UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014
or
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-02658
STEWART INFORMATION SERVICES CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 74-1677330 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
1980 Post Oak Blvd., Houston TX | 77056 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (713) 625-8100
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | x | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
On October 29, 2014 the following shares of each of the issuers classes of common stock were outstanding:
Common, $1 par value |
23,055,143 | |||
Class B Common, $1 par value |
1,050,012 |
FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT
QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2014
Item |
Page | |||||
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||||||
1. | Financial Statements |
3 | ||||
2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
17 | ||||
3. | 29 | |||||
4. | 29 | |||||
PART II OTHER INFORMATION | ||||||
1. | 30 | |||||
1A. | 30 | |||||
2. | 30 | |||||
5. | 30 | |||||
6. | 30 | |||||
31 |
As used in this report, we, us, our, the Company and Stewart mean Stewart Information Services Corporation and our subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise.
2
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS
For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||
($000 omitted, except per share) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Title insurance: |
||||||||||||||||
Direct operations |
229,277 | 202,344 | 588,133 | 581,281 | ||||||||||||
Agency operations |
231,109 | 306,583 | 654,706 | 804,143 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage services |
42,174 | 23,322 | 91,941 | 83,014 | ||||||||||||
Investment income |
3,870 | 3,729 | 12,588 | 11,657 | ||||||||||||
Investment and other gains (losses) net |
1,667 | 857 | 1,143 | (2,327 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
508,097 | 536,835 | 1,348,511 | 1,477,768 | |||||||||||||
Expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Amounts retained by agencies |
188,513 | 250,035 | 533,971 | 656,589 | ||||||||||||
Employee costs |
164,423 | 147,132 | 457,596 | 430,360 | ||||||||||||
Other operating expenses |
95,535 | 72,657 | 252,436 | 209,878 | ||||||||||||
Title losses and related claims |
9,084 | 32,630 | 50,021 | 80,362 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
6,621 | 4,142 | 16,070 | 12,721 | ||||||||||||
Interest |
1,101 | 649 | 2,646 | 2,259 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
465,277 | 507,245 | 1,312,740 | 1,392,169 | |||||||||||||
Earnings before taxes and noncontrolling interests |
42,820 | 29,590 | 35,771 | 85,599 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
16,760 | 11,573 | 11,592 | 32,925 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net earnings |
26,060 | 18,017 | 24,179 | 52,674 | ||||||||||||
Less net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests |
2,343 | 2,608 | 6,289 | 7,160 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net earnings attributable to Stewart |
23,717 | 15,409 | 17,890 | 45,514 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net earnings |
26,060 | 18,017 | 24,179 | 52,674 | ||||||||||||
Other comprehensive (loss) earnings, net of taxes: |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
(6,030 | ) | 3,560 | (4,308 | ) | (3,642 | ) | |||||||||
Change in unrealized (losses) gains on investments |
(966 | ) | 1,287 | 6,900 | (7,053 | ) | ||||||||||
Reclassification of adjustment for gains included in net earnings |
(185 | ) | (338 | ) | (378 | ) | (1,574 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other comprehensive (loss) earnings, net of taxes |
(7,181 | ) | 4,509 | 2,214 | (12,269 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Comprehensive earnings |
18,879 | 22,526 | 26,393 | 40,405 | ||||||||||||
Less comprehensive earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests |
2,343 | 2,608 | 6,289 | 7,160 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Comprehensive earnings attributable to Stewart |
16,536 | 19,918 | 20,104 | 33,245 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Basic average shares outstanding (000) |
22,267 | 22,475 | 22,416 | 21,962 | ||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share attributable to Stewart |
1.07 | 0.69 | 0.80 | 2.07 | ||||||||||||
Diluted average shares outstanding (000) |
24,663 | 24,769 | 24,812 | 24,735 | ||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Stewart |
0.97 | 0.63 | 0.76 | 1.88 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of September 30, 2014 |
As of December 31, 2013 |
|||||||
($000 omitted) | ||||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
168,445 | 194,289 | ||||||
Short-term investments |
37,016 | 38,336 | ||||||
Investments in debt and equity securities available-for-sale, at fair value: |
||||||||
Statutory reserve funds |
437,148 | 450,564 | ||||||
Other |
128,465 | 86,779 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
565,613 | 537,343 | |||||||
Receivables: |
||||||||
Notes |
3,949 | 4,075 | ||||||
Premiums from agencies |
41,498 | 45,249 | ||||||
Income taxes |
324 | 9,477 | ||||||
Trade and other |
82,311 | 55,737 | ||||||
Allowance for uncollectible amounts |
(9,603 | ) | (9,871 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
118,479 | 104,667 | |||||||
Property and equipment, at cost |
||||||||
Land |
5,559 | 5,559 | ||||||
Buildings |
26,773 | 26,779 | ||||||
Furniture and equipment |
218,757 | 213,585 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
(175,682 | ) | (191,657 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
75,407 | 54,266 | |||||||
Title plants, at cost |
76,822 | 76,822 | ||||||
Real estate, at lower of cost or net realizable value |
627 | 2,636 | ||||||
Investments in investees, on an equity method basis |
10,071 | 9,892 | ||||||
Goodwill |
247,985 | 231,838 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net of amortization |
31,253 | 13,050 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset |
160 | 144 | ||||||
Other assets |
49,491 | 62,775 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
1,381,369 | 1,326,058 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Liabilities |
||||||||
Notes payable |
64,080 | 5,827 | ||||||
Convertible senior notes |
27,183 | 27,119 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
122,006 | 119,961 | ||||||
Estimated title losses |
491,542 | 506,888 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities |
9,648 | 3,174 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
714,459 | 662,969 | |||||||
Contingent liabilities and commitments |
||||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||
Common and Class B Common Stock and additional paid-in capital |
179,237 | 194,768 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
470,204 | 452,314 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings: |
||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
1,042 | 5,350 | ||||||
Unrealized investment gains on investments |
12,054 | 5,532 | ||||||
Treasury stock 352,161 common shares, at cost |
(2,666 | ) | (2,666 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Stockholders equity attributable to Stewart |
659,871 | 655,298 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
7,039 | 7,791 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total stockholders equity (22,021,813 and 22,501,030 shares outstanding) |
666,910 | 663,089 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
1,381,369 | 1,326,058 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||
2014 | 2013 | |||||||
($000 omitted) | ||||||||
Reconciliation of net earnings to cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Net earnings |
24,179 | 52,674 | ||||||
Add (deduct): |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
16,070 | 12,721 | ||||||
Provision for bad debt |
749 | 1,818 | ||||||
Investment and other (losses) gains net |
(1,143 | ) | 2,327 | |||||
Payments for title losses in excess of provisions |
(24,797 | ) | (9,613 | ) | ||||
Insurance recoveries of title losses |
2,707 | 665 | ||||||
Decrease in receivables net |
3,307 | 687 | ||||||
Increase in other assets net |
(2,366 | ) | (3,641 | ) | ||||
Decrease in payables and accrued liabilities net |
(9,439 | ) | (11,999 | ) | ||||
Increase in net deferred income taxes |
4,996 | 24,043 | ||||||
Net earnings from equity investees |
(2,720 | ) | (3,548 | ) | ||||
Dividends received from equity investees |
2,742 | 3,829 | ||||||
Other net |
811 | 883 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash provided by operating activities |
15,096 | 70,846 | ||||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from investments available-for-sale matured and sold |
146,633 | 70,080 | ||||||
Purchases of investments available-for-sale |
(166,541 | ) | (116,125 | ) | ||||
Purchases of property and equipment, title plants and real estate net |
(15,482 | ) | (13,022 | ) | ||||
Cash paid for acquisitions of subsidiaries and other net |
(39,359 | ) | (15,302 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from the sale of equity investees and other assets |
| 3,090 | ||||||
Other net |
3,924 | 4,363 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash used by investing activities |
(70,825 | ) | (66,916 | ) | ||||
Financing activities: |
||||||||
Payments on notes payable |
(54,196 | ) | (1,447 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from notes payable |
112,149 | 400 | ||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
(7,044 | ) | (7,214 | ) | ||||
Repurchases of common stock |
(16,287 | ) | | |||||
Cash payments for settlement of debt |
| (742 | ) | |||||
Other net |
3 | (909 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash provided (used) by financing activities |
34,625 | (9,912 | ) | |||||
Effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates |
(4,740 | ) | (1,418 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(25,844 | ) | (7,400 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
194,289 | 208,538 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
168,445 | 201,138 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Supplemental information: |
||||||||
Retirement of Convertible Senior Notes with issuance of Common Stock |
| 37,810 | ||||||
Changes in financial statement amounts due to the acquisition of subsidiaries: |
||||||||
Goodwill acquired |
16,148 | 9,327 | ||||||
Receivables and other assets acquired |
12,536 | 7,926 | ||||||
Intangible assets |
21,510 | | ||||||
Liabilities acquired |
(10,835 | ) | (1,951 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash paid for acquisitions of subsidiaries and other net |
39,359 | 15,302 |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY
Common and Class B Common Stock ($1 par value) |
Additional paid-in capital |
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings |
Retained earnings |
Treasury stock |
Noncontrolling interests |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
($000 omitted) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2013 |
22,853 | 171,915 | 10,882 | 452,314 | (2,666 | ) | 7,791 | 663,089 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings attributable to Stewart |
| | | 17,890 | | | 17,890 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock bonuses and other |
37 | 960 | | | | | 997 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
2 | 56 | | | | | 58 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock repurchases |
(518 | ) | (15,769 | ) | | | | | (16,287 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of remaining interest of consolidated subsidiary |
| (299 | ) | | | | | (299 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized gains and losses on investments |
| | 6,900 | | | | 6,900 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net realized gain reclassification |
| | (378 | ) | | | | (378 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
| | (4,308 | ) | | | | (4,308 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| | | | | 6,289 | 6,289 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiary dividends paid to noncontrolling interests |
| | | | | (7,044 | ) | (7,044 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net effect of changes in ownership and other |
| | | | | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Balances at September 30, 2014 |
22,374 | 156,863 | 13,096 | 470,204 | (2,666 | ) | 7,039 | 666,910 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1
Interim financial statements. The financial information contained in this report for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, and as of September 30, 2014, is unaudited. This report should be read in conjunction with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
A. Managements responsibility. The accompanying interim financial statements were prepared by management, who is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), including managements best judgments and estimates. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of this information for all interim periods, consisting only of normal recurring accruals, have been made. The Companys results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year and actual results could differ from those estimates.
B. Consolidation. The condensed consolidated financial statements include all subsidiaries in which the Company owns more than 50% voting rights in electing directors. All significant intercompany amounts and transactions have been eliminated and provisions have been made for noncontrolling interests. Unconsolidated investees, in which the Company typically owns 20% through 50% of the equity, are accounted for by the equity method.
C. Reclassifications. Certain amounts in the 2013 interim financial statements have been reclassified for comparative purposes. Net earnings attributable to Stewart, as previously reported, were not affected.
D. Restrictions on cash and investments. The Company maintains investments in accordance with certain statutory requirements for the funding of statutory premium reserves. Such reserves for statutory reserve funds were approximately $437.1 million and $450.6 million at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. In addition to those investments, cash and cash equivalents include approximately $30.9 million and $15.1 million at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, designated for the funding of statutory premium reserves. The cash and cash equivalents so designated are not restricted or segregated in depository accounts. If the Company fails to maintain minimum investments or cash and cash equivalents to meet statutory requirements, the Company may be subject to fines or other penalties, including potential revocation of its business license. These funds are not available for any other purpose. In the event that insurance regulators adjust the determination of the statutory premium reserves of the Companys title insurers, these restricted funds as well as statutory surplus would correspondingly increase or decrease.
E. Recent Significant Accounting Pronouncements. In May 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The standard will eliminate the transaction- and industry-specific revenue recognition guidance under current GAAP and replace it with a principles-based approach for determining revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is not permitted. The revenue recognition standard is required to be applied retrospectively, including any combination of practical expedients as allowed in the standard. The Company is evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 to its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures, and does not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-09 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
7
NOTE 2
Investments in debt and equity securities available-for-sale. The amortized costs and fair values follow:
September 30, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | |||||||||||||||
Amortized costs |
Fair values |
Amortized costs |
Fair values |
|||||||||||||
($000 omitted) | ||||||||||||||||
Debt securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Municipal |
54,209 | 55,186 | 47,808 | 47,252 | ||||||||||||
Corporate |
292,208 | 303,115 | 285,104 | 291,832 | ||||||||||||
Foreign |
169,169 | 170,434 | 164,146 | 162,367 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds |
13,819 | 14,369 | 14,334 | 15,197 | ||||||||||||
Equity securities |
17,663 | 22,509 | 17,441 | 20,695 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
547,068 | 565,613 | 528,833 | 537,343 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign debt securities consist primarily of Canadian government bonds, Canadian corporate bonds and United Kingdom treasury bonds. Equity securities consist of common stocks.
Gross unrealized gains and losses were:
September 30, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | |||||||||||||||
Gains | Losses | Gains | Losses | |||||||||||||
($000 omitted) | ||||||||||||||||
Debt securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Municipal |
1,097 | 120 | 258 | 813 | ||||||||||||
Corporate |
11,958 | 1,051 | 9,955 | 3,228 | ||||||||||||
Foreign |
1,601 | 336 | 363 | 2,142 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds |
590 | 40 | 924 | 60 | ||||||||||||
Equity securities |
5,210 | 364 | 3,264 | 11 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
20,456 | 1,911 | 14,764 | 6,254 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities as of September 30, 2014 mature, according to their contractual terms, as follows (actual maturities may differ due to call or prepayment rights):
Amortized costs |
Fair values |
|||||||
($000 omitted) | ||||||||
In one year or less |
1,610 | 1,627 | ||||||
After one year through five years |
262,946 | 268,276 | ||||||
After five years through ten years |
230,273 | 236,883 | ||||||
After ten years |
34,576 | 36,318 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
529,405 | 543,104 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
8
As of September 30, 2014, gross unrealized losses on investments and the fair values of the related securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, were:
Less than 12 months | More than 12 months | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Losses | Fair values | Losses | Fair values | Losses | Fair values | |||||||||||||||||||
($000 omitted) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Municipal |
2 | 494 | 118 | 10,747 | 120 | 11,241 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
123 | 21,044 | 928 | 34,704 | 1,051 | 55,748 | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign |
24 | 42,924 | 312 | 22,016 | 336 | 64,940 | ||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds |
1 | 241 | 39 | 3,555 | 40 | 3,796 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities |
364 | 1,090 | | | 364 | 1,090 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
514 | 65,793 | 1,397 | 71,022 | 1,911 | 136,815 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The number of investments in an unrealized loss position as of September 30, 2014 was 62. Since the Company does not intend to sell and will more-likely-than-not maintain each investment security until its maturity or anticipated recovery, and no significant credit risk is deemed to exist, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.
As of December 31, 2013, gross unrealized losses on investments and the fair values of the related securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, were:
Less than 12 months | More than 12 months | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Losses | Fair values | Losses | Fair values | Losses | Fair values | |||||||||||||||||||
($000 omitted) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Municipal |
770 | 27,686 | 43 | 628 | 813 | 28,314 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
1,682 | 66,776 | 1,546 | 21,710 | 3,228 | 88,486 | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign |
1,539 | 63,039 | 603 | 53,807 | 2,142 | 116,846 | ||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds |
60 | 3,772 | | | 60 | 3,772 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities: |
11 | 1,267 | | | 11 | 1,267 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
4,062 | 162,540 | 2,192 | 76,145 | 6,254 | 238,685 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company believes its investment portfolio is diversified and expects no material loss to result from the failure to perform by issuers of the debt securities it holds. Investments made by the Company are not collateralized. Equities consist of high-dividend paying common stock.
9
NOTE 3
Fair value measurements. The Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal, or most advantageous, market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs when possible. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:
| Level 1 quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; |
| Level 2 observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data; and |
| Level 3 unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair values of the assets or liabilities, including certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs. |
As of September 30, 2014, financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Fair value measurements |
||||||||||
($000 omitted) | ||||||||||||
Investments available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||
Debt securities: |
||||||||||||
Municipal |
| 55,186 | 55,186 | |||||||||
Corporate |
| 303,115 | 303,115 | |||||||||
Foreign |
| 170,434 | 170,434 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds |
| 14,369 | 14,369 | |||||||||
Equity securities |
22,509 | | 22,509 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
22,509 | 543,104 | 565,613 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2013, financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Fair value measurements |
||||||||||
($000 omitted) | ||||||||||||
Investments available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||
Debt securities: |
||||||||||||
Municipal |
| 47,252 | 47,252 | |||||||||
Corporate |
| 291,832 | 291,832 | |||||||||
Foreign |
| 162,367 | 162,367 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds |
| 15,197 | 15,197 | |||||||||
Equity securities |
20,695 | | 20,695 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
20,695 | 516,648 | 537,343 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2014, Level 1 financial instruments consist of equity securities. Level 2 financial instruments consist of municipal, governmental and corporate bonds, both U.S. and foreign. In accordance with the Companys policies and guidelines, which incorporate relevant statutory requirements, the Companys third party, registered investment manager invests only in securities rated as investment grade or higher by the major rating services, where observable valuation inputs are significant. All municipal, foreign, and U.S. Treasury bonds are valued using a third-party pricing service, and the corporate bonds are valued using the market approach, which includes three to ten inputs from relevant market sources, including Financial Industry Regulatory Authoritys (FINRA) Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine (TRACE) and independent broker/dealer quotes, bids and offerings, as well as other relevant market data, such as securities with similar characteristics (i.e. sector, rating, maturity, etc.). Broker/dealer quotes, bids and offerings mentioned above are gathered (typically three to ten) and a consensus risk premium spread (credit spread) over risk-free Treasury yields is developed from the inputs obtained, which is then used to calculate the resulting fair value.
10
NOTE 4
Investment income. Gross realized investment and other gains and losses follows:
For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||
($000 omitted) | ||||||||||||||||
Realized gains |
1,722 | 1,409 | 2,429 | 5,309 | ||||||||||||
Realized losses |
(55 | ) | (552 | ) | (1,286 | ) | (7,636 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
1,667 | 857 | 1,143 | (2,327 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses assignable to investment income were insignificant. There were no significant investments as of September 30, 2014 that did not produce income during the year.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, investment and other gains (losses) net included realized gains of $1.1 million from the sale of debt and equity investments available-for-sale, a realized gain of $0.8 million on the sale of a title plant, partially offset by a $1.1 million non-cash charge relating to office closure costs.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, investment and other (losses) gains net included a $5.4 million non-cash charge relating to the early retirement of convertible senior notes and a $1.5 million loss on the sale of an equity investment partially offset by realized gains of $2.5 million from sale of debt and equity investments available-for-sale and a $1.7 million gain on non-title-related insurance policy proceeds.
Proceeds from the sale of investments available-for-sale follows:
For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||
($000 omitted) | ||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of investments available-for-sale |
30,105 | 19,256 | 44,580 | 49,345 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 5
Share-based incentives. The Company granted executives and senior management shares of restricted Common Stock with a fair value of $3.9 million in January 2014, which are performance-based and time-based and vest over a period of three years. The Company granted to executives and senior management shares of restricted Common Stock with a fair value of $2.2 million in January 2013, which are performance-based and vest over a period of three years. Awards in both years were pursuant to the Companys employee incentive compensation plans, and compensation expense associated with restricted stock awards will be recognized over the vesting period.
11
NOTE 6
Earnings per share. The Companys basic earnings per share attributable to Stewart was calculated by dividing net earnings attributable to Stewart by the weighted-average number of shares of Common Stock and Class B Common Stock outstanding during the reporting periods.
To calculate diluted earnings per share, net earnings and number of shares are adjusted for the effects of any dilutive shares. Using the if-converted method, net earnings is adjusted for interest expense, net of any tax effects, applicable to the Convertible Senior Notes. The number of shares is adjusted by adding the number of dilutive shares, assuming they are issued, during the same reporting period. The treasury stock method is used to calculate the dilutive number of shares related to the Companys stock option plan.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, the Company had minimal dilutive shares under the treasury stock method mentioned above since the exercise prices of the options were greater than the weighted-average market value of the shares, which excludes them from the diluted earnings calculation.
The calculation of the basic and diluted earnings per share is as follows:
For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||
($000 omitted) | ||||||||||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||||||||||
Net earnings attributable to Stewart |
23,717 | 15,409 | 17,890 | 45,514 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net of tax effects |
314 | 303 | 941 | 1,109 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
If-converted net earnings attributable to Stewart |
24,031 | 15,712 | 18,831 | 46,623 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Denominator (000): |
||||||||||||||||
Basic average shares outstanding |
22,267 | 22,475 | 22,416 | 21,962 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive average number of shares relating to options |
1 | 1 | 1 | | ||||||||||||
Dilutive average number of shares relating to convertible senior notes |
2,111 | 2,115 | 2,111 | 2,595 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive average number of shares relating to restricted shares grant |
284 | 178 | 284 | 178 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Dilutive average shares outstanding |
24,663 | 24,769 | 24,812 | 24,735 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Basic earnings per share attributable to Stewart |
1.07 | 0.69 | 0.80 | 2.07 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Stewart |
0.97 | 0.63 | 0.76 | 1.88 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 7
Contingent liabilities and commitments. In the ordinary course of business, the Company guarantees the third-party indebtedness of certain of its consolidated subsidiaries. As of September 30, 2014, the maximum potential future payments on the guarantees are not more than the related notes payable recorded in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company also guarantees the indebtedness related to lease obligations of certain of its consolidated subsidiaries. The maximum future obligations arising from these lease-related guarantees are not more than the Companys future minimum lease payments. In addition, as of September 30, 2014, the Company had guarantees of indebtedness, relating to lease deposits, aggregating $0.2 million, and unused letters of credit for $5.3 million related to workers compensation coverage and other insurance. The Company does not expect to make any payments on these guarantees.
12
NOTE 8
Segment information. In the second quarter 2014, certain title production operations performed on behalf of our direct offices and independent agents and previously reported in the mortgage services segment were aligned with the title segment. Prior quarters results for both title segment and mortgage services segment were restated to conform with this new reporting. The Companys three reportable operating segments are title insurance and related services (title), mortgage services and corporate. The title segment provides services needed to transfer the title to property in a real estate transaction. These services include searching, examining, closing and insuring the condition of the title to the property. The title segment also includes home and personal insurance services and Internal Revenue Code Section 1031 tax-deferred exchanges.
The mortgage services segment includes a diverse group of products and services provided to multiple markets. These services include providing origination and servicing support; default and REO services; post-closing outsourcing; portfolio due diligence; mortgage compliance solutions; servicer oversight to residential mortgage lenders and servicers; technology to support the real estate transaction, and centralized title and valuation services to large lenders.
The corporate segment consists of the expenses of the parent holding company, certain other corporate overhead expenses, and the costs of its centralized support operations not otherwise allocated to the lines of business.
Selected statement of operations and comprehensive earnings (loss) information related to these segments follows:
For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||
($000 omitted) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Title |
440,513 | 504,276 | 1,210,740 | 1,369,510 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage services |
63,114 | 28,017 | 124,846 | 99,141 | ||||||||||||
Corporate |
4,470 | 4,542 | 12,925 | 9,117 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
508,097 | 536,835 | 1,348,511 | 1,477,768 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Intersegment revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Mortgage services |
2,561 | 2,089 | 6,435 | 5,891 | ||||||||||||
Corporate |
733 | 790 | 2,158 | 2,372 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
3,294 | 2,879 | 8,593 | 8,263 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Depreciation and amortization: |
||||||||||||||||
Title |
1,526 | 1,461 | 4,340 | 4,517 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage services |
3,149 | 1,022 | 6,128 | 2,819 | ||||||||||||
Corporate |
1,946 | 1,659 | 5,602 | 5,385 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
6,621 | 4,142 | 16,070 | 12,721 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Earnings (loss) before taxes and noncontrolling interests: |
||||||||||||||||
Title |
74,921 | 60,320 | 138,372 | 162,455 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage services |
3,423 | (22 | ) | (432 | ) | 16,321 | ||||||||||
Corporate |
(35,524 | ) | (30,708 | ) | (102,169 | ) | (93,177 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
42,820 | 29,590 | 35,771 | 85,599 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company does not provide asset information by reportable operating segment as it does not routinely evaluate the asset position by segment.
13
Revenues generated in the United States and all international operations follows:
For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||
($000 omitted) | ||||||||||||||||
United States |
473,852 | 501,506 | 1,258,098 | 1,390,220 | ||||||||||||
International |
34,245 | 35,329 | 90,413 | 87,548 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
508,097 | 536,835 | 1,348,511 | 1,477,768 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 9
Regulatory and legal developments. In January 2009, an action was filed by individuals against Stewart Title Guaranty Company (Guaranty), Stewart Title of California, Inc., Cuesta Title Company and others in the Superior Court of California for the County of San Luis Obispo alleging that the plaintiffs had suffered damages relating to loans they made through Hurst Financial Corporation to an individual named Kelly Gearhart and entities controlled by Gearhart. Thereafter, several other lawsuits making similar allegations, including a lawsuit filed by several hundred individuals, were filed in San Luis Obispo Superior Court, and one such lawsuit was removed to the United States District Court for the Central District of California, which was dismissed and then refiled in San Luis Obispo Superior Court. The defendants vary from case to case, but Stewart Information Services Corporation, Stewart Title Company and Stewart Title Insurance Company were also each sued in at least one of the cases. Following several years of discovery and other pretrial proceedings, the Court conducted a bellwether jury trial of the claims of eight of the plaintiffs, four selected by plaintiffs and four selected by defendants, starting on August 5, 2013. The eight plaintiffs in the bellwether jury trial each asserted claims against Cuesta Title Company, Stewart Title of California, and Guaranty. One plaintiff in the bellwether jury trial also asserted claims against Stewart Title Company; the Court granted Stewart Title Companys motion for directed verdict after the close of plaintiffs case. On October 8, 2013, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Cuesta Title Company, Stewart Title of California, and Guaranty on every one of every plaintiffs claims against them. On January 30, 2014, the Court denied plaintiffs motion for new trial. On February 28, 2014, plaintiffs filed their notices of appeal from the verdict in the bellwether jury trial. Rather than incur additional time and expenses associated with these actions, the Company announced on June 11, 2014, the settlement with approximately 500 plaintiffs representing more than 90 percent of the total number of plaintiffs, pursuant to which it agreed to pay $10.53 million. The settlement agreement involved no admission of liability or violation of law by the defendants and bars the plaintiffs from pursuing further associated claims against the defendants. A small number of plaintiffs have not settled. A trial of the claims of two non-settling plaintiffs is scheduled to start on January 5, 2015, and a trial of the claims of the remaining non-settling plaintiffs is expected to be scheduled to take place sometime thereafter in 2015. Although the Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of these actions with the remaining plaintiffs, it will vigorously defend itself and does not believe that the ultimate outcome relating to the remaining plaintiffs will be material to its consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
* * *
In April 2008, Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch (Credit Suisse) asserted a claim under a Guaranty policy of title insurance dated on or about May 19, 2006 based upon the alleged priority of mechanics and materialmens liens on a resort development in the State of Idaho known as Tamarack. Guaranty ultimately undertook the defense of the claim under a reservation of rights. For reasons set forth in Stewarts complaint, on or about May 18, 2011, Guaranty withdrew its defense of Credit Suisse and filed a declaratory judgment action in the United States District Court for the District of Idaho captioned Stewart Title Guaranty Company v. Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch seeking a declaratory judgment and other relief. In the lawsuit Guaranty sought, among other things, a determination that it had no duty to indemnify Credit Suisse and sought to have certain provisions of the title insurance policy rescinded. Credit Suisse counterclaimed for, among other things, bad faith failure to pay the claim.
On August 29, 2013, the United States District Court for the District of Idaho rendered an opinion on Credit Suisses Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. In its opinion the Court, among other things more fully set forth in said opinion, granted Credit Suisses motion negating certain policy defenses to coverage asserted by Guaranty. The Court also granted Credit Suisses Motion to Amend and permitted the assertion of punitive damages against Guaranty.
14
Guarantys Motion to Reconsider the Courts August 29, 2013 was denied. Guaranty has also filed a Motion for Summary Judgment based on Credit Suisses lack of standing to pursue its counter claims, and other grounds. Although the Company cannot predict the outcome of this matter, Guaranty is vigorously prosecuting this litigation and does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse impact on its consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
* * *
In August 2011, Stewart Information Services Corporation and Guaranty (collectively Stewart) commenced an action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas Houston Division against Great American Insurance Company (Great American) concerning a fidelity bond Great American had issued insuring Stewart for the bond period from April 23, 2009 to April 23, 2010. Stewarts complaint sought damages and alleged, among other things, breach of contract and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing as well as declaratory relief. On July 22, 2014 a federal jury returned a verdict in favor of Stewart awarding it $9.7 million in actual damages, $4.8 million with respect to Great Americans knowingly engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or claims settlement practices, $1.6 million in damages proximately caused by Great Americans failure to comply with the its duty of good faith and fair dealing to Stewart, and $15.0 million in exemplary damages. The trial court set aside the $15.0 million exemplary damage award subsequent to the jurys verdict. During the third quarter 2014, the parties entered into a confidential settlement agreement which resolved the action.
* * *
The Company is subject to other claims and lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of its business, most of which involve disputed policy claims. In some of these lawsuits, the plaintiff seeks exemplary or treble damages in excess of policy limits. The Company does not expect that any of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial condition or results of operations. Along with the other major title insurance companies, the Company is party to a number of class action lawsuits concerning the title insurance industry. The Company believes that it has adequate reserves for the various litigation matters and contingencies discussed above and that the likely resolution of these matters will not materially affect its consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
The Company is subject to administrative actions and litigation relating to the basis on which premium taxes are paid in certain states. Additionally, the Company has received various other inquiries from governmental regulators concerning practices in the insurance industry. Many of these practices do not concern title insurance. The Company believes that it has adequately reserved for these matters and does not anticipate that the outcome of these inquiries will materially affect its consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
The Company is subject to various other administrative actions and inquiries into its business conduct in certain of the states in which it operates. While the Company cannot predict the outcome of the various regulatory and administrative matters, it believes that it has adequately reserved for these matters and does not anticipate that the outcome of any of these matters will materially affect its consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
NOTE 10
Acquisitions. During 2014, the Company completed acquisitions of three companies that provide collateral valuation, settlement services, title and closing services, and quality control and due diligence services for an aggregate purchase price of $39.4 million, net of liabilities assumed. The acquisitions were primarily funded by borrowings on the Companys unsecured line of credit. The Company has recorded preliminary fair value estimates for the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and estimated goodwill of $16.1 million, all of which are subject to change pending completion of the Companys purchase price allocation, which it expects to complete by the end of 2014. The Company allocates the purchase price of each acquisition to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed using a variety of valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis. These acquisitions have been included in the Companys results of operations and financial position from their respective dates of acquisition.
15
NOTE 11
Other comprehensive (loss) earnings. Changes in the balances of each component of other comprehensive (loss) earnings are as follows:
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Before-Tax Amount |
Tax Expense (Benefit) |
Net-of-Tax Amount |
Before-Tax Amount |
Tax Expense (Benefit) |
Net-of-Tax Amount |
|||||||||||||||||||
($000 omitted) | ($000 omitted) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
(8,257 | ) | (2,227 | ) | (6,030 | ) | 4,587 | 1,027 | 3,560 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Unrealized (losses) gains on investments: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized (losses) gains on investments |
(1,487 | ) | (521 | ) | (966 | ) | 1,981 | 694 | 1,287 | |||||||||||||||
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains included in net earnings |
(283 | ) | (98 | ) | (185 | ) | (520 | ) | (182 | ) | (338 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net unrealized (losses) gains |
(1,770 | ) | (619 | ) | (1,151 | ) | 1,461 | 512 | 949 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Other comprehensive (loss) earnings |
(10,027 | ) | (2,846 | ) | (7,181 | ) | 6,048 | 1,539 | 4,509 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Before-Tax Amount |
Tax Expense (Benefit) |
Net-of-Tax Amount |
Before-Tax Amount |
Tax Expense (Benefit) |
Net-of-Tax Amount |
|||||||||||||||||||
($000 omitted) | ($000 omitted) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
(6,359 | ) | (2,051 | ) | (4,308 | ) | (5,247 | ) | (1,605 | ) | (3,642 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Unrealized gains (losses) on investments: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments |
10,616 | 3,716 | 6,900 | (10,851 | ) | (3,798 | ) | (7,053 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains included in net earnings |
(581 | ) | (203 | ) | (378 | ) | (2,421 | ) | (847 | ) | (1,574 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net unrealized gains (losses) |
10,035 | 3,513 | 6,522 | (13,272 | ) | (4,645 | ) | (8,627 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Other comprehensive earnings (loss) |
3,676 | 1,462 | 2,214 | (18,519 | ) | (6,250 | ) | (12,269 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 12
Subsequent events. On October 14, 2014, senior convertible notes aggregating $27.2 million matured and were exchanged for approximately 2.1 million common shares pursuant to the terms of the underlying indenture. On October 21, 2014, the Company replaced its $75.0 million unsecured line of credit with a new $125.0 million unsecured line of credit, providing the Company with additional flexibility and access to cash if needed for short-term operational purposes or to finance strategic initiatives. Amounts outstanding under the prior line of credit, which were $60.0 million at September 30, 2014, are now outstanding under the new line of credit. The new line of credit expires on October 21, 2019. The line of credit includes an expansion option of up to an additional $50.0 million, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. Borrowings under the line of credit may, at the Companys election, bear interest at either an Alternate Base Rate plus the Applicable Rate (ABR Borrowing) or LIBOR plus the Applicable Rate (Eurodollar Borrowing). The Applicable Rate ranges from 0.50% to 1.00% per annum for ABR Borrowings and 1.50% to 2.00% per annum for Eurodollar Borrowings based on the Companys consolidated leverage ratio (as defined). The line of credit includes representations and warranties, reporting covenants, affirmative covenants, negative covenants, financial covenants and events of default customary for financings of this type.
16
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
MANAGEMENTS OVERVIEW
We reported net earnings attributable to Stewart of $23.7 million, or $0.97 per diluted share, for the third quarter 2014, compared to net earnings attributable to Stewart of $15.4 million, or $0.63 per diluted share, for the third quarter 2013. Third quarter 2014 results include a credit, recorded in the title segment, relating to the recovery of a portion of a previously recognized large title loss, partially offset by $4.2 million of litigation-related accruals recorded principally in the title segment and approximately $2.4 million of aggregate costs recorded primarily in the corporate segment related to the integration of acquisitions. The confidential settlement agreement associated with the recovery noted above restricts providing further detail.
Total revenues for the third quarter 2014 were $508.1 million, a decrease of $28.7 million, or 5.4%, from $536.8 million for the third quarter 2013. Operating revenues decreased 5.6% to $502.6 million in the third quarter 2014 compared to $532.2 million in the third quarter 2013. Compared to the third quarter 2013, title revenues decreased 9.5% in the third quarter 2014, while mortgage services revenues increased 80.8%.
Revenues from our title segment for the third quarter 2014 were $440.5 million, a decrease of 12.6% from the third quarter 2013, but an increase sequentially of 8.5% from the second quarter 2014. In the third quarter 2014, the title segment generated pretax earnings of $74.9 million (17.0% margin), a 24.2% increase over the third quarter 2013 pretax earnings of $60.3 million (12.0% margin) and a 64.2% increase sequentially from the second quarter 2014 pretax earnings of $45.6 million (11.2% margin). Title segment results for the quarter include the title loss recovery described above, partially offset by $3.8 million of litigation-related accruals. Our direct operations include local offices, commercial and international operations. We generate commercial revenues both domestically and internationally. U.S. and Canadian commercial revenues increased 31.2% to $41.2 million from the third quarter 2013, and 20.5% sequentially from the second quarter 2014. On a year-to-date basis, commercial revenues increased 13.8%. International revenues, including commercial transactions, declined 2.5% from the third quarter 2013, with substantially the entire decline due to the U.S. dollar strengthening against the Canadian dollar.
Revenues from our mortgage services segment were $63.1 million for the third quarter 2014, increasing 125.3% compared to $28.0 million in the third quarter 2013 and 74.4% sequentially from the second quarter 2014. Revenues were favorably influenced in the quarter by the acquisitions closed in both the second and third quarters of 2014 as well as by new contracts which began contributing meaningful revenue during the second quarter. We closed on the collateral valuation business of DataQuick Lending Solutions, Inc. on August 1, 2014, completing our previously announced acquisitions. In accordance with segment accounting rules, the revenues associated with the acquired centralized title businesses are reported in the mortgage services segment, and the title office operations are reported in the title segment.
As a result of our acquisition integration efforts, as well as lower overall costs in the legacy mortgage services businesses, the segment reported pretax earnings of $3.4 million in the third quarter 2014, as compared to a $22,000 pretax loss in third quarter 2013 and a pretax loss of $2.1 million in the second quarter 2014. Also, although recorded in the corporate segment, we incurred approximately $2.0 million of incremental costs relating to integration activities, down from $3.2 million in second quarter 2014.
See Results of Operations for a full discussion of revenues and expenses and drivers thereof.
During the third quarter 2014, we acquired approximately 0.4 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $13.4 million pursuant to the previously announced stock repurchase program, and since the inception of the program we have acquired 0.5 million shares for an aggregate purchase price of $16.3 million. We remain committed to our $70 million stock repurchase program by the end of 2015 using operating cash generated from improving operations. On October 21, 2014, we replaced our $75.0 million unsecured line of credit with a new $125.0 million unsecured line of credit, providing us with additional flexibility and access to cash if needed for short-term operational purposes or to finance strategic initiatives. In addition, on October 14, 2014, the senior convertible debt of $27.2 million matured and was exchanged for 2.1 million common shares pursuant to the terms of the underlying indenture.
17
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The preparation of the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of certain assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosures surrounding contingencies and commitments.
Actual results can differ from our accounting estimates. While we do not anticipate significant changes in our estimates, there is a risk that such changes could have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations for future periods.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company made no material changes to its critical accounting estimates as previously disclosed in Managements Discussion and Analysis in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Title loss reserves
Our most critical accounting estimate is providing for title loss reserves.
Provisions for title losses, as a percentage of title operating revenues, were 2.0%, 6.4% and 4.4% for the quarters ended September 30, 2014, September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2014, respectively. During the third quarter 2014, we recorded a policy loss provision reduction relating to partial recovery on a large claim recorded in prior years. Actual loss payment experience, including the impact of large losses, is the primary reason for increases or decreases in our loss provision. A change of 100 basis points in this percentage, a reasonably likely scenario based on our historical loss experience, would have increased or decreased our provision for title losses and pretax operating results approximately $12.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.
For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Provisions Known Claims: |
||||||||||||||||
Current year |
5.4 | 9.2 | 13.4 | 16.9 | ||||||||||||
Prior policy years |
3.1 | 30.3 | 36.8 | 63.5 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
8.5 | 39.5 | 50.2 | 80.4 | |||||||||||||
Provisions IBNR |
||||||||||||||||
Current year |
19.0 | 34.6 | 58.2 | 80.9 | ||||||||||||
Prior policy years |
(15.3 | ) | (11.1 | ) | (21.6 | ) | (17.4 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
3.7 | 23.5 | 36.6 | 63.5 | |||||||||||||
Transferred to Known Claims |
(3.1 | ) | (30.3 | ) | (36.8 | ) | (63.5 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total provisions |
9.1 | 32.7 | 50.0 | 80.4 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions for known claims arise primarily from prior policy years as claims are not typically reported until several years after policies are issued. Provisions Incurred But Not Reported (IBNR) are estimates of claims expected to be incurred over the next 20 years; therefore, it is not unusual or unexpected to experience adjustments to the provisions in both current and prior policy years as new loss experience of policy years occurs. This loss experience may result in changes to our estimate of total ultimate losses expected (i.e., the IBNR policy loss reserve). As claims become known, provisions are reclassified from IBNR to known claims. Adjustments relating to large losses may impact provisions either for known claims or for IBNR.
Known claims provisions decreased for the nine month period ended September 30, 2014 to $50.2 million from $80.4 million for the same period in 2013, due principally to the partial recoveries on certain large claims recorded in prior years lowering the current year provision amount combined with a large claim reserved in 2013 which increased the prior year provision. Current year provisionsIBNR are recorded on policies issued in the current year as a percentage of premiums realized (provisioning rate). For the three months ended September 30, 2014, current year provisionsIBNR decreased $15.6 million to $19.0 million compared to 2013. As a percentage of title operating revenues, provisionsIBNR for the current policy year decreased from 5.8% in 2013 to 4.7% in 2014 due to a decrease in the provisioning rate as a consequence of favorable loss experience relative to actuarial expectations of losses. ProvisionsIBNR relating to prior policy years were a net credit due to the aforementioned policy loss provision reduction.
18
In addition to title policy claims, we incur losses in our direct operations from escrow, closing and disbursement functions. These escrow losses typically relate to errors or other miscalculations of amounts to be paid at closing, including timing or amount of a mortgage payoff, payment of property or other taxes and payment of homeowners association fees. Escrow losses also arise in cases of mortgage fraud, and in those cases the title insurer incurs the loss under its obligation to ensure that an unencumbered title is conveyed. Escrow losses are recognized as expense when discovered and are typically paid less than 12 months after the loss is discovered. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, we accrued approximately $4.1 million and $6.7 million, respectively, for policy loss reserves relating to legacy escrow losses arising from mortgage fraud.
We consider our actual claims payments and incurred loss experience, including consideration of the frequency and severity of claims compared to our actuarial estimates of claims payments and incurred losses, in determining whether our overall loss experience has improved or worsened compared to prior periods. We also consider the impact of economic or market factors on particular policy years to determine whether the results of those policy years are indicative of future expectations. In addition, we evaluate the frequency and severity of large losses in determining whether our experience has improved or worsened. The loss provision rate is applied to current premium revenues, resulting in the title loss expense for the period. This loss provision rate is set to provide for losses on current year premiums and is determined using moving average ratios of recent actual policy loss payment experience (net of recoveries) to premium revenues. Our method for recording the reserves for title losses on both an interim and annual basis begins with the calculation of our current loss provision rate, which is applied to our current premium revenues, resulting in a title loss expense for the period.
At each quarter end, our recorded reserve for title losses begins with the prior periods reserve balance for claim losses, adds the current period provision to that balance and subtracts actual paid claims, resulting in an amount that our management compares to its actuarially-based calculation of the ending reserve balance necessary to provide for future title losses. The actuarially-based calculation is a paid loss experience calculation where loss experience factors are selected based on company data and input from our third-party actuaries. We also obtain input from third-party actuaries in the form of a reserve analysis utilizing generally accepted actuarial methods. While we are responsible for determining our loss reserves, we utilize this actuarial input to assess the overall reasonableness of our reserve estimation. If our recorded reserve amount is within a reasonable range (+/- 4.0%) of our actuarially-based reserve calculation and the actuarys point estimate, but not at the point estimate, our management assesses the major factors contributing to the different reserve estimates in order to determine the overall reasonableness of our recorded reserve, as well as the position of the recorded reserves relative to the point estimate and the estimated range of reserves. The major factors considered can change from period to period and include items such as current trends in the real estate industry (which management can assess although there is a time lag in the development of this data for use by the actuary), the size and types of claims reported and changes in our claims management process. If the recorded amount is not within a reasonable range of our third-party actuarys point estimate, we will adjust the recorded reserves in the current period and reassess the provision rate on a prospective basis. Once our reserve for title losses is recorded, it is reduced in future periods as a result of claims payments and may be increased or reduced by revisions to our estimate of the overall level of required reserves.
Large claims (those exceeding $1.0 million on a single claim), including large title losses due to independent agency defalcations, are analyzed and reserved for separately due to the higher dollar amount of loss, lower volume of claims reported and sporadic reporting of such claims. Large title losses due to independent agency defalcations typically occur when the independent agency misappropriates funds from escrow accounts under its control. Such losses are usually discovered when the independent agency fails to pay off an outstanding mortgage loan at closing (or immediately thereafter) from the proceeds of the new loan. Once the previous lender determines that its loan has not been paid off timely, it will file a claim against the title insurer. It is at this point that the title insurance underwriter is alerted to the potential theft and begins its investigation. As is industry practice, these claims are considered a claim on the newly issued title insurance policy since such policy insures the holder (in this case, the new lender) that all previous liens on the property have been satisfied. Accordingly, these claim payments are charged to policy loss expense. These incurred losses are typically more severe in terms of dollar value compared with traditional title policy claims since the independent agency is often able, over time, to conceal misappropriation of escrow funds relating to more than one transaction through the constant volume of funds moving through its escrow accounts. As long as new funds continue to flow into escrow accounts, an independent agency can mask one or more defalcations. In declining real estate markets, lower transaction volumes result in a lower incoming volume of funds, making it more difficult to cover up the misappropriation with incoming funds. Thus, when the defalcation is discovered, it often relates to several transactions. In addition, the overall decline in an independent agencys revenues, profits and cash flows increases the agencys incentive to improperly utilize the escrow funds from real estate transactions.
19
Internal controls relating to independent agencies include, but are not limited to, pre-signing and periodic audits, site visits and reconciliations of policy inventories and premiums. The audits and site visits cover examination of the escrow account bank reconciliations and an examination of a sample of closed transactions. In some instances, the scope of our review is limited by attorney agencies that cite client confidentiality. Certain states have mandated annual reviews of all agencies by their underwriter. We also determine whether our independent agencies have appropriate internal controls as defined by the American Land Title Association and us. However, even with adequate internal controls in place, their effectiveness can be circumvented by collusion or improper override of the controls by management at the independent agencies. To aid in the selection of independent agencies to review, we have developed an agency risk model that aggregates data from different areas to identify possible problems. This is not a guarantee that all independent agencies with deficiencies will be identified. In addition, we are typically not the only underwriter for which an independent agency issues policies, and independent agencies may not always provide complete financial records for our review.
Due to the inherent uncertainty in predicting future title policy losses, significant judgment is required by both our management and our third party actuaries in estimating reserves. As a consequence, our ultimate liability may be materially greater or less than current reserves and/or our third party actuarys calculated estimate.
Operations. Our business has three main operating segments: title insurance and related services, mortgage services and corporate.
Our primary business is title insurance and settlement-related services. We close transactions and issue title policies on homes, commercial and other real properties located in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and international markets through policy-issuing offices, agencies and centralized title services centers. We also provide loan origination and servicing support; loan review services; real estate valuation services; loss mitigation; REO asset management; home and personal insurance services; loan due diligence; compliance solutions; service performance management; and technology to streamline the real estate process.
Factors affecting revenues. The principal factors that contribute to changes in operating revenues for our title and mortgage services segments include:
| mortgage interest rates; |
| availability of mortgage loans; |
| ability of potential purchasers to qualify for loans; |
| inventory of existing homes available for sale; |
| ratio of purchase transactions compared with refinance transactions; |
| ratio of closed orders to open orders; |
| home prices; |
| volume of distressed property transactions; |
| consumer confidence, including employment trends; |
| demand by buyers; |
| number of households; |
| premium rates; |
| market share; |
| independent agent remittance rates |
| opening of new offices and acquisitions; |
| number of commercial transactions, which typically yield higher premiums; |
| government or regulatory initiatives, including tax incentives; |
| number of REO and foreclosed properties and related debt; |
| acquisitions or divestitures of businesses; and |
| seasonality and/or weather. |
20
Premiums are determined in part by the insured values of the transactions we handle. To the extent inflation or market conditions cause increases in the prices of homes and other real estate, premium revenues are also increased. Conversely, falling home prices cause premium revenues to decline. As an overall guideline, a 6% increase in home prices results in an approximate 3.6% increase in title premiums. Home price changes may override the seasonal nature of the title insurance business. Historically, our first quarter is the least active in terms of title insurance revenues as home buying is generally depressed during winter months. Our third and fourth quarters are the most active as the summer is the traditional home buying season, while commercial transaction closings are skewed to the end of the year, although individually large commercial transactions can occur any time of year.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Comparisons of our results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 with the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 follow. Factors contributing to fluctuations in the results of operations are presented in the order of their monetary significance, and we have quantified, when necessary, significant changes. Results from our mortgage services and corporate segments are included in the discussions and, when relevant, are discussed separately.
Our statements on home sales and loan activity are based on published industry data from sources including Fannie Mae, the National Association of Realtors®, the Mortgage Bankers Association and Freddie Mac. We also use information from our direct operations.
Operating environment. Existing home sales in the third quarter of 2014 declined 3.8% in the third quarter 2014 from a year ago, while, following the usual seasonal pattern, home sales increased 5.2% sequentially from the second quarter 2014. September existing home sales rose to the highest level this year at an annualized pace of 5.2 million. On a 12-month moving average seasonally adjusted basis, median home prices rose 4.7% from a year ago and 2.2% from the second quarter of this year. September housing starts rose 6.3% from August and were up 17.8% from a year ago. Newly issued building permits in September increased 1.5% sequentially from August and 2.5% from a year ago. According to Fannie Mae, one-to-four family residential lending decreased from an estimated $450 billion in the third quarter 2013 to $297 billion in the third quarter 2014, primarily driven by an estimated $130 billion decrease in refinance originations from the third quarter 2013 to the third quarter 2014. Sequentially, residential lending for home purchase volumes increased from $186 billion in the second quarter of 2014 to $191 billion in the third quarter of 2014. Residential refinance lending volumes decreased from $116 billion in the second quarter 2014 to $106 billion in the third quarter 2014. On average, refinance premium rates are 60% of the title premium revenue of a similarly priced sale transaction.
Title revenues. Revenues from direct title operations increased $26.9 million, or 13.3%, and $6.9 million, or 1.2%, respectively, in the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 compared to the same periods in 2013. Revenues in the first nine months of 2014 increased primarily due to the title-related component of the acquisitions closed in the second quarter 2014 and a continued shift in mix to more residential resale and commercial orders, partially offset by declining refinance transaction volume. Revenues in the third quarter 2014 were favorably influenced by the aforementioned acquisitions. Excluding these revenues, the increase in direct revenues from the prior year quarter would have been approximately 3.8%. International revenues (including foreign-sourced commercial revenues of $3.2 million) decreased $0.9 million, or 2.5%, and increased $3.4 million, or 4.1%, respectively, in the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 compared to the same periods in 2013. Revenues from U.S. and Canadian commercial and other large transactions increased $10.0 million, or 31.8%, and increased $13.1 million, or 13.8%, respectively, in the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 compared to the same periods in 2013. While quarter-to-quarter results for commercial business can fluctuate considerably due to timing of when large transactions close, our commercial operation continued to improve its position in the marketplace. Our improved ratings and increasing surplus as well as streamlined management and sales structure put in place at the end of 2013 position us well to benefit from the expected increase in commercial refinancing transactions anticipated over the next several years. Direct operating revenues, excluding commercial and other large transactions, increased 11.0% and decreased 1.0%, respectively, in the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 compared to the same periods in 2013.
Direct orders closed decreased 9.7% and 19.3%, respectively, in the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 compared to the same periods in 2013 due to the continued decline in refinancing orders. As in second quarter, our order counts do not yet include those of the acquired operations. Those orders will be included as the operations are migrated to our systems. The average revenue per file closed (including commercial and other large transactions) increased 26.6% and 25.9%, respectively, in the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 compared to the same periods in 2013 due to a shift in mix to more resale and commercial orders combined with
21
the decline in refinancing orders. Excluding commercial and other large transactions, the average revenue per closing increased 22.9% and 22.8%, respectively, in the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 compared to the same periods in 2013 due to fewer refinancing transactions, home price appreciation, and to a lesser extent, a rate increase in Texas that went into effect May 1, 2013.
During the third quarter, the housing market continued the overall trend seen in second quarter 2014, with a reasonably consistent flow of refinancing transactions and resale transactions showing steady, if modest, improvement. Total opened orders decreased 0.8% and 13.2% in the third quarter and first nine months of 2014, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2013, with the nine-month decline driven principally by the decline in refinancing transactions. Refinancing transactions rose slightly from 20.8% of total opened orders in the third quarter 2013 to 21.3% of the total in the third quarter 2014. Opened orders per workday decreased 2.8% sequentially from the second quarter 2014. Since quarter end, we are experiencing a limited seasonal decline in order counts that appears muted compared to previous years. The recent decline in interest rates as well as the FHFA announcement relating to the loosening of mortgage rules has the potential to provide increased transaction volume in the fourth quarter.
Revenues from independent agencies decreased $75.5 million, or 24.6%, and $149.4 million, or 18.6%, respectively, in the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 compared to the same periods in 2013. Revenues from independent agencies fluctuate based on the same general factors that influence revenues from direct title operations. Although we dont specifically know our agents order composition, we believe the proportion of their orders from refinancing transactions was higher than previously thought and higher than in our direct operations. Therefore, the decline in independent agency revenue relative to direct revenue is largely due to this higher proportion of refinancing transactions than in our direct operations, as well as agency revenue that is now recorded as direct revenue due to recent acquisitions and the geographic distribution of our agents compared to our direct offices. Many of the states with the highest agency revenues experienced year over year declines in existing home sales in addition to the sharp decline in refinancing transactions. While we also experienced such declines in several states with a direct operations presence, our significant direct operations presence in Texas helped offset those declines. Our direct revenues also benefit from our commercial operations. Consistent with our strategy for this channel, our focus is on increasing profit margins in every state, increasing premium revenue in states where remittance rates are above 20%, and maintaining the quality of our agency network, which we believe to be the industrys best, in order to mitigate claims risk and drive consistent future performance. While market share is important in our agency operations channel, it is not as important as margins, remittance rates and risk mitigation.
Mortgage services revenues. Mortgage services operating revenues increased $18.9 million, or 80.8%, and $8.9 million, or 10.8%, respectively, in the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 compared to the same periods in 2013, due to the acquisitions closed in the second and third quarters of 2014 as well as the stabilization of the legacy mortgage services business. Mortgage services segment revenues increased $35.1 million, or 125.3%, and $25.7 million, or 25.9% in the third quarter and first nine months of 2014, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2013. Revenues from the acquisitions pertaining to centralized title operations are included in the mortgage services segment revenues in accordance with applicable segment accounting rules.
Progress continues on integrating acquisitions made in the second and third quarters to expand our offerings to mortgage lenders. As previously disclosed, we closed on the collateral valuation business of DataQuick on August 1, 2014 completing our previously announced acquisitions. Including actions taken subsequent to quarter end, the original synergy estimate of approximately $5.0 million of future annualized savings has been achieved. However, integration efforts are continuing, and we expect improving margins in 2015 through additional process and technology optimization. These acquisitions will take several quarters to become fully integrated into our operations.
With the closing of the collateral valuation services business, and upon full integration of the acquisitions, we are well on our way towards achieving the transformation of this segment from its historical service offerings for the management of defaulted and distressed loans to a more sustainable suite of service offerings that support the ongoing loan origination and servicing support needs of lenders. We will, however, maintain our default services expertise, and so this segment will have products that move in concert with traditional mortgage origination cycles, and products that will provide revenue in down markets.
22
Investment income. Investment income increased $0.1 million, or 3.8%, and $0.9 million, or 8.0% in the third quarter and first nine months of 2014, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2013. Investment income increased primarily due to increases in average balances. Certain investment gains and losses, which are included in our results of operations in investment and other gains (losses)net, were realized as part of the ongoing management of our investment portfolio for the purpose of improving performance.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, investment and other gains (losses)net included realized gains of $1.1 million from the sale of debt and equity investments available-for-sale, a realized gain of $0.8 million on the sale of a title plant, partially offset by a $1.1 million non-cash charge relating to office closure costs.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, investment and other gains (losses)net included a $5.4 million non-cash charge relating to the early retirement of convertible senior notes and a $1.5 million loss on the sale of an equity investment offset by realized gains of $2.5 million from the sale of debt and equity investments available-for-sale and a $1.7 million gain on non-title-related insurance policy proceeds.
Retention by agencies. Amounts retained by title agencies are based on agreements between agencies and our title underwriters. On average, amounts retained by independent agencies, as a percentage of revenues generated by them, was 81.6% in the third quarters of 2014 and 2013 and 81.6% and 81.7% in the first nine months of 2014 and 2013, respectively. The average retention percentage may vary from quarter-to-quarter due to the geographical mix of agency operations, the volume of title revenues and, in some states, laws or regulations. Due to the variety of such laws or regulations, as well as competitive factors, the average retention rate can differ significantly from state to state. In addition, a high proportion of our independent agencies are in states with retention rates greater than 80% and so we expect our average retention percentage remaining in the 81%82% range over the near to medium term.
Employee costs. Employee costs for the combined business segments increased 11.8% and 6.3% in the third quarter and first nine months of 2014, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2013. Excluding the impact of acquisitions, employee costs decreased 2.3% from the third quarter 2013 and 2.4% from the first nine months of 2013. As a percentage of total operating revenues, employee costs increased to 32.7% in the third quarter 2014 from 27.6% in the third quarter 2013 and decreased from 34.2% in the second quarter 2014. Since year-end 2013, total headcount has increased by approximately 960 employees. We experienced an increase of approximately 810 employees due to the recent acquisitions and 330 employees related to a new service offering and contract. These increases were partially offset by a reduction of approximately 180 employees from existing operations.
In the third quarter 2014, employee costs in the title segment increased 1.6% over the third quarter 2013. Employee costs for the first nine months of 2014 increased 0.8% over the same period in 2013. These quarterly and year-to-date increases are primarily due to the recent acquisitions. In our mortgage services segment, employee costs for the third quarter and nine months of 2014 increased 73.8% and 38.5%, respectively, over the same periods in 2013. The employee costs were impacted by the increase in employees related to the recent acquisitions as well as the new service offering and contract. Since year-end 2013, total mortgage services headcount has increased by approximately 860 employees, with an increase of approximately 770 employees due to the recent acquisitions and 330 employees related to a new service offering and contract. These increases were partially offset by a reduction of approximately 240 employees from existing mortgage services operations.
Other operating expenses. Other operating expenses include costs that are fixed in nature, costs that follow, to varying degrees, changes in transaction volumes and revenues and costs that fluctuate independently of revenues. Costs that are fixed in nature include attorney and professional fees, equipment rental, insurance, rent and other occupancy expenses, repairs and maintenance, technology costs, telephone and title plant expenses. Costs that follow, to varying degrees, changes in transaction volumes and revenues include fee attorney splits, bad debt expenses, certain mortgage services expenses, copy supplies, delivery fees, outside search fees, postage, premium taxes and title plant maintenance expenses. Costs that fluctuate independently of revenues include those for general supplies, litigation defense, business promotion and marketing and travel.
In the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 compared to the same periods in 2013, other operating expenses for the combined business segments increased $22.9 million, or 31.5%, and $42.6 million, or 20.3%, respectively. Costs fixed in nature increased $7.0 million, or 22.1%, in the third quarter 2014 primarily due to $6.8 million of expenses related to the acquisitions. For the first nine months of 2014, costs fixed in nature increased $15.5 million, or 16.7%, primarily due to $7.4 million related to a shareholder settlement and acquisition integration costs, $11.0 million of fixed other operating costs of the recent acquisitions partially offset by $2.4 million of decreased costs incurred by existing operations. The third quarter 2014 increases include increased technology costs, rent and other occupancy expenses and professional fees, which all resulted from the previously mentioned acquisition integration and operating costs of recent acquisitions. Increases for the first nine months of 2014 are due to increased technology costs, rent and other occupancy expenses and professional fees, which all resulted from the previously mentioned shareholder settlement, acquisition integration and operating costs of recent acquisitions.
23
Costs that follow, to varying degrees, changes in transaction volumes and revenues increased $11.3 million, or 40.9%, and $7.5 million, or 9.2%, in the third quarter and first nine months of 2014, respectively. The increases in these costs for the third quarter are primarily due to increases in certain mortgage services expenses (resulting from increased mortgage service revenues related to the acquisitions) and outside search fees related to the acquisitions. The increases in these costs for the nine months of 2014 are primarily due to increases in certain mortgage services expenses (resulting from increased mortgage service revenues related to the acquisitions) and fee attorney splits, partially offset by decreases in outside search fees, bad debt expenses and premium taxes. Costs that fluctuate independently of revenues increased $4.6 million, or 34.3%, and $19.6 million, or 54.0%, in the third quarter and first nine months of 2014, respectively. The increases in these costs for the third quarter are primarily due to litigation-related costs. The increases in these costs for the nine months of 2014 are primarily due to litigation settlement, litigation-related costs and increases in business promotion expenses.
Title losses. Provisions for title losses, as a percentage of title revenues, were 2.0% and 6.4% in the third quarter 2014 and 2013, respectively, and 4.0% and 5.8% in the first nine months of 2014 and 2013, respectively, including adjustments to certain large claims and escrow losses. We recorded a policy loss provision reduction in the third quarter 2014 from a bond claim which resulted in a partial recovery on a large claim recorded in prior years, which follows a reduction of $6.5 million recorded in the second quarter relating to non-large incurred losses. A similar decrease related to non-large incurred losses of $6.6 million was recorded in the second quarter of 2013. As there was no adverse policy loss development on non-large claims in the first six months of 2014, we lowered our overall loss provisioning rate effective with policies issued in the third quarter 2014. The provisioning rate was previously lowered at the beginning of the second quarter 2013. We expect to maintain a provisioning rate in the range of 5.0% to 5.5% in the fourth quarter and into 2015.
Title losses for the third quarter 2014 decreased 72.2% compared to the 9.5% decrease in title operating revenues from the third quarter 2013. For the first nine months of 2014, title losses decreased 37.8% compared to the 10.3% decrease in title operating revenues from the same period in 2013. Excluding the partial recovery described above, and adjustments to related large claims (recorded in the third quarter 2014 and 2013), title losses were 5.2% and 6.4% in the third quarter 2014 and 2013, respectively, and 5.7% and 6.1% in the first nine months of 2014 and 2013, respectively. The title loss ratio in any given quarter can be significantly influenced by new large claims incurred as well as adjustments to reserves for existing large claims, and we continue to manage and resolve large claims prudently and in keeping with our commitments to our policyholders. Included in policy loss expense for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, was approximately $4.1 million and $6.7 million, respectively, for policy losses relating to legacy escrow losses arising from mortgage fraud.
Cash claim payments in the third quarter and first nine months of 2014 decreased 67.4% and 29.8%, respectively, from the same periods in 2013.
Our liability for estimated title losses as of September 30, 2014 comprises both known claims and our estimate of claims that may be reported in the future (IBNR). Known claims reserves are estimated losses relating to actual claims reported to us. Our reserve for known claims comprises both claims related to title insurance policies as well as losses arising from escrow, closing and funding operations due to fraud or error (which are recognized as expense when discovered). The amount of the reserve represents the aggregate, non-discounted future payments (net of recoveries) that we expect to incur on policy and escrow losses and in costs to settle claims.
24
September 30, 2014 |
December 31, 2013 |
|||||||
($000 omitted) | ||||||||
Known claims |
116.9 | 129.5 | ||||||
IBNR |
374.6 | 377.4 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total estimated title losses |
491.5 | 506.9 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
Title claims are generally incurred three to five years after policy issuance and the timing of payments on these claims can significantly impact the balance of known claims, since in many cases claims may be open for several years before resolution and payment occur.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense was $6.6 million in the third quarter, an increase of $2.5 million compared to third quarter 2013. The increase is due to additional depreciation expense on fixed assets from the acquisitions, $1.1 million of amortization expense on acquired intangibles (including $0.4 million of catch-up amortization) and $0.7 million of amortization expense relating to an underwriter production system placed into service July 1, 2014.
Income taxes. Our effective tax rates were 41.4% and 42.9% for the third quarters 2014 and 2013 and 39.3% and 42.0% for the first nine months of 2014 and 2013, respectively, based on earnings before taxes and after deducting noncontrolling interests of $40.5 million and $27.0 million for the third quarters 2014 and 2013 and $29.5 million and $78.4 million for the first nine months of 2014 and 2013, respectively. The third quarter tax expense is the amount computed for the first nine months less the amount previously reported for the first six months.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our liquidity and capital resources represent our ability to generate cash flow to meet our obligations to our shareholders, customers (payments to satisfy claims on title policies), vendors, employees, lenders and others. As of September 30, 2014, our cash and investments, including amounts reserved pursuant to statutory requirements, aggregated $771.1 million ($334.0 million net of statutory reserves).
Cash held at the parent company totaled $14.0 million at September 30, 2014. As a holding company, the parent is funded principally by cash from its subsidiaries in the form of dividends, operating and other administrative expense reimbursements, and pursuant to intercompany tax sharing agreements. The expense reimbursements are paid in accordance with management agreements, approved by the Texas Department of Insurance, among us and our subsidiaries.
A substantial majority of our consolidated cash and investments as of September 30, 2014 was held by Stewart Title Guaranty Company (Guaranty) and its subsidiaries. The use and investment of these funds, dividends to the holding company, and cash transfers between Guaranty and its subsidiaries and the holding company are subject to certain legal and regulatory restrictions. In general, Guaranty may use its cash and investments in excess of its legally-mandated statutory premium reserve (established in accordance with requirements under Texas law) to fund its insurance operations, including claims payments. Guaranty may also, subject to certain limitations, provide funds to its subsidiaries (whose operations consist principally of field title offices and entities comprising the mortgage services segment) for their operating and debt service needs.
We maintain investments in accordance with certain statutory requirements in the states of domicile of our underwriters for the funding of statutory premium reserves. Statutory premium reserves, which approximated $437.1 million and $450.6 million at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, are required to be fully funded and invested in high-quality securities and short-term investments. In addition, cash and cash equivalentsstatutory reserve funds were approximately $30.9 million and $15.1 million at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. Cash and cash equivalentsstatutory reserve funds are not restricted or segregated in depository accounts. If the Company fails to maintain minimum investments or cash and cash equivalents to meet statutory requirements, the Company may be subject to fines or other penalties, including potential revocation of its business license. As of September 30, 2014, our statutory estimate of claims that may be reported in the future totaled $374.6 million. In addition to this, we had cash and investments (excluding equity method investments) of $206.6 million which are available for underwriter operations, including claims payments.
25
The ability of Guaranty to pay dividends to its parent is governed by Texas insurance law. The Texas Department of Insurance must be notified of any dividend declared, and any dividend in excess of a statutory maximum (20% of surplus, which approximated $94.7 million as of December 31, 2013) would be by regulation considered extraordinary and subject to preapproval by the Department. However, Guarantys actual ability or intent to pay dividends may be constrained by business and regulatory considerations, such as the impact of dividends on surplus and the liquidity ratio, which could affect its ratings and competitive position, the amount of insurance it can write and its ability to pay future dividends. As of June 30, 2014 (most recent information available), our statutory liquidity ratio for our principal underwriter was 0.95 to 1. Our internal objective is to achieve and maintain a ratio of at least 1:1, as we believe that ratio is crucial from both a ratings agency and competitive perspective. On an ongoing basis, this ratio will largely guide our decisions as to frequency and magnitude of dividends from the underwriter to the parent company. Also, the Texas Insurance Commissioner may raise an objection to a planned distribution during the notification period. Further, depending on business and regulatory conditions, we may in the future need to retain cash in Guaranty or even raise cash in the capital markets to contribute to it in order to maintain its ratings or statutory capital position. Such a requirement could be the result of investment losses, reserve charges, adverse operating conditions in the current economic environment or changes in interpretation of statutory accounting requirements by regulators. Guaranty paid a $10.0 million dividend to its parent in the nine months ended September 30, 2014 using funds received from one of its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
As the parent company conducts no operations apart from its wholly-owned subsidiaries, the discussion below focuses on consolidated cash flows.
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||
2014 | 2013 | |||||||
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
15.1 | 70.8 | ||||||
Net cash used by investing activities |
(70.8 | ) | (66.9 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities |
34.6 | (9.9 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
Our principal sources of cash from operations are premiums on title policies and revenue from title service-related transactions, and mortgage servicing support services. Our independent agencies remit cash to us net of their contractual retention. Our principal cash expenditures for operations are employee costs, operating costs and title claims payments.
Cash provided by operations for the first nine months 2014 was $15.1 million as compared to $70.8 million provided by operations in 2013. This decrease in cash provided by operations was primarily due to the decrease in operating results and payments for title losses in excess of provisions in the first nine months of 2014 compared to the same period in the prior year. While the aforementioned partial recovery of a large loss lowered our title loss provision in the third quarter 2014, the proceeds from this recovery were received subsequent to quarter end.
Although our business is labor intensive, we are focused on a cost-effective, scalable business model which includes utilization of technology, centralization of back and middle office functions and business process outsourcing. Our approach allows us to adjust more easily to fluctuations in transaction volumes.
We remain committed to our stated goal of achieving $25 million of annualized cost savings exclusive of market conditions by the end of 2015. During the third quarter 2014, we engaged additional third-party subject matter experts to further define project plans developed during the second quarter and set savings targets to be achieved from each of the opportunities identified. We believe these initiatives will enhance our operating structure and will drive long-term efficiencies. While most of these initiatives will not yield full benefits until 2016, we implemented actions during this quarter that will achieve approximately $2.0 million in annual savings.
26
Investing activities
Cash from investing activities was generated principally by proceeds from investments matured and sold in the amounts of $146.6 million and $70.1 million for the first nine months of 2014 and 2013, respectively. We used cash for the purchases of investments in the amounts of $166.5 million and $116.1 million for the first nine months of 2014 and 2013, respectively. We used cash for the acquisition of subsidiaries in the amounts of $39.5 million and $15.3 million for the first nine months of 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Capital expenditures were $15.5 million and $13.0 million for the first nine months of 2014 and 2013, respectively. We maintain investment in capital expenditures at a level that enables us to implement technologies for increasing our operational and back-office efficiencies.
Financing activities and capital resources
Total debt and stockholders equity were $91.3 million and $666.9 million, respectively, as of September 30, 2014. In the first nine months of 2014 and 2013, we repaid $54.2 million and $1.5 million, respectively, of debt in accordance with the underlying terms of the debt instruments. In October 2014, we exchanged an aggregate of $27.2 million of Convertible Senior Notes (Notes), at maturity, for an aggregate of 2,111,017 shares of Common Stock. In the first nine months of 2013, we exchanged an aggregate of $37.8 million of Notes for an aggregate of 3,094,440 shares of Common Stock plus cash for accrued and unpaid interest. On October 21, 2014, we replaced our $75.0 million unsecured line of credit with a new $125.0 million unsecured line of credit, which expires October 2019. Amounts outstanding under the prior unsecured line of credit, which were $60.0 million at September 30, 2014, are now outstanding under the new line of credit and were used principally to fund acquisitions. In order to preserve Guarantys liquidity ratio, we also drew on the line of credit to provide working capital at the parent company and to fund the litigation settlement payment by Stewart Title Company in June 2014. During the third quarter 2014, we acquired approximately 422,000 shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $13.4 million pursuant to the previously announced $70 million stock repurchase program. Although we expect the substantial majority of our stock repurchase program to be completed in 2015, we will monitor share price and operating cash flow on an ongoing basis and evaluate the timing for further share repurchases accordingly. Key considerations regarding the timing of future share repurchases include achievement and maintenance of key underwriter financial strength ratios, including the liquidity ratio, maintenance of our underwriter insurer financial strength ratings and our parent company investment grade ratings at their present level and utilization of cash balances to fund growth initiatives.
Effect of changes in foreign currency rates
The effect of changes in foreign currency rates on the consolidated statements of cash flows was a net decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $4.7 million and $1.4 million for the first nine months of 2014 and 2013, respectively. Our principal foreign operating unit is in Canada, and, on average, the value of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar decreased during the first nine months of 2014.
***********
We believe we have sufficient liquidity and capital resources to meet the cash needs of our ongoing operations. However, we may determine that additional supplemental debt or equity funding is warranted to provide liquidity for achievement of strategic goals or acquisitions or for unforeseen circumstances. Other than scheduled maturities of debt, operating lease payments and anticipated claims payments, we have no material contractual commitments. We expect that cash flows from operations and cash available from our underwriters, subject to regulatory restrictions, will be sufficient to fund our operations, including claims payments. However, to the extent that these funds are not sufficient, we may be required to borrow funds on terms less favorable than we currently have, or seek funding from the equity market, which may not be successful or may be on terms that are dilutive to existing shareholders.
Contingent liabilities and commitments. See discussion of contingent liabilities and commitments in Note 7 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this Report.
Other comprehensive earnings (loss). Unrealized gains and losses on investments and changes in foreign currency exchange rates are reported net of deferred taxes in accumulated other comprehensive earnings (loss), a component of stockholders equity, until realized. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, net unrealized investment gains of $6.5 million, which increased our other comprehensive earnings, were primarily related to increases in the fair value of corporate, municipal and government bond investments and equity securities, net of taxes. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, net unrealized investment losses of $8.6 million, which increased our other comprehensive loss, were primarily related to temporary decreases in fair values of corporate, municipal and government bond investments, partially offset by temporary increases in fair market values of equity securities and deferred taxes. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily related to our Canadian operations, decreased our other comprehensive earnings by $4.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and increased other comprehensive loss by $3.6 million, net of taxes, for the same period in the prior year.
27
Off-balance sheet arrangements. We do not have any material source of liquidity or financing that involves off-balance sheet arrangements, other than our contractual obligations under operating leases. We also routinely hold funds in segregated escrow accounts pending the closing of real estate transactions and have qualified intermediaries in tax-deferred property exchanges for customers pursuant to Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company holds the proceeds from these transactions until a qualifying exchange can occur. In accordance with industry practice, these segregated accounts are not included on the balance sheet. See Note 18 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Forward-looking statements. Certain statements in this report are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements relate to future, not past, events and often address our expected future business and financial performance. These statements often contain words such as expect, anticipate, intend, plan, believe, seek, will, foresee or other similar words. Forward-looking statements by their nature are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to be materially different than those expressed in the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things, tenuous economic conditions; adverse changes in the level of real estate activity; changes in mortgage interest rates, existing and new home sales, and availability of mortgage financing; our ability to respond to and implement technology changes, including the completion of the implementation of our enterprise systems; the impact of unanticipated title losses on the need to strengthen our policy loss reserves; any effect of title losses on our cash flows and financial condition; the impact of vetting our agency operations for quality and profitability; changes to the participants in the secondary mortgage market and the rate of refinancings that affect the demand for title insurance products; regulatory non-compliance, fraud or defalcations by our title insurance agencies or employees; our ability to timely and cost-effectively respond to significant industry changes and introduce new products and services; the outcome of pending litigation; the impact of changes in governmental and insurance regulations, including any future reductions in the pricing of title insurance products and services; our dependence on our operating subsidiaries as a source of cash flow; the continued realization of expense savings from our cost management program; our ability to successfully integrate acquired businesses; our ability to access the equity and debt financing markets when and if needed; our ability to grow our international operations; and our ability to respond to the actions of our competitors. These risks and uncertainties, as well as others, are discussed in more detail documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and our Current Reports on Form 8-K. We expressly disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statements contained in this report to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date hereof, except as may be required by applicable law.
28
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There have been no material changes during the quarter ended September 30, 2014 in our investment strategies, types of financial instruments held or the risks associated with such instruments that would materially alter the market risk disclosures made in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures. They evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of September 30, 2014, and have concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures are adequate and effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process, under the supervision of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2014. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control Integrated Framework published in 1992. Based on this assessment, management believes that, as of September 30, 2014, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Due to such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. As a result, no corrective actions were required or undertaken.
29
See discussion of legal proceedings in Note 9 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this Report, which is incorporated by reference into this Part II, Item 1, as well as Item 3. Legal Proceedings, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
There have been no changes during the quarter ended September 30, 2014 to our risk factors as listed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following is a summary of our repurchases of our common stock during the three months ended September 30, 2014:
Period |
Total Number of Shares Purchased |
Average Price Paid per Share |
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
Maximum Dollar Amount that May Yet Be Spent Under the Plan (1) |
||||||||||||
August 2014 |
264,154 | $ | 31.59 | 264,154 | $ | 58,787,250 | ||||||||||
September 2014 |
158,169 | $ | 32.10 | 158,169 | $ | 53,712,796 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
422,323 | 422,323 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | In February 2014, we announced a stock repurchase program that is expected to return approximately $70.0 million to stockholders through the end of 2015. |
Our book value per share was $30.28 and $29.47 as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. As of September 30, 2014, our book value per share was based on approximately $666.9 million in stockholders equity and 22,021,813 shares of Common and Class B Common Stock outstanding. As of December 31, 2013, our book value per share was based on approximately $663.1 million in stockholders equity and 22,501,030 shares of Common and Class B Common Stock outstanding.
Those exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed in the Index to Exhibits immediately preceding the exhibits filed herewith and such listing is incorporated herein by reference.
30
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, I have duly caused this report to be signed on our behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
October 31, 2014 |
Date |
Stewart Information Services Corporation | ||
Registrant | ||
By: | /s/ J. Allen Berryman | |
J. Allen Berryman, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer |
31
Index to Exhibits
Exhibit |
||||
3.1 | | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated May 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference in this report from Exhibit 3.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 5, 2009) | ||
3.2 | | Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated April 30, 2010 (incorporated by reference in this report from Exhibit 3.2 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010) | ||
3.3 | | Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated May 7, 2014 (incorporated by reference in this report from Exhibit 3.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 7, 2014) | ||
3.4 | | Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Registrant, as of May 7, 2014 (incorporated by reference in this report from Exhibit 3.2 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 7, 2014) | ||
4.1 | | Rights of Common and Class B Common Stockholders (incorporated by reference to Exhibits 3.1 through 3.4 hereto) | ||
4.2 | | Indenture related to 6.0% Convertible Senior Notes due 2014, dated as of October 15, 2009, by and between the Registrant, the Guarantors party thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference in this report from Exhibit 4.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 15, 2009) | ||
4.3 | | Form of 6.00% Convertible Senior Note due 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 hereto) | ||
10.1 | | Credit Agreement, dated as of October 21, 2014, among the Registrant, Compass Bank as Administrative Agent and Lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference in this report from Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 23, 2014) | ||
31.1* | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
31.2* | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
32.1* | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
32.2* | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
Exhibit |
||||
101.INS* | | XBRL Instance Document | ||
101.SCH* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | ||
101.CAL* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | ||
101.DEF* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | ||
101.LAB* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | ||
101.PRE* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
* | Filed herewith |
32