def14a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OMB APPROVAL |
|
|
|
|
|
OMB Number:
|
|
3235-0059 |
|
|
Expires:
|
|
January 31, 2008 |
|
|
Estimated average burden hours per
response |
14 |
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
|
|
|
Filed by the Registrant
þ |
|
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o |
|
|
Check the appropriate box: |
|
|
|
o Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
þ Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
Whiting Petroleum Corporation
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy
Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
|
þ No fee required. |
|
o
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1)
and 0-11. |
|
|
|
1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
|
|
o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
|
1) Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
SEC 1913 (11-01) |
Persons who are to respond to the collection of information
contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid
OMB control number. |
WHITING PETROLEUM CORPORATION
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held May 9, 2006
To the Stockholders of Whiting Petroleum Corporation:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the annual meeting of
stockholders of Whiting Petroleum Corporation will be held on
Tuesday, May 9, 2006, at 10:00 a.m., local time, at
the John D. Hershner Room located in the Wells Fargo Building at
1700 Lincoln Street, Denver, Colorado 80203, for the following
purposes:
|
|
|
(1) to elect two directors to hold office until the 2009
annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are
duly elected and qualified; |
|
|
(2) to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche
LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for
2006; and |
|
|
(3) to consider and act upon such other business as may
properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or
postponement thereof. |
The close of business on March 15, 2006 has been fixed as
the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled
to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting and any adjournment or
postponement thereof.
A proxy for the meeting and a proxy statement are enclosed
herewith.
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors |
|
|
WHITING PETROLEUM CORPORATION |
|
|
Bruce R. DeBoer |
|
Corporate Secretary |
Denver, Colorado
April 1, 2006
Your vote is important no matter how large or small your
holdings may be. To assure your representation at the meeting,
please date the enclosed proxy, which is solicited by the Board
of Directors, sign exactly as your name appears thereon and
return immediately.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
WHITING PETROLEUM CORPORATION
1700 Broadway, Suite 2300
Denver, Colorado 80290-2300
PROXY STATEMENT
For
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held May 9, 2006
This proxy statement is being furnished to stockholders by the
Board of Directors (the Board) of Whiting
Petroleum Corporation beginning on or about April 1, 2006
in connection with a solicitation of proxies by the Board for
use at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on Tuesday,
May 9, 2006, at 10:00 a.m., local time, at the John
D. Hershner Room located in the Wells Fargo Building at
1700 Lincoln Street, Denver, Colorado 80203, and all
adjournments or postponements thereof (the Annual
Meeting) for the purposes set forth in the attached
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Execution of a proxy given in response to this solicitation will
not affect a stockholders right to attend the Annual
Meeting and to vote in person. Presence at the Annual Meeting of
a stockholder who has signed a proxy does not in itself revoke a
proxy. Any stockholder giving a proxy may revoke it at any time
before it is exercised by giving notice thereof to us in writing
or in open meeting.
A proxy, in the enclosed form, which is properly executed, duly
returned to us and not revoked will be voted in accordance with
the instructions contained therein. The shares represented by
executed but unmarked proxies will be voted FOR the two nominees
for election as directors referred to in this proxy statement,
FOR the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte &
Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm
for 2006 and in accordance with the judgment of the persons
named as proxies in the enclosed form of proxy on such other
business or matters which may properly come before the Annual
Meeting. Other than the election of two directors and the
ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche
LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for
2006, the Board has no knowledge of any other matters to be
presented for action by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting.
Only holders of record of our common stock at the close of
business on March 15, 2006 are entitled to vote at the
Annual Meeting. On that date, 36,956,863 shares of our
common stock were outstanding and entitled to vote, each of
which is entitled to one vote per share.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Our certificate of incorporation and By-Laws provide that our
directors are divided into three classes, with staggered terms
of three years each. At the Annual Meeting, the stockholders
will elect two directors to hold office until the 2009 annual
meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly
elected and qualified. Unless stockholders otherwise specify,
the shares represented by the proxies received will be voted in
favor of the election as directors of the persons named as
nominees in this proxy statement. The Board has no reason to
believe that the listed nominees will be unable or unwilling to
serve as directors if elected. However, in the event that any
nominee should be unable to serve or for good cause will not
serve, the shares represented by proxies received will be voted
for another nominee selected by the Board. Each director will be
elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting
(assuming a quorum is present). Consequently, any shares not
voted at the Annual Meeting, whether due to abstentions, broker
non-votes or otherwise, will have no impact on the election of
the directors.
1
The following sets forth certain information, as of
March 15, 2006, about the Boards nominees for
election at the Annual Meeting and each director whose term will
continue after the Annual Meeting.
Nominees for Election at the Annual Meeting
|
|
|
Terms expiring at the 2006 Annual Meeting |
Graydon D. Hubbard, 72, has served as a director of
Whiting Petroleum Corporation since 2003. He is a retired
certified public accountant and was a partner of Arthur Andersen
LLP in its Denver office for more than five years prior to his
retirement in November 1989. Since 1991, he has served as a
director of Allied Motion Technologies Inc., a company engaged
in the business of designing, manufacturing and selling motion
control products. Mr. Hubbard is also an author. He
received his Bachelors Degree in accounting from the
University of Colorado.
James J. Volker, 59, has been a director of Whiting
Petroleum Corporation since 2003 and a director of Whiting Oil
and Gas Corporation since 2002. He joined Whiting Oil and Gas
Corporation in August 1983 as Vice President of Corporate
Development and served in that position through April 1993. In
March 1993, he became a contract consultant to Whiting Oil and
Gas Corporation and served in that capacity until August 2000,
at which time he became Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer. Mr. Volker was appointed President and
Chief Executive Officer and a director of Whiting Oil and Gas
Corporation in January 2002. Mr. Volker was co-founder,
Vice President and later President of Energy Management
Corporation from 1971 through 1982. He has over thirty years of
experience in the oil and natural gas industry. Mr. Volker
has a degree in finance from the University of Denver, an MBA
from the University of Colorado and has completed H. K.
VanPoolen and Associates course of study in reservoir
engineering.
The Board recommends the foregoing nominees for election as
directors for terms expiring at the 2009 Annual Meeting and
urges each stockholder to vote FOR such nominees. Shares of
common stock represented by executed but unmarked proxies will
be voted FOR such nominees.
Directors Continuing in Office
|
|
|
Terms expiring at the 2007 Annual Meeting |
Thomas L. Aller, 57, has been a director of Whiting
Petroleum Corporation since 2003. Mr. Aller has served as
Senior Vice President Energy Delivery of Alliant
Energy Corporation and President of Interstate Power and Light
Company since January 2004. Prior to that, he served as
President of Alliant Energy Investments, Inc. since April 1998
and interim Executive Vice President Energy Delivery
of Alliant Energy Corporation since September 2003. From 1993 to
1998, he served as Vice President of IES Investments. He
received his Bachelors Degree in political science from
Creighton University and his Masters Degree in municipal
administration from the University of Iowa.
Thomas P. Briggs, 57, was appointed by the Board
effective March 1, 2006 to fill the vacancy created by the
retirement of J. B. Ladd. Mr. Briggs is currently chief
financial officer (CFO) of Healthy Food
Holdings, Inc., a holding and management company for branded
food companies based in Boulder, Colorado. From 2000 to 2004, he
was CFO of Horizon Organic, the largest organic foods company in
the United States, which was acquired by Dean Foods in 2004.
During the 1970s and 1980s he was a tax and M&A consultant
to oil and gas exploration companies, and later CFO and senior
officer in two Denver-based independent oil and gas companies.
Mr. Briggs, an inactive certified public accountant, has
25 years of management experience as a CFO in public and
private companies primarily in the oil and gas and food
industries, and also has 10 years of public accounting
experience in two of the current four worldwide public
accounting firms. He is a past director of the Independent
Petroleum Association of the Mountain States (IPAMS).
Mr. Briggs holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in accounting
from Duke University and a Juris Doctorate degree from the
Georgetown University Law Center. He is currently a board member
and chairman of the audit committee of Corrpro Companies, a
publicly-held engineering and construction services company
headquartered in Cleveland. Mr. Briggs was recommended to
our Nominating and Governance Committee by one of our executive
officers.
2
|
|
|
Terms to expire at the 2008 Annual Meeting |
Kenneth R. Whiting, 79, has been a director of Whiting
Petroleum Corporation since 2003 and has served as a director of
Whiting Oil and Gas Corporation since its inception in 1980. He
was President and Chief Executive Officer of Whiting Oil and Gas
Corporation from its inception until 1993, when he was appointed
Vice President of International Business for IES Diversified.
From 1978 to late 1979, he served as President of Webb
Resources, Inc. He has many years of experience in the oil and
natural gas industry, including his position as Executive Vice
President of Ladd Petroleum Corporation. He was a partner and
associate with the Denver law firm of Holme Roberts &
Owen. Mr. Whiting received his Bachelors Degree in
business from the University of Colorado and his J.D. from the
University of Denver.
Palmer L. Moe, 62, has served as a director of Whiting
Petroleum Corporation since October 2004. He is Managing
Director of Kronkosky Charitable Foundation in San Antonio,
Texas, a position he has held since 1997. Mr. Moe is a
certified public accountant and was a partner of Arthur
Andersen & Co. in its San Antonio, Houston and
Denver offices from 1965 to 1983. From 1983 until 1992, he
served as President and Chief Operating Officer and a director
of Valero Energy Corporation. He received his Bachelors
Degree in accounting from the University of Denver and completed
the Senior Executive Development Course at the Alfred P. Sloan
School of Management at the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology.
D. Sherwin Artus, 69, was appointed to the Board
effective March 1, 2006 to fill the vacancy created when
the Board expanded the number of authorized directors from six
to seven effective March 1, 2006. Mr. Artus joined
Whiting Oil and Gas Corporation in January 1989 as Vice
President of Operations and became Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer in July 1999. In January 2000, he was
appointed President and Chief Executive Officer and a director.
In January 2002, he became Senior Vice President. He has been in
the oil and natural gas business for forty years. Mr. Artus
holds a Bachelors Degree in geologic engineering and a
Masters Degree in mining engineering from the South Dakota
School of Mines and Technology. Mr. Artus was recommended
to our Nominating and Governance Committee by our Chief
Executive Officer.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Corporate Governance Guidelines
The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that are
available, free of charge, on our website at www.whiting.com
or in print to any stockholder who requests it in writing
from our Corporate Secretary.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
The Board has adopted the Whiting Petroleum Corporation Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our directors and
employees that is available, free of charge, on our website at
www.whiting.com or in print to any stockholder who
requests it in writing from our Corporate Secretary.
Independence of Directors
Of the seven directors currently serving on the Board, the Board
has determined that each of Messrs. Briggs, Hubbard, Moe
and Whiting has no material relationship with us and is
independent under New York Stock Exchange listing standards. The
Board has established categorical standards within our Corporate
Governance Guidelines to assist in making determinations of
director independence. These categorical standards are attached
as Appendix A to this proxy statement. In making its
determination of independence, the Board found that each of
Messrs. Briggs, Hubbard, Moe and Whiting met these
standards.
Board Committees
The Board has standing Audit, Compensation and Nominating and
Governance Committees. The Board has adopted a formal written
charter for each of these committees that is available, free of
charge, on our
3
website at www.whiting.com or in print to any stockholder
who requests it in writing from our Corporate Secretary.
The Audit Committees primary duties and responsibilities
are to assist the Board in monitoring the integrity of our
financial statements, the independent registered public
accounting firms qualifications and independence, the
performance of our internal audit function and independent
registered public accounting firm and our compliance with legal
and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee is directly
responsible for the appointment, retention, compensation,
evaluation and termination of our independent registered public
accounting firm and has the sole authority to approve all audit
and permitted non-audit engagement fees and terms. The Audit
Committee is presently comprised of Messrs. Hubbard
(Chairperson), Moe and Briggs, each of whom is an independent
director under New York Stock Exchange listing standards and
Securities and Exchange Commission rules applicable to audit
committee members. The Board has determined that
Mr. Hubbard qualifies as an audit committee financial
expert, as defined by Securities and Exchange Commission
rules. The Audit Committee held four meetings in 2005.
The Compensation Committee discharges the responsibilities of
the Board with respect to our compensation programs and
compensation of our executives and directors. The Compensation
Committee has overall responsibility for approving and
evaluating the compensation of executive officers (including the
chief executive officer) and directors and our executive officer
and director compensation plans, policies and programs. The
Compensation Committee is presently comprised of
Messrs. Moe (Chairperson), Hubbard and Briggs, each of whom
is an independent director under New York Stock Exchange listing
standards. (Mr. Hubbard was chairperson of the Compensation
Committee during 2005). The Compensation Committee held three
meetings in 2005.
The principal functions of the Nominating and Governance
Committee are to identify individuals qualified to become
directors and recommend to the Board nominees for all
directorships, identify directors qualified to serve on Board
committees and recommend to the Board members for each
committee, develop and recommend to the Board a set of
corporation governance guidelines and otherwise take a
leadership role in shaping our corporate governance. The
Nominating and Governance Committee is presently comprised of
Messrs. Whiting (Chairperson), Hubbard and Moe, each of
whom is an independent director under New York Stock Exchange
listing standards. The Nominating and Governance Committee held
one meeting in 2005.
In identifying and evaluating nominees for director, the
Nominating and Governance Committee seeks to ensure that the
Board possesses, in the aggregate, the strategic, managerial and
financial skills and experience necessary to fulfill its duties
and to achieve its objectives, and seeks to ensure that the
Board is comprised of directors who have broad and diverse
backgrounds, possessing knowledge in areas that are of
importance to us. In addition, the Nominating and Governance
Committee believes it is important that at least one director
have the requisite experience and expertise to be designated as
an audit committee financial expert. The Nominating
and Governance Committee looks at each nominee on a case-by-case
basis regardless of who recommended the nominee. In looking at
the qualifications of each candidate to determine if their
election would further the goals described above, the Nominating
and Governance Committee takes into account all factors it
considers appropriate, which may include strength of character,
mature judgment, career specialization, relevant technical
skills or financial acumen, diversity of viewpoint and industry
knowledge. At a minimum, each director nominee must have
displayed the highest personal and professional ethics,
integrity and values and sound business judgment. In addition,
the Nominating and Governance Committee believes that the
following minimum qualifications are necessary for a director
nominee to possess to be recommended by the Committee to the
Board:
|
|
|
|
|
Each director must be highly accomplished in his or her
respective field, with superior credentials and recognition and
broad experience at the administrative and/or policy-making
level in business, government, education, technology or public
interest. |
|
|
|
Each director must have relevant expertise and experience, and
be able to offer advice and guidance to the Chief Executive
Officer based on that expertise and experience. |
4
|
|
|
|
|
Each director must be independent of any particular
constituency, be able to represent all of our stockholders and
be committed to enhancing long-term stockholder value. |
|
|
|
Each director must have sufficient time available to devote to
activities of the Board and to enhance his or her knowledge of
our business. |
The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider persons
recommended by stockholders to become nominees for election as
directors in accordance with the foregoing and other criteria
set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Nominating
and Governance Committee Charter. Recommendations for
consideration by the Nominating and Governance Committee should
be sent to our Corporate Secretary in writing together with
appropriate biographical information concerning each proposed
nominee. Our By-Laws also set forth certain requirements for
stockholders wishing to nominate director candidates directly
for consideration by the stockholders. With respect to an
election of directors to be held at an annual meeting, a
stockholder must, among other things, give notice of an intent
to make such a nomination to our Corporate Secretary in advance
of the meeting in compliance with the terms and within the time
period specified in the By-Laws. Pursuant to these requirements,
a stockholder must give a written notice of intent to our
Corporate Secretary not less than 60 days or more than
90 days prior to the first anniversary of the date on which
we first mailed our proxy materials for the preceding
years annual meeting of stockholders.
Presiding Director
A presiding director is designated to preside over each
executive session of the non-management directors at Board
meetings. The role of the presiding director rotates among the
chairs of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and
Nominating and Governance Committee.
Communication with Directors
Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate with
the full Board, non-management directors as a group or
individual directors, including the presiding director, by
submitting such communications in writing to our Corporate
Secretary at Whiting Petroleum Corporation, c/o the Board
of Directors (or, at the stockholders option, c/o a
specific director or directors), 1700 Broadway, Suite 2300,
Denver, Colorado 80290. Such communications will be delivered
directly to the Board.
Meetings and Attendance
The Board held fourteen meetings in 2005. No director attended
less than 90% of the total number of Board and committee
meetings on which they served. Directors are expected to attend
our annual meeting of stockholders each year and all of our
directors serving at the time attended our 2005 annual meeting
of stockholders.
Director Compensation
Directors who are our employees receive no compensation for
service as members of either the Board or Board committees. From
January 1, 2005 through February 23, 2005,
non-employee directors were compensated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Committee Service | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominating | |
|
|
Board | |
|
|
|
and | |
|
|
Service | |
|
Audit | |
|
Compensation | |
|
Governance | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Annual Retainer
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock, three year vesting
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Committee Chair Annual Retainer
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
Committee Member Annual Retainer
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,500 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
Meeting Fee
|
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
5
Effective February 24, 2005, non-employee directors were
compensated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Committee Service | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominating | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and | |
|
|
Board Service | |
|
Audit | |
|
Compensation | |
|
Governance | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Annual Retainer
|
|
|
$30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock, three year vesting
|
|
|
1,500 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Committee Chair Annual Retainer
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,000 |
|
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
|
$ |
8,000 |
|
Committee Member Annual Retainer
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
Meeting Fee, including telephonic meetings over one hour
|
|
|
$1,500 |
|
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
Telephonic meetings of one hour or less
|
|
|
$ 750 |
|
|
$ |
750 |
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
The Company also makes medical insurance coverage available to
directors. Messrs. Hubbard, Ladd and Whiting elected to
receive such benefits during 2005, the annual premium cost of
which was $2,711 per director. In addition,
Mr. Whiting receives payments under our Production
Participation Plan with respect to his vested plan interests
relating to his employment with us from 1980 to 1993.
Mr. Whiting was paid $31,629 under the Production
Participation Plan for 2005.
Effective February 1, 2006, non-employee director
compensation is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Committee Service | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominating | |
|
|
Board | |
|
|
|
and | |
|
|
Service | |
|
Audit | |
|
Compensation | |
|
Governance | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Annual Retainer
|
|
|
$36,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock, three year vesting
|
|
|
1,800 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Committee Chair Annual Retainer
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
Committee Chair Restricted Stock, three year vesting (shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
750 |
|
Committee Member Annual Retainer
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
Meeting Fee, including telephonic meetings over one hour
|
|
|
$1,500 |
|
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
Telephonic meetings of one hour or less
|
|
|
$ 750 |
|
|
$ |
750 |
|
|
$ |
750 |
|
|
$ |
750 |
|
6
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
Certain Beneficial Owners
The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial
ownership by persons known to us to own more than 5% of our
outstanding common stock. The beneficial ownership information
set forth below has been reported in filings made by the
beneficial owners with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voting Power |
|
Investment Power |
|
|
|
|
Name and Address of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent | |
Beneficial Owner |
|
Sole |
|
Shared |
|
Sole |
|
Shared |
|
Aggregate |
|
of Class | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Neuberger Berman, Inc.
|
|
3,251,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,288,974 |
|
4,288,974 |
|
|
11.6% |
|
605 Third Avenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York, NY 10158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wellington Management
Company LLP
|
|
|
|
3,206,400 |
|
|
|
3,815,300 |
|
3,888,800 |
|
|
10.5% |
|
75 State Street
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boston, MA 02109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
|
|
558,900 |
|
|
|
2,010,900 |
|
|
|
2,010,900 |
|
|
5.4% |
|
100 E. Pratt Street
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baltimore, MD 21202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Avenue Management LLC
|
|
1,956,700 |
|
|
|
1,973,375 |
|
|
|
1,973,375 |
|
|
5.3% |
|
622 Third Avenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York, NY 10017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management and Directors
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 15,
2006 by: (i) each director and nominee; (ii) each of
the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table
set forth below; and (iii) all of the directors, nominees
and executive officers (including the executive officers named
in the Summary Compensation Table) as a group. Each of the
holders listed below has sole voting and investment power over
the shares beneficially owned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of | |
|
Percent of | |
|
|
Common Stock | |
|
Common Stock | |
Name of Beneficial Owner |
|
Beneficially Owned | |
|
Beneficially Owned | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
James J. Volker
|
|
|
88,447 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Thomas L. Aller
|
|
|
5,980 |
|
|
|
* |
|
D. Sherwin Artus
|
|
|
36,628 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Thomas P. Briggs
|
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Graydon D. Hubbard
|
|
|
11,438 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Palmer L. Moe
|
|
|
5,050 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Kenneth R. Whiting
|
|
|
5,595 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Mark R. Williams
|
|
|
26,971 |
|
|
|
* |
|
James T. Brown
|
|
|
42,055 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Patricia J. Miller
|
|
|
16,558 |
|
|
|
* |
|
All directors, nominees and executive officers as a group
(15 persons)
|
|
|
309,581 |
|
|
|
0.8% |
|
7
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Information
The following table sets forth certain information concerning
the compensation earned each of the last three fiscal years by
our Chief Executive Officer and each of four other most highly
compensated executive officers whose total cash compensation
exceeded $100,000 in the fiscal year ended December 31,
2005. The persons named in the table are sometimes referred to
herein as the named executive officers.
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual | |
|
Long Term | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation(1) | |
|
Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted | |
|
All Other | |
|
|
|
|
Salary | |
|
Bonus | |
|
Stock Awards | |
|
Compensation | |
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year | |
|
($) | |
|
($)(2) | |
|
($)(3) | |
|
($)(4) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
James J. Volker
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
441,667 |
|
|
|
580,253 |
|
|
|
599,981 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Chairman, President and
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
342,488 |
|
|
|
309,683 |
|
|
|
650,340 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
168,713 |
|
|
|
202,792 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
659,144 |
|
D. Sherwin Artus
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
109,167 |
|
|
|
462,326 |
|
|
|
149,995 |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
104,500 |
|
|
|
277,351 |
|
|
|
162,590 |
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
102,250 |
|
|
|
183,211 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
680,044 |
|
Mark R. Williams
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
137,083 |
|
|
|
427,105 |
|
|
|
149,995 |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
Vice President,
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
113,847 |
|
|
|
239,213 |
|
|
|
162,590 |
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
Exploration and Development
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
95,406 |
|
|
|
150,672 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
626,041 |
|
James T. Brown
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
167,500 |
|
|
|
365,736 |
|
|
|
199,967 |
|
|
|
12,562 |
|
Vice President,
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
148,424 |
|
|
|
181,812 |
|
|
|
216,773 |
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
Operations
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
127,761 |
|
|
|
98,006 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
632,042 |
|
Patricia J. Miller
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
109,167 |
|
|
|
414,075 |
|
|
|
99,983 |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
Vice President,
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
103,827 |
|
|
|
226,570 |
|
|
|
108,386 |
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
Human Resources
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
99,579 |
|
|
|
138,930 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
416,028 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Certain personal benefits provided to the named executive
officers are not included in the table. The aggregate amount of
such personal benefits for each named executive officer in each
year reflected in the table did not exceed the lesser of $50,000
or 10% of the sum of such officers salary and bonus in
each respective year. |
|
(2) |
Except for an incentive bonus to Mr. Volker of $76,000 for
2003, all amounts presented under the Bonus column were paid
under our Production Participation Plan, which is allocated a
specific percentage of net income each plan year with respect to
oil and gas properties acquired or developed during each such
plan year. |
|
(3) |
These amounts are the dollar value of restricted stock awards
under our 2003 Equity Incentive Plan with the common stock
valued at the grant date price of $40.43 per share for 2005
and $21.05 per share for 2004. For 2005,
Messrs. Volker, Artus, Williams and Brown and
Ms. Miller received 14,840, 3,710, 3,710, 4,946 and
2,473 shares, respectively, on February 24, 2005 which
vest in three equal increments on each anniversary of the grant
date. For 2004, Messrs. Volker, Artus, Williams and Brown
and Ms. Miller received 30,895, 7,724, 7,724, 10,298 and
5,149 shares, respectively, on February 23, 2004 which
vest in three equal increments on each anniversary of the grant
date. As of December 31, 2005, Messrs. Volker, Artus,
Williams and Brown and Ms. Miller had aggregate restricted
stock holdings of 35,437, 8,859, 8,859, 11,811 and
5,906 shares, respectively, and the value of such shares at
such date (i.e., the closing price of $40 per share) was
$1,417,480, $354,360, $354,360, $472,440 and $236,250,
respectively. Dividends are payable on these restricted shares;
however, we have not historically paid any dividends and do not
anticipate paying any dividends on our common stock in the
foreseeable future. |
|
(4) |
These amounts for 2005 and 2004 are matching contributions by us
under our 401(k) Employee Savings Plan. These amounts for 2003
consist of (i) matching contributions of $12,000 by us
under our |
8
|
|
|
401(k) Plan to each of the named executive officers other
than Mr. Volker, who received no matching contribution, and
Ms. Miller, who received a matching contribution of $11,960
and (ii) payments valued at $659,044 to Mr. Volker,
$668,044 to Mr. Artus, $614,041 to Mr. Williams,
$632,042 to Mr. Brown and $416,028 to Ms. Miller
pursuant to our Phantom Equity Plan in connection with our
initial public offering in November 2003. After withholding for
taxes, these payments were made in the form of shares of our
common stock resulting in the issuance of 25,052 shares to
Mr. Volker, 25,394 shares to Mr. Artus,
23,341 shares to Mr. Williams, 24,026 shares to
Mr. Brown and 15,814 shares to Ms. Miller. The
Phantom Equity Plan terminated after the issuance of such shares. |
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
During 2005, Graydon D. Hubbard, J. B. Ladd (from
January 1, 2005 through July 22, 2005), Palmer L. Moe
(from July 22, 2005 through December 31, 2005) and
Kenneth R. Whiting served on the Compensation Committee of our
Board. Mr. Whiting was President and Chief Executive
Officer of Whiting Oil and Gas Corporation from its inception in
1980 until 1993. None of our executive officers serve as a
member of the board of directors or compensation committee of
any entity that has one or more of its executive officers
serving as a member of our Board or Compensation Committee.
9
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
We completed our initial public offering in November 2003. Our
common stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on
November 20, 2003. The following graph compares on a
cumulative basis changes since November 20, 2003 in
(a) the total stockholder return on our common stock with
(b) the total return on the Standard & Poors
Composite 500 Index and (c) the total return on the Dow
Jones US Oil Companies, Secondary Index. Such changes have been
measured by dividing (a) the sum of (i) the amount of
dividends for the measurement period, assuming dividend
reinvestment, and (ii) the difference between the price per
share at the end of and the beginning of the measurement period,
by (b) the price per share at the beginning of the
measurement period. The graph assumes $100 was invested on
November 20, 2003 in our common stock, the
Standard & Poors Composite 500 Index and the Dow
Jones US Oil Companies, Secondary Index.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
11/20/03 |
|
|
12/31/03 |
|
|
12/31/04 |
|
12/31/05 | |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Whiting Petroleum Corporation
|
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
|
$ |
186 |
|
|
$ |
246 |
|
Standard & Poors Composite 500 Index
|
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
$ |
121 |
|
Dow Jones US Oil Companies, Secondary Index
|
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
|
$ |
160 |
|
|
$ |
263 |
|
10
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
As members of the Compensation Committee of Whiting Petroleum
Corporation (the Company), our work is guided
by the Compensation Committee charter.
The Companys executive compensation program is designed to
support the Companys business strategy of achieving
meaningful growth in both production of oil and natural gas and
free cash flow. This business strategy is intended to increase
earnings and long-term value appreciation in the Companys
common stock.
During both 2004 and 2005, significant acquisitions were the
path to achieving significant growth in production and free cash
flow. In late 2005 and planned for 2006, exploitation of proved
undeveloped reserves and exploratory opportunities in the
Companys inventory of prospects have become the emphasis.
Success in implementing the Companys business strategy
depends on technically excellent, quality personnel in every
department and at every level of the Companys operations.
The Companys executive compensation program for its
executive officers in 2005 had three elements, considered
together, that have enabled the Company to attract and retain a
team of highly competent and committed personnel who have
effectively executed the business strategy since 2003 and who
have positioned the Company for continued growth in 2006 and
beyond.
The principal element of the Companys executive
compensation program is the Production Participation Plan (the
PPP). The PPP is a unique element that
provides a meaningful portion of the compensation of every
employee of the Company. One-third of the PPP benefits were
allocated to the executive officers as a group in 2005. The PPP
contributes significantly to the ability of the Company to
attract and retain an excellent executive team and maintain
experienced high quality personnel throughout the Company. The
PPP provides annual cash distributions with vesting in the event
of termination of employment at the rate of 20% per year,
which provides important retention incentives to all employees.
The annual cash distributions pursuant to the PPP may increase
or decrease depending upon prices realized and direct costs
incurred by the Company related to oil and natural gas produced
but the effects of such increases or decreases on Company
operating income are offset by income actually received and
direct costs actually incurred.
Each year, after reviewing management recommendations, the
Compensation Committee allocates on a discretionary basis (but
does not legally convey) an interest in income from oil and
natural gas wells acquired or developed during the year to the
plan. Once allocated to plan participants, the interests are
fixed but subject to vesting upon termination of employment. For
plan years prior to 2004, forfeitures are re-allocated among
other plan participants. For plan years after 2003, forfeitures
revert to the Company. The PPP provides for accelerated vesting
and lump sum distributions in the event of a plan termination or
a change in control. The Companys executive officers were
awarded 1/3 of the aggregate 2.25% interest in income from oil
and gas properties allocated to the PPP in 2005. Well
acquisition and development costs attributable to the executive
officer awards in 2005 were approximately $6.6 million.
The PPP provides a direct incentive to increase production from
the Companys oil and natural gas property investments and
to increase free cash flow. Economic acquisitions of oil and
natural gas properties focus on generating current cash flow and
near-term future development potential of proved undeveloped
reserves and, at the same time, add value to the PPP for
employees and executives. The allocation of drilling budgets to
the best prospects in the Companys inventory is a
complimentary goal for both the Company and its employees as a
result of the PPP.
A balancing element designed to ensure a direct alignment of
incentives for executive officers with shareholder interests is
the Companys Equity Incentive Plan. The Company has
systematically increased the executive officers ownership
in the Companys common stock. Under this Plan, the Company
awards restricted stock which vests ratably over three years.
The executive group was awarded 48,227 shares of restricted
stock in February 2005 valued on the date of grant at an
aggregate of $2.0 million.
Finally, the base salary is the third element of the executive
compensation program. Base salaries are maintained at levels
that are somewhat below comparable levels in the oil and natural
gas industry recognizing
11
the current cash impact of the PPP. Executive group base
salaries for 2005 were increased about 8% giving recognition to
salary increases in the industry arising from increased
competition for technically superior personnel. Aggregate base
salaries for the executive group effective April 1, 2005
were $1.6 million.
In our reviews of the executive compensation program, we
considered the Companys compensation philosophy, the
analyses and recommendations of management, the Companys
performance in executing large acquisitions while maintaining a
well-balanced financial structure through the successful
completion of debt and equity offerings, and drilling results.
We also considered other Company achievements in the areas of
return on equity, return on capitalization, annual reserve and
production increases, production replacement ratios, unit costs
of finding, developing and acquiring oil and gas reserves, stock
price, and the Companys performance in these and other
areas compared to a peer group of companies. We initiated a
Company self-evaluation of the prior years acquisitions designed
to assess the actual subsequent results compared with the key
assumptions developed in acquisition analyses. We also
considered an Executive Compensation Analysis and advice of
Smart Associates, Inc., the Committees compensation
consultants
Chief Executive Officer (James J. Volker) Compensation.
In establishing Mr. Volkers 2005 compensation, we
considered Company performance measures discussed above and
Mr. Volkers specific performance in guiding the
Company through another period of rapid expansion and in
managing many of the Companys external as well as internal
relationships. Effective April 1, 2005, we increased
Mr. Volkers annual base salary from $400,000 to
$450,000. Mr. Volker was awarded 5.3% of the aggregate
2.25% interest in 2005 income from oil and gas properties
allocated to the PPP. Well acquisition and development costs
attributable to Mr. Volkers award were approximately
$1.1 million. We also approved a restricted stock grant of
14,840 shares of the Companys common stock, valued at
$600,000 on the grant date, to Mr. Volker under the Equity
Incentive Plan, which vests in three equal increments on each
anniversary of the grant date.
Section 162(m) Limitation. Section 162(m) of
the Internal Revenue Code limits the Companys income tax
deduction for compensation paid to the named executive officers
to $1,000,000, subject to several exceptions. We intend to use
our best efforts to cause any compensation paid to executives in
excess of such dollar limit to qualify for such exceptions,
except in limited appropriate circumstances.
Conclusion. We believe the Companys executive
compensation program provides compensation for executive
officers that is competitive within the industry and also aligns
the interests of executive management with the interests of our
stockholders.
|
|
|
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE |
|
|
Palmer L. Moe, Chairperson |
|
Graydon D. Hubbard |
|
Kenneth R. Whiting |
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Deloitte & Touche LLP has served as our independent
auditors since 2003 and the Audit Committee has selected
Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered
public accounting firm for 2006. The Board of Directors
recommends to the stockholders the ratification of the selection
of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent registered public
accounting firm, to audit our financial statements for 2006.
Unless otherwise specified, the proxies solicited hereby will be
voted in favor of the ratification of Deloitte & Touche
LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for
2006.
If the stockholders fail to ratify the appointment of
Deloitte & Touche LLP, then the Audit Committee will
consider it a direction to select another independent registered
public accounting firm for the subsequent year. Even if the
selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion,
may select a new independent registered public accounting firm
at any time during the year if it feels that such a change would
be in the best interests of us and our stockholders.
12
The Board recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the
appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent
registered public accounting firm. Shares of our common stock
represented by executed but unmarked proxies will be voted FOR
ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche
LLP.
Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP are expected
to be present at the Annual Meeting with the opportunity to make
a statement if they so desire. Such representatives are also
expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.
The following table presents fees for audit services rendered by
Deloitte & Touche LLP for the audit of our financial
statements for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004
and fees for other permitted services rendered by
Deloitte & Touche LLP during those periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Audit Fees
|
|
$ |
884,400 |
|
|
$ |
868,486 |
|
Audit-Related Fees(1)
|
|
|
20,248 |
|
|
|
116,000 |
|
Tax Fees(2)
|
|
|
13,060 |
|
|
|
105,975 |
|
All Other Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fees
|
|
$ |
917,708 |
|
|
$ |
1,090,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
For 2005, audit-related services regarding our 401(k) Plan. For
2004, audit-related services regarding property acquisitions and
our 401(k) plan. |
|
(2) |
For 2005, tax services regarding state property tax filings. For
2004, tax services consisted of preparation of corporate and
partnership tax returns, state property tax filings and
consulting on the tax sharing agreement with our former parent
company. |
The Audit Committee has concluded that the provision of
non-audit services listed above is compatible with maintaining
the independence of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
The Audit Committee has established pre-approval policies and
procedures with respect to audit and permitted non-audit
services to be provided by our independent registered public
accounting firm. Pursuant to these policies and procedures, the
Audit Committee may delegate authority to one or more of its
members when appropriate to grant such pre-approvals, provided
that decisions of such member or members to grant pre-approvals
are presented to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled
meeting. In addition, the Audit Committee pre-approves
particular services, subject to certain monetary limits, after
the Audit Committee is presented with a schedule describing the
services to be approved. The Audit Committees pre-approval
policies do not permit the delegation of the Audit
Committees responsibilities to management.
13
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
As members of the Audit Committee of Whiting Petroleum
Corporation (the Company), our work is
guided by the Audit Committee charter. Regulatory requirements
applicable to audit committees are extensive, and we have
developed a task matrix to help assure compliance with the
charter and related regulations and to control timing of our
work. In addition, we monitor published information related to
audit committee best practices.
We have completed all charter tasks scheduled to be performed in
2005 prior to year-end, and we have completed all charter tasks
scheduled to be performed in 2006 prior to the end of the first
quarter. Our work included, among other procedures, the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
We pre-approved audit and permitted non-audit services of the
Companys independent auditors. |
|
|
|
We discussed with the independent auditors their independence
and the matters required to be discussed by Statement on
Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication with Audit
Committees, as amended. The independent auditors provided
us with the written disclosures required by the Independence
Standards Board Standard No. 1, Independence
Discussions with Audit Committees. |
|
|
|
Prior to their publication, we reviewed and discussed with
management and the independent auditors the Companys
December 31, 2005, audited financial statements, the
related audit report, the related certifications of the
Companys chief executive officer and chief financial
officer, and the applicable managements discussion and
analysis. Management is responsible for the financial statements
and the reporting process, including the system of internal
controls. The independent auditors are responsible for
expressing an opinion on the fairness of the presentation of
audited financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. |
|
|
|
We recommended to the Board, based on the reviews and
discussions described above, that the material reviewed above be
included in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, for filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. |
|
|
|
During the year, we monitored the Companys progress in its
assessment of internal control over financial reporting pursuant
to the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We reviewed and
discussed with management and the independent auditors
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting and the related audit report. No material
weaknesses were identified or reported. |
|
|
|
We reviewed with management and the independent auditors the
Companys 2005 quarterly and year-end press releases. |
|
|
|
We monitored the earnings guidance practices of a peer group of
companies in the oil and natural gas exploration, exploitation
and production business and reviewed the Companys guidance
during 2005 and its initial guidance for 2006. |
|
|
|
AUDIT COMMITTEE |
|
|
Graydon D. Hubbard, Chairperson |
|
Palmer L. Moe |
|
Kenneth R. Whiting |
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING
COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
requires our directors and executive officers to file reports
concerning their ownership of our equity securities with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and us. Based solely upon
information provided to us by individual directors and executive
officers, we believe that, during the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005, all of our directors and executive
officers timely complied with the Section 16(a) filing
requirements except for Patricia J. Miller, who inadvertently
filed one report two days late.
14
MISCELLANEOUS
Stockholder Proposals
Proposals which stockholders intend to present at and have
included in our proxy statement for the 2007 annual meeting
pursuant to
Rule 14a-8 under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Rule 14a-8)
must be received at our offices by the close of business on
December 1, 2006. In addition, a stockholder who otherwise
intends to present business at the 2007 annual meeting
(including, nominating persons for election as directors) must
comply with the requirements set forth in our By-Laws. Among
other things, to bring business before an annual meeting, a
stockholder must give written notice thereof, complying with the
By-Laws, to our Corporate Secretary not less than 60 days
and not more than 90 days prior to the anniversary date of
the 2006 annual meeting of stockholders (subject to certain
exceptions if the annual meeting is advanced or delayed a
certain number of days). Under the By-Laws, if we do not receive
notice of a stockholder proposal submitted otherwise than
pursuant to
Rule 14a-8
(i.e., proposals stockholders intend to present at the
2007 annual meeting but do not intend to include in our proxy
statement for such meeting) during the time period between
February 8, 2007 and March 10, 2007, then the notice
will be considered untimely and we will not be required to
present such proposal at the 2007 annual meeting. If the Board
chooses to present such proposal at the 2007 annual meeting,
then the persons named in proxies solicited by the Board for the
2007 annual meeting may exercise discretionary voting power with
respect to such proposal.
Other Matters
The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by us. In addition
to soliciting proxies by mail, proxies may be solicited
personally and by telephone by certain of our officers and
regular employees. We will reimburse brokers and other nominees
for their reasonable expenses in communicating with the persons
for whom they hold our common stock.
Pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
services that deliver our communications to stockholders that
hold their stock through a bank, broker or other holder of
record may deliver to multiple stockholders sharing the same
address a single copy of our annual report to stockholders and
proxy statement. Upon written or oral request, we will promptly
deliver a separate copy of the annual report to stockholders
and/or proxy statement to any stockholder at a shared address to
which a single copy of each document was delivered. Stockholders
may notify us of their requests by calling or writing Corporate
Secretary, Whiting Petroleum Corporation, 1700 Broadway,
Suite 2300, Denver, Colorado 80290-2300.
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors |
|
|
WHITING PETROLEUM CORPORATION |
|
|
Bruce R. DeBoer |
|
Corporate Secretary |
April 1, 2006
15
APPENDIX A
The Board of Directors has established categorical standards to
assist it in making determinations of director independence.
Under these categorical standards, the following relationships
that currently exist or that have existed, including during the
preceding three years, will not be considered to be material
relationships that would impair a directors independence:
|
|
|
|
1. |
A family member of the director is or was an employee (other
than an executive officer) of the Company. |
|
|
2. |
A director, or a family member of the director, has received
less than $100,000 during each twelve-month period in direct
compensation from the Company, other than director and committee
fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for
prior service (provided that such compensation is not contingent
in any way on continued service with the Company). Compensation
received by (a) a director for former service as an interim
Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer or other executive officer
of the Company or (b) a family member of the director for
service as an employee of the Company (other than an executive
officer) need not be considered. |
|
|
3. |
A director or a family member of a director is or was affiliated
with or employed by a firm that is the Companys internal
or external auditor, so long as (a) the director or the
family member is not a current partner of a firm that is the
Companys internal or external auditor; (b) the
director is not a current employee of such a firm; (c) the
family member is not a current employee of such a firm who
participates in the firms audit, assurance or tax
compliance (but not tax planning) practice; and (d) the
director or the family member, if he or she was within the past
three years (but is no longer) a partner or employee of such a
firm, did not personally work on the Companys audit within
that time. |
|
|
4. |
A director, or a family member of the director, is or was
employed other than as an executive officer of another company
where any of the Companys present executive officers at
the same time serves or served on that companys
compensation committee. |
|
|
5. |
A director is a current employee of, or has any other
relationship (including through a family member) with, another
company (including any tax exempt organization), that has made
payments to, or received payments from, the Company for property
or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal
years, does not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of
such other companys consolidated gross revenues. Both the
payments and the consolidated gross revenues to be measured
shall be those reported in the last completed fiscal year. This
test applies solely to the financial relationship between the
Company and the directors (or family members)
current employer. Former employment of the director or family
member need not be considered. |
|
|
6. |
A director is or was an executive officer, employee or director
of, or has or had any other relationship (including through a
family member) with, a tax exempt organization to which the
Companys discretionary contributions in any of the last
three fiscal years do not exceed the greater of $1 million
or 2% of such organizations consolidated gross revenues. |
|
|
7. |
In addition, any relationship that a director (or an
immediate family member of the director) previously
had that constituted an automatic bar to independence under NYSE
listing standards will not be considered to be a material
relationship that would impair a directors independence
three years after the end of such relationship in accordance
with NYSE listing standards. |
For relationships not covered by the guidelines above, the
determination of whether the relationship is material or not,
and therefore whether the director would be independent or not,
shall be made by the directors who satisfy the independence
guidelines set forth in above.
A-1
MR A SAMPLE
DESIGNATION (IF ANY)
ADD 1
ADD 2
ADD 3
ADD 4
ADD 5
ADD 6
MMMMMMMMMMMM
000000000.000 ext
000000000.000 ext
000000000.000 ext
000000000.000 ext
000000000.000 ext
000000000.000 ext
000000000.000 ext
C 1234567890 J N T
|
|
Mark
this box with an X if you have made changes to your name or address details above. |
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR
the nominees listed in Item 1 and a vote FOR Item 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
|
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (for terms expiring at the 2009 Annual Meeting
and until their successors are duly elected and qualified). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Withhold |
|
|
|
|
01-Graydon D. Hubbard
02-James J. Volker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Against Abstain |
|
|
2. |
|
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
|
In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please check this box if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting.
Number of persons attending: |
|
|
|
|
Authorized
Signatures - Sign Here - This section must be completed for
your instructions to be executed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign exactly as the name appears hereon. When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When signing
as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation, please
sign in full corporate name by President or other authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership
name by an authorized person.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature 1 - Please keep signature within the box |
|
Signature 2 - Please keep signature within the box |
|
Date (mm/dd/yyyy) |
|
1 U P X H H H P P P P 005103 |
2006 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
|
The undersigned hereby appoints James J. Volker and Bruce R. DeBoer, and each of them, as proxies, with full power
of substitution (to act jointly or if only one acts then by that one), for the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of Whiting Petroleum Corporation to be held on Tuesday, May 9, 2006, at 10:00 A.M., local time, at the
John D. Hershner Room in the Wells Fargo Building at 1700 Lincoln Street, Denver, Colorado 80203, or any adjournments
or postponements thereof, to vote thereat as designated on the reverse side of this card all of the shares of Common
Stock of Whiting Petroleum Corporation held of record by the undersigned on March 15, 2006 as fully and with the same
effect as the undersigned might or could do if personally present at said Annual Meeting or any adjournments or
postponements thereof, hereby revoking any other proxy heretofore executed by the undersigned for such Annual Meeting.
This proxy when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned stockholder. If
no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR the election of the director nominees listed and FOR the
ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm.
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY PROMPTLY |