Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENT
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant þ | ||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o |
||
Check the appropriate box: |
||
o |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
þ |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o |
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
SYNCHRONOSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | ||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
||||
þ |
No fee required. |
|||
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|||
(1) |
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|||
(5) | Total fee paid: |
|||
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|||
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|||
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|||
(3) | Filing Party: |
|||
(4) | Date Filed: |
Dear Stockholder:
I am pleased to invite you to our 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be held on June 5, 2019, at 11:00 a.m. (local time), at the offices of Synchronoss Technologies, Inc., 200 Crossing Boulevard, 8th Floor, Bridgewater, New Jersey.
At the meeting, we will be electing one member of our Board of Directors, ratifying the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019, holding an advisory vote on executive compensation, approving an amendment and restatement of the Company's 2015 Equity Incentive Plan and acting upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
Additional details regarding admission to the 2019 Annual Meeting and the business to be conducted are described in the accompanying proxy materials. Also included is a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. We encourage you to read this information carefully.
It is important that your shares be represented and voted at the 2019 Annual Meeting. As discussed in the Proxy Statement, voting by proxy does not deprive you of your right to attend the Annual Meeting.
WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE 2019 ANNUAL MEETING, WE HOPE YOU WILL VOTE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. YOU MAY VOTE OVER THE INTERNET, BY TELEPHONE OR BY MAILING A PROXY CARD. VOTING OVER THE INTERNET, BY TELEPHONE OR BY WRITTEN PROXY WILL ENSURE YOUR REPRESENTATION AT THE 2019 ANNUAL MEETING REGARDLESS OF WHETHER OR NOT YOU ATTEND IN PERSON. PLEASE REVIEW THE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS YOU RECEIVED IN THE MAIL REGARDING EACH OF THESE VOTING OPTIONS.
If you have any questions concerning the annual meeting or the proposals, please contact our Investor Relations department at (800) 575-7606 or MacKenzie Partners, Inc., our proxy solicitor, at (800) 322-2885. For questions regarding your stock ownership, you may contact our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Co., by e-mail through their website at www.amstock.com or by phone at (800) 937-5449 (within the U.S. and Canada) or (718) 921-8124 (outside the U.S. and Canada).
On behalf of the Board of Directors, I would like to express our appreciation for your continued interest in the affairs of Synchronoss Technologies.
Sincerely,
Glenn
Lurie
President and Chief Executive Officer
April 22, 2019
The use of cameras at the Annual Meeting is prohibited and they will not be allowed into the meeting or any other related areas, except by credentialed media. We realize that many cellular phones have built-in digital cameras, and while these phones may be brought into the venue, the camera function may not be used at any time.
Synchronoss Technologies, Inc.
200 Crossing Boulevard
Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
OF SYNCHRONOSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Date: June 5, 2019
Time: 11:00 a.m.
Place: Synchronoss Corporate Headquarters
200 Crossing Boulevard, Bridgewater, NJ 08807
AGENDA:
Record date: You can vote if you were a stockholder of record on April 10, 2019.
A Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials ("Notice") has been mailed to stockholders of record on or about April 22, 2019. The Notice contains instructions on how to access our proxy statement for our 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Proxy Statement") and our annual report for the year ended December 31, 2018 on Form 10-K (together with the Proxy Statement, the "proxy materials"). The Notice also provides instructions on how to vote online, by telephone or by mail and includes instructions on how to receive a paper copy of proxy materials by mail. The proxy materials can be accessed directly at the following Internet address: http://materials.proxyvote.com/87157B.
The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice. The stock transfer books will not be closed between the record date and the date of the Annual Meeting. A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for inspection at Synchronoss' corporate headquarters at the address listed above for the ten-day period prior to the Annual Meeting.
By order of the Board of Directors,
Ronald
J. Prague
Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary
April 22, 2019
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to be held on June 5, 2019: The proxy statement and annual report to stockholders and the means to vote by Internet are available at www.synchronoss.com
WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING IN PERSON, PLEASE FOLLOW THE INTERNET VOTING INSTRUCTIONS ON YOUR PROXY CARD IN ORDER TO ASSURE REPRESENTATION OF YOUR SHARES.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proxy Summary |
Proposals to be Voted On:
The following proposals will be voted on at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
|
For More Information |
Board Recommendation |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | |
Proposal 1: Election of one director |
Page 75 |
For Nominee |
||||
| | | | | | |
Proposal 2: Ratification of appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent registered public accountants |
Page 83 |
For |
||||
| | | | | | |
Proposal 3: Advisory vote on executive compensation |
Page 85 |
For |
||||
| | | | | | |
Proposal 4: Approval of the amendment and restatement of our 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2015 Plan") to, among other things, increase the aggregate number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2015 Plan |
Page 86 |
For |
If you are a stockholder of record, you may cast your vote in any of the following ways:
Internet | Phone | In Person | ||||
You may vote by proxy via the Internet at www.proxyvote.com by following the instructions provided in the Notice or the proxy card. | You may vote by proxy by telephone by following the instructions provided in the Notice or the proxy card, by calling (800) 690-6903. | If you received printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you may vote by proxy by filling out, signing and dating the proxy card, and returning it in the envelope provided. | Attend the Annual Meeting at our Headquarters located at 200 Crossing Blvd., 8th Floor, Bridgewater, NJ 08807. |
If you are a beneficial owner holding shares through a bank, broker or other nominee, please refer to your Notice or other information forwarded by your bank or broker to see which voting options are available to you.
This proxy statement ("Proxy Statement") is furnished in connection with solicitation of proxies by our Board of Directors ("Board") for use at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Annual Meeting") to be held at 200 Crossing Boulevard, 8th Floor, Bridgewater, New Jersey, at 11:00 a.m. local time on Wednesday, June 5, 2019, and any postponements or adjournments thereof. Beginning on or about April 22, 2019, we mailed to our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the "Notice") containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials. As used in this proxy statement, the terms "Synchronoss," the "Company," "we," "us," and "our" mean Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries unless the context indicates otherwise.
Attendance at the Annual Meeting
If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, you must be a stockholder on the record date. On the day of the meeting, each stockholder will be required to present valid picture identification such as a driver's license. Seating will begin at 10:00 a.m. local time and the meeting will begin at 11:00 a.m. Use of cameras (including cell phones with photographic capabilities), recording devices and other electronic devices will not be permitted at the meeting.
1
2019 PROXY STATEMENT HIGHLIGHTS
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in our Proxy Statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider. You should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting.
Voting Matters and Vote Recommendation
See "Proposals" starting on page 63 for more information.
Matter | | Board vote recommendation | ||
Management proposals: | ||||
Election of one director | For the director nominee | |||
Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2019 | | For | ||
Advisory vote on Executive Compensation | For | |||
Approval of the amendment and restatement of the 2015 Plan to, among other things, increase the aggregate number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2015 Plan | | For | ||
| |
Board Nominee
The following table provides summary information about the director nominee for election at the Annual Meeting.
Name | | Age | | Director Since | | Occupation | | Independent | | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mohan Gyani | | 67 | | 2019 | | Retired, President & CEO, AT&T Wireless Mobility Services | | Yes | | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Our Board recommends that stockholders vote to ratify the Audit Committee's appointment of Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as our Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019.
Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
Our Board recommends that stockholders vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers ("NEOs") in 2018, as described in this Proxy Statement. At our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our stockholders showed strong support for our executive compensation with 90% of the shares voted in favor of the advisory vote on executive compensation. Although the results of the "say on pay" vote are advisory and not binding, our Board and our Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders and take the results of the say on pay vote in to account when making decisions regarding the compensation of our NEOs. The Compensation Committee of our Board evaluates our executive compensation program each year in an effort to ensure it is in line with our stockholders' interests.
2
We encourage stockholders to take into account the significant changes to our executive compensation program that we have made over the last several years in light of the advisory vote including, among other things, adding new metrics to both our short-term and long-term compensation plans, including non-financial metrics to our short-term incentive plan, and meeting with stockholders as part of our annual stockholder outreach program.
Approval of Amendment and Restatement of the Company's 2015 Equity Incentive Plan
Our Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote to approve the amendment and restatement of our 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2015 Plan") to, among other things, increase the aggregate number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2015 Plan. The purpose of this increase in the number of shares available for issuance is to continue to be able to attract, retain and motivate valued executive officers and other employees and certain consultants. Upon stockholder approval, an additional 5,000,000 shares of Common Stock will be reserved for issuance under the 2015 Plan, which will enable us to continue to grant equity awards to our officers, employees and consultants at levels determined by our Board to be necessary to attract, retain and motivate the individuals who will be critical to our Company's success in achieving its business objectives and thereby creating greater value for all our stockholders. Furthermore, we believe that equity compensation aligns the interests of our management and other employees with the interests of our other stockholders. Equity awards are a key component of our incentive compensation program which we believe have been critical in attracting and retaining talented employees and officers, aligning their interests with those of stockholders, and focusing key employees on the long-term growth of our Company.
3
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS ABOUT THIS PROXY MATERIAL & VOTING MATTERS |
4
5
6
7
8
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE
STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON JUNE 5, 2019.
The proxy statement and annual report to stockholders is available at http://materials.proxyvote.com/87157B.
9
Corporate Governance at Synchronoss |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES |
Synchronoss is committed to excellent corporate governance, which we believe helps us to sustain our success and build long-term value for our stockholders. Our Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines (the "Guidelines") that set forth the framework within which our Board can effectively function and govern our affairs. The Guidelines address, among other things, the composition and responsibilities of our Board, director independence, management succession planning and evaluation, access to information, executive sessions, communication with stockholders, target ownership by, and remuneration of, our directors, Board committees and selection of new directors. We have also adopted a Code of Business Conduct (the "Code") that applies to all of our employees, officers (including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, or those serving similar functions) and directors. The Guidelines and Code are available on the Investor Relations section of our website at www.synchronoss.com.
Our Board regularly reviews legal and regulatory requirements, evolving best practices and other developments and may modify, waive, suspend or repeal the Guidelines or Code from time to time as it deems necessary or appropriate in the exercise of our Board's judgment or in the best interests of our stockholders. If our Board makes any substantive amendments to the Guidelines or the Code, we will promptly disclose the nature of the amendment or waiver on our website to the extent required by applicable law or regulations.
BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE |
Consistent with the Guidelines, our Board believes it is important to retain its flexibility to allocate the responsibilities of our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and Chairman of the Board in any way that is in the best interests of our Company based on the circumstances existing at a particular point in time. Our Board believes that it should periodically assess who should serve these roles and whether the offices should be served independently or jointly, and that our Board should not be restricted by any strict policy directive when making these decisions. In addition, our Board continually evaluates its leadership structure to ensure that the Board is structured to address the best interests of our Company and our stockholders as they evolve over time.
Our Board has determined that our Company and our stockholders are best served by having Mr. Waldis, one of our founders, serve as our Executive Chairman of the Board, and Mr. Lurie serve as our CEO and a member of our Board. As CEO, Mr. Lurie is the individual with primary responsibility for managing our day-to-day operations, setting our overall business strategy, and ensuring the successful growth of our business. Mr. Waldis' in-depth experience as our founder and long-time CEO and Chairman of the Board position him well to serve now as our Executive Chairman of the Board, where he will remain on our Board, assisting on certain sales and business development activities, and providing other consultative support to the CEO, upon his request.
10
INDEPENDENCE OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS |
Each year, as part of our assessment of director independence, our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee and our full Board conduct a review of the financial and other relationships between each director, or any of their immediate family members, and our Company, our senior management, companies with whom we have business dealings and our independent registered public accounting firm. Our Board also consults with our legal counsel to ensure that its determinations are consistent with all relevant laws and regulations regarding the definition of independence, including those set forth in pertinent listing standards of The Nasdaq Global Market ("Nasdaq"), as amended from time to time. Consistent with those considerations, after review of all relevant transactions or relationships, our Board has affirmatively determined that all of our directors are independent directors within the meaning of the applicable Nasdaq listing standards except for Stephen G. Waldis, who serves as our Executive Chairman, and Glenn Lurie, who serves as our CEO. Our independent directors meet in regularly scheduled executive sessions where only independent directors are present. Mr. Cadogan presides over those sessions. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OVERSIGHT OF RISK MANAGEMENT |
Risk is inherent with every business and how well a business manages risk can ultimately determine its success. We face a number of risks, including risks relating to our operations, strategic direction and intellectual property as more fully discussed under the heading "Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 and our other SEC filings. Assessing and managing risk is the responsibility of our management. Our Board oversees management in the execution of its responsibilities and for assessment of our approach to risk management. An overall review and assessment of risk is inherent in our Board's consideration of our business plans, strategies and other significant developments. Additionally, our Board regularly reviews various risks arising out of transactions and other matters that are presented to our Board and when making decisions impacting us. At least annually, our Board also reviews and analyzes the strategic and operational risks and opportunities that face our Company as a whole, as well as those related to specific areas of our business.
Our Board delegates the oversight of certain categories of risk affecting our Company to designated Board committees, who report their findings to our full Board. Our Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing our Board's execution of its risk management oversight responsibility, including discussing guidelines and policies governing the process by which our management and other persons responsible for risk management assess and manage our exposure to major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, based on consultation with our management and independent auditors. Our Audit Committee also annually reviews the audit plan of management, our information technology and cybersecurity risks and mitigation strategies, the domestic and international tax function and treasury operations and conformity with ethics and compliance standards. In addition, our Board has delegated to other Board committees the oversight of risks within their areas of responsibility and expertise. For example, our Compensation Committee oversees the risks associated with our compensation practices, including an annual assessment of our compensation policies and practices for our employees.
11
BOARD SELF-EVALUATION |
Our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee oversees a biennial self-evaluation process to analyze and review our Board's performance and the performance of each of the members of our Board. Our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee reviews these results and discusses them with the full Board with the intention of utilizing them to enhance our Board's effectiveness and, if necessary, develop action plans.
STOCKHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS WITH OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS |
Stockholders may communicate with our management and independent directors by sending a letter to Synchronoss Technologies, Inc., 200 Crossing Boulevard, 8th Floor, Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807, Attention: Secretary. Each communication should set forth the (i) name and address of the stockholder as they appear on our books and, if the shares of our Common Stock are held by a broker, bank or other agent, the name and address of the beneficial owner of such shares, and (ii) number of shares of our Common Stock that are owned of record by such record holder and/or beneficially by such beneficial owner. Our Secretary will review all communications from stockholders and has the authority to disregard any inappropriate communications or take other appropriate actions with respect to any inappropriate communications. If deemed an appropriate communication, our Secretary will forward it, depending on the subject matter, to the chairperson of a committee of our Board or a particular director, as appropriate.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEE DUTIES |
Our Board oversees, counsels and directs management in the long-term interests of our Company and our stockholders. Our Board, individually and through its committees, is responsible for:
BOARD STRUCTURE AND COMMITTEES |
During 2018, our Board met 11 times and acted twice by unanimous written consent. Each director who was a director in 2018 attended at least 75% of the meetings of our Board and of each committee of which he or she served as a member. Each of our directors who was a director in October 2018 attended our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Our Board has established an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Business Development Committee and a Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. Our Board has delegated various responsibilities and authority to its
12
committees as generally described below. The following table provides membership, chair and number of meetings information for each of our Board committees during 2018:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Name* |
Audit Committee |
Compensation Committee |
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee |
Business Development Committee |
| ||||||
|
Stephen G. Waldis |
| | | M | | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Glenn Lurie |
M | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
William J. Cadogan |
M | C | C | M | | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Thomas J. Hopkins |
M | M | M | C | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
James M. McCormick |
| M | | | | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Donnie M. Moore |
C | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Frank Baker |
| | M | M | | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Robert Aquilina |
|||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Kristin Rinne |
| | | | | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Peter Berger |
M | M | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Total meetings in year 2018 |
10 | 7 | 1 | 3 | | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
AUDIT COMMITTEE |
Our Audit Committee oversees the integrity of our financial statements, compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, effectiveness of our internal controls and audit function, and the qualifications, independence, and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm. Our Audit Committee also discussed with our independent registered public accounting firm the overall scope and plans for their audit and met with them on a regular basis without members of management. Our Audit Committee consults with our management and our independent registered public accounting firm prior to the presentation of financial statements to stockholders and, as appropriate, initiates inquiries into aspects of our financial affairs. In addition, our Audit Committee:
13
Our Audit Committee is comprised of the following three directors: Thomas J. Hopkins, William J. Cadogan and Donnie M. Moore (Chair). Mr. Berger also attends Audit Committee meetings in a non-voting observer capacity. Effective as of the expiration of Mr. Moore's term as a director at our 2019 Annual Meeting, Mr. Hopkins is expected to be appointed as chair of our Audit Committee, and our Board may either appoint another current or a new independent director of the Company to replace Mr. Moore on our Audit Committee. Our Audit Committee met 10 times during 2018. Our Board annually reviews the definition of independence for Audit Committee members set forth in the Nasdaq listing standards and has determined that all members of our Audit Committee are independent (as independence is currently defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) and 5605(c)(2) of the Nasdaq listing standards). In addition to qualifying as independent under the Nasdaq rules, each member of our Audit Committee can read and has a working understanding and comprehension of fundamental financial statements. Our Board has determined that each of Messrs. Moore and Hopkins is an audit committee financial expert, as defined by Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K based on a qualitative assessment of each of their level of knowledge and experience based on a number of factors, including their respective formal education and experience. The designation does not impose on either Mr. Moore or Mr. Hopkins any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than are generally imposed on them as a member of our Audit Committee and our Board, and their respective designations as Audit Committee financial experts pursuant to this SEC requirement does not affect the duties, obligations or liability of any other member of our Audit Committee or Board. Our Audit Committee charter can be found on the Investor Relations section of our website at www.synchronoss.com.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE |
Our Compensation Committee is comprised of the following four directors: William J. Cadogan (Chair), Thomas J. Hopkins, James M. McCormick and Peter Berger, each of whom is independent, as currently defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) and 5605(d)(2) of the Nasdaq listing standards. Effective as of the expiration of Mr. McCormick's term as a director at our 2019 Annual Meeting, Mr. McCormick will no longer be a member of our Compensation Committee. Each member of our Compensation Committee is a non-employee director, as defined pursuant to Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Securities Exchange
14
Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and an outside director, as defined pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Internal Revenue Code"). Our Compensation Committee met 4 times during 2018 and acted 3 times by unanimous written consent. Our Compensation Committee is charged by our Board to:
A more detailed description of our Compensation Committee's functions can be found in our Compensation Committee charter, which can be found on the Investor Relations section of our website at www.synchronoss.com.
Our Compensation Committee has also established a Key Employee Equity Awards Committee, with our CEO as the sole member, whose purpose is to approve equity awards to our newly hired and current employees, subject to guidelines previously approved by our Compensation Committee. Our Key Employee Equity Awards Committee acted 13 times in 2018.
In accordance with Nasdaq listing standards, our Compensation Committee, under its charter, may select and retain, and is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of, compensation consultants or any other third party to assist in the evaluation of director and officer compensation, as well as any other compensation matters. In addition, our Compensation Committee has the responsibility to consider the independence of these advisers in accordance with applicable law and/or Nasdaq listing standards. Our Compensation Committee has retained Deloitte Consulting LLP ("Deloitte") as its compensation consultant. In 2018, Deloitte did not perform any
15
services for us other than its services to our Compensation Committee and received no compensation from our Company other than its fees in connection with the firm's retention as our Compensation Committee's compensation consultant. Our Compensation Committee assessed the independence of Deloitte pursuant to applicable SEC rules and Nasdaq listing standards and concluded that the work of Deloitte has not raised any conflict of interest. Our Compensation Committee considers the information provided by Deloitte when making decisions with respect to compensation matters, along with information it receives from management and its own judgment and experience. Representatives of Deloitte generally attend regular Compensation Committee meetings and meet with our Compensation Committee without management present. Deloitte serves at the discretion of our Compensation Committee and our Compensation Committee approves the fees paid to Deloitte.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION |
During the year ended December 31, 2018, William J. Cadogan (Chair), James M. McCormick, Peter Berger and Thomas J. Hopkins served as members of our Compensation Committee. None of the members of our Compensation Committee was an officer or employee of our Company at any time during 2018 and none of the members of our Compensation Committee has ever served as an officer of our Company or had any relationship with us requiring disclosure herein. None of our executive officers currently serves, or in the past fiscal year has served, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of our Board or Compensation Committee.
NOMINATING/CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE |
The current members of our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee are: Frank Baker, Peter Berger, William J. Cadogan (Chair) and Thomas Hopkins. Our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee met once in 2018. All members of our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee are independent (as independence is currently defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the Nasdaq listing standards). In addition, our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee:
16
Our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee charter can be found on the Investor Relations section of our website at www.synchronoss.com.
Our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee has established procedures for the nomination process and leads the search for, selects and recommends candidates for election to our Board. Consideration of new director candidates typically involves a series of committee discussions, the review of information concerning candidates and interviews with selected candidates. Candidates for nomination to our Board typically have been suggested by other members of our Board or by our executive officers. From time to time, our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee may engage the services of a third-party search firm to identify director candidates. Our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee also considers candidates proposed in writing by stockholders, provided those proposals meet the eligibility requirements for submitting stockholder proposals under our amended and restated bylaws and are accompanied by certain required information about the candidate in accordance with our amended and restated bylaws and organizational documents. Candidates proposed by stockholders will be evaluated by our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee using the same criteria as for all other candidates. Stockholders may contact the Secretary at our principal executive offices for a copy of the relevant bylaw provisions regarding the requirements for making stockholder nominations and proposals. For more information pertaining to stockholder proposal, see "Stockholder Proposals for the Next Annual Meeting."
In considering nominees for our Board, our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee considers each candidate's independence, personal and professional integrity, financial literacy or other professional or business experience relevant to an understanding of our business, ability to think and act independently and with sound judgment and ability to serve our stockholders' long-term interests. These factors, along with others considered useful by our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, are reviewed in the context of an assessment of the perceived needs of our Board at a particular point in time. As a result, the priorities and emphasis of our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee and of our Board may change from time to time to take into account changes in our business and other trends and the portfolio of skills and experience of current and prospective directors. Our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee has not adopted a formal policy regarding the consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees or in searching for new directors.
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE |
The current members of our Business Development Committee are: Thomas J. Hopkins (Chair), William J. Cadogan, Glenn Lurie, Frank Baker and Stephen G. Waldis. All members of our Business Development Committee other than Messrs. Waldis and Lurie are independent (as independence is currently defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the Nasdaq listing standards). Our Business Development Committee met three times in 2018. Our Business Development Committee reviews certain strategic business development and growth opportunities and recommends those that it determines are in line with our short-term
17
and long-term strategic goals. Our Business Development Committee charter can be found on the Investor Relations section of our website at www.synchronoss.com.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION |
This section provides information regarding the cash and equity compensation policies provided to our directors in 2018.
Non-Employee Director Compensation Program
Each member of our board of directors who is not an employee of our Company is entitled to the following compensation pursuant to our non-employee director compensation program:
| | | | | | |
Compensable Position / Event | Compensation | | ||||
| | | | | | |
| Initial Equity Grant | Non-qualified stock option to purchase 30,000 shares(1) | | |||
| | | | | | |
Annual Cash Retainer | $50,000 | |||||
| | | | | | |
| Annual Equity Grant |
Equity awards with an aggregate grant date fair value of $200,000 60% in restricted shares(1) 40% in the form of a non-qualified stock option(1) |
| |||
| | | | | | |
Committee Chairperson Retainer | $20,000 (Audit) $15,000 (Compensation) $10,000 (Nominating/Corporate Governance) $10,000 (Business Development) |
|||||
| | | | | | |
| Committee Member Retainer |
$10,000 (Audit) $7,500 (Compensation) $5,000 (Nominating/Corporate Governance) $5,000 (Business Development) |
| |||
| | | | | | |
Our Compensation Committee annually reviews the amounts awarded under our non-employee director compensation program based on their analysis of the competitive range of the equity granted to directors at our peer group companies and other publicly-available information. The actual number of restricted shares and shares underlying stock options is determined based on the grant date fair value of the equity awards. The stock options have an exercise price equal to the closing price reported on Nasdaq of our Common Stock on the grant date. The annual retainer fees are paid to our directors quarterly at the beginning of each quarter. In addition, we currently have a policy of reimbursing directors for travel, lodging and other reasonable expenses incurred in connection with their attendance at our Board and Committee meetings.
Executive Chairman Compensation
As Executive Chairman, Stephen G. Waldis received a base salary of $300,000. Mr. Waldis did not receive any cash incentive bonus nor did he participate in the Company's long term incentive plan in 2018. In addition, in 2018, we leased an automobile (and paid applicable insurance and gas) for Mr. Waldis. As Mr. Waldis was our Chief Executive Officer in 2016, he did receive a grant of 2016-2018 Performance Shares. As described in "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" below, Mr. Waldis
18
earned the following 2016-2018 Performance Shares: (i) 93.3% of the target number of shares based on our 2016 financial performance and (ii) 51.4% of the target number of shares based on our 2018 financial performance. There were no shares earned based on our 2017 financial performance. The actual number of 2016-2018 Performance Shares earned based on our 2016-2018 performance is set forth below, all of which vested in March 2019:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Name |
2016 - 2018 Target Shares |
2016 Target Shares |
2016 Attain % |
2016 Shares Earned |
2017 Target Shares |
2017 Attain % |
2017 Shares Earned |
2018 Target Shares |
2018 Attain % |
2018 Shares Earned |
Total Shares Earned |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Stephen Waldis |
| 52,953 | | 17,651 | | | 93.3 | % | | 16,467 | | 17,651 | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | 17,651 | | | 51.4 | % | | | 9,072 | | | 25,539 | | | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The following table sets forth all of the compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to each person who served as a non-employee director during 2018. Mr. Lurie, our Chief Executive Officer and President, receives no compensation for his service as a director, and is not included in the table below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||
|
| Name* |
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) |
All Other Compensation |
Stock Awards ($)(1) |
Option Awards ($)(2) |
Total ($) |
| |||||||||||||||||
|
| Stephen G. Waldis |
| | $ | 300,000 | | | | $ | 11,889 | (3) | | | -0- | | | -0- | | $ | 311,889 | | | ||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||
|
| William J. Cadogan |
| | $ | 88,750 | | | | -0- | | | | $ | 120,006 | | | $ | 93,739 | | $ | 302,485 | | ||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||
|
| Thomas Hopkins(4) |
| | $ | 131,250 | | | | -0- | | | | $ | 120,006 | | | $ | 93,739 | | $ | 344,995 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||
|
| James M. McCormick |
| | $ | 60,000 | | | | -0- | | | | $ | 120,006 | | | $ | 93,739 | | $ | 273,745 | | ||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||
|
| Donnie M. Moore(4) |
| | $ | 71,250 | | | | -0- | | | | $ | 195,008 | | | $ | 93,739 | | $ | 359,997 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||
|
| Kristin S. Rinne |
| | $ | 21,000 | | | | -0- | | | | -0- | | | $ | 87,292 | | $ | 108,292 | | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||
|
| Robert Aquilina |
| | $ | 33,500 | | | | -0- | | | | -0- | | | $ | 185,635 | | $ | 219,135 | | | ||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||
|
| Peter Berger(5) |
| | $ | 46,875 | | | | -0- | | | | -0- | | | $ | 115,157 | | $ | 162,032 | | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||
|
| Frank Baker(5) |
| | $ | 45,000 | | | | -0- | | | | -0- | | | $ | 115,157 | | $ | 160,157 | | | ||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
19
DIRECTOR STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES |
We have established stock ownership guidelines for our directors to retain an equity stake in the Company to more closely align their interests with those of our stockholders. Each director is required to own the number of shares of our Common Stock with a value equal to three times the annual cash retainer for service on our Board. Ownership is calculated annually based on the closing sales price of our Common Stock on Nasdaq for the last trading day in the prior year. Any newly elected director has three years from the date of his or her election to achieve the targeted equity ownership level. As of December 31, 2018, each of our then serving directors owned at least the number of shares of our Common Stock required by these guidelines based on the price of our Common Stock on such date.
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION |
As permitted by Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, our amended and restated bylaws provide that we are authorized to (i) enter into indemnification agreements with our directors and officers and (ii) purchase directors' and officers' liability insurance, which we currently maintain to cover our directors and executive officers. The form of indemnification agreement with our directors provides that we will indemnify each director against any and all expenses incurred by that director because of his status as one of our directors, to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws. In addition, the form agreement provides that, to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, but subject to various exceptions, we will advance all expenses incurred by our directors in connection with a legal proceeding. Our restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions relating to the limitation of liability and indemnification of directors. The restated certificate of incorporation provides that our directors will not be personally liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability:
Our restated certificate of incorporation also provides that if Delaware law is amended after the approval by our stockholders of our restated certificate of incorporation to authorize corporate action further eliminating or limiting the personal liability of directors, then the liability of our directors will be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. The foregoing provisions of the restated certificate of incorporation are not intended to limit the liability of directors or officers for any violation of applicable federal securities laws. As permitted by Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, our restated certificate of incorporation provides that we may indemnify our directors to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law and the restated certificate of incorporation provisions relating to indemnity may not be retroactively repealed or modified so as to adversely affect the protection of our directors.
20
COMPENSATION RISK MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS |
Each year, our Compensation Committee reviews our compensation practices and policies for all employees, including our NEOs, and assesses whether they have the potential to incentivize employees without taking risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our Company. Since our annual performance-based bonus and equity programs are designed to align our employees' compensation with both our short- and long-term business objectives and performance, and therefore enhance stockholder value, our Compensation Committee believes that our compensation practices and policies discourage behavior that leads to excessive risk-taking. Therefore, our Compensation Committee believes our practices and policies will promote balanced risk management and are not likely to have a material adverse effect on our Company. Set forth below are the key risk-balancing elements of our compensation practices and policies:
| | | | | | | | |
Financial Performance Measures |
The ranges set for financial performance measures are designed to reward success without encouraging excessive risk taking. Pursuant to our performance-based equity plan, the number of performance-based restricted cash units or shares to be issued is based on our financial performance over a specific period. There are maximum payouts under our cash incentive plan and the performance-based restricted cash units or shares, which help mitigate risk. | |||||||
| | | | | | | | |
| Equity Vesting Periods | | Time-based restricted shares typically vest over three years, while stock options typically vest over four years. The performance-based restricted cash units or shares are earned and vest upon determination of the achievement of our performance metrics established for the performance period. The vesting of the equity awards is designed to reward continued service with us, increases in our stock price and achievement of corporate goals designed to enhance stockholder value. | | ||||
| | | | | | | | |
Equity Retention Guidelines | NEOs are required to acquire within five years of becoming an executive officer, and hold while they are executive officers, shares (vested and unvested) having a value of at least three times, or five times in the case of our CEO, their respective base salaries. | |||||||
| | | | | | | | |
| No Hedging | | Our employees, including our NEOs, are not permitted to enter into any transaction designed to hedge, or having the effect of hedging, the economic risk of owning our securities. | | ||||
| | | | | | | | |
Financial Restatement, Recoupment and Related Policies | As part of our Code of Business Conduct, we will investigate all reported instances of questionable or unethical behavior of a director, NEO or other employee and, where improper behavior or failure to act is found to have occurred, will take appropriate action up to and including termination. If an investigation uncovers that an individual has committed fraud or other improper acts that causes our financial statements to be restated or otherwise affected, our Board has discretion to take immediate and appropriate disciplinary action with respect to that individual up to and including termination. Our Board also has discretion to pursue whatever legal remedies are available to prosecute that individual to the fullest extent of the law and may seek to recoup or recover any amounts he or she inappropriately received as a result of his or her improper actions, including but not limited to any annual or long term incentives that he or she received to the extent the individual would not have received that amount had the improper action not been taken. | |||||||
| | | | | | | | |
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
The following table sets forth the name, age and position of each of our executive officers as of April 10, 2019. Information as of April 10, 2019 about the number of shares of Common Stock
21
beneficially owned by each of the individuals designated as a NEO, whether held directly or indirectly, appears below under the heading "Equity Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management."
| | | | | | | | |
|
Name |
Age | Current Positions | | ||||
|
Glenn Lurie |
53 | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director | | ||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
David Clark |
54 | Chief Financial Officer | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
Jeffrey Miller |
55 | Chief Commercial Officer | | ||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
Mary Clark |
52 | Chief Marketing Officer and Chief Products Officer | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
Ronald J. Prague |
55 | Chief Legal Officer and Secretary | | ||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
Patrick J. Doran |
46 | Chief Technology Officer | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
Kevin Hunsaker |
54 | Chief People Officer | | ||||
| | | | | | | | |
Glenn Lurie has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer and a Director since November 2017. Prior to joining Synchronoss, Mr. Lurie held significant leadership and operations positions at AT&T, most recently serving as President and Chief Executive Officer of AT&T's Mobility and Consumer Operations until his retirement from AT&T in September 2017. Prior to his promotion to President and Chief Executive Officer of AT&T's Mobility and Consumer Operations, Mr. Lurie served in a number of senior executive roles at AT&T and led the team responsible for negotiating its exclusive U.S. agreement with Apple Inc. to launch the first iPhone in 2007. Mr. Lurie is active in industry associations and within the community. He most recently served as chairman of the board for the Consumer Technology Industry Association in 2016. Mr. Lurie is a member of the Board of Directors of Avis Budget Group, Inc. Mr. Lurie received a degree in business/marketing from Seattle Pacific University.
David Clark joined Synchronoss as Executive Vice President, Finance in May 2018 and has served as our Chief Financial Officer since August 2018. Mr. Clark was Chief Financial Officer of The Meet Group, a publicly-held company, from 2013 to 2018. Mr. Clark served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Nutrisystem, Inc., a publicly-held company, from 2008 to 2013 and as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Nutrisystem from 2007 to 2008. Mr. Clark received a degree in accounting from Boston College.
Jeff Miller has served as our Chief Commercial Officer since October 2018. Mr. Miller previously served as President of IDEAL Industries Technology Group from December 2017 to October 2018. Prior to IDEAL, Mr. Miller held several senior sales and operations positions at Motorola during a 16-year tenure, most recently as Corporate Vice President and General Manager of Operations in North America for Motorola Mobility, LLC. Mr. Miller received a degree in business from Miami University of Ohio and a Master's Degree in Business Administration from The Ohio State University.
Mary Clark joined Synchronoss in January 2018 as our Chief Marketing Officer and Chief Products Officer. Prior to joining Synchronoss, Ms. Clark held various executive positions at Syniverse, Inc. from 2009 to January 2018, including Senior Vice President, Roaming Business Unit as well as Chief Marketing Officer. Ms. Clark received a degree in communications from the University of Delaware.
Patrick J. Doran has served as our Chief Technology Officer since January 2007. Prior to that position, Mr. Doran served in various positions, including Vice President of Research and Development, Chief Architect and Senior Software Engineer, since joining Synchronoss in 2002. Before joining Synchronoss, Mr. Doran was a Senior Development Engineer at Agility Communications from 2000 to 2002, member
22
of technical staff at AT&T/Lucent from 1996 to 2000 and a Software Engineer at General Dynamics from 1995 to 1996. Mr. Doran received a degree in computer and systems engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and a Master's Degree in Systems and Industrial Engineering from Purdue University.
Ronald J. Prague has served as our Chief Legal Officer and Secretary since joining Synchronoss in 2006. Before joining Synchronoss, Mr. Prague held various legal senior positions with Intel Corporation from 1998 to 2006, including as Group Counsel for Intel's Communications Infrastructure Group. Prior to joining Intel, Mr. Prague practiced law with the law firms of Haythe & Curley (now Torys LLP) and Richards & O'Neil (now Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP). Mr. Prague received a Juris Doctor from Northwestern Pritzker School of Law and received a degree in business administration and marketing from Cornell University.
Kevin Hunsaker has served as our Chief People Officer since joining Synchronoss in March 2016 in connection with our acquisition of Openwave Messaging, Inc. ("Openwave"). Prior to joining Synchronoss, Mr. Hunsaker was General Counsel and Vice President of Human Resources of Openwave from July 2015 until Synchronoss' acquisition of Openwave. Prior to Openwave, Mr. Hunsaker was Vice President of Human Resources at Deem, Inc. from 2011 to 2015. Mr. Hunsaker received a Juris Doctor from Golden Gate University and a degree in economics from the University of California, Davis.
23
Compensation of Executive Officers
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This section discusses our compensation philosophy, summarizes our compensation programs and reviews compensation decisions for our Named Executive Officers (our "NEOs") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. The table below sets forth our NEOs for 2018:
| | | | | | |
Named Executive Officer | Title as of December 31, 2018 | | ||||
| Glenn Lurie | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director | | |||
| | | | | | |
David Clark | Chief Financial Officer | |||||
| | | | | | |
| Lawrence Irving(1) | Former Chief Financial Officer | | |||
| | | | | | |
Mary Clark | Chief Marketing Officer and Chief Product Officer | |||||
| | | | | | |
| Jeffrey Miller | Chief Commercial Officer | | |||
| | | | | | |
Patrick Doran | Chief Technology Officer | |||||
| | | | | | |
| Robert Garcia(2) | Former Chief Commercial Officer | | |||
| | | | | | |
Executive Summary
Our executive compensation philosophy and programs are designed to attract, retain and motivate high-quality executives who possess diverse skills and talents required to help us achieve our short and long-term financial and strategic goals. Our executive compensation programs are designed to foster a performance-oriented culture that aligns our executives' interests with those of our stockholders over the long term. To provide for this alignment of interests, our compensation programs provide that 75.5% of our CEO's and 64.2% of our NEOs' targeted compensation is tied to long-term, equity-based incentives. By tying a majority of our NEOs' targeted compensation to equity-based incentives, our common stock's value needs to increase in order for our NEOs to realize any value related to our stock options or increase in value related to our restricted shares and our Company needs to hit certain financial and strategic metrics in order for our NEOs to vest in the shares underlying our performance-based restricted shares or cash units. In an effort to further provide for performance-based equity awards, approximately 67.5% of the total 2018 equity grants to each of our NEOs, other than our CEO, are either options to purchase our common stock, restricted shares or cash units subject to performance-based vesting. Accordingly, we believe that the compensation of our NEOs is both appropriate for and responsive to the goal of improving stockholder value, as the majority of each NEO's compensation is allocated to performance-based incentives.
2018 Compensation Program Highlights
Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, retain and motivate high-quality executives and drive the creation of long-term stockholder value by tying a significant portion of our
24
executives' compensation to Company and individual performance. Our compensation philosophy and programs are designed to achieve the following objectives:
| | | | | | | | |
Pay for Performance |
Provide a strong relationship of pay to performance through: Performance-based cash bonus tied primarily to achievement of corporate short-term financial goals and individual performance. Long term incentive awards that deliver value based on the performance of our Common Stock and the achievement of pre-determined, objective financial and business goals. |
|||||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
Emphasis on Variable Compensation |
| Total compensation is heavily weighted toward incentive compensation (i.e., annual cash bonuses and long-term equity incentives). Annual performance-based cash bonuses focus our NEOs on key short-term financial, strategic, and individual goals. Long-term incentives focus our NEOs on sustainable, long-term stockholder value creation. The value realized by our NEOs depends substantially on our long-term performance, achievement of our financial and strategic goals and the value of our Common Stock, which we believe aligns our NEOs' interests with the long-term interests of our stockholders. |
| ||||
| | | | | | | | |
Fixed Compensation Component |
Provide base salary based on our Compensation Committee's general understanding of current competitive compensation practices, corporate achievement, our NEO's role and responsibilities, length of tenure, internal pay equity and individual performance. |
|||||||
| | | | | | | | |
The following highlights some of the key components of our pay for performance policies and practices:
| | | | | | | | |
At-Risk Compensation | | A majority of the compensation of our CEO and our other NEOs is "at-risk" and tied to Company performance over the short- and/or long-term. | | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
Incentive Award Metrics | Establish and approve objective incentive award metrics tied to key Company performance indicators. | |||||||
| | | | | | | | |
| Performance Long-Term Incentives | | The number of performance-based restricted cash units or shares earned is based on our financial performance over a specified period, aligning our NEOs' interests with the long-term interests of our stockholders. | | ||||
| | | | | | | | |
Time-Based Equity Vesting | Equity awards subject to time-based vesting vest ratably over three or four years to promote retention. | |||||||
| | | | | | | | |
| Stock Ownership Guidelines | | Maintain stock ownership guidelines to support the alignment of interests between our NEOs and stockholders. | | ||||
| | | | | | | | |
No Hedging | Prohibition of hedging exposure of, or interest in, our Common Stock. | |||||||
| | | | | | | | |
| No Pledging | | Prohibition of pledging our Common Stock. | | ||||
| | | | | | | | |
Our Compensation Committee oversees the design and administration of the compensation of our NEOs and certain other executive officers, with an enhanced focus on the individual compensation of our NEOs. For 2018, our CEO assessed the performance of our NEOs (other than himself), consulted with other members of management, including our Executive Chairman and our compensation consultant, and made recommendations to our Compensation Committee regarding the amount and the form of the compensation of our NEOs and other key employees, including the performance goals,
25
weighting of goals, and equity compensation awards of our NEOs. Our CEO was not present during discussions regarding his compensation.
2018 Executive Compensation Program |
Cash Incentive Compensation
For our NEOs' Annual Cash Incentive Bonuses in 2018, our Compensation Committee approved the following metrics:
In addition, each NEO had the opportunity to earn another (i) 10% of his or her annual bonus target if our Company entered into at least two Tier 1 partnership agreements with third parties during 2018 and (ii) 10% of his or her annual bonus target if our Company entered into at least two new Cloud, Messaging or Digital customer agreements during 2018 with a guaranteed contract value of at least $10 million. Our Compensation Committee believes that non-GAAP revenue, non-GAAP EBITDA, free cash flow and entering into large strategic transactions with companies are metrics that accurately value our Company on both a short- and long-term basis and are targeted to emphasize strong growth on gross revenue and managing expenses. Based on the feedback received as part of our stockholder outreach program, several of these are the key metrics many of our stockholders use in their valuation of our Company. As such, our bonus goals for NEOs are focused on growing non-GAAP revenue, non-GAAP EBITDA and free cash flow and entering into large strategic transactions with companies, which we believe is aligned with our stockholders' perspective on our Company's ability to grow and succeed in the short- and long-term.
Long-term Incentive Compensation
Our Compensation Committee awards time-based vesting restricted shares, stock options and performance-based vesting restricted cash units or shares to our NEOs as the long-term incentive compensation component of their compensation, targeting an annual mix of one-third for each of these types of equity awards (based on grant date fair value). The number of stock options, target number of performance-based restricted cash units or shares and number of time-based vesting restricted shares granted to our NEOs is based on our Compensation Committee's general understanding of competitive pay practices, our CEO's recommendations (except for his own equity grants) and other factors it deemed appropriate.
2018-2020 Performance Units
Our 2018 long-term equity incentive plan was designed to reward financial and strategic performance during a three-year period from 2018 through 2020, and the restricted cash units or shares granted under the long-term incentive plan (the "2018-2020 Performance Units") are earned and vest based on achievement of pre-determined performance criteria during that period. Our NEOs are required to
26
remain employed by our Company through February 2021 in order to vest in the cash units or shares, as applicable. Our Compensation Committee approved the following performance metrics for the 2018-2020 Performance Units:
2018 Say on Pay Vote
At our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, approximately 90% of the shares voted were cast in favor of the advisory vote on executive compensation. We continuously strive to improve the level of stockholder support for our executive compensation program and, in 2018, met with several of our largest stockholders and solicited their feedback on our executive compensation policies. We have ongoing dialogue with our stockholders throughout the year on matters related to executive compensation, and our programs reflect feedback provided through these discussions. Our Compensation Committee evaluates our executive compensation program each year with the goal of ensuring it is in line with our stockholders' interests. We encourage stockholders to take into account the continuous changes to our executive compensation program over the last several years in considering the advisory vote presented below including adding new metrics to both our short-term and long-term compensation plans, adding non-financial metrics to our short-term incentive plan and meeting with stockholders as part of our annual stockholder outreach program.
Compensation Consultant |
Our Compensation Committee's compensation consultant generally attends regular Compensation Committee meetings and meets with our Compensation Committee without management present. When making decisions with respect to compensation matters and in an effort to gain a better understanding of the competitive landscape, our Compensation Committee considers various analyses prepared by its compensation consultant, along with information it receives from management and its own judgment and experience. Since 2013, our compensation consultant has been Deloitte Consulting LLP ("Deloitte").
Peer Group
Our Compensation Committee generally reviews executive compensation survey and proxy data from technology companies that have similar software/services business models or operate in the mobile networking space, are of similar financial size and are representative of the organizations with which we compete with for our executive talent. Our Compensation Committee, based in part on advice from
27
Deloitte, identified and approved the following companies that fit some or all of these criteria as our peer group for purposes of assisting in benchmarking our 2018 executive compensation decisions:
| | | | | | | | |
8x8 Inc. | Guidewire Software Inc. | PegaSystems, Inc. | | |||||
Blackbaud, Inc. | Imperva, Inc. | Progress Software Corp. | ||||||
| Bottomline Technologies, Inc. | J2 Global, Inc. | Proofpoint Inc. | | ||||
Broadsoft, Inc. | LogMein, Inc. | RingCentral, Inc. | ||||||
| CommVault Systems, Inc. OnDemand Inc. | Medidata Solutions, Inc. | Shutterstock Inc. | | ||||
Cornerstone OnDemand Inc. | MicroStrategy, Inc. | The Ultimate Software Group | ||||||
| | | | | | | | |
Our peer group for 2018 executive compensation decisions was updated in 2017 to reflect the acquisition of Fleetmatics Group PLC, Infoblox, Inc., Interactive Intelligence Group, Inc. and NeuStar, Inc. Our Compensation Committee added 8x8 Inc., Imperva, Inc., RingCentral, Inc. and Shutterstock Inc. as peer group companies based on the similarities of their business offerings, financial profile, market capitalization and profitability with those of our Company. As a result of these changes, we believe the peer group utilized for purposes of 2018 executive compensation decisions was representative of companies that we compete with for executive talent. When making compensation decisions for our NEOs, our Compensation Committee also reviews published survey and peer group compensation data for other software/services companies or companies that operate in the mobile networking space. Competitive market practices is an important factor in our Compensation Committee's decision-making process, although its decisions are not entirely based upon these factors and it is not bound by any target specific compensation levels derived from peer group data. Rather, our Compensation Committee reviews and considers the peer group and other survey data to obtain a general understanding of current competitive compensation practices. Additionally, reviewing the peer group and survey compensation data enables our Compensation Committee to accomplish our goal of paying our NEOs what is appropriate and necessary to attract and retain qualified and committed executives while incentivizing achievement of our corporate goals while conserving cash and equity.
28
Principal Elements of Compensation
Our executive compensation program has the following principal elements: base salary, annual cash incentive bonuses, long-term incentive awards and severance and change in control benefits. For base salary, annual cash bonuses and long-term incentive awards for our executive officers, our Company's compensation philosophy generally is to evaluate individual experience and contribution, as well as corporate performance, and then consider competitive market analysis. The markets we are serving are narrow and highly competitive for large-scale implementations leveraging unique technologies. With respect to all compensation components, we generally use the median compensation of our peer group and the markets for which we compete for talent as the starting point for the compensation decision making process. We seek to drive our Company to over-perform the market in the long term, and we believe that to ensure an appropriate pay-for-performance alignment, it may be appropriate for our Compensation Committee to approve compensation levels for individual executives that may be above or below target pay for similar positions based on experience, individual contribution and corporate performance. Additionally, our Compensation Committee may exercise discretion to issue one-time equity awards where appropriate to ensure alignment with key strategic business initiatives. The following table describes the primary compensation elements used by our Company and the objectives of each element:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Base Salary | | Objective: | | ||||||
| | | Our Compensation Committee sets base salaries with the intent to attract and retain NEO, reward satisfactory performance and provide a minimum, fixed level of cash compensation to compensate NEOs for their day-to-day responsibilities. | | ||||||
|
|
Key Features: |
|
|||||||
| | | | NEO base salaries are initially determined as a result of negotiation between the executive and our management in consultation with, and subject to the approval of, our Compensation Committee. | | |||||
| | | | Our Compensation Committee reviews base salaries annually and has discretion to provide increases based on our Compensation Committee's understanding of current competitive pay practices, promotions, our CEO's recommendation (except for his own salary), changes in responsibilities and performance, annual budget for increases, our overall financial and operational results, the general economy, length of tenure, internal pay equity and other factors our Compensation Committee deems appropriate. | | |||||
|
|
Process: |
|
|||||||
| | | | At the end of each calendar year, our CEO recommends base salaries for NEOs other than himself for the following calendar year. | | |||||
| | | | Our Compensation Committee reviews proposed base salary changes with input from its compensation consultant. | | |||||
| | | | Our Compensation Committee approves annual base salaries for our NEOs. | | |||||
| | | | Our Compensation Committee reports base salary determinations to our full Board. | | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
29
| | | | | | | | | | |
Annual Cash | Objective: | |||||||||
Incentive Bonus | Annual cash incentive bonuses are awarded under a performance-based compensation program and are designed to align the interests of our NEOs and stockholders by providing compensation based on the achievement of pre-determined corporate and/or business goals and individual performance. | |||||||||
Key Features: |
||||||||||
| Each year, the target bonus for each NEO is set by our Compensation Committee based on each NEO's employment agreement provisions, our CEO's recommendation (except for his own target), internal pay equity, our Compensation Committee's general understanding of current competitive pay practices and other factors it deems appropriate. | |||||||||
| The incentive compensation for our NEOs is based on achievement of certain objective corporate, financial, strategic and individual goals established and approved by our Compensation Committee at the start of the year. | |||||||||
| If we achieve results that are below certain threshold levels, these NEOs receive no cash incentive bonus, while results that are above certain threshold levels result in cash incentive bonuses above target levels. | |||||||||
Process: |
||||||||||
| Our Compensation Committee participates in our Board's review of our annual operating plan in the beginning of the year. | |||||||||
| Our CEO recommends bonus targets as a percentage of base salary for each NEO other than himself. | |||||||||
| Our management recommends financial and other performance measures, weightings and ranges. | |||||||||
| Our Compensation Committee reviews proposed bonus targets, performance measures and ranges provided by management and, with input from its compensation consultant, approves bonus targets, performance measures and ranges that it believes establish appropriately challenging goals. | |||||||||
| After the end of the calendar year, our management presents the Company's financial results to our Board. | |||||||||
| Our CEO recommends the individual component award for our NEOs other than himself. | |||||||||
| Our Compensation Committee reviews the results and determines whether to make any adjustments to the recommendations and then approves each NEO's bonus award. | |||||||||
| Our Compensation Committee reports bonus award determinations to our full Board. | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
30
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Long-Term | | Objectives: | | ||||||
| Incentive Awards | | Our Compensation Committee structures long-term incentive awards to align our NEOs' interests with those of our stockholders, support retention and motivate NEOs to achieve our financial, strategic and operational goals. Long-term incentive awards include stock options and time-based vesting and performance-based vesting restricted cash units or shares. | | ||||||
|
|
Key Features: |
|
|||||||
| | | | Our Compensation Committee grants stock options and time-based vesting and performance-based vesting restricted cash units or shares to our NEOs with the grant date fair value based on our Compensation Committee's general understanding of current competitive pay practices, our CEO's recommendation (except for his own awards), input from our compensation consultant, internal pay equity, evaluation of each NEO's performance, and other factors our Compensation Committee deems appropriate. | | |||||
| | | | Our Compensation Committee allocates long-term incentive awards among stock options, time-based vesting restricted shares and performance-based vesting shares or cash units based on grant date fair value (with vesting terms that generally extend up to four years) with the intent to provide NEOs with a balanced retention and performance opportunity and serves to closely align our NEOs' long-term objectives with those of our stockholders. | | |||||
| | | | In 2018, our Compensation Committee decided to grant performance-based cash units rather than shares (other than to Ms. Clark who received performance-based shares in connection with her new hire grant and Messrs. Clark and Miller who were not granted performance-based awards) and retained the discretion to settle the cash units in either cash or shares of our Common Stock at the time the cash units vest in an effort to protect against potential dilution. Each performance-based cash unit has a target number of cash units to be earned following completion of a specific performance period based on the achievement of certain pre-established Company performance criteria. These performance-based cash units or shares will be earned upon the completion of the specific performance period if the relevant performance criteria are achieved and typically vest based on continued service after a three-year period. At the time that each performance-based cash unit vests, our Compensation Committee has discretion to either (i) pay cash equal to the product of the closing price of our Common Stock on the date the cash units vest or (ii) issue one share of our Common Stock for each performance-based cash unit. Ms. Clark will not receive cash but, if earned, will receive shares of our Common Stock. | | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
31
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Process: | | ||||||
| | | | In the first fiscal quarter, our CEO recommends grant date fair values of awards for executives other than himself. | | |||||
| | | | Our Compensation Committee reviews proposed performance measures and ranges provided by management and competitive market data and, with input from its compensation consultant, approves performance measures and ranges that it believes establish appropriately challenging goals. | | |||||
| | | | Our Compensation Committee approves the number of time-based shares underlying stock options and the target number of time-based restricted shares and performance-based shares or cash units granted to our NEOs. | | |||||
| | | | Our Compensation Committee reports equity award determinations to our full Board. | | |||||
| | | | At the end of the relevant performance period, our Compensation Committee reviews the financial performance of our Company for the relevant performance period and determines the amount of earned shares or cash units that are subject to performance-based vesting. | | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Severance and | Objective: | |||||||||
Change in Control Benefits |
Severance and change in control benefits are included in each NEO's employment agreement or employment plan in order to promote stability and continuity of our senior management team in the event of a potential change in control and/or an involuntary termination. Our Compensation Committee believes these provisions help to align our NEO's interests appropriately with those of our stockholders in these scenarios. | |||||||||
Key Features: |
||||||||||
| Events triggering payment require a termination of our NEO's employment by our Company without cause or by our NEO for good reason. NEOs are entitled to enhanced benefits if the qualifying termination occurs during a specified period following a change in control (i.e., double-trigger). | |||||||||
| Change in Control benefits do not include excise tax gross-ups. | |||||||||
| Our Compensation Committee has determined these termination-related benefits are appropriate to preserve productivity and encourage retention in the face of potentially disruptive circumstances. These arrangements also include restrictive covenants that help protect our Company from competition and solicitation of employees and customers. | |||||||||
| Each NEO will only be eligible to receive severance payments if he or she signs a general release of claims following an eligible termination. | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Chief Executive Officer Compensation
In November 2017, we hired Glenn Lurie, a long-term executive at AT&T, as our new CEO, replacing Stephen Waldis. At the time of hiring, Mr. Lurie had several alternative career opportunities based on the competitive landscape and his unique skill set and, as a result, the Board approved a compensation package above the 50th percentile of CEOs at our peer group companies, including a one-time special grant of 1,000,000 stock options with the intent to increase our stockholder value. We believe hiring Mr. Lurie as our CEO was a key move towards moving the Company in the right direction for long-term
32
growth, and therefore we believe his compensation was commensurate with his experience and contributions he will make towards the Company's future.
In keeping with our results-driven culture, our Compensation Committee expects our NEOs to deliver superior performance in a sustained fashion and believes that a substantial portion of their overall compensation should be at-risk and tied to our short-term and long-term performance. As shown below, 75.5% of our CEO's targeted compensation and an average of 64.2% of the average targeted compensation of our other NEOs for 2018 was tied to long-term incentives.
In determining the criteria for our NEOs' incentive compensation, our Compensation Committee considers a variety of factors, including alignment of our NEOs' compensation with our stockholders' returns, and from time to time may adjust these factors or performance metrics based on our Company's transactions or the occurrence of unknown or unexpected events during the applicable measurement period. On the corporate level, our Compensation Committee selected non-GAAP revenue, non-GAAP EBITDA and free cash flow and our entering into strategic agreements, metrics that our Compensation Committee believes appropriately value our Company on both a short- and long-term basis and are targeted to emphasize strong growth on gross revenue while also managing our earnings per share. Based on feedback received as part of our stockholder outreach program, several of these are also the key metrics we believe our stockholders use in their valuation of our Company. As a result, our NEOs are focused on growing non-GAAP revenue, non-GAAP EBITDA and free cash flow and entering into strategic agreements, which we believe is aligned with our stockholders' perspective on our Company's ability to grow and succeed on the short- and long-term.
33
Base Salary
Base salaries for our NEOs are reviewed and may be adjusted annually. Base salary may also be adjusted during the year upon promotion or based on internal equity or external market conditions. Our Compensation Committee makes these decisions after reviewing the recommendation of our CEO (except as it concerns his own salary) and our Chief People Officer, and consulting with our compensation consultant. Based on this review, our Compensation Committee did not approve any cost of living or other increases to the base salaries of any of our NEOs in 2018 except for Mr. Doran who received a 5% increase as his base salary was below the 50th percentile of base salaries of similar executives at our peer group companies. The base salaries for Ms. Clark and Messrs. Miller and Clark were negotiated with such NEO's at the time they joined our Company in 2018.
The table below sets forth each of our NEOs' 2018 base salary:
| | | | | | |
|
Name |
2018 Base Salary |
| |||
|
Glenn Lurie |
$750,000 | | |||
| | | | | | |
|
David Clark |
$385,000 | ||||
| | | | | | |
|
Lawrence Irving(1) |
$425,000 | | |||
| | | | | | |
|
Jeffrey Miller |
$385,000 | ||||
| | | | | | |
|
Robert Garcia(2) |
$475,000 | | |||
| | | | | | |
|
Mary Clark |
$350,000 | ||||
| | | | | | |
|
Patrick Doran |
$347,000 | | |||
| | | | | | |
2018 Annual Cash Incentive Bonus Compensation
Our Annual Cash Incentive Bonus Compensation Program promotes our pay-for-performance philosophy by providing all executives and other management-level corporate employees with direct financial incentives in the form of annual cash awards for achieving Company, business and individual performance goals.
Target Percentage
Our Compensation Committee sets each NEO's individual target cash incentive amount (expressed as a percentage of base salary) based on its general understanding of competitive pay practices, our CEO's recommendation (except with respect to his own target), its consultation with our compensation consultant, and other factors it deems appropriate. Based on its review of these factors, in April 2018, our Compensation Committee kept the target bonus percentage of each of our NEOs who were employed by us in 2017 at the same level as in 2017. The 2018 target bonuses for Ms. Clark and Messrs. Miller and Clark were negotiated with such NEOs at the time they joined our Company in 2018.
34
The target cash incentive and maximum bonus percentages for each of our NEOs for 2018 who were employed by our Company as of December 31, 2018, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
|
Name |
Target Incentive Bonus Percentage |
Maximum Bonus Percentage |
| ||||
|
Glenn Lurie |
120% of base salary | 210% of base salary | | ||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
David Clark |
70% of base salary | 122.5% of base salary | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
Jeffrey Miller |
100% of base salary | 175% of base salary | | ||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
Mary Clark |
100% of base salary | 175% of base salary | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
Patrick Doran |
60% of base salary | 105% of base salary | | ||||
| | | | | | | | |
2018 Objectives
For 2018, the cash incentive bonus for each of our NEOs was determined as follows: (i) 90% based on certain corporate objectives and (ii) 10% based on a discretionary individual performance component. In addition, each NEO had the opportunity to earn another (i) 10% of his or her annual bonus target if our Company entered into at least two Tier 1 partnership agreements with third parties during 2018 and (ii) 10% of his or her annual bonus target if our Company entered into at least two new Cloud, Messaging or Digital customer agreements during 2018 with a guaranteed contract value of at least $10 million.
Our Compensation Committee established (i) non-GAAP revenue, (ii) non-GAAP EBITDA and (iii) free cash flow as the corporate components of our 2018 annual cash incentive bonus program, with each of the components weighted as set forth below. We utilize these non-GAAP financial measures internally in analyzing our financial results and evaluating our ongoing operational performance because they exclude certain non-cash adjustments and non-recurring charges required under GAAP. These metrics were also selected because they are several of the key performance metrics stockholders use in evaluating our Company. In calculating both non-GAAP revenue and non-GAAP EBITDA, we add back the fair value stock-based compensation expense, deferred revenue, acquisition-related costs, restructuring charges, changes in the contingent consideration obligation, deferred compensation expense related to earn-outs and amortization of intangibles associated with acquisitions.
Each of the components was assigned a "threshold" level, which is the minimum achievement level that must be satisfied to receive a portion of the applicable bonus amounts, and a "maximum" level, which, if achieved or exceeded, would result in our NEO's receiving up to 175% of the target amount attributed to that component.
35
The components of the 2018 cash incentive compensation plan are set forth below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Corporate Component |
Weighting |
Threshold 50% payout |
100% payout |
Maximum 175% payout |
| ||||||
|
Non-GAAP Revenue |
40% | $325,000,000 | $375,000,000 | $425,000,000 | | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Non-GAAP EBITDA |
30% | $25,000,000 | $75,000,000 | $115,000,000 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Free Cash Flow |
20% | $25,000,000 | $75,000,000 | $115,000,000 | | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Individual Component |
10% | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
2018 Corporate Component
In 2018, our non-GAAP revenue was $325,839,000, and therefore our NEOs received 50% payout for this metric. During 2018, we had two key events that were not taken into account when the above non-GAAP EBIDTA metric was initially established by our Compensation Committee we were required to make certain financial adjustments as a result of our restatement of our prior financial statements and we established a new product line, DXP, as a result of our Honeybee acquisition. Due to these key events, our Compensation Committee, in consultation with our compensation consultant and after reviewing several alternative approaches, determined that it was appropriate to adjust the calculation of our 2018 non-GAAP EBITDA for purposes of determining bonuses to be awarded pursuant to our 2018 cash incentive compensation plan. Our Compensation Committee resolved to add the following to our actual 2018 non-GAAP EBITDA to calculate 2018 Adjusted non-GAAP EBITDA: (i) the financial adjustments made as a result of our restatement of prior financials and (ii) expenses incurred in establishing the new DXP product line.
As a result, following the adjustments approved by our Compensation Committee, Adjusted Non-GAAP EBITDA was $28.5 million (comprised of $14.0 million, plus $10.8 million of financial adjustments relating to our restatement of our prior financial statements and $3.7 of expenses incurred in establishing the new DXP product line). As a result, each NEO received 53.5% of the payout with respect to the non-GAAP EBITDA metric.
The free cash flow component was defined under our 2018 cash incentive compensation plan as Non-GAAP EBITDA less any deferred revenue. Our Compensation Committee determined to utilize the Adjusted Non-GAAP EBITDA of $28.5 million discussed above for purposes of calculating free cash flow which resulted in $25.5 million of free cash flow following the reduction of Adjusted Non-GAAP EBITDA by $3 million of deferred revenue. As a result, each NEO received 50% of the payout with respect to the free cash flow metric.
In addition, as described above, each NEO was eligible to earn another (i) 10% of his or her annual bonus target if our Company entered into at least two Tier 1 partnership agreements with third parties during 2018 and (ii) 10% of his or her annual bonus target if our Company entered into at least two new Cloud, Messaging or Digital customer agreements during 2018 with a guaranteed contract value of at least $10 million. In 2018, our Company entered into Tier 1 partnership agreements with more than two companies but did not enter into at least two Cloud, Messaging or Digital customer agreements with a guaranteed value of at least $10 million. Accordingly, each NEO received 100% of the payout with respect to the partnership strategic metric and 0% with respect to the new customer agreement portion.
36
2018 Individual Component
In 2018, the individual component of each NEO's annual cash incentive compensation was based upon our Compensation Committee's subjective assessment of his or her individual performance.
Based on its assessment and Mr. Lurie's recommendations (other than with respect to his own incentive compensation), our Compensation Committee awarded the following as the individual component of their annual cash incentive compensation:
The level of plan payout that was applied to each of the performance components of the 2018 cash incentive compensation plan, which payout percentages were then applied to the cash incentive compensation payments to our NEOs is set forth in the following table:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Component |
|
Weighting |
|
Achievement |
|
Bonus Rate Payout |
|
Bonus Payout | | ||||||
|
Non-GAAP Revenue |
| 40 | % | $ | 325,000,000 | | 50 | % | | 20 | % | | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Non-GAAP EBITDA |
30 | % | $ | 28,500,000 | 53.5 | % | 16 | % | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Free Cash Flow |
| 20 | % | $ | 25,500,000 | | 50 | % | | 10 | % | | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Individual Component |
10 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 10 | % | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Strategic Agreements |
| 10 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 10 | % | | ||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Customer Agreements |
10 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Based on the results of the corporate and individual performance components of the annual cash incentive plan, our NEOs were awarded 66% of each of their targets, resulting in the following payout
37
amounts under the 2018 cash incentive bonus plan for those NEO's who were employed by us at the end of 2018:
| | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||
|
| Executive |
Target Bonus |
Percentage of Target Awarded |
Actual Bonus Awarded |
| |||||||||||||
|
| Glenn Lurie |
| | $ | 900,000 | | | | 66 | % | | | $ | 594,000 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||
|
| David Clark(1) |
| | $ | 269,500 | | | | 66 | % | | | $ | 98,926 | | | ||
| | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||
|
| Jeffrey Miller(1) |
| | $ | 385,000 | | | | 66 | % | | | $ | 48,732 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||
|
| Mary Clark |
| | $ | 350,000 | | | | 66 | % | | | $ | 231,000 | | | ||
| | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||
|
| Patrick Doran |
| | $ | 206,200 | | | | 66 | % | | | $ | 137,412 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
No amounts were paid to Messrs. Irving or Garcia pursuant to the 2018 cash incentive bonus plan as they were not employed by our Company at the time bonuses were awarded and paid.
2018 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan
Our Compensation Committee awarded time-based vesting restricted shares, time-based vesting stock options and performance-based vesting cash units (or shares) to our NEOs as the long-term equity incentive component of their compensation, targeting an annual mix with the intent to provide NEOs with a balanced retention and performance opportunity and serve to closely align our NEOs' long-term objectives with those of our stockholders. The number of shares underlying vesting stock options, the target number of performance-based vesting cash units or shares and the number of time-based vesting restricted shares granted to our NEOs is based on our Compensation Committee's general understanding of competitive pay practices, our CEO's recommendation (except with respect to his own awards), consultation with our compensation consultant, and other factors that our Compensation Committee deems appropriate.
Time-Based Restricted Stock, Stock Options and Performance-Based Restricted Stock and Cash Units
In April 2018, in consultation with our compensation consultant, our Compensation Committee granted time-based vesting restricted stock (31.5% of such NEO's equity award), time-based vesting options to purchase shares of our Common Stock (10.5% of such NEO's equity award) and performance-based vesting cash units (58% of such NEO's equity award) to Messrs. Lurie and Doran. In connection with her joining our Company in January 2018, our Compensation Committee granted Ms. Clark time-based vesting restricted stock, time-based vesting options to purchase shares of our Common Stock and performance-based vesting restricted shares, with each component being one-third of her equity award. In connection with their joining our Company in 2018, our Compensation Committee granted each of Mr. Clark and Mr. Miller time-based vesting restricted stock (75% of such NEO's equity award) and time-based vesting options to purchase shares of our Common Stock (25% of such NEO's equity award). Neither Mr. Clark nor Mr. Miller received any performance-based vesting restricted shares or cash units.
38
Except for the time-based vesting restricted shares granted to Ms. Clark, the time-based vesting restricted shares vest one-third on each of the first, second and third anniversary of their grant date and the vesting stock options vest one-fourth on the first anniversary of their grant date and in equal monthly installments thereafter over the next thirty-six months. With respect to Ms. Clark, the time-based vesting restricted shares vest 25% on the first anniversary of the grant date and 1/12th each quarter thereafter. The performance-based vesting restricted shares and cash units vest upon the Compensation Committee approving the performance metrics for such grants, which is expected to be in or about February 15, 2021. Each component is subject to the NEO remaining employed through each such vest date. The time-based vesting helps tie our NEOs' variable realizable compensation to our performance and further align their interests with those of our stockholders. See "Description of Awards Granted in 2018," below.
The following table sets forth the number of shares of time-based vesting restricted stock and performance-based vesting restricted cash units or shares awarded and the number of vesting stock options to purchase shares of our Common Stock granted to our NEOs who were employed by us as of December 31, 2018. The equity awards granted to Mr. Garcia in 2018 expired at the time that he ceased being our employee. The equity awards granted to Mr. Irving in 2018 will expire in August 2019 pursuant to his consulting agreement. Mr. Irving's performance-based restricted cash units granted to him expired at the time he ceased being our employee.
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Name |
Number of Time-Based Shares of Restricted Stock |
Number of Shares Subject to Options |
Number of Performance-Based Restricted Cash Units or Shares |
||||||
|
Glenn Lurie |
148,306 | 112,352 | 273,070 | | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
David Clark |
187,207 | 130,549 | -0- | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Jeffrey Miller |
120,968 | 84,357 | -0- | | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Mary Clark |
30,000 | 80,000 | 30,000 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Patrick Doran |
29,662 | 22,470 | 54,614 | | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Performance-Based Vesting Restricted Shares
2016-2018 Performance Shares
Our 2016-2018 long-term equity incentive plan was originally designed to reward financial and strategic performance during a three-year period from 2016 through 2018, and the restricted shares granted under the 2016-2018 long-term incentive plan (the "2016-2018 Performance Shares") were originally to be earned and vest based on achievement of pre-determined performance criteria during that period.
In 2016, our Compensation Committee granted our NEOs the 2016-2018 Performance Shares. The actual number of 2016-2018 Performance Shares earned were originally based on our Company's financial performance over the three-year period commencing on January 1, 2016 based on the following criteria: 60% based on non-GAAP revenue, 30% based on non-GAAP EBITDA and 10% based on the non-GAAP revenue from our Enterprise business. The specific target values for the 2016-2018 Performance Shares were set using aggressive three-year growth targets tied to key corporate financial metrics. In late 2016 and throughout 2017, we experienced changes in our business strategy, including
39
various management changes, the acquisition of Intralinks Holdings Inc. and the divestiture of our activation exception handling business. Our Compensation Committee discussed alternative methods of granting long-term incentives to our NEOs and measuring performance for open performance awards in light of these significant developments with its independent compensation consultant. Accordingly, our Compensation Committee, with the input of our compensation consultant, agreed to modify the 2016-2018 long-term equity incentive plan by approving that (i) one-third of the 2016-2018 Performance Shares would be awarded based on our Company's performance in 2016 and (ii) two-thirds of the 2016-2018 Performance Shares would be awarded based on our Company's future performance in 2017 and 2018. Our NEOs were required to remain employed by our Company through February 2019 in order to vest in the shares. Our Compensation Committee approved the following revised performance metrics for the 2016-2018 Performance Shares:
For 2016, our Compensation Committee kept the metrics the same percentage as originally approved:
For 2017 and 2018, our Compensation Committee revised the percentages as follows:
Mr. Doran, the only NEO who was employed by us in 2016, was awarded 2016-2018 Performance Shares that provided the opportunity to earn the following restricted shares based on the performance of our business during the 2016-2018 performance period:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Name |
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
| |||||
|
Patrick Doran |
| 3,164 | | 6,328 | | 12,656 | | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The method used to calculate the 2016-2018 Performance Shares earned was based on actual performance compared to our Company's revised targets for the 2016-2018 Performance Shares, as shown below, using straight-line interpolation between points. The determination of what number of shares (if any) were earned for the 2016, 2017 and 2018 performance periods is set forth below. The shares vested upon issuance in March 2019.
40
2016 Performance Period One-third of the 2016-2018 Performance Shares
In February 2016, our Compensation Committee approved the following threshold, target and maximum performance goals for the 2016 portion of the 2016-2018 Performance Shares:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Corporate Component |
Threshold 50% payout |
Target 100% payout |
Maximum 200% payout |
Weighting | |||||||
|
Non-GAAP Revenue |
$667,000,000 |
$696,000,000 |
$725,000,000 |
60% |
|
||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Non-GAAP EBITDA as % of Revenue |
25% | 35% | 45% | 30% | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Enterprise Business Revenue (% of total revenue) |
N/A | 15% | N/A | 10% | | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
In 2016, our attainment under the stated metrics was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Corporate Component |
Achievement | Plan Payout | Weighting | | |||||
|
Adjusted Non-GAAP Revenue |
$698,400,000 | 165% | 60% | | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Adjusted Non-GAAP EBITDA |
34% | 95% | 30% | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Enterprise Business Revenue (% of total revenue) |
3% | -0%- | 10% | | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
As a result, Mr. Doran earned 93.3% of the target number of the 2016-2018 Performance Shares allocable to 2016 based on our Company's 2016 financial performance. These Performance Shares vested in March 2019. The actual number of 2016-2018 Performance Shares earned based on our 2016 performance is set forth below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Name |
|
2016-2018 Target Shares |
|
2016 Target Shares |
|
Attainment % |
|
Shares Earned |
| ||||||
|
Patrick Doran |
| 6,328 | | 2,109 | | 93.3 | % | | 1,967 | | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2017 Performance Period One-third of the 2016-2018 Performance Shares
In July of 2017, our Compensation Committee approved the following threshold, target and maximum performance goals for 2017 for the 2016-2018 Performance Shares:
| | | | | | | | | | |