UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ý | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 |
||
OR |
||
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-31558
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
NEVADA (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
88-0104066 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
6601 S. Bermuda Rd. Las Vegas, Nevada 89119
(Address of principal executive offices)
(702) 584-7700
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class | Name of each Exchange on which registered | |
---|---|---|
Common Stock, $0.10 par value per share | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ý Yes o No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. o Yes ý No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ý Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ý Yes o No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). (Check one):
ý Large accelerated filer | o Accelerated filer | o Non-accelerated filer | o Smaller reporting company |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes ý No
The aggregate market value of the common stock, $0.10 par value, held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed based on the closing sale price as of December 30, 2011 of $39.56 per share as reported by the New York Stock Exchange, was approximately $1,690,000,000.
According to the records of the registrant's registrar and transfer agent, the number of shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding as of August 24, 2012 was 41,438,000, which do not include 21,896,000 shares held in treasury.
Documents Incorporated by Reference: Portions of the registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the end of the registrant's fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
FORM 10-K
Year Ended June 30, 2012
Forward Looking Statements
Certain statements made or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), in our press releases and in statements made by or with the approval of authorized personnel constitute "forward looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and are subject to the safe harbor created thereby. Forward looking statements reflect our intent, belief or current expectations with respect to, among other things, future events and financial trends affecting us. Forward looking statements are typically identified by words such as "believes," "estimates," "expects," "anticipates," "plans," "should," "would" and similar expressions.
Although we believe the expectations reflected in any forward looking statements are reasonable, readers are cautioned that forward looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, are not guarantees of future performance and that actual results, performance or achievements may differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward looking statements. These differences can arise as a result of a number of risks, including those described in Item 1A, Risk Factors.
Forward looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K speak only as of the date hereof, and forward looking statements in documents incorporated by reference speak only as of the date of those documents. Unless otherwise required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise these forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these risks and uncertainties, we cannot ensure that the forward looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K will, in fact, transpire.
Unless the context requires otherwise, the terms "Bally," the "Company," "we" and "our" as used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K refer to Bally Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
General
Bally Technologies, Inc. is a diversified global gaming company that designs, manufactures, operates, and distributes advanced technology-based gaming devices, systems, server-based solutions, custom mobile applications, and interactive applications. Our innovations and technology solutions allow our customers to more effectively manage their operations using our wide range of marketing, data management and analysis, accounting, player tracking, security, and other software applications and tools. We also provide hardware, including spinning-reel and video gaming devices, specialty gaming devices, and wide-area progressive systems. We support customers that include traditional land-based, riverboat, and Native American casinos, video lottery and central determination markets.
We were founded in Chicago, Illinois in 1932 as Bally Manufacturing Corp. The Company was incorporated in Nevada on September 30, 1968, under the name Advanced Patent Technologies. Following two other name changes, we became Alliance Gaming Corporation on December 19, 1994, and on March 6, 2006, we changed our name to Bally Technologies, Inc. Our principal executive offices are located at 6601 South Bermuda Road, Las Vegas, Nevada 89119; telephone (702) 584-7700. Our website is www.BallyTech.com. Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and all amendments to those filings are available on
1
our website, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.
Company and Product Overview
We derive our revenue from the following:
|
Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
|
(dollars in millions) |
||||||||||||||||||
Gaming Equipment |
$ | 310.7 | 35 | % | $ | 246.6 | 33 | % | $ | 273.7 | 35 | % | |||||||
Gaming Operations |
357.4 | 41 | % | 318.6 | 42 | % | 287.0 | 37 | % | ||||||||||
Systems |
211.7 | 24 | % | 193.0 | 25 | % | 217.5 | 28 | % | ||||||||||
|
$ | 879.8 | 100 | % | $ | 758.2 | 100 | % | $ | 778.2 | 100 | % | |||||||
Gaming Equipment |
| Sale of gaming devices and related equipment, parts and conversion kits; | |||
Gaming Operations |
|
Operation of linked progressive systems, video lottery and centrally determined systems, and the rental of gaming devices and content; and |
|||
Systems |
|
Sale and support of specialized systems-based software, hardware and interactive products and related recurring maintenance revenue. |
Prior to the sale of the Rainbow Casino in June 2010, our business consisted of two business segments, the Bally Gaming Equipment and Systems segment and the Rainbow Casino ("Casino Operations") segment. For the years ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, our Casino Operations were reclassified as discontinued operations in our Consolidated Statements of Operations, Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Our gaming equipment, gaming operations, and systems product lines have increasingly converged with the proliferation of high-speed networks. Key innovation drivers in our industry are Ethernet-based gaming floors, downloadable and server-based games and applications, and open protocols and common industry standards in game and system development, such as Gaming Standard Association ("GSA") protocols. Players benefit from these advances by gaining more exciting experiences, better communication from casino owners, and superior customer service from gaming operators. Our customers benefit through operational efficiencies that can increase their profits and streamline their operations.
The Bally Innovation Lab leads initiatives for new and emerging technologies. This research and development ("R&D") lab focuses on emerging technologies to produce our new products and enhanced features. Its mission is to accelerate the commercial deployment of the most cutting-edge, technology-based gaming devices, content, and systems on the market.
We focus on the convergence of games and systems in five key ways:
2
A gaming device consists of three elements:
Gaming devices are differentiated by a number of factors, such as game theme and layout, play mechanics, cabinet style, pay table, betting denomination, and minimum/maximum betting amount. We believe that the key to gaining market share is coupling superior customer service with leading-edge gaming cabinet hardware, content, and networks that offer high entertainment value and key operational advantages.
Game Cabinet Hardware
Our commitment to being a leader in technology is evident in our game cabinet hardware. Substantial efforts in product development, including internal, customer and end-player testing, has produced a variety of cabinet styles that house innovative features and layouts in both spinning-reel and video formats. The goal of our hardware development efforts is to maximize player appeal, product reliability, component commonality, and ease of maintenance. To that end, we dedicate hardware development resources to innovations in cabinet style, technical capability, controller circuit board design and programming, as well as user-interface devices such as card readers, keypads, button decks, and displays. We created a modular, extendible hardware and software architecture to help developers achieve greater efficiency, functionality and reliability. Development cycles can range from a few months for minor revisions, to more than a year for major design changes.
Pro Series Cabinets
We introduced the Pro Series cabinets, our latest generation design, in June 2010. Prior to the introduction of the Pro Series we marketed our cabinets under our ALPHA Elite brand. The Pro Series is currently available in upright, slant, spinning-reel, curve, V32, V22/32, and soon to be released V22/42, formats. They come with groundbreaking features such as the touch-screen, iDeck, which replaces a standard button deck; custom, four-speaker high-definition ("HD") surround-sound stereo, designed to cut through noisy casino environments and target sound to the player; exterior lighting and a super candle light crowning the game, both synchronized to game play; a shared single entry for currency, tickets, and cash-outs; a 15-inch Pro Series digital topper with game-synchronized LCD video display; and vertically opening doors that make it easier to service games without interrupting adjacent games. We can configure the top-box in Pro Series cabinets in a variety of ways including with upright wheel, as a hammerhead with an oversized 32-inch cinematic display, using the commanding digital ladder 32-inch HD video display, and the soon to be released 42-inch vertical display.
3
The Pro Curve Upright, which emulates a spinning-reel cabinet, but is actually a video slot machine with a curved LCD display, features a breakthrough video-reel technology. A 20-inch LCD display, curved just like physical reels, delivers a realistic spinning-reel experience in a video slot. The reels look, feel, and play like traditional reels, but are actually video screens, and are an ideal solution for video-only jurisdictions that want to offer their customers a traditional spinning-reel experience.
Game Platform
Each gaming device requires a game platform to manage the device hardware and deliver the game content. Changes in technology, consumer demand, capacity, security, and regulations, among other factors, drive innovations in game play. We update our game platforms and the related computer systems to keep pace with the ever-increasing complexity of current game-play requirements.
We currently support two gaming platforms; the ALPHA and the ALPHA 2. Launched in June 2010, the ALPHA 2 builds on the success, and reliability of the original ALPHA platform. ALPHA and ALPHA 2 were designed to support industry protocols, as well as various kinds of game bonuses and multi-denomination, multi-game and multi-pay table game configurations. It can operate with stand-alone, local, and wide-area progressive products.
The ALPHA 2 platform incorporated all the attributes of ALPHA, which featured a layered architecture and modular design, allowing for adaptability and simplified requirement changes, while adding significantly faster and richer features, such as an INTEL® Core 2 processor; four gigabytes of dual-channel memory; Realtek HD audio; and leading video technology. This powerful platform enables dramatic new levels of interactivity, visual quality, and performance. The result is a more compelling gaming experience for players, including three-dimensional ("3D") graphics and animations. ALPHA 2 supports both existing and new game content, as well as network and server-based applications. It is operable with the Bally Command Center, discussed in detail below, which will allow downloadable access to our game content via a central server. While transitioning to ALPHA 2 as our standard game platform for the majority of our game cabinets, we will continue to support the ALPHA platform.
Game Development and Game Content
We have decades of experience developing entertainment content for gaming operators, video lottery, and central-determination markets around the globe. Our game content features original themes, licensed themes using well-known brands, and adaptations of well-known Bally brands such as Cash Spin, Hot Shot®, Quick Hit, and Blazing 7s that can be found on most casino floors in North America and in many international markets. We have deployed our game content across wide-area progressive, local-area, and near-area progressive slots, spinning-reel and video gaming devices, specialty gaming devices, and multi-suite games. Our game-development teams cover the globe, with centers in Arizona, California, Nevada, Australia, and India. This diversification enables us to meet the demands of the markets in which we do business and develop market-specific game content.
The software development process for new game content, including graphics development, is continuous and requires a significant commitment of human resources. Creativity in software development is a key element in the market success and player appeal of our game content and gaming devices. Innovations in our development process and game design are generated internally and with the support of customers, and third parties, many of whom have entered into strategic relationships with us. Additionally, we have partnered with several internationally known brands, such as Michael Jackson, GREASE, Betty Boop, and the Playboy franchise.
We continue to add more entertaining, interactive, and complex play mechanics to our games, including features such as locking hot zone, free games with additional multipliers, rolling wilds, memory pay, multi-level progressives, free games, bonus bets, bonus spins, stacked wilds, mystery progressives, locked
4
symbol bonuses, second-chance features, asset giveaways, multi-player, community play, U-Spin player interaction, random bonus features, and the new arcade-like play mechanic which enables players to touch and roll balls on the game screen in our new SKEE-BALL® video slot.
Our game developers are also focused on developing highly interactive content for the iDeck touch-screen button deck, making it another interactive channel and display on the gaming device. In fiscal year 2012, we introduced new levels of iDeck interaction on games like All That Jazz, Total Blast, and Fish'n for Loot. These games enable players to use the iDeck as an arcade-like device. Players touch and play a virtual piano on All That Jazz. Fish'n for Loot and Total Blast introduced our new U-Shoot virtual shooting gallery bonus-game play mechanic in which the player touches the iDeck to create weapons for shooting at targets on the main game screens.
Game Parts and Conversion Kits
Our gaming device customers typically purchase replacement parts, upgrades, game conversion kits, and other products from us to keep the devices in good working order and enhance their underlying performance. Certain equipment within gaming devices, such as video monitors, bill validators, logic boards, and printers, may also be replaced as a result of wear and tear or new technology offerings by our suppliers. These sales may also include game conversion kits that provide our customers the opportunity to offer a new game theme or variant on the existing product without the necessity of purchasing a new gaming device. Our Pro Series cabinets, with their all-digital displays and iDeck digital, configurable touch-screen button deck, make game conversions easy and cost-effective for casino operators as they do not have to change the button configuration or replace game glass.
Maintenance, Trade, and Resale Market
We generally offer a 90-day parts, labor, and performance warranty/guarantee for new gaming devices. We provide several after-sale services to our customers, including customer education programs, a 24-hour customer service telephone hotline, a website for technical support, field service-support programs, and spare parts programs. Our historical warranty expense as a percentage of revenues has been less than 1 percent.
From time to time, we also sell used gaming devices, including products made by us as well as those produced by our competitors. Generally, we acquire used devices as trade-ins toward the purchase of new gaming devices. While there is a small secondary market for this in the U.S., used devices are typically resold in international markets where new device purchases may be too costly. Where appropriate, we incur costs to recondition used devices for resale or we may elect to destroy and recycle materials whenever possible.
Gaming Operations
We understand that each customer has its own particular needs based on its business and market. Through our Gaming Operations, we offer gaming operators a wide range of rental (also known as participation or recurring revenue) options for our gaming devices and content. Operating gaming devices under a rental arrangement often requires us to invest significant capital in manufacturing the gaming device and related equipment, purchasing signs and seating, and, in certain cases, acquiring intellectual property rights. These rental devices are available as linked progressive systems, rental and daily-fee games, video lottery systems, and centrally determined systems.
Linked Progressive Systems
We offer our customers gaming devices featuring a common jackpot or prize award that can be linked (within a casino, in a local-area network, or among multiple casinos within a market or jurisdiction) in a wide-area network. We typically offer progressive gaming devices to customers under a daily-fee
5
arrangement based on a percentage of the money wagered on the participating gaming devices. In many cases, we use a portion of these revenues to fund the ultimate payment of the jackpot awards. We market our linked progressive systems under titles such as Betty Boop's Love Meter, Golden Pharaoh, Money Vault, Instant Fortune, Ultimate Tower of Power, Quarter Million$, Millionaire Sevens and 1,000,000 Degrees. In addition, during the second half of fiscal year 2012, we introduced our new Cash Connection wide-area progressive link with identifiable brands including GREASE, Michael Jackson King of Pop, and our Cash Spin Jackpot. As of June 30, 2012, we had a total of 1,792 linked progressive systems.
Rental and Daily-Fee Games
We offer a variety of non-linked games and content on a rental basis for either a fixed daily fee or a fee based on the percentage of the net win generated by the gaming device. Many of these games are available as both wide-area progressives ("WAP") and flat-fee near-area progressives ("NAP"). This category includes both gaming devices in which we retain ownership and charge a daily fee for the use of the gaming device, and gaming devices our customers purchase which are classified as game sales revenue. Gaming devices in which we retain ownership and charge a daily fee include rental and maintenance of the gaming device and licensing of the game content. For gaming devices our customers purchase, we provide the game content under a usage-fee arrangement that results in a lower daily-fee than leasing the entire gaming device. We market our rental and daily-fee games under titles including GREASE, Michael Jackson King of Pop, Money Vault, Money Talks, Golden Pharaoh, Cash Spin Jackpot, Money Wheel, Vegas Hits Roadtrip, Betty Boop's Love Meter, Cash Spin, Hot Spin, Vegas Hits, Cash Wizard, Ultimate Tower of Power, Hot Shot Progressive Cash Wheel, Fireball, 77777 Jackpot, Reel Money, Hot Shot Progressive®, Quick Hit Platinum, Reel Winners, Hee Haw®, and Monte Carlo, among others. As of June 30, 2012, we had a total installed base of rental and daily fee games of 14,890 units.
Video Lottery Systems
We offer video and spinning-reel devices that can operate either as stand-alone devices or as units that interact with (or can be monitored by) a central system maintained by government agencies. The financial model for this market requires us to build, deploy, and maintain the devices, along with providing the related equipment in return for a share of the net win generated by the device for a contractually fixed period of time.
Through a competitive bidding process, we, and prior to our acquisition thereof in March 2004, Sierra Design Group ("SDG"), were each awarded approximately 25 percent of the initial New York State Lottery ("NYSL") terminals to be installed at horseracing facilities throughout the state. As of June 30, 2012, we earned recurring revenue from our installed base of 9,281 video lottery devices operated by NYSL. We also earn recurring revenues from 2,437 video lottery devices deployed at horseracing and other gaming facilities under agreements with the Delaware State Lottery Commission and Maryland State Lottery Commission.
Centrally Determined Systems
We offer video and spinning-reel devices that connect to a central server, which determines the outcome of the games. These systems primarily operate in Native American casinos in Washington, Oklahoma, and Florida, as well as Mexico. In some of these jurisdictions, our customers purchase our gaming devices and we classify the purchases as game sales revenues. In other jurisdictions, our customers rent the gaming device and we classify the rental payments as gaming operations revenues. In each case, for the use of our central determination software, we receive either a fixed daily fee or a percentage of the net win generated by the devices connected to the system. As of June 30, 2012, the total installed base of gaming devices connected to our centrally determined systems totaled 47,633.
6
In December 2005, we began selling centrally determined gaming devices in Mexico. In that market, we sell gaming devices for an upfront fee, and classify the purchases as game sales revenues. We also derive a daily fee equal to a percentage of the net win for providing a system network, gaming content, and monitoring, maintenance and consulting. As of June 30, 2012, 9,449 of the total installed base of gaming devices connected to our centrally determined systems were deployed in Mexico. Included in the total installed base of centrally determined games in Mexico are 6,981 iVIEW in-game player-communication units installed in non-Bally games, in which we charge a system connection fee. The total installed base of centrally determined games noted above includes the iVIEW units in Mexico.
System Solutions
We offer core, industry-leading slot, casino and table management systems (collectively, "casino management systems") that help our customers improve communication with players, add excitement to the gaming floor, and enhance operating efficiencies through greater automation, reporting, and business intelligence. Our comprehensive suite of cutting-edge technology solutions provides gaming operations of every size with a wide range of marketing, data management and analysis, accounting, player tracking, security, and other software applications and tools to more effectively manage their operations. We also provide technologies to deploy a networked, server-based gaming environment, complete with a command center solution for centralized management and control.
Our systems have evolved in recent years as we have taken significant steps to improve our casino management systems offerings. In fiscal year 2009, we released our core systems' Version 11, a powerful platform re-engineered to game-changing technology levels. Version 11 provides gaming operators with easy-to-use graphical interfaces; vertical and horizontal scalability; state-of-the-art distributed architectures; and support for multiple languages and currencies.
Today, there are more than 300 casinos that have installed Version 11. The improvements in our core systems platforms resulted in a reliable and scalable foundation of slot, casino and table management systems. This solid, world-class core infrastructure and a unified strategic product roadmap have enabled us to implement new and innovative solutions for marketing, bonusing, and server-based gaming. In fiscal year 2011, we released several innovative products on Version 12 including new bonusing applications within our Elite Bonusing Suite; predictive analytics within our Bally Business Intelligence; and intelligent way-finding within Bally CoolSign®.
Over the past several years, gaming content and systems applications have merged into a single gaming-floor network architecture. In response, we have evolved the functionality of our systems from basic automation of manual activities to highly integrated applications. Using our systems, gaming operators gain useful features such as active, real-time monitoring tools for gaming devices, tools to collect and manage customer data, security to protect against theft and data loss, the ability to track and reward players, and marketing programs to enhance the gaming experience.
As the gaming industry continues to evolve, some operators have embraced new server-based and high-speed network technology. Many have opened new operations that employ high-speed Ethernet connections on their floors, and many others are upgrading to high-speed networks. We partner with our customers to help them add network and server-based solutions to their existing systems, whether on a floor-wide basis, in smaller sections of the floor, or on selected banks of games. Once installed, these solutions increase efficiency and labor savings. More importantly, they provide operators with new and more efficient ways to communicate with their players. By marketing at the point-of-play and delivering floor-wide tournaments, bonusing events, and second-way-to-win games, operators increase their return on investment and create even more excitement for players across the gaming floor.
We believe we are the only provider in the industry that offers such a wide selection of technology platform options to its customers. More than 435,000 slot machines are connected to our Systems at more than 600 locations around the world.
7
Our Systems business comprises three key facets:
Casino Management Systems
The various system-based hardware and software products in our casino management systems offer gaming operators many benefits including: player-loyalty solutions that are comparable to frequent guest programs found in other leisure and retail industries; database marketing and table-game accounting solutions including the calculation of all revenue and expense-related items; and cage and credit accountability for all extensions of cage and credit cash balancing functions. We designed and deployed these systems in both domestic and international markets so that they would be and adaptable to foreign languages and currencies.
Our solutions, which support GSA protocols, operate on common platforms such as Windows ®, AS/400 (iSeries®), Linux, and UNIX. By supporting these platforms, we allow our customers to choose a technology solution that meets their existing or future infrastructure requirements.
We design our slot-management systems with features for handling slot monitoring, accounting, and operations, as well as bonusing, sweepstakes, promotions, cashless transfer, ticketing, jackpots, promotional coupons, redemptions, and soft count.
Our TableView real-time table-rating and player-tracking solution takes automated management of table-game activities directly to the casino pit with a high-tech touch screen.
The Bally Business Intelligence applications, which span across all our casino management systems, bring state-of-the-art data analytics to a gaming operator's key executive and marketing-management teams. Executive dashboards, slot floor data, and transaction visualization, empower gaming operators to analyze customer activity and make quick decisions about products, floor layouts, and marketing programs that can significantly enhance revenue and profits.
iVIEW Player-Communication Network
Our server-based iVIEW network serves as a way to communicate with players directly at the point-of-play. This network allows gaming operators to present messages in a split or full screen format on the main game display of any touch-screen- equipped gaming device without interrupting traditional game play. We created picture-in-picture-style technology, using an LCD screen and accompanying hardware and software that reside in the gaming device, for the iVIEW DM player-user-interface (also operating on the iVIEW network).
8
Our iVIEW network also works with our Bally Command Center for server-based download of content, our Elite Bonusing Suite of floor-wide bonusing applications, our Bally CoolSign media management solution, and other new technologies under development. iVIEW and iVIEW DM work on almost any manufacturers' gaming devices that have a touch screen and are backward and forward compatible, so they protect operators' invested capital.
The iVIEW DM solution, with all its capabilities, is especially effective for marketing to players at the point of play. This picture-in-picture-style technology facilitates enhanced communication and customer-service functions such as beverage service, floor mapping, and real-time perishable promotions without interrupting game play. iVIEW DM can also be used to create excitement on the casino floor with floor-wide bonusing events; game-in-games; second-chance-to-win games; floor-wide slot tournaments; interactive virtual racing events; time-based promotions; targeted, customized player messaging; and bonuses on birthdays, anniversaries and holidays. iVIEW and iVIEW DM can even work in conjunction with the casino's player data to offer customized content based on gender, age, and provide player preferences.
We can implement iVIEW DM across entire gaming floors, in smaller sections of floors, or bank-by-bank based on casino operator preference and capital budgets.
Elite Bonusing Suite
The Elite Bonusing Suite gives our customers a way to reward their patrons right at the point-of-play via the iVIEW network. This technology retains current players, attracts new ones, and increases player value. Bonusing applications on the Elite Bonusing Suite server allow operators to tailor and automate promotions using server-based applications such as Virtual Racing, DM Tournaments, U-Spin Bonusing, Power Winners, Dynamic Random Bonusing, Video Poker Bonusing, iVIEW Messaging, Flex Rewards, and Lucky Match Bonusing.
Bally CoolSign Media Management Solution
Bally CoolSign is the gaming industry's leading gaming centric media management tool that enables gaming promotions and/or gaming information, triggered through any of our products, to be displayed onto any digital display in the casino resort or the casino enterprise. Through digital signage that integrates with lighting and sound systems, CoolSign adds excitement to the casino floor and across the casino resort, even extending to compatible outdoor displays.
Casinos that offer the iVIEW, iVIEW DM, and CoolSign products often use these products in concert to create powerful, floor-wide virtual-racing, slot tournaments, and player-bonusing events so their patrons can fully experience the action and excitement not only on the gaming device, but on large media displays throughout the casino resort.
Bally Command Center
Our server-based command center enables gaming operators to download marketing content on iVIEW and iVIEW DM displays. They can also configure gaming device pay tables and game play options, deliver new game content and game libraries, and perform updates of game firmware such as ticket printers and bill acceptors in a matter of minutes via a central server, rather than having to implement updates on each device.
Systems-Delivered Floor-Wide Player Engagement and Bonusing Events
Casino operators consistently face the challenge of coming up with creative ways to attract and retain players, generate additional revenue, and increase retention rates. To overcome these challenges, casinos are using technology to change the player experience in their properties by communicating
9
marketing promotions and special events to players directly on the game screen across banks of games, in sections of the casino, and even across the floor.
Using a combination of our iVIEW DM picture-in-picture player-user-interface and the Elite Bonusing Suite innovations, casino are creating exciting tournaments and special promotional events on demand to enhance the player experience and to build player loyalty. Casinos are enhancing the player experience using community floor-wide events through the Elite Bonusing Suite's Virtual Racing application to promote excitement and participation across the casino floor. Using the DM Tournaments' application; casinos are staging their tournaments as group or individual start events, and converting their games to regular-play mode in a matter of minutes. This flexibility allows operators to identify what machines will be placed in tournament mode and instead of physically having tournament machines on standby, any bank of machines or any individual machine on the gaming floor can become a tournament game almost instantaneously.
This backward-compatible player-centric bonusing technology supports multiple manufacturers' games with a touch-screen display. As a result, all players across properties can now have the same game experience no matter which manufacturer's machine they are playing. In fiscal year 2012, we partnered with casino operators hosting several Elite Bonusing Suite floor-wide player engagement and bonusing events. Each of these events not only increased return-on-investment and property exposure, but they also generated large crowds of players and helped to build and attain player loyalty without interrupting game play.
Interactive Solutions
Bally Interactive encompasses our mobile and online initiatives and related product offerings that provide operators a variety of solutions designed to help develop, deploy, and manage their interactive presence, or enhance their existing presence if already in place. By offering mobile and online play-for-free and wager-based gaming products, we expect to integrate our cross-platform solutions with core casino patron, slot-management, and business-intelligence systems. This "single view of the player" will give casino operators enterprise-wide analytics and the ability to employ multi-channel promotions and bonusing to patrons on the casino floor, at home, or on the move.
Online
Our online solutions are designed to enable casino operators the ability to offer players a complete online gaming experience through our iGaming Platform and Remote Gaming Serverwhether it be play-for-free or wager-based gaming products on computers or mobile devices. Our open, cloud-based iGaming Platform, enable operators to choose "best-in-class" poker, slot, table, and other gaming content from various providers. This content is delivered via our Remote Gaming Server, allowing access to the entire library of games and one-time integration. We were the first in the United States to be awarded an online gaming license in the State of Nevada in June 2012, and expect to pursue additional online gaming licenses in domestic and foreign jurisdictions.
Mobile
With our acquisition of MacroView Labs, we offer or have created mobile apps and mobile websites for dozens of casinos around the world. Our apps are designed as casino "concierge" apps, providing operators the opportunity to attract new players, enhance their patrons' casino resort visit, and sell more to them via their phones or mobile tablets. Apps can include popular casino games, player's club sign-up and account information, hyper-targeted offers, show previews, room and restaurant bookings, feedback surveys, menus, interactive maps, and many other features. Utilizing our cloud-based mobile technology platform, casinos can manage their entire portfolio of mobile websites and native apps for
10
iPhone®, iPad®, Android phone, Android® tablet, BlackBerry®, and other devices from a single content management system.
Research and Development
Our R&D activities are directed toward the development of world-class games and systems technologies, continually evolving our product line. In addition, we devote R&D resources to researching future technologies and products. Due to our customer-centric nature, we also focus on custom development of applications and solutions for gaming operators. Often, these solutions become part of our general product portfolio.
Our R&D is far-reaching in scope, with major centers in Las Vegas and Reno, Nevada, and Bangalore and Chennai, India; and smaller centers in Nice, France and throughout North America. Various business groups across the globe execute our R&D initiatives, and this decentralized approach enables us to more easily recruit and retain top talent to develop games and systems specific to each market. We centrally manage key cross-business group product initiatives to prioritize and align our R&D activities across these teams. In addition, we may augment our R&D initiatives through third-party development agreements with outside companies, or by entering into agreements with companies that have similar areas of focus.
Our total expenditures for R&D were $96.2 million, $88.1 million, and $80.3 million during the years ended June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in R&D expenditures over this three-year period reflects our corporate focus on our technology assets, the expansion of technical resources, and the competitive landscape that requires continuous development of future generations of gaming products and systems.
Sales and Marketing
Our direct sales force consists of approximately 65 employees located in multiple offices, primarily in North America. To a lesser extent, we also employ an independent distributor network to distribute our products. The agreements we have with distributors generally specify minimum purchases and provide that we may terminate the relationship if certain performance standards are not met.
We sell gaming devices throughout our fiscal year, and contracts may be for anything from a small quantity of units to several thousand. We conduct one-on-one meetings with our customers to demonstrate our products at their locations, host customers at private demonstrations in our offices or at offsite venues, and participate in a number of trade shows and conferences domestically and internationally each year. In certain cases, we respond to competitive requests for proposal from private and public entities seeking to purchase gaming equipment.
For casino enterprise system sales, we give our customers the option of signing separate hardware and software maintenance agreements at the time of sale. Typically, these agreements are for one-year terms and automatically renew unless canceled in writing by either party. After an initial warranty period, usually 90 days, we invoice customers monthly for hardware and software maintenance fees that provide for, among other things, repair or replacement of malfunctioning hardware and software, software version upgrades, and on-call support for software.
Often, the sale of enterprise systems is a long process, at times extending beyond one year. A potential systems customer usually will conduct a formal evaluation and selection of a vendor. The level of sales available to us at any time can vary materially due to a number of factors, including the capital budgets of our customers, availability of new product modules, timing associated with regulatory approvals, and the success and features contained in the products sold by our competitors. The price paid for a full system also can vary materially from customer to customer depending on factors, such as the size of the gaming operation and the complexity and number of functions contained in the system specified.
11
Global Marketing
Our global marketing program is designed to support our sales team providing branding, public relations, promotions, product marketing, and extensive market-research activities.
We build brand awareness and generate demand through our own direct marketing as well as co-marketing programs with our casino customers. We direct market through print, e-mail, and web-based advertising, as well as media relations, industry trade shows, conferences, and events, and gaming industry and player/consumer communications. We primarily target business audiences focusing on heightened awareness of and demand for our games and systems solutions.
We currently have 24 dedicated marketing team members, who conduct casino-operator and player research, and provide pre and post-product launch support, as well as corporate marketing support in the areas of internal and external communications, community relations, marketing events, international marketing, and graphic design. Over the past several years we have significantly increased our use of focus groups to support product development. These focus groups are an important tool for acquiring feedback on new and not-yet-released products before they are broadly released to the market; they allow us to make customer-driven improvements to products before we invest in widespread product releases.
Discontinued Operations
The Rainbow Casino, located in Vicksburg, Mississippi, began operations in July 1994. On April 5, 2010, we entered into a definitive purchase agreement to sell the Rainbow Casino. The sale closed on June 8, 2010. Under the terms of the agreement, we received approximately $80.0 million in an all-cash transaction.
During fiscal year 2010, we recognized a gain on the sale of Rainbow of $22.1 million (net of approximately $12.2 million in income taxes). During fiscal year 2011, we recognized a loss on the sale of Rainbow of approximately $0.4 million, net of income taxes, for certain post-closing adjustments. The results of its operations for the years ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were classified as discontinued operations because we do not receive significant cash flows from the Rainbow Casino after the sale.
Product Markets
We believe that the total base of installed gaming devices in North America is approximately 987,000 units, with approximately 889,000 units in the U.S. alone. This total includes land-based, riverboat, and Native American casinos, as well as video lottery markets. Replacement of existing units, new casino openings or expansions, and the legalization of gaming in new markets are primary drivers of new sales opportunities for gaming devices in the U.S. and Canada. The gaming industry also continues to expand in international markets. Currently, our primary international markets are Europe, Latin America, South America, Mexico, and Asia-Pacific. We regularly evaluate opportunities to expand our business into additional international markets, examining the risks involved such as those described in Item 1A, Risk Factors.
We distribute our gaming devices through direct sales efforts and a small number of distribution arrangements. Staff conducts our international business primarily from offices in Amsterdam, Netherlands for customers in Europe; Puerto Rico for customers in the Caribbean and Latin America; Buenos Aires, Argentina for customers in South America; Mexico City for customers in Mexico; Macau, China for customers in Asia-Pacific; Sydney, Australia for customers in Australia and New Zealand; and Boksburg, South Africa for customers in South Africa.
The primary markets for casino enterprise systems are the U.S. and, to a lesser extent, Canada, South America, Europe, the Pacific Rim and the Caribbean/Latin America, but new international markets are constantly emerging. New casino openings, expansions, upgrades of existing facilities, and the
12
competitive replacement of other systems overseas are increasing the market for casino enterprise systems across the globe. We also generate new system sales through the introduction of innovative hardware and software products. In many cases, domestic regulations require the implementation of a system as part of a customer's operational requirements; yet, international markets have only recently begun the full implementation of such systems. We believe, as these markets mature and grow more competitive, the use of systems will become more common.
Competition and Product Demand
The demand for gaming devices, content, and systems varies depending on the level of new construction and renovation of casinos as well as market and legislative conditions that might generate the need for new and replacement equipment and product innovation. For the year ended June 30, 2012, our 10 largest customers, including customers with multiple casino properties, accounted for approximately 22% of gaming device sales.
Regulatory requirements in each applicable jurisdiction drive the demand for casino enterprise systems, as do gaming operators' needs to properly track device and player activity, and to establish and compile individual device and player profitability and other demographic information to stay competitive. These capabilities enable casinos to develop or enhance marketing strategies. As more and more gaming operators move to high-speed networked floors, we expect the demand for new systems technologies to increase. Customers will replace older systems with new network and server-based systems solutions that enable activities such as centralized management and floor-wide events and tournaments on each gaming device. We derive revenues for casino enterprise systems from selling products to new and existing customers. For the year ended June 30, 2012, the 10 largest casino enterprise system customers, that include certain multi-site operators, accounted for approximately 49% of systems revenues, with the largest customer accounting for 9% of these revenues.
We compete with a number of domestic and international businesses in the geographic markets where we operate. Our ability to compete effectively depends on a number of factors including our product quality and depth, pricing, financing terms, regulatory approvals, the successful development and protection of intellectual property, and the success of our distribution, sales and service levels.
International Game Technology ("IGT") is the market leader in the North American gaming device market. Some of our other competitors currently include Ainsworth Game Technology Ltd., Aristocrat Leisure Limited ("Aristocrat"), Aruze Gaming America, Inc., GTECH Holdings Corporation ("GTECH"), Konami Co. Ltd. ("Konami"), Novomatic AG, Recreativos Franco, S.A., Unidesa Gaming and Systems, and WMS Industries, Inc. ("WMS").
The competition for casino enterprise systems is also significant. Product feature and functionality, accuracy, reliability, service level and pricing are among the factors that determine how successful providers are in selling their systems. Our principal competition in casino enterprise systems currently includes IGT, Aristocrat, Konami and several smaller providers in the international market. Competition is intense in this market due to the number of providers and the limited number of casinos and jurisdictions in which they operate.
Global Headquarters, Technology Campuses, Manufacturing and Assembly Operations
Global Headquarters
Our global headquarters is located in Las Vegas, Nevada at 6601 South Bermuda Road. Our approximately150,000 square foot facility is used for corporate administrative functions as well as to accommodate the design, assembly and distribution of gaming equipment and casino management systems' hardware and to meet product design demands and varying levels of volume requirements.
13
Las Vegas and Reno Technology Campus
We lease an additional 36,000 of office space next door to our global headquarters facility in Las Vegas for a Technology Campus for our game development, advanced development, and project management teams. In addition, we lease 82,875 square feet in Reno, Nevada, which provides a larger campus-style environment that accommodates the growth of our game development, system development, product management, and administrative functions in northern Nevada.
Bally Innovation Lab
Our global Innovation Lab is located in Pleasanton, California, a major suburb of San Francisco. This allows us to draw from the significant high-tech talent that resides in the Silicon Valley. In our Innovation Lab, a team of employees focus on researching and developing new gaming technologies, products, and the rapidly growing area of server-based systems gaming. The Innovation Lab capitalizes on our R&D talent across the globe and is dedicated to developing, testing, and deploying the newest technology.
Manufacturing and Assembly
Our assembly operations have common hardware components that provide greater flexibility in our assembly operations where each product family can be produced by an expanded set of assembly lines with fewer internal product differences and more streamlined testing.
We generally buy raw material inventory to build our gaming devices when we receive firm orders from our customers. To the extent possible, we also forecast the demand for our products to develop more efficient supply chains with our vendors. We create specifications and design nearly all of the major assemblies that are incorporated into our gaming devices.
We believe our primary offices and related facilities in Las Vegas, as well as process improvement initiatives implemented during the last few fiscal years, will enable us to increase production without adding significant floor space.
Patent, Copyright and Trade Secret Protection
We have been a long-standing participant in the development of intellectual property in our industry. While we do not believe that any single patent or series of patents or other intellectual property is crucial to our business, we use a combination of patents, copyrights, trade secrets, trademarks and proprietary information to maintain and enhance our competitive position, protect our products, and defend against litigious competitors. We have been granted over 425 patents related to games and systems, most of which are unexpired, and have approximately 600 patent applications pending in the United States as well as in many foreign countries. The expiration dates of these patents vary and are based on their filing and issuances dates. We intend to continue to actively file for patent protection, where such filings are commercially reasonable, within and outside the United States. We also seek protection for a large number of our products by registering hundreds of trademarks in the United States and various foreign countries. Under permission or license agreements with third parties, we also sell products covered by independently filed copyrights and trademarks. Typically, these contracts require us to pay royalties to the licensing party. Royalty expenses are included in cost of gaming and systems in our consolidated financial statements included in this report.
Employees and Labor Relations
As of June 30, 2012, we and our subsidiaries employed approximately 3,146 individuals worldwide. None of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. We believe we have satisfactory relationships with our employees.
14
Financial Information
The other financial information that is required to be included in this Item 1, Business is set forth in Item 6, Selected Financial Data with respect to our revenues, profits and losses, and assets, and in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements, Segment and Geographical Information with respect to domestic and foreign revenues and assets.
Gaming Regulations and Licensing
The manufacture and distribution of gaming devices and systems are subject to extensive federal, state, local, and foreign regulation. Although the laws vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, the regulatory structure and the requirements of the State of Nevada, as described below, are typical of the types of statutory and regulatory schemes to which the Company is subject. Such laws, rules, and regulations generally concern the responsibility, financial stability and character of the Company and our officers, directors, major stockholders and key personnel. Many jurisdictions require gaming devices, systems and other products we manufacture to be tested and approved before being distributed. We have obtained all licenses necessary to manufacture, distribute and, where permitted, operate gaming devices in the jurisdictions in which we do business. We manufacture our products in the state of Nevada.
Nevada
Our business is subject to the Nevada Gaming Control Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder (the "Nevada Act") and various local ordinances and regulations. We are subject to the licensing and regulatory control of the Nevada State Gaming Control Board (the "Nevada Board"), the Nevada Gaming Commission (the "Nevada Commission"), and various county and city regulatory agencies, all of which are collectively referred to as the "Nevada Gaming Authorities."
Nevada gaming law is based on policies concerning (i) the prevention of unsavory and unsuitable persons from having any involvement with gaming; (ii) the establishment and maintenance of responsible accounting practices; (iii) the maintenance of effective control over the financial practices of licensees, including the establishment of minimum procedures for internal fiscal affairs and the safeguarding of assets and revenues, providing reliable record-keeping and requiring the filing of periodic reports with the Nevada Gaming Authorities; (iv) the prevention of cheating and fraudulent practices; and (v) providing a source of state and local revenues through taxation and licensing fees. A change in, or non-compliance with, such laws, regulations, and procedures could have an adverse effect on our business.
Each of our subsidiaries that manufactures, distributes, or operates gaming devices in Nevada, or the entities that own such subsidiaries (collectively, the "licensed subsidiaries"), are licensed or found suitable (which is comparable to licensing) by the Nevada Gaming Authorities. The licenses require periodic renewals and payments of fees and taxes and are not transferable. We are registered with the Nevada Commission as a publicly traded corporation and have been found suitable to own the licensed subsidiaries.
Only licensed manufacturers and distributors may manufacture or distribute gaming devices and cashless wagering systems in Nevada. All gaming devices manufactured for use or play in Nevada or for distribution out of Nevada must be approved by the Nevada Commission before they are distributed or exposed for play. Before associated equipment (as defined in the Nevada Act) can be distributed in Nevada, it must be administratively approved by Nevada Board chairman.
In December, 2011, the Nevada Gaming Commission adopted regulations implementing the Nevada Act's provisions authorizing interactive (online) gaming. The nation's first regulatory scheme for such activity provides that only licensed manufacturers of interactive gaming systems and licensed interactive gaming service providers may offer interactive gaming systems and related services to Nevada licensed
15
interactive gaming service operators. On June 21, 2012, the Nevada Gaming Commission approved the application of our subsidiary Bally Gaming, Inc., for such licenses.
The Nevada Gaming Authorities may require any individual who has a material relationship or involvement with us or our licensed subsidiaries, including officers, directors, and key employees, to be found suitable or licensed. The Nevada Gaming Authorities may deny an application for licensing or finding of suitability for any cause they deem reasonable.
The Nevada Gaming Authorities may require us to sever all relationships with anyone who is found unsuitable or who refuses to file appropriate applications.
We and our licensed subsidiaries are required to submit detailed financial and operating reports to the Nevada Commission. Substantially all material loans, leases, sales of securities, and similar financing transactions must be reported to and in some cases approved by the Nevada Commission.
If the Nevada Commission determined that we had violated the Nevada Act, our licenses could be limited, conditioned, suspended, or revoked. In addition, we could be subject to substantial fines for each separate violation. Any such disciplinary action could, and revocation of any gaming license would, materially adversely affect our operations.
The Nevada Gaming Authorities may require the holder of any of our equity or debt securities to file applications, be investigated, and be found suitable by the Nevada Commission. The applicant must pay all costs of investigation.
The Nevada Act requires any person who acquires more than 5 percent of any class of our voting securities to report the acquisition to the Nevada Commission. The Nevada Act requires that beneficial owners of more than 10 percent of any class of our voting securities apply to the Nevada Commission for a finding of suitability within thirty days after the chairman of the Nevada Board mails written notice requiring such filing, in which case the applicant must pay all costs of investigation. Under certain circumstances, an "institutional investor," as defined in the Nevada Act, that acquires more than 10 percent but not more than 25 percent of a class of our voting securities may apply to the Nevada Commission for a waiver of finding of suitability if the institutional investor holds the securities for investment purposes only, as defined in the Nevada Act. Any person who fails to apply for a finding of suitability or a license within thirty days after being ordered to do so by the Nevada Commission or the chairman of the Nevada Board may be found unsuitable. The same result would occur to a record owner if the record owner, after request, fails to identify the beneficial owner. Any stockholder found unsuitable and who holds, directly or indirectly, any beneficial ownership of our voting securities beyond such period of time as may be prescribed by the Nevada Commission may be guilty of a criminal offense. We are subject to disciplinary action if, after we receive notice that a person is unsuitable to be a stockholder or to have any other relationship with us or our subsidiaries, we (i) pay that person any dividend or interest; (ii) allow the exercise of any voting right; (iii) pay remuneration to that person; or (iv) fail to pursue all lawful efforts to require such unsuitable person to relinquish the voting securities, including, if necessary, the immediate purchase of the securities for cash at fair market value.
In March 2011, the Nevada Commission granted us prior approval to make public offerings of our securities for a period of two years, subject to certain conditions ("Shelf Approval"). The Shelf Approval is not a finding, recommendation, or approval by the Nevada Commission as to the accuracy or inaccuracy of the prospectus or the investment merits of the securities offered. Any contrary representation is unlawful.
Changes in control of us through merger, consolidation, stock or asset acquisitions, management or consulting agreements, or any act or conduct whereby a person or entity acquires control, may not occur without prior Nevada Commission approval. The Nevada Commission has regulations to ameliorate the potentially adverse affects of corporate acquisitions opposed by management,
16
repurchases of voting securities, and corporate defense tactics affecting Nevada gaming licensees. Approvals are required from the Nevada Commission before a registered corporation can make exceptional repurchases of voting securities and before a corporate acquisition opposed by management can be consummated. The Nevada Act also requires prior approval of a plan of recapitalization proposed by our board of directors in response to a tender offer made directly to our stockholders for the purpose of acquiring control of us.
License fees and taxes are payable to the State of Nevada and to the counties and municipalities in which the licensees operate.
We are required to deposit with the Nevada Board and thereafter maintain a revolving fund to pay the expenses of investigation by the Nevada Board of our participation in certain gaming activities outside Nevada. We are also required to comply with certain reporting requirements and are subject to disciplinary action if we violate any gaming laws of the foreign jurisdiction pertaining to the foreign gaming operation, fail to conduct the foreign gaming operations to the standards required of Nevada gaming operations, engage in activities that are harmful to Nevada or its ability to collect gaming taxes and fees, or employ a person in the foreign operations who has been denied a license or finding of suitability in Nevada.
Native America
Gaming operations on Native American lands are governed by tribal and federal law and tribal-state compacts. The Federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 (the "Act") created a framework for the various responsibilities of the tribal, state, and federal authorities over tribal gaming operations. The Act is subject to interpretation and enforcement by the National Indian Gaming Commission, which has the authority to issue regulations and to otherwise regulate tribal gaming activities. Most tribes, in the exercise of their sovereignty, have also established tribal gaming commissions or agencies that regulate gaming operations on their tribal lands. Compacts between tribes and states also may impose conditions and requirements on tribal gaming operations. We are required to comply with all such sources of law, which may impose different requirements with respect to licensing, product approvals, and operations.
Our business and investing in our common stock involves risk. Prospective investors should carefully consider the following risks and uncertainties and other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including our financial statements and the notes to those statements, before making an investment decision. We have identified the following important risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in any forward looking statements we may make from time to time.
Our success in the gaming industry depends in large part on our ability to manage and frequently introduce innovative products on a timely basis. If we fail to keep pace with rapid innovations in new technologies or product design and deployment, our business could be adversely affected.
Our success is dependent on our ability to develop and sell new products that are attractive to casino operators and other gaming enterprises and their customers, for both land-based and online gaming operations. Furthermore, if our land-based or online gaming content does not meet or sustain revenue and profitability expectations, they may be replaced by our competitors' products or removed altogether or we may experience a reduction in fees generated from our arrangements. Therefore, our success depends upon our ability to continue to design, manage and frequently market and update technologically sophisticated land-based and online products that meet our customers' needs regarding ease of use and adaptability, and that are unique and entertaining such that they achieve high levels of
17
player appeal and sustainability. If our competitors develop new game content and technologically innovative products and we fail to keep pace or we are otherwise unable to obtain, maintain or manage the level of complexities arising from new gaming technologies, whether land-based or online, our business could be adversely affected. Further, our land-based products could suffer a loss of floor space to table games or other more technologically advanced games.
The demands of our customers and the preferences of the end players are continually changing. There is constant pressure to develop and market new game content and technologically innovative products. Our revenues are dependent on the earning power and life span of our games. We therefore face increased pressure to design and deploy new and successful game content to maintain our revenue and remain competitive. The success of newly introduced technology and products, such as our Pro Series cabinets and ALPHA 2 platform, our iView Display Manager and our mobile and online gaming platform, is dependent on customer and end player acceptance as well as the reliability and performance of our products. Our customers will generally only accept a new product if we can show that it is likely to produce more revenue and net wins than our existing products and our competitors' products. While we feel we have been successful at developing new and innovative products, our ability to do so could be adversely affected by:
We have invested and intend to continue to invest significant resources in research and development efforts. We invest heavily in a number of areas including product engineering development for game and system-based hardware, software and game content. If a new product does not gain market acceptance, our business could be adversely affected. Most directly, if a product is unsuccessful we could incur losses and also be required to increase our inventory obsolescence charges. There is no assurance that our investments in research and development will lead to successful new technologies or timely new products.
Further, our newer products are generally technologically more sophisticated than those we have produced in the past and we must continually refine our production capabilities to meet the needs of our product innovation. If we cannot adapt our manufacturing infrastructure to meet the needs of our product innovations, if we are unable to make upgrades to our production capacity in a timely manner, or if we commit significant resources to upgrades for products that are ultimately unsuccessful, our business could be adversely affected. In addition, because of the sophistication of our newer products and the resources committed to their development, they are generally more expensive to produce. If the increase in the average selling price of these new products is not proportionate to the increase in production cost, in each case as compared to our prior products or, if the average cost of production does not go down over time, whether by reason of long-term customer acceptance, our ability to find greater efficiencies in the manufacturing process as we refine our production capabilities or a general decrease in the cost of the technology, our margins will suffer.
18
Consumer spending on leisure activities is affected by changes in the economy and consumer tastes, as well as other factors that are difficult to predict and beyond our control. Decreases in consumer spending adversely affecting the gaming industry could harm our business, and unfavorable economic conditions have impacted and could continue to negatively impact the play levels of our participation games and purchases of our sale games.
The demand for entertainment and leisure activities tends to be highly sensitive to consumersfdisposable incomes, and thus can be affected by changes in the economy and consumer tastes, both of which are difficult to predict and beyond our control. Unfavorable changes in general economic conditions, including recession, economic slowdown, sustained high levels of unemployment, and higher fuel or other transportation costs, may reduce disposable income of casino patrons or result in fewer patrons visiting casinos, whether land-based or online. As a result, we cannot ensure that demand for our products or services will remain constant. Continued adverse developments affecting economies throughout the world, including a general tightening of the availability of credit, decreased liquidity in many financial markets, increasing interest rates, increasing energy costs, acts of war or terrorism, transportation disruptions, natural disasters, declining consumer confidence, sustained high levels of unemployment or significant declines in stock markets, as well as concerns regarding epidemics and the spread of contagious diseases, could lead to a further reduction in discretionary spending on leisure activities such as gambling. Any significant or prolonged decrease in consumer spending on leisure activities could greatly affect the gaming industry, causing some or all of our customers to decrease spending or ultimately declare bankruptcy, each of which would adversely affect our business. If we experience a significant unexpected decrease in demand for our products, we could incur losses and also be required to increase our inventory obsolescence charges.
Our failure to collect outstanding accounts receivable or the deterioration of the financial condition of our customers could negatively impact our business. Development financing loans could adversely impact liquidity or cause us to incur loan losses. We have, and may continue, to incur additional provision for bad debt related to credit concerns on certain receivables.
We have offered extended payment terms to certain customers, including those in foreign jurisdictions. As a result, the collection of accounts receivable has become a matter of greater significance. While we believe the increased level of credit offered to customers has allowed us to grow our business, both domestically and internationally, it has also required direct, additional focus of and involvement by management. A decline in the relative health of the gaming industry, whether as a result of a general economic downturn or otherwise, and the difficulty or inability of our customers to obtain capital to finance their ongoing operations and purchase our products and services could adversely affect our revenues and collection of our outstanding receivables. Further, and especially due to the current downturn in the economy, some of our customers may not pay accounts receivable when due, whether as a result of financial difficulties, bankruptcy or otherwise, or because of assertion of sovereign immunity, or other defenses, resulting in increased write-offs for us. In addition, extended payment term arrangements are more prevalent with our customers in foreign jurisdictions which can implicate additional variables not present in our domestic transactions, and there is greater risk that those amounts will not be collected.
19
We have also provided financing for expansion or construction of gaming locations and other business purposes, including amongst other things, to assist customers with upfront payments to obtain gaming licenses abroad. These financing activities subject us to increased credit risk in certain regions, which could be exacerbated by unfavorable economic conditions or other political or economic instability in those regions. In addition, the repayment of these loans by the customer are contingent upon their operating performance which may be affected by delays in regulatory approval, as well as delays in the construction and opening of the individual gaming locations. Without the operation of gaming activities our customers may not be able to repay these loans. For example, we loaned a significant amount to an undercapitalized customer in Italy with limited operations to allow it to make advance payments necessary to obtain gaming licenses. If the customer does not otherwise commence gaming activities it will not be able to repay the loan. Finally, any repayments by these customers may also be affected by disputes that may arise from time to time between us and the customer in question. We have in the past and may in the future incur losses on these types of investments and loans. We monitor our investments and financing activities to assess impairment on a quarterly basis. Our results of operations, liquidity, or financial position may be negatively impacted if we are unable to collect on loans or profit from our investments.
The gaming industry is intensely competitive. We face competition from a number of companies, some of whom have greater resources, and if we are unable to compete effectively or expand into new markets, our business could be negatively impacted.
Competition among wager-based gaming companies is intense and is primarily based on the amount of profit our products generate for our customers in relation to our competitors' products. Additionally, we compete on the basis of price and financing terms made available to customers, the appeal of game content and features to the end player, and the features and functionality of our hardware and software products. There are a number of established, well-financed companies producing both land-based and online gaming products and systems that compete with our products. Some competitors may have access to greater capital resources than we do and as a result may be better positioned to compete in the marketplace.
Competition in the gaming industry is intense due to the limited number of casino operators and other gaming enterprises and jurisdictions in which they operate. Price, accuracy, reliability, and product features and functions are among the factors affecting a provider's success in selling its products. Obtaining space and favorable placement on casino gaming floors is also a competitive factor in our industry and our competitors with larger installed bases of gaming devices may have an advantage in obtaining or retaining more favorable placement than our products. Consolidation among the casino operators and cutbacks in spending by some operators due to the downturn in the economy has increased the level of competition among providers significantly as the amount of capital spend from casino patrons has decreased.
Because of the level of competition we face, our success and profitability is dependent in part on our ability to successfully enter new markets as well as new channels of distribution, such as mobile and online gaming. However, because the rate of growth of gaming in North America has diminished and machine replacement is at historically low levels, the competition has only intensified. Any protracted slowdown in the establishment of new gaming jurisdictions or delays in the opening of new or expanded casinos and continued declines in, or low levels of demand for, machine replacements, or any ability of ours to successfully expand into new channels of distribution such as mobile and online gaming could further heighten the competition we face and adversely affect the demand for our products and our future profits.
20
Unfavorable political developments, weak foreign economies and other risks related to non-U.S. jurisdictions may hurt our financial condition and results of operations.
Our business is dependent on international markets for a portion of our revenues. As of June 30, 2012, we had approximately $115.1 million of net accounts and notes receivable (current and long-term), or approximately 35 percent of our total net accounts and notes receivable, from customers in foreign countries. We expect that receivables with respect to foreign sales will continue to account for a significant portion of our total accounts and notes receivable outstanding. Our business in these markets is subject to a variety of risks, including:
We also operate in a number of tribal jurisdictions with sovereign immunity that present risks we generally do not encounter in U.S. jurisdictions.
We may not be able to attract and retain the management or employees necessary to remain competitive in our industry.
The competition for qualified personnel in the gaming industry is intense. Our ability to continue to develop new technologies and create innovative products depends on our ability to recruit and retain talented employees. Our future success depends on the retention and continued contributions of our key management, finance, marketing, development and staff personnel, many of whom would be difficult or impossible to replace. Our success is also tied to our ability to recruit additional key personnel in the future. We may not be able to retain our current personnel or recruit any additional key personnel required. The loss of services of any of our personnel or our inability to recruit additional necessary key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Changes in ownership of any of our customers or consolidation within the gaming industry could affect our business.
We are heavily dependent on the gaming industry. A decline in demand for our products in the gaming industry could adversely affect our business. Demand for our products is driven primarily by the replacement of existing products as well as the expansion of existing casinos and the opening of new
21
properties in existing and new jurisdictions as well as the opening of new channels of distribution, such as mobile and online gaming. Because a significant portion of our sales come from repeat customers, our business could be affected if one of our customers is sold to or merges with another entity that utilizes the products and services of one of our competitors or that reduces spending on our products or causes downward pricing pressures. Such consolidations could lead to order cancellations or negatively impact pricing and purchasing decisions or result in the removal of some or all of our products. Also, any fragmentation within the industry creating a number of smaller, independent operators with fewer resources could also adversely affect our business as these operators might cause a further slowdown in the replacement cycle for our products or otherwise adjust the number and frequency of orders they place with us to save money.
The gaming industry is heavily regulated, and regulatory changes may adversely impact our ability to operate or expand.
The manufacture and distribution of gaming devices, development of systems and the conduct of gaming operations, whether land-based or online, are subject to extensive federal, state, local and foreign regulation by various gaming authorities. Each of our games and systems hardware and software must be approved in each jurisdiction in which it is placed. Our ability to continue to operate in certain jurisdictions or our ability to expand into new jurisdictions or our ability to launch new product offerings could be adversely affected by:
The enactment of unfavorable legislation or government efforts affecting or directed at manufacturers or gaming operators, whether land-based or online, such as referendums to increase gaming taxes or requirements to use local distributors, would likely have a negative impact on our operations.
Public opinion can also exert a significant influence over the regulation of the gaming industry. A negative shift in the public's perception of gaming could affect future legislation in individual jurisdictions. Among other things, such a shift could cause jurisdictions to abandon proposals to legalize gaming, thereby limiting the number of new jurisdictions into which we could expand. Negative public perception could also lead to new restrictions on or the prohibition of gaming in jurisdictions in which we currently operate.
Although the jurisdictions in which we operate vary in their specific requirements, virtually all jurisdictions, including those into which we may expand in the future, require licenses, permits, qualification documentation, including evidence of integrity and financial stability, and other forms of approval to engage in gaming operations or the manufacture and distribution of gaming devices. In
22
addition, any license, permit or approval may be revoked, suspended or conditioned at any time. Our officers, directors, major stockholders, and key personnel are also subject to significant regulatory scrutiny. If regulatory authorities determine that any person is unsuitable to work in the gaming industry, we could be required to terminate our relationship with that person. To our knowledge, we and our key personnel have obtained, or applied for, all government licenses and approvals necessary to conduct our activities in the jurisdictions that we operate. However, there can be no assurance those licenses or approvals will be renewed in the future, or that new forms of approval necessary to operate will be granted.
Compliance with environmental, data privacy, health and safety laws and regulations, including new regulations requiring higher standards, may increase our costs, limit our ability to utilize our current supply chain, and force design changes to our products. These changes could reduce the net realizable value of our inventory, which would result in an immediate charge to our consolidated income statements. Non-compliance could negatively impact our operations and financial position as a result of fines, penalties, and the cost of mandated remediation or delays to our manufacturing.
Our intellectual property protections may be insufficient to properly safeguard our technology.
The gaming industry is constantly employing new technologies in both new and existing markets. We rely on a combination of patent and other technical security measures to protect our products, and continue to apply for patents protecting such technologies. Notwithstanding these safeguards, our competitors may still be able to obtain our technology or imitate our products. Furthermore, others may independently develop products similar or superior to ours.
We also rely on trade secrets and proprietary know-how. We enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees and independent contractors regarding our trade secrets and proprietary information, but we cannot assure you that the obligation to maintain the confidentiality of our trade secrets or proprietary information will be honored. Despite various confidentiality agreements and other trade secret protections, our trade secrets and proprietary know-how could become known to, or independently developed by, competitors.
We may be subject to claims of intellectual property infringement or invalidity. Expenses incurred with respect to monitoring, protecting, and defending our intellectual property rights could adversely affect our business.
Competitors and others may infringe on our intellectual property rights, or may allege that we have infringed on theirs. Monitoring infringement and misappropriation of intellectual property can be difficult and expensive, and we may not be able to detect infringement or misappropriation of our proprietary rights. We may also incur significant litigation expenses protecting our intellectual property or defending our use of intellectual property, reducing our ability to fund product initiatives. These expenses could have an adverse effect on our future cash flows and results of operations. We have in the past and are currently subject to litigation regarding patent infringement which, if resolved adversely to us, could have a material impact on our business. If we are found to infringe on the rights of others we could be required to discontinue offering certain products or systems, to pay damages, or purchase a license to use the intellectual property in question from its owner. Litigation can also distract management from the day-to-day operations of the business. There can be no assurances that certain of our products, including those with currently pending patent applications, will not be determined to have infringed upon an existing third party patent.
23
The intellectual property rights of others may prevent us from developing new products or entering new markets.
The gaming industry is characterized by the rapid development of new technologies, which requires us to continuously introduce new products and expand into new markets that may be created. Therefore, our success depends in part on our ability to continually adapt our products and systems to incorporate new technologies and to expand into markets that may be created by new technologies. If technologies are protected by the intellectual property rights of others, including our competitors, we may be prevented from introducing products based on these technologies or expanding into markets created by these technologies. If the intellectual property rights of others prevent us from taking advantage of innovative technologies, our financial condition, operating results or prospects may be harmed.
In addition, our business is dependent in part on the intellectual property of third parties. For example, we license trademarks and other intellectual property from third parties for use in our gaming products. Our future success may depend upon our ability to obtain licenses to use new marks and our ability to retain or expand existing licenses for certain products. If we are not able to obtain new licenses or renew or expand existing licenses, we may be required to discontinue or limit our use of such products that use the licensed marks and our financial condition, operating results or prospects may be harmed.
Our gaming products, particularly our wide area progressive networks, centrally determined systems and our mobile and online gaming platform, may experience losses due to technical difficulties or fraudulent activities.
Our success depends on our ability to avoid, detect, replicate and correct software and hardware errors and fraudulent manipulation of our products. All of our products are designed with security features to prevent fraudulent activity. However, we cannot guarantee that these features will effectively stop all fraudulent or subversive activities. If our security features do not prevent these types of activities, we could adversely be affected. To the extent any of our products experience errors or fraudulent manipulation, our customers may replace our products with those of our competitors. In addition, the occurrence of errors in, or fraudulent manipulation of, our products may give rise to claims for lost revenues and related litigation by our customers and may subject us to investigation or other action by gaming regulatory authorities, including shutting down our products, suspension or revocation of our gaming licenses or disciplinary action. Additionally, in the event of such issues with our products, substantial engineering and marketing resources may be diverted from other areas to rectify the problem.
Systems, network, telecommunications or other technological failures or cyber-attacks may disrupt our business and have an adverse effect on operations.
Any disruption in our network or telecommunications services could affect our ability to operate our gaming or financial systems, which would results in reduced revenues and customer down time. Our networks are susceptible to outages due to fire, flood, power loss, break-ins, cyber-attacks, network penetration, data privacy or security breaches, denial of service attacks and similar events. Despite our implementation of what we believe to be reasonable and adequate network security measures and data protections safeguards, our servers and computer resources are vulnerable to viruses, malicious software, hacking, break-ins or theft, third-party security breaches, employee error or malfeasance, and other potential compromises. Anyone that is able to circumvent our security measures could misappropriate confidential or proprietary information, including that of third parties, cause interruption in our operations, damage our computers or otherwise damage our reputation and business. Any of the foregoing matters related to unauthorized access to or tampering with our systems or networks in any such event could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, operating results or prospects.
24
Our online gaming products are part of a new and evolving industry, which presents significant uncertainty and business risks.
Online gaming is a nascent industry. The success of this industry and our online gaming products such as our mobile and online gaming platform will be affected by future developments in social networks, mobile platforms, regulatory developments, data privacy laws and regulations and other factors that we are unable to predict or control. This environment can make it difficult to plan and can provide opportunities for competitors to grow revenues at our expense. Consequently, our future revenues related to our online gaming products may be difficult to predict and we cannot provide any assurance that these products will gain market acceptance, that they will generate revenues at the rates we expect or will be successful in the long run.
Our credit agreement imposes significant restrictions. Failure to comply with these restrictions could result in the acceleration of a substantial portion of our debt, which we may not be able to repay or refinance.
Our credit agreement contains covenants that restrict our ability and certain of our subsidiaries to (among other things):
In addition, our credit agreement requires us to maintain compliance with certain financial ratios. Our ability to comply with such financial ratios, meet our debt service obligations, or reduce our total debt is dependent upon our future performance, which may be affected by events beyond our control. There can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with such restrictions and limitations, or that they will not adversely affect our ability to finance our future operations or capital needs or engage in other business activities that would otherwise be in our interest.
A breach of any of our covenants or our inability to comply with the required financial ratios under the credit agreement or under any replacement credit agreement could result in a default under such credit agreement. In the event of a default, the lenders could elect to declare all borrowings outstanding under such credit agreement, together with any accrued interest and other fees, to be due and payable, as well as require us to apply all available cash to repay the amounts. If we were unable to repay the indebtedness upon its acceleration, the lenders could proceed against the underlying collateral. There can be no assurance that our assets would be sufficient to repay the amount in full, that we would be able to borrow sufficient funds to refinance the indebtedness or that we would be able to obtain a waiver to cure the default.
Current borrowings, as well as potential future financings, may substantially increase our current indebtedness.
No assurance can be given that we will be able to generate the cash flows necessary to permit us to meet our fixed charges and payment obligations with respect to our debt. We could be required to
25
incur additional indebtedness to meet these fixed charges and payment obligations. Incurring additional debt could:
Any inability to service our fixed charges and payment obligations, or the incurrence of additional debt, would have an adverse effect on our cash flows, results of operations and business generally.
An inability to maintain sufficient liquidity could negatively affect expected levels of operations and new product development.
Future revenue may not be sufficient to meet operating, product development and other cash flow requirements. Sufficient funds to service our debt and maintain new product development efforts, and expected levels of operations may not be available. Additional capital, if and when needed by us, may not be available on terms acceptable to us. If we cannot obtain sufficient capital on acceptable terms when needed, we may not be able to carry out our planned product development efforts and level of operations.
Our reported results can be affected adversely by the implementation of new, or changes in the interpretation of existing, accounting principles or financial reporting requirements.
Our financial reporting complies with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP"), and U.S. GAAP is subject to change over time. If new rules, or interpretations of existing rules, require us to change our financial reporting (including the proposed lease accounting changes and the adoption of international financial reporting standards ("IFRS") in the United States), our reported results of operations and financial condition could be affected substantially, including requirements to restate historical financial reporting. As an example, the adoption of IFRS could affect many of our financial ratios and covenant compliance calculations under our credit agreement. We may or may not be successful in changing the original financial ratios based on U.S. GAAP with our lenders, and if successful, we may incur additional costs in updating our credit agreement for these new ratios.
As we introduce new products and transactions become increasingly complex, additional analysis and judgment is required to account for and recognize revenues in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Transactions may include multiple element arrangements and/or software components and applicable accounting principles could further change the timing of revenue recognition and could adversely affect our financial results for any given period. Fluctuations may occur in our deferred revenues and reflect our continued shift toward more multiple element contracts that include systems and software.
Changes in laws or regulations or the manner of their interpretation or enforcement could adversely impact our financial performance and restrict our ability to operate our business or execute our strategies.
New laws or regulations, or changes in existing laws or regulations or the manner of their interpretation or enforcement, could increase our cost of doing business and restrict our ability to operate our business or execute our strategies. This includes, among other things, the possible taxation under U.S. law of certain income from foreign operations, and compliance costs and enforcement under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. For example, under Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Act, the SEC has adopted additional disclosure requirements related
26
to the source of certain "conflict minerals" for issuers for which such "conflict minerals" are necessary to the functionality or production of a product manufactured, or contracted to be manufactured, by that issuer. The metals covered by the proposed rules include tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold, commonly referred to as "3TG." Our suppliers may use some or all of these materials in their production processes. The rules require us to conduct a reasonable country of origin inquiry to determine if we know or have reason to believe any of the minerals used in the production process may have originated from the Democratic Republic of the Congo or an adjoining country. If we are not able to determine the minerals did not originate from a covered country or conclude that there is no reason to believe that the minerals used in the production process may have originated in a covered country, we would be required to perform supply chain due diligence on members of our supply chain. Global supply chains can have multiple layers, thus the costs of complying with these new requirements could be substantial. These new requirements may also reduce the number of suppliers who provide conflict free metals, and may affect our ability to obtain products in sufficient quantities or at competitive prices. Compliance costs and the unavailability of raw materials could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Our financial results vary from quarter to quarter, which could negatively impact our business.
Various factors affect our quarterly operating results, some of which are not within our control. These factors include, among others:
In certain sales of new gaming machines and the placement of participation gaming machines, we have offered free gaming machines and free conversions, while at the same time we continue to charge our customers for gaming machines and conversions upgrade kits. We cannot be sure that competitive pressure will not cause us to increase the number of free gaming machines and conversions we are expected to offer to our customers, which would decrease the revenue we expect to receive and reduce our gross profit.
Our gross margins are impacted in a given period by a number of different factors. For example, our gross margins would be adversely affected by both decreases to the average selling prices of our units or our average daily revenue from gaming operations. The introduction of new products can also impact gross margins. Increases to our costs of products sold, whether from higher material costs due to the fluctuating commodities markets, higher labor costs, increased freight charges reflecting escalating energy prices or the use of higher-priced technology in newer products, can also have a negative impact on gross margins. These and other factors are likely to cause our financial results to fluctuate from quarter to quarter. We believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our results of operations may not be meaningful. In addition, such fluctuations could cause us to be unable to comply with the financial ratios in our credit agreement.
27
Business combinations and investments in intellectual properties or affiliates may not achieve the financial and strategic goals that were contemplated at the time of the transaction, which could materially affect our financial results.
We have invested, and may continue to invest, in strategic business combinations and acquisitions of important business technologies and intellectual property that we believe will expand our geographic reach, product lines, and/or customer base. Those combinations and acquisitions and any future such transactions may present difficulties in the assimilation of acquired operations, technologies and products, or may prove to be less valuable than the price we paid because of, among other things, a failure to realize anticipated benefits such as cost savings and revenue enhancements or because of the assumption of liabilities in an acquisition, including unforeseen or contingent liabilities in excess of the amounts estimated. In addition, acquisitions can divert management's attention from day-to-day operations and may include substantial transaction costs. We also may encounter difficulties applying our internal controls to an acquired business. Any of these events or circumstances may have an adverse effect on our business by requiring us to, among other things, record substantial impairment charges on goodwill and other intangible assets, resulting in a negative impact on our operating results.
Moreover, as we continue to evaluate our business and assess our long-term strategic goals, we will also evaluate past and potential investments to determine how they will fit into our organizational structure. If an event or change occurs in affiliate relationships or agreements associated with business combinations, we may be required to reassess cash flows, recoverability, useful lives, and fair value measurements, which may result in material impairment charges.
Provisions of our articles of incorporation and bylaws, Nevada law, and the regulatory burdens attendant to ownership, could discourage or prevent a potential takeover of our Company that might otherwise result in our stockholders receiving a premium over the market price for our common stock.
Our articles of incorporation permit our Board of Directors to issue special shares from time to time, with such rights and preferences as they consider appropriate. Our Board of Directors could authorize the issuance of special shares with terms and conditions and under circumstances that could have an effect of discouraging a takeover or other transaction.
As a Nevada corporation, we are also subject to certain provisions of the Nevada General Corporation Law that have anti-takeover effects and may inhibit a non-negotiated merger or other business combination. These provisions are intended to encourage any person interested in acquiring us to negotiate with, and to obtain the approval of, our Board of Directors. Some of these provisions may discourage a future acquisition of the Company, including an acquisition in which the stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares. As a result, stockholders who might desire to participate in such a transaction may not have the opportunity to do so.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
The following sets forth information regarding our leased and owned properties. We believe our facilities are suitable for our needs and we have no future expansion plans that would make these properties inadequate. See Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements, Leases, for information as to our lease commitments with respect to the leased properties.
28
Bally Gaming Equipment and Systems
Global Headquarters and Manufacturing and Assembly Facility
We maintain our global headquarters and our primary manufacturing and assembly facilities in Las Vegas, Nevada in a facility with approximately 150,000 square feet that we own. The facility is used for corporate administrative functions as well as to accommodate the design, assembly and distribution of gaming equipment and casino management systems' hardware and to meet product design demands and varying levels of volume requirements. We also lease an additional 135,000 square feet of office, warehouse and other rental space in the general area of our main facility.
Las Vegas and Reno Technology Campus
We lease an additional 36,000 of office space next door to our global headquarters facility in Las Vegas for a Technology Campus for our game development, advanced development, and project management teams. In addition, we lease 82,875 square feet in Reno, Nevada, which provides a larger campus-style environment that accommodates the growth of our game development, system development, product management, and administrative functions in northern Nevada.
Innovation Lab
Bally's Global Innovation Lab is located in Pleasanton, California, a major suburb of San Francisco. We lease a facility with approximately 6,250 square feet that allows the Company to draw from the significant high-tech talent that resides in the Silicon Valley.
Other Leased Facilities
IndiaWe lease a total of approximately 105,000 square feet of office and R&D space in Bangalore and Chennai.
NetherlandsWe lease a total of approximately 16,000 square feet of office, sales, service and warehouse space in Amsterdam and Diemen.
ChinaWe lease approximately 26,000 square feet of office, sales, warehouse and other rental space in Macau.
South AmericaWe lease a total of approximately 27,000 square feet of office and warehouse space in Buenos Aires, Argentina, Santiago, Chile, Lima, Peru and Montevideo, Uruguay.
In addition to the facilities described above, we maintain leased space in major gaming jurisdictions worldwide including a total of approximately 119,000 square feet of office, sales and service, R&D, warehouse and other rental space throughout the United States, and a total of approximately 45,000 square feet of office, sales and service, R&D and warehouse space in Australia, Canada, Europe,
29
Mexico, Singapore and South Africa. These facilities are located in the cities listed below. Each property is fully utilized.
United States | Australia, Canada, Europe, Mexico, Singapore and South Africa |
|
---|---|---|
Scottsdale, Arizona | Sydney, Australia | |
Huntington Beach, California | Toronto, Canada | |
Murrietta, California | Nice, France | |
San Diego, California | Rheine, Germany | |
Golden, Colorado | Rome, Italy | |
Dover, Delaware | Mexico City, Mexico | |
Davie, Florida | Singapore, Singapore | |
Kennesaw, Georgia | Kyalami, Midrand, South Africa | |
Lisle, Illinois | Chestergates, United Kingdom | |
Effingham, Illinois | ||
Biloxi, Mississippi | ||
Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey | ||
Chester, New York | ||
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma | ||
Fife, Washington | ||
San Juan, Puerto Rico |
Bally has been named in and has brought lawsuits in the normal course of business. We do not expect the outcome of these suits to have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations. A description of certain of these matters is contained in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements, Commitments and Contingencies, and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
30
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE") under the symbol "BYI". The following table sets forth the high and low closing bid price of our common stock as reported by the NYSE for the periods indicated.
|
Price Range of Common Stock |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
High | Low | |||||
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012 |
|||||||
1st Quarter |
$ | 41.44 | $ | 26.98 | |||
2nd Quarter |
39.56 | 25.15 | |||||
3rd Quarter |
47.18 | 39.37 | |||||
4th Quarter |
48.55 | 44.27 | |||||
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2011 |
|||||||
1st Quarter |
$ | 35.37 | $ | 30.75 | |||
2nd Quarter |
43.59 | 34.03 | |||||
3rd Quarter |
43.41 | 34.58 | |||||
4th Quarter |
41.01 | 35.75 |
As of August 20, 2012, we had approximately 3,900 holders of record of our common stock and the closing price on the NYSE was $43.95.
Dividend Policy
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock. Our credit agreement materially limits our ability to pay dividends on our common stock, as discussed in Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements, Long-Term Debt. We intend to follow a policy of retaining earnings to finance the growth of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The declaration and payment of future dividends on our common stock will be at the sole discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on our profitability, the terms of our credit agreement and our financial condition, capital requirements, statutory and contractual restrictions, future prospects and other factors the Board of Directors deem relevant.
Share Repurchases
On April 6, 2011, the Company's Board of Directors increased the authorized capacity under the Company's existing share repurchase plan, previously approved on April 4, 2010, under which, subject to price and market conditions, purchases of shares of common stock could be made from time to time in the open market or in privately negotiated transaction using available cash, to an amount equal to $550 million minus the amount repurchased in the Company's modified Dutch auction tender offer to purchase up to $400 million in value of its common stock launched on April 8, 2011. Shareholders tendered 9,912,993 shares of the Company's common stock in the tender offer at $40.18 per share for an aggregate cost of approximately $398.3 million.
On May 2, 2012, the Company's Board of Directors approved a new $150 million share-repurchase program, which replaced the repurchase program referenced above.
31
Our quarterly share repurchases under these plans, excluding treasury shares acquired in non-cash transactions related to forfeited stock awards and shares exchanged for options exercised, were as follows:
Period
|
Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased |
Average Price Paid Per Share (or Unit) |
Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) That May Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
April 1 - April 30, 2012 |
289,375 | $ | 46.67 | 289,375 | $ | 56,545,911 | |||||||
May 1 - May 31, 2012 |
644,561 | $ | 45.96 | 644,561 | $ | 120,377,760 | |||||||
June 1 - June 30, 2012 |
653,657 | $ | 45.76 | 653,657 | $ | 90,469,138 | |||||||
Total |
1,587,593 | $ | 46.00 | 1,587,593 |
32
Stock Performance Graph
The following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders on Bally Technologies Inc.'s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of (i) the S&P 500 index, (ii) the Russell 2000 index and (iii) a customized peer group of five companies that includes: Aristocrat, IGT, Scientific Games Corp., Shuffle Master Inc and WMS ("Peer Group"). The graph tracks the performance of a $100 investment in the Company's common stock, in each index and in the peer group (with reinvestment of all dividends) from June 30, 2007 through June 30, 2012.
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among Bally Technologies Inc., the S&P 500 Index,
the Russell 2000 Index and a Peer Group
*Comparison of 60 Month Cumulative Return:
|
6/07 | 6/08 | 6/09 | 6/10 | 6/11 | 6/12 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bally Technologies Inc. |
100.00 | 127.93 | 113.25 | 122.60 | 153.97 | 176.61 | |||||||||||||
S&P 500 |
100.00 | 86.88 | 64.10 | 73.35 | 95.87 | 101.09 | |||||||||||||
Russell 2000 |
100.00 | 83.81 | 62.84 | 76.35 | 104.91 | 102.73 | |||||||||||||
Peer Group |
100.00 | 63.69 | 43.01 | 42.14 | 40.82 | 37.51 |
The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
33
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected statement of operations data for fiscal years 2012, 2011 and 2010, and selected balance sheet data for fiscal years 2012 and 2011 has been derived from the consolidated financial statements, which appear elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Selected Financial Data should be read in conjunction with:
|
Year Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||
|
(in 000s, except per share amounts) |
|||||||||||||||
Statement of Operations Data: |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 879,759 | $ | 758,155 | $ | 778,191 | $ | 843,760 | $ | 852,392 | ||||||
Operating income(1) |
179,443 | 151,535 | 184,110 | 203,018 | 181,719 | |||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
164,459 | 143,393 | 170,818 | 184,960 | 160,985 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense |
(63,549 | ) | (45,182 | ) | (60,721 | ) | (64,781 | ) | (61,282 | ) | ||||||
Income from continuing operations |
100,910 | 98,211 | 110,097 | 120,179 | 99,703 | |||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations(2), net of tax |
| | 7,181 | 8,057 | 12,120 | |||||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations(2), net of tax |
| (403 | ) | 22,079 | | | ||||||||||
Net income(1) |
100,910 | 97,808 | 139,357 | 128,236 | 111,823 | |||||||||||
Less: net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(238 | ) | (455 | ) | 1,880 | 1,927 | 4,616 | |||||||||
Net income attributable to Bally Technologies, Inc. |
$ | 101,148 | $ | 98,263 | $ | 137,477 | $ | 126,309 | $ | 107,207 | ||||||
Basic earnings per share attributable to Bally Technologies, Inc.: |
||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 2.35 | $ | 1.90 | $ | 2.00 | $ | 2.19 | $ | 1.78 | ||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
| | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.19 | |||||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations |
| (0.01 | ) | 0.41 | | | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2.35 | $ | 1.89 | $ | 2.52 | $ | 2.32 | $ | 1.97 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Bally Technologies, Inc.: |
||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 2.28 | $ | 1.82 | $ | 1.89 | $ | 2.10 | $ | 1.67 | ||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
| | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.18 | |||||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations |
| (0.01 | ) | 0.38 | | | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2.28 | $ | 1.81 | $ | 2.38 | $ | 2.22 | $ | 1.85 | ||||||
34
|
Year Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||
|
(in 000s) |
|||||||||||||||
Statement of Cash Flows Data: |
||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Operating activities |
$ | 130,983 | $ | 56,756 | $ | 129,125 | $ | 153,308 | $ | 56,275 | ||||||
Investing activities |
(35,198 | ) | (29,220 | ) | (32,324 | ) | (28,966 | ) | (23,231 | ) | ||||||
Financing activities |
(126,946 | ) | (106,466 | ) | (83,921 | ) | (131,250 | ) | (19,009 | ) | ||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
(2,591 | ) | 669 | (396 | ) | (71 | ) | 1,159 | ||||||||
Discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Operating activities |
| (403 | ) | (9,483 | ) | 8,868 | 15,645 | |||||||||
Investing activities |
| | 78,757 | (6,756 | ) | (3,211 | ) | |||||||||
Financing activities |
| | (1,267 | ) | (1,371 | ) | (1,930 | ) | ||||||||
Increase in cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations |
| | 8,712 | 2,133 | 15 | |||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | (33,752 | ) | $ | (78,664 | ) | $ | 89,203 | $ | (4,105 | ) | $ | 25,713 | |||
|
As of June 30, | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||
|
(in 000s) |
|||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 32,673 | $ | 66,425 | $ | 145,089 | $ | 55,886 | $ | 59,991 | ||||||
Total current assets |
480,459 | 473,677 | 476,409 | 465,607 | 587,584 | |||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
214,037 | 160,616 | 174,553 | 178,050 | 294,398 | |||||||||||
Net working capital |
266,422 | 313,061 | 301,856 | 287,557 | 293,186 | |||||||||||
Total assets |
970,467 | 927,394 | 913,176 | 880,882 | 995,124 | |||||||||||
Total long term debt and capital leases, including current maturities(3) |
511,466 | 515,403 | 173,793 | 209,087 | 304,504 | |||||||||||
Total stockholders' equity(3) |
197,475 | 214,592 | 544,192 | 438,749 | 325,107 |
35
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Business Overview
We are a diversified global gaming company that designs, manufactures, operates, and distributes advanced technology-based gaming devices, systems, server-based solutions, custom mobile applications, and interactive applications. Our innovations and technology solutions allow our customers to more effectively manage their operations using our wide range of marketing, data management and analysis, accounting, player tracking, security, and other software applications and tools. We also provide hardware, including spinning-reel and video gaming devices, specialty gaming devices, and wide-area progressive systems. Under our business-to-business model, we support customers that include traditional land-based, riverboat, and Native American casinos, video lottery and central determination markets.
Our gaming equipment, gaming operations, and systems product lines have increasingly converged with the proliferation of high-speed networks. Key innovation drivers in our industry are Ethernet-based gaming floors, downloadable and server-based games and applications, and open protocols and common industry standards in game and system development. Players benefit from these advances by gaining more exciting experiences, better communication from casino owners, and superior customer service from gaming operators. Our customers benefit through operational efficiencies that can increase their profits and streamline their operations.
We derive our revenue from the following:
|
Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
|
(dollars in millions) |
||||||||||||||||||
Gaming Equipment |
$ | 310.7 | 35 | % | $ | 246.6 | 33 | % | $ | 273.7 | 35 | % | |||||||
Gaming Operations |
357.4 | 41 | % | 318.6 | 42 | % | 287.0 | 37 | % | ||||||||||
Systems |
211.7 | 24 | % | 193.0 | 25 | % | 217.5 | 28 | % | ||||||||||
|
$ | 879.8 | 100 | % | $ | 758.2 | 100 | % | $ | 778.2 | 100 | % | |||||||
Gaming Equipment |
| Sale of gaming devices and related equipment, parts and conversion kits; | |||
Gaming Operations |
|
Operation of linked progressive systems, video lottery and centrally determined systems, and the rental of gaming devices and content; and |
|||
Systems |
|
Sale and support of specialized systems-based software, hardware and interactive products and related recurring maintenance revenue. |
We review certain financial measures in assessing our financial condition and operating performance not only in connection with creating our internal forecasts and in making comparisons to financial results from prior periods, but also in making comparisons to our competitors' financial results. We focus on fluctuations in revenue, cost and gross margin and also pay close attention to changes in our consolidated operating income, net income, diluted earnings per share, adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, including asset charges and loss contingencies and share-based compensation), cash flows from operations and free cash flow (cash flows from operating activities less capital expenditures) as they are key indicators of our success. We also measure changes in selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses as a percent of revenue, which indicate management's ability to control costs, as well as changes in research and development ("R&D") costs as a percent of revenue, which demonstrate investment in technology and product development. The measures listed above are not a comprehensive list of all factors considered by us in assessing our
36
financial condition and operating performance, and we may consider other individual measures as required by trends and discrete events arising in a specific period, but they are the key indicators.
We continue to operate in a challenging economic environment. The gaming sector was and continues to be negatively impacted by lower consumer spending and limited resources available to fund capital projects. As a result of the challenging economic environment, we have provided select customers a greater amount of payment terms for periods up to one year, and in some cases for periods up to three years. We expect to continue to extend credit for these longer periods for the foreseeable future.
There are several new and potential gaming market developments that we believe will benefit us in the long term. In our domestic market, we are focused on approved new jurisdictional opportunities and expansions in Canada, Illinois, Ohio, Kansas, Maryland, Louisiana, Mississippi, Florida, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Maine and California, and the potential for new market opportunities in New Hampshire, Kentucky and Texas. The breadth and timing of such opportunities remain uncertain due to the legislative process in these jurisdictions, as well as the difficult credit environment facing certain of our customers and the risk of the gaming industry impact of continued economic uncertainty. We are also engaged in expanding our position in South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, and Mexico, and, in the future, we also expect to generate revenue from the Italian Video Lottery Terminal ("VLT") market and from potential new markets in Eastern Europe, Greece, Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, Vietnam, the Philippines and Brazil. Our entry into the Italian VLT market has been delayed by a lengthened regulatory approval process that developed in that market after we submitted our products for approval. As a result, certain customers and partners have modified their business approach to the market, which has delayed and, at least in the near term, reduced the amount of business we expected from the Italian VLT market. We received regulatory approval for our products and began deploying VLTs in Italy during July 2012.
Gaming Equipment
|
Year Ended June 30, | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
|
(dollars in millions, except ASP) |
|||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 310.7 | $ | 246.6 | $ | 273.7 | ||||
New gaming devices |
16,504 | 13,537 | 17,334 | |||||||
New unit Average Selling Price ("ASP"). |
$ | 17,044 | $ | 15,832 | $ | 14,398 |
Gaming equipment revenues improved in fiscal year 2012 due primarily to an increase in the number of new gaming devices sold as a result of key platform and hardware innovations, higher average selling price ("ASP"), and an increase in conversion kit revenue during the period, when compared to the same periods in the prior two years. In calendar year 2010, we released our new Pro Series cabinets with ALPHA 2 technology which are state of the art for the industry with regards to ergonomics, processing power, display technology, input device, operating system, sound and serviceability. This platform allows for the development of new, more compelling games and also facilitates our game download solution for customers. Our Pro Series cabinets also feature the iDeck, first of its kind multi-touch fully programmable and downloadable button panel which offers opportunity to add more interaction to the game-play experience with mystery bonus events, virtual shooting galleries and skill-based bonus games. We have and will continue to expand the number of game-development teams producing content on our new ALPHA 2 technology.
37
Gaming Operations
|
Year Ended June 30, | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
|
(dollars in millions) |
|||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 357.4 | $ | 318.6 | $ | 287.0 | ||||
End of period installed base: |
||||||||||
Linked progressive systems |
1,792 | 1,059 | 1,030 | |||||||
Rental and daily-fee games |
14,890 | 14,315 | 13,194 | |||||||
Video lottery systems |
11,718 | 8,350 | 7,739 | |||||||
Centrally determined systems |
47,633 | 50,754 | 50,029 |
Revenues increased period over period due primarily to the significant investments we have made in our game development studios over the past few years, and the continued performance of existing and new premium game titles which increased rental and participation revenue, improvements in linked progressive revenues and lottery systems revenues. Fiscal year 2012 results benefitted from our growing product offerings and innovations, such as U-Spin, and the continued success of our Cash Spin, Hot Spin, Vegas Hits and Cash Wizard games. Our linked progressive system revenue increased due primarily to the introduction of Cash Connection, the latest wide-area progressive link, with the release of GREASE and Michael Jackson King of Pop, and an increase in placements of our Betty Boop Love Meter, Golden Pharaoh and Money Vault wide-area progressive games. We also continue to focus our development efforts on the introduction of new and innovative games and cabinets both for our spinning-reel and video platforms.
Systems
|
Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
|
(dollars in millions) |
||||||||||||||||||
Hardware |
$ | 67.3 | 32 | % | $ | 74.9 | 39 | % | $ | 83.3 | 38 | % | |||||||
Software and services |
69.5 | 33 | % | 53.0 | 27 | % | 76.0 | 35 | % | ||||||||||
Maintenance |
74.9 | 35 | % | 65.1 | 34 | % | 58.2 | 27 | % | ||||||||||
|
$ | 211.7 | 100 | % | $ | 193.0 | 100 | % | $ | 217.5 | 100 | % |
Our Systems revenues are comprised of:
The combination of iVIEW Display Manager ("DM") and Elite Bonusing Suite and other features like Universal Card across multiple properties are becoming increasingly compelling return-on-investment propositions with multiple customer instances of demonstrable value generated from such implementations. We are also making good progress with international systems installations including Canada, South Africa, New Zealand and Australia. In addition, we are developing further DM applications, including wager-based applications, which we believe will be even more impactful.
38
We have continued to invest in the basics of enterprise software development, delivery, customer support and services discipline, on improving core products, providing quality upgrade options for our customers, and increasing customer satisfaction levels through better service and support.
Operating Expenses
|
Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012 | % of Revenue |
2011 | % of Revenue |
2010 | % of Revenue |
|||||||||||||
|
(dollars in millions) |
||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
$ | 255.0 | 29 | % | $ | 225.0 | 30 | % | $ | 203.2 | 26 | % | |||||||
Research and development costs |
$ | 96.2 | 11 | % | $ | 88.1 | 12 | % | $ | 80.3 | 10 | % |
The increase in SG&A expenses in each fiscal year period was due primarily to the increases in payroll and related expenses, regulatory, bad debt expense, and other infrastructure expenses to support key new markets. Payroll and related expenses increased due primarily to an increase in headcount in the comparative periods. Fiscal year 2012 includes a loss contingency accrual of $10.0 million related to several legal matters.
The increase in R&D costs was attributable to our continued focus on our technology assets. R&D decreased to 11% of total revenues, when compared to 12% in the same period last year, with revenues growing faster than R&D expense growth, as past R&D efforts begin to pay off with increased product acceptance.
Liquidity
Total cash and cash equivalents decreased $33.8 million in the year ended June 30, 2012, when compared to the same period last year. Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations was $131.0 million, $56.8 million and $129.1 million for the years ended June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations in the current period were positively impacted by improvements in net income, and decreases in prepaid and refundable income tax due primarily to a refund of $12.0 million for prior year taxes paid and increases in income taxes payable during the current period.
During fiscal year 2012, we made payments of $45.0 million on our credit facility, made capital expenditures of $11.5 million, acquired certain technologies and other long term assets of $18.8 million, and repurchased $154.2 million of our common stock. These cash outlays were partially offset by proceeds of $41.0 million from borrowings under our credit facility, proceeds of $25.9 million from the exercise of employee stock options and purchases of common stock under our 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "2008 ESPP").
39
Results of Operations
The summary financial results and operating statistics are as follows:
|
Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012 | % Rev | 2011 | % Rev | 2010 | % Rev | |||||||||||||
|
(dollars in millions) |
||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
|||||||||||||||||||
Gaming Equipment |
$ | 310.7 | 35 | % | $ | 246.6 | 33 | % | $ | 273.7 | 35 | % | |||||||
Gaming Operations |
357.4 | 41 | % | 318.6 | 42 | % | 287.0 | 37 | % | ||||||||||
Systems |
211.7 | 24 | % | 193.0 | 25 | % | 217.5 | 28 | % | ||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 879.8 | 100 | % | $ | 758.2 | 100 | % | $ | 778.2 | 100 | % | |||||||
Gross Margin |
|||||||||||||||||||
Gaming Equipment(1) |
$ | 139.8 | 45 | % | $ | 112.1 | 45 | % | $ | 138.0 | 50 | % | |||||||
Gaming Operations |
257.7 | 72 | % | 229.8 | 72 | % | 203.9 | 71 | % | ||||||||||
Systems(1) |
155.9 | 74 | % | 142.6 | 74 | % | 156.5 | 72 | % | ||||||||||
Total gross margin |
$ | 553.4 | 63 | % | $ | 484.5 | 64 | % | $ | 498.4 | 64 | % | |||||||
Selling, general and administrative(2) |
255.0 |
29 |
% |
225.0 |
30 |
% |
203.2 |
26 |
% |
||||||||||
Research and development costs |
96.2 | 11 | % | 88.1 | 12 | % | 80.3 | 10 | % | ||||||||||
Impairment charges |
| | | | 11.4 | 1 | % | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
22.8 | 3 | % | 19.9 | 3 | % | 19.4 | 3 | % | ||||||||||
Operating income(2) |
$ | 179.4 | 20 | % | $ | 151.5 | 20 | % | $ | 184.1 | 24 | % | |||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 100.9 | 11 | % | $ | 98.2 | 13 | % | $ | 110.1 | 14 | % |
Fiscal Year 2012 vs. Fiscal Year 2011
Total revenues increased $121.6 million, or 16%, in fiscal year 2012, when compared to fiscal year 2011, as a result of the following:
Gaming Equipment Revenue. Gaming Equipment revenue increased by $64.1 million, or 26%, to approximately $310.7 million primarily as a result of:
Gaming Equipment Gross Margin. Gaming Equipment gross margin was consistent at 45% in both periods.
40
Gaming Operations Revenue. Gaming Operations revenue increased $38.8 million, or 12%, to approximately $357.4 million in fiscal year 2012, when compared to the same period last year, primarily as a result of:
Gaming Operations Gross Margin. Gross margin was consistent at 72% in both periods.
Systems Revenue. Systems revenue increased $18.7 million, or 10%, to approximately $211.7 million in fiscal year 2012, when compared to the same period last year, which was comprised of:
Systems Gross Margin. Systems gross margin was consistent at 74% in both periods. Systems revenues for fiscal year 2012 were comprised of 32% hardware, 35% maintenance and 33% software and service revenue, as compared to 39% hardware, 34% maintenance and 27% software and services revenue in the same period last year.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. SG&A expenses increased $30.0 million, or 13%, in fiscal year 2012, when compared to the same period last year, due primarily to increases in payroll and related expenses, regulatory, bad debt expense, and other infrastructure expense to support key new markets. Payroll and related expenses increased due primarily to an increase in headcount in the comparative period as a result of our expansion into international markets. Bad debt expense increased due primarily to an impairment of notes receivable of $1.8 million related to development financing. In addition, fiscal year 2012 includes a loss contingency accrual of $10.0 million related to several legal matters.
Research and Development Costs. R&D costs increased $8.1 million, or 9%, in fiscal year 2012, when compared to the same period last year, due primarily to increased product development efforts requiring an increase in employees. R&D decreased to 11% of total revenues, when compared with 12% in the same period last year, with revenues growing faster than R&D expense growth, as past R&D efforts began to pay off with increased product acceptance among our customer base.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $2.9 million, or 15%, in fiscal year 2012, when compared to same period last year, primarily as a result of additions of intangible assets year over year.
41
Fiscal Year 2011 vs. Fiscal Year 2010
Total revenues decreased $20.0 million, or 3%, in fiscal year 2011, when compared to fiscal year 2010, as a result of the following:
Gaming Equipment Revenue. Gaming Equipment revenue decreased by $27.1 million, or 10%, to approximately $246.6 million primarily as a result of:
Gaming Equipment Gross Margin. Gaming Equipment gross margin decreased to 45% in fiscal year 2011 from 50%, in the same period in fiscal year 2010, due primarily to the write-down of older technology platforms, an increase in royalty-based fees associated with third-party themes due to an increase in the number of related unit and game conversion kit sales, and the increased cost of our new Pro Series cabinets during 2011.
Gaming Operations Revenue. Gaming Operations revenue increased $31.6 million, or 11%, to approximately $318.6 million in fiscal year 2011, when compared to the same period in fiscal year 2010, primarily as a result of:
Gaming Operations Gross Margin. Gross margin increased to 72% in fiscal year 2011 from 71% in fiscal year 2010. The improvement in gross margin was primarily due to increases in participation revenue which had little associated variable costs.
Systems Revenue. Systems revenue decreased $24.5 million, or 11%, to approximately $193.0 million in fiscal year 2011, when compared to the same period in fiscal year 2010, due primarily to the timing of certain customer decisions regarding system purchases and upgrades which impacted the closing of deals and implementation timelines. Systems revenue was comprised of:
Systems Gross Margin. Systems gross margin increased to 74% in fiscal year 2011 from 72%, in the same period in fiscal year 2010, primarily as a result of a change in the mix of products sold in the comparative periods coupled with an increase in maintenance revenue which involves minimal variable costs during the same period. Specifically, Systems revenues for fiscal year 2011 were comprised of 39% hardware, 34% maintenance and 27% software and service revenue, as compared to 38% hardware, 27% maintenance and 35% software and services revenue in the same period in fiscal year 2010.
42
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. SG&A expenses increased $21.8 million, or 11%, in fiscal year 2011, when compared to the same period in fiscal year 2010, due primarily to increases in payroll and related expenses, legal fees, travel and entertainment expense and bad debt expense. Payroll and related expenses increased due primarily to an 8% increase in headcount in the comparative periods as a result of our expansion into international markets. Legal fees increased due primarily to costs associated with litigation and fees related to our entrance into new international markets. The increase in travel and entertainment expense was due primarily for travel associated with new business and the addition of new international locations. Bad debt expense increased due primarily to increases in accounts receivable during the comparable periods and the increased exposure to international markets. Bad debt as a percentage of revenue continued to remain at approximately 1%.
Research and Development Costs. R&D costs increased $7.8 million, or 10%, in fiscal year 2011, when compared to the same period in fiscal year 2010, due primarily to an increase in employees and an increase in hardware development costs. The increased costs were attributable to our continued focus on our technology assets due to the increased focus on content development on the ALPHA 2 platform and the new Pro Series cabinets as well as development of iVIEW DM.
Impairment Charges. Impairment charges of $11.4 million were recorded during fiscal year 2010 due to the circumstances in Alabama where the legality of charitable bingo gaming was under challenge by the state's governor and there were several lawsuits pending before the State's Supreme Court that negatively affected charitable gaming in the state. See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, Impairment Charges.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $0.5 million, or 3%, in fiscal year 2011, when compared to same period in fiscal year 2010, primarily as a result of additions of intangible assets and property and equipment year over year.
Other Income (Expense), Income Tax Expense and Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
Other income (expense) and income tax expense from continuing operations and net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests was as follows:
|
Year Ended June 30, | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
|
(in millions) |
|||||||||
Other income (expense) |
||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 5.2 | $ | 5.0 | $ | 3.3 | ||||
Interest expense |
(17.4 | ) | (12.0 | ) | (12.6 | ) | ||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| (4.1 | ) | | ||||||
Other, net |
(2.8 | ) | 3.0 | (4.0 | ) | |||||
Total other expense |
$ | (15.0 | ) | $ | (8.1 | ) | $ | (13.3 | ) | |
Income tax expense |
(63.5 |
) |
(45.2 |
) |
(60.7 |
) |
||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(0.2 | ) | (0.5 | ) | 1.9 |
Fiscal Year 2012 vs. Fiscal Year 2011
Other Income (Expense). Other expense increased $6.9 million, or 85%, in fiscal year 2012, when compared to the same period last year, due primarily to increases in interest expense and foreign currency translation losses during the same period. Losses on foreign currency translations were $3.4 million in fiscal year 2012, when compared to gains on foreign currency translations of $2.5 million in the same period last year. Interest expense increased $5.4 million in fiscal year 2012, when compared to the same period last year, due primarily to the increase in long term debt upon entering into the
43
amended and restated credit agreement in April 2011. As a result of amending and restating the credit facility, we incurred a loss on extinguishment of debt of $4.1 million for the write-off of certain debt issue costs in fiscal year 2011.
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense increased $18.3 million during fiscal year 2012, when compared to the same period last year, due primarily to the increase in net income. Fiscal year 2011 was impacted by certain changes in our uncertain tax positions primarily resulting from settlement of the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") examination of our 2003 to 2005 income tax returns, the reinstatement of the R&D tax credit and deferred tax expense on the repatriation of earnings from our India subsidiary. See Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements, Income Taxes. The effective income tax rate for continuing operations for fiscal years 2012 and 2011 was 38.6% and 31.5%, respectively.
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests. Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests decreased $0.3 million in fiscal year 2012, when compared to the same period last year.
Fiscal Year 2011 vs. Fiscal Year 2010
Other Income (Expense). Other expense decreased $5.2 million, or 39%, in fiscal year 2011, when compared to the same period in fiscal year 2010, due primarily to an increase in gains on foreign currency translations of $6.8 million as a result of the weakening of the U.S. dollar during the same period. Interest expense decreased $0.6 million in fiscal year 2011, when compared to the same period in fiscal year 2010, while interest income increased $1.7 million during the same period.
As a result of amending and restating the credit facility, we incurred a loss on extinguishment of debt of $4.1 million for the write-off of certain debt issue costs. The interest rate on the term loan was 3.82% at June 30, 2011. In December 2008, we entered into a floating-to-fixed interest rate swap to fix the interest rate at 1.89% until September 2012. Effective June 2011, we entered into a second floating-to-fixed interest rate swap to fix the interest rate at 2.09% until the term loan's maturity in May 2016.
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense decreased $15.5 million during fiscal year 2011, when compared to the same period in fiscal year 2010, due primarily to a reduction in net income, certain changes in our uncertain tax positions primarily resulting from settlement of the IRS examination of our 2003 to 2005 income tax returns, the reinstatement of the R&D tax credit and deferred tax expense on the repatriation of earnings from our India subsidiary. See Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements, Income Taxes. The effective income tax rate for continuing operations for fiscal years 2011 and 2010 was 31.5% and 35.5%, respectively.
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests decreased $2.4 million in fiscal year 2011, when compared to the same period in fiscal year 2010. In fiscal year 2010, net income attributable to noncontrolling interests included Rainbow Casino. See Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, Discontinued Operations.
Discontinued Operations
On April 5, 2010, we entered into a definitive purchase agreement to sell the Rainbow Casino. Under the terms of the agreement, we received approximately $80.0 million in an all-cash transaction. The sale closed on June 8, 2010. We recognized a gain on the sale of Rainbow of approximately $22.1 million (net of approximately $12.2 million in income taxes) in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010. Per the terms of the sale agreement, we incurred certain post-closing adjustments during fiscal year 2011 which reduced our gain on the sale by approximately $0.4 million (net of income taxes).
44
The results of operations for fiscal years 2011 and 2010 were classified as discontinued operations because we did not continue to receive significant cash flows from the Rainbow Casino after the sale. Rainbow's revenues, reported in discontinued operations for fiscal year 2010 were $34.3 million. We recorded income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes, for fiscal year 2010 of $7.2 million. See Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, Discontinued Operations.
Financial Condition and Liquidity
Working Capital
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 30, 2012 |
June 30, 2011 |
|||||||||||
|
Amount | % | |||||||||||
|
(dollars in 000s) |
||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 32,673 | $ | 66,425 | $ | (33,752 | ) | (51 | )% | ||||
Total long-term debt, including current maturities |
$ | 511,466 | $ | 515,403 | $ | (3,937 | ) | (1 | )% | ||||
Total current assets |
$ |
480,459 |
$ |
473,677 |
$ |
6,782 |
1 |
% |
|||||
Total current liabilities |
214,037 |
160,616 |
53,421 |
33 |
% |
||||||||
Net working capital |
$ | 266,422 | $ | 313,061 | $ | (46,639 | ) | (15 | )% | ||||
As of June 30, 2012 and 2011, we had $32.7 million and $66.4 million, respectively, in consolidated cash and cash equivalents.
Pursuant to various state gaming regulations, certain cash accounts are maintained to ensure availability of funds to pay wide-area progressive jackpot awards in installments, rather than in one lump-sum. At June 30, 2012 and 2011, these accounts had an aggregate value of approximately $13.6 million and $8.4 million, respectively, which are classified as restricted cash in our consolidated balance sheets. In addition, we purchase U.S. Treasury Strip Securities for the benefit of jackpot winners who elect to receive winnings in annual or weekly installment payments. These securities are included in restricted long-term investments in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, and totaled $12.2 million and $12.5 million as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
On June 30, 2012 and 2011, the amount of cash and investments held by foreign subsidiaries was $22.6 million and $18.2 million, respectively. If these funds are needed for our operations in the U.S., we would be required to accrue and pay U.S. taxes to repatriate these funds.
Our net working capital decreased $46.6 million in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, when compared to the same period last year, and was primarily affected by the $33.8 million decrease in cash and cash equivalents during the same period and by net working capital changes in the following components:
45
Current and long-term accounts and notes receivable increased $29.6 million and $9.1 million, respectively, during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, when compared to the same period last year. Even with the increase in total accounts receivable, our DSO's decreased to 113 days at June 30, 2012 from 116 days at June 30, 2011 due to an increase in collections.
During fiscal year 2012, we repurchased 3.9 million shares of our common stock for approximately $154.6 million under our share repurchase plan. On May 12, 2011, we concluded a modified Dutch auction tender offer to repurchase up to $400 million of our common stock, purchasing 9.9 million shares at $40.18 per share for $398.3 million. During fiscal year 2011, in addition to the 9.9 million shares repurchased under the tender offer, we repurchased 2.0 million shares of our common stock for approximately $75.7 million.
On April 15, 2011, we entered into an amended and restated credit agreement, that provides for a $700 million senior secured credit facility comprised of a $300 million, five-year term loan and a $400 million, five-year revolving credit facility, including a $50 million sublimit for the issuance of standby letters of credit, a $10 million sublimit for swingline loans and a $150 million sublimit for multicurrency borrowings approved under the credit facility.
The interest rate on the credit facility is subject to a leverage-based pricing grid that ranges from LIBOR plus a margin of 1.25% to 2.00% based on a leverage ratio between 1.0 and 2.5. As of June 30, 2012, our leverage ratio was approximately 1.8 and the interest rate was priced at LIBOR plus a margin of 1.50%.
Effective December 2008, we entered into a floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreement with an original notional value of $218.8 million and a maturity date of September 26, 2012 to fix floating LIBOR based debt to fixed rate debt at an interest rate of 1.89%. Effective June 2011, we entered into a second floating-to-fixed rate swap agreement with an original notional value of $165.0 million and a maturity date of May 13, 2016 to fix a portion of the floating LIBOR based debt under the new term loan to fixed rate debt at an interest rate of 2.09%. At June 30, 2012 and 2011, the combined swap agreements had a notional value of $281.3 million and $296.3 million, respectively.
Under the credit facility, the term loan requires quarterly principal reductions in an amount equal to $3,750,000, through March 2013; $5,625,000, through March 2014; $7,500,000, from June 2014 until the term loan's maturity in May 2016 upon when the remaining outstanding principal balance of $187,500,000 is due.
The credit facility is collateralized by substantially all of our domestic property and is guaranteed by each of our domestic subsidiaries, excluding any noncontrolling interests, and is secured by a pledge agreement and contains a number of covenants as described under Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements, Long-Term Debt. We were in compliance with all of the credit facility covenants as of June 30, 2012 and 2011.
As of June 30, 2012 and 2011, there was approximately $170.0 million and $181.0 million, respectively, of undrawn availability under the revolving credit facility. Availability under the revolving credit facility is reduced to the extent of outstanding letters of credit.
Management believes that cash flows from current operating activities will provide us with sufficient capital resources and liquidity to operate our business for at least the next 12 months.
At June 30, 2012, we had no material commitments for capital expenditures.
46
Cash Flow Summary
Our primary sources of liquidity include existing cash and cash equivalents, cash flows from all operating activities and the availability of funds under our revolving credit facility.
Cash flows from continuing operating activities are derived from Bally Gaming Equipment and Systems. Cash flows from discontinued operating activities, or Casino Operations, were derived from the operation of the Rainbow Casino. We utilize our cash to acquire materials for the manufacture of goods for resale, to pay payroll, interest, taxes and SG&A expenses and to fund R&D activities.
Cash flows provided by continuing operating activities were $131.0 million in fiscal year 2012 as compared to $56.8 million in the same period last year, a $74.2 million increase. Cash provided by operating activities were positively impacted by improvements in net income, and decreases in prepaid and refundable income tax due primarily to a refund of $12.0 million for prior year taxes paid and increases in income taxes payable during the current period.
Cash utilized for investing activities by continuing operations is primarily for capital expenditures related to office and gaming equipment and improvements in leaseholds, financing arrangements with customers, acquisitions, and investments in technology and other long-term assets. During fiscal year 2012, we made payments of $10.5 million related to acquisitions, and made capital expenditures and purchased long-term assets of $11.5 million and $8.3 million, respectively. During fiscal year 2011, we provided $9.9 million in loans to finance gaming opportunities for certain customers, and made capital expenditures and purchased long-term assets of $13.2 million and $6.6 million, respectively.
Cash utilized for financing activities from continuing operations is primarily for the payment of principal on our debt and the repurchase of shares of our common stock. During fiscal year 2012, we repurchased 3.9 million shares of our common stock for approximately $154.2 million, and made payments of $45.0 million on our notes payable and our revolving credit facility. An additional 47,000 shares of our common stock were repurchased for $2.1 million with trade dates in late June that settled in early July. During fiscal year 2011 we repurchased 12.0 million shares of our common stock for approximately $477.2 million. With proceeds of $300 million from the term loan and $229 million in borrowings under our revolving credit facility, each after the amendment and restatement of the credit facility, we repurchased $398.3 million worth of shares from the Dutch auction tender offer, paid off our prior credit facility of $142.5 million and paid debt issuance costs for the amendment and restatement of the credit facility of $7.1 million. During fiscal year 2011, we also made additional payments of $66.9 million on our notes payable and our revolving credit facility.
Cash provided by financing activities is primarily from proceeds from the exercise of stock options and purchases of stock under our 2008 ESPP, borrowings under our revolving credit facility, and excess tax benefits of stock option exercises. During fiscal year 2012, we borrowed $41.0 million under our revolving credit facility, and employees exercised options for 1.1 million shares of common stock for $23.3 million and purchased 77,000 shares of common stock for $2.6 million under our 2008 ESPP. During fiscal year 2011, we borrowed an additional $21.9 million under our revolving credit facility, and employees exercised options for 1.6 million shares of common stock for $26.3 million and purchased 68,000 shares of common stock for $2.1 million under our 2008 ESPP.
47
Contractual Commitments
We are committed to make future payments pursuant to various contracts and agreements. A summary of those contractual obligations existing as of June 30, 2012, grouped according to the periods in which such payments are due, is as follows:
|
Payments Due By Period | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Less than 1 year |
1-3 years | 3-5 years | More than 5 years |
Total | |||||||||||
|
(in 000s) |
|||||||||||||||
Debt: |
||||||||||||||||
Revolving credit facility |
$ | | $ | | $ | 230,000 | $ | | $ | 230,000 | ||||||
Term loan facility(1) |
16,875 | 54,375 | 210,000 | | 281,250 | |||||||||||
Other, generally unsecured debt |
216 | | | | 216 | |||||||||||
|
$ | 17,091 | $ | 54,375 | $ | 440,000 | $ | | $ | 511,466 | ||||||
Estimated interest payments(2) |
13,914 | 25,441 | 10,284 | | 49,639 | |||||||||||
|
$ | 31,005 | $ | 79,816 | $ | 450,284 | $ | | $ | 561,105 | ||||||
Other commitments: |
||||||||||||||||
Operating leases(3) |
8,873 | 10,901 | 5,750 | 341 | 25,865 | |||||||||||
Purchase commitments(4) |
12,405 | | | | 12,405 | |||||||||||
Jackpot liabilities(5) |
11,682 | 620 | 672 | 4,238 | 17,212 | |||||||||||
Employment agreements(6) |
998 | 499 | | | 1,497 | |||||||||||
Total commitments |
$ | 64,963 | $ | 91,836 | $ | 456,706 | $ | 4,579 | $ | 618,084 | ||||||
Effective December 2008, we entered into a floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreement with an original notional value of $218.8 million and a maturity date of September 26, 2012 to fix floating LIBOR based debt to fixed rate debt at an interest rate of 1.89%. Effective June 2011, we entered into a second floating-to-fixed rate swap agreement with an original notional value of $165.0 million and a maturity date of May 13, 2016 to fix a portion of the floating LIBOR based debt under the new term loan to fixed rate debt at an interest rate of 2.09%. At June 30, 2012, the combined swap agreements had a notional value of $281.3 million.
We computed estimated future interest payments for our term loan and revolving credit facilities using interest rates as of June 30, 2012 of approximately 3.58% and 1.75%, respectively. The term loan facility interest rate includes both floating-to-fixed rate swap agreements for their respective remaining terms assuming our leverage ratio continues to be between 1.5 and 2.0.
48
As of June 30, 2012, we had a liability for unrecognized tax benefits of $13.9 million, including accrued interest and penalties. It is difficult to estimate the period of cash settlement for the liability for unrecognized tax benefits; however we believe it is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits may decrease in fiscal year 2012 by up to $1.3 million. See Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements, Income Taxes, for a further discussion on our income tax positions.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We are party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, such as performance bonds and other guarantees not reflected in our balance sheet that arise in the normal course of business. However, such off balance sheet arrangements are not reasonably likely to have a material effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or resources.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, we are required to make estimates incorporating judgments and assumptions we believe are reasonable based on our historical experience, contract terms, trends in our company and the industry as a whole, as well as information available from other outside sources. Our estimates affect amounts recorded in our consolidated financial statements and there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from initial estimates. Our accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Principles.
We consider the following accounting policies to be the most important to understanding and evaluating our financial results. These policies require management to make subjective and complex judgments that are inherently uncertain or variable. We have discussed the development, selection and disclosure of our critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.
Revenue recognition
Our policy is to record revenue when all of the following criteria have been satisfied:
49
Revenues are reported net of incentive rebates, discounts, sales taxes, and all other items of a similar nature except for gaming industry taxes on certain Gaming Operations revenue. The gross amounts of these gaming taxes are not presented separately in the financial statements because they are not significant. For products sold under arrangements with extended payment terms the probability of collection is evaluated based on a review of the customer's credit worthiness and a review of historic collection experience on contracts with extended payment terms. As a result of such review, we recognize revenue on extended payment term arrangements when we have determined that collectability is reasonably assured and the fee is considered fixed and determinable.
Games placed with customers on a trial basis are recorded as revenue once the trial period has ended, the customer has accepted the games and all other revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied. Amounts billed to customers prior to completing the earnings process are deferred until the revenue recognition criteria are satisfied.
Effective July 1, 2009, we adopted new accounting guidance related to revenue recognition for multiple deliverable arrangements and certain revenue arrangements that include software elements. This guidance was applied using the prospective method to all new or materially modified revenue arrangements entered into since the start of our fiscal year of adoption, which was July 1, 2009.
Prior to the adoption of the new revenue recognition guidance gaming equipment and systems revenue was recognized in accordance with software revenue recognition guidance. The new guidance amended the scope of software revenue recognition to exclude all tangible products containing both software and nonsoftware components that function together to deliver a product's essential functionality. As a result of applying the new guidance, certain products that were previously accounted for under the scope of software revenue recognition guidance are no longer accounted for as software.
Considerable judgment is necessary to determine whether certain of our products are within the scope of software revenue recognition and whether the software and nonsoftware elements of these products function together to deliver the essential functionality. This determination dictates whether general revenue recognition guidance or software revenue recognition guidance applies which could impact the timing of revenue recognition.
Gaming Operations Revenue. Gaming operations revenue consists of the operation of linked progressive systems and the rental of gaming devices, game content and the related systems placed with customers. Fees under these arrangements are earned and recognized based on a share of money wagered, a share of the net winnings, or on a fixed daily rate. The daily fee entitles the customer to full use of the gaming device and includes maintenance, licensing of the game content software and connection to a linked progressive system, where applicable. In certain markets, we also charge a daily system connection fee for the customer to connect to a central determination system and/or back-office system. We do not consider these arrangements to have multiple revenue-generating activities as the services offered are a comprehensive solution in exchange for a daily fee and all of the products and services are delivered contemporaneously. Gaming operations revenue is recognized under general revenue recognition guidance as the deliverables provide the customer with rights to use tangible gaming devices and software that is essential to the functionality of the gaming devices.
Gaming Equipment Revenue. Gaming Equipment revenue is generated from the sale of gaming devices and licensing rights to game content software that is installed in the gaming device, parts, and other ancillary equipment. Arrangements may also include sales of game content conversion kits which enable customers to replace game content without purchasing a new gaming device. Gaming equipment arrangements do not include maintenance and product support fees beyond a standard warranty period. The recognition of revenue from the sale of gaming devices occurs as title and risk of loss have passed to the customer and all other revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied.
50
As the combination of game content software and the tangible gaming device function together to deliver the product's essential functionality, revenue from the sale of gaming devices is recognized under general revenue recognition guidance. Prior to July 1, 2009, gaming devices were recognized under software revenue recognition guidance. Game content conversion kits are considered software deliverables and are recognized in accordance with software revenue recognition guidance.
Systems Revenue. Systems revenue arrangements generally include a combination of systems software licenses, systems-based hardware products, maintenance and product support fees and professional services. The primary function of systems software licensed by us is to aid customers to more effectively run their business with marketing, data management and analysis, accounting, player tracking and security features.
Revenue for systems software and maintenance and product support fees is recognized under software revenue recognition guidance. Although the systems software and certain systems-based hardware function together, the primary functionality of the systems software is derived from the software and the systems software is not essential to the functionality of the systems-based hardware.
We license systems software on a perpetual basis or under time-based licenses. Revenue from perpetual license software is recognized at the inception of the license term provided all revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied. Revenue from maintenance and product support fees sold with perpetual licenses is recognized over the term of the support period. Our time-based licenses are generally for twelve month terms and are bundled with software maintenance and product support fees. All revenue from such arrangements is recognized over the term of the license.
Systems-based hardware includes embedded software that is essential to the functionality of the hardware. Accordingly, revenue related to all systems-based hardware sales and related maintenance and product support fees are recognized under general revenue recognition guidance. Prior to July 1, 2009, systems-based hardware was recognized under software revenue recognition guidance. Revenue from the sale of systems-based hardware is generally recognized upon delivery when title and risk of loss have passed to the customer and all other revenue recognition criteria are satisfied. However, in the case of arrangements involving a systems installation, revenue on systems-based hardware is generally not recognized until the system has been installed and the customer has accepted the system. Hardware maintenance and product support fees are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the support period which is generally twelve months.
Software maintenance and product support provides customers with rights to unspecified software product upgrades, maintenance and patches released during the term of the support period. Our software maintenance and product support arrangements are generally for twelve month periods. Software maintenance and product support is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the support period.
Multiple Element Arrangements. We enter into revenue arrangements that may consist of multiple deliverables of our products and services. For example, customers may enter into arrangements with us for the implementation of systems software and the sale of gaming devices. Arrangements for the implementation of systems software will generally include a combination of systems software licenses, systems-based hardware products, maintenance and product support fees, and professional services. Certain gaming equipment arrangements may also include the sale of gaming devices and game content conversion kits.
Revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables are allocated to separate units of accounting if the deliverables meet both of the following criteria:
51
Considerable judgment is required to determine whether an arrangement consists of multiple deliverables, whether each delivered item has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis and in determining the relative selling price used to allocate the arrangement fee to each deliverable. Such determination affects the amount and timing of revenue recognition. Management evaluates the primary use and functionality of each deliverable in determining whether a delivered item has stand-alone value and qualifies as a separate unit of accounting. Judgments for revenue recognition also involve an assessment as to whether collectability is reasonably assured and whether fees under an arrangement are fixed or determinable.
At the inception of a multiple element arrangement, fees under the arrangement are allocated to the nonsoftware deliverables, and to the software deliverables as a group based on their relative selling price. Software deliverables are further subject to separation and allocation based on software revenue recognition guidance as described in the following paragraph. When applying the relative selling price method, a hierarchy is used for estimating the selling price based first on vendor-specific objective evidence ("VSOE"), then third-party evidence ("TPE") and finally management's estimate of the selling price ("ESP"). Revenue for each unit of accounting is recognized when the relevant recognition criteria for each respective element has been met.
In allocating arrangement fees under the relative selling price hierarchy, we use VSOE for all products which have been sold on a stand-alone basis. As TPE is generally not available, we use ESP for products that are not sold on a stand-alone basis and for recently introduced products that are sold on a stand-alone basis but for which a history of stand-alone sales has not yet been developed. Following these guidelines, we use either VSOE or ESP for gaming devices, system-based hardware products, maintenance and product support fees associated with perpetual licenses and professional services; and ESP for perpetual and time-based software licenses and maintenance and product support fees associated with time-based licenses.
We use the residual method to recognize revenue allocated to software deliverables. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee is allocated to the delivered element and is recognized as revenue. In arrangements in which we do not have VSOE of fair value of all undelivered software elements, revenue is deferred until delivery occurs or VSOE of fair value has been established for any remaining undelivered software elements. In the event the only undelivered software element is maintenance and product support for which VSOE of fair value does not exist, the revenue is recognized ratably over the maintenance and product support period.
The establishment of VSOE requires judgment as to whether there is a sufficient quantity of items sold on a stand-alone basis and whether the prices demonstrate an appropriate level of concentration to conclude that VSOE exists. In determining ESP, management considers a variety of information including historic pricing and discounting practices, competitive market activity, internal costs, and the pricing and discounting practices of products sold in bundled arrangements.
Inventories
We regularly review inventory quantities and update estimates for the net realizable value of inventories to estimate potentially excess or obsolete inventory. Our process includes examining the carrying values of new and used gaming devices, parts and ancillary equipment in comparison to the current fair market values for such equipment (less costs to sell or dispose). The determination of obsolete or excess inventory requires us to estimate the future demand for our products within specific time horizons, generally one year or less. Additional factors involved in this analysis include the overall
52
levels of our inventories, the costs required to sell the products, including refurbishment costs and importation costs for international shipments, and the overall projected demand for products once the next generation of products are scheduled for release. Demand for parts inventory is also subject to technical obsolescence.
As a result of our ongoing analysis of inventory, we recognized inventory write-downs totaling $5.9 million, $3.6 million and $2.0 million during the years ended June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Additional valuation charges could occur in the future as a result of changes in the factors listed above.
Leased gaming equipment
Leased gaming equipment is stated at cost and depreciated over estimated useful lives ranging from one to three and one-half years. The estimation of useful lives for our leased gaming equipment requires judgment and is based on the period of time over which we believe the assets will be of economic benefit. Given changes in technology, customer preferences and product demand, we review and evaluate the recoverability of our investment in such assets on a quarterly basis, as well as the estimated useful lives used to depreciate these assets.
There is the potential for acceleration of future depreciation, or asset impairments, if conditions were to change and certain factors were determined to have an adverse impact on our ability to realize our full investment in such assets.
Impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill
We review long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of long-lived assets are measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to future, net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset, undiscounted and without interest. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.
We review goodwill for impairment annually at the beginning of our fourth fiscal quarter, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable or warrant a revision to the estimated remaining useful life. We perform the impairment analysis of goodwill at a reporting unit level by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with our carrying value, including goodwill. If the fair value is less than the carrying value, the impairment to be recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit goodwill.
We are required to make significant judgments and estimates regarding future cash flows, the determination of fair values and the identification of reporting units utilized in determining the fair value and recoverability of long-lived assets and goodwill. We believe our estimates are reasonable; however, if our estimates materially differ or factors utilized in developing our estimates change, different assumptions could materially affect our assessment of the fair value and recoverability of long-lived assets and goodwill.
During the year ended June 30, 2010, impairment charges of $5.9 million related to long-lived assets were recorded (see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, Impairment Charges). During the years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, no impairment charges related to long-lived assets were recorded.
During the years ended June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, no impairment charges related to goodwill were recorded.
53
Share-based compensation
We account for share-based compensation based on the calculated fair value of the award measured on the grant date which is recognized, net of estimated forfeitures, as expense over the employee's requisite service period which is generally the vesting period of the equity grant.
Determining the appropriate fair value model and calculating the fair value of share-based awards requires the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected option term and the expected volatility of our common stock over the option's expected term. We believe that the valuation technique and the approach utilized to develop the underlying assumptions are appropriate in calculating the fair values of stock options granted; however, if actual results differ significantly from these estimates, share-based compensation expense could be materially impacted.
In addition, we are required to estimate the expected forfeiture rate, and only recognize expense for those shares expected to vest. If our actual forfeiture rate is materially different from our estimate, the share-based compensation expense could be significantly different from what we have recorded. As a result, if factors change and we use different assumptions, our share-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future.
Pre-tax share-based compensation expense from continuing operations was $14.2 million, $12.9 million and $13.8 million during the years ended June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. As of June 30, 2012, there was $6.8 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the unvested portion of stock options which will be recognized over the subsequent 1.64 years. In addition, as of June 30, 2012, there was $19.5 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the unvested portion of restricted stock and Restricted Stock Units ("RSUs") which will be recognized over the subsequent 2.09 years.
Income taxes
We conduct business globally and are subject to income taxes in U.S. federal, state, local, and foreign jurisdictions. Determination of the appropriate amount and classification of income taxes depends on several factors, including estimates of the timing and probability of realization of deferred income taxes, reserves for uncertain income tax positions and income tax payment timing.
We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the period that includes the enactment date. Taxes on income of our foreign subsidiaries are provided at the tax rates applicable to the tax jurisdictions in which they are located.
The recoverability of certain deferred tax assets is based in part on estimates of future income and the timing of temporary differences, and the failure to fully realize such deferred tax assets could result in a higher tax provision in future periods. Our net deferred tax assets from continuing operations totaled $49.6 million and $40.6 million at June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Our accrued income taxes payable totaled $12.2 million and $3.0 million and our accrued income taxes receivable totaled $25.8 million and $47.3 million at June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. We have classified $12.0 million of the accrued income taxes receivable at June 30, 2012 as long term as we do not expect collection of these amounts in the next twelve months.
We apply Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 740 "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" to our uncertain tax positions. Under the guidance, we may recognize a tax benefit from an uncertain position only if it is more likely than not
54
that the position will be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the issue. The amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that we believe has greater than a 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement.
We are required to make significant judgments when evaluating our uncertain tax positions and the related tax benefits. We believe our assumptions are reasonable; however, there is no guarantee that the final outcome of the related matters will not differ from the amounts reflected in our income tax provisions and accruals. We adjust our liability for uncertain tax positions based on changes in facts and circumstances such as the closing of a tax audit or changes in estimates. Our income tax provision may be impacted to the extent that the final outcome of these tax positions is different than the amounts recorded. As of June 30, 2012 and 2011, our liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits totaled $12.7 million and $8.4 million, respectively. Of these amounts, $12.7 million and $8.2 million, respectively, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate.
Recently adopted accounting pronouncements
For a description of recently adopted accounting pronouncements, see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.
Recently issued accounting pronouncements not yet adopted
For a description of recently issued accounting pronouncements not yet adopted, see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk
As of June 30, 2012, we had total debt outstanding of approximately $511.5 million which consisted primarily of a $281.3 million term loan and $230.0 million of borrowing under our revolving credit facility. During the year, the interest rate for the credit facility was subject to a leveraged based pricing grid. We have minimized our exposure to market interest rate risk because the variable interest rate on the term loan was effectively converted to a fixed rate as a result of the floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps entered into in December 2008 and June 2011, respectively, and discussed in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements, Long-Term Debt. As of June 30, 2012, the interest rate on the revolving credit facility was 1.75% and the interest rate on our term loan was approximately 3.58%, after giving effect to our interest rate swaps, given our leverage ratio was approximately 1.8 for the period. We estimate a hypothetical decline of 100 bps in applicable interest rates would have an immaterial impact on our business because we manage this exposure with derivative financial instruments.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
Certain of our foreign subsidiaries use their local currency as their functional currency and are exposed to risks resulting from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. During the years ended June 30, 2012 and 2010, we recognized foreign currency exchange rate losses of approximately $3.4 million and $4.3 million respectively, and during the year ended June 30, 2011, we recognized a foreign currency exchange rate gain of approximately $2.5 million. We estimate that a hypothetical 10% strengthening (or weakening) of the U.S. dollar for fiscal year 2012 would have had an immaterial impact on our business.
In addition, the net assets of these subsidiaries are exposed to foreign currency translation gains and losses which are included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders'
55
equity in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. Such translation resulted in an unrealized loss of $4.0 million for fiscal year 2012 and an unrealized gain of $0.8 million for fiscal year 2011.
We may enter into foreign currency forward contracts, generally with maturities of twelve months or less, to hedge recognized foreign currency assets and liabilities to reduce the reduce the risk that earnings and cash flows will be adversely affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. See Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, Summary of Significant Policies (Fair value of financial instruments).
During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, we borrowed and repaid €15.0 million (EURO converted into $21.9 million U.S. dollars) under our revolving credit facility. There were no similar transactions in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Our consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, and supplementary financial information are listed in Item 15, Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules, and are included after the signature page hereto beginning at page F-1.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) promulgated under the Exchange Act, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Based on this evaluation our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2012.
It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance that the objectives of the system will be met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected or that judgments in decision-making are not based on faulty input.
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of an issuer's financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that:
56
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, the application of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods is subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework. Based on this assessment, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 30, 2012. The attestation report issued by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is included in their audit opinion included on page F-2 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting during the Quarter Ended June 30, 2012
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred in the three months ended June 30, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
None.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information required under this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the close of our fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required under this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the close of our fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
All information, except the equity compensation plans table below, required under this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the close of our fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.
57
Equity Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth information as of June 30, 2012 with respect to our equity compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance:
|
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and rights(1) |
Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options and rights(1) |
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in the first column) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plan Category |
||||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
3,064,812 | $ | 21.64 | 2,483,857 | (2) | |||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(3) |
50,000 | 16.99 | | |||||||
Total |
3,114,812 | $ | 21.57 | 2,483,857 |
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required under this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the close of our fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required under this item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the close of our fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.
58
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Documents filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
Exhibit Number |
Description | |
---|---|---|
3.1 | Restated Articles of Incorporation of Alliance Gaming Corporation, as amended, filed on May 7, 2004 as Exhibit 4.6 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-115271) of Alliance Gaming Corporation, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
3.2# |
Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation dated March 13, 2006. |
|
3.3 |
Certificate of Increase in Number of Authorized Shares of Common Stock of Alliance Gaming Corporation dated April 16, 2002, filed on December 21, 2007 as Exhibit 3.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007 of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
3.4 |
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Bally Technologies, Inc., filed on March 16, 2012 as Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
3.5 |
Amendment to Amended and Restated Bylaws filed on May 9, 2012 as Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10.1 |
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of April 15, 2011 among Bally Technologies, Inc., Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Union Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agents, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Key Bank National Association and U.S. Bank National Association, as Documentation Agents and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, and Union Bank, N.A. as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Managers and the other lenders party thereto, filed on April 18, 2011 as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. |
59
Exhibit Number |
Description | |
---|---|---|
10.2* | Alliance Gaming Corporation 1996 Long Term Incentive Plan, filed on August 21, 1997 with the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-34077) of Alliance Gaming Corporation, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
10.3* |
Bally Technologies, Inc. 2010 Long Term Incentive Plan, filed on May 3, 2010 as Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10.4* |
Bally Technologies, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, filed on March 11, 2008 as Exhibit 4.8 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-149637) of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10.5* |
Amendment to the Bally Technologies, Inc. 2010 Long Term Incentive Plan, filed on March 31, 2011 as Exhibit 4.7 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-173190) of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10.6* |
Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 2001 Long Term Incentive Plan, filed on August 26, 2011 as Exhibit 10.6 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10.7* |
Form of Director Stock Option Agreement under the 2001 Long Term Incentive Plan, filed on August 26, 2011 as Exhibit 10.7 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10.8* |
Form of Director Stock Option Agreement under the 2001 Long Term Incentive Plan dated June 13, 2005, filed on August 26, 2011 as Exhibit 10.8 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10.9* |
Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option Agreement under the 2010 Long Term Incentive Plan, filed on August 26, 2010 as Exhibit 10.10 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10.10* |
Form of Notice of Grant of Award of Restricted Stock and Award Agreement under the 2010 Long Term Incentive Plan, filed on August 26, 2010 as Exhibit 10.11 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10.11* |
Restricted Stock Agreement by and between Alliance Gaming Corporation and Richard Haddrill, dated as of June 30, 2004, filed on August 26, 2011 as Exhibit 10.11 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10.12* |
Stock Option Agreement by and between Alliance Gaming Corporation and Richard Haddrill, dated as of June 30, 2004, filed on August 26, 2011 as Exhibit 10.12 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10.13* |
Stock Option Agreement by and between Alliance Gaming Corporation and Richard Haddrill, dated as of October 27, 2004, filed on August 26, 2011 as Exhibit 10.13 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. |
60
Exhibit Number |
Description | |
---|---|---|
10.14* | Restricted Stock Agreement by and between Alliance Gaming Corporation and Richard Haddrill, dated as of December 22, 2004, filed on August 26, 2011 as Exhibit 10.14 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. | |
10.15* |
Employment Agreement between Alliance Gaming Corporation and Richard Haddrill, dated as of June 30, 2004, filed on August 26, 2010 as Exhibit 10.16 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10.16* |
Amendment dated December 22, 2004, to the Employment Agreement by and between Alliance Gaming Corporation and Richard Haddrill, filed on August 26, 2010 as Exhibit 10.17 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10.17* |
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement by and between Alliance Gaming Corporation and Richard Haddrill, effective as of June 13, 2005, filed on August 26, 2011 as Exhibit 10.17 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10.18* |
Form of Third Amendment to Haddrill Employment Agreement dated June 20, 2006, by and between Bally Technologies, Inc. and Richard Haddrill, filed on August 26, 2011 as Exhibit 10.18 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10.19* |
Form of Fourth Amendment to Haddrill Employment Agreement dated February 13, 2008, by and between Bally Technologies, Inc. and Richard Haddrill, filed on February 14, 2008 as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10.20* |
Fifth Amendment to Haddrill Employment Agreement dated October 22, 2008, by and between Bally Technologies, Inc. and Richard Haddrill, filed on October 28, 2008 as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10.21* |
Sixth Amendment to Haddrill Employment Agreement dated December 30, 2008, by and between Bally Technologies, Inc. and Richard Haddrill, filed on August 26, 2010 as Exhibit 10.22 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10.22* |
Seventh Amendment to Haddrill Employment Agreement dated August 10, 2009, by and between Bally Technologies, Inc. and Richard Haddrill, filed on August 26, 2010 as Exhibit 10.23 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10.23* |
Eighth Amendment to Haddrill Employment Agreement dated December 22, 2010, by and between Bally Technologies, Inc. and Richard Haddrill, filed on December 27, 2010 as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10.24* |
Executive Employment Agreement dated May 23, 2011 by and between Bally Technologies, Inc. and Ramesh Srinivasan, filed on May 27, 2011 as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. |
61
Exhibit Number |
Description | |
---|---|---|
10.25* | Letter Agreement dated August 12, 2010 by and between Bally Technologies, Inc. and Neil Davidson, filed on August 17, 2010 as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. | |
10.26* |
Employment Agreement dated August 15, 2000 between Alliance Gaming Corporation and Mark Lerner, filed on August 20, 2009 as Exhibit 10.25 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10.27* |
Separation and Services Agreement dated August 12, 2010 by and between Bally Technologies, Inc. and Robert C. Caller, filed on August 17, 2010 as Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10.28* |
Employment Agreement dated December 6, 2011, by and between Bally Technologies, Inc. and Derik Mooberry, filed on December 12, 2011 as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Bally Technologies, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
21# |
Subsidiaries of the Registrant |
|
23.1# |
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
31.1# |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a). |
|
31.2# |
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a). |
|
32.1# |
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
|
32.2# |
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
|
101.INS |
XBRL Instance Document** |
|
101.SCH |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document** |
|
101.CAL |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document** |
|
101.DEF |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document** |
|
101.LAB |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document** |
|
101.PRE |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document** |
62
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. DATED: August 29, 2012 | ||||
By |
/s/ RICHARD M. HADDRILL Richard M. Haddrill Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Name
|
Title
|
Date
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|
/s/ RICHARD M. HADDRILL |
Chief Executive Officer (Principal |
August 29, 2012 | ||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
63
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL INFORMATION
All other schedules are omitted because the required information is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the applicable schedule or because the information required is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto.
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Bally Technologies, Inc.
Las Vegas, Nevada
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Bally Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2012. Our audits also included the financial statement Schedule IIValuation and Qualifying Accounts for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2012. We have also audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying management's report on internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule and an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
F-2
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Bally Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2012, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2012, based on the criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Las
Vegas, Nevada
August 29, 2012
F-3
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF JUNE 30, 2012 AND 2011
|
June 30, 2012 |
June 30, 2011 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(in 000s, except share amounts) |
||||||
ASSETS |
|||||||
Current assets: |
|||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 32,673 | $ | 66,425 | |||
Restricted cash |
13,645 | 8,419 | |||||
Accounts and notes receivable, net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $14,073 and $11,059 |
264,842 | 235,246 | |||||
Inventories |
75,066 | 68,634 | |||||
Prepaid and refundable income tax |
13,755 | 36,332 | |||||
Deferred income tax assets |
42,822 | 29,318 | |||||
Deferred cost of revenue |
17,615 | 13,795 | |||||
Prepaid assets |
13,061 | 10,524 | |||||
Other current assets |
6,980 | 4,984 | |||||
Total current assets |
480,459 | 473,677 | |||||
Restricted long-term investments |
12,171 | 12,485 | |||||
Long-term accounts and notes receivables, net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $3,029 and $507 |
55,786 | 46,659 | |||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
30,667 | 33,266 | |||||
Leased gaming equipment, net |
121,151 | 96,691 | |||||
Goodwill |
171,971 | 162,110 | |||||
Intangible assets, net |
39,166 | 34,865 | |||||
Deferred income tax assets |
7,409 | 12,120 | |||||
Income tax receivable |
12,041 | 10,972 | |||||
Deferred cost of revenue |
16,542 | 23,193 | |||||
Other assets, net |
23,104 | 21,356 | |||||
Total assets |
$ | 970,467 | $ | 927,394 | |||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|||||||
Current liabilities: |
|||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 41,414 | $ | 38,411 | |||
Accrued and other liabilities |
85,310 | 63,225 | |||||
Jackpot liabilities |
11,682 | 11,894 | |||||
Deferred revenue |
46,314 | 28,900 | |||||
Income tax payable |
12,226 | 3,033 | |||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
17,091 | 15,153 | |||||
Total current liabilities |
214,037 | 160,616 | |||||
Long-term debt, net of current maturities |
494,375 | 500,250 | |||||
Deferred revenue |
26,715 | 34,788 | |||||
Other income tax liability |
13,922 | 9,321 | |||||
Other liabilities |
23,943 | 7,827 | |||||
Total liabilities |
772,992 | 712,802 | |||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13) |
|||||||
Stockholders' equity: |
|||||||
Special stock, 10,000,000 shares authorized: Series E, $100 liquidation value; 115 shares issued and outstanding |
12 | 12 | |||||
Common stock, $.10 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 63,150,000 and 61,541,000 shares issued and 42,102,000 and 44,397,000 outstanding |
6,309 | 6,149 | |||||
Treasury stock at cost, 21,048,000 and 17,144,000 shares |
(790,633 | ) | (634,268 | ) | |||
Additional paid-in capital |
489,002 | 442,713 | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(13,477 | ) | (3,064 | ) | |||
Retained earnings |
504,895 | 401,363 | |||||
Total Bally Technologies, Inc. stockholders' equity |
196,108 | 212,905 | |||||
Noncontrolling interests |
1,367 | 1,687 | |||||
Total stockholders' equity |
197,475 | 214,592 | |||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity |
$ | 970,467 | $ | 927,394 | |||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012
|
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(in 000s, except per share amounts) |
|||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||
Gaming equipment and systems |
$ | 522,342 | $ | 439,534 | $ | 491,241 | ||||
Gaming operations |
357,417 | 318,621 | 286,950 | |||||||
|
879,759 | 758,155 | 778,191 | |||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||
Cost of gaming equipment and systems(1) |
226,636 | 184,836 | 196,699 | |||||||
Cost of gaming operations |
99,680 | 88,820 | 83,106 | |||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
255,043 | 225,033 | 203,195 | |||||||
Research and development costs |
96,182 | 88,086 | 80,301 | |||||||
Impairment charges |
| | 11,379 | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
22,775 | 19,845 | 19,401 | |||||||
|
700,316 | 606,620 | 594,081 | |||||||
Operating income |
179,443 | 151,535 | 184,110 | |||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||
Interest income |
5,221 | 4,960 | 3,310 | |||||||
Interest expense |
(17,378 | ) | (11,984 | ) | (12,581 | ) | ||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| (4,119 | ) | | ||||||
Other, net |
(2,827 | ) | 3,001 | (4,021 | ) | |||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
164,459 | 143,393 | 170,818 | |||||||
Income tax expense |
(63,549 | ) | (45,182 | ) | (60,721 | ) | ||||
Income from continuing operations |
100,910 | 98,211 | 110,097 | |||||||
Discontinued operations: |
||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| | 7,181 | |||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax |
| (403 | ) | 22,079 | ||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| (403 | ) | 29,260 | ||||||
Net income |
100,910 | 97,808 | 139,357 | |||||||
Less net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(238 | ) | (455 | ) | 1,880 | |||||
Net income attributable to Bally Technologies, Inc. |
$ | 101,148 | $ | 98,263 | $ | 137,477 | ||||
Basic earnings per share attributable to Bally Technologies, Inc.: |
||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 2.35 | $ | 1.90 | $ | 2.00 | ||||
Income from discontinued operations |
| | 0.11 | |||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations |
| (0.01 | ) | 0.41 | ||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 2.35 | $ | 1.89 | $ | 2.52 | ||||
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Bally Technologies, Inc.: |
||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 2.28 | $ | 1.82 | $ | 1.89 | ||||
Income from discontinued operations |
| | 0.11 | |||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations |
| (0.01 | ) | 0.38 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 2.28 | $ | 1.81 | $ | 2.38 | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
||||||||||
Basic |
42,985 | 51,960 | 54,576 | |||||||
Diluted |
44,420 | 54,420 | 57,675 | |||||||
Amounts attributable to Bally Technologies, Inc.: |
||||||||||
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
$ | 101,148 | $ | 98,666 | $ | 109,223 | ||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| | 6,175 | |||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax |
| (403 | ) | 22,079 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 101,148 | $ | 98,263 | $ | 137,477 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012
|
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(in 000s) |
|||||||||
Net income |
$ | 100,910 | $ | 97,808 | $ | 139,357 | ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment before income taxes |
(3,959 | ) | 762 | (266 | ) | |||||
Income tax expense |
| | | |||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
(3,959 | ) | 762 | (266 | ) | |||||
Unrealized loss on derivative financial instruments before income taxes |
(9,930 |
) |
(1,204 |
) |
(2,953 |
) |
||||
Income tax benefit |
3,476 | 422 | 945 | |||||||
Unrealized loss on derivative financial instruments |
(6,454 | ) | (782 | ) | (2,008 | ) | ||||
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes |
(10,413 |
) |
(20 |
) |
(2,274 |
) |
||||
Comprehensive income |
90,497 | 97,788 | 137,083 | |||||||
Less: comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(238 | ) | (455 | ) | 1,880 | |||||
Comprehensive income attributable to Bally Technologies, Inc. |
$ | 90,735 | $ | 98,243 | $ | 135,203 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) ("OCI") |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Series E Special Stock |
Treasury Stock |
Additional Paid-In Capital |
Retained Earnings |
Noncontrolling Interests |
Total Stockholders' Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares | Dollars | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(in 000s) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at June 30, 2009 |
57,091 | $ | 5,703 | $ | 12 | $ | (64,727 | ) | $ | 330,465 | $ | (770 | ) | $ | 165,623 | $ | 2,443 | $ | 438,749 | |||||||||
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
| | | | | | 109,223 | 874 | 110,097 | |||||||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| | | | | | 6,175 | 1,006 | 7,181 | |||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax |
| | | | | | 22,079 | | 22,079 | |||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
| | | | | (266 | ) | | | (266 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on derivative financial instruments, net of tax |
| | | | | (2,008 | ) | | | (2,008 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
| | | | | | | | $ | 137,083 | ||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
| | | | | | | (1,942 | ) | (1,942 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Issuance and receipt of restricted stock, ESPP shares, stock options and related tax and tax benefit |
2,364 | 236 | | (1,105 | ) | 48,462 | | | | 47,593 | ||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of common stock for treasury |
| | | (91,221 | ) | | | | | (91,221 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Shares issued upon exercise of warrants |
40 | 4 | | | (4 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation |
| | | | 13,930 | | | | 13,930 | |||||||||||||||||||
Balances at June 30, 2010 |
59,495 | $ | 5,943 | $ | 12 | $ | (157,053 | ) | $ | 392,853 | $ | (3,044 | ) | $ | 303,100 | $ | 2,381 | $ | 544,192 | |||||||||
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
| | | | | | 98,666 | (455 | ) | 98,211 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax |
| | | | | | (403 | ) | | (403 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
| | | | | 762 | | | 762 | |||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on derivative financial instruments, net of tax |
| | | | | (782 | ) | | | (782 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
| | | | | | | | $ | 97,788 | ||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
| | | | | | | (239 | ) | (239 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Issuance and receipt of restricted stock, ESPP shares, stock options and related tax and tax benefit |
2,046 | 206 | | (3,161 | ) | 36,953 | | | | 33,998 | ||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of common stock for treasury |
| | | (474,054 | ) | | | | | (474,054 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation |
| | | | 12,907 | | | | 12,907 | |||||||||||||||||||
Balances at June 30, 2011 |
61,541 | $ | 6,149 | $ | 12 | $ | (634,268 | ) | $ | 442,713 | $ | (3,064 | ) | $ | 401,363 | $ | 1,687 | $ | 214,592 | |||||||||
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
| | | | | | 101,148 | (238 | ) | 100,910 | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
| | | | | (3,959 | ) | | | (3,959 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on derivative financial instruments, net of tax |
| | | | | (6,454 | ) | | | (6,454 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
| | | | | | | | $ | 90,497 | ||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
| | | | | | | (82 | ) | (82 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of adoption of ASU 2010-16 for change in jackpot accounting |
| | | | | | 2,384 | | 2,384 | |||||||||||||||||||
Issuance and receipt of restricted stock, ESPP shares, stock options and related tax and tax benefit |
1,609 | 160 | | (1,720 | ) | 32,117 | | | | 30,557 | ||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of common stock for treasury |
| | | (154,645 | ) | | | | | (154,645 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation |
| | | | 14,172 | | | | 14,172 | |||||||||||||||||||
Balances at June 30, 2012 |
63,150 | $ | 6,309 | $ | 12 | $ | (790,633 | ) | $ | 489,002 | $ | (13,477 | ) | $ | 504,895 | $ | 1,367 | $ | 197,475 | |||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012
|
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(in 000s) |
|||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 100,910 | $ | 97,808 | $ | 139,357 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| | (7,181 | ) | ||||||
(Gain) loss on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax |
| 403 | (22,079 | ) | ||||||
Impairment charges |
| | 11,379 | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
81,453 | 74,980 | 73,900 | |||||||
Share-based compensation |
14,172 | 12,907 | 13,793 | |||||||
Amortization of deferred debt issuance costs |
1,807 | 3,404 | 2,984 | |||||||
Income tax (benefit) expense |
(5,986 | ) | 18,811 | (19,927 | ) | |||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
9,863 | 7,963 | 2,927 | |||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| 4,119 | | |||||||
Inventory write-downs |
5,902 | 3,623 | 2,025 | |||||||
Excess tax benefit of stock option exercises |
(5,523 | ) | (8,214 | ) | (15,355 | ) | ||||
Other |
3,949 | (1,320 | ) | (1,089 | ) | |||||
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||
Accounts and notes receivable |
(35,934 | ) | (46,647 | ) | (49,816 | ) | ||||
Inventories |
(98,432 | ) | (101,797 | ) | (36,553 | ) | ||||
Prepaid and refundable income tax and income tax payable |
40,802 | (24,849 | ) | 48,026 | ||||||
Other current assets |
(7,111 | ) | (557 | ) | 3,890 | |||||
Accounts payable |
(2,693 | ) | 14,615 | 3,763 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities, customer deposits and jackpot liabilities |
15,376 | 3,393 | (3,437 | ) | ||||||
Deferred revenue and deferred cost of revenue |
12,428 | (1,886 | ) | (17,482 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
130,983 | 56,756 | 129,125 | |||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||
Acquisitions |
(10,490 | ) | | | ||||||
Capital expenditures |
(11,464 | ) | (13,202 | ) | (11,611 | ) | ||||
Restricted cash and investments |
(4,913 | ) | 474 | (205 | ) | |||||
Development financing provided to customers |
| (9,940 | ) | (15,750 | ) | |||||
Additions to other long-term assets |
(8,331 | ) | (6,552 | ) | (4,758 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(35,198 | ) | (29,220 | ) | (32,324 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||
Proceeds from borrowing |
| 300,000 | | |||||||
Proceeds from revolving credit facility |
41,000 | 250,884 | | |||||||
Payments on revolving credit facility |
(30,000 | ) | (31,884 | ) | | |||||
Capitalized debt issuance costs |
| (7,118 | ) | (2,906 | ) | |||||
Pay-off of debt from refinancing |
| (142,500 | ) | | ||||||
Payments on long-term debt and capital leases |
(15,040 | ) | (35,049 | ) | (35,337 | ) | ||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
(82 | ) | (239 | ) | (675 | ) | ||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
(154,235 | ) | (477,215 | ) | (92,326 | ) | ||||
Excess tax benefit of stock option exercises |
5,523 | 8,214 | 15,355 | |||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and employee stock purchases |
25,888 | 28,441 | 31,968 | |||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(126,946 | ) | (106,466 | ) | (83,921 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
(2,591 | ) | 669 | (396 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in operating activities of discontinued operations |
| (403 | ) | (9,483 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by investing activities of discontinued operations |
| | 78,757 | |||||||
Net cash used in financing activities of discontinued operations |
| | (1,267 | ) | ||||||
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations |
| | 8,712 | |||||||
|
| (403 | ) | 76,719 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents: |
||||||||||
Increase (decrease) for year |
(33,752 | ) | (78,664 | ) | 89,203 | |||||
Balance, beginning of year |
66,425 | 145,089 | 55,886 | |||||||
Balance, end of year |
$ | 32,673 | $ | 66,425 | $ | 145,089 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-8
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012
The following supplemental information is related to the consolidated statements of cash flows:
|
Year Ended June 30, | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
|
(in 000s) |
|||||||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 17,119 | $ | 11,985 | $ | 12,982 | ||||
Cash paid for income taxes |
29,297 | 46,132 | 42,306 | |||||||
Non-cash investing and financing transactions: |
||||||||||
Transfer of inventory to leased gaming equipment(1) |
104,512 | 87,307 | 51,952 | |||||||
Reclassify property, plant and equipment to inventory(1) |
16,685 | 15,519 | 8,931 | |||||||
Liabilities assumed in acquisitions |
5,395 | | | |||||||
Acquisition of Bally trademark |
| | 7,500 |
F-9
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Bally Technologies, Inc. ("Bally" or the "Company"), a Nevada corporation, is a diversified global gaming company that designs, manufactures, operates, and distributes advanced technology-based gaming devices, systems, server-based solutions, custom mobile applications, and interactive applications. The Company's innovations and technology solutions allow its customers to more effectively manage their operations using our wide range of marketing, data management and analysis, accounting, player tracking, security, and other software applications and tools. The Company also provides hardware, including spinning-reel and video gaming devices, specialty gaming devices, and wide-area progressive systems. Under its business-to-business model, the Company supports customers that include traditional land-based, riverboat, and Native American casinos, video lottery and central determination markets.
Principles of presentation and consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Bally Technologies, Inc., and its wholly owned and partially owned subsidiaries and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP") and, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), include all adjustments necessary to fairly present the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows for each period presented. References to specific U.S. GAAP within this report cite topics within the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC").
All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Discontinued Operations
The Company was the general partner of Rainbow Casino Vicksburg Partnership ("RCVP"), which operated the Rainbow Casino, a dockside riverboat casino in Vicksburg, Mississippi. On April 5, 2010, the Company entered into a definitive purchase agreement to sell the Rainbow Casino which closed on June 8, 2010. The Company's Casino Operations have been classified as discontinued operations in the accompanying financial statements. See Note 3 to consolidated financial statements, Discontinued Operations.
Use of estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Fair value of financial instruments
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced sale or liquidation. The carrying amounts reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets for cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, investment securities to fund jackpot liabilities, accounts payable, jackpot liabilities and long-term debt approximate their respective fair values.
F-10
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
All financial assets and liabilities are recognized or disclosed at fair value using a fair value hierarchy that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. A financial instrument's categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
The Company transacts business in various foreign currencies and has international sales and expenses denominated in foreign currencies, subjecting the Company to foreign currency risk. The Company may enter into foreign currency forward contracts, generally with maturities of twelve months or less, to hedge recognized foreign currency assets and liabilities to reduce the risk that earnings and cash flows will be adversely affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The gains or losses resulting from changes in the fair value of these forward contracts, which are not designated as accounting hedges, are reported in other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations, and generally offset the gains and losses associated with the underlying foreign-currency-denominated balances, which are also reported in other income (expense). As of June 30, 2012, euro forward contracts for a total of $38.0 million, or the notional equivalent of €30 million, were outstanding.
F-11
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company may use interest rate derivatives to manage the interest expense generated by variable rate debt and foreign currency derivatives to manage foreign exchange risk. The Company's derivative financial instruments are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, and the balances were as follows:
|
Fair Value Measurements Using Input Type |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||
|
(in 000s) |
|||||||||
As of June 30, 2012: |
||||||||||
Other current assets: |
||||||||||
Foreign currency derivative financial instrument |
$ | | $ | 2,850 | $ | | ||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||
Accrued and other liabilities: |
||||||||||
Foreign currency derivative financial instrument |
$ | | $ | 115 | $ | | ||||
Interest rate derivative financial instruments |
$ | | $ | 4,804 | $ | | ||||
Other liabilities: |
||||||||||
Interest rate derivative financial instrument |
$ | | $ | 9,028 | $ | | ||||
As of June 30, 2011: |
||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||
Other assets, net: |
||||||||||
Foreign currency derivative financial instrument |
$ | | $ | 452 | $ | | ||||
Interest rate derivative financial instruments |
$ | | $ | 1,231 | $ | | ||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||
Accrued and other liabilities: |
||||||||||
Foreign currency derivative financial instrument |
$ | | $ | 586 | $ | | ||||
Interest rate derivative financial instruments |
$ | | $ | 5,133 | $ | | ||||
The valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of the derivative financial instruments above in which the counterparties have high credit ratings, were derived from pricing models, such as discounted cash flow techniques, with all significant inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data. The Company's discounted cash flow techniques use observable market inputs, such as LIBOR-based yield curves and foreign currency forward rates. See Note 8 to consolidated financial statements, Long-Term Debt.
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activity
The Company assesses, both at the inception of each designated hedge and on an on-going basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged items. Such highly effective derivatives are granted hedge accounting treatment. The interest rate derivative instruments meet these requirements and are accounted for as a cash flow hedges.
F-12
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The impact of the cash flow hedge and non-designated foreign currency derivatives on the consolidated financial statements is depicted below:
|
Amount of Loss Recognized in OCI on Derivative (Effective Portion) |
|
Amount of Loss Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion) |
||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Derivative in Cash Flow Hedging Relationship |
Year Ended June 30, 2012 |
Year Ended June 30, 2011 |
Year Ended June 30, 2010 |
Location of Loss Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion) |
Year Ended June 30, 2012 |
Year Ended June 30, 2011 |
Year Ended June 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
(in 000s) |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap agreement |
$ | (14,969 | ) | $ | (3,661 | ) | $ | (5,978 | ) | Interest expense | $ | (5,039 | ) | $ | (2,458 | ) | $ | (3,024 | ) | ||
|
Amount of Income (Loss) Recognized in Other Income (Expense) |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(in 000s) |
|||||||||
Non-Designated Derivative
|
Year Ended June 30, 2012 |
Year Ended June 30, 2011 |
Year Ended June 30, 2010 |
|||||||
Foreign Currency Forward Contract |
$ | 4,246 | $ | (135 | ) | $ | | |||
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase and are carried at cost, which approximates fair value.
Restricted cash
The Company maintains jackpot funds totaling approximately $13.6 million and $8.4 million at June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, to ensure availability of funds to pay wide-area progressive jackpot awards.
Accounts and notes receivable, allowance for doubtful accounts and credit quality of financing receivables
Accounts and notes receivable are stated at face value less an allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company generally grants customers credit terms for periods of 30 to 120 days, but may also grant extended payment terms to some customers for periods up to three years, with interest generally at market rates.
The Company has one portfolio segment, the casino industry customer, and four classes of receivables including its trade receivables with a contract term less than one year, trade receivables with a contract term greater than one year, sales-type leasing arrangements, and notes receivable, which are related to development financing loans.
Trade receivables with contract terms greater than one year relate to the sale of gaming equipment and systems transactions, and are generally collateralized by the related equipment sold, although the value of such equipment, if repossessed, may be less than the receivable balance outstanding. Sales-type leasing arrangements relate to gaming equipment and include options to purchase the equipment at the end of the lease term at established prices. Customers with sales-type leasing arrangements typically have a long-standing credit history with the Company.
F-13
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company has also provided development financing to certain customers in the form of notes receivable with repayment terms of three to ten years. These notes may require scheduled quarterly principal reductions and may also include accelerated payment terms based upon a percentage of net-win from gaming devices sold or leased to these customers. Notes receivable as of June 30, 2012, include $15.6 million, net of discounts of $3.3 million, related to development financing loans made to HBG Connex S.P.A. ("HBG") to allow it to make advance payments necessary to obtain gaming licenses in the Italian Video Lottery Terminal ("VLT") market. HBG has initiated arbitration proceedings against the Company as a result of alleged damages from delays in obtaining regulatory approval of certain gaming equipment to be leased to HBG (see Note 13 to consolidated financial statements, Commitments and Contingencies) and has not made required payments on the notes receivable. The Company has not recorded an impairment as management expects to collect amounts due under the notes receivable.
The Company's accounts and notes receivable were as follows:
|
Accounts and Notes Receivable as of June 30, 2012 |
Accounts and Notes Receivable as of June 30, 2011 |
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ending Balance |
Ending Balance Individually Evaluated for Impairment |
Ending Balance Collectively Evaluated for Impairment |
Ending Balance |
Ending Balance Individually Evaluated for Impairment |
Ending Balance Collectively Evaluated for Impairment |
|||||||||||||
|
(in 000s) |
||||||||||||||||||
Contract term less than one year: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Trade and other receivables, current |
$ | 173,889 | $ | 3,655 | $ | 170,234 | $ | 162,202 | $ | 2,064 | $ | 160,138 | |||||||
Contract term greater than one year: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Trade receivables, current |
85,075 | 41,213 | 43,862 | 72,237 | 3,973 | 68,264 | |||||||||||||
Trade receivables, noncurrent |
30,476 | 7,213 | 23,263 | 15,111 | 213 | 14,898 | |||||||||||||
|
115,551 | 48,426 | 67,125 | 87,348 | 4,186 | 83,162 | |||||||||||||
Lease receivables, current |
14,763 |
14,763 |
|
10,245 |
10,245 |
|
|||||||||||||
Lease receivables, noncurrent |
15,070 | 15,070 | | 13,490 | 13,490 | | |||||||||||||
|
29,833 | 29,833 | | 23,735 | 23,735 | | |||||||||||||
Notes receivable, current |
5,188 |
5,188 |
|
1,621 |
1,621 |
|
|||||||||||||
Notes receivable, noncurrent |
13,269 | 13,269 | | 18,565 | 18,565 | | |||||||||||||
|
18,457 | 18,457 | | 20,186 | 20,186 | | |||||||||||||
Total current |
278,915 |
64,819 |
214,096 |
246,305 |
17,903 |
228,402 |
|||||||||||||
Total noncurrent |
58,815 | 35,552 | 23,263 | 47,166 | 32,268 | 14,898 | |||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 337,730 | $ | 100,371 | $ | 237,359 | $ | 293,471 | $ | 50,171 | $ | 243,300 | |||||||
F-14
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The activity related to the allowance for doubtful accounts for fiscal year 2012 is summarized below:
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Beginning Balance as of June 30, 2011 |
Charge- offs |
Recoveries | Provision | Ending Balance as of June 30, 2012 |
Ending Balance Individually Evaluated for Impairment |
Ending Balance Collectively Evaluated for Impairment |
|||||||||||||||
|
(in 000s) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Contract term less than one year: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade and other receivables, current |
$ | (5,875 | ) | $ | 1,550 | $ | 243 | $ | (2,056 | ) | $ | (6,138 | ) | $ | (2,163 | ) | $ | (3,975 | ) | |||
Contract term greater than one year: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade receivables, current |
(5,184 | ) | 355 | 513 | (3,619 | ) | (7,935 | ) | (4,867 | ) | (3,068 | ) | ||||||||||
Trade receivables, noncurrent |
(507 | ) | 1,666 | | (2,438 | ) | (1,279 | ) | (118 | ) | (1,161 | ) | ||||||||||
|
(5,691 | ) | 2,021 | 513 | (6,057 | ) | (9,214 | ) | (4,985 | ) | (4,229 | ) | ||||||||||
Lease receivables, current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Lease receivables, noncurrent |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||
|
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||
Notes receivable, current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Notes receivable, noncurrent |
| | | (1,750 | ) | (1,750 | ) | (1,750 | ) | | ||||||||||||
|
| | | (1,750 | ) | (1,750 | ) | (1,750 | ) | | ||||||||||||
Total current |
(11,059 | ) | 1,905 | 756 | (5,675 | ) | (14,073 | ) | (7,030 | ) | (7,043 | ) | ||||||||||
Total noncurrent |
(507 | ) | 1,666 | | (4,188 | ) | (3,029 | ) | (1,868 | ) | (1,161 | ) | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | (11,566 | ) | $ | 3,571 | $ | 756 | $ | (9,863 | ) | $ | (17,102 | ) | $ | (8,898 | ) | $ | (8,204 | ) | |||
F-15
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The activity related to the allowance for doubtful accounts for fiscal year 2011 from December 31, 2010, the date of adoption for new disclosure requirements related to the credit quality of financing receivables and the related allowance for credit losses, to June 30, 2011, is summarized below:
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Beginning Balance as of December 31, 2010 |
Charge- offs |
Recoveries | Provision | Ending Balance as of June 30, 2011 |
Ending Balance Individually Evaluated for Impairment |
Ending Balance Collectively Evaluated for Impairment |
|||||||||||||||
|
(in 000s) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Contract term less than one year: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade and other receivables, current |
$ | (5,857 | ) | $ | 2,324 | $ | 191 | $ | (2,533 | ) | $ | (5,875 | ) | $ | (2,064 | ) | $ | (3,811 | ) | |||
Contract term greater than one year: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade receivables, current |
(3,329 | ) | 1,615 | 53 | (3,523 | ) | (5,184 | ) | (3,973 | ) | (1,211 | ) | ||||||||||
Trade receivables, noncurrent |
(498 | ) | 204 | | (213 | ) | (507 | ) | (213 | ) | (294 | ) | ||||||||||
|
(3,827 | ) | 1,819 | 53 | (3,736 | ) | (5,691 | ) | (4,186 | ) | (1,505 | ) | ||||||||||
Lease receivables, current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Lease receivables, noncurrent |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||
|
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||
Notes receivable, current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Notes receivable, noncurrent |
(5,169 | ) | 5,169 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||
|
(5,169 | ) | 5,169 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||
Total current |
(9,186 |
) |
3,939 |
244 |
(6,056 |
) |
(11,059 |
) |
(6,037 |
) |
(5,022 |
) |
||||||||||
Total noncurrent |
(5,667 | ) | 5,373 | | (213 | ) | (507 | ) | (213 | ) | (294 | ) | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | (14,853 | ) | $ | 9,312 | $ | 244 | $ | (6,269 | ) | $ | (11,566 | ) | $ | (6,250 | ) | $ | (5,316 | ) | |||
The Company evaluates the credit quality of its accounts and notes receivable and establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts based on a combination of factors including, but not limited to, customer collection experience, economic conditions, and the customer's financial condition. In addition to specific account identification, which includes the review of any modifications of accounts and notes receivable, if applicable, the Company utilizes historic collection experience for the most recent twelve month period to establish an allowance for doubtful accounts. Receivables are written off only after the Company has exhausted all collection efforts.
Gaming is a highly regulated industry requiring customers to obtain a gaming operator's license and verify with the applicable regulatory agency that they have the financial resources to operate a gaming establishment. Many of the Company's customers, including new casinos that have opened in recent years, are owned by existing multi-property customers that have established a favorable payment history with the Company. Customer accounts typically include a mix of trade receivables balances with terms for periods of 30 to 120 days and financing receivables resulting from extended payment terms.
The Company monitors the credit quality of its accounts receivable by reviewing an aging of customer invoices. Invoices are considered past due if a scheduled payment is not received within contractually
F-16
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
agreed upon terms. The Company's notes receivable are reviewed quarterly, at a minimum, for impairment. The Company also reviews a variety of other relevant qualitative information such as collection experience, economic conditions and specific customer financial conditions to evaluate credit risk in recording the allowance for doubtful accounts or as an indicator of an impaired loan.
The Company accrues interest, if applicable, on its accounts and notes receivables per the terms of the agreement. Interest is not accrued on past due accounts and notes receivable, or individual amounts that the Company has determined and specifically identified as not collectible. The following summarizes the aging of past due receivables, excluding trade accounts receivable with a contract term less than one year, as of June 30, 2012:
|
1 to 90 Days Past Due |
91 to 180 Days Past Due |
181 + Days Past Due |
Total Past Due |
Current | Total Receivable |
Recorded Investment in Receivables on Nonaccrual Status |
Recorded Investment 90 Days and Accruing |
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(in 000s) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade receivables |
$ | 7,278 | $ | 4,197 | $ | 8,735 | $ | 20,210 | $ | 95,341 | $ | 115,551 | $ | 20,210 | $ | | |||||||||
Lease receivables |
| | | | 29,833 | 29,833 | | | |||||||||||||||||
Notes receivable |
1,427 | 1,423 | 319 | 3,169 | 15,288 | 18,457 | 18,457 | | |||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 8,705 | $ | 5,620 | $ | 9,054 | $ | 23,379 | $ | 140,462 | $ | 163,841 | $ | 38,667 | $ | | |||||||||
The following summarizes the aging of past due receivables, excluding trade accounts receivable with a contract term less than one year, as of June 30, 2011:
|
1 to 90 Days Past Due |
91 to 180 Days Past Due |
181 + Days Past Due |
Total Past Due |
Current | Total Receivable |
Recorded Investment in Receivables on Nonaccrual Status |
Recorded Investment 90 Days and Accruing |
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(in 000s) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade receivables |
$ | 7,655 | $ | 4,790 | $ | 6,205 | $ | 18,650 | $ | 68,698 | $ | 87,348 | $ | 4,186 | $ | | |||||||||
Lease receivables |
| | | | 23,735 | 23,735 | | | |||||||||||||||||
Notes receivable |
| | | | 20,186 | 20,186 | | | |||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 7,655 | $ | 4,790 | $ | 6,205 | $ | 18,650 | $ | 112,619 | $ | 131,269 | $ | 4,186 | $ | | |||||||||
The aging of customer invoices is based on their contractually agreed upon payment terms, which in certain rare circumstances have been modified from the original financing terms. The modifications of original financing terms are infrequent and generally do not represent a concession as they result only in a delay of payment that is typically insignificant to our total trade, lease and notes receivable balances. There were no significant modifications of accounts and notes receivable during the period.
F-17
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Impairment is recognized when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of a note arrangement. Due to an individual customer's filing of a bankruptcy petition, the Company recognized an impairment charge on notes receivable in which a related allowance of $1.8 million was recorded after estimating the fair value of the collateral less costs to sell.
Impaired Loans
as of June 30, 2012
(in 000s)
|
Recorded Investment |
Unpaid Principal Balance |
Related Allowance |
Average Recorded Investment |
Interest Income Recognized |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(in 000s) |
|||||||||||||||
With an allowance recorded: |
||||||||||||||||
Notes receivable |
$ | 2,856 | $ | 2,856 | $ | (1,750 | ) | $ | 2,856 | $ | | |||||
With no related allowance recorded: |
||||||||||||||||
Notes receivable |
| | | | | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,856 | $ | 2,856 | $ | (1,750 | ) | $ | 2,856 | $ | | |||||
As of June 30, 2011, the Company had no impaired loans in its accounts and notes receivable balances.
The fair value of accounts and notes receivable, net, is estimated by discounting expected future cash flows using current interest rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers, with similar credit ratings and remaining maturities. As of June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, the fair value of the accounts and notes receivable, net, approximate the carrying value.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, determined on a first in, first out basis, or market. Cost elements included in work-in-process and finished goods include raw materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead. Inventories consist of the following:
|
June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012 | 2011 | |||||
|
(in 000s) |
||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 50,498 | $ | 53,926 | |||
Work-in-process |
1,713 | 1,630 | |||||
Finished goods |
22,855 | 13,078 | |||||
Total |
$ | 75,066 | $ | 68,634 | |||
The Company regularly reviews inventory quantities and updates estimates for the net realizable value of inventories to estimate potentially excess or obsolete inventory. Our process includes examining the carrying values of new and used gaming devices, parts and ancillary equipment in comparison to the current fair market values for such equipment (less costs to sell or dispose). The determination of obsolete or excess inventory requires us to estimate the future demand for our products within specific time horizons, generally one year or less. Additional factors involved in this analysis include the overall levels of our inventories, the costs required to sell the products, including refurbishment costs and
F-18
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
importation costs for international shipments, and the overall projected demand for products once the next generation of products are scheduled for release. Demand for parts inventory is also subject to technical obsolescence.
The Company recorded inventory write-downs totaling approximately $5.9 million, $3.6 million and $2.0 million during the years ended June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Additional valuation charges could occur in the future as a result of changes in the factors listed above. These charges are included in the cost of gaming equipment and systems in the consolidated statements of operations.
Deferred revenue and deferred cost of revenue
Deferred revenue arises from the timing differences between the shipment or installation of gaming equipment and systems products and the satisfaction of all revenue recognition criteria consistent with the Company's revenue recognition policy. Deferred cost of revenue consists of the direct costs associated with the manufacture of gaming equipment and systems products for which revenue has been deferred. Deferred revenue and deferred cost of revenue that are expected to be realized within one year are classified as current liabilities and current assets, respectively.
Restricted long-term investments
The Company purchases U.S. Treasury Strip Securities for the benefit of jackpot winners who elect to receive annual or weekly installment payments. These securities are held to maturity and recorded at cost plus interest accretion to date. Such securities are included in restricted long-term investments in the consolidated balance sheets, and totaled $12.2 million and $12.5 million as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Property, plant and equipment and leased gaming equipment
Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost and depreciated over the estimated useful lives or lease term, if less, using the straight line method as follows: buildings and improvements, ten years; furniture, fixtures and equipment, three to seven years; and leasehold improvements, the shorter of lease term or ten years. Leased gaming equipment is stated at cost and depreciated over the estimated useful lives ranging from one to three and one-half years. Depreciation and asset charges related to leased gaming equipment are recorded to cost of gaming operations in the consolidated statements of operations.
Significant replacements and improvements are capitalized while other maintenance and repairs are expensed. The cost and accumulated depreciation of assets retired or otherwise disposed of are eliminated from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is credited or charged to income.
Depreciation and amortization expense
For the years ended June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, depreciation and amortization expense from continuing operations totaled $81.5 million, $75.0 million and $73.9 million, respectively. Of these amounts, $58.7 million, $55.1 million and $54.5 million of depreciation and amortization expense were included in cost of gaming operations in the consolidated statements of operations.
For the year ended June 30, 2010, depreciation and amortization expense from discontinued operations totaled $2.9 million.
F-19
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill
The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of long-lived assets are measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset, undiscounted and without interest. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.
The Company reviews goodwill for impairment annually at the beginning of its fourth fiscal quarter, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable or warrant a revision to the estimated remaining useful life. The Company performs the impairment analysis of goodwill at a reporting unit level by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value, including goodwill. If the fair value is less than the carrying value, the impairment to be recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit goodwill.
During the year ended June 30, 2010, impairment charges of $5.9 million related to long-lived assets were recorded (see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, Impairment Charges). During the years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, no impairment charges related to long-lived assets were recorded.
During the years ended June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, no impairment charges related to goodwill were recorded.
Jackpot liabilities
The Company recognizes jackpot expense, included in cost of gaming operations in the consolidated statements of operations, and a liability for jackpots incurred but not yet won in each jurisdiction based on the discounted net present value of the progressive meter liability. Jackpots are payable either in weekly or annual installments, or immediately in the case of instant win progressive jackpots. Winners may elect to receive a single payment for the present value of a jackpot discounted at applicable interest rates in lieu of annual installments. Interest rates used in the single payment calculation vary by jurisdiction and are impacted by market forces and other economic conditions.
Revenue recognition
The Company's revenue recognition policy is to record revenue when all of the following criteria have been satisfied:
Revenues are reported net of incentive rebates, discounts, sales taxes, and all other items of a similar nature except for gaming industry taxes on certain Gaming Operations revenue. The gross amounts of these gaming taxes are not presented separately in the financial statements because they are not significant. For products sold under arrangements with extended payment terms the probability of collection is evaluated based on a review of the customer's credit worthiness and a review of historic
F-20
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
collection experience on contracts with extended payment terms. As a result of such review, the Company recognizes revenue on extended payment term arrangements as the Company has determined that collectability is reasonably assured and the fee is considered fixed and determinable.
Games placed with customers on a trial basis are recorded as revenue once the trial period has ended, the customer has accepted the games and all other revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied. Amounts billed to customers prior to completing the earnings process are deferred until the revenue recognition criteria are satisfied.
Effective July 1, 2009, the Company adopted new accounting guidance related to revenue recognition for multiple deliverable arrangements and certain revenue arrangements that include software elements. This guidance was applied using the prospective method to all new or materially modified revenue arrangements entered into since the start of the Company's fiscal year of adoption, which was July 1, 2009.
Prior to the adoption of the new revenue recognition guidance, gaming equipment and systems revenue was recognized in accordance with software revenue recognition guidance. The new guidance amended the scope of software revenue recognition to exclude all tangible products containing both software and nonsoftware components that function together to deliver a product's essential functionality. As a result of applying the new guidance, certain products that were previously accounted for under the scope of software revenue recognition guidance are no longer accounted for as software.
Gaming Operations Revenue. Gaming operations revenue consists of the operation of linked progressive systems and the rental of gaming devices, game content and the related systems placed with customers. Fees under these arrangements are earned and recognized based on a share of money wagered, a share of the net winnings, or on a fixed daily rate. The daily fee entitles the customer to full use of the gaming device and includes maintenance, licensing of the game content software and connection to a linked progressive system, where applicable. In certain markets, the Company also charges a daily system connection fee for the customer to connect to a central determination system and/or back-office system. The Company does not consider these arrangements to have multiple revenue-generating activities as the services offered are a comprehensive solution in exchange for a daily fee and all of the products and services are delivered simultaneously. Gaming operations revenue is recognized under general revenue recognition guidance as the deliverables provide the customer with rights to use tangible gaming devices and software that is essential to the functionality of the gaming devices.
Gaming Equipment Revenue. Gaming Equipment revenue is generated from the sale of gaming devices and licensing rights to game content software that is installed in the gaming device, parts, and other ancillary equipment. Arrangements may also include sales of game content conversion kits which enable customers to replace game content without purchasing a new gaming device. Gaming equipment arrangements do not include maintenance and product support fees beyond a standard warranty period. The recognition of revenue from the sale of gaming devices occurs as title and risk of loss have passed to the customer and all other revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied.
As the combination of game content software and the tangible gaming device function together to deliver the product's essential functionality, revenue from the sale of gaming devices is recognized under general revenue recognition guidance. Game content conversion kits are considered software deliverables and are recognized in accordance with software revenue recognition guidance.
Systems Revenue. Systems revenue arrangements generally include a combination of systems software licenses, systems-based hardware products, maintenance and product support fees and professional
F-21
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
services. The primary function of systems software licensed by the Company is to aid customers to more effectively run their business with marketing, data management and analysis, accounting, player tracking and security features.
Revenue for systems software and maintenance and product support fees is recognized under software revenue recognition guidance. Although the systems software and certain systems-based hardware function together, the primary functionality of the systems software is derived from the software and the systems software is not essential to the functionality of the systems-based hardware.
The Company licenses systems software on a perpetual basis or under time-based licenses. Revenue from perpetual license software is recognized at the inception of the license term provided all revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied. Revenue from maintenance and product support fees sold with perpetual licenses is recognized over the term of the support period. The Company's time-based licenses are generally for twelve month terms and are bundled with software maintenance and product support fees. All revenue from such arrangements is recognized over the term of the license.
Systems-based hardware includes embedded software that is essential to the functionality of the hardware. Accordingly, revenue related to all systems-based hardware sales and related maintenance and product support fees are recognized under general revenue recognition guidance. Revenue from the sale of systems-based hardware is generally recognized upon delivery when title and risk of loss have passed to the customer and all other revenue recognition criteria are satisfied. However, in the case of arrangements involving a systems installation, revenue on the systems-based hardware is generally not recognized until the system has been installed and the customer has accepted the system. Hardware maintenance and product support fees are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the support period which is generally twelve months.
Software maintenance and product support provides customers with rights to unspecified software product upgrades, maintenance and patches released during the term of the support period. The Company's software maintenance and product support arrangements are generally for twelve month periods. Software maintenance and product support is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the support period.
Multiple Element Arrangements. The Company enters into revenue arrangements that may consist of multiple deliverables of its products and services. For example, customers may enter into arrangements with the Company for the implementation of systems software and the sale of gaming devices. Arrangements for the implementation of systems software will generally include a combination of systems software licenses, systems-based hardware products, maintenance and product support fees, and professional services. Certain gaming equipment arrangements may also include the sale of gaming devices and game content conversion kits.
Revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables are allocated to separate units of accounting if the deliverables meet both of the following criteria:
F-22
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
At the inception of a multiple element arrangement, fees under the arrangement are allocated to the nonsoftware deliverables, and to the software deliverables as a group based on their relative selling price. Software deliverables are further subject to separation and allocation based on software revenue recognition guidance as described in the following paragraph. When applying the relative selling price method, a hierarchy is used for estimating the selling price based first on vendor-specific objective evidence ("VSOE"), then third-party evidence ("TPE") and finally management's estimate of the selling price ("ESP"). Revenue for each unit of accounting is recognized when the relevant recognition criteria for each respective element has been met.
In allocating arrangement fees under the relative selling price hierarchy, the Company uses VSOE for all products which have been sold on a stand-alone basis. As TPE is generally not available, the Company uses ESP for products that are not sold on a stand-alone basis and for recently introduced products that are sold on a stand-alone basis but for which a history of stand-alone sales has not yet been developed. Following these guidelines, the Company uses either VSOE or ESP for gaming devices, system-based hardware products, maintenance and product support fees associated with perpetual licenses and professional services; and ESP for perpetual and time-based software licenses and maintenance and product support fees associated with time-based licenses.
The Company uses the residual method to recognize revenue allocated to software deliverables. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee is allocated to the delivered element and is recognized as revenue. In arrangements in which the Company does not have VSOE of fair value of all undelivered software elements, revenue is deferred until delivery occurs or VSOE of fair value has been established for any remaining undelivered software elements. In the event the only undelivered software element is maintenance and product support for which VSOE of fair value does not exist, the revenue is recognized ratably over the maintenance and product support period.
The establishment of VSOE requires judgment as to whether there is a sufficient quantity of items sold on a stand-alone basis and whether the prices demonstrate an appropriate level of concentration to conclude that VSOE exists. In determining ESP, management considers a variety of information including historic pricing and discounting practices, competitive market activity, internal costs, and the pricing and discounting practices of products sold in bundled arrangements.
Advertising costs
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred, which totaled $9.3 million, $9.6 million and $9.1 million from continuing operations for the years ended June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Warranty and product indemnifications
Gaming devices are typically sold with a 90-day parts and labor warranty and certain sales agreements include third-party indemnifications for intellectual property infringement. Warranty expense is calculated using historical experience, and totaled $4.1 million, $2.5 million and $2.3 million for the years ended June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and no costs have been incurred or accrued related to indemnities.
Research and development
Research and development expenses related to product development are expensed until technological feasibility has been established. The Company has determined that technological feasibility is not established for its products until completion of the regulatory approval process. As this process is
F-23
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
completed shortly before the products are made available to customers, any development costs incurred after the establishment of technological feasibility are typically not significant and expensed as incurred.
Income taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the period that includes the enactment date. Taxes on income of the Company's foreign subsidiaries are provided at the tax rates applicable to the tax jurisdictions in which they are located.
The Company recognizes tax benefits from an uncertain position only if it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the issue. The amount recognized is the largest benefit that the Company believes has greater than a 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as tax expense.
Share-based compensation
The Company accounts for share-based compensation based on the calculated fair value of the award measured on the grant date, which is recognized, net of estimated forfeitures, as an expense over the employee's requisite service period. The Company classifies share-based compensation expense in the same financial statement line as cash compensation, including cost of gaming equipment and systems and casino operations, research and development costs, and selling, general and administrative expenses.
The excess tax benefit from stock option exercises and tax deductions in excess of compensation cost recognized are classified as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows.
Foreign currency translation
The functional currency of the Company's foreign subsidiaries is typically their local currency. Assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the rate of exchange at the end of the period, and the income and expense accounts are translated at the average rate of exchange for the period. Translation adjustments are reflected as accumulated other comprehensive income within stockholders' equity. Gains and losses on foreign currency transactions are included in the consolidated statements of operations.
On December 31, 2010, the Company adopted new accounting guidance and disclosures to address concerns about the credit quality of financing receivables and the related allowance for credit losses. The guidance is intended to provide additional information to assist financial statement users in assessing an entity's credit risk exposures and evaluating the adequacy of its allowance for credit losses. The new disclosures included information at disaggregated levels, including the nature of the credit risk and how it is analyzed in arriving at the allowance for credit losses, a roll-forward schedule of and reasons for changes in the allowance, credit quality indicators, aging of past due accounts, the nature and extent of modifications, and significant purchases or sales, if applicable.
On July 1, 2011, the Company adopted new accounting guidance related to troubled debt restructuring. The guidance clarifies which loan modifications constitute troubled debt restructurings to assist
F-24
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
creditors in determining whether a modification of the terms of a receivable meets the criteria to be considered a troubled debt restructuring, both for purposes of recording an impairment loss and for disclosures of troubled debt restructurings.
On July 1, 2011, the Company adopted new accounting guidance related to accruals for casino jackpot liabilities. Specifically, the guidance clarifies that an entity should not accrue jackpot liabilities, or portions thereof, before a jackpot is won if the entity can avoid paying the jackpot. Jackpots should be accrued and charged to revenue when an entity has the obligation to pay the jackpot. The guidance applies to both base and progressive jackpots. The new guidance was applied by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to opening retained earnings of $2.4 million on July 1, 2011.
On December 31, 2011, the Company chose to early adopt new accounting guidance to make the presentation of items within other comprehensive income ("OCI") more prominent. The new standard requires companies to present items of net income, items of OCI and total comprehensive income in one continuous statement or two separate consecutive statements, and companies are no longer allowed to present items of OCI only in the statement of stockholders' equity. The Company chose to present the items in two separate consecutive statements. The new guidance was applied retrospectively.
Effective December 31, 2011, new accounting guidance for testing goodwill impairment permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. The Company has not utilized this method in its evaluation of goodwill impairment.
Recently issued accounting pronouncements not yet adopted
In December 2011, the FASB issued new accounting guidance for disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities which requires an entity to disclose information about financial instruments that have been offset and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. Entities will be required to provide both net (offset amounts) and gross information in the notes to the financial statements for relevant assets and liabilities that are offset. The new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company expects to adopt this guidance in fiscal year 2014 and does not believe it will have a significant impact on its consolidated results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
In July 2012, the FASB issued new accounting guidance for testing indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. The new guidance states that an entity has the option first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events and circumstances indicates that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. The outcome of the assessment is used as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative impairment test by comparing the fair value with the carrying amount in accordance with ASC Topic 350. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, but early adoption is permitted. The Company expects to early adopt this guidance in fiscal year 2013 and does not believe it will have a significant impact on its consolidated results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
The Company believes there is no additional new accounting guidance adopted but not yet effective that is relevant to the readers of our financial statements. However, there are numerous new proposals under development which, if and when enacted, may have a significant impact on its financial reporting.
F-25
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
2. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing earnings by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the additional dilution from all potentially dilutive securities.
The following computation of basic and diluted earnings per share applicable to the Company's common stock is as follows:
|
Year Ended June 30, | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
|
(in 000s, except per share amounts) |
|||||||||
Amounts attributable to Bally Technologies, Inc.: |
||||||||||
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
$ | 101,148 | $ | 98,666 | $ | 109,223 | ||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| | 6,175 | |||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax |
| (403 | ) | 22,079 | ||||||
Net income attributable to Bally Technologies, Inc. |
$ | 101,148 | $ | 98,263 | $ | 137,477 | ||||
After tax interest expense on convertible debt |
| | 14 | |||||||
Diluted earnings attributable to Bally Technologies, Inc. |
$ | 101,148 | $ | 98,263 | $ | 137,491 | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
42,985 |
51,960 |
54,576 |
|||||||
Dilutive effect of: |
||||||||||
Stock options, Restricted Stock Units ("RSU") and restricted stock |
1,435 | 2,459 | 3,063 | |||||||
Warrants |
| 1 | 14 | |||||||
Convertible debt(1) |
| | 22 | |||||||
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding |
44,420 | 54,420 | 57,675 | |||||||
Basic earnings per share attributable to Bally Technologies, Inc.: |
||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 2.35 | $ | 1.90 | $ | 2.00 | ||||
Income from discontinued operations |
| | 0.11 | |||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations |
| (0.01 | ) | 0.41 | ||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 2.35 | $ | 1.89 | $ | 2.52 | ||||
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Bally Technologies, Inc.: |
||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 2.28 | $ | 1.82 | $ | 1.89 | ||||
Income from discontinued operations |
| | 0.11 | |||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations |
| (0.01 | ) | 0.38 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 2.28 | $ | 1.81 | $ | 2.38 | ||||
F-26
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Certain securities were excluded from the diluted per share calculation because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. Such securities consist of the following:
|
Year Ended June 30, | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
|
(in 000s) |
|||||||||
Stock options, RSU and restricted stock |
574 | 688 | 308 | |||||||
3. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
The Company owned and operated the Rainbow Casino, a dockside riverboat casino in Vicksburg, Mississippi, which was sold on June 8, 2010. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company was paid approximately $80.0 million in an all-cash transaction. The following table summarizes the gain on sale of discontinued operations:
|
Year Ended June 30, | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
2010 | |||
|
(in 000s) |
|||
Sale proceeds |
$ | 80,000 | ||
Distributions to noncontrolling interest |
(688 | ) | ||
Assets held for sale |
(45,733 | ) | ||
Liabilities related to assets held for sale |
1,161 | |||
Adjustments to proceeds for fees and expenses |
(471 | ) | ||
Gain on sale of discontinued operations before income taxes |
34,269 | |||
Income tax expense |
(12,190 | ) | ||
Gain on sale of discontinued operations |
$ | 22,079 | ||
Per the terms of the sale agreement, the Company had certain post-closing adjustments during fiscal year 2011, which reduced its gain on the sale of the Rainbow Casino in fiscal year 2010 by approximately $0.4 million, net of income taxes.
F-27
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes income from discontinued operations:
|
Year Ended June 30, | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
2010 | |||
|
(in 000s) |
|||
Revenues: |
||||
Casino operations |
$ | 34,336 | ||
Costs and expenses: |
||||
Direct cost of casino operations |
14,081 | |||
Selling, general and administrative |
6,821 | |||
Depreciation and amortization |
2,873 | |||
|
23,775 | |||
Operating income |
10,561 | |||
Other income (expense): |
||||
Interest income |
7 | |||
Other, net |
(25 | ) | ||
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes |
10,543 | |||
Income tax expense |
(3,362 | ) | ||
Income from discontinued operations |
7,181 | |||
Less income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
1,006 | |||
Income from discontinued operations attributable to Bally Technologies, Inc. |
$ | 6,175 | ||
4. IMPAIRMENT CHARGES
As a result of actions concerning the legality of the charitable bingo market in Alabama, the Company recorded a charge of $11.4 million during fiscal year 2010, which included full allowances for notes and accounts receivable of $5.5 million and an impairment of $5.9 million in long-lived assets. Impairment charges of $1.8 million in fiscal year 2012 were classified as bad debt expense.
Recoverability of the long-lived assets and notes and accounts receivable were measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the related asset to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the related asset. The impairment charges were measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeded the estimated fair value of the assets.
F-28
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
5. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT AND LEASED GAMING EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment and leased gaming equipment consist of the following:
|
June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012 | 2011 | |||||
|
(in 000s) |
||||||
Land and land improvements |
$ | 1,975 | $ | 1,975 | |||
Buildings and leasehold improvements |
25,908 | 25,125 | |||||
Gaming equipment |
29,293 | 25,734 | |||||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
32,314 | 32,002 | |||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(58,823 | ) | (51,570 | ) | |||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
$ | 30,667 | $ | 33,266 | |||
Leased gaming equipment |
$ | 306,997 | $ | 272,828 | |||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(185,846 | ) | (176,137 | ) | |||
Leased gaming equipment, net |
$ | 121,151 | $ | 96,691 | |||
6. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets consist of the following:
|
|
June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Useful Life (Years) |
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net Carrying Amount |
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net Carrying Amount |
||||||||||||||
|
(dollars in 000s) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Computer software |
3 - 5 | $ | 39,633 | (34,442 | ) | $ | 5,191 | $ | 36,725 | (31,841 | ) | $ | 4,884 | ||||||||
License rights |
3 - 13 | 8,440 | (4,251 | ) | 4,189 | 4,344 | (2,751 | ) | 1,593 | ||||||||||||
Trademarks |
5 - 10 | 2,430 | (2,216 | ) | 214 | 2,203 | (2,203 | ) | | ||||||||||||
Core technology |
5 - 14 | 27,063 | (17,935 | ) | 9,128 | 22,763 | (14,107 | ) | 8,656 | ||||||||||||
Contracts |
2 - 10 | 15,496 | (8,522 | ) | 6,974 | 15,303 | (7,372 | ) | 7,931 | ||||||||||||
Other intangibles |
3 - 5 | 6,574 | (604 | ) | 5,970 | 5,337 | (1,036 | ) | 4,301 | ||||||||||||
Total finite-lived intangible assets |
$ | 99,636 | $ | (67,970 | ) | $ | 31,666 | $ | 86,675 | $ | (59,310 | ) | $ | 27,365 | |||||||
Trademark |
indefinite | 7,500 | | 7,500 | 7,500 | | 7,500 | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 107,136 | $ | (67,970 | ) | $ | 39,166 | $ | 94,175 | $ | (59,310 | ) | $ | 34,865 | |||||||
Total amortization expense related to finite-lived intangible assets totaled $9.8 million, $9.3 million and $10.3 million for the years ended June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which included computer software amortization expense of $2.3 million, $3.3 million and $4.4 million, respectively.
In September 2009, the Company recorded an indefinite-lived intangible asset of approximately $7.5 million related to one-time consideration given for a perpetual, world-wide license for the use of the Bally trademark in connection with the Company's business.
F-29
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Future amortization of finite-lived intangible assets is scheduled as follows:
Year Ended June 30,
|
(in 000s) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
2013 |
$ | 13,200 | ||
2014 |
8,223 | |||
2015 |
4,950 | |||
2016 |
2,251 | |||
2017 |
1,750 | |||
Thereafter |
1,292 | |||
Total |
$ | 31,666 | ||
During fiscal year 2012, the Company acquired substantially all the assets and liabilities of MacroView Labs and Chiligaming LTD for approximately $8.8 million and $7.1 million, respectively. As part of the transactions, the Company recognized $4.3 million in core technology, $0.9 million in contracts, and $10.7 million in goodwill. The Company has not presented pro forma information for the acquisitions as the impact was insignificant both individually, and in the aggregate, to the Company's most recent consolidated financial statements.
All goodwill is associated with continuing operations. The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
|
(in 000s) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Balance as of June 30, 2010 |
$ | 161,153 | ||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
957 | |||
Balance as of June 30, 2011 |
162,110 | |||
Additions |
10,656 | |||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
(795 | ) | ||
Balance as of June 30, 2012 |
$ | 171,971 | ||
No impairment charges for goodwill and intangible assets were necessary for the years ended June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010.
F-30
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
7. ACCRUED AND OTHER LIABILITIES
Accrued liabilities consist of the following:
|
June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012 | 2011 | |||||
|
(in 000s) |
||||||
Payroll and related costs |
$ | 30,212 | $ | 27,014 | |||
Legal, professional and consulting costs |
13,548 | 2,748 | |||||
Customer deposits |
6,154 | 4,930 | |||||
Royalties |
4,019 | 3,772 | |||||
Regulatory approval costs |
2,394 | 2,182 | |||||
Sales, use and gaming taxes |
4,322 | 3,337 | |||||
Interest rate derivative financial instruments |
4,804 | 5,133 | |||||
Foreign currency derivative financial instrument |
115 | 586 | |||||
Accrued purchase of treasury stock |
2,130 | | |||||
Other |
17,612 | 13,523 | |||||
Total accrued and other liabilities |
$ | 85,310 | $ | 63,225 | |||
8. LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the following:
|
June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2011 | 2011 | |||||
|
(in 000s) |
||||||
Revolving credit facility |
$ | 230,000 | $ | 219,000 | |||
Term loan facility |
281,250 | 296,250 | |||||
Other, generally unsecured |
216 | 153 | |||||
Long-term debt |
511,466 | 515,403 | |||||
Less current maturities |
(17,091 | ) | (15,153 | ) | |||
Long-term debt, net of current maturities |
$ | 494,375 | $ | 500,250 | |||
As of June 30, 2012 and 2011, there was approximately $170.0 million and $181.0 million, respectively, of undrawn availability under the revolving credit facility. Availability under the revolving credit facility is reduced to the extent of outstanding letters of credit.
On April 15, 2011, the Company entered into an amended and restated credit agreement, that provides for a $700 million senior secured credit facility comprised of a $300 million, five-year term loan and a $400 million, five-year revolving credit facility, including a $50 million sublimit for the issuance of standby letters of credit, a $10 million sublimit for swingline loans and a $150 million sublimit for multicurrency borrowings approved under the credit facility.
The interest rate on the credit facility is subject to a leverage-based pricing grid. If the leverage ratio, as defined under the credit facility, is greater than 2.5, the interest rate will be LIBOR plus a margin of 2.00%; if the leverage ratio is between 2.0 and 2.5, the interest rate will be LIBOR plus a margin of 1.75%; if the leverage ratio is between 1.5 and 2.0, the interest rate will be LIBOR plus a margin of 1.50%; if the leverage ratio is between 1.0 and 1.5, the interest rate will be LIBOR plus a margin of
F-31
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
1.25%; and if the leverage ratio is below 1.0, the interest rate will be LIBOR plus a margin of 1.00%. As of June 30, 2012, the Company's leverage ratio was approximately 1.8.
As of June 30, 2012 and 2011, the interest rate on the revolving credit facility was 1.75% and 2.29%, respectively, and the interest rate on the term loan was 3.58% and 3.82%, respectively, after giving effect to the floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps. Exclusive of the effect of the floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps, the interest rate on the term loan was 1.50% and 1.75% as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Under the credit facility, the term loan requires quarterly principal reductions in an amount equal to $3,750,000, through March 2013; $5,625,000, through March 2014; $7,500,000, from June 2014 until the term loan's maturity in May 2016 upon when the remaining outstanding principal balance of $187,500,000 is due.
The credit facility is collateralized by substantially all of the Company's domestic property and is guaranteed by each of the Company's domestic subsidiaries, excluding any noncontrolling interests, and is secured by a pledge agreement.
The fair value of long-term debt is estimated by discounting expected cash flows using current interest rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and remaining maturities. As of June 30, 2012 and 2011, the fair value of long-term debt approximated the carrying value.
The credit facility contains a number of covenants that, among other things, restrict the Company's ability and certain of its subsidiaries to dispose of assets, incur additional indebtedness or issue preferred stock, pay dividends or make other distributions, enter into certain acquisitions, repurchase equity interests or subordinated indebtedness, issue or sell equity interests of our subsidiaries, engage in mergers or acquisitions or certain transactions with subsidiaries and affiliates, and that otherwise restrict corporate activities.
The financial covenants under the credit facility consist of a leverage ratio and an interest coverage ratio. The leverage ratio is computed as total debt outstanding at the end of the quarter divided by the trailing twelve months Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization ("EBITDA"), excluding certain cash and non-cash charges. The interest coverage ratio is computed as EBITDA for the trailing twelve months divided by the trailing twelve months of interest charges.
A breach of any of the covenants or the inability to comply with the required financial ratios could result in a default under the credit facility. In the event of any such default, the lenders could elect to declare all borrowings outstanding under the credit facility, together with any accrued interest and other fees, to be due and payable. If the Company were unable to repay the indebtedness upon its acceleration, the lenders could proceed against the underlying collateral. The Company was in compliance with all of the credit facility covenants as of June 30, 2012 and 2011.
Interest Rate Swap Agreements
Effective December 2008, the Company entered into a floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreement with an original notional value of $218.8 million and a maturity date of September 26, 2012 to fix floating LIBOR based debt to fixed rate debt at an interest rate of 1.89%. Effective June 2011, the Company entered into a second floating-to-fixed rate swap agreement with an original notional value of $165.0 million and a maturity date of May 13, 2016 to fix a portion of the floating LIBOR based debt under the new term loan to fixed rate debt at an interest rate of 2.09%. At June 30, 2012 and 2011, the combined swap agreements had a notional value of $281.3 million and $296.3 million, respectively.
F-32
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company has documented and designated these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges. Based on the assessment of effectiveness using statistical regression, the Company determined that the interest rate swaps are effective. Effectiveness testing of the hedge relationships and measurement to quantify ineffectiveness is performed each fiscal quarter using the hypothetical derivative method. As the interest rate swaps qualify as cash flow hedges, the Company adjusts the cash flow hedges on a quarterly basis to their fair value with a corresponding offset to accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ("OCI"). The interest rate swaps have been and are expected to remain highly effective for the life of the hedges. Effective amounts are reclassified to interest expense as the related hedged expense is incurred. Any ineffectiveness is reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to other income (expense). As of June 30, 2012, the Company had no ineffectiveness on its cash flow hedges. Amounts related to the swaps expected to be reclassified from other comprehensive income to interest expense in the next twelve months total $4.8 million.
Additional information on the Company's interest rate swaps are as follows:
Interest Rate Derivative Financial Instruments
|
Balance Sheet Location | Fair Value (in 000s) |
Location of Offsetting Balance | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash flow hedges$281.3 million LIBOR based debt |
Accrued and other liabilities | $ | 4,804 | ||||
|
Other liabilities |
9,028 |
|||||
|
$ | 13,832 | Accumulated other comprehensive income (before income taxes) | ||||
Principal Repayments
The following annual principal maturities of the Company's long-term debt for each of the fiscal years ending subsequent to June 30, 2012, are as follows:
Year Ended June 30,
|
(in 000s) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
2013 |
$ | 17,091 | ||
2014 |
24,375 | |||
2015 |
30,000 | |||
2016 |
440,000 | |||
2017 |
| |||
Total |
$ | 511,466 | ||
F-33
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
9. LEASES
The Company leases certain office space, equipment, autos, warehouse and repair facilities and other property locations under noncancelable operating leases which are generally included in selling, general and administrative expenses. Operating rental expense is as follows:
|
Year Ended June 30, | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
|
(in 000s) |
|||||||||
Equipment and office space leases |
$ | 9,273 | $ | 9,060 | $ | 8,325 | ||||
Sublease rental income |
(317 | ) | (357 | ) | (251 | ) | ||||
|
$ | 8,956 | $ | 8,703 | $ | 8,074 | ||||
A schedule of future minimum rental payments required under noncancelable operating leases for each of the fiscal years ending after June 30, 2012, is as follows:
Year Ended June 30,
|
Operating | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
2013 |
$ | 8,873 | ||
2014 |
6,491 | |||
2015 |
4,410 | |||
2016 |
3,629 | |||
2017 |
2,121 | |||
Thereafter |
341 | |||
Total minimum payments |
$ | 25,865 | ||
10. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "2008 ESPP") provides that eligible employees are able to contribute up to 10% of their eligible earnings towards the quarterly purchase of the Company's common stock. The employee's purchase price is equal to 85% of the fair market value. During the years ended June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, employees purchased 76,526, 67,730 and 53,716 shares of common stock for approximately $2.6 million, $2.1 million and $1.9 million, respectively.
Share-Based Award Plans
The Company's 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which was an amendment and restatement of the Company's 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended, (the "2010 Plan") provides for the issuance of up to 15,050,000 shares of common stock to Company employees, directors and designated paid consultants. At the Company's 2010 Annual Meeting, the 2010 Plan was amended to increase the number of shares issuable pursuant to awards of restricted stock, restricted stock units ("RSUs") or incentive bonuses granted after the 2010 Annual Meeting shall count against the overall share limit as 1.75 shares for every share granted. Prior to the 2010 Annual Meeting, the number of shares issuable pursuant to awards of restricted stock or RSUs was capped at 1,400,000 shares. Generally, options are granted at the fair value of the Company's common stock at the date of grant and are exercisable for up to ten years.
F-34
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company's 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "1996 Plan") provided for the issuance of up to 3,428,000 shares of common stock to Company employees, directors and designated paid consultants. Generally, options were granted at the fair value of the Company's common stock at the date of grant and are exercisable for up to ten years. No shares of common stock remain available under the 1996 Plan for the grant of new awards.
The Company issues new shares for shares delivered under the 1996 Plan and the 2010 Plan (collectively, the "Plans").
Stock option activity as of and for the year ended June 30, 2012 is summarized below:
|
|
Weighted Average | |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Shares | Exercise Price | Remaining Contractual Term | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | |||||||||
|
(in 000s) |
(per share) |
(years) |
(in 000s) |
|||||||||
Balance outstanding as of June 30, 2011 |
3,682 | $ | 24.45 | $ | 60,558 | ||||||||
Granted |
79 | 37.20 | |||||||||||
Exercised |
(1,148 | ) | 20.33 | ||||||||||
Forfeited or expired |
(68 | ) | 35.87 | ||||||||||
Balance outstanding as of June 30, 2012 |
2,545 | $ | 26.40 | 3.06 | $ | 51,655 | |||||||
Exercisable as of June 30, 2012 |
1,976 | $ | 23.83 | 2.50 | $ | 45,191 | |||||||
Restricted stock and RSU activity as of and for the year ended June 30, 2012 is summarized below:
|
Restricted Stock |
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
RSUs | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(in 000s) |
(per share) |
(in 000s) |
(per share) |
|||||||||
Balance outstanding as of June 30, 2011 |
337 | $ | 38.42 | 600 | $ | 18.92 | |||||||
Granted |
391 | 42.80 | | | |||||||||
Released |
(152 | ) | 38.90 | (30 | ) | 42.01 | |||||||
Forfeited or expired |
(8 | ) | 38.07 | | | ||||||||
Balance outstanding as of June 30, 2012 |
568 | $ | 41.31 | 570 | 17.69 | ||||||||
Vested as of June 30, 2012 |
534 | $ | 16.04 | ||||||||||
F-35
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following is additional information about stock options, restricted stock and RSUs exercised, granted and vested during the periods:
|
Year Ended June 30, | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
|
(in 000s, except per share amounts) |
|||||||||
Weighted average grant-date fair value per share: |
||||||||||
Stock options granted |
$ | 17.04 | $ | 16.86 | $ | 19.56 | ||||
Stock options vested |
$ | 16.05 | $ | 11.47 | $ | 10.71 | ||||
Restricted stock and RSUs vested |
$ | 39.34 | $ | 33.31 | $ | 29.99 | ||||
Total grant-date fair value of stock options vested |
$ | 6,097 | $ | 6,458 | $ | 7,123 | ||||
Total grant-date fair value of restricted stock and RSUs vested |
$ | 7,289 | $ | 8,962 | $ | 4,384 | ||||
Exercises under all share-based payment arrangements: |
||||||||||
Total intrinsic value |
$ | 26,973 | $ | 37,915 | $ | 59,583 | ||||
Cash received |
$ | 23,225 | $ | 26,314 | $ | 30,074 | ||||
Tax benefit realized |
$ | 6,390 | $ | 8,718 | $ | 16,730 |
Shares Reserved
The following shares are reserved for stock options and RSUs issued and available for issue under the Plans and the 2008 ESPP:
|
(in 000s) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Stock options and RSUs issued and currently outstanding |
3,115 | |||
Shares available for future issuance |
2,484 | |||
Total |
5,599 | |||
Share-Based Compensation
The following table presents share-based compensation expense and related effect of the income tax benefit included in the Company's consolidated statements of operations:
|
Year Ended June 30, | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
|
(in 000s) |
|||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
$ | 9,996 | $ | 9,624 | $ | 10,382 | ||||
Research and development |
3,956 | 3,104 | 3,231 | |||||||
Cost of gaming equipment and systems and operations |
220 | 179 | 180 | |||||||
Share-based compensation expense before tax |
$ | 14,172 | $ | 12,907 | $ | 13,793 | ||||
Income tax benefit |
(4,960 | ) | (4,517 | ) | (4,828 | ) | ||||
Net share-based compensation expense |
$ | 9,212 | $ | 8,390 | $ | 8,965 | ||||
Share-based compensation expense from discontinued operations before income tax was $137,000 for the year ended June 30, 2010.
F-36
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Included in share-based compensation expense in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010 is restricted stock amortization of $8.9 million, $7.0 million and $6.4 million, respectively.
As of June 30, 2012, there was $6.8 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the unvested portion of stock options which will be recognized over the subsequent 1.64 years. In addition, as of June 30, 2012, there was $19.5 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the unvested portion of restricted stock which will be recognized over the subsequent 2.09 years.
The Company estimates the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes valuation model. Key input assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options include the exercise price of the option, the expected option term, the expected volatility of the Company's common stock over the option's expected term, the risk-free interest rate over the option's expected term and the Company's expected annual dividend yield. The Company believes that the valuation technique and the approach utilized to develop the underlying assumptions are appropriate in calculating the fair values of the Company's stock options granted. Estimates of fair value are not intended to predict actual future events, or the value ultimately realized by the recipients of equity awards.
The fair value of each option granted during the periods referenced below was estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes valuation model with the following assumptions:
|
Year Ended June 30, | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Weighted Average: |
||||||||||
Expected option term (in years) |
4.36 | 4.61 | 4.66 | |||||||
Expected volatility |
56.90 | % | 54.91 | % | 56.04 | % | ||||
Risk-free interest rate |
0.89 | % | 1.76 | % | 2.23 | % | ||||
Expected annual dividend yield |
0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % |
For the year ended June 30, 2010, the expected option term was determined using the simplified method for share based payments as the Company did not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term. During fiscal year 2011, the Company ceased using the simplified method and began using its historical exercise activity to estimated expected term. Expected volatility is based on historical market factors related to the Company's common stock. Risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury rates appropriate for the expected term.
11. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY, OPTIONS, WARRANTS AND RIGHTS
Warrants
The Company previously issued 100,000 stock purchase warrants in connection with a prior acquisition. The strike price of the warrant was $24.69 with a term of seven years. During the year ended June 30, 2011, 125 stock purchase warrants were exercised and converted into 125 shares of the Company's common stock.
Share Repurchase Plan
The Company's Board of Directors have approved a variety of share repurchase plans under which, subject to price and market conditions, purchases of shares can be made from time to time in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions using available cash.
F-37
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
On April 6, 2011, the Company's Board of Directors increased the authorized capacity under the Company's existing share repurchase plan, previously approved on April 4, 2010, under which, subject to price and market conditions, purchases of shares of common stock could be made from time to time in the open market or in privately negotiated transaction using available cash, to an amount equal to $550 million minus the amount repurchased in the Company's modified Dutch auction tender offer to purchase up to $400 million in value of its common stock launched on April 8, 2011. Shareholders tendered 9,912,993 shares of the Company's common stock at $40.18 per share for an aggregate cost of approximately $398.3 million.
On May 2, 2012, the Company's Board of Directors approved a new $150 million share-repurchase program, which replaced the repurchase program referenced above.
As of June 30, 2012, $90.5 million remained available under the plan for repurchase in future periods.
For the years ended June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, the Company made the following purchases under its share purchase plans:
|
Year Ended June 30, | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Shares | Average price per share |
Amount (in 000s) |
|||||||
For the year ended June 30, 2010 |
2,297,278 | $ | 39.71 | $ | 91,221 | |||||
For the year ended June 30, 2011 |
11,957,208 | $ | 39.65 | 474,054 | ||||||
For the year ended June 30, 2012 |
3,860,778 | $ | 40.06 | 154,645 | ||||||
Total |
18,115,264 | $ | 39.74 | $ | 719,920 | |||||
Special Stock
The Company's Articles of Incorporation authorize the issuance of up to 10,000,000 shares of special stock ("Special Stock"). The Special Stock may be issued from time to time in one or more series, each having such designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights, qualifications, limitations or restrictions as shall be stated and expressed in the resolution providing for the issuance of Special Stock or any series thereof adopted by the Board of Directors. Special Stock consists of non-voting stock where no holder of the Special Stock shall be entitled to vote at any meeting of stockholders or otherwise, except as may be specifically provided by law or as approved by the Board of Directors in certain limited circumstances at the time of the stock issuance.
To date, there have been four series of Special Stock authorized for issuance: the Initial Series, the Series B, the Series E and the Series F. In June 1996, the Company issued shares of Series E Special Stock to certain holders of the Company's 71/2% Convertible Subordinated Debentures (which were retired in 1996) who elected to receive such stock in lieu of receiving common stock. The holders of shares of Series E Special Stock have no voting rights except as required by law. A total of 115 shares of Series E Special Stock remain outstanding. No other shares of Special Stock remain outstanding.
F-38
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
12. INCOME TAXES
Consolidated income from continuing operations before taxes and noncontrolling interest for domestic and foreign operations is as follows:
|
Year Ended June 30, | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
|
(in 000s) |
|||||||||
United States |
$ | 161,043 | $ | 131,668 | $ | 160,265 | ||||
Foreign |
3,416 | 11,725 | 10,553 | |||||||
Total |
$ | 164,459 | $ | 143,393 | $ | 170,818 | ||||
The components of the Company's income tax expense from continuing operations are as follows:
|
Year Ended June 30, | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
|
(in 000s) |
|||||||||
Current: |
||||||||||
Federal |
$ | 61,115 | $ | 12,614 | $ | 59,626 | ||||
State |
9,085 | 5,585 | 5,928 | |||||||
Foreign |
2,902 | 3,245 | 5,057 | |||||||
|
73,102 | 21,444 | 70,611 | |||||||
Deferred: |
||||||||||
Federal |
(7,169 | ) | 23,984 | (9,261 | ) | |||||
State |
(1,383 | ) | (919 | ) | (796 | ) | ||||
Foreign |
(1,001 | ) | 673 | 167 | ||||||
|
(9,553 | ) | 23,738 | (9,890 | ) | |||||
Income tax expense |
$ | 63,549 | $ | 45,182 | $ | 60,721 | ||||
The difference between the U.S. statutory federal income tax rate and the Company's effective income tax rate is as follows:
|
Year Ended June 30, | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
U.S. federal statutory income tax rate |
35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | ||||
Change in income tax contingencies |
2.1 | (2.5 | ) | (0.9 | ) | |||||
State income taxes, net of federal benefit |
2.8 | 2.0 | 2.0 | |||||||
Foreign earnings subject to U.S. tax |
(0.3 | ) | 2.9 | 1.2 | ||||||
Change in valuation allowance |
(0.6 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (0.3 | ) | ||||
Tax credits |
(1.2 | ) | (4.7 | ) | (1.7 | ) | ||||
Domestic production activities deduction |
(2.7 | ) | (1.5 | ) | (0.4 | ) | ||||
Foreign losses-no future benefit |
2.0 | | | |||||||
Other, net |
1.5 | 0.5 | 0.6 | |||||||
|
38.6 | % | 31.5 | % | 35.5 | % | ||||
F-39
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The major components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities from continuing operations are as follows:
|
June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012 | 2011 | |||||
|
(in 000s) |
||||||
Deferred tax assets: |
|||||||
Share-based compensation |
$ | 11,838 | $ | 11,405 | |||
Deferred revenue, net of deferred costs |
14,145 | 9,326 | |||||
Accruals not currently deductible for tax purposes |
21,537 | 13,243 | |||||
Inventory |
5,518 | 4,640 | |||||
Net operating loss carryforwards |
2,988 | 3,466 | |||||
Intangible assets |
4,825 | 4,029 | |||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
4,132 | 4,607 | |||||
Foreign tax credit carryforwards |
1,588 | 2,154 | |||||
Other tax credits |
969 | 2,086 | |||||
Interest rate swap agreement |
5,043 | 1,412 | |||||
Other |
1,176 | 426 | |||||
Total gross deferred tax assets |
73,759 | 56,794 | |||||
Less: Valuation allowance |
(68 | ) | (1,186 | ) | |||
Deferred tax assets |
$ | 73,691 | $ | 55,608 | |||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|||||||
Property and equipment |
$ | 22,955 | $ | 12,734 | |||
Other |
1,153 | 2,293 | |||||
Total gross deferred tax liabilities |
$ | 24,108 | $ | 15,027 | |||
Net deferred tax assets |
$ | 49,583 | $ | 40,581 | |||
Current deferred income tax liabilities of $21,000 and $439,000 of as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, are included in accrued and other liabilities, and noncurrent deferred income tax liabilities of $627,000 and $418,000 as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, are included in other liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The Company has not provided income taxes on approximately $12.1 million and $9.7 million of undistributed earnings as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, from certain foreign subsidiaries. The Company plans to permanently invest the earnings in the foreign subsidiaries and therefore has not recorded a deferred tax liability associated with the undistributed earnings.
At June 30, 2012, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards for U.S. federal income tax purposes of approximately $5.1 million. The entire amount of the net operating loss carryforwards are subject to limitations under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 382 limits the amount of carryforwards available per year for use against future taxable income. Based on the Company's recent history of taxable income and projections of taxable income in the future, the Company expects to utilize all of its federal net operating loss carryforwards. The Company also has net operating losses in several foreign jurisdictions totaling approximately $4.3 million. Based on the Company's recent history of taxable income and projections of taxable income in the future, the Company expects to utilize all of its foreign net operating loss carryforwards and, therefore, no valuation allowance has been established for these losses.
F-40
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company's subsidiary in India operated under a tax holiday that expired in March 2011.
The Company recorded $6.4 million and $8.7 million as an increase to stockholder's equity for certain tax benefits from employee share-based compensation for the years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The Company had $12.7 million and $8.4 million of liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Of these amounts, $12.7 million and $8.2 million, respectively, if recognized, would impact our effective tax rate. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as tax expense. As of June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company had accrued interest and penalties of $1.7 million and $1.3 million, respectively. The Company increased the accrual of interest and penalties by $0.4 million, and decreased the accrual of interest and penalties by $2.5 million during the years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Changes to the balance of unrecognized tax benefits are as follows:
|
June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012 | 2011 | |||||
|
(in 000s) |
||||||
Balance, beginning of year |
$ | 8,364 | $ | 11,637 | |||
Additions based on tax provisions related to current year |
3,099 | 1,035 | |||||
Additions for tax positions of prior years |
1,461 | 2,812 | |||||
Reductions for tax positions of prior years |
(128 | ) | (6,687 | ) | |||
Lapse of statute of limitations |
(36 | ) | (541 | ) | |||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
(53 | ) | 108 | ||||
Balance, end of year |
$ | 12,707 | $ | 8,364 | |||
The Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") commenced examination of the Company's United States federal income tax returns for 2003 through 2005 in the fourth quarter of 2006. In January 2009, the IRS completed its field examination of the open tax years and issued a Revenue Agent's Report and the Company paid $3.4 million in tax and $1.2 million in interest to the IRS to settle certain agreed adjustments. The Company filed a formal protest regarding certain unagreed adjustments and in June 2010, the Company agreed to settle all remaining issues with the IRS. Formal closure of the case occurred in October 2010 and the Company received a refund from the IRS of $2.3 million, including $0.6 million in interest.
The IRS commenced examination of the Company's United States federal income tax returns for 2006 through 2009 during fiscal year 2011. The IRS completed its field examination of the open tax years and issued a Revenue Agent's Report in January 2012. The Company filed a formal protest regarding certain unagreed adjustments in March 2012. If successful in defending the Company' position, it would result in a reduction to unrecognized tax benefits and a corresponding reduction of income tax provisions of approximately $3.7 million. If the IRS were to prevail in full, it would result in additional income tax provisions of approximately $7.1 million.
It is reasonably possible that within the next twelve months the Company will resolve the matter presently under consideration with the IRS which may increase or decrease unrecognized tax benefits for the open tax years. However, an estimate of such increase or decrease cannot be reasonably made.
Excluding the IRS Appeals case described above, it is reasonably possible that the Company's amount of unrecognized tax benefits may decrease within the next twelve months by a range up to $1.3 million.
F-41
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company files numerous consolidated and separate income tax returns in the United States and various state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company is currently under examination in certain states and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to United States federal, state and local, or foreign income tax examinations for years before fiscal year 2006.
13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Commitments
The Company is obligated under several agreements to pay certain royalties on the sale or rental of gaming devices. Total royalty expense for the Company for the years ended June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $20.8 million, $11.5 million and $8.3 million, respectively, and is included in the cost of gaming equipment and systems in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. In addition, the Company has obtained the rights to certain game themes and intellectual property that call for payment of royalties based on either fixed amounts or variable amounts based on game performance.
Litigation
The Company is subject to legal proceedings, claims and investigations in the ordinary course of business, including claims of alleged infringement of third-party patents and other intellectual property rights, indemnification claims, commercial, employment, regulatory and other matters. Liabilities related to such matters are recorded when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. All legal costs associated with litigation are expensed as incurred.
In February 2012, HBG filed requests for arbitration in the National and International Chamber of Arbitration of Milan, Italy, against the Company's Dutch and Italian subsidiaries ("Bally Netherlands" and "Bally Italy", respectively). HBG alleged breach of contract (i) by Bally Netherlands in connection with a contractual arrangement pursuant to which the Company agreed to supply certain gaming equipment and (ii) by Bally Italy in connection with financial assistance for HBG's acquisition of licenses to operate gaming equipment in certain Italian markets. The Company responded in March 2012 denying the allegations and seeking to dismiss HBG's claims. Bally Netherlands has asserted a counterclaim against HBG for breach of contract for failure to assist in altering its products to conform to regulatory requirements in the Italian market. The counterclaim seeks equitable relief compelling HBG to perform its contractual obligations as well as an undetermined amount of monetary damages. While it is possible the arbitration could result in damages against the Company, management has assessed the merits of HBG's claim for alleged damages of approximately € 114 million and believes a range of potential loss related to this claim is not estimable.
In April 2006, International Game Technology ("IGT") filed a patent infringement lawsuit against the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The complaint asserted that the Company's Bally Power Bonusing products infringe patents held by IGT, and sought injunctive relief and damages in unspecified amounts. In April 2009, the district court issued an order finding that two of the Company's products, ACSC Power Winners and ACSC Power Reward, infringe some patent claims asserted by IGT, but not others. Both parties appealed. In October 2011, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, and the case will now be remanded back to the district court for discovery and trial on the issue of damages. In the meantime, the Company undertook technical changes to ensure non-infringement for the two products partially in question. Trial is scheduled to commence November 5, 2012.
F-42
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In December 2004, IGT filed a patent infringement lawsuit against the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. The complaint asserted that the Company's wheel-based games, its games with a reel in the top box and its iVIEW products infringed on patents held by IGT, and sought injunctive relief and damages in unspecified amounts. As part of the defense, the Company asserted counterclaims seeking damages and other relief against IGT, including claims that IGT's patents were invalid, unenforceable and not infringed, as well as several claims that IGT engaged in anti-competitive conduct in violation of state and federal antitrust laws. In October 2008, the court granted the Company's motions for summary judgment, ruling that IGT's two "wheel" patents and a touch-screen player-tracking patent were invalid; that even if the patents were valid, the Company's wheel-based games at issue would not infringe; and that certain of its iVIEW products do not infringe the two asserted player- tracking patents. The summary judgment determinations were upheld by the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. Upon remand, the District Court granted summary judgment in favor of IGT on the remaining portion of the case regarding IGT's alleged antitrust violations and in favor of Bally on IGT's remaining claim that Bally infringed an IGT player tracking patent. An appeal of the summary judgment on Bally's antitrust claims against IGT is pending.
In October 2010, WMS Gaming Inc. ("WMS") filed a patent infringement lawsuit against the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Northern Illinois. The complaint asserted that several of the Company's products using iReel displays infringe two WMS patents and sought injunctive relief and damages in unspecified amounts. WMS later amended its complaint to assert three additional patents related to the use of a video screen in conjunction with a gaming machine using mechanical reels also infringe certain WMS patents. As part of its response, the Company asserted counterclaims seeking damages and other unspecified relief against WMS for violation of certain Company patents, including claims that the WMS patents are invalid, unenforceable, and not infringed. In November 2011, the Company and WMS entered into a settlement and license agreement to end the litigation. As part of the agreement, the Company obtained a license to the WMS and Aruze Transmissive Reels® gaming technology portfolio under confidential terms.
The Company is also a party to various claims and lawsuits relating to routine matters that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of its' business. Although, management does not currently believe that the outcome of such claims, including the matters discussed above, in the aggregate, will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows, these matters are subject to inherent uncertainties and management' s view of these matters may change in the future.
As of June 30, 2012, the Company accrued aggregate liabilities of $10.8 million in other current liabilities for its contingent legal matters. While the Company intends to defend all legal matters vigorously, adverse outcomes that the Company estimates are reasonable could possibly reach approximately $16.0 million in the aggregate beyond recorded amounts. Were unfavorable final outcomes to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on the Company's financial statements for the period in which the effects become reasonably estimable.
14. SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION
The Company's revenue consists of: Gaming Equipment, which includes the sale of gaming devices and related equipment, parts and conversion kits; Gaming Operations, which includes the operation of wide-area progressive, video lottery and centrally determined systems and the rental of gaming devices and content; and Systems, which includes the sale and support of computerized monitoring systems and related recurring hardware and software maintenance revenue.
F-43
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following is a summary of revenues and gross margin:
|
Year Ended June 30, | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
|
(in 000s) |
|||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||
Gaming Equipment and Systems |
||||||||||
Gaming Equipment |
$ | 310,651 | $ | 246,514 | $ | 273,718 | ||||
Gaming Operations |
357,417 | 318,621 | 286,950 | |||||||
Systems |
211,691 | 193,020 | 217,523 | |||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 879,759 | $ | 758,155 | $ | 778,191 | ||||
Gross Margin(1): |
||||||||||
Gaming Equipment and Systems |
||||||||||
Gaming Equipment |
$ | 139,845 | $ | 112,096 | $ | 138,000 | ||||
Gaming Operations |
257,737 | 229,801 | 203,844 | |||||||
Systems |
155,861 | 142,602 | 156,542 | |||||||
Total gross margin |
$ | 553,443 | $ | 484,499 | $ | 498,386 | ||||
The Company has operations based primarily in the United States as well as significant sales and distribution offices based in Europe, and other foreign locations, including South America. The table below presents information as to the Company's revenues, operating income and identifiable assets by geographic region which is determined by country of destination:
|
Year Ended June 30, | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
|
(in 000s) |
|||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||
United States and Canada |
$ | 716,075 | $ | 619,219 | $ | 621,205 | ||||
International |
163,684 | 138,936 | 156,986 | |||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 879,759 | $ | 758,155 | $ | 778,191 | ||||
Operating income: |
||||||||||
United States and Canada |
$ | 159,324 | $ | 135,096 | $ | 144,060 | ||||
International |
20,119 | 16,439 | 40,050 | |||||||
Total operating income |
$ | 179,443 | $ | 151,535 | $ | 184,110 | ||||
Identifiable assets: |
||||||||||
United States and Canada |
$ | 730,758 | $ | 692,778 | $ | 743,426 | ||||
International |
239,709 | 234,616 | 169,750 | |||||||
Total identifiable assets |
$ | 970,467 | $ | 927,394 | $ | 913,176 | ||||
F-44
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
15. 401(k) PLAN
The Company is the sponsor of the Bally Technologies, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan (the "401(k) Plan"). The 401(k) Plan was adopted for domestic employees of Bally Technologies, Inc. and all its domestic subsidiaries. Employees may enroll in the plan after meeting certain age and length of employment criteria, and plan participants may defer up to 25% of their compensation, up to certain IRS imposed limitations.
The Company matches 50% of any participant's contributions, up to the first 6% of their compensation (as defined in the plan document). Company matching contributions totaled approximately $2.2 million, $1.9 million and $1.9 million for each of the years ended June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
For participants hired through December 31, 2000, employee and employer matching contributions are 100% vested immediately. For employees hired on or after January 1, 2001, vesting of the employer match is on a 20%, 5-year vesting schedule. Effective October 1, 2005, vesting of employer match is on a 25%, 4-year vesting schedule.
16. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
The following tables set forth unaudited quarterly financial information for the years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.
|
Fiscal Year 2012 Quarterly Results | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
September 30, | December 31, | March 31, | June 30, | |||||||||
|
(in 000s, except per share data) |
||||||||||||
Statement of Operations Data: |
|||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 194,967 | $ | 210,457 | $ | 228,540 | $ | 245,795 | |||||
Cost of revenues |
71,333 | 77,931 | 84,063 | 92,989 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
57,222 | 61,304 | 63,764 | 72,753 | |||||||||
Research and development costs |
23,386 | 22,377 | 24,838 | 25,581 | |||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
32,262 |
38,972 |
47,627 |
45,598 |
|||||||||
Income tax expense |
(11,853 | ) | (14,688 | ) | (17,713 | ) | (19,295 | ) | |||||
Income from continuing operations |
20,409 | 24,284 | 29,914 | 26,303 | |||||||||
Less net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests |
17 | 16 | (53 | ) | (218 | ) | |||||||
Net income attributable to Bally Technologies, Inc. |
$ | 20,392 | $ | 24,268 | $ | 29,967 | $ | 26,521 | |||||
Basic earnings per share attributable to Bally Technologies, Inc.: |
|||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.47 | $ | 0.57 | $ | 0.70 | $ | 0.63 | |||||
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Bally Technologies, Inc.: |
|||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.45 | $ | 0.54 | $ | 0.67 | $ | 0.61 | |||||
F-45
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
Fiscal Year 2011 Quarterly Results | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
September 30, | December 31, | March 31, | June 30, | |||||||||
|
(in 000s, except per share data) |
||||||||||||
Statement of Operations Data: |
|||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 170,808 | $ | 182,726 | $ | 190,941 | $ | 213,680 | |||||
Cost of revenues |
59,179 | 65,722 | 68,181 | 80,574 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
51,614 | 55,185 | 57,562 | 60,672 | |||||||||
Research and development costs |
21,384 | 21,360 | 22,088 | 23,254 | |||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
33,937 |
33,616 |
37,429 |
38,411 |
|||||||||
Income tax expense |
(12,285 | ) | (6,347 | ) | (13,651 | ) | (12,899 | ) | |||||
Income from continuing operations |
21,652 | 27,269 | 23,778 | 25,512 | |||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax |
(403 | ) | | | | ||||||||
Net income |
21,249 | 27,269 | 23,778 | 25,512 | |||||||||
Less net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(540 | ) | 17 | 12 | 56 | ||||||||
Net income attributable to Bally Technologies, Inc. |
$ | 21,789 | $ | 27,252 | $ | 23,766 | $ | 25,456 | |||||
Basic earnings per share attributable to Bally Technologies, Inc.: |
|||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 0.42 | $ | 0.51 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.53 | |||||
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations |
(0.01 | ) | | | | ||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.41 | $ | 0.51 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.53 | |||||
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Bally Technologies, Inc.: |
|||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 0.40 | $ | 0.49 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.51 | |||||
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations |
(0.01 | ) | | | | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.39 | $ | 0.49 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.51 | |||||
F-46
BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
SCHEDULE IIVALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Years ended June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010
|
Balance at Beginning of Year |
Additions | Net Write-offs/ (Recoveries) |
Balance at End of Year |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(in 000s) |
||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts (current and long-term): |
|||||||||||||
Year Ended June 30, 2012 |
$ | 11,566 | $ | 9,863 | $ | 4,327 | $ | 17,102 | |||||
Year Ended June 30, 2011(1) |
$ | 15,143 | $ | 7,963 | $ | 11,540 | $ | 11,566 | |||||
Year Ended June 30, 2010(1) |
$ | 8,897 | $ | 8,382 | $ | 2,136 | $ | 15,143 |
F-47