nymti_10q-063009.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
 
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
 
OR
 
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                to              
 
Commission file number 001-32216
 
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Maryland
47-0934168
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

52 Vanderbilt Avenue, Suite 403, New York, New York 10017
(Address of Principal Executive Office) (Zip Code)
 
(212) 792-0107
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x     No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o     No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See definitions of “large accelerated filers” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one.):

Large Accelerated Filer o
Accelerated Filer o
Non-Accelerated Filer x
Smaller Reporting Company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o    No x

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $.01 per share, outstanding on August 3, 2009 was 9,419,094.
 

 
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC.
 
FORM 10-Q
 
PART I. Financial Information
1
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
1
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
1
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
2
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
4
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
5
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
23
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
39
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
43
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
44
Item 1A.  Risk Factors
44
Item 6. Exhibits
44
SIGNATURES
45
 

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1.  Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
 
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 
(amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
 
 
   
June 30,
2009
   
December 31,
2008
 
ASSETS
           
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 15,797     $ 9,387  
Restricted cash
    3,269       7,959  
Investment securities - available for sale, at fair value (including pledged                
securities of $202,962 and $456,506, respectively)
    268,925       477,416  
Accounts and accrued interest receivable
    2,765       3,095  
Mortgage loans held in securitization trusts (net)
    313,955       348,337  
Derivative assets
    18       22  
Prepaid and other assets
    2,158       1,230  
Assets related to discontinued operation
    4,608       5,854  
Total Assets
  $ 611,495     $ 853,300  
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Liabilities:
               
Financing arrangements, portfolio investments
  $ 188,151     $ 402,329  
Collateralized debt obligations
    302,325       335,646  
Derivative liabilities
    3,053       4,194  
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
    5,252       3,997  
Subordinated debentures (net)
    44,755       44,618  
Convertible preferred debentures (net)
    19,776       19,702  
Liabilities related to discontinued operation
    2,614       3,566  
Total liabilities
    565,926       814,052  
                 
Commitments and Contingencies
               
Stockholders’ Equity:
               
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 400,000,000 authorized,                
9,320,094 and 9,320,094, shares issued and outstanding, respectively
    93       93  
Additional paid-in capital
    146,969       150,790  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (2,980 )     (8,521 )
Accumulated deficit
    (98,513 )     (103,114 )
Total stockholders’ equity
    45,569       39,248  
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
  $ 611,495     $ 853,300  

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
1

 
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
 
(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
 
 
   
For the Three Months
Ended June 30, 
   
For the Six Months
Ended June 30, 
 
   
2009 
   
2008 
   
2009 
   
2008 
 
REVENUE:                        
Interest income-investment securities and loans held in securitization trusts
  $ 7,621     $ 10,755     $ 16,206     $ 24,008  
Interest expense-investment securities and loans held in securitization trusts
    2,047       6,791       5,177       17,305  
Net interest income from investment securities and loans held in securitization trusts
    5,574       3,964       11,029       6,703  
Interest expense – subordinated debentures
    808       896       1,632       1,855  
Interest expense – convertible preferred debentures
    608       569       1,145       1,075  
Net interest income
    4,158       2,499       8,252       3,773  
OTHER EXPENSE:
                               
Provision for loan losses
    (259 )     (22 )     (888 )     (1,455 )
Impairment loss on investment securities
                (119 )      
Realized gain (loss) on securities and related hedges
    141       (83 )     264       (19,931 )
Total other expense
    (118 )     (105 )     (743 )     (21,386 )
EXPENSE:
                               
Salaries and benefits
    472       417       1,013       730  
Professional fees
    357       346       698       698  
Management fees
    245       184       427       293  
Insurance
    95       300       187       392  
Other
    433       713       847       1,278  
Total expenses
    1,602       1,960       3,172       3,391  
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
    2,438       434       4,337       (21,004 )
Income from discontinued operation - net of tax
    109       829       264       1,009  
NET INCOME (LOSS)
  $ 2,547     $ 1,263     $ 4,601     $ (19,995 )
Basic income (loss) per common share
  $ 0.27     $ 0.14     $ 0.49     $ (2.77 )
Diluted income (loss) per common share
  $ 0.27     $ 0.14     $ 0.49     $ (2.77 )
Dividends declared per share common share
  $ 0.23     $ 0.16     $ 0.41     $ 0.28  
Weighted average shares outstanding-basic
    9,320       9,320       9,320       7,218  
Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted
    11,820       9,320       11,820       7,218  
 
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
2

 
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
For the six months ended June 30, 2009
 
(dollar amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)
 

   
Common 
Stock
   
Additional 
Paid-In 
Capital
   
Accumulated
Deficit
   
Accumulated
Other 
Comprehensive
Loss
   
Comprehensive
Income
   
Total
 
Balance, January 1, 2009
 
$
93
   
$
150,790
   
$
(103,114
)
 
$
(8,521
)        
$
39,248
 
Net income
   
     
     
4,601
     
   
$
4,601
     
4,601
 
Dividends declared
   
     
(3,821
)
   
     
     
     
(3,821)
 
Decrease in net unrealized loss investment available for sale securities
   
     
     
     
4,056
     
4,056
     
4,056
 
Reclassification adjustment for sales of investment – available for sale securities
                           
(141
)    
(141)
     
(141)
 
Increase in derivative instruments utilized for cash flow hedge
   
     
     
     
1,626
     
1,626
     
1,626
 
Comprehensive income
   
     
     
     
   
$
10,142
         
Balance, June 30, 2009
 
 $
93
   
146,969
   
$
(98,513
)
 
$
(2,980
)
   
  
   
 $
45,569
 
 
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
3

NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 
(dollar amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)
 
   
For the Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
   
2009
   
2008
 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
           
Net income (loss)
  $ 4,601     $ (19,995 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    710       721  
Amortization/accretion of premium/discount on investment securities and mortgage loans held in securitization trusts
    193       498  
Realized (gain) loss on securities and related hedges
    (264 )     19,931  
Impairment loss on investment securities
    119        
Provision for loan losses
    888       799  
Loans held for sale lower of cost or market adjustments
    306        
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Accounts and accrued interest receivable
    306       193  
Prepaid and other assets
    (947 )     78  
Due to loan purchasers
    (152 )     185  
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
    (1,281 )     (3,323 )
Payments received on loans held for sale
    969       1,844  
Net cash provided by operating activities
    5,448       931  
                 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
               
Decrease in restricted cash
    4,690       6,286  
Purchases of investment securities
    (20,669 )     (825,933 )
Proceeds from sales of investment securities
    196,252       601,309  
Principal repayments received on mortgage loans held in securitization trusts
    33,130       52,293  
Proceeds from the disposal of fixed assets
          11  
Principal paydowns on investment securities - available for sale
    37,806       47,692  
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
    251,209       (118,342 )
                 
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
               
Proceeds from common stock issued (net)
          56,579  
Proceeds from convertible preferred debentures  (net)
          19,553  
Payments made for termination of swaps
          (8,333 )
(Decrease) increase in financing arrangements
    (214,178 )     102,235  
Dividends paid
    (2,610 )     (1,118 )
Payments made on collateralized debt obligation paydowns
    (33,459 )     (52,075 )
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
    (250,247 )     116,841  
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
    6,410       (570 )
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Beginning of Period
    9,387       5,508  
Cash and Cash Equivalents - End of Period
  $ 15,797     $ 4,938  
                 
Supplemental Disclosure:
               
Cash paid for interest
  $ 8,537     $ 21,244  
Non-Cash Investment Activities:
               
Purchase of investment securities not yet settled
  $ 683     $  
Non-Cash Financing Activities:
               
Dividends declared to be paid in subsequent period
  $ 2,143     $ 1,492  
 
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
4

 
NEW YORK MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2008
(unaudited)
 
1.  Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Organization - New York Mortgage Trust, Inc. together with its consolidated subsidiaries (“NYMT”, the “Company”, “we”, “our”, and “us”) is a self-advised real estate investment trust, or REIT, in the business of investing in residential adjustable rate mortgage-backed securities issued by a United States government-sponsored enterprise (“GSE” or “Agency”), such as the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”),or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”), and prime credit quality residential adjustable-rate mortgage (“ARM”) loans, or prime ARM loans, and non-agency mortgage-backed securities. We refer to residential adjustable rate mortgage-backed securities throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as “RMBS” and RMBS issued by a GSE as “Agency RMBS”. We also invest, although to a lesser extent, in certain alternative real estate related and financial assets that present greater credit risk and less interest rate risk than our current RMBS investments and prime ARM loans including, among other things, non-Agency RMBS, certain non-rated residential mortgage assets, commercial mortgage-backed securities, commercial real estate loans, collateralized loan obligations and other similar investments.  We refer to our investment in these alternative assets as our “alternative investment strategy.” We seek attractive long-term investment returns by investing our equity capital and borrowed funds in such securities. Our principal business objective is to generate net income for distribution to our stockholders resulting from the spread between the interest and other income we earn on our interest-earning assets and the interest expense we pay on the borrowings that we use to finance these assets, which we refer to as our net interest income.
 
The Company conducts its business through the parent company, NYMT, and several subsidiaries, including special purpose subsidiaries established for loan securitization purposes, a taxable REIT subsidiary ("TRS") and a qualified REIT subsidiary ("QRS").  The Company conducts certain of its operations related to its alternative investment strategy through its wholly-owned TRS, Hypotheca Capital, LLC (“HC”), in order to utilize, to the extent permitted by law, some or all of a net operating loss carry-forward held in HC that resulted from the Company's exit from the mortgage lending business.  Prior to March 31, 2007, the Company conducted substantially all of its mortgage lending business through HC.   The Company's wholly-owned QRS, New York Mortgage Funding, LLC (“NYMF”), currently holds certain mortgage-related assets under our principal investment strategy for regulatory compliance purposes.  The Company also may conduct certain of its operations related to its alternative investment strategy through NYMF.  The Company consolidates all of its subsidiaries under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”).

The Company is organized and conducts its operations to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. As such, the Company will generally not be subject to federal income tax on that portion of its income that is distributed to stockholders if it distributes at least 90% of its REIT taxable income to its stockholders by the due date of its federal income tax return and complies with various other requirements.

Basis of Presentation - The condensed consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are unaudited.  In our opinion, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows have been made.  Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation S-X and the instructions to Form 10-Q.  These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).  The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.
 
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our consolidated subsidiaries.  All significant intercompany amounts have been eliminated.  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
5

 
New Accounting Pronouncements - In June 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached consensus on Issue No. 06-11, Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Award.  EITF Issue No. 06-11 requires that the tax benefit related to dividend equivalents paid on restricted stock units that are expected to vest, be recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital.  The Company accounts for this tax benefit as a reduction to income tax expense.  EITF Issue No. 06-11 is to be applied prospectively for tax benefits on dividends declared in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company adopted the provisions of EITF Issue No. 06-11 during the first quarter of 2009.  The adoption of EITF Issue No. 06-11 did not have a material effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Statements Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, Business Combinations and issued SFAS No. 141(R) Business Combinations.  SFAS No. 141(R) broadens the guidance of SFAS No. 141, extending its applicability to all transactions and other events in which one entity obtains control over one or more other businesses.  It broadens the fair value measurement and recognition of assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and interests transferred as a result of business combinations; and it stipulates that acquisition related costs be generally expensed rather than included as part of the basis of the acquisition.  SFAS No. 141(R) expands required disclosures to improve the ability to evaluate the nature and financial effects of business combinations.  SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for all transactions the Company closes, on or after January 1, 2009.  The Company adopted SFAS No. 141(R) as of January 1, 2009 and it did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements - An Amendment of ARB No. 51.  SFAS No. 160 requires a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary to be reported as equity and the amount of consolidated net income specifically attributable to the non-controlling interest to be identified in the consolidated financial statements.  SFAS No. 160 also calls for consistency in the manner of reporting changes in the parent’s ownership interest and requires fair value measurement of any non-controlling equity investment retained in a deconsolidation.  SFAS No. 160 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2009 and most of its provisions apply prospectively.  The Company adopted SFAS No. 160 as of January 1, 2009 and it did not have an impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. 140-3, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing Transactions.  FSP No. 140-3 requires an initial transfer of a financial asset and a repurchase financing that was entered into contemporaneously or in contemplation of the initial transfer to be evaluated as a linked transaction under SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities (“SFAS No. 140”) unless certain criteria are met, including that the transferred asset must be readily obtainable in the marketplace.  The Company adopted FSP No. 140-3 as of January 1, 2009 and it did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.  SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities, and is effective for financial statements the Company issues for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged.  Because SFAS No. 161 requires only additional disclosures concerning derivatives and hedging activities, adoption of SFAS No. 161 did not affect the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. The Company adopted SFAS No. 161 in the first quarter of 2009 and as a result expanded the footnote disclosure included in the condensed consolidated financial statements (see note 4).
 
In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments that may be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement). The FSP requires the initial proceeds from the sale of our convertible preferred debentures to be allocated between a liability component and an equity component.  The resulting discount would be amortized using the effective interest method over the period the debt is expected to remain outstanding as additional interest expense.  The FSP No. APB 14-1 is effective for our fiscal year beginning on January 1, 2009 and requires retrospective application. The Company adopted FSP as of January 1, 2009 and it had no impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
6

 
On October 10, 2008, the FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active “FSP No. 157-3” clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157 in a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate key consideration in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not active.  The issuance of FSP No. 157-3 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s determination of fair value for its financial assets.
 
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (“FSP No. 157-4”), to provide additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 157 when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased as well as on identifying circumstances that indicate that a transaction is not orderly. FSP No. 157-4 provides additional guidance on determining fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased when compared with normal market activity for the asset or liability (or similar assets or liabilities). FSP No. 157-4 further amends SFAS No. 157 to require the disclosure in interim and annual periods of the inputs and valuation technique(s) used to measure fair value and a discussion of changes in valuation techniques and related inputs, if any, during the period.  FSP No. 157-4 is effective for the Company’s interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and should be applied prospectively. The Company adopted FSP SFAS No. 157-4 as of June 30, 2009 and it did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 115-2 and SFAS No. 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments, which provides additional guidance on the recognition, presentation and disclosure of losses in earnings for the impairment of investments in debt securities when changes in fair value of those securities are not regularly recognized in earnings (other-than-temporary impairment for debt securities).  This FSP also requires additional disclosures regarding expected cash flows, credit losses, and aging of securities with unrealized losses. Under this FSP, an other than temporary impairment is taken if the Company intends or is forced to sell the related debt security before its anticipated recovery with any impairment charge recognized in the statements of operations. Realized credit losses are also recognized in the statement of operations. The FSP is effective for the Company’s interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and should be applied prospectively. The Company adopted FSP SFAS No. 115-2 and FSP SFAS No. 124-2 as of June 30, 2009 and it did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 107-1 and APB No. 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to require 1) disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements and 2) disclosures in summarized financial information at interim periods. This FSP does not affect the ongoing requirement to report non-fair-value amounts on the face of the financial statements. This FSP further requires that an entity disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments and a description of changes in the method(s) and significant assumptions, if any, during the period. The FSP is effective for the Company’s interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and should be applied prospectively.  The Company adopted FSP SFAS No. 107-1 and APB No. 28-1 as of June 30, 2009 and it has disclosed the required information in note 10.
 
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events which is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009.  SFAS No. 165 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. It requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date. The Company adopted SFAS No. 165 in the second quarter of 2009 and evaluated all events or transactions through the date of this filing. During this period, we did not have any material subsequent events that impacted our consolidated financial statements.
 
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140,  which amends the derecognition guidance in SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, eliminates the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity” (“QSPE”) and requires more information about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions as well as a company’s continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. SFAS No. 166 is effective for financial asset transfers made by the company beginning of January 1, 2010 and early adoption is prohibited. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 166 on the consolidated financial statements.
 
7


In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), which amends the consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities (VIEs). The amendments will significantly affect the overall consolidation analysis under FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities—an interpretation of ARB No. 51, and changes the way entities account for securitizations and special purpose entities as a result of the elimination of the QSPE concept in SFAS No.166. SFAS No. 167 is effective for the Company January 1, 2010 and early adoption is prohibited. Management is currently evaluating the impact on the consolidated financial statements of adopting SFAS No. 167.
 
2.  Investment Securities - Available for Sale
 
Investment securities available for sale consist of the following as of June 30, 2009 (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
   
Amortized
Cost
   
Unrealized
Gains
   
Unrealized
Losses
   
Carrying
Value
 
Agency RMBS (1)
  $ 232,873     $ 5,836     $     $ 238,709  
Non-Agency RMBS
    26,266       4       (5,042 )     21,228  
Collateralized Loan Obligations
    8,833       219       (64 )     8,988  
  Total
  $ 267,972     $ 6,059     $ (5,106 )   $ 268,925  

 
(1)
-  Agency RMBS includes FNMA securities only.
 
Investment securities available for sale consist of the following as of December 31, 2008 (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
   
Amortized
Cost
   
Unrealized
Gains
   
Unrealized
Losses
   
Carrying
Value
 
Agency RMBS (1)
  $ 454,653     $ 1,316     $ (98 )   $ 455,871  
Non-Agency RMBS
    25,724             (4,179 )     21,545  
  Total
  $ 480,377     $ 1,316     $ (4,277 )   $ 477,416  

 
(1)
-  Agency RMBS carrying value includes $354.4 million of Fannie Mae and $101.5 million in Freddie Mac securities.
 
The Company commenced its alternative investment strategy by purchasing $46.0 million face amount of CRATOS CLO I collateralized loan obligations (“CLO”) on March 31, 2009 at a purchase price of approximately $9.0 million. This transaction closed on April 7, 2009. This marks the Company’s first investment under its alternative investment strategy.  In addition, during the second quarter of 2009 the Company initiated a program to opportunistically purchase approximately $25.0 million of Non-Agency RMBS.  As of June 30, 2009 the Company had accumulated approximately $4.6 million of non-Agency RMBS at an average cost of 58.17% of current par value.  The $4.6 million of non-Agency RMBS purchased during the second quarter of 2009 were previously rated AAA (at issuance) and represent the senior cashflows of the deal structure.
 
During March 2009, the Company determined that the Agency CMO floaters in its portfolio were no longer producing acceptable returns and initiated a program for the purpose of disposing of these securities. The Company disposed of approximately $159.5 million in current par value of Agency CMO floaters during March 2009, with the balance of the Agency CMO floaters, or $34.3 million in current par value, in its portfolio being sold in April 2009, for an aggregate disposition of approximately $193.8 million in current par value of Agency CMO floaters and a net gain of approximately $0.1 million.  As a result of this sale program, the Company incurred an additional impairment of $0.1 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as the Company no longer had the intent to hold the Agency CMO floaters. 
 
8

 
Moreover, because the sale of these Agency CMO floaters occurred prior to filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company determined that the unrealized losses related to our Agency CMO floaters were considered to be other than temporarily impaired as of December 31, 2008 and incurred a $4.1 million impairment charge for the year ended December 31, 2008.  In addition, we also determined that $6.1 million in current par value of non-agency RMBS, which included $2.5 million in current par value of retained residual interest, had suffered an other-than-temporary impairment and, accordingly, recorded an impairment charge of $1.2 million for the year and year ended December 31, 2008.
 
All RMBS securities held in investment securities available for sale, including Agency RMBS and non-agency RMBS, are based on unadjusted price quotes for similar securities in active markets and are categorized as Level 2.  The CLO market valuation is based on management's estimate using market inputs and market accepted valuation analytics. (see note 10).
 
The following tables set forth the stated reset periods and weighted average yields of our investment securities at June 30, 2009 (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
   
Less than 6 Months
   
More than 6 Months
to 24 Months
   
More than 24 Months
to 60 Months
   
Total
 
   
Carrying
Value
   
Weighted
Average
Yield
   
Carrying
Value
   
Weighted
Average
Yield
   
Carrying
Value
   
Weighted
Average
Yield
   
Carrying
Value
   
Weighted
Average
Yield
 
Agency RMBS   $           $ 59,557       2.51 %   $ 179,152       3.22 %   $ 238,709       3.04 %
Non-Agency RMBS  (1)     16,536       16.35 %     3,559       18.23       1,133       15.07 %     21,228       16.60 %
CLO     8,988       29.08 %                             8,988       29.08 %
Total/Weighted Average   $ 25,524       20.84 %   $ 63,116       3.39 %   $ 180,285       3.30 %   $ 268,925       4.99 %
 
 
(1)
The NYMT retained securities includes $0.1 million of residual interests related to the NYMT 2006-1 transaction.
 
The following table sets forth the stated reset periods and weighted average yields of our investment securities at December 31, 2008 (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
   
Less than 6 Months
   
More than 6 Months
to 24 Months
   
More than 24 Months
to 60 Months
   
Total
 
   
Carrying
Value
   
Weighted
Average
Yield
   
Carrying
Value
   
Weighted
Average
Yield
   
Carrying
Value
   
Weighted
Average
Yield
   
Carrying
Value
   
Weighted
Average
Yield
 
Agency RMBS   $
197,675
     
8.54
    $
66,910
     
3.69
%   $
191,286
     
4.02
%   $
455,871
     
5.99
%
Non-Agency RMBS  (1)    
21,476
     
14.11
%
   
     
     
69
     
16.99
     
21,545
     
14.35
%
Total/Weighted Average   $
219,151
     
9.21
%   $
66,910
     
3.69
%   $
191,355
     
4.19
%   $
477,416
     
6.51
%
 
 
(1)
The NYMT retained securities includes $0.1 million of residual interests related to the NYMT 2006-1 transaction.
 
9

 
The following table presents the Company’s investment securities available for sale in an unrealized loss position, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2009.  (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
    Less than 12 Months     Greater than 12 Months     Total  
   
Carrying
Value
   
Unrealized
Losses
   
Carrying
Value
   
Unrealized
Losses
   
Carrying
Value
   
Unrealized
Losses
 
Non-Agency RMBS
  $     $     $ 16,152     $ 5,042     $ 16,152     $ 5,042  
CLO
    3,021       64                   3,021       64  
Total
  $ 3,021     $ 64     $ 16,152     $ 5,042     $ 19,173     $ 5,106  
 
The following table presents the Company’s investment securities available for sale in an unrealized loss position, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2008.
 
 
Less than 12 Months
 
Greater than 12 Months
 
Total
 
 
Carrying
Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Carrying
Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Carrying
Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Agency RMBS
  $ 9,406     $ 98     $     $     $ 9,406     $ 98  
Non-Agency RMBS
    18,649       4,179                   18,649       4,179  
Total
  $ 28,055     $ 4,277     $     $     $ 28,055     $ 4,277  

As of June 30, 2009 and the date of this filing, we do not have the intent to sell or we believe that it is more likely than not that we will not have to sell our portfolio of securities which are currently in unrealized loss positions for the foreseeable future.  In assessing the Company’s ability to hold its impaired securities, it considers the significance of each investment and the amount of impairment, as well as the Company’s current and anticipated leverage capacity and liquidity position.  In addition, the Company anticipates collecting principal repayments in amounts sufficient to recover the amortized cost value of non-Agency RMBS and does not anticpate any credit losses to exceed the purchased discount. Given the uncertain state of the financial markets, should conditions change that would require us to sell securities at a loss, we may no longer be able to assert that we have the ability to hold our remaining securities until recovery, and we would then be required to record impairment charges related to these securities.  Accordingly, a majority of the Company’s Agency RMBS that are classified as investment securities available for sale are pledged as collateral for borrowings under financing arrangements (see note 5).
 
3.  Mortgage Loans Held in Securitization Trusts (net)
 
Mortgage loans held in securitization trusts (net) consist of the following as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
   
June 30,
2009
   
December 31,
2008
 
Mortgage loans principal amount  (1)
  $ 313,900     $ 347,546  
Deferred origination costs – net
    1,987       2,197  
Reserve for loan losses
    (1,932 )     (1,406 )
Total
  $ 313,955     $ 348,337  
 
 
(1)
Includes $1.2 million and $1.9 million in real estate owned through foreclosure as of June 30,2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
 
10

 
Reserve for Loan losses - The following table presents the activity in the Company’s reserve for loan losses on mortgage loans held in securitization trusts for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (dollar amounts in thousands).
 
   
June 30,
 
   
2009
   
2008
 
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 1,406     $ 1,647  
Provisions for loan losses
    888       1,455  
Charge-offs
    (362 )     (364 )
Balance at the end of period
  $ 1,932     $ 2,738  

The reserve for loan losses is maintained at the amount estimated to be sufficient to cover probable losses inherent in the loans held in securitization trusts. Estimations involve the consideration of various credit related factors, including but not limited to, current housing market conditions, current loan to value ratios, delinquency status, borrower’s current economic and credit status and other factors deemed to warrant consideration.
 
All of the Company’s mortgage loans held in securitization trusts are pledged as collateral for the collateralized debt obligations (“CDO”) issued by the Company (see note 6).  As of June 30, 2009, the Company’s net investment in the securitization trusts, which is the maximum amount of the Company’s investment that is at risk to loss and represents the difference between the carrying amount of the loans and the amount of CDO’s outstanding, was $11.7 million.
 
The following tables set forth delinquent mortgage loans in our securitization trusts as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
June 30, 2009                  
Days Late   Number of
Delinquent
Loans
    Total
Dollar
Amount
   
% of
Loan
Portfolio
 
30-60     4     $ 2,309       0.74 %
61-90     5       1,375       0.44 %
90+     20       11,590       3.69 %
Real estate owned through foreclosure
    3       1,226       0.39 %
                         
December 31, 2008                        
Days Late
  Number of
Delinquent
Loans
    Total
Dollar
Amount
    % of
Loan
Portfolio
 
30-60     3     $ 1,363       0.39 %
61-90     1       263       0.08 %
90+     13       5,734       1.65 %
Real estate owned through foreclosure
    4       1,927       0.55 %
 
4.  Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
 
The Company enters into derivatives instruments to manage its interest rate risk exposure. These derivative instruments include interest rate swaps and caps entered into to reduce interest expense costs related to our repurchase agreements, collateralized debt obligations and our subordinated debentures.  These derivative instruments are comprised of interest rate swaps and interest rate caps for the periods presented.  The Company’s interest rate swaps are designated as cash flow hedges against the benchmark interest rate risk associated with its short term repurchase agreements.  There were no costs incurred at the inception of our interest rate swaps, under which the Company agrees to pay a fixed rate of interest and receive a variable interest rate based on one month LIBOR, on the notional amount of the interest rate swaps.  The Company’s interest rate swap notional amounts are based on an amortizing schedule fixed at the start date of the transaction.  The Company’s interest rate cap transactions are designated as cashflow hedges against the benchmark interest rate risk associated with the collateralized debt obligations and the subordinated debentures.  The interest rate cap transactions were initiated with an upfront premium that is being amortized over the life of the contract.
 
11

 
The Company documents its risk-management policies, including objectives and strategies, as they relate to its hedging activities, and upon entering into hedging transactions, documents the relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged liability.  The Company assesses, both at inception of a hedge and on an on-going basis, whether or not the hedge is “highly effective” when using the matched term basis.
 
The Company discontinues hedge accounting on a prospective basis and recognizes changes in the fair value through earnings when:  (i) it is determined that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting cash flows of a hedged item (including forecasted transactions); (ii) it is no longer probable that the forecasted transaction will occur; or (iii) it is determined that designating the derivative as a hedge is no longer appropriate.  The Company’s derivative instruments are carried on the Company’s balance sheet at fair value, as assets, if their fair value is positive, or as liabilities, if their fair value is negative.  Since the Company’s derivative instruments are designated as “cash flow hedges,” changes in their fair value are recorded in other comprehensive loss, provided that the hedges are effective.  A change in fair value for any ineffective amount of the Company’s derivative instruments would be recognized in earnings.  The Company has not recognized any change in the value of its existing derivative instruments through earnings as a result of  ineffectiveness of any of its hedges.

The following table presents the fair value of derivative instruments and their location in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively (amounts in thousands):

Derivative Designated as Hedging
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
June 30,
2009
   
December 31,
2008
 
Interest Rate Caps
 
Derivative Assets
  $ 18     $ 22  
Interest Rate Swaps
 
Derivative Liabilities
  $ 3,053     $ 4,194  

The following table presents the impact of the Company’s derivative instruments on the Company’s accumulated other comprehensive loss for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (amounts in thousands):
 
    Six Months Ended June 30  
Derivative Designated as Hedging Instruments   2009     2008  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss for derivative instruments:
           
Balance at beginning of the period
  $ (5,560 )   $ (1,951 )
Unrealized gain on interest rate caps
    485       437  
Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps
    1,141       2,086  
Reclassification adjustment for net losses included in net income for hedges
           
Balance at the end of the period
  $ (3,934 )   $ 572  

The Company estimates that over the next 12 months, approximately $2.5 million of the net unrealized losses on the interest rate swaps will be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings.
 
12

 
The following table details the impact of the Company’s interest rate swaps and interest rate caps included in interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (amounts in thousands):
 
   
Three Months ended June 30,
   
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2009
   
2008
   
2009
   
2008
 
Interest Rate Caps:
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
Interest expense-investment securities and loans held in securitization trusts
  $ 168     $ 168     $ 328     $ 357  
Interest expense-subordinated debentures
    81       71       161       141  
Interest Rate Swaps:
                               
Interest expense-investment securities and loans held in securitization trusts
    812       133       1,665       118  
 
Interest Rate Swaps - The Company is required to pledge assets under a bi-lateral margin arrangement, including either cash or Agency RMBS, as collateral for its interest rate swaps, whose collateral requirements vary by counterparty and change over time based on the market value, notional amount, and remaining term of the interest rate swap (“Swap”).  In the event the Company was unable to meet a margin call under one of its Swap agreements, thereby causing an event of default or triggering an early termination event under one of its Swap agreements, the counterparty to such agreement may have the option to terminate all of such counterparty’s outstanding Swap transactions with the Company. In addition, under this scenario, any close-out amount due to the counterparty upon termination of the counterparty’s transactions would be immediately payable by the Company pursuant to the applicable agreement.  The Company believes it was in compliance with all margin requirements under its Swap agreements as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.  The Company had $3.0 million and $4.2 million of restricted cash related to margin posted for Swaps as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
 
The use of interest rate swaps exposes the Company to counterparty credit risks in the event of a default by a Swap counterparty. If a counterparty defaults under the applicable Swap agreement the Company may be unable to collect payments to which it is entitled under its Swap agreements, and may have difficulty collecting the assets it pledged as collateral against such Swaps.  The Company currently has in place with all outstanding Swap counterparties bi-lateral margin agreements thereby requiring a party to post collateral to the Company for any valuation deficit.  This arrangement is intended to limit the Company’s exposure to losses in the event of a counterparty default.
 
13

 
The following table presents information about the Company’s interest rate swaps as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (amounts in thousands):
 
    June 30, 2009     December 31, 2008  
 
Maturity (1)
 
Notional
Amount
   
Weighted Average
Fixed Pay
Interest Rate
   
Notional
Amount
   
Weighted Average
Fixed Pay
Interest Rate
 
Within 30 Days
  $ 2,560       2.99 %   $ 2,960       3.00 %
Over 30 days to 3 months
    4,850       2.99       5,220       3.00  
Over 3 months to 6 months
    6,440       2.99       7,770       2.99  
Over 6 months to 12 months
    14,100       2.99       13,850       2.99  
Over 12 months to 24 months
    63,010       3.01       48,640       2.99  
Over 24 months to 36 months
    11,860       3.02       34,070       3.03  
Over 36 months to 48 months
    18,500       3.07       7,560       3.01  
Over 48 months
                17,200       3.08  
     Total
  $ 121,320       3.01 %   $ 137,270       3.00 %

 
(1)
The Company enters into scheduled amortizing interest rate swap transactions whereby the Company pays a fixed rate of interest and receives one month LIBOR.

Interest Rate Caps – Interest rate caps are designated by the Company as cash flow hedges against interest rate risk associated with the Company’s collateralized debt obligations and the subordinated debentures. The interest rate caps associated with the collateralized debt obligations are amortizing contractual notional schedules determined at origination and had $408.1 million and $456.9 million outstanding as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.  These interest rate caps are utilized to cap the interest rate on the collateralized debt obligations at a fixed-rate when one month LIBOR exceeds a predetermined rate.  In addition, the Company has an interest rate cap contract on $25.0 million of subordinated debentures that effectively caps three month LIBOR at 3.75% until March 31, 2010.
 
5.  Financing Arrangements, Portfolio Investments
 
The Company has entered into repurchase agreements with third party financial institutions to finance its RMBS portfolio.  The repurchase agreements are short-term borrowings that bear interest rates typically based on a spread to LIBOR, and are secured by the securities which they finance.  At June 30, 2009, the Company had repurchase agreements with an outstanding balance of $188.2 million and a weighted average interest rate of 0.53%.  As of December 31, 2008, the Company had repurchase agreements with an outstanding balance of $402.3 million and a weighted average interest rate of 2.62%.  At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, securities pledged by the Company as collateral for repurchase agreements had estimated fair values of $203.0 million and $456.5 million, respectively.  All outstanding borrowings under our repurchase agreements mature within 30 days.  As of June 30, 2009, the average days to maturity for all repurchase agreements are 20 days.  The Company had outstanding repurchase agreements with five different financial institutions as of June 30, 2009 and six as of December 31, 2008.
 
As of June 30, 2009, our Agency RMBS are financed with $188.2 million of repurchase agreement funding with an advance rate of 93% that implies an overall haircut of 7%.
 
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had $15.8 million in cash and $56.3 million in unencumbered RMBS securities, including $35.7 million in Agency RMBS, to meet additional haircut or market valuation requirements.
 
6.  Collateralized Debt Obligations
 
The Company’s CDOs, which are recorded as liabilities on the Company’s balance sheet, are secured by ARM loans pledged as collateral, which are recorded as assets of the Company.  As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had CDOs outstanding of $302.3 million and $335.6 million, respectively.  As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the current weighted average interest rate on these CDOs was 0.70% and 0.85%, respectively.  The CDOs are collateralized by ARM loans with a principal balance of $313.9 million and $347.5 million at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.  The Company retained the owner trust certificates, or residual interest, for three securitizations, and, as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, had a net investment in the securitizations trusts after loan loss reserves of $11.6 million and $12.7 million, respectively.
 
14

 
The CDO transactions include amortizing interest rate cap contracts with an aggregate notional amount of $408.1 million as of June 30, 2009 and an aggregate notional amount of $456.9 million as of December 31, 2008, which are recorded as assets of the Company.  The interest rate caps are carried at fair value and totaled $17,783 as of June 30, 2009 and $18,575 as of December 31, 2008, respectively.  The interest rate cap reduces interest rate risk exposure on these transactions.
 
7.  Discontinued Operation
 
In connection with the sale of our mortgage origination platform assets during the quarter ended March 31, 2007, we classified our mortgage lending segment as a discontinued operation.  As a result, we have reported revenues and expenses related to the segment as a discontinued operation and the related assets and liabilities as assets and liabilities related to a discontinued operation for all periods presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.  Certain assets, such as the deferred tax asset, and certain liabilities, such as subordinated debt and liabilities related to lease facilities not assigned to Indymac Bank, F.S.B. (“Indymac”), are part of our ongoing operations and accordingly, we have not included these items as part of the discontinued operation.
 
Balance Sheet Data
 
The components of assets related to the discontinued operation as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
   
June 30,
2009
   
December 31,
2008
 
Accounts and accrued interest receivable
 
$
50
   
$
26
 
Mortgage loans held for sale (net)
   
4,102
     
5,377
 
Prepaid and other assets
   
456
     
451
 
Total assets
 
$
4,608
   
$
5,854
 

The components of liabilities related to the discontinued operation as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
   
June 30,
2009
   
December 31,
2008
 
Due to loan purchasers
  $ 394     $ 708  
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
    2,220       2,858  
Total liabilities
  $ 2,614     $ 3,566  

Statements of Operations Data
 
The statements of operations of the discontinued operation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
 
Three Months
Ended June 30,
 
Six Months
 Ended June 30,
 
 
2009
 
2008
 
2009
 
2008
 
Revenues
  $ 220     $ 762     $ 510     $ 933  
Expenses
    111       (67 )     246       (76 )
Income from discontinued operation-net of tax
  $ 109     $ 829     $ 264     $ 1,009  
 
15

 
8.  Commitments and Contingencies
 
Loans Sold to Investors - For loans originated and sold by our discontinued mortgage lending business, the Company is not exposed to long term credit risk.  In the normal course of business however, the Company is obligated to repurchase loans based on violations of representations and warranties in the sale agreement, or early payment defaults.  The Company did not repurchase any loans during the six months ended June 30, 2009.
 
The Company periodically receives repurchase requests based on alleged violations of representations and warranties, each of which management reviews to determine, based on management’s experience, whether such requests may reasonably be deemed to have merit.  As of June 30, 2009, we had a total of $1.5 million of unresolved repurchase requests that management concluded may reasonably be deemed to have merit, against which the Company has a reserve of approximately $0.4 million.  The reserve is based on one or more of the following factors, including historical settlement rates, property value securing the loan in question and specific settlement discussion with third parties.
 
Outstanding Litigation - The Company is at times subject to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. As of June 30, 2009, the Company does not believe that any of its current legal proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on its operations, financial condition or cash flows.
 
Leases - The Company leases its corporate offices and certain office space related to our discontinued mortgage lending operation and equipment under short-term lease agreements expiring at various dates through 2013.  All such leases are accounted for as operating leases.  Total rental expense for property and equipment amounted to $96,900 for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
 
Letters of Credit – The Company maintains a letter of credit in the amount of $0.2 million in lieu of a cash security deposit for its current corporate headquarters, located at 52 Vanderbilt Avenue in New York City, for its landlord, Vanderbilt Associates I, L.L.C, as beneficiary.  This letter of credit is secured by cash deposited in a bank account maintained at JP Morgan Chase bank.
 
9.  Concentrations of Credit Risk
 
At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, there were geographic concentrations of credit risk exceeding 5% of the total loan balances within mortgage loans held in the securitization trusts and retained interests in our REMIC securitization, NYMT 2006-1, as follows:
 
   
June 30,
2009
   
December 31,
2008
 
New York
    31.0 %     30.7 %
Massachusetts
    18.1 %     17.2 %
Florida
    8.0 %     7.8 %
California
    7.9 %     7.2 %
New Jersey
    6.3 %     6.0 %
 
10.  Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
The Company has established and documented processes for determining fair values.  Fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available.  If listed prices or quotes are not available, then fair value is based upon internally developed models that primarily use inputs that are market-based or independently-sourced market parameters, including interest rate yield curves.
 
A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  The three levels of valuation hierarchy are defined as follows:
 
Level 1 - inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
 
16

 
Level 2 - inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
 
Level 3 - inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
 
The following describes the valuation methodologies used for the Company’s financial instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.
 
a. Investment Securities Available for Sale (RMBS) - Fair value for the RMBS in our portfolio is generally based on quoted prices provided by dealers who make markets in similar financial instruments. The dealers will incorporate common market pricing methods, including a spread measurement to the Treasury curve or interest rate swap curve as well as underlying characteristics of the particular security including coupon, periodic and life caps, collateral type, rate reset period and seasoning or age of the security. If quoted prices for a security are not reasonably available from a dealer, the security will be re-classified as a Level 3 security and, as a result, management will determine the fair value based on characteristics of the security that the Company receives from the issuer and based on available market information. Management reviews all prices used in determining valuation to ensure they represent current market conditions. This review includes surveying similar market transactions, comparisons to interest pricing models as well as offerings of like securities by dealers. The Company's investment securities are valued based upon readily observable market parameters and are classified as Level 2 fair values.
 
b. Investment Securities Available for Sale (CLO) - The fair value of the CLO notes, as of June 30, 2009, was based on management’s valuation determined by using a discounted future cash flows model that management believes would be used by market participants to value similar financial instruments. If a reliable market for these assets develops in the future, management will consider quoted prices provided by dealers who make markets in similar financial instruments in determining the fair value of the CLO notes. The CLO notes are classified as Level 3 fair values.

c. Interest Rate Swaps and Caps  - The fair value of interest rate swaps and caps are based on using market accepted financial models as well as dealer quotes.  The model utilizes readily observable market parameters, including treasury rates, interest rate swap spreads and swaption volatility curves.  The Company’s interest rate caps and swaps are classified as Level 2 fair values.
 
The following table presents the Company’s financial instruments carried at fair value as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 on the condensed consolidated balance sheet (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
   
Asset and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
at June 30, 2009
   
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
   
Total
Assets carried at fair value:
                             
    Investment securities available for sale
 
$
   
$
259,937
   
$
8,988
   
$
268,925
    Derivative assets (interest rate caps)
   
     
18
     
     
18
        Total
 
$
   
$
259,955
   
$
8,988
   
$
268,943
                               
                               
Liabilities carried at fair value:                              
    Derivative liabilities (interest rate swaps)  
$
   
$
3,053    
$
   
$ 
3,053
        Total  
$
   
$ 
3,053    
$
   
$
3,053
 
17

 
   
Asset Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
at December 31, 2008
   
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
   
Total
Assets carried at fair value:
                   
 
       
    Investment securities available for sale
 
$
   
$
477,416
   
$
   
$
477,416
    Derivative assets (interest rate caps)
   
     
22
     
     
22
        Total
 
$
   
$
477,438
   
$
   
$
477,438
                               
                               
Liabilities carried at fair value:                              
    Derivative liabilities (interest rate swaps)  
$
   
$
4,194    
$
   
$
4,194
        Total  
$
   
$
4,194    
$
   
$
4,194
 
The following table details changes in valuation for the Level 3 assets for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 (amounts in thousands):
 
Investment securities available for sale – collateralized debt obligations
 
   
Three Months
Ended
June 30, 2009
   
Six Months
Ended
June 30, 2009
 
Beginning Balance
  $ 8,998     $  
Purchases
            8,998  
Net unrealized gains
    (10 )     (10 )
Ending Balance
  $ 8,988     $ 8,988  
 
Any changes to the valuation methodology are reviewed by management to ensure the changes are appropriate.  As markets and products develop and the pricing for certain products becomes more transparent, the Company continues to refine its valuation methodologies.  The methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values.  Furthermore, while the Company believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies, or assumptions, to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.  The Company uses inputs that are current as of each reporting date, which may include periods of market dislocation, during which time price transparency may be reduced.  This condition could cause the Company’s financial instruments to be reclassified from Level 2 to Level 3 in future periods.
 
The following table presents assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 on the condensed consolidated balance sheet (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
   
Asset Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
at June 30, 2009
 
   
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
   
Total
 
Mortgage loans held for sale (net)
 
$
   
$
   
$
4,102
   
$
4,102
 
Mortgage loans held in securitization trusts (net) – impaired loans (1)
 
$
   
$
   
$
6,648
   
$
6,648
 
 
(1) Includes $1.2 million in real estate owned through foreclosure.
 
   
Asset Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
at December 31, 2008
 
   
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
   
Total
 
Mortgage loans held for sale (net)
 
$
   
$
   
$
5,377
   
$
5,377
 
Mortgage loans held in securitization trusts (net) – impaired loans (1)
 
$
   
$
   
$
2,958
   
$
2,958
 
 
(1) Includes $1.9 million in real estate owned through foreclosure.
18

 
The following table presents losses incurred for assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008 on the condensed statements of operations (dollar amounts in thousands):
 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    June 30, 2009     June 30, 2008     June 30, 2009     June 30, 2008  
Mortgage loans held for sale (net)
 
$
143
   
$
1
   
$
246
   
$
399
 
Mortgage loans held in securitization trusts (net) – impaired loans
 
$
259
   
$
22
   
$
888
   
$
1,455
 

Mortgage Loans Held in Securitization Trusts (net) – Impaired Loans – Impaired mortgage loans held in the securitization trusts are recorded at amortized cost less specific loan loss reserves. Impaired loan value is based on management’s estimate of the net realizable value taking into consideration local market conditions of the distressed property, updated appraisal values of the property and estimated expenses required to remediate the impaired loan.

Mortgage Loans Held for Sale (net) –The fair value of mortgage loans held for sale (net) are estimated by the Company based on the price that would be received if the loans were sold as whole loans taking into consideration the aggregated characteristics of the loans such as, but not limited to, collateral type, index, interest rate, margin, length of fixed interest rate period, life cap, periodic cap, underwriting standards, age and credit.

The following table presents the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments, at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (dollar amounts in thousands):

   
June 30, 2009
   
December 31, 2008
 
   
Carrying
Value
   
Estimated
Fair Value
   
Carrying
Value
   
Estimated
Fair Value
 
Financial assets:
                       
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 15,797     $ 15,797     $ 9,387     $ 9,387  
Restricted cash
    3,269       3,269       7,959       7,959  
Investment securities – available for sale
    268,925       268,925       477,416       477,416  
Mortgage loans held in securitization trusts (net)
    313,955       307,776       348,337       343,028  
Derivative assets
    18       18       22       22  
Assets related to discontinued operation-Mortgage loans held for sale (net)
    4,102       4,102       5,377       5,377  
                                 
Financial Liabilities:
                               
Financing arrangements, portfolio investments
    188,151       188,151       402,329       402,329  
Collateralized debt obligations
    302,325       183,057       335,646       199,503  
Derivative liabilities
    3,053       3,053       4,194       4,194  
Subordinated debentures (net)
    44,755       18,147       44,618       10,049  
Convertible preferred debentures (net)
    19,776       17,855       19,702       16,363  

In addition to the methodology to determine the fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities reported at fair value on a recurring basis and non-recurring basis, as previously described, the following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in arriving at the fair value of the Company’s other financial instruments in the following table:

a.     Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash:  Estimated fair value approximates the carrying value of such assets.

b.     Mortgage Loans Held in Securitization Trusts - Mortgage loans held in the securitization trusts are recorded at amortized cost. Fair value is estimated using pricing models and taking into consideration the aggregated characteristics of groups of loans such as, but not limited to, collateral type, index, interest rate, margin, length of fixed-rate period, life cap, periodic cap, underwriting standards, age and credit estimated using the estimated market prices for similar types of loans. Due to significant market dislocation secondary market prices were given minimal weighting when arrriving at loan valuations at June 30, 2009 and December 21, 2008.
 
19


c.     Financing arrangements, portfolio investments – The fair value of these financing arrangements approximates cost as they are short term in nature and mature in 30 days.

d.     Collateralized debt obligations – The fair value of these collateralized debt obligations is based on discounted cashflows as well as market pricing on comparable obligations.

e.     Subordinated debentures (net) – The fair value of these subordinated debentures is based on discounted cashflows using management’s estimate for market yields.

f.     Convertible preferred debentures (net) – The fair value of the subordinated debentures is based on discounted cashflows using management’s estimate for market yields.
 
11.   Capital Stock and Earnings per Share
 
The Company had 400,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, authorized with 9,320,094 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2009, and December 31, 2008, respectively.  The Company had 200,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, authorized, including 2,000,000 shares of Series A Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) authorized.  As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had issued and outstanding 1,000,000 and 1,000,000 shares, respectively, of Series A Preferred Stock.  Of the common stock authorized, 103,111 shares were reserved for issuance as restricted stock awards to employees, officers and directors pursuant to the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan.  As of June 30, 2009, 103,111 shares remain reserved for issuance under the 2005 Plan.
 
On February 21, 2008, the Company completed the issuance and sale of 7.5 million shares of its common stock in a private placement at a price of $8.00 per share.  This private offering of the Company’s common stock generated net proceeds to the Company of $56.5 million after payment of private placement fees and expenses. The Company filed a resale shelf registration statement on Form S-3 on April 4, 2008, registering for resale the 7.5 million shares issued in February 2008, which became effective on April 18, 2008.
 
The Board of Directors declared a one-for-two reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock, effective on May 27, 2008, decreasing the number of shares then outstanding to approximately 9.3 million shares. All per share and share amounts provided in the quarterly report have been restated to give to effect the reverse stock split.
 
The following table presents cash dividends declared by the Company on its common stock from January 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009.
 
Period
 
Declaration Date
 
Record Date
 
Payment Date
 
Cash
Dividend
Per Share
 
Second Quarter 2009
 
June 15, 2009
 
June 26, 2009
 
July 27, 2009
 
$
0.23
 
First Quarter 2009
 
March 25, 2009
 
April 6, 2009
 
April 27, 2009
   
0.18
 
                     
Fourth Quarter 2008
 
December 23, 2008
 
January 7, 2009
 
January 26, 2009
 
$
0.10
 
Third Quarter 2008
 
September 29, 2008
 
October 10, 2008
 
October 27, 2008
   
0.16
 
Second Quarter 2008
 
June 30, 2008
 
July 10, 2008
 
July 25, 2008
   
0.16
 
First Quarter 2008
 
April 21, 2008
 
April 30, 2008
 
May 15,2008
   
0.12
 

20


The following table presents cash dividends declared by the Company on its Series A Preferred Stock from January 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009.
 
Period
 
Declaration Date
 
Record Date
 
Payment Date
 
Cash
Dividend
Per Share
 
Second Quarter 2009
 
June 15, 2009
 
June 30, 2009
 
July 31, 2009
 
$
0.575
 
First Quarter 2009
 
March 25, 2009
 
March 31, 2009
 
April 30, 2009
   
0.50
 
                     
Fourth Quarter 2008
 
December 23, 2008
 
December 31, 2008
 
January 30,2009
 
$
0.50
 
Third Quarter 2008
 
September 29, 2008
 
September 30, 2008
 
October 30, 2008
   
0.50
 
Second Quarter 2008
 
June 30, 2008
 
June 30, 2008
 
July 30, 2008
   
0.50
 
First Quarter 2008
 
April 21, 2008
 
March 31, 2008
 
April 30,2008
   
0.50
 

The Company calculates basic net income (loss) per share by dividing net income (loss) for the period by the weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding for that period.  Diluted net income (loss) per share takes into account the effect of dilutive instruments, such as convertible preferred stock, stock options and unvested restricted or performance stock, but uses the average share price for the period in determining the number of incremental shares that are to be added to the weighted-average number of shares outstanding.
 
The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share for the periods indicated (in thousands, except per share amounts):

   
For the Three Months
Ended June 30,
   
For the Six Months
Ended June 30,
 
   
2009
   
2008
   
2009
   
2008
 
Numerator:
                       
Net income (loss) – Basic
  $ 2,547     $ 1,263     $ 4,601     $ (19,995 )
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
    2,438       434       4,337       (21,004 )
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations (net of tax)
    109       829       264       1,009  
Effect of dilutive instruments:
                               
Convertible preferred debentures (1)
    608       569       1,145       1,075  
Net income  (loss) – Dilutive
    3,155       1,263       5,746       (19,995 )
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
    3,046       434       5,482       (21,004 )
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations (net of tax)
  $ 109     $ 829     $ 264     $ 1,009  
Denominator:
                               
Weighted average basis shares outstanding
    9,320       9,320       9,320       7,218  
Effect of dilutive instruments:
                               
Convertible preferred debentures (1)
    2,500       2,500       2,500       2,267  
Weighted average dilutive shares outstanding
    11,820       9,320       11,820       7,218  
EPS:
                               
Basic EPS
  $ 0.27     $ 0.14     $ 0.49     $ (2.77 )
Basic EPS from continuing operations
    0.26       0.05       0.46       (2.91 )
Basic EPS from discontinued operations (net of tax)
    0.01       0.09       0.03       0.14  
Dilutive EPS
  $ 0.27     $ 0.14     $ 0.49     $ (2.77 )
Dilutive EPS from continuing operations
    0.26       0.05       0.46       (2.91 )
Basic EPS from discontinued operations (net of tax)
    0.01       0.09       0.03       0.14  
(1) – Amount excluded from dilutive calculation as it is anti-dilutive for the 2008 calculations.

21

 
12.  Convertible Preferred Debentures (net)
 
As of June 30, 2009, there were 1.0 million shares of our Series A Preferred Stock outstanding, with an aggregate redemption value of $20.0 million and current dividend payment rate of 11.5% per year, subject to adjustment.  The Series A Preferred Stock matures on December 31, 2010, at which time any outstanding shares must be redeemed by the Company at the $20.00 per share liquidation preference.  Because of this mandatory redemption feature, the Company classifies these securities as a liability on its balance sheet, and accordingly, the corresponding dividend as an interest expense.
 
We issued these shares of Series A Preferred Stock to JMP Group Inc. and certain of its affiliates for an aggregate purchase price of $20.0 million.  The Series A Preferred Stock entitles the holders to receive a cumulative dividend of 10% per year, subject to an increase to the extent any future quarterly common stock dividends exceed $0.20 per share.  The common stock second quarter dividend rate was $0.23 resulting in an increase in the dividend rate to 11.5% from 10% The Series A Preferred Stock is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock based on a conversion price of $8.00 per share of common stock, which represents a conversion rate of two and one-half (2 ½) shares of common stock for each share of Series A Preferred Stock.
 
13.  Related Party Transactions
 
On January 18, 2008, the Company entered into an advisory agreement with Harvest Capital Strategies LLC (“HCS”) (formerly known as JMP Asset Management LLC), pursuant to which HCS is responsible for implementing and managing the Company’s investments in alternative real estate-related and financial assets, which is referred to in this report to as the “alternative investment strategy.” The Company entered into the advisory agreement concurrent and in connection with its private placement of Series A Preferred Stock to JMP Group Inc. and certain of it affiliates. HCS is a wholly-owned subsidiary of JMP Group Inc. Pursuant to Schedule 13D’s filed with the SEC, as of December 31, 2008, HCS and JMP Group Inc. beneficially owned approximately 16.8% and 12.2%, respectively, of the Company’s common stock, and 100%, collectively, of it Series A Preferred Stock.
 
Pursuant to the advisory agreement, HCS is responsible for managing investments made by HC and NYMF, as well as any additional subsidiaries acquired or formed in the future to hold investments made on the Company’s behalf by HCS. The Company refers to these subsidiaries in its periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as the “Managed Subsidiaries.” On March 31, 2009, the Company commenced its alternative investment strategy by purchasing approximately $9.0 million in collateralized loan obligations. The Company’s investment in these assets was completed in connection with the acquisition by JMP Group Inc. of the investment adviser of the collateralized loan obligations. The Company expects that, from time to time in the future, certain of its alternative investments will take the form of a co-investment alongside or in conjunction with JMP Group Inc. or certain of its affiliates. In accordance with investment guidelines adopted by the Company’s Board of Directors, any subsequent alternative investments by the Managed Subsidiaries must be approved by the Board of Directors and must adhere to investment guidelines adopted by the Board of Directors. The advisory agreement provides that HCS will be paid a base advisory fee that is a percentage of the “equity capital” (as defined in the advisory agreement) of the Managed Subsidiaries, which may include the net asset value of assets held by the Managed Subsidiaries as of any fiscal quarter end, and an incentive fee upon the Managed Subsidiaries achieving certain investment hurdles. For the year ended December 31, 2008, HCS earned a base advisory fee of approximately $0.7 million on the net proceeds to the Company from its private offerings in each of January 2008 and February 2008. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, HCS earned a base advisory fee of approximately $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively.  In addition, in the three months ended June 30, 2009, HCS earned an incentive fee of approximately $44,000.  As of June 30, 2009, HCS was managing approximately $13.5 million of assets on the Company’s behalf.
 
14.  Income Taxes
 
At June 30, 2009, the Company had approximately $65.8 million of net operating loss carryforwards which may be used to offset future taxable income. The carryforwards will expire in 2024 through 2028. The Internal Revenue Code places certain limitations on the annual amount of net operating loss carryforwards that can be utilized if certain changes in the Company’s ownership occur. The Company may have undergone an ownership change within the meaning of IRC section 382 that would impose such a limitation, but a final conclusion has not been made. At this time, based on management’s initial assessment of the limitations, management does not believe that the limitation would cause a significant amount of the Company's net operating losses to expire unused.  The Company continues to maintain a reserve for 100% of the deferred tax benefits.
 
15.  Subsequent Event
 
The Company initiated a $25 million investment strategy in the second quarter by investing approximately $4.6 million in non-Agency RMBS which were previously rated in the highest rating categories by one or more of the rating agencies.  Between June 30, 2009 and the date of this filing, the Company has invested an additional $19.3 million in non-agency RMBS, bringing its total investment in non-Agency RMBS to $23.9 million year to date.
 
22

 
Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements.  Forward-looking statements are those which are not historical in nature.  They can often be identified by their inclusion of words such as “will,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “should,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend” and similar expressions.  Any projection of revenues, earnings or losses, capital expenditures, distributions, capital structure or other financial terms is a forward-looking statement.  Certain statements regarding the following particularly are forward-looking in nature:
 
 
·
our business strategy;
 
 
·
future performance, developments, market forecasts or projected dividends;
 
 
·
projected acquisitions or joint ventures; and
 
 
·
projected capital expenditures.
 
It is important to note that the description of our business is general and our investment in real estate-related and certain alternative assets in particular, is a statement about our operations as of a specific point in time and is not meant to be construed as an investment policy.  The types of assets we hold, the amount of leverage we use or the liabilities we incur and other characteristics of our assets and liabilities disclosed in this report as of a specified period of time are subject to reevaluation and change without notice.
 
Our forward-looking statements are based upon our management’s beliefs, assumptions and expectations of our future operations and economic performance, taking into account the information currently available to us.  Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, some of which are not currently known to us and many of which are beyond our control and that might cause our actual results, performance or financial condition to be materially different from the expectations of future results, performance or financial condition we express or imply in any forward-looking statements.  Some of the important factors that could cause our actual results, performance or financial condition to differ materially from expectations are:
 
 
·
our portfolio strategy and operating strategy may be changed or modified by our management without advance notice to you or stockholder approval and we may suffer losses as a result of such modifications or changes;
 
 
·
our ability to successfully implement and grow our alternative investment strategy and to identify suitable alternative assets;
 
 
·
market changes in the terms and availability of repurchase agreements used to finance our investment portfolio activities;
 
 
·
reduced demand for our securities in the mortgage securitization and secondary markets;
 
 
·
interest rate mismatches between our interest-earning assets and our borrowings used to fund such purchases;
 
 
·
changes in interest rates and mortgage prepayment rates;
 
 
·
increased rates of default and/or decreased recovery rates on our assets;
 
 
·
changes in the financial markets and economy generally, including the continued or accelerated deterioration of the U.S. economy;
 
23

 
 
·
effects of interest rate caps on our adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities;
 
 
·
the degree to which our hedging strategies may or may not protect us from interest rate volatility;
 
 
·
potential impacts of our leveraging policies on our net income and cash available for distribution;
 
 
·
our board’s ability to change our operating policies and strategies without notice to you or stockholder approval;
 
 
·
our ability to manage, minimize or eliminate liabilities stemming from the discontinued operation including, among other things, litigation, repurchase obligations on the sales of mortgage loans and property leases;
 
 
·
actions taken by the U.S. and foreign governments, central banks and other governmental and regulatory bodies for the purpose of stabilizing the financial credit and housing markets, and economy generally, including loan modification programs;
 
 
·
changes to the nature of the guarantees provided by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac; and
 
 
·
the other important factors identified, or incorporated by reference into this report, including, but not limited to those under the captions “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk”, and those described in Part I, Item 1A – “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and the various other factors identified in any other documents filed by us with the SEC.
 
We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.  In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the events described by our forward-looking events might not occur.  We qualify any and all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary factors.  In addition, you should carefully review the risk factors described in other documents we file from time to time with the SEC.
 
General
 
New York Mortgage Trust, Inc., together with its consolidated subsidiaries (“NYMT”, the “Company”, “we”, “our”, and “us”), is a self-advised real estate investment trust, or REIT, in the business of investing primarily in residential adjustable-rate, hybrid adjustable-rate and fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”), for which the principal and interest payments are guaranteed by a U.S. Government agency or a U.S. Government-sponsored entity (“GSE” or “Agency”), such as the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”), which we refer to as “Agency RMBS,” and prime credit quality residential adjustable-rate mortgage (“ARM”) loans, or prime ARM loans.  We also invest, although to a lesser extent, in certain alternative real estate-related and financial assets that present greater credit risk and less interest rate risk than our investments in Agency RMBS and prime ARM loans, such as non-Agency RMBS and certain non-rated residential mortgage assets, commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”), commercial real estate loans, collateralized loan obligations (“CLO”) and other similar investments.  We refer to our investments in Agency RMBS and prime ARM loans as our “principal investment strategy” and investments in certain alternative real estate-related and financial assets that present a greater credit risk as our “alternative investment strategy” and such assets as our “alternative assets.”  We elected to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ending on December 31, 2004. Therefore, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income that is distributed to our stockholders.

Our investment strategy historically has focused on holding a portfolio comprised of Agency RMBS, prime ARM loans held in securitization trusts, and, to a lesser extent, on certain non-agency RMBS rated in the highest rating category by two rating agencies. The prime ARM loans in our portfolio were originated by us through Hypotheca Capital, LLC (“HC,” then doing business as The New York Mortgage Company LLC), our wholly-owned subsidiary and former mortgage lending business, or purchased from third parties, and were subsequently securitized by us and are held in our four securitization trusts.

24

 
In connection with a $20.0 million private investment in our Series A Cumulative Convertible Redeemable preferred stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) by JMP Group Inc. and certain of its affiliates (collectively, the “JMP Group”) on January 18, 2008, we entered into an advisory agreement with Harvest Capital Strategies LLC (“HCS,” formerly known as JMP Asset Management LLC), an affiliate of the JMP Group, on the same date, pursuant to which HCS manages the assets held by HC, other than certain Agency RMBS held in these entities for regulatory compliance purposes, as well as any additional subsidiaries acquired or formed in the future to hold investments made on the Company’s behalf.  We expect these assets to include certain types of alternative assets described above. We formed this relationship with HCS and the JMP Group for the purpose of improving our capitalization and diversifying our investment strategy away from a strategy focused exclusively on investments in Agency RMBS, in part to achieve attractive risk-adjusted returns, and to potentially utilize all or part of an approximately $65.8 million net operating loss carry-forward at June 30, 2009 held by HC.  As described more fully below, on March 31, 2009, we initiated our first investment under the alternative investment strategy.

Our principal business objective is to generate net income for distribution to our stockholders resulting from the spread between the interest and other income we earn on our interest-earning assets and the interest expense we pay on the borrowings that we use to finance these assets, which we refer to as our net interest income.  We intend to achieve this objective by investing in a broad class of real estate-related and financial assets to construct an investment portfolio that is designed to achieve attractive risk-adjusted returns and that is structured to comply with the various federal income tax requirements for REIT status and to maintain our exemption from registration under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”).  Because we intend to continue to qualify as a REIT and to maintain our exemption from registration under the Investment Company Act, we will be required to invest a substantial majority of our assets in qualifying real estate assets, such as Agency RMBS, mortgage loans and other liens on and interests in real estate.
 
Recent Events
 
Continued Deployment of Capital Under Alternative Investment Strategy
 
As noted above, on March 31, 2009, we commenced our alternative investment strategy by purchasing $9 million of discounted notes issued by Cratos CLO I, Ltd. a C