements including (i) the amounts of significant transfers of assets or liabilities between Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy and the reasons for the transfers, (ii) the reasons for transfers of assets or liabilities in or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, with significant transfers disclosed separately, (iii) the policy for determining when transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are recognized and (iv) for recurring fair value measurements of assets and liabilities in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, a gross presentation of information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements. ASU 2010-06 further clarifies that (i) fair value measurement disclosures should be provided for each class of assets and liabilities (rather than major category), which would generally be a subset of assets or liabilities within a line item in the statement of financial position and (ii) company’s should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements for each class of assets and liabilities included in Levels 2 and 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The disclosures related to the gross presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of assets and liabilities included in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy will be required for us beginning January 1, 2011. The remaining disclosure requirements and clarifications made by ASU 2010-06 became effective for us on January 1, 2010. See Note 3 – Fair Value Measurements.

ASU No. 2010-11, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) - Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives clarifies that the only form of an embedded credit derivative that is exempt from embedded derivative bifurcation requirements are those that relate to the subordination of one financial instrument to another. As a result, entities that have contracts containing an embedded credit derivative feature in a form other than such subordination may need to separately account for the embedded credit derivative feature. The provisions of ASU 2010-11 will be effective for us on July 1, 2010 and are not expected to have a significant impact on our financial statements.

ASU No. 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 830) - Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses requires entities to provide disclosures designed to facilitate financial statement users’ evaluation of (i) the nature of credit risk inherent in the entity’s portfolio of financing receivables, (ii) how that risk is analyzed and assessed in arriving at the allowance for credit losses and (iii) the changes and reasons for those changes in the allowance for credit losses. Disclosures must be disaggregated by portfolio segment, the level at which an entity develops and documents a systematic method for determining its allowance for credit losses, and class of financing receivable, which is generally a disaggregation of portfolio segment. The required disclosures include, among other things, a rollforward of the allowance for credit losses as well as information about modified, impaired, non-accrual and past due loans and credit quality indicators. ASU 2010-20 will be effective for our financial statements as of December 31, 2010, as it relates to disclosures required as of the end of a reporting period. Disclosures that relate to activity during a reporting period will be required for our financial statements that include periods beginning on or after January 1, 2011.

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

NOTE 3. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

ASC Topic 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value.

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) or identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, and other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

Accordingly, securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, we may be required to record other assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, such as loans held for sale, and impaired loans held for investment. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve application of lower of cost or market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

Following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value.

Available-for-Sale Securities: Investment securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’s credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions. Level 1 securities include those traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange, U.S. Treasury securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets and money market funds. Level 2 securities include mortgage-backed securities issued by government sponsored entities, municipal bonds and corporate debt securities.

Loans Held for Sale: Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or market value. The fair value of loans held for sale is based on what secondary markets are currently offering for portfolios with similar characteristics. As such, we classify loans subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 2.

Loans: We do not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for loan losses is established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, management measures impairment in accordance with ASC Topic 310, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan. The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value, liquidation value and discounted cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans. At June 30, 2010, substantially all of the total impaired loans were evaluated based on the fair value of the collateral. In accordance with ASC Topic 310, impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral requires classification in the fair value hierarchy. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, we record the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 2. When a current appraised value is not available and there is no observable market price, we record the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 3.

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

When a collateral-dependent loan is identified as impaired, management immediately begins the process of evaluating the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral to determine if a related specific allowance for loan losses or charge-off is necessary. Current appraisals are ordered once a loan is deemed impaired if the existing appraisal is more than twelve months old, or more frequently if there is known deterioration in value. For recently identified impaired loans, a current appraisal may not be available at the financial statement date. Until the current appraisal is obtained, the original appraised value is discounted, as appropriate, to compensate for the estimated depreciation in the value of the loan’s underlying collateral since the date of the original appraisal. Such discounts are generally estimated based upon management’s knowledge of sales of similar collateral within the applicable market area and its knowledge of other real estate market-related data as well as general economic trends. When a new appraisal is received (which generally are received within 3 months of a loan being identified as impaired), management then re-evaluates the fair value of the collateral and adjusts any specific allocated allowance for loan losses, as appropriate. In addition, management also assigns a discount of 7–10% for the estimated costs to sell the collateral. As of June 30, 2010, the total fair value of our collateral-dependent impaired loans which had a related specific allowance or prior charge-off was $4,213,000 less than the related appraised values of the underlying collateral for such loans.

Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”): OREO consists of real estate acquired in foreclosure or other settlement of loans. Such assets are carried on the balance sheet at the lower of the investment in the real estate or its fair value less estimated selling costs. The fair value of OREO is determined on a nonrecurring basis generally utilizing current appraisals performed by an independent, licensed appraiser applying an income or market value approach using observable market data (Level 2). Updated appraisals of OREO are generally obtained if the existing appraisal is more than 18 months old, or more frequently if there is a known deterioration in value. However, if a current appraisal is not available, the original appraised value is discounted, as appropriate, to compensate for the estimated depreciation in the value of the real estate since the date of its original appraisal. Such discounts are generally estimated based upon management’s knowledge of sales of similar property within the applicable market area and its knowledge of other real estate market-related data as well as general economic trends (Level 3). Upon foreclosure, any fair value adjustment is charged against the allowance for loan losses. Subsequent fair value adjustments are recorded in the period incurred and included in other noninterest income in the consolidated statements of income.

Derivative Assets and Liabilities: Substantially all derivative instruments held or issued by us for risk management or customer-initiated activities are traded in over-the-counter markets where quoted market prices are not readily available. For those derivatives, we measure fair value using models that use primarily market observable inputs, such as yield curves and option volatilities, and include the value associated with counterparty credit risk. We classify derivative instruments held or issued for risk management or customer-initiated activities as Level 2. Examples of Level 2 derivatives are interest rate swaps.

Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The table below presents the recorded amount of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

	Balance at		Fair Value Measurements Using:
In thousands	June 30, 2010		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Available for sale securities
U.S. Government sponsored agencies	$	50,724	$	-	$	50,724	$	-
Mortgage backed securities:
Government sponsored agencies		102,526		-		102,526		-
Nongovernment sponsored agencies		57,358		-		57,358		-
State and political subdivisions		7,772		-		7,772		-
Corporate debt securities		-		-		-		-
Other equity securities		77		-		77		-
Tax-exempt state and political subdivisions		40,514		-		40,514		-
Total available for sale securities	$	258,971	$	-	$	258,971	$	-

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

	Balance at		Fair Value Measurements Using:
In thousands	December 31, 2009		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Available for sale securities
U.S. Government sponsored agencies	$	54,961	$	-	$	54,961	$	-
Mortgage backed securities:
Government sponsored agencies		100,036		-		100,036		-
Nongovernment sponsored agencies		69,797		-		69,797		-
State and political subdivisions		3,792		-		3,792		-
Corporate debt securities		356		-		356		-
Other equity securities		77		-		77		-
Tax-exempt state and political subdivisions		42,635		-		42,635		-
Total available for sale securities	$	271,654	$	-	$	271,654	$	-

There were no assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the period ended June 30, 2010.

Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

We may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. These include assets that are measured at the lower of cost or market that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period. Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are included in the table below.

	Total at		Fair Value Measurements Using:
In thousands	June 30, 2010		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Residential mortgage loans held for sale	$	525	$	-	$	525	$	-

Impaired loans
Commercial	$	1,579	$	-	$	-	$	1,579
Commercial real estate		25,568		-		21,424		4,144
Construction and development		11,810		-		7,143		4,667
Residential real estate		21,735		-		1,554		20,181
Total impaired loans	$	60,692	$	-	$	30,121	$	30,571

OREO	$	69,478	$	-	$	69,301	$	177

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

	Total at		Fair Value Measurements Using:
In thousands	December 31, 2009		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Residential mortgage loans held for sale	$	1	$	-	$	1	$	-

Impaired loans
Commercial	$	104	$	-	$	-	$	104
Commercial real estate		48,057		-		30,585		17,472
Construction and development		25,621		-		20,717		4,904
Residential real estate		702		-		702		-
Total impaired loans	$	74,484	$	-	$	52,004	$	22,480

OREO	$	40,293	$	-	$	38,788	$	1,505

Impaired loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for collateral-dependent loans, had a carrying amount at June 30, 2010 of $72,566,000, with a valuation allowance of $11,874,000, resulting in an additional provision for loan losses of $7,087,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments, requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or non-recurring basis. The following summarizes the methods and significant assumptions we used in estimating our fair value disclosures for financial instruments.

Cash and due from banks: The carrying values of cash and due from banks approximate their estimated fair value.

Interest bearing deposits with other banks: The fair values of interest bearing deposits with other banks are estimated by discounting scheduled future receipts of principal and interest at the current rates offered on similar instruments with similar remaining maturities.

Federal funds sold: The carrying values of Federal funds sold approximate their estimated fair values.

Securities: Estimated fair values of securities are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, estimated fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable securities.

Loans held for sale: The carrying values of loans held for sale approximate their estimated fair values.

Loans: The estimated fair values for loans are computed based on scheduled future cash flows of principal and interest, discounted at interest rates currently offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. No prepayments of principal are assumed.

Accrued interest receivable and payable: The carrying values of accrued interest receivable and payable approximate their estimated fair values.

Deposits: The estimated fair values of demand deposits (i.e. non-interest bearing checking, NOW, money market and savings accounts) and other variable rate deposits approximate their carrying values. Fair values of fixed maturity deposits are estimated using a discounted cash flow methodology at rates currently offered for deposits with similar remaining maturities. Any intangible value of long-term relationships with depositors is not considered in estimating the fair values disclosed.

Short-term borrowings: The carrying values of short-term borrowings approximate their estimated fair values.

Long-term borrowings: The fair values of long-term borrowings are estimated by discounting scheduled future payments of principal and interest at current rates available on borrowings with similar terms.

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Subordinated debentures: The carrying values of subordinated debentures approximate their estimated fair values.

Subordinated debentures owed to unconsolidated subsidiary trusts: The carrying values of subordinated debentures owed to unconsolidated subsidiary trusts approximate their estimated fair values.

Off-balance sheet instruments: The fair values of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit are estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present credit standing of the counter parties. The amounts of fees currently charged on commitments and standby letters of credit are deemed insignificant, and therefore, the estimated fair values and carrying values are not shown below.

The carrying values and estimated fair values of our financial instruments are summarized below:

	June 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
			Estimated				Estimated
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
In thousands	Value		Value		Value		Value
Financial assets
Cash and due from banks	$	4,190	$	4,190	$	6,813	$	6,813
Interest bearing deposits with
other banks		24,810		24,810		34,247		34,247
Securities available for sale		258,971		258,971		271,654		271,654
Other investments		24,006		24,006		24,008		24,008
Loans held for sale, net		525		525		1		1
Loans, net		1,065,118		1,071,636		1,137,336		1,152,837
Accrued interest receivable		6,108		6,108		6,323		6,323
	$	1,383,728	$	1,390,246	$	1,480,382	$	1,495,883
Financial liabilities
Deposits	$	1,021,138	$	1,091,371	$	1,017,338	$	1,087,212
Short-term borrowings		2,739		2,739		49,739		49,739
Long-term borrowings		361,175		381,690		381,492		395,375
Subordinated debentures		16,800		16,800		16,800		16,800
Subordinated debentures owed to
unconsolidated subsidiary trusts		19,589		19,589		19,589		19,589
Accrued interest payable		3,872		3,872		4,146		4,146
	$	1,425,313	$	1,516,061	$	1,489,104	$	1,572,861

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

NOTE 4. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The computations of basic and diluted earnings per share follow:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2010								2009
				Common								Common
Dollars in thousands,	Income			Shares		Per			Income			Shares		Per
except per share amounts	(Numerator)			(Denominator)		Share			(Numerator)			(Denominator)		Share
Net income	$	(2,878	)						$	(3,450	)
Less preferred stock dividends		(74	)							-

Basic EPS	$	(2,952	)		7,425,472	$	(0.40	)	$	(3,450	)		7,419,974	$	(0.47	)

Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options		-			-					-			11,995
Convertible preferred stock		-			-					-			-

Diluted EPS	$	(2,952	)		7,425,472	$	(0.40	)	$	(3,450	)		7,431,969	$	(0.46	)

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2010								2009
				Common								Common
Dollars in thousands,	Income			Shares		Per			Income			Shares		Per
except per share amounts	(Numerator)			(Denominator)		Share			(Numerator)			(Denominator)		Share
Net income	$	(2,758	)						$	(1,685	)
Less preferred stock dividends		(148	)							-

Basic EPS	$	(2,906	)		7,425,472	$	(0.39	)	$	(1,685	)		7,417,642	$	(0.23	)

Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options		-			-					-			15,852
Convertible preferred stock		-			-					-			-

Diluted EPS	$	(2,906	)		7,425,472	$	(0.39	)	$	(1,685	)		7,433,494	$	(0.23	)

Stock option grants and the conversion of preferred stock are disregarded in this computation if they are determined to be anti-dilutive. Our anti-dilutive stock options at June 30, 2010 and 2009 totaled 309,180 shares and 265,980 shares, respectively. Our anti-dilutive convertible preferred shares totaled 674,545 shares at June 30, 2010.

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

NOTE 5. SECURITIES

The amortized cost, unrealized gains, unrealized losses and estimated fair values of securities at June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009, and June 30, 2009 are summarized as follows:

	June 30, 2010
	Amortized		Unrealized				Estimated
In thousands	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
Available for Sale
Taxable debt securities:
U. S. Government agencies
and corporations	$	49,893	$	848	$	17	$	50,724
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
Government-sponsored agencies		97,468		5,073		15		102,526
Nongovernment-sponsored agencies		63,265		512		6,419		57,358
State and political subdivisions		7,791		23		42		7,772
Corporate debt securities		-		-		-		-
Total taxable debt securities		218,417		6,456		6,493		218,380
Tax-exempt debt securities:
State and political subdivisions		40,056		717		259		40,514
Total tax-exempt debt securities		40,056		717		259		40,514
Equity securities		77		-		-		77
Total available for sale securities	$	258,550	$	7,173	$	6,752	$	258,971

	December 31, 2009
	Amortized		Unrealized				Estimated
In thousands	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
Available for Sale
Taxable debt securities:
U. S. Government agencies
and corporations	$	54,850	$	693	$	582	$	54,961
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
Government-sponsored agencies		95,939		4,189		92		100,036
Nongovernment-sponsored agencies		75,546		662		6,411		69,797
State and political subdivisions		3,760		37		5		3,792
Corporate debt securities		350		6		-		356
Total taxable debt securities		230,445		5,587		7,090		228,942
Tax-exempt debt securities:
State and political subdivisions		42,486		570		421		42,635
Total tax-exempt debt securities		42,486		570		421		42,635
Equity securities		77		-		-		77
Total available for sale securities	$	273,008	$	6,157	$	7,511	$	271,654

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

	June 30, 2009
	Amortized		Unrealized				Estimated
In thousands	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
Available for Sale
Taxable debt securities
U. S. Government agencies
and corporations	$	34,836	$	855	$	40	$	35,651
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
Government-sponsored agencies		117,853		4,379		53		122,179
Nongovernment-sponsored entities		89,836		945		11,253		79,528
State and political subdivisions		3,760		25		5		3,780
Corporate debt securities		349		6		-		355
Total taxable debt securities		246,634		6,210		11,351		241,493
Tax-exempt debt securities
State and political subdivisions		47,828		699		1,060		47,467
Total tax-exempt debt securities		47,828		699		1,060		47,467
Equity securities		180		127		-		307
Total available for sale securities	$	294,642	$	7,036	$	12,411	$	289,267

The maturities, amortized cost and estimated fair values of securities at June 30, 2010, are summarized as follows:

	Available for Sale
	Amortized		Estimated
In thousands	Cost		Fair Value

Due in one year or less	$	58,118	$	58,703
Due from one to five years		96,098		96,694
Due from five to ten years		43,576		42,538
Due after ten years		60,681		60,959
Equity securities		77		77
	$	258,550	$	258,971

The proceeds from sales, calls and maturities of available for sale securities, including principal payments received on mortgage-backed obligations, and the related gross gains and losses realized, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 are as follows:

	Proceeds from						Gross realized
			Calls and		Principal
In thousands	Sales		Maturities		Payments		Gains		Losses

Securities available for sale	$	32,778	$	31,671	$	25,692	$	1,527	$	7

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

During the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, we recorded other-than-temporary impairment losses on securities as follows:

	Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
	Residential MBS								Residential MBS
	Nongovernment								Nongovernment
	- Sponsored			Equity					- Sponsored			Equity
In thousands	Entities			Securities		Total			Entities			Securities			Total
June 30, 2010
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses	$	-		$	-	$	-		$	(454	)	$	-		$	(454	)
Portion of loss recognized in
other comprehensive income		-			-		-			425			-			425
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings	$	-		$	-	$	-		$	(29	)	$	-		$	(29	)

June 30, 2009
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses	$	(5,219	)	$	-	$	(5,219	)	$	(5,219	)	$	(215	)	$	(5,434	)
Portion of loss recognized in
other comprehensive income		451			-		451			451			-			451
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings	$	(4,768	)	$	-	$	(4,768	)	$	(4,768	)	$	(215	)	$	(4,983	)

Activity related to the credit component recognized on debt securities available for sale for which a portion of other-than-temporary impairment was recognized in other comprehensive income for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010 is as follows:

	Three Months Ended			Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2010			June 30, 2010

In thousands	Total			Total
Beginning Balance	$	(2,951	)	$	(2,922	)
Additions for the credit component on debt securities in which
other-than-temporary impairment was not previously recognized		-			(29	)
Securities sold during the period		-			-
Ending Balance	$	(2,951	)	$	(2,951	)

At June 30, 2010, our debt securities with other-than-temporary impairment in which only the amount of loss related to credit was recognized in earnings consisted solely of residential mortgage-backed securities issued by nongovernment-sponsored entities. We utilize third party vendors to estimate the portion of loss attributable to credit using a discounted cash flow models. The vendors estimate cash flows of the underlying collateral of each mortgage-backed security using models that incorporate their best estimates of current key assumptions, such as default rates, loss severity and prepayment rates. Assumptions utilized vary widely from loan to loan, and are influenced by such factors as loan interest rate, geographical location of the borrower, collateral type and borrower characteristic. Specific such assumptions utilized by our vendors in their valuation of our other-than-temporarily impaired residential mortgage-backed securities issued by nongovernment-sponsored entities were as follows at June 30, 2010:

	Weighted	Range
	Average	Minimum	Maximum
Constant voluntary prepayment rates	6.6%	3.1%	8.9%
Constant default rates	7.1%	4.7%	9.9%
Loss severities	51.5%	51.0%	53.0%

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Our vendors performing these valuations also analyze the structure of each mortgage-backed instrument in order to determine how the estimated cash flows of the underlying collateral will be distributed to each security issued from the structure. Expected principal and interest cash flows on the impaired debt securities are discounted predominantly using unobservable discount rates which the vendors assumes that market participants would utilize in pricing the specific security. Based on the discounted expected cash flows derived from our vendor’s models, we expect to recover the remaining unrealized losses on residential mortgage-backed securities issued by nongovernment sponsored entities.

Provided below is a summary of securities available for sale which were in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, including debt securities for which a portion of other-than-temporary impairment has been recognized in other comprehensive income.

	June 30, 2010
	Less than 12 months					12 months or more					Total
	Estimated		Unrealized			Estimated		Unrealized			Estimated		Unrealized
In thousands	Fair Value		Loss			Fair Value		Loss			Fair Value		Loss
Temporarily impaired securities
Taxable debt securities
U. S. Government agencies
and corporations	$	1,355	$	(17	)	$	134	$	-		$	1,489	$	(17	)
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
Government-sponsored agencies		3,686		(15	)		-		-			3,686		(15	)
Nongovernment-sponsored entities		16,884		(866	)		19,966		(5,169	)		36,850		(6,035	)
State and political subdivisions		2,010		(36	)		384		(6	)		2,394		(42	)
Tax-exempt debt securities
State and political subdivisions		4,866		(40	)		3,818		(219	)		8,684		(259	)
Total temporarily impaired securities		28,801		(974	)		24,302		(5,394	)		53,103		(6,368	)
Other-than-temporarily impaired securities
Taxable debt securities
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
Nongovernment-sponsored entities		157		(140	)		1,293		(244	)		1,450		(384	)
Total other-than-temporarily
impaired securities		157		(140	)		1,293		(244	)		1,450		(384	)
Total	$	28,958	$	(1,114	)	$	25,595	$	(5,638	)	$	54,553	$	(6,752	)

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

	December 31, 2009
	Less than 12 months					12 months or more					Total
	Estimated		Unrealized			Estimated		Unrealized			Estimated		Unrealized
In thousands	Fair Value		Loss			Fair Value		Loss			Fair Value		Loss
Temporarily impaired securities
Taxable debt securities
U. S. Government agencies
and corporations	$	26,607	$	(581	)	$	138	$	(1	)	$	26,745	$	(582	)
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
Government-sponsored agencies		9,612		(91	)		68		(1	)		9,680		(92	)
Nongovernment-sponsored entities		24,500		(1,530	)		21,485		(4,637	)		45,985		(6,167	)
Tax-exempt debt securities
State and political subdivisions		12,100		(138	)		3,748		(288	)		15,848		(426	)
Total temporarily impaired securities		72,819		(2,340	)		25,439		(4,927	)		98,258		(7,267	)
Other-than-temporarily impaired securities
Taxable debt securities
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
Nongovernment-sponsored entities		-		-			1,670		(244	)		1,670		(244	)
Total other-than-temporarily
impaired securities		-		-			1,670		(244	)		1,670		(244	)
Total	$	72,819	$	(2,340	)	$	27,109	$	(5,171	)	$	99,928	$	(7,511	)

We held 55 available for sale securities, including debt securities with other-than-temporary impairment in which a portion of the impairment remains in other comprehensive income, having an unrealized loss at June 30, 2010. We do not intend to sell these securities, and it is more likely than not that we will not be required to sell these securities before recovery of their amortized cost bases. We believe that this decline in value is primarily attributable to the lack of market liquidity and to changes in market interest rates and not due to credit quality. Accordingly, no additional other-than-temporary impairment charge to earnings is warranted at this time.

At June 30, 2010, we had $6.4 million in total unrealized losses related to residential mortgage-backed securities issued by nongovernment sponsored entities. We monitor the performance of the mortgages underlying these bonds. Although there has been some deterioration in their collateral performance, we primarily hold the senior tranches of each issue which provides protection against defaults. We attribute the unrealized loss on these mortgage-backed securities held largely to the current absence of liquidity in the markets for such securities and not to deterioration in credit quality. The mortgages in these asset pools have been made to borrowers with strong credit history and significant equity invested in their homes. Nonetheless, further weakening of economic fundamentals coupled with significant increases in unemployment and substantial deterioration in the value of high end residential properties could extend distress to this borrower population. This could increase default rates and put additional pressure on property values. Should these conditions occur, the value of these securities could decline further and result in the recognition of additional other-than-temporary impairment charges recognized in earnings.

NOTE 6. LOANS

Loans are generally stated at the amount of unpaid principal, reduced by unearned discount and allowance for loan losses. Interest on loans is accrued daily on the outstanding balances. Loan origination fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred and amortized as adjustments of the related loan yield over its contractual life.

Generally, loans are placed on nonaccrual status when principal or interest is greater than 90 days past due based upon the loan's contractual terms. Interest is accrued daily on impaired loans unless the loan is placed on nonaccrual status. Impaired loans are placed on nonaccrual status when the payments of principal and interest are in default for a period of 90 days, unless the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection. Interest on nonaccrual loans is recognized primarily using the cost-recovery method. Loans may be returned to accrual status when repayment is reasonably assured and there has been demonstrated performance under the terms of the loan or, if applicable, the terms of the restructured loans.

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Commercial-related loans or portions thereof (which are risk-rated) are charged off to the allowance for loan losses when the loss has been confirmed. This determination is made on a case by case basis considering many factors, including the prioritization of our claim in bankruptcy, expectations of the workout/restructuring of the loan and valuation of the borrower’s equity. We deem a loss confirmed when a loan or a portion of a loan is classified “loss” in accordance with bank regulatory classification guidelines, which state, “Assets classified loss are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as bankable assts is not warranted”.

Consumer-related loans are generally charged off to the allowance for loan losses upon reaching specified stages of delinquency, in accordance with the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council policy. For example, credit card loans are charged off by the end of the month in which the account becomes 180 days past due or within 60 days from receiving notification about a specified event (e.g., bankruptcy of the borrower), which ever is earlier. Residential mortgage loans are generally charged off to net realizable value no later than when the account becomes 180 days past due. Other consumer loans, if collateralized, are generally charged off to net realizable value at 120 days past due.

Loans are summarized as follows:

	June 30,		December 31,		June 30,
In thousands	2010		2009		2009
Commercial	$	117,334	$	122,508	$	126,661
Commercial real estate		432,321		465,037		459,671
Construction and development		143,907		162,080		183,733
Residential real estate		362,649		372,867		376,019
Consumer		25,968		28,203		30,179
Other		5,540		5,652		5,760
Total loans		1,087,719		1,156,347		1,182,023
Less unearned income		1,833		2,011		2,065
Total loans net of unearned income		1,085,886		1,154,336		1,179,958
Less allowance for loan losses		20,768		17,000		14,305
Loans, net	$	1,065,118	$	1,137,336	$	1,165,653

The tables below set forth information about our impaired loans.

	June 30,				December 31,
In thousands	2010		2009		2009
Impaired loans with an allowance	$	36,850	$	22,872	$	39,210
Impaired loans without an allowance		35,716		38,080		46,123
Impaired loans without an allowance as a result of
a direct charge off		-		1,224		-
Total impaired loans	$	72,566	$	62,176	$	85,333

Allowance for loan losses attributed to impaired loans	$	11,874	$	4,709	$	10,211

					Year Ended
	Six Months Ended June 30,				December 31,
In thousands		2010		2009		2009
Average balance of impaired loans	$	74,619	$	54,259	$	75,698
Interest income recognized on impaired loans	$	511	$	36	$	298

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Method Used to Measure Impairment of Impaired Loans
In thousands

Loan Category	6/30/2010		12/31/2009		Method used to measure impairment
Commerical	$	1,691	$	301	Fair value of collateral
Commerical real estate		26,673		43,639	Fair value of collateral
		2,561		7,658	Discounted cash flow
Construction and development		18,106		31,091	Fair value of collateral
Residential real estate		23,234		2,005	Fair value of collateral
		301		639	Discounted cash flow
Total	$	72,566	$	85,333

Included in impaired loans are troubled debt restructurings of $22,391,000, $4,505,000 and $8,297,000 at June 30, 2010, June 30, 2009, and December 31, 2009, respectively.

Included in impaired loans at June 30, 2010 are five credit relationships totaling $11,728,000 with a related allowance of $2,692,000 which were foreclosed upon and placed in OREO subsequent to June 30, 2010.

NOTE 7. ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

An analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, and for the year ended December 31, 2009 is as follows:

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

	Six Months Ended				Year Ended
	June 30,				December 31,
In thousands	2010		2009		2009
Balance, beginning of period	$	17,000	$	16,933	$	16,933
Losses:
Commercial		103		36		479
Commercial real estate		4,524		401		469
Construction and development		3,812		12,001		16,946
Residential real estate		1,797		1,152		3,921
Consumer		193		116		214
Other		84		104		231
Total		10,513		13,810		22,260
Recoveries:
Commercial		16		5		129
Commercial real estate		5		6		23
Construction and development		184		1,534		1,615
Residential real estate		115		11		29
Consumer		46		53		90
Other		65		73		116
Total		431		1,682		2,002
Net losses		10,082		12,128		20,258
Provision for loan losses		13,850		9,500		20,325
Balance, end of period	$	20,768	$	14,305	$	17,000

NOTE 8. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The following tables present our goodwill by reporting unit at June 30, 2010 and other intangible assets by reporting unit at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

	Goodwill Activity
	Community		Insurance
In thousands	Banking		Services		Total
Balance, January 1, 2010	$	1,488	$	4,710	$	6,198
Acquired goodwill, net		-		-		-

Balance, June 30, 2010	$	1,488	$	4,710	$	6,198

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

	Other Intangible Assets
	June 30, 2010						December 31, 2009
	Community		Insurance				Community		Insurance
In thousands	Banking		Services		Total		Banking		Services		Total
Unidentifiable intangible assets
Gross carrying amount	$	2,267	$	-	$	2,267	$	2,267	$	-	$	2,267
Less: accumulated amortization		1,688		-		1,688		1,612		-		1,612
Net carrying amount	$	579	$	-	$	579	$	655	$	-	$	655

Identifiable intangible assets
Gross carrying amount	$	-	$	3,000	$	3,000	$	-	$	3,000	$	3,000
Less: accumulated amortization		-		600		600		-		500		500
Net carrying amount	$	-	$	2,400	$	2,400	$	-	$	2,500	$	2,500

We recorded amortization expense of approximately $176,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 relative to our other intangible assets. Annual amortization is expected to be approximately $351,000 for each of the years ending 2010 through 2012.

NOTE 9. DEPOSITS

The following is a summary of interest bearing deposits by type as of June 30, 2010 and 2009 and December 31, 2009:

	June 30,		December 31,		June 30,
In thousands	2010		2009		2009
Interest bearing demand deposits	$	142,771	$	148,587	$	152,498
Savings deposits		196,224		188,419		105,828
Retail time deposits		368,295		364,399		377,749
Brokered time deposits		240,329		241,814		248,271
Total	$	947,619	$	943,219	$	884,346

Brokered deposits represent certificates of deposit acquired through a third party. The following is a summary of the maturity distribution of all certificates of deposit in denominations of $100,000 or more as of June 30, 2010:

Dollars in thousands	Amount		Percent
Three months or less	$	55,735		13.5	%
Three through six months		52,296		12.6	%
Six through twelve months		66,548		16.1	%
Over twelve months		239,737		57.9	%
Total	$	414,316		100.0	%

A summary of the scheduled maturities for all time deposits as of June 30, 2010 is as follows:

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

In thousands
Six month period ending December 31, 2010	$	173,195
Year ending December 31, 2011		202,424
Year ending December 31, 2012		83,047
Year ending December 31, 2013		71,896
Year ending December 31, 2014		30,184
Thereafter		47,878
	$	608,624

NOTE 10. BORROWED FUNDS

Short-term borrowings: A summary of short-term borrowings is presented below:

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
							Federal Funds
	Short-term						Purchased
	FHLB			Repurchase			and Lines
In thousands	Advances			Agreements			of Credit
Balance at June 30	$	-		$	1,787		$	952
Average balance outstanding for the period		27,412			1,326			1,782
Maximum balance outstanding at
any month end during period		45,000			1,787			3,617
Weighted average interest rate for the period		0.41	%		0.38	%		2.00	%
Weighted average interest rate for balances
outstanding at June 30		0.00	%		0.39	%		0.25	%

	Year Ended December 31, 2009
							Federal Funds
	Short-term						Purchased
	FHLB			Repurchase			and Lines
Dollars in thousands	Advances			Agreements			of Credit
Balance at December 31	$	45,000		$	1,123		$	3,616
Average balance outstanding for the period		92,326			1,079			6,092
Maximum balance outstanding at
any month end during period		184,825			2,433			9,663
Weighted average interest rate for the period		0.50	%		0.38	%		1.83	%
Weighted average interest rate for balances
outstanding at December 31		0.32	%		0.49	%		3.01	%

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

	Quarter Ended June 30, 2009
							Federal Funds
	Short-term						Purchased
	FHLB			Repurchase			and Lines
Dollars in thousands	Advances			Agreements			of Credit
Balance at June 30	$	100,000		$	1,373		$	3,345
Average balance outstanding for the period		119,815			1,467			5,647
Maximum balance outstanding at
any month end during period		184,825			2,433			9,663
Weighted average interest rate for the period		0.50	%		0.40	%		2.01	%
Weighted average interest rate for balances
outstanding at June 30		0.44	%		0.34	%		2.94	%

Long-term borrowings: Our long-term borrowings of $361,175,000, $381,492,000 and $396,802,000 at June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009, and June 30, 2009 respectively, consisted primarily of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) and structured reverse repurchase agreements with two unaffiliated institutions.

					Balance at
	Balance at June 30,				December 31,
Dollars in thousands	2010		2009		2009
Long-term FHLB advances	$	238,538	$	274,165	$	258,855
Long-term reverse repurchase agreements		110,000		110,000		110,000
Term loan		12,637		12,637		12,637
Total	$	361,175	$	396,802	$	381,492

The term loan represents a long-term borrowing with an unaffiliated banking institution which is secured by the common stock of our subsidiary bank, bears a variable interest rate of prime minus 50 basis points, and matures in 2017.

Our long term borrowings bear both fixed and variable rates and mature in varying amounts through the year 2019.

The average interest rate paid on long-term borrowings for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 was 4.94% compared to 4.71% for the first six months of 2009.

Subordinated debentures: We have subordinated debt which qualifies as Tier 2 regulatory capital totaling $16.8 million at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and $16 million at June 30, 2009. During 2009, we issued $6.8 million in subordinated debt, of which $5 million was issued to an affiliate of a director of Summit. We also issued $1.0 million and $0.8 million to two unrelated parties. These three issuances bear an interest rate of 10 percent per annum, a term of 10 years, and are not prepayable by us within the first five years. During 2008, we issued $10 million of subordinated debt to an unrelated institution, which bears a variable interest rate of 1 month LIBOR plus 275 basis points, a term of 7.5 years, and is not prepayable by us within the first two and one half years.

Subordinated debentures owed to unconsolidated subsidiary trusts: We have three statutory business trusts that were formed for the purpose of issuing mandatorily redeemable securities (the “capital securities”) for which we are obligated to third party investors and investing the proceeds from the sale of the capital securities in our junior subordinated debentures (the “debentures”). The debentures held by the trusts are their sole assets. Our subordinated debentures totaled $19,589,000 at June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009, and June 30, 2009.

In October 2002, we sponsored SFG Capital Trust I, in March 2004, we sponsored SFG Capital Trust II, and in December 2005, we sponsored SFG Capital Trust III, of which 100% of the common equity of each trust is owned by us. SFG Capital Trust I issued $3,500,000 in capital securities and $109,000 in common securities and invested the proceeds in $3,609,000 of debentures. SFG Capital Trust II issued $7,500,000 in capital securities and $232,000 in common securities and invested the proceeds in $7,732,000 of debentures. SFG Capital Trust III issued $8,000,000 in capital securities and $248,000 in common securities and invested the proceeds in $8,248,000 of

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

debentures. Distributions on the capital securities issued by the trusts are payable quarterly at a variable interest rate equal to 3 month LIBOR plus 345 basis points for SFG Capital Trust I, 3 month LIBOR plus 280 basis points for SFG Capital Trust II, and 3 month LIBOR plus 145 basis points for SFG Capital Trust III, and equals the interest rate earned on the debentures held by the trusts, and is recorded as interest expense by us. The capital securities are subject to mandatory redemption in whole or in part, upon repayment of the debentures. We have entered into agreements which, taken collectively, fully and unconditionally guarantee the capital securities subject to the terms of the guarantee. The debentures of SFG Capital Trust I and SFG Capital Trust II are redeemable by us quarterly, and the debentures of SFG Capital Trust III are first redeemable by us in March 2011.

The capital securities held by SFG Capital Trust I, SFG Capital Trust II, and SFG Capital Trust III qualify as Tier 1 capital under Federal Reserve Board guidelines. In accordance with these Guidelines, trust preferred securities generally are limited to 25% of Tier 1 capital elements, net of goodwill. The amount of trust preferred securities and certain other elements in excess of the limit can be included in Tier 2 capital.

A summary of the maturities of all long-term borrowings and subordinated debentures for the next five years and thereafter is as follows:

In thousands
Year Ending
December 31,	Amount
2010	$	57,066
2011		35,395
2012		66,720
2013		41,885
2014		83,416
Thereafter		113,082
	$	397,564

NOTE 11. STOCK OPTION PLAN

The 2009 Officer Stock Option Plan was adopted by our shareholders in May 2009 and provides for the granting of stock options for up to 350,000 shares of common stock to our key officers. Each option granted under the Plan vests according to a schedule designated at the grant date and has a term of no more than 10 years following the vesting date. Also, the option price per share was not to be less than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. The 2009 Officer Stock Option Plan, which expires in May 2019, replaces the 1998 Officer Stock Option Plan (collectively the “Plans”) that expired in May 2008.

The fair value of our employee stock options granted is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, changes to which can materially affect the fair value estimate. Additionally, there may be other factors that would otherwise have a significant effect on the value of employee stock options granted but are not considered by the model. Because our employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options at the time of grant. There were no option grants during the first six months of 2010 or 2009.

All compensation cost related to nonvested awards was previously recognized prior to January 1, 2009.

A summary of activity in our Plans during the first six months of 2010 and 2009 is as follows:

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2010				2009
			Weighted-					Weighted-
			Average					Average
			Exercise					Exercise
	Options		Price		Options			Price
Outstanding, January 1		309,180	$	18.54		335,730		$	18.36
Granted		-		-		-			-
Exercised		-		-		(8,000	)		5
Forfeited		-		-		(1,600	)		5
Outstanding, June 30		309,180	$	18.54		326,130		$	18.74

Other information regarding options outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2010 is as follows:


	Options Outstanding				Options Exercisable
			Wted. Avg.	Aggregate			Aggregate
			Remaining	Intrinsic			Intrinsic
Range of	# of		Contractual	Value	# of		Value
exercise price	shares	WAEP	Life (yrs)	(in thousands)	shares	WAEP	(in thousands)
$4.63 - $6.00	59,150	$5.37	2.78	$-	59,150	$5.37	$-
6.01 - 10.00	30,680	9.49	5.51	-	30,680	9.49	-
10.01 - 17.50	2,300	17.43	3.67	-	2,300	17.43	-
17.51 - 20.00	51,300	17.79	6.50	-	51,000	17.79	-
20.01 - 25.93	165,750	25.15	5.28	-	165,750	25.15	-

	309,180	18.54		$-	308,880	18.54	$-

NOTE 12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We are a party to certain financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the statement of financial position. The contract amounts of these instruments reflect the extent of involvement that we have in this class of financial instruments.

Many of our lending relationships contain both funded and unfunded elements. The funded portion is reflected on our balance sheet. The unfunded portion of these commitments is not recorded on our balance sheet until a draw is made under the loan facility. Since many of the commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash flow requirements.

A summary of the total unfunded, or off-balance sheet, credit extension commitments follows:

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

	June 30,
In thousands	2010
Commitments to extend credit:
Revolving home equity and
credit card lines	$	45,733
Construction loans		24,231
Other loans		39,410
Standby letters of credit		4,883
Total	$	114,257

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. We evaluate each customer's credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if we deem necessary upon extension of credit, is based on our credit evaluation. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, equipment or real estate.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Standby letters of credit generally are contingent upon the failure of the customer to perform according to the terms of the underlying contract with the third party.

Our exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. We use the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as we do for on-balance sheet instruments.

NOTE 13. REGULATORY MATTERS

We and our subsidiaries are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the banking regulatory agencies. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, we and each of our subsidiaries must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of our and our subsidiaries’ assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. We and each of our subsidiaries’ capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require us and each of our subsidiaries to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier I capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). We believe, as of June 30, 2010, that we and each of our subsidiaries met all capital adequacy requirements to which they were subject.

The most recent notifications from the banking regulatory agencies categorized us and each of our subsidiaries as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, we and each of our subsidiaries must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table below.

Our actual capital amounts and ratios as well as our subsidiary, Summit Community Bank’s (“Summit Community”) are presented in the following table.

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

											To be Well Capitalized
						Minimum Required					under Prompt Corrective
	Actual					Regulatory Capital					Action Provisions
Dollars in thousands	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
As of June 30, 2010
Total Capital (to risk weighted assets)
Summit	$	130,519		11.5	%	$	91,150		8.0	%	$	113,938		10.0	%
Summit Community		136,890		12.0	%		91,129		8.0	%		113,912		10.0	%
Tier I Capital (to risk weighted assets)
Summit	$	99,396		8.7	%		45,575		4.0	%		68,363		6.0	%
Summit Community		122,567		10.8	%		45,565		4.0	%		68,347		6.0	%
Tier I Capital (to average assets)
Summit	$	99,396		6.5	%		45,680		3.0	%		76,134		5.0	%
Summit Community		122,567		8.1	%		45,670		3.0	%		76,117		5.0	%

As of December 31, 2009
Total Capital (to risk weighted assets)
Summit	$	133,931		11.3	%		95,186		8.0	%		118,983		10.0	%
Summit Community		134,874		11.4	%		94,666		8.0	%		118,332		10.0	%
Tier I Capital (to risk weighted assets)
Summit		102,232		8.6	%		47,593		4.0	%		71,390		6.0	%
Summit Community		120,055		10.1	%		47,333		4.0	%		70,999		6.0	%
Tier I Capital (to average assets)
Summit		102,232		6.5	%		47,463		3.0	%		79,106		5.0	%
Summit Community		120,055		7.6	%		47,257		3.0	%		78,762		5.0	%

Summit Financial Group, Inc. (“Summit”) and its bank subsidiary, Summit Community Bank, Inc. (the “Bank”), have entered into informal Memoranda of Understanding (“MOU’s”) with their respective regulatory authorities. A memorandum of understanding is characterized by the regulatory authorities as an informal action that is not published or publicly available and that is used when circumstances warrant a milder form of action than a formal supervisory action, such as a formal written agreement or order. Among other things, under the MOU’s, Summit’s management team has agreed to:

§	The Bank achieving and maintaining a minimum Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of at least 8% and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 11%;

§	The Bank providing 30 days prior notice of any declaration of intent to pay cash dividends to provide the Bank’s regulatory authorities an opportunity to object;

§	Summit suspending all cash dividends on its common stock until further notice. Dividends on all preferred stock, as well as interest payments on subordinated notes underlying Summit’s trust preferred securities, continue to be permissible; and,

§	Summit not incurring any additional debt, other than trade payables, without the prior written consent of the principal banking regulators.

Additional information regarding the MOU’s is included in Part I. Item 1A – Risk Factors on our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

On July 21, 2010, sweeping financial regulatory reform legislation entitled the “Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act” (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) was signed into law. The Dodd-Frank Act implements far-reaching changes across the financial regulatory landscape, including provisions that, among other things, will:

§	Centralize responsibility for consumer financial protection by creating a new agency, the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, responsible for implementing, examining and enforcing compliance with federal consumer financial laws.

§	Require the bank regulators to seek to make its capital requirements for all banks, countercyclical so that capital requirements increase in times of economic expansion and decrease in times of economic contraction.

§	Require financial holding companies to be well-capitalized and well-managed as of July 21, 2011. Bank holding companies and banks must also be both well-capitalized and well-managed in order to acquire banks located outside their home state.

Change the assessment base for federal deposit insurance from the amount of insured deposits to consolidated assets less tangible capital, eliminate the ceiling on the size of the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) and increase the floor of the size of the DIF, which generally will require an increase in the level of assessments for institutions with assets in excess of $10 billion.

§	Impose comprehensive regulation of the over-the-counter derivatives market, which would include certain provisions that would effectively prohibit insured depository institutions from conducting certain derivatives businesses in the institution itself.

§	Implement corporate governance revisions, including with regard to executive compensation and proxy access by shareholders, that apply to all public companies, not just financial institutions.

§	Make permanent the $250 thousand limit for federal deposit insurance and provide unlimited federal deposit insurance until January 1, 2013 for non-interest bearing demand transaction accounts at all insured depository institutions.

§	Repeal the federal prohibitions on the payment of interest on demand deposits, thereby permitting depository institutions to pay interest on business transaction and other accounts.

Amend the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA) to, among other things, give the Federal Reserve the authority to establish rules regarding interchange fees charged for electronic debit transactions by payment card issuers having assets over $10 billion and to enforce a new statutory requirement that such fees be reasonable and proportional to the actual cost of a transaction to the issuer.

Many aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act are subject to rulemaking and will take effect over several years, making it difficult to anticipate the overall financial impact on our Company, our customers or the financial industry more generally. Provisions in the legislation that affect deposit insurance assessments, payment of interest on demand deposits and interchange fees could increase the costs associated with deposits as well as place limitations on certain revenues those deposits may generate.

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

NOTE 14. SEGMENT INFORMATION

We operate two business segments: community banking and insurance services. These segments are primarily identified by the products or services offered. The community banking segment consists of our full service banks which offer customers traditional banking products and services through various delivery channels. The insurance services segment consists of three insurance agency offices that sell insurance products. The accounting policies discussed throughout the notes to the consolidated financial statements apply to each of our business segments.

Intersegment revenue and expense consists of management fees allocated to the bank and Summit Insurance Services, LLC for all centralized functions that are performed at the parent location including data processing, bookkeeping, accounting, treasury management, loan administration, loan review, compliance, risk management and internal auditing. We also provide overall direction in the areas of credit policy and administration, strategic planning, marketing, investment portfolio management and other financial and administrative services. Information for each of our segments is included below:

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
	Community			Insurance
In thousands	Banking			Services			Parent			Eliminations			Total

Net interest income	$	21,128		$	-		$	(961	)	$	-		$	20,167
Provision for loan losses		13,850			-			-			-			13,850
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		7,278			-			(961	)		-			6,317
Other income		1,492			2,430			863			(587	)		4,198
Other expenses		12,745			2,124			984			(587	)		15,266
Income (loss) before income taxes		(3,975	)		306			(1,082	)		-			(4,751	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		(1,587	)		118			(524	)		-			(1,993	)
Net income (loss)		(2,388	)		188			(558	)		-			(2,758	)
Dividends on preferred shares		-			-			148			-			148
Net income (loss) applicable to common shares	$	(2,388	)	$	188		$	(706	)	$	-		$	(2,906	)
Intersegment revenue (expense)	$	(530	)	$	(57	)	$	587		$	-		$	-
Average assets	$	1,571,215		$	7,012		$	142,459		$	(178,904	)	$	1,541,782

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
	Community			Insurance
In thousands	Banking			Services			Parent			Eliminations			Total

Net interest income	$	23,310		$	-		$	(868	)	$	-		$	22,442
Provision for loan losses		9,500			-			-			-			9,500
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		13,810			-			(868	)		-			12,942
Other income		(2,281	)		2,594			3,135			(3,349	)		99
Other expenses		13,756			2,295			3,758			(3,349	)		16,460
Income (loss) before income taxes		(2,227	)		299			(1,491	)		-			(3,419	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		(1,276	)		116			(574	)		-			(1,734	)
Net income (loss)		(951	)		183			(917	)		-			(1,685	)
Dividends on preferred shares		-			-			-			-			-
Net income (loss) applicable to common shares	$	(951	)	$	183		$	(917	)	$	-		$	(1,685	)
Intersegment revenue (expense)	$	(3,292	)	$	(57	)	$	3,349		$	-		$	-
Average assets	$	1,591,314		$	7,575		$	136,560		$	(123,065	)	$	1,612,384

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
	Community			Insurance
In thousands	Banking			Services			Parent			Eliminations			Total

Net interest income	$	10,412		$	-		$	(476	)	$	-		$	9,936
Provision for loan losses		8,500			-			-			-			8,500
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		1,912			-			(476	)		-			1,436
Other income		384			1,211			334			(248	)		1,681
Other expenses		6,290			1,085			529			(248	)		7,656
Income (loss) before income taxes		(3,994	)		126			(671	)		-			(4,539	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		(1,356	)		50			(355	)		-			(1,661	)
Net income (loss)		(2,638	)		76			(316	)		-			(2,878	)
Dividends on preferred shares		-			-			74			-			74
Net income (loss) applicable to common shares	$	(2,638	)	$	76		$	(390	)	$	-		$	(2,952	)
Intersegment revenue (expense)	$	(219	)	$	(29	)	$	248		$	-		$	-
Average assets	$	1,569,927		$	7,127		$	141,383		$	(187,563	)	$	1,530,874

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
	Community			Insurance
In thousands	Banking			Services			Parent			Eliminations			Total

Net interest income	$	11,610		$	-		$	(503	)	$	-		$	11,107
Provision for loan losses		5,500			-			-			-			5,500
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		6,110			-			(503	)		-			5,607
Other income		(3,600	)		1,259			1,632			(1,633	)		(2,342	)
Other expenses		7,295			1,153			1,894			(1,633	)		8,709
Income (loss) before income taxes		(4,785	)		106			(765	)		-			(5,444	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		(1,824	)		41			(211	)		-			(1,994	)
Net income (loss)		(2,961	)		65			(554	)		-			(3,450	)
Dividends on preferred shares		-			-			-			-			-
Net income (loss) applicable to common shares	$	(2,961	)	$	65		$	(554	)	$	-		$	(3,450	)
Intersegment revenue (expense)	$	(1,604	)	$	(29	)	$	1,633		$	-		$	-
Average assets	$	1,578,951		$	7,424		$	137,874		$	(121,665	)	$	1,602,584

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations

INTRODUCTION

The following discussion and analysis focuses on significant changes in our financial condition and results of operations of Summit Financial Group, Inc. (“Company” or “Summit”) and our operating segments, Summit Community Bank (“Summit Community”), and Summit Insurance Services, LLC for the periods indicated. See Note 14 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements for our segment information. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our 2009 audited financial statements and Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The Private Securities Litigation Act of 1995 indicates that the disclosure of forward-looking information is desirable for investors and encourages such disclosure by providing a safe harbor for forward-looking statements by us. Our following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations contains certain forward-looking statements that involve risk and uncertainty. In order to comply with the terms of the safe harbor, we note that a variety of factors could cause our actual results and experience to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in those forward-looking statements.

OVERVIEW

Our primary source of income is net interest income from loans and deposits. Business volumes tend to be influenced by the overall economic factors including market interest rates, business spending, and consumer confidence, as well as competitive conditions within the marketplace.

Interest earning assets declined by 7.34% for the first six months in 2010 compared to the same period of 2009 while our net interest earnings on a tax equivalent basis decreased 9.06%. Our tax equivalent net interest margin decreased 6 basis points. Historically high levels of nonaccrual loans continue to negatively impact our net interest earnings and margin.

BUSINESS SEGMENT RESULTS

We are organized and managed along two major business segments, as described in Note 14 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The results of each business segment are intended to reflect each segment as if it were a stand alone business. Net income by segment follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
In thousands	2010			2009			2010			2009
Community banking	$	(2,638	)	$	(2,961	)	$	(2,388	)	$	(951	)
Insurance		76			65			188			183
Parent and other		(390	)		(554	)		(706	)		(917	)
Consolidated net income	$	(2,952	)	$	(3,450	)	$	(2,906	)	$	(1,685	)

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and follow general practices within the financial services industry. Application of these principles requires us to make estimates, assumptions, and judgments that affect the amounts reported in our financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates, assumptions, and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements; accordingly, as this information changes, the financial statements could reflect different estimates, assumptions, and judgments. Certain policies inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions, and judgments and as such have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported.

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations

Our most significant accounting policies are presented in the notes to the consolidated financial statements of our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K. These policies, along with the other disclosures presented in the financial statement notes and in this financial review, provide information on how significant assets and liabilities are valued in the financial statements and how those values are determined.

Based on the valuation techniques used and the sensitivity of financial statement amounts to the methods, assumptions, and estimates underlying those amounts, we have identified the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the valuation of goodwill, fair value measurements and deferred tax assets to be the accounting areas that require the most subjective or complex judgments, and as such could be most subject to revision as new information becomes available.

Allowance for Loan Losses: The allowance for loan losses represents our estimate of probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses is considered a critical accounting estimate because it requires significant judgment and the use of estimates related to the amount and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience, and consideration of current economic trends and conditions, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. The loan portfolio also represents the largest asset type on our consolidated balance sheet. To the extent actual outcomes differ from our estimates, additional provisions for loan losses may be required that would negatively impact earnings in future periods. Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements of our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K describes the methodology used to determine the allowance for loan losses and a discussion of the factors driving changes in the amount of the allowance for loan losses is included in the Asset Quality section of the financial review of the 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Goodwill: Goodwill is subject to a two-step impairment test by reporting unit at least annually to determine whether write-downs of the recorded balances are necessary. The first step (Step 1) of impairment testing requires a comparison of each reporting unit’s fair value to its carrying value to identify potential impairment. If the fair value equals or exceeds the related unit’s carrying value, no write-down of recorded goodwill is necessary. If the fair value is less than the carrying value, an expense may be required on our books to write down the goodwill to the proper carrying value. The second step (Step 2) of impairment testing is necessary only if the reporting unit does not pass Step 1. Step 2 compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of the goodwill for the reporting unit. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as goodwill that is recognized in a business combination.

The fair value, carrying amount and allocated goodwill with regard to each of our reporting units as of September 30, 2009 (date of our most recent goodwill impairment test) were as follows:

	Community		Insurance
(in thousands)	Banking		Services

Fair value	$	142,030	$	7,800
Carrying amount		122,200		6,891
Allocated goodwil		1,490		4,710

Neither of our reporting units failed Step 1 of the goodwill impairment tests conducted as of September 30, 2009. For purposes of these goodwill impairment tests, the following methodologies were utilized and key assumptions were made in determining the fair value of each reporting unit:

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations

Community Banking – We retained an independent valuation specialist who utilized a combination of both the income and market approaches to determine the fair value of our Community Banking reporting unit. The income approach was based on discounted cash flows derived from assumptions of balances sheet and income statement activity based upon an internally developed forecast considering several long-term key business drivers such as anticipated loan and deposit growth. The long term growth rate used in determining the terminal value was estimated at 3.5%, and a discount rate of 11% based upon the Capital Asset Pricing Model was applied to the Bank’s estimated future cash flow streams. For the market approach, observable deal value to book value equity multiples resulting from appropriate comparable recent bank mergers and acquisition were selected and applied to the Community Bank’s book value. The results of the income and market approaches were weighted 50% each.

Insurance Services – We performed an internal valuation utilizing the income approach to determine the fair value of our Insurance Services reporting unit. This methodology consisted of discounting the expected future cash flows of this unit based upon a forecast of its operations considering long-term key business drivers such as anticipated commission revenue growth. The long term growth rate used in determining the terminal value was estimated at 0%, and a discount rate of 12% was applied to Insurance Services unit’s estimated future cash flows.

During the third quarter, we will complete the required annual impairment test for 2010 for each of our reporting units, community banking and insurance services. We cannot assure you that future goodwill impairment tests will not result in a charge to earnings. See Note 11 of the consolidated financial statements of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion of our intangible assets, which include goodwill.

Fair Value Measurements: ASC Topic 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures provides a definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and requires expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is the price that could be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Based on the observability of the inputs used in the valuation techniques, we classify our financial assets and liabilities measured and disclosed at fair value in accordance with the three-level hierarchy (e.g., Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3) established under ASC Topic 820. Fair value determination in accordance with this guidance requires that we make a number of significant judgments. In determining the fair value of financial instruments, we use market prices of the same or similar instruments whenever such prices are available. We do not use prices involving distressed sellers in determining fair value. If observable market prices are unavailable or impracticable to obtain, then fair value is estimated using modeling techniques such as discounted cash flow analyses. These modeling techniques incorporate our assessments regarding assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or the liability, including assumptions about the risks inherent in a particular valuation technique and the risk of nonperformance.

Fair value is used on a recurring basis for certain assets and liabilities in which fair value is the primary basis of accounting. Additionally, fair value is used on a non-recurring basis to evaluate assets or liabilities for impairment or for disclosure purposes in accordance with ASC Topic 825 Financial Instruments.

Deferred Income Tax Assets: At June 30, 2010, we had net deferred tax assets of $10.9 million. Based on our ability to offset the net deferred tax asset against prior taxable income in carryback years and expected future taxable income in carryforward years, there was no impairment of the deferred tax asset at June 30, 2010. All available evidence, both positive and negative, was considered to determine whether, based on the weight of that evidence, impairment should be recognized. However, our forecast process includes judgmental and quantitative elements that may be subject to significant change. If our forecast of taxable income within the carryback/carryforward periods available under applicable law is not sufficient to cover the amount of net deferred tax assets, such assets may become impaired.

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Earnings Summary

Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2010 declined 72.46% to a loss of $2,906,000, or $0.39 per diluted shared as compared to a loss of $1,685,000 or $0.23 per diluted share for the same period of 2009. Net income applicable to common shares for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 improved 14.46% to a loss of $2,952,000, or $0.40 per diluted share as compared to a loss of $3,450,000, or $0.46 per diluted share for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. Earnings were negatively impacted for all periods by higher provisions for loan losses due to our increased nonperforming loans. The provision for loan losses was $13.85 million and $9.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively and $8.5 million and $5.5 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Included in earnings for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010 was a $2.2 million charge resulting from the write down of a portion of our OREO properties. Included in earnings for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009 was an other-than-temporary non-cash impairment charge of $5.0 million pre-tax, equivalent to $3.1 million after-tax, or $0.42 per diluted share. This impairment charge relates primarily to certain residential mortgage-backed securities, which we continue to own. Returns on average equity and assets for the first six months of 2010 were (6.38%) and (0.38%), respectively, compared with (3.89%) and (0.21%) for the same period of 2009.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is the principal component of our earnings and represents the difference between interest and fee income generated from earning assets and the interest expense paid on deposits and borrowed funds. Fluctuations in interest rates as well as changes in the volume and mix of earning assets and interest bearing liabilities can materially impact net interest income.

Our net interest income on a fully tax-equivalent basis totaled $20,993,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $23,084,000 for the same period of 2009, representing a decrease of $2,091,000 or 9.06%. This decrease primarily resulted from a decline in interest earning assets, both loans and securities. Average interest earning assets decreased 7.34% from $1,542,674,000 during the first six months of 2009 to $1,429,509,000 for the first six months of 2010. Average interest bearing liabilities declined 4.82% from $1,439,862,000 at June 30, 2009 to $1,370,500,000 at June 30, 2010, at an average yield for the first six months of 2010 of 3.04% compared to 3.26% for the same period of 2009.

Our consolidated net interest margin decreased to 2.96% for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to 3.02% for the same period in 2009. The margin continues to be affected by elevated levels of nonaccruing loans. The present continued low interest rate environment has served to positively impact our net interest margin due to our liability sensitive balance sheet. For the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to June 30, 2009, the yields on earning assets decreased 18 basis points, while the cost of our interest bearing funds decreased by 22 basis points.

Assuming no significant change in market interest rates, we anticipate a stable net interest margin in the near term as we do not expect interest rates to rise in the near future, we do not expect significant growth in our interest earning assets, nor do we expect our nonperforming asset balances to decline significantly in the near future. We continue to monitor the net interest margin through net interest income simulation to minimize the potential for any significant negative impact. See the “Market Risk Management” section for further discussion of the impact changes in market interest rates could have on us. Further analysis of our yields on interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities are presented in Tables I and II below.

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations

Table I - Average Balance Sheet and Net Interest Income Analysis
Dollars in thousands
	For the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2010								June 30, 2009
	Average			Earnings/		Yield/			Average			Earnings/		Yield/
	Balance			Expense		Rate			Balance			Expense		Rate
Interest earning assets
Loans, net of unearned income (1)
Taxable	$	1,131,013		$	33,491		5.97	%	$	1,200,625		$	36,083		6.06	%
Tax-exempt (2)		6,376			247		7.81	%		8,134			333		8.26	%
Securities
Taxable		249,937			6,554		5.29	%		285,779			8,418		5.94	%
Tax-exempt (2)		41,475			1,374		6.68	%		46,254			1,559		6.80	%
Federal funds sold and interest
bearing deposits with other banks		708			13		3.70	%		1,882			1		0.11	%
Total interest earning assets		1,429,509			41,679		5.88	%		1,542,674			46,394		6.06	%

Noninterest earning assets
Cash & due from banks		14,543								18,873
Premises and equipment		24,034								23,188
Other assets		97,337								48,919
Allowance for loan losses		(18,641	)							(21,270	)
Total assets	$	1,541,782							$	1,612,384

Interest bearing liabilities
Interest bearing demand deposits	$	146,331		$	330		0.45	%	$	155,456		$	392		0.51	%
Savings deposits		195,746			1,328		1.37	%		88,103			770		1.76	%
Time deposits		598,749			9,218		3.10	%		638,556			11,817		3.73	%
Short-term borrowings		30,519			78		0.52	%		129,928			358		0.56	%
Long-term borrowings
and capital trust securities		399,155			9,732		4.92	%		427,819			9,973		4.70	%
Total interest bearing liabilities		1,370,500			20,686		3.04	%		1,439,862			23,310		3.26	%

Noninterest bearing liabilities
and shareholders' equity
Demand deposits		71,255								77,775
Other liabilities		8,865								8,028
Shareholders' equity		91,162								86,719
Total liabilities and
shareholders' equity	$	1,541,782							$	1,612,384
Net interest earnings				$	20,993							$	23,084
Net yield on interest earning assets							2.96	%							3.02	%

(1) For purposes of this table, nonaccrual loans are included in average loan balances.

(2) - Interest income on tax-exempt securities has been adjusted assuming an effective tax rate of 34% for all periods presented.
The tax equivalent adjustment resulted in an increase in interest income of $826,000 and $642,000 for the periods ended
June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively.

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations

Table II - Changes in Interest Margin Attributable to Rate and Volume

	For the Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2010 versus June 30, 2009
	Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in:
In thousands	Volume			Rate			Net
Interest earned on:
Loans
Taxable	$	(2,067	)	$	(525	)	$	(2,592	)
Tax-exempt		(69	)		(17	)		(86	)
Securities
Taxable		(994	)		(870	)		(1,864	)
Tax-exempt		(159	)		(26	)		(185	)
Federal funds sold and interest
bearing deposits with other banks		(1	)		13			12
Total interest earned on
interest earning assets		(3,290	)		(1,425	)		(4,715	)

Interest paid on:
Interest bearing demand
deposits		(22	)		(40	)		(62	)
Savings deposits		763			(205	)		558
Time deposits		(704	)		(1,895	)		(2,599	)
Short-term borrowings		(256	)		(24	)		(280	)
Long-term borrowings and capital
trust securities		(686	)		445			(241	)
Total interest paid on
interest bearing liabilities		(905	)		(1,719	)		(2,624	)

Net interest income	$	(2,385	)	$	294		$	(2,091	)

Noninterest Income

Total noninterest income increased to $4,198,000 for the first six months of 2010, compared to $99,000 for the same period of 2009, with smaller other-than-temporary impairment charges on securities being the primary positive component. Further detail regarding noninterest income is reflected in the following table.

Noninterest Income
	For the Quarter Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
In thousands	2010			2009			2010			2009
Insurance commissions	$	1,223		$	1,283		$	2,432		$	2,627
Service fees		828			857			1,535			1,593
Realized securities gains (losses)		1,256			39			1,520			295
Other-than-temporary impairment of securities		-			(4,768	)		(29	)		(4,983	)
Gain (loss) on sale of assets		183			(115	)		195			(124	)
Writedown of OREO		(2,194	)		-			(2,194	)		-
Other		385			362			739			691
Total	$	1,681		$	(2,342	)	$	4,198		$	99

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations

Other-than-temporary impairment of securities: During second quarter 2009, we recorded a non-cash other-than temporary impairment charge of $4,768,000 related to certain residential mortgage-backed securities which we continue to own. The remaining $215,000 other-than-temporary impairment charge on securities during 2009 was related to an equity investment..

Writedown of OREO: During June 2010, we recorded a $2,194,000 charge to writedown certain OREO properties to estimated fair value as part of our normal, ongoing re-appraisal process. $2,130,000 of this writedown is attributable to three residential subdivisions located within Berkeley County, West Virginia. We hold no other OREO within this area that has not been re-appraised within the past year.

Noninterest Expense

Total noninterest expense decreased approximately 12.1% and 7.3% for the quarter ended and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2009. While OREO expenses continue to increase due to higher levels of foreclosed properties, salaries, commissions, and employee benefits decreased for both the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same periods of 2009 due to compensation freezes and staff reductions and FDIC premiums are lower in 2010 due to the special assessment that occurred during second quarter 2009. Table III below shows the breakdown of the changes.

Table III - Noninterest Expense
	For the Quarter Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
		Change				Change
Dollars in thousands	2010	$	%	2009	2010	$	%	2009
Salaries, commissions, and employee benefits	$3,839	$(469)	-10.9%	$4,308	$7,563	$(1,024)	-11.9%	$8,587
Net occupancy expense	509	43	9.2%	466	1,031	(32)	-3.0%	1,063
Equipment expense	634	107	20.3%	527	1,264	169	15.4%	1,095
Supplies	134	(114)	-46.0%	248	243	(199)	-45.0%	442
Professional fees	262	(141)	-35.0%	403	536	(201)	-27.3%	737
Amortization of intangibles	88	-	0.0%	88	176	-	0.0%	176
FDIC premiums	625	(620)	-49.8%	1,245	1,450	(178)	-10.9%	1,628
OREO expense	244	144	144.0%	100	476	320	205.1%	156
Other	1,321	(3)	-0.2%	1,324	2,527	(49)	-1.9%	2,576
Total	$7,656	$(1,053)	-12.1%	$8,709	$15,266	$(1,194)	-7.3%	$16,460

Credit Experience

Due to current recessionary economic conditions, borrowers have in many cases been unable to refinance their loans due to a range of factors including declining property values. As a result, we have experienced higher delinquencies and nonperforming assets, particularly in our residential real estate loan portfolios and in commercial construction loans to residential real estate developers. It is not known when the housing market will stabilize. Management anticipates loan delinquencies will remain higher than historical levels for the near term, and we anticipate that nonperforming assets will remain elevated for the foreseeable future.

The provision for loan losses represents charges to earnings necessary to maintain an adequate allowance for probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Our determination of the appropriate level of the allowance is based on an ongoing analysis of credit quality and loss potential in the loan portfolio, change in the composition and risk characteristics of the loan portfolio, and the anticipated influence of national and local economic conditions. The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is reviewed quarterly and adjustments are made as considered necessary.

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations

We recorded $8,500,000 and $13,850,000 provisions for loan losses for the second quarter and first six months of 2010, respectively, compared to $5,500,000 and $9,500,000 for the same periods in 2009. Approximately $2.4 million of the increase in the provision for loan losses for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 is attributable to one significant new nonperforming loan. Also contributing to the increased provision for loan losses are continuing historically high quarterly net loan charge off’s which resulted in a $1.3 million increase to the quantitative reserve component of our allowance for loan losses during second quarter 2010. At June 30, 2010, the allowance for loan losses totaled $20,768,000 or 1.91% of loans, net of unearned income, compared to $17,000,000 or 1.47% of loans, net of unearned income, at December 31, 2009.

As illustrated in Table IV below, our non-performing assets have increased during the past 12 months.

Table IV - Summary of Non-Performing Assets

In thousands	June 30,						December 31,
	2010			2009			2009
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more	$	1,566		$	668		$	201
Nonaccrual loans
Commercial		1,029			680			408
Commercial real estate		14,285			23,287			35,217
Commercial construction and development		812			11,156			11,553
Residential construction and development		18,307			18,334			14,775
Residential real estate		5,979			7,482			4,407
Consumer		23			91			381
Total nonaccrual loans		40,435			61,030			66,741
Foreclosed properties
Commercial		-			-			-
Commercial real estate		15,011			4,561			4,788
Commercial construction and development		16,213			903			2,028
Residential construction and development		34,506			14,001			30,230
Residential real estate		3,748			970			3,247
Consumer		-			-			-
Total foreclosed properties		69,478			20,435			40,293
Repossessed assets		333			11			269
Total nonperforming assets	$	111,812		$	82,144		$	107,504
Total nonperforming loans as a
percentage of total loans		3.86	%		5.22	%		5.79	%
Total nonperforming assets as a
percentage of total assets		7.36	%		5.19	%		6.78	%

The following table presents a summary of our 30 to 89 days past due performing loans.

Loans Past Due 30-89 Days
	For the Quarter Ended
In thousands	6/30/2010		3/31/2010		12/31/2009		9/30/2009		6/30/2009

Commercial	$	516	$	1,209	$	1,585	$	177	$	1,368
Commercial real estate		9,246		9,497		3,861		5,064		4,320
Construction and development		819		11,654		1,161		9,362		920
Residential real estate		10,846		8,638		8,250		8,381		5,802
Consumer		536		419		835		810		946
Total	$	21,963	$	31,417	$	15,692	$	23,794	$	13,356

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations

The following table details our most significant nonperforming loan relationships at June 30, 2010.

Significant Nonperforming Loan Relationships
June 30, 2010
In thousands
Location by Region	Underlying Collateral	Loan Origination Date	Loan Nonaccrual Date	Current Loan Balance	Method Used to Measure Impairment	Most Recent Appraised Value		Amount Allocated to Allowance for Loan Losses	Amount Previously Charged-off
North Central WV	Residential building lots & undeveloped residential & commercial acreage	Aug. 2008	Jun. 2010	$ 5,517	Collateral value	$ 2,000	(1)	$ 3,677	$ -
Northern VA	Residential building lots & undeveloped acreage	Dec. 2006 & May 2009	Jun. 2010	$ 1,314	Collateral value	$ 750	(1)	$ 639	$ -
No. Shenandoah Valley, VA	Three commercial buildings	Mar. 2007 & Dec. 2008	Jul. 2009 & June 2010	$ 5,347	Collateral value	$ 4,300	(1)	$ 1,477	$ -
Rockingham Co., VA & Hardy Co., WV	Residential subdivision & undeveloped acreage	Nov. 2007	Mar. 2009	$ 3,714	Collateral value	$ 3,034	(1)	$ 983	$ -
No. Shenandoah Valley, VA	Commercial building	Nov. 2006	Jun. 2010	$ 2,010	Collateral value	$ 2,076	(1)	$ 140	$ -
No. Shenandoah Valley, VA	Commercial building	Sept. 2006	Apr. 2010	$ 2,845	Collateral value	$ 3,188	(1)	$ -	$ -
Northern VA	Commercial building	Jan. 2009	Jun. 2010	$ 1,304	Collateral value	$ 1,365	(3)	$ -	$ -
Hardy Co., WV	Commercial building & equipment	Oct. 2008 & Jul. 2009	N/A	$ 1,419	Collateral value	$ 1,863	(3)	$ -	$ -
Western MD and Florida	Residential development, undeveloped acreage, 2 residential condos, and a residential building lot	Sept. 2005 Apr. 2006 May 2004 & May 2007	Jun. 2010	$ 4,363	Collateral value	$ 7,317	(1) (3) (4)	$ 336	$ -
No. Shenandoah Valley, VA	Three multi-family rental units and one single family residence	Jun. 2006 & Aug. 2007	May 2010	$ 2,129	Collateral value	$ 2,257	(1)	$ 267	$ -

(1) - Values are based upon recent external appraisal.
(2) - Values for equipment are based upon equipment trader prices and management's estimate of value.
(3) Value is based upon appraisal obtained at loan origination. New appraisal has been ordered.
(4) Value is based upon an appraisal that is slightly over a year old. New appraisal has been ordered.

As a result of our internal loan review process, the ratio of internally criticized loans to total loans decreased from 10.66% at December 31, 2009 to 9.75% at June 30, 2010. Our internal loan review process includes a watch list of loans that have been specifically identified through the use of various sources, including past due loan reports, previous internal and external loan evaluations, classified loans identified as part of regulatory agency loan reviews and reviews of new loans representative of current lending practices. Once this watch list is reviewed to ensure it is complete, we review the specific loans for collectability, performance and collateral protection. In addition, a grade is assigned to the individual loans utilizing internal grading criteria, which is somewhat similar to the criteria utilized by our subsidiary bank's primary regulatory agency. The decreases in the commercial real estate and land development and construction categories were primarily the result of foreclosures. Refer to the Asset Quality section of the financial review of the 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion of the processes related to internally classified loans.

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations

Internally Criticized Loans

In thousands	6/30/2010		3/31/2010		12/31/2009
Commerical	$	8,113	$	7,342	$	6,413
Commercial real estate		45,971		63,079		56,726
Land development & construction		27,216		30,145		38,279
Residential real estate		24,714		22,705		21,854
Consumer		-		-		-
Total	$	106,014	$	123,271	$	123,272

Included in the above table of internally criticized loans are approximately $9.5 million of performing loans which we have identified as potential problem loans at June 30, 2010. These loans are performing at June 30, 2010, but known information about possible credit problems of the related borrowers causes management to have concerns as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with the current loan repayment terms and which may result in disclosure of such loans as nonperforming at some time in the future. Management cannot predict the extent to which economic conditions may worsen or other factors which may impact borrowers and the potential problem loans. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that other loans will not become 90 days or more past due, be placed on nonaccrual, or require increased allowance coverage and provision for loan losses.

We maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level considered adequate to provide for estimated probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance is comprised of three distinct reserve components: (1) specific reserves related to loans individually evaluated, (2) quantitative reserves related to loans collectively evaluated, and (3) qualitative reserves related to loans collectively evaluated. A summary of the methodology we employ on a quarterly basis with respect to each of these components in order to evaluate the overall adequacy of our allowance for loan losses is as follows:

Specific Reserve for Loans Individually Evaluated

First, we identify loan relationships having aggregate balances in excess of $500,000 and that may also have credit weaknesses. Such loan relationships are identified primarily through our analysis of internal loan evaluations, past due loan reports, and loans adversely classified by regulatory authorities. Each loan so identified is then individually evaluated to determine whether it is impaired – that is, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the contractual terms of the underlying loan agreement. Substantially all of our impaired loans are and historically have been collateral dependent, meaning repayment of the loan is expected to be provided solely from the sale of the loan’s underlying collateral. While our collateral-dependant impaired loans typically are guaranteed by the principles and/or related interests of the borrower, rarely is it deemed probable that such guarantees will result in any meaningful repayment of the loan. For such loans, we measure impairment based on the fair value of the loan’s collateral, which is generally determined utilizing current appraisals. A specific reserve is established in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the recorded investment in each impaired loan over the fair value of its underlying collateral, less estimated costs to sell. Our policy is to re-evaluate the fair value of collateral dependent loans at least every twelve months unless there is a known deterioration in the collateral’s value, in which case a new appraisal is obtained.

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations

Quantitative Reserve for Loans Collectively Evaluated

Second, we stratify the loan portfolio into the following ten loan pools: land and land development, construction, commercial, commercial real estate -- owner-occupied, commercial real estate -- non-owner occupied, conventional residential mortgage, jumbo residential mortgage, home equity, consumer, and other. Loans within each pool are then further segmented between (1) loans which were individually evaluated for impairment and not deemed to be impaired, (2) larger-balance loan relationships exceeding $2 million which are assigned an internal risk rating in conjunction with our normal ongoing loan review procedures and (3) smaller-balance homogenous loans.

Quantitative reserves relative to each loan pool are established as follows: for loan segments (1) and (2) above, the recorded investment of these loans within each pool are aggregated according to their internal risk ratings, and an allocation ranging from 5% to 200% of the respective pool’s average historical net loan charge-off rate (determined based upon the most recent twelve quarters) is applied to the aggregate recorded investment in loans by internal risk category, such lower-rated loan relationships receive higher allocations of reserves; for loan segment (3) above, an allocation equaling 100% of the respective pool’s average historical net loan charge-off rate (determined based upon the most recent twelve quarters) is applied to the aggregate recorded investment in the smaller-balance homogenous pool of loans.

Qualitative Reserve for Loans Collectively Evaluated

Third, we consider the necessity to adjust our average historical net loan charge-off rates relative to each of the above ten loan pools for potential risks factors that could result in actual losses deviating from prior loss experience. For example, if we observe a significant increase in delinquencies within the conventional mortgage loan pool above historical trends, an additional allocation to the average historical loan charge-off rate is applied. Such qualitative risk factors considered are: (1) levels of and trends in delinquencies and impaired loans, (2) levels of and trends in charge-offs and recoveries, (3) trends in volume and term of loans, (4) effects of any changes in risk selection and underwriting standards, and other changes in lending policies, procedures, and practice, (5) experience, ability, and depth of lending management and other relevant staff, (6) national and local economic trends and conditions, (7) industry conditions, and (8) effects of changes in credit concentrations.

Relationship between Allowance for Loan Losses, Net Charge-offs and Nonperforming Loans

In analyzing the relationship between the allowance for loan losses, net loan charge-offs and nonperforming loans, it is helpful to understand the process of how loans are treated as they deteriorate over time. Reserves for loans are established at origination through the quantitative and qualitative reserve process discussed above. If the quality of a loan which is reviewed as part of our normal internal loan review procedures deteriorates, it migrates to a lower quality risk rating, and accordingly, a higher reserve amount is assigned.

Charge-offs, if necessary, are typically recognized in a period after the reserves were established. If the previously established reserves exceed that needed to satisfactorily resolve the problem credit, a reduction in the overall level of the reserve could be recognized. In summary, if loan quality deteriorates, the typical credit sequence is periods of reserve building, followed by periods of higher net charge-offs.

Consumer loans are generally charged off to the allowance for loan losses upon reaching specified stages of delinquency, in accordance with the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council policy. For example, credit card loans are charged off by the end of the month in which the account becomes 180 days past due or within 60 days from receiving notification about a specified event (e.g., bankruptcy of the borrower), whichever is earlier. Residential mortgage loans are generally charged off to net realizable value no later than when the account becomes 180 days past due. Other consumer loans, if collateralized, are generally charged off to net realizable value at 120 days past due.

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations

Substantially all of our nonperforming loans are secured by real estate. The substantial majority of these loans were underwritten in accordance with our loan-to-value policy guidelines which range from 70-85% at the time of origination. Although property values have deteriorated across our market areas, the fair values of the underlying collateral value remains in excess of the recorded investment relative to approximately 37% (by dollar volume) of our nonperforming loans at June 30, 2010, and therefore in such cases no specific reserve allocation is required. Due to the fact that our allowance for loan losses on impaired loans is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral less cost to sell, our allowance for loan losses will not always increase proportionately as our nonperforming loans increase. The allowance for loan loss will, however, increase as a result of an increase in net loan charge-offs due to the incremental higher historical net charge-off rates applied to the loans which are collectively evaluated for impairment.

At June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009, and June 30, 2009, our allowance for loan losses totaled $20,768,000, or 1.91% of total loans, $17,000,000, or 1.47% of total loans and $14,305,000, or 1.21% of total loans, respectively, and is considered adequate to cover inherent losses in our loan portfolio.

At June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009, and June 30, 2009, we had approximately $69,478,000, $40,293,000 and $20,435,000, respectively, in other real estate owned which was obtained as the result of foreclosure proceedings. Although foreclosed property is recorded at fair value less estimated costs to sell, the prices ultimately realized upon their sale may or may not result in us recognizing loss.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Our total assets were $1,519,606,000 at June 30, 2010, compared to $1,584,625,000 at December 31, 2009, representing a 4.1% decrease. Table V below serves to illustrate significant changes in our financial position between December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010.

Table V - Summary of Significant Changes in Financial Position

	Balance								Balance
	December 31,		Increase (Decrease)						June 30,
Dollars in thousands	2009		Amount			Percentage			2010
Assets
Securities available for sale	$	271,654		(12,683	)		-4.7	%	$	258,971
Loans, net of unearned interest		1,154,336		(68,450	)		-5.9	%		1,085,886

Liabilities
Deposits	$	1,017,338	$	3,800			0.4	%	$	1,021,138
Short-term borrowings		49,739		(47,000	)		-94.5	%		2,739
Long-term borrowings		381,492		(20,317	)		-5.3	%	$	361,175
Subordinated debentures		16,800		-			0.0	%	$	16,800
Subordinated debentures owed to
unconsolidated subsidiary trusts		19,589		-			0.0	%		19,589

Loans decreased 5.9% and securities decreased 4.7% during the first six months of 2010. We have restricted our growth in order to improve our capital ratios.

Deposits increased approximately $3.8 million during the first six months of 2010, primarily in retail deposits.

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations

The decrease in both short term and long term borrowings is primarily attributable to paying down FHLB overnight advances and the maturities of long-term FHLB advances during the first six months of 2010 funded by reductions in loans and securities portfolios.

Refer to Notes 6, 7, 9, and 10 of the notes to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for additional information with regard to changes in the composition of our securities, loans, deposits and borrowings between June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity reflects our ability to ensure the availability of adequate funds to meet loan commitments and deposit withdrawals, as well as provide for other transactional requirements. Liquidity is provided primarily by funds invested in cash and due from banks (net of float and reserves), Federal funds sold, non-pledged securities, and available lines of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (“FHLB”), which totaled approximately $225.5 million or 13.6% of total consolidated assets at June 30, 2010.

Our liquidity strategy is to fund loan growth with deposits and other borrowed funds while maintaining an adequate level of short- and medium-term investments to meet normal daily loan and deposit activity. As a member of the FHLB, we have access to approximately $423 million. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, these advances totaled approximately $239 million and $304 million, respectively. At June 30, 2010, we had additional borrowing capacity of $184 million through FHLB programs. We have established a line with the Federal Reserve Bank to be used as a contingency liquidity vehicle. The amount available on this line at June 30, 2010 was approximately $104 million, which is secured by a pledge of our consumer and commercial and industrial loan portfolios. Also, we classify all of our securities as available for sale to enable us to liquidate them if the need arises.

Liquidity risk represents the risk of loss due to the possibility that funds may not be available to satisfy current or future commitments based on external market issues, customer or creditor perception of financial strength, and events unrelated to Summit such as war, terrorism, or financial institution market specific issues. The Asset/Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”), comprised of members of senior management and certain members of the Board of Directors, oversees our liquidity risk management process. The ALCO develops and recommends policies and limits governing our liquidity to the Board of Directors for approval with the objective of ensuring that we can obtain cost-effective funding to meet current and future obligations, as well as maintain sufficient levels of on-hand liquidity, under both normal and “stressed” circumstances.

One aspect of our liquidity management process is establishing contingency liquidity funding plans under various scenarios in order to prepare for unexpected liquidity shortages or events. The following represents three “stressed” liquidity circumstances and our related contingency plans with respect to each.

Scenario 1 – Summit Community’s capital status becomes less than “well capitalized”. Banks which are less than “well capitalized” in accordance with regulatory capital guidelines are prohibited from issuing new brokered deposits without first obtaining a waiver from the FDIC to do so. In the event Summit Community’s capital status were to fall below well capitalized and was not successful in obtaining the FDIC’s waiver to issue new brokered deposits, Summit Community:

·	Would have limited amounts of maturing brokered deposits to replace in the short-term, as we have limited our brokered deposits maturing in any one quarter to no more than $50 million.

·	Presently has $330 million in available sources of liquid funds which could be drawn upon to fund maturing brokered deposits until Summit Community had restored its capital to well capitalized status.

·	Would first seek to restore its capital to well capitalized status through capital contributions from Summit, its parent holding company. Summit has present cash reserves in excess of $7 million available for capital infusion into Summit Community.

Would generally have no more than $100 million in brokered deposits maturing in any one year time frame, which is well within its presently available sources of liquid funds, if in the event Summit does not have the capital resources to restore Summit Community’s capital to well capitalized status. One year would give Summit Community ample time to raise alternative funds either through retail deposits or the sale of assets, and obtain capital resources to restore it to well capitalized status.

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations

Scenario 2 – Summit Community’s credit quality deteriorates such that the FHLB restricts further advances. If in the event that the Bank’s credit quality deteriorated to the point that further advances under its line with the FHLB were restricted, Summit Community:

·	Would severely curtail lending and other growth activities until such time as access to this line could be restored, thus eliminating the need for net new advances.

·	Would still have available current liquid funding sources totaling $138 million aside from its FHLB line and,

In addition, would have available currently almost $43 million unpledged government agency securities (debentures and mortgage backed securities) that are available for use in repurchase arrangements with institutional broker and would result in a funding source of at least $35 million to meet unforeseen liquidity needs.

Scenario 3 – A competitive financial institution offers a retail deposit program at interest rates significantly above current market rates in the Summit Community’s market areas. If a competitive financial institution offered a retail deposit program at rates well in excess of current market rates in the Summit Community’s market area, the Bank:

·	Presently has $330 million in available sources of liquid funds which could be drawn upon immediately to fund any “net run off” of deposits from this activity.

·	Would severely curtail lending and other growth activities so as to preserve the availability of as much contingency funds as possible.

·	Would begin offering its own competitive deposit program when deemed prudent so as to restore the retail deposits lost to the competition.

We continuously monitor our liquidity position to ensure that day-to-day as well as anticipated funding needs are met. We are not aware of any trends, commitments, events or uncertainties that have resulted in or are reasonably likely to result in a material change to our liquidity.

One of our continuous goals is maintenance of a strong capital position. Through management of our capital resources, we seek to provide an attractive financial return to our shareholders while retaining sufficient capital to support future growth. Shareholders’ equity at June 30, 2010 totaled $88,854,000 compared to $90,660,000 at December 31, 2009.

Summit and Summit Community have each entered into informal Memoranda of Understanding (“MOU’s”) with their respective regulatory authorities. A memorandum of understanding is characterized by the regulatory authorities as an informal action that is not published or publicly available and that is used when circumstances warrant a milder form of action than a formal supervisory action, such as a formal written agreement or order. Among other things, under the MOU’s, Summit’s management team has agreed to:

·	Summit Community achieving and maintaining a minimum Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of at least 8% and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 11%;

·	Summit Community providing 30 days prior notice of any declaration of intent to pay cash dividends to provide the Bank’s regulatory authorities an opportunity to object;

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations

·	Summit suspending all cash dividends on its common stock until further notice. Dividends on all preferred stock, as well as interest payments on subordinated notes underlying Summit’s trust preferred securities, continue to be permissible; and,

·	Summit not incurring any additional debt, other than trade payables, without the prior written consent of the banking regulators.

Management presently believes Summit and the Bank are in compliance with all provisions of the MOUs.

Refer to Note 13 of the notes to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding regulatory restrictions on our capital as well as our subsidiaries’ capital.

CONTRACTUAL CASH OBLIGATIONS

During our normal course of business, we incur contractual cash obligations. The following table summarizes our contractual cash obligations at June 30, 2010.

	Long		Capital
	Term		Trust		Operating
Dollars in thousands	Debt		Securities		Leases
2010	$	57,066	$	-	$	126
2011		35,395		-		199
2012		66,720		-		151
2013		41,885		-		138
2014		83,416		-		125
Thereafter		113,082		19,589		21
Total	$	397,564	$	19,589	$	760

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We are involved with some off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have an effect on our financial condition, liquidity, or capital. These arrangements at June 30, 2010 are presented in the following table.

	June 30,
Dollars in thousands	2010
Commitments to extend credit:
Revolving home equity and
credit card lines	$	44,594
Construction loans		22,426
Other loans		38,093
Standby letters of credit		4,202
Total	$	109,315

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations

MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT

Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in the fair value of financial instruments due to changes in interest rates, exchange rates and equity prices. Interest rate risk is our primary market risk and results from timing differences in the repricing of assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments, changes in relationships between rate indices and the potential exercise of imbedded options. The principal objective of asset/liability management is to minimize interest rate risk and our actions in this regard are taken under the guidance of our Asset/Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”), which is comprised of members of senior management and members of the

Board of Directors. The ALCO actively formulates the economic assumptions that we use in our financial planning and budgeting process and establishes policies which control and monitor our sources, uses and prices of funds.

Some amount of interest rate risk is inherent and appropriate to the banking business. Our net income is affected by changes in the absolute level of interest rates. Our interest rate risk position is liability sensitive. The nature of our lending and funding activities tends to drive our interest rate risk position to being liability sensitive. That is, absent any changes in the volumes of our interest earning assets or interest bearing liabilities, liabilities are likely to reprice faster than assets, resulting in a decrease in net income in a rising rate environment. Net income would increase in a falling interest rate environment. Net income is also subject to changes in the shape of the yield curve. In general, a flattening yield curve would result in a decline in our earnings due to the compression of earning asset yields and funding rates, while a steepening would result in increased earnings as margins widen.

Several techniques are available to monitor and control the level of interest rate risk. We primarily use earnings simulations modeling to monitor interest rate risk. The earnings simulation model forecasts the effects on net interest income under a variety of interest rate scenarios that incorporate changes in the absolute level of interest rates and changes in the shape of the yield curve. Each increase or decrease in interest rates is assumed to gradually take place over the next 12 months, and then remain stable, except for the up 400 scenario, which assumes a gradual increase in rates over 24 months. Assumptions used to project yields and rates for new loans and deposits are derived from historical analysis. Securities portfolio maturities and prepayments are reinvested in like instruments. Mortgage loan prepayment assumptions are developed from industry estimates of prepayment speeds. Noncontractual deposit repricings are modeled on historical patterns.

The following table presents the estimated sensitivity of our net interest income to changes in interest rates, as measured by our earnings simulation model as of June 30, 2010. The sensitivity is measured as a percentage change in net interest income given the stated changes in interest rates (gradual change over 12 months, stable thereafter for the up and down 100 and the up 200 scenarios, and gradual change over 24 months for the up 400 scenario) compared to net interest income with rates unchanged in the same period. The estimated changes set forth below are dependent on the assumptions discussed above and are well within our ALCO policy limit, which is a 10% reduction in net interest income over the ensuing twelve month period.

Change in	Estimated % Change in Net
Interest Rates	Interest Income Over:
(basis points)	0-12 Months	13-24 Months
Down 100 (1)	1.09%	4.18%
Up 100 (1)	-1.28%	1.38%
Up 200 (1)	-2.65%	-0.82%
Up 400 (2)	-2.66%	-1.42%

(1) assumes a parallel shift in the yield curve
(2) assumes 400 bp increase over 24 months

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has conducted as of June 30, 2010, an evaluation of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2010 were effective. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Summit Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Part II. Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

We are involved in various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the outcome of these matters will not have a significant adverse effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	SUMMIT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
	(registrant)




	By:	/s/ H. Charles Maddy, III
		H. Charles Maddy, III,
		President and Chief Executive Officer



	By:	/s/ Robert S. Tissue
		Robert S. Tissue,
		Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



	By:	/s/ Julie R. Cook
		Julie R. Cook,
		Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer


Date: August 16, 2010